TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PlainTundra Archive

View 3 posts and 2,309 comments by PlainTundra on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,309 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, wealth nor status haven't been an issue for me. On the other hand, I've never used dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:16 PM
–

Yes, from gestures to gifts they thought I would like or need. Nothing big because I tell them I am not a materialistic kind of person but still.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:46 PM
4

I had them in the past but I didn't use any special technique; considering that RP is just descriptive and not prescriptive. They simply liked it and liked me I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:38 PM
–

Thanks for your kind words, Megan. I'm sorry you had to experience that with yours and only his dead saved you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:52 AM
2

I have healthy relationships with others. I've never been to therapy and I've never taken any med related to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:48 AM
–

Because most people are a mixture of both to varying degrees, where “alpha traits” are more arousing and “beta traits” are more comforting. You're right. But as long as you understand the concept as a spectrum, you don't need a specific name for every possible combination of alpha and beta traits, imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 09:08 AM
11

Fine. Very positively. He always had (and has) this good balance between being strong or easy-going depending on the situation. My mother adores him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 12:38 PM
13

While self-improvement can increase your chances of success, it doesn't guarantee a positive outcome. It's tough yet true.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:33 PM
6

The European countries where that other study gets the data also have universal healthcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 12:58 PM
3

And plenty of other studies state the opposite, as the video shows. And by the way, your second article had been retracted by their own authors after it was debunked: Based on the corrected analysis, we conclude that there are not gender differences in the relationship between gender, pooled illness onset, and divorce. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022146515595817
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 09:07 AM
5

The video shows different recent studies with more samples and with more age range saying the opposite. For example, the one in Scandinavian countries from 2024, with 2,809,209 sample base (vs only 25,000 of yours) and an age range of 30-66 (vs only >50 of yours) says that there is no difference or slightly against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 08:58 AM
3

I agree with you. Even though my label says red, it's an actual darkish/bloody red. Confidence means nothing unless you have passed certain threshold and the cause and consequence are often switched. Successful people are confident because they are successful, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:07 AM
2

Women make rules for X and break them for Y. A tale as old as time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:35 PM
1

Women make rules for X and break them for Y. RP 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:32 PM
12

This is blindingly obvious and no amount of gaslighting is going to change it The amount of gas-lighting about this stuff here in order to justify not appearing shallow for not wanting to date unattractive people is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:07 AM
4

Most of the time I don't. Nevertheless, sometimes when my gf and I witness a situation where it can be seen through RP lenses, I give my brief point of view and she agrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:01 AM
–

Yes, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:05 AM
1

I agree, in general the most numerous and vocal people that lean to RP, do it in order improve their dating/s3x life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:22 AM
–

Considering RP is descriptive and not prescriptive; any advice, if any, would need to be tailored for each individual. redpillers want to control thier women not love them and hurt her into obedience, stop her from socializing etc. I don't do anything of this and I'll never advice for anyone to do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:16 AM
19

It's another way to say it. There is no bar because it is infinitely high since the attraction is 0. It is what happens when you divide anything by 0.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 09:00 AM
21

The height of the bar is inversely proportional to how she's attracted to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:52 AM
2

1) Bars/clubs, gym, shops, walkable streets... 2) Teens, 20s, 30s, maybe 40s... 3) I don't know. 4) I don't know. 5) No. 6) I am in a LTR. 7) 40 % 8) I don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:44 AM
12

what if TRP’s crusade to kill off the decent guy and flood the world with selfish “bad boys” What? xD TRP’s unspoken agenda seems to be about controlling who gets laid and who doesn’t What?! xD
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 03:25 PM
1

Just use deodorant and wear a button down collared shirt with the sleeves rolled to the elbows, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 05:16 PM
1

No. I have a gf, I don't date. I've never used online dating. No. I'm not married but I don't cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:14 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 02:36 PM
1

Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:40 AM
1

I have a gf, so none.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 06:42 AM
1

Hahaha I'll tell my gf that I am not fucking her and she's just imagining it, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 06:21 AM
2

I've spent most of my 30s in relationships, including my current one, and I've never used online dating. I wouldn't say I was drowning in options but haven't struggled.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:39 PM
17

Do you think having first kid in woman's 30s is selfish and stupid idea? No. At what age do you think women should start having children? Whenever they want and can. I heard in Russia, And in Asia they are called 'Christmas Cake' if they are single by 25. But, who cares what they say?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 12:07 PM
1

Bonus track about RationalMale: The Red Pill isn't about "self-improvement", it's about education. You can use that education to improve yourself, but the Red Pill is a textbook, not an instruction manual. https://x.com/RationalMale/status/1478518815839309826?t=E3w0kfnFQEw9Xt7aAMM-Mg&s=19 "The Red Pill isn't about "self-improvement", it's about education." Discussion closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:27 PM
1

RP is information, a praxeology and Game is the application of things. Two separate things. It is perfectly stated in the text you posted. One can read history because he is is interested about history, not to become an historian. Same with RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 07:52 PM
1

One can get a girl every week and be BPed and you can understand intersexual dynamicsto the thee, not get any girl no matter what and still be RPed. Even RationalMale started the RP while being already married and he's absolutely RPed. It's really not that deep, seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 07:46 PM
1

Well, it can be the case of people who wake up and understand the harsh realities of inter-sexual dynamics and decides it's too much work to take part of it and chooses to go m-g-t-0-w/monk. That's why it is called (taking) RP, an allegory of waking up, like in the Matrix, and see the things as they are. Once from there, you choose the path to go. It can be the path of improvement and getting as much pXssy as you can, establish a healthy monogamous relationship, or going m-g-t-0-w,... any of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:45 PM
1

No, it is proper reading of social cues. No it is not if you ever have read or listened it, which most likely you haven't. TRP is particularly hard for those missing such rather obvious points. It simple if you know what it actually is. TRP is information Yes... for success yes, Not necessary. You can be RPed and still not be successful with women. It is like saying civil engineering is just information, technically it is. But so is the process of building a skyscraper. And yet those civil engin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:31 PM
1

The reason was self improvement. This is a prescription. This is what one deduces from the RP, not the RP itself. RationalMale is pretty clear that RP is just information, not only in his blogs but in his interviews.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:18 PM
1

but it was always about getting women This is PUA/game. A different thing. Red Pill was the theory, and Game (really the social skills in relating to women) was the practice. So yes, the RP still just praxeology (aka information) and he clearly differentiates the two. Thanks for confirming it. The Red Pill as a praxeology is that information. Confirmed it twice. If anything, why the hell you even care about TRP if it is not to get women!? I got women even before RP was a thing and I just find in…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:14 PM
1

u/James_M_Croft but it was always about getting women This is PUA/game. A different thing. Red Pill was the theory, and Game (really the social skills in relating to women) was the practice. So yes, the RP still just praxeology (aka information) and he clearly differentiates the two. Thanks for confirming it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:13 PM
2

u/James_M_Croft Let's see what the person who coined the term RP concerning intersexual dynamics has to say on the matter: The Red Pill, in terms of intersexual dynamics, is, and will always be, a praxeology. [...] I started referring to the Red Pill as a Praxeology around 2014. A commenter on The Rational Male explained how the study of intersexual dynamics neatly fits the definition. [...] The Red Pill as a praxeology is that information. It doesn’t concern itself with best practices. That’s l…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 05:48 PM
1

He clearly doesn't understand the RP. The other day he was saying RP is about improvement instead of viewing/understanding the inter-sexual dynamics from a certain POV, basically it is just information. Improvement is just one potential consequence of being RPed, not a sine qua non condition.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 02:35 PM
1

She knows my views on inter-sexual dynamics but she doesn't know this is called being RPed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:48 AM
1

Because she finds me attractive and we have a similar values and a way of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:46 PM
1

She likes me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:17 PM
1

Mine does. Well, she's not very domestically but she's enjoys sex and nurtures.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:49 PM
1

Yes, but genuinely and freely,bnot because some holly book or priest says she has to do it or otherwise she'll go to hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:25 PM
1

That's why I am not religious, because I don't want free service from my gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:19 PM
1

If people want assistance they pay for it, they don't pretend to believe in God like you said to justify forcing anybody to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:09 PM
1

It's you who is throwing asinine accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:09 AM
–

It is the cultural background where I live, but it can be expanded to any other type of religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 08:03 AM
1

You tell me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 07:12 AM
–

Why would they want a willing servant?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 06:15 AM
–

[Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:44 AM
3

I don't fake believing in God and I am not conservative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:08 PM
4

Fake what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:05 PM
–

Sure, I can find some celebrities and models physically attractive, that's often why they're in those professions. Will I dedicate time or invest any on them? Of course not, I simply forget about them the moment I look away from the pic or the screen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 08:53 PM
15

Because I don't believe in God. In fact, I've never even been baptized.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:15 AM
1

But he talked about ratings and your source support what he just said (dotted line): men rate women in a bell curve and women rate men disproportionately poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 06:24 AM
1

It's you who is trying hard by typing the same letter multiple times like a 5 yr old, writing walls of emotional texts like this last one and wrongly thinking that RP is about improving.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:22 PM
1

What's unreliable of saying I have a gf?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 04:57 PM
1

What comments I wrote that make you think I don't have a gf?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 02:17 PM
1

What makes you think I don't have a gf?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 01:43 PM
1

I really miss the old RP. The content still there, fortunately, but in a format that the tiktokanisation of the society has made it difficult to absorb. The age of influencers, coaches and stuff like that has corrupted many things. Does it seem to you like the Old Guard just got like…. Tired of fielding the blackpill invasion and just gave up after a while? Maybe but I don't really care tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 01:39 PM
0

I know it's hard for you to understand due to some, most likely, bad personal life experiences but healthy relationships are possible and real. And RP is not about improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 01:29 PM
0

No. It is more about how physical appearance plays a bigger role than admitted; attraction is not the same as arousal; how different women behave when they really like a man or not; the relentless ongoing arms race among women (and men) in their intrasexual competition; genuine desire cannot be negotiated; that niceness is not arousing, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 01:20 PM
2

I am in a LTR. And RP is not about improvement. Check your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 12:49 PM
2

Self improvement. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 12:43 PM
1

theres a lot of people that are RPd that dont even consume RP content I didn't know RP was a thing until I found it and I realized most of the things I read were something I already discovered growing up in more or less degree. It didn't open my eyes, it just solidified what I already suspected was true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 10:05 AM
1

The definition written in this sub jargon encapsulates very well the original meaning of the term. It is, basically, the way you see and understand the intersexual dynamics between sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 09:20 AM
2

SMV =/= RMV
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 06:41 AM
1

What are you talking about? I have a healthy relationship and I don't use and discard women. Not even in my non-serious relationships with girls I used them, everything was agreeable and consensual.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 07:10 AM
1

You're trying to debate with a user that unironically states that [humans are not animals but only mammals].(https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1l300ig/are_there_redpill_men_and_potentially_women_who/mvzko6p/?context=3).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 10:49 AM
4

You didn't specify that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:24 PM
5

What's stopping you from becoming more attractive? What's stopping you from becoming one of the guys the women who reject you want? Nothing. Nothing. Have you tried all this? If not, what's stopping you? And if you have, what's stopping the results? Yes. Nothing. My human body physical limitations, satisfaction with my current job, already having a gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:13 PM
1

My gf is INTJ too. I am INTP. Assuming this mbti personality stuff is right, maybe that's why we understand each other and get along very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:30 AM
1

I'm totally fine my gf working. We both love our jobs and our relationship is 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 06:57 AM
1

Sure it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:25 PM
–

What are you talking about? I am happy and I'm in a LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:11 PM
7

About the intersexual dynamics between sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:25 PM
2

My relationship is not traditional. We're pretty much 50/50 as long as our physical capabilities allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:53 PM
8

This is likely due to survivorship bias. People who are unhappy or dissatisfied are often more vocal than those who are content.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:43 AM
18

But are you happy? Does being red pill increase your happiness? Does it bring you fulfillment? Or are you unhappy or less happy than you were before you found the online red pill content? Yes. It doesn't increase it nor decrease it. No necessarily. It hasn't changed my levels of happiness. Understanding inter-sexual dynamics through a RP lens doesn't affect my happiness. I already saw things that way before discovering the term online; finding it simply affirmed my own observations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:26 AM
1

Describing a phenomena doesn't necessarily mean complaining nor supporting the described phenomena.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 06:39 AM
12

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:42 AM
3

the issue with redpill is they didn’t take into account the looks factor Of course it does. It's a very important factor in the inter-sexual dynamics. They play a huge role.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:39 AM
1

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 06:31 PM
2

I couldn't have answered it better. If the goal of a date is to know each other; in the situation I described, both parties are already doing that since nearly the beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 02:30 PM
1

By the time they asked me out, it felt less like a first date and more like an official recognition of what we already were. We were practically a couple, just looking for more time together outside of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 09:57 AM
3

By the time they asked me out, it felt less like a first date and more like an official recognition of what we already were. We were practically a couple, just looking for more time together outside of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 09:57 AM
2

Unironically, that's how I got my gf (and my last ex). I didn't do anything special, I just showed up at work, met them, knew about them on a casual and daily basis and that was pretty much. Of course, you need to have all your shit together as a default subroutine.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 09:25 AM
–

It didn't really improve me, it just reassured the way I saw the inter-sexual dynamics. I managed to get girls before and after knowing the RP was a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:22 AM
5

I guess my gf doesn't exist and we don't regularly have sex, lmao. I'm gonna tell her she's imaginary.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:48 PM
2

No. RP is not about you do, is about what you know. Recheck your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 06:29 AM
1

What is your problem with this? I’m okay with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:16 PM
2

Yes, you properly understood what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:43 PM
1

The post is a question and the sub is to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:41 PM
1

The post is a question and the sub is to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:41 PM
1

But you thought my text was a complain of a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:20 PM
1

Did I not just explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:17 PM
2

Well, explaining a phenomena doesn't necessarily mean complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:42 PM
2

Yeah, why should it be?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:09 PM
0

Where did I say this is a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:11 PM
48

Most men can land a relationship at some point. But the difference is that men in the 'top 20%', tall, attractive, wealthy, high-status, have far more options with far less effort. Meanwhile, average or below-average men might scrape by with occasional success, but their dating pool is smaller, their margin for error is thinner, and they have to work much harder for the same results.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:57 AM
1

Yeah, most men can land a relationship at some point. But the difference is that men in the 'top 20%', tall, attractive, wealthy, high-status, have far more options with far less effort. Meanwhile, average or below-average men might scrape by with occasional success, but their dating pool is smaller, their margin for error is thinner, and they have to work much harder for the same results.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:53 AM
2

Not in the dictionary. Yes in a dictionary. Oops, you ignored the part I quoted because it's inconvenient to your narrative. Since I asked the definition of Incel I looked for the definition of Incel in your source. Which is totally different that what you claim it is, as expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 06:39 PM
1

A textbook case of red herring or simply the Hanlon's razor?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 06:36 PM
1

It's not the first time she says that. She truly means it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 05:34 PM
2

It's not defined in Merriam-Webster, the preeminent authority on American English. Why not? It is the defined in the others, so the definition, nevertheless, exists in a dictionary. Even the expression "no cap" does. I mean, if we're taking Wikitionary as a source: ebsco.com: Incel, short for "involuntary celibate," refers to individuals, primarily young men, who struggle to find romantic and sexual partners despite desiring them As we can see from your source, the romanticless and sexualness co…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 02:04 PM
2

It is defined in the others. Bring me your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 01:49 PM
2

"No cap": merriam-webster.com: No cap is a slang expression meaning “genuinely; truthfully,” used to emphasize the sincerity or seriousness of a statement. dictionary.com: The expression no cap is slang meaning “no lie” or “for real,” often used to emphasize someone is not exaggerating about something hard to believe. "Based": dictionary.com: Slang. true to one’s self or secure in one’s beliefs regardless of what others think, especially when those beliefs fall outside of the mainstream. Wiktion…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 01:45 PM
1

I am not angry, I'm in a LTR with my gf. Is it due to personal dating success, that you find logic in the way dating and courtship is set up "biologically" For me, it was a mix of both. I’ve never had much trouble finding girlfriends or casual relationships, and I’ve never used OLD. Growing up, I observed the dynamics between sexes around me and formed my own understanding. Later, I discovered that this perspective had already been explored and developed online under the name RP, a metaphor for …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 08:25 AM
2

If you could provide some source to prove your point rather than keeping parroting the 'because-I-say-so' it would be great.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 05:39 AM
3

Linguists who wrote the definition in the dictionaries say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:41 PM
3

Ah, so you are making it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:37 PM
3

It doesn't have to be Why not? Online dictionaries state the romanticless and sexualness condition as sine qua non: Wiki: people who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one Merrim&Webster: a person (usually a man) who regards himself or herself as being involuntarily celibate Britannica: primarily heterosexual men who identify as being unable to have romantic or sexual relationships. Oxford: people on the internet who are unable to find sexual partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:18 PM
5

So an involuntary celibate is neither involuntary nor celibate?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:50 PM
1

Well, the first thing to do is to separate virgins from incels since incel refers to men who espouse a pretty specific ideology and rhetoric So both are virgins yet the latter espouse a pretty specific ideology? Incel = virgin + specific ideology?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 11:11 AM
1

But incels are unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one and RPers not necessarily do. I only had to show up at work to get my gf and I don't say anything of this kind: "I'm lonely and dating is frustrating because women have delusional standards and only want to ride the cock carousel with the top 20% of men until they're alpha widowed by Chad and beta buxx a poor average man with no options"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 09:15 AM
1

Yes: really quiet, taller, 6ft3, first name as mom. Maybe: different race, different religion, really talkative, stay at home, lives with parents, sorority, refuses to have kids, dislikes videogames, is in military, slept best friend. No: smokes, has two kids, has OF, church every Sunday, asexual, 1000 miles away, alcoholic, hangover weekly, 200 pounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 09:03 PM
5

And this still not the RP. In order to be RPed you only need to know about the harsh realities of inter-sexual dynamics between men and women. It's just information. As long as you know that, you're RPed. You don't need to do anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:41 PM
0

No, the RP is not that. You can not lift, nor banking nor honning social skill and be RPed and do all of that and not be RPed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:03 PM
2

Explaining a phenomenon doesn't necessarily mean complaining about the phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 05:47 AM
1

Fingers crossed she sees this and realizes how in tune you are with your feelings. Maybe then she'll come back, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:16 AM
-3

What's your opinion on the matter? They can do whatever they want. Why do you think this attitude is growing? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 08:23 PM
9

I don't know, I don't care about that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 01:34 PM
12

Good strawman you made here. Stating a fact =/= wanting to police how women should do X
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 07:55 AM
1

What? I don't understand your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 07:46 AM
–

Mainly the first reason but, subconsciously, a little bit of the second I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:25 AM
5

I mostly agree with your comment. Nevertheless, tattoos (and smoking) are a hard NO for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:45 AM
3

I absolutely like that a woman has boundaries and the ability to say no. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:26 AM
1

Considering RP is about 'what is' and not 'what you have to do' I hardly doubt anything you claim is remotely close to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 01:33 PM
1

I'm personally not into it and I've never tried. They wanted me to dominate them instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:35 PM
2

You're getting it wrong. The RP itself doesn't do this. It only describes, not prescribes. Calling out and advising are just interpretations of the information.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 03:25 PM
1

It hasn't. I had a gf and I'm still with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:53 AM
–

Absolutely, genuine desire cannot be negotiated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:44 AM
–

And then everyone clapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:41 AM
6

Troll posts used to be believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 05:26 PM
5

Absolutely, nobody should need to justify their preferences. You like what you like and that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:36 PM
5

There has to be some non rp strategies you preach. I don't know, in my case I didn't follow any strategy to meet my gf, tbh. I just showed up at work, we started talking and over time we realized we think alike and understand each other, one thing let to another and that's it. PS: On second thought, maybe there was a strategy, but it was more passive, like a subroutine, by trying the best version of yourself for when it comes the opportunity you have what you need to attract the other person and…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 06:45 PM
2

Are you fat? What's your weight? Are you fat, are you not, really? No. 70 kg (180 cm). No, I'm not fat. Do you make enough money to support a family of three kids in your country right now? No, but my gf and I could live with my salary in case she didn't work. Can four people live comfortably on your salary? No. Are you kind, are you good to people? If we were to put your looks and tangible possessions aside, what do you have as a person that would make you a good partner? Yes. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 09:19 AM
3

Describing a behavior doesn't necessarily mean complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:15 PM
3

This has happened to me too. It's funny how they don't realize that it's pretty obvious we are so different and it wouldn't work but they still shoot their shot. They understand when you explain it to them, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:10 AM
5

Do they see him as less of a man? No. Or that men should not be teachers because it does not fit the gender role? No. They can be whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:05 PM
–

There’s a method to this madness; and that is understanding trends in human behavior and realizing what are the traits women are generally sexually attracted to (looks, male height, dominance, status, money). Yes but understanding and knowing what it works, sometimes doesn't mean you necessary have them. That's what I meant. It's a hard pill to swallow, yet, nevertheless, it is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 01:52 PM
–

As a result, they become successful in attracting women Embracing the RP doesn't guarantee this just as understanding a sport's rules and tactics doesn't guarantee winning.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 12:59 PM
–

What kind of issues do you commonly deal with when it comes to dating, or women in general? Nothing really, I filter out the ones I don't like automatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:45 AM
10

I wouldn't be with one but, apart from that, I don't care about them at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:53 PM
3

You should ask them, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:58 PM
0

Every single man in this thread (and this sub) who claims he believed that merely displaying basic manners and kindness would attract women. That doesn't mean they think women are asexual, it means they think they can get women by displaying basic manners and kindness. It's two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:46 PM
1

And they'd be correct, because that's precisely who others women. English is not my first language, I do not fully understand the meaning of this phrase. Some day I hope a man or two explains why and how they arrived at the idea that women are asexual. If you could provide some example of men thinking this way it would be great.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:37 PM
4

pretty girls showing interest in their best looking classmates Obviously a sexually reproducing species selects for fitness If man wrote that in a dating forum or stated that publicly he would be labeled as inc3l automatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:27 PM
2

I agree. Non-verbal communication is great in these occasions, it can tell from a mile whether the other person is interested or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 10:31 AM
11

why do you give a shit? I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 01:15 PM
1

I do the same but only with in person interactions, I don't use OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:55 PM
1

I never paid for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 03:09 PM
6

You can't simply override at will instincts honed over hundreds of thousands of years.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:29 PM
6

Don't know, just casual conversation about shared interests or whatever’s on your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 01:13 PM
6

Dude, anything can be a date. Indeed. If a date is simply an opportunity to get to know each other, then every shared moment, even daily interactions, can be one. With the advantage that there’s no pressure, just natural, organic connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 12:39 PM
1

I agree with your comment. My mother is not conservative nor liberal/feminist and has nothing to do with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 11:06 AM
3

I was not talking about any sexual activity on the spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:55 AM
4

Sometimes when you are in a public place with your earphones on the best way to communicate is by using non-verbal cues. It's possible to build so much tension just by letting the moment simmer, leaving the other person to overthink every little detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:42 AM
4

Does attraction require verbal interaction, or can it grow non-verbally, through repeated encounters, glances, smirks, and familiarity over time?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:23 AM
19

I personally wouldn't be with one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:53 PM
3

When a woman is attracted to you she’ll be delusional and lie to herself . This is 200% true. They don’t even need you to lie, they will just rationalize themselves to believe whatever they want to believe. Even before I discovered TRP I was always blunt about it. I think TRP only exacerbated what I noticed in regards to AF/BB dichotomy Same. It just put into words what I’d already seen, how those dynamics play out in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:50 AM
1

WTHell is that book?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:24 PM
2

I agree. Pay attention to non-verbal cues: glances, smirks, subtle nods. If they’re consistent, that’s a great sign. After all, no one reciprocates unless there’s at least some physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:17 PM
–

I also like concrete solutions to solve my problems. I don't like to just "cope". Have you asked her for potential solutions rather than just venting and koping?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 02:46 PM
–

I've never been to therapy, but I'm here to listen to the perspectives of those who have and had to find a suitable therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 01:24 PM
0

It is whatever you personally want in a relationship. Different RPed men will have different Ideal relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 08:10 PM
1

When did women ask men for dating advice? Everytime they do: Example1 Example2 Isn’t the red pill focused on men improving themselves? It's about understanding inter-sexual dynamics. Improvement is not required.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:53 PM
1

When did women ask men for dating advice? Everytime they do: Example1 Example2 Isn’t the red pill focused on men improving themselves? It's about understanding intersexual dynamics. Improvement is not required.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:51 PM
1

I answered, you not expecting it doesn't make it less real.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:00 PM
1

Classic: "I don't like the response I was expecting, I'll assume he/she wanted to say that other thing instead"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:53 PM
–

There's a little bit of commentary in your strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:48 PM
–

A: The solution proposed is that these women settle down very early with undesirable men B: No, this is not the solution proposed because it's not about to propose any solution. A: No, not true!! Basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:26 PM
–

So, you started a thread expecting a specific answer, and when you get something different, you don’t like it? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:20 PM
–

If you already think you know the answer why asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:16 PM
–

The expectations is that they should do whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:14 PM
–

The RP view isn’t that women should settle early with “undesirable” men, but that they should be aware of their declining SMV and, if needed, make decisions accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 08:08 PM
–

Beauty is subjective, as individual preferences vary. However, certain traits are widely appreciated, adding a degree of objectivity to attractiveness. For example, most men are more likely to find a woman with long hair and a healthy weight more attractive than one who is bald and severely overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:39 AM
–

Beauty is subjective. However, it has an objective aspect in that certain features are generally preferred by the majority of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:15 AM
3

I do what you state in your text. My relationships have always come about naturally and effortlessly and I never used a dating app.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 01:47 PM
0

The kids struggling the most in school are boys. And yet, the top scorers, specially in STEM fields, who later could be the geniuses of society, are still men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 09:37 AM
–

All else being equal, a shorter man generally faces more challenges than a taller man in attracting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:51 AM
8

In fact, studies show men are 6X more likely to leave their wives who get cancer than the other way around. A widely reported finding that the risk of divorce increases when wives fall ill — but not when men do — is invalid, thanks to a short string of mistaken coding that negates the original conclusions, published in the March issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior. or quoting another study from Finland that tells a whole different story: [...] We used Finnish register data on 127 …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:58 PM
18

"The wall is <ope" Proceeds to describe the wall Absolute kino.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:13 PM
3

Q4M: How often do you shoot IRL shots? I've never used dating apps and don't really do this. I just meet people naturally, and if we click, things progress from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 04:13 PM
2

With my gf, genuine connection and deep mutual understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 10:15 PM
5

Given the fact the OP thinks mammals can't be animals is all you need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 12:08 PM
1

It's crazy when you think about it, we're "debating" with people whose level of understanding includes believing that mammals aren't even animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 11:37 AM
1

Dude, you can’t be animals and mammals Hahahaha!!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 11:19 AM
1

Some may do, some may don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 09:32 AM
–

The idea is to show how much you're a good partner to give them reasons to stay with you. I do this and my gf loves it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 09:23 PM
–

The simplest code is showing a lack of interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 09:12 PM
3

I don’t think this is a fair question because there isn’t a handbook What is this? The FDS Handbook
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 05:55 PM
1

I don't really care as long as we have genuine connection and deep mutual understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 07:48 PM
1

Hahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 06:02 PM
1

Given that the RP explores intersexual dynamics, discussing value in terms of SMV and RMV is both relevant and expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:47 PM
–

No, you're not losing value because you're married or off the market.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:37 PM
1

Someone who creates a genuine connection based on mutual understanding and chemistry. While physical attraction is important, I value ambition, independence, kindness, and authenticity especially when paired with a desire for partnership and personal growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:37 PM
1

For me, a genuine connection built on mutual understanding is fundamental. Physical attraction matters, but chemistry is more important than a specific type. I value ambition, self-improvement, and independence, but also a strong desire for partnership. Kindness, authenticity, and grace in navigating life mean more to me than social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:26 PM
5

For a LTR, genuine connection and deep mutual understanding, along with physical attraction, are key. For something more casual, the connection and understanding don’t need to run as deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 11:59 AM
2

None. I never used them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:58 PM
1

I agree with your analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:52 PM
5

Or a life purpose that only he understands.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:26 PM
0

Too many em dashes, that's a ChatGPT text. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 05:01 PM
2

How would this make you feel? How would this change how you view her? Would you have wanted this information upfront like this? She just made the decision easy for me, I'm not interested anymore. And yes, I’d prefer to know this upfront. Would you believe her if she says she's vetting for men who respects her and values her time? Would you believe her if she told you she is vetting for men who can provide for a family? It doesn’t really matter, I've already lost interest. Do you think you'd stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 10:35 PM
2

The playbook of that guy is to create a strawman of what being RPed means, including PUAs, MRA, far right and everything imaginable, in a totum revolutum mess where he attribues whatever he wants to it and tries to prove it by whoever with a RP flag said it (or he imagined he said it). Once someone asks for specific examples, he chickens out and disappears for a while. As you can see here, he claimed he could find examples of RPers who did all the things he said in that list yet when he's asked …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:47 PM
1

And he chickened out and forgot to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:33 PM
3

The whole point of red pill is to go from unattractive to attractive understand the inter-sexual dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:45 AM
2

Of course he hasn't been able to provide any thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 07:01 AM
18

Virtue signaling about how kind they are instead of just acting on it is another big one. I agree. Those who proudly label themselves as empaths or highly intuitive often end up revealing manipulative or abusive tendencies over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 09:00 AM
5

What are your thoughts on Fujoshi? Indifferent. Is it normal to have this sort of interest as a woman? I wouldn't consider it very unusual nowadays. Why or why not? The internet era made it possible for a woman to access any of those interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 08:30 AM
2

Split 50/50, whoever owes the other covers the next expense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 04:30 PM
3

Ask the mods to change the definition in the sub jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 03:31 PM
5

It is about understanding the inter-sexual dynamics, not necessarily getting laid. Check your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:51 PM
3

Some may be obsessed, some don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:43 PM
3

Some will care, some won't. It depends on the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:24 PM
4

You didn't specify which kids the RPers should care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:18 PM
9

Why poor people would worry about legacy? Is wage slavery good somehow? You should ask them. No. Why some ugly manlet would want to sneak his crappy DNA in the gene pool? Because he wants to have kids. What benefit the red piller believe he have from this shite? ??? Also, being born in working class sucks, having crappy genes sucks. Do red pillers even care about the kids that will inherit all this crap (remember, steroids don't change your DNA)? Why should they care?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:02 PM
1

Motivation doesn’t invalidate action. People adapt to their circumstances, someone who has to be nice may internalize those traits, while someone who never needs to be nice may not develop them at all. The issue isn’t that ‘non-hot guys are just as bad’, it’s that incentives shape behavior. If someone consistently acts kindly, that still makes them kind. Meanwhile, if someone turns toxic the moment they don’t have to be nice, that says more about them than those who put in the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 08:41 PM
-2

I see what you're saying, but my point isn't that physical attractiveness determines toxicity, it's that people with more dating options (often due to looks, confidence, or status) don't need to compensate with niceness the way those with fewer options do. This isn't about 'vetting people for toxicity based on looks' but recognizing social dynamics at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 07:13 PM
–

Assuming both types share the same desire to succeed with women, the first group is more likely to achieve it, whether by being assholes or non-monogamous, while the latter would struggle much more. As a result, the latter generally compensate for their lack of physical attractiveness by being nice while the first don't need to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 07:05 PM
1

Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 01:55 PM
7

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 12:16 PM
20

It's a shame that men nowadays are not working to become the type of man she wants, approach and give her the life she deserves! Men out there, man up!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:45 AM
1

Brutal. He came for wool and went home shorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 12:39 PM
2

If it hurts their feelings it must be censored.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 09:52 PM
1

So 61% of Finnish men between 18 and 29 are single while 37% of women the same age are?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:12 PM
1

Yes, I see your point, some people take it to the extreme and choose to live in a state of perpetual casual dating while maintaining this image of an alpha male.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:49 PM
0

men should be plate-spinning, Plate-spinning just means dating casually. It is not a life goal but a suggestion for those who need it to avoid becoming overly invested or needy while improving social skills and confidence. It allows a man to make better choices in relationships without desperation clouding his judgment. Nobody says you have to do this until the day you die. always have options. If you're attractive enough, you'll always have options, whether you want them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:33 PM
1

My girlfriend does this shit all the time Mine doesn't, she thinks like a man about this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:47 PM
1

I ate something that looked like that when I went to Oslo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 09:37 AM
3

So you made it up. Better luck next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:10 PM
7

if women are 'dating the same guy' Where did I say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:03 PM
25

The stat from a survey Pew Research Center survey of U.S. adults conducted July 5-17, 2022 states that: "When looking at age and gender together, 63% of men under 30 describe themselves as single, compared with 34% of women in the same age group." A trend that continues growing from yet another survey from the same Pew Research Center survey of U.S. adults conducted Oct 5-17, 2019 that states: "Among men, those younger than 30 are by far the most likely to be single. About half of men in this ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:59 PM
50

Impossible. PPD women told us repeatedly that doesn't happen. Those Gen Z girls aren't also dating older guys outside their generation because they also told us this is not happening. They must all be dating each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:15 PM
12

Indeed. A product so good nobody buys it is equivalent to a man so attractive that no woman has ever wanted to have sex with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:20 PM
-1

Red Pill presents itself as an ally to religious men, claiming that it restores the "natural order" of relationships. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:08 AM
1

Red Pill (TRP) claims to be an awakening for men, teaching them "the truth" about women, relationships, and male self-improvement. It seeks to explain human sexual relationships within this framework, and this framework is in disagreement with the general understanding of society in these matters (hence, taking the red pill).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:03 AM
1

I haven't considered doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:58 AM
1

Maybe. But once you know it, how do you unlearn it? You just have to accept it and move on. I'm not sad nor resentful.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 09:15 PM
25

Just because my body asks me to loudly burp in the middle of a work meeting doesn't mean I should do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 09:10 PM
–

So what’s the point of being “redpilled” if you’re not actually redpilled? Being RPed means seeing the world, in particular the inter-sexual dynamics, with different lens than the rest. Whatever you do with that information is up to the individual. You can see the world that way and live normal life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:50 PM
1

I wish to believe that the users here read it. I wish it to, ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:42 PM
–

You can be RPed and live your life as you want. I don't see how or why you shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:36 PM
–

How is not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:29 PM
–

IMO, the definition provided in this sub jargon it is the closest one I read so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:02 PM
1

Some may think this, some may don't. I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 05:46 PM
13

I prefer to keep it as neutral and unbiased as intended, as free from political and spiritual influence as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:58 PM
41

b) All this right-wing, pro-capitalist and fundamentalist christianity bullshit you see on the internet, as well as shaming girls for who they are. Just do your thing and let other people be. So many 'redpillers' on the internet are just right-wing propaganda and I hate to be associated with them. You can strive for your best version and at the same time be critical of all the fucked up bullshit going on in the world. I agree with you. They can’t just stick to the descriptive or praxeological as…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:35 PM
1

I wouldn't considerate her for a serious relationship. For anything else, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:22 PM
1

I wouldn’t say it saved my life at all, but in my experience, it reinforced patterns I’ve been observing in intersexual dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:10 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:16 PM
–

Textbook AF/BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 06:36 PM
–

Height and weight? Out of curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:48 PM
1

I don't get how you are downvoting and attributing malice towards literally subtracting and highlighting the maximal difference???? Because you highlighted the fact that physical attributes are actually in a higher preference position when the preference is revealed rather than when is stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:33 PM
1

I didn't select them because they were high or down in the absolute scale but how much they changed from stated vs revealed. This one is also a fun one (pun intended): Fun: 8 -> 11
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:05 PM
1

Yes I selected the most physical related vs the 'good personality' ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:02 PM
1

I'm not gauging that but which of the stated preferences raised in importance when revealed and which ones decreased.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 07:58 PM
-1

Attractive: 16 -> 8 Nice body: 26 -> 16 Sexy: 19 -> 6 Good lover: 12 -> 1 Humorous: 11 -> 13 Considerate: 7 -> 10 Honest: 2 -> 5 Understanding: 4 -> 7 Good listener: 5 -> 14 Patient: 10 -> 18 lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 07:53 PM
2

I agree with this, especially in a subreddit dedicated to discussing these topics. It's not like you're interrogating a person about that face to face in the street.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 07:37 PM
4

I agree. While self-improvement can objectively put you in a better position, it doesn’t always lead to the desired outcome, as it varies from person to person and can sometimes result in resentment. It’s a harsh reality to accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:43 PM
2

I don't take steroids and I don't grind to whatever women like the most. I already told you that I didn't put effort on finding my gfs. I simply showed up at work and met them casually.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:56 PM
2

The description says nothing about changing for women. Read it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:49 PM
2

No, it's about understanding the inter-sexual dynamics. Check the description in the subs jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:42 PM
1

you basically changed every single bit of yourself to please women, I didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:32 PM
2

I didn't. I met my gfs on a casual basis at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 06:39 PM
1

I agree. I met my girlfriend at work, in an environment that naturally draws in people I get along with. At first, she didn’t catch my attention, but we met and gradually got to know each other over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 04:16 PM
1

Well i personally get offended when women on this sub say AMALT If you're easily offended by the words of anonymous strangers online, the issue might lie within yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 07:17 PM
1

You comment sounds like a ChatGPT response, no offense xD Don't worry, she handles it with her witty humor and manages to persuade me at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 10:59 PM
1

I know but I am also tired.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 10:46 PM
1

Lol, you guys find some crazy girls out there
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 10:45 PM
1

What does she do/say?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 10:41 PM
1

I'm exhausted from the gym and my girlfriend will likely be in the mood for some intimacy tonight.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 10:37 PM
18

Enjoying your options as a man is misogyny. A real man should owe his own age women a better life and rescue them from their life mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 06:07 PM
1

It's hilarious to watch the woman in the video trying to negotiate genuine desire from the men she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 05:55 PM
–

It's astonishing how these people gaslight you into questioning the reality of what you've witnessed firsthand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:38 PM
–

based on my experience. In my experience, people don’t meet through dating apps because my friends, family and work colleagues, generally, haven’t. Does that make it true? Not at all, it’s simply a case of survivorship bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 10:54 AM
–

I think my beef with it is that it doesnt capture attractiveness It does if physical appearance is the only factor you're evaluating, given that you have no other information about the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 10:41 AM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 10:16 AM
–

No, but it’s not a random choice either. It’s highly unlikely that the men in your top 20 would rank among the bottom 20 for other women, or that your bottom 20 would make it into their top 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 10:05 AM
–

False dichotomy fallacy identified: It's entirely possible to rate others' attractiveness using a personal numerical scale while also finding someone's attractiveness change for the better or the worse as you get to know them better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 09:24 AM
1

The point is that this movement becomes bigger, RP is not a movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 06:56 PM
–

Yep. But for some reason all girls in this sub are super prudes and never lust for a man only for his physique. They only like them because he's a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 06:31 PM
–

From a physical POV only, which kind of men do you find attractive and/or arousal?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:05 PM
–

It isn't since the definition is clearly stated in the sub-jargon with proper links to sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 02:25 PM
–

I’ve never felt attraction on a spot or to a person I haven’t known that well. I've met one girl once who, after just a few days of knowing me, admitted, half-jokingly after we slept together, that if the parents of the kids she taught truly knew what she was like, they'd never let her be their teacher.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 02:23 PM
–

Men here do not have a good reading/listening comprehension or hear the things by 3rd parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 02:19 PM
–

Whenever you hear RP men telling other dudes they need to hit 6 figures, have huge muscles, be assertive, physically dominant at all times, how does that make you feel? This is a grotesque caricature of what RP says. RP doesn't say what you have to do but what it is. Descriptive vs prescriptive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 01:59 PM
-3

The unattractive one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:29 PM
2

because I notice it “in the wild” I completely agree. There are times when you simply can’t help, especially when it involves people you know. You realize the other person isn’t ready to hear the truth, and confronting them would be too difficult for them to handle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:16 PM
1

What do you mean by: After applying RP, I had much more success in dating. ? AFAIK, RP is just descriptive, not prescriptive. How can you apply it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:05 PM
3

Lol. I would say I've seen more about top/bottom men distinction than female/male one when it comes to those comparisons like upper/low classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 05:02 PM
7

That post simply highlights the inequalities in dating; it doesn't claim that women represent an upper class oppressing men as a worker class. In any case, from an RP/BlackP perspective, the "upper class" would be seen as top-tier men, while the "worker class" would be bottom-tier men—not a division of men versus women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:40 PM
6

Any example?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:03 PM
5

I've noticed an oddly common comparison (especially in these spaces) between women and the capitalist upper class, and men to the working class, that some RP/BP guys love to spout. Where did you find these comparisons?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:01 PM
7

My second link was from 2024. Your second link is from 2019.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 01:41 PM
9

But it’s more up to date, the first link I provided is also proof. The first link still quotes Dolan's work which he admitted being wrong when confronted about misinterpreting the variables of the survey he used. “Dubious” is a matter of opinion It is not when Dolan himself had to admit he was not using the data properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 01:15 PM
–

Attraction isn’t negotiable. Women are biologically hardwired to seek traits that maximize reproductive success. Complaining about their preferences is as pointless as arguing with gravity. The marketplace rewards value, not effort. Your belief that “trying hard” should be enough betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of competition. Value is determined by results, not effort. Entitlement is your enemy. No one owes you attraction, attention, or affection. If you want better outcomes, you must ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 02:34 PM
-1

If the caliber of men she's interested in show her less attention than they did when she was younger, then yes, she's hit the wall. This is entirely independent of the lifestyle she has led, though it’s true that some lifestyles can help her age more gracefully than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:34 PM
25

Curiously enough, in the case of lions, it is American women the ones who think they could win the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 02:20 PM
2

I find red pill observations are often true, red pill prescriptions for behavior are goofy Interestingly, RP serves only as the initial, descriptive component; the remainder does not align with the definition outlined by this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:09 PM
3

What I have noticed with most successful non-pilled people is that their dating life and relationships still follow red pill principles, so even if they do not believe in the red pill Can you provide some examples of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:46 PM
1

I agree with you. The issue with that sub is that they simply don't understand what it means since they defined as: But I think “be a man’s peace” really just means “shut up and be a quiet servant”. While in actuality, the meaning of "be a man's peace" is what you said: It's about not being neurotic, insecure, nagging, and creating issues where there are none. But they are incapable of understanding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:18 PM
8

There is only one the one, everyone has only one soulmate. It's not a out numbers, it's destiny to find the ONE. [Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:12 PM
5

You're statements are pretty red-ish leaning considering your flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 01:47 PM
1

I just wanted to know if all that effort was, eventually, successful hehe
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 12:07 PM
–

Do you have a gf/wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 11:43 AM
-2

By reading all your comments, I guess I'm not the average experience. I met my last two serious gfs by just showing up at work and let the things simply happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:19 AM
1

By reading all your comments, I guess I'm not the average experience. I met my last two serious gfs by just showing up at work and let the things simply happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:03 AM
–

it's a dating strategy. In order to be a dating strategy it should be prescriptive but the RP is only descriptive. You're misunderstanding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:17 PM
3

The OKCupid data never validated your narrative. I didn't state any narrative I only said the source of that is not what the other user said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 12:31 PM
5

The only reason they came up with those 20% and 5% is because of an article from a man who got his data from polling 27 male Tinder users, and then peterson talked about it and it blew up. In reality, it's from OKCupid and Hinge raw data from hundreds of thousands of users collected over the years.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:55 AM
6

The issue I see with that is that men who can avoid putting in effort often attract many women, while men who need to put in effort are largely overlooked by most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 04:39 PM
4

the red pill is a dating strategy It's not even that. In order to be a dating strategy it should be prescriptive but the RP is only descriptive. You're misunderstanding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 11:51 AM
-4

Your inhability to prove your own point? Indeed it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 03:52 PM
-2

Estimated earnings like any other channel in youtube about whatever topic is equivalent to "vast majority of RP men spend money on any of these things". Lol. "Trust me, bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 03:42 PM
0

Absolutely. "Trust me, bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 03:07 PM
2

RP is not a lifestyle but being aware of the harsh realities of inter-sexual dynamics between men and women. As the description of RP given by this subreddit puts it: RP is a praxeology (a way of understanding actions in the world) that deals with Sexual Strategy. It seeks to explain human sexual relationships within this framework, and this framework is in disagreement with the general understanding of society in these matters (hence, taking the red pill).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 06:57 PM
1

I didn't say that. You have a serious problem with reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:49 AM
-2

RP has no one’s interests in mind. It’s information. It’s not a value system and doesn’t tell anyone what do to or what aught to be. It simply says what it is. It's so simple, yet so many people overlook it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:31 PM
-1

So you recognize what you wrote is wrong. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:17 PM
-1

Red pill’s claim is that all men are like that: they all want young women and hate women over 30. It doesn't claim that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:03 PM
1

Women can do whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 08:38 PM
12

Just go bowling on Friday nights, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 08:16 PM
1

It doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:05 PM
–

Time to time someone ask in askmen how gfs or wives reacted them opening up and the answers are absolutely brutal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:37 AM
0

I agree with what you stated. Oddly enough, if you had said that under a RP flag, you'd be flooded with "women are not a monolith" and accusations of misogyny. Funny how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 04:31 PM
8

Albeit mainstream Red Pill has unfortunately turned into trashy entertainment too e.g. fresh and fit I agree. Nowadays, everyone uses it to promote their own brand, assigning a personal interpretation to the term that completely diverges from its original meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:23 PM
8

The Earth is flat!! Don't you see the title of this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaRxOesKIyg&ab_channel=74Gear It's an actual pilot that says that "Proving The World is Flat!", therefore it must be true!! Trust me bro, 100% real no fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:09 PM
4

I mean, the PUA stuff is like the entire point of the red pill. No. The OP doesn't understand that RP is just information. It's not prescriptive but just descriptive. What you do with that information is up to the individual. There is no "RP way of life" or "RP way to date".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:00 PM
2

Indeed, your inhability to post anything specific is very funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 07:04 PM
2

I told you to be precise.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 06:17 PM
2

What's the point of me continuing the conversation when your are going to deny everything's that's written here? Where is here? Be precise.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 05:54 PM
5

You started straw-manning and everything went downhill from there; so now you just flee.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 05:49 PM
2

As far as I know it's "the tendency to seek out men of higher economic status" It's either social status, economical status or/and sexual status. But anyway you can use any other example like "women are after bad boys" denying the existence of normal average couples The RP doesn't deny the existence of normal average couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 05:44 PM
2

Hypergamy and "all women only care about money, doesn't matter what they say" is not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 05:20 PM
4

"all women only care about money, doesn't matter what they say" The RP doesn't say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 05:16 PM
14

In my career field (UX design and research), we observe users actually using products rather than ask them questions for the same reasons. What people say is almost always not the complete story. The good old 'stated preference vs revealed preference'. A tale as old as time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 04:48 PM
1

"I didn't steal the money!" "Here's a video from a security camera showing you did." "You're silencing my voice!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 04:07 PM
14

I agree, I have a happy and healthy relationship. The RP helped me to understand the harsh realities of inter-sexual dynamics of males and females which I had already intuitively grasped. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 07:18 PM
1

I have a happy and healthy relationship. The RP helped me the harsh realities of inter-sexual dynamics of males and females which I had already intuitively grasped. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 06:56 PM
2

you’d think listening to some women in this thread that all a man would have to do to get a relationship with a woman is to just want a relationship They fall for the apex fallacy over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 11:34 AM
3

It's the opposite in reality: Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) controlling for age, gender, education, and socioeconomic status (operationalized by estimated annual household income) indicated that IQ scores tended to be lowest (p < 0.001) for "religious only" participants (estimated marginal mean [EMM] = 93.0) and highest for "neither religious nor spiritual" participants (EMM = 103.7). Furthermore, IQ scores were significantly lower (ps < 0.001) for Christian/Catholic participant…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 12:13 PM
1

Does stating an objective and real fact mean spewing hate?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 06:55 PM
2

I know a girl that has a short bf; your papers, studies and data are automatically invalidated by my anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 06:12 PM
2

The average height of a women is 5'4.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:54 PM
1

No, you're not. You're chronically online, with an average of >30 comments per day, posting every day of the week and barely sleeping 4 hours: https://i.imgur.com/c9Qb4ML.png
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:12 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 12:18 PM
1

No. I like to know and see the person I am having sex with is enjoying it and likes to have sex with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:46 AM
5

No. Using TRP just means understanding the harsh realities of inter-sexual dynamics and accept the potential consequences that may happen in different situations. It is definitely not an excuse to cheat or any other bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 12:25 PM
1

It's impossible that two person can be equally attractive if the age gap is large. There are always differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:05 AM
–

She's more attractive, has this juvenil joy and more years to spend with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 08:29 PM
–

Younger boss babe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 04:31 PM
0

You can generalize, though. That's the point of statistics. I actually generalized by saying "for many" and "in general." Those are generalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 01:07 PM
1

For many, it is not the largest criteria to choose a partner. Men, in general, don't lust after a title or careers yet this doesn't mean it may matter for some in addition to other qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 12:55 PM
2

No. Being red pill means you are aware of the sexual dynamics between men and women. Wanting an educated wife has nothing to do with being RPed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 10:20 AM
1

This is the quote of the text they are debunking. You are unable to understand what you're reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:30 PM
–

This is precisely the quote they are debunking. Did you fail reading comprehension tests at school?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:26 PM
1

I check some boxes and I am proud of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 11:19 AM
2

Troll posts used to be believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:43 PM
10

You should rewrite the title to something like: "Preselection is real but using it to get girls is a dumb idea." based on what you wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:28 PM
2

Are there more men than women on there, though? Irrelevant, we're talking about percentages, not absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:07 AM
–

Nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 03:10 PM
1

My gf is like this. She's a logic cracking machine, when she hears an argument she detects logical inconsistencies in microseconds. Funnily enough, this year she teaches algebraic logic in university as a math professor as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 08:13 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 08:07 AM
–

Are you sure he's not into cXck stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 03:25 PM
6

It applies to everybody and it is a good way to navigate in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 06:52 PM
2

Aaand he's gone. A little bit of basic logic and facts makes that guy to melt faster than ice in lava.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 08:17 AM
4

As old as I am. My gf is 8 years younger than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 08:48 AM
–

So you want woman to date men they don't attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:37 PM
7

My husband has told me the reason why a lot of men hate tattoos is because is they can't pretend those kind of women are innocent children. It takes away their youthful innocent look. Needless to say, it actually makes me grateful I have tattoos and don't appeal to those kind of guys at all. What an awesome "If you don't like tattoos in women you're a p3d0!!"-logic we have here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:19 PM
–

People in this sub are experts at using the few blue examples to dismiss the overwhelming number of green ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:42 PM
1

Troll posts used to be believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:38 PM
1

Troll posts used to be believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:38 PM
1

What she thinks was obtained from a survey it was, in fact, obtained from the dating site OKCupid raw data without the influence of the famous "stated preference vs revealed preference" bias. And she compares this with a random video on Youtube. Both are a source, hence have the same value, according to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 05:49 PM
–

They think "I want to look/be healthier and stronger and fitter". Which, generally, aligns with being more attractive than being unhealthy, weak and overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:52 PM
1

Spanish speaker detected. https://preview.redd.it/3jayvjlv5isd1.jpeg?width=253&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c106b50176f106d310f0ba78fd8aea8dbab5deeb
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:33 AM
–

Wasn't he an advocate of PUA at the beginning, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 10:21 AM
–

Rollo Tomassi rightfully advocates against PUA Where does he? Just out of curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 08:42 AM
6

What region or culture you are from (United States, Europe, Asia, Western, Eastern, etc.) Mediterranean Europe. How long you have been together 3.5 years Does your wife/gf contribute to the household expenses? What does this split look like? Yes. 50/50. Does your wife/gf contribute to planned dates or the overall date fund? Have you ever split the cost of dates? Has she ever paid for date night? We didn't date. We met at work, slowly knew each other and that's it. The times we went out was paid …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 09:09 AM
2

If she is unable to get the quality of men she could land when she was 20-30, it means her SMV is lower. It is as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 08:11 AM
1

But she doesn't have the same SMV when she was 20-30. The Wall is a comparison with her former self, not with anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 08:01 AM
1

In reality depends on each individual but don't they usually say it starts about late 30s and early 40s as the sidebar says?.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 07:58 AM
13

It's not his theory, this has been said many times already.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:13 AM
5

The turning point is when experience transforms into emotional baggage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:01 AM
1

And... this question has been deliberately ignored. Quite predictable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 06:46 PM
58

Girls: We consent giving homie heads Boys: We consent you giving us homie heads Windmill_flowers: I don't Isn't there somebody you forgot to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 03:10 PM
1

TRP is not about self-discipline or self-improvement. I agree. It is about knowledge of inter-sexual dynamics. They mistake it by some kind of prescriptive stuff when it is only descriptive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 06:37 PM
–

Redpill way is better. Which is the RP way, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 06:27 PM
2

Even when I point "the sidebar" people here tell me it is not true and they proceed to vomit their own make-up-straw-man definition of the RP. So go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 07:58 AM
21

Thread about men who were treated badly by women to tell their stories: Men: tell their experience. Women: "Move on, women hater!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:30 AM
4

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1f7a58s/would_you_allow_your_daughter_to_go_to_college/ This thread is fascinating. RP men are sharing that they'd allow their daughters to attend college, while non-RP users argue that RP men wouldn't. It's all happening in the same conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 06:10 AM
–

Cool story, bro
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:32 PM
–

RP is about understanding sexual dynamics, not dating toxic women. Your post makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:28 PM
1

I didn't look for that, it just happened to be like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 05:50 PM
–

My current gf was one of those kind of virgin girls you described. She wasn't interested in sex until she discovered it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 05:40 PM
–

Ofc!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 01:38 PM
–

They don't like to talk to strangers, really. For instance, we took a Bolt a couple of times and the only words we heard from the driver was our name and destination to confirm we ordered it. The rest of the trip went totally in silence. In this regard they are very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 11:54 AM
–

You can hold your breath, walk and only breath when you see the next Zabka and you won't die. It's crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 11:40 AM
–

I spent a week in Poland. Good land and good people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 11:37 AM
1

He always run away when he's cornered in a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 07:19 PM
–

Low quality bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:47 PM
1

Most of the times. There's an interesting book about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 08:29 AM
1

I agree. Women don't shave because some average Joe tells them, they do it to compete with other women for the men they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:11 AM
–

all of it is focused and based on solutions It's focused on providing answers. Finding solutions, in case they are needed, is up to the individual. You claim to have read the sidebar, but it appears you haven't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:01 PM
1

Congratulations, you have completed the cycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:02 AM
1

That doesn't change anything about the content being for free if you don't want to pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 09:46 AM
-1

And yet, you still pay zero amounts of money for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 09:23 AM
-1

You're moving goalposts now. You didn't talk about the potential money they can make due to viewership and YouTube advertisement, you talked about "make money off of you" and "pay-walled information, guides, coaching etc". There's zero money they can make out of you if you decide not to pay a single cent for whatever content they're selling.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 09:05 AM
2

Do you realize you can read or watch the content without having to pay a single cent besides any advertisement, pay-wall information, guide, coaching, etc? Are you the type of person that payed for WinRAR?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 07:39 AM
7

rather than some pilled creators who want to make money off of you? AFAIK, all the content has been available for free on the internet in different formats. There's no need to waste a single cent on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 07:15 AM
6

Society has bluepilled men into thinking attraction doesn't matter, that being attractive as a man doesn't matter. Intuitively society knows that it matters but, most of the times, it doesn't express it due to virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 11:03 AM
3

It does not say it, you clearly cannot properly read, and youtube is not a source on its own. Anybody can make a video stating whatever they want. Unless they don't back it with a source, it's useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 01:08 PM
2

It is relevant because it is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:56 PM
3

It doesn't say in the title nor in the video that 87% Of Red Pill men are single and it doesn't provide any source. You're not even watching the videos you're posting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:55 PM
2

But it is the point I am making.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:52 PM
3

It doesn't say 87% Of Red Pill men are single and it doesn't provide any source.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:46 PM
2

You said OkCupid data came from a survey. It did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:45 PM
2

It isn't, I'm just pointing out you're wrong in front of everybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:01 PM
3

It does not. It says "87% Of Men" and not " 87% Of Red Pill Men". And it doesn't provide any source where this figure comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:00 PM
3

I wasn't arguing about that. I was stating that the OkCupid study didn't come from a survey.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:56 AM
3

The video doesn't say 87% of RP men are single. You are making this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:55 AM
2

I'm not using anything. I'm just saying the OkCupid study wasn't made from a survey.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:52 AM
5

1) This is a different video. 2) It doesn't say 87% of Red Pill men are single but "Why 87% Of Men Are Stuck Being Single". 3) It does not even provide any source where this figure comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:51 AM
–

I'm only saying the OkCupid study was not made from a survey which you claim it did.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:49 AM
1

I haven't seen the figure of 87% in that video. Any point of the video where it is shown?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:42 AM
–

You're not getting my point, dudette. You can't swear a study was made from a survey when it was not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:41 AM
1

The video is 25 minutes long. Any precise moment where they show the figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:36 AM
–

The data from OkCupid was not a survey. The founder used literally ALL the data to identify users patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:31 AM
-3

Wow! Brutal! Any particular youtube video?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:18 AM
–

It didn’t surprise me to learn that 87% of redpill men are single. Holly molly, where does this figure comes from?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:06 AM
15

If it truly worked, men would already be using it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 10:13 PM
2

And is an Alpha Man a High Value Man or are different things?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:36 PM
–

What is Alpha Male Advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:09 PM
3

This is yet another reason it is so important to have friends, a notion that red pillers routinely reject. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:57 PM
1

after following redpill advice online and starting to date guys who weren't attractive to me at all Whoever suggested you this trolled you really hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:42 PM
1

The red pill needs to stop deciding what standards to have based on how other men are/ have been treated. The RP doesn't decide, each individual person does.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:05 PM
1

The system is working as intended. POSIWID
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:26 AM
–

I'll take the b8t. What's a mid top face?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 04:32 PM
1

I'd say I'm just RP aware, if it can be said so. Taking into account the definition of RP being stated in this sub jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:19 PM
1

Being RP or not isn't defined by what you do but what you know (or the way you see the world in terms of sexual dynamics, in this case).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:13 PM
1

Apparently, women, on average, swiping right 7% of the time but men, on average, being swiped right only 2.5% of the time doesn't create any kind of skewness in the men who are being swiped right at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:16 PM
1

The rate at which someone swipes right/left is not based on number of users, it’s based on the profile on front of them. The number of users only affects the total number of matches, not the percentage. I agree. Yet people here keep bringing the male-to-female ratio over and over again trying to disprove that women are way more selective than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 12:03 PM
1

You're an adult who doesn't know how to use a dictionary. It's not an insult but a definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:07 PM
1

See? Unable to prove your own statements. Mental retardation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:01 PM
1

Didn't you say this retardation? “Arsenic is a chemical element with the symbol As and the atomic number 33. It is a metalloid and one of the pnictogens, and therefore shares many properties with its group 15 neighbors phosphorus and antimony” According to you aresnic isn’t a poison since nowhere in its description did the word poison come up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:55 PM
1

No, it's you. You haven't moved a single inch from the part of the conversation where you had to prove your retarded analogy "the definition of arsenic doesn't include the fact that it's a poison". Since you can't prove your own words, you're stuck there unable to win. Because lying is loosing in a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:47 PM
1

I'm not the one who has to prove their own false, and retarded, analogies. Hence I'm not stuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:41 PM
1

Did you manage to find the meaning of that word in the dictionary, at least?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:39 PM
1

You're an adult who's unable to properly look for a word definition in a dictionary pretending to debate using 3-year old like stupid analogies like "The words are similar, hence they have to be the same meaning". You can't not tell me this show is not interesting to see xD
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:34 PM
1

If I don't post anywhere else is because I don't find anything interesting to post. Why did you say the definition of arsenic doesn't mention it's a poison? Can you write its dictionary entry and we can check?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:27 PM
1

No you are talking about being stuck in this convo. Stuck meaning being unable to prove your own analogies and progress. Not being unable to do anything else, dumbhead. I am multitasking to, I am working... Why don't you write the definition of arsenic?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:20 PM
1

How am I stuck if I’m bouncing around other comments? Are you? We're talking about you being stuck in this conversation unable to prove your own analogies, not being stuck anywhere else, dumbhead. Can you post here again the definition of arsenic to see how impossible it is to know it is a poison? One more time, please, it's so funny, come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:42 PM
1

I’m not stuck. You're stuck here. And you’re stuck on completely unrelated topics. I'm not, I'm not the one who writes analogies unable to be proven. Tell me more about how we can't know arsenic is poison by looking at the definition. Tell me, I haven't laughed at you enough yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:38 PM
1

I am. Go look It has nothing to do with the issue here. every sexing you’re stuck here is another second you aren’t posting about TRP. Why would I post about the RP? Wtf xD I win Wtf xDDDD You're not even able to look for the definition of the word arsenic in a dictionary without don't realizing it states it is a poison. Even 5 yr old kids know how to use a dictionary, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:30 PM
1

Nah you see: I I’m still posting on other comments You aren’t Nothing to do with the debate here. And this was never a debate. Using wrong and unproved analogies, made up definitions and no sources at all from your part, no, of course this can not be a debate. This was me putting you where I wanted. Lmao You can’t even talk about RP anymore. Once you admit your unable to prove your analogies we'll go back to the RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:25 PM
1

It's you who is stuck being unable to use valid analogies. And they are your own analogies, not mine! I am just pointing it out. If you could prove your analogies right or admit they are wrong, the debate could continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:18 PM
1

See? Instead of trying to make your analogies right by providing a proof, you keep posting this link because you're unable to prove your own points. How can be a debate possible when you're unable to prove your own analogies?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:14 PM
1

Yes, you still unable to prove them right. Scientology doesn't say is science and the definition of the word arsenic includes the fact that it is defined as a poison. Your analogies are plainly wrong, hence your attempts to define the RP based on those analogies is wrong as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:07 PM
1

If the analogies are false, they are not valid arguments. Since you can't prove them to be right, you failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 03:03 PM
1

In a debate, when you bring a statement you need to prove it true. The burden of proof is on you, not me. You just can't stop being unable to prove the shit you write.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:59 PM
1

It's you who said "Scientology says is a science" and "the definition of arsenic doesn't say it's a poison". Not me. Not even that, you made yourself unable to prove those two statements you said. I'm just pointing it out. Since you can't prove them, you keep posting that link over and over due to frustration.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:53 PM
1

You're sharing stuff that has nothing to do with the topic because you're unable to tackle, not only the main issue, but the different parallel issues you bring yourself and you're unable to defend. Such "the definition of arsenic doesn't include it's poison".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:48 PM
1

If you're unable to prove what you say, it doesn't make a difference if we talk about RP, Scientology or arsenic. You said the definition of arsenic doesn't say it's poisonous what you actually did was to hide or ignore the part where it says it is. You are straight up using lies to proves your points.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:45 PM
1

Posting this over and over doesn't change the fact that you're unable to prove what you say.......
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:40 PM
1

Tell me more about how in the description of arsenic it doesn't say it's poison.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:34 PM
1

Imagine saying something like: "According to you aresnic isn’t a poison since nowhere in its description did the word poison come up." When the literal description of the word in the Oxford Dictionary say it's a poison: "a chemical element that is very poisonous, often used to kill rats" With this level of retardedness, it's impossible in a million years you could prove what you said: "Scientology says it’s science".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:32 PM
1

Lot of rambling but you're unable to prove that "Scientology says it’s science".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:25 PM
1

"Scientology is about science because it is in the name but Apple is not about apples because... bla bla" You sound this stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:23 PM
1

It's not called science but Scientology and in their own official explanation about what it is they never use the word science. The same logic would be apply to Apple but it doesn't since it's a retarded argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:18 PM
1

I can see why you can't prove what you said: "Scientology says it’s science".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:13 PM
1

It doesn't say anything about "Scientology says it’s science". It still unproven.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:12 PM
1

You made the following statement "Scientology says it’s science". You need to proof that the actual Scientology cult says so. And you haven't. Because you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:08 PM
1

No. It's more simple, you need to proof that from an official statement "Scientology says it’s science".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:59 PM
1

If you say "Scientology says it’s science" you need to proof the actual Scientology says it, not anybody else says it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:55 PM
1

That is no official statement from Scientology church.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:52 PM
1

You need to show an official statement from that cult stating that it's science since you said "And Scientology says it’s science". Otherwise it's not "Scientology says", but "someone else says".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:47 PM
1

No. The "And Scientology says it’s science" said by you is still unproven.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:38 PM
1

This is not what Scientology says, this is a wikipedia article about someone not from Scientology saying so.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:34 PM
1

You have to prove what you said: "And Scientology says it’s science"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:24 PM
1

Prove what you said: "And Scientology says it’s science"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:21 PM
1

Prove arsenic isn’t poison. The literal definition you posted, comes from the wiki and it literally says, if you read a little bit more, that it's poison: "Arsenic is a notoriously toxic heavy metal." or "Arsenic and many of its compounds are especially potent poisons. " The word poison appears 23 times in the article. You're a total illiterate who's unable to read. Now prove what you said: "And Scientology says it’s science"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:16 PM
1

You are unable to prove "Scientology say is about science".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:06 PM
1

Then Apple should be about selling apples and not computers or smartphones. Retarded logic. You: "And Scientology says it’s science" Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:03 PM
1

You: "And Scientology says it’s science" Prove they say Scientology is science.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:00 PM
1

I'm not defending it, I'm simply saying that your definition of what you say they are is not what you say they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:58 PM
1

You: "And Scientology says it’s science" Their official definition doesn't say so at all You (unable to answer): "Troll!" Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:32 PM
1

Scientology doesn't say they are science. From their own site: https://www.scientology.org/what-is-scientology/ Developed by L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology is a religion that offers a precise path leading to a complete and certain understanding of one’s true spiritual nature and one’s relationship to self, family, groups, Mankind, all life forms, the material universe, the spiritual universe and the Supreme Being. Scientology addresses the spirit—not the body or mind—and believes that Man is far mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 06:33 AM
1

It says it's a praxeology, indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:20 PM
1

You posted the link And the link says nothing you've been saying since the beginning. It actually says it's a praxeology, aka the study of human behavior, in this case about inter-sexual dynamics. Nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:14 PM
1

RP is just knowledge, it's not a company, nor organization nor a movement. There are no results. You learn about it and deal it as you please. That's it. You clearly don't know what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:06 PM
1

Results about what? Be specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:00 PM
1

Which results are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:56 PM
1

Subjectively, maybe; objectively no. It's totally independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:51 PM
1

The lack of trust in something doesn't negate its meaning. This applies to alchemy as well. While I don't consider it a real science, that doesn't strip it of its significance. However, your mind seems unable to connect these dots. Anyone can sell a book with their shit, nowadays. Doesn't prove a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:47 PM
1

I did, I posted the link with the definition. People can sell any content at any moment at anyone who wants to pay for it. It doesn't make the content what it's not, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:42 PM
1

Rp isn’t about “knowledge” It’s about selling self published books, seminars, Pateron support and superchats to desperate losers so the “influencers” can grift off them. It's not. Anyone can learn the knowledge for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:38 PM
1

My examples proved it can be defined and the actual definition is very well stated. RP is about knowledge, of course people talk online about it, like any other topic. It can be done in person as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:28 PM
1

My examples are ideal to prove potential fraudulent concepts still can have a precise meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:23 PM
1

I didn't say it was, I just use it as an example. Your reading comprehension is very poor. The creator of the term defined what is it. Imagine my shock. You mad it up instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:13 PM
1

Of course it can be true, I already told you that, alchemy, for example, has a precise and clear meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:06 PM
1

The definition of a thing can be true independently of how fraudulent it is. It doesn't matter if is in a glossary. You made up the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:59 PM
1

You made up the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:53 PM
1

You describe what you pretend it to be and he what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:39 PM
1

Your example is wrong since she doesn't defined the meaning of a Stacy. Hence, it doesn't matter how pretty she thinks it is, she's not a Stacy. The same way you did not define the meaning of the RP and your explanation is as far as the ugly girl from a Stacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:35 PM
1

In your example, the ugly girl is you trying to define the RP by saying what is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:29 PM
1

No I don't. Concepts can have definitions regardless of their legitimacy. Take alchemy, for instance; although it was a fraudulent practice, it still has a well-defined meaning. Your inability to grasp this level of abstraction in names and definitions is apparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:17 PM
1

You could apply this to any field that seeks to explain something unknown, yet the definition of the field wouldn't change.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:10 PM
1

It still the definition of the thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:01 PM
1

The glossary has first hand sources. You just made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:53 PM
1

It didn't. You keep pointing the finger rather than watching the moon. The glossary is there for a reason, specially if they source their definitions. You don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:36 PM
1

I said what it is. Not what it wishes it was. It is the opposite, in fact. I’m Starting to see how Onlyfans can make so much money off girls pretending You're so out you have to start writing nonsense thing like this to pretend you're saying something meaningful.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:11 PM
1

The sidebar uses the definition used by the people who coined the term. You just made it up instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:03 PM
1

You made up your definition and nobody is forced to buy books. I actually know what RP is. You clearly don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:57 PM
1

I didn't say any of that I just told you the definition and that the mods used that definition. If you have any problem with that, talk with the mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:54 PM
1

Your ad hominems don't invalidate what I said. He coined the term decades ago, he explained the definition, the sub mods used the definition of the person who came with the term the explain the actual term.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:48 PM
1

It's the definition of the people who coined the term more than a decade a ago and the ones cited in the bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:12 PM
1

It's a praxeology that seeks to explain human inter-sexual dynamics. Since some of those explanations or realities may come harsh it was used the term RP like in the movie The Matrix. Whatever you do with this information is up to the individual since is not prescriptive. Do you want to use it to get as many girls as possible? Ok. Are you angry about it and want to isolate from women and be mgtow? Ok as well. Do you want to have a LTR? Perfectly good as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:05 PM
1

The mods are just putting in their word the definition from the people who coined the term. You're focusing on the finger rather than the moon.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:56 PM
1

The mods used sources from the ones who coined the term and describe what it is which matches the definition posted there.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:50 PM
1

“It’s not true cause I linked the sidebar!” Nope Yes. Otherwise request the mods to change the definition with your because the one they posted is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:46 PM
1

What you wrote is totally different to the definition in the jargon sub. Day and night. No word about hooking with women, toolbox, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:42 PM
1

The circle surrounds all because you said something totally different. It was so bad even the mods had to delete your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:36 PM
1

The definition you came up is completely different to the one in the sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:33 PM
1

I did. I even posted the link with the definition which is the one in the jargon sub. It's you who is unable to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:30 PM
1

No, they are clearly unable to answer the question like you do. Even one tried to compare it with being Christian, for some reason, and failed miserably.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:28 PM
1

The other posters are, like you, unable to answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:26 PM
2

The RP would work for him in the sense that he will see the world differently, which is the main goal of the RP according to the jargon of this sub. Apart from that, nothing is guaranteed he would life as you described and most likely he won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:25 AM
1

Ok but answer: ideology about what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:53 PM
2

"that's not real red pill!" I am using the sub jargon that I did not write and has been there for ages. The definition of it is clearly written there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:51 PM
1

Ideology about what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:49 PM
3

What is it about?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:31 PM
2

Most BP folk wouldn't be RP even if they read the sidebar since they wouldn't think that knowledge is true in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:28 PM
6

If being a Christian was about knowledge it would.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:16 PM
1

If you knew for real you should have answered straight away with a clear and concise answer instead of suggesting me to ask RP. What you wrote next are just ramblings.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:15 PM
2

Is it mandatory to use the tools in the toolbox to be RPed? Ask RP [because I don't know] Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:11 PM
0

No, I’m saying I’m not taking the B8. You are simply unable to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:06 PM
2

The definition in this sub jargon says it's just knowledge. Hence, having the knowledge without necessary apply it makes you being RPed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:05 PM
2

Ask RP So you tried to define RP without knowing the answer and now you're telling me to ask RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:02 PM
3

Is it mandatory to use the tools in the toolbox to be RPed?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:58 PM
3

Define being RPed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:45 PM
3

It always has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:37 AM
–

tl;dr
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 07:51 AM
1

Why would I pay for something I found for free?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:22 AM
2

It is pretty accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 08:34 AM
–

I checked this sub jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:56 AM
–

If that Tate or whoever who declares himself as RP said he fXXs oranges to get vitamin C, would f**ing oranges to get vitamin C be a part of the RP?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:47 AM
–

Isn't the RP about understanding inter-sexual dynamics? What you wrote has nothing to do with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:22 AM
1

I totally agree. I met my serious LTR girlfriends there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/06/24 08:57 AM
3

If my engine breaks, and I get angry, I don't need to discuss why I think it makes me angry. I need to know how to fix my engine. I agree. Fixing the stuff that makes me angry helps me to stop being angry, not talking about it and keep the stuff that makes me angry untouched.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 11:42 AM
11

It's possible for most men to get chiseled abs. "Just get chiseled abs, bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 11:46 AM
1

I met all my gfs in my everyday life in a casual manner. If they had been boring, things wouldn't have progressed to them becoming my gfs.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 08:11 AM
4

"I know one metalhead that is fat, hence all your statistics are completely wrong." /s
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 08:05 AM
1

If you think you can use them as a substitute for actual experience or knowledge, The assumptions come from experience and knowledge in the first place. It's called sampling in the statistic argot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:29 PM
2

No, it's just regular probability and statistics. You know, normal distributions and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:13 PM
3

The mistake you and others are making is to go "the majority think this, therefore I will assume this to be positively true about everyone in my life." No, you are misinterpreting it. It is actually: "The majority think this, therefore I will assume this to be positively true about everyone the majority in my life." This is about probabilities, not absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 09:39 AM
–

I agree with this comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:12 PM
1

It's ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:00 PM
11

I don't know I am just answering OP's question.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 12:12 PM
12

Every woman is allowed to be as picky as she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 12:02 PM
17

in terms of bluepill thought, my "personality" "Physical attractiveness undeniably matters—it's common sense! There's no need to explain that getting in shape and working out will boost women's attraction to you." Yet, they often point this out only after you've discovered for yourself that it makes a difference, having previously suggested you focus solely on your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 08:36 AM
5

But it is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:08 PM
3

I personally think TRP is dumb, because it reduces women to a program that you can “hack” with the right combination of pickup lines and game, This is PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 04:52 PM
1

Hello, human resources?!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:36 PM
–

I agree. It's similar to the say: "A man is as faithful as his options."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 08:45 AM
1

I couldn’t use the classic “I have a boyfriend” excuse. Why not? The other guy doesn't know you don't have a bf.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:19 AM
2

Isn't there a thrill to meeting someone new, finding all about thier little quirks and kinks? And even before when you haven't exchanged a single word and there is only non-verbal communication even though when you just see each other a couple days a week during commuting time, for instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 07:49 PM
–

I meant in different circles/levels of SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:02 AM
–

In a graphic way to put it, you have two circles of people that never overlap and, hence, they'll never have the chance to meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:13 AM
6

Women are scammed too. I thought I had a hot date — but I got catfished by an NYC restaurant instead . You only need a chadly profile to make women do whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:00 AM
1

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:19 PM
6

This issue has been brought multiple times in the askmen subreddit and the answers always went as you can expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:14 PM
2

Indeed. "Emotionally unavailability" often means he has the attention of multiple women and he doesn't want to commit to her in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:59 PM
-2

Death by 1000 concessions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 05:45 PM
9

Maybe because some men can get women without working hard?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 01:19 PM
20

No matter what you said before. The most important part is this: assuming that the guy is at least reasonably sexually attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 10:07 AM
8

Beggars can't be choosers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:10 AM
1

Isn't infinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:00 AM
3

Women have a tendency to just ascribe positive traits to people they find attractive. It indeed happens and most likely with both sexes
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 08:37 AM
1

The guy who coined the term, wrote and discussed the topic since more than a decade says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 06:21 PM
2

The definition of the sidebar says the opposite, it is about knowledge. What do you do with the knowledge is up-to the person individually.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:34 PM
2

It doesn't make sense. One is redpilled when he knows about the harsh realities of intersexual dynamics that RP tells independently of what he does.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:18 PM
1

What if you know and discuss all RP knowledge, also interact with women but don't do any of lifting, spinning plates, etc..?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 07:50 AM
–

?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:30 PM
–

Yea, and? Nothing. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:03 PM
2

If you are describing a goal, yes So there are two kind of RPs then. The ones the want to analyze/discuss a phenomena, in this case the intrasexual dynamics, and the ones that want to put this knowledge into use for their own personal reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:45 PM
2

Not necessarily, if you describe and discuss stuff you have seen or experienced it means only that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:38 PM
2

Say what? Be more specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:20 PM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:03 PM
2

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 03:35 PM
1

But one of the links in the description of the RP in PPD jargon page says the RP is non-prescriptive since what you do with the knowledge is up-to the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 03:30 PM
2

What if you don't do any of that but you know how intersexual dynamics work like the actual definition of RP? Are you RPed then?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 02:40 PM
1

Which things?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:27 AM
5

Definitely I don't like overweight women but I don't care about big frame girls. My gf is 5'9-10" and she has strong legs due to ballet, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:19 PM
7

The importance of that aspect in the dating scene is being discussed recurrently here and not every time it has devolved into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:10 PM
2

Discussions about looks on this sub absolutely do. No they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:01 PM
6

Not every discussion about 'energy' devolves into that. But good strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:57 AM
13

Imagine a physics sub where 'energy' content isn't allowed. Insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:28 AM
–

I didn't say it wasn't. Now answer mine, lowIQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 01:03 PM
23

As much as you want to give them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:33 PM
–

I didn't re-frame it and you are so low IQ to be able to answer a simple question.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:43 AM
2

Did you have an idea of the true natures of the sexes before discovering the RP or it came totally by surprise?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:39 AM
1

How can the RP be practiced?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 08:35 AM
2

Not and answer of my question. It's just a simple 'yes' or 'no', you can do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:47 PM
3

It is manipulation but everything is since it is an action-reaction scheme. Now answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:38 PM
3

You don't want to answer the question, indeed that's why don't to discuss anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:30 PM
3

It's not a re-frame, all I wanted to say I said it. You can answer the question now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:18 PM
4

Should a man cease his efforts to earn more income or neglect physical activity simply because it causes anxiety to his gf/wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:54 AM
3

I agree. Dread is, in short, becoming the best version of yourself, increasing your value for the other sex and not letting yourself go during the relationship. It means to increase the competition anxiety passively. It has nothing to do with cheating or threatening to cheat or any kind of straw-man stuff people like to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:16 AM
5

Why is that a bad advice? Just for curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:01 AM
–

I’m talking about seriously dating for a long term relationship and also kids one day Then date accordingly to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:56 AM
–

As long as you like the man and you are fulfilling your relationship goals, be with whoever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:51 AM
1

With Chad or with her best ex-bf among them all?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:05 PM
1

Why some RPers says TRP is about improvement or strategies when the actual definition is being aware of the harsh realities of the intersexual dynamics between men and women? I mean, as long as you are aware of them you are RPed independently that you improve your life or not, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:32 AM
0

It is but for some strange reason they always push this narrative of being grossed when they were younger which is totally unrelated with two adults liking each other and being in a healthy and consensual relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:41 AM
3

Same with my 8 yrs younger gf. I never had any issues with her parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:36 AM
1

Same with my 8 yrs younger gf. I never had any issues with her parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:35 AM
6

"putting in the work", "making effort", not letting yourself go, You can kill to birds with one stone if you do this. As long as you are someone who the other sex finds attractive and wants to be with, it'll generally be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:13 PM
3

Woman moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 03:43 PM
–

Exactly!!! I can sense from here that is totally her terrible personality what prevents men finding her attractive. She definitely needs to work on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:00 PM
–

Have you tried working on your personality, grooming, showering and respecting men?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:36 PM
–

But tell me more about how lifting makes guys so confident When women find them more attractive they become more confident. It's not that difficult. It's called positive reinforcement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:14 PM
–

That guy seems incredibly dense; I'm genuinely unsure if he's just trolling. Claiming that improving your physique and building some muscle doesn't influence how women perceive you is utterly absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 12:05 PM
2

Yeah, it happens to me all the time, it sucks. Then comes the regret "I shouldn't have done that final rep" and I spend my salary buying new T-shirts that I can fit in.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 09:55 AM
2

No, the fact that you keep bringing unrealistic outcomes as the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 09:19 AM
2

You cherrypick the unrealistic extremes because you don't know what actually lifting is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 09:10 AM
3

You see the extreme cases, not the majority. Nobody gets too muscular by mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 09:06 AM
–

You consistently reference extreme scenarios that fail to discredit the underlying argument. If you believe that the typical man can attain a level of muscularity deemed unattractive, you seem disconnected from reality and and have never tried to get in shape in your entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 09:00 AM
–

Your anecdotal preference doesn't invalidate the general statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:47 AM
–

Having a shape, yes, if you are overly obese. No. You can be out of shape without being overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:45 AM
–

It doesn't invalidate the fact that getting in shape is always correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:39 AM
–

"Just have rizz, bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:09 AM
5

My gf. I'm not uploading a pic of her but she never wears it and I find her attractive. I've only seen her wearing make-up twice: in a wedding and in a theatrical play. And the latter was not even serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:57 AM
1

Meanwhile, 95% of CEOs are men, 83% of patents are created by men, top scoring students, specially in STEM, are boys, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 09:01 AM
1

it's more to do with that than what women they are with. I agree. The complain "Muh, he is emotional unavailable" is a lie to tell themselves to avoid thinking the plainly obvious think: he doesn't like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:45 AM
-1

it's more to do with that than what women they are with. I agree. The complain "Muh, he is emotional unavailable" is a lie they tell themselves to avoid accepting the plainly obvious thing: he doesn't like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:45 AM
7

Same in mine. The athletic one would slay utterly more than the objectively fat one.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 08:52 AM
1

it works better to pretend to be an arrogant asshole. Because if you pretend being that when you're not attractive it's even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 08:20 AM
1

Basic statistics and concepts like 'per capita' or 'normalization' are kryptonite to those people. It's amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 10:11 AM
14

But if he worked on his personality and took lots of showers, would it change your mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:50 PM
4

Why do you write this way?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:40 PM
–

I saw a couple in Walmart, your argument is invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:34 AM
2

You'll be indistinguishable from your colleague in no time!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:10 PM
–

You clearly need to work on your personality, take more showers and hate women less.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 12:32 PM
3

Wtf xD
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 10:53 AM
1

It isn't something I particularly cared but it just naturally happens that all girls I had something with were younger than me and they didn't care at all about the age gap between us. My current gf is 8 years younger, my last ex was 4 years younger, some non-serious girls I met in between the two were even younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:36 AM
–

He invented a new kind of fallacy: the whataboutredpillism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:58 PM
3

If more woman were in charge, there would be less wars to begin with [Citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:33 PM
3

I am the INTP and she's the INTJ in my relationship according to the test but I agree with what you wrote, specially this part: We both tend to approach things...ah...rationally...which makes decisions and conversations easier to get through with out a lot of fighting. Fights also dissipate rather quickly because we always burn through the feels quick and settle down to a plain old discussion of the issue. Even when I don't like something, my logic tends to win out over my feelings. The mental p…
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/24 05:57 PM
1

Can you give us a definition of what a p3d0 is?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 04:53 PM
1

No, I just proved you don't know the meaning of the word p3d0.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 04:05 PM
1

No it isn't. You don't even know the meaning of the word p3d0.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:54 PM
1

Not a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:51 PM
2

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:26 PM
1

I agree with your comment. My gf is considerably more logic leaning than emotional and she also says that, generally, it's hard to have a honest debate with girls because they tend to take everything personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:07 PM
5

P3d0s are attracted to prepubescent children, not young adults. Women over 18 are way beyond that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:36 PM
1

P3d0s are attracted to prepubescent children, not young adults. Women over 18 are way beyond that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:26 AM
5

Hi, u/HardTimes4Vampires, do you claim what you say in the first post is a woman only issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 09:51 AM
7

You asked studies of what the OP claimed. The OP claims that studies show that bullies have more partners than "no-bullies." The study I provided says that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 09:47 AM
6

Cool story but I just posted an example of what you asked for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 09:34 AM
5

You asked, I delivered.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 09:26 AM
9

Here is one, for example: Adolescent Bullying, Dating, and Mating The data partly supported our prediction that bullying, but not victimization, would predict dating behavior. The data for sexual behavior more clearly supported our hypothesis that bullying behavior predicts an increase in sexual opportunities even when accounting for age, sex, and self-reports of attractiveness, likeability, and peer victimization. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426866/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 09:18 AM
11

The main difference between a younger and older woman is how much "free" attention and opportunity they receive. "Privilege is invisible to those who have it". It's hard to go back to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:15 AM
2

Mr Strawman in action again? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:46 PM
3

1: Lifting 3 days a week or swimming. I prefer to go well shaved if I can. In terms of clothing I like plain t-shirts or polos, short leaves, generally tucked and chinos. I like to use good color combinations. 2: I don't struggle with them. Currently with a gf. Never used dating apps, I always met my girls in person. 3: Yes but not the same way men do it. I often see more men than women practicing physical activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:31 PM
3

Wtf, that amount of activity doesn't "keep you in shape". Yep, I missed the previous comment but if I had to answer it I would have basically said this. Go hiking on weekends to get in shape is utterly delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 10:50 AM
1

The same way a doctor that smokes and drinks tells you that smoking and drinking is bad for health, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 10:29 AM
3

I like going to the gym. I left my phone in the locker and I take the advantage to re-order my thoughts while I train (or I swim). So I guess it depends on everyone. On the other hand, even rock climbers need to go to the gym to gain muscle mass to prevent injuries as it can be seen in the following articles: 1) Workouts for Climbers: How To Train for Rock Climbing and Bouldering. From healthline.com. 2) 4 Gym Exercises All Climbers Should Do. From climbing.com 3) Weight Training for Climbers. F…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 10:18 AM
35

The problem is that there’s a certain number of men who take friendliness and niceness as an expression of interest regardless of the words coming out of the woman’s mouth. I agree with this. It's embarrassing and painful to watch men flirting with women when you can clearly tell she's just being nice and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:51 AM
4

They are the same. Muscles don't distinguish whether you apply the force by lifting weights in the gym or by climbing a rock. Just because you have a goofy image of what gym is it doesn't mean it is the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:33 AM
4

Well if you consider those mutant bulks under the skin beneficial... Muscles have multiple healthy benefits it's not only about aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:26 AM
2

I do agree with you, the best exercise is the one that comes naturally while doing other demanding physical activities. However, for urban people who have an office type job, the gym is the only viable option most of the times.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:57 AM
6

But those big bumps that gym guys have are ridiculous. When men think about getting in shape they don't think about those guys you described but the Brad Pitt in Fight Club body type. Which it requires a lot of gym time and diet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:28 AM
2

Now that I think about it, the only times I've seen my gf wearing makeup was during a wedding and in an amateur theater play she did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:21 AM
6

I guess is that when people say most men are not successful in dating apps because the ratio is in favor of men it wouldn't change if it was the opposite. In short, women would mainly choose a minority of men as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:11 AM
3

When both people get what they want. I was about to say this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 06:40 PM
16

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 04:15 PM
1

Wtf I just read xD
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 01:21 PM
5

I agree too. Getting in shape, for instance, requires self-discipline that will have some impact in your character. It will make you have a more assertive attitude without necessarily being an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 10:50 AM
1

Perhaps that attitude is part of what drew these women to him. What is what pushes women apart from him? His relationships only last months.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 04:40 PM
1

As far as I've just read, Ariana dumped him and he took it quite bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 04:17 PM
1

Maybe that's why the relationship didn't last long. Less than 6 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 03:39 PM
1

And the status he has probably contributed to his success besides being less wealthier than some of his gfs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 03:13 PM
–

So definitely not ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:55 PM
–

Do you think he's good looking or too goofy to be hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:52 PM
–

Yes but it wouldn't made him able to access female celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:07 PM
–

It's the good old looks-money-status. His 6'3 height is also a factor and BPD diagnose also could contribute to the way he love-bombs women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 01:36 PM
1

Download from here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:29 AM
1

Go here. Introduce: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.001 . Click 'open'. It should work.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:24 AM
1

This is the full paper of the socond study and here the first one. Both are pdfs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:16 AM
1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268119302495 Or https://sci-hub.53yu.com/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.08.001
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 09:04 AM
1

From the second study: Overall, the picture that emerges from these findings is that both visibly and hidden tattooed men are more short-sighted and impulsive than their non-tattooed counterparts; yet, while visibly tattooed women are more short-sighted and impulsive than non-tattooed women, women with only hidden tattoos are not significantly different from non-tattooed women along either of these measures.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:59 AM
2

There is one here: Are People Who Get Tattoos Really More Reckless and Impulsive? Researchers found that those with tattoos, especially visible ones, are more shortsighted and impulsive than those without visible tattoos. Evidence shows that individuals who possess the trait of shortsightedness are more likely to get tattooed. Source. Here another: Tat Will Tell: Tattoos and Time Preferences We collect numerous measures of time preferences and impulsivity of tattooed and non-tattooed subjects an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:48 AM
1

So no screenshot. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:05 PM
1

One that you didn't took a screenshot, for some reason. It actually has not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:03 PM
1

I literally just linked you to a post where someone was getting opposite answers to the same question. And yet I have obtained the same ones stating that there is no explicitly. But, like I said, if red pillers need to rely.on ChatGPT to make their arguments for them, then that certainly explains a lot. What is it yet to be explained is where the original posts states explicitly that it refers to teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:59 PM
1

That's why I asked the same question 5 times and I obtained the same answer written in a different way but stating in all of them that it is not explicitly said that in the original post. Which is the way ChatGPT works. Here are 3 more that state that it is not explicitly stated: Question 6, Question 7, Question 8. Q: ChatGPT, which is the sum of 2+2? A1: The sum is 4. A2: The sum of 2+2 is 4. A3: The summation of 2 plus 2 is 4. A4: The result of the sum is four. Different answers yet the same r…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:47 PM
1

ChatGPT doesn't say that. Even with the same words you use, it says the opposite: Question 1: "Could potentially incompass... [...] Without additional context or calrification from the author, it's difficult to determine their specifiic intentions of the exact scope" Question 2: However, without further context or qualifiers, it's difficult to determine the specific age range implied by the author Question 3: could potentially apply to such a scenario. However, it's essential to consider the bro…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:22 PM
1

So we're dealing with an official troll or simply a person that doesn't know the meaning of the word "explicit", lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 12:32 PM
2

He's (r/Solondthewookiee) so full of bullshit that even ChatGPT knows it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:50 AM
1

I was just providing you evidences about your point that you may have missed. Also GPT clearly states that the OP doesn't talk about teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:43 AM
1

The OP says he isn't talking about 18 year old females dating 50 years old males. So he is not saying that crap explicitly by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 08:44 PM
1

So you didn't and he is just strawmaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 06:05 PM
1

Hi, u/SlowEffective8146, did you talk about teenagers dating 50 year old men?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:28 PM
1

I still dont' see the word "teenagers".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 03:07 PM
1

Where is the word "teenagers" exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:21 PM
1

OP did. Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 09:14 AM
1

l don't know how many times this has to be said but people just keep beating the same dead-hourse on this It's way easier to attack a strawman rather than the actual thing. That's the reason why they're keeping doing this over and over.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 03:02 PM
3

I'd say so, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 06:46 PM
2

My gf pays half of the rent and half of the bills. Never saved more money since I live with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 05:38 PM
1

Darwin.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 03:12 PM
11

No, it's just the optimal thing to do when there is no alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:23 PM
18

So what happens when a guy gives a solution versus just listens? They don't want to fix their issues, most of the times they just want to vent. So it's better to let them do it even if they are actually speaking to a wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:19 PM
27

Not in dating but in general. I don't try to offer solutions when women tell their problems unless they specifically ask for them and even that I don't seriously think about what they could do to solve them. I disconnect my brain, nod time to time and say stuff like "yeah, it sucks", "damn", "pffff"...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:12 PM
1

Dating is very inefficient. I always met the girls I had something with in a casual way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 12:53 PM
1

The fallacy is believing that they are swiping right on equally distributed proportions of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 09:49 AM
1

I don't imitate it, I'm quite aloof and dgaf by default, and I can't complain, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 01:15 PM
2

It's not uncommon. It just mean you're more comfortable being alone than being with someone unable to make the former situation better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:41 PM
10

here are more "nice guys" than "nice girls" and so on. Why is this the case? The disparity between sexes of what they find physically attractive in the opposite sex and the abundance of options they have out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:37 PM
–

I agree, it is very inefficient. All my serious relationships have been casually meeting and knowing a girl little by little in a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:16 PM
3

There is a definition of the wall but people keep strawmanning like crazy no matter how many times you explained them what it actually means.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 09:47 AM
8

I didn't imply that, you just imagined it as you are doing with everyone else in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:43 PM
8

I didn't said that but keep straw-manning as much as you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:40 PM
10

They complain because they want to keep that good dick around, but his disinterest in commitment Congratulations, you've come with the definition of situationship/sex_zone the OP and everybody is talking about after several unsuccessful, yet funny to read, messages trying to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:36 PM
6

Yes, but they when they do what you describe they don't complain about being in a situationship. Like the articles written by women such: "Stuck in a 'situationship'? It's the destructive dating trend that's ruling our love lives - and here's how to spot it"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:27 PM
0

just sounded to me that she was pump and dumped It is exactly this but it feels less painful in her mind when she calls it "situationship".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:18 PM
11

Yes and if you reverse the sexes it would be called "friend zone". Situationship is another word to define the "sex zone", where men obtain sex from women but women do not obtain the commitment they desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:13 PM
4

A Chad can be an incel with the definition she provided. Insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:36 AM
8

drycod First time in my life I heard this word.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 07:22 PM
43

And mostly from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 12:51 PM
6

"Just not be boring, bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 11:55 AM
1

She knows I am joking. The humor is quite dark between us :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 11:14 AM
4

I reward my gf with sex when she does the chores, actually. In reality it's not, but I tell her it's because she did the chores anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 08:18 AM
-3

For women who spend their 20s having actual hobbies, seriously dating, building a personality and skills, and overall just being an important part of their community, there is no wall (and a "career" in some dumb BS like marketing or middle management does not count). Are these women able to pull the quality of men they pulled when they were younger? No? Then they hit the wall as any other. It doesn't matter the amount of hobbies, personality and skills they worked on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 07:11 PM
3

It is what happens when you live in a gynocentric society.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 06:13 PM
2

Self Improvement has nothing to do with the Red Pill I agree. The RP is just knowledge, whatever you do with that is up to you and unrelated with the RP. Do you want to improve? Ok. Do you want to do nothing and keep complaining? Ok as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 05:36 PM
25

The same reason there are "Are we dating the same guy?" groups but there aren't "Are we dating the same girl?" ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 06:14 PM
1

Who is Brian?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:43 PM
1

Which are your features that you consider better than hers? Just for curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 01:58 PM
1

Lmao, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 11:56 AM
1

I'm INTP and my gf is INTJ. We understand each other and get along very well, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 09:39 PM
4

It smells desperation, ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 05:38 PM
2

They don't find all tall men attractive just happens that all the men they find attractive is tall, like what point you're even trying to make? Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 11:03 AM
11

I don't like tall men in particular, it just happened that I only dated tall men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 11:00 AM
3

I've dated guys in the 5'10" - 6'2" range, but it was in spite of their height because they had other features I found attractive. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 09:04 AM
8

And you can verify what you said in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 08:38 AM
1

Virtue signaling fest thread
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:13 PM
3

Tell me you don't know what "just world fallacy" means without telling me what "just world fallacy" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:23 AM
0

He clearly isn't his mental point of origin which invalidates himself from being a real alpha male.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 09:57 PM
2

🎯
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:18 PM
3

The thing is, being fat is not such a big turnoff as you think. Ok, then. If you think so there's nothing more to debate here. Good luck out there in the dating world.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:15 PM
–

Yes, what you said is true. The issue here, though, is that positive interactions with women will reinforce this confidence and, in order to havee positive interactions with women you'll need that thing that opens the door for you which is sensed with the eyes and it can't be named anymore in this sub. Telling some men to be more confident with women is just telling poor people to work harder in their dead-end low pay job if they want to be wealthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:11 PM
5

If you really think doing just those things is what will help you attract women, I have bad news for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:01 PM
2

If you need a woman who will love you for who you are, show who you really are and dont try to 'attract', While this being true in abstraction, it's also true that there are some characteristics and behaviours that, from a probabilistic point of view, will help you to attract more women than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:50 PM
2

But if red pillers mistakenly see women as malevolent They see them as they are. Malevolent or not is just on the eye of the observer. RP is amoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:40 PM
1

The apex fallacy strikes again.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 07:20 PM
1

The apex fallacy is helluva delusion of what real life actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 07:20 PM
1

The apex fallacy is helluva delusion of what real life actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 07:20 PM
1

In this sense, dating coaches for men are not ruining modern dating. They are the consequence, not the cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:12 PM
5

A RP woman would be a woman that understands the harsh realities of intersexual dynamics, not whatever you wrote about posting stuff on tik-tok.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 01:46 PM
–

It's easy if you lack cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 12:03 PM
6

Indeed. If a woman is really into you, you won't need to lie to her. She will create her own stories inside her head to justify anything you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 09:22 AM
6

Cool story, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:17 PM
1

Yep, he always does that. Check his posts and you'll see many of such cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:56 AM
1

The post only says that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:53 PM
1

You didn't say any of that, your post was simply: "P3d0 shouldn't be shamed?"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:50 PM
2

He was talking about relationships between adult people, hence no p3d0 at all is involved here and the question was not tackling the main issue. Textbook red herring.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:38 PM
2

The OP is not talking about all age preferences but relationships between adults. Hence there is no p3d0 involvement here so you that's why you fell for the red herring fallacy. See? That wasn't so hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:32 PM
3

P3d0 is bad and should be shamed and punished. Now try to address the point without falling into fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:28 PM
3

The argument was not about p3d0 but shaming tactics used by women. Textbook case of red herring fallacy. Try to argue like an adult before typing whatever crosses your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:25 PM
1

A textbook case of red herring fallacy by not tackling the initial argument but deviating it towards something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:22 PM
4

You provided a good example of a Red herring fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:22 PM
3

It's insane that you need to clarify that just because some people really think that a young adult woman is equal to P3d0.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 11:10 AM
0

Yes, it's just knowledge. Whatever you do with that knowledge is up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 12:40 PM
1

You can be RP and not spinning plates.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 12:21 PM
1

Because they can't have the first ones and they have to low their standards otherwise they'll end up alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:43 PM
1

It is true, you answered another thing and it is called straw man fallacy. The shorter ,skinny fat or double-chinned women still find more attractive the tall, muscular, with good jawline men despite getting laid with the others. If they could, they would get laid with the first ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:39 PM
1

So it is not true that in average women don't like tall, muscular, with good jawline men than short, skinnyfat, double chin men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:21 PM
–

It is one of the least preferred races in dating apps in the male side.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:18 PM
-1

And yet it is possible to extract patterns about general female preferences when it comes to attraction with only these two extreme examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:14 PM
–

Do they make surveys asking about pills?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:12 PM
–

Yeah, it is impossible to theorize that between HCavill and the average minimum wage 5'6' Indian janitor nobody could tell who will have better chances to trigger the most irrational emotion out there from the other sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:05 PM
1

Can you define RP first of all?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:55 PM
18

Beta bux has to qualify, alfafux only has to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 09:49 AM
1

You haven't proved nothing so far, you only avoided doing it with personal attacks. This is the obvious thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 11:34 PM
1

You cannot live without straw-manning, don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 11:30 PM
17

My parents tried to surprise me by introducing me to a woman about my age once. We had a bit of banter and a few things in common and exchanged numbers. I got ghosted immediately after we left. Ouch.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 10:46 PM
1

Your video didn't prove what you stated "So at no point does TRP advocate cheating?". The video is just a guy telling that men with options have more chances to cheat. You don't even read yourself. Oh wait…..anyway here’s your only chance in life to be catered to by a woman, you should relish this. I have a gf, I'm catered enough by a women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 10:34 PM
1

Does he go to the gym to get in shape? If he doesn't, encourage him to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 06:26 PM
–

What happened to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 05:57 PM
1

Have you actually watched the video instead of just reading the title from a third party youtuber channel? The guy is saying that men with options have more chances to cheat he never says men HAVE to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 05:38 PM
1

Post whatever you want or shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 05:14 PM
1

Then it wouldn't be difficult for you to provide an example of those as evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 05:03 PM
1

"I state stuff without any evidence and accuse the others of lying." You sound like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 04:44 PM
2

Or you are straw-manning. Stop lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 02:48 PM
–

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 01:33 PM
5

The agency scammed her setting up a date with a man she didn't want. They should have been honest with her and told her her demands for a man were, in practical terms, impossible to find.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/23 01:25 PM
–

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 07:26 AM
0

But it still a description of a phenomenon. If some people use it for their benefit, it doesn't invalidate the statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 12:34 PM
10

women on this sub seem to be in denial of this happening to them Because they straw-man it into believing The Wall means "when a woman reaches 25-30 yrs old she will be unable to attract men and find a partner ever again" instead of tackling the actual meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 05:15 PM
-4

The wall is a scare tactic The Wall is not a tactic but a description of a phenomenon. It is not mean to scare nobody.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 05:06 PM
15

Everybody knows the amount and quality of opposite gender partners you're able to attract it directly correlates with the amount of hours you work on your personality and the number of showers you take. Here's the formula: hours_working_on_personality x showers_taken_per_week = attraction_score
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 04:26 PM
1

The only difference with the other guy is the the latter takes showers, works on his personality and respects women while he doesn't do any of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 04:05 PM
3

I've noticed that, in general, people hold prejudice and hate towards any preference that excludes them even if you're not interested at all in the person in particular that states the said preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 03:57 PM
10

This is crap the industry tells to women to sell more products, men can't care less about this. The worst part? Women fall for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:13 AM
4

Beauty standards are not flipped to the exact opposite within a decade or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 10:46 AM
2

She says that men are viscerally attracted to bigger women What?! She is plus size Aaaah, ok, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 07:52 PM
3

It doesn't, read it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 02:18 PM
2

At the same time they Say that women are not interested on men's bodies RP doesn't say this, your argument is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 02:12 PM
5

Don't put yourself in the friendzone, it's not that difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 12:25 PM
2

You're not doing any "game" if you're just being valuable. You're doing the dread game by being desired by other women. If she values you, there are no extra steps, there is no dread, If she values there's no need to do nothing. She'll do whatever she needs to do for you to be with her. there is no thinking about cheating. It never was. You're strawmanning, I didn't say you'd explicitly say "do this or I'll cheat". You said it here: [Making threats that you'll cheat if someone doesn't have sex w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 04:40 PM
–

Zero. It wasn't necessary, one thing led to another and that's it. With all my relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 04:28 PM
2

No it's not. The whole point of "dread game" is that she knows you have value and other women desire you, hence, you could cheat if you wanted. It doesn't mean you tell her "do this or I'll cheat". Stop straw-manning.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 04:08 PM
2

This is not what RP means about dread, it's a straw-man you created in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 04:07 PM
2

How are you threatening to cheat by just being attractive to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 02:05 PM
3

This is PUA, not necessary RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 09:33 AM
6

:cricket_sounds:
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 09:21 AM
4

This is not what dread means. It means you're attractive to other women and she knows you could cheat if you wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 09:18 AM
4

Getting in shape and being attractive to other women is also dreading for your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 09:16 AM
1

It may work, my last two serious gfs approached me, for instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 04:04 PM
2

I don't understand the problem. If he's the father, why should it matter? (Assuming the test was mandatory, automatic, and free)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 12:24 PM
2

But most of men don't have the chance to choose. It's either bad s3x/relationship or the absolute nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:09 AM
–

Because I agree with what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 09:34 AM
2

Yeah, right? It's always about that. Nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 09:29 AM
1

I agree with you. I find very funny when some fat people say something along the lines "But I jog 3 days of the week, eat healthy and yada, yada, yada" pretending you'll find them attractive after knowing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 09:16 AM
–

Why it means that or why I can't change your mind/view?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 09:13 AM
4

How is a mandatory paternity test shit? It changes absolutely nothing if the father is actually the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 08:54 AM
–

Change Your Mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 08:45 AM
2

Yeah, considering the OP describes them as: And they tend to have massive boobs also And none of your fertility goddes have them, OP and my opinion of "bigger" are definetely different than yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:49 PM
4

Not fat, just big hips. It's not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:45 PM
6

No flacid arms, no double chin, lean face... certainly not overweight by modern standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:44 PM
4

None of them are depicted as fat women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:35 PM
3

For instance...?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:13 PM
5

Do you mean the ones that archeologist don't know their actual meaning and it's all pure speculation? Very little is known about the Venus' origin, method of creation, or cultural significance; however, it is one of numerous "Venus figurines" surviving from Paleolithic Europe.[9] The purpose of the carving is the subject of much speculation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 08:07 PM
2

It's just mother nature telling us: "Don't have kids with that woman."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 07:46 PM
1

I agree, I can't CYM.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 05:45 PM
1

It doesn't invalidate the fact that 1) Men pay more taxes and 2) Women receive more from the government than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 01:07 PM
3

The power of taking showers and working on the personality will always prevail!!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 02:03 PM
12

They first gaslight men telling looks don't matter that much. When they finally admit they do, they gaslight men telling them they never said looks don't matter that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 01:58 PM
16

The younger one took more showers and worked on his personality more than the older. This is the only difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 09:42 AM
–

I thought that inexperienced guys were obsessed with wanting women with inexperience but not teenagers specifically. The OP is just trying to justify she doesn't like dating inexperienced (aka losers) guys by making up some gross stuff to feel better about it. It's pure virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 01:34 PM
1

Just say you don't like dating unexperienced (aka losers, incels, neckbeards, misogynists, "nice guys tm", etc...) men, it's ok, there's no need to relate it with some kind of p3d0 shit. Yeah, just say (the OP) you don't like dating that type of men, it's ok, there's no need to relate it with some kind of p3d0 stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 01:32 PM
2

Theory(explaining female nature) This one is the more interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 12:48 PM
8

The average weight for American females in the survey is 141.2 lb vs 170.6 lb US average (20.8% diff) The average weight for American males in the survey is 179.3 lb vs 197.6 lb US average (10.2% diff) The average height for American females in the survey is 64.6 in vs 63.7 in US average (1.4% diff) The average height for American males in the survey is 69.8 in vs 69 in US average (1.1% diff) Well...... or we either have a bunch of quite healthy people here or people love to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 06:49 PM
17

No. Date whoever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 04:23 PM
–

This article is interesting about what you're talking: The U.S. National Survey of Families and Households determined that those who report being happy in their marriages declined when women earned more than their husbands. This was said to increase the risk of divorce by 50%.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 09:52 AM
–

Accept their situation and deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 09:42 AM
6

I hope she sees this, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 09:11 AM
2

Don't go to dates to meet people. Meet them in the daily basis and you'll know them way better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 06:47 PM
2

I don't care, I don't have any opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 06:00 PM
7

It's like a straw-man fallacy autobot xD
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 04:22 PM
7

"Can we just avoid poor people complaining about financial issues? Rich people also have their own financial issues even though they are totally different. Just stop, you poor people whinning about them, and make the effort to understand ours."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 02:22 PM
1

O_o
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:02 PM
1

We're arguing that not even women know how to flirt with women taking into account the experiences of bisexual women. Whatever you wrote here has no relation with the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 12:35 PM
1

It's not that difficult. Women who date women and men thing its harder to flirt with women than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 09:53 AM
1

I don't remember who talked who first and there was no asking out. At some point we just started to see each other outside work time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 09:44 AM
1

I am talking about women flirting with women, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 09:43 AM
1

So why then they say women are harder to flirt with even if they, as bisexual women, don't see them as a piece of flesh?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:26 PM
1

Bisexual girls see other girls as a piece of flesh?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 08:07 PM
11

I don't know. It just happened we met and we liked each other. It was a gradual process.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 02:58 PM
5

Women don't know anything about attracting women as men because they've never had to attract a woman as a man And most of bisexual girls who shared their views they state its way harder to flirt with women than with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 12:12 PM
1

Because your comment was referring to a comment referring to a generic situation and there was no indication from you it was anything else. The fact that most men do what you wrote referring to a generic situation. I don't care at all about any of your personal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 12:09 PM
1

You talking about the first comment referring to a generic situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:05 AM
2

It doesn't. The original comment was referring the a generic situation. Your comment was referring to the original comment referring to a generic situation. You never stated it was your particular experience, hence my comment was referring to a generic situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 12:50 PM
2

This is what TRP fails to convey to its followers It actually does. So TRP is basically selling these desperate men a lie that they will turn 35 or 40 or whatever and magically become attractive to hot, young women It does not. Only people who doesn't know about it can make such a dumb straw-manesque charicature.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 12:33 PM
2

I was not talking about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 08:48 AM
–

No, this is not true and it is very disingenuous. You're falling for the apex fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 11:14 AM
10

She looks so jaded of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 07:24 PM
0

That constant rejection - person after person after person - They can get easily fix this by taking some showers and spend few hours a week working on their personalites. And respecting women!! Don't forget that as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 02:17 PM
4

Clowns at best, grifters at worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 09:25 PM
3

Knowing each other without going on dates. If they see each other on a daily basis, like at work, dates are not needed at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 09:38 PM
4

The only difference between the first guy and the second is that while the first works on his personality, respects women and takes showers, the other doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 07:02 PM
2

Same. Met my last and current serious gfs at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 09:57 AM
–

Ouch!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 05:07 PM
7

This is The Wall and not the straw-man OP wrote.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:36 PM
19

So taking showers and working on personality doesn't work?
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 02:38 PM
5

"See? A good personality makes you more attractive!" /s
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 02:51 PM
3

And showers. Take a lot of them!!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:08 PM
0

The "functional" caveman daily exercise was probably way better than the average "artificial" gym plan, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 06:39 PM
7

I saw a short guy with a gf at Walmart, your argument is invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 07:20 PM
6

It's the classic straw man we see daily in this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 05:33 PM
1

Generally in places where you see them regularly, once a week at least: work, commute, gym... Everything starts with non-verbal communication such glances, up nods, smirks. If the thing scalates, it's easy to start talking. And from there just depends on what you or they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 06:23 PM
3

Yep, I had to told one that precisely today in that thread. They genuinely think that you need to talk to them to tell if they like you.
/r/AllPillDebate06/10/23 05:20 PM
1

Men [...]. They run around banging everybody Apex fallacy. The majority of men can't do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 05:14 PM
9

I saw a couple at Walmart, your argument is invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 01:57 PM
2

I never said it is a plan to get girls. Believe me, they quickly notice the guys they find attractive. If they find you attractive and there's a chance there could be something between you two, you'll know if you pay attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:17 AM
5

Just hot enough for her. I've never cold approached, at most I only approached after IOI signals I received after exchanging zero words with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 09:09 AM
5

No. Women can give you signals without the need of talking to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/23 08:57 AM
9

I love this "just-take-a-shower" comment: Guys, there’s a few simple things that will help your dating life. If you’re having a woman over to your place.., clean your bathroom. Like all of it. Sink, toilet, mirror, empty trash, shower curtain closed, fresh hand towel, soap, extra toothbrush, even have some shampoo and conditioner (even if you never use it) clean wash cloth. Women notice this stuff instantly and it’s a big deal to most. And for god sake clip your finger nails and have clean sheet…
/r/AllPillDebate05/10/23 11:34 AM
3

I think that most guys wait for signals from girls, without signals they don't proceed further And most of them don't receive any. That's why a lot of them ask what those signals look like and how to react to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 09:36 AM
1

Does a high value man use manipulation to get laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:35 PM
2

Do you have a bf? In case that yes, does he like you for anything else besides what you said? Genuine question.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 05:12 PM
-1

But women in PPD always say the don't like men that "fake sensitivity" to "get laid". Why then would be someone who knows how to do it a high value man while an autist that doesn't, and hence is genuine in his intentions, not labeled as high value?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:21 PM
10

A high value man knows how to at least fake sensitivity at times when it will help him get laid. Do HVM use manipulation to get laid? Isn't this a "PUA tactic"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 04:12 PM
1

The other day, he only needed a handful of redditor comments to conclude that men fat shame women after one (1) female friend told him how men view fat women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 07:14 AM
1

TikTok is not real life. Twitter and Facebook are not real life either, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:56 AM
–

But I want true love and true friendship, access to health and comfort has little meaning to me. Peace? When everybody wants my money? Ha! I cannot even sleep.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 03:58 PM
–

You cannot buy true love, true friendship and you have to be 24/7 aware not to be scammed. It's living literally in hell. I wish poor people could understand it. You don't understand the privilege of not being rich, the most important things in life don't cost money. Wealth is a curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 03:52 PM
–

"Poor people seem not to understand that having a lot of money is a bad thing. People are only friendly with you because of your wealth, you never know for sure if women love you or they are just gold diggers, everybody tries to scam you with different kind of investments, etc... I wish I was poor."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 02:30 PM
2

What would a RP revolution look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 02:23 PM
2

but Ken’s still had to be ripped, tall and hot and that was on “oooh” moment for her. Loool
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:36 AM
3

She doesn't care about these things. She understands that boys have a hard time in the current dating scene, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:18 AM
3

Interesting. Where is this stated?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:03 AM
9

It's a constant straw-manning or mistake it for PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 09:46 AM
1

This statement isn't saying women who do this are wrong for doing it. I never said women who do this are good or evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 07:05 AM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 06:24 PM
7

I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 06:23 PM
2

No. Why should I?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 06:17 PM
5

Soft harems.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 12:41 PM
119

As long as they find you attractive, they'll just break all these rules for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 12:01 PM
4

A chance to be told to "go away or I'm calling the cops".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 03:34 PM
4

Only when she's tired of having fun and she requires some beta billy to pay for her bills.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 11:41 AM
2

I find it insane too. It's easier to check for some non-verbal cues and then proceed, it makes the things way easier. If she likes you she would make it clear for you to advance.
/r/AllPillDebate29/09/23 11:16 AM
1

A lot, a lot more. So? This didn't anwered my question. Did all DiCaprios gfs date him because he manipulated them or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 05:43 PM
1

But women don't choose to. That is the point. These "relationships" are often a result of manipulation Lol. So DiCaprio manipulated all his gfs, for instance?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 05:15 PM
2

A consenting adult dating another consenting adult is a total non-issue. He dated them while both were in their 20s and early 30s. And he's definetely not marrying a 42yr-old "attractive woman" but a 26yr-old one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 01:29 PM
4

There are even articles about it: Many people have taken to Twitter to express their disapproval of the relationship, with some calling it “creepy”. “That 16 yr age gap would’ve been ON EVERY SINGLE HEADLINE IF IT WASN’T CHRIS EVANS I SAID WHAT I SAID,” one person wrote on Twitter. “Thought it was his daughter,” exclaimed another. Another user expressed their opinion strongly, labeling the 16-year age gap as “gross” and emphasizing, “Even if you’re Chris Evans.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:55 PM
1

This means you have some value they like/desire/appreciate ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:51 PM
3

He announced his preferences with his actions. It's a stated preference, not a revealed preference. Also, younger =/= young. This thread is based on "younger girls", not "young girls". Hence, your premise still wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:37 PM
5

People act like it's easer for 30-40s men to date younger women than same age women, for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:27 PM
3

So you're telling me that when Chris Evans (42) announced he started dating his 26yr-old gf women felt disgusted about it because they automatically pictured in their head a perv telling a 11yr-old girl to lick her ice cream slowly? Because is the first thing what is being discussed in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:10 PM
7

You had to straw man things to the point of using child molestation examples when the discussion was about relationships between two consenting adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 11:23 AM
17

The majority of men wouldn't be able to date a younger woman not even in their wildest dreams, let's face it. Those who can is because they are valuable. If those valuable men date younger women it means the dating pool of valuable men for same age women is reduced. So same age women will try to prevent this by shaming them. At the end it's just a zero sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 11:12 AM
2

Maybe in early 1800s.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 10:19 AM
14

I have the same experience. I have my own ones like anybody else but I am not vocal about them besides very specific occasions where I am directly asked about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 12:07 PM
–

I known some short guys that do good, not particularly attractive or rich, mostly just rizz. Do you date them?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 04:35 PM
–

Imo, it's more about that women deny it rather than being mad about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/23 02:04 PM
3

I found my serious gfs there. I never had issues at work because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 08:37 PM
1

Those figures are actually quite close to what the average American woman looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 01:42 PM
–

Projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 01:35 PM
10

Guess who's the common denominator in these three failed relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:52 PM
80

It only applies for the ones they consider attractive. For the rest it doesn't since they are virtually invisible and are not even taken into consideration. The bar is low for the top ones because they have plenty to pick and don't need any effort to get whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 12:03 PM
3

In these days some people will think you're a jerk for stating you like fit people: “People aren’t necessarily coming right out and saying, ‘No fatties,’” Lena explains. Not in a profile, at least. “They’ll say, ‘I’m super into fitness and hope you are too!’” Wink! or The use of the word fit, though, has always felt to me less like a description of activity level than a kind of dog whistle meant to ward off, well...fat people. Or, in other words, people like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 04:28 PM
3

They say they don't find them attractive. It is perfectly possible to don't find them attractive and don't care about them at all at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 02:06 PM
2

That's also why they HATE stuff like the fat positivity movement because not only are women continuing to exist while being unattractive to them Nobody cares at all about their existance. but they're daring not to feel bad about it. Nobody cares at all about how they feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 01:28 PM
11

Knowledge to navigate as best as possible the current sexual dynamics of today.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 07:31 PM
1

My job is in a STEM field and simulations take some time to finish.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:49 PM
-1

Entertainment, mostly during computing/simulation time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:19 PM
1

For example?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 01:33 PM
–

Which reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 01:31 PM
–

He "dodged" a bullet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 02:22 PM
3

It means finding the BB during the AF fucking phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 01:31 PM
1

How and when did that K-pop phase dissapear? Did your taste in men change too?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 10:53 AM
2

Nothing, everyone has its own preferences.
/r/AllPillDebate17/08/23 04:01 PM
2

Open the video, see the F&F clowns, close the video.
/r/AllPillDebate17/08/23 04:00 PM
6

Dunno, man, I met my last two serious gfs at work without looking for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 06:40 PM
1

If you want to understand dating patterns...your ability to recognize patterns is way more important than your gender. Something so simple and yet so polemic when the conclusions drawn are not in line of what some people would like to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 05:44 PM
7

In reality they don't trick nobody, women lie to themselves and don't see the red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 04:51 PM
11

Ah, yeah, the ever-growing epidemic of sexless dangerous 9/10s because the safety 5/10s get all all the girls out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 03:51 PM
–

Besides the endless straw-man... I unsubscribed from every single dating "guru" that spills non-sense. ... he had issues with dating gurus, not with RP itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:42 AM
20

The classic apex fallacy in action again. Top men standards are the regular standards by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 08:48 AM
1

This would be a simplified charicatured version of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 04:42 PM
1

RP is a praxeology (a way of understanding actions in the world) that deals with Sexual Strategy. It seeks to explain human sexual relationships within this framework, and this framework is in disagreement with the general understanding of society in these matters (hence, taking the red pill.)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 02:39 PM
1

All I'm saying is that different places have different [dating] cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:55 AM
5

Just information. It's not a strategy, not a philosophy, not a lifestyle, etc... it's just information. 99 % of the self called RP creators are clowns at best and grifters at worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 08:30 AM
–

I'm from there and I've always done 50/50 all my life. No one complained.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 08:10 AM
1

If RP explains XYZ and you realize you don't fulfill the XYZ, of course it doesn't help. That's why it is called RP, since it's a harsh realization from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 02:20 PM
1

Well, this can be applied to any kind of knowledge. A degree doesn't guarantee you will end up finding a job related to that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:39 PM
1

Considering RP is about understanding sexual dynamics, it doesn't necessarily mean it will help you to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:04 PM
2

No, I already have a gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 12:01 PM
5

It's over for averagecels.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 12:00 PM
4

Like the wall? It's a red pill revenge fantasy that suddenly women suddenly become less desirable at a certain age and no one wants them. You clearly didn't understand the wall and you're just strawmaning here. The wall doesn't mean women suddenly become less desirable out of the blue and nobody wants them. It means that women, at some point of their lives, they are unable to compete with a younger version of themselves to get the best men they could attract back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 07:43 AM
4

I understand. All of this "growing to be attracted to smb" sounds bs to me and just an excuse the non-attractives use to negotiate desire with the ones they actually like.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 07:33 AM
1

Why did you marry him in the first place? Just for curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 07:04 AM
2

I'm not gonna read that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:26 PM
1

And it's not what you are talking about so IDGAF, Fify.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:12 PM
1

The paper stated clear the meaning of incel. It's you who doesn't know statistics nor the meaning of the words.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:03 PM
1

I am not ignoring it I am just stating that incels are less violent than the average as the article stated: Incels’ propensity for violence appears relatively low compared to that of the general population You need to study basic statistics and stop cherrypicking things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 11:43 AM
6

In your head? Maybe, but not in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:09 PM
6

But they haven't. Again: data > your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:01 PM
5

They define incel with the definition of incel: Incels (involuntary celibates) are an online subculture community of men who form an identity around their perceived inability to form sexual or romantic relationships. Data > your feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:58 PM
6

Contrary to common beliefs, empirical evidence suggests that incels are not particularly prone to violence. Incels’ propensity for violence appears relatively low compared to that of the general population. We conclude by offering one hypothesis as to why modern day incels are not as violent as we might expect. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-023-00220-3
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:54 PM
2

The OP is ignoring all the answers stating that RP has actually nothing to do with what he said and he keeps pushing his biased narrative. If this is not a funny metaphor of religion I don't know what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 10:30 AM
2

Absolutely not. RP only explains sexual dynamics and it is completely amoral. It has nothing to do with values nor is a guide on how to behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 08:09 AM
2

Because high status men have very good personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 04:50 PM
18

Step 1) Deny it ("it only happens in your minds, this is some stupid incel theory, go out and touch the grass, etc"...). Step 2) Partially admit it ("only damaged women do it"). Step 3) Fully admit it (of course it happens, you don't need do be RP to know this well known fact, etc"...). Step 4) Accuse the other sex of doing it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 02:26 PM
14

How can you convince him that something doesn't exists if he sees it often happening in real life? :/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 12:56 PM
5

You got it backwards. Because the hot guy doesn't want to be with you, your priorities change.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:36 PM
5

I never said the don't have choices I said they have worst than when they were at their peak.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 05:25 PM
12

The idea that the older you get the less desirable you are to the other sex, especially with women, is not a bullshit theory but an empirical fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 03:09 PM
17

It's more like their SMV drops and they need to cash out with the best they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/23 12:48 PM
1

The OP points? Not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 10:36 AM
3

My and my gf can go 50/50 and we do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 09:05 AM
3

Because we can.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 09:03 AM
3

Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:47 AM
2

I'm actually with one that doesn't care about feminism at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:33 AM
6

I'll still only pay 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:25 AM
5

Not getting the very best men available doesn't seem like "hitting the wall". It is exactly this, though. Being unable to get the quality of men she got in the past is literally the definition of the Wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 03:07 PM
14

Learn what the Wall actually means before straw-man things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 01:03 PM
1

Their genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 12:03 PM
14

Because he worked on his personality.
/r/AllPillDebate13/07/23 09:21 AM
3

Nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:33 PM
1

She's objectively fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 06:07 PM
1

Ok, so what?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 04:28 PM
1

Tell you only see her as a friend.
/r/AllPillDebate01/07/23 09:08 AM
23

Ok.
/r/AllPillDebate29/06/23 03:00 PM
4

So AFBB.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 01:23 PM
16

A terrorist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter