csdx Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Hypergamy is not bad, we shoudl embrace it. I think what you're calling hypergamy is just women wanting masculine traits. The measures that are typically used for 'better' are things that typically favor men, so we're simply observing the fact that women want men who are more masculine than themselves. But if we look at measures that favor feminine traits, men look for women with more 'success' in these areas than themselves. Both sides have relative specializations and so will look for a partner with different strengths than themselves.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/24 07:09 PM
1	Controlling partner Obviously you have the right to act autonomously. But you also have the ability to waive those rights. In order to create said social media account, the user agreement has you forfeit several of your rights in order to participate. Similarly if you wish to be in a relationship with someone you may have to give up other rights as well, and the agreements of both are subject to change over time. Ultimately they can only take how much control are you willing to give.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/11/24 03:39 PM
1	The Dating Curve With All Things Equal is Just Harder for Men Just by population, there should be an even dating market on both sides (and even skewed toward men a bit as there are slightly more women). So there are some external factors that are likely causing this imbalance. It could be that the pool of desirable women is actually smaller than the pool for men. Since men go much more strongly for a subset of women (e.g. only younger or prettier) while themselves not being limited there's more competition. Also another factor could be women are less inter…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/11/24 07:25 PM
2	This is not 'advocacy', it is bigotry. his fear will likely only go away when other dudes more readily persecute that small minority and hold them accountable This really encapsulates the issue. Any group of people, some small number will just be terrible people. It's how the rest of the group reacts to their actions that informs people whether the group as a whole can be trusted. The worst scandals are always when a group is trying to cover up the misdeeds of their members, because that speaks to the group as a whole not the individ…	/r/MensRights	09/07/24 03:39 PM
1	Players vs Spectators in the Sexual Marketplace & Game Ok interesting debate angle. I figured one day my post history would get me in trouble somewhere, but decided I'd rather to be honest about it. But ad-homenim aside, my point was that a theory needs to make a claim or prediction. I noticed thought that you do address that in another comment. I think including that in the original comment would've helped. Altough, I felt like the orignial take away was about the verterns versus newbies (contenders) angle that I've seen expressed previously. Also …	/r/TheRedPill	01/05/14 06:12 PM
0	Players vs Spectators in the Sexual Marketplace & Game I think the criticizism is that a theory should lend itself to creating new understanding or a hypothesis, without that it is just a metaphor. Metaphor is not a bad thing because even that can lead to better understanding but I'm failing to see what sort of new insights viewing the SMP in a player-spectator framework gives. Isn't it already called 'the game'?	/r/TheRedPill	01/05/14 04:26 PM
3	Briffault's Law [Refresher] So does it then follow that the point of adopting a red pill philosophy is to be more like a woman in this regard? Only associate with women if you are deriving a benefit? Honestly though it seems like it should be expected that people only enter into relationships which they believe will be beneficial. So perhaps red pill is more about being less willing to accept promises of future benefit and more focused on current benefit.	/r/TheRedPill	28/04/14 07:01 PM
1	Misplaced expectations: "I'm angry that women are boring, not honorable, & don't have solitary pursuits." I mean how men abandon social reinforcement to pursue solitary things or things that explicitly aim to improve themselves; fixing a car or house .. These are not things women like. I'd actually argue that such activities actually are reinforced by society as worthwhile things for men to do. So anyone doing it is more buying into the rest of society's narrative about what they should do. Maybe if your examples were things typically ostracized like ballet or say creating a book club for men who wa…	/r/TheRedPill	24/04/14 08:03 PM
1	Misplaced expectations: "I'm angry that women are boring, not honorable, & don't have solitary pursuits." I guess I feel vaguely like that was a "no true Scotsman" answer. I recongize that in your original post you had the qualifiers "honorable" and "to fullfill an intrinsic purpose", but reflecting on that I'm not entirelly sure what you mean. I'm not sure what distinguishing characteristic you're using to seperate the feminine hobbies. Take for example, how is a traditionally feminime hobby like knitting are any less truth based than say restoring old cars? To me both involve creating an end produ…	/r/TheRedPill	24/04/14 05:40 PM
5	Misplaced expectations: "I'm angry that women are boring, not honorable, & don't have solitary pursuits." Anecdotally I've not experienced what you're talking about, in fact more women than that I know have at least one hobby if not more. But I suspect neither of us are correct. I think the majority of perception is due to self-selection bias. For myself I tend to meet women (and men) through my hobbies, therefore obviously a majority of women I know do have intersting hobbies. Whereas I'd suspect, someone mostly meeting women in bars would find the opposite, since those women are spending their tim…	/r/TheRedPill	24/04/14 02:51 PM