TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skelefal Archive

View 2 posts and 81 comments by skelefal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
78

Marriage/Childrenskelefal/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:21 AM
4

Generalskelefal/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Another glib response. Too bad you weren't there to share your wit with Baby P.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 12:02 PM
1

So long as people who defend child-torturers rome the Earth, I'm good ;)
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:55 AM
0

Yes. But not as bad as Baby P, who had half of his skull ripped off by a dog, which was trained to brutalize the boy. Tell me, how do you live with yourself? It's a sincere question.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:28 AM
1

I hope you aren't able to sleep at night. If you are, and you aren't a psycho, that would destroy my opinion of human beings.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:23 AM
1

You piece of shit. You are the gutter trash Fascist, you are the person that they warn us about. You de facto support child murder and torture. You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:16 AM
1

There's nothing to be ashamed of that you kinda suck at booty shaking. MANY white women suffer from this problem. It's true that black girls are genetically superior in this respect, but there's NO REASON why white chicks can't learn to shake their booties something proper....(!) :)
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:39 AM
-4

You are an idiot Good God Karen, can't you go a single post without engaging in personal attacks? various theories about why Chinese like ping pong and "barrel-chested" Europeans. Okay fine. I asked for evidence, you provided it. Great. Too bad you can't do the same for your support of capitalism and imperialism. "I wouldn't have talked about the socioeconomic factors involved in various sports, dumbass." Waaaaait a minute I think you're trying to deny the genius of Rodger Federer. I'm not salty…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:20 AM
0

It's called logic. lol. It's called imbecility. The best I can do for you is that you are cringey gynocentric. Otherwise you are just an apologist for child torture/rape/murder. Congrats.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:13 AM
0

Thank you. ' P.S. This post is being brigaded by feminists. But you're right, obviously.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:42 AM
1

just a conspiracy theory I presented a link to a book with 51 documents. Not a single scholar has disputed their authenticity. Here's the link to Oded Yinon's genocidal essay in full: https://archive.org/details/TheZionistPlanForTheMiddleEast Hell it even as a Wiki entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinon_Plan Note again that not a single scholar disputes its authenticity. ugly obsession with "Jewish" names LMAO. Note this comment comes on the heels of YOU mentioning a bunch of Jewish sounding…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:03 AM
1

This isn't a contest. I thought your post was great. But using the word "libtard" is a sure way to debunk your own argument: people rightly consider the term idiotic. Retarded, if you will.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:52 AM
-1

You've said a lot indeed. Too bad you arguments consisted almost entirely of personal attacks. In future, you may want to address the actual evidence. Bye.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:39 AM
-1

Are you drunk? And you forgot Finkelstein, which you have to admit is a pretty awesome surname.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:34 AM
-1

Me to /u/girlwriteswhat: Karen, criticizing a state is not the same thing as being hostile to its populace. For example, I can criticize North Korea and not be an anti-Koreanite. I can criticize Saudi Arabia, which has been propped up for several decades by Britain, the US And Israel, without being "Islamophobic." When it comes to one's own state, one could even argue that dissent can be "patriotic". Your attempts (both Karen and this Israeli shill) to characterize me as "anti-Jew" are incredibl…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:33 AM
1

Libtard You were doing so well until you uttered that word. Just for future reference, using the word "libtard" is a sure sign of imbecility or ignorance or both. You're clearly no imbecile, so feel free to thank me.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:21 AM
1

One fellow on Quora lol. Shahak himself is not exactly a universally respected figure He's respected by everyone except Zionists. but unless my eye missed something, it does not recommend that Israel take charge of any of those territories No. That's America's job ;)
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:00 AM
1

Sorry, the rantings of a Brenner I'll let others decide whether these documents are "forgeries" as MA bizarrely claims. Certainly no reputable historians or academics agree with him. Some of your best friends are Joooooz. My best friend growing up was Jewish. So yes. Sadly we lost touch after awhile. But I have zero animosity in my heart toward Jews. You're a despicable person in that you attribute hatred to fighting against it. Karen's a credit to the MRM. You're not. I'm a nobody on the Intern…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:56 AM
1

Islamist barbarity Perhaps if the West and Israel stopped funding radical Islamists it wouldn't be such a big problem? Oh and also bombing their countries and overthrowing their governments? Just a thought. I mean you're aware that half a century ago John Foster Dulles publicly argued in favor of supporting Islamists as a means of combatting "Arab secular nationalism"? And that pretty much every administration since Truman has pursued this policy? Are you aware that Israel financed Hamas as a di…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:51 AM
1

And Yinon was hardly a major policy maker even when in government. Strange that his plans are being followed to a T though, wouldn't you say? And as already mentioned, Yinon merely articulated in stark terms what was already a standard tactic. In fact it would be bizarre if Israel didn't pursue such a strategy, given its precarious position. Divide and conquer is the oldest trick in the book. Your attempt to somehow blame the Jews/Israelis I haven't blamed "Jews" for anything. I just got through…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:32 AM
1

As for documents, you've presented none. Yinon: “Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short te…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:22 AM
1

Brenner was born to an Orthodox Jewish family in 1937. Lol that dirty anti-Semite! In point of fact the article you linked doesn't dispute the authenticity of the documents in question. So they have certainly not been "debunked". You can disagree with some of Brenner's conclusions, that's fine. neo-Nazi drivel than Karen ever has. The modern far right is pro-Zionist, in case you haven't noticed. Indeed, so were the Nazis, as Brenner and others have documented.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:01 AM
-1

talk of Israeli plans to carve up the Islamic world places you in the lunatic fringe. Evidently the major Israeli policy planners are on the "lunatic fringe." Hey you said it, not me. In fact you're closer to the truth than you realize. Former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan famously said, "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother”. They have succeeded admirably, and indeed they even created something called the Samson Option -- the most narcissistic foreign policy concept in …
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:58 AM
3

Great video. I find Peterson's views on psychology and politics reductionist (whenever you talk about politics you need to view it along several axes, not just a left/right binary). But his lectures are always interesting. I think his most fascinating theory relates to the emerging female totalitarianism. We don't associate females with oppression ("women are wonderful"). But if you happen to meet a mother grizzly bear in the woods you better believe you're in danger of being "oppressed." Peters…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:44 AM
-5

God you're an idiot. lol. There's no need to be insulting. I'm still waiting for your bio-troof explanation of why the Chinese dominate ping pong. Is it because whites think it's too nerdy? Are blacks unable to buy ping pong tables? And why DO "people of Northern European descent" dominate strong man competitions? I mean weren't African slaves chosen specifically for their strength and athleticism? And do you really think that sports are all about athleticism? I'm perfectly okay with being corre…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:59 AM
2

abuse How is criticizing someone's political philosophy "abuse"?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:50 AM
5

Belfort Bax and Richard Doyle were hardly leftist. Um, Bax was a socialist.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:47 AM
2

It's unfortunate that any critique of prominent figures within the MRM gets automatically downvoted. We should be debating these issues honestly. The MRM began as a leftist movement but has been hijacked by extremist far right ideologues. Don't get me wrong, Karen is terrific when she's arguing about gender, but we're talking about someone who literally said she doesn't like reading books. It's pretty clear she has no idea what she's talking about when it comes to non-gender issues. For someone …
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:28 AM
-1

There’s a less cynical explanation, though, which is that liberals are deeply and increasingly uncomfortable with calling out Islamic extremism for fear of being smeared as “Islamophobic,” or worse. There's a more mundane explanation still. Millions of Muslims have been killed in imperialist wars in the past few decades. These wars started well before 9/11. Some people think demonizing Muslims adds fuel to the fire. It's not exactly rocket science. The other elephant in the room is that the West…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:15 AM
0

Trump is a cowardly buffoon just like his predecessor.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 03:57 AM
-2

Why don't they dominate hockey And here I was thinking you would go with the obvious answer that there isn't a lot of ice in Africa. Basketball? Larry Bird? Steve Nash? Next I would like to hear your bio theory about why the Chinese dominate ping pong lol. I still say Rodger Federer is in a class all his own. Also why do Irishman and Scots dominate those "strong man" contests? And what's up with that little Filipino boxer? I think your theories are starting to break down...;)
/r/MensRights27/08/17 03:41 AM
2

Nice.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 09:31 PM
0

There are also suspiciously few Jewish musical artists...
/r/MensRights26/08/17 09:29 PM
1

So the superiority of blacks is debatable. Yes. Rodger Federer wants a word.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 09:26 PM
0

The Proud Boys are a bunch of clowns as is their founder Gavin McIinnes. However this article's thesis -- that they aren't far right enough -- is more clownish still.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:53 AM
0

I found the problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3U0udLH974 Turns out it was a big "joooey" misunderstanding lol.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:45 AM
1

At the same time, they all differ from me in some ways, and that doesn't make me love them any less, or put them on some hierarchy of human dignity where one is worth less than another. You recognize the problem though right? Society is not "your kids". As for "sabotaging" the MRM, I'll do what I do, subject to my personal code of honor. You can do what you do. I gave Chris Cantell a fair hearing. I agreed with him on the points he made that I agree with. I disagreed with the points he made that…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:27 AM
2

I notice that you didn't accuse me of anti-white racism by saying Asians and Ashkenazi Jews have higher IQs on average than whites. That's because I don't entertain your racial superiority/inferiority view of life. Is that so hard to understand? Really? Let me tell you something about IQ sweetheart: there are Ashkenazi Jews who can barely spell their name, and there are jet black Nigerians who have a higher IQ than you. Unnerstand? Amanda Marcotte will be able to connect the MRM with white natio…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:35 AM
2

And, now you're bringing up the Wai et al papers. It's true inheritance has a very strong positive correlation to wealth when analyzing the upper upper most wealthy ($30 million+) Indeed. How do you qualify "success"? Middle of the road? A mere billionaire? and billionaires. Also, the Wai studies didn't use direct measures of IQ. How can I get this through your thick skull? When a billionaire or major power broker has a son, he could be functionally retarded and still become a great "success". H…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:38 AM
2

Notice it doesn't mention a negative correlation here, on the overall analysis. I never said the paper in question (which debunks Peterson's thesis) demonstrated a strong negative correlation. I said there is a very strong correlation between inheritance and wealth -- much, much stronger than any nonsense about IQ. And yes I personally suggested that there is often a negative correlation. Which there is. For example the greatest artists in history often died broke.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:08 AM
1

You can't say, "identity politics for everyone! Oh, except whites and males." I agree! The question is what is going to be fruitful in the long run. And you seem to have failed miserably on that "IQ" test.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:04 AM
1

You're embarrassing yourself. Stop brown-nosing.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:03 AM
2

This narrative paints whites (and white men) into a corner where they cannot win for losing. I'm a white man. I hate identity politics possibly even more than you -- since ID pol has destroyed the left. As for your argument that white men are more in peril than other groups -- bullshit. White men are not being rounded up and put in camps. We're not facing Japanese-American-style oppression. We can easily overcome this nonsense. The solution is to attack ID politics itself, not create White ident…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:02 AM
2

IQ is positively correlated with success Nope. Re-reread the previous post. And here I will quote Mark Twain. "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence, and then success is sure." Granted he didn't mention intelligence, but the principle is the same. High IQ is often negatively correlated with "success", at least materially and at least in this society.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:32 AM
2

That makes perverse sense. Man hurt, especially when kicked in the balls = funny. The big tough man is brought down to size. Dog hurt = atrocity. The poor wittle doggie didn't do nuffin. Naturally I would prefer neither man nor dog hurt. I think it goes back to (a) neoteny and (b) agency. Dogs are cute and we regard them as helpless/noble, which in a way they are. Human males are supposedly the height of agency and power, which in a way they are -- or could be. Cats receive less sympathy because…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:29 AM
2

you certainly can't claim it's hogwash. I never claimed it was hogwash. I said that poverty is a huge factor, and that "intelligence" itself is an ill-defined concept. I used the word "hogwash" in reference to the claim that high IQ = success, which turns out to be false.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:23 AM
-1

This is an appeal to consequences. Yes. Your actions have consequences. Welcome to adulthood. I do not argue in favor of discrimination against any individual That's all very fine and well, but when you use your platform (how many subscribers do you have? Hundreds of thousands?) to argue that blacks have inferior intelligence it doesn't really matter whether you qualify your statements or not. You're just pouring fuel on the fire of racial conflict. One of the sticking points here is that you ha…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 11:04 PM
1

You live in a democracy. lol. Um no. I live in a plutocracy.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:42 PM
1

All of that said, you might be shocked to realize that if I am "arguing nazi talking points" by acknowledging different distributions of IQ between groups, caused in part by evolution, then I have also spent the last 9 years arguing "misogynist, patriarchal, male supremacist" talking points when acknowledging sex differences caused by evolution. Facile comparison. There is no danger of women being "oppressed", at least not in the manner feminists claim. Conversely it was only a few decades ago t…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:24 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:42 AM
2

Sorry to say that HBR is done. Although they can probably be kept afloat by racists. As long as they're able to sleep at night. I feel bad for Alison Tiemen. She's always struck me as the more sensible of the trio.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:41 AM
1

Nice to see a few voices of reason on this thread.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:32 AM
2

Yes, thank you for adding a boatload of ammunition to the liars -- now truth tellers -- who claim the MRM has a Nazi problem. I take it you're a feminist? Or just a Nazi?
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:27 AM
1

Not all male issues are caused by feminism. But yes some billionaires -- notably Bill Gates -- sponsor massive MGM campaigns around the world. Another billionaire, Harvey Kellogg, popularized MGM in the US. That was a particularly poor example to cite in retrospect, eh? ;) You may want to read up on the history of the feminist movement. It was indeed financed by billionaires, in particular the Ford and Rockefeller foundations.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:25 AM
7

It may just be that Trump supporters get banned everywhere on Reddit so end up posting in the handful of subs that won't censor them (or downvote them into oblivion). There's obviously a big problem with astroturfing on this website, especially by the Democratic Party and various alphabet agencies. So they end up in places like mens rights, KIA, conspiracy and a few others. This in turn skews these formally balanced subs into far right territory, just as R/politics became a Democratic Party circ…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:22 AM
1

If you cannot even identify an oppressor class Sure I can. They're called the billionaire class. Their vehicle is the state.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:05 AM
1

The odds of Neo-Nazis overthrowing the government are nil. Most of your cells are run by the Feds anyway. You're useful idiots just like the SJW's. Edit: fun fact. The leader of the biggest Neo-Nazi party in Germany for several years was revealed to be an MI6 agent. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/aug/13/johnhooper Germany's most notorious postwar neo-Nazi party was led by an intelligence agent working for the British, according to both published and unpublished German sources. The allege…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:01 AM
1

Men are not oppressed. Cruel or unjust treatment. Males in every country in the world are subject to cruel or unjust treatment. Could be child soldiers in Africa, boys being raped in Afghanistan, infants having their genitals mutilated in the US, men becoming indentured servants after divorce while being denied access to their children. Etc. ETc. Perhaps we have (very) different ideas about what constitutes justice. I will concede one thing: not every man is oppressed in exactly the same way, an…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:51 AM
3

Holy shit, I looked in the comments and you're actually arguing neo-nazi talking points. You may well have set the MRM back a decade. It will take a monumental effort to clean up your mess. Congratulations. Edit: here's Karen arguing that blacks are inferior: "How can anyone justify using a group's presumed intelligence as an excuse for treating them poorly?" I don't know that he was arguing that. I think he was bringing it up to explain in part why blacks are under or over represented in certai…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:18 AM
16

Hundreds of baby boys die from the procedure every year you fucking imbecile.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 06:00 AM
4

you are heading these groups towards violence. I don't think there is enough support for Neo-Nazism for them to represent a significant threat. Like certain SJW groups they're probably being bankrolled by intelligence agencies to create a "strategy of tension" (see Operation Gladio), which in turn is designed to further empower the state. White identity politics is not the solution to identity politics, as Peterson recently stated.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:28 AM
1

I don't deny the link. I just deny that your theories about race are relevant.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:23 AM
6

The Geek stuff is fine. It's when they veer into philosophizing about right-libertarianism that it becomes a complete shit show. Perhaps they need more "diversity of views."
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:26 AM
2

Yeah, THAT's the reason the US has 5% of the world's population and 25% of the world's prisoners (more than China). Social safety nets and blacks being inferior! It's not that the US ranks fourth for wealth inequality in the entire world; or the war on drugs, which was created by Nixon specifically to target blacks; or the prison industrial complex; or the militarization of the police (the police themselves being derived from slave patrols); or the dismal education and health care systems; or th…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:24 AM
2

Yeah, it's much more productive to commiserate with Nazis. Will you be doing a follow up with Roosh V soon? Perhaps you two can talk about putting Muslims in concentration camps. Or why blacks have sub-human intelligence and should be considered 3/5ths of a person. Or why people with disabilities should be sterilized. It's already patently obvious where losers like Cantwell are coming from. They project their failings in life onto minorities in order to feel superior. They're the mirror image of…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:09 AM
7

Extremely irresponsible on the part of GWW. She may as well just put on a KKK dunce cap at this point. The upvote/downvote ratios in this thread are also a good indication that the MRM has been co-opted by the far right. The same thing happened to KIA.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:59 AM
4

Yep. Done with Honey Badgers. Won't be giving them another dime. They seem to care more about pushing far right quasi fascist politics than men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:56 AM
3

Wow I would be interested in seeing that...
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:46 AM
28

Is it possible we have less empathy for human males than dogs? It's an honest question. Reminds me of that Norm MacDonald joke about the homeless man with the dog.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 02:35 AM
7

Israel is the country in question. I watched the first five minutes, it's disturbing as fuck. Humorously the Youtube comments are saying "Maybe Islam isn't so bad after all." That is the point we're eventually going to reach unless the MRM succeeds -- men are going to demand a return to patriarchy. Feminists don't realize that they are fighting the one group that can save them from themselves: men's rights activists. They are drunk on power and think men will put up with this shit indefinitely.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:04 AM
1

It's much more comfortable for them to pretend they are fighting "Marxists" than to realize the billionaires are playing both sides like puppets.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:20 PM
0

They want to go back to the late 19th century when 4 year old kids worked all day and people starved in the streets. Every facet of a person's life was controlled by corporations, workers had no protections, and labor organizing was met with extreme violence.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:17 PM
1

EDIT How exactly do men as a group use their power to "oppress" women as a group. They don't. Nor to women oppress men as a group. However men are subject to oppressive (unjust or cruel) laws.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:36 PM
3

Really depressing that you're being downvoted. The Alt-right fascists are taking over this sub. People like Cantwell and apparently Straughan want people bickering over race and blaming non-whites for society's problems -- they are the mirror image of SWJs and play right into the hands of plutocrats.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 06:07 PM
1

The Ford Foundation has been linked to the CIA practically since its inception. Here's a great piece on the subject: https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/FordFandCIA.html
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:54 PM
1

There are other conceptual issues in classical Jungianism, such as the restatement of traditional gender-roles that accumulated under Jung’s descriptions of Animus and Amima which divides an enormous amount of psychological phenomena into strictly masculine and feminine boxes, and applies those boxes to real men and women. Add to that what classical Jungian’s call “the Feminine” – a big basket of bloated gynocentric concepts (eg. that Eros and all the other treasured psychological phenomena are …
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:43 PM
1

Great articles both. Not familiar with her work. Could be a tradcon?
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:32 AM
2

Nice trolling.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 03:18 AM
1

More than sexism. Misandry. Hate.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 03:17 AM
4

Oppression = cruel or unjust treatment.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:49 PM
69

This is incredibly ironic. Many of the worst man-hating feminists from the second wave were lesbians. They even created a "lesbian separatist" movement based on the idea that they would finally be safe from violence and sexual assault. They spawned an entire literature demonizing men for being abusers and rapists. Now it turns out that lesbians are themselves the worst offenders! What, did the patriarchy make them do it? You couldn't make this stuff up.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:22 PM
1

I think those problems are exacerbated by the fact that the Left/regressives haven't experienced those tactics being used against them, at least not recently and perhaps not ever in living memory. lol you can't be serious. Hundreds of people were brutalized by police during the Occupy Wall Street protests alone. So Leftists & regressives don't care about free speech as an issue because their own free speech has never been threatened. Hahahaha. People like Joel Kovel have been fired from their jo…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 09:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter