TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HumansDisgustMe123 Archive

View 2 posts and 87 comments by HumansDisgustMe123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I see a lot of parallels with this and the MAGA genesis. Trump got poor people to vote for him despite being an obvious classist snob, and he got rural communities to vote for him despite being a pampered city-boy. How did he do it? How did it happen? It's because the poor and rural communities felt ignored, isolated and demonised by the mainstream, so they readily flocked to whoever promised something different regardless of the red flags. MAGA went from a minor joke to a major platform in reco…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 10:17 PM
13

I wonder when people like this will notice that you don't get "not all men" comments when you don't generalise all men? It's really not that hard to be specific. I've had more than my fair share of abuse from specific straight people, but I don't go around making wild reductive statements about all straight people, what good would that do? All I'd be doing is adding more hate and distrust into a world that already has too much of it. I fight bigots, not anyone who happens to occupy the sexuality…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/25 03:02 AM
11

Apex fallacy.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/25 01:16 PM
26

Many people who worked with Lucy Letby thought she was safe and friendly. She murdered babies. We don't even have the full picture on how many she killed, but she was convicted on 7 counts of murder and 8 counts of attempted murder. So no, not all women, but some women, indistinguishable from other women. See how fucking ridiculous that sounds? Misandrists use statistics to justify generalisations, but fail to realise that women contribute to over 70% of infanticides and over 90% of neonaticides…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/03/25 07:33 PM
30

It's the Andy Murray problem. In the UK back over a decade ago, whenever he was doing well in tennis, the major England-based newspapers would refer to him as "British", and when he was doing poorly, they'd refer to him as "Scottish". Both terms are accurate but the motivation behind when they'd use each term was obvious. It became something of a running gag.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 05:49 PM
11

Maybe that description applied to Twitter of old, but right now it's a Nazi hellhole full of medical disinformation, bots saying "PUSSY IN BIO", and white supremacists espousing anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Arguably a million times worse.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/25 12:21 PM
18

How deranged do you have to be to think men are committing SUICIDE out of spite? Nobody ends their own life as part of some convoluted scheme to bully women. That's fucking insane.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/25 12:18 PM
1

I pity these TikTok teens, they think they're helping feminism, they think they're helping equality, but all they're doing is being good little sheep for the billionaires. Equality is achieved through specific action, not through lazy generalisations and vitriolic tribalism. Anyone engaging in such behaviours is just assisting the billionaire class in fracturing what little remains of working class solidarity.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/25 06:39 PM
-1

It's pretty obvious that the claim that this crash was the fault of a female pilot is driven by misogyny (just another example in an endless roster of alt-right blame-games targeting anyone who isn't an uber-wealthy white male Trump sycophant), but you can't counteract that disinformation with your own disinformation. You can't fight fire with fire. "male leadership" doesn't cause crashes just as "female leadership" doesn't cause crashes, "white leadership" doesn't cause crashes just as "black l…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/25 06:27 PM
19

There's always this complaint that men are stealing focus because we interject in women-only discussions, but what's missed here is that men only interject when reductive generalisations are thrown out that paint all men as problematic, disenfranchising countless male victims of SA as well as countless other crimes. The simple fact is, men wouldn't be inserting themselves into these discussions if these discussions weren't rife with sexist stereotyping and tribalist hate. You won't find men inse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 04:56 PM
17

There's such an obvious double standard at play. When I was a kid this girl tormented me and my friend as we'd sit outside the gates to be picked up after school, she'd spit in our hair, throw dirt at us, and we just sat there and took it because we both knew if we defended ourselves the adults would punish us. One day I finally snapped when she was mashing her lunchbox leftovers into my friend's scalp, I shouted at her, I called her a slag (I'm British and that was the go-to insult). I didn't p…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/25 10:23 PM
22

"You can't wear that specific shape of fabric because currently society associates that with a gender for unexplainable reasons" I guess we're supposed to ignore the fact that dresses, skirts and high heels were very common for men throughout centuries of human history. Just have a quick look at how men dressed in the 17th century, it puts drag queens to shame it's so flamboyant. The point is attitudes change but that's all they are, attitudes. Clothing is just fabric, just materials cut and wov…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/25 11:38 PM
29

I get that there are plenty of men out there who date young, too young in my opinion but if it's two consenting adults of legal age I really can't pass judgement even if I personally think huge age gaps are weird and gross (regardless of the genders involved). Having said that, there's no indication here that the man in question was trying to measure her "worth" other than the woman's own assumptions and biases. Giving him (as I would give anyone of any gender) the benefit of the doubt, he may h…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 05:00 PM
7

Anita Sarkeesian, there's a name I haven't heard in a long time. It was truly horrifying the sorts of disgusting comments she received when that whole fiasco years back kicked off, but what really struck me was the perceived binary nature of it all. Either you supposedly had to be 100% behind Anita's videos and take all she said as gospel, or you had to be a misogynistic violent incel-type, no other choices. It really just didn't stack. Nothing is ever so black and white. I'm no violent misogyni…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/25 05:15 PM
5

I feel like she's a very tepid example of sexism in the music industry, especially when the rap scene circa 1990-2005 was rife with songs about feeling up skirts, getting girls drunk to make them more pliable, hell, some basically just describe rape, literal rape. I'll say that there's no place in a civilised society for material which treats any gender, race, sexuality etc as a monolithic stereotype, but Rihanna is just such a lukewarm example.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/24 11:15 AM
24

Ah yes, the sub full of TERFs who claim not to be TERFs, even though their literal sub name is a blindingly obvious reference to their belief that biological sex and gender identity are the same thing. I mean you almost have to admire their delusions. The sub is full of white middle-class cisgender hetero women, literally the most protected demographic on Earth, who think they're the victims despite the fact that they spend most of their time generalising and outright harassing gay men, black me…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/24 09:17 PM
44

How about this, anyone who deliberately falsely accuses anyone of any crime, and it can be proven without a reasonable doubt that this false accusation was indeed deliberate, should face the average sentencing term for that same crime. The key word here being deliberate, because I don't want to see any woman or man to go to jail simply because they misidentified their attacker in the dark of night, and I don't want any woman or man to feel hesitance at taking their attacker to court, but what he…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/24 09:10 PM
30

To be fair, if the choice is a disingenuous party of supposedly progressive people who treat me with contempt by virtue of my gender, and a geriatric authoritarian clown in orange fake tan... I'll take the former, but I understand why so many men took the latter. Competency, qualifications, policies, none of this shit actually matters to 90% of the electorate regardless of gender. What it really boils down to is the Republican party treats mens issues with indifference at worst and lip-service a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 04:08 PM
4

Which is why I said republicans and not republican men. Stop trying to look for an enemy. I hate misandrists just as much as the rest of you, the point is this isn't misandrist. This is just flipping a popular sentiment amongst Republicans on its head to showcase their gendered hypocrisy. That's all.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 02:20 AM
5

Yeah you're right, the real man is the pot-bellied one dying his hair piss-yellow and having himself painted in fake tan every day. Wait a minute....
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 01:52 AM
1

Nah, I think we can definitely do that with the American Conservatives. They're a unique case. The kind of group that celebrates people like Elon Musk for ragging against trans people, but ironically has had more gender-affirming surgery than his trans daughter.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 01:50 AM
-7

Not really. It makes a valid point. Republicans made a choice for women's bodies rather than leave the choice to them. I think it's important Republicans see graphic material like this so they might someday understand what it's like to have a government deciding things about your body without your consent. If that means posters of jagged cock rings, so be it, the only men this will piss off are the Republican men anyway, and they're a far cry from real men to begin with.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 01:34 AM
-2

I think that's really just anti-Republican propaganda.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 01:30 AM
35

Ultimately, I don't think the problem is that men tend to lean more towards the Republican party, but rather that people of all genders tend to lean more towards whoever pays them attention. Trump won 2016 because countless people in rural communities and across the rust-belt felt completely ignored by the political status quo. He was able to win the votes of women, POCs and queer folk despite the fact that his personality, beliefs and behaviour are clearly at odds with what these groups want. T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/24 11:13 AM
5

True, but best to avoid giving them any ammunition that might reinforce their generalisation
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 01:54 AM
2

I meant I understand why OP doesn't like Item 1. Not that the woman's perspective was understandable.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 10:52 PM
7

I think the vast majority of people in this sub would agree too, but I am worried this is the sort of post that could be in a TwoX screenshot about how misandry isn't real and how everyone here just wants to control women's bodies. We're all walking on a pretty tight line here, we've got to be perfect bastions of altruism if there's any hope of anyone listening to what we have to say instead of lumping us in with the red-pilled incels and Tate fans. OP might want to reconsider this post in my op…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 10:45 PM
13

Item 1 I understand, Item 2 I can't get behind because I believe a woman has the right to choose what she does with her body, and that right ultimately should override the man's decision since he's not the one carrying the embryo, she is. Having said that, I wish for a utopia in which abortions simply aren't necessary. I know obviously it won't happen, but I hate to see life extinguished, even non-sentient underdeveloped foetuses, I don't even like to see a fly squished. I still believe in a wom…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 10:09 PM
31

It's true, the patriarchy serves us so well, that's why we kill ourselves at 400% the rate of women, why we end up homeless at 400% the rate of women, and why we die in work-related accidents at 1000% the rate of women. /s I'm so tired of these culture war cunts. They'll take the absolute zenith of capitalist success and use that as a baseline to compare the experiences of average people. If I used Oprah as my measure for the lived experiences of the average black American woman, that'd be right…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/09/24 11:06 AM
3

This is only readable for people with Tumblr accounts. Half way down the page you get that shitty "classified" pop-up.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/09/24 09:46 AM
64

Except we can't create safe spaces at all. Any time we try to open a refuge for male victims of domestic abuse it gets derailed by misandrists. The therapy fallacy is ridiculous as well, more than half of male suicide victims pursue some form of therapy prior. Evidently the gynocentric approach to therapy isn't working for most men, and that says more about the therapy given than the recipient.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 07:03 PM
33

So in an industry already beset with QA issues, they decide to eliminate the vast majority of applicants from consideration, and they're surprised that it didn't work to their favour? You already had slim-pickings and then you made it 10x worse for yourselves. The same thing would happen if I tried to start a primary school with exclusively male staff. I'd just be arbitrarily denying myself access to the majority of CVs on my desk when I have to hire teachers, and would have to accept essentiall…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 03:34 PM
8

Obvious projection. I've seen, liked, and supported countless posts and discussions about women's issues. I draw the line when those same issues are used as a bargaining chip to make sweeping negative tribalist generalisations about any gender, which unfortunately happens far too often. There's plenty of women out there who want to talk about their issues, who genuinely want to improve things for women like themselves, then there's the hateful minority (who are still a significant quantity) who …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/24 11:00 AM
1

Her campaign tactics and talks haven't really made her racial or gender identity a major talking point which is refreshing, establishing a more inclusive view of the political norm which is nice, rather than denoting her specifically as an exception. It's nice to see that she's not trying to use tribalist language like Trump. I don't think she will encourage either of the things you're suggesting. I doubt she can heal the divisions in America, or that anyone else can, but that's very much prefer…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 07:36 PM
9

This fallacy has been used by MAGA types, racists, homophobes and transphobes countless times. The question that needs to be asked in feminist spaces is this, if I take a violent crime that is disproportionately committed by women and use the same logic, would you have a problem with it? Infanticide for example. Women lead in infanticide and neonaticide. "No, not all women, but if you saw a toddler eating a box of maltesers, and you knew 1 in 10 were poisoned, you'd be concerned, would you not?"…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 10:16 AM
9

Raised by a covert narcissist, this style of argument sent me through a whole series of childhood flashbacks 😂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 10:04 AM
5

The sad irony of it all is that there's a good reason why male SA victims are so vocal in feminist spaces. Nobody is defending male SA victims so they have to defend themselves, and the only circles that routinely shit on them for existing and conflate them with their abusers by virtue of gender are feminist spaces. As an SA victim you have two choices, let them continue to draw parallels with you and your abuser with their wild generalisations, dredging up your trauma time and time again, or yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 09:59 AM
24

Imagine being so fucking thick that you think you can generalise billions on the basis of personal experience. Narcissism at its finest.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/08/24 09:52 PM
20

I think it's important to remember that when it comes to the electorate, the vast majority just want to feel as though they've been seen, moreso than they want substantive policy. Trump won 2016 precisely because people in the rust-belt and the more rural communities felt ignored by the political system. He paid them lip-service and the Trump presidency was the result. The mistake is thinking that the people voting for Trump are aligned completely with his stances. Humans are VERY good at cognit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/24 12:03 PM
46

So a developer does his job, and she's mad? I'm a software developer and if I were only restricted to developing apps where I am the target demographic, I'd have to say goodbye to 90% of my clients. What if we applied this same shitty tribalist nonsense to other industries? What if supermarkets like Tesco and Asda stopped making vegan products because their CEOs are meat-eaters? Bitter madness for tribalist narcissists who seethe seeing anyone but themselves succeed.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/24 05:38 PM
8

The irony of it all. I'm sure the commenter thought they were being supportive here, but really they were just implying that homosexuality is a choice. The commenter wanted to make a misandrist statement, and instead managed to propagate one of the most damaging myths about gay people. I'm not surprised though. People who hate blindly based on reductive generalisations often believe they're doing it for some greater good, but inevitably they always reveal that as far as they are concerned, minor…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/24 11:47 AM
34

I'd also argue their market is also more liberated in a way, Magic Mike and 50 Shades of Grey made a fortune, and men are viewed with suspicion for viewing and reading things much more tame, and 99.9% of men certainly wouldn't view or read such things in public as many women have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 07:05 PM
78

The trope which I find infuriating is when the news describes victims as either "women" or "people". They're very deliberate in their choice of words so that when an tragic event disproportionately or exclusively affects men, they generalise to "people". It's verbal obfuscation. They've been doing this a lot with the Bibby Stockholm fiasco in the UK. The previous government bought a decrepit barge designed to temporarily house 250 people. The government decided to use it to host asylum seekers w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 04:38 PM
41

Here's my version: 7 babies murdered by a nurse with a syringe Shaving cream is carcinogenic 99% of all workplace deaths are men due to the role they play in society Men being abused by women are 40,000% less likely to find a DV shelter that will accept them the internet: "Everything is your fault because of how you were born"
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/24 10:00 PM
64

Honestly I just think it's disgusting how self-professed progressive people (many in feminist spaces) think it's okay to use such a fresh and heinous tragedy as a prop for their petty tribalist gender war. Murder victims aren't tokens to whip out when you're feeling hate towards some ill-defined monolithic boogeyman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 10:53 PM
36

Can't even watch The Good Place anymore because of her. I refuse to support any product or media that enriches a gender tribalist.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/24 01:17 PM
45

The irony considering men are overwhelmingly more likely to be the victim of a violent crime. Yes yes I know, the misandrists will say "by OTHER MEN", but that argument falls flat on its face with the most minimal critical examination. What if we did the same unsympathetic victim-blaming bullshit with violent crimes where women are the majority perpetrators? Infanticide and neonaticide come to mind, both overwhelmingly commited by women, and no, to any misandrist lurkers here, since you'd never …
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/24 01:15 PM
25

Eh.... Postpartum psychosis is a real thing, birth can be traumatic as fuck and what comes after can really break your mind. However, I do find it interesting that people are readily leaping to the more sympathetic and diminished responsibility end of potential explanations, when with men the automatic assumption is that their motivations must lie at the most nefarious end of the range of possibilities. When we know the facts about this case, then we can determine if this is really diminished re…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 01:53 AM
2

I have a pretty nasty confession to make. I was complicit in this bias. Before striking out on my own as a contractor, I worked for a larger software house where it was mostly men. I'd get handed a bunch of CVs from the HR department sourced from agencies and whatnot, and I'd pick out the ones I wanted to interview. It was a long time ago, I was young, naive, I was the quintessential proud company man. The company's image meant a lot to me, so I resented the idea that we could be seen as a boy's…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 06:02 PM
25

Why do misandrists seem to almost always operate in absolutes? Every man is the oppressor, every woman the victim. Doesn't that just remove female agency and completely erase the men and young boys who have faced abuse? Seems like operating on broad hateful generalisations just yields a net loss for all genders.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 05:19 PM
4

No arguments here, but it sure is depressing
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 10:27 AM
8

You'd think having access to almost all human knowledge would change things, but I've yet to meet a single misandrist or misogynist who will actually research anything. They don't like scientific journals or peer-reviewed studies. They don't have the critical reasoning skills to discern a reputable source. They like pretty infographics spread on social media that tell them exactly what they want to hear. Personally I think it's rooted in narcissism. 8 billion individuals all as multifaceted and …
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 10:20 AM
12

Cites 2 egotistical celebrities, uses that to justify a generalisation of "the average man". Well, if anecdotal evidence is sufficient as this person seems to believe, I could cite Genene Jones and Lucy Letby. After all, we know the vast majority of infanticides are committed by women, and that's two women famous for murdering several infants. If we're following the same broken generalising logic, I could say that my definition of safety for infants is "very, very different" from the average wom…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 10:04 AM
17

Having my ass pinched by giggling drunk middle-aged women over a dozen times comes to mind, the earliest incident happened when I was 10. Pinch a 10 year old boy's ass and it's a laugh riot. Pinch a 10 year old girl's ass and the law get involved. Both should be taken seriously but they aren't. Then when I was 12, there was the girl at school who routinely pushed and shoved me and my best friend for months, she would put gross things in our hair, bits of cookies and the like, and for months we j…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/24 10:08 PM
7

It seems it's only really considered a problem if the industry in question is considered high-class and/or a money-printer like the tech space. Note how nobody cares that refuse collection, waste treatment, street sweeping, bricklaying and other "low-class" jobs are "male dominated". On the flip-side of that, nobody seems to care that university placements, childcare workers, HR, PR, veterinarians and primary school teaching positions are "female dominated", all of which are considered comparati…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/24 12:28 AM
9

They did the same thing in Coronation Street last year. Aadi, barely 18 years old got coerced into having an affair with a woman in her 30s who grabbed at his junk in a restaurant, clearly making him uncomfortable, but the entire storyline was played for laughs and the show's producer kept referring to it as a "steamy love affair". She routinely put him in compromising and risky positions, heightening his anxieties, getting him panicked and flustered, and it was all set up to be some sort of hap…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 03:53 AM
3

You never actually get an answer though. Like, never. They never answer questions. You only get ad hominems, straw manning and more fallacies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/24 01:11 AM
51

Just got into an argument with a Man Vs Bear proponent on another sub. I pointed out that women commit the vast majority of neonaticide, so by "Man Vs Bear logic", I can therefore conclude that it's safer to entrust a baby with a bear than the baby's own mother. Obviously they had no counterpoint to this, so they said "I'm not listening and you can't change my mind" over and over. I felt like I was arguing with one of those radical MAGA lunatics. What amazes me is the cognitive dissonance requir…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 09:01 PM
21

By their own logic, if we're allowed to generalise entire genders based on what crimes they commit at a greater rate than other genders, I should therefore be allowed to make the claim that leaving babies in the care of women is dangerous because they commit the majority of neonaticide. Obviously I wouldn't make such a bold reductive statement because : 1) It's idiotic, 2) I'm not a misogynist, and 3) It wouldn't do anything to stop neonaticide, it'd just be a sanctimonious excuse to shit all ov…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/24 04:37 PM
21

I don't see why so many people see it as a binary choice. It is possible to support an alleged victim without denigrating the alleged perpetrator. My position is you treat both with basic human decency until the facts and evidence have been established so as to finally decide who of the two are truly deserving of compassion. I think that a lot of people think attacking the "bad guy" is just a way of expressing support for the "good guy", but it isn't. It's a sanctimonious excuse to indulge in mo…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/24 12:54 PM
15

You know, now that I think about it, I've never seen this kind of criticism before for jobs like waste collection, or the army, or mining, or basically any job that isn't clean and safe. I think that's pretty telling, because if some feminists are claiming to seek equality and don't see a reason to acknowledge the countless number of workplace injuries and fatalities affecting one half of the people, then that's a contradiction. You can't champion equality by insulating a preferred group from th…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/24 04:17 AM
1

I do not have any objection to people bonding over their beliefs in righting societal injustices, nor do I have any objection to people relating to each other based on similarities in their individual trauma. I object to people bonding over the physical attributes they possess and creating an identity around said attributes. This is what separates this subreddit from actual misogynist groups who presume all women to be devil incarnate. We have women here, men here, cis people, trans people, all …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/24 01:47 AM
16

A lot of people see things in a kind of linear transactional sense. They believe they can elevate one group by denigrating another, but only when the latter group is ranked higher on a subjective and ill-defined hierarchy based on cherry-picked data. It's fundamentally incompatible with the concept of intersectionality, yet ironically the people who practice it are often proponents of understanding intersectionality. We often see this in recent movies and TV shows, where writers believe they can…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/03/24 01:09 AM
3

I don't refute it, I merely think it isn't conducive to societal betterment, and historically, it hasn't. Whenever humans have bonded over immutable attributes or a shared pain, it has often lead to isolationism and ignorance. North Korea did it. The NOI did it. The Sentinelese did it. All groups/societies comprised of people hurt by outside powers, now suffering because they can only see themselves as "the group" and everyone else as "the others". Whenever we bond over things we cannot control,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 09:14 PM
1

Culture can be created by collective lived trauma. This is the case with marginalized groups. I disagree with this concept. I've been on the receiving end of all manner of bigotry, it has not imbued me with a sense of belonging or culture. I think any sense of belonging one derives from having an immutable attribute will ultimately lead them down a path of isolationism. The response to ignorance is not to bond over being the recipient of a specific form of ignorance, but to bond over the agreeme…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 08:57 PM
0

Culture is not relevant to immutable genetic attributes. I'm not advocating for social uniformity, what I'm suggesting is that there will be no "bringing people together" until we eliminate divisions based on irrelevant biological and psychological components. I think we should celebrate individuals, we should celebrate doctors, scientists, engineers, the charitable, the people who make society better and have real measured accomplishments. I don't want to be celebrated because I happened to be …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 08:03 PM
34

I mean there is an international men's day, but honestly neither the men's day nor any of these days are necessary or conducive to societal betterment. All they do is make completely arbitrary distinctions that serve no purpose other than to divide people in the name of pride in immutable attributes that nobody worked for. I think for a lot of people, they see social equality as something which is purely transactional, but you can't counterbalance these things like it's a budgetary system. You d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 07:13 PM
35

Really exemplifies misandrist priorities, often they claim to be LGBTQ+ allies but they'll throw literally any minority under the bus if it means they can poke holes in men's "fragile masculinity".
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/24 04:46 PM
6

Oh for sure, I agree completely, I'm just saying if it were me, you know?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/24 03:58 AM
9

I mean, if I were a woman, and if I had a professional makeup artist give me the full star treatment on my wedding day, I'd be a touch pissed off if I got face-slammed with cake, mainly because of the amount of time spent sat in the chair early in the morning getting dolled up (I'm not a morning person, or a sitting still person). I'd want my money's worth for that treatment and to look a million bucks for the whole night. I'd probably see the funny side of it after all had passed though and I g…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/24 03:39 AM
14

I think the Simpsons implied this happened in an episode where Marge had the roid-rage. Always thought that was pretty fucked up.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/03/24 03:41 PM
9

Love how people like this think men can't grasp this experience. We're the majority of homicide and aggravated assault victims, but the difference is that we don't generalise half the planet as potential attackers because they happen to share genital configuration. We fear criminals, not "men", we fear the violent, not a race or a gender or a sexuality. I mean really, it's such an animalistic primitive response. An individual poses a threat, so you take a completely irrelevant physical attribute…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/24 08:01 PM
25

In my opinion, it's because humans rarely ever leave their bubbles. Right wingers hang around right wingers just as left wingers hang around left wingers. Humans are terrified at the prospect of being ostracised by their group so left-wing MRAs tend to keep quiet whilst right-wing MRAs can be more vocal since they know they won't be attacked by their own circle. Think about it, if you're in a right-wing echo-chamber, you're not going to care that leftists hate you because a) it's outside of the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 10:28 PM
51

I find it funny that men are held responsible for the actions of other men, but society doesn't apply this broken logic anywhere else or to any other group... well, they do, but those people are rightly called racists, sexists, transphobes, homophobes etc. I don't think there's much difference now in the left vs right when it comes to ignorance and toxicity, I think the only real difference is in who each side targets. Both are now seemingly driven by a hatred that doesn't discern individuals. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 07:59 PM
54

As someone in the IT industry, here's my take: Men on the whole are less inclined to make their career decisions based on what others may think of them because a lifetime of being valued merely for economic output has left them numb to everything else. If you were a teenager getting into IT back in the early days, and someone called you a nerd, it didn't really matter at all because such insults rarely hold weight when you know deep down that society would happily discard you when you're not pro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 11:28 PM
55

It's a bit of a mind-f*ck. Whilst I sympathise with women who have lost their husbands, their fathers, their sons, I can't help but think the priority should be on helping the people who are tortured, abducted and murdered, not the people who were emotionally affected by others being tortured, abducted and murdered. It's not an either/or situation, but it seems to me that the latter group tends to get more attention, sympathy and funding than the former. It reminds me of that time Michelle Obama…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/23 09:00 PM
35

People of all sexes, colours, classes and creeds have used "feeling unsafe" to enforce derogatory stereotypes, othering and generalised hatred for millennia. The rich have used it against the poor. White Americans have used it against black Americans. Fox News uses it against the LGBTQ. In fact, humans have been doing this since before hunter-gatherer times, we would justify atrocities against other tribes because we feared difference. Humans like to think we're more evolved than that now, and m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/23 09:46 PM
13

Schools really are just engineered at this point to extinguish any passion for learning boys may have. As a child, I was considered very ahead of my peers in mathematics, IT and art, those were my three standout subjects, and I was hopeless everywhere else, but then I moved up a year, and my new mathematics teacher promptly took every opportunity she could get to make me feel like a fool. If I so much as got one answer wrong after 99 correct ones, out came her condescending tone, her acid-tongue…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/23 02:08 AM
2

I'm not sure how "human trafficking" is compatible with "equality", but you do you 😐
/r/EverydayMisandry14/09/23 11:33 PM
6

The great irony of it all is misandrists haven't realised yet that they literally fuelled Tate's rise. They screamed, threatened, slandered and shouted over every reasonable sane person advocating for men until they all fell silent, so that naturally left a void on the world's stage which would inevitably be filled by someone who can't be shouted down: a misogynistic lunatic who can't be shamed into silence. It's literally the same reason why Trump did so well in American politics. Moderate cons…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/23 08:17 PM
27

I think it's pretty undeniable that she was able to do this because of the "women are wonderful effect". A male doctor raised concerns about her years before she was charged, and it was all dismissed, brushed under the carpet. One hospital staff member is quoted saying "not nice Lucy" (could there be a more succinct example of the trope?), and when more concerns were raised, said concern was portrayed as abuse and she even received an apology. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66120934
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/23 11:29 AM
12

Had my ass squeezed more times than I can count, earliest incident was when I was 10. Those cackling hens thought it was hilarious how I jumped out of my skin.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/23 01:25 PM
3

I find it deplorable that she continues to walk free, constantly delaying her incarceration, meanwhile Balwani is already behind bars and will serve a sentence more than 2 years longer than hers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 12:51 PM
51

Well there's always the soaps. I watch the odd episode of Coronation Street from time to time, which has always been pretty terrible at handling male characters (they're literally either thick as pig-shit, emotionally stunted robots, or murderous villains), anyway they recently did an acid attack storyline. I heard the acid attack story was coming, and the supposed target was to be one of the women characters, but I already knew weeks before I saw the actual episode that a man was definitely goi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:51 AM
26

Treat someone like a monster for long enough, and you risk them becoming a monster. If everyone in my life spent every day telling me I was a magic horse-man, I reckon I'd have maybe 6 months to a year before I start whinnying and spitting glitter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 10:24 PM
2

A few days ago I saw a debate on one of the popular news channels about pensions. Specifically women's pensions. In my country the rule used to be you would get your pension at 65 if you were a man, and 60 if you were a woman. It's now 66 for both men and women. The funny thing is the TV debate had them talking about how difficult and damaging it was to older women to make them wait for their pension. These people were calling for the minimum age to be brought back down to 60 (but just for women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/22 11:49 AM
52

Trouble is they will be believed without any evidence, and you don't have any public evidence to the contrary... yet. I'm not sure if this is the best advice, but if it were me? I'd call your ex, record the whole thing, and ask why they lied. Typically when people are asked this in a private conversation, they fumble and try to justify the lie, and don't even bother with denial. Once you have that, let it spread like wildfire.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/22 11:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter