TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_Middlefinger_ Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by _Middlefinger_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This has nothing to do with MR, and you are an asshole. Consider yourself blocked.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:16 AM
2

Yeah, um, nope. This man is a serial rapist, and is utterly contemptible. He does not represent the average man at all. He should be locked up for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:13 PM
2

Heres the thing, i can handle a flaw in any administration, but coupling wealth unequal distribution with persecution of LGBT, atheism, any race but white and women and is too much. Thats why the GOP would never get my vote, even if i agree with their fiscal policy, which i often do, i cant support the rest. This sub however only sees Hilary as an SJW, which is laughable frankly (it was just part of a bad tactic) and Trump as some sort of saviour. While I agree with what this sub wants to achiev…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:15 PM
1

The rep turnout was nearly identical to the last 2 elections. 59M for trump, 60 for Romney, 59 for McCain. The difference is Clinton got 59M, Obama got 66M and 69M.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:13 PM
2

It doesnt matter what you think Trumps position is what matters is what he has to agree to. All the guys being talked about for positions are just horrible. Trump, most likely, doesnt give a shit if peoples rights are erroded, as long as he is OK. Reagans era concentrated the wealth at the top like no other. The notion that helping the rich 'creates jobs and wealth from the top down' is a lie that has been around for decades. It wasnt true then, it isnt true now in the US or anywhere else.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:07 PM
2

The reality is that the Republican vote didnt change from the last 3 or 4 elections, people just didnt vote Dem. She failed to make her case and failed to make trump seem bad.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:45 PM
5

Hilary alienated the dem voters, they didnt want her. If you look at the figures Trump actually had less votes than McCain and Romney, but Hilarys vote collapsed compared to Obama, by 10M from 2008. Honestly though, i dont think this was anything to do with SJWs, it was just that her campaign was horribly misjudged. Instead of painting Trump alone as a horrible man, she ended up insulting or ignoring all men, and plenty of women that actually LIKE men saw that.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:43 PM
2

No but Reagans era was bad for a hell of a lot of people, denying that would be disingenuous. Im not really sure what you are complaining about anyway, its been made very clear that unless you are a straight white christian male with a decent job that you will have a bad time under Trump.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:19 PM
-8

No, just right.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:41 PM
1

The change will come from Hilary losing to him, not from him.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:01 PM
7

Look at his running mate and other cronies and tell me he isnt anti-secular (or at least will throw them a bone and erode the separation of church and state further). The 'left' has done nothing to erode freedom of religion whatsoever.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:59 PM
4

Im not a liberal crying over a conservative getting in, In concerned that the conservative denies facts. Hilary would be bad for mens rights, possibly, Trump is bad for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:56 PM
-7

Well, if it doesnt it would be a first.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:54 PM
2

What will change. Trumps claim he will help the average person is BS. He says he is against corporate lobbying, all why owning a corporation that did exactly that and more. He is more of the same, but more crass and unstable.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:16 PM
-9

As often happens when right wing politicians get power, those that voted for them soon realise that they themselves will be the subject of the attack from that new government.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:12 PM
2

Its not good. There is about to be an Anti-science, anti-secular, anti-rights government put into place, its going to be good for no one. Sure Hilary wasnt great, but she wouldnt be worse than that. There is also no evidence that trump will be good for mens rights, lets remember that making abortion harder affects both men and women, and men will be forced to support children neither parent wanted.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:09 PM
1

Milo isnt a MRA, he is a right wing, self serving asshole who will say and do whatever if it suits his own agenda.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:04 AM
2

As bad as a Hil win would be, a trump win would be far worse in just about every other respect, and actually could be worse for MRAs. He is so awful in every way that it would only make the SJWs point and make them double down.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:43 AM
0

True, but the alternative is much much much worse.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 10:02 AM
1

I can see both sides somewhat. You might expect that the person accused could work out who the accuser is anyway, unless they are a total man whore. All thats being kept from them is the name, which if its a one night stand you might not know anyway. However the Ched Evans case proves that the name can help.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:20 PM
1

Most 'rape' cases have little more evidence than he said/she said. If both agree there was sex it becomes almost impossible to convict. It might suck for those that were genuinely raped, but its the way it should be, there isnt any other fair way
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:18 PM
0

It is responsible for an increase in hate crimes, rape may just be one of those crimes. Seems like a somewhat selective claim though.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:20 PM
2

Its pretty clear you under estimate the UK police. Yes, they will investigate some seemingly random minor thing like they are Sherlock Holmes. It also only takes one bored or biased person in the complete chain to turn something like this into what it became, and yes if THEY think a crime has taken place they dont care if the 'victim' doesnt.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:58 PM
2

Bitch has probably never had to deal with any discrimination her entire life, apart from that caused by her sour attitude.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:23 PM
8

Self regulation is a fantasy. In reality it results in cartels and price fixing.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 06:54 PM
4

Yeah i feel like thats all that needed, but some people seem to not realise that History (for example) might include topics like war and death..
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:25 PM
-8

I'm not completely against trigger warnings as such. A list on the course documentation of what will or may be covered isnt a bad thing, it can be quite useful to everyone, but it should not be mandatory. Safe spaces though are moronic, and courses should not be sterilised just because a few special snowflakes cant handle the topics covered.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:33 AM
0

I dont monitor what others post are you narcissistic enough to think I record and monitor your posts?. Its actually VERY likely just random religious crap because it happens all the time. It would be better if it was actually a good analogy... You know what they say though, dont argue with people online, its better to just block them, so bye..
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:26 PM
3

Its sad really that men who fancy women get attacked for it, and men that dont also get attacked for it (I'm gay, and I have been called misogynistic for being so). These feminists just hate men, there is no other explanation.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 12:48 PM
1

Given the amount of random ignorant religious preaching that pops up on reddit ..No it wasn't. Rather than just claiming I'm stupid think about how you could do it better next time.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 12:46 PM
4

Im surprised they didnt put gay men in their to.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:01 AM
3

Both off topic and completely wrong. Well done.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 07:57 AM
3

The sad thing is many are second and third wave and dont even now it.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 07:56 AM
1

Very few, even here, agree with you. I doubt there are many athletes that share your view. It's very petty.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:50 AM
1

This has nothing to do with the 'Olympics'. The Olympics is a just a collection of separate sports doing their thing in one place. Complaining that women get their own chances really is pathetic and diminishes us greatly. Its not like the main stars arent men anyway. Bolt, Farrah, Phelps..
/r/MensRights22/08/16 08:23 AM
1

Best in class is a very common practice in sport. Sometimes in sex, sometimes its size or weight. Why have a paralympics when most of then could be beaten by the average person in the street?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:56 AM
1

This is an issue of best in class. Do the little boxer guys deserve a medal when the bigger guys could smash them to bits? There is no deceptive practice here, there is clearly a difference between men and women in most sports because the times, distances etc are there for all to see. As for Rhythmic gymnastics etc, there isnt the demand from men to compete. At the Olympics each sport is self governing, there is no mens versions because men dont compete in it at any other time. Normal gymnastics…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:53 AM
0

As soon as anyone says 'Trump says' they lost. Trump is a compulsive liar who says whatever seems popular or newsworthy at the time. 'Opposes off shoring'.. while doing it. He has no fixed policies and has proven to be a hypocrite of the worst order. Hilary is little different, but is using feminism to gain votes, Like trump, she doesn't really care about the issues at all. Once in power she will drop it like a hot potato in order to gain money and power from anyone she can, man or woman.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:37 AM
1

You know feminism is bad when it makes you agree with Anne Widdecombe.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 05:39 PM
1

Regressive liberal... Most liberals make sense, that type are nutcases.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 06:09 PM
1

This is very flawed, for a start the outcomes in each scenario arent certain in real life, and secondly its unlikely the car would be able to determine the age, gender or any any other attribute of people surrounding it. I feel like the cars dont need a morality chip, they need a preset action to take in each scenario, and one that is industry wide, so that one sort of car isnt thought of as worse than the others, which would affect liability.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter