TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sea-Ebb4658 Archive

View 1 posts and 132 comments by Sea-Ebb4658 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Well, good thing having casual sex is complete optional then. You can very much choose to not men who want casual sex. Most men only have a problem when a girl who has had casual sex in the past, dont want to have it with him but wants a relationship. Any self respecting men walk away from that deal when they find out (not that most would find out tho cause women also lie)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 06:59 PM
1

Old women who go after young men get shamed?? Lmao, no they dont
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 05:07 PM
1

Women aren't a monolith. Huh, who said they are? I didnt say all women sleep with these type of guys. But definitely enough of women do for these guys to never have a problem getting laid Men keep committing crimes despite all the laws we pass. Lol, you are comparing your words to rule of law? 😂. Incase you didnt know, law is only effective because there is powerful force called the government and the justice system keeping them effective. In what universe will someone who is benefiting from the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 06:17 AM
8

Idk who this post is supposed to be for? Guys who hate women but still have desirable physical and financial traits are able to mask their hatred with some charisma and get women to have sex with them. They aint gonna stop just because you told them. Guys who dont have either of those physical or financial traits thats desired by women don't get women whether they love them or absolutely hate them. They may get the privilege to be a simp for her if he does have some money that he is willing to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:35 PM
2

I can ask you the same tho, when has a man judged a woman for hitting on him?? Maybe a man who also likes the woman will judge her because he is jealous, but rarely do they ever go up to her face. Similar with when a man hitting on a woman and if her friends like the man too, they definitely do judge him or think that he is being superficial for going after the hotter looking one.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 06:06 AM
1

Now i feel like you are just trolling. No one goes around telling everyone that their spouse committed paternity fraud without getting a test first
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 05:13 AM
23

Lmao who says men arent judged for expressing their physical attraction? Do other men judge them? No, not most of the time... But women on the other hand, they are really judgemental about it. But the reason it may seem as normal is alot of guys dont care whether they are being judged or not. But women, i have noticed like virtue signalling alot. They are worried about appearing shallow and hence they dont express it as much, and therefore, it doesnt seem normal. But in reality, most men already…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:32 PM
9

Punishment of any crime is usually dependant on the damage caused by it. If a woman commits paternity fraud and extracts financial resources from a man under a false pretense, then there is damage, hence the punishment. A man asks for a paternity fraud in private, no monetary damage, no reputation damage, hence no punishment
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:05 PM
3

Adultery is what leads to a paternity fraud 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:55 PM
4

What the hell is a false accusations of paternity fraud? Asking for a paternity test? What damage does that even cost for there to be any punishment? Is the man going around claiming to everyone that you committed paternity fraud and ruining your reputation without any evidence? If not, then there is literally no damage at all... Now dont say some bs like emotional damage or whatever. Hurt feelings is not something law should be concerned with. Or else we would need to be sending people who reje…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:54 PM
1

Bruh what? Are u living under a rock? Have u never talked to women before? Never even seen them talk about their preferences in online spaces? Now i feel bad for telling u By sexless losers online, you mean women then yeah, idk why u would refer to them that way but sure. Idk about influencers tho, dont really watch them
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:32 PM
2

What? You would have to be very dumb to not trade your car for a car thats much more expensive. You can sell it and buy your own car back and much more. I mean i get that your analogy is about relationships but this isnt a very good analogy lol Most guys are happy with their relationship? Is that why the divorce rate is 50%? This post isnt saying men dont pull. Its saying they pull women who dont really desire them and that they are being settled for. Now am i saying that it always happens? No, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:23 PM

Reality and simple maths. Alot of women have similar standards when it comes to physical traits, tall height, great jawline, not balding etc etc and social traits, rich or makes good money. But only a small percentage of men meet those criteria. Anyone with a brain can tell u not all of those women who have those standards can be in a monogamous relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 01:55 PM
5

Bruh if they could they would trade their teslas or whatever car they have for a much expensive ferrari or Lamborghini in a heartbeat, what are u even on about lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 01:51 PM
8

Brother, you are comparing a man online and a woman irl. Those are two different worlds. Most of the rants that i have seen from men are mostly on anonymous forums because they wouldnt be whining about it irl as most of them do have a life and dont want to appear weak. None of my friends who have always been single ever ranted about being lonely nor have i ever ranted about it irl. On the other hand, i have had female friends who im close with talk about all men in such negative light after a fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:32 AM
2

I dont think he said he did them favours each time tho, he only said that they asked for it. If he was doing favours or giving money while getting nothing in return, then yeah he is getting used. In that case, he should definitely start choosing better. I mean, being critical of our guy friends dating habits is nothing new for us. If someone is acting like a simp, we generally call them out
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 08:04 PM
5

I dont think simply going on dates is a big deal tho as long as you arent paying for their share too or doing them favours and stuff, especially if they show no interest towards u. You are not "choosing" them simply by hanging out with them
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 08:00 PM
4

I mean, he didnt help her move and allowed it to end... So didnt he already choose better?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 06:58 PM
1

Why? It would solve their problem of lack of sex as long as they have the money for it and they wont have to resort to these extreme measures of changing their own biology. Now is it the best way of going about things, no. Especially considering transmission of std, but then again im sure people get stds more often from one night stands, casual sex and from relationships too, mainly because of cheating partners. Atleast with prostitutes, since its just business, its more easier to request an std…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 03:39 PM
2

Why would they eradicate their libido? If not getting sex is the problem, they can just have sex with prostitutes. And if they are able to make good money, they can even get high class escorts once in a while or go to a less developed country if they are from a first world country. Not getting sex is a problem thats not too hard to solve. The problem thats hard to solve is not getting love and romance. How does one eradicate the need for companionship and love? Because if it was possible, thats …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 07:06 AM
1

Its a much, much more plausible assumption then saying half of the entire population are shit. And not to mention, its only a response to what you and the OP are saying
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:52 PM

Your average day to day men have no systematic power, what are u even on about? And those men that do have systematic power arent helping your average men just because they are of the same gender
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 09:23 AM
2

The men she wants isnt accepting her. The men she doesnt want accepting her means that her market value in dating isnt as high as she wants it to be. If no woman accepting a man means his value in the market is 0, then only those 0 value men accepting her while she gets rejected by higher value men whom most women would gladly accept would mean that her value is also close to 0. P.s im just talking in the extreme tho, obviously there arent many men or women who value is absolutely 0 in the marke…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:20 PM
8

As if women who "choose" to stay single arent always complaining about how awful All men are
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 05:33 PM
3

Why do you have to assume at all? You slept with or dated some shitty men and now dont want to date anyone at all? That is totally fine. Its your life. But once you start spewing nonsense that all men are shitty and they do this and that like you know each and everyone of us. Then its no longer just about you. And if you still want to generalize, then dont be surprised when men start doing the same or when they start leaning more and more towards the manosphere
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 05:43 AM
-1

Another day of men this, men that. When will yall realize that the men you sleep with and have problems with arent the ones who have any problem getting women? Yall just gravitate towards a small percentage of men who fit the mainstream narrow requirement for attraction, flood them with attention and sex and then complain that they arent giving enough effort or that they see u as objects? And not just that, then you extrapolate your narrow experience into every male that exists turning them bitt…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 10:04 PM
7

Betabux maxing, thats all that is. Do you really think all her previous boyfriends and hookups had to do her chores, cook her meals, while also provide financially for her? Nope, they most likely didnt have to do anything of that sort to have sex with her.... But you have to, or else you wont even get to be near her. How much of a low self esteem does a man need to have if they are okay with a situation like this
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 08:55 PM
4

And if she didnt have a husband, she would also have to cook 100 percent of the meals and also make a living... By your logic he is the one who is the maid here lol ...and a provider, yikes
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 08:41 PM
2

Who even is talking about relationship here? I was talking about the dating market and how much masculinity is expected from men by young women on their dating prospects. A relationship may only start once those requirements are met. Believe it or not, alot of those red pill guys that you call incel have experience dating even if they dont have much relationship experience. Thats how they turned red pill in the first place. But its just easier for yall to believe they just live in cave and some …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:07 PM
2

I mean, if you arent the best in bed, why even tie the knot and be exclusive. Clearly she isnt having as much fun as she could have been having with someone else, and you as a guy arent having much of a good time either knowing that you are whats stopping her from having the best time. It doesnt take much of a thinking to know this kind of dynamic will definitely lead to a catastrophe in the future. Who even is obsessing over it? Any self respecting guy would understand, leave her to be with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:56 PM
1

You think i have spent my whole life on cave or something just because you havent observed and experienced what i have? Just because you happened be happily married to an average guy, you are the only one who experienced everything? And any guy who is experiencing dating life through failures and struggles is hallucinating ig or is just an internet dweller And are you a boomer or something that thinks internet is some kind of fairy tale land where nothing is real is in it? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:48 PM
6

Its only unrealistic if her body count is very high. For someone with 2 to 4 previous sexual partners, The odds arent that bad. Also you dont get to dictate what is and what is not important in someones life. Are you gonna take responsibility if the couples sex life stops after marriage or that if she has sex with someone else who was better than her husband? If not, then u shouldnt be telling them whats not important What self respecting guy would even want to be in a relationship with a girl w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:34 PM
4

Incel shit? You expect us to believe your experience of marriage as reality but when people talk about their experience and how they have observed the world, its just incel shit? You really dont think young girls have much higher standards when it comes to traits that define masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:22 PM
2

Husbands... Thats the thing tho. These days guys marry during their late twenties and early thirties. But the problem with dating starts early on for most average young guys. When they are young girls their age prefer to be with guys that display those hyper masculine traits, whether it be height, status, wealth or all of it. So these guys spend most their youths single and trying to be like those hyper masculine men. Also once girls of their generation go through enough heartbreak with those hy…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:33 AM
0

Yes i agree, if my gf was very rich and wanted a prenup, i would totally understand. The only reason i can think of as to why i would be offended at the idea of prenup is if the default terms set by law would favor be heavily in the event of divorce and i would have alot to gain
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:35 AM
-1

Yeah, ig the only time a prenup is unnecessary is if both parties have somewhat equal amount of wealth. But when one party is very much against it, then its most likely not as unnecessary as it first seems and there is definitely some kind of imbalance in fairness given by the default terms
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:24 PM
-1

So you agree that all contracts should be breakable, including marriage. Well, i think so too and a prenup is literally just setting up the terms in the event the contract breaks. So anyone who thinks its weird or brings up trust issues when asked to set up terms and conditions in the event that the contract breaks despite knowing full well that the contract is breakable, knows that the default terms set by law is already in their favour and are trying to emotionally manipulate the other party i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:01 PM
3

Pre nup doesnt let you do that. Its in the name, pre, as it only deals with things u had before marriage. And even if im wrong on that, prenup is literally a contract that both party can read, make changes and agree to. If the prenup contract is unfair to her, she can read it, make changes to it and only sign it once she is satisfied with what it says. So rather than outright reject the idea of prenup, both parties can make it fair for them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:27 PM
1

If there wasnt any requirement of prenup then why have problem signing it? Heck, since signing prenup means lack of trust the marriage will last, maybe we need a system or a type of marriage contract that is impossible to break, meaning no divorce marriage. Since the person opposing prenup is so confident that nothing will go wrong in their marriage, they might as well sign an unbreakable marriage contract
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:06 PM
-2

Inheritance can be made through writing wills through lawyers too. People who are unmarried do that and are able to give their wealth to specific person after their death. Why do u need the approval of government to tie your lives together tho, you can just do it without any formal documents. And if marriage isnt about protection why are there so many laws related to when the married couples seperate? If signing prenup means lack of trust that the relationship will last, then maybe marriage shou…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:01 PM

You are probably the first person i know who watches porn for the plot 😂 when i used to watch it back then, i would just skip it and get to the sex stuff. And im pretty sure most guys did that too. And idk what hentai you watch but the ones that were mainstream back then.... The nice guys definitely werent the ones having sex.. But that too i would usually skip the plot. But atleast you do admit that its a lie that being nice and having personality is whats gets you women, unlike most blue pille…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 01:18 PM

You are saying going to another country around the world and providing alot financially to one girl (because u probably have to since she is from a poorer country) is cheaper than getting a prostitute in your own country? And who are u to judge if someones relationship is real or not just because one party is more rich than the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 10:18 AM

Indeed, but is not a moral standard. Its more of a desire. Like how its tough not having free time because u gotta work to get paid unless you were born rich or did something that got u rich quickly.Sure, being laid, and being paid isnt the same but thats the gist. Its like when a woman in her 30s desperate to get married and have kids have to settle with someone they aren't really attracted to but they dont have much of choice if they want to make a family
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:44 AM
2

Bruh, you have to be the most gullible person if you believe that women truly didnt know that child could not be her husbands/ boyfriend. The intent to decieve is established when she had that affair and didnt tell her husband about it, because there is always a chance.... Everyone with middle school biology knowledge knows that. Stop believing people who play dumb, cause you are just gonna get played
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:22 AM
1

Yes they should be. Marriage is a sacred contract and if a married woman cheats and has a baby from another man she should be charged, and so should a man who breaks the oath and has baby with another woman But currently only the man is somewhat charged as the court forces him to pay child support for that kid to that mother. There is no equivalent law for that for women who cheat and have another mans baby. They dont have to compensate or anything. If anything the man is made to further pay for…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:14 AM
1

Poor vulnerable women who did knowingly commit paternity fraud*. While it is true the rich and powerful who get away with much severe crimes will likely get away from punishment related to paternity fraud too, but that doesnt mean we shouldnt have laws in place. Or else we wouldnt have any laws. And most rich women are usually in a relationship with an equally or more rich man. So they would probably have equally expensive lawyers in most case. And for a rich woman, poor man pair... Idk why she …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:04 AM
1

Then it seems like we do need to reinvent the wheel when it comes to punishment related paternity fraud. Because most cases of paternity fraud doesnt involve any form of sworn statement. It usually goes, a man does a dna test after birth, could be immediately, could be years later. Then takes the test to court, but since they laws are very much against the man, he will either have to continue paying for child support despite dna claiming its not his kid or at best the child support is discontinu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 06:50 AM
3

According to my understanding, a sworn statement is a government contract, which in this case is the birth certificate. And since it was signed at a false pretense, which is assuming the baby is his, the contract becomes a false sworn statement. If u were talking about something, then please, feel free to tell me about And ig since u didnt say anything about the second paragraph of my reply, i assume you do agree that marriage contract shouldnt automatically assume all babies are his right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:17 AM
3

Straight men find other mens penises disgusting. Not because they are homophobic, its because they arent gay. Homophobia is when u find gay people disgusting, not when u find genitals of your own gender disgusting. Thats just being straight
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:13 AM
1

Op is asking what it should be, not what it is already. If making an affair in marriage illegal and punishable by law is fair, then its only logical to make paternity fraud illegal too, more so in a marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 07:56 AM
4

It is a false sworn statement 99 percent of the time. The mother knows she had slept with someone else too and the child could very well be the other mans, yet she did not inform it to the person who signed the birth certificate or to the person who is her husband. If she had informed him, he could have done a dna test and confirmed it was his or not. So this is perjury and the punishment for perjury is jail time What men should focus on to reinvent is the marriage system, where law automaticall…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 07:52 AM
1

If saying i dont want to date high n count women is shaming, then saying i dont want to date short guys, poor guys, virgin guys etc etc are all shaming too
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:19 AM
3

So if you are not gay, you are homophobic? Great logic
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:17 AM
1

Thats very naive if you think that, everything in life is a competition. Relationships are not an exception
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:16 AM
1

Then why even be in a relationship with him, just be with guy who is your "best" lol. Clearly you both arent happy cause he isnt your best, and cause he wants to be with someone whose best is him
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:55 PM
1

Victim? What are you even talking about? Who said said anything about being a victim, and of what? Also, literally everyone wants their partner to find them attractive, that is literally everyones 'fantasy', regardless of their gender, are you an alien or smth? How do u not know this? If your partner says he finds you attractive and loves u, but never touches you, never gets u gifts, never calls, never has sex with u, is always looking at some other women, always talking with them etc, would you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:22 PM
1

Cause, for one most guys dont have that much money, anyone who is from lower or middle class knows how hard it is to earn decent money, let alone get filthy rich to spend so much on women. And two, most cause dont want to be delusional like trump or whoever, or rather they just fundamentally cant be. They would rather find a woman who genuinely finds him attractive and makes him believe that too
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:00 PM
0

And do you think trump himself doesnt believe that he is hot ? Lol. I didnt say a guy getting a lot of girls means he is hot, it means it will make him believe he is hot... And whats the point of a relationship where your woman or your man doesnt make u believe they are hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 03:39 PM
2

Actions speak louder than words, they want girls to prove them they are attractive, usually through intimacy. If a girl making a deep emotional connection with him proves that he is attractive personality wise, a girl making a strong physical connection with him proves he is physically attractive. And it goes same with girls, even if we dont think about relationships like that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 03:11 PM
-2

It may not be enough, but it helps, alot... Like very much so.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 03:01 PM
2

Any one can learn to be nice, kind, polite etc etc. but not any one can be attractive. Sure u can be to some extent but its usually not enough as you cannot change your underlying genes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:59 PM

So in the end, you also admit incels (actual definiation of incel, im not talking about misogynists) who are socially awkward but not bad people are much much less liked than charismatic and rich pedophiles and murders like Epstein?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:18 AM

Why should men have the same energy for issues that affect women when u and other women here have clearly proven that you dont even care for issues men have? The child support issue is already solved legally. Men are forced to pay child support or face jail time. Sure it may not be implemented effectively but this paternity issue isnt even addressed legally to give justice. And its super easy to not commit paternity fraud too, its as simple as being honest, so the fact that women here are so aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:51 AM

Men who have side babies are forced to pay child support or go to jail Even in a lot of european countries paternity fraud rates per population is 1 percent to 3 percent. Even if it was just US, then atleast US should have laws discourging it then
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:40 AM

When u consider the rate of paternity fraud per total population, the rate is still 3.7 percent globally. Thats still high. And what even is the logic behind there not being any punishment just because the crime rarely occurs. 'Your honor, yes my client committed mass murderer, but it only happens once every 10 years, so lets let him go' 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:38 AM

Classic... 'you dont agree with my opinion, you should get therapy so they brainwash u to agree with me because i cant debate' 😂 Op's ability to control himself is completely irrelevant here, he was just using your logic of victim blaming
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:22 AM

What if a person who has a child and is a sole care taker commits any other crime, or what if both the parents commit some crime which normally would get anyone jail time? You are saying just because they are parents and have to look after a kid, they get unlimited get out of jail card? I do agree tho on hefty fine for compensation of the mans time and expenses on the kid, but thats only possible if she can or will pay the fine. If there is no possibility of jail time, anyone who is able to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:11 AM
1

Its not that men are intimidated by successful women but rather people generally become more arrogant once they are successful. Unlike women who are attracted to arrogant men, upto a certain point, most men arent attracted to arrogant women. Or rather the bar of tolerance for arrogance is much lower. Ofc not everyone who becomes successful will become arrogant and not every men is unattracted to arrogant women, but generally this is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 04:46 AM
8

Who tf gives a shit if its safe or not, if i can have a superpower, i would make it super af
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:00 AM
3

Deepest bond and emotional investment? Now you are really convincing me this is some kind of fantasy of yours. What part of wanting to highly respected and high status among men because thats the optimal strategy of getting laid says, deep bond and emotional investment 😂. If anything, its just very envious, to look at other men and want what they have, thats not a deep bond No surprise you are blue pill tho, so out of touch from reality. They spend time with men and obsess over male body cause g…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 11:53 AM
7

I feel like the reason male hierarchy and respect is talked about often is because the ones at the top are the ones women sleep with most and not because these men are romantically attracted to each other and whatever that is supposed to mean. They see what kind of men most women sleep with for the least amount of commitment and try to imitate that. They arent seeking approval or respect from those men just for it, they are seeking it because that is what it will get them laid. Red pill men bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 10:40 AM
4

One of the reason it works so well for women is because there arent many women compared to men. Either because they already have plenty of options irl or just arent desperate as men
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:56 PM
1

It would make your relationship harder but finding that relationship would be easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:32 AM
0

That is true, its more of lifestyle thing i guess, and if they have grown out of it, they are no longer a slut. But that still doesnt reduce their body count and just like how some women have a strict requirement of height or income, some men will have a strict (or even lenient) limit on body count
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:47 AM
2

And what are your standards? Do you require them to be kind, or attractive or caring or whatever? Why dont you drop all those too cause that would increase your pool even further and make dating even more easy and simple 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:45 AM
1

If a woman can say, oh i grew out of my phase and now i only like you, why cant a man say, i no longer like other men and only like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:37 AM
2

Did i say high body count makes a woman a slut? I mean, alot of people think that, but i dont see where i even used the word. Some people just dont want to seriously date someone who has had sex with alot of different people, whether they think its because it makes them a slut or not. To reiterate what i said before, not having preference does make finding relationship easier. A woman who doesnt care about height or wealth will have an easier time finding a relationship, but can u ever convince …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:32 AM
-1

Ofc dating is simple when you drop your standards but most people think long term when talking about dating. Dating will be easy cause your pool increases when standard decreases but relationships?... Well thats another matter
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:58 AM
1

Doesnt matter what they believe on their own value, if the value of a woman is set by men in the market, men that she wants, then a mans value in the market is set by women that he wants
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 03:56 AM
0

In the west there are more women who have had casual sex than there are who have never had it. Also you admit there are alot more factors to casual sex than just "being at the right place and right time". Infact there are so many more that right place right time falls way down in the importance hierarchy it seems, so OPs point definitely stands. A man does need to prove to himself that he is attractive to women by having casual sex, especially if he is gonna be okay with a girl who has had it, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 03:51 AM
-1

And if those men themselves start having casual sex, then their value would diminish too and now they would be at the same level as majority of women these days who have had casual sex. Hence it will be easier for them to find a partner, since they are as valuable as most of the women according to their own logic
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:04 PM
12

If it is true that women have casual sex only with the men who was there at the right time and place, then there wouldnt be such a huge percentage of below average and average guys who rarely or never have had casual sex compared to much higher percentage of "chads" who have it. If the only factor for women having casual sex was her mindset, then the distribution of guys who have casual sex would be pretty uniform compared to how skewed it is rn
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:00 PM
7

If half the woman in the world turn into giants slugs or something, you think every men should start dating slugs too? People have standards, not everyone can force an attraction to someone that dont fit their standard just because they cant handle being alone
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 02:40 PM
1

The original post was talking about misandry, how some women hate all men regardless of whether they have done something awful or show undeniable signs. If you only hate those scums or careful around those who show signs, then there isnt much to discuss. You are just being a normal person like most people
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 02:52 PM
1

I get treatment once i get bit and im careful around once who shows signs of rabies. I dont go around hating the entire animal kingdom or live in constant fear because less than 1 percent have rabies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 07:09 PM
2

I suppose there could exist a woman like that too in our current dating market. Well i guess her only choice would the same as an average guy then, go for someone below their league to settle with if she cant wait to find someone with same values as her in her own league. Its an unfortunate reality, just like any other market in the world, dating market have been running on supply and demand and not on fairness
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 05:32 AM
3

Lets not act like the average men would not do the same if he had the chance to Yes, he would. Just like when an average women goes on a dating app and is swarmed by hundreds of dudes, she becomes more picky, goes on multiple dates paid by those men, recieves expensive gifts etc only to reject most of those guys anyway. Average guy would definitely be very picky if he got that kind of attention. Many men on PPD have admitted to being more "predatory". What do you mean by that? how many till she …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 05:12 AM
1

If an unattractive woman doesnt find an equally unattractive guy attractive enough to have a relationship with then she shouldnt be complaining when an attractive guy doesnt find her attractive enough to have a relationship with either
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:53 AM
9

The only reason some men can treat women like pokemon trading cards is because most women throw themselves at those men. The hypergamy exists, 80% of women go after the same top 20% of men, atleast when they are young, so ofc those men who have abundance are gonna be very picky which comes of as taking advantage. But the reality is no one can take advantage of you if you dont let them, atleast legally. I mean, no one feels bad for a guy who spends tons of money on a girl despite her rejecting hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:42 AM
1

Men do this, men do that... Yall speak like men are a monolith, like one huge collective consciousness. Those actions that u speak of, just a quick search shows less than 1 percentage of the entire male population commit those crimes. But for the sake of the argument lets say its 20% or something. You believe that gives you the right to hate rest of the 80 percentage of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:29 PM
3

Im from a passport bro country too and i dont really have much sympathy for women who go after rich foreigner guys. They go after them because solely because they are richer than people here and can give them a green card or a citizenship. These women are shallow and want to use these men for their wealth and status... Seems to me they just get out-used sometimes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:46 AM
5

It takes two to tango tho, if a girl dates a significantly wealthy man despite knowing she is at a huge financial disadvantage... Its kind of on her too
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:31 AM
-1

Ok, cool, congratulations, you dont need romantic companionship to be happy. You are fine working just to be be alive, thats great. But most people arent. Most people dont like the idea of working just to survive, paying taxes and then dying alone with occasional hobbies to distract themselves with. What op is saying is people dont see much of reason to be a productive member of society if they have no hope of ever fulfilling their core biological directive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:03 PM
2

Everyone needs incentive to do anything. You can absolutely love your work that u do, but if the payment is absolute peanuts with no possibility of increasing in the future either, you will most likely look for something else cause you arent gonna survive with that pay, let alone live a quality life. But once u have a financially stable life, most people's incentive changes to what their biology demands, which in alot of case is companionship and reproduction. Hobbies and wealth, while they can …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 02:36 PM
0

You dont think it makes someone racist to avoid people because of the color of their skin or their race? Even if u think so, many governments have made it illegal to do that and will classify u as racist and so will most people A quick google search says around 1 to 5 percentage of men are convicted of violent crime. For the sake of the argument lets even its 10 percentage.... Is that enough for u people to justify hating rest of 90 percentage of the group or a race or a gender or whatever?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:04 AM
7

Ah yes, here it is. The classic, "People of this group are inherently evil, all of them and because of the things that happened before they themselves even existed. Generalizing them doesnt make me a racist but if that group generalizes my group because of the actions of some, then they are racist, misogynist, bigots and all the other name under the sun" 😂 The hypocrisy is stunning. You are judging people based on their genetics, things that happened before they were born and things that they ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:01 AM
7

Why should the question be asked the other way around? If a woman feel anxious around a man because of her past negative experience with other men or because of the news she has heard of the crimes other men committed, then how is that different from a white person who feels anxious around black person because of their past negative experience with other black people or because of the news they have heard?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:19 AM
1

Unless u dont have know much about cars, like op here who thinks marrying a woman who isnt attracted to you, only for what u provide is actually a good idea. If u think its a good idea to buy a car despite its brakes not working or even if its been rundown, your chances of accident drastically increases
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:01 AM
1

But if u are driving a faulty car, you are much more likely to get into a messy car accident
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:02 AM
1

It maybe a 0.1 percent case but that 0.1% usually only happens to beta bux who marries women that doesnt love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:51 AM
-2

The alternative is that he lost half his premarital wealth because his wife couldnt stay loyal, has to pay alimony and child support to kids that arent even likely his cause again, a ran through wife most likely wont stay loyal to a beta but atleast he lives long ig, so hurray?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:28 AM
8

Man with a family? More like a man with a divorced family who lost half his premarital wealth in the divorce and has to pay child support (to children that's probably not even his) and alimony because his wife was never attracted to him. Im sorry but is there supposed to be an appeal in this? Is this some kind of cuckholdery that im not familiar with cause personally i would rather live a short life alone than be in such a situation
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:17 AM
1

The thing is it is much easier to leave an abusive or manipulative partner that you are not married to then leave one that you are married to. People dont argue that women should be able to identify red flags as soon as she sees him, the argument is that once she eventually does see it, she should leave him instead of sticking around But once a man is married and then he spots a red flag, its gonna be much harder to leave knowing he will lose half of his pre maritial wealth as well. Its not the …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:04 PM
6

The reason people say men peak at around somewhere in 30s is because at that point he mostly has life in order. Its especially true if they worked really hard in their 20s building skills and wealth. And one thing you cant deny is women love wealthy men, especially younger ones. So i usually see a huge age gap relationship as being kind of transactional
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:55 AM
2

If they have no intention of following through than i dont see the problem? If they say i dont like this thing, if u do it i will leave u but then u keep doing it and they don't leave, who really is in the advantage here? Its you, because you know they wont follow through and you will have no problem doing the thing they dislike. If you truly wanted to be with them u would respect their request even if u know it was an empty threat
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 04:57 AM
2

What even is the threat here? If a girl says to you hey i dont like this kind of thing, infact i dont like it so much i will leave u if u do it.. You are saying she shouldnt be allowed to emphasize how bad that thing is for her?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 04:52 AM
0

I cant threaten to cause any bodily harm to anyone but i can definitely threaten someone that i will get rid of them from my life if they disrespect my boundaries For example, "i will break up with you if u keep going to the club/ keep dming other men etc etc"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:56 AM
-4

They said if you threaten to leave unless they do what you want. Thats also not controlling, its just setting up your terms and conditions
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:36 AM
3

Most people do think that this is controlling tho. I mean how else can one person control the other without doing something borderline illegal like threating violence?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 03:34 AM
2

With random people you just met
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 06:07 AM
4

Yet there are some women having hookups left and right. This is why alot of guys dont want a relationship with a woman like that, we know its not safe, she knows its not safe and yet she cant control it for the guys she finds hot
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 03:38 AM

So why call women wonderful and more empathetic gender if they dont even care about most humans that have this bare minimum criteria lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 10:59 AM
1

they feel like the person won't or can't leave them Thats the skill issue, putting yourself in a position where u cant leave or leading so much with your emotion that u cant think logically and leave. Maybe its not a skill issue related to dating but its definitely a skill issue related to relationship Now personally i wouldnt be calling these things skill issue but if you people want to call mens dating problems skill issue, then so is this. They are typically higher in compassion and more forg…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:54 AM

Let's be real: that shit barely even works on single women. That shit barely works if you aren't the top 10 percent of the man
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:07 PM
11

Idk if it counts but i have had a female friend call me gay or say that i should date guys because i had simply expressed how dating is just not worth the time and money. Its not blaming but its definitely some kind of shaming tactic and i have seen the same thing multiple times online too, where a guy says he is done with dating or having to pay for dates just for it to go nowhere is just not worth it and women in the comments have resorted to telling him to go date guys as an insult for his la…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 08:52 PM
3

I would rather just be alone tbh. 80/20 implies means she was attracted to and did have sex with the top 20 percent. Seems like now she just had her fun and wants to settle down with a good man (basically a simp who doesnt ask for much in return and still provides). No thanks, i would rather be alone with dignity than be with a girl who doesnt find me attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 04:20 AM
4

From the guys perspective who likes the rides, it would be like always going to amusement park with no rides. Sure, the other things are enjoyable but its not worth it going to the amusement park just for those and not the rides. So yeah most guys would rather just find a different amusement park that has the rides than waste time going to the one without it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 04:15 AM
-1

I mean, even if u werent the best lover, you are still the best male lover. But if another guy is her best, you are neither the best lover nor her best man
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:28 PM
6

Usually the guys who want a virgin girl or a low n count girl are also virgins or low n count, when its other wise then sure, ig it is a fetish You just said women wouldnt date virgin men, seems to me body count does matter
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:10 PM
3

Seems like women fetishize sexual experience then if virginity is a deal breaker for them. If its not harsh to do that then its not harsh to desire virginity or lower sexual experience either If past homosexual experience of a man matters then its fair to say past does matter when considering a relationship, which means body count does matter
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 06:16 PM
0

Depends on how much working each one is doing and how much money they are bringing in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 06:08 PM
1

Still wouldnt care, heck she can even invite her for a threesome 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 05:57 PM
2

The thing is, men dont get casual sex by trying to get casual sex. Its either a product of being successful in life or being born with genetic advantage. So its more like a measure of their own success and advantage they have in their life. Thats why its more respected, by men and yes, even by women. Whearas, for a women, in order to get casual sex, she doesnt have to successful, they arent expected to pay for dates, drinks etc and they dont have to have exceptional genes as well, since men dont…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:19 AM
4

Trying to do something bad is worse than actually doing it? What kind of logic is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 02:48 PM
1

Its only fair in a relationship if a guy has to adhere to a traditional gender role, then so does the woman. It only so happens that the traditional role for a woman is to have a low n count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:19 PM
-2

In a relationship you can only just be desired for your wealth or status too or for the emotional support you provide without any physical attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 09:04 AM
7

Thats cause its easy for an average women to find sex, but its very difficult for an average man lol. Thats why when men have sex with alot of women, its seen as an achievement while when women do it, it is seen as a self disrespect
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 08:19 AM

Op is taking about preference here, they are saying if a girl has to choose between a genuinely nice guy or a not so nice but a charismatic guy, she is choosing the charismatic one. Obviously if she has the choice of choosing nice and charismatic, she would go for it, but they are rare
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 07:35 AM
1

Supply and demand isnt always about which number is larger. Most women are usually aiming for the top guys and either they dont mind sharing or arent aware that she is sharing. Meanwhile those men dont care as much and will just hook up with anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 03:28 AM
-6

Doesnt state already force men to pay child support tho? Its not marriage but its alot more than nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 04:54 AM
2

Some do, some dont. Those who dont are probably the ones in a transactional relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 03:59 AM
34

Yeah, i dont think some men even want a relationship based on love. Some men just want a transactional relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter