TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sunfirepassionapple Archive

View 1 posts and 62 comments by sunfirepassionapple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

blackout drunk Oh, so wait, that's not okay to do to a man but it's okay to do to a woman? Why doesn't he just not drink so much? And he should be more aware of where he goes to sleep. Sound familiar?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 02:27 AM
0

Studies have shown that women are happier when their husband earns more than them compared with vice versa. And this has to do largely with the division of household chores. Women do not mind doing the bulk, as long as hubby is bringing home more money. But as soon as he doesn't, and she is STILL doing the bulk of the chores, this is when she becomes unhappy. And who would blame her? Bringing home more money AND having to do the chores. Fuck. May as well be living alone!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 02:22 AM
5

And I agree with you. And this therapist is sharing with her clients that they (and other women) do not have to accept this. We can say the same thing for beta male orbiters. In the end it's your choice. Like what, you want her to stay in that arrangement even if she doesn't get what she wants? Lol. Or you think because he's being 'honest' she should just be OK with that and stay? LMAO. No. This therapist is saying if he won't agree to exclusivity at the get go, drop him and go for someone else.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 01:26 AM
6

Oh I agree. And you drop those dudes like a hot rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 01:15 AM
8

And, perhaps more importantly, he won’t agree to exclusivity. I think this is the kicker, he says he won't agree to it, but does that mean he'll actually act on it? And that's where the mind games come into play. Because he isn't explicitly telling her, 'I am fucking other girls, right now as we talk.' No, he reels her in and then when the exclusivity talk comes up, he doesn't give a hard no or a yes. He is wishy-washy on it. I guarantee you if he said, 'no exclusivity and I am going to fuck oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 12:49 AM
2

All attractive men are fuckboys. Or gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 09:07 PM
1

your plates and one of their fuckboys :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 09:04 PM
2

Doormat syndrome. Where you don't have (or you perceive) you do not have any redeeming qualities so you think turning yourself into a doormat is a way to get a relationship. FYI it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 08:58 PM
2

So the kicker is she can't change her mind. It has little to do with 'hard to read' but the bitch refusing him in the end!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 12:50 AM
1

He's telling the truth and yeah, it sucks to hear it. The cucks on the TRP movie couldn't handle it. Trust me I know what it's like to be the only intellect in a room full of fucking idiots. All reason goes out the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 05:58 PM
1

Why? Because he doesn't support your opinions? LOL. He is a very smart person. Oh and watch out, you are getting e-m-o-t-i-o-n-a-l ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 05:39 PM
1

I think you're the one putting too many emotions into this. And thinking a man can do no wrong, lmao. And not getting a hot meal is no way being an entitled ass, no he's being abused because his wife is a drunk. LMAAOOOO!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 05:30 AM
1

And why wouldn't a man make an absurd claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 04:32 AM
1

So why is your interpretation right but mine is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 11:46 PM
1

Lmao, I am sure it was definitely that. OR? Wife: I was doing every fucking thing in this house and taking care of the children while you 'worked' 9 to 5'. But we know based on research you didn't /actually/ work 9 to 5, it's more like 4 hours of solid work and the remaining dicking around. Then you come home and expect to be waited on hand and foot, haha, what do you take me for, a fool? So, make your own hot meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 05:50 PM
1

He deserves far more respect than you and any other Terper, Merper, or MRAer. As he's much more intelligent than all of you put together. No wonder you sweep his valid arguments under the proverbial rug.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/16 05:48 PM
1

Lol. Cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 10:25 PM
1

And how's that mentality working out for you bud?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 10:11 PM
1

Lol, right? He even admits he never does it in his example lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 10:10 PM
1

I provide you with an actual source that has been referenced by 100's of subsequent papers written by different authors, and your response is 'lol'? Good talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 10:09 PM
1

This outlines the domestic violence symmetry myth quite well, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.468.9330&rep=rep1&type=pdf “Gender Symmetry” in Domestic Violence A Substantive and Methodological Research Review
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 09:24 PM
1

why is that only in the home women are suddenly as violent as men? but in the real world men are much more violent? oh and what about the underestimation and overestimation of domestic abuse?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 06:46 PM
1

it is actually true. sorry the statistics don't back up what your narrative believes. did you also know that women overestimate their abuse towards their partners and men underestimate it their abuse to their partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 06:30 PM
1

make your own hot meals? ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/16 06:28 PM
3

http://www.thecitizen.org.au/features/what-about-men-lies-statistics-and-peddling-myths-about-violence-against-women The researcher is Dr Elspeth McInnes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 10:58 PM
3

http://www.thecitizen.org.au/features/what-about-men-lies-statistics-and-peddling-myths-about-violence-against-women The researcher is Dr Elspeth McInnes. I never thought of it this way, but another researcher basically asked...why only in the home is violence equal? While in society there is a huge gender asymmetry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 10:58 PM
4

Pretty much. I was reading an interview by a researcher who studies domestic violence in both men and women, who said men labeled 'no home cooked meal' as domestic violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 09:52 PM
5

then church would be a better option Oh my sweet summer child.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 08:03 PM
5

Thanks for providing further evidence to my theory "Men are mad they can't separate women who are sluts from women who are virgins!"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 01:04 AM
1

try living a week without anything invented by men and get back to me. Pray tell, but what have you invented? You know it's plagiarism to take credit for work you didn't do, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 08:36 PM
2

I drive a Nissan Murano. It's a nice car :) It's just the right amount of flashy but is still very practical. Like how the fuck am I supposed to put groceries into a Lamborghini Aventador? And we just chopped down a real tree this past weekend for Christmas. It fit nicely into my Murano. It's much more practical :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 08:27 PM
1

They did say they believe it's also related to the rise in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 06:47 PM
1

Blood test I believe. It's not shocking, many parasites have been known to influence our behaviors. It's just that those parasites aren't as common as this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 08:56 PM
1

Men can get it too. You might have it right now. A cross-sectional study probably means they had 36,564 subjects to sample from and they randomly selected those.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 07:44 PM
0

Okay, so if the study attracted a certain kind of person, why were differences found? If the composition of the groups were the same and there was no effect of Toxoplasma (this is the only variable that is being 'manipulated'), why the differences? What that comment is saying is the results might not be able to generalize to the whole population; however, in this particular sample differences were found between groups despite if they shared similar personality traits. Something biological (i.e. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 12:55 AM
0

So why not clothe the woman? Why have her naked and him wearing a business suit? Why clothe him and not her? If this is such a 'weak' argument, surely you can come up with an answer as to why she's naked and he's clothed. Oh and in the calendar, both models are a naked. Is the male vet using the other male vet as a prop? You know the objectification can also be on how the two models are interacting with one another, right?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:26 AM
-4

I was showing you true male objectification in advertisement. Where they are used as props by clothed women. Naked. No character depth. Just props. And it's your opinion those differences I pointed out are 'minor.' And I think you point them out as 'minor' because you don't want it to change. You equate naked = objectification. But that is very simplistic thinking. And that simplistic thinking is what'll give rise to true objectification ads using men as props. And nothing more.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:16 AM
-2

So you're OK with this? https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/30/objectifying-men/ In most of the images, the female model is in the foreground and he is in the background. In the only image where they are side by side, she has her arm bent to suggest she's holding him like a bag, kind of like the bag he is holding over his junk. He is a prop and his only purpose is to be used. Here's another one; http://www.advertisingforadults.com/print/2007/6/reversa-side-effects-print-ad.jpg He's nak…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:43 AM
0

The uniform tells more about the person. It's not just his body being used as a prop. Here is an example of objectification of a man without objectifying the woman: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/30/objectifying-men/ In these images she is fully clothed, and while we do not know a profession, we know much more about her than her naked male prop. Also, she is mostly in the foreground and he's in the background. The only image where they are side by side, she has her arm hooked, as …
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:24 AM
-12

Who cares whether you can see the profession? That's part of bringing character depth to the males, they are not just to look at, they have more to them. The female? She's nothing. Also the vets both of them are nude, they are equal. In the other image the male is clothed and the female is naked. These are subtle differences are nuances, but still important. Here's an example of a man being objectified and the woman is not: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/30/objectifying-men/. In t…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:13 AM
-18

Ditch the dog and stethoscope and then you'll have something equivalent. From both pictures I can clearly see the profession of the males but not the female.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:28 AM
2

disney movies, So, thinking back to all the Disney movies I watched, I can't think of one movie where the main male character wasn't the stereotypically good looking prince charming. There were no frogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 06:42 AM
1

It's cool how you don't understand what bias is. Umh, this isn't opinion, the literature on sexual relationships has shown that women who engage in one night stands are less likely to orgasm. That's the whole point of a one night stand. If you're not going to get one, may as well stay home and use a vibrator. Do you know what the hookup culture is? The research also says that compared to their parents, millennials have fewer sexual partners. So while there are people participating in the hookup …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 06:34 AM
1

It seems your arguing with a personal, sex negative bias so there isn't much reason in debating with you. Maybe if men don't up and leave after a woman puts out, we wouldn't be so negative <3 Also, it's cool how you completely skipped over the 'less likely orgasm' part.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 06:18 AM
1

In general, when man ask for dating advice, or advice on how to be more attractive, they are asking of how they can change so women will want to have sex with them. This statement includes a plural which is 'women.' I am assuming you want to have sex with a lot of women aka not be in a monogamous relationship. This sounds like pump and dump. Maybe you should reframe your question? 'How can I improve my sex life with my partner?' So all sex advice is to use people? It is for a woman. Especially w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 04:13 AM
1

You're using dating advice to get laid. Of course you are going to have a bad time. When you (aka men) ask for advice on how to be with women, we women assume it's a relationship. We do not assume it's just for sex. We don't think your motive is a pump and dump. We think you are being genuine and are interested in a relationship. Why would we give you advice on how to 'use' women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 03:14 AM
11

Their obsession over women's mental wellbeing is interesting. And I think I am beginning to understand why their diatribes gives me a headache, because unlike research proposals (which I am used to reading) these diatribes do not offer any useful and or/ practical suggestions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 01:52 AM
1

Ah he lives! Good job mate, giving the MRA ammo.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:29 PM
1

Nothing different from what men bring to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 04:10 AM
1

Yeah in University, when I was a virgin I lied all the time. And then when I lost my virginity, I bumped it up to 2-3.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 04:02 AM
1

KillAllMen was apparently started by /u/EvanHarper https://www.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/390uhf/so_it_turns_out_i_might_have_invented_the/, not feminists.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:32 PM
2

That's why those who say it's a 'joke' are often against programs that motivate girls to pursue math?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 02:16 AM
2

This is how you can identify someone who has misogynistic opinions: A woman does poorly on a math test - 'Wow, women suck at math.' A man does poorly on a math test - 'Wow, he sucks at math.'
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 10:56 PM
2

FYI not being with a man doesn't make me a lesbian. See your arguments are driven by benevolent sexism. That babies is a woman's job and that's what makes a woman happy. Not all women. And it'd be wise to drop that benevolent sexism attitude. Time's are changing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:07 PM
2

You're also worse off than a lot of other women who put their trust in a man. No. I think I am just fine. Fear is what is driving you entirely. Good fear though. A little fear is always good. A dog does not replace human connection and intimacy. Better than a man. Are you over 30? No. If I'm not attracted to your body I can still love you. Doubt it. Remember this isn't feminism teachings, but my father's. A man who knows men, because, well, he is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:54 PM
3

It will keep you unsatisfied and bitchy for life. You keep saying that but I am much better off than a lot of other women who put their trust in a man. At least men can love unconditionally. BULLSHIT. If that was the case women wouldn't need to keep their 'girl game' as you previously mentioned on how to keep him from leaving.* Bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:46 PM
2

What did men do to you? I can't trust them. Just as my father told me, never trust them. Only trust yourself. He's a true businessman. I didn't ask to have these instincts, and I put in a lot of effort to remain faithful and not break my word. It's gross how men see women as sexual conquests first and people second (if even people).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:40 PM
2

Alone? With your cats? With your girlfriends who don't actually care about you? With your business? Dog actually. And my dog is much better than you or any man. No compassion or sympathy at all. To be a lying cheat? No. Sorry. As a high test man, you have no idea how hard it is to control myself around other woman, and my woman is highly attractive. You're gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:32 PM
3

You suffer at the end of it, not anyone else. No. I won't. I will be perfectly fine. Better actually. :) I won't marry someone and put up with his shit, and him guilt me by saying 'it's in my nature!' Waaah!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:28 PM
5

Why? Because that's an insult to a relationship? That she puts up with his cheating ass b/c she can't support herself. Better in what way? See above. I WILL NOT be trapped into a relationship with a man. Nope. If another woman wants to do that, her choice, but she is putting all her eggs into one basket.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:19 PM
2

There are no guarantees but thats as good as it gets. It's not worth the risk. It actually CAN get better. Don't fall into that trap. But, an older woman can also allow her man to fuck other women for pleasure while he still provides for her. What a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 10:14 PM
3

Because if he's with her just for her looks, he's going to royally fuck her over when she gets older.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter