TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

antariusz Archive

View 7 posts and 5,437 comments by antariusz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,437 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Wow, such an original thought that you are having. “I secretly despise my husband, but if he did more chores I would desire sex more with him” Are you actually a parody account? I honestly cant tell. Or at least please tell me that my summary is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 08:37 PM
1

3 days out of the month ... women want to fuck... The important thing is to match with them on one of those 3 out of the 28 days.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 06:12 AM
6

I can absolutely confirm that I can and have gotten matches and one night stands based on "short term open to long" or the "just fun" (or whatever it's called on tinder). It doesn't matter what your put down if a woman thinks you're attractive they'll ignore what else you write.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 06:11 AM
5

30 was old... until I hit 30. 40 was old... and still is, now that I'm 44.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 09:16 PM
1

I’ve had a few encounters with 18-22 year old virgins in similar situations, that literally just want to meet a random guy and fuck, someone not in their social circles. Tinder used to be good for that. Sadly I’ve kind of aged out of that, most of those girls set age filters at around 39. But it was good fun while it lasted. A handful of lesbians in similar circumstances also. They want to cheat on their partner, but they also don’t want it to be with anyone that can ruin their social reputation…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/26 09:58 PM
1

That’s the point. People are choosing to run marathons rather than the survival of our species. That’s not a good place to be. The “hate humans, humans are bad” propaganda went too far and brainwashed too many people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:48 PM
0

I make 250k in a lcol area. I would prefer a wife that didnt want to work, or if she did work, did it in a career that she enjoyed and did it for the love of it, but I’ve never once found a woman like that. They work because they want a backup plan and independence. But you’re right, I think most men would prefer a wife that helps support the family, I just don’t think that’s the major reason why women aren’t having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:46 PM
4

They aren’t gone. They just went to different locations. The life that you think no longer exists, does exist… in China.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:46 AM
-4

It’s the “young professionals” that are the ones receiving the largest amount of propaganda. “Don’t have kids, you won’t be able to golf if you have children” … is just a ridiculous thought to even entertain. But they believe it, because it’s been fed to them over and over again. Thats how propaganda works. Its insidious. Like you said, the people who are actually having kids are the ones who aren’t scrolling through the brainwashing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:44 AM
0

I mean, that’s just not even true anymore. Men are far more likely than women to want children, and want more children than women. 57% of men 18-34 want children compared to 45% of women. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3708672/ If I just take your presupposition that men ideally want only 2 children, well that’s still more than women who want less. Such as the 0.5 children in South Korea, that’s 400% less.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:41 AM
1

As opposed to eating children, which is far more socially acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:33 AM
-4

The labor participation rate of Indian women is 42% lower than the labor participation rate of U.S. women, at 56% But yea, you’re right there are probably worse issues than participating in the workforce. Iranian women make up 60% of the universities, remarkably similar to u.s. women. Perhaps we could start there instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:34 AM
0

God, did you sleep through all of your history classes or something. Go look up Jonathan Swift.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:28 AM
0

That's the beauty/sadness of it, by the time they recognize that the world is ending, it'll be too late to stop it. But they (the women) be the ones begging for help, men won't be begging for babies. Civilization has collapsed many times before, and it will again. The bronze age collapse, the fall of the roman empire... this is just a cycle. They'll write an allegorical story about not trusting women, maybe in an ironic take they'll call it revelations this time, and then the cycle will start ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:26 AM
-3

it's a modest proposal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:22 AM
1

7 deaths per 1000 people alive... per year... And then let's pretend people live for 100 years to make the math really really easy for you. and then next year it's 8, and then next year it's 9 and then next year it's 10... as the population ages, it will only continue to climb.... the population has already peaked.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:21 AM
2

10 million of people per year is a lot when the entire world population was only 600 million. The equivalent today would be about 400 million dying per year. And ... yes, we are indeed going to have that level of population loss. 0.5 births per woman means the "death rate" is 750 deaths with no replacement per 1000 people. Not 7 per 1000. That is far beyond your "300-600" rate. Just because it doesn't happen in a single year, doesn't mean it isn't going to be as devastating. edit: and then... of…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:15 AM
0

Because we have sperm banks currently, and it isn't increasing the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:09 AM
1

We do know have examples of huge population declines. Tell me everything you know about the Inca, the Aztec, and the Mayan people you encounter today.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:06 AM
0

Yea, you get it... we're going back to what it was like in the 1920s. I hope you enjoy baling hay and milking cattle to survive. I hear route 66 is pleasant to visit this time of year.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:04 AM
0

that's exactly the threat. We are literally about to experience a rate of population decline WORSE than the black death. (during the bubonic plague roughly 50% of the population died)... In south korea, the current rate is 75% decline PER generation) (0.5 births per woman) So that means in another 25 years ANOTHER black death level extinction event.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:02 AM
7

lol, which country figured it out, afghanistan? (4.5 children per woman by the way, more than twice the rate of the u.s.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:00 AM
-5

how about we stop allowing women to work. The alternatives become more appealing then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:58 PM
5

I've been sexually assaulted multiple times by women that I wasn't interested in. I don't typically go to bars anymore. I've never once had a good sexual experience from something that started at a bar, not that they don't ever happen, but it never happens for me. Usually the only women that "pursue" men are the women that you wouldn't want to pursue you in the first place. I do have a lot of sympathy for women, because the men that are pursuing them are typically not desirable at all, otherwise…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:44 AM
8

Elliot was the epitome of the opposite of redpill. He hated redpill worse than most blue-pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:41 AM
2

They are just following their biological programming. Literal NPCs that don't even realize they are actually weeding out weakness from the genetic pool. They won't ever be able to accept it if it was pointed out, but yet it's true. I do think it's the "limited experience" thing that really kills it. I was a virgin until I was 25. But I knew that I had succeeded in so many OTHER things that I attempted in my life, I knew that eventually I'd be able to figure out what I was doing wrong with relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 02:27 AM
1

You’re underestimating how hard it is to ignore mainstream advice to just be open, share feelings, compromise, “active” consent
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:33 PM
25

If this is a problem for you, you are online too much. Don’t patronize gyms that allow filming. Don’t watch social media influencers. Don’t go to gyms frequented by social media influencers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 08:36 AM
1

Thank you for acknowledging your mistake, perhaps now you’ll stop following me around 4 different subreddits responding to every single one of my posts, I thought the memes about personally assigned fbi agents was supposed to be a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 09:38 PM
1

So you admit that women value strength in men, cool. That’s what I said. You are making up anything I said about liberals or conservatives. I didn’t claim any of that. I said nothing about testosterone or politics. You are hallucinating that. Now show me a recipe for apple pie.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 09:22 PM
2

Nah, you’re right, women don’t care about strength, just keep believing whatever you want to believe. You do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 08:54 PM
3

it was so stark of a contrast that here is a top comment from a reddit thread about the study 8 years ago. There was no nuance to these results, he said. Zero of the 160 women surveyed showed a statistical preference for weaker men. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/284/1869/20171819/78768/Cues-of-upper-body-strength-account-for-most-of As far as scientific studies go... it doesn't really ever get any more clear than this... https://trs.silverchair-cdn.com/trs/content_public/journa…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 05:02 PM
5

There was an interesting study I saw that concluded that women are attracted to pure strength much more than body fat %. The dad bod that can deadlift 600lbs beats out the skinny poetry kid that struggled picking up a single plate.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 02:13 PM
-1

It already is too late. Civilization is already going to collapse. It's too late to reverse course. We are STILL feeding the next generation of children the propaganda that there are too many humans despite the reverse being true. Governments are far too slow to respond. Best case scenario is we'll only suffer a mild collapse/dark age that will take hundreds of years to recover. It's not the population decline that is the problem. It's the rapidness of it. We are going through a bigger and faste…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:42 PM
–

Men are always paying for it. Sometimes it's on the front end. Other times it's on the back end. Sometimes they pay more and sometimes they pay less. Your bitterness comes across in your commenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:12 PM
–

If you ever detect "mild digust" from someone you are attempting to date, just move on. It's not worth it. Not all women hate men. It is not something "in-built" in women like you claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:09 PM
1

I am a Republican. 100% of the government is bad, because 0% of my tax dollars is useful to me. That might be an exaggeration, nasa can stay, and I like… the coast guard, those are some good people. Fuck everyone else. And I work for the government, my agency is absolutely full of worthless people and waste. For people getting free health insurance or education grants or one of have a job with on those many useless boondoggles… I’m sure those people love the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 08:30 AM
2

I think that’s a statement, but just in case you’re saying that as a question, the answer, imo, is yes. And it applies whether you are beta or alpha or anything in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 02:00 AM
1

It’s not that women prefer bad boys… it’s that they prefer bad boys 1 day a month. And then the other 27 days of the month they will argue about that reality on reddit. And it’s pointless to debate it, because they can’t possibly conceive of themselves as being that way, until they are… at which point they can’t see themselves as being any other way. It’s like being drunk. You will do things you wouldn’t normally do. You might not be the type of person who sings karaoke, but you will when you’ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 06:51 PM
2

I think you're viewing female attraction through the same lense and male attraction, and men and women are not the same. Women want both alpha fucks AND beta bucks. They have a dual mating strategy to reproduce with chad AND want to lock you down for your provisioning. Women like beta men just as much, but it's a different kind of attraction. The key is to make her work for your provisioning just like she has to work to get chad's sexual attention. The problem most men run into is that the women…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 03:31 PM
4

Wasn't the fact that the POLICE shut it down... proving OP's point? Are we dating the same guy is in every major city in the world. And yet the ONE TIME it existed in the gender-swapped variant (in a foreign language on u.s. ran website facebook)... the government shut it down?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:13 PM
3

Thankfully women have social media so they can get all the validation they crave.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:41 AM
0

I think once the government stops using propaganda on children to lower the birth rate I think you’ll start to see a swing upward a few decades later.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:41 AM
2

I don't know how to define AI, but I know it when I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 02:30 AM
-1

You are so close, but you are confusing cause and effect. Men have no problem paying for dates with the 4th type of woman. The problem is that Women 1,2, and 3 actually want to be treated like 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:32 PM
-2

lol. I do. This is essentially just re-worded black-pill non-sense: To break down his/her entire thesis: If you're struggling in dating, just stop, give up. Men that are having casual sex don't need to change what they are doing, it's working. For the men that aren't having casual sex, them "stopping" doesn't actually change anything. A) casual sex isn't difficult for the men who get the most of it. It's not "hard" for attractive men, so they don't have to "work hard" at it. Why would an attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:16 AM
0

Neither are women. They aren’t attracted to a man that wants their opinion. So if you ask a woman what you need to do to become attractive, you’ve already lost the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 02:18 AM
5

Worse: if you’re poor, just try working harder and be more kind to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 02:16 AM
2

she's not wrong though. That is actually 100% the CORRECT response to tell a man who is struggling with women. Quit simping for her opinions and instead find a woman who will instead mold herself to fit your opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 12:02 AM
7

You do misunderstand. The reason he is unattractive to women is because he's asking for your opinion in the first place. It's not a matter of you saying height, or you saying it's "emotional intelligence" that gets you into bed. The mere act of not knowing is enough for him to get lumped in with the beta losers, and so that's how you treat him. "just be there for her more emotionally"... You don't tell chad to do that, because chad doesn't ask your opinion. The clueless man fails because you don…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 12:00 AM
1

https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-do-women-lie-about-how-many-men-theyve-slept-with/ https://medium.com/modern-women/the-real-reason-women-lie-about-their-body-count-and-why-it-matters-6dad477c4286 https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/sex/a45863643/lied-about-body-count/ https://www.xonecole.com/do-you-lie-about-your-body-count-heres-why-you-shouldnt/numbers-do-lie https://www.salon.com/2018/11/24/why-women-lie-about-sex/ Oh come on… how dare you try to use a tired trope that “youre just m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 10:31 AM
1

https://www.vice.com/en/article/why-do-women-lie-about-how-many-men-theyve-slept-with/ https://medium.com/modern-women/the-real-reason-women-lie-about-their-body-count-and-why-it-matters-6dad477c4286 https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/sex/a45863643/lied-about-body-count/ https://www.xonecole.com/do-you-lie-about-your-body-count-heres-why-you-shouldnt/numbers-do-lie https://www.salon.com/2018/11/24/why-women-lie-about-sex/ Oh come on… how dare you try to use a tired trope that “youre just m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 10:28 AM
1

I wasn't saying they LITERALLY forget... I'm saying they lie about it and rationalize away why those men don't count and aren't included those when asked about how many sexual partners they've had.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:04 AM
1

You implied that they don't have hormonal fluctuations that make them more or less horny -> which is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:31 PM
1

What you just said isn’t true. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/ajpendo.00418.2023 Hope this helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 09:10 PM
–

You got a lot of really great answers already, but I think it's a lot simpler than that. Men like to use logic, and pointing out how illogical women are makes men feel superior. Women are at the mercy of their hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 08:28 PM
–

This take is a lot cleaner and easier to understand when you simply say "enjoy the decline"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:30 AM
2

Women genuinely forget about most of their sex because they are controlled by their hormones. Yes, they aren’t normally like that, because 26/28 days of the week (93% of the time) they aren’t like that. But then for a few hours, while awake, on 2 days a week, so let’s just say maybe a grand total of 24 hours per month. (Roughly 3% of the time) they absolutely ARE LIKE THAT. So yea, absolutely you aren’t a serial killer 97% of the time Jeffrey Dahmer. But don’t let people forget about 3 percent o…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 06:56 PM
2

What? I’ve literally had to argue numerous times in this subreddit that 100% of my relationships started off as hookups, so if a man can’t get a hookup, he’s often locked out of romantic relationships also. I feel like I’m being gaslit or this is Mandela effect in effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 06:52 PM
-5

The fact that you believe fully and are so easily influenced by others is what makes you hard to take seriously. You're simply someone else's tool. A) Rape is not common. B) Drinking does not instantly remove your ability to think logically nor remove your ability to consent. C) The fact that you somehow believe both of these preposterous notions tells me that YOU are the person spreading feminist propaganda, not the "feminist boogymen" that you claim exist. The women have won, and men have lost…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 04:21 AM
1

I'm too lazy to go through his comment history, but I guarantee there are plenty of anti-elon musk one-liners, even though he's the closest human being we have in reality compared to the fictional tony stark.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:50 AM
1

If anything you are the other 2 people in this thread and you’re just talking to yourself. I’ve been posting daily on Reddit for like 14 years straight, I don’t need a burner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:39 AM
1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513808001177 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26193479/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513811000250 Your anecdotal evidence aside, there are multiple studies that show that men that are wealthier and men that are more attractive give more orgasms, and I was unable to find a single study that showed chubby men give more orgasms, so I think that’s maybe just you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:50 AM
3

Women don’t need to overtly communicate what they want, if you want to get a woman to orgasm, you have to pay attention to what their body is responding to. I can assure you that just because you’re good at casual sex, doesn’t necessarily get you into relationships. The narrative that women automatically want relationships with every man that makes them cum is… not accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:36 AM
1

It’s the internet, nothing is ever private.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:33 AM
2

No, there are winners and losers in this world, and not being able to pass on your genetics is absolutely the definition of a loser if we are going to use any definition of what is a winner and what is a loser, we must go to the very basic biological definition of it. Some genetics survive, other genetics are wiped out. Some people obtain the Darwin Award for stupidity, he is going to win the lifetime achievement Darwin Award, but not for any particular act, but for a lifetime of social struggle…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:30 AM
2

Agreeing with you, but there is also research that proves that women are more likely to have more orgasms with more attractive men. So it’s more a double-whammy where if she is selecting a mediocre man, she’s less likely to orgasm because she just isn’t as aroused by him on top of his lack of experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:26 AM
1

well that's a funny statistic for you to bring up, since the number of rapists and murders is actually pretty close to the number of women who cuck men to raise another man's baby. 1% of men make up 63% of all violent crime. 3% of men would describe every single murderer AND convicted rapist. Less than 0.01% (fewer than 1 in 10,000) of men have killed another man. Combine in rape AND sexual assault, AND include every man never caught, and it's still less than the women who lie to men about who t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 08:29 PM
1

I never once said the majority. I simply said a large enough percentage of women to make it not worth the risk. Ok big shot engineer, what percentage of collapse in any given year does a bridge need to be at before it's considered unsafe for humans to use? If a bridge was 5% likely to collapse and kill you within the next 5 years, would you drive on it? What about 3%
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 08:26 PM
0

Thanks: You've helped establish a clear and fundamental difference between men and women. A man will care about facts and figures and information for the sake of information. A woman only cares about being right insofar as she can use it to manipulate others around her. To get something from it. I just want you to understand that men and women are different, and there is such a thing as objective truth, and that matters to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 06:43 PM
1

When the government actively lies to you and pushes narratives that are false: sure, why not. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.13351 Here's a study where, in 2022, the government funded a study to prove that most all babies are who the mom says it is, and that there is no reason to be concerned about misattributed paternity. The study was based on nationwide ABO blood group data Wait, so they ... used blood typing, instead of genetic testing why? Apart from widespread societal im…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:38 PM
1

It's actually 30% of men that test for it. The lower figure is when everyone is just randomly getting tested. For example, 7% of people that do 23andme find out that they aren't related to their "father"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:23 PM
1

Because women are really good at lying about how often they cheat. Some men are too. That's the cool part about being "unsuspecting"... you don't "suspect" the person you are with is a whore. Which is why millions of men would be shocked if every baby had mandatory paternity tests performed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:04 PM
1

I'm not extrapolating anything. What's the percent of babies that are being raised by a man that isn't the biological parent, even though he thinks he is the biological parent, where she was not cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:02 PM
1

Yea, as opposed to a whore you don't know. No reason to ask a random stranger. If english isn't your first language, you could say "your car has a mechanical fault" (even if you don't own it, but you're just driving it) "your pipe is leaking" (even if you are just renting an apartment) Trust me, I assume no ownership over women. I'm simply using "your whore" to refer to the specific one accusing you of paternity, as opposed to whores in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 02:06 PM
1

what statistic? https://ifstudies.org/blog/number-1-in-2018-who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-infidelity-in-america A good percentage of women cheat. Some admit to it. Others don't admit to it. The number that ADMIT to cheating is around 13% That's more than were proven to cheat. And some of those women that cheat end up pregnant by the other guy. So please tell me what "statistic" shows that I'm wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:55 PM
0

Ok. You're obviously willing to keep engaging. If 10% of women have babies with one man, while in a relationship with another man, what percent of women are cheaters?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 12:23 PM
1

Cheaters
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:19 AM
1

A good reason to question paternity would be your whore not wanting to take a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:19 AM
1

It's not "common sense" This is BASIC MATH I have 10 apples. All rotten apples taste bad. Some apples that are not rotten also taste bad. If 5 of my apples are rotten. How many bad tasting apples do I have? This is literally math that a 9 year old learns. The correct answer is one of these 4 select one: A) 2 B) 3 C) 4 D) 7
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:15 AM
0

I'd be very surprised if you ever passed a math class.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 10:11 AM
0

I'm going to walk you through this really slowly, step by step. 1) If 10% of babies that born are not the child of stated father, but are actually another man's child. 100% of those women cheated. Every single woman that has a child where she claims it's one father, but actually had a child with another man... cheated. 100% The man thinks it is his baby, but she actually had raw unprotected sex with another man and got pregnant, and then lied so that the wrong man would help pay for and support …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:40 AM
2

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/ soon enough that won't be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 11:32 PM
4

Not true, I'd would be happy with 3 out of those 4. Absolutely happy with any combination of 3 of those would absolutely be relationship material for me. But 3/4 itself is asking too much from most women. I think most men are happy if they can get 2/4
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 11:30 PM
0

I know this is difficult, but use common sense. If 10% of women have babies with another man. What is the lowest possible percentage of women that have cheated on a man? Does 100% of cheating result in a baby being made? (hint: no) That's not "my opinion" that's math.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 08:49 PM
0

It's 30% when requested by the father. Like I said, it's roughly 10% off random samplings of the population. If 10% is the rate of misattributed paternity, then the rate of cheating, definitionally, would be required to be higher. https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(22)00013-1 The "naughty secret" that women want to keep secret is that a LOT of babies are being raised by men that are not the fathers. MILLIONS in the u.s. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11653245/ In fact, it's regularly…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:44 PM
1

Statistically speaking, a good percentage of women are. You you go all in on a poker hand that only had a 70% chance of winning? Sounds like poor play to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:27 PM
2

“Incredibly unlikely”, 10% of the time it’s actually the other man’s baby. That means more than 10% of women are fucking multiple men and lying to to the “fathers”. If 25% of women are cheating, but only 10% get pregnant with the other man, is that “incredibly unlikely”?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 09:18 AM
-10

It’s taking your absurd statement and cranking the absurdity from an 11/10 to 12/10
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:36 AM
1

If you are having unprotected sex with a woman, it’s reasonable to ask that she not be fucking other men also, but if 10% of babies are born with misattributed paternity, that means that more than 20% of women are sleeping with multiple men at the same time raw, but only some of the time does it turn out to be the other guy that gets her pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:32 AM
1

Sorry for multi-posting. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1752928X18300179 (typical paternity testing results, 30%) Specific study I was references Nuevo León: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199907)109:3%3C281::AID-AJPA1%3E3.0.CO;2-31096-8644(199907)109:3%3C281::AID-AJPA1%3E3.0.CO;2-3) It was the specific 1999 Mexico study that helped prove how those older blood test paternity tests which often showed rates as low as 3% were completely wrong, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:10 AM
2

“Before you knock her up” Why do you keep saying these words, In this example I didn’t knock up anyone. She got herself pregnant with another man. I didn’t do jack shit other than get cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:55 AM
0

Yea, “literally fucking insane” I agree with you, and yet it happens REGULARLY. When they do random testing of the population (not selecting for men that don’t trust their partners, which can triple the rate) they have found rates as high as 10% of women are psychopaths (by your definition). There was a town in Mexico where they tested the entire population for the entire year and found a rate of 10%. Some studies are flawed because they do things like blood testing and if paternity is “possible…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:09 AM
-18

Tell a man that you want to have multiple men cum inside you before you get pregnant, but only one of them will need to spend the next few months in a relationship with you, it’s literally that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:07 AM
-7

Woah, she altered the course of her life to manipulate a man into raising a child that isn’t his… are you suggesting she wouldn’t have manipulated a man if she didn’t think she could get away with it? That sounds positively sociopathic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 03:47 AM
-11

Correction: if she’s is a cheating whore, then it doesn’t involve the man at all, it’s not about his child at all. In fact, you could equally claim that she spent the last 9 months emotionally abusing a man to manipulating him into raising a child that shares none of his biology, that makes her the bad guy. Even if she doesn’t know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that it is or isn’t the baby, only an emotionally manipulative abuser would object to the idea of testing. Schroedingers whore, she is a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 03:42 AM
–

I think we're long past the point where feminism was about "equal rights" and has clearly moved into the realm of a female supremacy movement. For example, in the 1960s 40% of college students were female and 60% male. In 2026 that number is the exact opposite. If feminism were about equal rights, they'd be fighting to get women out of college.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 02:28 PM
1

lol, stalker much?
/r/ThankTRP05/06/26 01:47 AM
5

Close but not quite. We fantasize about being the man that she is willing to stay with regardless of the circumstances. Very few men are able to give the good d though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:09 AM
5

Are the redpill podcasters in the room with us now? Can you point to them? He made a great point, that any anti-redpill or feminist person SHOULD be able to agree with if they being intellectually honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:08 AM
14

When a woman stays with a man just because "he gives good D" He's an abuser... he's a cheater... he's a misogynist... And none of that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 03:35 PM
1

Found the not-cited study cited in the article. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jomf.12313 Flawed study. They didn't do any original research. They looked at two old datasets, drew a trendline and then said well obviously this must be true now if we extrapolate 20 years into the future. And then the feminist news organization prints it as gospel - and then you quote it as fact 10 years later. You don't hate the media enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 12:18 PM
0

Well I’m certainly not jumping to do your dishes
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 06:03 AM
1

So you think it should be the bare minimum amount of sex to keep him from leaving?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 02:12 AM
5

The other commenter answer already... but, the question is ... do you have more sex with your partner if he does the dishes. The answer is no.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 10:06 AM
2

All of the data is there, I'm not your personal AI assistant. It's all public and discussed ad-nauseum elsewhere. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/gender-inequity-in-selective-college-admissions/ TL;DR Some liberal arts colleges try to keep the gender at 50/50 so they give a small bonus to men. Other more stem focused colleges give huge 100% bonuses to women "because we need more women engineers" : overall it results in a 62/38 enrollment of women versus men in this country. ZERO colleges think…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 09:51 AM
2

Your anecdotes are a symptom of wages being heavily tied to degrees, and universities being explicitly anti-male for the last 4 decades. Women are currently trending towards obtaining twice as many degrees as men. The current split is 62/38 I'm genuinely curious how far the pendulum will swing before we stop the blatant institutional sexism. I wish I was making this up, but it's actually easier for a man to be accepted into college by changing his gender than it is by remaining a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:53 PM
12

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4273893/ Our main question of interest, however, is whether and how men’s participation in household labor is linked to sexual frequency. Our results suggest that sexual frequency is highest in households with traditionally gendered divisions of labor. As Table 3 shows, the coefficient for men’s share of core house-hold labor is negative: households in which men do more female-typed (core) tasks report lower sexual frequency. The coefficient for men’s sha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:41 PM
4

Ah yes, just do more chores, then she'll want to have more sex and be more aroused by her partner... Classic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:40 PM
-1

Just for curiosity, how many subscribers does a youtuber need before you'd call them anything other than "niche" for example, I know car youtubers with as many subscribers as the example that can comfortably live off that income as their full-time job, including hiring other people (employees) to take care of things like video editing or managing their sponsorships?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:21 PM
2

notallmen
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:46 AM
1

I would take that to mean that all dogs have 4 legs, although some weird, strange, and very rare exceptions might possibly apply, such as genetic abnormality or serious injury like a car crash affecting a very small percent of the population, perhaps less than 1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:39 AM
0

You don't have to assume, I was indeed attempting to use sarcasm in my edit, and I did actually intend for it apply to literally every woman born throughout human history. Notice how I used the exact same grammar as you used?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:36 AM
0

Women are liars. It comes so naturally and easy to them. I think it's probably genetic. Have you ever encountered a woman that didn't lie? I haven't, at least none that I can think of off the top of my head. edit: (obviously not ALL women, of course, I'm OBVIOUSLY not talking about ALL women, ESPECIALLY NOT YOU)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:17 AM
-1

Your very first post. You say "men" not "some men" but "men" Unless English is not your first language, you are implying ALL men. Don't try to play coy or ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:16 AM
1

We found that 26.5% of women, 6.6% of men, and 22.3% of transgender and gender non-binary participants reported having been choked during their most recent sexual event. Additionally, 5.7% of women, 24.8% of men, and 25.9% of transgender and non-binary participants reported that they choked their partner at their most recent event. Choking was more prevalent among sexual minority students. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34242530/ If I say whenever I look up at the sky, it’s blue If you say "whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:56 AM
1

I don't have any kinks that involve putting my partner into discomfort or pain. If that's all you are finding, the common denominator is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:44 AM
-2

You can protest as much as you want, I don't think you are going to be able to convince any man here, because we have actual lived-experience with women. Of course it's easy for you to live in hypotheticals, because you aren't actually dating anyone at all. That's like me suggesting that I only have sex with supermodels, of course; I'm not actually having sex with a supermodel now, but theoretically I would only have sex with a supermodel if I was dating a supermodel. When all of the men of this…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:40 AM
5

Look, just because I took me ex on cruises and we went to disneyworld and traveled around the world and went to dinner twice a week for 7 years straight, doesn't mean that I can do that anymore with you. I need to be serious about retirement now and I have to start saving up. You don't understand that my preferences have changed. I'm 35 years old now and if I don't start saving 30% of my income I won't be able to retire when I want. You know how comfortable I am at home, I OBVIOUSLY only did tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 05:54 PM
–

I honestly don't even remember, this was years ago at this point. Generically, I would give the advice that I typically just "assume the sale" - basically treat her like someone you're already comfortable with and someone who wants to hook up with me, and act accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 08:38 AM
–

I messaged her on an app, we talked for a few days, then met up, had sex, and then dated for 4 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 07:49 AM
6

There is very little overlap between the men that have access to dozens or even hundreds of different women for casual sex and the men who post on reddit. I don't want to sound rude, but I feel like that is a very basic concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 12:05 AM
2

I had a weird experience once, where a woman asked for extra for anal... and then later said that I could keep the extra money. I have never before or since had a woman turn down money. It does indeed happen, not often, but it does happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 12:03 AM
4

How many relationships have you been in where they weren't attracted to you? I'd have to assume more than I've been in. Every relationship I've had started with them being attracted to me. Including several that lasted multiple years.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:46 AM
4

it's completely ok for a woman to go through 0 dates if you aren't looking for them, because you know that at any time you want, you could get 50 dates by tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 09:50 PM
3

I’ve been in both the 80% and the 20% Now that I’m currently in the 80% I prefer being alone. Women don’t provide any value to my life, they only want to take value away. When I was in the 20% I preferred being in relationships, because I didn’t need to make that deal with the devil like OP suggested. I didn’t need to have an either:or situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 02:43 AM
0

If one partner wants to be generous, and the other partner wants someone who is generous, then there will be no problem in the relationship. Men value youth and beauty, while women tend to not be attracted to men younger than themselves at all which balances itself out. Women want a man who is funny, meanwhile there is no such thing as a woman who is funny, so again, it balances out. You don’t need to have a trait in order to want a trait in your partner. It’s not hypocritical at all. I used phy…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:36 AM
0

This sounds like generic incel black pill slop. I like women with a thin waist and big boobs, do I need to have a thin waist and big boobs myself? The entire argument that to want something, you must already be something or have that something is fallacious. In fact, it could be argued that the reverse is true. It is human nature to want what we don’t ourselves have. The rich doctor wants more free time, and the broke lazy stoner wants more money, but yet neither is willing to change their life …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:19 AM
–

Disagree, even scenario one is a bad situation. It means she didn’t like doing it, but was willing to do it for a guy that she liked more. For example: I don’t like to go to work. But if you pay me enough money, I will go to work. So the question becomes, why was she willing to do something she didn’t like for that other guy. What is he providing that the 2nd guy is not. This is a purely hypothetical argument for me; because I’ve literally never encountered this in my own life, I am “that guy” I…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 05:57 AM
1

Wrong, it's not self-inflicted. It's inflicted upon men by women. The top post in ./r/ doordash right now is a dasher telling a woman "sorry but you look amazing". in a TEXT MESSAGE via the app - so he doesn't even know her actual real number. Of course hundreds of comments telling her to report him so that he loses his job, which she says she did. Lonely male: compliments woman: loses his job: USA 2026
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 06:34 PM
–

yea, you can look up survey studies that consistently prove that women lie about the number of sex partners... because the math doesn't math. https://news.osu.edu/men-women-lie-about-sex-to-match-gender-expectations/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8982912/ etc etc, I mean you could literally just google "women lie study"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:13 AM
–

Umm, nope, flatly disagree with your entire premise. I'm always shocked when women DO select for me. Red pill knowledge works, but it's always shocking every single time. It didn't come naturally to me, and still doesn't 15 years later.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 12:08 PM
2

No, pick me is an insult women use against other women they feel jealous over.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 02:02 AM
2

So your belief of what is the worst emotion is "fact" and mine is 'opinion" I'll finish your sentence for you, it's because I'm a man and women are just smarter about emotions right? Your blatant sexism is gross
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 06:51 AM
1

very "convenient" that the largest difference between men or women just "coincidentally" happens to be what is "obviously unhealthy" Personally, I think the emotion of jealousy is the worst and most unhealthy emotion, it's unfortunate that women are constantly encouraged to engage in it and there are billions of dollars and vast corporations engaged in encouraging that super duper unhealthy feeling. One might even say, I'm angry about it. But only in a healthy way, not in a feminine-disapproved …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 03:06 AM
14

I grew up in the tits or gtfo era. the reasoning behind tits or gtfo is as relevant in 1996 as it is in 2026
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 04:55 PM
0

I wasn't going to followup, but you downvoted me, so you deserve another response: ALSO your language itself is extremely problematic, Men are only allowed to express their emotions if they are feminine-approved emotions. If you're sad or anxious or scared, that's "allowed" but anger is not a "healthy emotion" male emotions are inherently viewed as "unhealthy" and emotions that women feel more often are "healthy" emotions. So your entire language and mindset is trying to turn men into women, or …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 10:21 PM
1

Yea, that’s my exact position. Being a man is seen as being a problem. It’s messed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 10:00 AM
0

It’s because she thinks men need to become more like women and be proud and supported for being more feminine. It’s viewing men through the lens that men are the same as women, but worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 08:38 AM
3

considering something like 33% of women 18-24 are willing to publicly state that they "hate men" ... they might know and simply not even care.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 07:03 PM
13

As someone who didn't kiss a girl until 25, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 07:02 PM
6

when women are attracted to you, they make it easy, you didn't even have to ask her out. That's what ugly men don't and won't ever understand. (unless they are black-pilled). If you can make yourself attractive, do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 04:33 PM
–

I'll just post the top comment from that thread. Dude, this is weird. Stop asking your coworkers out. It creates a reputation. Hello, Human Resources? meme.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 04:32 PM
1

You don’t care about a woman’s social skills, hobbies, life experience and maturity? Nope, I'll reiterate for you. Your hobbies are not attractive. No woman's hobbies are attractive. No one is aroused by your hobbies, nor do they want to marry you because of your hobbies. You were the person arguing that your hobbies were attractive to men. So we've established that your makeup collection doesn't attract men. Your mold-o-rama wax figures don't attract men. What hobby do you have that has gotten …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:44 PM
–

"I'm just an average guy, you know, 6'3" and on a athletic scholarship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:41 PM
1

My point is - what many women think is interesting, is not to a man. What many women think is attractive, is not attractive to a man. What many women think of as an advantage in dating (this one is targeting towards you specifically), is actually a disadvantage. As you say, you don't like a man more because he enjoys video games, similarly, men don't care at all about your makeup collection. The man's hobbies don't make him more attractive to you, and your hobbies don't make you more attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:42 AM
1

All those things you listed are interesting cool things. And zero of them make me want to date you more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 07:12 PM
1

Your "afterthought" is the only thing that matters to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 07:10 PM
-1

No... you don't understand. The bartender/nurse "career woman" with "maturity" and "hobbies" is the person I'm making fun of and not interested in. The "modern woman" which is probably 80% of millennials. You are the type of woman that I'm not interested in. I was making a series of broad generalizations about the type of woman that you said was "aspirational" and I broke down why each of those things that you say that are important, are not important. The "woman with herpes, no social life, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:43 AM
0

You have it totally backwards. Those are the women that "I" am attracted to. Newsflash for you, but men and women are not the same. You wanted to date a Lawyer and a Doctor. I don't, and neither do most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:22 AM
-1

Her hobbies: buying purses and caking on makeup. Her social skills: scrolling tiktok 4 hours a night Her life experience: herpes outbreaks from too many Chads Her maturity: a soul-sucking 9-5 that makes her miserable to deal with. I made 240k last year, why the fuck would I want to date a nurse OR bartender... I wouldn't... I'd honestly rather date an unemployed woman that lived with her parents. Honestly. Nurse and bartender are literally 2 of the worst possible careers that a woman can have. L…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:46 AM
1

Just for curiosity, where are you from where the situation is so different?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:04 PM
0

Are you suggesting that the statistics are wrong and young people are having children? There have already been multiple cities abandoned in Japan. The only reason the u.s. isn't in the same boat is because we imported 50 million immigrants in the past 50 years. Do you know young people having kids? I know a few, but it's certainly not the majority, and everyone I do know that is having kids is having 1 or 2 at most, and that's in my relatively high-paid profession, they simply can't afford more …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:17 AM
0

Something something islam ... something something women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:29 PM
–

well let's make sure we define what feminism is... because "they" have 2 very different definitions between what feminism for you and feminism for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:29 PM
–

I have a counter-proposal for you: We just make it so that it's hard or almost impossible for you to work at all. So you must live off a man's income to survive. Funny how you can "demand" anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:26 PM
–

This society gave birth to you, and because you are the only one capable of it, unfortunately for you, it MUST become your duty to do it. Unfortunately for society, trying to shame women who have no shame, and trying to force a duty on a woman who has never had responsibility in her entire life, does not work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:25 PM
5

Well, the marriage thing is just pure statistical data. 50% of first marriages in the u.s. end in divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:32 AM
1

Don’t worry, they interact with a lot of minorities on their Netflix television shoes which they stream into their gated communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:26 AM
–

Are you joking? Girls are AWFUL to boys (and each other) in middle school.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:23 AM
–

I fully acknowledge the hypothetical possibility of your thought experiment. That said, what is the advantage of believing in the existence of a good woman? How does that benefit my life. It doesn’t. It’s like believing in god or any other higher power. Just because Jesus theoretically might save my soul, doesn’t mean I should donate 50% of my income to church on the off-chance. Actually I like that analogy, churches only demand 10% of your income, a divorce will claim 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:22 AM
-1

absolutely, any man that is dumb enough to believe: for better for worse, for richer for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love, cherish, and to obey, till death us do part is a fool that deserves to be ripped apart by the court system because of how stupid he is. Also, any man that would not get a paternity test deserves to be called a cuck while he raises another man's child. Also any man that believes bullshit like: he's just a friend or nothing happened absolutely deserves to be cheated …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 09:37 PM
3

if a man is able to say a lie and that causes you to sleep with him, that's called being gullible. Hey, I'll give you a million dollars, all you have to do is give me a blowjob... "ok"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:56 PM
2

Nah, it's that the men you are attracted to and interested in casual sex with never respected you in the first place. But you were too blind/horny/dumb/naive to recognize that. You weren't "tricked" into doing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:59 PM
1

Sorry, the guy said debunked, and literally that’s all you need to do to prove an arguement in 2026. You can’t argue with his flawless logic of “debunked” like how the 6 foot rule was “debunked” that “safe and effective” was debunked and that “virus can’t pass through a cloth mask” was debunked. And “trust the science” was debunked. But only if the science is given to me by experts who already agree with my political system. Surely their gender studies professor is the expert and knows more abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 02:42 AM
0

biology changes slower than culture. 20,000 years ago we didn't have studio apartments that needed laundry done. Or sheets of paper to "split the chores equitably" Or... money. This entire posts reeks of of oddly-specific personal problems being characterized as general complaints about male-female relationship dynamics. Why can't women confront their partner directly when they are upset, and instead try to gather social support via reddit to complain about what is upsetting them. They should "j…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:11 PM
1

ok, so you're saying that I'm right, he doesn't have a girlfriend any longer, and that it was a short-lived aberration from normality? Needless to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:19 AM
5

they just do it naturally, it's biologically ingrained into our genetics, that's why humans have hidden ovulation
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:16 AM
3

"make friends first" means that the betas stay sexless losers who nevertheless provide resources to women. It's literally just asking men to friendzone themselves first. Self-selecting themselves to be betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:15 AM
1

I'd argue that this Hollywood romanticized version of courtship never actually existed at all. I've been in several long relationships, and many short-term hookups, and they all started off romantic - never once has a platonic relationship ever become romantic later.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:12 AM
2

was your mother like this? You ARE being snarky and attempting to social shame me... but that's ok, I understand why you do that - it's because you're a woman - and that's what women do when they attack people. just cuz this always yields fun answers in this sub: where do lesbians fit into that equation? i’ll skip your mother on this one lol what percent of the 4 billion women on the planet would you say are like this? what is your strongest source for both claims? I would say roughly 90% of wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:40 PM
2

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:33 PM
1

Im a little tired, so it might have been a bit rambly, TL;DR: yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:13 AM
0

I think I understand women’s perspective better than most men. When I say things like “women lie on surveys”, women deceive men constantly, or women mold themselves to fit the expectations on them effortlessly, I want you to understand that these are not value judgements, but just objective observations. Women judge men because they need to know how to manipulate that man. Women need to lie to men just to survive, and I don’t think most men understand that. I don’t think most men understand what…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:41 AM
1

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 12:58 AM
11

You and a lot of other people who hate humanity, a lot of people have been brainwashed since they were toddlers to think that, it’s really hard to overcome the biological urges, that’s why the brainwashing is so thorough and so pervasive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:06 AM
0

All of it. Mostly women in the workplace. They didn’t get rid of sexism, they just changed who was in charge of the sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 01:42 AM
7

Coherence was never a part of their plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 02:29 PM
-1

I mean, I do see a different way forward, but it means abandoning the feminism experiment. Surely you must concede that it's a possibility that is a possibility for the future. I think what you "mean" to say is that "I don't see a way forward that also promotes my agenda" Because CLEARLY there are alternatives to "more feminism"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 02:27 PM
0

Wife must always obey husband 13% -> 33% let's see it get to about 99% then maybe I'll admit the pendulum has swung too far towards conservativism
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 02:23 PM
3

I guess you’ll have to explain, because the way I understand Madonna/whore it to mean, is they act like whores for some men (random nudes, salacious texts, Don/sub roles), and then act like they are weak innocent virgins in need of protection around other men. Which … yea… is basically just AF/BB with more steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:53 AM
1

25, 25%, 50% imo. The amount of women that are whores in their 20s and then want to settle down is by far the biggest percent of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:23 AM
2

Of course soft sweet gentle “good girls” are great, and I’ve even had a relationship with a few over the decades. The problem is, most of them don’t want a relationship with me, or sometimes they just don’t want a relationship in general. Promiscuous women at least want me for sex. “Good girls” don’t want me for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:21 AM
5

I haven’t even asked a single woman in the past 15 years, because my own number is triple digits, and if I can have that much sex as an “average man” (average as how women would define it) and I absolutely know how they treat attractive men. Because I’ve been one of those too when I was lifting regularly and taking prohormones before they were banned. As long as she is treating me like she does “chad” then it doesn’t matter anyway; because women only love temporarily and if it’s beneficial to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:22 PM
2

Yea, I'm good. Why are you trying to weaponize mental health against me in such backhanded way? Is it not socially acceptable to call someone fucking crazy in 2026? Your false concern-trolling is proof of how morally bankrupt you are. You insult through a thin veneer of moral righteousness and it's disgusting. You troll by saying "not everyone is american" but you yourself talk about politics in the United States. Would you feel better if I throw up a picture of Poilievre for you to spit your an…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 08:05 AM
4

We are truly living in 1984. It wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual. Of course, redpill is just one of the thoughtcrimes. If you start to have one thoughtcrime, soon enough you'll start having other thought crimes. Soon enough you might be using parenthesis in your comments. Or talking about FBI crime statistics, we wouldn't want that now. Go back to watching the superbowl and consume product. Hey did you see what happened at the olympics, brought to you by Lilly (they care about your he…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 04:51 AM
0

https://www.hims.com/blog/how-many-dates-before-sex 35% of people CURRENTLY IN RELATIONSHIPS had sex before a first date or after just 1 date.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:10 AM
3

Yep, it’s absolutely easy to wait with one woman, if you’re dating/fucking 4 others at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:06 AM
1

And if you applied that same standard to all men, then us men would have no problem with it. The problem is that no woman makes all men wait. When your body count is 20+ and you’ve had a few one night stands, it sucks to feel like a second class citizen. The best analogy I’ve heard “how would you feel if your boyfriend/future husband you didn’t believe in an engagement ring, because the last time he bought a girl an engagement ring for his ex she left him and just kept it and he feels like he do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:03 AM
–

How many videos would you like? There are literally dozens of them: here is literally 5 seconds of looking; the first link when I looked for “ice protestors demand ID” https://youtube.com/shorts/IwY2Htej6gM?si=YHFqCYXv53FRFMww
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:54 AM
–

Meet the new aristocrats, same as the old aristocrats, except this time they are called Joseph and Vlad instead of Peter and Catherine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:35 AM
–

The irony of the Minnesota ice protestors stopping people driving, forcing them to prove their identity, and only allowing certain people into their neighborhoods and harassing those they didn’t want, was not lost on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:29 AM
2

Except that at least for a small percentage of men, and I'll include myself in this. Were actually able to improve their life. I had never kissed a girl, let alone had sex until I was 25. Maybe you think that puts me into the AFC category, because I was able to improve beyond that, but believe me, I "felt" like an incel when you have never even held hands with a girl or anything, it's soul-crushingly lonely. Back then, they called it "seduction" or "game" or whatever, but all of that got incorpo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:13 PM
1

Older women have a lot of baggage and trauma and aren't worth wasting your time with. Let's just be honest at least. No woman makes it to 36 in a dateable condition. They are used-up and discarded by players for the previous 20 years and they are offering the men that are still interested the leftovers. Straight from the mouth of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:09 PM
8

noticing? straight to jail. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:06 AM
–

The variability that men experience in a lifetime, is the same variability that women experience literally every single month. So OP, tell us, how does it feel to have hormones that are incompatible with family life or long-term monogamy. How does it feel to have evolution push you towards short term hookups when you’re ovulating and then wanting a stable man with a good career 26 days of the month.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 12:42 PM
25

What’s absolutely crazy to me is that you found a video of a 19 year old man saying he didn’t find women older than 22 attractive as your “proof”. But yet you would likely say “duh of course old men are creepy and of course her pre frontal cortex isn’t even formed yet” if you saw a 19 year old girl saying she doesn’t want to date a man older than 22. That’s literally just sexism. You are a misandrist / hypocrite. It’s perfectly valid for a 19 year old man to say he doesn’t want to date older tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:35 PM
3

They basically still had to get permission from the president before they were allowed to, he could have easily crushed them the same way he crushed the train strike and Reagan crushed the air traffic controller union (permanently) And yes, they got a 62% pay raise over 6 years. If air traffic controllers were GIVEN PERMISSION to strike we’d also get something like a 60% pay raise over the next 6 years, because the economic impact would be just as great if not greater than the ports shutting dow…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:07 PM
2

That’s actually how it is here too, in the states, except in addition, our labor unions ALSO have little to no power to make changes for the better. It’s just a social club that you have to pay to get into basically. Like any other country club / private golf course membership / private shooting range etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 03:58 PM
-6

We can't vote for a million trumps? That's where you're wrong kiddo.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 06:00 AM
8

I think simps have emboldened women just as much, if not more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:58 AM
36

The ironic part is they KNOW that the men they are attracted to don't give a shit about feminism, or therapy, or misogyny, and yet they keep offering that same advice. Just the act of asking for advice is like kryptonite for attraction from a woman, it instantly puts you into "child" category in their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:58 AM
–

I do. edit: to clarify, I honestly think women have already wizened up to the fact that liberal women are being discriminated against on places like Tinder and now they aren't as open about talking about politics or even filling in those boxes on their profile. Typically if they don't answer, that means they are liberal, and I need to suss out the information. 5 years ago it was common for women not to talk about being single mothers, now they also hide their political affiliations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:36 PM
–

I like, no... I LOVE women. But I absolutely hate the politics of the majority of women. A liberal woman to me is like a short man is to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:31 PM
2

It's about pathologizing normal human sexuality. If they can convince you that you have a disease, then they are able to sell you on the cure, be it steroidal creams, or hormonal injections (viagra for women) etc... Women in particular are susceptible to marketing and emotional manipulation. They are doing it to make a profit off you. It has nothing to do with "patriarchy" and everything to do with feminist controlled corporations.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 07:26 PM
0

Oh, they simp over a tall dark attractive millionaire, so much so they will ignore red flags like animal abuse? Yea... shocking (not as shocked as his dog). It has nothing to do with "late stage capitalism" women have been doing this (with evidence) for at least the past 500 years, and because biology doesn't change, likely the last 50,000 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 04:39 PM
–

Typically that means that their hormones shifted. It wasn’t anything you did. If you were too nice to her and she just wanted to be fucked, because she was ovulating, you failed. If you push too fast and she actually wanted to take things slow because she was on her period, you also failed. You’ll unfortunately never get another chance with that fickle woman but luckily there are 4 billion other women to find. The really crazy thing is with enough experience you can identify when women are DTF b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 09:48 AM
1

No, what I mean to say, by way of my terrible analogy, is that OP shouldn't be meddling in the affairs of this hypothetic (or real) woman who has this issue. She's the one that is messed up in the head, and he should be spending his time worried about 100 other things that are far more important than a toddler that won't eat healthy foods, because the toddler will eventually eat when they are hungry and no amount of social shaming will make them think that a piece of broccoli is a chicken nugget…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 01:19 AM
0

It's kind of like teaching a toddler not to be a picky eater. As soon as they get hungry enough they will eat. Chicken Nuggets will always be preferred over brussel sprouts, but we need both to survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 07:27 PM
1

I agree with you OP. Most women need 4-10 hour of interaction with to feel your "vibes" before they will sleep with you. I don't think that is enough time to get to know anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 08:38 AM
1

Excellent analysis into the mind of a woman (introspection). You put a lot of effort into this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:33 AM
1

They just want a "natural" killer who is that way because of high levels of testosterone. They don't want someone who uses their intellect to "rationalize" their way into their pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:32 AM
5

You got divorced because you chose to play video games/smoke weed/join a red pill forums instead of taking care of your toddler you weirdo. Ummm, it sounds like you have some personal issues. This is not common and sounds extremely specific just to your particular situation. Women divorce men because they can. They are lied to and told that their lives will be better afterward. They only view men as resources to be extracted, not as people, so the best way to extract the most resources is to div…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 09:45 AM
-1

No Yes No A woman being submissive is not a negative thing. It's a good thing. Men want a submissive woman. The negative thing with modern society is that women are being taught that being submissive is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:44 PM
7

yea, women continue to like men who don't "do the bare minimum" so if it works, why do more, it doesn't change the outcome of whether a woman likes you or not. There is only downside, in that you might accidentally waste your resources on a woman that doesn't like you. Because the woman that does like you, will like you even without doing those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:40 PM
3

This is the key. The amount of effort I put into a relationship has everything to do with how much I like her, not how much she likes me. I've had a few women that have liked me and given me things even though I had zero interest/attraction at all with them. I will not reciprocate being nice to her just because she gives me stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:35 PM
-1

Gotta defend the sisterhood
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 12:48 PM
1

think a lot of confusion in dating comes from people thinking what they want is what the opposite sex wants. What are some examples of this that you can think of? Your question literally asks the exact opposite of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 09:38 AM
1

No no; you don’t understand; when men are animals, it’s empowering and helpful metaphor; when women are animals it’s harmful misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 07:10 AM
-1

Part of that is the reason that American men tend to talk about American women as if they aren’t willing to accept any kind of restrictions on their behaviors at all, zero accountability and maximum personal freedom. It’s a holistic problem. For many of us, we encounter women on the regular who refuse to accept anything other than zero responsibility for their behaviors, even if it begins to negatively affect other people around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 03:07 AM
3

It's insane to me that women will fight tooth and nail against 20 week bans here in the states when if they went to a "progressive" country like germany (or I guess australia too) they'd be limited to just 12 weeks. https://www.thelantern.com/2022/06/student-groups-react-to-roe-v-wade-being-overturned/ (roe versus wade being overturned finally allowed for a 20 week ban in Ohio ending 3rd trimester abortions) and some people were PISSED locally https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98W5HbSi7Xg
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 01:00 AM
7

I'd go one step further and say that we have, as a society, (most laws in most countries) determined that the rights of the child supersede those of the parent once the baby is viable to live outside of the mother's womb, which is why MOST countries outside of the barbaric united states ban abortions after 20 weeks or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 11:04 PM
19

Eventually you will get beaten up, raped, and robbed. Not necessarily in that order. The more you do it, the higher the odds become until eventually n = 1
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 05:41 AM
18

Exactly... Women already do chase men. They aren't chasing "you" but they do chase other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:03 PM
–

Oh Jesus, way to prove his point. he said “consistently” which you interpreted to every woman ever. You either are pretending to not know the meaning of the word consistent or you’re just trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 08:04 AM
1

wow I must have really pissed of their online marketing team.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 10:32 PM
1

I reject your argument. If anything I'd argue that someone looking for resources is more likely to want those resources for years to leech off the other party. A short term relationship gets them very little resources. The longer the relationship goes, the more likely they are to walk away with cash and prizes. Who said anything about "committed" they aren't "committed" to the relationship at all, they are committed to getting the most out of you as possible, which they view as a sacrifice they …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 10:19 AM
42

It's not women. It's literally just one singular monopolistic company that claims to be a dating company, but has financial incentive to keep people single. Online dating / dating apps were better 10 years ago. And women (biologically) haven't changed in 10 years. When OKcupid and PoF and Tinder, and Meetme and even later when Hinge first came out, they were actually competing for users and trying to do their best to be successful. One company has owned ALL of those websites since 2020. That is …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 07:11 AM
1

I got a message on Tinder about a month ago... her first message was "dtf" we had a good time. I just wish there was more than just a one-time thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:19 PM
1

I am in the same boat. It is unusual.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:18 PM
4

Especially the goes out of her way to spend time with you in private... Like, I don't think any man, red, blue, or black pill would kick a woman out of his house/apartment if she came over to cuddle and she was actually doing that, even if she was verbally strong about not wanting the cuddle to turn into sex (hint: it always does), actions speak louder than words. Of course, context matters, if you've been non-stop talking for like 10+ hours, and you come over to "cuddle" and it's like your 4th …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 11:30 PM
1

I would use the term “aroused” because attraction and arousal are two different things. I personally am pretty good at getting one night stands and/or arousing women, much more so than I am able to get them into a relationship. I just tend to have a lot of situationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:53 PM
6

Yea, the same thing that women did when they were younger and not sexual, pay you a lot of attention, make you gifts, talk to you constantly. Try and do favors for you, make your life easier, it’s really simple, a woman can ask me for a favor if she is fucking me. If she isn’t, then I’m not her boyfriend and she needs to get one if she wants boyfriend treatment. But I’m 43, if I meet a woman that doesn’t want to have sex, maybe if she told me she was like 26 and a virgin, but she wouldn’t be att…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:50 PM
50

It's not that we don't acknowledge that the difference exists. The problem is that, if she doesn't have a strong desire for you, then she won't desire you even moreso a few years down the road when attraction starts to wane in every relationship. Don't waste your resources on a woman that doesn't desire you. That's why men give advice the way we do. Because (again, a difference in the genders) a woman will absolutely use you for your resources even if she has no desire for you romantically. But …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 06:39 PM
8

You're just wrong about history. Boomer women weren't any better than modern women. The divorce rate amongst boomer couples was something like 60%
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:23 PM
17

lol, there is no such thing as a loving woman that isn't jaded. Women have always been jaded. Women have always been the realistic sex, men have always been the idealistic dreamers and romantics - despite decades of propaganda to the reverse. Go read a novel like Pride and Prejudice. You think they talk about love and hope and dreams with each other? Nope, they swoon over the man with the biggest salary. They fall in love with narcissistic liars that easily "manipulate them" because of good look…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:44 PM
-1

Human biology hasn't changed very much in 500,000 years. What worked 30 years ago works today. The real problem you are noticing is you're trying to get advice from people who weren't very successful at dating. For example, maybe they married their highschool boyfriend, so they only ever dated one person. If you're trying to get a bunch of casual hook-ups online, you need to find someone that was using craigslist 30 years ago (like myself) rather than someone that wasn't dating at all 30 years a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:38 PM
1

I think you’ll appreciate the analogy… maybe. They call a guy who likes women but can’t get laid, someone who doesn’t like to wrestle with pigs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 05:14 PM
0

Ok Karen
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 05:06 PM
0

Unhappy? Where do you get unhappy from. That is not what involuntary means.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 05:05 PM
–

Yes, celibate means you abstain from sex. Voluntarily. Incel means you abstain from sex. Involuntarily. Trying to redefine words arbitrarily is dumb. Incel is not the same thing as misogyny. It’s basic, elementary school logic. Some incels might be misogynistic. But not all misogynists are incels and not all incels are misogynists. You can’t just make up definitions, words have meanings.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 06:02 AM
–

The mental gymnastics are exhausting to deal with, that’s true. I’m one of those old geezers that believe that words have meanings and I can’t just say “blue means red la la la”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 05:57 AM
–

Do you understand what “celibate” means? Or are you intentionally being obtuse?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:28 AM
3

They think they are Shakespeare. Instead they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the rose analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:27 AM
0

Once a month is perfectly accurate description of when a woman’s ovulation hormones tells her to breed with alpha men. 27 days out of the month she wants a beta simp friendzoned man around her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:23 AM
1

Yes, it also works for long-term relationships as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 07:28 PM
2

What happened is that the reddit admins quarantined the subreddit and the original founders/moderators of the red pill took their game and left because they wanted to make money off their work. TRP was a carefully curated community that took a lot of effort to keep out the incels and the blue pills from distracting with bad advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 12:10 AM
5

I was being generous. I think it's fair to say "about half" would be a fair enough compromise. edit: and also I think BMI is a terrible metric to measure attractiveness. But 40% bodyfat is roughly where most women would be considered obese. (above 30bmi for a woman is roughly above 35% bodyfat) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K9QhkPww44
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 08:36 AM
1

40% https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 08:22 AM
1

I guess that means if you want to meet women interested in dominating you, you need to loudly and obviously and publicly state your preferences for being dominated to every woman you encounter. Well or you can take on the persona of a Reddit moderator perhaps, but I prefer the more comedic aspect of being more subtle about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 10:39 AM
3

Women are like water, they flow into whatever container they are presented. They are generally very good at presenting themselves exactly as what the men would want them to be. The women in an Islamic world happily enforce the rules of their religion on those around them. The women in the west do likewise.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 07:17 AM
1

I thought it was clear that my comment was sarcasm and intended humorously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:04 AM
1

If it’s an actor and his life revolves around interviews, and red carpets, and LA Parties… and oh yea. Actually working on films, yes, it does take steroids to achieve that look because they don’t have 40 hours a week to dedicate to fitness
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:48 AM
1

Of course the first 2 are, especially the second guy, you don’t just hit 40 years old and suddenly develop muscles like that after a lifetime without, it’s not magic, it’s science.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:41 AM
2

They aren’t lying. 25 days out of the month that isn’t what they like. 3 days out of the month that is what they like. 90% of the time they don’t want a man who is too muscular. Only when they want to have sex, do they want a muscular man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:39 AM
3

I don't know, arguing that the government is actively working against the people to the benefit of the elite seems like a rather "progressive" thought to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:04 AM
4

Well, I wouldn't say it's benefitted capitalism. Capitalism just "is" it's neither good nor bad, it's simply a system. In a truly capitalist free market society you'd see market forces push back eventually. Instead the government manipulation of the market has only helped enrich businesses and the elite at the detriment of the majority. It's benefitted giant corporations and a few wealthy elites who live off the work of the lower class. Our government (at the behest of the elites who want lower …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 06:58 PM
9

I'll rephrase. Women are better at collecting welfare, men are better at earning money at a job. Better?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 06:52 PM
10

Ok, again, not sure what point that you're trying to make. According to google 35% of single mothers live with an unmarried partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 04:06 PM
18

Ok, so 40% of single fathers have a girlfriend in the house? What "evil narrative" of redpill does that dispell? That women are attracted to men that are pre-selected by other women? Oh wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:37 PM
21

You really want to go down that argument though? So not only are single mothers a burden on society because they are twice as likely as men and 4 times as likely as couples to raise criminals. But Single mothers are also more likely to require taxpayer funded assistance to live because they suck at surviving, so they are a drain on our nation and our tax funds. That's not the "win" you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:01 PM
3

I prefer the 3rd option: we continue down the road of sub-replacement procreation and belief that children are evil and only evil people procreate, so that eventually civilization dies and we go through another dark ages, and hopefully the next civilization that arises won't be so fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 02:55 PM
40

Here's the problem, your math is bad. Have you ever heard of "per capita" 41% of of inmates in the prison are from single mother households. But only 21% of children live in single mother households. 35% of inmates come from two parents households. But 71% of children live in 2 parent households. 5% of inmates grew up with only a father. 5% of children in the united states live with their father. So the moral of the story is: 2 parents good. 1 parent bad Single father is 200% worse than 2 parent…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 02:47 PM
-1

That's why I'm a firm believer in "your body, my choice" let's bring back ownership of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 02:42 PM
1

Because if you are willing to spend time with me, you might be interested in having a relationship with me, instead of making everything transactional, like a prostitute. If I wanted to pay for a woman, I would just skip the game and just pay for one. Edit: but to answer the second part of the question, I would want to go on a date with you if I want to spend more time with you, I’m willing to do things that you enjoy, even if I don’t enjoy them much, just to spend more time with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 11:03 AM
1

I don’t really care if she was a slut in the past so long as she is a slut for me currently and ONLY a slut for me currently. Now, that doesn’t mean that I would marry a woman with a history, but that’s the absolute minimum for a relationship. I honestly don’t even understand man that accept less than that. (Dead bedroom and not married, or a woman that is sleeping with other guys)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:16 AM
3

To steal an 11 year old reddit comment The brain is in a constant state of change from the time it first starts developing until the time you die. Brain size does not change much in the 20's unless there is some sort of traumatic injury, or surgery, so there's no empirical, non-subjective way that you can say that a female's brain is "fully developed" any more than you can say that a male's brain is. The frontal lobe is not the only portion of the brain associated with planning, reward, motivati…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:43 PM
1

To steal an 11 year old reddit comment The brain is in a constant state of change from the time it first starts developing until the time you die. Brain size does not change much in the 20's unless there is some sort of traumatic injury, or surgery, so there's no empirical, non-subjective way that you can say that a female's brain is "fully developed" any more than you can say that a male's brain is. The frontal lobe is not the only portion of the brain associated with planning, reward, motivati…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:35 PM
-6

Without going too deep into it, there is a segment of the population that would like to see roughly 80% of the humans on the planet eliminated, mostly because they’ve been brainwashed since childhood that we have overpopulated the planet. The more extremist sects believe humans should be eliminated as fast as possible, the more moderate sects of this anti-human religion believe that humans should slowly be eradicated, but they all fundamentally believe that there are too many humans and that les…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 07:44 AM
12

I’m absolutely fatigued with the narrative that anyone under the age of 25 is just a poor naive child that needs to be protected from themselves. It’s literally just anti-human propaganda designed to get our species to go extinct that much faster.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 07:16 AM
-4

No no “everyone else is fake but I’m a real girl” tee hee
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 07:12 AM
1

We are already past that point now, and it isn’t causing a revolution. Your argument is flawed because it assumes things can’t get worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 05:20 AM
1

Yes, women lie to men because they are afraid of being killed if they would find out the truth. And they aren’t even necessarily wrong, which is why I think it’s ingrained biologically.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 05:03 PM
1

Innocent until proven guilty. Would have been nice if she believed in the same concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:58 AM
3

What do you think “Indepedant video reltated to the incident” means? Independent meaning they didn’t need to get a warrant for her phone or anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:33 AM
2

The official police statement does say they have a source of independent video, it’s easy enough to assume that would mean a ring camera. And not something like a street cam or intersection camera. And video from her wouldn’t be called “independent video” either
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:32 AM
5

Independent video related to the incident has been collected and reviewed by the police department That's the direct quote.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:30 PM
7

https://www.facebook.com/OswegoPD/photos/on-10132025-an-incident-was-reported-to-the-oswego-police-department-regarding-a/1272795918219652/ Independent video related to the incident has been collected and reviewed by the police department oops, didn't realize I was replying to you a second time. See my other comment for a more thorough review of where the information that it was ring probably came from.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:29 PM
13

https://nypost.com/2025/11/17/us-news/doordash-driver-arrested-over-sharing-naked-vid-of-customer/ Here is a news article discussing a police statement. I don't have facebook, but here is a tiktok showing an image of a facebook post and an official statement from the police department saying they "have collected and reviewed independant video" https://www.tiktok.com/@giancrstesq/video/7573823983854849311 Here is TMZ reporting that "police say" ring footage shows: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/x…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:14 PM
15

the charging documents on the case that I saw showed the statement that ring footage showed her opening the door. I'll try to find it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 04:56 PM
3

Because you said I watched too much Maury. You're insinuating that I'm crazy for thinking that men care about paternity. edit: I'm not SAYING you want to raise another man's child, I don't have to say it, you know... because of the implication. The children of paternity fraud and the women that do it are perfectly safe! But the IMPLICATION is why women have to lie about it or make laws such as the one in france that make it illegal to do paternity fraud... you know, because of the implication. h…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 04:44 PM
4

Are you saying that men (in significant numbers) WANT to raise another man’s child believing it was his? That’s a very crazy assertion coming from a man regardless of blue or red pill beliefs. I actually knew a man who killed himself after his wife left him AND he found out his kid wasn’t actually his kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 03:42 PM
1

Yea and humans have existed for a million years, and 1,000,000 > 2,000. Women are shamed for their sexuality because men want to raise their own children while women don’t want men to know who k the father of the babies are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 02:45 PM
3

Oh Jesus, you’re being serious. Lol, I thought you were making a joke. I didn’t realize that you were being one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 02:43 PM
2

lol, did you actually expect something different, all the women in my life take hundreds of selfies a month and they are all similar; attention is like crack to women. I was being honest when I said the surprise to me is that SOME of the photos are pointed at their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 02:42 PM
1

I don’t think it’s cultural at all. The fact that it is universal to all cultures and goes back for thousands of years of recorded human history; definitely points to it being biological in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 02:23 PM
2

Truth is stranger than fiction I guess? Not sure what you don’t find believable but I’ll answer any question you have that makes you doubt what I say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 02:19 PM
2

I thought I would want a wild woman that would provide excitement to my boring life. Found out quickly that alcoholism and violent mood swings weren’t so much fun. I actively seek out “boring” women for relationships now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 02:13 PM
2

Just for curiosity, I just went to /selfie on reddit just now (a subreddit I have never once before visited) and was shocked to discover that only 2/3rds of the photos on the front page had the camera pointed at the collarbone or lower. I honestly thought the percentage would have actually been higher. Truly women have the moral high ground on this issue. /s At least a few woman were shameless and the center of the image was literally pointed directly at her boobs. The majority point the camera …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:44 PM
4

I’ll stop looking at boobs when you stop pointing your camera DIRECTLY at them when you take a selfie.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:37 PM
2

Ah yes. So when the first message that a woman sends me on tinder is “dtf?” (True story from a month ago) she was actually “testing me” to see if I’m going to call her a slut because of it. Honestly?! I do think a lot of men would fumble that bag. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:34 PM
2

A tall man sleeps with a bunch of women: “women like tall, good looking men. A confident man sleeps with a bunch of women: “women like confident men, acquire as much power as possible” A charismatic man sleeps with a bunch of women: “women like a man with a sense of humor” An assertive man sleeps with a bunch of women: “women need a man with confidence”. A competent man sleeps with a bunch of women: “women value resources, acquire as many as possible” A wise man sleeps with a bunch of women: “wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:03 PM
3

Look, a good way to improve the conversation would be to acknowledge that you have slept with men that you don’t even know if they were misogynistic or not, because it literally never even occurred to you to ask. It’s the opposite side to the same coin as men who say “women won’t sleep with me because I only have a 4 inch penis” When in reality, no woman (out of hundreds) has ever known my penis size BEFORE agreeing to have sex with me. It literally doesn’t matter at all. Same as my views about …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:59 PM
3

Well if we acknowledged that women lie regularly and often, we would have to acknowledge things like a woman’s word is not worth as much as a man’s. Aka Islam is right about women, and that tends to make a lot of women uncomfortable because women want to have the maximum amount of power with the last amount of accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:54 PM
2

They can’t do it. They are biologically programmed in their dna to lie about it. It’s like trying to get you to breathe oxygen from your gills… oh, you lack the capability of breath underwater? “Stop denying that you have that capability!” Lying to men about sec is as biologically ingrained as it is for men to look at cleavage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:51 PM
1

That’s because men weren’t evolved to have sex with 2 different men and gain both the best genetics and the best possible resources for our children possible. Human women absolutely do benefit from being one of the minority of animals that hide when they are in estrus.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:48 PM
7

It’s actually really amazing that you acknowledge this, I always get downvoted to oblivion for pointing out to women that yes. Absolutely, you are fine upstanding moral people 27 days a month and men are super dangerous to be around and you’d never meet up with one in person. But then for those 2 days right when you’re ovulating, you’re absolutely right swiping on me on tinder and I’m coming over at 2am with barely any conversation required. And my sexual success as a man, at least a lot of it, …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:43 PM
–

The incel comes about because he puts too much faith in what women say, a certain “internalized matriarchy” so to speak, that has infected their brains (they think their genetics holds them back because their nose is like 2mm off or they will never have sex because their dick is only 5 inches) that’s a hugely feminine way to think about themselves. Women obsess over chin jobs and buccal fat and boob size. Incels are just parroting the same thought process that consumes women. Of course it’s not …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 06:05 AM
–

This (the OP) is basic feminist trash that pre supposes that men and women are the same and when viewed through the lens of what makes a good woman, men just look like inferior women. Most good men are not born, they are made. Women will never understand or accept that. Because what women are valued for has nothing to do with their values or hard work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:01 AM
1

You’re too weak. The argument that men aren’t dangerous is the incorrect one. Anyone that argues otherwise is arguing from a position of emotions and has completely thrown out objective truth and logic. Edit: that’s not the argument you made, actually, so to answer your actual position, you have too many rights because men have given you too many rights. It’s not either/or it’s AND
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:08 PM
1

Because of the way it works (and by this I mean math) in a hookup culture area, such as a college town, more women will be having casual sex and less men will be having casual sex, because all women pick the same few men for casual sex. So the total amount of sex partners will be higher but it will not be evenly distributed. For example, I’m somewhere north of 600, but I imagine a lot of the women I’ve had sex with were single digits.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:05 AM
10

Please, women don't want children anymore. So that argument falls apart quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:05 AM
5

Literally nothing that the OP complains about matters of you satisfy those 2 requirements. I have completely ignored literally all 4 of her bullet points and have had several casual sex hookups in the past year, which puts me leagues above the average man. Those things don’t matter, because women don’t select for those 4 things.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 08:03 AM
3

Ah yes, the classic, treat women like a pet, train her like a dog and she’ll be loyal to you like a dog. How progressive of you. All women are like that, all women are like that assless chap girl, and they will ALL lie about that past. There is no such thing as a “good girl” anymore. They don’t exist. You can’t punish the behavior because they all do it. The only winning move is to boycott all women, which just exacerbates the current situation where a few men (such as myself) who don’t care abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 07:42 AM
6

I agree, you’ve opened my eyes on this issue and changed my mind. If a woman wants to leave a relationship, you should hit her over the head, throw her in a cage and force her to remain yours forever. Good idea bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 07:29 AM
8

That’s exactly right. As soon as she finds a different option, she will take it. Red pill is supposed to be about truth. If she has a stable provider at home, she will long for an exciting fling with Jose the pool cleaner. If she has Chad as a boyfriend she’ll long for Billy the beta to tell her how much she is loved every day. You can be tom fucking Brady and your wife will still not be happy with you as you actually are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 06:07 AM
6

this post is too good for reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 07:08 PM
-2

horseshoe theory. The guy went so far left as to go back right again. (or maybe vice-versa)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:14 PM
0

the age of the russian mail-order bride was 50 years ago. Slavic women are indistinguishable from the swine in western europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:13 PM
7

the women don't change, but the price does.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:12 PM
2

you're so far lost, women are NOT "contextual" their desire to procreate is driven by the same biology/evolution/neuroscience that applies to men. And you don't need to eliminate sexual desire, women certainly don't eliminate theirs. Stop caring what women "call you" did your parents never teach you 'sticks and stones may break your bones but names will never hurt you'?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:45 AM
–

If you can’t take out your septum piercing at least long enough to appear to be sane for a few months, then it’s a glaring red flag for men to stay away.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 10:23 PM
–

Actually that’s not true. Most women no longer have children. 80% of women under 30 have no child at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 10:20 PM
–

Just because a man will never experience the amount of attention that a woman in her 20s will experience, does not mean that men don't have a peak. I was a virgin until I was 25. Had decent success in my later 20s, absolutely was easily able to have a ton of casual sex in the first half of my 30s and now at 43 it's difficult for me to even get dates. Just because one man's peak might be higher than another man's peak, doesn't mean they didn't both peak. Similarly, more men will lust after sydney…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 03:10 PM
2

I prefer to remain as intentionally ambiguous as possible for maximum plausible deniability. You know, like a woman. How dare you insinuate that your love could be purchased, that's very misogynistic of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 06:52 PM
1

I make 200k a year, and can support both of us on one salary, I wouldn’t be giving up my dreams at all. My “dream” is to have a family with a woman I could trust not to divorce me in a couple years just to take half of my retirement, that’s the impossible dream. Career and comfortable living was easy, those things are easy for men to do, some of us are genetically hardwired to be good at it (providing). Hell there are studies that show men naturally work harder and earn more when they have a wif…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 03:23 PM
0

It’s simpler than that, they don’t want a partner, because they don’t need a partner. A partnership requires dependency. They want to remain independent. So independent and single they shall remain. They won’t get to tick that box that will complete their perfect life. They want a man to put on their trophy shelf to show how accomplished they are to compete against the other women in their life, and that existence is abhorrent to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 05:34 AM
1

Women don’t want partners, they want ornaments to complete their curated lives. They don’t need men, so they won’t get men. That’s not a partnership. It’s a roommate that you have sex with. It’s not a partner, it’s a box to check off. A partnership requires dependency. It requires compromise. Feminist women don’t want either.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 05:28 AM
1

Every single man know what it is like for a friend to get a new girlfriend and him to slowly fade away as he starts spending more time with her. If a man is orbiting around a girl, it’s because he doesn’t have a girlfriend. Hell, girls themselves make sure that you will slowly lose your other girl-friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 01:19 AM
1

The left embracing authoritarianism is only a recent development. For most of my life, the left were seen as libertarians wanting the maximum amount of personal freedom and limited government involvement (pro-choice, legalized drugs, no foreign intervention in wars)... it's only been in the past 10 years where rigid social order and doctrine have been applied to the left (cancel culture, covid obedience)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:56 PM
1

it's a very stark contrast here in what used to be the purple bellwether state of Ohio. conservatives split 60% men and 40% women. Liberals swing 50/50. I mean, if it were just a LITTLE BIT MORE skewed, you'd have 2 conservative men for every 1 conservative woman. (twice as likely) https://www.midstory.org/decoding-ohios-2024-election-outcome/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:53 PM
-1

I used to be pro-choice. Then I realized that I was fed propaganda from a literal death cult as a child who wanted to see the decline and fall of our civilization. Now I'm pro-birth. I'm usually fairly libertarian in my views, but I've seen now that what might be good for the individual will lead to the death of civilization. I first started to realize this in 2008. A couple corporations/banks that were going to lose money laid off employees, and that led to more corporations laying off employee…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:49 PM
1

A man might be able to leech off a woman in a sexual relationship, but I firmly believe in the history of the entire planet, no man has ever been able to be a “leech” off of a woman in a non-sexual relationship. Women use betas for resources, women do not “give” resources to betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:34 AM
5

Ok, thanks for clarifying. And this is an EXTREMELY different scenario than what you initially described. What you are describing is men in the friend zone, aka beta simps. Men that are getting laid don’t dote on other women. The reason they are following these women around is because they aren’t having sex. Online they get made of/mocked but male simping is a real phenomenon in real life, because of hardwired biology. (Check out one of the many white knight subreddits if you want to see more ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:24 AM
8

I’m 43 years old and I’ve never once seen this ever, not for myself, and not for any of my male acquaintances. If I have a girlfriend she takes up 100% of my free time and attention. I don’t even HAVE any female friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:19 AM
2

No, but I’d have sex with her
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 08:36 PM
4

Maybe this is just my skewed perspective from my own personal experience, but literally all of my relationships have started AFTER having sex with a woman. And being kind and emotionally stable is not something women care about in order to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 08:10 PM
0

Ok, now imagine Jack stats... except he were 4 inches taller. Do you think he would still be struggling with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:54 PM
1

It is funny how 250 is the new 6 figures. Fuck hoeflation. You don't need 2 porsches in the driveway damnit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:38 PM
-1

Yea, I think all women should settle for a man like Jack, just like your wife settled for you. Sad that more women aren't willing to settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:33 PM
2

Yea, I think that's the right answer. Men want objective truth. Stacy is a 7 and Jane is a 5 and Sara is a 8. Women only think "How dare Sara get the man I want, I'll show her by sleeping with her boyfriend that I'm better" It's not that women don't compete, it's that the competition entirely subjective to their current situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 05:04 AM
4

No, it's not worth it for women in the short term. Women don't tend to think outside of what is best for them, in their individual situation at this particular time. (men do this too) That's why our birth rate is collapsing and civilization will die, and is currently doing so. Our population will collapse, our culture will die, and our ability to sustain the level of comfort that we currently enjoy (made possible by extreme specialization amongst the population) will disappear when 90% of the po…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 09:00 PM
2

"society" has been making the decisions for males, that's why society is the way that it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 06:47 PM
2

umm, who said I was struggling?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 11:58 PM
1

https://www.salon.com/2018/11/24/why-women-lie-about-sex/ It doesn’t happen It does happen but she didn’t enjoy it <—— you are here. It might have happened, but if it did she made a mistake. Of course it happen, it was your fault. Of course women lie about it, here is why that is a good thing <<—— salon.com is here
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 04:25 PM
1

Look, if you didn’t record yourself using Tinder to cheat on your husband (and of course film the sex) and then send the data off to a renowned researcher to post the conclusion in a peer-reviewed journal, did it even happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 04:21 PM
1

Women in relationships can and do have casual sex too. Often times, they have casual sex with men that they are not in relationships with, sometimes that involved using an app like Tinder instead of “using their social circles for safety”. I understand you can’t possibly understand how that is relevant, but I assure you anyone else reading this would be able to understand. Nevermind, I’ll spell it out plainly for you because you seem incapable of following simple logic. I have no idea how … this…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 09:12 AM
1

Assumptions aren't evidence. Being willing to have sex with someone you meet from an app =/= using an app to find a hookup. If you were here to look at my phone I could literally show you an example from this month where the literal first message I got was, and I’ll quote it for you “Dtf?” That is direct evidence of a woman who used a dating app to hook up with a stranger (me).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:48 AM
1

Well it is reflected in society. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/12/12/u-s-children-more-likely-than-children-in-other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/ 23% of children in the u.s. are being raised in single parent households, 90% of which are single mothers. “Misattributed paternity” which we could argue about he actual percentage of babies being raised by men that are unknowingly raising another man’s child, it is at minimum 3% (some sources will say much higher) (the one da…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:38 AM
1

You say women don’t use dating apps, I have a large amount of anecdotal evidence that women do. Matchgroup is a billion dollar corporation that relies on online dating apps to generate revenue. If they didn’t work, they would go out of business. Edit: the women that you talk to might not be telling you about all of their casual sex encounters, but I’m just a random stranger, I have no problem telling you about the women I encounter on online dating and why they match with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:18 AM
1

I’ve had sex with over a hundred women off dating apps over the last decade or so, ama?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:15 AM
2

It’s because for most women, their hormones take over and they stop caring about safety about 1 day a month. So yes “you aren’t like that” 97% of the time you aren’t. But 3% of the time you are. Yes, social circles are great and all, but your social circle isn’t going to be awake at 3am on a Tuesday when you text him “dtf” and you really don’t want to explain that text later if he says he isn’t interested. For a woman who cares about her “social safety” hooking up with a stranger with no strings…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:10 AM
1

Why does he have to choose only one. You’ll gladly just share him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 02:17 AM
2

Sure, I agree that women need men to protect them from other men, and toxic femininity invites dangerous men into their lives. You can argue that is a man’s fault, or a woman’s fault, but regardless, women aren’t smart enough to make those decisions for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 01:17 AM
1

Sometimes women need to be protected from themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 05:30 PM
2

The flaw in your argument is that it doesn’t address the point. If society restricts the “average joe earning minimum wage easily getting casual sex” down to only one woman, then society as a whole benefits. This “average joe” (which statistics say is literally anything but average, he would have to be in the top 1% for looks). Everyone should work, equally, men shouldn’t be able to “easily” have casual sex with 20+ women. Because for every man that is able to. There is an equal number of men th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 04:38 PM
-1

The difference is she was successful at her career, other women struggle for 20 years and are never as successful as she is despite proclaim their careers to be “super important” in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 04:34 PM
0

A long standing human tradition is recognizing that some people are able to separate their political views and realize that while it may not be the best system for themselves, it might lead to a better society on the whole. It’s called altruism, and I think the majority of women are incapable of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 04:31 PM
1

Because many women know that their past will be abhorrent to the type of man that they would want to help raise their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 06:06 PM
1

Oh fucking please. As if any woman in the history of all womanhood has ever told the “complete” history of her other partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:42 AM
1

Dude, The devil's advocate, if I come over to your house tonight I am absolutely 100% absolutely not going to dress up in a furry costume, why would I even bring up such a thing, furries are gross, unless you're into that, but I am definitely NOT going to do that for you at least not tonight, maybe someday in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:28 PM
3

So this girl that "was really really into you" .. you slept with her right? Oh, wait, you didn't? She wasn't into you at all, but wants to still be your friend, and if she told you she had zero romantic feelings in you ever, she senses you wouldn't want to be her friend anymore. That's how women operate, they sense what the man needs to hear, and that's what he'll hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 05:40 PM
14

Dude, she just wants to come over to my house for the first date, we're absolutely NOT going to have sex at all because she isn't like that. (what an odd thing to say - bart.jpg). It's just a game, and women will select you if you know how to play it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 05:37 PM
1

Yeah, exactly. The thing is... I'm gonna admit, it's insulting to my ego being seen as a committed relationship only for the things i can provide. I wanna feel wanted. It's not about sex, otherwise i could deal with prostitutes. Because you crave validation, like a woman does. You want them to want you because you don't like yourself. You radiate insecurity that is the primary emotion I am able to pick up in your writing even though I assume english is not your first language. You want a woman t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:03 PM
–

I'm not saying you need to use steroids. I'm saying that steroids will improve the amount of women you are able to fuck with minimal effort, if that is a goal of yours, which it seems like it is not. Furthermore, I'm saying that I did, and it did.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 07:49 PM
–

Perhaps 1% physical is too much of an exaggeration. Women don’t care about insertions or body fat distribution doesn’t matter. Literally all you have to focus on is hypertrophy. All they care about is big looking muscles, functional strength doesn’t even matter. And like I said, in order to get noticed for your muscles I think you need muscles not normally obtainable by normal genetics. They see guys who use steroids and think that is natural: and they have access to fuck those guys. Roughly 6% …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:02 PM
–

In my country, I am average height. For women everything is subjective. Why choose you when she could have everyone else. And you need to adopt that mindset if you want to have success. I am average height here, but everyone in America is overweight, so average height, average looks, way better physique, and above average salary = more attention from women. Because you are below the average that your women have access to, you need to compensate in other ways. Below average height but “good” phys…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:00 PM
–

That’s my entire point of contention. Men look more attractive with more muscles, your face looks better (to women) when you are leaner and have more muscles/higher levels of testosterone. Your face is not an immutable characteristic. Go look on any weight loss subreddit and see “face gains” when someone goes from overweight to average. Height, I’m 5’8” 172cm. When I am overweight I would rate my appearance as a 6, and I’m treated that way by women (completely invisible and ignored). When I’m ja…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:28 PM
1

Again, I don’t think that proves women will chase men. They will rather pay for men, go into debt for men, and develop mental health problems, all to avoid talking to a “normal” man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:10 PM
1

But your conclusion “now women will chase men” can’t be supported from your data. At best you might be able to say “civilization is doomed and no one will make babies which will lead to global collapse because neither men nor women want relationships with the other”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:01 PM
1

YOUR SOURCE: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/facts-single-americans-topline.pdf https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/facts-single-americans-methodology.pdf Women say they are less interested in dating (by a small percent) than they were 3 years ago and yea. And of those people that say they ARE interested in dating, only 45% adults are using online dating. (which I'd consider "serious" looking for dates) Staying home alone in your room and scrolling blues…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:46 PM
2

Men are approaching women less and ALSO women are approaching men less (not more). And the end result is more people end up alone and our birth rate continues to plummet.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:01 AM
7

single women who are looking for a relationship or casual dates: 35% said this in 2022, compared with 38% in 2019 Less women are looking for a relationship or dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:42 AM
4

You said we are inching closer to women approaching men. The data actually shows women approach men less often than they used to. That’s actually us inching further away from women approaching men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:19 AM
2

I don’t think I can offer you great advice online without ever having met you. My point is that you’ll get better advice from males that you interact with in-person IF they are the type of person you want to become. But I think in general, your idea of calibrating your behavior, to how you are being treated, is a good thing. Most of us are not top 5% genetically, so you have to do things to make yourself stand out in other ways. I’ve been very successful, on the whole, with women, but my strateg…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:17 AM
3

You can talk to another successful man that you trust; find a mentor that you want to emulate and ask him to give you advice if you want to follow in his footsteps. For example: Part of the problem with say, black culture is that men were excluded from raising their children, so 2-3 generations of men grew up raised by women. And societal degradation is the result. Men acting like women (overly emotional and only interested in the short term without long-term provisioning in mind)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 01:39 AM
8

It's not jsut the "alpha males" that don't run around making kids anymore. It's women themselves that no longer want children. They've been brainwashed / propagandized since toddlers to believe that anyone that reproduces is a bad person, "ghetto" "white trash" "welfare moms" "teen moms" "welfare queen" are all pejoratives used commonly, let's not even talk about the more recent inventions like "breeders" which started to show up within the last decade. The planet is doomed, the only way to save…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:38 AM
4

It's complicated right, sure the average lifespan might be shorter, but that's because evolution isn't rewarding the safe men that live long lives. If you want to get laid, you need to take risks. And men being risk-takers (regardless of species) does tend to get us killed more. (or killed by rivals). As it turns out, sexual selection might be what determines who gets to live longer—one sex of a species may ultimately drain potential lifespan by using too many resources to develop and maintain t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 05:50 AM
7

Well the difference is that I had to learn them, and as a result I was a virgin until I was 25. Some men can fake confidence, I was never able to, but thankfully earned competence can eventually give you real confidence. I like to tell the story about how we just got out of basic training and a (really really really hot) girl sat down across from me at a table for 2 and gave an icecream cone a blowjob while looking at me/talking to me. I was a moron that didn't know how to even act on that socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 05:51 PM
24

I think you're right, I think we have moved past that narrative as a society. Women are regularly being taught (I watch tiktok) that they need to show they are interested in a man if they want him. The biggest problem is... "I looked at him for 4 seconds, why did he not come over and talk to me, how much more obvious can I make it?!?"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 05:34 PM
7

"I don't normally do this" "I'm not normally like this" those are the key phrases you're looking for. Even an autistic person "can" learn social cues or signs of attraction, the key is to stop listening to what the person is saying, and start paying attention to what the person is doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 05:32 PM
50

I think you misunderstand this advice. It's not intended to help the men. It's intended to make the situation of women better. Your problem is you assume altruism, when none exists. An attractive man, a man that "just gets it" doesn't need to ask advice from women. So any man that needs to ask advice from women needs to be excluded from the gene pool. Look at it from a woman's perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 05:29 PM
1

No, never, zero possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 07:20 PM
1

Relatively minor. First, this is back before prohormones were banned in the u.s. , so if the legal system at all is something you're worried about, well that's issue number one. They gave me some minor cramping / bloating (water retention) / minor loss of appetitite, and they suppressed my sex drive completely after about 10 days. (harsh on the liver androgenic compounds and I did not take testosterone supplementation which would have given better results because they would work synergistically)…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 02:02 PM
4

I used prohormones (steroids) and was fairly consistent with my workout routine for a long period of time and it absolutely worked When redpill says "work on your appearance" it means, get swoll bro Muscles are not an immutable characteristic. They can can be improved upon, they are not something you are born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 04:40 PM
2

Having sex with a woman is not winning. The game has only one end, death, and there is no progress bar, there is no level-up, there is no winning and losing. You don't get a "ding" sound when you have an orgasm with a woman. Yes, sex with a woman feels better than masturbation, but it's not "winning"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:15 PM
0

It's just a fundamental difference between men and women. Women tend to be both more narcissistic and solipsistic than men. You care about what you think, I care about what society thinks. Could men fix the birth rate problem tomorrow? Yes. Would it involve taking away women's choice? Also yes. Right now both men and women do not want to reproduce. So it does not happen. This is going to destroy our planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:12 PM
1

are you serious? Porn and a hand do not feel better than a real woman. It's not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:10 PM
1

They've checked out. The system no longer provides incentive to men. You think any good man would want a feminist girlfriend or wife? Never. It's a choice, and the options are both equally bad. He'd rather sit on a couch and jerk off than talk to you. That's how annoying you are to talk to.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:56 PM
-1

Well I acknowledge that there is a problem, and I've thought it through long and hard. It's truly a difficult question. I've actually been pondering the problem for over a decade. One solution is to be like Elon Musk. To try to start your own little army of mini-me's. To stem the tide of collapse and "fix the problem". I think that is a short-sighted answer to the problem. You could take 1000 elon musks having 14 children and it still wouldn't fix the problem. His own children are growing up and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:53 PM
2

You're the one that "wanted" to debate by making the thread. Obviously you really just wanted everyone to affirm your beliefs and tell you that you're really smart and intelligent and so brilliant for your interesting hot takes. Well, you're not. And I don't agree with literally anything you believe. And most men would agree with me, because they use logic. So you can get mad and use your emotions to make illogical choices some more while acting like men are the problem instead of just different…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:47 PM
1

You haven't quoted anything of mine. Do you even know what a "quote" is? Yes, for humans to exist as a species, women and men need to have sex. Women need to carry babies. Because they are not doing that, our civilization is going to collapse. I don't honestly even care about it, I'm just telling you the reality of what is coming. Your original post completely misses the point of the man in the youtube video (because it's a react video from an equally confused feminist youtuber, perhaps yourself…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:41 PM
4

No, I didn't say that, you're putting words in my mouth. Women contribute a LOT to society. Unfortunately all of those things are literally leading to the downfall of civilization. That's not nothing, that's a negative contribution. You think I said: "women do nothing" what I ACTUALLY SAID was "women do many things, all of which are bad for civilization" there is a difference. *edited for clarity on my position
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:06 PM
–

You're not very smart. Your intuition about other people is way off too. I might be gross, but not for why you think. I've had sex with somewhere north of 500 women. But I honestly stopped counting about 15 years ago when I got to about 60 and I realized I couldn't even remember everyone's name or even what they looked like exactly anymore, back then some of the girls would be like "girl with the interesting back tattoo" or "really likes doggy" or "alcoholic" or "lives in trailer with parents" S…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 09:52 PM
5

So you're saying having sex with women is how you win? Does it have to be consensual? or just anyone that has sex? "whatever it takes"? You sound like you are advocating for rape, that's pretty gross. Personally, I think women think too highly of themselves. Women of this society are definitely not worth the effort required. Especially the fat gross feminists who tend to be the type to post on reddit. But you're wrong, that is absolutely the JOB of men - provide the sperm. And the job of women i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:55 PM
7

So are you claiming that a man's only purpose is to provide semen for women to procreate?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:46 PM
3

"not supposed to have" "not supposed to" According to who? Your 3rd grade teacher that brainwashed you into thinking the world was overpopulated and that there will be no trees left in the rainforest and save the turtles? Yes, birthing more humans IS THE PURPOSE OF WOMEN FOR HUMANITY AS A SPECIES TO EXIST. If you don't do it, humanity stops existing. And that's fine, I already accept that it is going to happen. I'm not trying to argue that with you. But there are consequences to our actions, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:39 PM
6

I don't agree with your conclusion. Women are not driving society forward. They have already driven it off a cliff. This civilization is dying. It will be replaced eventually, I do not think humans will go extinct, but actual population and societal collapse is coming. I won't be around to see it, I'm already too old. But I feel sorry for anyone under the age of 30. https://youtu.be/m2GeVG0XYTc?si=x8AckuOLAKCqF8Pe As for what our society will look like now, our population is going to shrink belo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:26 PM
0

hey, the guy lied, he got sex. Guess what he'll do the next time he wants sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 09:37 PM
15

It absolutely does, women HATE being rejected when they approach a man. They will refuse to acknowledge it. They will call you gay, they will assault you, they will rub up against you, and no one will do anything about it because it’s a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 09:54 AM
14

I’ve been physically assaulted multiple times in my life because I don’t want to dance with a girl who was drunk and unattractive. But hey, I guess it’s in public, so it’s just fine for her to literally grab a stranger yank with all her might, sit on his lap, etc. no means no unless you are telling it to a woman. They have no qualms about assaulting you, physically or sexually, in public, if you reject them, and no one will act out in your defense, women are never wrong, so if she’s hitting you,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 08:20 AM
10

If you’re told by a woman that you look “average” that actually puts you in the top 20% of men, congratulations. (Source: okcupid numbers)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 04:47 AM
1

I have regularly gotten hit up by women I haven’t talked to, in years or even a decade, who just remembered that they enjoyed having sex with me and wanting something again. The problem is, that in order to have a regular rotation of sex, I needed to sleep with hundreds of women. Because being hit up once every 4 years isn’t a lot of sex, unless you’ve slept with enough women so that you have a different one texting you every week. I don’t need to date women in order to have sex with women. Payi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 07:52 AM
6

“Attraction isn’t even important, the fact that my boyfriend is 6foot 1 and able to pick me up with one hand is totally coincidental!”
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:07 AM
3

Well sure, and for a man who literally has zero options, that is asking for help to meet that minimum threshold of which he currently is not. If you think of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, you are doing the equivalent of telling a homeless man literally starving to death on the street that he just needs to better understand god to find happiness. Well sure, that would help. But so would a cheeseburger and might make him happier than a religious sermon would.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:05 AM
9

Yea. Id bet a lot of money that the guy who talked you into it and the guy you talked you out of it had differing amounts of assertiveness and confidence. Which were listed among the traits that women find attractive. It’s not all physical.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:02 AM
1

If your girlfriend walks like a duck, quacks like a duck maybe she belongs to the streets. She may not be single, but she is certainly acting the exact same way a single woman would act.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:10 AM
7

Chad is just one singular stereotype of the type of man that can have a lot of sexual encounters. Old redpill was way better back in the day about speaking truth. And lots of other men can “get sex” whether it’s Billy the beta, Steve the simp, or Timmy the Thailand tourist. The differentiation is the quantity and quality of sex. Alpha fucks beta bucks isn’t a descriptor of one man that gets sex and one man that doesn’t get sex. It’s a descriptor of 2 different men that both have sex. But that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 01:37 AM
3

If you’re hot, it doesn’t make them uncomfortable, they just let you do it. -paraphrased quote, not my original idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 01:27 AM
0

Yea, great example of 80s-2000s anti-male feminist media.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 05:52 AM
7

Yes, and it works equally as well on men (I can fix her) it’s gender neutral, but what isn’t gender neutral is that men admit to being turned on by hot+crazy, women know it would cost them their beta orbiters.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 04:11 AM
2

First real answer of the thread. Women don’t like to reveal that they like criminals, because they want it to be organic, they don’t want guys to “pretend” to be hard just to impress her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 04:09 AM
1

The real enemy in “the gender war” is social media itself, and the only winning maneuver is not to play.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:29 AM
–

well, it also emerged as a term in-use during a wider societal push to reclassify definitions of both gender and sexuality. Now there are infinite genders and therefore sexualities. I'm not saying I agree with it, but it was part of a broader cultural shift in the language. And the narrative needed to be pushed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 12:59 PM
4

So Lothario, how has wearing that expensive suit to your dinner parties improved your number of female sexual partners? Presumably your argument is that if men dressed better, they would get laid more. So what is your evidence for this. How much are you slaying?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:30 AM
2

Allegedly
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 10:55 PM
2

If someone said any of these things to you, they are just gaslighting you about cheating. No one believes this, unless they think you’re just incredibly naive, which might be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 10:54 PM
0

How is “supported” equivalent to “vulnerable” in your twisted worldview? I’m trying to wrap my head around it. Do you think every single woman should be an independent girlboss who don’t need no help from anyone? And just independently wealthy without needing to “rely” on the government to give her free food? 60% of people on SNAP did not work AT ALL in the previous 12 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 10:06 PM
1

It might not be aspirational, but it is a social safety net. 42 million PEOPLE are on food stamps. Of those recipients, 50% are single mother households. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/19/what-the-data-says-about-food-stamps-in-the-u-s/#:~:text=Non%2DHispanic%20White%20people%20accounted,and%2035.8%25%20of%20child%20recipients. You might not “aspire” to it, but it does prevent women from being “uniquely vulnerable”. Edit: million people, not percent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:06 PM
1

The fact that he said “you always hear” No, no I have never once heard in my entire life that marriage benefits men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 08:07 PM
-1

Screwed and vulnerable? You mean like free healthcare, free food, subsidized living?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 08:05 PM
1

I’ve never once, ever, in my entire life heard that marriage benefits men. Not once. Your entire premise is flawed. (Male 43)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 08:03 PM
0

4.. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA HAHAHHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAA
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 10:31 PM
3

I've been in a relationship before and also had a side piece. It wouldn't be lying at all for me to state that I was in a relationshp... and it also wouldn't be a lie for me to state that in like the previous 60 days I'd had sex with 4 different women. If she lives in my house, she's paying no rent, we're still having sex, sure women might not like it, but it's still a relationship. Men are not women. Women will lie in a scientific survey just because their answers will make them look bad. Men d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 10:29 PM
0

young attractive women aren't debating online. They're still in their "hoe phase" and enjoying the attention they get in the real world. People who spend a lot time on reddit are by very definition: losers. (I include myself)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 10:26 PM
1

Most women don’t require that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 07:59 PM
1

No, not at all, you advocate for the same things that I am. Women should not be treated like men. And similarly, don’t treat men like women. As YOU said, women and men are different. Neither fills the role of the other very well and neither will be happy if treated the same as the other. So stop supporting egalitarian nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 02:59 PM
1

Maybe I enjoy being bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 02:56 PM
1

Good girl, you responded exactly like I wanted you to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:58 PM
-2

I am in complete agreement with you, I believe women should be banned from the workforce. I also believe that women need a lot of positive reinforcement, such as head pats when she does the dishes for me; just like I reward my dogs. They love it when I tell them “good girl”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:39 PM
2

It’s funny that you say that, because I actually treat women like dogs that I am training and they love it, universally.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:36 PM
3

It’s actually the exact opposite. “This one is bad boy, let me fix (fuck) him. This one is a good boy, so boring”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:34 PM
3

“They’d make great partners for someone someday(just not for me).” That’s literally the worst compliment you can give a man. It’s like the godfather kiss of death.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:33 PM
7

I refuse to download Instagram. I refuse to take thousands of selfies. That alone disqualifies me from 60% of women. With politics being the way they are currently, marking down conservative on my profile eliminates 60% of the women again (with obviously some overlap). The funny thing about “being good in bed” is just a different side of the same coin of the incel complaint about women only liking men with big penises. I’ve had sex with hundreds of women, and never once did the sex stop AFTER th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:29 PM
3

It’s the personality. Most women are insufferable, and as they get older, their personality gets worse. You’re right, there isn’t a huge looks difference between 28 and 24 or whatever, but 99% of the time I’d pick the 24 over the 28 just based on how jaded she isn’t because she’s likely had about 20 less penises inside her in that 4 year timespan.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 09:52 PM
8

Women have been fucking drug dealers for centuries, if not millennia.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 11:02 PM
0

No, I mean leftist millennials in general. Most have been brainwashed their entire life and it’s a deeply held belief in their secular-humanist religion that humans are bad, and more humans is more bad. It’s not unique to journalists, but I’d argue it’s very common amongst their community because of common backgrounds. And I don’t think most of them even take a second to think of their motivations for why they do what they do, most humans don’t. But yes, their underlying core beliefs is that hum…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 09:20 PM
0

No, it’s not, actually. I was just applying some sophistry to your inquiry. My actual belief is that they hate humans. They hate reproduction, they hate people being in relationships, and they want to reduce the global population by 80% or so. Some people want to reduce it slowly over time with slow growth policies like humans are a herd to be managed (pro abortion, pro birth control, anti-family policies), and on the other hand, some more extreme anti-natalists want the population to fall overn…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 09:08 PM
0

No, it’s not, actually. I was just applying some sophistry to your inquiry. My actual belief is that they hate humans. They hate reproduction, they hate people being in relationships, and they want to reduce the global population by 80% or so. Some people want to reduce it slowly over time with slow growth policies like humans are a herd to be managed (pro abortion, pro birth control, anti-family policies), and on the other hand, some more extreme anti-natalists want the population to fall overn…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 09:05 PM
6

Boom! Headshot! I can dance all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:59 PM
3

Roughly 40 hours a week. So yes, by most subjective definitions of what people mean by doing a task “all day”, indeed, I am playing video games “all day” And I work roughly 50 hours a week. And I’d rather work 40 hours a week and earn 210k than work 60 hours a week and earn 290k (but I don’t have a choice in the matter) I have something that I enjoy doing for fun and there is more to life than endless consumerism and mindless spending. I already have 3 Porsches. I don’t need a 4th. There are dim…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:58 PM
2

that is "google, how much does a teacher make at harvard"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:32 PM
10

Huh? no I'm saying that you're doing that very thing you just accused me of. OK, fine, you don't like community colleges? (my argument is that a community college fits the definition of acedemia, because it does, not because of some weird interpretation, but because academia is "education" jobs. And I just think you maybe don't even understand what academia means if you think it doesn't include teachers at all levels. A teacher at Harvard starts at 60k and slowly increases to 98k. How is that up…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:29 PM
3

I wasn't aware that you don't need to learn anything to get a job certification.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:26 PM
5

ac·a·de·mi·a [ˌakəˈdēmēə] noun academia (noun) the environment or community concerned with the pursuit of research, education, and scholarship: "he spent his working life in academia"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:23 PM
6

I make 250k a year and game most of my freetime. I suppose your "scrolling instagram" for 2 hours a day is a far more "productive" use of your time though. At what point are men allowed to play video games, does Henry Cavill not have enough millions of dollars and thousands of hours in the gym to be "allowed" to play games by some random woman on reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:19 PM
3

since when was academia considered anything other than working-class. I wasn't aware there was a lot of generational wealth and porsches in the parking lots of my local community college.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:17 PM
9

what are you doing steppebrother.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 08:16 PM
-1

oh, ok, so they wrote the article because they thought it would hurt match group financially?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:37 PM
-1

Yes, I did read the article. So now ask yourself why was it written? What agenda does the person who wrote that article have? You think they wrote the article to assure people that there are actually very few rapists on tinder? You think they wrote it because the ceo will be prosecuted? What do you think they wrote it for?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 05:30 PM
1

How very retro-hipster you are. “Yea sure I’m on Reddit in a debate subreddit about dating culture, but I’m too cool to know standard internet lingo that has been around for a decade”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 11:47 AM
3

I mean, it’s … not the government doing it. But endocrine disruption is absolutely a real factor in plastics, pesticides, herbicides. And you ARE consuming those products in levels the government has deemed safe, but like how DDT used to be “safe and effective” and Thalidomide used to be “safe and effective”and leaded gasoline used to be “safe and effective” and yes, “endocrine disruption is literally the same thing as “fucks yo hormones up” Thankfully we stopped using leaded gasoline, at some p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 11:43 AM
5

You act as if Wall Street and “the rich” aren’t real. They are. They are disgustingly gluttonous. And they make everyone’s lives worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 11:38 AM
0

Wow, propaganda meant to show that all men on dating apps are rapists, they really are trying to go full-blown population collapse. It’s not enough for them to stop growth, but they want an 80% decline in our population and civilization collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 11:33 AM
1

No actual free market works like that. Information asymmetry is a normal part of a free market. Just like when you go to buy a car, the dealership has a vast advantage, similarly the top 1-2% of men who are fucking hundreds of women have an information advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:58 PM
1

If you’re unatttactive, if you don’t provide resources. Basically the bottom 30% of men are neither Brad nor Chad and remain mostly sexless. There are a lot of Greek letters that could be used to describe this type of man, delta, omega, gamma, regardless, they won’t have much success with women in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:06 PM
1

Beta bucks are the men that are able to sleep with women because of the resources they provide, be it emotional, money, watching children.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:21 PM
-1

I’ve answered it multiple times already. You’re confused about it, but I’ve explained, feel free to read my responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:24 PM
0

You’re really confused about this entire AF/BB thing. Rich men are slept with because they have money. Tall/attractive men are slept with because of their good genetics. If a man is neither attractive or rich, he is invisible to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:24 PM
0

Beta bucks, alpha fucks, doesn’t mean that betas don’t fuck. Alpha and betas are the two types of men that sleep with women. Women sleep with alpha men for fun and beta men for being a provider. Just because you have money, won’t make your relationship a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:21 PM
3

If she’s sleeping with him for his genetics, it’s Chad, if she is sleeping with him for his provisioning, he’s a beta, aka Billy or Brad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:20 PM
–

>As if they could all just die off and nothing would matter all that much. They aren't wrong. They've been told their entire life that men could disappear and the world would continue just fine without any man. Propaganda works. And men have been fed feminist propaganda for DECADES. A World Without Men. A thought experiment | by Marty Nemko | Medium And of course, as a woman, you would have encountered less propaganda meant for men. You probably don't read the things intended for men, so you may…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:41 AM
–

Moronic feminist believes things that aren't true: shocking. I bet when she goes to the car dealership and gets a bad car deal she calls the salesman that gives her a bad deal "kinda rapey" If your definition of "rape" is "woman doesn't get everything that she wants" then yes, of course everything she will see is "rapey"... and she's the reason why islam says that a woman's word is worth about half as much as a man's. #believeallwomen
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:21 AM
5

But.... yet you DID sleep with him. You DID share him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:17 AM
3

unless you're with her 24x7, you don't actually know her. I know lesbians that get dick on the downlow. The fact is, even a lot of "sapiosexual" and "demisexual" women are sometimes getting random hookups, and it may only be 3-4 times a year, which is certainly "less than average" but it's still not "an exception"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:16 AM
1

Because the most feminine dudes and the most butch women are equally as undesirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 08:29 AM
1

Oh right, you like men that look like girls, why don’t you just go all the way and date a woman then?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:16 PM
1

Ok, so you like powerful men, just like, not lawyers in a suit. Got it, but if he’s big and strong and powerful, you do like powerful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 06:57 PM
5

I’m glad you’ve decided to take one for the team and married a short fat balding pizza delivery driver. Oh, wait you haven’t?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 02:10 PM
6

Sure, just go to sleep for the next 3 million years and maybe our biology might change by then, until then, you’re just fighting against reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 01:40 PM
1

Those were already legal. Still are. That's not what they were trying to make legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 03:26 PM
1

Of course, that's why they wanted to change the law, so that the thing that no one does can be done by no one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 11:07 AM
1

No, you have a better one
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 01:26 AM
1

Went through your last 50 or so comments and you’re a sarcastic troll in every single comment, I bet you’re a fun person to be a round in the real world and have a lot of friends. You go on reddit to call people fat, I’m going to guess that’s a case of the pot calling the kettle black. By reacting to my age is anything remarkable, I’ll guess your actual age is about 19 but your maturity level is about the same as a 13 year old. Damn Covid really did mess up a lot of teens and slowing their devel…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:18 PM
2

I appreciate your effort in understanding of how you were mistaken, how evil the left in this country is, thanks for allowing me to clarify how indeed the democrats did try to push for post-birth abortions and how they hate humanity and how it isn’t just a conspiracy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:04 PM
-1

That’s a gross mischaracterization. He pushed for the bill to pass. But he did not write the bill. He did not introduce the bill into congress. He nearly advocated for the democrats that did push for the bill and who wrote it. But sure, if you want to start calling congressmen and governors “just one dude” yea sure. And Trump is “just one guy” trying to implement trade deals, we don’t need to care what he does, just one guy. What can just one guy accomplish.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:50 PM
-3

Haha, great “gotchu” moment so funny so clever bro. Doesn’t mean they didn’t try. Doesn’t refute my point at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:35 PM
0

Thankfully they didn’t make it legal and he was voted out of office before he could make it happen. He was talking about a proposed law change that would have made post-birth abortions legal, when before they had been restricted at the third trimester in his state. If any “post birth abortions” have been performed, no one would talk about them, because they don’t want to go to jail for murder. They wanted to change the law to make it legal. They tried. And failed. Their restriction was already V…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:32 PM
-3

Thankfully they didn’t make it legal and he was voted out of office before he could make it happen. He was talking about a proposed law change that would have made post-birth abortions legal, when before they had been restricted at the third trimester in his state. If any “post birth abortions” have been performed, no one would talk about them, because they don’t want to go to jail for murder. They wanted to change the law to make it legal. They tried. And failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:26 PM
1

yes, of course they are trying to get ALL of that passed, but as with everything else in our government, it's hard to get anything passed until you have a strong majority. And don't try to say that "well because they don't have the power to get it done, it's pointless" because I KNOW you do not use the same argument when people on the right talk about doing things like "deporting every illegal immigrant" fearmongering is the play of the day, everyday in politics. The uniparty is real, it doesn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:23 PM
-1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6WD_3H0wKU&t=2324s Democratic Governor in his own words: "EXACTLY WHAT WOULD HAPPEN": the infant would be delivered. the infant would be kept comfortable the infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desire and then a discussion would ensue. So I think this was really blown out of proportion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:17 PM
1

In 2004, Guizhou enacted a ban on abortions in non-medically necessary cases after 14 weeks of pregnancy in an effort to curb sex-selective abortion.[6] In 2005, the government began an Action Plan consisting of ten policies with the aim of normalizing the sex ratio of newborns by 2010.[18] Under this plan, sex-selective abortion was outlawed, as was prenatal sex diagnosis, and harsher punishments were implemented for violating both. Other policies include controlling the marketing of ultrasonic…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:48 PM
-4

Bullshit, the left of america is WELL PAST the left of europe For example: on abortions: IN EUROPE: Every single nation has a restriction on abortion at some point. Some countries ban it after 15 weeks, others ban 3rd trimester abortions. IN AMERICA: The democratic party advocates for abortions up to and even potentially past birth. Until 2022 the u.s. has more permissive abortion laws (essentially none) than 95% of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:50 AM
18

Best I could find. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dinner-party-smart/202308/men-subscribing-to-onlyfans-are-not-who-you-might-think/amp And onlyfans obviously keeps their numbers hidden, but I’ve seen 130million total global users (not necessarily paid) so waaaay less than 82 million men in America. Waaaaay less. The majority of subscribers are women or married men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:48 PM
-2

Newsflash: women lie to make themselves look better. They won’t admit to it, but they like casual sex too. They just don’t want the social stigma associated with it. Thats why you multiply the number they tell you by 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 12:34 AM
1

Thank you, at this point I think it’s an impossibility and I’m currently checked out of the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:28 PM
1

I’d be willing to bet that 95% of men share my experience more than share your experience if we put both on the spectrum
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 06:36 PM
1

While he’s at it, he should really open up about his insecurities and probably lose his job too, maybe get sick and ask her to take care of him. I mean, if you are trying to speed-run his break-up you might as well go all out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 11:24 AM
7

The real problem is, he falls in love, a woman uses him transactionally, he gets married. And then she divorces him when she gets bored to take away all his assets. Finding a relationship isn’t hard with a blue pill mindset. The problem is, all the women out there are operating with a red pill mindset and willing to take advantage of an opportunity
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 11:21 AM
8

I knew a really hot 26 year old woman that was super into me (I was 29 at the time) despite me being barely an above average man. Just recently started working out and using some prohormones which is how I moved up to even the objectively about an 8. She said I gave her the best sex/dick she had ever had, I broke up with her after 2 months because she was an alcoholic. Neither of which is a noticable trait on the first date. She called me 2 years later to try to hook up while she was dating some…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 08:53 PM
5

"can I ask you something" Typical beta behavior. Stop asking permission to do the thing that you're already doing anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:02 AM
9

Having also been through the entire spectrum of attractiveness, it’s always better to be more attractive than less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 09:38 PM
1

I'm just being direct. I'm using 2nd person "you" to describe a hypothetic person. I'm not verbally trying to assault you, I'm just describing the logic: If you're intelligent, that means you can solve problems. If you're not having as much sex as you want/desire, if you were intelligent, you'd be able to solve the problem. I believe this is a variation on the "midwit" meme. Where both very smart people and very dumb people are able to get sex at a frequency they desire. Yes, I do believe that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 04:25 PM
1

maybe if you were more intelligent, you'd be able to figure out why your shortcomings prevent you from achieving what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 12:51 PM
1

if you're not attractive, you need to at least be intelligent. If you're not attractive nor intelligent, then you need to at least be rich. If you're not attractive, intelligent, nor rich, you need to at least be creative. If you are not attractive intelligent, rich, nor creative, why would a woman want to sleep with you? Do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 07:56 AM
1

A lot of women engage in casual sex, just not regularly: and just not “with you”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:50 PM
6

If you want women to be direct and honest, you’re going to have a hard time existing in the world. That isn’t how they operate. Which might help explain why you are struggling with sex/relationships with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:49 PM
1

Of course you don’t, the entire last 2 generations have been brainwashed since they were toddlers with the belief that humans are evil, humans are destroying the planet and only morons (idiocracy) and evil people have children. And you don’t want to be viewed as stupid or as evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 03:14 PM
1

Thanks for providing a compelling arguement and countering the feminist propaganda narrative thst literally every other woman in this thread pushed that all women are victims and all men are evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:31 AM
1

Most people don’t consider time spent working out in the gym getting a nice body as investment in sex, but nevertheless, from a purely transactional level, yes. Getting a sexy body so you don’t have to pay for sex, is still paying for it with time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:26 AM
1

Yes, now that women make up 60% of college graduates, they will only settle for men who also have a college education. (and 6 feet, and make more than them) So now, as a 42 year old man, I'm finding a lot of single childless 30-35 women on sites like bumble/tinder. 10 years ago it was all single mothers in that age bracket, now I think many of the single mothers have given up on dating, and it's the desperate women who have biological clocks ticking that are the biggest demographic. About 10 chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 10:01 AM
1

Completely off topic, but the reason this lady isn’t anyone’s girlfriend and men are embarrassed to be around her, is how hideous she looks with that crazy makeup. I wouldn’t want to be seen in public with her either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 09:58 PM
6

An entire generation of people have been destroyed by the dangerous disinformation campaign waged against them, when they were only children, that there are zero differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 09:55 PM
–

Sorry, it is a well known fact that every single man becomes a pedophile and abuser at the age of 41.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:57 PM
–

And what would you do if you were asked out by a man you were interested in…? Come to Reddit asking for advice about how you really like a guy but are concerned he’s too old to be socially acceptable to the average redditor?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:55 PM
1

90% on if a woman will sleep with a guy on the first night depends on what stage in her cycle she is on. Once you know the signs to look for, as a guy, first date sex can/will occur regularly. Blast me for being creepy or overanalyzing it all you want, it’s both true and works.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:02 PM
6

https://www.campop.geog.cam.ac.uk/blog/2024/07/25/marriage-in-the-middle-ages/ We have more female ancestors than male ancestors, but that stretches back to pre-historic times, literally before history was written. The "one man mated with 17 females" story was thousands and thousands of years ago. Here is an article, if you want to read about it at various points, less people were married, roughly 60% at times, but never as low as modern day. But marriage in Europe (and in the roman empire) was …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 03:05 AM
5

Slang for vagina
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 10:37 PM
2

The only rules that matter are the ones that you can enforce or are forced upon you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 10:36 PM
3

A girl that invited me out to the bar last pre-gamed a pint of henessey with me, and she brought a bottle of Minute Maid orange juice chaser with her into the bar. I should introduce you two. (The pre-gaming was my idea) (sneaking in the OJ was hers)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 10:33 PM
22

Try closer to the roughly last 2300 or so years In 1500s Europe roughly 92% of women were married. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_ancient_Rome Slightly lower marriage rates in the Roman Empire, but still way higher than “the majority”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:26 PM
1

Well “scientifically proved” isn’t a “real science” thing if you want to be pedantic, but here is one relevant study that found that women were attracted to strong men. There are several others. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480609/#:~:text=They%20were%20asked%20to%20rate,irrespective%20of%20the%20ecological%20condition. Which itself cites roughly 8 other studies which also correlates. Women’s mate preferences are influenced by men’s physical features that convey indirect (i.e., gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 10:49 PM
3

It’s been scientifically proven that women lust after physical strength. Lift weights 5 days a week until you become big, then do steroids until you become even stronger than what is naturally possible. Then you will start to experience primal lust. It’s sad that I have to recommend things that are bad for you and will reduce your lifespan, but it’s the harsh truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:26 PM
0

I am not a smart man. Jen-ny
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:28 PM
3

It’s far simpler than that. Some men get to have sex because of the things they provide; those are called betas. Other men get to have sex because of good genetics, those are called alphas, and other men don’t get to have sex at all, and are culled from the genetic pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 11:08 AM
-1

You’ve explained why betas have sex with women. Now you just have to understand how the other 20% of men who don’t “ gives resources, attention, or emotional labor” Are able to have sex. And then you’ll understand beta bucks and alpha fucks. Except explained in your own words instead of just accepting the redpill who described this phenomenon 10 years before Andrew Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 11:06 AM
2

I did read it critically, and I’d encourage your boyfriend to dump you immediately. You know, just as a general precaution, why take the risk?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:19 PM
1

So… why are you a special unique snowflake, or are you saying you’re planning on accusing your boyfriend of taking advantage of you? Are you planning on leaving him in 7 years when he magically becomes invalid for some inexplicable reason just because you think “50 is old people” Your argument falls apart completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:23 AM
4

30 year old women upset that men her age are no longer as interested in her sexually so she has to settle for a man in his 40s. Shocking. The most shocked I’ve ever been in this subreddit. /s Yawn, water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:07 AM
3

Equally as annoying to a man. If I'm playing with your clit and you stop me every 5 seconds to tell me I'm doing it wrong and that actually you prefer if I did it exactly like you who is able to get yourself off regularly. Sometimes it's just fun to play for a while and see what happens. I'm not stupid, I can jerk myself off as a man, doesn't mean I will tell you that if you want to try and give me a handjob. I may not finish, but I appreciate the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 04:59 AM
3

And that’s how she met Asmongold.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:41 PM
4

Similarly, if you sleep with 200 prostitutes, that wouldn't count as "success with women" even if by any objective metric, it would place him as having had sex with more women than 99% of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:33 PM
1

A single anecdote can prove any statement wrong. "all women are dumb" "here is a woman who is smart" "ok I am wrong" this is basic logic
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:20 AM
1

You stated an affirmative claim. In order to disprove your statement I'm only required to provide one contradictory example: that is how science works.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:54 AM
1

I can prove your thesis wrong with my own personal anecdote. I've never once had a single female friend. (friendly co-workers, sure, but never once a single friend). And yet I've had great experiences dating women. I've had a couple relationships last longer than a year and one relationship that lasted for 4 years that I really enjoyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 11:56 AM
1

I guess we need to send the “native Americans” back to Africa by your definition. Or where do you draw the line? Where it is politically convenient for you? Is being born in America not good enough for citizenship? I guess you agree with Trump about ending birthright citizenship?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:30 PM
0

He’s American. He’s referring to Americans as “our people” versus the globalists neocons and progressives that want to “import Americans” and it doesn’t work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:04 PM
0

Our people aren’t having enough children to replace themselves. That should bother us,” Vance told the gathering in Washington. He outlined the obvious concern that Social Security depends on younger workers’ contributions and then said, “We want babies not just because they are economically useful. We want more babies because children are good. And we believe children are good, because we are not sociopaths.” https://apnews.com/article/jd-vance-childless-cat-ladies-birth-rates-555c0f78ef8dd4c13…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:50 PM
1

Biology doesn’t change in the order of thousands of years. We’re doomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:45 PM
1

Literally 40 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:42 PM
1

They are having casual sex, just not regularly or often.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:58 AM
-2

Because he knows you are doing it, you just aren’t doing it with him. That makes him jealous and competitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:42 PM
–

clearly I don't need as much time as you do
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:33 PM
–

I'm 42 years old, I've been having sex since I was 25. I don't have an exact count, but I'll estimate that I've averaged a new sexual partner every other week during that entire timeframe. There is still plenty of time to post on reddit. (13 out of every 14 days)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:10 PM
–

oh no, if I correct someone on the internet for being bad at math, I won't have sex?!? stop trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:06 PM
–

There are 7,000,000,000 people currently alive in the world, give or take. Even if I am in the 99.99% of the population, there are still 700,000 people who have had more sex than me. If you say "there are a million people on this planet who have fucked more people than me" it doesn't sound nearly as impressive, does it? But that's because you're bad at math. Your statement would only be true if there were 10,000 people on the entire planet. You can have sex with more than 99.99% of the people in…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 06:58 PM
–

it's not your autism holding you back. Source: I have autism, I've had sex with more people than 99.99% of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:44 PM
3

I’ve literally never seen a single one of these ever. The algorithm feeds you content that it thinks you will look at and engage with. Evidently you are interested in this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:44 AM
4

>Anyway I was told that she needed space and that she hated me again and could see why that certain friend had cut me off. Projecting at me that I was hurting her because I called out her issue and it triggered her. This is codewords for she is going to fuck someone else
/r/MarriedRedPill03/05/25 12:03 AM
1

Guess what, your mom AND your grandma also put out for a man, shocking I know, your mom is an angel and all, but she also took a nice deep creampie to make you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:21 PM
-3

The problem is that for many of us, We've been both #1 and #2 at some point in our life. I personally have been an invisible to women 4, and also used steroids (prohormones technically when they were still legal) to get closer to the after appearance (although obviously way bigger) and what I would objectively call "an 8" And you get treated better/significantly better by ALL women when you look like the after photo. As for why women are saying they like the before photo? it's the artificial har…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:23 PM
1

The fact that you are even dating her tells me that the standards are different. Go ask her male coworkers how much their girlfriends make, they’ll all tel you “what girlfriend”?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 02:50 AM
–

“Kick out your ex boyfriend, you’re being disrespectful” “No” “Ok dear, I’ll move out then so I’m no longer bothering you”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 04:17 PM
–

This is how normal women treat normal beta men. What do you think “a stepdad” is? The original OP is absolutely right, and this guy is unfortunately living proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 05:11 AM
–

Wow dude, I’m sorry to read this entire thread, you’re like a walking beta stereotype, I hope you can at some point learn to respect yourself first, because no woman ever will until you do that for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 05:09 AM
–

For being a supposedly purple pill man, your idea is pretty much straight out of red pill ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 05:04 AM
3

He’s not infallible. He gets a lot of stuff wrong. He is still fundamentally blue-pilled about a lot of things. Maybe he just needs to be divorce-raped before he actually swallows the redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 02:36 AM
3

You’re right about everything. The problem comes from holding females accountable for failing. That will never happen in our feminine-primacy society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 09:03 AM
2

I mean, getting married in 2025 is beyond retarded too. And yet here you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 08:20 AM
3

Attractive men are having more fun, and you don’t even need to be a top 5% man to participate. Im an extreme outlier, but most men won’t have hundreds of sexual partners, but a few are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 06:26 AM
2

Real statistics are important, but so is actually understanding what you are looking at. OP claimed our population is larger, which is true, but the number of children has actually decreased. So if the number of children living with single mothers has stayed the same, but the number of children being born has decreased. Then that means OP that you are praising, has drawn the wrong conclusion, because the percentage of children living with single mothers has increased.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 06:22 AM
1

it's "most" of them men (that women are attracted to)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:16 AM
1

Objective truth is true regardless of who says it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 05:36 AM
–

Had to scroll really really far to finally find the answer to the OP in your 3rd paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 05:36 AM
–

I reported this post to the mods, but they're more concerned with making sure I don't hurt peoples fee-fees in my comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 06:54 PM
15

Nice advertisement. Hopefully you get a few chuckleheads Who are too dumb to see that you’re just a paid shill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 06:55 AM
5

I wouldn’t date any woman who would be willing to date me -mark twain 2025 (probably)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:26 AM
-2

You assumed that the OP was looking for you to fix his insecurity. I merely flipped the genders and applied the same logic to you. He didn’t ask how to feel better about having a small penis, he asked why do you prefer larger.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 01:40 AM
6

In my experience, it’s not even what I do with my hand or mouth that changes how much a woman can or can’t cum. The number one indicator of if a woman is able to cum is how attracted she is to me. If she’s attracted to me, it’s easier, if she isn’t, she won’t. Regardless of penis, mouth, or fingers, or any other combination of the 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 01:13 AM
0

Men can’t fix the insecurities women have about (insert every body part that isn’t a penis).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 01:11 AM
1

If someone is telling a 35 year old woman that she has “plenty of time for children” it’s amazing advice, if they want the destruction of the human race. I’ve argued this before, there are people out there that want humanity to go away. They know what to say and what to do to accomplish that, and it’s working. It’s literally a death cult. Anything that results in more humans is considered bad, anything that results in less humans is considered good.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 12:51 AM
2

the difference between sarcasm and a lie is that you're trying to bring the other person in on the "untruth" with sarcasm. You both know the thing you are saying isn't correct and it's a form of humor. The women he's talking about are using it to filter out men that don't "get it" though. It's exclusionary instead of inclusionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:42 PM
6

Dude, he went to 12/10 on the sarcasm meter, I say this with all the compassion in the world, are you possibly autistic? Sarcasm is not the same thing as lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 02:39 PM
5

Sure, as a not even particularly masculine although probably (undiagnosed) autistic man I’ve been “rewarded” with sex a handful of times by several different supposedly “lesbian” women. At least that’s how they wanted to appear in public. I’m guessing it’s because I probably care less about social rules or labels than most men, and they could pick up on that. Or something. People who fake things (like car salesmen that try to be friendly) give me the ick, so when a girl shows genuine interest, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 02:33 PM
1

https://youtu.be/y-yGUSRdNG4?feature=shared I’m not giving up my Porsches just so you can brag to your friends about what neighborhood you live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 05:32 AM
5

Deal, only problem is, to live off one income we have to live in Ohio, non of these fancy schmancy states
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 01:57 AM
4

Oh no, hot milfs in my area really like autistic men with world of Warcraft addictions…. lol. The entire premise is so laughable. Women and men are not the same, this question doesn’t work when gender flipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:25 AM
1

As an “elder millennial” I tend to have more in common with Gen z than I ever have had with the younger millenials. I just have never once bought into the woke garbage that is just taken for granted in anyone currently 25-35ish I absolute hated hipsters when that was a thing. When I was 28 I didn’t want to date women 5-10 years younger than me, and now that I’m 42 I still don’t want that generation of women that are currently 32-37ish. I’d would rather date someone my age or someone who is 25-30…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:17 AM
1

Why? I already have sex with women. These sex bots can't be "that" much better, can they?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:30 PM
5

You're in such a deep depression that you can't even imagine that it's possible to be a man AND be happy. You can't even imagine it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:59 PM
-1

Congratulations, you've successfully incorporated the "4B" movement into your life and turned yourself into a sexless woman. Now, for the rest of the men out here, who biologically crave sex, perhaps because of differing testosterone levels, then all the amount of "brokeback mountain wyoming" isn't going to help us.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:31 PM
7

The problem is, guys that don’t take no for an answer, also don’t care about being shamed. The guys that do listen to your ridicule and pay attention to women are the type of guys that hear the message and now refuse to approach women in all situations. So now women have created the worst of both worlds. They only get approached by the men they don’t want, and the men they do want refuse to approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:21 AM
6

I googled it “how many men are virgins at the age of 20” You’re welcome to follow up and tell me why google’s sources are inaccurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:08 AM
8

37% of 20 year old men currently, have not had sex yet. What is your definition of “abnormal” are we saying you’re abnormal if you’re anything less than the majority? By your definition any man that identifies as a feminist is “abnormal” and should seek therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:53 AM
6

Yea, I’m pretty sure I’m undiagnosed autistic, or what in the past would have been called Asperger’s. But books like that, and other similar books, did help me learn basic human interaction. Are you suggesting that all self help books are bad? What about professionals? Are THEY allowed to read books? Do you have to be a paid nutritionist to read about about nutrition? Or dieting, must you pay someone to read about how and why the ketogenic diet works? Do you need to be submissive and bow down be…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:47 AM
1

That’s kind of true, I was fucked, society failed me, but I went from being a 24 year old virgin (18 years ago) to finally learning how to get laid thanks to that material as well as books like “the game” and seduction forums.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:43 AM
–

I slept with a lot of women in their 20s when I was in my 30s, it honestly doesn’t matter when you peak, eventually meaningless sex stops mattering when you’re getting enough of it, maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:11 AM
13

No. And I highly doubt that she “deserves” anything. Because good women aren’t talking shit about men and whoring themselves out for validation on social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:47 AM
–

The same reason that a man can be high value and he devalues the value of a Ferrari when he drives it. No one wants used merchandise. The high value man can own a garage of 20 different cars, some cars can be nice, some cars can be winter beaters. But they all lose value as they age. The more cars he is able to own, the more value HE has. But him owning the car does NOT make the car itself more valuable. For example, Jay Leno and Jerry Seinfeld both like older Porsches. You can even buy some of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 10:38 PM
2

lol, that’s funny, and a very solipsistic world view. You do know that a LOT of men aren’t actually able to sleep with a lot of women, right? They aren’t sharing anyone. Something like 1/3 men under the age of 30 have zero sex
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:46 PM
0

I used the water fountain analogy already, so go read it. Just because have no claim to ownership over the water fountain, doesn’t mean that you aren’t sharing it with other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:33 PM
1

Ok, I’ll break this down as best I can for you in an analogy. There is a really really high end jewelry store. They are worth billions of dollars. It’s a “high value” jewelry store, because they come in contact with a LOT of jewelry. And a lot of high end clients. People bring in their old jewelry to sell. It happens regularly. When the business go to sell the used jewelry, they don’t market it as used. It’s just “an engagement ring” not “used engagement ring, 50% off”. All they did was take a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:31 PM
2

If you drink from a water fountain. You understand it’s not your water fountain, you don’t own the chiller, but you’ve instead shared it with everyone else that likes to drink water. Just because there is no expectation of owning the water fountain after you put your mouth on it, doesn’t mean you’re not sharing it with other thirsty people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:22 PM
11

I see what you did there, and I approve.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/25 06:20 PM
-1

Yes, when 100 women all have sex with the same man who doesn’t want commitment with any of you, that’s sharing the same man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:04 PM
58

2 teachers at the same school is fucking crazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/25 07:54 AM
-8

Until you get horny. In which case, you (not you specifically, but women on average) do, de facto, end up sharing a man. Even if you find it distasteful. And that’s the problem with literally every single reply on this thread. “I’d rather stay single”. Ok, but OP wasn’t just asking about relationships. Women might very well be single, but they are still having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:11 AM
0

I think most of the comments have got it mostly explained, but I’ll try my best to explain it differently. These are not different insults, they all stem from the “same issue” most women have an over-inflated sense of their worth. For some women, they have lowered their value by being with many men (the first group you have described). The second set of women is the same set of women, but also has unrealistic expectations on the type of man they can get into a relationship because of their forme…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:06 AM
0

Wrong. If it were completely out of your control, I wouldn't have been able to go from being an invisible 4 to an 8+ and back to a 4 again. My face is "ok", but I'm only average height. If you can't be tall, at least be strong. There is scientific proof (i'm feeling lazy, but the papers are out there) that "power" is the things that women find most important, more than the size of the muscle or any kind of weird asymmetries that gym bros talk about. I wouldn't have been able to go from virgin at…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 04:08 AM
0

Unfortunately, it's kind of unfair to make that accusation. Because of course they would deny such a thing, because that's what a sociopath would do. Even though I know it's true what you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 07:53 AM
3

Well I think Greta Tunberg just suffers from small boob syndrome, she should just get a boob job and then it would fix her issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 05:26 PM
-3

One of the most popular authors/red pill influencers wrote this 13 years ago. https://therationalmale.com/2012/07/18/the-wall/amp/ I highly doubt you’d ever find a single redpill man saying the wall occurs at 25. If you are going to generalize, 30 is as good of a round number as any though. But hey, as long as you’re “go me woman power I have crazy access to as many men I want” at 27… then you aren’t at the wall yet. But at some point it will happen to you. And then you’ll be posting here in pur…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 07:07 AM
1

How "nuts" are we talking, like giving a 13 year old student a peanut butter sandwich laced with psychedelic mushrooms so that she could rape him? Or we just mean like " a little nuts "tee hee I'm a blonde don't punish me, the boys wanted it" level of nuts
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/25 03:10 PM
3

Looked up indiana law. She has 10 charges of child molestation. Each charge carries a fixed penalty of 20-50 years. Theoretically she should spend 200-500 years in prison PLUS all the other charges. we'll find out though for sure. Hey, you might be right. But I do guarantee the man would get the 200-500
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/25 02:39 PM
7

lol, good one 😂 Male teacher raping 10 girls would get 2-5 decades in prison minimum. Especially in Texas. We’re talking about a state that acquitted a man who punched to death the man caught raping his daughter. I guarantee she gets less than 5. Guarantee it even.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/25 08:15 AM
13

It’s also twitch. Popularizing terms like pdf file, un aliving, and grape. Ironic considering it’s perfectly acceptable to glorify and promote violence as long as it’s pro Palestine or pro Marxist causes, I wonder why…. (I hate social media)
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/25 08:11 AM
3

I'm single. I play video games. I reddit. I work. This is why I'm single, it's related. To quote southpark, how do you kill, that which has no life. I'm like Asmongold, except with 3.5 million less followers on Youtube.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 04:33 AM
1

? You're right. I actually can't get anything. LOL Wait, were you suggesting I don't actually make that much? Really? I've been posting on reddit for 12 years. I talk weekly/daily about my job, which is all public record what I make. Even a cursory examination of my profile would be enough to dox me, my coworkers were able to figure it out. And yes, there are very few women that make more than me (low cost of living area, if I lived in a high cost of living area many people would make more than …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 03:03 AM
5

I'd love to find a woman making 250k a year in Ohio. Unfortunately they don't exist. And if they do, they are banging other doctors and lawyers. So like most men, I take what I can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 11:58 PM
–

To be fair, the guy labels himself as "purple pill man" and you're attributing it to red pill, so I guess your reading comprehension is pretty low. Also, putting far too much stock in the opinions of one online anonymous person. (who isn't even redpill)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:25 PM
–

Well look at you... going ahead and proving the men right. Congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:23 PM
–

Old guy = extract him for resources and simping in exchange for my youth and fertility. Don't backtrack now just because I called you out on this. This has nothing to do with "being a provider" "extract him"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 07:57 PM
2

Exactly, reverse the genders and it isn't a "shocking" taboo, it's a crime, and the male teacher would end up in jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 04:51 PM
2

Now, don't lie and tell me that women don't say that. I have seen this reasoning a hundred times (and highly upvoted too) in ppd alone. You answered your question with your pre-emptive defense. Women lie and create whatever narrative they need to suit their CURRENT needs. A 23 year old woman is empowered to do whatever she wants according to a 23 year old woman ... and a 23 year woman, ACCORDING TO a 35 year old woman, is a child who is incapable of coherent thought. The caveat to that is that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 04:48 PM
1

Are you a man? Did you call a potential provider your simp (twice)? Why would you blame MEN for what you just did
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 04:42 PM
0

why does a guy need to be a simp to be willing to support a SAHM. I make more than enough income to support a family by myself, but how you talk about it is a giant red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 08:30 AM
1

“Hardcore” is not a violent term, it means penis and vaginas are visible and shown along with the actual insertion of penis into mouth or vagina. This is to differentiate between “soft core” porn where you will see asses and tits or perhaps even showing a woman rubbing on the outside, but not actually showing insertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:36 AM
–

That’s the entirety of most feminists on this subreddit, it just comes with the territory of a “debate” forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:31 AM
–

The question is: convicted of what? Obviously peeing in public while drunk (although I know for a fact that men are more likely to be punished for things like that compared to women) but like nude sunbathing at a public beach would be concern for me, a red flag but not immediately disqualifying, something like having sex with an 18 year old student if she was a teacher would also be a red flag for sure, but not immediately disqualifying. Something like sex with a 15 year old would, on the other …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:29 AM
5

If you get uncomfortable touching a woman, what makes you think it’s going to be better when you’re “touching” a woman. Stated plainly: If your goal is putting your penis inside of a woman, how are you going to let a little rubbing up against her while dancing make you nervous. That’s like wanting to shoot a gun, but being afraid to load the magazine. Wanting to drive a car, but scared of pressing the unlock button on the key fob. If your goal is to drive a car, you have WAY BIGGER things to wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 03:01 AM
1

I don't know your situation. Most women leave the home earlier than most men, typically it's because they are moving in with romantic partners. Something like a 2:1 ratio at 18-24. I'm not offering prescriptive advice here. I'm just talking in vague generalities. But yea, ideally you'd figure out if your boyfriend is worth committing to, and if he's just a temporary fuckboy, you'd pick a better boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:10 AM
0

If the majority of women leave the workforce, those that remain also benefit. It's basic "game theory" except everyone is currently playing only for themselves instead of what benefits the most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:21 PM
0

Well Afghanistan wasn't a great economy before the wars (russia/us), still isn't a great economy after the u.s. left. Iran has women in the workforce, although it is significantly lower, around 14% in Iran, and at least from a PURELY economic standpoint they do seem to be doing well despite harsh economic sanctions from the u.s. for the past 50 years. (and the u.s. MIC funding Iraq to war against Iran as a proxy) I mean ideally I'd rather it was voluntary and something that women did because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 11:11 PM
2

Women didn't enter the workplace overnight. They wouldn't leave the workplace overnight either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:09 PM
4

I’m perfectly happy unmarried. I’m not trying to get married at all. Why would I? Like you said, I would just end up divorced and a lot poorer. The situation sucks for everyone. I said I had my age on my dating apps set for younger than 30, I never once said I was looking for marriage? Why would I want something that women have ruined. Married by 22? lol I was a virgin until 25. Women aren’t interested in nerds who play video games. No woman wanted me until I had resources. Sorry to inform you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:14 AM
1

You want to be a boss babe and go kill sauron or beat up the hulk while also attending to business in the courtroom, you go right ahead, but the Hollywood fantasy they are selling is just that, a fantasy, but women seem to eat it up in a way that men don’t, I don’t get to shoot lightning bolts from my hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:09 AM
1

The alternative is prioritizing a family over your own personal happiness. How dare I ask a woman to sacrifice anything, I know, but that’s the alternative. If women exit the workplace, en masse, than wages would rise again for men, reversing the wage stagnation over the past 50 years. I realize that is a radical suggestion, but I’ll throw that Overton window wherever it needs to go to fix our fucked up society. Sorry that feminism lied to you and said you could have everything, they themselves …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 10:49 PM
2

Because the women who wait until they are “established” which in today’s modern world means 35. End up having 1-2 children at most, many end up having no children at all, and it is going to cause massive global demographic issues, our entire world functions on the next generation being larger than the previous, but we’ve finally hit population decline. The last time human populations declined, they called it “the dark ages” before that, “the Bronze Age collapse” doesn’t sound particularly pleasa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:28 PM
5

Good, so the advice to men is to hide any good parts of yourself, or she will make you wait for sex. Remember, men, if she makes you wait for sex it’s a “compliment” lolololololol I think you need to look up what “punishment” and what “reward” means in the dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:18 PM
–

He's bragging about how good of a wife he had.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 12:15 AM
1

No, I don't think I do. I absolutely agree that those things were terrible. Regardless of what the church taught, the truth is that the earth revolves around the sun, and eventually the truth won in the end over doctrine/dogma
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:55 PM
8

A lot of good advice for men here: A) don’t project yourself as being good relationship material, be a bad boy or bum, or emotionally unavailable, or whatever works for you. Or you get friendzoned. B) be good at sex so she will want to sleep with you more than once. I said a lot of good advice, because really those are the only 2 things you need to know. Because it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:40 PM
1

I’ll do you a favor and answer for you; because you refuse to accept reality. Being sexual early on gives better results with women than not being sexual early on in a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:36 PM
1

You might as well ask him if he didn’t eat breakfast how would he feel, because he is incapable of responding to hypotheticals; dodging your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:35 PM
1

If it’s pointless to debate about it, you would have to also argue that this entire subreddit is pointless, but it’s clearly not; people can learn, and get different perspectives. When theredpill was new, some concepts were very controversial and argued against, nowadays everyone considers them as just common sense. Women don’t lack access to sex, they lack access to sex with men that they want, and the reason they lack access is because of competition from other women. Women want what other wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:09 AM
2

Eastern Orthodoxy is as logical/illogical as Islam, but doesn’t require stoning the heretics or condone sex with 9 year old women. Some cultures are better than others. If you view religion only through the lens of societal control, I’d much rather live in an Eastern Orthodox strict Christian nation than an Islamic state.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 07:19 AM
1

I make decisions without complaining about it. I am emotionally stable and don’t mind if you aren’t. I make something like 5x the median salary. I don’t care about your job, unless you want to get married/have kids, in which case I’m rightfully concerned about divorce rape or child support decisions being anti-high earner, but even then, as long as you have a career and not just working in fast food or a gas station or something similar, I’d be happy. I have more sexual experience than 99% of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 06:23 AM
–

This has been studied, women are aroused by power. It can come in many forms. Not just muscle power, but if you’re richer (significantly, talking millions) women are more likely to orgasm during sex. For most men, the easiest way to achieve power would be weight lifting (and perhaps enhanced weightlifting).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 06:00 AM
7

I got jaded at 17, when I asked a girl to prom, she told me she’d love to go, and then her friends came around an hour later to tell me she was just being polite and that I was way too ugly and a nerd to go to prom with anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 03:38 AM
7

No, that is feminist propaganda and just flat wrong. The VAST, VAST MAJORITY of women are more attractive at 20 than at 30. The only women that does not apply to would be women who have some kind of major health issue such as being obese at 20, that they fix by the time they are 30. Unless you define “plenty” as less than 10% of women, then sure, but you’re ignoring the 90% of women who are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 03:36 AM
7

When I told him that 'dread game' doesn't work, he responded that it 'worked on his ex' and I was absolutely beyond disgusted. The incredible thing is, I tried to deconstruct why his 'tactics' didn't work and how his stupid manosphere beliefs are completely unfounded, and he just disagreed. Here you are on reddit still posting about your ex that you haven't gotten over. Even though you were long distance and he wasn't happy. Yep. Clearly they don't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 07:14 AM
2

I mean, it was big in my life because it turned my dating life around, and instead of being taken advantage of by women looking for a meal ticket I started dating on my own terms and getting what "I" wanted out of a relationship. (After previously learning seduction/game helped me go from a virgin at 25 to being able to regularly get my foot in the door in the first place). So yes, I absolutely understand why women hate TRP, it teaches men how not to be taken advantage of. I was absoutely being …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 05:38 PM
2

TRP handily predates metoo by a couple years. TRP had nothing to do with metoo. TRP grew from "game" and "seduction" such as "the mystery method" and men trying to find an underlying theory of WHY those dating "tricks" work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 01:01 PM
-1

Except if the woman was drunk and the man was drunk and she doesn't regret it. It's consensual. If the woman was drunk and the man was drunk and she does regret it. It becomes rape, believe all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 01:00 PM
1

I’d consider that is even worse then. They want babies with and logically choose to SHARE THE SAME MAN, rather than settle for a lesser lower-value male all to themselves, they aren’t being driven by hormones or lust (if true, but again, people lie). But instead logically choosing the situation they put themselves in. And yes, while some (most) of his children have been created via ivf, some of his children were created the old fashioned way, including the rumor that he slept with Sergei brin’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:48 AM
2

Ashley St. Clair "wanted an LTR" with a man who is currently publicly in relationships with 2 other women? Continually knocking both grimes AND Shivon up and has never once been seen in public with him? Look she can "blast him" on social media all she wants, but she absolutely knew what she was doing when she had unprotected sex with him while he already had 2 other women pregnant at the same time. Musk allegedly told St. Clair via text in November 2024, "I want to knock you up again," before te…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 10:53 PM
2

Look, they aren't all "hoes in the street" let's not pretend this is only something that happens with the lower class. Example: Justine Musk Talulah Riley (twice) Amber Heard Grimes Ashley St. Clair (baby momma number 4) Shivon Zilis All successful in their fields, millionaires, and 4 of whom decided to have children with the same man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 08:46 PM
1

It's not delusional at all for a woman to have her standards wherever she wants them. Women would rather share a high value man than settle for a less-valuable man that she can have all to herself. She'd rather have a situationship with a good-looking successful man than a committed relationship with an ugly loser. And we can see that because of their actions, I really don't care what women say, but I look at what they do. And similarly, many men are more than willing to date/fuck multiple women…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 08:33 PM
2

Dude, just stop. This sounds like mental gymnastics trying to justify the fact that the traits that you offer are not the traits that women want. It’s not logical, it’s emotional and you have my sympathy, but it honestly just feels kind of sad. Wouldn’t it be easier for you to develop more of the traits that women are actually aroused by rather than these reframing choices. “I’m not her second choice, I’m her first choice after the asshole left her!”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 10:53 AM
8

When you’re a top 10% man, you can do this. I’m not currently, but I was in the past, there is no reason not to when all women like the same small % of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:47 AM
1

There isn't anything to read... it just presents you with a photo, reading takes extra steps. Wasting time on a woman that only has a 3% chance of liking you back is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 03:15 AM
3

The problem is they want to be treated like a conservative woman, without actually being a conservative woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 01:43 AM
0

Being consistent. Women that I don't ghost are ones that include in their profiles things like ENM or "short term open to long" ... OR long term conservative women. Hell, I've matched and met with several "lesbians" (to their friends and family) over the years who wanted to experiment. Great. We can both have fun. If she is a liberal feminist man hater, I really just don't care to interact with her. And if she is welcome to match with the plethora of "liberal feminist men" and deal with their is…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:39 PM
0

I was pointing out the "reason she gets ghosted" is the OPPOSITE reason of what she THINKS. She's being ghosted BECAUSE men read her profile and say no thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:32 PM
1

you actually have to scroll the profile a bit before you can press on a section of their profile to "like" and then you can send them a comment or a response based on that portion of their profile. Well yes, technically you can like one of their photos, but it's not just swipe left or swipe right.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:26 PM
-9

look, If I swipe based on appearance I can clear my maximum 50 allowed swipes per day in like 3-4 minutes. If I take the time to read every single profile It would take me 20 minutes. Regardless of if I read profiles or don't read profiles I will have a 3% match rate. Most women don't read profiles either, so I'm just doing what has been gamified for me to do to achieve maximum success with minimal investment. edit: the proof I have that women will match without reading a profile: I have a blank…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 09:12 PM
-8

If tinder wanted me to read a profile before I was allowed to swipe, they would make it so that I needed to read a profile before I'm allowed to swipe. For example: hinge does not allow you to swipe based on appearance. Tinder does not require you to read profiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 09:07 PM
–

Oh look here's a cute girl... swipe right. match... NICE she likes me.... Oh, oh no, she's r-tarded. "MAGA swipe left" "no hook-ups, just because I have 5 children from 3 men doesn't mean I want to sleep with you, even though tinder is literally the app for hookups" "only swipe if you are pro abortion" "if you can't handle me at my worst you don't deserve me at my best" "..." "why do I get ghosted after men match with me?" ... Hunny, the reason you are being ghosted is BECAUSE they are reading w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 08:04 PM
1

you're right, also, a lot of the posts on TRP have been deleted. I'll send you a better one... https://www.forums .red/p/TheRedPill/106983/how_to_give_a_woman_an_orgasm
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:04 PM
1

1 sec
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:47 PM
0

I got auto moderated for linking, the posts are there, I can’t link, and I’m on phone so even navigating a quarantined subreddit is painful enough, you’re on your own buddy. I can’t lead a horse to water, but if you’ve decided not to drink, I can’t help you any further.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:26 PM
2

Yea, unfortunately people treat other people as one big monolithic block, and hopefully you speak up in the other comment threads when women complain about not being approached by men anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:56 AM
0

You said that no red pill content encourages men to become better at sex, that is itself easily disprovable, which I just did. I could just plug my eyes and ears and say “blue pill encourages men to rape women, I haven’t actually seen it but it’s true” and it would be equally as valid as your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:53 AM
0

You’ve somehow managed to “consume” the content without actually reading it, or you were so negatively biased against it; you selectively ignored much of it. It’s literally pinned posts in the sidebar that have been stickied there for the past 8+ years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:43 AM
5

Dear women of this subreddit: this post is why you never get approached at the gym, at the bar, in the street, or ever. This woman is actively making men ignore you in public, by furthering the narrative that all men are creepy. Enjoy finding dates on Bumble.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:29 AM
0

You’re wrong. Society still believes the premise. Only the chronically online men who have swallowed the red pill believe what you wrote. Society as a whole does not agree with you. You’ve seen the matrix, and you can’t unsee that, you can’t be plugged back in. But most people are still plugged in and actively resist being told the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 09:01 AM
0

Do you genuinely believe that? Despite a massive amount of the top posts of all time on the redpill subreddit being about how to give women the best sex/orgasms of their life so that they become addicted to having sex with you? You’re just objectively wrong about what TRP is and stands for. And you’re just lumping together random “I hate women” into the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 05:45 AM
–

That’s why mgtow and black pill have separate terms/subreddits. Redpill was always about teaching men how the world works and how to overcome adversity/bad thoughts after learning what reality is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:44 AM
2

I never dated, I never kissed a girl, I never had any romantic interests at all before the age of 25; I finally got depressed enough to want to learn and change. I learned dating/attraction from reading books about it and finally had my first kiss/sex at 25. I had my first relationship by 26. I had multiple year long relationships throughout the rest of my 20s/30s and finally had an almost 5 year relationship in my later 30s. What sets you back is your defeatist mindset. Once you understand that…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:53 AM
1

Yea, they aren't "hanging out" with their casual sex partners. They meet and fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 11:03 PM
1

You don't... until you do. And there are enough women to do it that "some guys" are capable of having regular sex without committed relationships. Again, you DO NOT KNOW your friends sex lives. They will not introduce you to me, you'll never hear of me nor see me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:31 AM
1

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna38755436 There is... actually... It's just a news summary, but it includes about 10 different ways you act on those 2-3 days a month. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1559901/ etc etc etc there are lots of research articles about it if you want to read them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:51 AM
4

The problem with your premise is that it categorizes women into two categories, those that are aroused by scumbags and those that aren’t. Unfortunately, 100% of women get aroused by “scumbags” and if “good men” didn’t choose those women ever, there would be zero women left for them to select, and even good men want women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:12 PM
3

The best we can get is that women lie about how many sexual partners they have, if they will lie to researchers about it, of course they will hide it from other women too. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/202004/gender-differences-in-casual-sex?amp
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:37 PM
2

You’re wrong about there being “different types of women” When a woman says “I’m not interested in casual sex” I believe her, for 27 out of the 28 days in her cycle, she isn’t. But women are absolutely controlled by their hormones far more than men are stereotyped to be. For that 1 day a month, she absolutely will hook up with some dude that she matched with same day on tinder. And she’ll never introduce me to her friends. And I might not even ever see her again. You won’t ever know this side of…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:32 PM
0

I don’t care if I am, if they want to play games like “I won’t sleep with someone till after 3 weeks”, it’s a huge red flag for me, and I’ll instead stick to dating women that don’t have that restriction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:53 AM
1

What I mean to say is that they aren’t looking for a relationship at first. First they’ll figure out if they want to fuck you, if it’s good to go, then they’ll try to convert that into a relationship. If a girl hasn’t put out by the 2nd date, she’s not interested in anything longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:27 AM
0

Women generally pick men for short term dating, hoping to turn it into a long term relationship. If it doesn’t work out, they will easily have more chances for short term relationships and converting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 11:43 AM
–

Red pill actively encourages men to develop dark triad traits because it will get them more sex and more relationships because women are aroused by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 08:20 AM
3

TL;DR summary for everyone else. Woman has sex with scumbag, now has baggage that she will carry to future relationships. You are the reason red pill teaches guys to act more like “scumbags” Because those are the type of men that women, including yourself are attracted to. To steer back to the claim that you make, that it is better to be “late” nope. Not at all. Because you decided to be late, you put far more importance on your one singular encounter with a bad guy instead of realizing that it …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 07:53 AM
–

Ok, I’ll accept that explanation. I’d argue that no one is capable of keeping her “un-bored” and that the problem is with her, and it doesn’t matter who she picks, a ends up moving on from guy to guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:46 PM
–

It’s not about “me” keeping her attention, I’d believe that “no one” could keep her attention. As they say “she’s for the streets … of some foreign country living her life of adventure”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 08:06 AM
–

Woman B. My hobbies include video games and Netflix and Reddit. I enjoy vacations, I’ve been to almost every state in the u.s. scuba diving in Mexico, I enjoy skiing, but I can’t afford to fly to the Rockies every year, but it was worth doing once, but adventures are not the norm, “norm” means i hit my local ski slopes 45 minutes away or maybe drive out 4 hours away for some of the upstate New York resorts. For me, my life is 99% at home, and 1% adventure. I’d rather spend time with someone who …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 08:05 AM
1

That was a typo, meant reddit, but I think you knew that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:27 PM
1

I got called a racist because I didn’t think Elon did a Nazi salute, and I linked to the entire video instead of the edited out of context clip. And I got called a Nazi because I am against censorship of Twitter links. Oh trust me, there are a lot of zealots on Twitter, you just haven’t felt their brunt because you toe the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:51 AM
–

I’ve heard it said before that women are pragmatists who pretend to be romantic while men are romantics who pretend to be pragmatic. Stop dreaming about it, marriage is dead, it’s over, stop thinking about it. Everything you want from life, relationship, cohabitation, sex, children, all completely possible and better without marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:25 AM
1

I’d argue the same thing about Reddit, except replace conservative with liberal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:20 AM
1

It’s basically the Pareto principle on steroids, 95/5. 95% of women will give their attention to 5% of men. If you’re in the the top 20% of men (which is where I include myself) then you can at least still get some scraps. If you aren’t in the top 20% of men, fix that first before trying. Otherwise you are wasting your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:04 AM
1

Tinder was amazing 10 years ago, they absolutely changed the algorithm to make it worse. Hell, I even had luck using Craigslist personals, none of that shit works anymore, I didn’t change, match group did.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:23 AM
1

See: the birth rate in Korea / Japan.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 01:05 AM
0

It takes more than 2 hands to count the number of “feminists” and “lesbians” that I’ve had sex with. I’d argue that it’s safer, socially, for a woman to claim to be a lesbian, than it is for her to claim to like men, in a liberal arts progressive college. She’ll suffer more social backlash for being straight (or bi) than for being a lesbian.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 01:03 AM
1

Sabotage them? Might I ask why you’re divorced? Is that what a normal and healthy relationship looks like?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:40 AM
0

you claim that society has only had a problem with age gap relationships recently. Instead it has been a problem for all of history.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:03 AM
2

Your entire premise is just wrong: https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/unequal-marriage-by-vasili-pukirev/ It's been a societal issue for a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 08:05 PM
6

Everyone’s hands are different, it sounds sus, because it is bunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:53 AM
3

A million times this, I’ve had sex with many women, and not once has a woman EVER seen my dick BEFORE we were going to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:52 AM
2

Great repost, this is one of the best lessons TRP ever taught me. Both betas and Alphas get sex, the quality and frequency is determined by if she sees you as a beta or an alpha. (regular frequency, low quality sex, versus high quality random chance hookups). And of course, either is preferable to being an invisible incel not getting laid at all.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/25 10:04 PM
3

https://www.tiktok.com/@spnvrm/video/7195551297607585025
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 06:05 PM
11

Duh, she pulled out her phone recording everything around her while looking angry, that is supposed to mean approach her. I guess, as opposed to yesterday when you would have been out on blast.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:44 AM
10

You’ve never tried rejecting a woman. I’ve had a 300lb woman literally pick me up out of my seat when I didn’t want to dance with her at the bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:42 AM
47

Are you kidding me? After the trend of the last several years of recording men at gyms trying to catch them looking at women to be shamed on social media? Nope, no way, if a woman is dressed nice at a gym I wouldn’t know, because my eyes are glued to the ground. Did you just wake up from a 10 year long coma?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:25 AM
2

Maybe in your state, in my state, it doesn’t have anything to do with if the woman works while married or not. Child support has a hard and strict formula which is actually gender neutral. alimony, however, is not. It’s strongly biased against men, but regardless the standard is “to keep her at the standard of living she was accustomed to while married” so if she is married and makes 40k pretax and he makes 80k pretax, they have a combined HHI of 120k, they are considered equal partners so that …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 11:04 PM
-2

That isn’t how it works at all. I mean; that would make logical sense, but that isn’t how it works at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:54 PM
-1

Lololololololol are you like 15 or something? Tell me you’ve never talked to a divorcee without telling me you’ve never talked to a divorcee.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:54 PM
-3

And if she also kept a job, the children became latchkey kids: and she was always too tired to do any housework anyway, why does she still get alimony and child support. Oh right, because the courts are biased. Anyway, marriage is dead, feminism killed it. Enjoy the decline of society everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 07:50 PM
9

the Ryan Gosling movie everything thinks sex dolls will be like: Barbie The Ryan Gosling movie that sex dolls will actually be like: Lars and the Real Girl
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 07:28 AM
1

Women have sex with men constantly that aren't 6 feet tall also. Online and hypothetical examples are skewing your idea of what is happening in reality. Women are subjective choosers. She'll take the best man that she can get "that night". Women don't care about sex 85% of the time. (4 days out of a 28 day they do care a lot about sex, even if they are on birth control pills they still tend to have spikes in their hormone levels which causes their interest in sex to drastically increase). Apps l…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:58 PM
9

All women have shallow preferences. Some women admit it. Other women lie about it. Gravitate towards the one that are honest about it and steer clear of the liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:50 PM
2

But yes, i would prefer to debate the merits of the arguments over who made the argument too, but the problem is they do actually come from a place of jealousy and selfishness, she got to date men in their prime when she was younger, and now that she’s older and worth less in the relationship marketplace, she is upset that men in their prime no longer want to date her. It’s just how the world works, you can rage against it all you want. The day I hit 40 my online dating matches decreased by 80% …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 06:35 PM
2

Cool, and if they are capable of consenting they are probably less insufferable than you or the average single 40 year old woman too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:25 AM
3

https://magesblog.com/post/2014-02-04-does-sexual-activity-change-with-age/ 55-64 still have a lot of sex. TL;DR: roughly 50% of people 55-64 having sex within the past month. Hell that’s better than most guys under the age of 25 these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:21 AM
2

Claims to be a man, that is. He has a certain “je ne sais quois” that makes me think it’s actually a woman just doing gender flipping. I’ve never once known a man in-person who writes like him, but plenty of women who do, and then there is the whole “I have mommy issues” thing to “it’s ok when I dating older”, look… it’s the internet, I understand anything could be possible, but I’d be willing to bet 200 bucks OP is actually a woman who didn’t want to have their debate quashed because they’d jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:05 AM
0

I didn’t have my first kiss until I was 25. The fact that I have self respect won’t permit me to help some woman my age to help raise some other man’s child.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:04 AM
3

If he’s 30 and she’s 18, theoretically, when he’s 60 she’ll still be 48, both plenty capable and interested in sex. Is he just supposed to stop having sex and keel over and die once he hits 50? When are we supposed to just Soylent green ourselves for the next generation? 40? You write like a teenager “eww I never want to be 30, that’s old”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:01 AM
1

Dude, you made the same mistake elsewhere in the thread, so I wont badger you too badly about it, but it’s not. In most states it’s not. I’m not going to look up every states consent laws, but most prohibit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 07:57 AM
3

The problem with your argument is that you are wrong. In many states it’s illegal to have sex with someone that is mentally retarded. In some states it’s written in explicit laws, and in other states it’s implicit because of how their consent laws are written. I wasn’t going to interject, but calling the person you’re arguing with an imbecile while factually and objectively being wrong (while talking about retarded people) is peak pedantry.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 07:54 AM
1

I already explained. 1/3rd admit to it, I think others also do it but would not admit to it, which is why I linked to another study/story about how 33% of people lie on surveys, even anonymous ones, to make themselves look better than they actually are. 33% + 33% > 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 01:59 PM
-2

Oh damn, I didn’t realize Nicholas cage was a Nazi sympathizer too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 10:48 AM
1

Yes, they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 08:58 AM
1

So because a man is stupid, it’s a woman’s fault?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 08:57 AM
1

Yea, exactly my point, I’m calling you out for bad behavior and poor logic, and I notice it because it do it too. That being said: A) in the first link: I call men stupid. B) in the second link I say it is the man’s fault. C) I’m arguing against someone who claims that women are never at fault, which is objectively untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 08:22 AM
2

Yes, you are overly broadly generalizing, one man behaving one way you don’t like, and one different man behaving another way you don’t like doesn’t mean that the average man is following all of those behaviors and treat women as you describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 08:17 AM
2

I do t get what you’re trying to prove, I told you you are taking the beliefs of several different men and combining the worst traits into one imaginary super-evil man and saying all men are like that. So to disprove that, you link me 8 different men on Instagram that post memes and imply that all men are the same? No, that’s literally you doing again, what I accused you of doing in your original post. You are taking what one man says, combining that with what another man says, and then saying “…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 08:10 AM
2

Because you can’t just combine the worst features of any 5 particular men, and then say that these are “general features of all men.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 08:01 AM
3

Look, if you're physically repulsive to women, you need to improve that. If you want to get laid, you need to be willing to put in time and effort into the gym and your diet, because life is a competition and other men are willing to put in effort into getting laid. If you're ugly, become big, women are aroused by powerful men regardless of (or more accurately in spite of) their aesthetics. If you don't have 6 hours a week for the next couple years to spend on your fitness, then you're a liar, q…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 07:36 PM
1

pick a man to emulate, one that is successful with women, and just copy what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 07:34 PM
2

You can be a 6/6/6 guy and if you're a timid beta you might as well be invisible to women. Dominance, assertiveness, intelligence are all attractive qualities to women too. Top 20% refers to the top 20% of men, overall. If you're having "some" luck like Happy Difference is, then he probably is actually a 20% man, it doesn't take much: decent job, decent health, decent level of attractiveness, decent level of confidence. MOST MEN don't even meet that bar, they'll be significantly deficient in one…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 07:33 PM
2

Men act like this online, anonymously. Women do it openly, in public, in front of their significant other or behind his back to their friends. I’ve personally overheard women ranking the dick sizes of the different men they had slept with at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:18 PM
3

You’ve amalgamated 6 different men into your ultimate boogy-man. I dare you to find a single redpill poster that has done all of these things. Hell, I’ve done some bad things on Reddit, but I don’t think any of my comments fall to the level of and certainly not all of them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:14 PM
1

I’ll just piggyback off yours because I was basically going to say the same thing. That is not stereotypical behavior of men, and I highly doubt that any man would actually marry a woman he felt that way about. A) because I’ve done stuff like that online, talking disparagingly about women I was sleeping with. Although I agree that the “gender swapping” was done very poorly by OP. And B) the guys paying for OF tend to be single and incel. But that being said: you can still find your significant o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:10 PM
5

Porn stars? Dude, are you delusional? They are literally just selling product, and if it’s online, those are men behind the keyboard using feminine social media profiles to make money.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 07:43 AM
9

Woah, you're saying MEN are allowed to change their minds at any time and for any reason? Sounds like misogyny to me. Sorry buddy, only women are allowed to withdraw consent!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:24 AM
8

You just raped him with that comment so good, you should go to jail for that comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:20 AM
5

No no, you don't understand. If a woman manipulates a man into sex it's because men are stupid and deserve to be taken advantage of. If a man manipulates a woman into sex, it's rape, a serious crime that should be punished with strict laws from the government. Misandry 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:20 AM
3

It’s a shit list anyway, I clicked 4 links and literally zero of them were for men only.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 06:12 AM
6

My assertion is that marriage is dead, and women like you killed it. Any man that is dumb enough to marry a woman in 2024 deserves to lose all of their money, morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:59 PM
3

Duh, if you don’t want to be robbed, just stay away from criminals, thanks for that exceptional advice captain obvious. Why would you go out in public if you don’t want to be mugged?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:57 PM
4

Ok, now how much bigger is the list for only women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:55 PM
1

You fundamentally don’t understand the reason why men don’t like dating apps if you think the reason is “you are often making connections that aren’t nice or fun”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 03:35 AM
2

Want has EVERYTHING to do with it. It’s the want of your partner. Your logic is flawed because you’re assuming your partner doesn’t want to be pegged. In previous relationships her partner wanted to try anal sex so she tried it. In her current relationship her partner wants to try anal sex but she doesn’t want. The actual act itself is inconsequential, the only important word is “want”. In previous relationships she was willing to try new things with her partner, and now her new beta doesn’t get…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 07:16 AM
8

I understand now the problem with your thinking. The flaw in your logic is you don’t understand what x equals. You incorrectly assume that x = anal sex. Or x = pegging. You don’t understand men at all. The correct answer for x: x = did what he wanted. If you did what your previous partner wanted, and now you won’t do what your new partner wants, that is a problem. X does not equal blowjobs, or anal sex or pegging. X is, “she tried to make him happy”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:45 AM
7

It’s a bad troll. Oh you only went to first base with your first boyfriend when you were 14? I guess your future husband also only gets to go to first base with you. It’s terrible logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:40 AM
2

That’s the entire point. If a woman doesn’t want to have a rich and fulfilling sex life “with you” because she only cares about her own wants, and previously she cared about the wants of her partner, they are going to have a bad relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:38 AM
2

I’m not settling for anything less than Ana de armas. You can’t hold me down random redditor!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 10:32 AM
1

The 2 ladder theory was first postulated about 20 years ago. Funny to see what is old is new again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 01:46 AM
1

Who are these men, are they in the room with us right now? You accused “me” of being contradictory, what did I say that contradicted myself? Where did I state that I wanted women to be badass assertive girlbosses AND also chaste submissive quiet demure playtoys? I simply described how women actually are, not how I would like them to be (which is neither of those obscene generalizations)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 10:46 PM
1

Because people commonly confuse 2 different concepts, Chad Thundercock (6’4” jacked college football player and member of a fraternity) is one stereotypical “alpha male” but is commonly used incorrectly when the original poster simply meant the broad category of alpha. On TRP these other stereotypes had other names, but yes I think it’s important to acknowledge you don’t have to be Chad to be an alpha male. Chad is not the same thing as alpha, and the definition of words matters. Women aren’t at…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 10:41 PM
1

It’s almost as if you are talking to multiple different individuals with differing beliefs and not one big monolithic block of robotic thinkers. Nah… it’s just easier to call us woman haters.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 10:28 PM
1

YES. Thank you for agreeing with me. Because you’ve agreed with me, I’ll now agree with you. Why choose only one. Just like you post multiple times a day on this subreddit. because I’m a red pill man, I am constantly blaming women both for being too submissive while simultaneously being not submissive enough. All red pill man are bad and hate women. Thank you for pointing out the error in my ways. And somehow a man (me) having to go out and live on his own would be “a woman’s fault” (naturally)?…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 06:41 PM
1

We talking about prehistoric era, I have to kill a deer with a flint-tipped arrow? Yea, maybe, because I would have been raised in such an environment. But if we're talking about 2024, no person is out there having to trap and fish with zero help or trading from other humans, doesn't mean, genetically and biologically, that's how humanity survived for hundreds of thousands of years. And yes, most men didn't reproduce, their lineages died out. The ones who had "community" bred with multiple women…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:21 PM
3

That isn’t what I said at all, you made some pretty big assumptions. In some situations the otherwise jobless drug dealer comes out at the top of the hierarchy, in other situations I would, in other situations you would. Hell, you could make a reality show out of it if you wanted, street smarts vs book smarts or something like that. I bet it’d be popular. The man that comes out on top in whichever situation the woman happens to be in, is the one she will find most attractive. And my point is, mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 06:44 PM
5

Alpha is contextual. It literally doesn't matter what you or I think about those men. Women are out there fucking and reproducing with him because THEY see him as alpha. IF you and me and James the drug dealer were sitting in a room having a conversation, eventually as men we'd form our own hierarchy, and women fuck whichever man ends up at the top of that hierarchy in the larger societal sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:51 PM
2

I mean it in the scientific sense of the word, the classic definition of alpha male. The dominant male amongst a group. He's the one that women choose to have sex with. To subvert the old seinfeld adage "master of his domain"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:44 PM
6

I didn't say chad. I said alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:40 PM
1

Think it's a mistake to view human behavior through the lense of species further and further removed from our ancestry. Dogs and Horses are already a bit of a stretch, apes are the better animal to study.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 02:25 PM
7

Like it or not, there are alpha males out there with 12 babymommas and broke living drug sale to drug sale. "alpha" doesn't care how much money you make.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 02:23 PM
25

I very rarely ever check someone's post history, unless prompted. Red pillars are society's losers, blaming women for all their problems. Successful men have no need for red pill nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/25 02:00 PM
19

A woman who is ostracized from the community dies. Any females that didn't learn that lesson were darwin'ed out of the gene pool 200,000 years ago. Not giving offense is the biggest concern for any woman in every social situation you described.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 01:43 PM
2

That wasn't her question. She was asking, of men, how many men would prefer the safer woman or the riskier woman. We all know women like "badboys" ... But I guess what wasn't obvious to her that ALL MEN like safer, more submissive (to them) women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 01:33 AM
0

I'm not 100% sure that you can argue that beta traits require "more" to invest in. Show up every day to work? Don't do drugs? Drive the speed limit? Yes, for "beta" people those are easy tasks. For "beta" people, other tasks are hard, disregard what women say? Take risky behaviors? (the entire subreddit of personalfinance just had a heart attack), stop caring about other people other than yourself? Forget finances, work on your body more? Take steroids maybe even? Those are not "easy" for beta m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 07:33 AM
4

The problem is that you're putting too much faith into what one woman told you years ago. Women don't have a concept of objective reality, what is TRUE to a woman is what she currently feels about a topic. If instead you did what was best for you, you'd perhaps realize that women can be enjoyed for what they are, instead of what they are not (trustworthy sources for accurate information)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 07:13 AM
1

DEBUNKED!!! I don't think I've ever heard a person in real life actually use that term, only the chronically online and political pundits. But what did I say is "scientifically proven" (aka debunked) to be wrong? That women lie about their behaviors (scientific fact) That women actually do enjoy having sex with alpha men? (again, scientific fact)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 07:11 AM
1

“Fall for it” Women tell you they are tricked by “risky choice” men because it gives them sympathy from betas like you. The first step in recovery is recognizing that you have a problem. You are being manipulated by paying attention to what women say, rather than watching what women actually do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:04 AM
3

That is all women. Her treating you bad is not because of her fault (all women are like that), it’s your fault. You can fix it. She would do it with any other man that was like you also, but she wouldn’t do it to every other man. I don’t know your situation, but do you think she is rude and disrespectful to her boss?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:01 AM
18

Sorry to hear that dude, when I got rejected once, not to my face, but by her friends (in a very harsh manner), it left me unable to approach women for years afterward. Thankfully they aren’t all as broken. You have to be able to overcome your fear of failure or it’ll just keep holding you back.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:57 AM
3

I’m more in the “risky man” category, but for me, I absolutely prefer any relationship that I’m in to be with a “safer” woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:53 AM
7

I’ve had to remind a few men this, but both beta men and alpha men get to have sex. Beta bucks still gets sex, it’s not the quality or in quantities that the man wants, but they do still get to have sex. It’s only if you have neither alpha nor beta that men don’t have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:52 AM
6

It’s literally impossible, that isn’t how women, or men for that matter work. They are aroused by the highs and the lows, for men it’s called “crazy in the head, crazy in the bed” you can’t be both “sexyl and “stable”. You can be “attractive” but stability is not what gets a woman wet. No woman in the history of womankind has ever orgasm’ed while thinking about 6% 30 year average returns on their 401k or buying a car that will last 200k miles with only the recommended maintenance schedule.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:49 AM
4

Sorry, those women don’t exist according to the other poster.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:45 AM
1

Risky choice is what I’d rather be. I own 3 Porsches, although I should definitely get the motorcycle too, I used to ride one as a teenager.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:44 AM
1

Yea, not sure why they take offense when the red pill just accurately describes the behavior and then gives it a term, “cock carousel” 🎠
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 01:26 AM
1

Women will have sex with a man for 2 reasons. A) because he is fun to be around, he is attractive, good genetics, this is often called “alpha” by the red pill. B) because he can provide her with goods, quality of life, this sex is transactional and is called “duty sex” and is unenjoyable to the woman and the man too, it’s basically work. This is called “beta”. It’s a common misconception that red pill teaches that only alpha men fuck and beta men don’t have sex, that has never been true. Both al…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:58 PM
–

That’s just, patently false though, all sorts of women have sex without needing you to buy them food and gifts. Again, you’re thinking of women like a vending machine where you put in tokens and eventually they spit out sex rewards, that isn’t how ANY woman works.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 05:50 AM
–

Damn dude, every single woman that sleeps with a man is ugly? Nice progressive ideals you have there. Have you ever considered that women are actual humans also and that sometimes they want to have sex too and that women that enjoy sex also can be attractive and highly desired by other men? Typically I only see this level of hatred of women from recently unplugged redpill men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 03:11 AM
–

Yea, the difference is, with a prostitute the man gets something he wants out of it. Women will gladly accept a free meal with no intention or any romantic interest in a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 12:40 AM
–

That she enjoys sex? With me? I’m old enough to remember when women were allowed to enjoy having sex, “sex positivity” was considered cool. And not all women were assumed to be prostitutes like you are insinuating.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 12:15 AM
–

It’s simple, I don’t pay for dates and don’t take women out to dinner. If she wants to fuck, later I’ll be willing to buy her food. But if she doesn’t want to fuck, feeding her some Cheesecake Factory isn’t going to make her magically want to fuck. You can’t just “insert favor coins” and then “expect sex payout” Honestly, I think the whole expecting sex for dinner thing is incredibly sexist and I’m surprised it still persists, it’s 2024…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 10:08 PM
2

ah yes, if only I knew how to cook, women would be slobbering all over my dick. Thanks blue pill!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:16 AM
1

statistics says that modern men and modern women don't start relationships at all. Yes, some do it on dating apps, but most just don't date. That's why the birth rate is plummeting. Women are content because they get as much sex as they want. Men are miserable but society doesn't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:15 AM
3

Change the sort from "hot" to "top" and then change the date range to "all time" read the top 50 or so posts of all time.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/24 08:14 AM
0

>Why do you think women are drawn to soldiers, cops, fighters, authority figures? You are so wrong it's not even funny. They are drawn to men in these careers because these careers have physical fitness standards/requirements and most of the men in these careers are required to be in-shape.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/24 08:12 AM
1

Instagram is just advertising for onlyfans, buying followers on Instagram doesn’t mean someone is popular
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:15 AM
2

Sorry, the only people lusting after “insta baddies” are women like you who spend their entire lives on social media. Literally no man I know even uses Instagram. I know it’s been a long time since you were in elementary school, but let me introduce you to a concept known as bandwagoning, that marketers use to make you think something is popular. Hint: some random model doesn’t really have 3 million people following her just to see her latest and greatest life update. The only person they are “i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:51 AM
–

I'm an air traffic controller. Roughly 80% of my coworkers are married, and of those, roughly 33% of them have wives that either minimally work part-time/side work like realty or just don't work at all. If your wife is "demanding" an expensive car and large house, then you married the wrong woman, People can live modestly on 1 income, easily, but modestly is the key word. If she spends all her days browsing instagram and wanting to keep up with the kardashians, then it's a doomed relationship. e…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 09:43 PM
15

10/10 would wife up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 06:47 PM
27

Right, she wrote a perfect post to describe “loser” men, incels, in an attempt to “teach us” via analogy, and she ended up creating the perfect waifu.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 05:26 PM
12

Exactly, you aren’t wrong at all. Never once have I asked or cared about how many friends a woman had before I dated her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 05:23 PM
16

Did you not read the paragraph after bullet point 3? He eliminated 95% of women with that one caveat.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 05:21 PM
2

Ah yes, just read a book and take a guitar lesson, and you will magically get laid, look lady… no offense: but you have less than zero clue what it’s like to be a man, and it would be better if you just acknowledged that you have no idea how or why men are able to have sex rather than spitting the bad advice. Your blue pill advice failing an entire generation of men is why the red pill was necessary in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 12:50 AM
–

Ah yes, great advice, tell the men not having sex, to get better at sex. So that more women will want to have sex with them, that’s amazing advice. Let me make sure to put that on my tinder profile … “Match with me, I am very good at the sex because I have a lot of it, and am well-practiced”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 08:45 PM
–

Because I talk to all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 08:43 PM
–

Sorry, I'll grow 4 inches taller in my 40s, my bad, anything to make women happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 05:30 PM
1

Me? No. I’m the type of guy that gets everything I want and don’t typically stay in committed relationships, I’m the guy she tries anal with a few hours after meeting me. I am the man that OP hates and OPs woman thinks about at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 07:09 AM
1

Because only women can have an abundance mentality like that. You can do whatever you want and it’ll just “work out alright” That isn’t how the world works for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 03:36 AM
0

Oh thank you sage wise woman telling me the secrets to never break up again. All I needed was a “secure confident” woman, let me narrow my tinder matches from 1 out 100 to 1 out of 100,000
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 03:08 AM
1

I'll try to stay respectful, to comply with the subreddit rules... But you're completely missing the point of the question as posed by OP. He's using it as an allegory for bad sex. He's describing a relationship that a women would find offensive, and are rightly expected to leave for and the metaphor is, that's what men are expected to "just deal with" in a relationship. She did anal in the past and doesn't want to now? Just deal with it. She used to give blowjobs and doesn't want to now? Just d…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:39 PM
2

People in general have trouble seeing things from other people’s perspectives. Solipsism is incredibly prevalent in women and has worked to the benefit of the propagation of the species and isn’t considered a bad thing by society. IQ of under 80 is typically associated with being able to understand hypothetical scenarios. In this particular case, I’d argue that OP not being able to see things from the feminine perspective is worse than the woman responding in telling him that he is stupid becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:07 PM
0

In red pill terminology this is referred to as “making yourself the prize”. For women, this comes naturally, for men, less than 5% of men are the prizes, and probably less than 1% of men ever adopt that mentality, usually it’s the super-celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio, or Derek jeter that have thousands of women fighting to be with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:33 AM
9

This is what OP doesn’t understand about women. Women won’t settle for less than what they want. They will just rather remain single. Even when single they will still have as much sex as they want. Men will put up with starfish sex and bad relationships. Women know they can replace a lukewarm man with one that will adore her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 10:30 AM
1

No, many/most men are not intimidated by “pressure” and also don’t understand the concept of “failing” there is no such thing. Yes. He may lose “a job” but then there are other jobs he can do. Losing one job may lead to forward advancement even vs stagnation. Women, being more risk averse, are more likely to be perfectly happy to stay with one employer for 20 years without advancement. Men are less likely to be happy about that situation. Men tend to work harder to provide for their families. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:26 AM
3

I have a few Porsches, but it only gives me attention from men. I guess I was too autistic to pick up on the social cues that women actually prefer boats.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 04:11 PM
8

Another problem with autistic people is that they tend to be very literal in interpreting what people say, and when it comes to sex and relationships, people very rarely literally describe what that's supposed to be like, so they may have a very childish view of relationships Yea, I definitely struggled with that and dating in general until I started to study seduction/dating starting at around 23. I finally lost my virginity at 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:35 PM
5

That's been my strategy most of my adult life from 25 (when I lost my virginity) until 40. After 40 it MOSTLY stopped working, because the women in the age range that mostly want to smash (18-29) look at 40 as a hard cutoff just like they look at under 6 feet tall as a hard cutoff on dating websites.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:32 PM
1

but every now and then it rears its head in the form of a missed social cue How do you think men get sexual opportunities?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:30 PM
5

more direct An asshole Don't cater to a man's emotional state Don't care about you or your feelings. expect maturity from their partners Demand more, provide less. more naive Don't bother you more prone to people please Nicer easier to manipulate Easier to get along with
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 04:29 AM
5

It's also a 400k a year job so she can leech off your salary, ideally divorcing you once she gets bored so she'll never have to work again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 09:21 AM
1

To use a vulgar slang term for it, you're trying to top from the bottom. Stop doing that, says the doctor the the patient
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 02:16 PM
2

No, most men do not enjoy having constant fights and bickering for control. If you ask him to make a decision, just go along with his decision and stop second guessing. Whether that's something important like a big purchase decision, or it's something trivial like picking what you are going to eat tonight. It's very annoying (as a man) when a woman asks you what do you want, you decide, you tell her, and then she tries to tear down what you just said "no we just had KFC last month"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 02:14 PM
–

Women are allowed to make jokes about vasectomies, but men can't talk about abortions. I guess that's why we should repeal the 19th.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 04:40 AM
8

It’s not that they don’t want to be the main breadwinner, the truth is that women are never satisfied in “enough” so she thinks that if she isn’t the main breadwinner she would be happy if she made more. And if she is the main earner, she thinks she would be more happy with a man that makes more than she does. There is never an end to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 06:34 PM
2

I make 220k a year in Ohio, I’ve been single for the past 2 years. I’m 42. So yes, there isn’t really a huge quality of life difference between like 100k and 200
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 04:38 AM
1

The female equivalent of “you’re a nice guy, you’ll find someone someday”. “That’s a nice movement, not for me, but one day it’ll catch on”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 08:49 PM
–

So, you're actually dating a man and regularly having sex presumably. Describe to us again why this 4B thing is going to take off? (One of the 4 things in the 4b means you aren't dating, which you are dating, so you've already failed the 4B)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 03:16 AM
–

Duh, women have to be protected from having their own opinions, if you don’t support murdering babies you aren’t a real woman, whatever that means…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:14 AM
–

lol, lol, lol, Make abortions legal so that women will fuck me. Lololololololol If you’ve been on the subreddit long enough you’d realize how misogynistic that sounds. A) it presupposes that women want casual sex with you but b) women are too stupid to use contraception, but c) but is smart enough to realize that she can have unprotected sex as long as she can get an abortion later.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:12 AM
2

No, no, no: Clearly we need more gun control to prevent tragedies like this. Think of the children!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:34 PM
–

Good, your bad genetics and mental poison will fade from the world. I award you, the darwin award, antemortem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 01:44 AM
1

"minimize joy" I don't think you actually understand what actually causes happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 01:43 AM
1

Because sometimes what is important for society is what is more important than what makes you feel comfortable. I'd rather not have civilization collapse and the human race disappear.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 01:35 AM
4

That is absolutely pure feminist propoganda, female sex drive is nowhere near of that of male sex drive (on average). The fact that women have a huge amount of desire for 4 days a month doesn't compare to the constant need men feel 31 days a month... And this of course manifests itself in dead bedroom lesbian relationships as well as high std/promiscuity rates among the male homosexual population.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 05:46 AM
3

Increase your sex drive by 1000% that is the difference between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 09:44 PM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 09:42 PM
1

That’s like saying men can choose not to make appearance a factor in the women they choose. You’re going against basic biological urges. Like a man who literally can’t help looking at cleavage. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Technology/scientists-prove-men-ogle-women-women/story?id=20749938 Similarly, women can’t help but me more attracted to a man who has more resources than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 08:05 PM
1

Except she doesn’t have control, she’s clearly stating a desire for children, that’s why someone would freeze their eggs. But being unable to find a partner they can be happy with with never go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 05:45 PM
1

Statistically keep lying to yourself and your friends, there is a reason more women are on anti-depressants than ever before. Keep telling yourself you can freeze your eggs and science will help you negate biology. If you were truly happy without kids there would be no need to freeze your eggs. But you know that it’s not an ideal situation, you’d rather have kids, but you can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 05:43 PM
20

There has however, been studies on the rate of std transmission, which is going up. https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0125-sexualy-transmitted-infection.html https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/abstract/2021/04000/sexually_transmitted_infections_among_us_women_and.2.aspx
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 06:08 AM
1

The last time the global population declined we literally had no system of writing. Or civilization to speak of. Every single year of recorded history we've only grown as a species. We are currently at a tipping point where we're about to start declining again, the last time it happened we were literally killing other species of humans to try and survive. The narrative that "women have less children because children die less" is absolute bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:27 PM
-9

ho ho ha, abortions have no burden passed onto society? what about global population collapse and emotional damage from an entire generation of women who have the cognitive dissonance from murdering a "clump of cells"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 02:27 PM
2

So “right ring religious nut jobs” are why abortions are banned in almost every single European country after 23 weeks?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 11:35 PM
3

Safe option meaning the guy has no other prospects, he's safe because no other woman would want him, and would take him first. Just like women pine after men that other women want : inversely : men want to be wanted by multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 06:08 AM
1

Doesn’t matter if she doesn’t do it “a lot” they all do it. And they all do it with the same type of guy. Be that type of guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 01:56 PM
2

The problem is every woman is wired the same, it’s ingrained biologically, like I said, it’s similar to looking at cleavage. If she doesn’t want to hook up with you casually, she isn’t going to want to have your babies in a relationship either. Both “good girls” and “bad girls” both will be attracted to a man who is a good “bullshitter” and a man who passes the shit tests. They just want to be in a relationship with a “bad man” who is “good to her”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 02:08 AM
2

If you are getting casual sex with a woman, literally hooking up on the first time meeting, within a few hours, then she doesn’t care how much you make at all, you could literally make zero dollars, that is “alpha fucks” If she cares what you make, and makes you wait for sex, you might still get sex. But that is “beta bucks” One is preferable to the other. I’ll let you figure that one out on your own. Women are attracted to status, she thought you might be a lawyer, if you were a lawyer and made…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 09:15 PM
1

air traffic control
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 02:40 AM
2

work a lot of overtime
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 12:13 AM
7

As someone who owns a house and makes 200k a year, 3 Porsches, well that doesn’t sound too bad at all. Because u.s. women have the same “requirements”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 11:51 PM
-1

No, they want honesty AND they don’t want to fuck loser virgins. Correlation is not the same as causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 01:02 AM
1

She isn't "openly" cheating on him. The dude suspects that she is cheating on him. He doesn't have solid proof. So she wants toe benefits of a relationship and also the benefits of being a 304. His friends are telling the man to treat her appropriately, and stop giving her a relationship, stop caring about her, stop trying to text her and give her emotional validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 09:30 PM
2

OP is confused because OP doesn't think like a man. He's not "giving" anything to her. His friends are counseling him to get something without giving anything back in return. Be more greedy. Receive sex, enjoy sex, don't give her any feelings. Enjoy the sex with her, but do not catch feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 08:39 PM
-2

Technically this is a question for men, but I’m not the target group. I am glad I decided to learn what I needed to do to attract women and 17 years after I first lost my virginity at the age of 25 I’m still enjoying meeting and interacting regularly with new women. In fact, the vast quantity of men that have checked out has made it easier than ever to meet and have sex with women (for those that are direct and upfront, it’s like shooting fish in a barrel). Women are lonely, women want to be app…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 07:27 PM
2

Median? lol, you want an average woman to settle for an average man? How will she get validation on her Instagram page with that kind of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:02 PM
1

Duh, women good men bad
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:01 PM
–

Hey, just keep following that live laugh pray mindset and in a couple more years you’ll be able to divorce rape him. Looking forward to hearing about all the new cock you get to experience as you go on your “journey” of “discovering yourself”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 01:56 PM
1

I have the first currently with a small harem. I don't have the 2nd. I'd still say the first is preferable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:18 AM
23

Sorry, I'm only 5'9", 6 appearance, and only make 200k a year... too average for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 04:51 AM
7

I'm 42. My experience isn't quite as "trivial" as it is for infps. But I don't struggle. I was an incel before the term was even well known, until I was 25, which would have been around 2008
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 10:51 PM
1

Yes, I ended up finding books like "the game" and other PUA/seduction forums and learning how to flirt/attract women around the age of 24/25, which was 17 years ago at this point. The loneliness until then was absolutely crippling and led to a LOT of unhealthy behaviors and relationships in the decades after.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 06:34 PM
1

Yes, I was so completely convinced that I could not understand how women worked or if they were interested or not interested because she ACTUALLY knew that I was an ugly loser but "to me" seemed happy that I asked her out and genuinely seemed interested, but was just too embarrassed/polite to tell me that herself, that she used her friend to tell to me because she was too scared to tell me herself (my thoughts, not her words), I became convinced that I was so clueless that it would be better to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 12:45 PM
–

They are dying to be approached because it has stopped happening completely, and it’s literally impossible to make women happy. They asked to stop being approached, and now that it has happened, they are still unhappy about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 10:09 AM
–

lol, your wording is funny, because it’s true. Because every man that isn’t “attractive” is “repulsive” and there is no in-between for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 10:08 AM
–

Boo hoo Go hop on tinder and then hop on a dick within an hour, little sympathy from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 10:06 AM
1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278584619307304 It’s not even just women, men are more aroused / addicted to uncertainty also. Dopamine is the “pleasure” chemical. And yes, even the women in this thread talk about dead bedrooms, because to a certain extent being the cuddly kind of love is not the same kind of love that you have for sexual arousal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 08:47 PM
1

I’m proving that safety and certainty are not arousing to women. If safety were a concern, the human race would cease to exist because full body condoms would be preferable to women because even kissing is risky. If certainty were preferable you (the royal you) would not spend years pining after fuckboys in the hope that he will choose you over the other women he’s with.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 07:10 PM
10

2 stories in particular: The girl that had been near to my friend group, (her friend was dating my best friend) I asked to prom said yes and seemed happy about it. An hour later her best friend came up to me, called me an ugly loser and said that she was just being polite and she didn’t actually want to go with me. I didn’t ask any girl out for 7 years afterward. (I avoided talking to the girl I asked out ever again for the remaining 4 months of high school). My boss’s wife (1 year older than me…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 05:45 PM
2

Well that’s why you’re going to have a team of legal experts and your friend and family watching the entire thing to ensure your safety throughout the encounter. Just the thought of that must be making you wet!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 05:25 PM
-2

Ah yes, the fact that the contractually agreed upon sex would not be able to be upheld by a judge is surely that which is keeping you from being aroused.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 05:23 PM
0

No, just that because you’re so turned on by certainty and safety, that the thought of a legally binding contract to engage in intercourse on a mutually agreed upon date in the future hashed out by our team of representatives (who will of course also ensure your safety and the terms of our agreement by witnessing the act and acting as your representatives to ensure your safety is paramount) would be your ideal situation. Or maybe it’s not “safety” and “certainty” that turns you on, because my of…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 12:19 PM
-3

Same response for you as the other woman that responded to my comment, have your lawyer speak to my lawyer, I’m sure the thought it is already turning you on.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 11:56 AM
4

Yea, you’re right, nothing makes a woman more wet than safety and security. Let’s draft up a legally binding contract to have sex on September 23rd and have 6 witnesses to ensure your well-being.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 11:55 AM
0

2 random words and a 4 digit number, it’s like having dejavu in the matrix, once you see the patterns they are hard to miss.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 10:24 AM
3

All women get turned off by safety and certainty. What is attractive to a woman and what is arousing to a woman are often two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 10:21 AM
1

Err, I literally just told you what that problem will be, hyper specialized production and globalized transportation will fail. You want to buy a GoPro camera made in Taiwan and delivered to your house tomorrow? Sorry no global supply chains to produce that level of specialization. Millions of people, who work for places like Amazon, who only exist to bring convenience to your life; will no longer be sustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 12:45 PM
–

it's an everquest thing, sz was sullon zek. Antarius was a similar sounding name to one of the main npcs Antonius Bayle. Yes, I am part polish, but that had nothing to do with the name.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 10:29 PM
–

Many of the conveniences of our modern society only result from the efficiency gained from a population of 8 billion. If we go back to 1 billion, who delivers your cheap goods produced in Asia: No one. No one is the answer, and you go back to living like how people lived in the 1800s. Enjoy growing your own food.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 09:33 PM
–

I strongly disagree as to if this is a "culture" problem. This is straight up brainwashing of the young. Children as young as 2 are subjected to "culture" that says that there are too many humans on the planet, that only bad people procreate and that good people don't have children. Yes, those other "capitalist" problems exist, yes hedonism is bad. But "socialist" cultural programming also encourages children to think that only selfish people reproduce, which is why even the most socialist count…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 09:31 PM
3

There are women that I've fucked that I didn't know their name, their telephone number, or anything else about them, that I would never see them again ever. That's not about trust at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 04:25 PM
6

It assumes that women trust all the men she is willing to fuck, which is absolutely not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 04:12 PM
5

I think your bigger problem is that you are literally so oblivious that you think obvious bot accounts are actually real people The 10/10 hot chick that wants to find a guy to shoot a corn video for her onlyfans that is also a gamer girl? Yea, she's not a real person bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:19 AM
0

Because women like you have raised a generation of men to think of themselves as defective women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:31 PM
1

Well it's because that isn't the scenario of OP. He has sexual desires. He isn't talking about being lonely, he's talking about wanting to feel sexually desired. These are 2 separate emotions. The OP needs to learn to express himself in the way that he wants to be viewed. If he's actually horny and wants sex, he needs to stop presenting himself as some kind of "I only have missionary sex within the confines of a legally binding marriage"... Because that isn't what most women want, and that's why…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:32 PM
–

The flaw with your logic is that it assumes that "chad" lies to get into bed with a woman. I can assure you from first hand personal experience, when you are attractive enough, you don't have to lie about anything, women will ENCOURAGE you to have casual sex with them. You don't have to lie or hide what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:25 PM
6

I mean, what exactly are you saying about leftists? He should try getting pegged by a woman and vote for kamala in order to better understand the dating market?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:05 AM
9

such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 09:32 PM
17

I like @Hoe_math's take on the ick situation. There are 2 different categories of ick. Not enough masculinity OR too much femininity. And then there are various degrees of ick which tell you how unreasonable the woman is. If you don't know how to change a flat tire or are scared of a spider, those are relatively "normal" woman. But if she gets the ick because you ducked while getting shot at... those would be an "unreasonable" woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:31 PM
–

Just for curiosity, is it the misandrist attitude, out of shape body, bad unnatural hair color or lack of hygiene that does it the most for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:51 PM
26

I was a virgin until I was 25. I've dabbled in an age gap relationship once... otherwise I've been pure "fuckboy" ever since. I'm 42 and still in that mindset. Congratulations women for building me this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 09:37 PM
–

As someone who did go from 60k to 200k a year, that's just not true at all. You might think it's crass, you might think it's the "wrong" kind of attention from women, but they do absolutely notice the Porsche when you pull up. Look, if you choose to be a boring billy beta and invest that 750k a year in mutual funds so that you can retire early, well that isn't exciting to women. They want fun and excitement, and money can provide that, especially at the 750k a year level.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:52 PM
–

On the contrary. The top 10% richest people in the world is the exact same number of people as the top 10% hottest people in the world. Math.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 05:38 PM
4

traditional "seduction" aka "pick up artists" can teach a man how to act confident, trick a woman into thinking the man is confident. It's basically "fake it till you make it" paint by numbers. And the best part is, once you've been laid a bunch, actual confidence can be achieved. You don't actually need stoicism or a composed demeanor to arouse women. It's great advice for relationships, it's great advice for life, but remaining stoic isn't how you get women to sleep with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 05:30 PM
1

Yea, it’s not a subversion of anything. It’s literally just the “stereotypical” red pill narrative of women. Meet dominating alpha chad, reproduce. Meet nice guy Billy beta, raise Chad’s child. There isn’t anything “romantic” about it. It’s “reality”. I don’t read a lot of women’s fantasy novels (none, actually), although I have seen the occasional movie adaptation. I do recall there was a Nicholas sparks movie/book a few years ago that basically had this same narrative, except the alpha chad al…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 03:11 PM
–

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819 Are you happy now, was it so hard for you to google for 5 seconds? To find the link to the article? The relavant conclusion: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/cms/asset/7777001f-e569-4c55-9203-65e953c2beab/rspb20171819f02.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:32 PM
0

Let me guess, your argument that the physically abusive man that she chooses to procreate with isn’t actually Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:04 AM
2

Yea, you’re not wrong, what do you want as a man, and how do you achieve it. That is male fantasy. Woman’s fantasy is how do I make the worst possible decision and never be held accountable, aka this book.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:38 AM
0

Well it’s far more than that, woman chooses alpha chad, regrets life choices, Billy beta comes to rescue her and is cucked, preemptively. It’s red pill horror.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:23 AM
6

I mean, the entire movie/book is red pill horror movie/story. Woman fucks an alpha chad, gets pregnant and then settles for a blue pill Billy beta to help raise the bastard. Any man that watches this movie fantasizes about getting cucked. So yes, 100% it’s the white knight narrative that you wrote about, save the woman from her poor decision making in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:20 AM
24

exactly, she wanted a guilt free hoe phase, I bet the number of guys she fucked was closer to 3 in 2 months than to 1
/r/TheRedPill12/08/24 07:31 AM
1

No, being wealthy gives you a greater chance of hooking up. Just like being attractive gives you a greater chance of hooking up. Social media distorts attractiveness just like it distorts wealth. Neither being attractive nor being wealthy is the norm. But if you want to have a lot of short term casual encounters, then it’s better to have both than neither.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:55 PM
1

But wait, to take your worldview into account, not everyone single person on the planet is a 9/10 hot attractive model. How did our mid 6/10 or 4/10 parents ever get laid. It’s weird to me that you can so easily acknowledge that looks matter, everyone values looks, and yet not everyone that gets laid looks good. In fact, the average person… only looks average. But yet when it comes to money your (good) logic just completely falls apart and you reduce down to “fee fees” So yes, looks matter AND w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:24 AM
–

Wow, crazy that this chick has been raped like 30+ times from 30+ different men, I wonder what the common denominator in those scenarios is? Consenting to sex and then regretting it later is not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 06:37 PM
0

Sure, if you don't want to have sex, that's fine. And I'm sure when women suggest it, they are mostly referring to men that they don't want to have sex with. But, if your goal, as a man, is to have sex, that is bad advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 05:37 PM
30

"Duh, OF COURSE women are attracted to super high status males, are degenerates who will do anything for drugs and completely ignore misogynism when said by high-status males." -blue pill The cognitive dissonance they must constantly feel is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:09 AM
5

42 year old man here, still horny quite regularly. Sure, not as much as when I was a teenager or in my 20s, but it still happens daily.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 11:06 PM
2

Well I wouldn't exactly call having sex at a rate of once (or even 3-4 times per year) "not having problems" either. That's way too far hyperbolic in the other direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:25 AM
–

Hey, listen, someone has to be ... the bottom 15% That's how percentiles work.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 10:19 AM
–

I left out one of the requirements in my original post, I edited to narrow it down further, otherwise my post is still the same. (personal preference girls that are a 6-7, beach girl, red hair flower dress, busty pink shirt in front of grass, yoga pants wood floor) The girls that I feel most perfectly encapsulates a 5 would be striped shirt standing in front of a hill, batgirl outfit, big forhead. Some of the girls that I feel most perfectly encapsulates a 3 would be, weightloss progression, bla…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 01:22 AM
–

AI answer According to the CDC, the average American woman over the age of 20 is 63.5 inches tall and weighs 170.8 pounds, with a waist circumference of 38.7 inches: https://app.mybodygallery.com/#/?height=163&weight=77&pant=40&age=30 I scrolled through about 3 pages of women, I'd say they range from a 3 through a 7 (at best), so yea, here is a good gallery of "average real woman" from my personal redpill perspective from a site dedicated to showing what real women with real measurements look li…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 01:08 AM
2

No. Stop with your egalitarian nonsense. That's not how the natural world works, and it isn't how the human world works either. Men and Women are not the same, stop treating men like defective women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 12:02 AM
3

well, you gotta tiptoe around the ToS of most tech companies these days... people unaliving themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 10:14 PM
9

Ah yes, the classic: Well we've tried feminism, and it isn't working and making women happy. Maybe we should try even more feminism. "Men should do more chores, and women should work harder at being girl-bosses that break up with the men they are dating because they deserve everything in life, don't settle." Fuck, once you see the intentional destruction of society, from the point of view that anything that results in less happiness, less children, less relationships, less humans... it's impossi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:45 PM
1

I have a different take compared to most of the other commenters. It's because women lie about their body count, they can't be trusted. They have no way of knowing if you're being serious or if you're one of the MOST women that claims to be a virgin/ low body count, but then actually turns out to actually be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 08:54 AM
1

yea, I do actually tell men that get married and then get divorce-raped that they were stupid. I had a coworker that wife started cheating on him right as soon as he was eligable to retire. Well shit, once half his 401k was gone, he's now still my coworker 4 years later. But that's why so many fewer people are getting married these days. It's been ruined. Any smart man will avoid getting married, there is zero benefit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:34 PM
–

Yea, absolutely, treyvon the drug dealer doesn't deserve trust, and yet women do it over and over, and the women are DUMB for giving their trust to someone untrustworthy. They should do better. Single women don't have kids with the most trustworthy men, that's not valued by women at all (don't lie and claim it is). Attractiveness, status, wealth, power... those are what women want to procreate with. No woman in the history of the planet has ever said "that man always pays his rent on time, that …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:07 AM
–

The planet will survive. Don't worry about the planet. Humanity, the species, is far more important. You've been fed a lot of brainwashing. Our planet has existed as an entire molten lava surface and has also been frozen completely over for millions of years, but human civilization has occupied less than 0.01% of the time of the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:03 AM
4

5'7" is the global average for men. 5'9" in the u.s. 11" would be 4 inches taller than the average. it's roughly taller than 75% of men in the united states and it's roughly higher than 90% globally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:18 AM
13

it's called "a humble brag" and men do it also From grammarly Another typical way that humblebragging is expressed is alongside a complaint. Saying “I have to miss happy hour to pick up my Mercedes from the detailer after work” may seem like an annoyance to the speaker, but to anyone listening, this is nothing but a classic humblebrag. If it’s not necessary to mention your fancy car in conversation, then you probably shouldn’t. For the OP, she claims that his big dick didn't add anything to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 05:06 AM
11

all the negatives you laid out... like being 5'11? I know this is the internet where if you aren't 6 foot you don't care, but in reality being taller than 90% of men on the planet... is still pretty good.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 05:05 AM
8

No way... women don't do that... but man you should have seen my ex, she was a multi-millionaire, it was SO annoying, she was ALWAYS away at work doing doctor things... and buying me shit... god, so annoying /s
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 05:04 AM
7

Look, I know it's stupid to ask for pictures, but I bet your 4 is probably in actuality a 7. So he's taller than average, better looking than average, smarter than average, and has a huge penis... and that's to have sex with 1 woman? Cool story.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 05:00 AM
8

Humans are one of the few species on the planet with hidden ovulation. Our entire species is predicated on women being able to hide and obfuscate their intentions. It's a "feature" not a "bug"... YOU not being able to read the signs is ... the entire point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:03 PM
2

the switch-flip happens with women when they stop loving a man also. It's like they are resentful you "wasted" their time and so they want revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:37 PM
1

Yes, I considered it, and then I dismissed it as a false narrative deigning to make men subservient to promiscuous women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:55 PM
7

oh, that's right, once you surpass 90k a year women stop having "hoe phases" sorry for getting it wrong, lol...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 12:34 AM
–

lol, I've enjoyed over the last decade or so that I've been on reddit every single post I've ever read where "that only works on insecure women"... So you mean ALL women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:01 PM
–

The higher social status women are just better/smarter about hiding how many men they've slept with. They don't stop banging multiple men, but they keep it better hidden.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:59 PM
–

That's how I was 17 years ago (#1), and yet social skills can be learned and practiced. And the funny thing is, once you fix #1, all of a sudden the fat disgusting ugly women .... aren't a target anymore, because regular non-disgusting, non-ugly, non-fat women give you attention/sex/relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:57 PM
–

sure, 90% of men are unattractive to you. That's the entire point. That small 10% of men that you find attractive are also attractive to 80% of women. That's what causes men at the top to be able to date multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:54 PM
–

Plead ignorance all you want, but if you're on a subreddit like this, you know that the top 20% of men are being pursued by the top 60% of women. Many many men have multiple options. You can pretend to be ignorant all you want, but just because it sounds disagreeable, doesn't mean you won't do it. It's not like I discuss the other women I'm dating when I'm with another woman. Most women want sex a few times a month and I want sex a few times a week. I don't ask what you do when I'm not around, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:53 PM
3

So... of the subset of passport bros. But not the young ones, or the ones that are just there for work, but specifically going to asia to find "love" because they are delusional, AND they are 60+ and unattractive... I mean, you must be literally talking about ... hundreds of men in the entire world, perhaps even a thousand, in a planet of billions. Most passport bros are not delusional. You're talking about a tiny fraction of a small subculture of men. Essentially a "blue pilled" man (she will l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:23 PM
3

And in the west, the transactional offer equivalent woman would be 20x as much, as numerous other people have said, something > nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 12:24 PM
4

I think your general premise is completely wrong. Passport bros absolutely know they are getting a gold-digger. They know that relationships are transactional. They are just trying to get better bang for their buck.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 10:19 AM
3

The problem is there are humans that have been actively campaigning for the death of humanity for the last 50 years. And the bigger problem is that they are now the ones in charge of our planet. Even in this thread you found someone who was likely taught from a very young age, perhaps before they could even read, that more humans = evil and less humans = good. (not to throw him under the bus, but gymbrotrt) It's already too late for our civilization. We have 3 generations already indoctrinated i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:39 AM
3

raise their boys to be girls. raise their boys to be inferior girls. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:36 AM
2

They are complaining because they want MORE of those men who pumped and dumped them. They want to spend more time with those men. For example, if you go to McDonald’s and order a quarter pounder, and a mcchicken and you only get your mcchicken, you are going to be pissed that you didn’t get what you want, but you’ll still eat that mcchicken and you’ll still be happier than if you were hangry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:07 PM
15

Hey, when she is wearing skin tight yoga pants at the gym it’s to streamline her performance and increase her gains!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 11:27 AM
2

Oh, those poor poor women, they had sex with an attractive person, that must be terrible, those poor poor women. Dude, women enjoy sex with attractive men just like men would enjoy sex with an attractive woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 10:56 AM
1

Man… that’s actually a really good question. I wish I could give a short easy answer. Personally, I started learning with learning pick-up artistry aka seduction ex: the book “the game” and forums for men to talk about PUA, but that was written almost 20 years ago and I’m not sure would be quite as relevant in todays age. But it would still be an entertaining book to read, because I think it does put you into the mindset of a person that wants to improve their sex life, and if you can emulate th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 09:47 PM
–

You need to vet your sources better, just because it’s written in a book, doesn’t mean it’s true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:49 AM
1

Yea, I'd include one night stands as well as friends with benefits as well as sneakylinks. One night stand is obvious, I think you and I could agree that it counts as casual. Casual means low effort. In this case, the amount of effort is "effort required by the man". I know it's difficult/impossible for women to view the world from a male perspective, and I'm honestly not trying to be condescending about that, but it's important to understand that particular aspect of male sexuality for this par…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:33 PM
4

The problem is you think you as a man get to decide who is and who isn't a chad. WOMEN are the ones who decide who is alpha and who is beta. Just like men are the ones that rate women on the scale of 1-10... women also rate men. And it's the women's scale that determines where you end up. https://youtu.be/n4aMiAesXjE?si=Rkq8P9BkuRgDxqdo&t=594 For me, I stopped 100% caring about anything in the security side, and focused 100% of my time and attention towards the things that build what hoe math ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:26 PM
1

low inhibition is a direct side effect of high testosterone. Testosterone can be increased by building more muscle.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:05 PM
6

I was a virgin who had never even kissed a girl until 25. I'm now 41 and I've had sex with 3 women this past week including one girl that I met and fucked with only a small amount of time talking. I do not know my exact body count but I'd estimate it somewhere around 450ish I'm not tall (5'9") I'm only decently well off (200k a year). And I'm not super aesthetically pleasing (large amount of facial asymmetry, reddit rated me as a 5, since that time I've gained about 30lbs and another 5 years) So…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:01 PM
1

It's also the algorithm. You won't even see the hottest women, because they know it's just a waste of your/their time. You see the hotter women / bots that men swipe left on because you yourself are not ranked highly by the algorithm.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:33 PM
2

yea... if she won't fuck within the first date, best to just not even put in any effort at all. Your definition of casual sex is obviously not my definition of casual sex. You say the words "casual sex" but it you actually describe a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:31 PM
12

If women were so interested in raising other people's children, more than 1% of women would ever adopt a child. It's hypocritical because they want to encourage behavior that they themselves are not willing to do. They would just be ok if hospitals handed out random babies at the hospital after you give birth. One baby is just as good as any other right? Obviously that isn't true, and it's intellectually dishonest to argue that it could happen. A mother want to 1000% ensure that the baby they ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 09:22 PM
-3

So… I need to deconstruct what you wrote because I “am” a man who has had a lot of casual sex with women. Women that enjoy casual sex… typically are not worried about sexual safety, if a woman is sufficiently attracted to you, no condoms, no std test requirement, the very first night she meets you, women make rules for beta males, and they break rules for alpha males. She may “not ever kiss on the first date” until she is, and how very quickly she will say she doesn’t kiss on the first date befo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:52 AM
1

Novelty wears off very quickly. I don’t even remember the names of the first few women I had sex with anymore (41 now, lost virginity at 25).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:44 AM
-3

Even at 400+ women, if I hook up with a woman and the sex is REALLY GOOD I will find myself thinking about her, and wanting a relationship with her, and continuing to see her. I just had sex tonight with someone I just met, beautiful woman, significantly younger, absolutely amazing sex, very passionate, she enjoyed, I enjoyed, it was great. Objectively she is a 8 in looks, maybe a 9 if she happens to matches your preferences (black, in shape, smallish tits, skinny, cute face, flawless skin, very…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:35 AM
0

You’re right. It is difficult for me to make the point without being insulting. Therefore I’ll let men that are more intelligent than me explain it for me. https://therationalmale.com/2012/03/28/insanity-plea/amp/ While it may offend men’s sensibilities and morals, hypergamy doesn’t care what your preconceived notions are about what constitues Alpha according to the male perspective. Women are attracted to Men with a capacity for dominance, by order of degree. How that dominance manifests itself…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/24 05:48 PM
1

I’d argue that I was asking a legitimate question. The OP posits something I would consider very naive. You can tone police me if you want, that’s your prerogative as admin/moderator and claim that I could have been more friendly about my assertion. Doesn’t change the fact that I’d consider women finding “bad boys” attractive as pretty basic common sense. If you’re very young it makes more sense for you to not understand something so basic to the way that women think. If you’re just now discover…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/24 05:26 PM
–

Look, you don’t have to be a perfect man to have success, but it is a competition, if you aren’t in the top 20% of men (overall) then… start. I’m average height and decent fitness but way above average income and also in confidence/experience. Ideally you’d be excellent in 3 out of those 4 categories. If not, do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:41 AM
–

I watched it for about 5 minutes. Despite being a "experts" they answer every single question with "I feel" and qualify every single statement at all with "I feel" The only thing you can actually learn from watching this is they are definitely biologically female. Anyway, the key takeaway is ... be the man that "makes her go mental when he doesn't text her back" and be the man that women are competing for. But yes, they are definitely hitting the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 10:12 PM
2

Complaining gives them power, so therefore they complain about it. For as many men that are red pill aware, there are 3x as many white knights and simps ready to defend madams honor.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 11:22 AM
3

I’ll agree with you that Paul is objectively the best choice for a relationship (if I were a woman) but as someone kind of similar to Adam except with 5x the salary and not interested in football) many women do actually pick me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:56 AM
5

The only woman who is absolutely zero no possible way is Jessica. Once per month isn’t a relationship. May is the most desirable for me, but both Mary and Susan would be acceptable for either a long term or short term relationship, respectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:34 AM
3

Actually I think it’s equally likely that he is Paul, and curious why he never has sex, but all his friend group (the other guys) do. He’s the only one described as inexperienced, and the post reads like it was written in a very analytical way, almost autistic. Edit: nevermind. I went through his post history, it took roughly 15 seconds to find out he is a slob and also has autism. So yea, he’s Paul in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:24 AM
1

About a decade ago 2 girls I was fucking set me up with their virgin friend because they thought she was guaranteed to have a good time with me. Didn’t tell me beforehand, we ended up dating for about a month, but had absolutely zero in common.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:22 AM
3

Yea, I don’t know why OP posted this, but I’d assume that was the reasoning… maybe? Trump derangement syndrome is real. And a lot of women do actually pick Adam in the real world, as long as he doesn’t put his politics in his dating profile. But don’t expect any woman that hangs out on the left-wing cesspool that is Reddit to ever admit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:19 AM
0

Dude, trust me, as being the closest to Adam myself (except I don’t like football and I make 5x as much) absolutely women will pick Adam a lot in the real world. You just have to hide your politics, and after they’ve had sex a few times they don’t care who you vote for anymore, they start to want to shoot guns with you, adopting the more conservative views over time. But yes, if you put on your dating profile that you support Trump you are instantly cutting off 60% of all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:17 AM
1

And… this is why men say it’s better not to date/marry “a boss babe” what is in it for the man? What does a man have to gain? Absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 10:24 PM
2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinderella_effect Oh I’m very much aware of its existence, I had both a stepmother and a stepfather growing up. Boomers were just literally the most selfish generation in existence. I’d rather not subject the next generation to that. If society won’t punish women for making mistakes, I’ll do my very very small, insignificant part in correcting the problem and refuse to reward their behavior. As far as your original links. I absolutely agree with the link to rollo,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:51 PM
2

To tack onto your comment. 97% of single mothers are not widows. 3% are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:52 PM
1

To tack onto your comment. 97% of single mothers are not widows. 3% are. I’d totally be willing to date a widow. They are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:52 PM
3

It absolutely is, I was fed a constant barrage of it throughout the 80s/90s/00s
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:46 PM
6

The stereotype exists for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:44 PM
2

Simple: no woman wants to raise another woman’s kids, so why should I as a man? If you want to date single mothers so badly, go date one yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:44 PM
1

They have sex with those "elite men" which they then consider "being pursued" A groupie having sex with her favorite guitar player in her favorite band might the highlight of her decade. The guitar player will have never ever learned her name, let alone forgotten it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 03:06 AM
1

I'm not trying to shame women. I'm trying to shame the people brainwashing children that there are too many humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:29 AM
1

Actually that's no longer true. Most women will end up not having at least 1 kid. https://carsey.unh.edu/publication/more-us-women-childbearing-age-fewer-have-given-birth#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20there%20were%2021.9,in%202016%20(Figure%201). https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-birth-rate-drops-record-low-2023-after-pandemic-uptick/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/241538/percentage-of-childless-women-in-the-us-by-ethnic-group/ We just passed the 50% (aka most) of all women in the u.s. will not repr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:24 AM
1

The religion of environmentalism has a strong grip on society. If I suggest that the population is collapsing on most places on reddit, I'll receive a lot of pushback that there are far too many humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:17 AM
9

Come on OP, disingenuous much? “That doesn’t jive with my experiences though” “What they say after you leave the room is a different story” So… what you’re saying is that you were lying in your original post, because you HAVE experienced women talking shit about other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:16 PM
10

If you blame women for anything, in academia, your funding is cut off, even if something is 95% women and 5% men, you’re still going to have to say something like “both sexes demonstrate prejudice due to the patriarchy” if you want to keep making money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:13 PM
1

The women that go to clubs and get smashed by dudes. Are too busy having sex to post on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 11:17 AM
-2

Yes. And for women, every time they are going out to the club they are trying to get laid. She was confused. You had a small peak into the life of a woman. If she knew that she was leaking info to a man who “doesn’t get it” she would deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 11:13 AM
1

Self-improvement only will take you so far. It can make you eligible to be a prospect for women. But until you fix yourself mentally it isn't the entire picture, which is why blue pill ultimately fails.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 07:10 AM
1

Yea. You write like a woman too. I imagine that comes across when you are trying to flirt with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:23 PM
1

Sorry, I forgot to include the most important part, and learn what is arousing to women. But yes, just doing that absolutely bare minimum basic shit will get you into the top 30% literally 70% of men are overweight and like 45% obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:07 PM
3

No, you were right, it is the OP that is wrong. Skinner.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:44 PM
1

That’s one of the more stupid takes I’ve ever read. Even 6,3 born into generational wealth Chaddius the 3rd still needs to try or he gets nothing. If a “below average” man like myself can participate and have a great life and participate in hookup culture (even if I didn’t start until way later in life because I misunderstood social and sexual dynamics), then yes you should absolutely try. If I can go from virgin at 24 to hundreds of bodies by 40, then there is hope for any man. But not with you…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 01:00 PM
2

Red pill doesn’t take biblical ideas and twist them. It takes the idea on how to get laid, and then presents them to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 12:51 AM
13

I'd argue that you have miscategorized "prescriptive" redpill, which is actually still just descriptive. IF you exhibit these behaviors, THEN you can and will get laid, is still just a description of reality. If you choose to not want to get laid, that's on you. Redpill as opposed to being an incel or MGTOW is far preferable. You don't "have" to follow the red pill, but you aren't owed anything. Men who ask redpill for advice come at it from the perspective of "I want X to happen" So the masculi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 10:31 AM
4

Best part about the redpill is that it teaches you the reality of how sad the current state of men is. Workout, dress well, learn to be social, it’s all easy enough to change. Something like 30% of all men at the age of 18 are still virgins and it’s still like 5% by 29. Below average doesn’t mean “give up on life” it means “try harder if you want success” and of course success changes as you age too. When I was 24 and a virgin, success meant going on a date and kissing a girl. As a 41 year old s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 08:15 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDxee-gmHtM Some random advice for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:05 PM
1

If we’re at the point that the provisioning capability of men is so useless that even a man with 200 BILLION dollars is less “valuable” than a random gym bro 20 year old high school graduate working at shake shack…. And he wants to hop on the juice so he can tren harder and bang more chicks. Then yes, I am Elon musk.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:33 AM
1

Look, there are literally thousands of women at this point that have fucked drake and machine gun Kelly has a literal harem where he has orgies quite regularly. I’m capable of acknowledging a reality regardless of if it applies to me or not. Elon musk, for example, has had children with 3 different (arguably attractive) women at this point, and yet somehow also still has time to play Diablo 4. Your argument that I can’t be a top tier man and also play a fairly “mainstream” video game is pretty l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:26 AM
1

Dude, you’ve clearly swallowed too many black pills in your coffee this morning. Describing it as “over” for any man suffering from an OVERBITE is extreme hyperbole. I hate to give anecdotal evidence. But I’m an example of a man that has had a copious amount of sex in my life. And I had never even heard of the term retrognathia until I had just googled it 2 minutes ago. Despite supposedly “suffering” from this condition. It’s similar to guys who complain about women preferring a large penis size…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 05:35 AM
1

It’s not just at the Olympics, every single college town every single night in the United States, young women are going out having casual sex, they may not be banging OP, but they are enjoying short term situationships and one night stands. I just used that as one example of some young people with “high testosterone” and “high level of competition” OP said women don’t like men with high testosterone, I produced one example of men with documented high levels of testosterone having documented leve…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 05:30 AM
5

I hate that I have to explain this pretty regularly, BUT... Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks wasn't/isn't used to describe 2 opposite men, the Chad that gets laid and the Billy who goes to his room in his parent's house to go jerk off. Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks are the 2 different types of men that women will fuck. If you don't have money, then you might as well build muscles. When a woman is young and in her peak fertility years, she is MOST aroused/attracted to men that are pure Alpha. And when she…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:38 PM
-1

Lol, you're so wrong it's sad. Of COURSE women want an extremely high libido and aggressive competitive men. The Olympics every year turns into basically an orgy or athletes and celebrities because the women can't keep their hands off the top tier men. 160,000 condoms were given out for free in Tokyo to the athletes. 160,000. Let that number sink in for what is roughly 3,000 athletes. https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/inside-sex-mad-olympic-village-24602344 They want men at the TOP of …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:30 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjKNbfA64EE Is this you? Are you nothing more than the brand of deodorant you wear and your workout routine?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 03:35 AM
1

You've really hit a nerve with the women of this subreddit with this truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 03:31 AM
1

Definitely some aspects of evolutionary psychology going on there. Women are aroused by high testosterone. Dude looks like he’s got an abundance of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 06:24 PM
5

People like Rollo still are creating content, writing books... but instead of posting on reddit, or on his blog, it's just that it's on youtube these days due to monetization. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DEJ_NmqHbg You see a lot of redpill truths being espoused on other podcasts like "fresh and fit" or "whatever" or https://www.youtube.com/@MichaelSartain
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:53 AM
12

Nice summary of what Redpill is. DGAF is far more than just what you wrote about it. If a chick ghosts you, DGAF. If you haven't talked to a girl for 4 days after you fucked, you DGAF. If a girl turns you down, it doesn't matter, DGAF. It's one of the things that being slightly spergy can help with. You'll never have the rythm of a guy who spends 10,000 hours dancing in night clubs with women, but you don't need it. Also, don't forget about Dark Triad traits. You don't have to be a full-blown ps…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:46 AM
9

That's absolutely true, it's roughly a 90/10 ratio in most online nerdy communities, 80/20 in the MOST gender equal hobbies that I have if we're talking about popular mainstream games.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:41 PM
1

Can't argue with the OP when I agree with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:39 PM
11

Don’t forget the advice to be more attractive, no one ones to be with someone unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 02:52 PM
2

no dating allowed, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:38 PM
17

Women are only ever looking for an excuse to disqualify you. If she logs into her Instagram and sees you only have like 300 followers, she's going to disqualify you and swipe her finger a few inches to go back to drooling over another guy with 300,000.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/24 03:40 PM
5

I responded to your original post with the original link.. The most popular individual in our four cities, a 30-year-old woman living in New York, received 1504 messages during the period of observation, equivalent to one message every 30 min, day and night, for the entire month. Now multiply 1504 messages by .4 to account for a 40 year old woman. That's 601. But then multiple that 601 by .3 to account for her being black... 180 messages in a month. If she's 40, and black (and highly desirable a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:56 AM
3

That graph is so flawed. It's based on the most desirable woman being 1. And the most desirable man also being rated a 1. The problem is that the Most desirable woman has 20x the prospects as the most desirable man. edit: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aap9815 I went to the source. The most popular individual in our four cities, a 30-year-old woman living in New York, received 1504 messages during the period of observation, equivalent to one message every 30 min, day and night, for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:43 AM
1

Watch the whatever dating podcast sometime, they have a bumble section where the women swipe through dating profiles. For one, most women are only swiping on the top 10% of men, for 2, they are ALL swiping on the same top 10% of men. You're either drowning it it, or it's a desert.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:41 AM
12

Worse, most "normal women" (ie: 5s) post cleavage shots on instagram, get 7 men drooling on it and then wonder why no one loves them because they ALSO see the women posting the same image getting 100 dudes drooling for the simps. The ones you see are the ones you are looking at. It's turning men into women in that aspect. Unfairly judging women that "look normal" and they expect 18" waist and 38DDD and filtered flawless skin. So the women stop going out, they stop interacting with men (because t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 10:26 AM
5

The first and 2nd rule of fight club is to not talk about fight club. Rules that the creator himself broke by inviting you to the club. It’s an allegory to teach the indoctrinated simps that rules don’t apply, the rules that you follow and break are done so arbitrarily. In order to break the feminine conditioning, you must first understand that rules are allowed to be broken in order to gain power. Once Tyler understands that the club members have begun to internalize that, because the club has …
/r/TheRedPill08/06/24 07:25 PM
3

the bad news: women are easily influenced by new trends and whatever is the latest in-fashion. The good news: women are easily influenced by new trends and whatever is the latest in-fashion. Last month it was the bear, this month it seems to be not being friends with their boyfriends, 4 months ago it was icks, etc etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:57 AM
5

I agree that humans are biologically wired to help women and support women both physically and emotionally and your comment just now is one example of that. If a woman did the same thing to a boyfriend, you wouldn't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:56 AM
2

structural, institutional sexism is bad. Unless it supports women. Look, that's kind of like suggesting that whoever asks out the other person should pay for the date, it's sounds fun and egalitarian to say, but the reality is it still forces men to pay 90% of the time. The language can be gender-neutral and yet still biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 04:58 AM
0

Hmm. I guess I was wrong. Your issues are that you are living at home AND you're insecure. Fail to launch harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:44 AM
31

I like the hoe_math take on "icks" Women will get an ICK for either things that make you "less masculine" or "more feminine" (because they are 2 different things) and then he rates them on a scale of how unreasonable the woman is who got the ick.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 03:18 AM
0

I was kicked out of my house when I turned 18 years old, before I had graduated high school. My grandmother took me in and helped make sure I did my final year of high school. I'd highly recommend you stop sucking on your mom's tit and grow a pair and take a risk living away from home. You're already "slow to launch" as the kids these days call it. I don't know you at all, I have only ever read 1 paragraph about you. But just based on this limited knowledge, which is about what you'd get from da…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 03:00 AM
1

I'm 42, 5'9", slightly above average face, full head of hair, chubby, zero friends outside of the internet, makes 200k a year and not much contact with my family. And ... I do ok, although I had a rough start, virgin until I was 25 and discovered "the game" and PUA community, and then I had a string of bad relationships until I discovered redpill, so it's easy to assume that people better off than me can do better than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:55 PM
1

The idea that he’d be better off just interacting with women in his near vicinity who also despise a core aspect of who he is just limits his options. Are you seriously asking? or was that sarcasm? I honestly can't tell. But I'm terrible at social signals and humor. But even I could feel the resentment and seething anger you have over the issue, it comes across in your writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:52 PM
2

97% of the time, it works every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:48 PM
4

I have used, throughout the last 15 years... Tinder, PoF, okcupid, meetme, Hinge, Bumble, Craigslist, OkCupid, and one other app that was really popular back in the day on the iphone 3GS when it first launched but I can't remember, wikipedia tells me it might have been highlight? Regardless, it was a good competitor to okcupid before tinder existed because it sorted people by distance first.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:46 PM
–

Absolutely I see us returning to feudalism, and that's a basic result of the extreme income inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:54 AM
–

The ones you see at the gym are largely comprised of the top 20% of men. The ones that have checked out don't care. AF/BB is used by the redpill to describe the 2 different types of men used by women for sex. AF are used for their genetics/their looks/for fun. BB are used for their resources/emotional validation. Women today get all the validation they need online, and they don't need resources from men either. So the only option left for a young man is to become AF for her, which means becoming…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:51 AM
0

I think that’s the biggest problem with society today, these women think they can just hop on tinder at the age of 35 and find a single rich tall handsome 37 year old single man who has been cryogenically frozen for the last 17 years while she has been out living a party lifestyle. And then she’ll get married and pop out 2.3 children and live happily ever after, and statistics say no.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:01 AM
4

Once a term has entered the cultural zeitgeist, the dating market updates, men have to adapt or die. Once "negging" became mainstream you were no-longer allowed to tease a woman or make jokes about it or you'd be accused of it. So you just have to adapt. Implement the redpill, and never admit to reading the red pill. Women want natural alphas, not someone who has to learn it later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 01:40 AM
1

exactly, and then the conclusion is that people are willing to date 1 tier down... but they don't really want to skip down 2 tiers ever (both men and women) And going down a tier is not ideal, ideally they go up a tier, but they will sometimes give up if they aren't getting what they want from the tier above. AND YES I understand that means some attractive women would rather date a woman than date an attractive man, and just get some occasional D from a 99% male on the side. I've actually been i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 12:41 AM
32

I think it's important to finish the hierarchy when descriping it. HV men > attractive women > normal woman > attractive man > unattractive women > average man > unattractive man
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:01 AM
–

There are far more studies that prove that you can't trust the words that come out of a woman's mouth. If she's speaking, it's to manipulate. If you'd like, I could come up with at least a dozen, I think you can google on your own, but ... For example: here is one https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837889/ Despite consistently reporting poorer health, women universally outlive men. We examine whether gender differences in lived circumstances considered, and meaning attributed to SRH b…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 03:11 AM
1

Actually it's always the reverse with me, I turn UP the asshole-ness up if I want a relationship. If I'm bored and I want to end things, and I'd rather just play video games for a few months/years I'll just stop being an asshole completely and that's a great way to get a woman to break up with you. edit: before you respond, blah blah blah I've already heard it before, you just must not be dating the right kind of woman, etc etc, i've heard it all before, all women are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 07:54 AM
2

I didn't have my first relationship until the age of 26. It didn't last very long, only a few weeks, but I learned important lessons. Between 27-34 I had 4 different 6-18month long relationships, and then from 35-39 I had a 4 year long relationship. I'm 41 now. I'd highly encourage you not to apply a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Shortcomings can be compensated for. The peak for male attractiveness/desirability doesn't even START until the age of 30. But even before 30 you'll start …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 07:09 AM
1

Oh, my bad, I didn't know the only definition of a successful relationship is the one that doesn't end until the day you die, which means we're all doomed. Except you, because your flair says you're married, and we all know that marriage is forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 06:55 AM
1

I gave you more practical advice in the other comment, but I'll continue the line here, the other comment thread talking about advantages and disadvantages is a good one also. Learn to be aloof, it's ok to be a little bit of an asshole, and sometimes it's better just to not say anything. As redpill would say, work on your mission. If you're a millionaire, women are able to look past a few problems like social-awkwardness. FWIW I was a virgin until I was 25, it IS possible to learn social skills.…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 10:32 PM
5

Pay attention to what women do, not what they say. Did she date a man who "cares about not hurting other people with what they say"? No, she literally just told you what EXACTLY you would need to do to date her, and you took it the complete opposite and wrong. In her entire paragraph the only thing that even HINTS that it was a negative behavior is the one little word "but".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 10:29 PM
3

Stop wearing your autism so openly. Don't talk about it, don't think about it, blend in. If you can't, then you won't ever have a relationship. If you're able to mask it well enough, then to the rest of the world it's like you aren't even autistic. It's like CCW, concealed means concealed. Guess what, you aren't a disney princess in a magical ice kingdom, you don't have that luxury.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 10:24 PM
–

it's also due to being horny. The trope is that MEN think differently when we are horny (zen budist monks after we cum, horndogs until then), but the reality is that women become completely different people all-together. I've straight up had many multiple women (10+ incidence over my life so while not the majority, fairly common) want me to continue fucking them IMMEDIATELY AFTER I cum before putting on a second condom (if I pulled off the condom and cum all over them), or if I make them cum fir…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:57 PM
–

I know you flaired this as debate, but I honestly think this is more of a question for women. As a redpill man, I think of it as a skinner response and huge red flag. she makes the good man wait because she's been pumped and dumped by other men that she gave it up early too. classical conditioning. and a huge red flag
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:50 PM
-3

speak for yourself, I enjoy dating and being around submissive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 11:47 PM
0

without immigration the u.s. population would already be shrinking. If you aren't in a location where they are being shipped to, you'll see signs of that decline happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 09:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter