TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AlaskanWilson Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by AlaskanWilson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lol yeah it’s all definitely a big conspiracy by the evil deep state, total nothing burger.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:39 PM
1

At this point if you have to ask you’re just being willfully ignorant
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:27 PM
3

About what? I think there were people who defended Nixon during watergate and even through his resignation, and there will be people who will defend Trump in the face of an overwhelming preponderance of evidence too. That same one third of the country or so who live in an alternate reality than the rest of us.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 05:03 PM
22

Lmao people actually believe this shit? You aren’t being sarcastic? When Trump and Nunes had that laughable attempt with the memo I was wondering what people were actually stupid enough to believe the charade, but here you are out in the wild! People this stupid actually do exist!
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:46 PM
32

Judging by his post history, 10/10 idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/17 03:18 AM
2

It's not, OP is crazy
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:18 AM
53

That's a strawman argument and not the type of scenario being discussed. Don't be obtuse
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:57 PM
0

What, exactly, is the issue here? The issue is you laid out a straw man and don't understand the literature very well. Your research begins and ends when you can find a way to further cement your preconceived notions. I thought I was having a more academic discussion but it seems like I hurt some feelings in here. Stop peddling this purely political propaganda. Ironic, since I'm not the one denying science in the first place like a climate change denier. What a waste of time. You all should publ…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:44 PM
0

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/03/equal-pay/472407/ You should read this article, it addresses your point pretty head on and explains the wage gap in greater detail.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 06:51 AM
0

Go ahead and write a paper disproving it all. You'd make a big name for yourself in labor economics.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:17 AM
1

I don't see the point you're trying to make (if one at all). As of right now how I see the point having as much relevance as responding to a comment about a murder saying "it's illegal to kill someone though." Can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:30 AM
-1

What numbers exactly are you looking for me to back up? It's not as if other people are providing a wealth of sources. Everything I'm talking about is so readily available in the literature and literally not controversial in any way that I just don't bother. It's honestly amusing how much I'm getting downvoted for parroting contemporary research where the guy who falsely said economists don't care about it is one of the top posts. That conference was a really eye opening experience for me. We he…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:51 AM
-1

I could not disagree with you more. This seminar on the care economy I attended years ago says it better than I can: Women are the backbone of the care economy. Paid care jobs such as childcare, domestic work, homecare, and eldercare tend to pay low wages and offer sub-standard benefits. Unpaid care work devoted to family members, friends, and members of the community is often taken for granted. Supportive public policies such as paid family leave, sick leave, high-quality child care and after-s…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:35 AM
-7

You're either being intentionally obtuse or you don't understand the literature
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:10 AM
-4

That's not how the wage gap is calculated
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:51 AM
-2

You've been questioned several times and your reply was "im not going to write an ELI5 go learn economics" I literally told that to one person who asked me how we measure the wage gap in the first place. It was an ignorant question not worthy of an explanation. Which claims have I made that are outlandish? And it's not a straw man argument when statistical discrimination is statistical discrimination, it doesn't make that much of a different if you're discriminating against someone because of ra…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:05 AM
-3

Thanks for noticing. I always try to be as civil as possible, but a lot of people view the downvote button as a disagree button. That's why I create a new account every couple of months so I don't get too hung up on my karma. And yes I agree, sometimes this place is like tumblr for men. The people I talk about men's rights stuff with irl are also pro women's rights so this sub is a little strange to me anyway.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 08:22 PM
-12

That's too much to explain, I suggest doing a review of the economics literature on the pay gap to start. If you don't have a statistics background it would be hard to describe, and I'm not trying to write out an ELI5
/r/MensRights27/09/16 07:17 PM
-1

I'm not ignoring relevant factors. So they are partaking in "rational discrimination" (because they irrationally conflate things like crime rates among a demographic and propensity to commit a crime). HR is not looking for employees in a vacuum or drawing from the general population - they are picking people who likely at least had a good resume and cover letter. I hope we can both agree that rational or statistical discrimination is a bad thing for our society, and that we shouldn't be justifyi…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:20 PM
-8

Because they don't know how much every other person in the company is making? It's also not costless to just switch to another job.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:06 PM
3

You're placing an overemphasis on ability. Even if that upper middle class kid is less able than the poor kid in the urban environment, it's more likely the upper middle class kid will he go to the college of his choice and has a better network for job prospects. You have things like when a black and white worker send in an identical resume, the white worker gets called in for an interview significantly more (based on the name). It's not a just world.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:00 PM
0

Exactly, it's false precisely for the reason you just stated. You agree with me!
/r/MensRights27/09/16 05:56 PM
-30

So pointing how the same arguments used to justify racial discrimination are not being rehashed to justify sex based discrimination is a straw man argument how?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 05:45 PM
-10

Right -- the reason why this is not seen in reality is because some company owners actually do think that black workers are not as good workers. Or that some company owners are racist, and while they may understand that the black workers produce just as much labor at the same quality as other workers, they pay them less anyway. Again, you're looking for a rationality in irrationality. There is perceived to be a gender pay gap because the belief is that women are just as valuable workers as men, …
/r/MensRights27/09/16 05:42 PM
6

Having a bad start doesn't absolve you of making responsible decisions. Of course not, but it does heavily influence the kind of decisions you're likely to make, or the kind of choices you think are available to you. It's like how a kid in an upper middle class suburb thinks about going to college (routine) versus how a poor kid in the city (nobody in his family has ever gone to college, it's not expected of you). It seems like you're completely dismissing nature and nurture in how people grow u…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 04:43 PM
-110

That's a flawed argument. It's the same one used to justify thing like "there's no racial pay gap, if there was employers would only hire black workers!" You're taking an irrational behavior, sexism (or racism), and then trying to say what would a rational sexist do. In other words, what would an irrational rational person do? Statistical discrimination is statistical discrimination be it based on gender or race. Economists do take the pay gap seriously. Saying no economists take it seriously is…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 04:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter