TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

randomthoughts1050 Archive

View 3 posts and 520 comments by randomthoughts1050 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

India, but if India is like the USA, it's because: A husband and wife each have 100% ownership of his and her assets and debts acquired during marriage. It's worded this way, so the debt can still be collected if the original debt signor loses their job. When I worked in Payroll, to pay for college, men would get payroll deductions from the IRS to pay for their ex-wife unpaid taxes. (They would pay 2-3 months, before the IRS would properly change it to her.)
/r/MensRights20/02/25 07:36 PM
8

I'm OK with it. I don't live in the USA. I don't want Google to push discriminatory events onto me. Give me the official holidays for the country I am in. That's it. Anything else, I can manually add.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:39 PM
14

They should win, due to it being in California and receiving state funds. Recently, there was a post about an attorney winning a case against a restaurant/bar over Ladies Night being discriminatory. (It caused the place to shut down, why it hit the news.) As I recall, the attorney won because there is an older California law, or ruling, perhaps the one mentioned in the article, that prohibits discrimination based upon gender, race, etc. Apparently, the attorney made his income off businesses dis…
/r/MensRights14/02/25 10:24 AM
2

Most of our core values are learned at youth. Most men are raised by stay-at-home moms/single mothers and female teachers. Later on in life, real-world experiences make us question the values we were instilled in. I'm not saying to hate the teachers, but the Matriarchy creates the world and does some gas lighting about the Patriarchy (that was raised by women).
/r/MensRights14/02/25 01:16 AM
1

You only get half of the assets acquired during the marriage. No judge is going to award "her" anything for a marriage that lasted less than 24 hours.... assuming he didn't like what he found in the marriage bed.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 01:53 PM
19

Top floor of my gym is women only. They still have to have to climb the stairs or take the glass elevator. No. They typically wear a baggy shirt with yoga pants. When they their shirt changes to form fitting, it's only a matter of time before they go coed.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:29 AM
3

Been proven time and again there is a gender bias. Years ago, 1 woman posted contradictory advice to the flip flop gender stories. IIRC, she deleted the account, but not before people had quoted her, or used that archival reddit, to post what she had said. Those subs watch out for those types of posts. Probably have a bot for it these days.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 03:24 AM
2

Reddit overall is very biased against men, the dating & relationship subs even more so. The banned blood colored subreddit gave better advice than those dumpster fire subs. That in itself tells you how reddit leans. From experience, the dating/relationship advice is mostly a relationship killer. Better off looking at heavily downvoted comments.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 03:17 AM
15

They won't get asylum for being denied access to a PhD program. Asylum means they will receive a monthly stipend, and to be honest, countries will have had enough of spending money on Ukraine. Being realistic here. They could apply to PhD programs and get a student visa. The irony is that most of them won't go back to Ukraine and that hurts Ukraine.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 02:43 PM
17

Shaming tactics. Emotional abuse. This is the thing women don't get. They abuse men ALOT more and think it's ok to do it.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 01:24 PM
7

Please stop forcing your gender incorrect language on me. We don't use that language here in Germany, nor is it acceptable in the USA anymore.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 12:50 PM
5

Exactly. It's a no value add comment.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 12:07 PM
3

Mr Worsfold (her barrister) asked that the Crown review the case including public interest. She hasn't entered a plea yet, as her barrister is trying to find a defense to the financial fraud case. The barrister's problem is that it truly is financial fraud. She knew she had sex with 2+ men at the time of conception and should have requested a DNA test. Pushes that burden properly onto her. This case could be great for Men's Rights in regards to paternity fraud. We all know the defense will make …
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:26 AM
1

Strawman agreements. Get out of here. The problem is that even if she was on birth control she could have become pregnant. Same with condoms. not using a condom can transfer STIs in a way that is not applicable for the pill Using only the pill definitely can transfer STIs. In fact, it's much worse that only using condoms. Condoms were created to prevent AIDS transmission. Birth control is a side effect.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:38 AM
1

It's considered rape by deception, if a guy lies about having a vasectomy or using a condom (stealthing). It's the same situation, except the gender is flipped on who is lying. The difference is that when a woman lies, she wants the kid and the government doesn't want to pay.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:01 PM
15

100% they lie for the sympathy & attention. It's a statistical impossibility for every woman that I've dated, casually & seriously, to have said that she's been sexually assaulted. Glad the internet is here for you younger guys to learn the truth. Took me 10+ years to realize what was happening and ignore what they told me about their ex's.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 02:06 PM
1

Regardless, an uphill battle at best of case. He was punished and received an honorable discharge. Something sounds fishy there, like a deal was made. As to the rest, do we know where the alleged incident occurred? Military land is US federal, not state nor foreign, ground. What if it happened in a foreign country? Too many questions for a defamation case. Those are ridiculously hard to prove. Depp beat Heard due to her being crazy & a liar and his deep pockets. That's not happening to the norma…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:57 PM
11

Doubt he could sue for defamation. A) He got punished, so even if he could do a civil lawsuit, he would have to prove the punishment was false. B) Military has its own court system and he wouldn't have been a civilian. I have no clue if defamation is even possible in that court system.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 09:19 AM
9

Used to be called, talking down to someone. As we all know, mansplaining would be specifically from a man to a woman. I've heard a man do this. He was being an ass. (Basic math to a finace employee.) I've heard much more often a man training a woman properly. He doesn't know what she knows and her telling him to stop mansplaining. (What the company specific datasets were used for.)
/r/MensRights18/12/24 08:48 AM
1

As I said, I'm not going to debate with you about whether she was SA or not. Let me tell you a story, my story. Long time ago, I moved to a new city and started dating a woman. What I didn't know, but everyone else knew, she was the town bicycle. Some time passed, and I caught her cheating and dumped her. I told our mutual friends she cheated, when they inquired about why I dumped her. One by one, the mutual friends stopped talking to me. Eventually, one of the guys asked why I choked her. He co…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 02:57 PM
3

Alleged virgin. Have a hard time believing she was a virgin at 19 and agreeing to rough sex as her first time. This isn't the '90s before porn was easily accessible.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 01:02 PM
5

her family is very wealthy IMHO, people from wealthy families are the biggest entitled assholes ever and have the most to "lose". Wealthy typically marry wealthy. We all want the lady in the streets and the whore in the sheets. Wealthy doesn't want to marry the known whore. She couldn't exactly hide the fact that she had rough sex by the time she got home and saw her parents. Hell, even the friend in the car. (I'm not going to debate whether she was SA'd, that's for the courts to determine and n…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:52 PM
1

Cruel Intentions (1999) She's the definition of manipulative bitch. Spoiler. IIRC, towards the end of the movie, the step-sister falsely accuses the step-brother of rape. A guy fights him, and the step-brother dies. (Short version.) Nothing happens to her, even though she instigated the events that ultimately resulted in the step-brother's death.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 07:40 AM
11

"Misandristic", as she wrote it, but misogyny was without quotes. Just seeing those two words written like that told you this was a biased critique, without having to waste 10+ minutes of your life on her femsplaining & misandry.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 04:34 PM
1

I agree, but OP misled people to believe it was a completely dead bedroom for the entire time. They said it was a dead bedroom for 4 or 5 years. They also said the boyfriend would be good for a week and meet her needs before returning to a deadbedroom. Forget how often, but was common. I'd guess one week a month he was good and 3 weeks deadbedroom. Still bad, but bot to the level she indicated. Can't say I'm surprised about the lying. It's a requirement of cheaters.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 02:00 PM
1

Give it a couple of weeks and make it a New Year's hookup. If they keep the same, they will say its a great way to start the New Year, but we all know the shitstorm it will actually be.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 01:52 PM
6

It's due to the Matriarchy. Mothers do most of the raising of children, so we bond with them, they tell us mom is always right, so naturally we believe they can do no wrong. I'd imagine it's even worse for kids raised by a single mother.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:57 AM
16

There is a horrible double standard to cheating. Men are evil for doing it, and women are justified. I foolishly believed that for a while. Dated a woman who's husband cheated on her, so she fucked someone else (not me). Took me a long time to realize that meant she cheated also.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:06 PM
64

Nothing wrong with banging the Starbucks barrista. She'll do all kinds of things to try and lock you down, plus wake you up with a nice cup of coffee. Just make sure to wrap that shit up. She'll be ecstatic to get more in child support than she earns.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 01:00 PM
9

100%, they would laugh at a man getting hit by a woman. If he tried to back away with his arms up, like a boxer, they'd jump him with knives and guns because man is bad and woman needs to be defended. White knights need to wake tf up.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:20 PM
8

The irony is that s/he regularly posts in r/Law and yet is advocating it's ok to be a vigilante and kill people. The hypocrisy is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:08 PM
5

Check out this woman's comments, who is all over that thread. u/Sweet_Concept2211 I warn you, it's seeing through the looking glass.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 05:03 PM
90

Fully agree. Oddly, the Tribunal only awarded him half of the settlement, as they said he would have been released after returning from paternity leave due to performance problems. Which I find odd, as he worked there for 15 years. Started in Salt Lake City, relocated to Australia and then London. Climbed through the ranks to a VP level and only received high praise until he took paternity leave, which is when he got his first poor performance. Bet if he was a woman, he'd have received the full …
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:27 PM
88

'It was clear, however, that Ms Liu told him that he was underperforming on 9 December 2021, when he was on parental leave. Shocker. Of course, it was a woman who told him that while on paternity leave. Goldman Sachs even said they would never say, or do, this to a woman on maternity leave.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:49 PM
16

College educated women want: the three e’s—eligible, educated, and equal Those men don't want a woman with huge debt. Decades ago, I recall hooking up with a late 20s woman with $100k student debt. She was paying the minimal amount and confused by my shocked expression, as all of her girlfriends were in the same boat. She/they were obviously looking for a man to pay off that debt. I ghosted her the next day. I can't imagine how much debt these college educated women graduate with today.$2-300k? …
/r/MensRights04/12/24 07:15 AM
80

As I've gotten older, I've realized people are selfish. Politicians and their financial donors don't want to pay child support for accidently knocking up their intern, secretary and other women who are attracted to power. Let their cuckold boyfriend/husband unknowingly pay for that woman's love lust child.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 02:15 PM
3

Even worse when you take into account the emotional affair she had been doing. If she put that time and energy into her relationship, she might have married Roy. You see Roy later, and he is happy. Most men turn into a drunkard instead of facing the truth, when they sense a relationship is failing.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:34 PM
0

I agree that there are decent women out there, which you completely missed in my message. I never said that ALL women are toxic. Going to stop reading the rest of your message, as you only perused it and read what you wanted to read. Whereas I read yours and gave you a coherent reply.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:40 PM
0

That's A) disingenuous & B) limited thinking. Many women have toxic personalities. They've never had to develop an attractive personality to attract men. Plus, it's no secret how women talk about other women behind their backs. (This last part I will skip, as its irrelevant to this topic.) Speaking from experience, you will put up with a toxic personality for great sex. You won't consider her girlfriend material, so let's consider this woman as the sexbot. You continue dating, while having sex w…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 03:21 PM
22

is bad because women are being trafficked into it As a percentage, I'm sure this is a very small percentage of the women & men, let's not forget about them, that are trafficked. As is always done, they blow it out of proportion and make it seem the majority are trafficked. OnlyFans & TikTok sexcapades shows the reality.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:33 PM
4

I assume so. I didn't click the hyperlink to read the other story. I just know what the other guy wrote, didn't relate to OP's post. It was a tangent story at the bottom.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:49 PM
13

That's from a different story at the bottom. The shocking Alps killing comes after two small children were last week found decapitated in a bathtub on the French island of Guadeloupe.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 02:06 PM
45

Apples to oranges. A single mother is rarely A) single & B) homeless. Only when she gets caught branch swinging.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:06 PM
15

Not OP, but 5 months ago, someone posted this article. Said 40% were men at that time and considering boys & men aren't vaccinated, that number will continue to increase. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/ZwMef8mQ4Y Edit: seems you deleted your reply to me which said, men don't die in equal numbers. You must not have read the article. It's throat cancer in men with numbers expected to rise until 2060, so will exceed women in contracting HPV. Back again to its throat cancer. Even if that does…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:30 PM
1

There occasionally is a speed limit on the Autobahn. Around bigger cities and construction work. When the traffic control sensors detect congestion, they will put a limit of 120 kph, or less, on illuminated boards.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:20 PM
20

For those that don't know, until recently, German driver's licenses didn't have an expiration date. Mine still doesn't. Have to exchange it in ~10 years. I'll be 60ish. Crazy.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:15 PM
15

only 0.012% of men are such people. The percentage might be even lower, because of serial rapists. Depending how it was calculated.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:42 PM
0

Is there a physical advantage for male pilots? It's all power assisted.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:57 AM
-14

Looking at your post history, you find some odd things to complain about. How did you go from complaining about haircuts in a masters degree to airlines? 0.05 meters is 2 inches* for people using the imperial system. Edit: bad math on my side. Still, why is OP looking for these issues. Karma farming? Or is he actually interested in a masters degree and becoming a pilot? Take a position and report back to us on if you can grow your hair beyond 1 cm or if they hired you because you are under 170 c…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:52 AM
12

The scary thought is wondering what the true stat is for poisoners. I'm sure many women get away with poisoning their husband, because A) the coroner has to run the correct toxicology screen, and B) it must be ridiculously hard to prove she did it. "Oh, he must have accidently doubled up on his heart medication." Or whatever it takes to kill him. Decades later, I still remember why my mother stopped talking with her best friend. She'd get more money if her husband died at work than if he retired…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:00 AM
119

Which is ridiculous, because women are known poisoners. It's the first gender police look at if someone is poisoned.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:05 PM
3

You might want to edit your first comment. I read that you fully support the movement, as you truly support it. Not that you are supporting it, as its bad for their movement. We all know there are plenty of White Knights out there that will fall on their swords and not have sex for months, because they fail to see how toxic this is.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:48 PM
25

Will be an interesting who he sues in the aftermath. Doubt he has many legal actions he can do against the firm. I'd guess they fired him for violating a morality clause, which still would apply. He's a married man kissing a female coworker on company property. Regardless, that will get settled out of court and probably sealed with a NDA. That being said, I'm sure he will sue her with everything he can throw at her. He has to, to protect his reputation as a lawyer.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:44 PM
59

Simple. Report her to the police. Non-emergency number. Show the police your selfie, and then the police can talk to her about harassing her neighbors. It will be on file that she is a problem.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:31 PM
12

stick it to men 1) You are in a Men's Rights group. What does this have to do with Men's Rights? Nothing. 2) Weaponizing sex is toxic relationship behavior. People supporting this movement are toxic people. There is no need to discuss this. Go do any search on a relationship sub about withholding sex and how toxic that is. 3) 44% of women voted for Trump. The male Trump voters are still getting laid. Female Kamala supporters are punishing the male Kamala supporters during Men's health awareness …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:22 PM
5

Same. My curiosity is what made me look. Was surprised not to see the big 2 male hate groups (2x & witchesvs) in their recent comment history. Probably in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:09 AM
5

She's another troll account, created 3 weeks ago. Easier to block than to ban. Will take her awhile to realize why no one replies to her versus easily creating a new account.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:00 AM
8

S/he is a troll account created a couple of months ago. Take a quick scan of their comment history. Easier to block these people than ban them. They just make new accounts when they are banned.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:58 AM
5

There is the possibility that things will improve. Even staying the same is better than what Kamala would have done. (In regards to Men's Rights.) The majority of her platform was helping women, which typically is discriminatory towards men. (Title IX, DEI, etc) It's really a question of whether Trump & the GOP will follow their predecessors and continue to cave to the minority groups or actually stand up and say the majority needs to be taken care of also. That's actually what the government is…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:01 PM
1

Not what I said. Please read it again. You choose where you live, and if you disagree with those state or federal laws, move elsewhere. It's not rocket science. I didn't specify a political party. I left it vague enough to include any country. If you choose to live where you live, you abide by those laws. There are plenty of legal options you can do to try and change those laws, but that takes resources. (Time, energy & money.) Personally, it's easier to move to a state or country with laws that…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:47 PM
1

As I said in your other reply: You choose where you live. If you don't agree with those state or federal laws, move elsewhere. Not rocket science.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:04 PM
1

eye roll One big paragraph? Really? Must have hit a nerve. It's a state problem, not a federal problem. You choose where you live, and if you disagree with those state or federal laws, move elsewhere. It's not rocket science.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:02 PM
8

The irony is that those women can choose to live in a pro-choice state where abortion is legal and choose not to live in a state where it is illegal.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:08 PM
5

What? Why are you putting words in my mouth? I never said it was open misandry.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:00 PM
11

In this specific segment, she was speaking about pro-choice. Her tone was full of vitriol and hatred. Which was what caught my attention. Went something like this: Men, think of your current or future daughters, your sisters, your neices, that's should have the right to decide. Pure shaming tactics and gas lighting. She was implying that if she lost, all those females would blame men for not voting for her. Which is very threatening. Dare I say, borderline blackmail. That message is for female v…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:54 PM
1

You are confusing 2 different legalities. Joint custody, or 50/50, isn't placement. Joint custody is for legal decisions regarding the child. Placement determines where the child resides and determines how much child support each parent owes the other. Get the child support decree done in your state, and she can't leave with your child. Assuming you want to raise your child as a single father.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:20 PM
34

Being an American expat living in Europe, I missed out on watching the political advertisements, debates, etc. I just saw a political rally by Kamala, and my god, was it full of vitriol towards men. I'm not a Trump supporter, especially as I think he will make my life harder living in a foreign land, but she is awful towards men.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:16 PM
11

I am currently pregnant (unexpectedly and unplanned but I take responsibility for it because I am an adult who didn’t think could get pregnant anymore so didn’t insist on using protection). Wow, she's taking responsibility for her inaction.... oh wait, there she blames him. Birth control is a responsibility of both people. Condoms were developed to stop transmission of STIs, which is a failsafe in case one, or both, are cheating. The pill, ring, IUD, etc are there as the main birth control preve…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:10 PM
6

Depends where you live. 5+ years ago, I read a post from a 20 year old, who took a gap year, or perhaps was just summer vacation, and lived in Thailand. The last week he was there, his Thai gf said she was pregnant and keeping the baby. Don't know if it changed, but he claimed that he didn't have to pay child support, as it was her choice to have the baby. Obviously, the Western world has zero interest in changing that status quo. Imagine how fast a politician would lose their job. No woman woul…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:38 PM
1

How do you not know this? It's an open secret that women have been bragging about on the internet for years. Almost 2 decades ago, when I got divorced, I found my ex-wife's account. Had $15k in it. Even though I'm not violent, and we were together for 10+ years, was just in case I ever got violent.
/r/MensRights28/10/24 11:45 PM
147

When over half the votes come from women and most men are simps/white knights, they don't need to support MRA as a platform
/r/MensRights26/10/24 06:32 PM
10

Women do it. They call it their emergency escape account, in case the man gets violent and they need to flee. Think 5+ digits, not 4 digits in size. Since women do it, they assume men do it also.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 06:30 PM
8

Simply put, (most, s/b obvious, but for those special people out there) women want their men to better themselves, so they have the potential to earn more and those women have the potential to spend more. In addition, they don't want their men doing activities to attract the attention of other women. Why? Because they know other women will try to steal that man. Just like some women will sleep to the top, some will knowingly sleep with men in relationships
/r/MensRights22/10/24 04:58 PM
3

Boomers and Gen X had the last of the "patriarchy," Boomers did, Baby Boomers did, Gen X didn't. I'm 50, right in the middle of Gen X, and had university friends that applied for government jobs. Minorities got additional points on their test scores. Irionically, Gen X and younger got screwed by people who are long retired. Granted, it got worse generation over generation.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 01:45 AM
28

Why genealogy was so important in the past, but do you think those women care about logic? They will be happy to get knocked up by an important politician and that's their children's problem.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 02:40 PM
74

According to women, women are important to repopulate their country and only takes 1 man. Certainly their politicians will be happy to have a harem of women. Probably temporarily change child support laws to be provided by the government, as they won't want to pay all their salary to support those children.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 11:52 AM
11

IIRC, psychology is considered a soft science. It consists of a lot of generalizations that may or may not apply at an individual level. Simply put, an electron is always an electron. While, you and me are likely very different.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 10:34 AM
10

She's checked out of the marriage. F#ck Abby's daughter who is writing this. It's a box of victim blaming wrapped up with a gas lighting ribbon. Instead of addressing the actual problem, she is making him out to be the monster.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 08:24 AM
12

How many mothers actually clean the house? Growing up, cleaning the entire house was dumped on us kids.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 06:09 AM
5

Of course, its gas lighting. It redirects the attention to man = bad instead of focusing on the core reason why most marriages fail, women. The other guy was saying that was in homosexual relationships and not heterosexual relationships.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 10:14 AM
18

What they are trying to say, in heterosexual marriages, the divorce rate is understated, because women are afraid that they will be killed by their murderous husband if they file for divorce. I suppose it's that entire bear analogy. eye roll
/r/MensRights02/10/24 05:09 AM
13

How would you not have realized this earlier? It would have come out during the dating period. Or did you marry her within 2 months of meeting her?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:28 PM
5

I realize there are many Indians in this community, but when making a post, please translate this into $/€ so the rest of the world can relate to it. Perhaps also, median income, so it's comparable.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 09:17 AM
9

I'm a decade "younger" & can say it's only gotten worse and worse over the years. Forbes has divorce rates at: 50% for 1st marriage 60% for 2nd marriage 73% for 3rd marriage Ridiculous. Better odds in Vegas. At least you have fun there.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:53 AM
0

Women don't unilaterally control access to sex. Men can say no. Or do you think all men want sex all the time?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:44 AM
1

This is a Schödinger's cat situation. Both situations can be true, that single fathers are better than single mothers, also that single fathers are no different than single mothers. At this point, we can only move forward with the current study, that single fathers are better than single mothers. In addition, how many of these single mothers were truly single and didn't dump their kids onto their boyfriend to raise? After all, it's not babysitting, the kids are part of the package.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 06:25 AM
1

FYI - the phrase you are looking for: deal breakers. The other person is gas lighting, trying to remove a person's agency. Deal breakers are what you find unacceptable in a relationship. That's for friends, family & sexual partners, etc.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 06:23 PM
10

single mom Pet peeve of mine. Most aren't single. They claim to be "single" to work the system & exploit sympathy. What you are referring to is called parenting. No one ever said parenting is easy.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 05:05 AM
3

Meant to write that in mine. Good catch. 30 minutes tops, and that's if you have to iron, in addition to what you said. 2 loads means she's working a 12 hour day. Plus, the stress of sorting the colors from the whites is significantly more than a multi-million $€£ contract. Right? Right? So many aspects of that study are wrong.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 12:01 PM
28

Was obvious from the start that they were double or triple counting hours. My dryer takes 4 hours to dry and washer is around 2 hours. Even though those 2 items can be done together, you know the data is saying that's 6+ hours. Plus, whatever other chores I would be doing in the meantime.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:39 PM
1

I am suspicious of why the study stopped in 1985. That's ~40 years ago. We live in a completely different world. I see, publishing date is 1992. I think you need to look for an updated study. Even though the numbers might be closer, I feel like men still do, as men and women think differently. Women like the mental games and playing dirty. For example, she gets her revenge by sleeping with his best friend or someone, and her husband unknowingly raises another man's child.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:54 AM
7

Unlikely anything will change legally. Many women do not go to university. Educated women typically date educated men who earn more. So there's the women vote to keep things as they are. Men overall still think it's their responsibility to provide for the household. There was a graph recently posted that had it at 71%(IIRC). Still, a lot of votes that men will vote to keep it the same. I do agree, that more and more women will join men in screaming about the unfairness of the system. As a percen…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:09 AM
3

The irony is that women are the primary customers. So, the salary of a nail technician is driven by what women are willing to pay to get their nails done.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:32 AM
7

I'm curious how men's opinions will change for women with useless degrees, have huge college loans and expect their man to provide for the household and pay off those loans. (Curious on the gender flip also, but this study has men expected to be the bread winner.) Recently read a person asking how useful a bachelor in American History would be outside the USA. Then, they proceeded to whine about how they wished someone told them it was a useless degree. Certainly, many people told them it was us…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 05:11 PM
1

I would double check adding court related topics as legal advantages. The issue resides upon the judge and the discretion that judges have. Let's put the.blame where it belongs. Pretty certain that the laws are gender neutral, but I'm not an attorney. Judges are supposed to be impartial, but they aren't. Knew a couple of judges, and they are very white knight thinking. (One was a bartender, so should know better. Back in those days, he joked about women who would leave the bar with a guy who was…
/r/MensRights13/08/24 05:52 AM
3

Because the father brought a shotgun to "convince" the man to marry the daughter he defiled. Sometimes, the father brings the shotgun to the wedding. Or so the story goes. No idea if it's true.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 06:49 PM
24

Here's some numbers for marriages that end in divorces. 1st marriage = 50% 2nd marriage = 60% 3rd marriage = 73% I find those numbers more interesting, as, in the best case, it's a coin toss if the marriage won't end in divorce. Worse odds than gambling in Vegas.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:08 PM
30

Alternatives for the bottom 80% has always been real life, such as bars. Much higher quality of woman you will match up than the remote chance via apps. Still a chance of getting catfished, but you won't realize that until the next morning when the alcohol fades and the makeup is off.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:38 PM
6

Yep. Replied with more detail to your other reply. Depending upon how widely distributed this is, it's downright frightening. A) even if someone received it and didn't use the information, they kept the secret of fraudulent & illegal activities to manipulate the legal system. B) if it was used, how often? This could distorts so much data, which is used to fund abuse shelters, pass legal laws, etc. Hell, even simple public opinion due to a distortion of data points.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:10 AM
11

What do you mean? Aren't you astonished and appalled? This information was published 6+ years ago. Probably been out much much longer, just compiled 6+ years ago.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:46 AM
13

Published 2018....
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:33 AM
5

Agreed, but recently had an OP saying his post was in regards to Africa.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:18 AM
19

In addition, this sub is global. Do we really want global politics to be posted here? I can go see that on World News.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:49 AM
1

I get it. I'll be deleting this post shortly, as its part of my past I don't like to focus on. I don't let it define me nor influence my actions, until people like you want to say they have it worse. I've been mentally & eventually physically abused, while living in a foreign country with limited local language skills (as that was one way she controlled me) and being a man, so having much more limited resources available to escape. I can go on and on, but you get the point. I've been there. I go…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:39 AM
1

No way would I trust those stats. It's well known that those numbers are distorted by false abuse reports, as the abused spouse receives financial aid and assistance in divorce cases. IIRC, 20 years ago, United Way only supported mothers and not fathers.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:21 AM
2

Sounds like a shit boss Actually is great advice. It's a complete change of mentality, from being part of the problem (whining) to becoming part of the solution. Perhaps the solution isn't viable, but you learn along the way.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:02 PM
2

Best of luck to you. I personally think there are bigger issues to advocate for, but if having the option to have long hair & wear earrings is your thing. Awesome. Better come up with an amazing presentation to convince those companies that this is in the company's best interest. In case you don't know, companies only care about making a profit. For example, how many times has Nestle been caught polluting? They pay the fine and keep polluting, because it's cheaper than fixing their processes. So…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:58 PM
1

As a former boss told me: bring me solutions, not problems. So you identified a problem. What's the solution?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:27 PM
0

I didn't talk about pilots, as I know nothing about that profession and don't pay attention to them. They're a fancily dressed taxi driver to me. Maybe you are right, maybe you are wrong. Can't comment about that profession. Doctors are going to fall all across the spectrum, like business professionals. I stated earlier what I've personally seen, so factually, you are wrong that they all can't wear long hair. I'd speculate, doctors in private practice will require more professional grooming stan…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:12 PM
1

Well, as I've lived in the USA & the EU, which are the majority of redditors, my comment is valid to those areas. You need to specify Africa then.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:25 PM
1

Edit: what a joke, OP only means for Africa and didn't specify that. My statement is for USA/EU. Correction, now he's talking about the USA. Dude is all over the board and inconsistent, because what I said below is relevant now and he finds one-off situations. End Edit. This is absolutely untrue. I've seen plenty of male doctors with hair to the shoulder and one past his shoulder blades (that guy was the head of his department). I have seen it in the workplace also. Don't recall ever seeing it i…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:13 PM
20

or have another man on her mind That is cheating also. Emotional cheating at a minimum. Which is just as bad as physical cheating in my book, as they are checked out of the relationship and looking for someone else.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:37 PM
3

Women always have somewhere to go. Tens of thousands of women shelters. Hell, even Tinder will get them a place for the night. If you are talking in regards to men leaving their abusive wife/girlfriend, they are fucked. That's an extremely hard situation. Especially if they don't have friends or family around. Statistically, women abuse their children more than men. So once again, stats favors women leaving their children and coming back for them later. https://www.statista.com/statistics/418470…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 09:23 AM
3

What drugs are you on? Alimony is irrelevant when you are being abused, especially physically abused. You run. Otherwise, you literally are staying for the money. Source: am a male abuse survivor. She wore rings on all her fingers, so it was like getting punched by brass knuckles with spikes.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:34 AM
3

Never will change from 50/50. More women register to vote than men. (77m men vs 84.4m women in 2022 presidential election.) Even with more women than men getting Bachelor degrees, that won't offset the average woman that doesn't nor the women of previous generations.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:38 AM
7

I'm sure everyone agrees with your statement, that neither male nor female should stay in an abusive relationship. The facts are: Women are the main abusers in a relationship (see below, plenty others like that from non-biased studies) Men outearn women due to maternity leave & not entering STEM/high risk jobs that pay very well (such as oil rigs) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ Methods. We analyzed data on young US adults aged 18 to 28 years from the 2001 National Longitud…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:27 AM
1

In which case, it's based upon the custodial home and how far away, and for how long, they took the kids. In theory, the parent should have a piece of paper saying where they are taking the child(ren), the departure/return dates and the signed agreement of the other parent. (Notarized, ideally.) Without that, it's child abduction.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:36 PM
1

The problem resides in where the custodial home is and where s/he took the kids. Reference the above link. Some states, dont know if all of them are listed in that website, have distance limitations. Its still going to apply, because of the custodial home. Neither parent can take the child(ren) thousands of miles away from the other parent without the other parent's consent or a court order.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:45 PM
2

That's not true at all. Edit: the problem resides around the custodial home and how far away s/he take the child(ren) from the custodial home. Many states have laws about those distances and certainly don't want to cross state borders. Just because people do it, doesn't make it legal. End Edit. It's called parental child abduction, or kidnapping, if the custodial parent moves the child without getting necessary permission. (Either from the court or non-custodial parent.) It's very serious and ca…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 03:46 PM
1

Interesting, as men ages 18-25 is the first bracket the USA drafts from.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 11:20 AM
1

I had seen this posted on Europe or World News. Someone commented that they haven't drafted from the 18-25 male segment. Is that true? Curious what age range they have drafted from.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:40 AM
-1

I've seen the moderators cracking down on a lot of posts lately. Or was it in a different sub? Regardless, I think it's too much work for them. It's not a paid job and definitely a thankless job. Subs like this attract too many men and women stuck in the anger phase. They focus on posts like this versus moving on to a healthier mental place.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:02 PM
31

Top 2 comments on the first picture were calling her out and telling her to be truthful to her fiance about cheating. You ran into 1 or 2 psychos in your flip the script comment. We have them here also. It's hilarious about the Brad Pitt comment. He didn't get a pass for being a cheating man, he got a pass because he's Brad fucking Pitt. He is the epitome of an alpha male. Women would rather share him, even be the other woman, than not be with him.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 07:40 AM
7

Stay at home parent for 20 years.... in this day and age? Most have at least a part-time job during that time. In addition, it's usually the stay at home parent that does the cheating and causes the divorce. Should s/he get alimony?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:00 PM
18

a REAL man is/should do [this or that]"... I hate that phrase more and more the older I get. It's a shaming tactic and pure misandry. Doesn't matter if a man or woman says it. Let that man live his life the way he wants to.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 03:49 PM
-2

5'11", 230 pound 26 year old on the autism spectrum and I have also been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder which has only gotten worse over the years To be blunt, you answered it yourself. You are obese and come across as a creep. (215 is the start of obesity for your height, so you are definitely obese.) First impressions matter. In addition, you don't talk to anyone, so no-one will change their mind about you being the local creep. Sucks, but that's the reality of your situation.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:27 PM
5

Your mistakes weren't enough to cause confusion. S/he is trolling or not in a good mental place.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:28 PM
11

You post in Indian subreddits. You require English, or a translator, to communicate with neighboring villages. It might not be your first language, but it's not like you are from China.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 06:37 PM
1

To be honest, I'm back and forth on it. Would have been better if he wrote, true or not, advice on how he fought off the false rape charges, the challenges he is still facing and seeking advice on how to overcome those challenges. It's written like a pity party of one or rage bait.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 10:01 AM
4

It feels like a fake story. Especially when you see his comment history, not very long, and he states he was trolling people in a game. OP commented: *This was 2 years ago *He retained an attorney *He successfully defended himself *He sued her and won a "pretty penny" All of that should have been included in the opening post and changes the advice he needs.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:54 AM
7

Most friends are better classified as acquaintances. A friend is going to independently verify their alibi. Due to self-preservation, be it physical harm or reputation, most acquaintances are going to distance themselves from anyone charged with a crime. Who wants the cops knocking on your door?
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:47 AM
3

No man is obligated to protect a random woman from other dangerous men. Vs No man is obligated to protect a random woman from dangerous men. Your statement says, at a minimum, you are also dangerous. It can also say, all men are dangerous. Removing the word other changes it.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 06:13 AM
9

move on to the next guy after a year or two A week or two, tops. Maybe even day(s). Some might grieve for month(s). Very few will grieve year(s).
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:28 AM
14

She should get a man if she wants to be protected by one. Did she say she was robbed by a man? I find it glaring that the man-hater didn't say she was robbed by a man. My ex-sister-in-law got fired from stealing money from patients in the ER. Never was reported to the police.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:22 AM
3

other dangerous men ?? The man-hater never said she was robbed by men. Using "other" implies that all men are dangerous.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:18 AM
20

MGTOW isn't always safe. A while back, there was a post where someone had a false accusation against him. Believe it was rape, but might have been sexual harassment in the workplace, or perhaps it was 2 separate posts. Regardless, the guy never went on a date / met the woman 1 on 1 and yet she accused him, because he blew her off. Point being, these types of women can accuse anyone with zero evidence.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 11:33 AM
2

Get a food scale. Worth it's weight in gold. Track everything. Even if you aren't yet doing a calorie deficit, dieting, it still helps to understand the calories and macros. For example, I recall drinking a shandy (beer/soda mix) and thinking it was healthier than a beer and shocked at the numbers. I'm a stress eater, which i believe is similar to a nervous eater. Having to scale all that stuff helped me control my stress eating. (I'm assuming you aren't munching on celery or such.)
/r/MensRights12/07/24 08:44 PM
1

I'm not OP, but did the fit to fat to fit. A calorie counter is half the battle. Helps understand proper portion size and hitting the right balance of protein, carbs & fat (micronutrients). I used a TDEE calculator with a calorie deficit. Hand in hand, realize that this IS your diet and you are not dieting. Hard to explain, but when you realize how many calories are in that Snickers bar, you will see that's something you have as a special treat and not daily. As to exercising, find a routine tha…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 08:21 PM
7

She stopped being a wife and team player. There's nothing else to do, but divorce the woman-child.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 01:56 PM
4

OP's problem, and yours also, is not understanding dating. In addition, you misunderstood what I wrote. Close reddit, take a deep breath and come back when you are calm and can coherently read a foreign language. I know 3 languages fluently, so understand your struggle in learning another language. Dating isn't a one-way street, him proving why he is boyfriend/husband material. It's a two-way street. She has to prove why she is girlfriend material. If she's a gold digger, next. Plenty out there.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 01:35 PM
40

The SAHM should have at least a part-time job these days. Kids are 10 & 12, not 2 & 4. This guy is fuuuuuuucked. Or rather, financially fucked, she's certainly using her free time to find a new man. We all know, she has to put out in order to get out. I'm sure she's been putting out a lot. One night, he will come home to changed locks and divorce papers. Possibly, police. He will cave in, sleep in his truck and give in to all her divorce demands. Only silver lining, hopefully he learns.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 06:02 AM
5

You are overthinking this. 1 step at a time. Dating means you date 1+ women at the same time to get to know if you are compatible. I test sexual & financial compatability at the start of a relationship. Let's focus on financial compatability, as that's the topic. I set the first meet-up at a bar for drinks. (I hate the word date, as it implies she is immediately my girlfriend.) I'll say, I get the first round, and you get the next round. If she doesn't buy the 2nd round, she will never become my…
/r/MensRights11/07/24 05:30 AM
25

let’s conveniently forget about all the men she broke up with for no reason before marriage Ah, but all those former men were abusive or cheaters. Women are never the reason why a relationship failed. /s Unfortunately, white knights and naive men believe that false relationship history. Hopefully, we all know the truth by now. Statistically, it's impossible for all of those exs to have been abusive or cheaters, which means she's a liar.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 10:20 AM
47

*through divorce and/or child support. My ex got the condo because she didn't have anything in her 401k (retirement) account. I'm sure 401k/pensions are the main reason divorced women walk away with the house/condo. Typically, men invest heavily into those, while women invest into beauty products & their secret "escape" bank account.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 10:07 AM
12

Self reported could explain a lot of this variance. My last 2 ex-gfs said they were cheated on by their last ex-bf. Came out much later that those ex-bfs were non-exclusive fuck buddies. Don't believe anything a woman says about her ex.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:14 PM
1

You are a joke. Can't tell if you are a troll or an idiot who doesn't understand the legal definition of consent.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:55 AM
3

Where did you see their ages? the indictment ... did not include the ages of the students Also, didn't see anywhere that the boys consented to sex. Good chance these boys were under 16 and couldn't consent. The article did state that these two women were best friends, "ride or die" friends, that were in each other's wedding parties. Feels more like they made a competition on how many minors they could rape.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:15 PM
3

Men are used to seeing women do everything and wonder why women won't continue this cycle. How old are you? 70? That isn't normal, nor has it been for 50+ years. I'm 50, and household chores have always been split. It flexes based upon work schedules. I don't know of any friends and family that do what your parents did. Some coworkers have stay at home wives, but that's different. Hell, one of my peers is a woman and her husband works in the trades. He cooks, cleans and takes care of the house w…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 03:53 PM
9

Guys forget that women are the OG of porn consumers. Romance novels range from soft to hard-core porn, just with an innocent name to it. Women consume porn differently because their situation is different. Most of them can install Tinder or go to a random bar and hookup within 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 11:04 AM
3

on average a woman can expect an almost 30% decline in her standard of living following divorce, while men often see an increase of 10%. Can't you do basic math? If men are seeing an increase in their cost of living and women are seeing a decrease, that means the women were spending a disproportionate percentage of the family disposable income on themselves. (In short, the ex-husbands were spending their disposable income on their ex-wives.) The percentage of differences is interesting. I'm assu…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 07:21 AM
1

It doesn't. There is a tax penalty for married couples earning similar amounts. I'm sure it is to cover the tax savings the people with vastly different incomes receive. (The rich are the ones who write the laws. No surprise, they want the tax advantage.)
/r/MensRights25/06/24 07:10 AM
5

Let me put it a different way: Would you make an investment that has a 50%* / 60% / 73% failure rate? Typically, failure rates decrease with experience, but this investment doesn't. Why do you think that is? *Forbes now lists 1st marriages at 43% failure rate, but I know I read it at 50% previously. In fact, a month ago, I posted the divorce rates from Forbes, and it was 50%. Something sketchy going on there. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/2OoeCZqGli
/r/MensRights25/06/24 07:08 AM
16

Women initiate divorce more than men as well. Forbes said 69% of divorces are initiated by women. The majority are, at a minimum, emotionally cheating on their husband, as the next day they have a boyfriend after telling their husband they are divorcing. For those women lurkers, I'm sure the majority of the 31% of men initiating a divorce are doing the same. What's that, perhaps 50% of married women versus 25% of married men. Not a good ratio.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:56 AM
3

Tax has what's called a "marriage penalty", unless things have changed in the past 10 years. It's a tax benefit if there is a vast difference in income. Think stay at home spouse. (These laws are set up by the rich that want a benefit.) It's a tax penalty if the incomes are similar. A married couple would actually pay less taxes if they could file as single individuals. (These are the people that pay for the rich to have that benefit.)
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:31 AM
1

Thanks, blocked that person. Quickly scrolled through that person's comment history, and 95%+ of their comments are heavily downvoted. I don't want an echo chamber, like other subs, but this person needs to reevaluate their thinking.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 05:18 AM
1

Grabbing some excerpts from a website. Earned income is the money you make in salary, wages, commissions, or tips. Investment income is money you make by selling something for more than you paid for it. Passive income is money you make from something you own, without selling it. Really depends upon how investment & passive incomes are classified. In tax, they are considered unearned income. Perhaps I am overthinking it. To me, someone's earnings is their wage or pay. I fully agree that overall, …
/r/MensRights08/06/24 03:05 PM
0

You are interpreting pay only for hourly employees, which isn't always the case. I've been salaried since I obtained my bachelor's degree. That's a flat annual pay, irrelevant of how many hours are worked. Pay is your weekly/biweekly/monthly wage. Thus, the payroll department. I get the point you are making, I just don't know if hourly employees drive those numbers enough to make a significant difference over salaried employees. I do agree that overall men work harder than the average woman. Tha…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 02:52 PM
-3

How do you define earnings and pay? To me, a finance guy, pay is your salary, which is a facet of your earnings. Your definition isn't the same. Edit, removed some tangent thought.and keep it on track.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 02:04 PM
8

When sex becomes a barter system, it's time to move on.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:35 PM
11

A useless degree provides useful information about the person, aka a red flag as big as China. Lacks long-term planning, meaning what she is going to use that degree for. Being wasteful with money and likely having a huge college debt that she will expect you to pay off. On a side note, didn't realize accounting wasn't STEM. Just assumed accounting & finance would have fallen under the Math part of it. I know a bunch of auditors and bankers/hedge fund managers that out earn STEM majors. I'd have…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:37 PM
2

No-one is owed sex True, but you are ignoring: Sex is a huge aspect of most relationships It's not one dimensional, and most people realize that. Only people who want to nitpick focus on sex being an obligation.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:48 AM
3

My point is that if you get a match, you need to meet up that night and not waste time trying to setup a date. If she isn't meeting you that night, she's fucking someone else. As a solid 6, you are better off meeting women in person.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 07:46 AM
7

multiple studies show women initiate as much or more DV as men. Those are great studies. They show lesbian (female) couples having the highest rate of DV, while gay (male) couples have the lowest rate of DV. Clearly shows which gender initiates DV. Women won't put up with another woman's shit. Whereas men either tolerate it, or more likely, don't even realize what women are doing. (Hear plenty of stories of women loving to push people's button to piss them off. That is DV.)
/r/MensRights03/05/24 11:43 AM
15

Hookup apps. That's what they are for, not dating. The men, with matches, have their pick & just want to get their dick wet. The women have sex on the first date, because if they don't, another girl will, and she will be ghosted. They hope that will lead to dating and a relationship. For your reality check. When I was single, I'd use them when traveling for work. Chat with them for 10 minutes in app, meet them outside the hotel to make sure I didn't get catfished and then directly to the room. I…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 11:07 AM
4

Divorce rate in the USA: 50% 1st marriage 60% 2nd marriage 73% 3rd marriage Those are worse odds than betting on roulette.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 08:29 AM
9

You will still need to use condoms to prevent STIs.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:29 AM
6

You are delusional. How pretty / handsome a person is, is the topic and the sexual harrassment that possibly can occur from it. End of the day, my recommendation is to fight fire with fire. If a man is being sexually harassed or discriminated against, file a lawsuit. Companies only care if their bottom line is impacted. Soapbox is all yours if you want to continue your dick size discussion. I'm done with this thread.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 03:50 PM
6

Ah, you are the Polish guy. Your Eastern Europe customs are different from the USA and Western/Central Europe. You complained that women weren't carrying heavy boxes at your workplace. I explained that having only men carry heavy boxes being a potential sexual discrimination lawsuit in the USA. There is a small weight band that is allowed to be discriminated against men, the range being like 44-50 pounds. Anything less than 44 pounds and it's a lawsuit if women are excluded. Anything over 50 pou…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 02:41 PM
9

I said both genders in my original comment, so please step down from your soapbox. I go to the gym 4 days a week and swim the other 3. My shirts are tailored to my V shape, so I watch what I eat, or it would be a fortune to replace/tailored them again. I certainly have used my looks to my advantage in negotiations/meetings in the past and I'd definitely go to Compliance (HR) if my boss said they want me in a meeting specifically and only due to my looks.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:39 PM
4

people get hired all the time mostly for their looks Maybe not mostly, but it does differentiate you between other candidates that have similar CVs/resumes. You just can't say that is the reason. What you say, especially as a male, even more so as a white male, is very important.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:24 PM
6

her boss told her to attend a meeting - because a male client liked 'pretty women'. You didn't read the article. Her boss is an idiot and there were more things he wrote to her included in the article. Go read it. He could have told her to attend and give him feedback after the meeting on what she learned. End result is the same, eye candy in the meeting, but the invitation is quite different.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:16 PM
32

Of course, it's sexual discrimination. What else would you call having an employee, male or female, attend a business meeting solely to be eye candy for the client? I have no idea what this is to do with this sub. That's the confusing part. Karma farming?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:42 PM
1

Not necessarily. A female lawyer, correction, a high-end female lawyer doesn't care about gender, she values money. She knows how nasty women can be and fights for her client, who is paying a high bill rate. Many judges are elected, and they run on conservative or traditional values platforms. That bias is what works against men, because obviously its the man's fault the marriage failed. (/s)
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:30 PM
14

The problem resides in the fact that most TRPers skip to the "How to get laid like a Warlord" section and skip the self improvement/development sections. They will call them TRPers, but in reality, they are seduction artists by skipping the core tenets. Women hate the part that tells TRPers not to settle for the first girl they have sex with and to vet those women. Which is irionic, as I'd call that all about having standards, no different than the 6-pack, 6 figures, 6 foot tall minimums many wo…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:44 PM
23

No surprise. Women can easily exchange sex for a roof over their head. Waaaay back in college, pre-Tinder, had a friend of a friend that needed a place to crash. Told her she could sleep on my couch for free until my roommate came back, 5 or 6 nights. She was a hellcat in my bed every night. No idea what became of her, but I'm sure she found some guy that gladly provided her a roof and a ring. Not an option for 99% of men.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 05:48 PM
1

Oddly, is it true that females are the fairer sex? It means physically beautiful. Wasn't it determined that ladyboys are prettier? (In terms of physical beauty, not sexual attraction based upon your sexual orientation.)
/r/MensRights25/04/24 03:53 PM
8

Got it. You are a woman using a male name. Either way, you need help, if you think physically assaulting people is the answer.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 03:49 PM
23

Even if the defendant is guilty af, the police, prosecutors & judges have to give that person their due process. Innocent until proven guilty. Or are you saying you endorse vigilante justice?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 03:38 PM
4

I don't care about the genetics. What they are doing is minimizing the rapes against young boys & deflecting attention away from female pedophiles.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:40 AM
3

Let's hope the wife of the Chief of Police gets the same prison time as a man. That will set a precedence.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:35 AM
7

At least they are saying, "raping young boys". Articles in the past would say, having sex. Little steps matter also.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:31 AM
7

Huh, learn something new every day. Thanks for pushing me to Google it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statelessness Not that wiki is a terrific source, but has plenty of examples.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:16 PM
11

I don't think it's possible to become stateless. They can threaten all they want, but the rest of the world won't recognize it. Though, they can call him a traitor and then imprison/shoot him.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:25 PM
44

Legally, alimony is gender neutral. Though, this might depend upon the country. Typically, the higher earner pays the lower earner / non-working ex-spouse. In reality, judges, attorneys, society, etc have a negative opinion if a man receives alimony from his ex-wife. What needs to change is that opinion and also men enabling their wives to become stay at home mothers. It's perfectly fine for the father to become the stay at home father, even if he earned more. In addition, it would help for figh…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:32 AM
6

The irony of porn addiction comments, women do most of those porn activities with men they view as Chad. (One woman's Chad could be another woman's average man.) The porn addiction comment only applies to the non-Chads. They don't want to do those things with him.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 05:05 AM
25

Dating today for a man that's established feels like women are trying to take advantage of you. As a 50 year man, most women wanting to take advantage of you has always been a thing. "Your money is our money and my money is my money" was very common thinking in my 20s. That's why it's called dating. You see the signs, easier nowadays, and move on to the next woman. Women might gatekeep sex. Men gatekeep who they elevate to girlfriend and eventually being exclusive with.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 04:42 AM
25

The amount of women 25 and up that are virigins Alleged virgins. I'd be extremely surprised if they didn't have sex, at least have given oral sex, which is more than the equivalent 25 year old male. or have never had a boyfriend or long term relationship is rising. Doesn't mean they didn't hookup. I've had women as booty calls span years and never would have called any of them as girlfriends nor as a relationship
/r/MensRights22/04/24 04:35 AM
1

That makes her girlfriend material?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 04:17 AM
2

Get a divorce attorney and let them deal with the hostile judge and your divorce. It will be the best money you have ever spent for your peace of mind. You earn decent money, so can rebuild your savings/investments. Follow your divorce attorney's advice. For my own divorce, I asked my attorney friends who they would use. They were expensive but worth every penny. My ex used one that cost 2/3 of mine and heard her constantly complaining. (My divorce was fairly amicable, but she wanted separate at…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:27 PM
5

Simple: don't tell anyone your preferences. Anyone includes your male friends also. Enough simps out there that will throw you under the bus for that 1% chance she will hook up with them instead.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 03:48 PM
9

Doxing. Many forums and other subs don't allow you to dox people.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:20 AM
17

That's why it's called dating. You don't stop dating with the first woman that will fuck you. If you see red flags, you find a different woman. Your feminist is no different than a woman with trust issues due to having an alleged* cheating ex. Hard pass. It's not your job to fix them. Those women should not be dating and should be working on themselves. *alleged, because most woman I've dated, from doctors to cashiers, claim all of their relationships ended due to abuse or cheating. Statisticall…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:23 PM
1

Both can be true, he is a loon and she is a liar. He had his name removed from the birth certificate within the required time of the child being born. That's because he had a paternity test done and didn't come back as the father. Or you can believe your sister's lie. He somehow had his name removed because he changed his gender and they can't have 2 women on the birth certificate. As his gender was male at the time of the birth, the fact that he is female now wouldn't change the child's birth c…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:19 AM
1

I was adding to, or perhaps simplifing, your comment. The other guy seems to misunderstand HR's role.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 12:14 PM
54

Their "escape funds" aren't small either. We aren't talking a couple hundred, but thousands. I've seen it range from 1-3 MONTHS. Was shocked when I read about these escape funds years ago. The amount of truly physically abusive men is extremely small and doesn't justify deceiving the majority of men. After seeing it done to friends and myself, most women say they were abused, so when its found out they were cheating, it's "justified cheating".This leads me to believe that these escape funds are …
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:46 AM
6

HR is to protect the company from its human resources. When you accept that, they aren't completely useless.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:52 AM
11

I don't have a problem with women getting useful, aka STEM, degrees. The problem I have, is when they get useless degrees and then complain about their student debt and how no-one told them to get a STEM degree. (Certainly many people told them, but they ignored them.)
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:27 AM
1

This has nothing to do with Men's Rights. askMen, MarriedTRP, believe there is/was a religious TRP subreddit would be a better place to ask.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:04 AM
2

If she's short of time, why is she dating guys that live out of the country? He's going to have significantly less time than a single father. they couldn't get as many ads onto a page that's only a paragraph long. This is the reason why it's so long. The short version would be: single mother wants to relive her 20s with a good looking child-free man for fun on her child free nights. I don't recall reading if she said the men needed to be single, just not single fathers.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 08:42 AM
0

The father of your nephew is someone else. Your sister is a liar and a thief by committing paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:14 AM
49

Vasectomies are considered to be permanent by doctors. The long version: the longer you wait to have it reversed, the lower the success rate. Months, not years. Even if it is successfully reversed, there is a good chance you will shoot blanks. Thus, why doctors consider it permanent. In addition, the reversal cost is ridiculously expensive and very unlikely to be covered by your insurance. Pet peeve of mine. Many online women are spinning a false narrative that vasectomies are a better option th…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:01 PM
8

German men come in 2 varieties, the athletic version or the walking beer barrel. German women keep getting bigger and bigger until they resemble what they eat. Sausages attached to a potato body with a short bob cut that is either maroon or multi colored. (Granted there are some exceptions, but those are the athletic version or immigrants.)
/r/MensRights15/04/24 05:48 PM
42

That's why psychology is a soft science.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:49 AM
1

92 citations. Unbelievable. What I meant, in order for a paper to get published, it needs to be reviewed by their peers. That means, other doctorates "reviewed" the accuracy of this paper and signed off on it being published. Which means, not only were the authors of the paper idiots, the peer review group are also. They must be the book smart but can't apply it to the real world type of doctorates. Useless.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:56 PM
5

I agree with you. If there is a will, there is a way to make it happen. It's been a while since I was single, but dates were always 50/50. Perhaps I bought the first round and said she gets the next round, but that's also to test her. If she can't afford to split a date, she shouldn't be dating and I certainly don't want to date someone that is awful with their finances.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:39 PM
9

Why would a successful 30-35 year old man date a woman around his age? They date women in their 20s.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:29 PM
2

How did that study make it past the peer-review stage?
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:35 AM
23

Healthy skepticism is a good thing in reddit. I even watch male accounts also. Trolls and many women hide behind male accounts. Been that way since the Internet was founded.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:31 AM
9

Especially when she bragged about having a knife and mace in her opening post.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:25 AM
7

Germans typically don't bet around the bush. They tend to be very direct and find that to be the polite way of speaking
/r/MensRights06/04/24 01:31 PM
2

A woman's fanny isn't her ass in the UK either, it's something more private. Google is your friend. Especially when something doesn't make sense from your culture's POV, it very likely means something else in another culture's POV.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:53 AM
2

You didn't read the article. 7 times over 2 years. By the way, fit means hot/sexy in the UK and she wanted him to meet her parents, so she completely ignored how uncomfortable he was. The hearing in Watford was told Mr Papashvili was sexually harassed by Mrs O’Shea on seven occasions over two years, from 2017 to 2019.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:50 AM
2

Plus, they are asylum seekers and get paid. €4-500 tax-free / month up to 3 years in Germany. Plus benefits, such as language classes, job center, health care, etc.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 05:30 PM
2

Based upon your writing style, AI says you are female. No dick, no opinion on vasectomies.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 10:11 AM
0

Do you have a penis?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:38 AM
0

Curious. Have you ever gone to the doctors for a Vasectomy consultation? I have and I don't believe you have, or you would understand why people are stressing its permanent or to treat it as sterilization.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:12 AM
1

Why get a Vasectomy? The main reason for having a Vasectomy is birth control, there are little to no other reasons. People are going to skip right to this section. Nothing in there about it being permanent. That needs to be stressed.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:01 AM
17

Trolls are all over the real world, more so on the internet, even more so in reddit. My recommendation is to report them and block them. Why expose yourself to their negativity? As an aside, as perhaps this is one of your contention points. Guys criticize women who say they want a man 6'+, as its only 14.5% of the male USA population. (Quick Google search.) Toss in their other requirements and it quickly becomes unrealistic & unreasonable.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:00 AM
1

Misinformation Vasectomies are considered by doctors to be permanent male birth control. Straight from the Mayo clinic's website, which is one of USA's top medical facilities. Although vasectomy reversals are possible, vasectomy should be considered a permanent form of male birth control. Before you get a vasectomy, be certain you don't want to father a child in the future. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/vasectomy/about/pac-20384580
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:35 AM
6

Don't his parents pay the child support until he is 18? I vaguely recall hearing that, but perhaps it's an urban myth.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:06 AM
1

Apparently, it depends upon where you live, and I'm sure things can change in future years. Below was taken from a family law attorney website. One major legal issue concerns sperm donation and child support. Certain states have adopted the Uniform Parentage Act, or versions similar to the uniform act, which states that “A donor is not a parent of a child conceived by means of assisted reproduction.” Unif. Parentage Act § 702 (2002). Likewise, the law generally does not treat a sperm donor, who …
/r/MensRights26/03/24 09:32 AM
35

use my detective skills and posted on.... She meant stalker skills. She hadn't even been on a date with this guy and asked for other dumped women's experiences with him. She ends the video by saying, he was physically attractive and a great talker, pauses for a minute and then says there was just something. She hadn't even met the guy! That something is based upon him dumping her for posting about him on that Facebook group and the other dumped women's lies.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 09:15 AM
38

At face value, Are we dating the same guy, seems innocent, if they are in an exclusive relationship. Don't have a problem with that. Cheaters lie, so nothing wrong with vetting the guy/girl you are exclusive with. (As long as it's not psycho level.) The reality is toxic af. You went on 1 date and the girl in the YT video hadn't even gone on a date with the guy. Of course, these women are going to say it was a bad experience. They got dumped. Nothing worse than a woman scorned.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 09:09 AM
9

That 42 year old looks proud that she raped a minor. The disgusting part, certainly wasn't her first time grooming and raping a minor. Just like a cheater, it was the first time she got caught.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:32 AM
4

You obviously didn't read the article. A 23 year old teacher having sexual interactions with a 14 year old certainly falls under the public's opinion of being a pedophile. (Technically, believe it's called something else, but irrelevant in social convention.) A 42 year old teacher raping a 17 year old, I'd even call her being a pedophile. She likely was raping him for much longer and grooming him. That's a 25 year age gap. Certainly wasn't her first time grooming and raping a minor.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:31 AM
6

It's always been a common occurrence, it's finally being prosecuted. Look at the Friends sitcom, mid 90s to mid 00s. Watched them at the local bar and here were the crowds replies: Monica breaking up after finding out the kid she fucked was in high school at least have breakup sex was the overall replies. That's called rape at that point, as she knows his age. Ross having some sort of sexul interaction with the school librarian. ewwww towards Ross and no comment about the librarian doing sexual …
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:08 AM
19

It happens here in Germany also. A buddy witnessed a stabbing on a train, but since it was a Syrian refugee doing the stabbing, it was kept quiet. He finally found an article about it in an Austrian newspaper. At that time, it was against a certain political party's interests for people to know all the crimes being committed by the refugees.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:51 AM
4

I feel what I did was far more ethical than roping a man into a relationship for the soul purpose of having a baby. I applaud you for that decision. I believe the courts would throw away the contract, if the mother entered financial hardship and needed child support. Unless the contract has a second parent assuming the sperm donor's parental & financial responsibility.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 08:11 AM
11

I can believe it's increased to almost 30%. A couple of years ago, I posted a study from around 2015 in the UK. It was slightly over 20%. There is no punishment for paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:36 AM
38

I'm a 50 year old white man and have been discriminated against my entire life & career in the USA. It's just gotten worse and openly allowed to discriminate against white men. The older ones that enjoyed those privileges are retired or dead. Affirmative Action started in 1961. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has been around since 1963. https://www.eeoc.gov/youth/timeline-important-eeoc-events 2024 - 1961 = 63 years, or 3 generations, of legal discrimination.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 08:41 AM
29

Wage Gap was proven by a Nobel prize winner to be due to maternity leave. There is no wage gap for equal jobs & experience. Experience is the key. Most women take maternity leave. Here in Germany, that's 1 year plus they normally get pregnant when they return. So over 5 years, the man is supervisor or manager, while the woman is still entry level with 3 years experience. That's a significant difference in salary. Men can take the 1 year off, but good luck with her agreeing to that.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 07:28 PM
2

What's the phase in timeline? You are only giving pieces of puzzle. What you are getting at is very common to extend the retirement age for national pensions, and there is a phase in timeline.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 06:44 PM
4

Your text doesn't necessarily match your title, so I will address the title. The short version: a person, usually a woman, settling for another is easily corrupted. I'm 50, so seen it happen when online dating came around, both websites and apps, 50 shades of grey & divorced people trying to convince their friends they aren't happy in their relationship. OLD & 50 shades had hordes of women running to divorce court, as they saw their friends hooking up with hot guys and living the lifestyle they …
/r/MensRights22/03/24 03:13 PM
2

Please explain more how these people were excluded then. The way you explain it, it's not optional, while the article is saying it's optional.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:53 PM
3

Back in mid 90s, worked in payroll and most 20something women contributed 0% to their 401ks. Somewhere around 30-40, they would start contributing small amounts. (Meaning, not even up to the company match, which is free money.) Men on the otherhand, would contribute at least the company match in their 20s and some would escalate in their 30-40s. Just because someone CAN contribute, doesn't mean they WILL contribute.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:52 PM
5

No surprise that The Guardian did poor fact checking. Last time I was single, it was common knowledge to expect the person you are dating to be dating other people. Thus, the word dating. It's why, if you wanted to be exclusive, need to have that conversation sooner rather than later. I'd expect the male version overall to be the same as the woman's version. Though in terms of vitriol, I'd expect the female version to be worse. There is a reason behind the saying, nothing worse than a woman scor…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 06:16 PM
25

Loser is equally applied to both genders that leach off the system. Unfortunately, males are also called losers if they aren't following the protector and provider paradigm. Have a doctor friend who travels the world and plays video games. No significant other. I assume he is MGTOW. My gf once called him a loser, and I quickly shut that down.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:22 PM
56

Was this a men's group? This sounds like someone with fuck you * money and he had enough of these groups and decided to work about year or 2 to fight them in court. Fuck you is a FIRE (financial independence, retire early) term. It's when you have enough money to retire and can tell your boss, fuck you. Sometimes, they will still work, as its much less stressful when you can walk away at any time.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:10 PM
12

In addition, it would be bad publicity for Facebook to drag this out. They are gender specific hate groups with a pretty title. I'm sure you won't read a comment like, John Doe is a great guy, date him if he ever is single again. Flip the narrative. Are we dating the same woman? Would be shut down immediately for sl#t shaming.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:02 PM
5

This type of thinking is why it won't happen. Women can provide covering fire for 1 man or 2 women to drag/carry your wounded ass. Women only squads/companies, where they don't have to drag a 100kg man. Artillery or other support functions, where if it's overrun, no one is dragging a wounded soldier to cover, so gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:56 AM
19

Too many men and most women still believe: Men should be protectors & providers They don't understand that duty/entitlement went away with equal rights.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 07:30 AM
0

My reply addresses both situations equally.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 07:45 AM
0

their respective party Is how I would write it. To indicate that they are in different political parties.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:42 AM
19

the coworker isnt as interesting anymore They smashed, probably more than once, and he dumped her. She didn't suddenly stop being interested in him because you are going to the gym. At best case, she is faking interest in you until she finds a new man to monkey branch to. Men are from Mars and women are from Venus. We think differently. When a woman stops loving a man, it's game over.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:49 PM
27

You answered why they lie about you being abusive. its because they are bored when I am at work so they meet another guy They get their narrative out before you say they cheated on you with xyz. It's pretty common that women act like victims, so people get gas lit and don't focus on the fact that she cheated.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 03:15 PM
31

they ... get back in touch with me months or years later They are either looking to cheat or searching for a new boyfriend. Guaranteed, within a month, those women had a new boyfriend.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 03:05 PM
43

Asia Argento, one of the MeTwo leading figures, is a prime example. He was 7 when they first met and 17 when she raped him. She was 27 and 37, respectively.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:19 AM
23

A vasectomy is more than 99% effective. It's considered permanent, Source: NHS Women have been spreading misinformation for decades about vasectomies, and it got much worse recently. Doctors consider it non-reversible as the chance to undo a vasectomy decreases significantly over time. Think in months, not years. Who is going to have a vasectomy reversed in 3 months? Much more likely a decade later when he changes his mind and it 100% can't be reversed.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 05:44 AM
6

Our company's receptionist was whining about how she has to have 2 part-time jobs to earn what she "earned" from the welfare system to be a stay at home single mother. Then she proceeded to say how unfair it was to her and how the system discriminates against single women. My reply, "As I was saying, I am expecting this interview candidate to arrive at X time. I won't be in my office, so please call me on at number and I will come get them." Internally thought, Welcome to finally being a product…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 01:49 PM
8

We have something similar in Germany without the salary threshold (Kindergeld). It will get heavily abused. €250/kid/month until they are 18. At that time, the child gets the money until they are done with their education. Same with child support. Many women become baby mills to multiple fathers and live off welfare (Hertz IV) until their 40s. Around that time, they don't have very young children at home, so they have no excuse not to work.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 12:20 PM
34

Sex will become duty sex and reduce in frequency to just enough to keep him from divorcing her.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 06:14 AM
1

Go away, troll. If you can't see the connection. That's on you. Blocked.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:07 PM
0

She chooses to overeat and not exercise. It's not like she has bones the thickness of an elephant's and a low body fat %. In fact, it looks like she might have a good bone structure. I'd even speculate that she looked completely different during her university days.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:06 PM
10

I'd say it's walking the line, but is a Men's Right issue. Safe to say, you didn't read the article. In summary, feminists blamed men for causing dead bedrooms. Trying to support their theory, they did a survey of lesbian couples. The result proved that females are the main cause or perpetrators of dead bedrooms. 43% of lesbian couples were in a dead bedroom vs. 16% of heterosexual couples.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 02:50 PM
3

My father had to investigate a boy who was committing SA against a girl in Kindergarten. The kids would have been about 5. Turned out, he saw his mom doing those activities with her boyfriend(s). The boy said, she was doing that in order to keep that man around. So the boy told the girl she needed to do that in order to keep him as a friend. Pretty fucked up parenting. I'm sure she got the single mother of the year award (I will delete this after a day or two, as it shares too much personal info…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 12:31 PM
15

To me, the interesting part is that her attorney appears to be scrambling. Their law license is at risk if they know their client is committing fraud. I really hope they lose their law license. That is what will stop, or severely reduce, these types of cases. There will always be conwomen like this. Years ago, saw there are websites that sell this shit. Fake bellies, fake pregnancy tests, fake ultrasounds, etc. Was sickening.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 12:13 PM
1

Victim mentality. It's never their fault. Once you learn to spot these people, it's scary how many women think this way. Ask them why their relationship(s) ended and 100% chance the guy cheated or abused them.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:54 AM
1

The problem resides in not teaching boys/men to have a backbone and say no. I'd summarize this as codependency and/or fear of being alone. Codependency simply put is happy wife = happy life, which is bullshit. A man's happy life is dependent upon making himself happy and same for a woman's. It's not dependent upon making another person happy. The man is afraid that telling her no will ultimately end in divorce. What he doesn't realize is that the relationship is already over by that time. She's …
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:37 AM
9

I'd challenge that those women need it the most. (Keep in mind the type of man they believe they deserve to be with, realistic or not.) 1) Those women have never approached those types of men. 2) That specific group of men have plenty of hookup options.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:49 PM
11

People focus on the woman being in a new relationship and ignore the emotional cheating that went on before the physical. There was a study asked to cheaters on with whom and why they cheated. Women cheated 80% of the time with friends and coworkers, while men were 60%. Men cheated more often via bars & hookup apps. Women primary reason for cheating was because they felt the man wasn't paying attention to them, while men's primary reason was that she was hot. Significant difference there. The wo…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:42 AM
-5

I can understand your point. Overall, most posts are negative versus being positive. Come with solutions, not problems.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:30 AM
2

Coming from the other side's reasoning, as I saw it happen to my brother and asked why he put up with it. My brother's ex-wife would go to the bar and flirt. When it went too far, he'd go up to split them up, assert his dominance and it would get her horny. She'd fuck him like a wildcat in the bar's bathroom, their truck or when they got home. Some women be crazy and sadly, men think with their wrong head too often.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:19 AM
2

If you’re under the illusion that you get enough child support to pay your entire rent you’re in a fantasy world. I quoted you, disagreed with your statement that child support pays rent for both the mother and child, explained the rent portion of child support and then you change your narrative. Gtfo and go live in your ever changing fantasy world. Blocked.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:58 AM
2

While I think it's an extremely bad idea to make friends with female coworkers, you likely took time to create that friendship. OP just started, and most of the women find him creepy af. I think he is either not telling us the entire story or is clueless on why he is creepy and needs to figure it out fast, as his career interacts with people. Personally, I think it's something that Chad can do, but it is creepy from OP. Such as putting your hand on the small of a woman's back to guide her into a…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:50 AM
9

Don't shit where you eat. Don't even give the appearance of shitting where you eat. Decades before the MeToo movement, my mentor told me to always keep it professional with women. Do you believe it got better afterward? I will say it louder for the people in the back or the people who think it doesn't apply to them. DON'T SHIT WHERE YOU EAT. KEEP IT PROFESSIONAL
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:18 AM
11

ask everyone if I can take a picture/video Hope you, or the manager, got the permissions in writing. Perhaps you can prove it's a hostile workplace and claim a lawsuit of some sort. At the very least, if you decide to quit, you can claim unemployment due to having to quit because of it being a hostile workplace. Document everything in a professional manner.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:00 AM
8

Inheritance rights could be violated.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:47 PM
3

The roof over the mothers head is also over the child’s head. The custodial parent pays for their own roof, just as the non-custodial parent pays for theirs. The housing portion from child support is for additional space the child requires, and should be only a portion, not the full amount, as the child has 2 parents.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:22 PM
1

Who is OP really? Look through his post & comment history to decide for yourself. I'm curious what you all think OP is... Perhaps OP's the guy with the supposed 14 year old step daughter. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/aUWm8IgG4p Or the guy that goes to South America as a sexpat? Or the digital nomad in Thailand? Or a chick in her mom's basement?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 09:12 AM
1

Added rent is irrelevant. Both parents have added rent. Many of your objections are dependent upon the divorce agreement, such as healthcare costs are split, and who has placement, meaning is it 50/50, or does one parent never see their child. And no, you didn't cite your source. Citing is completely different from adding a hyperlink (link). Nor did you link your $1800 source in the comment I replied to. As mine uses the US census data, we can use mine. $5-$6k in child support is one parent's ha…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:59 AM
1

Your statements have absolutely nothing to do with what I talked about.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:26 AM
12

she has an extra 20 hours a week to herself. The majority of men are spineless, afraid to be alone & put their wives on pedestals. A successful relationship is flexible and shares the workload. If I am busy at work or tax time, she does a lot more and vice-versa. If she's not carrying her weight in the relationship, then it's time for a talk or time to move on if she isn't going to be a team player.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 05:24 PM
3

I treat it as a troll post, otherwise he would post it in a more appropriate subreddit. He also posts in bigdickproblems. eyeroll So he knows how to find appropriate subreddits.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:40 AM
3

The hiring is done by the hiring manager, not HR. That's a common misperception. Human Resources manages the company's resources that are human. Such as employee vacation days, company holidays, benefits, etc. They also protect the company from human resources. Why HR has an attorney on staff.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:06 PM
1

a woman will get half of the man's things in the divorce, which isn't true It's technically true. I believe in legalese it's stated the husband and wife each own 100% of his assets + debt and 100% of her assets + debt. It's easier to say she gets 50% of his assets + debt and he gets 50% of hers. Excluding joint assets + debt, such as the house + mortgage, the problem is that she typically has very little individual assets, while he has a lot. Top individual assets would be 401k retirement accoun…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:37 PM
1

And the average child support payment is 1800$ per year, Where do you get your data? Out of your ass? Quick Google search proves you wrong. The below numbers are averages for the USA, they vary greatly from state to state. Parents who receive child support report getting an average of $5,743 annually Parents who owe child support report paying an average of $7,906 a year. I assume the discrepancy is that child support is paid from after-tax money. Another factor could be from parents being incar…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:13 PM
17

Look at his post history. He's supposedly a digital nomad living in Thailand for ~6 months. So where does this 14 year old step daughter come from? Better yet, take a look at this recent comment of his, talking about being single in South America. He is full of shit, typical keyboard warrior. https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalnomad/s/44NctiK53t Edit: He quickly deleted his comment after I linked it. Further proof that he is full of shit. Then he blocked me for calling him out. What a troll.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:30 PM
45

not all women are like that. Obviously. It's extremely unlikely that she was the only woman there. In addition to women thinking like you, there certainly were other Karens there who thought it. The point is the entitlement. Protection by a strange man, and when he didn't provide protection, she blamed him. In short, this entitlement is misandristic.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:56 PM
63

5%-10% is low. Decades ago, there was the running joke, "You must be the mailman's kid." Between cheating being much easier via Tinder & other OLD apps, and dating & fucking multiple men being common, I'm sure that percentage is much higher. Plus, never underestimate the male ego. No guy wants to find out he was cucked until its divorce time.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 11:52 AM
19

I am surprised that health insurance companies don't push for DNA testing, especially the ones where the baby is under that father's health insurance. Insurance companies are notorious for trying to avoid paying or paying as little as they can. So I can easily see the insurance company requiring the father providing some DNA proof, or adoption papers, in order to add the baby to his plan.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 11:41 AM
18

extra cost to the mother or it'll be part of insurance... That extra cost is insignificant next to the total birthing costs plus baby costs, such as a crib, clothes, etc. In addition, as you said mother and not parents, that implies she isn't in an exclusive relationship. The DNA test will be required for the child support decree, so might as well get that process started right away.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 11:33 AM
7

Delete those subs or block the people. Life is too short for trolls to live rent-free in your thoughts.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:17 PM
2

I realized this over two decades ago, while working in payroll during Uni. Men and women were hired at the same, or similar, amounts for entry level jobs. By similar, it was because of negotiating and wasn't gender specific. Anything beyond entry-level jobs are going to be subject to differences due to job opportunities they've taken to help their resume/CV and negotiating a better salary. Anecdotally, having climbed the ranks and having managed hundreds of employees, men work harder and will wo…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:29 PM
3

They see the bottom 80%/90% (whichever split you believe in) when they are ready to settle for a non-Chad. The problem is, these party girls are in their 30s, and the non-Chads their age are dating 5-10 years younger than them. Reality check and life is so unfair (to them). Thus begins the shaming of 30+ year old men for dating women in their 20s.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:22 AM
61

Chad = men. They don't notice the other men, so why would they talk about them?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 06:08 PM
4

More likely, she is the type that needs to be fisted to get off from watching too much porn. Men need to wake up and realize it's relative to her vagina. Vaginas come in all sorts of length and width.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 05:05 AM
4

As for others stating that you can’t receive the vaccine over a certain age, that is also not true. Well, now I know you are a troll that likes to spread lies or lacks critical thinking skills. I looked into it earlier, why I made that statement, as I was curious if I could get it at 50 years old. Answer is no. CDC set the upper age limit at 45 years old. The second link has a little more information as to why. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/hcp/recommendations.html https://www.verywellhea…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 03:45 PM
2

Invalidated the argument? How do you mean? Due to the vaccine? I'm 50 years old and am outside the limit now. The CDC has the upper limit at 45 years old. Edit, changed "they" to "CDC". Also, the CDC is hesitant to give the vaccine to people 26-45, because the assumption is they have it already. I'm sure that is a case by case consultation. Link are in my below message.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:52 PM
14

For cheating, it comes down to women primarily cheat with friends and coworkers (~75% vs ~60%), while men cheat via apps or bars (~38% vs 17%). The reasoning for men, she was hot, while women said their partner wasn't there for them and the other person was there for them.* In short, women are creating a much more sympathic narrative of why they cheated and gas lighting people on the fact that they broke their exclusivity promise and cheated. This isn't covering the fact that the amount of femal…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:48 PM
3

Thanks for allowing this to stay as I didn't know this also causes cancer in men. Last I knew, this was a female problem, and men were vilified for being carriers.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:20 PM
3

A mod replied, saying they were allowing it as a Public Health Notification. Last I knew, this was a female only problem, and men were vilified as being carriers. For me, and likely any others, it is very important to know this is also harmful to men.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:13 PM
13

Occupy Wallstreet was a bigger issue, and very little came out of that. The rich are still becoming richer, and the disparity keeps increasing. Democracy is still around, as politicians increased the minimum wage and did some smoke & mirrors. Once this hits the boiling point, politicians will do the same. Two things they are great at, lying and trying to save their job.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:59 PM
1

In addition, the short man has a receding hairline and wouldn't stand still. Did anyone select the guy on the far right? He was probably over 6'.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 03:51 PM
2

Even then, the other one ridiculed her by saying, "She still wouldn't, as she wouldn't want short children." Video stopped then, but wouldn't surprise me if blondie changed her mind.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 03:36 PM
-1

Unfortunately, indecent exposure charge puts a person on the sexual predators list. Being caught peeing gets you an indecent exposure charge. (Obviously, these people aren't sexual predators, but how easy it is to get on that list is a different problem.) So the schools are a huge factor, as it excludes those unfortunate men from being able to use that location. I don't give a shit about those other locations (firehouse & ambulance entrance) as they are meaningless. They don't prove the shelter …
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:59 PM
0

And how does your point prove that the shelter should be built at its current location? The locations of the firehouse and the ambulance entrance are irrelevant. It's why I didn't put it in. So why did you mention it?
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:55 PM
0

Do you mean the other school that is 500 feet away? Thought mentioning the one within 250 feet was enough for my point, it's a location problem. Stop being vague. If there is something meaningful to show that current location is valid, prove it.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:40 PM
-2

The issue is location. It's why OP excluded that information While we understand and empathize with the need for more homeless shelters in our city, we believe that this particular location is not suited and poses several potential risks. The proposed location is directly across the street from the Spruce Street School PS397, the local public elementary and middle school That means, a homeless man that was caught taking a piss, because he doesn't have a home, will get an indecent exposure charge…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:32 PM
-5

Direct from the petition. While we understand and empathize with the need for more homeless shelters in our city, we believe that this particular location is not suited and poses several potential risks. The proposed location is directly across the street from the Spruce Street School PS397, the local public elementary and middle school Simple indecent exposure charge makes you a dot on those pedophile maps and they can't be within 1000 feet of school. This would then exclude those people, who m…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:29 PM
-4

When are you going to share the link to the photo you cropped? That will tell the story. Edit, someone else linked it. This is a matter of location, they agree that there is a need for the shelter. While we understand and empathize with the need for more homeless shelters in our city, we believe that this particular location is not suited and poses several potential risks. The proposed location is directly across the street from the Spruce Street School PS397, the local public elementary and mid…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:59 PM
-6

OP isn't sharing the source plus he cropped the picture. It can be both man hatred and property loss.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:53 PM
-14

Chicago did something similar decades ago. The homeless trashed the units. They also need education and job opportunities. But as I said to the other guy. You are living in the wrong country and should move somewhere that fits your ideals.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:51 PM
-2

You are living in the wrong country and should move somewhere that fits your ideals. No-one is saying we shouldn't help the homeless men, though this is a temporary fix. Chicago did something similar and they trashed the housing units. They also need education & job opportunities. Edit: Your comment history shows you are socialist living in a capitalist country. The county isn't going to change and the only thing you can control is yourself, so as I said, you should move to a socialist country.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:49 PM
0

Vague reply. Can you share your source? Edit: of course you didn't share, because.... it's a matter of location that is the issue. While we understand and empathize with the need for more homeless shelters in our city, we believe that this particular location is not suited and poses several potential risks. The proposed location is directly across the street from the Spruce Street School PS397, the local public elementary and middle school
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:44 PM
-18

You obviously are young and do not own property. Edit: OP's comment history shows he is socialist living in a capitalist country. It's no surprise he edited this picture to show only man hatred. Edit2: they want a shelter, just disagree about the location. While we understand and empathize with the need for more homeless shelters in our city, we believe that this particular location is not suited and poses several potential risks. The proposed location is directly across the street from the Spru…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:43 PM
10

MeToo shows everything that is wrong with society. It was the worst kept secret that actresses could suck/fuck their way into an acting career. Then this actress aged out and couldn't suck/fuck her way into a job and blows the lid on the entire thing. This thing snowballs cross the world and lo and behold, the actress was a predator & rapist to at least 1 young boy. Nothing came out of that, though.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:41 PM
-32

This petition just happens to have been started by a person with a female name. There is a reason OP cropped that photo and didn't include the entire image. Edit: OP's comment history shows he is socialist. It's no surprise he edited this picture to show only man hatred. Edit 2: what OP edited out, they want a shelter, just not across the street from a school. While we understand and empathize with the need for more homeless shelters in our city, we believe that this particular location is not s…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:22 PM
2

Women come in two types: those that baby trap and those that don't. Both types will never admit how common baby trapping is. The way this woman wrote her post gives it away, as she assumes baby trapping is a common thing, and thus, victim blames the man.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:17 PM
1

Psychical impotence is experienced because the sensual and the affectionate are at different poles, they simply do not converge on one and the same object. The article is an intrepation of Freud's paper, but I'm assuming the above excerpt is close to what Freud means and the excerpt is gender neutral. Back to the matter at hand, it's my understanding that Madonna-Whore complex is a derivative of Psychical Impotence. In which case, it can be gender specific. This means that the Madonna-Whore comp…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:16 PM
1

Being as pedantic as you, you didn't properly cite anything. Author last name, first name. Year. “Title of Article.” Name of Publication, month date, year. URL if applicable Please cite and link what you are referencing. Otherwise, your defense is as meaningless as the random numbers that feminists use. A link would be ok. As long as it is a reputable source. Edit: It has been a long time since I took a psych class.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:41 PM
1

Troll, go to Literotica for your jerk-off needs. If you are serious, everyone is different. You define what your sexual needs and wants are. My requirements are irrelevant to what your requirements are. Dating, simply put, is finding a person that you are compatible with. They check your boxes and you check their boxes.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 01:00 PM
0

Freud called it psychic impotence. Impotence is a male erectile problem. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19493285/ Too lazy to look, but not as lazy as you spreading disinformation, but I'm sure he has a name for the female side
/r/MensRights11/01/24 11:24 AM
1

At 32, I became a director at a very large international company. To put it in other terms, I'd have been a CFO or VP at a smaller company. Needles to say, my income and position is only increased. I routinely have to talk in front of 100+ of my staff, though now days it is recorded, meant with vendors, etc. So talking isn't a problem. My body fat is very low, but as I am 50, I can't pretend that my abs are as hard as they were at 35. Edit: forgot to add, good looking women approach me. Though, …
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:38 AM
1

There’s a chance she doesn’t want to do it at all That means we are sexually incompatible. No big deal. I've learned not to compromise on certain activities and I don't want my partner to compromise either. Otherwise, she will build resentment.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:32 AM
0

Don't recall if there is a statute of limitations, but if she did financial fraud, you can go back to divorce court to get your rightful half.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:24 AM
2

As the secret account is to escape abuse, kind of defeats the purpose of it being secret. Ignoring the fact, it's huge breach of trust, then a man should have a secret account also. Die to limited resources available to men, 3 to 4 times as big. So if the woman has 5k, the man should have 15k-20k. No woman would agree to that though. (15k goes very fast with no assistance. )
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:13 AM
2

As n addendum, for certainly, there will be someone thinking it's her money, so it's not stealing. If she is siphoning money into a secret account, that means her partner needs to cover more of the bills, as she is misrepresenting her income.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:01 AM
78

Don't forget her secret bank account/cash stash in case she needs money to escape abuse. I was shocked when I first read about that years ago. Thought it was a troll post, but its real. The lack of trust to have a secret stash is inconceivable to me. Then why move in or marry the guy?!
/r/MensRights10/01/24 09:47 PM
1

You can't put the genie back in the bottle, so to speak. The world is constantly changing, and you need to accept that. I'm not saying you have to embrace it, but you need to accept it. Especially when half the voters are against your ideals, such as removing the Sexual Revolution & No Fault divorces. From an outside perspective, you want to turn back time to 1950 and have the Beaver Cleaver family. I'm sure it wasn't rainbows and unicorns back then, and cheating still occurred. There is a reaso…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 07:12 PM
3

Why are you here? I am in MenRights, which has very little to do with the topic you are referring towards. Why are you here?
/r/MensRights10/01/24 06:18 PM
2

That's a male problem. It's where the guy can only think in binary terms, she's either the Madonna (virgin) or a Whore. Drawing a blank on the name of woman condition you are getting at. It has to do with them acting as chameleons and changing their personality to fit their mates. For example, the other guy who replied talked about body count and these women will suddenly rewrite their history and become a virgin, or low body count if they can't write some exs out. Say she has a child or is divo…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:24 PM
3

Perhaps you only have 1 option when dating, I don't. I worked my ass off at the gym, university & the office to be successful. I am in the top 15% of overall men, easily top 10% for my age bracket. When I am single, I fuck around until I find a woman that passes my compatability tests. I prefer to be in a relationship versus serial dating. Sex is a huge compatability test, and where women lie ALOT. As an aside, which tells me you are young. A woman can have a low body count, but she has been inv…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:12 PM
14

It's a sex positive sub, consisting mainly of desperate housewives, single mothers, teen/college kids & simps/white knights. That being said, even though it's a biased sub, it's true. The most depraved things I've done were with FWBs. For our members, here are some very basic rules: Rule #1, if your woman isn't a freak in the sheets, she's not into you. Unless she's asexual, which is a different problem, she's experimented with ex(s). Rule #2, No is No, which is absolutely fine. But, statistical…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:00 PM
8

Reddit contains a ridiculous amount of trolls/toxic people. Couple podcasters I follow, deleted their reddit accounts as it was more trouble than it was worth (for social media marketing). I skimmed through that post and saw the same as you. OP cherry picked the worst answers and implied these were the top answers. There were some reasonable & top voted tips/advice in there.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 02:05 PM
24

As an American living abroad, I have to make sure I don't do anything even appearing to be illegal, in order to protect my visa. That is common knowledge. If she gets deported, that is on her.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:33 PM
1

Judges are elected officials also. That will influence their interpretation of the law, especially with how much leeway the USA judicial system has. If the letter of the law was black and white, the Supreme Court would not have cases so close in vote. (And that's not an elected position, once you are in it.)
/r/MensRights06/01/24 02:32 PM
14

Standard cheater thinking, which is mostly what open relationships are. I can fuck around, but you can't. *I'm sure there are some true open relationships, but this isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:51 AM
6

I blame the politicians & judges. Every community is going to have many different opinions, even within the same gender, race & culture. It's their job to harmonize it and lead in 1 direction. They are leading in opposite directions.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 10:50 AM
15

Few women do negging correctly, because they don't need to push-pull.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 03:14 PM
6

In Germany, we have "female only" and also "family only" parking spots, in addition to the standard handicap spots. I've seen plenty of people, without kids, park in the family only spots. Never paid attention to the "female only" spots. Wouldn't surprise me if people ignore those also. Honestly, that sums Germans up nicely. Ignore the Hollywood myth about being rule abiding and efficient. Truth is, rules apply to everyone but them. The VW defiant system is the Germany of the 2000s.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 02:12 PM
1

I want him to apologize for breaking my family up. Even you are doing it. Your MOM cheated. She made the promise to be faithful to your father. He was the affair partner. He made no promises to your dad. Cheater = liar. It's far more likely that she lied to him, they were on a break, open relationship, getting divorced, etc, versus him being an asshole home wrecker. Even if he found the truth out later & is an asshole. Asshole's don't apologize. Kind of goes with being an asshole.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 04:02 PM
20

Do most people actually cheer them on? Or is it an extremely vocal minority? I'm curious as I haven't lived in the USA in over 10 years.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 10:59 AM
1

Plenty of men would definitely attack us if we rejected them outright. This is bullshit. People don't hang out with people who are, or can be, physically violent due to a rejection. If that is the case, you need to find better friends. Additionally, I've been physically assaulted by a lot more women than men. Quirk of Western culture. Men are raised to not hit women, but women are raised that it's ok to slap a man when they are upset. I've been punched by women, who thought it would be funny. Do…
/r/MensRights04/01/24 12:53 AM
21

Reddit is full of keyword warriors, even subs like World News. The upvote/downvote system is meaningless & constantly broken by brigading. There must be some 3rd party program to influence the voting system, similar to the bots used to auto-moderate subs. Block those users and move on. Don't give them rent free living space in your brain.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 07:16 AM
2

The truth is that it’s not on women to read your mind/ make assumptions Incorrect. The answer is that the burden is on the one being chased to shut it down. "Nice guys & nice girls" have no to little dating experience and need to be told point blank that it's a platonic friendship. Now, if they want to continue and foolishly hope there is a chance, that's the "Nice guy/girl" problem. Being an oddity here, by being in the top 10%, I've had to shut "Nice girls" down. It's sucks, but it's not fair …
/r/MensRights01/01/24 10:07 PM
1

Even their "about me" is troll-like
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:14 PM
52

"Nice guys" are kind guys that women don't want to date/fuck, but rarely tell those guy that nothing will ever happen. Typically, they are doormats. Eventually, those guys explode for wasting their resources (time & money being the top 2). Women know exactly why a guy is being nice towards her. Read all the time, treat every guy like a loaded gun/rapist, or a variant of that. In addition, women have been hit on since they were teenagers. They know exactly what's going on but choose not to reject…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:59 PM
13

I'd say you nailed it between open communication & sexual compatability.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 08:59 AM
3

Well, being pedantic as you are. I'd have to call 911 when visiting family & friends, here the emergency number is different. OP specifically stated a woman. I wouldn't help a man in a dangerous situation either. Reasoning is still the same. It comes down to risk management. This is a dangerous situation. I have children that depend upon me.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:44 PM
4

a woman's in a dangerous situation Love how you try to defend your irrational logic by changing the conditions. It's a DANGEROUS situation, which you are ignoring to fit your narrative.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:39 PM
5

I will reply to you directly. This scenario repeats consistently. Man or woman beats woman. Another man defends the woman being assaulted. Cops come and woman defends her abuser. White knight is arrested and charged with assault on the abuser's partner. That isn't getting into what is considered dangerous. I'm not about to get shot or stabbed. As I said, I have children that depend upon me. My family comes first. As to you, one of my exs carried mace and then pepper spray. Wouldn't surprise me i…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:31 PM
18

If for you body count matters fine. For me it doesnt tho: ergo it doesnt always matter You are missing the bigger picture. People, men & women, are allowed to have their own personal deal breakers. That is what is supported, and you are ignoring. You don't have body count as deal breaker, which is fine. I'm betting you do have deal breakers. For example, finding out the person you are dating has $200k of student loans, not paying them off and earns $40k per year. (Which means you will be paying …
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:18 PM
24

From a woman that replied here: In my opinion withholding help JUST based on gender is misguided... Not all women are bad or hateful or against men. I can't physically help much in some situations if a man were in need, but I would call 911 or yell or get someone else. So, her help will result in you being dead/hospitalized, as its a dangerous situation. Yet, she EXPECTS others to directly help her if she's in that situation. Sorry, but not sorry. I have kids that depend upon me.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:37 PM
4

Excellent links. Will read the rest later, but it brings up the point that the promiscuous women avoid talking about. Women have the same problem dating guys with high body counts. Love the link about the woman having been with ~150 women and seeing guys' reactions. I'm certain she wouldn't date a guy that had been with 150 guys.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:13 PM
11

I stand behind your original statement. Never ever date BPD. It's called risk management.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:01 PM
8

When that other poster later writes: Stone us, burn us, rape us, do your worst. You know exactly what type of MRA supporter she is, and it is no surprise what subs she posts in. Ignore & block. She isn't worth the stress.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 12:38 PM
2

They certainly are using it in a broad sense. I even read the following and didn't connect the dots. the original survey question of “How many people have ever kissed you in a sexual way? Remember, we are only asking about things that you didn’t want to happen” was changed to “How many times has a woman kissed you in a sexual way? Remember, I am only asking about things that you didn’t want to happen”
/r/MensRights26/12/23 10:03 PM
8

Every guy I know has said they were groped at least once by a woman. 1) The study was specific to partners. Some of these men likely were groped at parties & bars by random women. 2) Some men won't consider non-consentential groping as sexual victimization. I'm happy seeing 71%, given how men aren't as educated on what truely is sexual assault/victimization. It goes hand in hand with women comparing men to guns. Treat every gun as its loaded. Well, at 71% victimization, treat every woman as a lo…
/r/MensRights26/12/23 08:27 AM
9

Power of the internet. Men are being more open, and the world is slowly realizing that females sexually assaulting men isn't a one-off occurrence but rather happens a lot. Believe this is a generational thing also. Being 50, I wouldn't have talked about this in my 20/30s, but would nowadays. My father would take info to the grave. This is one of the few studies, 2010+, I've seen post online dating, 2008. Most sexual studies seem to be early 2000s and stop data collection by 2008.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 08:13 AM
2

I looked into this a year or two ago. Feminists quote x% as false allegations of TOTAL rape cases, which includes all the cases that never make it to trial. As I recall, false allegations were well over 33% when you read the source paper. I found it humorous watching the upvotes and suddenly significant downvotes when my comment got brigaded, even though I linked and quoted the source material and charts.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 04:10 PM
1

That's because they have reserved premium parking spots. /s
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:51 AM
14

No more unwed fathers, no more babies for the adoption industry, This will still happen. 1) Some won't take the risk of side effects. 2) Some won't be able to afford it. 3) A few unbalanced guys will say they are using it, but aren't, as they want to sow the fields and spread their progeny.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:14 AM
5

Women who call men incels, involuntarily celibate, can't understand that men can be asexual, or voluntarily celibate. These women like to shame and belittle men, so it is no surprise they added entitle/entitlement to their shaming vocabulary. FYI, these are the same women in their 30s & 40s, who will shame men to date in their own age bracket. Don't fall for that trap. They are bitter after being run through by the entire European football league. The sex isn't the problem, it's that they felt e…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 07:51 AM
2

You obviously did NOT read the article. Comingling is common knowledge and something most people avoid by keeping their finances separate. Look at the debt section. If the relationship is deemed to be separate, it operates as expected. His debt is his, her debt is hers and their debt has to be split. If the relationship is deemed to be marriage-like, it's all their debt to be split. Cursory Google search shows the same as my experience in Finance, women have more debt than men. (Of course, then …
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:36 AM
2

Yes and no. Technically, yes. The US judicial system is flexible and dependent upon the judge. My ex & I had everything settled via our attorneys, and she earned more, as a base salary. We agreed to no alimony/maintenance payments. The judge asked her if she was certain that she didn't want any maintenance payments.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:16 AM
123

Pretty hard to draft them when they left the country. My single friends say they are all on OLD here in Germany. Ya, their boyfriends/husbands are fighting on the Frontline, and they are partying and hooking up like a Rockstar... well, groupie.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 10:48 PM
7

At a minimum, it should say "sexually assaulted".
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:51 PM
2

Hard question to answer for the USA. I'm an American who moved to Germany, where it is legal. The women I hooked up here were much more open sexually. Activities that were a hard No with American women, occasionally occurred on the first hookup and definitely by the 3rd. Problem is, how much of that openness is driven by sex workers or culture (nude saunas) or competition against Eastern Europeans/Asians doing anything for a maroon/blue passport or being the semi-exotic foreigner? Edit: Will say…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:25 AM
5

polygamy will be mainstream Polygamy will be out in the open. I speculate that at least 1/2 of the women I hooked up with on OLD were in committed relationships, based upon the times we hooked up, when they texted and no overnights. You put the pieces together or they accidentally say/show something.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:52 PM
10

Mother of my kids did both emotional and physical abuse. 10 years later, my shoulder joint still aches from where she punched me while wearing this huge ring. The emotional abuse was worse.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 06:26 PM
2

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 06:15 PM
33

In 20 years: Baby boomer generation (born in 1946-1964) will be mostly deceased. This leads to higher unemployment in health care service jobs, mainly female, that focus on that generation. (Will be interesting to see what the government does, offers retraining classes?) Men will continue to wake up to the financial pitfalls of marriage and baby traps. Wouldn't surprise me if the government will treat unmarried couples living together, as married, though single for taxes. This leads to the contr…
/r/MensRights18/12/23 12:54 PM
6

Perhaps in 1950, not these days. Men pay child support, and those mothers live off the government*. The children are placed in front of a TV, or given a phone/tablet, and ignored. *The government is mostly supported by men and childless women. (Yes, there are some mothers contributing, but its an insignificant amount between tax deductions and child support being tax free.)
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:42 AM
0

Not German, but "-chen" means small or little and gets assigned "das". It's die Mädel that becomes das Mädchen.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:52 PM
9

As if German wasn't hard enough for English speakers to learn. Lehren = to teach Lehrer = male teacher Lehrerin = female teacher Der = the (masculine) Das = the (neutral) Die = the (femine/plural) Die Lehrer makes no sense.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 02:35 PM
0

It's always the man's fault when a relationship fails, married or not. Being old af, top reasons are due to cheating or abuse. The irony, every single woman that told me she was cheated on, cheated on their man in revenge, yet never considered themselves a cheater. As a disclaimer: I'm sure there are women out there that this has happened to, but they aren't jumping back into the dating scene the next day, weekor month. It's going to take them a while to recover.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 10:14 PM
17

One of the main reasons, as I recall, it's so both the husband and wife can retire at the same time, as most husbands are older than their wife. Not saying it's right, but welcome to a world run by gray-haired old politicians.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 01:10 PM
6

Can't negotiate sexual attractiveness. Have a great friend, power lifter with a barrel chest, big legs and a big gut to match. One night, failed pulling a hot petite ~27 year old. She went home with him. Just becuase you think they aren't attracted to you, doesn't mean they aren't attracted to you. (In full disclosure, my buddy has a bigger than life personality and great charisma.)
/r/MensRights09/12/23 08:52 AM
10

Take my upvote, but as a 50 year old, things weren't super in the past either. OLD, first by website and then apps, changed the dating scene. It became a 24-hour bar scene, where the top 20% men could take home all of the women instead of 1 or 2 apiece. (That's the big difference from the sex side.) As to dating; I got divorced at 35 with an awesome job, top 10% income for my area, didnt flash my money. Hit the gym and watched what I ate, so I was easily top 15% in looks. Needless to say, I was …
/r/MensRights09/12/23 08:26 AM
90

She's not wife material, sorry bro. Take her off that pedestal.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 08:07 AM
2

Women reject tons of men and very few men are chosen Chosen = relationship material. Many women have much lower standards (i.e., is he hot or not) for just having sex.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:50 AM
6

Huh, never thought about this. 50 years old and still learning. Guess I filtered these types out by never elevating them to girlfriends from fwb status. Kind of goes hand-in-hand with that toxic mentality; man's money is our money, while woman's money is her money.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:45 AM
5

I don't know how many are laughing. People are apathetic towards it, which is perhaps worse. People shrug their shoulders that men sign up for high stress jobs and die of a heart attack. No different than the Hollywood Starlet that gave oral sex for her chance at stardom. (Of course, that became a problem only when oral sex, or whatever kink she had to do, wasn't even enough to get past casting. )
/r/MensRights08/12/23 04:24 PM
3

He has to get out of the house. She sounds like the type to send the kids to knock on the man cave's door.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 07:49 PM
6

I will give you a slightly different perspective as an American. Work/life balance in the USA sucks. Typically, vacation is 2-3 weeks, perhaps 1 more week with 10 years. Germany is 6 weeks right out of university. (Took a pay cut, but well worth it.) You are getting run ragged by work & your wife. Doubt, you will change your work lifestyle, but you might want to take a pause and see if there is something you can do to reduce that stress. They won't care if you burn out, other than the inconvenie…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 05:31 PM
1

For a bit of clarification. It was getting wordy & didn't want to write a novel. Normally, people aren't naturally good in both areas (introverted & extroverted). There are some people that are gifted in both, while most have/had to work at it. (For those that can navigate both areas.) In my case, coming up through Finance into Management, I had to force myself, at first, to talk to other teams and eventually grew to enjoy it.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 04:32 PM
6

Recently read that by the time a wife threatens divorce, she has been thinking about it for a year and made plans. Even though OP has only been married for a year, his wife has given it some thought and it's game over. He needs to work on his exit plan. Also, glancing at OP's post history, he needs to refocus his priorities. Poker/gambling is something to do with disposable cash & time, which he doesn't have.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 01:33 PM
3

As to working on yourself. One of the first things I learned from my manager and have taught many employees afterwards: Don't bring me problems, bring me solutions. This is to work on critical thinking and root causal analysis. It works in these types of situations. End of the day, you have to put in the work by reflecting on what worked and what didn't work. Change what you can control and stop worrying about what you can't control. There is too much information that only you know, for us to gi…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:43 PM
4

I will reply in two messages, as they are separate & distict messages. Gender specific dating strategies tend to cause the subreddit to be closed in Reddit, as they attract people who are stuck in the Anger phase, (Misandrists & misogynists, dependant upon the sub.), and those posts/replies cause the subs to be closed. Also, they give very jaded advice. This isn't fair for the people with actual rights problems. Such as: *accidentally getting a hookup/girlfriend pregnant *divorce *false accusati…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:22 PM
25

Fail to see why this is in Men's Rights and not in a dating sub. Your post was way too long, I skimmed it after this part. We had some arguments due to being basically opposite of characters and views of which gender is more dangerous It's a fallacy that opposites attract in relationships is a good thing. As to rest, here is my quick answer. When someone asks for an open relationship, your relationship is over. They have already been emotionally cheating and want your permission to physically ch…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 06:11 AM
0

OP has an odd post history. Hard to tell if it's the same guy or someone posting shower thoughts. Edit: OP's posts and comments come across as playing the Victim. He gathers information together to make a court case against his sister. Dad protect his child, so thus dad is a Simp. He borrows money from dad and then states he will act maliciously towards dad. Dad reacts like anyone and wants their money, as their child is acting like a baby. Dad is a Simp. It goes on and on. Blames mom for puttin…
/r/MensRights04/12/23 05:45 PM
1

Was it disproven? At this point, it's her word vs. his word. That's the entire point of the defamation case, which the article says may take years to resolve.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 12:04 PM
2

My mother was a SAHM and controlled the finances. She went back to Uni & got her degree at 40. By 50, she was earning more than my father. It really depends upon the husband & wife.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:43 AM
4

Structure is 1 big paragraph. 3000$ is an odd way for an American to write it. Though, I see it written that way in Europe. Some of the word choices are also odd. Not wrong, but doesn't feel native. Perhaps I've been gone from the USA too long. In its entirety, it feels like how I would write in German. Fluent, but not native. Edit: look at his post history. He lives in Germany, but writes terrible in German, so not a German. 8 days ago, he had a wife. A couple months ago, he had a girlfriend. H…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:08 PM
6

Are you equal to LeBron James?
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:19 PM
1

The other guy was pretending OPs friend is a Hollywood star worth 10s of millions. That's a different caliber of attorney Mrs Mail Order Bride is retaining. Plus, California has so much precedence, that her attorney could easily find a loophole. The reality is OPs friend probably has a house with a mortgage, and that's all. Enough to make him semi attractive to a 30-something year old. Otherwise, gold diggers would have been dating him. If all he had was the house and he paid the mortgage from a…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:05 PM
15

I used OP's word, and according to dictionary.com, blackmail is the correct word. Blackmail is often considered to be a type of extortion rather than a synonym for the word extortion. Extortion is typically used as the more general term, while blackmail is more specific. Extortion is getting something, while blackmail is getting payment. She asked for $3000, blackmail. If she wanted OP to perform the laser eye surgery, extortion.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:47 PM
19

Many times, it what people don't say, which tells their story. (Lieing by omission, but technically they didn't lie.) Her not being on a date doesn't mean she wasn't hooking up during missionary work, but she sounds like an angel in her version. Dating apps, unfortunately, are full of sketchy people, men & women. I'm sure she was recording your conversation, or someone else was listening in. At least she didn't lie and admitted she gave consent. My money is on her having a boyfriend. Regardless,…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:39 PM
5

I haven't heard of alimony being awarded in my former state in decades, without special circumstances. Going to be state dependent. Long time ago, I recall a lady bragging about how she got the house in the settlement. 1-2 years later, she was bitching about how he ex fucked her over with sticking her with the house and it being foreclosed on.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 10:21 AM
110

Who knows. Story sounds fishy and made up. In case it's real, perhaps this lady has a rap sheet of being a conwoman, and it will help him. Her rap sheet would never come to light in a sexual assault case.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 09:24 AM
496

Go to the Polica and file a report of her blackmailing you. It's not rocket science. They won't be able to prove anything, as I am sure it was done verbally, but then you will have a police report to fight her police report.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 09:20 AM
1

Where did you read that OPs friend is a Hollywood star? That's a completely different story than the average Joe with maybe a couple hundred grand. Stick to what OP wrote, and don't change the story to fit your narrative. Had enough of that shit with my ex.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 07:17 AM
6

Couple reasons off the top of my head: Children. To minimize the disruption to their lives. The wife gets the house because the husband has a much bigger retirement (ie, 401k, govt pension, etc) account. (Worked in payroll during Uni & most men made max retirement contributions, while I seldom saw a woman under 30 making any sort of retirement contribution.) The husband knows he can't afford it alone, while the wife doesn't want to give up the big house.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 07:08 AM
1

Okay, keyboard warrior. Come back with more life experiences, and you will realize I am right. Might be when you turn 30, might be when you hit puberty or might be when you finally get dumped for the first time at 40. It will occur to you eventually, but you are obviously very young, naive or both
/r/MensRights30/11/23 07:40 PM
3

Are you confused? Those are prenups of the '80s & '90s. Prenups these days need 2 attorneys, one for each party, to make sure one party isn't taking advantage of the other. If you can't afford the 2 attorneys and the back and forth, then you don't have enough assets for a prenup. Edit: Spicy is changing OPs story to fit their fantasy narrative. Somehow, OPs friend is now a Hollywood star while still being a virgin and has never dated.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 07:29 PM
45

The Good, Bad & Ugly The Good, depending upon Australian law. This could set a precedence allowing falsely accused male rapists to hide their names. Don't know if a rapist's name is released when successfully convicted. The Bad. This is that POS serial rapist with 80+ charges of rape and at least 1 charge of torture. Somehow the magistrate agrees to prevent publication of her name in the press?! The Ugly. She's out on bail. The Uglier. She made video tapes, so wouldn't surprise me if she plea de…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:58 PM
60

They want to have their cake and eat it too. Meaning, they get to have fun in their 20s and find Mr. Provider in their 30s. He can't say no. That destroys their dream. The perception is that he must have money, as dating is expensive. Whether he saved/invested his money is a different story. Irionically, he would be better off finding a mail-order bride from Asia. She might divorce him after 7-10 years, when she has her citizenship, but she will sign a prenup, be younger & prettier than anything…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:24 AM
16

one is hers from a previous marriage That's mistakes #1 & #2. I'm sure there are awesome divorced mothers out there who would make great wives. The problem is that you can't differentiate them from the many bad ones out there. The risk is too great. In addition, the wording will be poor here, but hopefully, the idea comes across correctly. She knows that she isn't going to hell or that society will shame her as a divorced single mother, so she has less motivation in fighting for her second+ marr…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 06:43 AM
57

Go to any festival in Germany and you will see plenty of: Old German men with young Asians. Old German women with young Africans. Actions over words.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 06:02 AM
1

Use the thing inbetween your ears and think about the studies and you will also realize how foolish the article is and searching for their cite is. In case you don't know. MRIs are used for soft tissue, which don't show up on x-rays. The studies are for neuroscience, which deals with the brain and not gender specific. These studies weren't for gynecology, where you would have 0.0% for men. It wouldn't surprise me if 0.5% were only men specific also. The studies likely differentiate within by gen…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 05:46 AM
1

You missed my point about the first half of your clickbait title. Your title states that only 0.5% of the neuro studies include women. The article says that only 0.5% of the neuro studies were specific to women, aka specific to women's health. Do you see the difference?
/r/MensRights30/11/23 05:34 AM
12

Similar principles, Never underestimate the power of walking away. Can't stress this one more. There are plenty of women out there, and there is nothing wrong with walking away. Don't get stuck in the Sunk Cost Fallacy. As an aside, women use this all the time to lock a man down in a relationship. You're disposable. V cost money. D is free. Be comfortable with the idea. This is debatable. Really depends upon the guy and perhaps where you live. When I lived in the US, I agree with your statement.…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:35 PM
5

More than 50,000 human-brain-imaging articles... less than 0.5% consider health factors specific to women. Did you read the article? Your title is incorrect from the quote within the article. I am not a neuroscientist, but I would imagine the majority of the studies impact both men and women. They are looking at MRIs, not genitalia. Likely, within the studies, they differentiate between genders.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:59 AM
20

how the women put in the baseline amount of effort and then complained about the men getting the higher paid Gender pay gap explanation. (Top 1 of 2*.) 30+ years of working, 25+ in management and this has been my observation in a nut shell. I called it, lacking ambition and striving for excellence. The problem is that this isn't a data point that can be obtained, or it's purposely ignored/excluded, when compiling those gender pay studies. (* The second main reason is due to having children and p…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:44 AM
2

Healthcare is STEM, part of Sciences. While I agree with your comment, didn't OP specify no STEM, nor Trades?
/r/MensRights28/11/23 08:15 PM
1

Couchsurfing Very true. Met a gorgeous classmate of my partner's. She traveled Europe for free by Cousurfing. She would sleep with the guys if they were cute and rarely paid for meals or sightseeing. Even if she was a rare unicorn, most of the guys will hope their female guest is that unicorn.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:09 PM
3

The competition is tough, because those are the high paying jobs. Or rather, have the potential to be high paying. What type of jobs are you thinking of? In addition, how are those guys going to support themselves? Can't get pregnant and get child support to subsidize your lifestyle. Such as upgrading from a Studio to a 2 bedroom apartment.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:01 PM
11

These unequal taxes will go on to subsidise women As more and more women* become aware of it, it will become worse and worse. *Women will be split into 2 major groups, those that contribute with aspirations of management and those that live off the system. My German ex got her 1st real job at 40 years old. She worked at 17/18 in fast food to get herself into the system, got knocked up at 18/19 and hadn't worked since. (I was the idiot white knight that knocked her up at 25.) She "earned" ~€55k b…
/r/MensRights28/11/23 11:58 AM
-5

So does the blue-collar man that loses a limb due to a work related injury, or white-collar man that gets a heart attack or stroke due to stress. All jobs have risk. Some are different than others.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:07 PM
10

While that might be true, she can still go through the process and he's fucked if he goes back to the USA. As I recall, many countries that the US has/had a military presence in, had those treaties. No surprise as many of our military men are young. As the saying goes, "Young, dumb & full of cum." The treaties are mainly setup to go the other way, for those military guys to pay child support to foreign women.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:57 PM
-22

This is subjective from person to person. The drafted man who became a POW and/or was tortured, certainly I feel bad for them. The person who voluntarily enlisted. It's part of the risk of that job. That's on them for not making an informed decision prior to enlisting.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:51 PM
38

“I love a man in uniform!” Those women will also love a man in a tailored suit. The difference is that its an accepted selection criteria, as those military men they are drooling over are in great shape. Unlikely, they are drooling over the chubby IT guy in a uniform. I'm sure there is a little fetishing going on, but for the majority, it's an excuse to drool over the 6 pack without blatantly saying that.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:42 PM
46

This is the way. It's amazing how fast she contacts the other possible father(s), and you never hear from her again.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 08:49 AM
3

A long time ago, I joined the mgtow sub and unsubcribed within the week. The idea is fine. Work on yourself, both physically and mentally. Focus on what you can change and ignore what you can't. The reality is that it was full of memes and posts ridiculing women, which isn't what mgtow is about. Some of those posts were very nasty. Irionically, some of those posts could have been written by women and who also flagged them to close the sub down. Though I imagine the majority were written by men g…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:30 PM
7

Homophobia falls into both categories. Listen to closet homophobic women complain when they can't play the victim/minority card against a member of the alphabet soup. I personally find it much worse than homophobic men. As the men are normally openly homophobic, while the women pretend they are not and stab their "friends" in the back.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:50 PM
2

That specific policy, for that specific bank, could be sexist and discrimatory, but that doesn't apply to all banks, and as pointed out previously, it didn't impact all women, so it's not oppression. Edit, in addition, it's not like they can't use cash. I see people all the time using cash at grocery stores. Not having a bank account isn't oppressive by itself.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 05:24 PM
1

This is a great example of genetics vs environment. In this case, cross generational gender discrimination, it matters who raised the children. So, biological parents are irrelevant in an adopted family.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 05:08 PM
2

Even in US in second half of XX century women had limitations regarding opening bank account. Yet, there were female investors, bankers, business owners, etc. They certainly had bank accounts. Some women being limited from opening a bank account wouldn't classify as the entire gender being oppressed.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 05:01 PM
1

Being pedantic, but valid as you bolded Everyone. Gender-based oppression can occur across generations, but the following would be the outliers. You are referring to every child having a male and female bio-parent, but with adoption, they can be raised by same sex parents. I know of 2 different couples that adopted, and their children are also part of the alphabet soup. No idea if those children will adopt, but if they do, it will become generational.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:52 PM
3

gender pay gap. The only valid point about this, is due to pregnancy & maternity leave. They potentially miss out on opportunities & career advancement if they decide to have children. Working in the Finace world, I've worked for some amazing women, and there is a significant difference between them and the female clerks. Even myself and my female peer who was hired at the same time. They lack that fire to climb the ranks. The drive for excellence. That doesn't make it into statistics, though.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:41 PM
4

Women have been ALWAYS the protected group. Boat sinking, women & children first.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:28 PM
6

Ignore them. S/he is a troll and should be banned. Take a step back and read their 1 sentence replies. Its to incite you.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:58 PM
-1

For the UN, it's an ok goal. Being an American that's worked around the world, I've seen plenty of Xenophobia & sexism. Latest example was in Germany. One of my managers had an opening and I was included in the final round of interviews. A woman knocked it out of the ball park, but my manager wanted to hire someone else. He couldn't, or wouldn't, explain why. My final remark was, it better not be because the other candidate is a man nor because he's German. Point being, if that's happening in Ge…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:56 PM
4

I don't believe women changed. It's that they can't hide it anymore, so they don't bother to hide their requirements. 50 years ago, if a woman cheated on her boyfriend/husband with a more successful man, society would nod their head. They would hate the cheating, but understand the reasoning. (Same with a guy cheating with a younger and prettier woman.) I've always compared OLD as a 24/7 bar with the major difference that Chad can take all of the women home and they are happy to wait for their t…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:18 AM
4

In fairness, it's a problem here in Germany. I've seen teenagers, both men and women, get fatter and fatter. It's like the USA 20 years ago. Literally, cities are finally upgrading to fiber optics. Women now are either fit/skinny or fat. Not many inbetween. That being said, I believe there is a higher percentage of women in Germany falling into the fit/skinny range versus the USA, but the over half are foreigners.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:28 AM
13

I haven't been back to the US in over a decade, but could it be there aren't many women 7s and 8s? When I left, the women 7s were disappearing because those women were getting bigger and bigger and dropping to 6s or lower. This goes hand in hand with that other post, where have all the good men gone. They haven't gone anywhere, but the average US woman has become obese and chasing social validation.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:17 AM
2

Rule #1. People don't change. Rule #2. Marriage isn't a magic pill that makes everything wonderful. She agreed to pay for the wedding under the stipulation that we live in this house forever and pay the mortgage / property taxes / bills. This is the stupidest agreement I've ever read. Do you realize how much that will cost? I doubt it. Plus, the tax nightmare if it exceeds what can be gifted. Also, your MIL would have the equity. Hell no. As said above, rules #1 & 2. You will still need to provi…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:09 PM
2

As with everything, you need to look at the root cause. You stopped at the first level of the dive. Short answer, lack of clear and open communication. What caused the end of the marriage? Alienation due to porn addiction is your conclusion, but you didn't go further. What led to that porn addiction? Certainly, it wasn't there before they were married, which means porn addiction is a result of a bigger problem. Lack of sex drove him, or her, to porn. One, or both, lost sexual attraction for the …
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:02 AM
1

Years ago, I read a case: While they were legally separated, the wife got pregnant by her boyfriend. The wife & boyfriend told the judge that the unborn child was the boyfriend's. The judge made the husband pay child support. Took 3 or 4 years to clear it up, even with paternity tests showing the boyfriend was the biological father and the husband was not. The family court system is fucked up.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:31 PM
2

What the other redditor means, are the current outliers. Jane has a ONS with Chad, but can't find him for months or years. If the father can only sever the financial responsibility within the abortion time period, she's just going to wait to tell him until it's too late to abort. "For fear of her and her child's safety reasons."
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:18 PM
7

Men date younger women explains a lot of it. Their false reality explains some more of it. When I got divorced at 35, I was hooking up with women in their mid 20s. 2 or 3 of them would have said we were in a relationship, while I would have said we weren't. I was very open that it was only sexual, while I focused on myself. (Granted, physically I was top 15-20%, but professionally, top 5% for single bachelors in the area.)
/r/MensRights06/11/23 06:57 PM
4

Paid overtime is dependent upon location. In the US, typically, it's unpaid for salaried positions. (It's factored into your annual salary, which is bullshit.) In Europe, typically, it's paid in €€ or comp time. Most jobs have busy times of the month, where 40 hours doesn't cut it. For example, Sales, Logistics & Credit Control are the last week of the quarter and for some companies, last week of the month. Accounting is the first week of the month. The only thing she knows for certain, is that …
/r/MensRights06/11/23 06:28 PM
13

You do realize that Romance novels are porn, right? Edit: As their comment is deleted. They were trying to shame men, by saying "porn addled cocks" and yet don't understand that women consume a significant amount of porn. On average, it wouldn't surprise me if women consume more porn than men.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 03:22 PM
30

Mansplaining. 🙄
/r/MensRights06/11/23 09:58 AM
29

Having had an abusive ex-girlfriend, they use sex to make everything better. In my case, she would drop to her knees and take care of me for 20-30 minutes. It took me a long time to realize what she was doing. Should mention, she learned this trick before me, so I wasn't the first guy she abused. She perfected that routine on that guy/those guys before me.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:51 PM
1

Big pharma is a business. By extending people's life spans, people take medication for longer. Big profit from extending that medication revenue stream. By curing an autoimmune disease, the patient doesn't require autoimmune medication any longer. Complete loss of a revenue stream. Plus, the pharma might still have R&D costs from developing the autoimmune medication. You can tell that other sub is replying based upon feelings versus using their rational mind. Took 2 seconds to realize the answer…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 02:58 PM
23

That's why the hospital should do paternity tests. It's so the child has their proper medical history. Establishing paternity is necessary for that. This practice could and would save lives.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 12:58 AM
7

I looked into this a couple of years ago, and a study averaged at 1 to 8, or 12.5%. Every study can have selection bias. For example, based upon age. Younger people, 18-22, have fewer children than an older couple, so there is a lower likelihood of paternity fraud. Google it and I'm sure you will find the study. As I recall, the data was collected in the late 2000s, so pre-dating app days. (Probably on purpose, as it takes a long time to collate that data and publish.) Point being, if the 12.5% …
/r/MensRights05/11/23 12:46 AM
1

There is a way around it. As I recall, it's testing for genetic defects and if there are abnormalities, then you can get a court order for a paternity test.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 12:26 AM
4

Promiscuity impacts pair bonding, not nerve endings. Perhaps you misremembered or mistranslated something. The nerve damage would be caused by excessive use of a vibrator acting like the death grip on men. Blame porn. Women consume more porn than men. Romance novels is a cute name hiding what they really are, soft or hard-core porn novels. Back to promiscuity. It's not that it makes them harder to bond, but that it's easier to walk away. So instead of being together for the good and bad times, i…
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:44 PM
61

It's a distraction technique. 1) It's equally possible that she has a wide and/or deep vagina. 2) That his dick is too big for her, which makes for bad sex. 3) She knew what she agreed upon, his dick didn't magically change size and shape. If the sex was sub par at the start, she should have been honest and they went their own ways searching for someone else.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:22 PM
6

Mandatory DNA testing when a baby is born would resolve some of that hatred. Cheating fractures families, but very few wives will admit to having an affair baby, while the husband has to admit to having an affair baby. This means that the majority of that hatred is directed towards men.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:25 AM
4

Why are we wasting our time with this shit? Otherwise this will turn into a dating sub.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:02 PM
1

Women are ok with their man earning more and having more stress rather than sharing that workload. I began working at the same time & same job as a female coworker. She earned more than me, as she had a masters degree. She was smarter than me, but book smart and couldn't apply it to her job. By the time I quit, 10 years later, I reported to the CFO and she wasn't even a manager. (This is to show the progression she could have taken, but here is why it didn't.) She always bragged how her husband …
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:43 PM
0

Did you read it though? It's an odd case. He proposed to her and gave her a 7.5 karat diamond ring. So they were engaged to be married. He offered her marriage contracts multiple times, which she turned down for an unspecified reason. Called her by his last name. Together for 14 years. Wouldn't surprise me if the alimony payments were based upon one of the marriage contracts.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:16 PM
2

Being a single father who raised his twins, I can agree to count the time when you are caring for them, including their nap time, as you are still cleaning or finally taking a break. Those first 2 years were hell. But, when they go to daycare, preschool, etc, it's a different story as the children are outside of your care. I'd still count getting groceries, cleaning, and laundry, but I'd exclude the time stopping to have coffee with the other parents or going to the gym. (Those are examples of j…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:03 PM
3

You can tell Chad, or many Chad's, dumped her and she wants revenge. Doesn't care about the innocent people she harms along her way to. justice".
/r/MensRights02/11/23 09:11 PM
1

I believe all courts need better checks and balances, as judges judge judges, which is ridiculous. I doubt this will do much. Judges have too much latitude in their judgements due to the nature of the US court system. As long as they fall within that huge range, they will be fine. As an aside, this doesn't mention Gender studies. Seems to be focused on disabilities.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 03:19 PM
9

The issue is that the Guardian published 8 articles without due diligence of checking and verifying its sources, the 20 women. If people actually did their job, this would be a non-issue.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 11:56 AM
21

Straight from the Friends TV show. Ross is screwing one of his University students and eventually has a relationship with her. He gets shit upon. Rachel was screwing a 19 year old and bo-one had a problem, except he was stealing from her. Monica, unknowingly, screwed an underage kid and no-one commented about her being a pedophile after it came to light. (Yes,technically, it's a different word, but what society seems to use these days.) Heck, forgot about this, but there was a comment about Ross…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 10:39 AM
2

Nothing against using escorts if you make bank Thing is, he didn't get an escort, he got some random thot that put up a little ASD in front of her friend. 6am flight out and clubbing at 3am. They are traveling on a budget. Setting up and paying for an uber to get her to the airport would have been enough. As you said, he just needs to know when to walk away. Likely, ego got in the way.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/22 09:19 PM
4

Spending money on women is not beneath me. This gets into the time value of money. Then approach women for the fun of it and to keep your skills fresh. As the night comes to a close, you need to learn when to cut bait. As you are in Vegas, you have different options than other guys here. For what you spent on that Latina, you could have got a Latina hooker that was prettier, fucked better and open to do kinkier stuff. Possibly for cheaper. I know this is a controversial subject here, but for how…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/22 08:30 PM
3

It's in the name. Beta Bucks (Buys) Alpha Fucks It's a misperception that the Beta isn't getting laid. Some get laid, because of the money they spend. Take it as a minor constructive criticism. She put up some ASD, as her friend was there and knew it would be a quickie.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/22 08:16 PM
1

the baby sitter won't stay past midnight The real reason she's looking for a boyfriend/husband.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/04/22 08:21 PM
1

You are correct, missed that's she said kids. Though if you are going to correct me, it's sentence, not sentnece. Correct sentnece.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/22 09:46 AM
1

She's obviously not following a traditional gender role. She's either divorced or has a bastard out of wedlock.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/22 01:16 PM
–

That sub is extremely misandrisitic. Full of men haters. The irionic part, many of the outspoken ones are lesbians or partake in lesbian forums, which is hypocritical.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/22 03:22 PM
63

fuckboys This word always bothers me. Not because of who and what fuckboys/fuckboi represents, but because other subreddits allow people to use the word in a derogatory way but you can't say hoe/slut. The way they are using it, it means the same thing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/22 04:49 AM
11

I call it the need to succeed. Men don't like to fail, which is where your stubbornness comes in. We stay in bad relationships way longer than we should. I do agree that some men will need multiple women to learn and some never will, as they refuse to wake up. I don't want to make this political, but I'd say governments are pk with this. Rules don't apply to men in power and we know what women are willing to do for men in power. Then we have societal influence. Women and children first plus men …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/22 06:33 AM
16

Luckily, it only takes 1 of these women to wake those men up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/22 04:53 AM
1

In fairness, she's way better looking than most of the 20 something women we see posted here. As to what she offers, she's showing it. At her age, she has kept herself from getting fat, judging based upon her ankles and wrists. Also, she knows that in order to compete with girls half her age, she has enhanced her body and she's displaying in the 1st photo what you get versus those girls half her age. I'm not saying she's worth it, but she is certainly showing what she offers, no different than a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/22 10:34 AM
26

Happily the other woman, perhaps cheating and literally alpha widowed. "We couldn't make it official in high school." So he had a girlfriend and she happily gobbled up his cum when his gf wasnt around. "We hooked up throughout the years when we coincidently were both home at the same time, blah blah." So you found out he was going home and made plans to once again, be his cum dumpster, hoping he would ditch whatever gf he had at the time for you. Maybe she was still single, waiting for him, most…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/22 10:17 AM
1

I mostly socialize at parties and bars where there's alcohol and other substances involved Hookup culture. Got it. Nothing more to read. She buried this almost at the end and should have started with this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/22 06:31 AM
1

She's a nanny = she can't afford anything. Wants to be treated as a queen = you pay.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/22 06:04 AM
25

Welcome to OLD, aka hookup app. I'm 45+ so can relate directly to this post. I go to the gym 4-5 days a week and watch what I eat. This woman probably has never seen the inside of a gym, except maybe the cardio section that she half asses. In a relationship these days, but back when I use OLD, my age range was 23-29 and I was 40. I got plenty of matches and hookups from that age range, no need to go higher nor even close to my own age. I did test closer to my age and every single woman, 35+, I s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/22 01:45 PM
3

Separate point from the hypocrisy. So, we now know that she is like the men she dates. The men cant keep their dick in their pants and she sees multiple guys at the same time and can't keep her legs closed. The interesting thing, she is obviously very good looking, won the Ms GB title, and likely many other beauty pageants, but can't keep the interest of any man. Wasn't for lack of sex, as she said she wouldn't put out on the 1st date, but would somewhere inbetween the 2nd and 4th. Let's be hone…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/22 11:31 AM
12

The hypocrisy. States men can't keep it in their pants, but has dated, "more that 100" since she won her pageantry in Feb 2020. So, in 2 years, 104 weeks, she's dated a different guy every week. Definitely was some overlap there, as she states guy would.message her 2 weeks later. Has slept with "about 5 guys" in the past year. Article was published end of Feb 2022. In woman speak, that's 8 guys this year, or roughly slept with a different guy every week. Remember the "more that 100 guys" from ab…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/22 06:17 AM
2

Honestly, your like a chick and distracted me. Please enlighten me, and us, on the great Western Europe social system that is 20-50 years ahead of the US.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/21 08:45 PM
3

Not at all, just looks that way when you only work 4 hours a day.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/21 05:47 PM
2

Trying to back pedal? Most people hear Western Europe and think of France or Germany due to them being the economic powerhouses of that region. Yes, UK would fall into Western Europe, but its usually called out separately as they are not part of the EU, so different laws, nd their culture is different. I'd like to see your data. Granted my data is aged, but even before entering management in the USA, I was working 8+ hours a day and after entering management, 10-12 hours a day was pretty typical…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/21 05:43 PM
10

Excellent summary. Suppose we will have to agree to disagree on German health care. The system in Germany is similar to the shitty HMO system in the USA, where one needs approval before seeing a specialist and you need to run the gambit. I paid a little more and had a PPO in the USA and could go to a specialist directly. I tore my ACL playing sports and went to the doctor. Had an MRI (MRT) taken on Thu, Fri saw the doctor for the results and Mon had the surgery and then a private recovery room. …
/r/TheRedPill28/07/21 07:54 AM
20

Western Europe is about 20-50 years ahead of the us on social things to come. As an American living in Germany, dead wrong. I'd actually say it's the flip. German teenagers are getting fat as fuck, compared to 10 years ago when I moved here. The adults mainly come in 2 categories, fit or fat, but that will steady shift to a higher percentage of fat versus fit as those teenagers become adults. Social programs, let's start with health care. It's not free, it's paid via taxes. I paid less and got m…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/21 05:55 AM
2

Personally, I have no problem if a plate has been in a MMF, but not a LTR. When the plate starts to ask for commitment, can't delay commitment longer and seems LTR worthy (6 months +), I point blank ask her if she has been in a MMF. I also add, this is a deal breaker for me, so if I find out she lied in the future, 1 month or 5 years, we are done.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 08:33 PM
14

Use the divorce attorney that attorneys use. It will cost you, but be well worth it. Get a bunch recommendations and 1 name will be stand out. The conflict of interest is hit or miss, because if it's established that you had no intention of using that attorney, then there is no conflict of interest. So if she hires that attorney, they are going to be pissed at you and bring it up to the judge and he will be pissed at you. No need to shoot yourself in the foot. Divorces are hard enough for men, e…
/r/askTRP20/06/21 06:12 AM
3

You vet for 6+ months as the first 2-3 months are the honeymoon phase. After the honeymoon phase, you can truely vet her. If her libido is still strong. If her stories still line up. Many times, they change the dates/timing and can't remember the lie. For example, had a plate lie about when she started seeing a former boyfriend. Fast forward a month and she mentions something she did with him and the timing was when she was with the previous boyfriend. Hard lock into plate-only. Perfect plate, a…
/r/askTRP02/06/21 12:11 PM
2

We aren't like women, we have plenty of seed to sow, so get that misperception out of your mind. Besides which, wrap it up and there isn't much seed sowing. It's a slight shift in perception. I'm not saying you need 10+ plates, like some guys here say they have. That sounds like a God damn headache to me. I spin 2-3 plates, the 3rd is spun in as I am getting bored and ready to get rid of one of the others, or sense a plate is about to break.
/r/askTRP04/03/21 02:58 PM
1

Thanks. Most guys fail to realize that women are very analytical for LTRs, at least in a subconscious level. 1st questions friends ask: How hot is she? What's he do? How much does he make?
/r/askTRP04/03/21 02:50 PM
4

Do NOT cohabitate with a LTR that has an expiration date, especially when it's being forced.on you. I'm 40+, divorced and open minded in regards to LTRs versus most red pill guys. That being said, at any point in a LTR, you should still be able to walk away. Once you cohabitate, it's not that simple. You should still be in the vetting stage, it really never stops: (see walk away comment abive) * unemployed - certainly don't start precedence of cohabitation with her jobless. * opposite political …
/r/askTRP03/03/21 03:51 PM
1

Simple. Single women can go to their black book or dating app for her dick flavor of the day. Married women don't have that availablility. Its here and now. Carpe diem.
/r/askTRP03/03/21 03:18 PM
8

Short veesion: Spin plates, you will be amazed by the results. Speaking from experience, me and many friends had the same, which led me here to find answers. We all were betas and wanted one relationship. The women quickly weopnized sex, sex became a tool in their arsenal rather than something they enjoyed. After getting divorced, realized my beta friends had the same exact experiences. So I decided to model myself after a college friend and fuck whoever whenever (spinning plates I later learned…
/r/askTRP03/03/21 02:56 PM
17

No penalty for getting divorced, in fact it's usually a positive. During the bad times in a marriage, most men will struggle through it, while women will say fuck it. Mixture of lightswitch effect, typically make less money and might get limited alimony, many social programs exclusively to support women, etc. Couple months ago, saw a top post in relationship advice, where the problem between husband and wife could have been easily talked through, the advice was to divorce rape him and get as muc…
/r/askTRP15/02/21 02:17 PM
6

Being a personal trainer doesn't equal shredded. My favorite quote when I think of trainers and professors: Those that can't do, teach.
/r/askTRP15/02/21 11:13 AM
2

The drunk grabbing the girls ass is sexual harrassment. The guy punching the drunk is assault. Not only did he lose, but can get in trouble with the police if the other guy presses charges. Shit deal, but that's the legal system. Don't even get me started if you used a bottle. Dumb ass.
/r/askTRP26/06/20 05:48 PM
1

forces herself to cheat Forces. Thanks for the laugh. She chose to cheat.
/r/askTRP26/06/20 06:27 AM
6

if you divorce him after a kid or two you will continue to get the same benefits or more! Unbelievable, but so true. Women are more and more looking at men as meal tickets, not for what they can do during the marriage but what they can milk him for after a divorce. Yesterday read a bitter woman post about her being a teacher and not being able to work while her husband was doing his 8-6. Complained about having to take care of the newborn and home school their other 2 kids. Top comment was, divo…
/r/askTRP25/05/20 10:27 AM
21

AskMRP is a better place to ask. Was married in my beta days. Honestly, big difference is a metric shit ton of legal protection for her. In fairness, it protects the lower income earner, which typically is women. Additionally, if the man is the lower earner, judges tend to not treat them the same. She can still leave as easily as when she was your girlfriend. All states are no fault. So, she has her ultimate goal and your dread game diminishes. There are some medical reasons that being married h…
/r/askTRP12/04/20 11:00 PM
9

You analogy doesn't apply here. In your example, you need to act immediately. In OP's case, he has time and can both talk to an attorney and poll the community in the meantime. Though, he shouldn't take any actions until after talking with the attorney.
/r/askTRP09/02/20 03:07 PM
17

She threw a knife at you. Hell's ya, that is a end the relationship. She believes throwing whatever is handy around her is acceptable. What if next time it's a sharp knife or a frying pan? Let someone else deal with this sociopath.
/r/askTRP04/02/20 09:26 PM
1

Studies have shown that while men DO require an orgasm to feel sexually satisfied, women DO NOT. In my experience, ONS & plates will do almost anything to make sure you cum. They want to know you are satisfied and as validation that they can satisfy you. I have a hard time busting a nut while fucking for the first time. Subsequent fucks, no problem busting it in the condom. Girls will finish me off with their tits, facials or blowjobs. Don't believe a girl when she says she doesn't do that. Had …
/r/askTRP06/11/19 09:39 AM
1

he owes it to the husband He owes the husband nothing, unless they have a meaningful relationship (business or personal). No woman is worth jeopardizing that. stealing what belongs to him, She is not his, it's only his turn. As to the house, cohabitation and/or marital property laws make it equal, so she can invite him in and he isn't stealing there either. Agree its shit, but when have the laws been in men's favor? If you're going to fuck someone's wife, do it on your own dime. Assuming you mea…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 01:12 PM
1

Zzzzz Reported. Let someone else deal with your moralizing
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 04:11 AM
1

He owes the guy nothing. He didn't make a commitment to being exclusive with him. Fuck off with your personal morality. It doesn't belong in TRP or askTRP.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 09:47 AM
1

Bankruptcy. They already have a system in place to remove that debt.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 09:35 AM
1

27 year old virgins suck dick and do anal, if the man's SMV is high enough. If you aren't getting anything, your SMV is too low.
/r/askTRP16/09/19 01:28 PM
1

Because you have a PhD? Boring.
/r/askTRP21/08/19 10:39 AM
1

Sunk Cost Fallacy not Bias. Learn the correct terminology. https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/resources/mini-encyclopedia-of-be/sunk-cost-fallacy/
/r/askTRP20/08/19 05:28 PM
1

Depending on whether he was an active participant, he could have been raped, as he has only given consent to protected sex. Happened to me. Was drunk as all fuck and only have flashes of that night. Brought a plate back to my place and fumbled with the condom, next thing I know she is riding me, then woke up to see an unused condom on the floor.
/r/askTRP15/08/19 08:26 AM
1

Its called sunk cost fallacy. Please explain to me how you view LTRs. I believe that is the disconnect. To compare to batteries, most people view LTRs as rechargeable batteries. It has a life cycle and needs to be recharged from time to time, but may last you forever. Are you guys thinking of LTRs more like a disposable battery, that once it is done, you throw it away and replace it with the newer and better disposable battery? If so, I'd call that a fuck buddy or FWB, perhaps exclusive if you w…
/r/askTRP15/08/19 08:15 AM
1

statistically speaking men who actually fight for their kids, keep their noses clean, and generally play the game, they get equitable custody. Custody is not physical placement. So these guys have to be ideal citizens and perfect fathers to just be equitable in custody. If they hit that target, they should have placement not be 50/50 custody which should be automatic. For example, I hear about my nephew's ex-wife in and out of rehab for her drug addiction, but still retains physical placement of…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 07:55 AM
1

And even then, the woman can still monkey branch and divorce rape you. Which is why TRP considers the best sexual strategy to just spin plates and live your own life instead of trying to cater to her ever changing demands. These are the main two attraction points to TRP. Self improvement and enjoying life for your own reasons. Plate spinning - for college boys and avoid divorce rape for older men. If we haven't personally experienced divorce rape, we know a great friend or family member that has…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 09:17 AM
1

If you bring up your smv you’ll go from “ This girl is the best I can do” to “ I think I can do better” to “this girl doesn’t deserve me, where’s the next one” How does that answer OP's question? Do you not cheat and bounce from one LTR to the next? If that is the case, why be in a LTR at all? You can have long term plates that you rotate out as your SMV increases. Many plates will be accommodating while your SMV is increasing, meaning they won't break as fast due to you being with multiple wome…
/r/askTRP14/08/19 09:05 AM
1

Let's get the basics done. LDRs in married couples very very rarely work, something like 1% and its because they typically are open or asexual (think Sheldon Cooper from big bang theory). Of course she is fucking someone else. Your LDR isn't even a LDR as she's not your girlfriend. She owes you nothing, like you owe her nothing. Yes, it really is that simple. As to demote. Simplest way is, send her a SMS (so she gets it) saying, "This isn't working for me." Don't wait for a reply, immediately bl…
/r/askTRP13/08/19 03:26 PM
1

How about if you applied women morality onto the LTR instead of applying our male morality? You would realize that it's a relationship only in this exact moment. Does that make you feel better? Saw a post in PPD asking women if they cared about their mans sexual history. One of the replies that struck me as being true, "I would think about ANYTHING besides how a man is WITH ME is so wildly alien i dont even know how to express it." The rest of the replies were a varient of if he ever had STD/STI…
/r/askTRP13/08/19 01:16 PM
1

Often these women have one foot out the door of their relationship and looking to branch swing Excellent point about branch swinging. A person following TRP should be in the top 20%, at least physically, which will skew these percentages. Then they realise I’m not falling for that LTR shit and revert back to their boyfriends. Ignoring the morality of it, it's an enjoyable experience. Not going to get emotionally invested with a cheater and get to push those sexual boundaries, way beyond what the…
/r/askTRP13/08/19 07:14 AM
1

Not a chance all men are, some men might be. Your analogy is as stupid as me saying, I've been cheated on by multiple women, therefore women are cheaters by nature. Come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 11:36 AM
1

What did you think of Chiang Mai for visiting? Been to Koh Samui and had a great time, though I wish I split the week between two islands instead of just the one. Wanted to go to Koh Phangan, but the water was too choppy to get there on the 2 days I had left. Back to topic, bet you had a great time in Chiang Mai, between the local populace and all the tourists.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/19 11:25 AM
1

My European friends convinced me legal prostitution is a good thing. The women said, rape is much lower than in the USA, as guys will go fuck a prostitute rather than rape a girl. Sexual kinks aren't repressed, as you can find a prostitute to engage in that activity. The guys (in confidence) said that if their girlfriend, or whatever she is, doesn't do X, they just go see a prostitute to do it. Have a group of friends that went to a whore house last month, one is handsome & successful that has n…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 02:42 PM
1

Can't relate to the prostitution, but women from countries where prostitution is legal are way more sexually open. Got used to spinning plates from South America, Asia and Europe, was surprised by the entitlement when I returned to the states for a month. Still laughing at one American girl's comment, "but... but... but why I are you leaving? I even sucked your dick."
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 02:29 PM
1

Why would a woman build tech that would identify her in home made porn? Many many women have made home made porn. Maybe not with you, but 100% they have done it with at least 1 former partner. Also, getting paid to do porn is always an option, be it worst case scenario or mama needs that gorgeous new pair of shoes.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 10:08 AM
1

This recent study seemed pretty accurate, perhaps not for Gen Z, but probably limited data points to derive lifetime numbers. Shows women averaging 10-11 partners, though that will be double humped distribution as 40% had 5 and under partners. Suppose the other hump would start around 14 and go to 91. https://www.bodyandsoul.com.au/sex-relationships/sex/heres-the-average-number-of-sexual-partners-each-generation-has-had-in-their-lifetime/news-story/f114d63057bf898cc8581328d7f31ac5 The Results Ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 12:57 PM
1

start a fund that's publicly funded via taxes for it. You must be joking? At face value, it sounds ok. Think about it for 2 seconds and its worse than the current system. Lets start with the accountability, that random woman can go get pregnant by Chad in the club bathroom, or better yet, her boyfriend/husband. Now she can honestly say she doesn't know Chad's name or lie and say it was random Chad, in either case, she gets child support from this public fund. The taxes, who pays? Assuming its a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 03:23 PM
1

What a child like reply, my 7 year old knows better. Its at the same level as defining a word by including that word in the definition. The person answered you and you completely disregarded their answer and stated your point exactly the same. My thing is why bring it up at all. No I really do mean why bring it up at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 05:40 PM
1

I was about to say I have nothing to say and then realized yes I do. This is a great example of what women may do to catch a guy, change their body and personality to match what a guy wants. Will have to think how to write that up for a another post, or you can. Over the years, I've seen that play off many times. Yours isn't that atypical, the bulimia and anorexia, but the worst I've seen was where a women changed her personality and eventually took anti-anxiety medication until she divorced her…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 04:29 AM
1

In summary: you broke up, she slept with 2 different men in the same weekend, you got back together and now you just found out. For starters, when I think of two people casually seeing each other, I don't think of exclusivity. Regardless, you were broken up and she can go sleep with whoever she wants to. The red flag, is if you guys ever have a fight, is she going to turn back to drugs, alcohol and sex? Do you really want to take that chance? Additionally, you said she disappeared for a few week…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 06:10 PM
1

Nice way to try to recover, but the 7.7 is the UK study. You are quoting the one that had 2000 participants from USA and UK. If you are going to be specific, then admit that what you quoted was the wrong number rather than it was close. Anyway, its all moot. These types of studies are in alignment to politics. It will depict the results in a way to further the agenda of the person writing the report. Meaning, OP could sit outside a porn studio and compile all the data of the porn stars and state…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 02:34 AM
1

https://www.statista.com/statistics/248856/average-number-of-sexual-partners-in-selected-countries-worldwide/ This isn't any better than your source, since its from 2005. It has USA at 10.7 partners and UK 9.8. Another one I read from 2012, had USA at 7.2 and UK at 7.0, but sample size was only 2000 people. Regardless, its not material, even at the higher number, 10 or 11 partners doesn't matter. Either its a red flag or it isn't. As to your comment about slags, believe that is apparent in the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 11:02 AM
1

That's one of the reasons of the double hump in women data. Religious reasons of course would be another reason. I wouldn't be surprised that 1/3 of women are under 5. It's the other 2/3 that I believe is higher these days (please continue to read before making a snap judgement). As to the 7.7 reported figure above, see below. Posted in a different comment, but so you don't need to look for it. Reviewed the data, its based upon UK, which I can't make an educated opinion on. (Recall reading that …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 10:23 AM
1

Reviewed the data, its based upon UK, which I can't make an educated opinion on. (Recall reading that statistically they are more conservative than the USA.) Regardless, the important piece of information is the date range, September 2010 and August 2012. According to Google, Tinder was launched September 2012. Females falling into the lowest age category of 16-24 had 21% over 5 partners and 16% over 10 as compared to the highest age category (65-74) had 11% and 8% respectively. Interpret the da…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 10:03 AM
1

Reviewed the data, its based upon UK, which I can't make an educated opinion on. (Recall reading that statistically they are more conservative than the USA.) Regardless, the important piece of information is the date range, September 2010 and August 2012. According to Google, Tinder was launched September 2012. Females falling into the lowest age category of 16-24 had 21% over 5 partners and 16% over 10 as compared to the highest age category (65-74) had 11% and 8% respectively. Interpret the da…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 10:02 AM
1

Believe why people get confused and state women have more partners is that men have a normal distribution curve, with virgins and high n-count being the outliers, where as women have a bimodal distribution (double humped). They are either in the under 5 category or over 10. That being said, the overall average sounds low at 7.7. Would have expected a couple points higher. Would be interesting to know the data behind deriving that number and what type of average they are using. (typical assumptio…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 02:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter