| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | I found this soothing and inspiring. Tumblr log of a recovering SJW feminist. | Story | skywyze | /r/MensRights | 16/02/15 04:28 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsI'm comparing these two: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-tinari-15054633/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-tinari-9578b53/ Both have Director, Pacific Institute of Advanced Studies listed, and both went to Queen's University, but they graduated different years and their photos are totally different. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 03:31 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsI don't. I had hoped that someone else had one. I'd hoped that, since he published as much as he did, that he'd actually taken a stand and defied the wishes of his censors. And if he'd gone this far, then maybe the full article existed out there somewhere on the web. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 03:26 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsStrange, when I click that link it takes me to the wrong page. So I can't see that page for some reason. Are you sure it's talking about Paul D. Tinari, and not Paul Tinari? Because the first guy is the author of this study and the second guy is a 3D printing engineer who has nothing to do with it. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 02:50 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsActually, that's one of the problems I had: There's two people with very similar names. One is a 3D printing engineer. The other is the "author" of this paper. One of the sources published in this thread links to an article with a picture of the wrong guy on it. Try searching Paul Tinari on LinkedIn and you should get 3 results. One is the guy you're talking about. The other is the author of this paper. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 02:48 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsSource or it didn't happen. And I mean peer reviewed source, not a link to the guy's own website. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 02:22 PM |
| 1 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsNot saying you're wrong, but what's your source? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 02:06 PM |
| 10 | Tumblr is at it again. Men's rights activism is about harassing feminists.Depending on how you count, you can trace mandatory military service exclusive to men in that region back to the Viking age, and you can find examples of it in every century since. The first female to be drafted will be some time in 2014. Too little, too late. It's true that most men have not been shot. That does not make it acceptable to put us in harm's way for no crime greater than being born the wrong sex. It just tells us that we're more expendable. Besides, even if all the bonus points for… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/13 06:33 AM |
| 14 | Tumblr is at it again. Men's rights activism is about harassing feminists.Be me, age 17. Forcibly drafted into the military against my will, as all men are where I'm from. Separated from all loved ones, shot at, permanently injured so I can never run again. Years of my life taken away for the crime of being male. Return to civilization. Realize that former female classmates from high school have never been shot at or injured in combat. See them protesting injustice against their gender while simultaneously accepting bribes in the form of bonus points to all college ap… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/13 05:53 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter