TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Falandyszeus Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Falandyszeus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Women can already serve voluntarily Yeah, but with special rights men don't get such as quitting at any time for any reason. At least back when I served. I also signed up voluntarily (got "free number", but wanted to enlist) but was told I'd be expected to finish or be subject to the same legal intervention as those not voluntarily there. So while they probably wouldn't make it illegal to skip, the current laws seem to allow that they just show up and quit on the spot.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 10:10 AM
7

Saw quite a few on tinder in denmark... On the positive side, at least they're embracing "local culture", rather than causing trouble I guess?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 02:48 PM
14

I Doubt they thought they didn't feel pain, probably rather that their subjective experience of it was different, so it wasn't ethically as problematic as doing it to an "equal." Extreme example: many people apparently believe animals like lobsters and whatnot don't really feel pain, they just react to sensing damage instinctively. So between boiling a hamster alive and boiling a lobster alive, and I'm sure the vast majority would feel much more reluctant about the hamster. Regardless of whether…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:02 AM
1

Far as I'm concerned the primary active ingredient in soap is the same in most soaps: Sodium laureth sulfate. Not a chemist or anything though, but if you just want soap, that seems to be enough and You can buy the Sodium laureth sulfate for about 15$ a kg. Could probably make 50- 100L soap with that?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 10:38 AM
1

Knowing that some crimes there have different punishments for men and women, not sure who it's usually more lenient for, but it'd be interesting to know what specifically people are risking when they protest. If you risk getting hung/stoned to death, vs a year in prison fx. Whoever is risking death is definitely the braver ones in the context. If we are to deem one party or another as braver and not just appreciate that they're both doing something. To improve their country.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:25 AM
214

Also VERY optimistic to think she could do it in 24 hours as some random bloke, assuming it was indeed a thing.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 08:41 AM
7

If she'd done a bit more rather than resting on her laurels she'd probably have gotten the victory (by the actual conditions of US elections...) Its all on her, she could hardly have had a better/worse opponent. Yet she screwed the pooch. Imagine losing to Trump. Especially with damn near all of the media backing you up and half the country acting as if he's genuinely evil. Must be embarrassing. Though to be fair, her and biden were probably close to being the 2 candidates that'd give trump the …
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:58 AM
7

In the sequel she has sex with her boyfriend from the first movie while he is essentially possessing someone elses body, due to her wish of having him back. Kind of a weird situation.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:53 AM
2

Not that it justifies it, but did they have any sort of equipment to help them get down there or get you up? From personal experience a ~2m deep hole is fairly tough for women to get out of. At least based on how many of the ones I was conscripted with who couldn't do it alone when running the obstacle course, despite being otherwise fairly fit. (Maybe 6/8, that being after a couple weaker ones left "conscription", since it's free for women to quit at any time... while for the men it was maybe a…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:41 PM
3

Seems like a decent guy and some of his songs are pretty good. Not sure why anyone would particularly have issue with him.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:44 PM
9

Somewhat, don't particularly like Musk, he's a bit of a scam artist. That said he seems to like freedom of speech as long as it's not about his businesses, so cautiously optimistic that he'll improve the general lack of freedom on there.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 09:51 AM
1

Not sure about your conclusion. could just as well be that the small portion of male leaders, care a bit more about their female subservients wellbeing than their male ones. (which seems likely if believing in the idea of the empathy gap, ie both men and women are more empathetic towards women) or that women hold a lot of soft power, that is rarely considered cause it's less obvious when looking at history, than someone wearing a uniform and yelling orders. Whether something is a matriarchy or p…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 11:56 AM
2

Average or median? With these kinds of low numbers, with occasional high ballers I'm pretty certain a few individuals could drag the numbers way up. FX if you have 10 who've had 1 partner and 1 who've had 10 then the average will be ~2. Long story short, median is probably a way better measurement for this. Also if it's more of a moral based question it shouldn't really matter if they do, but whether they would if they could. FX personally wouldn't, as I'm just not interested in it.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:33 AM
11

"more educated" seems relative, in a general sense yeaaaaaah no, I wouldn't count it for much, would even count it against them in most regards... but in regards to this topic they SHOULD be better informed... But clearly the education is shite or they didn't pay attention if something as simple as "misandry" is beyond them as a concept.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 10:48 AM
3

In Denmark: Our law regarding domestic abuse victims (service loven 109) specifically grants various rights to women (and their kids), such as: shelter and 10 hours of psychological services etc. Men, not so much. At best somewhat incidentally through a law regarding socially vulnerable people, though to my understanding that's more along the lines of people suffering from bad mental health. (Service loven 110) service loven 109 (can't put it into Google translate for you, it just opens the app …
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:06 PM
1

but I'm sure you can agree that those dudes exist and that this shit happens, no? For sure, maybe not exactly that, but there's definitely guys who'd support a cause they hate cause they think it improves their chances with the ladies. If memory serves there's been quite a few "male feminists" who turned out to be rather... Rapey... When it didn't work out for them. Though that might also just be a case of acting pious to hide sins. No doubt some dude would put in that effort for some "original …
/r/MensRights10/12/21 09:59 PM
2

Which is relevant how? Maybe if it was the same man and the feminist group was of the not fond of "sexual expression" variety (can't recall the term...) It'd make sense but if not, fail to see the relevance? Especially if they're doing a decent job of it, would put them ahead of a LOT of mainstream subreddit mods...
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:39 PM
2

What's wrong with praising their self insight? It's great that they are least can see what the rest of us can't.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 10:52 PM
1

Agreed, especially if it's obligatory (here it's currently optional but that's just cause they ignore the system in place that's used for obligated service, you draw a number and either go free or not, but there's enough willing people that it's mostly just used to prioritize who gets in, you mostly aren't forced, though some are...) Here in Denmark you get paid decently for it assuming you do it when 18ish (comparing to what other ~18 year olds earn at least). Assuming you don't have an apartme…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 11:05 AM
1

Seems like a ridiculous goal at any rate that they should FEEL safe, rather than BE safe. (As much as is reasonable without living under some totalitarian nanny state...) 1) should they feel safe if they actually aren't? Is it not better then to be aware of the risks? And take precautions. 2) they might be safe but not feel like it. In which case the issue isn't safety but paranoia/misinformation/people who benefit from you feeling unsafe for whatever reason. Make it as objectively safe as is re…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 05:23 PM
2

If you want then R/Bropill is also a really great community overall for this kine or stuff Regardless, best of luck in the future mate. <3
/r/MensRights03/10/21 10:03 AM
1

Depends on what they're a victim of, but presuming that that's where you want to go... What does it matter if they're the victim of a man or woman?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 02:39 PM
4

all that does is encourage companies to treat beliefs as something they can make into a commodity Pretty sure they do so regardless if they feel that it's to their benefit. Sometimes that really doesn't pan out but they try. Might as well have them do so for you too if they're doing it for others. It might be false but it's "free" advertisement of your cause if you get them to "support" the things that you support by buying things that you would anyhow. Fx all the companies preaching LBGT+ talki…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:22 AM
110

Always just cringe at it, kinda funny, besides if women run the world then they can take the blame for the shit in it, no? I say embrace it, deflate the "the world suck because of men and would be better under women's leadership" Crowd. Besides does similar empowerment even exist for guys? Closest type of stuff i can think of is songs being all "I am badass" not "Guys are badass" (rap, rock and metal have a bunch, but that's always about the individual not their gender)
/r/MensRights20/08/21 11:16 AM
1

As long as it clearly states what someone is looking for and allows you to sort by that it's perfectly fair imo. Wanna look for friends on tinder or whatever site? Go ahead. Sex buddies? Go ahead. Someone to seriously date and marry? Sure thing... Etc... Just be clear about what you're seeking especially if it's not the usual purpose of the site. (Friends on tinder Fx)
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:21 PM
6

Neat, alternatively R/Bropill is pretty close and has a quite active user base of 48k.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:39 AM
3

For sure, Finland gets it far as I'm aware. Then again when you are a sparsely populated country on border with Russia that's probably not a bad call. Would make sense to have everyone undergo some branch or the other, even if it's something more domestic minded like disaster relief.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 03:30 PM
27

We'd murder for those gas prices... Sincerely the rest of the western world...
/r/MensRights14/06/21 09:55 AM
7

Maybe if you were the slave of someone sufficiently rich that they treated you exceptionally well, just to screw with less rich people... "Hah, my slaves are wealthier than you!" Would be a decent flex I'd assume... Definitely a stretch to consider what you mentioned slavery for sure though.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 05:24 PM
13

Awesome, good luck with it <3
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:31 PM
2

Ah, that really sucks. Hopefully you can make some progress toward not being dependent on their friendship if it goes too far for you. Believe me, know how hard that can be! Majority of my friends are all connected to my best friend somehow... Thanks <3
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:31 PM
11

Doing pretty good, work is good as usual, country is slowly reopening, so with some luck i can start going to MMA, boxing, dancing or something soon. And at least starting to swim more again. Also got a much nicer apartment coming up in start June, 20min closer to work, more privacy, possibility of having fur pets, all the good stuff! Weather is FINALLY summer like rather than winter! Definitely lifts the spirits. Unfortunately MC battery is completely shot and it'll only start when jumpstarted.…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:27 PM
4

Pretty sure you've got to relearn your counter-banter skills unfortunately or try to explain to them that it's hurtful to you, or a bit much, but success is probably unlikely... Good luck mate.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:14 PM
52

how is Big titty goth gf pedo now? Wait a second... Goths are seen as kind of immature, immature is a synonym for childish, childish = PEDO, so big titty goth gf = what a pedo wants confirmed... Damnit...
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:40 PM
6

Probably not much, those mods are trying to be more censorious than the chinese government when it comes to shit they dislike...
/r/MensRights29/03/21 10:00 AM
-4

No argument from me, women hold and have probably always held a metric shit ton of soft power. Pretty sure patriarchy/matriarchy refers primarily to hard power though. Just pretty certain that it's technically a patriarchy regardless, even if it doesn't behave in a way you'd expect. (If for whatever reason you expect men to care more about other men than they do women... Which doesn't seem to be the case, empathy gap and all.) You officially hold the "power" even if you choose to follow someone …
/r/MensRights15/03/21 03:19 PM
-17

Not if men technically hold the power (on average), but just use it in a way that's anti-men/pro-women.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:44 AM
10

New feminist movie from Netflix? No way On top of that the snapshot is of the presumed lead looking fucking miserable!? Feel like I'm about to win in bango here!
/r/MensRights06/03/21 12:12 PM
1

Which is at all relevant when I've only referred to them in the context of their waterproofness...
/r/MensRights23/02/21 09:10 PM
1

You have your way of doing things, I have mine. Thank God for that, you go be the ShamWow I'll be the duck... quack quack. Ignoring the complete fact that she was a totally shallow and disgusting excuse for an XY chromosome. Then why lower yourself to her level. Why care?
/r/MensRights23/02/21 08:20 PM
2

Sure, did i dispute that? Cause he clearly could, just don't think he should've.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 07:39 PM
0

She came at him and he got hit hard... Ever heard the saying water off of a ducks back? Op ain't a duck he's a ShamWow... First message he sent fine, leave it at that, instead he kept going and going...
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:47 AM
0

Yeah, good luck with all that bruh. Especially if it's just to piss off some subset of women who could probably care no less regardless of your success. Can't wait to be as shallow and dismissive as they are. Can't wait to use em til I'm bored with em and move on to the next one. Just going to so EXACTLY what they have done to me my whole life. It's only fair and they asked for it. Strong everything...
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:42 AM
1

You do you, but if this exchange was all I had to go off on, I'd avoid you both.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:34 AM
2

Idk mate, you both seem obnoxious.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 05:05 AM
1

Regardless, if the goal is to avoid any potential trouble, being aware of the legality would probably not be unwise for how easy it'd be to check.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 07:22 PM
17

No reason you couldn't record yourself talking to the class along with the teacher's reaction. Might want to check local laws first, apparently US states are pretty split between one party and two party consent in regards to recording in public. So might be illegal.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 10:44 AM
10

Call the factory directly and order a pallet...
/r/MensRights27/01/21 10:27 AM
30

Undoubtedly they find that to mean that 40% is wasted completely or worse yet spend on something counterproductive to their goals... (In the case of the ones whose ideal world is something like 5% makes, 95% women.)
/r/MensRights27/01/21 10:26 AM
1

True, but Getting an idea if they want it in the first place is probably a good start, from there you have whether they're qualified and whether they are willing to deal with the pros and cons of it.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 07:24 PM
2

Using that trick, I can make trump look better off than a homeless guy. Surely that doesn't require the trick, the opposite however! (Think you wrote it the wrong way around mate, quick before anyone sees!)
/r/MensRights07/01/21 04:35 PM
10

For once I would really love stats that don't just show that so and so category is "underrepresented" in a vocation, in consideration of someone's ideological goals... but what rate of interest they actually have for it... Fx: if 20% of politicians are women, but only a 1/10th as many women as men, actually wants the job (and everything that comes with it...) then women are overrepresented significantly, despite being the minority. While if twice as many women as men want it, then they're severe…
/r/MensRights07/01/21 04:28 PM
6

car production in 1942 was 223,000 units. in 1943? it was only 139 units. dropped by 99.9%. that doesn't sound like "women doing that too" to me. It was apparently much higher in 1941 too! And if I'm reading it right those 139 units were personal vehicles made during the entirety of the war period from 1943-45. there were about 3 million automobiles manufactured in the U.S. in 1941 Besides not necessarily nor apparently a result of what you're claiming Other items considered essential for war in…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:43 PM
11

Arguably if there's no doubt she did it, just having someone count to that much to drive home the point should be enough for any sane person to agree to locking her up and throwing away the key... so decent test for court bias. Here's a visual for anyone not bothered with counting: IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII III each…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 04:10 PM
2

Don't feed the beast and then complain when it comes back for seconds... Can't really blame any women for taking advantage of it, but something we as a society should probably try to move beyond.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 01:04 AM
3

Nope you aren't, you're anti American, islamophobic AND anti-semite! /S Whoever wants to be circumcised for whatever reason should choose to do so themselves at 18+, would be way more meaningful then too since it's something you choose to get closer to God, not something chosen for you...
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:31 AM
99

And will possibly always have the accusation hanging over them even if it's proven false. Also has a cost to it.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:42 AM
0

Fair, didn't catch that, have a nice weekend.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:46 PM
0

You forgot? Just saying that I find the media's hypocrisy when it benefits them rather entertaining. Especially with how much they apparently expect everyone to forget everything from one day to the next and yet apparently they aren't wrong in assuming so...
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:35 PM
12

I will the instant when it's official, it's not over till whatever issues trump (and whoever else eligible to do so), has been raised and resolved.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 09:01 AM
2

This, it might seem like that's the outcome we'll get once it is over, but the fat lady has yet to sing... Got to wait for all the trials and whatnot to run their course. Gotta love the (let's be charitable and say:) inconsistency from the media though, in being all "this will probably go on for months! It isn't over till it's over let's not call it prematurely!" "Biden is (seemingly) going to win, it's over it's over! Why aren't you conceding defeat!?"
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:57 AM
6

So can women! It's just sorta messy...
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:00 PM
0

IDK mate, my colleagues has a chat were they send sexy women, transwomen and weird clips... Those women with dicks are well endowed!
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:00 PM
2

Hard to say, to me it just screams "equality" when you want it, not when you don't.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:44 AM
2

Not entirely the same but somewhat; Here in denmark men have "værnepligt" (directly translated: the duty to guard), while women have "værneret" (the right to guard) in effect meaning that women can sign up for conscription should they wish to and may quit at any time too for any reason. while for guys you are called to come fullfil various physical and mental tests, (station day) followed by pulling a number (free card, vs "obligated" service). Now currently there's plenty willing people that it…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 08:40 PM
2

While I agree that it's probably more and that their numbers seem arbitrary, for the sake of moral consistency I have to argue that we can't really base that assumption on what we hear from the (news/social) media and whatnot. Especially not in regards to famous/wealthy people as they're probably significantly more likely to be involved in such a case. As people really have something significant to gain from such an accusation. So they could easily make up the majority of such cases, even if it'…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 08:04 PM
11

Agreed that it should carry a penalty, for one as you say it's accusing someone you know to be innocent and two it's a massive waste if the court systems resources, but how do you balance making it punishable enough to dissuade people from trying to falsely accuse someone while keeping it low enough of a punishment that they'll preferably admit to falsifying so it can be resolved and and the accused properly proven innocent.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:38 PM
1

Imo nah, they should leave everything up to the individual subs/mods and just stay out of it. Maybe with a limit to how many subs any one moderator may rule to try to avoid the whole "majority of popular subs being under the heel of very few people" we have got going on currently. But since they haven't choose the road of non interference then yeah, they should be consistent and do something about subs like that too if they take issue with the mens ones. Picking and choosing what to interfere in…
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/20 09:54 AM
1

Sorry to disappoint you then, I'm 190cm tall and got a sprinters physique. (Decent amount of muscle but not bulky, got wide shoulders though)
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:16 PM
2

Ditto, I've worn dresses a few times (for fun), rather liked it, and could definitely get behind it being normalized, but those were actually nice dresses (pretty simple but fitting, really shows of my shoulders) So couldn't they at least make it not something that even little girls would be likely to cringe at having to wear? Give me a black cocktail dress that's slimfit and then we'll talk. Hell I'd happily wear high heeled boots too, BRB 2m tall!
/r/MensRights08/10/20 01:28 PM
3

What even is the supposed logic of the lawyer here? Her being entitled to assets earned when married, sure whatever, that's a discussion for a different time, but how in the hell is she somehow entitled to a part in HIS future earnings? Their obligations to eachother should end the moment their divorce is signed. Especially when parting with several hundred million dollars... She won't be lacking anything for a lifetime or three, of doing nothing, while maintaining a VERY high standard of life.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 11:49 PM
53

Apartheid wasn't racist! - white guy/gal The final solution was justified - Nazis. Ceremoniously cutting the heart out of a living person and pushing them down the stairs of your pyramid is totally fine - Aztec priest. The raping of Nanking wasn't terrible - Japanese WW2 general involved in said raping... Etc... Guess that solves that, potential opresor says it's cool, so everything is cool!
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:55 AM
12

The entire premise falsely assumes that male leaders would care more about men just because they're men as well, when in reality both men and women are more sympathetic to women. So is it really a safe bet that men would be advantaged by male leaders?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:57 AM
43

Not sure if intentional but interesting how the camera angles change making then seem roughly equal in size on the left and the boy way larger on the right.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:08 PM
2

It's when you have windows in the ceiling/roof of your house, it's really neat in kitchens and living rooms as it creates a nice natural lighting! In this context however it's referring to the idea that there is an invisible barrier preventing women from ascending the corporate/political ladders. Inversely there's the concept of a glass floor, which is the lowest someone will go without struggle, ie less women coal miners Fx.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 02:31 PM
2

I'd bet they probably associate it with some supposed fantastical time period in which men just had these wonderful lives, while their wife's suffered like prisoners at home as property, so using the term wife now even with a different intention would still be a condonation to that somehow, thus offensive
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:03 PM
1

Arguably it's more like: 1-12 child, 13-19 teen. ~18+ adult depending on context
/r/MensRights15/04/20 10:01 AM
13

Majority of women must've got a submission kink or something. /S Edit: /s.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 11:55 PM
10

Can try to dig it up if I have time later, but there's a few studies that proves that both genders on average care more about womens wellbeing than that of men, so at any rate politicians regardless of gender would likely favour women moreso than men, in any situation in which they aren't exclusively serving the needs of individuals for their own benefit. Which arguably proves that the gender of the leader is a largely moot point, their morals are what matters, which can go either way, fx; tons …
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:39 AM
2

But does that count retroactively or only from now on? Pretty damn fucked up if they suddenly make people who though they'd be anonymous known all of a sudden. Especially if they can then be sued for child support or what not.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:03 PM
1

Yeah ditto, never particularly worried about anything involving other people. Would hate to be anxious constantly.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 11:00 AM
2

Male privilege is being able to walk a few miles home at night without even wondering about your safety. I just do it, and it's normal. It should be normal to everyone but it isn't. Probably moreso a result of women being taught that they're less safe than they really are and men being taught that they are safer than they really are. Which leaves women excessively stressed and men excessively careless. (How much excessive is obviously depends on how far of from reality people's perception of the…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:46 AM
3

That one group has it better than the other regardless of whether they're the cause of the other groups misfortunes. So on this case it'd mostly be women's fault that women feel like they have to wear a variety of clothing, unlike men who doesn't face the same pressures, but it's still presented as men being the privileged ones as if they're to blame. Same goes for fit/skinny privilege Vs fat people, the skinny (normal sized really) people didn't cause the fat people to be fat, but it's still pr…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:29 AM
1

Sexual selection (as first outlined by Charles Darwin) plays a part in the way women look at each other and the clothes they wear. This is not the sub for a discussion on Evolution but whatever feminists say, there are differences between the two genders. Why would women do that though? Shouldn't it be the men by that logic? After all most species arguably including humans have the male try to woo the female, not wise versa, thus most male individuals of species being more colourful or impressiv…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:24 AM
42

Fairly certain they'd just find some convoluted way to make that men's fault somehow.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:29 AM
9

So if I just don't know that something is illegal it's excusable? That's... Interesting... As it turns out I know nothing about British laws whatsoever so everything must be permitted!
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:08 PM
3

For someone who hates men they sure do love strawmen...
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:06 AM
1

No idea, sorry.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:47 AM
1

My guess (or retelling of something I've heard long ago, can't recall), would be that it's less detrimental for the survivability of a race to have higher rates of mutations/variations in males than females, resulting in more beneficial and detrimental traits, while females follow the safe road more closely until a specific trait has been successful enough that a majority of females have acquired it too though breeding. So men overall end up with more deviations. Would be interesting if someone …
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:25 AM
6

Intelligence wise from what I've seen there's a negligible difference if any in average intelligence. Some particular skills favours one gender over the other though, but that goes both ways, can't really list any off the top of my mind though. Though fairly interestingly if you take bell curves of men's and women's IQs, you'll find that more women are closer to the average IQ value, while for men there's more people at either extreme; more dumbfucks and more geniuses.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:12 AM
7

Charlie's angels remake. Fairly sure at least.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:40 PM
1

Not really feeling up to doing more attempts at math, so I'll let you play with it. But I'd guesstimate that you should end up with something close to 25% on account of those time spans roughly adding up to 10. When multiplied by 1.7 kids. Assuming that 24 hours is spent daily 7 days a week, otherwise you'll want to divide by 24 and multiply by the number of hours spent, or not spent... One of the other depending on what you want. I’m guessing you never nursed an infant Nope, haven't and can't s…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 08:24 PM
4

Even if it did, how much does that raise the long term average? From all the guesswork below I'd say about 0.8% would be attributable to breastfeeding. guesstimate for pregnancy would be about 0.9% (40/100*(3 years × 0.75) = 0.9%) so 1.7% between the two of them. Assuming that you're completely incapable of doing anything for the entire 9 months of each pregnancy. Obviously these numbers are different to different individuals on account of being an average, so some women might spend significantl…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:07 PM
3

I personally always refer to casually explained: is she into you. https://youtu.be/xa-4IAR_9Yw In, short, there's really no way to be sure, maybe she's Canadian...
/r/MensRights05/01/20 07:11 PM
2

Is it common knowledge that not applying for the draft has those consequences? Or does it just work out in a way that the majority of the ~160 million US men just randomly apply through secondary means sooner or later, before it becomes an issue? Seems like pretty crucial information, regardless definitely unfortunate for people who unknowingly end up in that situation.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:34 PM
8

They should, neither the media nor people, hold out long enough for the legal judgement to be made before branding someone accused as guilty...
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:53 PM
3

For All the critique they can imo justly give it.¹, ², ³.. Incels is hell of a stretch, the only even remotely "incel" part is the bard failing badly in his attempts to score one of the old man's 2, bodyguards. Outside of that he apparently got laid a fair bit, it's at least alluded to as such. Maybe spoilers ahead, I'll try to avoid them but beware... Anyhow imo they could critique the following: 1: the way the series jumps around throughout a sizeable timespan was pretty confusing at times and…
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:26 AM
173

Check your privilege guys... Obviously women's hours are longer than men's, a "woman's hour" is the equivalent of 1.5 men's hours. So women actually work 50 men's hours a week! But they're so efficient that they do it in 34...
/r/MensRights15/12/19 08:38 PM
7

You could probably argue something along the lines of: 1) Both men and women care more about the wellbeing of women than that of men. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112287/#!po=6.56566 2) so even if/when kings/Pharaoh's/tribal leaders/whatever, cared about their subjects wellbeing, they'd probably have favoured things that act in women's favour. Which does seem to be the case as women were usually protected to one extent or another, from the worst hardships sometimes at the cost o…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 06:30 PM
8

That it's an unnecessary procedure that in some cases doesn't turn out fine and is only really done for cultural or religious reasons. (Kellogg's trying to prevent masturbation, weird ass story in the old testament, etc) Sure there are some medical cases in which it's a reasonable threatment, but those aren't common enough to warrant preemptively doing it on everyone. So absent legitimate medical reasons, leave people's foreskins for them to decide what they want done to, once they're old enough…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:12 PM
3

another movie that fails cause its target audience is the portion of the population that not only agrees with it, but desires to be spammed with feministic talking points, while also being a part of some niche fanbase of an old pre-existing franchise!? who'd have thought that most people just want an interesting movie, not propaganda.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 04:09 PM
3

Not sure what your point is here? The father in that post does legitimately sound like he's an asshole. Sure he can make a father son bonding trip if he wants, but it sounds way more like the father-daughter relationship is the one that needs mending. Yet he completely disregards that cause she's being "sensitive and unreasonable".
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:18 AM
2

I'd the woman isn't extremely ugly, not far, probably just receive a bunch of comments to be thankful or some shit, the same run of the mill cycle that happens every time some female teacher has statutorily-raped some underage boy.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:21 PM
0

Yeah, but that'd take close to as many years and take a heavy toll, a sufficiently fertile man could impregnate 15 women and have 15 babies by the same time next year. With artificial insemination you could make that a thousand, no woman can bear that many children. Even if they were crazy enough to want that. also all of this isn't really a significant concern in modern times, there's plenty of us, we won't exactly go extinct regardless. But it's still faster with a surplus of women than a surp…
/r/MensRights09/11/19 01:01 AM
0

The other dude did a pretty bad job explaining the most probably cause... basically a group of humans, losing 80% of its males could recover in a generation or two, same group losing 80% of their women would take several generations longer to recover, which would long term reduce the number of men too, So in regards to society it's cheaper to lose men, than women. especially with our low human birth rates, if we were spiders or something and laid a million eggs then it wouldn't matter much. Not …
/r/MensRights07/11/19 05:38 PM
3

This, for all crimes in general, as much as possible the identity of the accused should be held confidential. Too many cases of people having their life's ruined cause the media or social sites ran with it, only for it to later turn out that the accused was without a doubt innocent, the knowledge of their innocence, never spreads as far as the accusations. So people's life is ruined regardless of their complete innocence.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 09:16 PM
6

You caring about the health of your dick/balls is definitely toxic masculinity... /S Good luck with it man, hopefully all is well and it's nothing serious, but better get it checked just to be safe. <3
/r/MensRights03/11/19 08:38 PM
3

Couple of things that worked for me: Try to be more conscious of breathing only through your nose when awake and to sleep on your side rather than your back/stomach. If that fails or on top of it, you can sleep with your mouth taped shut for a while, sounds crazy but it works. (You can get tape specifically made for it, or use sports tape, just be aware to clean away the glue residue properly if using sports tape. It's pretty easy to get off if need be, but as long as you don't do it after a nig…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 06:41 PM
1

This one is also guided by a female ground control operator... Which is probably making them making a big deal out of this all the more sexist, this isn't an achievement unless you view women as less capable, it's just Tuesday. As you said a woman has already done a spacewalk, so that achievement has already been achieved, decades ago! what does the gender of the ground control operator matter!? But whatever, if it makes them happy, to pat themselves on the back for the achievement of someone el…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:04 PM
6

Ruin a few more if you have to, better than paying a bit of money... From same thread: "I’m not OP but personally, I’d say in a louder voice “ohhh, you don’t have enough money?” in a really innocent way, with my head to the side. And if he tries to get smart, I’d say, in the same louder voice, “I’ve just never been on a date with a cheap guy.” in the same innocent tone, laugh a little if you can. If he keeps trying to be smart, say “I’ll pay half since I feel bad that you don’t have enough money…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 06:23 PM
1

That's some 1984 level stuff. ministry of peace = administration of war... Feminism= patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 02:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter