TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nefnaf Archive

View 0 posts and 385 comments by nefnaf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Men who are slutty, if they genuinely want a monogamous marriage and family after their days of slutting it up, should have no problem shacking up with an equally slutty woman. The idea that men aren't this way is a remnant of an obsolete culture of patriarchy. Those men are called hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:04 AM
1

If you have other attractive qualities you don't necessarily need money. I've been been in four different LTRs since 2020 and all of them out-earned me at least a litte bit. Gf (soon to be fiance/wife) is the highest earner out of them not to mention a total smokeshow.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:15 PM
1

Reddit Reddit Friend of a relative Tinder Chance encounter at the beach
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:30 PM
1

Well personally I haven't focused much on career and finances. Every gf I've had has out-earned me, sometimes by a little bit and sometimes by a lot. I have other attractive qualities instead to make up for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 08:41 PM
1

It's likely that ancestral humans exhibited a wide variety of sexual behaviors, including (but not limited to) serial monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, and group sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 06:05 PM
1

Met a girl at a hostel while traveling. She struck up a conversation, friendly at first and then turning more flirty. Eventually she just straight asked me to go to bed with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:32 PM

Yes this is exactly it. A woman who was a virgin before meeting you might not even appreciate your efforts in the bedroom because she assumes it's just standard and takes it for granted. (Speaking from experience.) If you can bring the heat, an experienced woman will know how invaluable you are and hold onto you tight.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:53 PM

Wait weren't you the one with a 9 inch dick and "gorgeous virgin" wife? Or was that someone else
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:53 AM
1

There are two separate axes, which we might call sexual compatibility and relationship compatibility. Sometimes, things line up perfectly so two people get together who have high sexual compatibility, and high relationship compatibility. But this doesn't always happen. Sometimes, two people have high sexual compatibility but low relationship compatibility. That's how you get stories about the "psycho ex" who was good in bed. The truth is that on an objective level, the ex was no more or less "ps…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:51 PM

Not a criminal. And no, it was not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:00 PM

Overstaying a visa is a matter of civil immigration law. It has nothing to with being a "criminal." These people are generally just ordinary working folks. And the US citizen children, who were deported without due process putting their health and wellness in jeopardy, are completely innocent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:35 PM

According to the parents, they did not consent to have their children deported. They had US based relatives who could have taken them in. There is no reason to believe the parents consented to this except ICE's say-so, which is worth about the same as a pile of dog shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:08 PM

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/ice-deports-3-u-s-citizen-children-held-incommunicado-prior-to-the-deportation Children, who are US citizens, have been deported without due process. This is blatantly illegal, but under this fascist regime, it is our government's modus operandi.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:57 PM

OK bootlicker. People who are here legally are being disappeared and in some cases dying from medical neglect while in "custody." US citizens are being harassed, arrested and in some cases deported. If you think the fascists behind this give a shit about the law, you have it backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:41 PM
1

My understanding is the families who did it were already disproportionately high achieving I don't think so. Many of the families were refugees who escaped from Europe with nothing, and may have left before they could finish their education. There implementation varied a lot between different kibbutzim. All of them had some time alotted for children to spend with their parents. Weekends were spent at the parents' house and then they lived in the children's house during the week. Some were more s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 10:40 PM
1

Not keen on that. If you ask a baseball player to give up one of the times they've hit a home run, so that someone who's never played baseball could have it, I doubt they would go for it. It's kind of like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:37 PM
2

The kibbutz collective childrearing experiment was successful in the sense that most of the children came out happy and well-adjusted and a disproportionate number eventually achieved high levels of academic, entrepreneurial, or military success. However, it was ultimately not sustainable, since the children raised this way were not willing to give up their own children to be raised communally. And so the experiment largely faded away.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:21 PM
1

Like the same doesn't apply to men? Anyone who doesn't own at least one or two yachts and voted for Trump is a sad, manipulated fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 08:41 PM
4

"Globalists" is a code word for "Jews." A lot of these conspiracy theories, including chemtrails, flat earth, and qanon are originally / fundamentally antisemitic conspiracy theories. It's pretty obvious if you actually go on the message boards where these people congregate. They aren't shy about pointing the finger at the real overarching problem in their minds, ie Jewish people. Nazism is coming back in a big way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 07:46 PM
1

There are three groups of women. Those who would be repulsed by your lack of experience, those who would be neutral about it and those who would find it endearing. Your best bet is getting with woman from the second or third group because that way you can be authentic and they will accept it. But if you keep running into women from the first group, you can always just lie to them and your "problem" will resolve itself in short order. (I don't recommend doing this actually since plan A will tend …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:57 AM
1

Yep, I remember when I was 24 and insecure that I hadn't penetrated a woman yet. Caused me to fumble a baddie that wanted it really bad. But I guarantee the real problem is your insecurity and not how women feel about your level of experience. Doesn't automatically solve the problem but you should at least understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:12 PM
1

Might be overthinking a bit there chief
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:07 PM
3

Of course it is. There are people that love the idea of their husband or wife cheating and get turned on at the thought. I wouldn't be compatible with those people but it sounds like you would be, so maybe that's who you should pursue. Godspeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 10:31 PM
0

I legitimately feel sorry for any woman (or for that matter, any human) who has to come in contact with you in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 10:11 PM
2

Is it cheating if she loves her bf and just sees other men as dildos?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 10:01 PM
1

The outward signs of a guy wanting to sleep with you are probably identical to what he’d do if he wanted to murder someone, so there’s a lot of gray area Wtf does that even mean? No. Nothing about that woman's story is normal. Normal guys who are just trying to get laid don't act that way. You’re possibly overestimating the difficulty of getting laid. It doesn’t take as much as he did a lot of the time It's not hard to get laid normally. The guy in OP was doing a bunch of unnecessary shit that w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 06:08 AM
2

No you are being way too generous to the guy. If he was just trying to get laid he would keep trying to charm her once she turned down the 2nd drink. You don't have to be drunk in order to fuck at all. The most likely explanation was that his intention was more nefarious. He wanted to get her into a drunk situation where there was no consent / nebulous consent and basically SA her. Probably he gets off on that type of shit. She was lucky* to get out of that situation without being assaulted. Who…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:14 AM
1

I've waited that long to get intimate with a girl, but then we were both virgins. Both 22-23 years old. Since then it's been sex on the first day of meeting, maybe 3rd date tops. Don't settle for a guy who's not nice, you don't need that in your life. Anyway I hope you find what you're looking for
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 09:04 PM
1

My gf is a badass and right now she makes about double what I do. I have no problem with her making $$ (quite the opposite) but then I'm not insecure. I haven't focused on my career but I have other positive qualities which she admires. My advice is to stop dating insecure men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 05:33 PM
2

I've had casual encounters with women where we were both fully sober throughout. I've also had encounters where we there was clear mutual interest, and there was no chance of anything beyond casual, and alcohol was used in order to facilitate things. It's common for women (and men) to be more sexually open when slightly intoxicated, and some people depend on this to facilitate sexual behavior. But other people don't depend on it or don't drink at all and are still very sexually open.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:25 AM
1

grocery store I hope you're using sushi-grade fish at least??? I know there are some grocery stores that stock this, specifically those catering to Japanese or Korean food, but most don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 10:10 AM
4

Except this app is not so "universal" like Tinder. This app has a niche, and that niche is maledom/femsub as your research indicates. There are separate apps for femdom/malesub niche, which admittedly is less popular overall but still sizable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 07:06 PM
1

Well clearly you're not the target she is aiming for. If that picture causes you to swipe left, perhaps it is having the intended effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 08:31 PM
2

Bruce Lee quite literally had movie star good looks. Idk what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 12:43 PM

You make a lot of blanket claims. None of these are hard rules. In fact my lived experience contradicts most of them. Height: I've dated multiple women my height or taller. Body type: I have specific preferences for body type. Certain body types don't do much for me, and I have no problem admitting that. Race: I have multiple Asian male friends married to white women. In my own family there are multiple instances of white women who married south asian men. Age: I've dated women as much as 10 yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 10:25 AM
0

I wouldn't be so sure. People said the same thing about Trump. Of course AOC is on the side of the "good guys" so in that sense she is nothing like Trump, but she has a similar level of charisma and political instincts. I think she has a decent shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 03:56 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrumatio
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 04:52 PM

A mix of skinny, average, and overweight. But then again, I don't have the personality of a wet sock.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:17 PM

Minus the part about no college, I've done that a few times and never had a problem scoring dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:30 PM

If you can also reciprocate the romantic or sexual interest for them, then it's great. You can notice them staring you down, not even moving their gaze, basically admiring you for just existing. At that moment it can feel like everything is right and you can do no wrong, regardless of whatever else is going on in your life. On the other hand, if you don't reciprocate their interest, it can be a rather uncomfortable feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:50 PM
1

Way to admit that you want a woman who's too inexperienced to realize that you aren't very good in bed. On the other hand, if a man is confident in the bedroom, he won't necessarily want a "low n-count" woman because then she might take his skills for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 04:48 PM
1

Blackpillers are self-pitying, whiny, pathetic individuals who refuse to help themselves. Redpillers are cynical assholes who anyone with sense would do well to steer clear of in a romantic context.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 03:16 PM

When you put it that way... yikes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:33 PM
2

I was under the impression that red pill advocates for stringing women along, enticing them with the prospect of commitment even when you have no intention of committing to them. Was I mistaken?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 06:27 PM
1

As far as that goes, I'm not tall, not rich, no "status" to speak of. At the time I was driving a crappy 20 year old car. Quiet, autistic introvert. I think i look good, but no one is mistaking me for a model. I don't fit the bill for things that the toxic "red pill" ethos says you need to be successful with women. I didn't have to lie to or deceive women, or target people with low self-esteem. Just being straightforward, honest about my intentions, respectfully shooting my shot with girls who s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 05:28 PM
3

"Charm" is not an exhaustible resource. When I was single I would just message a girl online, establish an agreement for a hookup / fwb situation, and I would come over to their house at the next convenient opportunity according to what we discussed. Cost to me is $15 for drinks and maybe some weed. No exchange of resources involved, just exchange of sexual energy. You may feel the need to trade $ for sexual access because you lack confidence, charm, you have an unfortunate face or whatever reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 08:03 PM

Just because it's possible to look busted at 35 doesn't make it automatic. Some people look fantastic at that age or even better than they did in their 20s. And yes I've had sex with a few 35 year old women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 04:13 PM

Taylor is 35. A normal 35 year old who doesnt smoke cigarettes or use tobacco, doesn't drink excessively, doesn't have kids, doesn't work a high stress job, and gets adequate sleep and hydration will look about as good as her. Expensive treatments not required.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 04:04 PM
1

Raeya every day and twice on Sunday. Confident partner is so much better than insecure one. Also if girl too skinny then sad pee pee :(
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 05:43 AM
1

BMI of 20.2 is a non-starter. Skinny girls don't do it for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 05:31 AM
1

When I was 16 I cuddled with a female friend when we were both drunk. I didn't even remember it happening, except our other friends who were there told me about it later. Nothing else ever happened between us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:18 PM
1

Nope, not a chance for serious LTR. If I was single, I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 09:22 PM

I like it when my mommy dom gf calls me a good boy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 04:11 PM
2

So what's your proposed solution? It seems you've been propagandized very effectively to identify with your class enemy, and vallainize people who are closer to you than you realize. Current policies aren't raising them up, they're just knocking you down to their level, and then telling you it's their fault. The tax burden has shifted massively away from the top and towards workers and that trend is currently being accelerated. We live in a world where Warren Buffet's secretary pays a significan…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 03:28 PM
3

Not really if your definition of "easy" includes owning a home, having affordable access to healthcare, being able to afford having kids and so on. The current federal government is probably the most anti-worker ever, certainly in the last 100 years, so things are not getting better anytime soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 02:50 PM
6

In real terms the average American worker was compensated much better in the 1960s-1970s than today. So things for the average person were better, at least economically. That was the peak time for workers. That caused a backlash among the capitalist class and government policies and the economy have been getting more and more hostile to workers every decade since then. So the average worker is now very economically disadvantaged compared with 50 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 02:36 PM
1

No doubt but that doesn't seem to stop all the other women on TV.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 03:30 AM
3

Props to her for going on TV without first butchering her face. Mad respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 03:16 AM

If you watch the full 8-minute clip, most of the women who took part had legitimately unfortunate looking or average-at-best faces. This particular woman is obviously very attractive even without makeup. I suppose people weren't used to seeing women's faces without makeup on TV, so that in and of itself was sufficient for her to be deemed ugly. Or they just aren't really looking and are making faces at the camera just because. Obviously the whole premise of the contest is in very poor taste as e…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 04:19 PM
1

Of course, you shouldn't just blurt it out out of nowhere. There's a skill and art to knowing when and where to escalate both verbally and nonverbally. I thought introverted guys have a problem with getting girls to meet them. OP was describing situations where women were agreeing to meet with him but then lost interest after a couple weeks, and assigned blame on his introversion. I tend to think the problem is a lack of interpersonal charm, which is a quality that can be improved and not necess…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 03:03 PM
-2

Women typically love it when you praise their body and let them know you find them sexy. Of course, if they're not into you, it will not lead to anything. Presumably if she's already agreed to meet with you, then she's into you on some level.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 02:53 PM
5

Being a good conversationalist. Listening and remembering things they say. Complimenting / praising their style, appearance, or other positive attributes. Being confident (but not pushy). Being good in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 02:04 PM
14

There are ways to be a shy, reserved introvert, and also charming. Being an introvert doesnt mean you have to have the personality of a wet noodle. It's true that two introverts together can sometimes be a bit boring. As an introvert you can get around this by dating a more gregarious, extraverted woman. If women are dropping you after two weeks, they are probably picking up something about you that is not good. And it's not simply that you are more shy or reserved; it has to be worse than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 11:24 AM
2

I've been informed on this sub that I must be "Chad" because during my single days I've had casual sex and FWB situations with women. So the standard is pretty damn low as far as I can tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 05:38 AM

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Ben Franklin
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 03:02 AM

No one truly knows how or why the universe came into existence. "God did it" is one explanation, but it isn't a very good one. "Atheist" is a broad term that encompasses anyone who lacks a belief in a God or gods. Atheism is not necessarily the same as irreligion. For example, many forms of Buddhism are atheistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 07:39 PM
1

In my experience, I've mostly dated women who out-earn me by a significant amount. Instead I bring value to the relationship by being attentive, considerate, and a good conversationalist. And good in the sack. Just gotta find your niche.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:01 PM
1

There is a certain logic to it. Consider that, according to our understanding of human sexuality, no one is fully gay or fully straight (Kinsey Scale). Everyone is somewhere in between, although naturally you're going to lean one way or the other. If you're really that hard up for sexual contact of any sort, then in principle, seeking out other men would be a valid option, even for a straight man. Not for long-term, but just for breakinga dry spell, why not? In practice this doesn't work, becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:52 AM
1

We probably won't know for years since truth and transparency is scarce nowadays. Police report indicates the incident involved his own car so he certainly wasn't preventing a girl from getting carjacked.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:27 AM
3

One of Elon Musk's 19 year old twinks at DOGE was up to some fuckshit and got beat up by a 15 year old girl. That is now the pretext for yet another sad, pathetic attempt at tinpot dictator antics from Trump. Can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:15 AM

Women actively soliciting casual sex partners via reddit vs woman who has literally never had sex and may have severe social anxiety. Which is one is more likely to agree to a hookup with a stranger off of reddit? This shouldn't be a hard question. Plus, you don't even know if these women are picky or if you pass their threshold for attractiveness. Even if your face is chopped, if one of them is a height fetishist she may be excited to meet you anyway. Or she may legitimately like your face and …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 03:27 PM

So you're willing to throw a "hail mary" at someone you can be certain will not be receptive to it, but when it comes to those women who conceivably could be interested, you are unwilling to even entertain trying it. Sounds like you just went a "safe" route with guaranteed rejection rather than try something that actually has a possibility of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 03:09 PM

Dude there are women on reddit posting on hookup-oriented subs looking for casual sex all the time. Why tf would you hit up a virgin who's clearly not going to be interested? And how tf would a virgin even care about your dick size or want a big one when she's probably terrified the normal sized ones will hurt? Seems like you're just intentionally shooting your shot in the wrong places for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 02:51 PM

It's okay dude. That means you're cute. If you keep smiling at girls, eventually one of them will get a glint in her eye and talk you into her bed. You won't actually have to do anything other than be adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 03:16 AM
0

To me, getting to know someone entails learning how they smell, how they taste, how they feel, what they're like in bed and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:42 PM
1

Idk about that. One time I had an absolute bombshell (she literally had won beauty contests and worked as a TV presenter, which she didn't tell me about but I found out when I looked her up later) ask me to join her in bed after meeting in a hostel. Not exactly a cold approach, but we had only chatted for about 30 min beforehand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:31 PM
2

Why would anyone go on a date with someone they don't want to have sex with? I've dated one virgin woman who waited a long time before having sex, and one non-virgin woman who waited until the third date. With every other woman sex happened either on the same day that we met or never at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 07:42 PM
1

Meh, anytime I've used the apps I've at least managed to drum up some dates with minimal effort. They aren't great but they do serve a purpose at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:50 PM

We're both in our 30s, been together 2 years. It's fine just hard to replicate that pent up sexual energy being released all at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:01 PM

When I first met my gf we would have marathon sex sessions lasting several hours. We still go the better part of an hour but I miss it sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 03:49 PM
1

Relieving all your stress in a baddie's throat is one of life's simple pleasures.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 03:42 PM
1

It legit cannot be overstated how awesome it feels when a baddie you just met lets you deep stroke her throat as long as you want and then drinks your nut
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 03:12 PM
1

Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:02 PM
5

Each partner can have a different interpretation of events. I've been accused of withholding sex in a relationship multiple times, by different women. In both cases there was something wrong with the underlying relationship dynamic that made me less interested in sex. But my behavior was perceived as unfair or even manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 07:01 PM

Vin Diesel didn't really have anything "handed" to him. He had to bust his ass and work ridiculously hard for years in various capacities before breaking out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:50 AM

Unless the guy weighs <100 lbs this should really not be a challenge. My gf has never lifted weights in her life and I'm nearly certain she could bench 125 (she stronk)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 06:55 PM
0

It's a cliche but when it comes to sexual attraction, confidence is everything. A man who's chopped but has confidence in himself will still be able to talk a girl out of her clothes. As for your dating app profile, it needs to some sort of differentiated identity in order to drum up interest. There are lots of good looking men with boring, run-of-the-mill profiles who get no matches. Much better to be homely but have an engaging profile / bio.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 06:26 PM
1

You can gnash your teeth and stamp your feet like a toddler, guess what you're still gonna get dumped and she is gonna find someone better. And I will applaud her for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 09:22 PM

Yes, live your life according to the dicta of a bunch of chronically online misogynistic loser men. That will go great for you babes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 07:24 PM

So... is it the case that women can feel sexual attraction towards men, in a way that hinges not at all on wealth or status? Or is it not the case. You seem to be of two minds about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:26 AM

Women have initiated hookups with me, or begged me to come over late at night, despite knowing there was no chance of any relationship forming or extracting any "resources" from me beyond some very temporary companionship and sexual connection. How does your very scientific mind account for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:23 PM

Not exactly. It's one thing to see someone you've never met from a distance and think "they're hot, I want to fuck them." And another to have a 1-on-1 encounter with conversation for 30 minutes and think "I like this person, I want to fuck them." Women rarely do the first one but often do the second one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:13 PM
3

"There's no real difference between a woman having a one-night stand and a man having a one-night stand." FTFY. Mutualy agreeing to bump uglies with someone because you both find it fun and enticing is a totally different situation from paying someone to touch your dingaling who would never consider it without being compensated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 10:27 PM
3

The intrinsic, natural properties of humans have not appreciably changed since that time. They were more or less fixed at that point. Societies have changed but biology has not. If we wish to understand the "natural" or innate condition of humans, the ancestral state is of the utmost importance There was no such thing as a provider role at that time because we didn’t have currency or resource accumulation. Right, insofar as "provider" refers to money. At that time there was still a need for adul…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 02:17 AM
3

She's right. In the ancestral state of humans, when our modern genetics came to be, both men and women most likely had an equal provider function. So any social distinction whereby men have a greater "provider" role is therefore not related to the innate biology of humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:39 AM
1

I am very happy with my gf so probably won't have a need to cold approach ever. Meeting organically means via mutual friends or acquaintances or some shared activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:37 AM
2

Adult women expect you to make your intentions clear from the get go. I've never cold approached anyone, but in my experience, if I meet someone organically and our next encounter isn't a date, there's never gonna be a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:24 AM
13

There are three main factors but you only focused on the least important one. 1) Some proportion of young women "dating" the same man, as you outlined in your post. This is a relatively small factor. It happens sometimes but most women wouldn't accept this, and few men have both the energy and proclivity to act this way. 2) Some proportion of women are single, but not celibate. They still have sexual encounters, which they can arrange easily because most men are easy. These women might have sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:09 PM

Okay this is the most unhinged thing I've read this week. I get saying Pedro is oversaturated since he's seemingly in everything nowadays. But saying he's a bad actor? Comparing him to Dwayne Johnson???? Come on man. Like him or not Pedro is supremely talented and good at his craft.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:47 PM
1

Pretty common in my experience. As long as they don't make themselves a pain in the ass we just kind of dealt with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 10:39 PM
1

Hey now, a beautiful virgin 19-year-old is sure to fall in his lap as a reward for all the High-Value (tm) pumping and dumping of "hoes" he's definitely for sure really doing, like all the time. Don't laugh!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:04 PM
1

You may earnestly believe that. The rest of us will still see through it as just something you tell yourself to assuage your ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:39 PM
3

It's insecurity mixed with a combination of resentment / jealousy. Real talk, sucking and fucking on a hottie you just met is awesome. It's fun as fuck. If an opportunity to do that fell in your lap you would almost certainly take it, whether there was a possibility of a longer term connection or not. The fact is that you yourself would engage in that same behavior which you claim provokes "visceral disgust." This proves that your feelings are just a front for insecurity and jealousy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:26 PM
1

So when you were with a man who was actually a competent lover, you did want to fuck a lot, thus proving my point? Not sure what you are getting at. Btw my views are informed more by personal experience, not so much porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 04:22 PM
1

The women who have invited me to come over late at night because they were horny say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 03:03 PM
1

Wtf are you on about. Women are horny and want to fuck all the time. You may not be but that only applies to you, not all women. I've never had to pay money to get a girl's attention, not even once. Most I've done was pay for a hotel room, because she lived with her mom and I was visiting with family.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 08:40 PM
1

shrugs I've always gotten with women who out-earn me. Just not very career focused ig
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 01:01 AM
1

shrugs I've always gotten with women who out-earn me. Just not very career focused ig
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 01:00 AM

Shocking revelation but people vary from one to the other. Some men and some women enjoy casual fucking and sucking with someone they recently met, and some don't. Another element is that some women are naturally more perceptive and can intuit which casual partners will please them sexually. A woman like this might, for example, proposition a shy, reserved man for sex because he seems like he would be a good lover. On the other hand, when a less perceptive woman tries to dip her toes into casual…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 04:06 AM
1

Correct. In experience with that scenario, you always get invited back. Typically the next day.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:03 PM
2

Personally I rebuffed any and all interest from women until I was around 21. At that point I started actively looking for romantic and sexual connections. I've found that I have a particular, disarmingly awkward / autistic charm. If you don't take yourself too seriously, a lot of women find that awkwardness endearing. I feel that sometimes they are more willing to hop into bed (or even suggest it themselves) because I seem harmless.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 12:12 PM
1

No doubt. There are many ways this can be done each with various advantages and drawbacks. The way Jung did it has its own logic, and some would argue utility, and the surface level properties of his theory were ripped off to create MBTI.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 03:56 AM
4

Sort of. Depending on how you want to look at it, MBTI is either an adaptation or a corruption / bastardization of the ideas of Carl Jung, specifically his book Psychological Types (German: Psychologische Typen), which was published in 1921. Jung had many interesting ideas. For example, he was the first to describe the introversion / extraversion dichotomy, which has been validated many times over by subsequent research.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 03:44 AM

The secretary explicitly told you that you were handsome so you have to roll with that. She has no reason to lie. You have no idea what it is specifically about you that made the first girl uncomfortable. It probably wasn't that she found you ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 02:03 PM
1

Humans are pathetically slow and weak relative to our size. Almost any other animal can out-sprint us over short distances. Humans and horses are the only animals that can sweat to stave off heat exhaustion. That gives them (and us) endurance superpowers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 01:54 PM
3

Almost all my relationships have started with sex right off the bat. If you look up reddit threads where married people explain how soon they had sex after they met their spouse it's by far the most common answer (right away). Because when two people meet and they have real chemistry, they will want to have sex right away more often than not. Yes waiting can work for some people but overall that is rather more the outlier and having sex right away is the standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 06:21 PM
3

You have to think about what the stats really mean a little bit and then it will make sense. For example "35% of men ages 19-24 have had zero sexual partners." Let's take a man, call him N for short. Let's say N has his first sexual partner at 22. So for 50% of the time he was in the 19-24 cohort, he had never had a partner. Men like him are actually pushing that 35% average up towards 50%. But when you meet N at 24, with (let's say) three partners under his belt, you perceive him as having an o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 05:13 AM
1

Nothing wrong with being a slut. I am one too. My advice is just own your sluttiness. Being a hypocrite is cringey.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:06 PM

It's mostly just one dude constantly posting it on every thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:52 PM

Yes, at least once and perhaps 1-2 other times. But generally speaking, most girls even in a casual situation will want a kiss before getting down to business.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:39 PM
1

My list is non-exhaustive
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:21 PM
1

Pretty much! Biggest L is the sad low-N girl that gets shacked up with a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:21 PM

If achieving a high N-count can potentially remove the possibility of getting romantically entangled with hypocrites such as yourself, that would be considered a positive. If anything that is an argument for why savvy women ought to actively pursue high N status. So really, by helping them get their rocks off while increasing their N count you're doing these women a double solid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:34 PM
5

ass so fat wants to fuck my brains out morning, noon, and night
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:49 PM
2

If you are putting up with any or all of that stuff, whether the guy is rich or not you need to look in the mirror. Why are you punishing yourself by choosing to spend time with garbage?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:13 PM
8

In my experience I often get hit on by men. One time I actually accepted and went through with it - as in had sex with the guy - because I was curious what it felt like. I had always been curious, plus we were vibing a bit, and I was single at the time. Subsequently when I told that story to women that I've dated, I've had some mixed reactions. Some were maybe less than thrilled and most didn't really care. Maybe it's because I have chosen chill women to date, or maybe because I live in a very l…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 11:29 AM
1

That is very easy to set up if you are willing to do a minimal amount of legwork. The internet is a magical place, full of horny people of all shapes and sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:30 PM

I don't know anything about your friend but for sure she is the LAST person you should ask for advice about looks. Bleaching your skin??? Oh hell no. Beards are overall a positive asset, however you should trim or style it in an attractive way. Preferably done by a professional.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 08:26 PM
1

Who said anything about Kim Kardashian? I don't find her appealing at all and it has nothing to do with her weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:45 PM
1

Some women have unfortunate fat distribution and start looking unattractive at bmi of 25 or so. And some have elite fat distribution and can look incredibly sexy and hot at a bmi of 40+
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:36 PM
1

I prefer it that way because then she would know exactly where I stack up. If I am the best out of 50 that is more valuable than being the best out of 4. Low N = she may take me for granted on some level.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:20 PM
5

Shirtless thirst trap never fails as long as you are at least a bit lean / muscular
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:15 PM
1

And yet Dr. Strangelove, one of the best movies ever made (and my personal favorite), has a runtime of only 95 minutes. If long is good and short is bad, how is that possible?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:06 PM
1

Yes. Or more accurately they picture a dick in the average range of size. If someone tells me they saw an "awesome movie" last weekend, I would imagine a movie with a runtime between 85 to 135 minutes. Because the vast majority of feature films are in that range. A movie being 3+ hours is not what makes it "awesome" although such longer movies exist. Sure, if I paid $20 for a movie ticket and the runtime was only 35 minutes I might feel cheated. But as long as the runtime was at least 80, or eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 07:36 PM
2

Some women may prefer a huge one but average or even below average can still make them finish. And a greater number of women find a huge one uncomfortable and prefer average. Unless you have a tiny one it will be long enough to reach the spots, so don't sweat it. There will always be someone more "ideal" than you in any given category whether it's face, height, job, family background, etc. Getting caught up on any one thing is just letting your insecurity take you out for no good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 04:24 PM
3

That's your humiliation fantasy talking. In the real world "fire dick" is typically close to average in terms of dimensions, as the vast majority of men fall in that range. The man's attentiveness, bedroom skills, and stamina are typically above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 04:04 PM

If you have other attractive qualities you can make up for a lackluster salary. I haven't been career focused, at least up to this point in my life. Every girl I've dated has earned more money than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 03:06 PM
1

Chill, laid back, confident, good sense of humor. Even if you're broke and decked out in Old Navy, if you can put her at ease and make her laugh, there's a good chance she will be willing to sleep with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:22 PM
1

I dated a girl like that, a long time ago. But other than her all my gfs and fwbs have been blessed with ass which I am grateful for. Couldn't go back
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 11:27 PM
1

How would you know the guy's sexual history? Sounds like you are making a lot of unfounded assumptions. One man can be low-key, non-aggressive, doesnt go out to bars or get drunk, and have a history of casual sex. And another guy can go out drinking, act aggressively, and not have any casual experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 07:38 PM

Peterson is a sub. Most likely his wife is pegging him on the reg
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 11:14 PM

If you want to be in a more challenging class, talk to someone in the math department and see if they can move you. In my experience, when I talked with the professor they always let me take their class even if I was missing some pre reqs
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 11:13 PM
5

Except your explanation doesn't actually explain anything. On an individual level, if you artificially boost someone's testosterone their libido typically goes way up. But comparing two individuals, A and B, if A's baseline level of testosterone is twice as a high as B's that tells you absolutely nothing. A could have a much higher libido, much lower libido, or anything in between. Anecdotally, when I was 24 I dated a 34 year old woman who had a very high libido. She basically wanted sex twice a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:46 PM
1

My experience dating women has been a lot more variable. I have been with women who didn't know how to orgasm from a partner. They still found sex to be enjoyable and enjoyed giving head. I have no doubt we would have figured it out eventually, but I didn't stay in those relationships long enough for that to happen. With other women I was able to give them numerous, prodigious orgasms on the first encounter. In some cases they were shocked that my technique was so effective and expressed this ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:09 PM
1

Does it bother you knowing that the escort is not into it at all and only doing it for the money? Would you prefer to date or hook up with an equally attractive woman who was choosing to sleep with you without being compensated?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:04 PM
1

Parent comment is 100% right. You just can't accept it because your logic is overwhelmed by your insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:31 PM
2

I've had relationships where I did most or all of the cooking. And also relationships where my partner does most of the cooking. In my experience it was determined by who has the most cooking skill and enjoys cooking the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 03:39 AM
0

A virgin who will go down on you is inexperienced but not selfish. A player who fucks you hard but won't go down on you is experienced but selfish. We all know who most women choose. Do we all know that? I think some of us know the answer to that question, but somehow I don't think it's the one you're hinting at. I've been that inexperienced guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 05:15 AM
1

You can dogmatically call it a human. But that is just a fanciful conceit. If it never had a feeling, never had a thought, never had an emotion, did not have a name, never touched or was touched, never saw or was seen, then why should we consider it human? One property of humans is that they are conscious. If a so-called "human" has never had a conscious experience, then it is human in name only. Ethically and morally its existence did not hold the same value as humans who were conscious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 05:25 PM
1

The value of a Human life is not determined by whether or not a funeral is held to mourn their passing. That is true. And yet, the bloody discharge from this (very common) scenario is not, and never was a human life. We can all intuitively recognize this fact, which is why we would not hold the funeral. True, it carried the potential to eventually be formed into a human. But then so do the gametes that reside in my testicle. If you kicked me in the balls and caused 100 of these gametes to suffer…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 05:15 PM
1

And yet if you have any shred of humanity, you must recognize that the second scenario is more consequential, and more tragic by leaps and bounds. Even if you claim not to, unless you are truly antisocial you do recognize it. Suppose a woman misses her period, and gets a positive pregnancy test. She is pleased since she wanted to get pregnant, but the next week she bleeds heavily into the toilet. Further testing confirms a miscarriage. Should we hold a funeral for the bloody discharge? Bury it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 03:57 PM
1

Doubftul. Suppose a scientist at an IVF lab trips and destroys a vial containing 25 blastocysts. According to your stated views, this scenario is a tragedy on par with accidentally killing a classroom with a teacher and 24 kindergarteners. Of course any right thinking person would recognize that these two scenarios are in no way, shape, or form equivalent to one another. In reality, each blastocyst does not deserve the same consideration as a kindergartener or an adult human or anything close to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 03:38 PM
1

Abortion is a positive social good in most cases. Of course it can have antisocial uses as well, for example sex-selective abortions in countries like India and China. You do not actually believe that fertilized embryos are equivalent in value to fully fledged humans. Even if you think you believe that, you are just lying to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 02:55 PM
1

I think porn can be a net positive when the people involved in production are genuinely having a good time and freely choosing to participate. In some cases it can open people's minds to the possibilities of human sexuality. Consider an ordinary, non-pornographic film studio. Its output could become a valuable piece of culture. On the other hand, it could be a cigarette commercial, or even Nazi propaganda. The people involved in the production could be freely expressing their creativity and bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 02:21 PM
1

Who hurt you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 03:53 PM
10

As it should be. I don't want to date 95% of people. I want someone highly compatible with me specifically. The potential of finding someone like that is the whole advantage of choosing my partner in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 04:44 AM
1

It could be that you have a horribly bland and uninspiring bio when you go on the apps. The idea there is not so much selling yourself, as it is projecting a differentiated self concept. If someone sees your bio and can surmise that they've seen 1000 just like it, they're not going to bite. It sounds like you had some close range interactions with cute single girls when you were doing your solo traveling. If you can swing some charm and confidence and make a move in that scenario, your chances a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 12:44 AM
1

Analysis game on point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 12:00 AM
1

It's all about appearance and vibes. I agree that personality is very important as that is what determines the vibes. For example, let's say I was single and someone I just met propositioned me for sex. If the appearance and vibes are there, it's a yes. If either one of those is off it's a no. "How they treat you" doesn't come into play because we haven't known each other long enough for that to become apparent. If we do end up forming a long-term relationship, ultimately that is what will deter…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 06:02 PM
1

It's rare to have a woman you just met proactively hop on your dick even if you're attractive. Usually you need to at least initiate some physical contact or offer to get a hotel room, or something along those lines. Sometimes the girl will be the one to initiate. In Japanese culture anyone can signal they want sex by asking the other party to shower. One time a friend of mine was hanging out with a Japanese girl in her apartment and she asked if he would like to shower. He wasn't familiar with …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 05:19 PM
0

Was definitely not expecting that in the moment. Made me feel a mix of accomplished and embarrassed. I will say that sometimes angry pussy just hits different.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 04:58 PM
1

You're probably not ugly. Work out, wear tight clothes, get a nice haircut. Smile. Find ways to interact with single women. Get on dating apps. Maybe do some solo traveling. Are you a freak in bed? Make a personal ad on reddit and describe the freaky things you want to do. If someone bites, you win and you didnt even need to do the hassle of initiating or going on a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 04:10 PM
1

Rooms 2-3 are mid for me. The top and bottom girls in room 1 are the only ones I would find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 03:10 PM
0

My ex actually did that. We had a bit of an argument, and later while I was fucking her on the couch she called me a "fucking asshole" because I was doing it too good lmaoo
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 03:08 PM
1

Lmao @ this chart. I feel like there needs to be another axis for rizz. Like my bro is 5'7 with a 6/10 face, but he's got a good likeable personality so he's never had a problem getting girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 02:06 PM
1

I find that I am attracted to a mix of feminine and masculine traits. I am predisposed to liking women who are confident, loud, and assertive (all stereotypically "masculine") but also nurturing, emotionally open, and empathetic (stereotypically "feminine").
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:11 PM
2

Has he never gotten a late night booty call from a woman? Wrong. Men may masturbate more on average but there are women out here masturbating 10+ times weekly, especially if they don't have a partner. Gay couples can also suffer from dead bedrooms. And what about all the straight couples where the man loses interest in sex? Those are almost as common as the reverse. Wrong. Irish laundries for example were notorious for abuse including sexual abuse, largely perpetrated by and against women. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 03:21 PM
1

Dude just own your behavior. Stop trying to justify yourself. When you leave out important, highly pertinent information, that you know someone you are in a relationship with (casual or otherwise) would like to know, that is called a lie of omission. If you let this girl think you were heading towards exclusivity / a real relationship, but that was never your intention, you lied. Of course she's gonna be mad. It's not a hard concept. If you are fine with being a guy who lies to women in order to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 12:09 PM
1

Dude that isn't a study, it's gobbledygook written by Christian fundamentalist nutjobs in order to give a "scientific" window dressing to sexual shame based on religion. It has exactly zero scientific credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:08 PM
2

If you are prudish, you can date another prude and be frigid together. Nothing wrong with that. As someone with a high sex drive I would much rather be with someone else who also has a high sex drive. Whether they have been "promiscuous" or not in the past is immaterial.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:37 PM
1

It's a joke to claim you are "sexually active." You are able to get your dick wet, with someone who does not even see you as an appealing sex partner and is just praying to get it over with. To be honest I would rather just die.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:09 PM
1

Confident + charming, most likely. A man (or anyone) with these qualities will be perceived as much more attractive than their physical features might indicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 03:39 PM
1

In Khelif's case it is only "speculation" because she refuses to confirm or deny it publicly. But it can safely be assumed based on comments made by people in her camp. Other athletes like Semenya are more forthcoming. Athletes like Semenya with 5-ARD were banned from women's athletics following the 2016 Rio Olympics.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:05 PM
1

Imane Khelif was identified female at birth, raised as a girl, and lived her life as a girl and then as a woman. I don't agree with people who call her a "man" and I find it disrespectful and worse. However she almost certainly has 5-ARD or a similar condition which causes her to have most of the biological characteristics of a man, including the ability to father children. Another athlete in a different sport with this same condition is Caster Semenya. It is not a given that Khelif should be al…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:45 PM
3

The question is not whether men should box with women. It is whether those women who possess the physiology and biological characteristics typical of men (with the exception of external genitalia) ought to be restricted from athletic competitions designated for women. It is a legitimate question.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 04:32 PM
1

Who cares about conviction stats? Less than 0.01% of women have been convicted of false rape accusations. Using your wonderful big-brained logic, we can assume the rate of women who have made false accusations is not much more than that. You're quite obviously content in your delusions and are not going to change your mind regardless of any evidence. So let's leave it at that. Pretty sure they categorized the sexual assaulters and rapists independently. Nope. From the article: For all analyses, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:57 PM
1

You need to work on your comprehension and analysis skills. The study lumped all 4 years of adolescence into a single bucket, and each year of college into a separate bucket. It's true that there "bucket" with he highest rate of rapes or attempted rapes was adolescence at 6.3%. However, when looking at a single year the highest rate was the third year of college at 5%. (By the way, this data point alone goes a long way toward invalidating your absurd fantasy that only 1% of adult men are rapists…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:39 PM
1

In that particular study, the most rapacious time was actually the third year of college. 5 % of the surveyed admitted to rape or attempted rape during their third year of college (n = 15). It's true that there was a huge drop-off from year 3 to year 4, with only 1.5% men admitting ro raping or attempted raping during their 4th year (n=2). However there was also a huge drop-off in sample size of over 50%, which means a majority of the men who completed the survey in year 3 did not participate in…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 05:22 PM
2

First of all, you're both delusional and wilfully ignorant. The study doesn't say that at all; you're just making stuff up. Second of all, even if the study did say that, so what? Are rapes and attempted rapes committed by first- and second-year college students somehow not so bad? Please.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 04:25 PM
1

For my gf, wearing makeup has nothing to do with my preferences. It is for her to feel better when going out in public or meeting people. I prefer when she doesn't wear makeup because I like the way she looks naturally. That's why she is my gf. So nothing has changed too much on that front, although I will say she goes out less now mostly due to spending more time with me. So the frequency is less.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 02:54 PM
3

One study found that 14% of male college college students self-reported committing rape or attempted rape. 34% reported committing sexual assault. Source Other studies report similar figures. Your 1% number is a utopian fantasy thay has nothing to do with the actual world we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 01:59 PM
0

Hotness boils down to a combination of looks (i.e., physical features) and confidence. Height will only make a difference with women who are height fetishist, which make up a minority of eligible women. That's why reddit is crawling with 6'3 guys who report getting no action at all. Meanwhile that 5'3 Italian guy on Tinder was poking a new girl every other weekend.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:30 PM
5

My own research (unpublished) says high N women are better in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 09:01 PM
1

No way. Most people are polite in social situations. If you aren't rude to them they won't be rude to you. The idea that 50% of women are just waiting to say something rude if given the opportunity is completely insane. Probably less than 20% are even capable of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 03:21 PM

No you're wrong and she's right, that is objectively a big donger. Moreso on the length.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 08:20 PM
1

I can agree with this. I haven't focused much on my career and consequently don't have a good job. I don't feel that it's impeded my dating life too much. I've just always dated women who make more than me. But then I have other attractive qualities so YMMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 11:37 AM
2

"You can't slander me because I will state right now that I am absolutely sexist and I'm absolutely a misogynist [...]" - Andrew Tate Yeah sure voting for Donald Trump is bad but Biden was even worse. I have a question which president was it again that supported men in women sports? I'll wait. Regardless of how one feels about transwomen competing in women's sports, the idea that that is somehow in any conceivable way as important as domestic economic policy, tax policy, environmental policy, co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:46 AM
3

Tate's entire brand and public persona is nothing but toxic masculinity. That's not based on any unproven allegations. Everything he says and does publicly exemplifies that. You defend someone whose most notable characteristic is being an outspoken misogynist. Assuming that you hate and resent women is more than fair. Actually that would be a rather racist thing to say. It's racist when white people say it, and it's racist when black people like Bill Cosby say the same thing. If you support Trum…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 09:53 PM
11

Dude just admit you're a misogynist who resents women. It's ok. (Well it's not ok, but it is what it is.) The fact that idolize a criminal who is literally wanted for sex trafficking pretty much says it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 09:11 PM
1

Butterface
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 08:45 PM
4

Tate encourages young men to be shitheads who manipulate and abuse women. And he abuses steroids which will ruin a man's health. EVERYONE encourages kids to be physically fit and "train their bodies." What the fuck do you think is the point of parents enrolling their kids in sports? Tate does not get some special consideration there.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 08:26 PM

Lmao when my relationship was new I had to beg her not to shower so much. Now she gets it and I no longer have to ask!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:40 PM

The online discourse is crazy depressing and honestly insane. Real life is a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:08 PM

A vocal minority of women are height-obsessed. The majority don't care or at most just want the man to be a little bit taller than them. (And the taller they are, the more relaxed they tend to be on that front.) Your prospects as far as what type of girl you can bag are FAR better as a good-looking, confident, short man as a opposed to a big, tall guy with an unfortunate face.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:59 PM

It must suck knowing / believing you have to act this way just to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:46 PM
0

Not even remotely how that works. We rarely get a partner with our exact ideal preferences in every dimension. Suppose you fall in love with a beautiful woman who uplifts you, needs what you are good at it, covers for your weaknesses, gives you all her care and attention and is fully invested in your relationship. Then, let's say you discover that she happens have n=25. Would you reject her with a bitter mixture of jealousy and disgust? Or simply look past something mostly irrelevant that doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:48 AM
1

With a 0 count woman, I run the risk that she might take my efforts in the bedroom for granted. Speaking from experience. She might realize I'm good, but also assume that other men are similar. With a 50 count woman I don't have to worry about that, since she would have a more accurate idea of my performance compared to the others. At the same time, 50 is kind of a lot and might indicate some unhealthy underlying neuroses. I would be most comfortable with someone in the 5-20 range.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 01:20 AM
3

We need a bit more nuance. Why would an experienced man prefer "low n/virgin" women? Typically, the answer is because he is insecure about his sexual performance in bed. Complementarity in relationships is good. If a man is introverted, quiet, reserved himself and prefers to date confident, extroverted women, I don't think anybody would see that as a bad thing. A dating double standard only becomes hypocritical and a potential red flag when it reveals something uncomfortable that would cause sav…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:31 PM
2

Few things. 1) Tinder has 75 million users per month. 14% of that is still a lot. 2) Tinder's gender ratio is extreme. Other dating apps, including some very popular ones are more balanced. 3) A lot of girls who don't even actively use Tinder or any dating apps can still get horny. Under the right circumstances, they could invite a guy they just met up to their bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:55 AM
6

A BPD woman will do psychic damage to you that you won't even realize consciously until years after the fact. It's not worth it at all
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:06 AM
9

Near as I can tell, they aren't hideous, know how to smile, and can hold a conversation longer than 45 seconds
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:03 AM
2

Keep in mind there is no shortage of girls who are mentally stable, good childhood, educated, good job, kind, nice personalities who are also open to hookups / casual sex. But those girls usually aren't thirsting after criminals. The boys they are hooking up also have some of the same personality traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:59 AM
2

That's all well and good, but it could still be a mask to cover up deeper insecurity. You might initially catch the eye of a potential partner without too much trouble. But then they start to pull away relatively soon after establishing contact. Under these conditions, improving your outward appearance will have diminishing returns.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:45 AM
3

You may be physically attractive, yet broadcast insecurity and lack of confidence. In that case potential romantic partners may get turned off rather quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:19 PM

Hey some of us eat ass on the first date. I wouldn't joke about it though I take it very seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 12:47 PM

Nazis gonna nazi. It was always gonna happen here at some point
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:30 AM
2

The longer you wait the lower the odds of success
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:35 PM
1

When I was young and inexperienced, sure. If I was single nowadays.... probably not. Life is short.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 01:35 AM

If I believed that a potential romantic partner viewed me as a "number" and nothing more, I would be icked out and want nothing to do with them. Social media algorithms heavily promote toxic rage bait content because it drives up engagement. You have to deprogram your mind to ignore such content.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:40 PM

I would say I'm somewhat shy/coy in a way that some people find disarming. I guess she picked up on that and that gave her license to be more forward. At the time I was fairly inexperienced and she was a couple of years older. She initiated the interaction from start to finish, which is admittedly a rarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:27 PM

Idk about that. As a guy most of my hookups have been initiated by the other party. One time I was sure that the girl was just being very sociable / friendly until she straight up asked me to come to bed with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:14 PM
2

Well damn. If given the option, would you have preferred to be intimate with someone who genuinely wanted you based on your looks and personality? Or were you content just paying for it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:33 PM
1

The thing is there's a limit to how "ideal" the dimensions of a man's shaft can theoretically be. There's no limit, in theory, to how much effort a man can give. Consider the retired Spanish tennis player David Ferrer. At 5'8 he was severely physically outmatched at the highest elite level of the sport. While he never actually won a major tournament, often being stymied by Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer, simply by trying harder than more physically gifted players he made a few major finals. Most…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:30 AM
1

It all depends on how much effort the man is willing to put in. If he makes a dedicated effort towards maximizing the sexual pleasure of his female partners, he actually can do that for a majority of them, even those with "high" n-counts. He may not be able to do that for literally every woman, but the truth is that no one can.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:20 AM
1

You are rationalizing a man's feeling insecure over not having a gigantic meatstick. There will always be someone better, faster, stronger, taller. That applies no matter who you are. Instead of getting caught up in feelings of inadequacy due to this fact, a healthy psyche will ignore that and instead focus on maximizing the assets available.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:51 AM
1

A virgin who is confident in himself and charming will pull just as easily as an experienced man. Potentially he could even pull above his weight class as some subset of women find virginity endearing. The problem is that male virgins tend to have crippling insecurity that is mucking up their social and dating prospects. But this isn't iron clad, there are exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:42 AM
0

Even if we accept that premise... Why wouldn't you want to become the best lover you could be, even with an unremarkable voluminosity? Most men are bad at sex regardless of the size of their junk. Given average size, and even a modicum of effort one can easily make an good impression on a woman or even be the best she's had.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:29 AM
1

Sex isn't a game of volleyball. Bigger isn't always better. If you give her better dick than her past lovers, she won't care if your physical dimensions don't measure up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:15 AM
1

Not everyone wants a skinny waif. Some of us like some thick ass / thighs to get the juices flowing. Plus you can then use her thighs as a headrest
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:55 AM
1

Except in real life it doesn't work like that. If a man happens to be an Adonis with a huge donger, but his mind is wracked by insecurity and his sexuality is repressed, he will most likely be a terrible lover. On the other hand, a short man with a modestly sized pecker who happens to be confident, charming, attentive, and sexually curious / adventurous, he will probably make a fantastic lover
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:46 AM
0

Were you also get laid for free at the same time? Or were all of your sexual encounters based on currency exchange?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:32 AM
1

The death of a newborn is just not as tragic as the death of an adult or a child 4+ years of age. Less time, care, energy, resources, parental and societal investment have gone into raising the infant. While the mother and father may certainly be aggrieved by the loss of a newborn infant, the degree of harm to the larger group is relatively minimal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:36 AM
1

If you were not so ignorant you would know that traditionally dowries are when the family of the bride pays the man's family for taking the daughter off their hands. A separate but related practice is the "bride price" where the man's family pays. This is practiced by some modern societies as opposed to a dowry. It is an example of how patriarchy tends to soften as societies become more technologically advanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 02:47 PM
1

Try picking up a book. Your ignorance is grating. We know that patriarchy is not the natural, innate, biological condition of humans, because those modern humans whose lifestyles most closely resemble those of our biological ancestors do not practice patriarchy. Anthropologists believe that patriarchy is a byproduct of the emergence of agriculture. In early agricultural societies, sons are an economic asset to families because they can perform the backtracking physical labor required for early a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 02:19 PM

He is mid/late 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 07:17 AM

Seek help
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 06:29 AM

Wtf is this notion lmao. Being 5'6 is not a disease. I'm 5'9 and that's like the perfect height, I wouldn't want to be any taller or shorter. Is being 5'6 really that much worse? My brother is that height and he's always been popular with girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 06:21 AM
9

Even the most physically strong specimen is totally dependent on maintaining good social standing within the group. Otherwise he would be exiled and quickly perish. In these societies, women can be just as socially dominant as men. Physical strength is not relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:22 PM
10

There is actually no evidence that men held higher status than women in pre-agricultural societies. Modern-day hunter-gatherers who have similar lifestyles to our ancestors, such as the San people, are largely egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 06:45 PM
1

Incredible how someone can try to be as mean and nasty as possible, and as soon as they get a taste of it thrown back at them it's all "your hurting my feefees!!1"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 06:29 PM
1

And what about a woman that has her own money, pays for dates, and hooks up with a guy because he's good looking and charming? Who is "selling themselves" in that scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 02:59 PM
1

In order to get better, you have to be willing to try new things and maybe look silly sometimes. Someone who is terrified of "losing" is guaranteed to remain a scrub.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 02:03 PM
7

Pretty much. It's like refusing to go golfing with anyone who's an experienced golfer. Because then they "might have seen someone hit a longer drive" and they can't have that. They only want to go golfing with newbies who can hardly pick up a golf club.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:32 PM
8

Moralistic BS. When i was single, I had no issues with casual sex. I considered it a good use of my time and energy. Life is short, it's good to experience it while we can. In a relationship, I've never cheated or even really considered doing so. Just because I like sex doesn't mean I get to abandon ethics.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:31 PM
1

By dating an inexperienced woman, I run the risk that she might take my efforts in the bedroom for granted. It has happened before. A woman with broader experience will have a better idea of where I stand in relation to other men, which I consider a virtue.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:53 AM
4

I've shared it with all the women that I've dated subsequently. If they cared, it apparently wasn't a deal breaker since none made a big deal out of it. Once you start being curious and experimenting outside heterosexuality you’re not straight Nonsense. Suppose a gay man has had sexual experience with women, but decides that he's not interested in women and wants to pursue men exclusively. Is he not gay enough? Impure? It doesn't work like that. I tried it out, learned some things, but not roman…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:40 AM
7

Okay, but I like casual sex. When single. A girl with a history of casual sex, while single, is the opposite of a problem for me. On the other hand a girl with a history of cheating is very much a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:53 PM
41

No idea why you're lumping in cheating with casual sex. One can be done ethically while the other cannot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 04:22 PM
10

This is what the loser dregs of the male species say about other men. If you take their advice at face value, you're gonna have a bad time
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:25 PM
1

Nah, believe it or not even the most innocent-seeming women are total freaks once they get comfortable with you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:08 PM
3

In my experience, I have not encountered such toxic attitudes but then again I live in a very liberal area. I am straight but at one point had sex with a man because I was curious what it felt like. I've dated straight women since then and it hasn't been an issue
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 02:24 PM
2

Maybe you were trying to be unselfish but just not hitting the right notes? Idk. I would say I'm very unselfish in the bedroom and I've literally never not had a "call back."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:46 PM
1

Ahh yes, women are demonic entities and not real people. How could I forget
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:59 PM
1

And in the case that, by chance, I happen to be genuinely the best lover she's ever had? Should I still reject her and throw the relationship away, because.... reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:18 PM
1

If she's always down for sex and cums buckets every time, why wouldn't I believe her? Out of those 200 someone has to be the best so why can't it be me?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 03:52 PM
1

So if my gf fucks me enthusiastically every night and tells me I'm the best, I'm still somehow a cuck because... she had sex with someone else before we met. Hmm
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 02:39 PM
4

Yeah, except it doesn't work like that at all. If you're bad at sex, you are bad at sex. It doesn't matter if your partner has n=0 or n=200, you're still gonna be bad. Conversely, if you're great at sex you are gonna be great regardless of your partner's n count. Compatibility plays a role as well. Suppose that a man receives the best blow job in the history of the universe from a random hookup when he's 24. Does that mean that blowing him then becomes a futile endeavor for all his future partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 07:01 PM
6

If my past hookups / relationships can't enjoy their current or future partners because sex with me was too good, that's their problem, not mine. I would hope they learned something from me and are able to find satisfaction anyway. I wouldn't care if my partner had n=200, because I'm still the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 06:42 PM

I think that's overblown somewhat since I've never had a problem generating dates from OLD apps with minimal effort. I consider myself good-looking but I'm certainly not "Chad." I can't help but think a lot of these men just have hopelessly boring and unappealing profiles and if they weren't so clueless, they could easily make themselves more appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 02:07 PM
1

Not every man shares this obsessive dick size insecurity, although admittedly it is very common. I have a totally average member. If my girl could magically make it bigger, maybe she would or maybe she wouldn't -- I honestly have no idea. It's not something that's worth my time or energy to worry about. Similar goes for height, although while I wouldn't mind having a bigger dick, personally I wouldn't want to be taller (I'm 5'9)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 08:55 PM
1

Republicans always put the screws on the working class, without fail. Recessions are good for people like Jeff Bezos because they can go on a buying spree and get tons of assets for cheap. The difference is Republicans normally do it in such a way that it can plausibly benefit the wealthiest 5-10% of society. This time around, everyone who owns less than 5 yachts is absolutely fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:56 AM
1

Disagree, just go to /r/RandomActsOfMuffdive and ctrl-f "success"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 06:23 PM

It depends If she stores most of her excess weight in her ass / thighs she could still be incredibly hot
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 06:10 PM

Roids have hollowed out your brain. Natty physique is more aesthetically pleasing by miles
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 06:01 PM
4

If girls are ghosting you after sex it has absolutely fuck all to do with the dimensions of your nether regions. You are probably suffering from BDD which causes obsessive negative thoughts regarding your own body. I've seen a few BDD suffering women on reddit who were convinced no man will ever love her because of her small chest, and she bitterly blames all men for this imagined chest-size standard. You are basically their twin in terms of psyche
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 05:27 PM

Medium ugly, which is another word for average. If I was single and really into her personality I might hit it, but definitely below my standard
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:49 PM
1

Sure, I can believe that. Personally I'm the worst dancer everyone who's seen me dance has ever seen, so that's never been on the table for me lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:12 PM
1

Some women might need alcohol or drugs to facilitate casual sexual encounters. Not everyone is like that. For the girl I met at the hostel, it was chatting for 20-30 minutes with someone she just met and deciding to hook up stone cold sober. I don't think either of us were looking for or expecting anything that night, it just happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:58 PM
2

Sure, not gonna disagree. The vast majority of gay men are also vibe checking each other before hooking up. They can afford to be more blunt / forward about their desire to hookup because male sexual desire is not stigmatized in our society to the same degree as female desire. A vibe check works differently for different people. It's not always some long, drawn out thing. A girl has asked me to get in bed with her after chatting for less than an hour at a hostel. It has also happened to me that …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:00 PM
2

I'm not saying that the Tinder and Grindr experiences are the same. Clearly there are huge differences. Buuut tons of straight women are open to hookups / NSA sex. Tinder is one avenue they can use to generate these encounters. Reddit is another one. Every big metro area has a subreddit for finding casual sex partners, and some of them are quite active.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:45 PM
1

Can't agree with this. I've downloaded Tinder, made a low effort profile and been in bed with a girl within a day. She messaged me first. We were both looking for more than a hookup but sometimes that's how things start off. Sure Grindr might be more of a "sure bet" but Tinder also works for this purpose, at least some of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:10 PM

One time I installed Tinder on a Thursday afternoon, and met a cute girl in the park the next day. We parted ways, then later she invited me to her place and I spent the night
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:01 PM
-1

A 5'4 man with an unfortunate face can still have a love life even if it's not quite the same. If guy B is really trying that hard and never succeeding as in the prompt, he has significant flaws beyond just looks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:07 AM
2

She is thin and pretty face
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:00 PM
1

Yeah that seems to be where they're headed. No kids and he's been unemployed for a year, although previously he had a good job. Only obstacle is that apparently "she really loves him."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:42 PM
2

My gf told me about a conversation she had with her friend. Apparently the friend is in a dead bedroom situation with her husband. They are having sex less than 1x per month and the friend is very sexually frustrated. She is submissive in bed but the husband cant or doesn't want to dom, and recently doesn't want to have sex at all. They tried going to a therapist but the husband is not following through with the therapist's recommendations. He also claims to masturbate once a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:25 PM

It means you waited too long to ask them out. The paradigm of "befriend and then ask them out" doesn't work in practice unless you and the other party are both 15 year old virgins. Grown women expect you to make your intentions known in short order, or else they assume you aren't that into them
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:02 AM
6

On a side note, I never understood ONSs, if someone is good enough for 1 time, unless that are awful in bed, why not go back for more? This is exactly what the article gets wrong. According to the article only 10% of sexual encounters are with a new partner, and therefore meeting someone and having sex right away is "exceedingly rare." However it doesn't even try to assess the proportion of sexual encounters where the partners initially had sex right away, and continued seeing each other. I susp…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 05:07 PM
4

Because the article is basically lying. Let's say two people meet and have sex on the same day. Then those two people continue having having sex 10 more times in total. According to the methodology of this study, in this sample only 9% of encounters happened with a "new" partner, and therefore casual encounters of this kind are "exceedingly rare." The article is almost intentionally written in such a way as to be misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 05:02 PM
1

Of course I had a lot of first dates where there wasn't enough mutual interest so nothing came of it. Otherwise, with a couple of exceptions sex either happened the same day that I met someone in person for the first time, or it never happened at all. As for one girl that did wait, I believe she had some poor sex partners in her past. She claimed at first that she "wasn't very sexual," probably because of underwhelming experiences up to that point. However, with me she was very sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:31 PM
1

"Whipping it out" unprompted sounds like a great way to end up on a list. Sorry you had to deal with that. That being said, fucking on the first date is pretty standard. Only one non-virgin girl waited til the third date in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:58 PM
-2

That sub is a misogynistic project designed to harm women's self esteem. That's literally the purpose the creators of the sub had in mind and anyone who deviates from the script gets banned. In real life this girl would have lots of straight men interested in her
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:10 PM
1

Amazon position, woman on top (cowgirl or reverse cowgirl), facesitting are popular positions where the woman is active / in control. Of course, couples where the man is dominant can engage in these positions also
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 10:04 PM
2

You are conflating active / passive with dominant and submissive. Phallocentrism is the view that the penis is central and everything else is subordinate. Society adopts this view but it reflects a cultural ideology, and has little to do with nature. For example, if the dominant partner orders the submissive to give them a massage, they are taking a passively dominant role by being the recipient of the massage. It works the same way with penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 09:47 PM
4

You are focusing on the wrong thing. It doesn't matter who is the penetrating partner or who is being penetrated. For example, a dominant woman might require her male partner to fuck her for a long time until she is satisfied but forbid him from reaching climax. The position could be missionary, doggy, cowgirl or whatever - it really doesn't matter. The point is that her needs get satisfied without question, while his needs and pleasure are subordinated and depend entirely on the whims of the do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 09:24 PM
5

Follow the advice of chronically online loser men at your own peril
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 12:41 AM
4

With that mindset you could end up with a sad sack or unfortunate looking man who resents you for being his only option. Sounds miserable
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:54 PM
3

One time a 10/10 woman blatantly came onto me even though I was absolutely none of those things. (Today I am a bit jacked, i guess 1/3 ain't bad lol) There are superficial women out there who only care about those qualities. And there are superficial men who only want a skinny blonde with big tits. Anyone that superficial would never interest me personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:11 PM
3

Humans prefer mates who are not in the same social group (exogamy). This may be an adaptation to avoid inbreeding depression, where recessive mutations accumulate in a breeding population. In practice, it works like this. You encounter a potential mate you find attractive. You fuck, find out you enjoy their company (not necessarily in that order) and decide to keep fucking. Voila
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:21 PM
1

You encounter someone you find attractive, you fuck, you decide that you also enjoy their company and want to keep fucking. Basic human interaction. It's really not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:10 PM
1

I'm fairly passive and reserved. In my experience I can make a low effort dating app profile and set up some dates with minimal effort. No need to fraud or misrepresent myself in any way, even when I was unemployed. But I would also say I'm attractive. If a man looks truly unfortunate it probably shakes out a bit differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 01:41 PM
1

It sounds like you are primarily interested in women as a means to validate your own ego. Even if you are physically fit, if you give off the vibe that you are terrible in bed women may avoid you nevertheless
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 03:53 PM
1

Flip side, once you've locked down the big booty with a pretty face it feels amazing. You can stare at the booty all day long if you want to, never gets old
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:58 PM
-1

Word of advice, being a virgin at 25 is still cute. I understand feeling self-conscious about it but you actually are in a great spot right now. Now is the time to be making moves, because in a couple of years it will no longer be cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:34 PM
4

Cool. Next time I'm giving my girl prodigious orgasms, I'll be sure to let her know she's not supposed to do that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:10 PM
1

I would go Nerd > Himbo > Bro
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 02:43 PM
5

Oof sorry you're dealing with that. If it helps you can try browsing /r/sex. Some of the most common posts that are constantly being submitted are from women saying "I want rough sex but my bf is too gentle, help" and also from men saying "my gf wants rough sex but I'm too gentle, help." There's no shortage of guys who prefer to be gentle in bed. Occasionally you might see the inverse but those are usually girls whose bf is clearly bad news
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 02:22 PM

Do it Cute nerdy guys are usually good in bed
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 11:36 PM
1

Average height for younger generations in China is roughly on par with USA. Japanese people are indeed shorter
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 04:53 AM
1

This dude gets laid
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 03:45 PM
2

Some people with FWB situations do, and some don't. Generally it's a good practice to discuss boundaries and expectations around this with your FWB
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 03:38 PM
1

Not too surprised. When a girl is getting hit on by lesbians they are usually very generous with buying drinks and such, more generous than men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:41 PM
2

This strategy is underrated for girls. You're more likely to snag a guy who's relatively more normal but too reserved to ask women out. If you limit your pool only to men who ask, you will end up with a higher proportion of fuckbois who are shameless about making approach
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 02:18 AM
1

Sounds very similar to my quick and simple kimchi fried rice, except I use canned tuna instead of beef. When I was single I practically subsisted on that recipe since it was tasty and I couldn't be bothered to cook anything more elaborate for just myself
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 02:14 AM
1

Sure, and uppercase G and Q are fairly likewise dissimilar to lowercase g and q
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:40 PM

My personal experience is that I've always been physically desirable to people attracted to men. (So straight women and gay men.) This is despite having no sense of style, often unkempt hair, minimal grooming habits, rarely/never wearing fragrances, and generally putting not much effort into my appearance. So I can only assume there are other men who have the complete opposite experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:15 PM
2

They are basically the same thing. About as different from each other as uppercase and lowercase Latin characters
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:23 PM
1

Context: 30sM One time, I installed Tinder on a Thursday afternoon, and was sharing a bed with a woman from the app on Friday night. We ended up dating for a year (she's now an ex). Another time, I installed CoffeeMeetsBagel, ended up going on dates with about 6-7 different women in the span of about a month. One of them stuck and we dated for a year until I broke it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:31 AM

That definition refers to a famous game, better known as "ookie cookie." Although I can't say I've ever heard someone discuss it in real life https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soggy_biscuit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:10 PM
2

Or maybe I would like to see some of the perpetually lonely, frustrated men on here overcome their mental prison of crippling insecurity? Nothing is funnier than fevered indignation about "whores" from men who themselves desire or engage in casual sex or relationships. Most people, men and women are slutty by nature and that's ok. BTW, if I was single and interested in reddit pussy (I'm not), PPD is the last place I'd look. There are a number of hookup subs expressly designed for that purpose, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 06:13 PM
5

Dude. A gigantic dick is not necessary to please 99% women. If you perform with even a modicum of effort and attentiveness during sex, you will have an excellent chance of being her best partner even if she's had several previously.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 05:39 PM
7

This is such a loser mentality. "You'd better have no experience so my lame sexual performance might actually impress you." You want to just be someone's best partner by default, not by any semblance of merit. That's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:56 PM

The war is not ending. The US is bending the knee to Putin but Ukraine will continue to fight and defend their homeland
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 03:00 PM
1

Drake is not a "chad" anything. He is lame, doughy physique, gives a vibe that he's terrible in bed
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 04:11 PM
2

So what? Someone can experience grief and commit suicide after losing their job. But that doesn't mean causing a job loss is tantamount to murder. Now if you told me that she held a funeral for her miscarriage, and that you attended said funeral then we'd have something to talk about. But of course neither of those things happened. Because spontaneous abortion is not equivalent to the natural death of a real person, and medically induced abortion is not the equivalent of murder. Never has been a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:21 PM
2

And the soldier and officer are both counted in tally of the dead. The soldier receives a gravestone and has a grieving family at home. In fact, if the officer has no living family members and is widely disliked by his men, and no one grieves his death, you could argue his death is even more inconsequential than that of the lowly soldier
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:46 PM
2

We also need more organs because there is a critical shortage. I advise you to sign up today to donate your liver, kidney, and bone marrow. For the good of society
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:41 PM
1

No we're not. You understand intuitively that the death of a 1 inch diameter fetus is inconsequential, in comparison to the death of a fully fledged human person. You dislike medically induced abortion, but not because you consider it to be murder. Maybe that's what you tell yourself but it's still a lie
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:29 PM
1

Late term spontaneous abortion / stillbirth is one thing Would you hold a funeral for a fetus that's less than 1 inch in diameter? Of course not because that would be ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 02:56 PM
2

No one truly believes that abortion is murder. This is trivially easy to demonstrate. It's just a front for misogyny and treating women as slaves who have no rights. Consider this: do you or anyone else hold a funeral for every miscarriage? Of course not, because that would be insane. If someone working in an IVF clinic slips and destroys 20 fertilized embryos, are they a massmurderers? Of course not
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 02:34 PM
2

He's not "negotiating" at all. He's imposing tariffs unilaterally in order to grant himself the power to pick winners and losers through granting tariff exemptions. He has not even laid out a case to try to justify the tariffs on Canada, or explained what concession he would like from them. It's not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 07:56 PM
1

AI bots don't actually know anything. The way people are treating AI is like people in the 1950s getting their first television and taking everything that it says as an indisputable fact. 90 IQ is just barely smart enough to not be diagnosed with mental retardation. I could be friends with someone that has 90 iq but any romantic partnership is out of the question
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 01:22 AM

Another W for 5'9 gang We out here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 05:53 PM
1

That tracks. If you're a hetero man and you're good in bed, no woman will ever leave you. Every relationship will end when you are done it with it and not before
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 02:58 PM
2

Chill out dude. I didn't date anyone until I was like 22. Not because I didn't get attention, I just didn't really care until then. Who cares
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:26 PM
1

That has to do with behavior and is a feature of a person that can change over the years, or even over the course of a week The concept of introvert and extravert was developed by Carl Jung as a feature of a person's psyche that remains steady over time. His definition was a bit convoluted but the best way to tell is by looking at processing speed. Extraverts process information quickly but not necessarily in depth. Introverts process more slowly but also more in depth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:14 PM
1

Ignorant. The US relied on huge transatlantic mass migrations in the 19th century to populate the country. There are still towns in North Dakota where people speak German to this day. And yes they suffered anti-immigrant backlash from politicians who exploited ignorance and xenophobia back then. But hey at least they didn't have scary melanin
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:55 PM
1

Nothing to do with worth. A virgin would naturally be apprehensive about getting physically intimate, so it may not be disinterest that keeps their clothes on but simply nerves
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:37 AM
2

If a girl is not a virgin, and doesn't want to get intimate after 3 hangouts, then it has to be one of three things. She's not into me (most likely). She's not into sex in general. Or she has a considerable amount of sexual shame/trauma. Can't say what I would do in this situation since I've thankfully never encountered it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:35 AM
1

Cute face. Unkempt look is adorable in its own way but not for everyone. If you lift weights, get a good haircut and beard lineup, and wear tight clothing you will be hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 01:23 AM
1

My girl has a higher N count than me, but we're both in the range of 10-20. Couldn't care less if she was at 5 or 50
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:54 PM

I've drank enough squirt juice to know that this is false
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 04:34 PM
1

Patriarchy and "rape culture" are byproducts of the agricultural revolution. Rape was not common behavior in humans before agriculture
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 04:21 PM
1

News to me. My girl straight up asked me if I was autistic in the first week. I do have mild undiagnosed ASD, but I'm charming enough so it comes off as quirky
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 05:27 AM
1

One time I was staying at a hostel in South Korea and I made a big batch for the staff and a couple other guests. It came out surprisingly good
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 03:38 AM
1

When I was single I was making kimchi fried rice practically every day
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 03:32 AM
2

And yet Reddit is chock full of 6'4 incels reporting they get no looks from women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:44 PM
1

Yeah I normally dress homeless so that was a somewhat strange experience for me. To be fair, I am above average facially as well
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:33 PM
1

A 6'6 guy who dresses like a hobo and has a bad haircut would be as invisible as anyone else Anecdotal, but I am below 5'9 and when I get a nice haircut and wear tight/revealing clothing I have been gawked / complimented by random women on the street
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:23 PM
4

Nancy Pelosi is fine with Trump, if the alternative is Bernie Sanders
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:11 PM
1

Not necessarily. Ancestral humans raised their children communally. All members of the community would have some childcare responsibilities including for unrelated children. Fathers could identify their own offspring via scent or other bio-markers
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:57 PM
1

That's pretty well established. Less sperm competition than chimps but more than gorillas, which can be observed by comparing the anatomical size of the testes in each species. Universal monogamy was not a feature of ancestral human populations
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:41 PM
2

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Bonobos also mate at all parts of the menstrual cycle. Humans are not unique in this capacity. There is no human society on Earth where misattrinuted paternity is greater than 15%. In developed countries it's generally around 2% which is just not very significant
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:37 PM
1

99% of the time taking a break and then getting back together ends badly. Most people learn this at some point but sometimes you have to make mistakes, not everyone can learn from others' experiences
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:30 PM
1

Nyash is all I care about all day every day until I die
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:07 PM
1

One person's heaven is another's purgatory
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 07:55 PM
1

Some people just don't like receiving, never have and never wi. Seems to be more common in women but it happens in men also. In such a case it has nothing to do with the skill or abilities of the active partner. Can't relate personally but I have experienced it from the other side
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 06:50 PM
1

I once left a 1 year relationship with a girl partly because she wasn't into receiving oral sex. She was really hot, good in bed, mentally stable but I knew I wouldn't really be satisfied long term so I ended it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 05:23 PM
3

Met someone on the beach. Couple hours later she was eating my ass and then I finished in her mouth from 69
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 02:58 PM
1

First time with a new partner/hookup, I gave them 3-4 orgasms in a row. They can't leave me alone for the next week. This one has actually happened to me several times!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 02:55 PM
1

One time I downloaded Tinder on a Thursday afternoon, and on Friday night I was sharing a bed with a beautiful woman who I matched with. Never paid a dime for any OLD sevice. If you play your cards right and know how to present yourself as an appealing option, it works just fine. A lot of guys struggle because they make themselves seem as boring and basic as possible, so of course no one is gonna bite.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 02:30 PM
1

Average 5'9 guy with an Ideal jacked & stacked physique would weigh 185 give or take 10 lbs
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 09:34 PM
2

It's not just about how heavy he is, it's the lack of fat to balance out the lean mass. The result is visually freakish. Compare actual athletes with elite physiques, they will have appropriate fat along with muscle which looks 100x better
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:20 PM
1

Nope, someone's gotta cook dinner while I'm at work scrolling reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:08 PM
2

The trick to using steroids is to finesse it so it approximates a good natty physique, which is easy on the eyes. If you overdo it you end up looking like this guy and it's no longer attractive. Similar concept to ugly bolt-on breast implants for women vs thoughtfully done implants that look more natural. Natty is better in either case imo but people will always be obsessed with cheating the system in some way
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 07:58 PM
1

Ok let's make a deal. You keep believing that, and I'll keep satisfying hot bitches with my bog standard 5 incher. Sound good?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 07:48 PM
1

It's ok just admit it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 07:46 PM
5

Excessive steroid use/abuse. Not a good look at all
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 06:43 PM
1

Proportions/chin just don't do it for me. Gracie Dzienny (Hollywood actress) has the same issue. Doesn't do it for me even though a lot of people think she's attractive. That's why looks are subjective
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 03:40 PM
1

To be honest he can probably pull like an 8.5-9. Aesthetic preferences are subjective to some degree
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 03:14 PM
3

7.5 Face shape is too blocky to go any higher. But I'm not into men so ymmv
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 02:58 PM
1

Any physical preference is fine if you can bag a partner who fits it. I only go for women with a monster nyash, even though I don't have much going in that department myself. I wonder if I lucked out somewhat that women in my generation (millenial) don't seem to care too much about height. Whereas the younger girls seem to be obsessed with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 09:18 PM
2

This advice never made any sense to me. If someone is attracted to you, they will still be attracted regardless of your financial situation. If you are broke and unemployed, that is all the more reason to leverage your sex appeal to get something going in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 04:20 PM
2

Lots of women and men will reject someone for being too attractive. Typically they're insecure about their own looks and self-aware enough to know that an attractive partner will trigger their insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 11:50 AM
1

The thing people don't understand about AI is that it is not now, and never will be a replacement for actual human intelligence. Any AI model, regardless of sophistication will always be useless at best for any situation that is unlike what it knows from the training data set. Overcoming this would require a genuinely intelligent machine, which can only be achievable through quantum computing or some distant far-off technological progress
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 02:41 PM
1

Why do you say that? I'm a guy who's pretty close to that description. It's happened to me several times in my life that I've met a beautiful woman and we ended up sharing a bed the same day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:28 PM

Girl you are suffering from ED. Don't listen to the virgins on this sub telling you that men prefer rail thin women, that is true for them but not true for straight men out in the wild. Hollywood and fashion industry do not reflect the aesthetic preferences of most straight men
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 06:46 AM
1

50 million dollars is chump change for the NBA. It's less than one year of Jamal Murray's salary and he's never even appeared in an all-star game
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:58 PM
5

It's absolutely hilarious to me that you believe Trump publicly shitting in his pants will somehow improve your romantic prospects
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:09 PM
1

Righteous murderers are praised, like Michele Angiolillo who murdered a monarchist pro-slavery politician in Spain in 1897 and was praised by American news media
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 09:46 PM

Small % of the population but the Jewish vote also went heavily for Harris overall, around 77%. So Jewish women were most likely 80%+ for Harris
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:30 PM
1

I wonder. When you finally meet your ideal, virginal would-be bride, and she coldly rejects you for being "ran through," what will you say to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 03:38 PM
1

This you? Doesn't matter, the idea is intrinsically repulsive Your future wife having had other sexual partners is "repulsive" and yet you don't hold yourself to the same standard. Deny it if you wish but 99% of people who read that will instantly mark you down as a hypocritical, misogynistic loser. And with good reason
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 03:48 AM
0

Are you seriously denying that you're a hypocrite? There's a massive difference between a "preference" and a value judgment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 02:41 AM
1

So you are nothing but a hypocrite then. Pour one out for the poor soul that ends up romantically linked to someone like you... chances are they will be just as toxic and unlikeable in their own way
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 02:24 AM
2

Considering your views, certainly you must be abstaining from sex with anyone other than this hypothetical future wife, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 05:03 PM
1

You are also "saving yourself" for marriage I presume?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 05:00 PM
0

I'm not tall
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 08:22 PM
3

Standards are dropping apparently. My under-5'9, mildly autistic, no-wealth-or-status-having ass has been described as "Chad" on this very subreddit, simply for engaging in casual sex and having success meeting women via OLD back when I was single
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 04:57 PM
1

In person, while traveling In person having dinner with friends Online via swiping (kinda lame but it gets the job done) Online via reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:13 PM
1

I would be, if I was taller by about 3.5 inches
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:54 PM
5

Dude you can't possibly think this is a sound argument. Lots of activities can be done as a service in exchange for money, and are also frequently done for pleasure. Cooking, dancing, driving, singing, and yes also fucking. Doing it as a profession to make a living does not mean that nobody engages in it for fun. In my experience women are just as horn as men. Every woman I've had sex with for the first time has invited me back the next day. None of them were getting money or any material benefi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 03:13 PM
1

Why not? Are you expecting to have sex only on anniversaries and Valentine's?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:05 PM
0

Seriously. In an ideal scenario, casual sex is like a mutually beneficial service that two people provide for each other, because it's fun and makes life more enjoyable. I fail to see how someone depriving themselves makes them any more desirable in the future
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:20 PM
3

The vast majority of women aren't really size queens like that. For most women, with a modest effort you will easily be in the top 2-3 lovers she has had. More serious effort you can probably be top 1. Average sized equipment is a blessing, not a curse
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 02:15 PM
3

You're telling on yourself here. If you actually make an effort to please your partner it's easy to be good in bed. Let go of insecurity, find a girl you like and blow her mind every night
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:57 AM
1

Find someone who's genuinely attracted to you? If that sounds unattainable idk what to tell you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:53 AM
0

When your girl is hot, men will hit on her all the time even when you're right there. Doesn't bother me because she never entertains them. Can't blame her for being hot
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:27 AM
4

Who tf wants "procreation only" sex?? Sex is supposed to be fun. Not just for making babies
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:24 AM
0

Okay thanks for confirming I guess? So does that mean your ideal partner is someone who is unconfident, so you can essentially gaslight them into thinking you're hot shit without making a real effort?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 08:28 PM
-3

I'm convinced the only reason why all you losers have such a problem with women who have had casual sex is because you're insecure about your ability to please a woman in bed. If she's had casual sex she will have "had better" and will therefore be able to accurately gauge your mediocre dick game for what it is. CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 08:08 PM
5

The men who are vocally obsessed with getting virgins are terminally online losers. In the real world men don't care about it except for highly religious or from a conservative non-Western culture
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:20 AM
0

Not my experience at all. Never had a problem getting dates with minimal effort via OLD. I guess I must be Chad then lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:43 PM
-1

What's your point? That some people have to try harder? Boo freaking hoo. A man who's actually short like 5'4" might earn my sympathy. (And even then, lots of them figure it out.) 5'7" and above height is not an obstacle to getting a partner or casual sex for that matter. If being a 6'10" millionaire NBA player is the one and only true ticket to happiness, why do we see guys like Ben Simmons and Zion Williamson struggling with mental health? Everyone is born with different advantages, you just g…
/r/AllPillDebate19/08/23 12:03 AM
0

If you have the personality of a wet sock, can't carry a conversation, and want women to take their clothes off for you without having to do or say anything interesting then yes it helps to be tall. Provided he can smile, wink, say something interesting then it really is not that hard for a 5'7" guy to get in bed with a beautiful woman in a casual situation. Even if he's broke as fuck. Just because it doesn't happen to YOU doesn't make it impossible.
/r/AllPillDebate18/08/23 11:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter