TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

arvada14 Archive

View 5 posts and 4,377 comments by arvada14 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,377 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I dont have to i live in a region where we dont have it. I just hope you keep the same stance when it comes to abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:46 AM
–

Fries
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:09 AM
0

Men tried being honest. Look at the voice notes tiktok. You called him an assaulter. You cant now complain about guys not telling the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:33 AM
2

Great at least I can stop pretending that the left likes me. I welcome whatever shit hole this country has to offer after the left enivitably keeps losing to republicans as this sentiment spreads. If you're a lefty male its just time to abandoned the west entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:22 AM
2

"Told her whatever she wanted to hear" When the rape is so low you have to start manufacturing new things to call rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:17 AM
1

That sounds like r*pist logic. You consented to x so that means you must consent to y also. Consent is supposed to be specific. Consenting to live with someone is not Consenting to marry them. Common law marriage is just an artifact of rpe culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:52 PM
0

So now the concept of consent doesn't apply. Unless someone clearly admits on a contract that they want to marry you. You shouldn't be able to force them to be your spouse. No means no bill Cosby.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 10:24 PM
1

Nah not buying it. Walk up to court house pay 20 dollars and get married. Sick of people's laziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 10:22 PM
16

Women are also complaining about dating. There countless think pieces on how they cant find "a good man". So no this isn't the excuse you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 06:49 PM
1

You can sue for emotional distress alone. It just wont go any where in court. Its almost impossible to win. That hospital was sued for emotional distress tied to a loss of money. False paternity fraud wont have anything tangible.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 02:35 AM
1

No the damage is once again emotional distress and the money spent on a child not biologically there's. You're making the argument that men who falsely accuse their wives of paternity fraud Need some punishment. In this case the hospital wasn't falsely accused. So its a moot point. You're really reaching for anything here bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:15 AM
1

Read up on how a hospital was sued successfully of emotional distress when accidentally switching babies at birth. Same thing is true here
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:34 PM
0

She can do what ever she wants. She doesn't need any excuse to get a divorce and she doesn't need to divulge it to anyone. If she chooses to than that's her prerogative. But its no longer him slandering her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:45 AM
1

The wages he paid to a child not his. That's the restitution. On top of punitive damage if found guilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:20 AM
1

Even if it isn't and she didn't know if he was the father. She would still need to pay back the man because he isn't the father. I agree that intention needs to be present for other damages. But that's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:45 PM
2

The crime for paternity fraud should be the same as any fraud. You're basically arguing that fraud shouldn't be punished if you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:41 PM
-1

The only crime or tort to hold them accountable would be slander. However I dont see why this would need to be publicized? Are you asking for a social punishment. Although the misconception here is that a man must suspect his wife of cheating if he asks for a paternity test. I know my dad is 100 percent my dad but I still got a DNA test out of interest. The punishment you're asking here is to punish curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:36 PM
0

But that's not slander and they would only not be living together if she blows up the marriage because of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:29 PM
-1

Yeah but the post is about women calling him coercive for asking directly. Are you dense?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 01:21 PM
0

Ok I see what this is and so can everyone else. Have a nice day
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 02:06 AM
1

Can you answer a question? Do you actually believe that your behavior ( in part) isn't controlled by your genes?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 01:24 AM
0

People reading this are seeing yillegitimate. Im going to be fine. Ive provided evidence for every claim u asked. I simply as you to provide evidence of behavior genetics being academically illegetimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 02:23 PM
1

Stop deflecting. Give me your source for academic legitimacy concerning behavior genetics. You made the claim that its academically illegitimate. So give us prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 02:12 PM
1

So you don't have an argument do you. You can use Wikipedia, I can use AI. Answer the question how are you defining academic legitimacy and who are you quoting saying that behavioral genetics isn't academically legitimate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 02:07 PM
1

"Yes, behavioral genetics is a highly legitimate and established academic field. It integrates psychology, biology, and genomics to study how genetic and environmental factors influence individual differences in behavior and psychological traits" Who doesn't consider it academically legitimate" also I gave you the exact same critique of psychiatry with biological determinism. Provide me evidence that behavioral genetics isnt academically legitimate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 02:03 PM
0

Behavioral genetics is another field equally criticized in the same way as evo psych. One shared critique is genetic determinism. You can find it at the criticism and controversy section here. Also the psychiatry article i showed has similar criticism on determinism. You dont have an argument i fulfilled every condition u asked for. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioural_genetics
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 01:54 PM
0

Science is a legitimate field that has criticism levied against it. According to you this would put it in the same pseudoscientific category as evopsch. But if you want something else. Let's go with psychiatry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-psychiatry
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 04:46 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_science
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:04 AM
–

interesting considering women are actually the ones with higher libidos and drives than men There is genuinely no proof of this. In fact id wager the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:39 PM
0

Humans didn't have language until about 100,000 years ago. Again, just do a quick google search. This is about rape not language. You cant prove that most humans were produced via rape. Just let it go.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:37 AM
1

This just shows that the Mongols used rape in their conquest it doesn't show that genghises genes spread through rape. He had like 20 wives who had sons who had 20 more wives. I didn't ask you to prove that rape happens in war. Also your AI source is pulling comments from reddit as proof. Hundreds of thousands of years ago, humans were essentially animals with crude communication skills. And they were mostly at war with each other. See below. This is an assertion without evidence. Hence it can b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:26 AM
1

Proof this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:11 AM
1

You realize that reproduction hasn't really been a consensual thing for the vast majority of our species' 300,000 year history, right? It's been brute force for most of our existence. What's your evidence for this. Why do you believe most sex of human history was uncosensual? Invaders would come into a settlement, village, etc., kill all the men and boys, Do you believe this was the exception or the rule in human society? But that's not because he was hot. It's because he was a prolific rapist I…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:47 AM
2

Why do we have twice as many female ancestors compared to men? Can you honestly tell me that the average woman is as attracted to rhe average man as he is to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:34 AM
1

No, most men like most women. Most women dont like most men. Its a heuristic but one that is true to a scary degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:31 AM
2

Looking at differences between men and women and accurately stating why they may arise isn't mysoginy. Its having such respect for the idea of women that im often disappointed by the reality. Men I feel are more likely to align with their image, good or bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:07 AM
2

You're not understanding just let it go. I dont hate women. You're just cultured to take less agency for your lives than men do. Im genuinely baffled at some of the easy things women miss that could better their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:03 AM
3

No I still like women. But the lack of personal agency is just something I cant get over. Men are more violent for sure but the unagentic fecklessness of a large portion of women genuinely saddens me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:55 AM
3

I don’t have sex with attractive men either. did a couple of times in my 20’s At this point if I continue talking to you im going to become a mysoginist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:52 AM
2

You said average men were lack luster. I'd bet dollars to donuts youre an average woman. OP is diagnosing your problems to a t. You're comparing 95 percent of men to an elite. 5% the fact that you said you "go after them" tells me you're screw these guys but they dont want you for a relationship. That's why you're biased against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:44 AM
4

Men are trash.... men are trash "but trust me, im not biased against 95% of men" 🐹
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:40 AM
-1

I try not to follow the red pill but when they're right they're right. The hamstering in this comment is just chef's kiss.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:14 AM
2

Right, some people are jusr attracted to balding 5'4 Indian janitors. No rhyme or reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:09 AM
4

When ever women say they don't trust x or hate y. It just means that x or y person is occupying their mind. Hot guys are still effecting your mating choices even if you're too afraid to go for them. You're subconsciously comparing your average partners to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:05 AM
0

Outside of America they are. Speaking to the issue of settling men happily settle women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:03 AM
0

I'm being facetious, the point is that it mixes asking twice with other severe forms of coercion like threats. This is a joke study and its why everyone is just sick to death of the me too era. still morally wrong Im sorry this is like saying lying on your taxes and lying about Santa claus to your kids should be put in the same category. You just become unserious to anyone listening to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:58 AM
8

Hahaha, the amount of delusion you have to be immersed in to actually believe that hot people aren't your type and play no role in the fact that you're dissatisfied with "average " guys is so nuts. Women are truly fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:54 AM
4

Read the prompt. He said chasing the 5%. That doesn't mean everyone will catch them. Some have to settle, the problem is that a lot of women aren't happy with what they settle with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:51 AM
1

The study specifies that these tactics were used after the woman said no upfront. Even if that were true, asking someone twice and them saying yes the second time is in the same category as hold someone down and forcing them. At this point im just so tired of the manufacturer victimhood
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:49 AM
0

Commented on the wrong person sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:45 AM
1

You didn't answer his question so that kinda means he must of struck a nerve.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:36 AM
6

The prompt is that your problems come from : "chasing" the same 5 to ten percent. Not necessarily being with them.The fact that you an average woman are complaining about dating average men speaks to his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:35 AM
1

No one does this. Ive heard you say that sex isn't important to a relationship. You project your asexuality and trauma onto every discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 03:58 PM
2

There's more to house than a toilet. But you wouldn't live in a house without one. Same is true with relationships and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 03:53 PM
3

Women dont say, you cant control who you're attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 03:44 PM
2

If she hasn’t responded how do you know what she believes? She's responded, shes just ignore and blatantly try to deflect from the question of women being accountable. Id say "do women hold accountability for their actions" and she'd say im doing what about ism. Not the definition of that word. wouldn’t think it is my place to say that everyone must have the same values as me. That is a very self centered way of thinking. They dont have to have the same values as me but we should hold people to …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 03:27 AM
1

I dont care about what you think is right and wrong I care about whether you consistently apply whatever standard of right and wrong you have. If you think that wearing blue on Monday is a horrendous moral crime. Don't make excuses when you or someone you love wears blue on monday. My example of Lilith comes from the fact that she thinks that men are responsible for the bad dating choices they make. I agree, I simply ask if she applies the same logic to women. She responds with silence. What if …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:09 AM
2

Im not saying I want women to agree with my views im noticing that women don't agree with their OWN views when a woman is asked to take accountability. I dont care if you agree with me I care if you're consistent with your own values.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 11:52 PM
1

The original question was that some women are bad. My rebuttal is that women don't call them out when they're bad for instance when they're being hypocrites like lilith. It was just a clarification on the different dynamics between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 11:47 PM
2

So these women agree that men should be held responsible for their bad choice in women but women should not? Do you agree with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 11:36 PM
3

Male accountability I haven't made it contingent on that. Ive agreed that men who choose these women need to hold themselves accountable for their choices. As a separate argument do women who make these choices need to hold themselves personally accountable? This is your argument. 2+2=4. I agree. My argument is does 4+4=8? Yes or no. An by analogy men are personally for their bad choices in dating. Should women also be personally responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 11:03 PM
2

For example, in a thread with lilithofbabylon. She's arguing that men who choose bad women are to blame for their choices. I agree. Now my argument is that women who choose bad men are also to blame for their choices. She's deflected and dodged and avoided admitting this. Are you and other women willing to call her out for this genuine double standard? Ill link if you'd like.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 10:57 PM
3

What about ism is a diversion from.the argument. Im agreeing with your argument ive addressed it and im aboard. Men are responsible for the shit women they select. 100% even 1000%. Ive addressed your argument. Now as a separate argument are women responsible for the shitty men they choose?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 10:49 PM
4

That's not what I said. Im just saying that women show their bias towards women even when they're in relationships. Im just asking you to call out women when they wrong. With the same frequency as you do men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 10:28 PM
4

All you have to say is women should also choose better its not what about ism if we agree with the premise. We're just presenting a new argument based in your own logic. Should women also choose better if this standard applies to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 10:24 PM
3

You would expand your options by going to more countries though? Right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 09:25 PM
9

You're just proving that women really cant take accountability for their choices. Men Absolutely ate this. This is the problem with modern day relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 08:28 PM
6

But when they're bad and it hurts men women have a hard time calling out other women for their bad behavior. The women are wonderful effects leads them to side with women in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 07:39 PM
2

I know im just pointing out that the commentors view point falls flat on its face.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 04:08 AM
10

.43 vs .46 stated women were actually more likely to care about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:48 PM
–

You don't know how wrong you are. But hey its hurts when you get called out. Take care
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:18 PM
–

You dont understand the underlying logic behind those stats. Stop thinking its just gonna hurt your brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:22 PM
–

Did he have a criminal record yes or no. You're the one racializing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:21 PM
–

Yes you do. As dumb as the people who argue that bears are statistically safer than men. Bears are also statistically safer for babies than mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 01:48 PM
–

from other men by beating the man’s ass for “looking at my women” 🤦🏽‍♀️ This just seems like you're dating a violent thug. Tell me do any of your exes have criminal records.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:38 AM
–

That's fine but men broadly expect deference society wide, from women, for being men. Give me an example of this along with an explanation. How essentially they supposedly are to protect women Its literally always been the women in our family. We don't care enough about random women to risk our lives for them. I don't know how this got confused but when men say men protect women. Its men protect women you're close with. If all men do that then the effect is men will have protected women as a goa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:19 AM
–

Yes and the biggest threat to a baby is its mother. I mean you guys sound dumb when you uncritically regurgitate this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:10 AM
3

Maybe we should start saying family protectors. Because we've never wanted to protect random women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:40 PM
6

Protectors of the women in THEIR lives. Moms, sisters, girlfriends, wives, daughters etc. Not a random woman who literally chose to date a murderer. Look it up, cant make this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:39 PM
5

Have you watched these men. They're saying they'd protect their family members but not strangers. When men say they protect women its usually the women around them. We're not intervening for strangers unless its 911.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:38 PM
7

By any chance do you mind telling us how old you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:35 PM
5

When do men shame women for taking precautions? The man who killed this guy was literally a convicted murderer who got out of prison a year ago and still got a date with a woman. This is why we say pick better. But some women actively choose douche bags like this. Im willing to bet that most women. Killers had a violent crime in their past. Its not a dateline episode where a lawyer kills his family and then himself Women focus entirely on the wrong precautions and blame all men when it goes wron…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:29 PM
2

Women say that they want a guy that respects their stated boundaries. If enough women scream not to approach women guess which guys are going to listen? The incentive is for less men that care about your boundaries to approach you. Feminism overcorrected and generalized an issue were a few men were spamming multiple women to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:18 PM
1

Dv stats show that in the middle. Women and men are approximately equally violent. A violent man just hits harder than a violent Women. If violence was a male only problem there would be no lesbian dv. I know the study and people coping that lesbians only appear violent because of past male violence in other relationship is false and I can prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:01 PM
–

As long as they aren't feminists women I'm for it. I hate jury duty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:29 PM
2

Nah, im sorry thats been the case with men in your life. But violence is thankfully rare amongst humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:28 PM
44

Theyre best in terms of the hypothetical things women say they want. Op is just pointing out how women are shooting themselves in the foot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 01:17 AM
2

im talking about how scales for those medical conditios are developed its not medical professionals asking the questions face to face. its literally researchers asking a bunch of people if they've felt extreme sadness in the last 2 weeks. People who criticize self report surveys dont seem to understand that large numbers inherently increase the accuracy of a self report survey. They are effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:59 PM
3

Id argue that the most violent people are men. That doesn't mean that men in average are violent or enjoy violence. So maybe overall but in terms of modern DV I think you have the burden of proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:40 PM
5

Give me a source for nearly all women being victims of violence. It doesn't exist because theyre in the minority. You're traumatized because you got abused by a man but understand that this isnt normal. Violence is abnormal. Also 21% is a number you brought up. Im saying its likely not even that. You can have 5 percent of men beat up 4 women in their lives and get the 21% of women are victims of DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:28 PM
3

always believe women over men. The only time I wouldn't take a woman's testimony at face value I think its reasonable that misandry or even modern day feminism at this point be a criteria to exclude people from juries.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:23 PM
2

Is this more than 21% of men have been violent or 21 percent of women have been the victims of violence? Whats the source. Im guessing you confused what I just got done explaining. An abusive man can be in multiple relationships throughout his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:17 PM
4

Nah, we can look up reciprocal and non reciprocal violence rates. I dont think women want to admit that a lot of women do start fights and keep abusing and losing guys until they find a guy that finally fights back. Also if youre making the claim that most female perpetrated dv is in self defense. Give us the evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:15 PM
5

How do you know that some DV stats say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:08 PM
4

I didnt say a took issue with women. Im just showing you how your logic doesn't necessarily lead to OPs conclusions. Also do u take issue with the 21 percent of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:06 PM
6

If I were to accept your experience. all of women can experience mysogyny in real life and still have it come from 7 percent of men on the internet. One comment or post can reach multiple people. In real life thats also true. One president can do mysoginistic things that effect the whole. Not to mention mysoginistsic men could get into multiple relationships in their lives. Jobs, romantic partners, school, church etc and spread their mysoginy to women that way. 7 percent of men could easily be r…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:00 PM
3

How do you feel about mental health diagnosis then? Are they valid or invalid seeing as they rely predominantly on self reported data?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 07:55 PM
4

The new statesman poll is also anonymous. So the fact men were still less likely to say they hated women less is telling. Men dont hate women. Women seem to though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 07:48 PM
2

Ok i guess it takes all sorts. Ill believe it. Thanks for providing evidence .
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:17 AM
5

Oh ok . So not the op of the post but someone who i think is making fun of that op by assuming he's just coomer brained?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:15 AM
3

This isn't what that post said at all. If the comment below linked the right thread. Can you copy and paste exactly where he said he said he wanted women to fuck inexperienced men? Or even alluded to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 11:55 PM
1

Yeah but this assumes these guys dont have glaring red flags. Plenty of women find a man attractive, overlook the negatives and pretend he tricked them. If you keep choosing bad items at every restroom you go to, maybe consider that your are bad at ordering and let a friend do it for u. Instead of saying all restaurants are bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 05:14 PM
–

The issue is that even if you were killed by a woman. That woman would get a lighter sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 09:36 PM
1

Ok if youre fucking him everytime he needs to masturbate. I salute you sister, go forth. But I don't think most women are/can do that so therefore men will pull one off.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:33 PM
1

Lol men aren't limited in the amount of erections they have. You dont use 10,000 and then youre done. On top of this women aren't having sex every time there guy has a stiffy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:28 PM
1

You can do both in a relationship. How are they mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:25 PM
–

Men aren't really asking for help, we pride ourselves on being self reliant. We only ask for accurate info.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:38 PM
–

I was just talking about men and women online. In their so called spheres.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:35 PM
1

That wasn't my claim in any good faith attempt at conversing. But here. If you want "evidence" me opening youtube and typing in those words gives me mostly women talking about this. Scrolling lower there are men but they're making fun of it and are mostly give woke feminist takes. A couple red pill of course https://preview.redd.it/a0052dqk6nug1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bedec571e423c385c030e94b564b2fde5cb4f94b
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:01 PM
1

It appears in the sentence where I mention. "Its mostly women.....". Do I have to reuse the word mostly every time I mention a new group or can we just understand that we're speaking in generalities due to basic social context clues? I dont have any evidence because you've also brought none. You have a couple anecdotes and snipets from people. On top of that, I wasn't making the claim that no red pillers were talking about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:36 PM
1

When I use the word mostly one time in a sentence to refer to groups. Understand that we dont usually have to keep using it to imply that were talking about most instances. That's our disagreement. Your autistic tantrum is blinding you from a very easy to understand social situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:21 PM
1

You have links to individuals. On reddit. We could go back and forth and i can show you what tiktok looks like when you type in male loneliness (BTW I dont have tiktok so no algorithm manipulation). I can do the same in youtube as well. This conversation is mostly coming from women and male feminists. You haven't debunked anything because im not sure you even understand what youre arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:13 PM
0

Its not. You'll notice the word most in my claim. If you type in the word male loneliness epidemic on Google, tiktok, YouTube etc. The people talking about this the most are women and feminists in general. You haven't debunked anything you're just showing that red pill men have talked about it in instances. Which i dont contend with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:47 PM
0

The male loneliness discussion is being promoted mostly by women. The men pushing it as of this moment are feminist men aligned with feminism. That's my claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 07:07 PM
2

To be fair, their stated goal is just to arm men with information about women. Also what do "femosphere" discuss besides all men being trash and blaming men for their dating problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:44 PM
0

What are you arguing against what's your claim. Im saying that men dont only talk about male loneliness. Which is what I think you're trying to imply. Im saying that I hear more about the male loneliness epidemic from women than men as a way to disparage men. But they miss that 10% of women are also classified as lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:42 PM
1

How many men just speak about the male loveliness epidemic? In deed the only people who zero in on the male loneliness epidemic are strangely women. 10% of women are lonely but 15% of men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:33 PM
4

No evidence for this. Its mostly a rich poor thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 05:35 PM
1

Ok but these women aren't on the fence saying they might not. They're adamant antinatalists. On top of that i do mention women who can't get pregnant for whatever reason. Should they go off to war?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:41 PM
1

What if a woman couldn't or didn't ever want to grow children in her womb. Is it ok to advocate for those women to go to war?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 10:28 PM
1

benevolent misogyny. No you were saying that you were young and would have avoided these men because they were "assholes". Im pretty sure they weren't assholes because they held the door for you. Again I can show you the studies men who rape women also have more consensual partners for example. We do when he walks in with meth mouth and a pipe in his hand. This sub makes this broad generalization to any guy who's struggling dating there's even a famous meme. 10 women flocking to a guy who just w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:53 PM
1

Those are two different things. I have dated men who turned out to be assholes. I wasn't willing, I was ignorant. Don't change the verbiage you called the mysogynystic not assholes. Anyhow its irrelevant your argument just entails that you should be better at hiding your mysogyny. I dont even quite believe that because even the most out in the open mysoginists seem to always have a partner. A woman beater seems to always have a woman to beat. Im not in favor of any of this im just pointing out t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:32 PM
1

we have no way of knowing which factors are involved True, but then why do people keep insisting that incels are that way because of mysoginy? you are stating or implying that incels are in their predicament because of their mysoginy right now. So you can answer my question and say at least at some point in their life multiple women have and are willing to date mysoginistic men. Including you and or your friends? The paragraph above is moot if you're admitting to this. I dont care about judging …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:55 PM
1

Alright, whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:11 AM
1

You being a lunatic who howls at the moon at 3 am wont hurt your chances with men. You being a progressive leftist feminist justs means that those men want you for a fun time. Not a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:04 AM
0

I love how we're just skipping over egalitarian because you know that even feminists dont want to split the check on the first date. Furthermore my broader point was that it will hurt your chances with some women. Just like sexism will hurt your chances with some women. Its all a wash at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:01 AM
1

The point was that incels aren't single because they're mysoginists. I think everyone should choose better but if the goal is just incels getting into relationships, mysoginy isn't the answer that blue pillers want it to be. We're moving the goal posts by saying that these women who date bad boys are all traumatized. My greater point was that there are a lot of women who have dated these mysoginists exes. If im going to guess, you probably have too or you know girlfriends who have. Would charact…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:58 AM
6

But likewise being a male feminist can hurt your chances with some women. Being egalitarian and not subscribing to patriarchal gender roles can hurt your chances with some women. It may all be a wash at the end. You say that being a bad guy wont get you much success with stable women. But how many women fit that criteria. Same goes for men btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:50 PM
2

True but we just need a woman who has a high sex drive within relationship settings. Being a virgin is an impossible standard that no one is reaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:19 AM
11

Thank you people dont realize this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:14 AM
2

Op, can I ask if youre planning to ever get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:12 AM
1

You lack a tremendous amount of critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:11 AM
1

Yup, were all the same and have the same motivations. I dont even believe that men are taller than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:46 AM
1

You're 16 eh, people like you can vote in 2 years. Disappointing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:45 AM
0

based off of a few women’s opinions? Im giving you a medium that literally millions of women enjoy and read. Romance novels and movies. The guys in then are all roughly the same. I compare that to something multiple men consume. How am I being narrow minded? as a woman i have more than one ‘type’ in men, You have one type youre attracted to and another you'll accept if certain conditions are met. This is the easiest thing in the world to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:15 AM
-1

because males also have types? Men have multiple types, women essentially have one. Look up the characters in romance novels for women vs porn categories for men. Women just hate not being the type for her specific type of man. And can you believe it fit attractive guys want fit attractive women. Shucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:09 AM
1

Clarify. In what way is unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:53 AM
–

0 Caring about society and it's problems is the purview of better men Most men will not be "better" for nothing in return. Notice how the elite men in society are almost always married and or have kids. As women keep going higher and higher more and more men stop caring.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 11:30 PM
–

Yes the tail is wagging the dog. As women continue with their higher and higher selection more men become NEET and society has less revenue to run itself. If the reality that OP states becomes true. Tell me, why wouldn't men reduce to extra labour they do for society to the bare minimum required survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 11:25 PM
–

Tl;dr : we will soon finally have no gener pay gap. Stop larping as oil rig workers. You dont need to be an oil rig worker. Even for common jobs men work more hours than women. Likely because they need to. But if there isn't an incentive that goes down. You're already seeing an rise in NEET men. Men not going to college in even roughly comparable rates as women. Also let's bring to mind that married men make more than single men. I think women like to pretend that their causing there men to earn…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 11:19 PM
–

I think youre right but people need to become comfortable with the idea that men will likely do less of the back breaking sole crushing extra work it takes to keep society afloat. Men currently are net contributors to our taxes usually are not. Why would men do this extra contribution without benefit. Also a less bleak option for these men is good sex robots. But for both solutions I fear its women that will have a harder time adapting to the consequence of the world created.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 08:49 PM
1

but the people who buy dildos are a very specific kind of woman. I know but the random sample matches the Dildo buying population averages. That's why I bring it up. So its a pretty accurate extrapolation to women at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:17 PM
2

When a woman has a high libido there’s very often a medical reason behind it. Ok how does that address anything ive said? Good for you. Im just saying that promiscuity and sex drive are different but likely correlated concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:01 PM
3

She can keep getting fucked by high status rich guys. But dont complain about them not committing. Women want commitment that these men wont give. At some point they need someone to support their life. You're saying this as if these high status men are lining up to marry average women 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:59 PM
1

Preferences dont mean necessity. Also the study is prause et Al 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 04:59 AM
-1

You dont think that women do this as well. Do you think short men aren't disparaged by women? Men are asking for equal standards. If women want to say that short men have napoleon complexes why cant men opine about the complexes and issues around single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 12:24 AM
7

Ok but women do actually choose that on social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:01 PM
0

No, they've proven that's the size the found visually and tactiley appealing. On top of this. Women choose around the same size when they're shopping for their own dildo. Pretty good evidence as to what dimensions they like inside them. It shouldn't be surprising that women love above average size given the love for height that women have. In terms of rarity a 6.4 penis size is equivalent to a 6'2 man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:56 PM
3

Bro can we stop this put men to shame thing. Lesbian have much less sex than gay men when the genders are completely left to their own devices. Men on average will have a higher sex drive than women and thats OK. This makes sense given the fact that men dont get pregnant and have had no selective pressure to dampen sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:44 PM
18

You're confusing sex drive and promiscuity. You can have a high sex drive in a relationship with one person. Hell you can have a high sex drive and just masturbate 10 times a day. Im not naive enough to believe that there isn't a correlation between sex drive and promiscuity but they are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:41 PM
5

Its bone pressed length, for age ill give it 5.5 for young men. Still one in shorter than the prause study.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:14 PM
1

Let them touch them. Jesus christ its a scientific study not a porn shoot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:36 PM
4

There was a study about this with women that used silicone models to get better estimates of women's preferences. The average size women wanted was 6.4 inches. So we'll above the 5.1 inch average. However that doesn't mean that 5.1 inches isn't sufficient to please a woman gentlemen. Like height, I think its just an ideal that most women do get over. The study is by nicole prause 2015.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:25 PM
1

Sir according to you. Whoever I pick wishes they could romp around town and break hearts Its not hypocritical because they can't effectively. most men are are constrained from cheating by their lack of options. If you want to pick the same man that other women are picking. Then you're likely to get a guy who'll cheat on you. Its not about morality its about practicality. Its not pretty to say but its the truth. By pick better im saying acknowledge this truth and act accordingly. Also, im using h…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 03:13 AM
1

With views like this and the name obsessive that. Its no wonder you get the outcomes you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:15 PM
2

And yet fuck boys exist. Sometimes I think women just lie to themselves to get into these relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:21 AM
1

No youre projecting your ideas on to me. Men can want sex but the cost for women is eventually half their assets as collateral. If im wrong than marry a man but sign a prenup saying you only want the assets you contributed to in a relationship. Most women aren't doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:34 PM
2

They dont have to. You're giving it up for free. More than 20 percent of women end up coupled but that doesn't mean they didn't fuck those top men first.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:31 PM
1

So many men. You ladies are going after the same few men. Men wish we were running around town and breaking hearts but we're not. Its literally just the men women flock too in droves. Pick better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:29 PM
2

You had sex, no one used your body. If you wanted to not have your body "used" you would have gotten into a relationship and then slept with the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:23 PM
3

Nope, they'd be married and some would be incels. That's the cost of sex for most men. You can sleep with dozens of men who just wanted to use you for sex and then generalize that negative experience to all men. Stop, blaming the fact that your mom chose a loser of a man who abandoned you on all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 05:13 PM
4

Because not all women deserve a rich man. Not all women are worth the same "price" so to speak. No one's complaining if Jennifer Lawrence says she wants to date a millionaire. People are if 200 lbs 5'2 Jenny and Keisha are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 10:46 PM
5

They are. Its what marriage is. Women (usually) want the baby as well as the man so they choose a man who makes a little more than them and can care for both them and the baby. The government is just an aggregate of our taxes from our labor. Marriage essentially compensates women for labor by giving you half of the man you can bag's resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 10:06 PM
3

Men also become particular if they're forced to take over everything in the house. Putting the cart before the horse there aren't we. But regardless, women aren't being forced to do anything. A lot are just neurotic and given they marry men that make more than them in average. The person staying home is going to by default fall to the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:10 AM
-8

As long as you dont make it your partners problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:08 AM
1

A relationship every year almost if we average. Hope you worked through whatever you needed to before marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:56 AM
5

Agree it should be between the last two. " Open to sex with a stranger after a few dates". Last one should "open to sex with strangers NSA/first date"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 01:55 AM
15

assign and explain to the man tasks instead of the man assuming any responsibility. Understand thought, that women like things a very particular way. If you want something done particularly and not generally then yes you're either going to be doing it yourself or dictating how it gets done.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 03:36 PM
3

There is no evidence that you'll be more attractive though. It is a subtle contract because its a call to action for men to be more progressive or women wont date them/ women date guys that are more progressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 05:35 AM
2

he’s literally saying if women ARENT meeting these expectations of They're not contingent on each other. He's saying that he wants to abolish all contracts but feminists make the distinction between male and female contracts and want to preserve the male ones. he’s literally saying if women ARENT meeting these expectations of sex then they need to like make it clearer Right but they're not contingent. He's making a post hoc analysis of how come male covert contracts are left behind but female on…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 05:32 AM
6

The refusal to give sex just because some guy paid for dinner is a rejection of a covert contract. Correct, this is what OP and I both believe. The issue is that expecting men to pay is also a covert contract. Feminists don't fight at all to remove that contract but fight to remove a woman reciprocating any intimacy. You dont understand what youre arguing do you? in order to reject the covert contract, women must insist on 50-50.* No they're not contingent upon each other. The outcome is what we…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 05:22 AM
0

he’s gonna get laid is the definition of a covert contract. Yes i know, that's the point OP was making. He doesn't agree with it though. You're not paying attention. Re-read the post. Ill ask again how is OP imposing the idea of a covert contract?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 05:11 AM
1

And the insane part is that rainn knows what its doing. The sources on their studies are from 1998. Its such a disgusting way to pit men and women against each other and it works because you look like an asshole to even try to question that women raped men at somewhat comparable rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:08 AM
4

Its a covert complex in the sense that it subtly impresses upon men that if they follow liberal politics they'll be more likely to get a girlfriend. The covert contract is vote for x policy or person and you'll get some ass. Don't and you wont.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:04 AM
1

the examples you pose are you pushing covert contracts onto others and not vice versa. He's giving examples of covert contracts and saying there shouldn't be an expectation of men paying or women giving men intimacy. Feminists rightfully disagree with the latter but are silent about the former. If people dont owe you shit then they dont owe you shit across the board. How is he emphasizing a covert contract by just saying this shouldn't be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:00 AM
4

believes women can't rape men". I know but Mary p koss did say that women can't rape men. Im bringing this up because feminists say that rape and dv is a tool that men use to oppress women. So you'll hear them talk about men raping women and we need to teach men not to rape. And 98 percent of rapist are men. But never bring up that those stats are acquired because we dont consider a woman drugging or coercing a man and putting his penis inside her as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 11:02 PM
2

I'd actually just love it if you could show any prominent feminists who would even say that women can rape men. These aren't fringes, this is the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 10:06 PM
6

I give feminists no credit for making the definition gender neutral. The woman in charge of that Mary p koss. Believes that women cannot rape men. The FBI definition reflects this bias by defining rape as penetration and not also envelopement. I can provide the proof of her denying that women can rape men if anyone needs it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 09:15 PM
1

Not the point im making. Who do you think is having children? The best among us?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 11:59 PM
–

all men are evil rapists I mean you literally don't understand it. If you said that all men have the capability of rape i'd understand. On top of that its a different scenario, rape, (unless you're fucked by a billionaire apparently) is punished by law. You getting divorced raped is encouraged by law. Not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:56 PM
–

Im actually baffled at how y'all get tripped up by this. AWALT is all guns are loaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:46 PM
–

We can acknowledge that and still believe men still shouldn't deal with insane women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:42 PM
1

False. There was a study done on spinal curvature of women and male attraction. The spinal curve men found most of attractive was theorized to be that way because it helped women give birth easier therefore giving them a direct evolutionary benefit. This was confirmed when obstetracians calculated the curve angle that was most conducive to giving birth and it matched what males found most attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 01:36 AM
1

Maybe they should. Marriage rates are going down and married people are funding these single mother families. Lets use that money to support married families instead. I want to produce tax payers not dependents.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:44 PM
1

Ok I changed my comment from can to can't wanna answer that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 11:19 AM
1

*can't
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 11:17 AM
2

We're not talking about child abuse. Children can't leave or form relationship with adults. Its always hilarious when women are confronted with accountability they want to default to "what about Children". You're not a child. You're qn adult grow up. Edit: can't
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 11:00 AM
1

Haha look up the raw hours. "Full time" isn't what you think it means?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:59 AM
0

How does the mom work, dude? Less they work less. You can't expect me to work full time and be a full time single parent. Something will give. Look up the stats. Mothers usually work part time. The "gravy train" of $400 a month This is an average. Poor people are usually put of child support do it drags the average child support. On top of that child support isn't the only fee that goes to paying for a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:47 AM
-1

Then they can be the primary parent,*** if this is what you allege is true. How does he work? On top of that, this assume that women want the gravy train to stop. Why would they let him become primary parent?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:36 AM
2

Children do need dads though. So I dont understand Why you'd bring a kid into the world knowing partially that he's unloved. Stop making a baby for a check.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:34 AM
2

This is not "half the assets" for most people who don't marry super young. Given that women marry around 30. You're catching a man entering the peak of his career. So yes its almost half the assets. Unless you want his allowance money when he was a kid. Or all the money he makes for the rest of his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:33 AM
1

Even a "committed man" will change his tune if the relationship ends. Press x for doubt. Men want to care for their children. They dont want to pay for the mom's lifestyle. Make a cap on child support and restrict it to items that a child would need and you'd have no issues with men paying. For the married men, women are complaining that they aren't paying enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:30 AM
0

I think this is coming sooner or later. I dont see why men are going to keep paying for women's bad decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:27 AM
4

Be honest there were signs, people just ignore them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:05 AM
2

Because you guys usually tell that to women who have been abused and/or left single moms with zero evidence she knew this would happen. We'd tell it to men as well. Christian Coleman sh'carri Richardsons boyfriend. Should have chosen better. Even when he forgave her, people still blamed him for setting her off. Men can't win, thats ok though. Just need to admit it and keep moving.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:04 AM
0

I disagree, it discentevizes women from choosing some dead beat with the though in mind that she's going to get child support. The only thing left would be to limit government assistance some how. How do you feel about prospectively taking away assistance from them. So prospective means starting let's say in a year, all women who gave birth out of wedlock from 2027 and onward would only get half the government assistance they would have. If its confusing look up what a prospective law is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:35 PM
1

They were and my guess is that married fathers are less likely to abandoned their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:29 PM
1

Men here also routinely ignore the fact that divorced men also are often obligated to pay child support for children they completely and voluntarily made. As a married women you get better protections. Half the assets split from a man who is generally making more than you is not a bad golden parachute. However, yes you need to be careful with who you marry as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:26 PM
1

Im at the point where I do think we need to at least limit child support as a disincentive. Even as a lib I hope the republican shutdown would show women that they're entire lives rest upon the whims of a very capricious gov't
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:23 PM
3

Is that what I said? My argument is that if you want a man to stay. Choose a man who wants a baby with you. The best you can get in the alternative situation is a man that pays his child support but hates you and your child and never visits.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:21 PM
0

I think women having babies with men who dont want them does that. If he doesn't commit to you, he won't commit to your baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 04:53 PM
6

What? Gay men have more sex than gay women. Why do you think that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 04:49 PM
1

I think they're claiming its lower than men. Not saying that its pathologically low like these studies are treating. There are multiple reasons for low libido and T is just one of them. Hell even low E might be a problem. I hope that women get their hormonal profile assessed while young do that they can optimize it by the time premenopause comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 02:25 PM
12

These studies are in populations with already low sexual desire. That may be caused by something else like depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 01:34 PM
1

The age? What diferences? U realise women normally date around their age? Please explain The people you see walking around couple are older or likely formed before the age of dating apps. Our society runs on women and men's labour, society will stop working if women wouldn't go to work. I didn't say it didn't. But im talking about paid labor. Men are net contributors to the tax base. They put in a lot, don't use a lot of services and die earlier than women. Giving our society a lot of taxes base…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:48 AM
2

Im talking about women at large here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:33 AM
1

Ok so is animated porn or AI porn an equivalent to book related porn? Are those equivalent?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:54 PM
7

League defined by who you can attract Somewhat correct. But for women its defined by who you can get to stay. A guy using you as a fleshlight for a night doesn't mean thats your league. I guess for men and women, its who you can get into a relationship with. Not situationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:44 PM
1

Definetely 80% of men are not single because women are only dating the 20 top% of men. Look around you. Average men are dating and marrying average women everywhere Notice the age of those men and women. Amongst the dating app generation. Im sure its not 80/20 but the differences between men and women are stark. Now a lay person might see these age effects and assume inaccurately that people are just getting hooked up later. But you need to understand the difference between longitudinal and coho…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:20 AM
1

but we aren’t discussing wives and romantic partners are we We are the premise of the question was using insinuating that in order to get women you need to treat them like humans beings. treat everyone the same. A random stranger isn’t some number on the street, they are somebody’s mother, father, brother, sister and deserve to be treated as such This is such a bullshit lie. Go ahead and tell me you'd equally give up your life for a random stranger vs your mom. This is why I hate blue pill discu…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 10:48 PM
2

Why would you treat your parents differently to anyone else? Because they're my parents I've spent my entire life with them. They know me and I know them. They have favoritism for me compared to other people in the world as well. Are you genuinely telling me that you treat your family members as any randomly picked stranger off the street. you can be respectful and polite to your parents, then you can do it for anyone! I'd be willing to give up my life for my parents and siblings, and those dear…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:35 PM
1

The dystopia is created by those men just not participating in society not overthrowing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:08 PM
8

Just treat them like humans and act like a decent human being This is an empty platitude. We do treat humans differently. You treat your parents differently from every other human being on the planet. A woman who wants to be your girlfriend, quite rightfully she expects better treatment than the average human being. I never want to hear this asinine phrase again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:08 PM
1

When a woman is nursing and giving birth i agree that men should do 100 percent of the providing. In pregnancy too. However outside of that women are getting 50/50. As a sanity check if a women doesn't want to have children should she be expected to split the bill even with her partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:15 PM
1

This is just excuses you have balls and testosterone.. you're built to work and grind. Nah, im build to work and grind for the right woman. What are women today offering that justifies me working 80 hour days. you can't make it in this world as a man then you're insufficient as a man I agree but most men can do that. You're asking for them to take care of themselves and you. But you dont offer anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 08:15 PM
2

No they aren't. Do you think currently the best men are having children and reproducing? For example
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 05:51 PM
1

We're more educated then you that's why we get hired. Nope all things being equal men are discriminated against. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560 There's data related to schooling as well. But too lazy to the work you know. Working so hard as a man and getting so little back.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 04:16 AM
2

Oh no im just saying that nationally there will be a wage gap. So many feminists cry about the fact that in aggregate men make more. They're not gonna like this proposal. To be serious if you really want this. Lets remove the hiring and scholarship advantages that women have and we'll have equal pay. The anti DEi push that trump has ushered will already get us part way. Men aren't going to work more. Especially for what women are offering these day but there are ways to increase the wage gap wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 10:26 PM
1

So where do you think we're headed if this continues?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:09 PM
1

No im just correct. If a woman doesn't want to sleep with you she doesn't like you. Time to find one that does.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:09 PM
1

Men need to make more money. Then we're no longer equal to women. Are we pro wage gap now?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 06:04 AM
1

You've proven my point already. Those who are reading can make their own determination
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:22 AM
1

Correct and guess what the incentives are for women like you? Promiscuity
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:10 AM
1

But at the end of the day I want different things from different people Again if men wined and dined and lavished promiscuous women and waited to spend on serious women. What do you think the incentive is for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:02 AM
1

Women like you are collectively making the pissy daying pool youre complaining about. I also noticed you said the men i go on dates with not the guy im dating or married to. Can you see how the incentives you set up may have led to circumstances that are less than ideal for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:29 AM
0

he point is to flesh out who wants just sex and who wants more than just sex Sweetheart do you understand what incentives are? You're creating negative incentives for Men if you make the men who have relationship qualities wait longer. What do you believe will happen to those qualities. The male equivalent of what youre doing would be absolutely simping and taking promiscuous short term women to fine restaurants and then waiting before you spend much of anything on relationship minded women beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:12 AM
3

I thought you've been influenced to be independent and not need no man? Your fathers were providers when a house was the cost of loaf of bread.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:45 AM
1

According to your logic the new women he is dating would have a right to be upset According to reality women would be upset. Either way its a good argument as to why men shouldn't simp and women shouldn't be promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:36 AM
2

me, attraction is a baseline for both casual and serious dating. But the requirements don’t stop there for a relationship. Casual sex can exist on attraction alone, Ok let's say I agree with you. Can you the incentives are misaligned for the men you want? All men want to have sex. If you supposedly have sex with the hot guy who does nothing else but make the hot guy who has good relationship qualities wait. What will men want to be in order to have sex? You're explaining to a T how hookup cultur…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:33 AM
1

Can you name me any flourishing polygamist nation you'd like to live in? Even the ones that allow polygamy dont have a lot of polygamist marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:20 AM
2

Men are talking about morally good men. But please choose more attractive 6 ft tall men. What was said above will happen. You'll create a dystopia and im all here for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:18 AM
1

Ok how's that relevant to this discussion? If it takes you two years to sleep with your partner expect that he'll find someone else who's hormones aren't "fluctuating". You're either monogamous or not, if you dont want to have sex agree to a one sided open relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 08:11 PM
1

For multiple reasons. Most dont have anything to do with the length you have wait until having sex. If she wanted to she would. I dont think you can ask for a monogamous relationship and then for a year. If a woman can't have sex for a years like you said. She should consider letting her husband find new partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 01:46 PM
1

Men as a rule don’t want their kids. The men that women try to baby trap do not. These absentee fathers don't happen out of nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:41 AM
1

The postpartum window extends until two years post delivery. That's great. If my wife isn't fucking for 2 years after a healthy pregnancy. Its a divorce. Only loser men accept this clap trap. Find a way to fix your hormones if they're out of wack. Men do TRT go to the gym and everything if they have ED. We can expect the same from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:29 AM
1

Hey as long as you're consistent im ladies number on advocate for waiting for sex. We just both know that y'all give it up faster to men you do like. That's why men wont stand by and wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 05:08 AM
6

Ops statement relies on a misinterpretation of what men are saying. Im clarifying that. Consistent treatment is what men are good with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:36 AM
5

This is being explained and you can't see it. Men should be consistent just like the women im describing. If a man was wining and dining skanks while stiffing good girls you'd make a good point. For me personally just make sure a girl likes you for you before spending on her. It could mean she has sex with you on the third date then you spoil her. That should be pretty simple. Consistency across the board. Men have never said not having sex with a man you just met is a punishment in it of itself…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:30 AM
10

No, once again men absolutely sympathize with women who have standards. A woman who wants to save herself for marriage may not be my cup of tea but I absolutely respect her choice. The woman who doesn't sleep with anyone without three dates is also fine. Men just know there are women who'll get plowed behind the dumpster and the come 30, try to find a guy and make him wait because she's "healed her trauma". The logic isn't the same when you look at the context.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 03:53 AM
8

You can. but if you treat me different to the guy you fucked behind the dumpster expect me to treat you differently from the consistent woman with a three date standard. Seems fair right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 03:49 AM
16

Men have zero problem with women who have a consistent standard of waiting for sex with guys. They just aren't going to wait for a woman who just took it behind the Macdonalds dumpster for her last guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 02:21 AM
0

I know we never consider why it would be in the best interest of future children to reward a child rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 08:17 AM
2

Once a kid is born, Once again we're talking about termination of a contract before the child is born. That way the mother has an opportunity to abort or do anything she needs to but the responsibility shouldn't be on the raped father. If we can't agree on this then as a liberal man I dont see any reason to defend women's bodily autonomy if they won't defend mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 06:39 AM
1

Im glad one person was brave enough to answer. The cowards posting paragraphs above a strangely silent on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 06:30 AM
4

That slogan is about abortion and bodily autonomy, not about opting out after a child exists. Ok should men who are raped by women be able to opt out? If this is about bodily autonomy. It would follow that the man's bodily autonomy was violated and he shouldn't have to further pay after being violated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 01:32 AM
2

True. And women get raped by men. But that's not the topic we're discussing here. We're discussing consent to be a parent. If a man is raped by a woman and there's proof why shouldn't he be able to terminate his childcare obligations?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 01:27 AM
–

Drew afuolo says that men are inherently evil and need to prove that they're not. What do you mean like Andrew Tate though?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 02:27 PM
–

basic Yeah I think this only works on women. I wasn't brought up on messages being told im a queen and a boss. Basic is good, im happy you think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 09:00 PM
–

No i think I pride myself on not conforming to a sick societies definition of "good". Why not just go ahead and call me a mysoginist for disagreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:08 PM
7

Wouldn't the not all men be a response to a general blanket statement to men. So how is that a double standard. Even your own example falls on its face. Anyhow, the comment below me answered it better than I could. Men make generalizations on large minorities or majorities of women. Women choose scumbags and then start saying they hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:09 PM
9

I already dont give a shit im asking why the discrepancy exists. On a social level.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 06:14 AM
11

Ok id love of this was reciprocated. Women can have 6'6 minimum height as a standard. I have no problem with it but why is does men having the standard of healthy weight seen as objectification and toxic? I dont mind people having even absurd standards im just wondering why there's backlash on one side only. The only criticism men really give height is that women should stop complaining they can't find a 6 foot 3 man. No shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:29 AM
1

Women are hypergamous. If losers leave the country the new losers are the men just above them on the totem pole. I guess this is why I see both men and women shaming this. Subconsciously, both blue pill men and women think its "cheating " in the dating game.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:27 AM
1

The point is that he doesn't find you unattractive if you couldn't. Also men just find women hot as a rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:24 AM
1

that makes the behavior not innate. The particular behavior isn't innate. The drive to conform in order to be desired by the people we like is. We're a social species and one that wants to reproduce into the future (broadly speaking). So we're attuned and want to be liked by the people we like. primarily like that women are not the beneficiaries of patriarchy This is just a virtue signal. Your mind doesn't innately know what patriarchy is. Its a concept that had to be thought to you. You see thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:14 AM
1

Its just something that isn't learned or acquired from the society. E.g blind babies knowing how to smile. This behavior is innate. Im sympathetic to Trans people because I do think there is a part of the human brain that tells you what gender you are and what gender you're attracted to. There's no real way to change this besides embracing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:59 AM
1

What I am arguing is that people don’t go to these roles because they’re “innate” or “natural”, they go to these roles because they want to. I think the mistake we make when talking about gender roles. Is focusing on the roles themselves. I fully admit most of these roles are arbitrary and will change. Pink vs blue? Who cares. What is not arbitrary is the desire to differentiate between men and women in some way. Sometimes that falls along some biological pathway but other times its cultural. Tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:46 AM
2

people gravitate towards the roles they like. Why do trans people usually gravitate to rolls that "confirm" the gender they want to be? In the case of trans women, higher pitched voices, long hair, and generally feminine clothing? I don't doubt that some people go do something else but why do most Trans people embody the stereotypical attributes of the gender they want to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:34 AM
1

Ah, I'll stop you right there and give you time to look at the heart in my pfp. Im using the plural you're and not the personal. It still applies to women and relates to my question on innate sexuality. If sexuality is innate then you must agree that there are things that you like about women over men on an innate level. Some of these traits are physical but others are in how men and women behave. Understand that straight women have these innate desires as well and gender roles are just us tryin…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:30 AM
1

damn, didn’t realize I lost the right to talk about gender roles by being trans lol - You can talk about them just don't start criticizing them and saying they're enforced when you willingly try to conform the women's gender roles in action and form. I think its fine if you do. Just don't be a hypocrite. And here is the thing, what “is” right now is the man is seen as the protector and the woman isn’t. Do you believe that at least some parts on sexuality are innate?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:23 AM
0

Okay, what response could I have possibly given for you to not think I'm lying? One that doesn't fly in the face of reality. If Your a woman with an attraction to men. You're attracted to the average differences that men exhibit compared to women. Saying And what else would it be but misogyny if your first response is to accuse women of lying I didn't read your tag when I answered your post first. Maybe I'm just a disagreeable asshole. Why do you immediately skip to your sex being the reason im …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:19 AM
2

acts as an excuse to enforce gender Gender roles shouldn't be "enforced". They dont need to be they're natural predelictions between men and women. Trans people especially can't critique gender roles and their enforcement and the go on to adopt and emulated those rolls when they want to pass. This shouldn’t be gendered no Im not talking about should or ought, im talking about is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:13 AM
1

What plastic? That was a real knife. And she’s a real human with a life. The phone, pay attention. This is why men need to be protectors. Y'all dont understand danger. If she let's go of her phone. The guy runs away and both are safe. What she did endangered not only her but her partner and those 10 other men. Nope, because it was a man that attacked her So what, 10 other men swarmed in to protect her. Not to mention when there are natural disasters. Men are usually the first on the seen protect…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:09 AM
2

You are lying. People who are telling the truth dont deflect by calling someone a mysoginst. I originally said you're lying because we all have gendered expectations of the opposite sex. Feminists call it internalized patriarchy, others call it biology. Are you someone that believes that sexuality is at least partially innate?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:05 AM
1

Sounds like something men need to examine then. No, men and women can be attracted to different things and thats a wonderful thing. It doesn't need to be "looked at" or pathologized it needs to be embraced. Also, saving or helping your partner isn’t about “attractive” - it’s about protecting your partner lol Im stating that women find it attractive when men protect them. Fire fighters have a profession that is attractive to women because they save people from danger. Men dont really swoon over f…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:02 AM
–

An accurate one, nonetheless
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:55 AM
–

Its just harder to feel sexual feelings towards someone after coffee than in a well lit chic restaurant with drinks flowing. Hahaha, now this is a psyop. Women know when they want to sleep with you from the nature of your conversational and you looks. You throwing money at a chic restaurant just let's her know youre a walking wallet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:26 AM
1

We’re y’all fucked up is branding yourselves as “protectors” (when you’re CLEARLY not), lol. Protectors of life, not objects. Give up your phone. Im not dying for 500 dollars plastic. On top of that men still ended up protecting her. So the branding is accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:20 AM
-2

expect any partner to protect their partner in instances like this - gender doesn't matter. I BS, you don't expect her to protect him if he's getting attacked. This is gendered and you absolutely do not feel a need to protect men from danger. Inversely, you do expect men to protect you. Its ok to say that. Men and women having different expectations. If you do expect partners to protect each other. Would you agree that letting go of the phone the robber was trying to take would be her best way t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:17 AM
-1

shouldn’t be a gendered thing). It is though. Men dont find it attractive when a woman dives in to save them from danger. Women do. At the very least a man doesn't become unattracted to a woman if she can't protect him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:10 AM
0

she delayed the robbers long enough for two random men who don't even know her to help No he shouldn't she held onto the phone in her hand when she could have released it. She put her life and her partners life on danger. Is your life worth a 1000 dollar phone? Let it go and call the police, if that guy had intervened he's seen as a bigger threat and would have been stabbed. He should defend her if her life is in danger but not if her property is getting stolen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:06 AM
1

The top 10 percent composes mostly of men though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:01 AM
1

Jeez desperate much. I think the BP needs to realize that before RP there was pick up artistry. The guy in the TikTok is indeed confirming a lot of red pill talking points. We're at the "i did it but i its good that I did" part of the narcissists prayer.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 01:56 AM
0

This is like saying "there are so many jobs out there with so many skills required its impossible to give high schoolers advice". Women want to think of dating as this impenetrable black box that's so mysterious but we can and should generalize about what gets you a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:53 PM
–

I do understand the word rate and you're confused. You're thinking that she said that black people kill less per capital than white people. That would be false. However she's saying that when white people they mostly kill their own. The same is true for white people (all people really). Just read a bit closer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 09:27 PM
–

I can't believe you dont know this. Its the FBIs crime report. You can just AI the answer. It is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 05:08 PM
2

Nah, its an accurate conclusion. Women are saying that they want chubbier characters. There are other articles as well. You have to look.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:02 PM
2

Still not Germaine. Sad but irrelevant. You moved away from your friends who dated mysoginists, were they all child prostitutes as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:00 PM
2

I'm saying misogyny is a factor that can negatively impact a man's dating. There's just no evidence for this one the broader scale. This is like saying wearing a brown belt or a black belt will impact you dating option. I guess for an individual woman sure. But on a group level they cancel out. If we're being honest there are plenty of women who are misogynistic as well and might do well with a misogynistic man. He was extremely misogynistic as demonstrated by his manifesto, and that misogyny co…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:58 PM
2

Did you miss the child prostitute part? I didn't care, its not relevant. Child is doing a lot of work here. We're you 17 and gave 20 year old sexual favors? Give me a break. Why are we pretending like you were held at gun point and made to do this. Its illegal and should be avoided but Im not very sympathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 07:12 PM
1

Not to mention, the men with the most sexual partners had low levels of hostility towards women. It proves men with few romantic partners aren't nysoginistic. I was going to link something else that did but what ever. Elliot Rodgers. In my opinion, easily an 8/10 appearance wise. Elliot Rodgers had autism, his mysoginy wasn't preventing him from dating as the study showed. Men with a moderate amount of sexual partners exhibit the most mysoginy. The point of this is to throw a wrench into the ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 07:08 PM
–

hates them - again, is he hurting his chances? No, his chances aren't dictated by hatred of women. They're dictated my him being unattractive (read ugly or akward). Being a nysoginist might even help him accordingly to this study. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11735252/#:~:text=In term of the interpersonal,successful in relationships with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 02:25 PM
–

Yeah but the greater point was how women incentivize and disincentivize men to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 02:21 PM
2

And yet, you've still slept with and dated a "misogynists" and so have most women. So does mysoginy really hurt you in dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:51 PM
3

That women say that only immoral women date mysoginists but in the end they have a couple of misogynists that they've given their best years to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 01:42 AM
2

Hahaha, knew it. Women will preach about how its only hot and wealthy men who can get away with it. But then claim how much they hate their nysoginistic, ugly, broke loser boyfriend. Sleep well knowing even the data shows im right. Women sadly love mysoginy. On top of that, if you divorced your husband you'd call him a nysoginistic pig as well. However, in a broad sample of young men, a study found that men who reported having sexual experience had significantly more hostile attitudes towards wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 01:11 AM
6

Hot or wealthy misogynistic men can take their pick of pick mes. If you were to ask your friends or yourself if you've ever dated a nysoginistic man. What would be the answer? You are neither, so the pick mes are not going to pick you. This is your life,lead it. I don't have a problem dating. I just hate the just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:59 AM
6

Tldr: please answer the last paragraph. Yes or no. A sad sack is not. Wait I thought we were talking about misogynists when did we start talking about sad sacks. Or is it as everyone assumed that misogynistic is just the new term for men who already can't get a date and voice any form of frustration over it? I just want to emphasize that misogyny isn't causing loneliness. Loneliness might be causing mysoginy. Can you say if you agree to this. Because thats my only argument with the comment above…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:49 AM
–

There's a reason charities had to start focusing on women Charities focus on women (read mothers) because the benefits trickle down to their family. Men can be single and giving them money doesn't necessarily produce that effect. Men that are fathers for the most part dont need help. By being violent and destructive To make an omelet you need to break some eggs. Society is built on destruction and so is nature at large. Cry about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 11:43 PM
–

Do you both think the “lonely” “incel” guys are mostly comprised of the men doing difficult manual labor? No, but they dont have to be for this theory to play out. Divorcing men who are busting their ass and giving their all also produces the same effect of men not working because there's no incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 11:39 PM
–

Im trying to counter the idea that "immoral" people are more likely to be lonely which is what I responded to. The idea that mysoginistic men dont get laid isn't true. Do you agree or disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 11:37 PM
–

Or women's morals go out the window for guys they like who have things they like. The point is that you need to be attractive to women. Mysoginy isn't relevant , especially with how its defined now. Everything is Mysoginy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:51 PM
3

https://www.mindlessmag.com/post/womens-bodies-in-video-games There are several articles just like this I can spam you with more or you can just look up body positivity in video games. Women care about seeing fatties in games.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:49 PM
–

You really think the lonely awkward man becoming hostile towards women he interacts with isn't hurting his chances further I think youre reversing the causality. Men who are too ugly and awkward to date become misogynistic. Misogyny (which isn't just hostility to women, you all call everything mysoginy) has very little to do with it. In fact plenty of women love the degradation in the context of sex on top of benevolent misogyny in the form of seeing women as victims. Misogyny is at worst neutra…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:44 PM
–

Men didn't break the social contracts. Its only been very recently that all men could vote and this was given at cost of being drafted in case of war. The reason for the voting age being lowered to 18 was because the Vietnam war drafted young men but didn't allow them to vote. The daughters and wives you were talking about didn't want voting if it came with these stipulations. They didn't want to work in back breaking conditions that men were subjected to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:37 PM
–

These are just too rare to draw conclusions about the population at large though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:11 PM
–

Can we kill the idea that multiple factors don't interact Why dont you bring this up when talking about misogynistic men not getting laid. Is he ugly, broke or autistic. Im guessing that a much bigger factor than misogyny. When may actually even prefer misogynistic men if he treats her well and you add in benevolent sexism/misogyny. point is that misogyny wont make or keep you lonely other things will as you've inadvertently proved. Played yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:09 PM
4

You said no one cared about women being fat in video games. Stop moving the goal post. If you want more look at the entire discourse on "realistic " women in comics and video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:59 PM
–

I dont think many women do. They assume men will just "be better" forever and with no incentive. We see the guys getting laid its not because they're moral people or hard workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:56 PM
–

That makes it even worst. Women still go after this guy. Please shut up about misogyny when all your stories are "my boyfriend is so misogynistic " "my fuck buddy is so misogynistic". Y'all are dating these guys they aren't lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:54 PM
–

True, men don't usually make it everyone's problem. They usually just delete.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:31 PM
–

men are angry that hating women leads to the consequence of loneliness, I Can we kill this myth. Misogynistic men don't have a shortage of women. Donald Trump has been married 3 times and some here would consider him the most misogynistic man in us history.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:27 PM
–

Men also have a penchant for solving most of societies problems. Whether they're natural or man-made
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:23 PM
–

Yup, 10 percent of women have no close friends. While 15 percent of men have no close friends. Women shit on men and say the deserve it but can't look internally and societally at what's going on
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:19 PM
–

I think ultimately people don't understand that men do extra work and hard work in society in the hopes of earning enough for a family and partner. If society tells men that you're not going to get these things for whatever reason, then why should they do dirty and long hours. What is the incentive? I think we as a society have gotten so comfortable and used to seeing men put in these hours that we assume its natural and men just want to do it. Its not a threat its a natural consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 05:09 PM
1

Ok let's take straight people out of the equation. Why do lesbian women divorce more than gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:52 AM
3

Got em. This is an excellent way to put women's preferences right in front of their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:26 PM
1

Looks money status. Any day of the week. This is why I think no pillers are some how worse than blue pilllers
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:23 PM
2

Women aren’t mad that women in video games are skinny dude… 1.https://bulimia.com/examine/video-games-realistic-body-types/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:31 PM
7

Are these the same video games with unrealistic depictions of men? Its not like men are playing as fat slobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 01:57 PM
1

you're not mad at the man who didn't take responsibility If we had to be mad, id have to be made at 3 women for every 2 men. Are you okay with that since its the ratio of mothers to fathers in out community. Are you okay with giving 50 percent more hate to single moms as compared to dead beat dads. Ill make to compromise with you involved with coparenting than other communities. Yeah, im glad that the red pill is spreading enough hate and shame so that this stops. Im all in favor of men holding …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 06:06 AM
1

She's the one raising a child on her own. You don't get props for fucking up your kids life and choosing a shit head who couldn't stay. Both people are degenerates. Call out your family and friends. women get more sympathy than men, This "sympathy" has led to communities with 72% out of wedlock births. This isn't a man problem when there are 142 mothers for ever 100 fathers. Women need to choose better. You need to shame the girls around you. the motivation of hating single moms The motivation i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:30 AM
1

So you understand it and can't rebutt it. Awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 04:22 PM
1

So if let's take the current job market for example. New college grads are having a hard time finding jobs and unemployment is historically high in this group. We all know of how predatory men like Harvey westein would proposition young people into having sex for opportunities. Do you belive the current unemployment rate amongst grads is because we're slowly pushing out predatory men who would give these grads jobs for sexual favors? I mean it must be right and the number of times this happened …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 05:23 AM
4

If she wont do it as a gf, she wont do it as a wife. If she pulls this up just say that paying for dates is a husband activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 07:03 PM
1

Great, glad im seeing less women pretend that they ever cared about them and it wasn't just a covert form of mate sabotage.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:02 AM
1

Because, you got caught slut shaming and it feels uncomfortable. So now you want to ignore it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 04:44 AM
1

But there is no reason why non-consensual Even if I agree with you. You're not explaining why rape was a significant fraction of total sexual encounters. We see a massive decrease on sex, why are we attributing all or most or a large fraction to rape going down if by your own admission we dont know.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 04:43 AM
1

If it can't be known how are you so sure that consensual sex didn't rise to replace it. Youd need to know what fraction was rape and what was consensual.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:59 AM
1

Men who were raping are being taken out of the equation Out of the total sex had say in 1990s vs now how much do you, respectively, think was rape. And no not the number of women who've ever been raped but every single sexual encounter. How much was rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:44 AM
1

Yes being a slut is sexual behavior. The word hypersexual shares the same connotation and fact that its sexual behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:00 AM
1

No, doesn't hypersexual mean an excessive amount of sex or sexual thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 06:31 PM
1

Its not about not being able to it. Its about on average not being able tolerate the physical demands of the job. You know this and are obfuscating on purpose. You absolutely loose everyone when you do this. We know you're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:45 PM
3

Good bait windmill. Always fun chatting with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:39 PM
2

hypersexual That sounds like a coded word for slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:05 PM
0

Bullshit, they're fully consenting and any ramifications are usually mitigated by the fact that they're usually covering their face. Tell me what actually is morally wrong about an 18 year old having a one night NSA with a person who's I believe 24.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 01:48 PM
1

Women can do laborious jobs just as well as men can. Ok, I see we're starting to lie even to ourselves. Listen, I know you dont believe this and you know you're acting in bad faith. I just want you to know that discourse like this doesn't help the cause of feminism or women's rights. In fact it shows that these ideas are so fragile that they can't even play in reality. I can't continue with bad faith interlocutors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 07:26 AM
1

Men don’t desire labor jobs either. They however were more likely and more equipped to do them than women. Or are we going to argue about the physical differences between men and women. There is also an extremely misogynistic attitude at blue color jobs Misogyny isn't keeping women out of blue collar jobs. Physicality is. Every job was misogynistic in the 1950s. Women still entered them and changed them. I’m sure some slaves in Egypt had a real passion for building the pyramids too I think this …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:28 AM
1

adhere to a certain rule. What do you think you'd be doing in an economy of largely physical labor? Do you think women were chomping at the bit to work outside of air conditioned offices. Can you answer my hypothetical. Go back a couple comments
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 03:25 AM
1

threatened Am I also threatened by our society to get a job and follow the law. Could you have an ostensibly coercive element in society and still want to and consent to engaging in the activities that people are "threatening" you with. why does it matter if you lived your youth thinking that? Just so you could get used to the idea of the oppression so it wouldn’t feel as bad? Consent is informed by morals and upbringing. I also added it just to make it an analogous scenario. ll the correspondin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:27 PM
1

Fear of being accused of sexual assault may be a large reasons why YOU don't drink, but that reason isn't seen as a significant one by many. The woman im responding to specifically said that people aren't getting drunk and having sex. So I responded, in part is that do to a campaign to say drunk sex is rape. Your study doesn't address this question at all so why post it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:22 PM
1

Maybe we are moving in different online circles (and have different algorythms) and different countries? I'm aware of increasing the tax on alcohol, showing videos how drunkards behave, You're a citizen of the internet? You're dodging and pretending that you didn't here that drunk sex is rape. Throughout all social media. You can look it up on reddit right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:21 PM
1

does that mean the marriage was consensual? 1.) Yes if Im not threatened by any one else into marrying. 2.) A better analogy would be if I lived my entire youth with that idea and then got married. I'd still say yes. You have less rights compared to 50% of the population now. Is there corresponding social privileges that I get. Like women pay for dates? Also what time period are we going to hypothetically, 1960s and " women" can vote? The job example makes no sense, Can you answer my analogy sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:19 PM
6

Its just incredible, its an actual example of internalized misogyny. Women say "hey guys dont do x, its bad" men comply and women see the outcome of what they've done. But they literally can't see that their own actions caused this consequence. Like they believe that men won't listen/shouldn't have listened to them because they're women. The lack of agency is baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:16 AM
7

There are campaigns against drinking in general, You're deflecting. Am I lying or are/were there campaigns and even posters saying drunk SEX (specifically) is rape? I can provide evidence if you need it. But let's argue in good faith. Was there not an explicit campaign saying that drunk sex in it of itself is RAPE
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:19 AM
2

I’d say the majority of marriages in the past weren’t consensual On what evidence? This is like saying that because people in the past didn't have the choice of having the internet. They were less happy. Its a biased toward the modern. In 30 years can women in the future say that you're not happy now because you dont have the choice of a perfect robot boyfriend? I consensual, but rather out of necessity. You dont understand what consent is. I still consent to going to my job. However, I need to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 04:17 AM
2

But this assumes that the men who were raping are having less sex and thats driving the decrease. More so than other men that is. There's really no reason to believe this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 11:31 PM
2

I think you could have worded that better point. Is that legal beneficial sex has gone down. Rape was thankfully never a large fraction of the interiors being had. Yes a percentage of women have been assaulted but most of the sex that those women have isn't assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 11:28 PM
2

lol what? Sex is down because fewer women are being forced or coerced into sex they don’t want to have So is the increase in female loneliness, by this logic, because women were forcing others to conversate with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:50 PM
5

There is also the thing that youth nowadays tends to get drunk or use other inhibition lowering substances less. Can you admit that in part this is due to a campaign to classify all drunk sex as rape. Can you admit that its spearheaded by 4th wave feminists movements?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:48 PM
3

Their not necessarily tied. This is like saying there will be less drugs overall if we reduce illegal drugs. Whatever, measure were implementing to reduce illegal drugs, ideally, shouldn't effect the sale and distribution of safe and beneficial drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:46 PM
1

Ok but then we need to admit that verbalizing consent isn't ideal in every/ even mos scenarios. Feeling out the situation and not being autistic is the go to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:40 PM
0

This is idiotic, testetosterone is the driver in sexual behavior. I assure you men have a much higher peak the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 10:18 AM
0

What you posted had a N ~ 3000 This is a massive study with a number that's more than generalized to the public. Why do idiots seem to think that higher number studies Above is a meta analysis looking at N ~1,000000 showing no significant gender differences in life satisfaction. Ok but is this as a function of marriage and singledom. Furthermore is this just amalgating old and young people or tracking them through time
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 08:04 AM
0

Do you believe these peaks are the exact same in magnitude?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 07:59 AM
1

The amount of sex you want to havr is almost inexhaustible. The amount of people you want to have sex with is finite.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 07:57 AM
1

An unattractive introvert whose idea of fun is WarHammer? She's getting her DMs exploded. You ladies seem to think men and women have equal options for sex in this world. Fat chicks easily pull more hot guys than Henry cavill pulls hot women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 07:55 AM
1

Really, if your partner got into an accident and couldn't have sex. You'd end your relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 12:58 AM
5

Male hyperagency and female hypoagency. Its honestly so beyond misogynistic that I dont get why feminists support it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 11:18 PM
2

Yes, if there is a dead bedroom the societal norm is to blame men for that problem. Either he wants too much sex or he's not sexy enough or he's lacking in something. Men first fix anything that may be amiss in the the relationship. If that doesn't solve anything than what else is there left besides my wife doesn't want to sleep with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 11:13 PM
2

Ill accept that both premises are true but the conclusion doesn't follow from them. Why would the two premises necessitate that women be in worse relationship. Why can't it be argued that women perceive negative stimuli more acutely, regardless of how much there truly is
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 11:08 PM
1

Also women can be bad at sex. They can also turn off a guy if they show their naked bodily imperfections and a guy hasnt built enough of a connection with them to forgive these flaws. If a guy is willing to have sex with you he doesn't care. You're projecting the female mind onto a man. Yeah, I think we're done here. Was I your longest relationship? Lol Lol clearly the girl you're talking to isn't giving it up to "any guy" since she's not giving it up to you and that's why you're here all bitter…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 10:19 AM
3

The average age .... (2019) same sex marriage had been legal for 4 years at that time vs Legal at the time of what? Seriously use proper nouns. Fuck, is gen z or alpha this incompetent at communication? Also the first 5-10 years of marriage are the most vulnerable for divorce Then that pattern should have held for gay male-male marriages. This is still showing that women are still more unstable in that 5 to 10 years. Furthermore, this 5 or 10 years is irrelevant because we're looking at a group …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:50 AM
1

Would you rather embarass yourself in front of someone you'll only see once and never again or in front of someone Yeah but that's not mitigated by making him wait. Two women don't need to be good at sex, just not completely awful. Three you can lie to me that's fine but given this week response im guessing you're understanding why a woman having different standards for men is a red flag for us. I mean seriously, I might embarrass myself so I'll wait to fuck you because I might be bad. Repeat it…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:41 AM
2

To get to be in a long term relationship with her instead of being used as a casual fling and then thrown away by her. So my benefit is being an a long term relationship with a woman who views me as a second best option. Y'all wonder why men disrespect you. You give us no reason to treat you otherwise. Wanting to get to know a guy before sleeping with him is trying to build intimacy so the sex is more special and the relationship will last longer." Why would the sex be more special if you wait? …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 08:15 AM
3

What? At the time of who posting what? Maybe use some proper nouns. You'll be less confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:22 AM
5

100% true, you want to pretend that it can be any men. But murderers are fairly cut and dry and easy to predict. Just stop rubbing your pussy to convicted criminals and you'll be fine (not you of course, the women who do this).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 06:18 AM
3

Depends on the relationship. What does this mean? If you want to divorce and the other party has done nothing wrong. Leave with what you came. Suddenly we have qualms about divorce? Let's make a world where men are equally free to leave a divorce without financial punishment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:23 AM
3

Nonetheless, divorce sucks but I'm all for letting adults make the decision to divorce. Im for it too, but imagine you just left with the percentage you came in with. Marriage needs to be overhauled. Into a system that doesn't reward divestment. If you wanna leave a marriage thats great. Just leave with what you came with. Fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:01 AM
-3

No woman will overthink and ensure a happy situation turns bad. Then justify a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 04:28 AM
3

A retired promiscuous woman? You're not worth a lot sweetie. We all know how that deal is going to go down. Listen I respect it. Turns out there might be a simp dumb enough to marry a "retired " promiscuous woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 04:26 AM
2

No all it means is that you're horny enough to sleep with him and that he didn't creep you out. Again, not looking good for the guy you're making wait. You're not horny for him because.....? Life is risky and people take risks to have fun all the time. Yeah but women will bring up the risk argument to paint men as degenerates in another breath. Men sleep with women they don't respect too. Is that an uncharitable thing to say about men? The same thing. We just don't lie about it. Being respected …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:04 AM
4

Oh ok, you still have time to take him for what he's worth then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:59 AM
1

Lol. Gosh. Sounds like real winners. Its the truth, now we just need something for moms. did when I got married. Who initiated the divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:37 AM
1

Please do
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:05 AM
7

Look up how often people die from chocking on food. And then compare it to this "femicide". Y'all are do dramatic. On top of that its because these women date criminals cheat on them and then get buried 6 feet. Not saying its ok but let's stop pretending there's an abundance of well to do suburban lawyers killing their wives with a kitchen knife. Its the criminals women gets their pussies wet for.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:04 AM
7

The rate is almost double for women “According to the CDC, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men will experience Men are well known to report less than women. A man gets pushed in an argument and walks it off. A woman writes a best selling novel about abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:00 AM
2

Not advice. Mansplaing. That means its like gold. You better listen to it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:58 AM
1

This is as big of a ragebait troll as he needs to be 6'4. Relax buddy. Most people aren't virgins when married.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:57 AM
7

And yet the blame is still placed on the man by the man. Women just take less agency over their lives. Very external locus of control.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:41 AM
5

Better men are chosen by women to get married. Its not causal. I can show you some convincing evidence if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:38 AM
5

You're speaking about a made up relationship. This isn't happening on some grand conspiracy level. Lol, you're doing what OP is accusing you of doing. You can't take a second a realize that maybe women themselves have something to do with the termination of their marriage. That's not to say men don't. Nobody said that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:35 AM
2

Why are y'all so afraid of divorce? Please put up half your networth on a whim against a person who can divorce you at any point. Marriage is tool used so that fathers wouldn't abandoned their families. The disincentive is taking away money from him. If women had a similar one you'd see less divorce too. It would still be high because of neuroticism but lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:33 AM
3

Lesbians aren't women, they're Lesbians. Ill let the lesbians be offended at that one. However, is the key difference between straight and lesbian relationship that would cause more divorce in lesbian marriages? There's a study out of Finland that controls for a lot of these factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:28 AM
12

I think she's saying even if there's an equal amount of bad relationships in lesbian, straight, and gay relationship. Women are just less likely to stay in a bad relationship. This might be true but we should also acknowledge that most of these divorces aren't because of fault. If women are more likely to divorce because of nothing the point still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:24 AM
6

Two thirds being exclusively women still gets us 30% lesbian abuse rates. Compared to 35% among straight women. The remaining is not necessarily because of men by themselves, it could be two women beating up one lesbian women or a man and a woman or indeed just a man. The point is I would have thought if men were the biggest bullies on the block. You'd see a bigger difference than 5%.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:16 AM
13

That's enough time for 10 lesbians divorces and marriages. Lol, seriously though, there are other countries and states that allowed marriage before obergefell. Massachusetts has it at 15 years. Even 10 years is enough to see a trend, especially when compared with gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:09 AM
1

You can do that, have fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:06 AM
2

Why do men think they deserve Chad like privileges without looking and acting like Chad? Tell this to the women saying its not that she things you're not attractive its because she values you more. Lol. We know Chad gets benefits, its pulling teeth to get women to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:01 AM
1

Sex is an act that can be dangerous for women, bringing a guy you dont know to your place or his place, pregnancy, grape etc. If you're giving that to a man on the first date your actions tell men that you think its worth the risk. What you say doesn't matter your actions do. You're telling me that you respect him enough to fuck him. On top of this. Let's just say its true and you have sex with men you dont respect. Do you think that's more charitable to women? And what's the incentives for men …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:56 AM
1

They're saying its not the only thing that matters. Keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:41 AM
1

True but so does hugging and kissing. Would you want to be in a relationship with someone who said he doesn't kiss his partners. Someone who doesn't hug them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:39 AM
2

Alright, glad to see anyone admit. Their mistakes. Can you edit your other comments asking for evidence since I provided it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 11:37 PM
7

https://www.tiktok.com/@dearmedia/video/7501427755431611679?lang=en Just tackles misogynistic men right? Normal men are left alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 11:31 PM
10

Again all I’ve ever seen drew do is make fun of men who have posted misogynistic content. She said that men are intrinsically evil. I can provide the clip if you'll say you're wrong. I’m not a fan of hers Why? If all she does is take on misogynistic men. That seems like someone we should all be at least neutral too if not openly in favor of.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 11:28 PM
6

spectrum. Most women are gonna be on Instagram or TikTok Ok how many subs and books does Drew afualo sell? And if you're going to talk about TikTok, than any large female creator apologize?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 11:05 PM
12

There are entire think pieces and even governments calling for Andrew Tate to stop radacalizing young men and he has way less. Two and drew afualo openly spew bile to women about men and mums the word. Women will bring up incel deaths but these guys may be equally radicalized by the bile the see women spew.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 11:03 PM
3

The post is that women wont call her out. Got to any female subreddit that talked about the story and check to see if they've corrected any narratives. Go ahead, I genuinely want to be proven wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 10:35 PM
2

Point some out
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:47 PM
8

Agree with most of what you said. Buy the movement is dead because of Ozempic. Not because women changed their attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:47 PM
12

There's an entire beauty at any size campaign for fat women. None exists for short men. A lot more hate goes to male preference
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:36 PM
6

Sure, let's see some evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:35 PM
6

Stop victim blaming. He's drunk, he's free from any responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:35 PM
9

Are we victim blaming? OP should be allowed to drink as much as he wants and lay out in a gutter without fear of being touched.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 02:34 PM
9

I've actually never seen a woman attacked for preferring taller men. I could understand her being criticized if she was looking for exclusively 6'4 and up guys. But the criticism is for expecting this guy to fall into her lap when she's an obese 5 foot 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 02:25 PM
–

You said the book doesn't defend the theory well in your opinion so why would I assume she's a good source. Anyhow. From what I've briefly searched. The emotion of jealousy has both affect and valence. So why isn't it as natural derived as the other emotions you agreed on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:52 PM
1

Because there is no affect for jealousy. What's the evidenced for this claim. What's your source showing emotions like anger have affect but jealousy doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:23 PM
1

Then this entire diatribe is a difference without a distinction. If affect is real. Why can't we talk about the biologically relevant part of jealousy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:19 AM
1

My point is this "I make more money than my husband " is women trying to pretend that they're marrying some part timer who does art on the side and she's taking care of his life. No, you're both high earners and 140k is too different from 150k. Especially if 140k is still performing the male roles. Have a wonderful marriage Tommy lahren but my point stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:49 PM
-1

You both still make good money and he's paying the bulk of the bills. Am I right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:34 PM
1

Emotions are socially constructed. In what sense? Chimps and monkeys feel disgust and jealousy. Why are humans emotions a social construct. Do you believe that there is anything that isn't a social construct?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:03 PM
1

Oh ok. My bad
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:40 PM
2

The feminine urge to not have your savings wrecked by inflation. If you want a conservative man so he can provide for you, just say that. But dont pretend he actually values you for your intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:38 PM
1

Have you considered you dont have a girl because you dont have a spine and are willing to let people walk over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:32 PM
2

I think she's a black woman. Not male
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:06 PM
1

As liberal male it genuinely will be the death of the democratic party. Some of these girls need to be told to shut up and they aren't that special or smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:03 PM
6

Not everything is about getting you wet. Some people like stable economies and good prices.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:02 PM
2

Men go off on single moms because they're held up in society as some victim who didn't know what she was doing. I agree that in technical terms. Both are to blame, however, deadbeat dads aren't called victims by men "if only these deadbeats had a little help they could be there for their kids". That last sentence is what men here when you all cheer on single moms. Stop doing it and the criticism goes away, deadbeats should be jailed and have the key thrown away.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:51 PM
0

one is asking you to hold men as a group accountable either. Yes they are, "men need to hold these men accountable" is literally a meme at this point. You hold single moms accountable fine, No, I just want them to stop blaming men in general for the problems they created with their choices. On top of that stop using societal resources for your dysfunctional family. you better also hold the other half of that equation-the deadbeat- equally accountable. No, as long as you dont woah as me cry about…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:47 PM
1

Men are less likely to have children than women so this point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:37 PM
2

Well the thing we can do in those cases is the bare minimum. Jail the women who do that. We jail deadbeat dad's because they're animals let's do the same to female rapists. Other than that, I agree take safety into your own hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:35 PM
2

women can do no wrong” Read the parable of the scorpion and the frog. I dont blame the scorpion in that situation. He's being a scorpion. I blame the frog. I guess women and men have a different morality in this. I maximize personal agency in my life. I have no expectation for anyone else to do or act kindly or benevolently to me. It's my job to select the people in my life that will. You (women in general) seem to put agency and responsibility in other people. That can lead to lots of personal …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:36 AM
1

Im not holding women as a group accountable. The ones who dont have baby daddies and complain aren't implicated. Just the ones that do. And yes, if you complain about making the biggest mistake in your life and solely put it on the other party. I think you're almost as sub-human as your baby daddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:30 AM
3

No you're looping. Ill say it again. I see women dating these deadbeats the same as i would a guy dating and marrying a stripper. If she cheats on him and gets him into a whole bunch of nonsense. Am I supposed to blame the stripper? Am I supposed to "hold her accountable". No, no man would go off on the stripper in that situation. They're going to blame the dumbass who dated her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:34 PM
1

But you guys clearly dont care nor have ire towards men that cant support these kids. You guys see a problem but only wanna blame women for it. No Lilith, you want men to "hold them accountable" because women want to be able to fuck truly despicable men and then have normal guys turn them into respectable upstanding members of society. That can't be done and wont be done by us.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:01 PM
3

One, they do because they've done what im accusing them of and its relevant to the convo. 2.) You ignore relevant chunks of my arguments for one liners. So, try addressing them and I wont have to bring it up. Even if its totally true. So hold your family accountable before you start talking about random men online. When one of the girls shows you her new boo. Help her vet him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:59 PM
1

We would but their kids use my tax dollars for a meal. Id rather these go to fund medical and scientific advancement.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:28 PM
5

So still blaming women for the actions of men. Nope, just blaming the friends and family in your life Lilith.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:27 PM
4

Werent you trying to collectively blame women for the actions of these men? No, just the women who fuck these guys and get pregnant by them. Just like your friends and family.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:11 PM
1

Deadbeat dads create single moms. Divorce creates single moms, the death of a father creates single moms. That's why I want to focus on deadbeat dads. The term single mom is too broad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:09 PM
3

The manosphere definitely doesnt. Lol I dont care what you want to do with the men who abandoned their kids. My issue is you making it a collective project for men. Most men under 50 aren't fathers. Most women are. Who do you think is choosing these guys. It's not a 1 to 1 male/female problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:07 PM
1

Bad things will always happen in the world. We do things to mitigate them. Car accidents happen, I wear a seat belt to mitigate it, society makes laws to lower the probability but bad things happen. Ideally, what would you want men to say to deadbeat dad's? What could men honestly say to turn a degenerate who abandoned his kids? We believe they're incorrigible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:04 PM
0

What does walk away mean. Are they paying child support or sending money to their kids? Because right now im talking about deadbeats being dad's who dont monetarily provide for their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:57 PM
1

How does that change that they happen They'll happen less if you take basic precautions like tying the knot. Please ask your friends if they knew the income of their baby dad when they got together. There are more mothers than there are fathers, especially in communities that produce deadbeats and single moms. This means that women are choosing a portion of men that are dead beats.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:55 PM
1

I dont have any kids Lilith. Blame the men who do and abandon them. That's personal accountability. Tell your friends and family to stop sleeping with broke men who won't marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:51 PM
-2

Define deadbeat for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:49 PM
1

Considering the fact that so many single moms We're not talking about single moms We're talking about deadbeat dad's. This is an irrelevant statement. Being a single mom doesn't necessarily mean you have a dead beat dad husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:47 PM
3

If he isn't doing his part maybe dont fuck him. How is it this hard to understand. If a guy marries a stripper no one feels bad when she divorces him and steals his shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:42 PM
8

Accountability is mostly about holding yourself accountable, we usually complain that women (some) aren't doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:40 PM
-1

Contraception fails, the morning after pill fails. Oh please, these women are doing it raw for tyrone and Chad. They want these babies even if they're "unplanned"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:36 PM
3

If you had a gun to your head and had to pick who was a dead beat dad. Is it going to be 6 figure man or brokey down the block?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:34 PM
-3

It's rarer, especially financially. These broken homes aren't coming from communities with very high marriage rates. But " oooooh marriage is patriarchy.... I just need to spread it for a drug dealer".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:32 PM
6

No we believe these men are almost subhuman. They're not capable of understanding or empathy. So I dont understand how women keep choosing them. People aren't swayed by speeches and "accountability". Their need to be incentives. Sex is an incredible incentive for men, ladies please dont give it out to men who aren't shit. Shame women who do. This is why society invented slut shaming. The negative incentive against women who do this needs to be ostracism by other women
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:27 PM
2

Thank you. If you have power in a situation you also have responsibility. If women want absolute power over life coming into this world. They need to take absolute responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:20 PM
-3

the women knew the man was just gonna walk away, t It's not like these men were responsible citizens in the first place. If he wasn't going to marry you he's more likely to leave your kid. On top of this, these guys are usually broke and have a record. Men in the system who are productive members of society will get their wages garnished if they dont pay child support. Dead beats who can't keep a job will never be held accountable because the money it takes to wrangle them is more than the child…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 09:18 PM
–

College basketball teams are NOT that short lol College basketball players are ears deep in College cheer leader pussy. Not 45 year old pseudo lesbians. Moldovans aren't gunning for obese American women, no country of men is. Im sorry but you guys are thinking of a fantasy. Men leaving for the Phillipines is current reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:55 AM
–

No im happy we can get this out especially the men in their 20's thing. The age gap relationship being predatory argument can finally be laid to rest. It's just old or ugly women afraid of their option getting with younger women. Also men from poor countries, suddenly we're pro "exploitation". I actually love this men are more than happy to do this oversees. Also the 6'6 thing is just hyperbole. You're going to be fucking 6 foot + guys to get your rocks off. The lesbian commune is going to be do…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 04:10 AM
–

Oh we already know women make exceptions for hot guys. Don't lie to yourself 6 foot 1 every week is what these "political lesbians" are going to go for. Until they hate the women they're around and just jump into the pool again. Gay marriage was the best thing that could happen to straights. We can finally see divorce rates for what they are now
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:54 AM
–

Again that is women with low self worth Im sorry but straight women who are building a lesbian commune just to avoid dealing with the fact that their dating woes are their own fault, dont scream emotional security. Also are you saying that lesbians are insecure. What explains their astronomical divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:41 AM
–

You're forgetting that women also hate other women. This whole gender war is just women outside of relationships trying to make relationships look worst for women in them. Look at lesbian divorce rates to see how this will turn out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:31 AM
1

It's aged matched. Life expectancy is how long you're expected to live in total. Widows having life expectancy is a significant blow to the argument that they're thriving. Check out single women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:16 AM
1

Awesome. I just wish we could choose where our tax dollars went so we could really put this to the test. But more of this attitude will eventually bring a candidate willing to execute on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:21 AM
1

Lmao yes the man who worked in his office for a company that has been closed for 20 years 1.) You spoke about men of that generation in general and so did I. 2.) Too, men in cubicles were still burning the midnight oil to fund the tax system that let's you believe that men are useless. Pretty sure I’ve done more for society as a nurse Get checked out for that narcissism. No one is saying women dont do anything for society or you dont personally. We're explaining how men build a society that allo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 11:53 PM
2

She's an incurable wretch who knows that she wont achieve any long term relationship happiness (of her own doing) so she thought her self to hate what she can't get. Leave a message for others reading this thread but understand that she's lost. People just need to see these types for what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:15 PM
2

I’ve met who expressed sadness over the loss of his wife. Yeah, men dont share their feelings with strangers as a general rule. Women are more likely to thrive because they have more connections. dear lord the sheer amount of elderly man who cannot even cook a grilled cheese sandwich is mind boggling!!), do their laundry, Yeah, older men broke their backs building the society you live comfortably in. They didn't learn domestic skills because that wasn't their role back then. Now that society nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:12 PM
2

Ok can you guys please provide evidence that married women die sooner than non married women because im not sure the premise is even true. I've heard married people live longer both men and women however women get less benefit than married men. So MW>NMW>MM>NMM
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 04:33 PM
10

Show us this statistic. It's not true
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 04:14 PM
0

Either way, can you see how historically most societies eventually led to patriarchy that restricted women's rights. It might be where we're doing too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 11:48 AM
12

No one says you can't enjoy sex. Being a slut means screwing lots of people and that literally has consequences that are both physical and mental. On average of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:14 AM
2

PROVEN false accusations are rare. However so are proven true allegations by that logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:54 PM
5

mean we have a case where this was looked at it found a range of 2 6 percent. No, once again this is the PROVEN rate of false reports. The PROVEN rate of people who commit rape is also similarly low. The rest of the allegations are UNKWOWN. So the data says nothing about how many rape allegations in total are true or false. So are you thinking that there are more false accusations based on feelings. No im reading data and seeing the word PROVEN there. If there are PROVEN cases of rape than there…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:13 AM
1

Im not explaining away rape stats. The think be argued here is your use of 4 percent to imply that then its necessarily true that 96 percent of rapes are true. Im saying we dont know the true rate. Your stats are accurate, your interpretation is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:04 AM
4

Again, I dont care about the interpretation of what they said. They said "believe women" and I find that indistinguishable from believe all women. Putting a pretty bow around asinine phrases doesn't change their meaning. Believe means to accept as true. This is a motte and Bailey tactic. Ultimately the movement wanted the accusations of women to be taken at face value as true. If not legally than certainly socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:19 PM
2

The part where they said believe women. What women are they talking about if not all?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:12 PM
5

Where do I even imply that. Copy and paste it for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:06 PM
6

Ok but that's not the word they chose to use. We can't rewrite the past because we don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:57 PM
6

What is this overwhelming evidence showing? All I get from your comment is that you dont know how to interpret statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:54 PM
3

Yes, very few are found to be proven false. Very few are also proven to be true. That's the argument you fail to contend with. If want to use proof as a standard then apply it across the board. seems the only ones concerned about false accusations Not at all, I support the innocence project and am against the death penalty. Does that make more likely to murder someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:52 PM
7

We dont know how many accusations are false. We know how many are proven to false. We also dont know how many accusations are true. We know how many are proven to be true
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:01 PM
11

Research for the Home Office suggests that only 4% of cases of sexual violence reported to the UK police are found or suspected to be false. S People keep doing this and I almost believe its deliberate. 4 percent of cases being proven false doesn't mean that 96 percent are automatically accurate. By this same standard we could say that only 4 percent of SA perpetrators are proven guilty. So therefore 96 percent of women are lying. Neither are true. In England and Wales, more than 99% of rapes re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:55 PM
-1

At this point, we're not getting anywhere. Have a nice night. Im trying to cordially sign off. Did you read my last comment. Nighty night.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:51 AM
1

Thank you, this really made my night.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:37 AM
0

Ok all of this misinterpreting my arguments let's me know you're too emotional to see them. Meaning you're probably defensive because you meet the criteria i laid above . Women like you are easy to spot. The men you want also see this, its why you're facing dating frustrations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:35 AM
0

Nah, my kink is people finding it and telling me about it. I also have a kink in noticing that when people are losing arguments they look at unrelated comments. Im eating good tonight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:21 AM
2

One, because most people dont have that many partners. Only the internet is a cesspool of virgins and extreme sluts. The median is 4 for women. Two, demographics, is she college educated her age (younger people have less partners). And the most important part is her friend group. I dont need an exact number. I just need a ball park of if you're a promiscuous person or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 08:11 AM
–

Thank you. Yes this is what im implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:46 PM
–

Attractive people tend to be more confident. We can't just ignore attraction because it makes us feel bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:20 PM
15

No, you've been on the internet too long. Most people (95%) have sex before marriage. Men aren't looking for virgins in America. Just a reasonable number. The median for women if 4 partners. That's perfectly fine for me personally
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 05:16 AM
18

Well why are you guys crying about bod counts then if they dont matter hm? In good faith. Don't you think there some middle ground between a Virgin and promiscuous woman? A non virgin woman could be a woman who's had 3 long term relationships and wants to get into an LTR with you. 99 percent of men aren't going to have any complaints about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 04:50 AM
1

No, its not a crime because we dont criminalize it. Why is it that criticism seems like a bigger crime than actually going to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 11:22 AM
2

Aah so they're unemployed but still somehow have a roof over their heads provided by a woman. Some of the things you ladies admit, you couldn't get out of me with 100 sessions of waterboarding.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:53 AM
2

They're pretty rare, 7 million in a country of 270 million or so adult men. Y'all stay fucking losers. Edit: also non custodial women are less likely to pay child support do maybe those numbers are due to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:48 AM
3

that are famous for using women for all their resources Those men are doing just fine. You complain about dating them so often, they're just making their rounds around your friend group. Responsible men who are financial and emotional stable are tucked though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:38 PM
2

Is this the gender famous for giving those men multiple kids and making sure deadbeats propagate into the future?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 09:00 PM
1

I'm asking you to react like his action is actually more important than hers. It is, I think this organism should be in jail. But I dont think he's human enough to understand my words. So I instead talk to the human in the room." Why'd you sleep with a man who has the capability to abandon his kids".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:42 PM
1

I'm asking you to react like his action is actually more important than hers. It is, I think this organism should be in jail. But I dont think he's human enough to understand my words. So I instead talk to the human in the room." Why'd you sleep with a man who has the capability to abandon his kids".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:42 PM
-1

Why are you fucking a guy who isn't married to you? Men hold other men accountable with jail and violence. You can't teach a deadbeat to be present for their kids. You have to avoid them. Marriage is an institution that's meant to ward of men who wont commit. Jail reinforces that institution. Women can't continue to blame men when we hold up our end of the bargain and you all coddle women who are obviously dating degenerates. Tell your female friends to marry before they carry or shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:17 PM
1

She is a single mom because of a deadbeat dad. Reaction there usually is "she is bad, she made bad decisions Men bother to even correct women because they assume they're sentient human beings that can be changed. There's a possibility that she got tricked so men are confronting someone who ostensibly can be reasoned with . What am I supposed to say to a man who knowingly abandons their child? Nothing, they're subhuman i dont think they're people. Most men think it's futile. The dark part of my m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:12 PM
2

You're not understanding. A man that for example abandons his kids. Is subhuman i dont correct them because In my eyes human beings don't abandon their kids and fuck a thousand women and have kids with them. In the darkest sense of the word I think men who do this are animals. Men dont think it's worth it to talk to these guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 07:31 PM
13

You are so wrong on that. If a man dates an obvious red flag, you can be sure that a lot of people will remind him that he shouldn't have listen to his dick. Don't stick your dick in crazy is a male mantra for a reason. Men put their bad relationship on their shoulders all the time. Edit: I do agree with you BTW, not OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:00 PM
3

No it's frequently enough that every woman has a friend like it whom they enable. Just making it clear. Also that's just the one messy enough to tell you. The rest of tge girls have a bit more tact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 06:07 AM
6

I wonder what it would be like to have a brain so small that it couldn't come up with anything intelligent to rebut with after several minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:50 AM
3

not* a source for their dating woes, though. It does if they're getting rejected at the profile pic stage. Blue pillers and women seem to think the problem with incels is that they're getting dates or short term relationship and then fumbling them by divulging their misogyny. The harsh truth is these guys are probably rejected at the gate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:47 AM
4

Maybe, but I'm willing to bet you know a friend who's excused and continues to excuse bad behavior from a guy who has looks money or status.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:45 AM
2

Source? Don't need one, it a heuristic insult more than a factual claim. Women just need to admit that most of them would excuse and have excuse terrible behavior for LMS.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:43 AM
3

Be specific. A source for what. To add, Melania could of lived a perfectly reasonable life with the money she made. She wanted more and I don't blame her. But we also need to be honest and admit many women would make the same decision if given the option.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:41 AM
6

It's banal to the point of being useless. It's like saying some blonde guys have lost their chance with women. True but irrelevant. Her statement was made to imply that misogyny and the other traits are a source for these men's dating woes. Im saying that they arent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:37 AM
1

I guess we'll find out if this shutdown continues a bit longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:34 AM
2

Im not saying it bad. Hell me saying that our biologies cause this like you said would have me labeled an incel. More and more I see blue pillers just repackaging red pill ideas and pretending it was there's all along.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:33 AM
5

Are you ready to admit that red pillers were right and that women don't care about personality if you have Looks money or status. We could unite the pills right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:31 AM
2

Doesn't change the fact that women want men with money. This dodge just tells me you agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:29 AM
1

Women want resources from men. How they get it is irrelevant. in the mean time, they fucking random attractive men. I think they want to fuck random attractive men and that will happen to a large chunk of them. However, attractive men get their pick of attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:57 PM
6

Trump is rich and powerful and therfore an exception. What but that's red pill talk. Women wouldn't put up with misogyny for a bit of cash. Especially not already rich women, right? That aside if you look at men in jail, they're more likely to be fathers than men who have never been to jail. The pattern is pretty clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:55 PM
13

Bro covered in nazi tattoos. Literally a walking red nazi flag. But women are still the best misogyny detectors in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:41 PM
11

Because it's not even 50 percent accurate. where is the evidence that evil men or immoral men have less chance of finding a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:39 PM
8

I don't know why this persists. Misogynistic men get girlfriends and wives. So do assholes, pervs and perks. A man who meets those exact characteristics is in fact president and has had 3 wives and multiple girlfriends. Jig is up ladies, the just world fallacy is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:38 PM
1

natural state. Natural doesn't mean ideal or good for a society. The natural state was some harems alongside some monogamy. The less monogamous the society got, the more violent and dysfunctional it got.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:34 PM
2

Your husband just sounds like a douche bag. In general we know that the upper class men look down on the middle and lower class. However, they need to realize that the pyramid all crashes down without the base. As to him contributing to taxes. Men are net tax producers not only because they make more but also because they use less and die sooner. Income tax is not the only one form of tax on the people, payroll tax is another major tax that usually men pay more into and get less out of. Your hus…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 03:24 AM
5

much higher Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 09:11 PM
2

People will rightfully blame both the guy for being a dumbass and the woman for letting one cum in her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:31 AM
4

who have kids that they never see So there's not an exclusive male insult for this type of guy. People just love him and accept him?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 03:40 PM
3

the "boys are doing poorly, This is in comparison to women. Not in comparison to men in the past. Men today, of course, are more educated than men in the past. However, we need to make more in order to afford housing. Or even get into a relationship because however much people want to cry about it, women still want a man who makes more than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 03:38 PM
1

There are far more angry, volatile men who hate their wives and would rather cheat on them or worse, than divorce. There's also gay men who seem to divorce slightly less than straight couples and much less than lesbian couples. Anyhow, I dont think this is because women start their relationships earlier its that they're gassed up and have an expectation of relationships thats fantastical and doesn't stand up to reality. Gay marriage might have been the best thing that happened to straight marria…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 09:17 PM
1

You'd have to explain why lesbian divorce at such a high rate despite their orgasm rate being closer to straight men's. Women, sadly, just aren't built for long-term happiness. A new study came out showing that women have twice as many depression genes as men. Ill link if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 07:46 PM
2

Im being hyperbolic. But the idea that women want an unattractive man is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 08:44 PM
1

In every relationship. Women do not like passive men who can't order them around. Hell, y'all dont even like a man that can't plan dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:36 PM
2

My point being. Hot men can still be abusive. But the majority of abusive men aren't hot No, but they do need to have something going for them. If not hotness, then its the fact that some women crave a man able to put them in their place. Dominance is attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:52 AM
3

Women are capable of falling in love with someone oofy goofy who worships the ground they walk on. Women will cheat on this guy who worships the ground they walk on. Y'all dont respect men who are beneath you and worship you. The jig is up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:49 AM
-1

I think so If it's not a yes, it's a no. If something as simple as reciprocity gets equivocation from you. The answer is that you can't live up to your own standards. They're a front for the fact that you don't qualify for the men you want and likely don't qualify even for an average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:48 AM
3

You can scroll and look at arrest records for domestic violence. Most of the men are avg or ugly rarely a hot one. Those are just the men ugly enough to be caught. Women likely didn't put up with the beatings because they were ugly. Chris Brown, on the other hand, was forgiven by Rihanna and has millions of women begging him for 1000 dollar pictures. The world is not just.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:45 AM
2

are happy with unattractive man who loves them. No they aren't, they settled. No one is happy with an unattractive partner. Women need to stop the oofy doofy grift. Everyone knows you're looking for a retirement plan and not a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:42 AM
3

Which still would confirm the point of this post. In that men are virgin shamed and incel is just one example. Im not autistic I just hate the run around that women give on this issue. Virgin shame= slut shame
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 05:37 PM
–

Why do incels complain about being mocked when they mock others? You'd have to ask an incel. My point, however, that it is a derogation of their ability to have sex. Why do people get uncomfortable when you call out what they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 02:37 PM
4

Once again, the involuntary celibate part of the definition doesn't go away just because you want it to. Small dick energy is still penis size shaming. It does change just because you're saying that it means something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 06:24 AM
5

It's an insult that denigrate someone for not being sexually successful. Your vague response is proof of how you don't really believe in what you're saying .
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 12:46 AM
7

insult incel has zero to do with having sex or not. Not even the involuntary celibate part?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:03 PM
3

Oh ok thats fine i can belive a guy in a relationship with you who's promiscuous would say this. However im talking about how people that guys dont know will criticize him online for stating he wants low BC, children, and etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:49 PM
1

amount of times I've heard that I have no right to expect a chaste man Give me an example story of a person telling you these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:30 PM
1

Ha, who's going to be paying child support if he's doing full time care?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:28 PM
1

Gemini says most states dont have 50/50 default by law. Which is what im advocating for. Many men don’t want to pick up their kids on a Sunday evening to drive them to school 3 days of the week, hurry home from work to pick them up, do baths, stories and bedtime. Even if this is true, 50/50 child custody reduces child support paid to the mother because the father is paying for the kids when they're together. This would be ideal for most fathers. A lot of states are jumping on board this. 6 or so…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:02 PM
1

If you're trying to make the point that women are associating, they are likely to be criticized for wanting children. You have another thing coming.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:52 PM
1

heterosexuality attractive, My dude, heterosexuality is not a concrete thing. Im sure you dont find a 500-pound guy making out with his 600-pound wife on the park bench attractive. It’s just an ick for me if my partner is also attracted to the same sex. Thank you for saying this. If you notice what examples of most icks are. They're irrational dislikes that make a man less masculine to a woman. In this case, the point im trying to make is that women think that bi men are less masculine or in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:59 PM
3

Thank you if this was reversed. Suddenly, you'd see. Let's help the ladies. Indeed, historically, the children were given to the father in divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:52 PM
1

actually isn’t very expensive as family court lawyers aren’t priced like a criminal lawyer. There are lots of charities that donate to dads petitioning for custody of their children. [THIS is a great place to start.](LawHelp.org) [Or HERE.](USA.gov) I dont personally need this. You saying it isn't very expensive. Still, it means it's expensive, and we agree on that much, at least. It’s a cop out to say “I didn’t petition (even tho she did) because it’s too expensive! Im explaining that going bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:51 PM
4

lot of men on here complain about oppression regarding women's preferences for men with healthy BMI's, access to wealth, and genetic predispositions regarding height. Men aren't complaining that women aren't choosing fat men. Height, its hard to acknowledge that women do indeed select for height. The same for wealth. Give me an example of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:46 PM
1

Point still stands
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 12:43 PM
18

You feel oppressed because someone wants their future partner to have a healthy BMI and kids. You're making OPs point for him. The low body count thing is literally proven to affect your likelihood of divorce. Its just sad that men cant express any standards in women that aren't a mirror copy of women's own.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:24 AM
-2

No, this is because contesting child support is expensive ad dad's are paying their own money for them to fight. Kentucky made child custody 50/50 by default and divorce fell 25% compared to the national average of 18. That should tell you who's getting favored in courts and who's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:43 PM
2

Because it’s just what feels right to me. Same way some guys prefer tall women, When you ask women why they prefer tall men. They say it's because of feeling protected and safe because on average taller men are more physically imposing or because they're sexually attracted to that and want to pass on those genes to their kids. For men, it can be the same, tall children or even a submissive personality. Everyone's preferences have an explanation. We aren't black boxes. Even if you're not thinking…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:53 PM
1

extremely masculine By definition, very few people like extremes. Most guys wouldn't like a dainty princess who needs everything to be hot pink. You've said nothing here. Sexual dimorphic traits weaker, they be biological or social, seem to be what unites different definitions of masculinity and femininity. The definition of masculinity and who is included in it has changed over time, which is why I don’t see it as unchanging. I know my definition encapsulates that. It's just "traits, attributes…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:47 PM
2

Then explain what the relevant difference is between bi women and straight women. Why choose one instead of the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:24 PM
1

The idea of masculinity is socially constructed Im interpreting your use of social construct here is to apply that its not relevant or is completely changeable on a whim. Masculinity or femininity aren't. Their traits and behaviors that men and women find attractive in each other. In other words, it's sexual dimporphism in women and men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:23 PM
2

Im just wondering whats the relevant difference between a bi woman and a straight woman i. In terms of a relationship. I wish you guys would just say how you really feel. Do you think they have more options to cheat?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 04:17 PM
1

My last marriage ended after he tried to kill me, but I’m sure you will blame me for that too No, him trying to kill you is his fault and not yours. You just need to evaluate why you were in that situation. Murder and attempted murder aren't common occurrences. 5/100,000 per year in the us. Just consider the men you choose and the men that choose you. Im happy for your long marriage, but im disappointed in your promotion of a lifestyle that leads people away from achieving what you did in. Your …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 07:38 PM
1

The thing is, your relationship might have been saved if you could admit and work on how you might be attracted to short-term relationships. It might be novelty seeking from ADHD or some past abuse, or you're just predisposed to it. But you could make a conscious effort to recognize that, yes, promiscuous people in the past tend to have future short-term relationships. You won't, though, and you're going to divorce again. Remember to invite me to your divorce party, ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 06:35 PM
2

A marriage is not a job. Jobs are a legal and contractual relationship with someone else. When making a decision like that. Someone's past relationships (of that type) matter a great deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 06:14 PM
2

Pretend you're an employer looking for an employee. One has a resume that shows he got a new job every six or so months for the last 5 years. The other has been in two jobs in that same time period. Which one do you pick. All else being equal (same industry, education, etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 05:44 PM
2

You're husband matrial not hookup matric. Y No, even bringing up hook up material in the first place is a turn off for men who are marriage minded. Im sorry, but just dont bring up hookups if your intention is marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 05:31 PM
4

It doesn't matter that woman obviously prioritized and valued hook-ups right until she needed to be married. Men dont want to be the husband material standard of a woman who didn't prioritize marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 05:27 PM
4

Think about it this way. The woman who has prioritized marriage and been marriage minded obviously holds marriage and a husband to high standard/value. The woman who is promiscuous and hooks up with guys instead of trying to look for marriagable guys probably holds marriage and husbands at a lower value than the former woman. I dont want to be the husband material standard of woman number 2, I want to the husband material standard of woman number 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 05:21 PM
13

Men are saying that the excess drive that makes men compete and work long hours comes from the idea that it helps the create a family with a woman. You can say that women aren't owed to them, and I agree. But you're going to see a massive fall off in taxes when men realize that the extra effort won't go anywhere. Men are net contributors to taxes. We make lots of money, and we die early like good little robots. You can tell men that women aren't owed to them, but neither is male excess labor owe…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 03:38 PM
2

Im guessing the erotica you read still has masculine figures. My point is that this is pretty baked into straight women. We need to stop pretending that everything is socially constructed and thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:28 PM
2

But that’s just reddit being reddit, no? In real life I think there’s way less of that compared to the loud minority here My guy no, just no. Reddit is a liberal site, and the women here are the most liberal in the world. If they're spouting this shit. Women in the real world are absolutely vicious. It's like saying that women only avoid autistic guys on reddit and not IRL. Personally, I wouldn’t date a bi woman either, but not for some deep reason That's fine but you must admit that most guys d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 04:09 PM
3

Its disordered is the argument op made. We're not talking about clinical disorders, just shit that may be dangerous or strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:53 PM
1

There are people on this post saying this shit my dude. Just scroll. On top of that, these same women are throwing fits at the idea of a man saying I dont want my partner to be with many men. That's the thr hypocritical side of it from liberals. On top of even that, they dont want their partners to be with men because of the stated reasons. They dont say it because its unpopular. They view bisexuality as unmasculine, the fear STD spread, and they're afraid of their partners not being invested in…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:51 PM
3

Absolutely. Its just depends on how you're defining dominance
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:47 PM
1

But it’s also not weird for a straight person to only be into other straight people. It's not weird, and nobody said that. Im saying the reasons women give as to why they won't do it. 1.) Conflict with their denunciation of slut shaming and judging. 2.) Are because bi guys aren't performing certain traditional gender roles. Which progressive women say are toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:02 PM
1

The original claim was that women are more/less likely to have disordered views about sex. You brought up paraphilias as a rebuttal im bringing up women's predeliction for abusive monster novels and bdsm as disordered sex. Also, paraphilias dont have to be acted upon. So, wanting to fuck a dead body is a paraphilia. Doing it is a crime and a paraphilia. Similarly, wanting to be 🍇 is not wrong. But putting yourself in violent situations that deliberately lead to that would be the problem. Disorde…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 02:58 PM
1

That's not a gender role, how many times am I going to have to say this? Ok, you define what a gender role is for me then. Im saying that being heterosexual (the act of engaging with women) is a gender prescription that is forced on men. There is nothing stopping it from being BOTH a sexuality and a gender role. It's not either, or im arguing that it's both. Especially when women use shame in order to call out bi men. Descriptively heterosexuality is a sexuality. Prescriptively, it's a gender ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 02:52 PM
1

Reading a romance novel is also not comparable to fucking a dead body Neither is porn but there's an entire movement of women trying to ban sex dolls and AI porn even when no real women are present.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 02:26 PM
5

Ok, then, how do we explain the popularity of monster style romance novels? Or 50 shades of grey? Stuff that isnt at all pushed by our culture but is still a prominent feature in women's erotica
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 12:42 PM
2

Heteronormativity is an expectation of "normal" sexual orientation. Normal being for men to be heterosexual and date exclusively women and for women to date exclusively men. In this case, society seems to have throwing away the need for women to exclusively date men, and instead, it keeps men's role in exclusively dating women in order to be perceived as masculine. enforced gender roles. How do you think they're enforced? There's no law forbidding men from wearing dresses or staying at home to r…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:59 AM
1

Symmetry, sexual orientation, sexual dimorphism mostly through secondary sex characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 04:24 AM
1

A prescription on how a gender should behave. Heterosexuality is both a role, as in men should only fuck women and its sexuality in that men who are attracted to women are Heterosexual. It's called heteronormativity and it seems to be applied more strongly on to men,by women, in this case. A lot of women seem to believe this implicitly, and liberal women are hypocrites because they're screaming that men should let go of traditional gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 04:20 AM
3

Once again, sexual orientation isn't a gender role It's both, sexual orientation is both prescriptive and descriptive. men getting with women is a gender role (something that society prescribes men to do in order to be seen as manly). The implication behind roles like, men must hold the door for women and provide for women is a gender role that necessitates that men be with women or else be seen as not masculine. Now, this is homophobic and it's a role that should be stopped. But women are assoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 04:04 AM
2

Bisexuality is a sexual orientation. OP's own title and post attempts to conflate sexual orientation with gender roles Yes, his premise is that women dont like bi men because they dont follow certain gender roles due to their sexuality. However, their sexuality isn't precluding women from dating them the gender roles are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:52 AM
–

thinking that social conditioning doesn't factor in attraction is pure cope Im not saying it doesn't. im saying that the fundamentals are baked in by genetics or hormones. Identical twins are more likely to be gay than fraternal ones, etc. The foot binding thing was confined to the elite peasant women needed to do farm work on their feet. So they couldn't be broken and bound. You're talking about a very niche group.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:49 AM
2

You brought up the term sexual orientation in a post about women dating bi men. What does sexual orientation have to do with. Unless your intention was to imply that straight women can't date bi men because their straight? If im wrong, tell me why you brought up sexual orientation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:43 AM
5

Dating a bi person doesn't change your sexual orientation. Dating a bi man wouldn't mean your bisexual. Nor does dating a bi woman make a man bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:39 AM
16

but most didn't care. Be honest where the most who didn't care bisexual themselves? I see this as mostly a het women problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:11 AM
11

doesn’t really have much to do with gender roles, I will & have dated bisexual men Are you a bisexual woman? Because this seems rare in straight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:08 AM
7

went to a very progressive university Also, i bet that even within this university, that was a minority of women. There are women who are attracted to femininity. They tend to be lesbian and gay but not always.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:07 AM
–

No one has to tell you what to find attractive. I swear liberals had an entire movement in the 2010s where you were born with your sexuality. The Lady Gaga song "born this way " is about that idea. No one tells you to be gay or straight, and furthermore, no one tells you that certain men or women are attractive or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:04 AM
1

Women like average height attractive hot men. The data says otherwise. Tall hot men are hotter all things being equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:15 PM
8

This isn't a personal statement im speaking to the broader question. The biggest difference between a creep and a non creep is just how good he looks. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 09:46 PM
8

And not be unattractive. that's the most important thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 09:04 PM
1

Look up what the word relative means. Im not doing this today.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 05:15 AM
6

That new yourk times article and several TikTok, YouTube videos, etc. Beg to differ. It's not no one. Is enough women to cause a stir.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 12:49 AM
1

is a common occurrence that many children challenge their parents and disagree with them on many points. Does that mean that they necessarily vote differently from them, or are they challenging their curfew or that they have to clean their room? Maybe we see the extremes rather than what's common. am a geneticists. It was my area in school until I switched to computer science You believe that there is no heritability in political party or voting? does not mean that women are raised to be doormat…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 10:39 PM
2

multiple ways to get to that minimum attraction Again, there are multiple ways to become a millionaire. You can become a high-powered lawyer, an incredible surgeon. A professional athlete. Build a very successful business. Have a successful YouTube or twitch. Win the lottery. I could keep going. But the point is even if there are a lot of ways to get there. few people will still get there anyway. Women likewise want the "best" men irrespective of how they define that. It will still limit the poo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 07:05 PM
3

men find most women attractive”. This is actually true. You're misunderstanding the meaning, though. There's a pornographic category for almost any type of woman you can think of, baby, quadrapalegic, etc. There isn't one for every man a short woman can think of. If you take romance novels or romcoms. The guy is essentially the exact same tall, handsome guy who has power but is devoted to her. Men speaking in generalities and hyperbole here. Of course. When women say beautiful at any size, they …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 06:59 PM
–

Politics is not something that is passed on in the gene You say this with so much conviction, how are you so sure? Anyway, putting that aside. Im not even talking about the fact that politics is indeed partially genetically transmitted. But the fact that conservatives raise conservative children with conservative values around other conservative friends and families. If conservatives are doing this more than liberals there will be more conservatives in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 03:55 PM
6

Men aren't lying about it, though. We don't say that fat women are having problems dating because "men are intimidated by her personality." Its because they're fat, and that's unattractive. Men don't lie about this shit. Beautiful at any size is not a manosphere coined term.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 03:45 PM
7

This is like saying there's multiple ways to become a millionaire. Yeah those ways are still exclusive and hard to do. And if you're going to give me a nonsense argument, just change millionaire to six figures. Point still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 03:40 PM
1

In this context, it's actually artificial selection This isn't Germaine to the point im making. You argued that people agree that iliza isn't hypocritical. whether it's natural, sexual, or artificial selection. It doesn't change the fact that it's evo Psych based. Which blue pillers? Consider incorrect and wrong when it doesn't suit them the point. Maybe the point wasn't to have an academic discussion and instead point out that these men's own misogyny is why nobody wants to date them and nobody…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:29 PM
2

don’t know, nor do I care. See how hard entrenched ideas are to change. Now apply this to liberals and conservative politics, and you can see how hard it will be to just convince others to be liberal. I know im high jacking this conversation for the other conversation, but it proves my point. You're taking an absolutely salient point and ignoring it because it doesn't mesh with a pre-concieved notion. Now, back on topic. Both sides aren't being judged by the same standards. One MRA saying he's p…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 09:02 PM
5

Your kid isn’t guaranteed your politics, as any conservative parent can tell you about their college age kids. Im aware of that, but you're overestimating the number of conservative to liberal conversion. Do you think that most democrats have Republicans as parents and vice versa, or do most children usually take up their parents party. conservatives having more kids doesn’t guarantee more conservatives It doesn't guarantee it, but it makes it more likely. Conservatives know their ideas aren't p…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:53 PM
1

A very large chunk of feminist believe in equity vs. equality. I literally don't know a single MRA who is pro spousal rape . Do you honestly believe that there are an equal number of pro spousal rape MRAs than there are equity feminist. Answer in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:45 PM
1

Which doesn’t matter; profoundly conservative times produced liberal ideas in the first place. You're not getting it. Those liberals people had kids at around the same clip as conservatives. Im liberal so I believe that liberal ideas are more popular and sound (in general). However, if conservatives have more kids than liberals we're fighting a tide of indoctrinated kids who were raised from birth not only to hate "liberal" ideas but to hate the very act of being educated and learning from exper…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:42 PM
2

Means and averages change. Regression implies that extreme possibilities are less likely to happen with successive chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:34 PM
1

You’re never going to convince a majority that women need to be forced back into the kitchen. The women who are against going back to the kitchen are reproducing less than the ones that are pro going back in the kitchen. In time, there are fewer anti-kitchen women voting. We teach our kids our values and ideas. If you have less of them, there are less to teach. And please don't bring up the current culture. That is subject to change with demographics as well. Colleges won't be able to liberalize…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:30 PM
1

Well, first of all, natural selection is not evolutionary psychology. That's just biology. Isla is saying that misogynistic men (misogyny being a psychological trait) are being selected out. In this context, it's evo psych people are lapping it up when it ostensibly goes against men. They tried to draw a direct comparison between what red pillers say and what they claim women say. It's not a strawman to point out that's bullshit. Sorry if that's inconvenient to your agenda. Read the above. Most …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:25 PM
5

I don't want women to be second class citizen. But this comedian is correct in that selection is happening and since feminist are pro-creating less. They're being selected out. True of liberals in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:22 PM
1

Feminists may now believe in equity, not equality. That women need extra consideration in order to make up for present or even past grievances.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:20 PM
1

Can you explain this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:57 PM
2

The problem is incels want the most attractive girls and are entitled* This isn't true. Actually read the science. Incels are extremely insecure with extremely low standards. They essentially want any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:52 PM
1

Agreed, if we're doing natural selection, let's do it across the board. No welfare, and if you don't pick the right baby dad, your kids is a bastard that starves to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:51 PM
2

Not really, no. Yes, these are the same people who ignore evo psych when they think its beneficial to men. Please, show me all the women complaining that men only want the top 20% of women, Strawman. No one said this would be what women would complain about. They do complain when evo psych is brought up. Look up munecat
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:34 PM
4

The reason is that women don't need to be. Ironically, it might be a form of natural selection where funny men reproduce more. But I think its mostly cultural selection, men have to practice being funny to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:16 PM
5

Or feminist women not having feminist children that continue the ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:07 AM
1

Ok, then keep the same energy when a woman says I don't wanna date broke men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:27 PM
1

It's true if not a bit poorly worded. There are more mothers in the US and most countries than there are fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:19 PM
4

Is the way women speak about broke men a reflection of their characters?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:30 PM
4

These are childless women and men. Women have more kids than men do. Also, the difference is 15 vs 21 percent. Calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:58 PM
11

Single moms are to men what broke men are to women. We dont want to take care of 2+ people. You ladies can keep trying to shame men for this preference, but it won't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:56 PM
2

Nope my point stands with or without the routine part. We all know the study you're referencing. most women routinely orgasm. Around 2/3ds
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:56 PM
-2

This is awfully close to the number of women who do not routinely orgasm during sex. I wonder if there's a connection. False, around 70 percent of women do orgasm. So these aren't related at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 05:52 PM
6

Outside those rare unforseen circumstances. You have a paperweight of debt. On top of that, young need a wife that's so rich that she can pay off your student debt and hers. Are you ladies trolling us right now. How many women want to marry a guy loaded with debt he can't pay while she has to pay all the bills. Even if he was the best homemaker on the planet. Just be honest. If you can be honest, this post answers itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 05:20 PM
19

Yup, and man who plans on being a stay at home father from the start is rarely going to find women attracted to him. OP is an anomaly. Men don't do it because it's a waste of a degree or license if you do, and if you don't get that degree/license, most women aren't going to date you. Im using degree/license as a stand-in for investment in any careeer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 04:46 PM
1

I didn't say they were im just saying they are the most vociferous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:08 PM
2

I think you guys forget that women want kids too. The only ones complaining were going to have them anyway. If democrats wanted to pull men in, this would be the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 05:26 PM
3

Period. No reason necessary. Cool, just leave with what you came with then. force someone that hates you to stay with you? I actually want to stop certain marriages from happening in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:53 PM
1

But you're ignoring the fact that there has been years of zero upward mobility for the stay at home parent while the working spouse has been moving up the ranks Its proportional, that's why I used percentages. So if the husband is increasing his earnings. The wife will get a higher total amount of money. Yeah fuck that. I think liberal men are going to team up with conservative s on this one. The family court system seems to only benefit liberal rad fems. I hope the change comes soon. It definit…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:46 PM
2

Ok, give me an example of a common gangster without a gf. Guys in prison are more likely to be fathers than men outside of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:36 PM
5

Hmm..how does that work? Like in reality? If a woman is making 50k and a man is making 100k. Instead of the assets being split 50/50 in a divorce. I think they should be split 33/66. Assuming there were kids,she stayed at home, and there is no fault in the marriage . Ideally the best answer is just to abolish marriage and turn it into a legal contract when you decide to have kids. That way people can make their own rules. How does this work, exactly? Explain what you mean with a fault based syst…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:34 PM
6

Yup, the marriage system we've made is too liberal. I never thought id be saying it but a conservative correction is very much needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:24 PM
11

The stay at home parent is benefiting the working parent to their own detriment. No. That should be compensated with regards to that parents' own career, not the working parent. Raising a kid isn't suddenly worth a million dollars because you're married to a millionaire. Gross. You want to force women to stay married too? I wouldn't consider myself a liberal then. No, they can also not get married. Which is fine by me. This only applies to marriages with kids. Point being kids make it hairy. Rar…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:21 PM
1

That 1.1 percent is because we define rape via penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:10 PM
10

stay at home parent is worth half as much as what the other working parent makes Yeah, this should change. I believe stay at home parents should be given essentially the proportion they were making before they were parents. Im a liberal but one benefit to conservatives taking power is that we're talking about things like divorce reform. Don't like it don't get married or have kids. Or, if you must have kids, pay for their childcare/nanny so she can work. You get your marital assets split regardl…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 11:57 AM
6

Could you given example of famous gangster who had trouble with women or didn't have a gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 07:27 PM
15

All of this is unsourced. Stop whining About sources when you don't provide any yourself. Argue against it or get off the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:59 PM
21

Gangsters will have no problem finding a girlfriend, though. It's not that women like bad men per se, but we need to get rid of the notion that being bad or mysoginistic is an impediment to dating. Your looks are on top of a couple of other factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:16 PM
3

actually shows men take for more than they give since they're only relying on one person for emotional support and therapy while women have family, friends, and usually a therapist. It proves the opposite. Women are taking from more people. If you're sharing your struggles with how you lost your job with multiple people, how have you reduced the amount of emotional labor. This has never made sense to me. You can't really divide emotional labor. You can only reduce it by not telling someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:23 AM
9

What is your evidence of this? Does that include makeup and filters. If so, I agree. If it's right out of the shower. I dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:23 PM
2

They're marrying men their level. And the guy can probably take care of her. It's really that easy. The vast majority of couples are looks matched. Filters and make-up give us the illusion that a woman looks better than her partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:21 PM
11

And if they were attractive. It wouldn't be a problem to their dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:18 PM
1

adapting sexual practices that don’t pit their strongest members against each other Monogamy is a sexual strategy that minimizes sexual based aggression in males because one man has one wife and children to take care of. Polygamy ends with more people left out and therefore more reason to be violent. It does the opposite of assuaging violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 10:03 PM
1

That doesn’t mean the culture is influenced by a genetic disposition toward monogamy in humans This is possible, but the inverse wouldn't be true. Im fighting against the notion that polyamory or certainly cuckold polyandry is natural. For the latter, there is no selective or cultural mechanism for it. If we're going to talk about polyamorous societies, let's be honest and just say polygyny. Because there is loads of evidence of that working to an extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 02:49 PM
2

And the polyamorous society can also just bring in new women to help diversify the gene pool as well How? They have literally less man power. They can't tempt the women with more goodies because men don't want to produce things that don't go their children. They can't even raid surrounding monogamous groups because, again, less willing men. However in a polygamous society, the man would also do less work than if they went to a monogamous society. This statement makes my point for me. Less work m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 06:59 AM
1

I can agree to most of that. But think in this system that you laid out what is the incentive for men to help propagate a group/society that gives him less chance of passing his genes into the future vs. one that gives him a greater chance. The easy answer is that men defect to groups that don't have this system and reproduce with the women their, the men that stay are less likely to reproduce, and the system that you described dies. That's why removing the social script against cheating would n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 05:44 AM
7

Evolution favors promiscuity. Evolution favors survival and reproduction. We're not talking about promiscuity. Here we're talking about allowing your partner to cheat on you. Your own genes are not being favored. The chance of your offspring being your own biologically goes down. Remember, there was no birth control pill 100 + years ago. Males would be less likely to pass their genes on to the next generation in this system, but female would be able to continue their lineage just the same .( So …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:33 AM
7

This is babble. What genes are more likely to proliferate. The genes where people feel disgust when eating rotten food or the genes of people who don't? Likewise, what genes are going forward to the genes of the guy who lets his wife bang 5 other dudes because he's not "insecure" or the guy who tells the wife no?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:21 AM
10

You need to think. Would people who let their partners cheat on them be very successful at an evolutionary level? Would their genes be more or less likely to pass on into the next generation?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 12:19 AM
14

You don't think jealousy to your partner cheating is an ingrained biological response. Like feeling disgust when seeing rotten food. I mean, I get youre blue filled, but I don't. The default setting for human beings is to just be ok with being cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 10:37 PM
24

Social norms become social norms for a reason. Monogamy is time tested as the most stable way to grow a family and subsequently a country. If you want to see the fruits of polygamy. Check out Afghanistan.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 10:34 PM
2

Because we have more food and aren't malnourished.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:32 PM
2

Education and intelligence is also being selected against. There is no evidence that we're getting more attractive or taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:26 PM
–

You see women with makeup with men without it. Most people, according to research, dare their looks match. I can link the study if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:00 AM
0

Please read my full comment. You don't understand what hypergamy is. I explain it. You're moving a mile a minute and trying to get a gotcha. However, you don't understand what you're debating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 12:41 PM
4

Look up the definition of hypergamy. You're so close, but miss the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 12:37 PM
-2

Tl;DR: men are polygamous not hypergamous No, hypergamy is the tendency or desire to date or marry someone with highER social status than yours. Men do love and want to date attractive women. But they don't necessarily want to date a woman who's more attractive than them. Does that make sense? Its the tall girl problem. The tall girl has a problem dating because she wants someone taller than her. A tall man has no problem dating because even if he wants to date a tall woman. She doesn't have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 12:34 PM
–

It begs the question, why are women dating toddlers. Dating a teenager (18 & 19) can be legal. Why do women date toddler men?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:51 AM
0

It's more likely to be ignored, though. Promiscuity works like wealth does for men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:59 PM
3

But remember, she won't get to know your personality unless you pass basic attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:49 PM
1

So we both agree that the world isn’t just, and that your inability to date isn’t a moral failing. Always did. Glad it took you 10 comments to come to that realization. I guess we can leave it here. Our argument was you saying that "screeching" People who say just world fallacy belive the opposite of the meaning of the just world fallacy. Stop lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:04 PM
2

they “already know it”, then why do they trot out the fallacy? Because people like you don't know it. When you finally figure out they're correct, it psychologically hurts to agree with them, so you mischarcterize their position Do you know what the “just world” fallacy is? It's in the name. Just world and fallacy implies the world isn't just. "Good" people aren't more likely to get a girlfriend. Bad people aren't less likely to get a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:22 PM
1

I know you need to call it out in real time. The narcissist's prayer is a good guide.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:46 PM
6

"People who screech about the just world fallacy don't seem to realize that being sexually repulsive doesn't make you immoral" People screeching about the just world fallacy already know this it's the entire point of their argument. You're deliberately mischarecterizing their argument because it hurts you psychologically for them to be correct about something. Look up what the just world fallacy is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:36 PM
9

You're projecting, and you deflected from my previous statement because you know it's true and can't argue against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:24 PM
2

It's the old blue pill trick of trying to save face when they're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:21 PM
13

That's what these people who are "screeching " for the just world fallacy are saying. I notice that when blue pill can't argue against something. They try to pretend that it was obvious and that they thought of it first.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:19 PM
17

The point is that being "repugnant" or not doesn't correlate with having a relationship or not. Hitler and Stalin both had girlfriends and wives. The just world fallacy is just untrue. Being physically attractive and having a fun personality is all you need to have a partner as a man. Finances help, but she won't love you. She just needs you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:14 PM
0

All of Hollywood literally goes against what you're saying. As far as the eye can see. Older male celebs dating younger hotter women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:39 PM
1

I guess for women or gay men, sure. But straight men more along the lines of a women wanking herself off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 03:08 PM
1

What if it's solo?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:48 PM
1

We were arguing about the proportion of blame to attribute to the parties in the deadbeat dad dynamic and if men take accountability. I'm giving you a summary of who's responsible for what in those scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:27 PM
1

So you agree then that he could not have impregnated her by not ejaculating inside her. Of course, I have said that all along. So you agree that he had the opportunity to not get her pregnant. Yes. Meaning...he had a choice. Yes, I'm saying his choices essentially end there The choice to have the baby (that is to carry and deliver it after impregnation), however, is the exclusive purview of women. Do you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:57 AM
1

Like any woman, it depends on how hot she looks. This is a bad comparison because bisexuality men don't look or act a certain way as a rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 10:53 PM
2

I understand it. You just don't want to admit you argued yourself into a corner. It's pathetic but sadly predictable when arguing with certain people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:53 PM
1

His choice wasn't "taken away". He made his choice. After you make a choice, it's made. Same with anything. His choice was to cut inside. Fully agree that he's at fault for that. The choice to carry and deliver a baby is on a woman, though. Conception doesn't necessarily equal a baby, thanks to abortions and even the morning afterpill. Would you agree that he could choose not to impregnate a woman by not ejaculating inside her? Is so, he has a choice. If not, you're ignorant of basic biology. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:44 PM
3

more prolific than most men on average. I don't know if I believe that assumption
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:38 PM
–

He also chose to have a child with her No, his choice was taken away as soon he came inside. He chose to come inside and I fully him for that. But carrying that child to term and delivering that baby is the exclusive purview of women. My body my choice is what women advocate for. Abortion should be a decision between a woman and her doctor. Men have no authority over whether you keep the child. So you're responsible for that. We all know how babies are made, but if women want full autonomy over …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:03 PM
–

I hold both parties accountable but for different things. The man and the woman for having sex without a condom. But the woman exclusively for having the child with this deadbeat. I'm sorry, but sole authority over a given area gives you sole responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:50 PM
2

This isn't the same thing they're still dating you but want you to be exclusively into men. "Essentially" to make you straight. Women (some/most) do not want to date bi men at all. Also, this is pretty niche for men, but most women, even on this post, are saying they won't date bi guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:48 PM
2

But your statement was straight. People want to dare straight people. There was no qualifier to specify one group of straight people or the other. What's hard to grasp is that you obviously said something dumb and you won't back down from it. Straight people don't want to date straight people they want to date the opposite sex. I have straight male friends, and I'm straight. I don't want to dare them because their straight. I want to date women because I'm straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 06:44 PM
1

"Straight people want to date straight people," These are your words. If I wanted to date a bi woman, am I not straight?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:45 PM
3

Straight men don't want to date you or lesbian women? I believe the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:26 PM
4

No bi women are just equally as hot as straight women to men. The attraction is the same. The reason straight men date by women is just because they're women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:24 PM
1

To be straight is to want to date the opposite sex. If a guy dates a bi woman is he not straight?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:22 PM
3

If men are participating in casual sets, they need to participate with someone. And of they're heterosexual that someone is a woman. Are you blaming the discrepancy on gay men?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:06 PM
–

But women choose whether or not to have a baby. They have the final say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:59 PM
2

It really isn't saying that you hate women as a man is way less accepted than the inverse. If a man said he hated women to me, I'd either call him out or not engage with him anymore. Women, even women in this sub, are probably friends with a woman who says she hates men. That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:52 PM
–

You missed the entire easy to understand point. Some people have low iq, it's OK. I'm just not going to waste my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 06:10 AM
3

Almost every man I have encountered in North America and Western Europe has been a virtual child with the emotional range of a spoiled brat whose never developed any discipline or self-control. I'm super glad you said this. It says so much about you and the people you hang around. Best guest is that you fit this criteria perfectly. As if men have ever been remotely tolerant of women who express negative emotions? It's actually scary how traumatized you are. Seek help. Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 06:08 AM
–

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know I was speaking to an imbecile have a nice night.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 06:04 AM
4

We were talking about the kind of strength and weakness that requires protection. Keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 05:33 AM
4

Sure, then society cares less about men than women. Does that make things better?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 05:30 AM
5

Women are the majority of counselors. This is irrelevant. The majority of CEOs and presidents are men. This doesn't mean that men necessarily should be or are the leaders in relationships? Right. Women in relationships with men provide emotional I don't really see evidence for this. women may be a man's primary confidant, but that doesn't mean that women aren't counseled more by men. Observationally, it's women sharing their struggles with men that's more prevalent in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:54 PM
2

Tl;DR last paragraph is the most important How is it unsubstantiated? 1.) The fact that this is caused by toxic masculinity and not any other factors 2.) If toxic masculinity in it of itself exists. 3.) Masculine behavior doesn't need to be enforced by society it can be enforced by nature. Nature can give men on average more risk-taking behavior, more disagreability, etc. It can also give people less empathy because of those gifts. "You're competent, so you don't need help," Toxic masculinity an…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:48 PM
2

The impetus of the article is false then. This isn't something men do to any substantial degree. And my point that women really can't or want to see men express negative emotions still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:42 PM
11

Boys show more empathy for girls not because girls are more deserving, but because they’re seen as weaker and in need of protection Replace girls here with children. How is this a negative. Women aren't perceived as weaker. They are weaker physically relative to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 02:14 PM
4

Men innately will lose more than women. The animal kingdom is brutal to male animals in terms of reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 02:11 PM
2

Seems like the issue here is mainly male friendships that lack intimacy No, that's just the issue that allows you to feel bad for how you treat men. The evidence given shows that both men and women treat men this way. Imagine if I showed that slut shaming is done 50 percent by women to other women. And say see slut shaming is mainly an issue of female cruelty.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 02:09 PM
5

This is an unsubstantiated assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 02:03 PM
1

No, you idiot they're not entitled to be seen as beautiful. No one is. However, if they want to whine about that. Unattractive men will whine about it as well. I hate both of them. But one group is hugged and given dove "beautiful at every size" commercials. While we rightfully call men who do this losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 12:49 AM
4

You can't have both, though. Either men are not opening up to women enough or they're doing it too much. What phenomenon are you attributing to men? The answer to this is that men try to open to women after being told to, and women actually hate it. Instead of just stating that. They say it's trauma dumping.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:58 PM
3

How can this be true,when women complain about men not opening up and being emotionally available as a sex? I think this phenomenon is just women realizing they don't really want men to open. They just like the idea of being there for men. Not the practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:54 PM
2

Do you think that website would be pro AI porn? Or animated porn? They hate it because it takes away women's collective bargain.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:31 PM
9

Weird that a lesbian would deny that women get into relationships relatively quickly and realize the person isn't what they said they were.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 03:02 AM
7

The issue again is those women wanting to land high tier men while being the equivalent to a guy working at McDonald's at 30. Men don't care and wouldn't say a word if women weren't complaining on tik tok about all men being assholes because she couldn't she that she was a slow Tuesday.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 02:52 PM
11

I'm 💯 percent correct
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 08:28 AM
12

No man cares if fatties are getting pumped and dumped by Chad. Men start carrying when she complains all men are assholes when Chad doesn't want a relationship. Women literally invaded male spaces and demanded men make video game characters less sexy. These aren't the same issue but nice obfuscation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 07:28 AM
5

So wanting monogamy without multiple other naked women is just wanting all the attention on you? Asinine You can want all the monogamy you want. What does it have to do with people you Don't know watching porn. Something that literally doesn't effect you in any way buy you have to interject yourself. Don't make me laugh. Nope. I lost interest in dating men about 10 years You still have an incentive to make sure that men's sexuality is controlled by women and that them seeing a nude woman is at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:39 AM
12

fictional* women even. Exactly, it's why the exploitation argument is nonsense. I agree they don't want low value men to have sex. But even high value men watch porn to take the edge off. They want to control all male sexual behavior and ensure that obese feminists are the beauty standard. If men are going to have sex they need to give half their life's earning for the opportunity. Sure, attractive men they'll have sex with, but the others have to pay top dollar or else it's sexual exploitation.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:33 AM
13

Do you think I want the attention of porn sick weirdos? No, I think you care that their attention is somewhere else. I believe you hate these guys, but you still don't want their attention directed at beauty you can't attain. get attention from men. They are, deep down, women really do care deeply about male attention. I mean, why on earth would you see women complaining about video game characters being seen as sexual objects. They're ARE literal objects. If you didn't care you wouldn't be comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:29 AM
7

You're making my point. Also, if you want that no one is stopping you. You hate men watching porn because, deep down, you think we compare these women to you. When you see it, you can never unsee it. Human 5 is almost 100 percent about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 06:13 AM
13

Because some women need to intellectualize the fact that they feel that porn shifts male attention away from them. It's not just porn it's obviously fake and unexploited women in video games too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 05:36 AM
18

Y'all don't care about porn because it's exploiting women's bodies you care because it takes attention away from you. You could turn the entire porn industry into fully AI fake women tomorrow, and people like you would still cry. You see porn and even video games with hot fake women as competition. The most depraved depictions of sexual entitlement are not from online porn they're from women's erotica. 50 shades is the manifesto of a stalker and you guys jerk of to that with glee.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 05:34 AM
-1

You're an only child, aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 07:41 AM
3

Women when they complain about fatness not being seen as beautiful in society. Either we're all entitled to be viewed as "beautiful " or none are. I lean towards the latter. I wont, however, accept the double standard that is women constantly bitching about societal beauty standards and then complaining when guys bring up beauty standards that are unfair to them. And then there are idiot pandering male retards that come in and start talking about bootstraps when men don't disagree with that they…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:22 PM
7

It looks like calling out these double standards without it being called whining if women want to talk about beauty standards being toxic. The cure to all of this is that everyone needs to stop being a victim in dating, or everyone will start playing the victim. Let's all play the same game. It's not a whine if you see someone picking up the ball with their hands in soccer, and you call them out. The correct answer is not "stop complaining to the ref and just get better."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 04:33 PM
11

Because its just self agrandizing from a boomer who lucked into a relationship and thinks he got into it by himself and through hard work. Pure survivorship bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 04:28 PM
21

It's idiotic. No one is arguing that men shouldn't take responsibility. You jackasses come out of the woodwork when anyone at all starts noticing that there are societal forces that affect dating. Sympathy isn't supposed to help dating. It just tells someone you understand what their going through. If blue pillers want men to share the feelings more, they need to be willing to accept and sympathize with those feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 04:24 PM
1

They absolutely would. Their morality is purely emotionally based. These people are authoritarians.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:38 PM
2

Those men are just physically attractive. If they were 6 ft I'm sure women like then even more. There are strong biological preferences that are somewhat mediated by culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 09:22 AM
3

You really want to avoid the offended part of my statements. Having someone pick up after themselves and not cheat is controversial. Them not offending you as general rule is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:07 PM
3

Clothes change, but hard wired behavior doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 04:59 PM
4

Oddly, many men are able to do it. You can't spend your life trying not to offend someone who wants to get offended. I'd never date someone who wants to go out of their way not to be offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 04:18 PM
7

A partner being constantly upset and offended at everything is even sadder. If you have to make a rule that you don't want to be offended. It seems like you're a person to take offensive and need their feelings assuaged during every couple joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 03:50 PM
2

You must be too young to remember heroin chic. No, I know how this idiocy is always brought up. However, that is for fashion models, one section of society. If you look at societal trends in general and ask regular guys the pattern persists.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 02:56 PM
9

No, you're looking at history through the lenses of a couple of rich people. Educated men mostly. Body weight fluctuated. However, WHR is pretty consistent. Height is also consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 02:53 PM
17

don’t offend me Seems pretty open-ended and a reason to break up with anyone. But do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 02:50 PM
18

Attraction is subjective. No, can we stop repeating this. There are parts of attraction that are pretty hard wired. Like symmetry, clear skin, a healthy looking body and proportion features. The superficial things like beards can be changed but characteristics like height and an hourglass figure will always be the standard. If there's no definition of a standard, why would women say beauty standards are so rigid and toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 02:48 PM
1

That same study still finds marriage correlates with higher earnings There was still correlation, but that doesn't mean the marriage is causing the earning increase. Read the quote it was due to a third factor, for example. We do a study and find that ice cream is correlated with drowning deaths. You say that the ice cream is causing the deaths (maybe due to cramping). I say that maybe people who are drowning have some predilection for ice cream. But it turns out that there is a third factor tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:07 PM
1

sure, but marriage adds legal stability and protections that matter They matter, but they matter to women. These protections ensure that the guy stays and she's not destitute. I love that for women, but don't tell me men that they're benefiting. Let's be honest. For the most part, marriage is a net cost paid to a woman. In order to get a long-term relationship and a child from her. That's not a bad thing, it's reality. Funny how the burden of proof suddenly shifts to me when you dismiss peer rev…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 10:44 PM
1

show benefits, better health, habits, stability, and life satisfaction. Whether you like it or not. The question would be, do you think these correlations magically go away if you're just in a non marital partnership? These aren't exclusive to marriage it's just that women won't do this for long term unless they're married. So, no, besides some possible tax benefits there really isn't a benefit to marriage for men. The whole point of marriage is to make sure a guy doesn't run off after having a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 07:29 PM
–

Men are usually coming in with more earning potential, so they are bound to lose more.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 05:43 PM
–

What's the marital risk for women as a group in today's day and age? If you say something like DV, understand that it also happens outside of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 05:42 PM
–

It's your resume, you self-righteous liar. Your education, accomplishment, and dedication in other jobs predicts your ability to make money in the future. Women can do the same thing by asking you questions about your job and where you went to college.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 05:40 PM
–

1.) Healthier, this still does sufficiently address unrelated factors thar may select for health and marriage but ill yield thar the correlation isn't women choosing healthier men. 2.) Wealth this one agrees with me "Hence, men who are well placed within the structure of social relationships are more likely to be both married and of higher wages than other men" 3.) Not due to marriage just partner ship 4.) See 3 5.) More selection bias 6.) Read conclusions. The point being is that marriage doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 05:37 PM
–

Learn to read. The argument was wealthier men. Also, how do you think employers pick good 20-something employees to hire for a business? I don't want to believe you're stupid, but the only other option is that you're being malicious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 09:07 AM
–

So, almost never and her divorcing is still initiated by her?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 09:04 AM
–

They lose 2 years of life expectancy Where is the evidence for this. have less leisure time What about marriage makes women have less leisure time? You're confusing having kids with getting married. higher stress. Again kids. Then if they divorce, they end up poorer. Nope, they started out poorer and made less than the men they where earned and are now making less relative to him. It'd be awesome if you'd post the study.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 09:03 AM
-4

What risk do women take in marriage? Compared to a gf
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:08 AM
0

You're making the claim, so you need to provide proof .
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:06 AM
1

Therefore, instead of pretending like divorce is something that just happens to men, realize that they played an active role in their marriage’s demise as well Of course, they chose to get married 😆 maybe consider that the number is so lopsided because the wrong people are marrying each other. Why are there more lesbian divorces than straight or gay ones? The lopsidedness is because women are more trait neurotic and have more incentive to get divorced.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:05 AM
0

Nah, need to be like men for the prenup fear to kick in
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:44 AM
2

Prenups are cowardly too Go ahead and marry a man making less than you. No one is stopping you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:12 AM
2

You people who think that marriage is only a risk for men are so annoying. It is a big commitment for EVERYONE With 80 percent of the people initiating divorce being women the risk isn't always towards men but pretty dam close.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:11 AM
-9

The risk seems unilateral for men that's the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:09 AM
-2

Wealthier than single men This is a perfect example of selection bias. Are married men wealthier, or do women choose to marry wealthier men. The same goes for all of these.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:06 AM
0

Wealthier than single men This is a perfect example of selection bias. Are married men wealthier, or do women choose to marry wealthier men. The same goes for all of these.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:05 AM
-1

I think you're confusing trad cons and red pill guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:03 AM
-4

What's the negative part of a marriage for a woman? The stuff you usually complain about isn't codified into law.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:02 AM
8

America's birth rate decline isn't because of 4B. Neither is Korea's. 4B is taking credit for something they didn't do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:10 PM
4

They're still talking about men, though. It's like the child free subreddit. Any group that builds around avoiding something usually just becomes focused on that thing. That's the point I'm making.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:45 PM
1

Look up the women who "de-center" men. Same story
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:27 PM
5

Is there any data to back this up, or are you just confusing causality and correlation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:10 PM
3

1.) Type in broke men in the search of the sub 2.) I don't see you criticizing those women in the broke men threads 3.) There's also a place you can go if you're promiscuous it's called a whole house.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:06 PM
3

Why don't you ask women how much is too broke?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:57 PM
4

numbers don’t matter then why equate it wish a volume of high or low Because the number varies so greatly between individual s. We seem to accept the concept with "broke" Men. I. Don't see the blue pill chasing down these women for an exact number. So I don't see a need to give one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 05:54 AM
6

So I asked this person what they considered it It wouldn't change anything if I answered it or didn't. All that matters is that no one cares if a woman doesn't want to date a broken man, and that's her preference. But we seem to have an issue with men doing the same. Personally, the number doesn't matter to me, just the baggage and personal trauma that's usually associated with women engaging in promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 08:09 PM
5

isn’t defined?! You're asking for all men to quantitatively define high n count women when all women haven't defined "broke man". It depends on the person, and both are preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:56 PM
6

It doesn't matter. If a woman says I want a rich guy. We don't ask what you consider rich. We know it depends on the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:42 PM
9

If you reject someone first, can you be rejected?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:25 PM
0

You don't have to do something a lot for it to be made illegal. Murder is actually pretty rare. But we make it illegal because it's morally repulsive. So is rape. On the flip side. A lot of men are raped by women, but non penetration rape of a male is still perfectly fine in some states.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:47 PM
-1

There seems to be a lot of women posting on reddit about men hiding conservative views, They'll go back to fucking these guys if they're hot enough. You need to think of most people (women and men) as essential base animals running on instinct they'll virtue signal one thing but do the opposite because it feels good.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:44 PM
1

you go to a sandwich place and see a disclaimer Less than the legal limit of 2% poop! Yes, because I know that feces is everywhere. If they're taking the time to go down, even lower than the legal limit, that's impressive. Bad marketing pitch, though. This is not the win you think it is. There's nothing to win. This is just a simple fact. I don't want an award for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:42 PM
2

I’ve never dated anyone like that, nor would I. I'm not talking about you personally. Is English your second language. The word you can be used to address plurality or a singular person. I'm using the former. No woman knowingly marries a far right cult member hoping to teach him kindness. Hahaha, this is the true difference between men and women. We're happy admit that a crazy amount of men are complete retarded or evil or generally bad. Women just can't help but cheer on every woman as some sor…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:38 PM
1

Men not only lie to get dates and relationships, Women lie, and men lie during dating. If were considering withholding info as lying, then women are happy to withhold information about how many people they've slept with. Men and women are pretty straight up about who they are for the most part. Women just believe that they can change a guy. Sorry that your gun loving church going guy from a small town magically turned out to be a conservative. This happens to guys all the time. Men keep each oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:04 PM
0

The mothers of every adult woman alive today lived in a time where she could have been marital raped and the fathers of every adult woman alive today could have considered that a part of her wifely duties and raised her to think that she should give in to her husband. They could have, but most men don't do that. He'll even be given that there is a law rape that can still happen. The point is. We don't live in a society where marital rape is tolerated culturally and now legally.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:58 PM
0

As they should. They have the kids and resources to now the divorce the dude. He got unattractive after a couple of years. That's all this is. Men aren't lying about what they are. Women just want the fantasy of changing a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:53 PM
5

All these law dates are irrelevant. Just because something is legal does not mean people do it. You're not living in a country with marital rape. It's irrelevant to our discussion. I don't care about countries with marital rape because i Don't want to fight in a war to liberate them and neither do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:51 PM
5

I don't mean literally you. I'm talking about the women just now divorcing Trump supporters.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:48 PM
6

Bear in mind nearly every man here admits they do not care about a woman’s values or her socio-political views Really, where is your evidence for this? Politics matter a lot. You think no man here cares if his gf or wife is shrieking feminists talking points in his ear like you. This seems like something you wish were true 😆. Faithful Word Baptist Church posted a video sermon Right, and you're supposed to wait until marriage for sex but 95 percent of people don't. Christians and certainly crazy …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 03:15 PM
5

Most sexual encounters are consensual. You guys are confusing consent with dislike. No consensual sex is illegal. Go to a police station. Sex you don't want to have can ve unconsensual, but it doesn't have to be. Both should be avoided. talking about a gunshot vs. a pin prick.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:41 PM
7

You don't live in the countries where men want that. Stop extrapolating to the world if you don't want to do anything about it. Do you want to bomb Afghanistan into stopping female oppression?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:38 PM
1

I would kill for the dudes physique. Please stop embarrassing yourself. I was in a tongue in cheek on my fist comment, but I've now convinced myself. Goddammit, it's not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 12:46 AM
1

Even in this picture, the guy is built, and the chick has a FUPA. You can't make this up. Women aren't beating the allegations, lol 😆 . The man above is a Nordic god, and the woman could be found at any walmart.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 12:34 AM
1

Even then, we're talking about the porn that women read. Why are there big, beautiful men? Instead of Christian gray. What about 5'9 and 220 lbs Chris Johnson? Surely, there would be characters like our bbm friend Chris,
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 10:20 PM
1

Men carry weight much easier than women and don’t look fat until they are literally obese This is so beyond ridiculous. No one is checking for fat men. BBW is a thing, BBM is not. Get over it. Men are attracted to most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:20 PM
1

Depends on how you carry it. Waist to hip ratio is actually a better measure of health. However, the point is that guys are still into that BMI. Women, on the other hand, are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:13 PM
1

Yes obesity is 29 and above. Men don't want literally medically unhealthy women, but 26-28 is just fine. Is that too high of a bar to clear? Just be a healthy partner? Most women in most countries clear that standard easily. It's just the United States that struggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:23 PM
1

SLIGHTLY is the key word Sweetheart, you can't literally be unhealthy. I'm sorry that's not just unattractive. it's a liability for a guy's wallet and his kids. But if you want an idea of men's tastes. Consider the fact that there are subs with millions of subscribers dedicated to bbw women just on reddit. There are no romance novels with pudgy dad bods. Get over it. Stop projecting. Men do really go for a variety of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:34 AM
1

Believe it or not, men like a slightly curvier woman. You ladies puking yourself into anorexia is once again you trying to fight other women for high tier guys. Those guys don't give a shit either. Guys, I didn't ask for buccal fat surgery to sink your cheeks. Women did that. Your insecurity is reeking over the screen. I can show you the study of men not caring as much about BMI as women might think. In conclusion, most men like most women. Yes, it should aim not to be morbidly obese but that's …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:17 AM
1

We're not dumb. There's a reason why he gave her that money for guys not to buy her drinks. Women who entertain the attention of multiple men are not wifey.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:12 AM
3

It's a game of thrones reference the stone men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:07 AM
3

VIRTUE SIGNALING It's genuinely not, I wish It wasn't true, but it is the case. You're projecting how women feel attraction onto men. Men are genuinely sexually attracted to a wide swath of women and female body types . Much more than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:17 AM
4

Why would you want a partner that finds you unattractive? The great thing for women is that most men find most women attractive. The opposite isn't true. Yes, most men care about attractiveness, but the threshold is easy to meet in order to speak to a man
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:55 PM
11

No, the assumption that you could change literally nothing and get good results is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 03:53 PM
6

Some of them were wonderfully helpful and honest. Others were just wishful thinking and ego stroking. There are some women who can't realize how equally shallow they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 02:54 PM
13

Love the honesty. I'm sympathetic to what women go through in life, especially regarding childbirth and periods.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 02:51 PM
17

Oh my sweet summer child. I sometimes wish the genders could switch in a freaky Friday simulator and spend a short time as a woman and a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 02:49 PM
–

But the inverse would come naturally come into the lexicon like small dick energy. Loose pussy energy would be seen as sexist, no sorry, misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 04:48 AM
3

I dated two men as a single mum both wanted to marry me. Either way, they didn't. Either the men who are desperate enough to want to marry you are not wanted by you. Or the ones you want don't want to marry you and just "date." Do you really think that being a single mother is immaterial to you finding a partner you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 09:10 PM
2

Good, to it's credit the point of TRP is giving men the tools and agency to avoid these relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 05:39 PM
5

The struggle is marriage and commitment, not dating. A lot of men will sleep and even date a single mom. But women have a harder time being remarried than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 05:38 PM
1

You're projecting. You ran out of arguments and tried to ask for the "SOURCE" of a joke. You don't really care about minorities or minority women. You're going to be just fine in trumps world. It's why you can make quirky "venting" sessions with your GFs. You know that no matter what happens, in the end, America was made to cater to your feelings. Enjoy your performative protests and online activism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:42 PM
1

Can you give examples of women letting their dating experiences drive the public conversation and how that alienates men? No, because it's a throwaway joke. You're focusing on it because you can't refute anything else I've said. I'm using it to insult not for a factual claim. What is the one point you speak of that you would like me to focus on while ignoring other things you say? Maybe go back two to three comments and choose anything I said. Then respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:16 PM
1

can't even begin to understand how feminist dating choices are responsible for the fascists taking over the US, Truly spectacular, the most throwaway part of my comment, and you decide to not only uniquely focus on it but do it in bad faith. Misandric feminists are letting past dating experiences with men spill out into their political and public speech. Thus alienating more men. It's a joke for the most part. But heuristically I think it has a hint of truth. What If you are confused, maybe focu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:36 PM
1

I'm not claiming the Manosphere overall promotes murders but I'm saying if feminists all need to be accountable for women who pulled fire alarms, all manoshpere guys have to be responsible for the killers too. That makes sense, right? No, the issue comes from a mass group of feminist protesting these conferences. It is not one in a million killers. Who were probably fucked in the head anyway. If it was literally one feminists pulling an alarm it would be fine. But it's an entire group shouting d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:51 PM
1

multiple cases where manosphere guys have mass murdered groups of women. You can't, you can't. You can name men who've done it. But the ideology that agrees with it or not doesn’t promote killing women. Feminism does promote universal patriarchal blame. And in large part endorses the power plus privelege definition of isms. Yes some women pulled a fire alarm once These speech protests happen constantly in MRA university events. What would democrats declaring that black people can be racist do? I…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:53 AM
1

Men speak out against feminist topics all the time? That's fine, you can disagree with people. What isn't done is blocking them from speaking and pulling fire alarms. don't know any women who would deny women or minorities can't be sexist, racist or bigots. The denial is that women can't be sexist to men or black people can't be racist to white people. It's the power plus prejudice definition of "isms." This definition is something liberals should fight against. It's untrue and promotes more big…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:45 PM
1

Do you get mad the the American heart association No, I'd be mad if one of its members were protesting against a speech on cancer prevention and the association didn't denounce it. Instead, they just said we need to focus on heart related issues. Can you give an example of something feminists support that needs specifically to be called out? This question is in bad faith because you'll retort that feminism is a monolith. However, I'll bite. The use of patriarchy is an explanatory tool to explain…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 03:13 PM
1

What specifically are you calling it as wrong that women do to you Not women and not to me personally. Feminism specifically shouts down MRA movements and then when asked to do things that help men "were not a male centered movements". It's completely non sensensical. How does a group stop that exactly? Call it out, say that this doesn't represent us as a movement. The same thing you'd expect Right to do when calling out racism in their party. Virtually no democrats are supporting crazy policies…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 01:01 PM
1

a base. The democrats aren't calling you misogynistic, some women who may or may not identify as democrats were. You've fallen for the fascist they don't like you propaganda. Women who are feminists and democrats do nothing to distance or castigate the members of their group that do these things. They, like you, down play it. As a matter of fact, to even have this conversation, I have to bring up how this behavior will negatively effect women. We on the left can't just say it's wrong to this on …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:09 AM
1

Women are over here fighting actual legal battles to be able to control their own bodies and retain the right to vote and men are like "women made me feel bad on the internet so I will vote for fascists to show them who's boss." Do you think it's possible that women are fighting these legal battles because they've alienated a massive part of their base. Would we expect any other group to vote Democrat if they were called misogynistic for having a conference on their issues? men are dumb Again, z…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 03:02 AM
2

Laws aren't the only way to censor people. On top of that even without laws. Stuff like this drives men to not vote for liberals because they can literally see that they aren't wanted. We have two choices, distance from and call out the crazies in our group or continue to lose elections. Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:24 PM
2

If that protest leads to groups not being heard and abandoning the left you're going to get more wins for the right. We would never accept white liberal protesters shouting down a conference on issues in the black community. He's rightfully see it as alienating. We need to do the same here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:21 PM
2

Why can't we walk and chew gum at the same time. They aren't equal in proportion, but a punch and a slap are still assault. We should give both some attention. That doesn't mean equal attention. If you disagree you need to be honest and say that you like one form of free speech and not the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:19 PM
2

I'm talking about the perception of liberals in the United States. The voters and the culture of liberalism. The idea of judging individuals as just that has been replaced with cliques and groups of oppressors and oppressed. If we keep framing things this way, we will continue to lose groups like young men to the right or through not voting. If you don't care, then please shut up and get out of the way and let people who want to win elections speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:17 PM
2

There will always be dipshit college students who pull fire alarms or use blowhorns. Or full grown adults who try to fire people from their jobs or ban games and media they don't like. On top of thayFree speech, suppression doesn't have to be overt. Getting people to self censor and not discuss male issues on fear of backlash works just as well. But those are private actors with little to no power acting up like college students always have. Culture matters, and private actors working in unison …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:12 PM
–

Right, as men do back to them. Nope men allow feminists to speak at any gathering. They don't pull fire alarms like feminists do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:49 PM
–

I'm not talking about Biden and the democrats I'm talking about feminists and how they stifle speech. Stop trying to redirect the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:48 PM
–

Criticizing by yelling so loudly that no one can hear anyone is an assault on free speech. There was also a fire alarm pulled to stop the proceedings.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:47 PM
–

So only the first speaker has a right to speak? Never those who object Fire alarms were pulled so that no one could speak. The protest was because the school was hosting that topic. There is a Q and A at the end for anyone to speak, but that's not what protesters wanted. It’s the right that is cutting off funding to universities. It is the right is disappearing people who protest and sends them to Latin American gulags. This is pure whatabouttery I'm a lefty and what these people did is disgusti…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:46 PM
–

There's a difference between being shot and being stabbed. That doesn't mean either are ideal. Bringing up Republicans is just an attempt to obscure what the movement us doing and the fact that if they were in power, they would use the law for similar bans.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:14 PM
–

They have argued protested against men speaking about their issues, though. https://youtu.be/YiRasOrIoYQ?si=P9xvVtJAavoVILxm
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:12 PM
2

I'm not an ugly person, so I wouldn't know. But in general, feelings are equally irrelevant to what the law should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:18 AM
1

Yet I'm willing to bet if I go through your post history, I won't find that. Dude, only you drag these debates into your own life. I'm just arguing on principle and for looking for consistency. You're never going to see that on my post history because my life isn't devoid of meaning to the point I have to defend illogical arguments. Admit that you don't have an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:16 AM
0

The biggest difference is that murder can be justified Murder by definition, is unlawful and unjustified. Killing can be justified. But there are games that allow targets are morally bad people Does that mean you're allowed to take the law into your own hands. Couldn't you argue that games like hit man or even super hero movies promote taking the law into your own hands? I absolutely don't see a moral difference in rape in video games vs murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:40 PM
3

Incest rape fantasies don't belong in video games. Ick 1.) You don't have to play it. 2.) Does murder and any violence belong in video games? What about movies or books. I don't have this kink nor play any steam games, but OP makes a good point. What's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:32 PM
2

they feel If they ARE harassing them, then yes, I'm supportive of that. Harassment is behaviorially defined in law, not feelings based. Would you be okay with banning content online supportive of that behavior Harassment through the internet is already illegal. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:13 PM
2

Then, what you're saying is irrelevant. Being harassed is a crime and can be ameliorated. Being ignored can't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:04 PM
2

The answer is easier than you think. Their minds are already warped by Instagram. There's not much left for porn to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:23 PM
1

Look it up. You guts got lost in the sauce, even you agree that disgust is an instinctual behavior. You've lost the argument. Which was thar some human traits don't need to be thought. Seeking social validation is likely instinctual in social creatures. Just like avoiding bad food is beneficial to an individual. Not getting ostracized and keeping in the good graces of a societal group. Is also evolutionarily beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 09:03 PM
3

lot of hate thrown at them. Ask any ugly person if they'd want to attractive, ask any attractive person if they'd want to be ugly. Are we actually pretending that having good lucks isn't a massive net positive. This is like saying having money can bring you a lot of problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 08:54 PM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womad_(website) Child-abuse incident in Australia On November 19, 2017, a member wrote a post on the WOMAD forum claiming that she had drugged and raped an Australian boy.[5][22] She uploaded photos and videos allegedly portraying her raping the boy.[WOMAD members showed support for the writer, leaving comments saying that they would pay to watch the videos of the sexual assault
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:10 AM
3

It’s not really celebrating though is it? You're really fighting to keep a narrative you can't maintain. Other people gave you examples you just move the goalposts. If cheering isn't a form of celebration I don't know what is. The increased death of men includes violence and you specified women in your second post but. A large enough proportion of liberal women are feminists for me to make the association. Keep trying bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:39 AM
2

I’m looking for evidence that women supported it This is in front of a live audience reacting to che. https://youtube.com/shorts/40Kpn5kGR3Q?si=fT4oL7y6D3-iOdUR
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:17 AM
7

Is clementine Ford laughing at male covid deaths enough? https://www.bandt.com.au/cv-19-is-not-killing-men-fast-enough-columnist-clementine-ford-forced-to-issue-latest-apology/ This is a prominent feminist laughing at male deaths. I have more if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:34 PM
18

I don't think this is true. You could be the kindest person on the planet, and if you're not attractive, you'll never get action. Be attractive should be the advice. Then, just use the golder rule to navigate life
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 01:08 AM
34

Be attractive, and for most women (and people in general), you'll be golden.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 01:06 AM
4

We've done it, and we've reached peak blue pill delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 10:23 AM
1

Men aren't a monolith. Isn't that the excuse women use here. On top of that, women don't need a man's permission to get an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:17 AM
2

No, you don't suck it up. Someone committed suicide during the trial. Why wouldn't I use condoms instead of a drug that makes me want to kill myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:24 PM
1

those same side effects we women have been dealing with for decades)* Some of the side effects were suicidilality. It wasn't just mood swings. What drug are you even talking about exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:27 PM
2

Nope, in Canada, there's a case where birth control tampering is not illegal if you're a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:46 PM
6

1.) The woman/girl can still abort the baby 2.) She can put him up for adoption 3.) Pretty sure these laws aren't on the books anymore 4.) These laws are for alleged rapists not the clear cut rape case that happened in hermensmen v seyer, were the judge even puts responsibility on the boy for getting that woman pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:45 PM
0

Yeah they have, usually refer to them as betas or simps from what i can recall. You missed the question above. Were talking about women. On top of that, no one is calling a man who's just married a beta. He has to do something pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:39 PM
1

Sounds like you’re contradicting yourself. If men don’t say these things, then why would an algorithm or friend group matter? I'm saying that men as a group don't say these things. The men You're around or the algorithm you've curated. Is exposing you to a certain type of man who wants to normalize pedophilia. I would genuinely be careful. Didn’t you just say in the paragraph above that men don’t say these things? Are you able to separate groups from one-off individual instances. Some people don…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:35 PM
1

uess either you’re not one of the people obsessed with the number or you’ve magically turned into one after being pressed on it. I've never cared about exact numbers. I don't think men should either. After all a woman could have an ex as booty call after every relationship. Guys who focus on the exact number are missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:31 PM
1

How is he high value if him touching her lowers her value? He's not lowering her value. It's that high value guys have preferences, and it's not run through women. And her having his 2 kids significantly decreases her value, so how would he be considered a high value guy? I don't think you're understanding the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:28 PM
2

When you ask, do you ask for a range? Or a number. If she gives you a range does this make it more You just do it jokingly and non judgementally after both of you are relaxed, maybe with a couple of drinks. Do all girls in particular friend groups have similar ranges Again, a numerical amount is turbo autistic. It's just a feeling and has to come from you. I’ve yet to see any women post their range of partners on social media, where would I look for this. You don't look for numbers and geometric…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:58 PM
1

I'm sorry this is just beyond unhinged men don't say that most men are pedophiles. You seriously need to be worried about your algorithm or your friend group. Odd thing to be skeptical about. I believe a couple of individuals might admit it but any significant amount should have you running out of whatever space you're in. Those are pedophiles trying to normalize pedophilia. You need to get out of that space before you're associated.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:53 PM
3

There are entire songs that go viral of women destroying a car for cheating. "I dug my key into the side of his pretty little souped up for wheel drive" No one cares if the shoes are on the other foot.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:48 PM
3

1.) Ask 2.) Look at her friend group 3.) Look at her social media. We're not looking for an exact number. It's just a vibe. If you're too promiscuous, it's a no. Women do it too, with their "icks." Suddenly, when men have a preference, it's insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:43 PM
2

Really, has anyone here shamed a monogamous couple raising two kids and minding their own business? A woman having a roster and taking gangbangs from 15 guys won't even be changed. It's only when women and some men here expect a woman like that to be married with 2 kids to a HV guy that we disagree with. Do what you want but understand that all behavior had consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:39 PM
3

Right, this isn't a dove commercial. Men know where they place is. No one is going to tell us if we're beautiful at every size.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:34 PM
1

Bullshit. Men blame not being successful dating on women. Evidence, every post on this board. No you can't disentangle a societal conversation from an individual one. One the individual level its always your fault for your dating life. But on a societal level there are things that change that are outside your control. Are we really going to argue that covid didn't effect people's dating chances. Are we going to argue that the rise of social media has no effect on relationship dynamics. Men here,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:44 PM
1

multiple men defend it on social media This isn't normal. Not even pedophiles or biggest white knight feminist would say this. I think you're just encountering bots.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:39 PM
2

My family is nowhere near that dysfunctional. Also, it's mostly satire to hit back at a purposefully bad interpretation of the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:37 PM
3

This post just radiates anger towards women the way a hot stove radiates heat. No, any anger I may feel is toward people who do the same thing and expect different results. I think it's funny that i can tear into men with zero problems and never be called hateful. But any negative observation and women and their simps swarm.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:36 PM
8

This same guy not only has millions of views hating on single moms, he has a tiktok dedicated to it with lots of fathers. They're still not hated. This comes from a constant bombardment of men being told that single moms are a catch and all women are 10s. No one is hating you. We just want you to be honest. You're a liability in the dating market, and you need to make up for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:24 PM
-1

I'm not, I'm just assuming women will let them get away with it and probably give him a blowjob 10 minutes after he gives her a black eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:21 PM
1

Choose better = the guys you're choosing are morally shitty, stop choosing on just looks. Don't stick your dick in crazy= you're choosing fuckable but immoral women. Don't let a a crazy guy stick his dick in you" How traditionally heteronormative. Women can be on top on ride guys. The exact opposite would be stop fucking crazy dudes. That is the intention behind choosing better. date the fat girl who works at the comic book store that you talk with for hours, That's because men don't say that we…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:19 PM
1

Yes, some men say it. I've literally never heard this said by a man ever. If they did, I'm pretty sure they're a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:07 PM
1

Look at behavior and stop listening to what they say. Do what men do when we're screening for high body count women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:59 PM
-1

By “choose better” the men here mean “choose the unattractive nerdy guy with no options because men are only as loyal as their options” No, we don't mean that. But please go for abusive hot guys. Just don't complain when he beats your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:58 PM
1

Which men are never told. Don't stick your dick in crazy is our version of this. The crazy hot matrix is another. Men beat this into each other's heads, and when we try to tell women. We're misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:53 PM
13

Because they typically talk about how women deserve to be unalived, abused, and/or SA’d for not going after the ‘nice guy’. I also noticed men who have a deep hatred of single moms are always single. "One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong" No one here has says women deserve to be SA'd or murdered. The deep hatred of single mom things is made up. Any statement that men don't want to date single moms is seen as hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:46 PM
9

NGL this is a garbage take. It's an accurate take, when women call any man who disagrees with them a misogynist an incel. Women don't want equality they want positive sexism when most guys treat them neutrality. And address their arguments. Those guys are misogynists. It's only when a man treats the with absolute deference and fawning that they're a misogynist. The clear and obvious signs of violence are ignored. Domestic abusers aren't hard to avoid. Women choose being gaslit over equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:43 PM
1

Yes that's the answer, I was responding to a clearly incorrect take. I'm glad you agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:17 PM
4

The problem is women criticizing masculinity on the left. That doesn't mean men are changing their masculinity. The amount of trans people in the US is a fraction of a fraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:33 PM
17

am a left-leaning moderate and this is my observation. Conservative men with liberal women: I can fix her Liberal men with conservative women: I'm not dealing with that I'm guessing it's just that conservative women are more selective than liberal women. They're not as willing to compromise on core values.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:25 PM
1

Personally, I believe that much of attraction is cultural - think how the Victorians freaked over an exposed ankle or the Japanese about painted white lines along the neck, or which cultures value thiccness over being muscular or thin. I've noticed that female beauty is more cultural. Male beauty is much more globally and historically rigid. This is likely because men vary more than women. There is no culture that prefers short men over tall men. The athletic tall build with a symmetrical face I…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:11 PM
–

Basically, it's this societal idea that "Once you go penis, you never go back, This doesn't make sense. Gay men fuck other men who've been promiscuous with men before. The answer is options. Straight men don't date promiscuous women because they have more options to leave. They do like bi women because there is an option for a female threesome. Lesbian women hate bi women because they're afraid they'll leave her for a guy. Straight women feel bi men will leave for a guy. Gay guys are less relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 03:28 AM
–

You are a pussy bro, threatening violence and stating your height as a go to, is peak beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:22 AM
–

Andrew and Tristan Tate do not behave like that with women, they do benevolent sexism. Why is this some scapegoat excuse. If you're with a partner who treats an other group of people badly. You are a bad person. " Oh, my boyfriend is a nazi but he's so sweet to me"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:20 AM
–

Things would be better in terms of wars and overall violence, yes They wouldn't be better and even if they were. We'd still be on the Stone Age. War drives progress. Get over it. You're living in a comfortable house typing this because your ancestors were killers and took what they needed. And women fucked the men who did these killings.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:14 AM
–

, it means that most of the dominant political force throughout society is driven by men and is masculine coded. If this arrives meritocratically, is it still patriarchal? Does society necessarily have to be 50/50 at the top of its not 50/50 at the bottom.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:11 AM
–

Not gonna happen, unfortunately, men are more varied than women. On top of that rape is defined to not include women assaulting men
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:08 AM
–

Women are the limiting factor to reproduction. This is true of every mammalian species. Women choose the genes that go into the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:05 AM
–

A useless word that means nothing now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 01:50 AM
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 01:45 AM
1

I don't understand what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 05:53 PM
3

Humans are ~80% Nurture. What evidence do you have of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 05:52 PM
3

different people like different things. Do you believe we can make any general or average claim about the different things that men and women like? Although the blue pill says it doesn't have a coherent ideology. You guys consistently show that you are blank slatists. You don't believe that men and women can have biological (on average) predisposition to being attracted to different traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 05:25 PM
1

Usually women initiate divorce more simply because they are the ones doing the paperwork No, no this isn't true. It's an anecdote that's disproved in study after study. Reference rosenfeld 2015 for evidence. Furthermore, women are not abusers at the level and extent men are They're reasonably close. In fact, so close that the difference can be debated. Dv stats from the famously misogynistic CDC are testament to this. Had that study asked the gender of the WLW’s abusers, most likely, the abusers…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 04:32 PM
1

It’s not “accountable” to say women are WORSE than men You're actually the best example a misogynist and sexist could use to prove his points about women. I'm not saying women are worse than men. I'm saying both women AND MEN can be shitty in different ways. The accountability comes from acknowledging this and trying to fix it. Accountable is actually reading that DV article and seeing that the perpetrators’ genders are unspecified. Accountable is realizing that even when you look at just the fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 01:03 PM
1

Yes, believe it or not women do bad things in society too. They have toxic traits similar to men. It's actually quite progressive to hold both sexes accountable. No man here would deny that there are masculine traits that are harmful to men and society. There are plenty of women who'll deny the feminine traits that do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:20 PM
1

It’s used to say “women are bad and divorce all the time and women violent”. Once again, ironically, female neuroticism takes a small point of critique or negative comparison and blows it up to infinity. The divorce conversation usually goes. Q. WHY DO WOMEN INITIATE MORE THAN MEN A. BECAUSE MEN ARE ........ IMMATURE.... LAZY .ETC Q. WHY THEN DO LESBIAN DIVORCES OCCUR MORE THAN GAY OR STRAIGHT ONES. A. YOU HATE LESBIANS AND THINK WOMEN ARE EVIL When we bring this up, it's to bring up the fact th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:13 PM
1

That point is brought up to illustrate that women are just as capable of commiting violence against women. It's usually after a barrage of " I choose the bear". Not all criticism is "bashing". Lesbians are well recieved here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:00 PM
1

Who shits on lesbians here? Hell they understand the plight of men better than most women. Bi and lesbian women are queens.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:43 PM
3

It's just not homophobic. I'm not saying men are being progressive. I'm saying they're less homophobic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:26 PM
1

I've actually never heard him called an incel. Predator sure but never incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:59 AM
8

Men just want to fuck women. They'd fuck lesbian women if they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:50 AM
1

The definition of unattractive is variable, though. In the past the church, families, and women's lack if money incentives pairing with the best man they could get. Culturally enforced monogamy just makes it so you can't get the benefits of a relationship without being in ONE relationship. Incentives can change people's minds not just force.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:46 AM
1

You guys are confusing an outcome wit a desire. If I said that most people would like to earn 150K at their job. You can't come back with "well why do most people earn around 50k, they must not want it".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 03:05 PM
1

Are you honestly arguing that the children of single moms have the same outcomes in those areas as two parent children
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 07:46 PM
1

she's doing more then he's the problem The issue is that you pulled this out of your ass. The other responder explained that women can be bad in relationships, too. You dodged with saying why doesn't he leave. I'm saying that's true of both men and women. You don't know much about a very large portion of men who leave their families, do you? Not personally, I don't keep men like that around my life. My social circle isn't filled with degenerates.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 04:24 PM
1

Academics, finances ( to take care of living expenses), and emotional needs are met.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 04:21 PM
1

Do you think you're not already off work to be able to go pick your children up? Not if you have weekends. On top of that, courts are packed, and you're going to wait essentially a full day for a 30 min appointment. You do not need court fees to inforce a previous order. The enforcement is for payment, as long as the state knows the kids are taken care of and they don't have to pay. They don't care. Hell, women can tell you how hard it is to get cops to enforce a restraining order. Sadly, that i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 05:26 AM
1

A deadbeat is anyone that doesn't provide a child with the necessary environment to thrive. If you're depriving a child of a parent/ two incomes. You're a deadbeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 05:33 PM
1

You responded ti a comment when you said "because she's doing more than him" the other commenter responded that some women are the problem. Your answer was "well leave". No one said that the man was leaving his kids, they were calling you out for pinning all the blame on the man in a relationship, and you pivoted. Who said anything about leaving your kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 05:30 PM
1

Do you think taking a day off of is work free. Do you think court fees are free?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 05:25 PM
0

Nah, there is no such thing as bad pizza, which all true pizza lovers know. Sex is a little different there is bad sex but if you end up having to find excuses as to why sex is bad you just need to admit you don't like it as much as the next guy. Women don't want this secret to get out because If it did, men would absolutely be justified in asking for one-sided open relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:04 AM
1

don't necessarily think so - men absolutely seem to crave novelty. But to me, it seems like they tend to want to add novelty in, alongside the familiar. These are just meaningless words to dodge the fact that lesbians and straight women both seem to fall off a cliff sexually over time. Men want to sleep with their long term partner as well as others. That's the simple answer. Why? Because they have nothing to lose historically and presently. Women, however, do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:00 AM
3

Ok, do you blame women like yourself for not leaving sooner?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:57 AM
4

Irrelevant, you've deprived a child of having two parents. You're a deadbeat mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:56 AM
3

Who's going to enforce it. Does the father need to go to the court house again and spend money on lawyers everytime it's violated. People are living paycheck to paycheck . This is how bad moms get away with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:55 AM
3

When a man tries for full custody, it's likely that the mom is so incompetent that the court gives it to him. Also, getting custody doesn't mean that the mother allows the kid to be seen by the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:32 PM
7

Yes, there is a single mom by choice movement, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:28 PM
6

And yet he's still there. He can leave and still be a father I wonder if you will keep the same exact same energy when we ask women why they don't leave abusive partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:27 PM
4

Massively decreases with age. But maybe in the near future there may be drugs that affect sociability. Decrease autism etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 04:27 PM
1

So are women just more novelty seeking than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 04:03 PM
1

No, again, there's no evolutionary benefit. To make old women horny again. And do what exactly have more kids with Down syndrome? I almost feel like there's an evolutionary imperative to lie to men about this. Think just 70 years ago before the pill. Would a woman want to have a sex drive as high as her husband? You'd be pregnant waybto often, and it would be dangerous. Whatever mechanism that stopped women from being too horny 70+ years ago still seems to be with us to this day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:38 AM
2

So why does it decrease more drastically for lesbians, who don't have an orgasm gap issue? 2/3 of heterosexual women orgasm just as frequently as 88 percent of lesbian women. However, we still see a pattern where sex massively falls off over time for women The clear answer is an evolutionary adaption to avoiding too much sex because pregnancy is a risk. I think women constantly say they're just as sexual as men because if men knew about this innate decrease in sex. They wouldn't partner long-ter…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:26 AM
2

It's not a shot at lesbians or women. It's just a difficulty that men in relationships have to deal with. I can understand why it happens. Sex is likely to lead to pregnancy in women, and on a biological level, women just need to limit sexual encounters more than men. It kinda hurts that this is the eventual endpoint of most FF and MF relationships. However, such is life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:19 AM
1

Most animals aren't monogamous. True monogamy is rather rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:16 AM
3

Nah, my guess is that since you're young, you haven't been in an incredibly long-term relationship. This study shows that with time that women in a relationship lose sexual desire faster than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:15 AM
4

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-passion-paradox/201206/the-ins-and-outs-of-sexual-frequency In one study of 16,000 American adults, the typical participant reported having sex two to three times per month, but those under the age of 40 reported having sex slightly more often (once a week).3 Regardless of age, couples also tend to have sex more frequently in the early stages of their relationships. Among couples in the first two years of their relationships, 67 percent of gay couples,…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:12 AM
2

Almost all good dating advice is also good general advice. Especially for men. The person you're commenting to is right you're dodging because you know he's right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:05 AM
-2

probably in prison Most rapists aren't in prison and the US prison population isn't that large. There isn't enough of a sample bias to make a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:54 AM
7

I've never gotten this. If you're hornier to a narrower range of people, you're not as horny as a person who is horny to a wider range of people. It's like saying I love pizza put only a specific kind of pizza, vs. someone who just likes all pizza. The second guy likes pizza more. I don't know why women fight to be as horny as men? It just doesn't seem to be true. Especially when we look at gay and lesbian couples
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:47 AM
1

If someone would use the word transactional in the context of a relationship? That to get anything you need to do for something. Right, but then here were just talking about the degree of transactionalness. It's not one date for one sexual encounter it's more like if dates stop sex will eventually decrease and vice versa. That is transactional, just not to the highest degree. Instead of both just wanting to do nice things for each other and keeping both needs met You do need to do something in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 06:39 PM
1

Don't get him twisted. Men are fine with sleeping with promiscuous women. They just don't think they're wife material.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 06:35 PM
1

Is there evidence of this. All op posted where male studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:54 PM
0

Why do lesbian women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:50 PM
1

You said that when people use the world seriously, it has a different meaning. What is that meaning?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:47 PM
1

Have you ever considered why men are taller than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:39 PM
1

Excellent question. Blue Pill loves to bury the lead. Men don't care about attraction when a woman is already attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:37 PM
1

Men (37%) in relationships are more than twice as likely as women (14% This is stated vs. revealed preferences. There's a study showing couples are relatively close in attraction to each other. Men saying their wives are more attractive is probably. 1.) Make up 2.) Happy wife, happy life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:33 PM
5

Men in an "ideal" world would choose multiple women. Women want the best guy they can get. The difference is due to how we reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:28 PM
0

No, they know that they aren't going to get a better option in terms of sex. We're animals trying to rationalize animalistic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:26 PM
2

But those younger men have less money/ status and are less stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:18 PM
1

people use the word seriously it is used in a completely different way then OP is trying to argue. What is the definition?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 08:54 PM
1

literally said you can argue that every single action one can take is transactional. I And this is true, at least every interaction with another human being. Transaction isn't a bad word. People just feel dirty using it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 01:50 PM
2

Female hate subs get banned because they end up promoting violence against women and criminal behavior. Nope. There is an actual quire from reddit stating that they don't see hatred towards men as discrimination. I can find it for you if you want. Subs like two x are just a bunch of women trauma dumping on each other. Ok, this isn't mutually exclusive to man hating. Notice how you say that him the other poster was excusing the behavior of this sub by calling it niche was bad? You're doing the ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 07:46 PM
2

67/ 2,643x 100 = 2.5349% Hence the 2.5-8% figure Ok I can yield the point that 2.5 percent is written out but not tabulated. The far greater point made by Aydin is how they got that 2.5 percent and their methodology. The criteria the authors set was to find evidence that a rape did not happen. This proves a negative and, by definition, would yield low numbers. Evidence would be at the 11-minute mark
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 12:50 AM
5

any reference to it What is "it" what number does she state in the video? There is also no mention of number 2 in the paper you showed me. With regard to false allegations. It's in the insufficient evidence category. You specify the difference in your own post, you lying little coward. It doesn't say 2% of people falsely accused someone it says 2 percent has no way of the evidence making it to court. Absolutely shameless. Blue pill narrative humping liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 10:38 AM
6

shes claims that the 2-8% claim is nowhere to be found No, she claims that she couldn't find the 2.5% that lisak and all cited in their paper and she's right. If anything it's roughly 8 to 12 percent. She's contesting the 2.5 percent lower bound that you uncrititically gobbled up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:50 AM
8

would argue one is far worse than the other. One cannot result in conviction, a lengthy trial, stress of a trial, public record of a trial, imprisonment ect Again, it can still result in job loss, friend alienation, and suicide. It is literally the analogy of the stab wound and gunshot wound. Ones worst but it doesn't matter because both are bad. You cretin. Expecting me to account random public accusations? idk. complete strawman These are the situations that false rape stats are brought up in.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:39 AM
11

The consequences of a false allegation are also much lesser when it is informal This just seems like comparing a stab wound to a gunshot wound. It's irrelevant to the point. In the court room this already happens. Rape cases are extremely hard to prosecute. Once again I'm talking about the asinine cases litigated, by blue pillers like you on social media. Just got done with the daniel Greene allegations that were proven to be false. Now mindless brainless chimps are back peddaling to correct the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:52 AM
9

about rape accusations to the police, I don't even believe this. Have most me too rape cases or most cases in the public eye even gone to court? You're scrabbling to justify a uniquely inane post that hides behind an AI generated word wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:44 AM
13

Your central thesis is that false rape allegations are over exaggerated. Then you go on to say that we can never know how many women don't report rape or many women who don't say rescind allegations falsely. But you don't make the opposing argument that there are women who don't report to the police but indeed falsely claim they are raped. This entire post is just special pleading. aydin paladin goes into detail on why these false allegation studies are flawed. Including the lisak study. The big…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 06:38 AM
–

This is an idiotic take. 17 percent of men make six figures or more. If they're working in a field that is in demand on computer based, they don't have to take an extended vacation. interested in being PPBs for whatever reason, you're probably left with roughly 0.01% These assumptions are laughable. So, at first, you choose 1 percent and then divide it again by 1 percent? The point to all of this is that women are sensitive to guys with money dating out. Low attractive men with money are cash co…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 05:52 PM
–

First of all Fox News? Lmfaoooo The print version of Fox is actually not bad. Their polling is also excellent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 05:44 PM
4

Can you understand that people can change their present behavior temporarily to be ideal? However, past behavior shows a trend in certain negative attributes, and you can use that to make better judgments of a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 10:14 PM
6

past shouldn't burden our judgment What should burden our judgment if we can't use someone's past?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 09:47 PM
1

Ok, but this doesn't say domestic violence. If we were going to bring up irrelevant details, guess the composition of male stalking victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:24 PM
2

Even the explicit verbal consent stuff patronizes women. Very few of us here physically ask to kiss someone. We feel the vive and lean in and see if she does as well. On another level, we definitely don't do it in established relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:26 PM
1

Don't give a shit. No one is going to take these women seriously. Women seem to take guys who fuck around seriously. That's on you guys, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 10:54 PM
–

People divorce because 1 party didn't keep up their commitment. Yup, if that party is someone who "feels unhappy and unfulfilled" they just shouldn't get married. There are people who aren't meant to be married. Promiscuous people are probably on top of the list. Their dopamine. Receptors are fucked and Need constant stimulation. Just do short-term relationships. Stop ruining the idea of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 10:52 PM
1

To be fair, it does give the breakdown of the remaining 33 percent. It could be a male and a female perpetrators.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 09:58 PM
1

No my statement was that why are women complaining about situationships at all. If they never saw these guys as relationship material (per your statement), why are there so tiktoks, think pieces, and surveys that demonstrate that women hate their situationships? It doesn’t contradict the notion that the average girl is only immediately hooking up with a guy if they don’t see a future with him The contradiction is that women don't have sex with guys they don't see as long-term partners. Women are…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:17 AM
1

I think your deleted comment made more sense, bud. Anyway, if it was 9/10 and rare, you wouldn't see the Profusion of regret about situationships. You can't honestly tell me that 9/10 situationships end up with women being happy with their decision, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:06 AM
1

or she thinks they could be more Good now we've gotten somewhere. Why does she think they can be more? If you're statement is that most women are just reserving men who don't have long term prospects as fuck buddies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:56 AM
–

I don't think English is you first language. What depends. Complete sentences and ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:54 AM
1

Harvard links. [unhealthy men actually marry earlier, are less likely to divorce, and are more likely to remarry OK but what's the overall number, are unhealthy men more likely to get married than healthy men? This is a conditionally probability looking at married unhealthy men. Not unhealthy men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:51 AM
1

Can you give me an example of someone who doesn't promise some life-long commitment? I feel like that would be a great sign to not marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:37 AM
1

marriage isn't a cage to keep someone trapped in. Why get married then? If it isn't life long and you can leave because you "need to find yourself". Why bother?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:36 AM
1

she doesn't think they're relationship material. Then why are so many women complaining about situationships with guys who just start out as sexual partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:23 AM
0

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:20 AM
1

immediate sexual attraction What do you think triggers immediate sexual attraction in women. What makes one man immediately sexually attractive and one not?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:19 AM
2

So why are you fucking the fuck boys?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:15 AM
-1

Sometimes we take it quickly with someone because they're trivial OK, so what's the incentive for a man who wants to get into a sexual relationship with you? Is it to be serious or to be trivial. Women can't have these standards and complain that guys are fuck unserious fuck boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:00 AM
3

serious relationship The fact that you delineate serious vs unserious relationships in it of itself Is the problem. Men don't want to be in serious relationships with women who've had unserious relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:56 AM
-4

Surely you must know people already do all of these things. Men leave their sick wives. People leave for being unfulfilled. And people forcefully open relationships. Do you agree that these people have done nothing wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:39 AM
–

They don't , How do you even define free will?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 06:07 PM
2

See, they have been trying to stop that because it's victim blaming. That's the issue. Every ounce of group accountability is considered victim blaming. What are you the victim of? A bad relationship. Get over it. No one is blaming you for rape. They're asking you to take control of your own life. Sure they do, it's "don't get raped or murdered." That's literally victim blaming. How can you say women are getting away from victim blaming but then say the most victim blamey statement in the world.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:23 PM
1

Cool, glad I cleared it up
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:16 PM
1

Oh great, so do women Maybe in personally but I'm talking about other women as a group blaming other women. Women don't have a phrase like don't stick your dick in crazy. A phrase that makes them accountable for their decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 05:47 AM
1

The reason why women have so much high standards is literally because men will go and fk anything. Women have higher standards because they need to. Sex is more dangerous to them. Hypergamy isn't a bad nor is it good. It just is. Exactly so you admit men and women think differently I'm not a blue piller of course I do. Another reason why women demand for money in relationship, because a guy who is investing money in a girl is not going to leave her easily Oh no, I hope you don't believe this. Mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 05:45 AM
1

No, porn has a different danger for men it pacifies them into not going out and tackling real challenges. Body dysmorphia can happen to men. It's just more prevalent in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 05:41 AM
1

What about the stats when one partner loses their job in an economic down turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:39 PM
1

Oh come on, normal women want children and know the best scenario to do it in is marriage. Are we actually pretending that women in the past and present don't want kids to the same degree as men do?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:28 PM
5

Because me already blame themselves when we fuck up with a girl. " I'm an idiot, I put my dick in crazy" Stop putting your dick in crazy is choose better for men. Women usually say "be better " when complaining about men. So "choose better" is the retort.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:00 PM
0

What woman isn't going to reject these guys (not rhetorical). Name the characteristics that a man should go for when choosing these women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:56 PM
3

Right women name and complain about the things they hate in the men they choose (he's insensitive, flakey, not true to his word), and when men say "choose better." They choose a hotter guy. When men say choose better, they mean not to choose the guys with the traits you yourself listed. Irrespective of their physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:53 PM
2

I think it's related to many women comparing themselves to photosphopped pictures on Instagram and developing a warped sense of their own attraction. I simply extend that to men and relationships. Women see an idealized man, woman, or relationship on the internet, and then it warps their perspective of all three things. That's my hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:46 PM
3

The barn door example would work if one party wasn't blaming another for the horse leaving. If some were to say, you should train your horses not to run away. Telling them that they should have shut the barn door is actually good advice for the future. Likewise, men only say, "Pick better after women go on tirades about men "doing better. " The rebuttal pick better is stinging because, in a lot of cases, it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:37 PM
1

Thanks for the find. I just saw a triangle and quadrilateral for 3 and 4 variables. I love effective data visualization.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:27 PM
–

Cannot speak for all women I'm just talking about the women who do and noting the difference between male single and female single.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:20 PM
3

have never heard of that being the reason. Rape kits are incredibly invasive, painful, and take hours upon hours It's not about the alleged victim. I'm saying that the perpetrator says that sex happened, so there is no need for a rape kit to be processed. Both the victim and alleged perpetrator agree that sex did, in fact, happen. The alleged perpetrator is just saying it was consensual. think a police officer here once posted they usually only take on extremely violent or ones that test positiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:17 PM
1

Same with men lol, men want to bang the most hottest 1.) Men don't lie about this. 2.) Men will bang any chick that is hot enough Number 2 is the difference between hypergamy and just choosing hot women. Men want to include as man women into the criteria as possible. Women are looking for one hot man with all the traits/best traits to satisfy her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:11 PM
4

I don't think it needs to be to keep men and women apart. My guess is that they're blank slatist and gynocentric. They want men and women together but only in a way that maximizes the benefit women get. The men in favor of this, maybe doing it because of genuine ignorance or likely they've learned that agreeing with women gets them benefits in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:00 PM
2

they are literally proven to be true in a court of law with evidence backing them. Those are the rape allegations that get to court, though. We're talking about all allegations, even the ones that are spread online, for instance, but not brought up in a court of law. How do we know if those are true of false.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:52 PM
1

All evidence needs to be entered first. So no, testimony in it of itself isn't evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:44 PM
1

They shouldn't be ignored. But they shouldn't be "believed" evidence should dictate whether we believe or not. Allegations shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:38 PM
4

Isn't that because in most rape cases, the accused admits that they had sex with the accuser? A rape kit doesn't prove rape. It proves that sex happened. We still don't know if that sex was consensual or unconsensual. On top of that, if the alleged victim admits to fabricating the case before tests are done. There would be an obvious backlog.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:36 PM
7

I agree with the statement that a system is what it does. However, I would say that what blue pill does is obfuscate any difference or characteristic between men and women that is disfavorable towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 04:52 PM
–

Different definition of single. Are women willing to forgo situationships and one night stands as well and be truly single?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 04:46 PM
1

But the outcome is literally what is required The question being posed by men is what women desire, not what women end up settling for.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:41 PM
1

Devastating comeback
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:38 AM
1

This is an interesting graph! I know right, what an intuitive way to visualize data. Do you know what is called. Could you use different polygons for different number variables.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:04 AM
1

You're looking at the outcome, not the desire. Most couples are average because most things are average. Most people are average height, and most people have an average height. That doesn't necessarily mean they want to that way. This is like saying, " Hey, this floor is made out of floor."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:58 AM
2

Looks like you're correct. Most couples are looks matched. Women here and in society just pretend their made-up face is their real face. https://news.ufl.edu/2024/06/attractiveness-ratings/#:~:text=Couples also tended to be,led by Gregory Webster%2C Ph.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:55 AM
9

You're on a debate sub bud either make an argument or move on. Don't pretend you're not talking to yourself too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:33 AM
–

Yes but when we say rule 1 and 2 blue pill women get pressed and start talking about how the bar is in he'll and all you need is to be able to wipe your ass and be nice to get a girl. All of these exist and have been argued, sometimes on this sub. Edit: if you want to ask for proof, tell me what kind and how much you need to change your mind. Because like OP, I have receipts
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:10 AM
3

Everyone has fantasies that they would never pursue in reality. It's pretty normal actually? Were talking about sexual fantasies. Your example of killing people in video games is dumb because the consequence is that you can go to jail. That's the deterent. Rough sex won't kill you. It might hurt, but that's the point for some women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:16 AM
2

The sub OP references is a sub of fringe lunatics Neither of those subs has 13 million views and is placed on the front page of reddit. Twox is very mainstream. I'm sorry, but saying, "That's just some people isn't going to cut it." Like it or not, a massive chunk of women thinking this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:14 AM
2

Yes, but we know that lizard people aren't real. We're the smartest species on our planet. Talking about the desires of men and women, stated and revealed. Is not like a conspiracy theory or farfetched in any way. If it's not interesting to you, don't respond. However, on a dating debate subreddit. People talking about this topic isn't abnormal in any way whatsoever. Especially when OP provides evidence of the phenomena existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:43 PM
1

I don't think you are to say that your internal fantasies have NO correlation with what you want. makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:40 PM
1

They don't need to 40-50 percent are a high enough to surmise that at least those people were not satisfied with their relationship. That's not to even go into the people staying in a marriage but that are miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:39 PM
3

Reddit takes it seriously enough to put this cesspool on the front page. 13 million women is something we should pay attention too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:33 PM
2

So what's the point of having a debate sub, why are you participating in this discussion in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:32 PM
3

Sweetie, I don't think you're smart enough to read what you're posting. Your argued that he thinks women are evil, then you post him, not even saying that he makes a reference to SOCIETY thinking MEN (reread the commennt) are evil because they have a false perception of male/female sexual dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:30 PM
2

This is the only sane response. What we entertain in fantasy does not correlate to what we want in reality. This is completely asinine. What are you basing this claim of off?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:20 PM
1

I self reported data can be accurate but is temporally specific. I.e it's people's feelings at the moment the survey is given. This can change over time. I think the point the other poster is making is that, people aren't happy enough with their relationships to stay in them and not divorce/break up (divorce stats).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:17 PM
0

You gotta find out what your specific partner is into. He's not talking about his personal life, though. He's making a statement about society and the broader group. If I said most men like big breasts, the rebuttal that you have to find what your specific partner is into misses the point. Individual vs. group average. Stop personalizing everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:10 PM
1

What op is saying is correct a shocking amount of women want rough degrading sex. That doesn't mean it should be assumed, and it shouldn't be consensual. This isn't wrong to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:05 PM
5

u're making gross generalizations about how men are sadists and 'fundamentally sociopathic'. It's a fantasy you invented in your head. Get over it. Ironically, I think women like her subconsciously get off on the thought of "all men" being rapist. They want to feel like all men want them so badly that they can't control themselves. It's a subconscious value signal internally, they say, " If all men are so full of lust they have to rape me, it must be because I'm so attractive that they can't hel…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:03 PM
1

I think what women really are searching for isn't confidence per se. It's the confidence that comes with competence. So, really, what they want is a competent man who can honestly demonstrate it. But there are manipulators that can act confident but have no skill whatsoever. Those guys are the deadbeats that become their exes and that they complain about. So can women sniff out a confident from an unconfident man yes. However, with enough acclimating, most men can become that confident. Most men…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:51 AM
0

usually social. Married men and fathers are more likely to receive promotions, for example. Unproven nonsense. Your boss doesn't want to give you money as a rule. You're paid for the fact that you're indispensable to a company. Not by how hard you work or how much you need it. Society inherently respects married people more, and caters to married people, Give us an example? Are you confusing bring in a relationship to being married. always find this question kind of funny though - if someone wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 10:32 PM
1

Women’s reproductive success is contingent on them being able to read confidence and overall assess a man’s mate value. I know women need to read and assess confidence. I'm just saying that they can't tell faked confidence from the real kind. People aren't magic, there's a process by which they do things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 02:07 AM
0

Just going tit for tat sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:06 PM
1

Comparing women who willingly have sex with men they find gross because it’s a lucrative business to actual rape victims and slaves Right, they're incomparable because of the consent vs. dislike element.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:04 PM
0

Maybe the men who sleep with you end up doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:24 PM
3

Someone having sex that they don’t want is raped Someone having sex they don't consent to is rape. Someone doing a job they don't consent to Is slavery. Doing something you don't want to is not necessarily rape or slavery so long as you consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:22 PM
1

The corollary you're looking for is slavery. Being forced to work even if you don't consent is slavery. With the sex worker, you're just a sex slave/rape victim. You're not making a categorical argument just on degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:21 PM
1

This just seems like praising dipshit party girls for having vapid short term flings. You're forgetting that factors outside of "skills" dictate if we have friends or not. I.e being ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:44 PM
0

sex and have a connection have a dead bedroom. 100% his fault that she doesn't want to sleep with him. As it always must be. Right. You know I've never seen a woman who was good in bed be cheated on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:38 PM
1

How are we measuring social competence? How are we measuring social life activity? Is a bunch of fleeting friendships proof of social competence
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:37 PM
1

Many women and even girls have mentioned that they can sense fake confidence Many men and boys swear they bench press 400 but they can't show it to you because it was only that one time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:34 PM
5

Oh, please? Can we stop with this magical girl bullshit. Women literally say the opposite when told to pick better. How are women so good at reading fake and real confidence but still complain about men lying about who they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:32 PM
1

Isn't this the basis of all contracts, though? A lot of people continue to work only because they're paid. How does sex work differ from this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:26 PM
-2

Can't blame the guy if his wife isn't giving him an ass TBH. You want to get into an exclusive life long commitment where you can't fuck other people but want to pull back? 100% your fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:51 PM
1

The feminists prayer 1.) It doesn't exist 2.) If it exists it isn't that prevalent 3.) If it's that prevalent it's men/patriarchy fault for making it. 4.) If it's not all men's fault and women contributed to it, men deserve it as pay back for past oppression
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:51 AM
2

There is no such thing as "us" rape law. Rape is a state level crime. The definition I'm referring to is non legal, but is defined for research purposes by the cdc. This is the origin of the 1/5 women raped stat. The under counting of rape towards men is an issue propagated by bad research. The law is bad, but it's downstream of that. Edit: also read into the links of your source. "Any person subject to this chapter who commits a sexual act upon another person" "A sexual act" is defined as “sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:42 AM
1

will point out that it is in fact MEN who defined sex by penetration The creators of the cdc questionnaire were three women. One of them bring Mary p koss, who outright denies that men can be raped by women. You've also admitted that raped is defined by penetration, so this conversation is moot
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:38 AM
3

Nothing in US law makes rape impossible for women to be charged It's not impossible but unlikely. A woman needs to penetrate a man to rape him. If a woman is raping a man she's enveloping or coercing a man to perform a penetrative sex act on her. This specifically is not classified as rape by the cdc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:59 PM
1

So misandry is subtle but still present. Or denied but still present?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:56 PM
1

If you are badly abused by one group She wasn't, though. She was abused by individuals, and she has extrapolate it to blaming a group. That's the negative here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:53 PM
1

Which is what she is expressing. She is struggling against something. Most adjusted people don't struggle against hating entire swaths of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:52 PM
2

Made to penetrate
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:50 PM
3

It's a balance, highly hypergamous societies turn into harems. You get Afghanistan as your result.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:41 PM
5

How are we measuring social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:37 PM
1

Both cab be true, and I actually do agree. However, the men with the experience aren't going to. 1.) Want to marry 2.) Because of their "experience," it will cheat in your marriage. Life's a cruel mistress.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 09:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter