TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

valleyshrew Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by valleyshrew on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So if I deceived my identical twin's wife into having sex with me because she thought I was her husband, that wouldn't be rape to you?
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:55 PM
0

There are other lesser rapes, not all are violent. Having sex with a 17 year old is rape in new york, but not in most other states. Rape by deception is a thing. It's just a grey area how much you have to deceive someone for it to count as rape. If a person pretended to be the husband of a woman to have sex with her, I'm sure you'd agree that is an obvious rape, but perhaps not warranting the same punishment as a violent rape. If I pretended to be a Muslim and had sex with a devout Muslim woman,…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:15 PM
6

How is he clearly innocent? As I understand it, she consented to sex with a condom, and he stopped using the condom without permission. Thus it's rape. Does he argue she did give permission for that?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 11:45 PM
1

I've been reading every reply. I defended the film a bunch in the past because a lot of the criticism of it before it was even out was pathetic and there was no explanation for it other than misogyny. But after the twitter stuff revealed Leslie to be an ignorant racist, and given the director's open sexism against men, I'm glad it wasn't a big success.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 02:07 PM
-7

It's number 1 for Friday and Saturday on Box office mojo. I assumed that would extrapolate to the full weekend. We'll have to wait and see.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 07:12 AM
-14

And this subreddit is doing the same thing. Truth is it already made loads of money, it's not a flop. It's the #1 film of the weekend. It was never going to be Jurrassic World level success. It will be Feig's biggest ever opening weekend.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 05:47 AM
1

because it's not discriminating against anybody Many sporting tournaments discriminate based on age and gender, are those not ok? Think of it being like "Whites Only Night", where anybody of color isn't allowed. You think that would go over well? There's no reason for racial discrimination in a gym, there is reason for sex/age discrimination.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/15 12:23 PM
1

You can't sell a product / service to somebody, then tell them that they can't use said product / service (unless both parties agree to it). Gym memberships generally don't allow 24/7 use of the facilities. My local center is closed at certain hours for school use and various other activities. It's completely normal and reasonable. You can get a membership to a golf club and you wouldn't complain you can't play when they're hosting tournaments, it's the exact same thing here.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/15 10:32 AM
1

What percentage do you think it is? Be honest here. I'd guess it's something like 80% of women and 5% of guys that would prefer to train without the other sex around. Yeah I'm making an assumption but I think it's a fair one, unless you have a good argument otherwise. There is obviously more demand for the women's hour and it's good for their business. If the women's hours ate a significant portion of the time the gym is open it would be unacceptable, but 1 or 2 hours a week in off-peak hours wo…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/15 07:46 AM
-1

From the gym's point of view, it's impractical to charge the males less. If they misled him then that's one thing, but I think the hours he can use the gym would be part of the contract he signed up for. They could have a male only hour but the males wouldn't want that and would probably prefer to go in a mixed hour so you're basically asking for them to lose business by having an unnecessary male only hour to even it up. That's not logical. We should accept some discriminations are acceptable. …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 12:06 PM
-36

Sports have all kinds of discriminations - nationality, disabilities, age, gender, weight. They're justified a lot of the time so that more people can have a good experience.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/15 06:17 PM
-1

You have to make a list with this kind of thing on it? This is the most autistic thing I've ever seen on reddit.
/r/seduction13/05/15 07:30 AM
4

Criticizing Jews in Israel is hardly anti-semitic or racist. Of course it is anti-semitic. You are a racist if you think Yemeni Jews cannot be criticised but Israeli Jews can - the UN definition of racism includes discrimination based on national identity.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:42 AM
-6

In Norway it is probably not necessary, but don't you think it would be reasonable in a country like Saudi Arabia where women are oppressed? It's not fair to make a Nazi analogy. If anything it would be "Oh we don't hate Nazis; we're just particularly mindful of the Jewish plight" since Jews/women are the oppressed group.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:49 PM
-6

And by some curves you probably mean someone who is thin with big breasts and hips. Women use the term curves as a euphemism for overweight. Men think curvy means Kate Winslet and Scarlett Johansson, but they are thin. Even Christina Hendricks is thin, just with a very disproportionate body. She has a flat jaw line and protruding clavicles that fat people never have. Her BMI is 23 which is very healthy and well below the average American woman (29). This is curvy.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:54 PM
0

Bill Gates charity is sadly a net loss for the world, he cares more about saving people that will think of him as a hero and that he can get to fantasise about than having people long after he's dead benefit from a planet that is still habitable. People love to throw their money around to make themselves feel good rather than putting it all towards what will do the most good long term which unfortunately means putting it all on something he wont see benefit from in his lifetime.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 07:21 PM
-2

Fathers own the sperm but they give it away, they don't own the baby that is created from it. Mothers can be worse parents but it's irrelevant, in terms of cold rational facts, the child is the property of the mother until it's maturity. If a man wants to own a child he can adopt it. Subjective judgements about who is the "best parent" are something the law should not be able to decide. Unless the mother is abusive to the extent her child would be taken away anyway, or the child is old enough to…
/r/MensRights06/01/12 07:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter