TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

serious_sarcasm Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by serious_sarcasm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-10

The rules are very clear about what brigading is. This post is an attempt to brigade and harass someone. I'm not going to read some creeps wall of text.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:49 PM
-1

They blacked out the person's username, and then posted a link to that person's posts. We all know you creeps are doing this to harass them. You all know it is a blatant rule violation.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:23 PM
-12

It was left so this sub can brigade them.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:18 PM
-35

Yes, linking to someone’s post with the intent to harass them is the literal definition of brigading.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:01 PM
-50

Sure, if we just ignore the fact that OP deliberately left the link in picture so you idiots can still brigade them.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:55 PM
-69

Your comment was a blatant attempt to brigade a thread and dox someone. So is this post.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:40 PM
1

PTSD exists. A patient undergoing surgery is always at risk. A panic attack increases that risk. PTSD triggers panic attacks. It absolutely a thing to be considered even just from a medical standpoint. But what is really absurd is that your ass is going to sit there and act like PTSD is never considered in modern medical care. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 05:25 PM
-2

No. You are asking an absurd question. We have whole shelters and hospital teams set up to respond to sexual trauma which includes things like all women teams. It is such a common idea that it is a trope in tv. You are fucking asking me to source common sense, basic respect, and how PTSD works. In short you are being disingenuous and making fallacious arguments. Get bent.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:37 PM
-1

Sure you are, kid.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:33 PM
-1

Okay, kid.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:26 PM
-5

Fuck your whataboutism
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:28 PM
0

Doesn’t really change anything. What we should do, what we can practically do, and what we are currently doing are all three separate things. Conflating the three to dismiss one of them is a formal logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:25 PM
0

Nah, it happens either way, and if anything they are more mad at being called “conservatives”. I know it really bugs pseudo-libertarian incels.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:22 PM
0

What a weird strawman.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:18 PM
-6

Okay, kid.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:19 AM
-5

It is literally a trope in medical and police dramas; stop acting ignorant, child.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:07 AM
0

Okay, kid.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:06 AM
0

I joined this sub to support other male survivors of rape and sexual assault. Y'all have just become a caricature.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:40 AM
-3

No. I am addressing overly broad generalizations and idiotic hypocrisy in this thread. The specifics of this case don't matter. It's like trotting out some racist black person to discredit the entire civil rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:22 AM
-1

Again, fuck your strawman.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:16 AM
-2

Am I fucking talking to the patient in the article, or am I talking to you chuckle fucks?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:00 AM
-2

Fuck your strawman.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:59 AM
1

You can. You just wouldn't do it by just saying "no blacks". A reasonable person would have a conversation, like, "I was raped by a black man, and being alone in a room with a man, especially black men, triggers my PTSD." They would probably respond by suggesting therapy. Then you might explain how you are deeply disturbed by your own trigger, and how it may come off as offensive and racist if you just say "no black doctors", and how that guilt compounds your anxiety about PTSD. Then hopefully s…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:54 AM
-4

Okay, kid.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:43 AM
-1

I am addressing the sweeping and absurd generalizations in this thread, not this specific incident.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:41 AM
-21

You are the one making weirdly specific strawmen, and making statements based solely and explicitly off your own limited experiences.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:02 AM
-1

I am aware of that. I am also aware that doctors will try to avoid triggering a person's PTSD.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:01 AM
0

You literally said you would only understand during their initial hospitalization after being raped. So fuck off with your disingenuous bullshit. *I see you are going with the “blocking them means I win” argument.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:40 AM
-91

Because that is absolutely the only way to bring up the topic of PTSD with your caregivers. After all, you said it. So it must be the only option. Because, again, we all know you are the absolute definer of what experiences people can have.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:09 AM
1

Then you must be aware that your last sentence contradicts this basic fact.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:07 AM
-134

Oh my fucking god! I didn't know that you have never heard of that particular thing happening. Well, since Amoki602 has never heard of things like that happening I guess we all just have to accept it as absolute truth now. After all, we all know that your experiences are the epitome of human knowledge.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:34 AM
2

Do you think PTSD just disappears after meeting with a "trauma team"?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:03 AM
0

You're not actually suggesting that this subreddit has become overrun with conservative propaganda instead of focusing on male issues?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:00 AM
-180

It is pretty common knowledge that after being raped people don't like interacting with people who look like the rapist. Downvote away, you fucking conservative carpetbaggers. Men get raped too, and also suffer from PTSD, so you can all go fuck yourselves with your hypocritical bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 12:57 AM
1

Already covered that.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:51 AM
1

No. Your claim that there is no historical precedent for non-combat conscription is bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:10 AM
1

Most soldiers never see combat, because logistics wins wars. Conscripts can support public works. Using conscripts for public works was the basis of a lot civilizations, so your historic argument is unfounded. And you are right. They would be part of a well regulated militia. Of course, the only reason to use them (since professional soldiers are better) would be in the event of total war during an invasion or civil war. Oh, and a lot of states already have a State Defense Force which includes e…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:01 AM
1

I specifically said conscripts do not have to be used in combat, and conscription can be more like work programs. Your strawman is idiotic.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 12:32 AM
1

Okay, kid.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:09 PM
-1

Weird strawman, kid.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:58 PM
-1

Stop deflecting.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:49 PM
1

Since I am not a moral relativist I don't think the legality of something is what makes it right or wrong. I think conscription isn't inherently bad, because I think it can be done morally as part of a civic education. I think spousal rape is inherently bad, because rape is immoral. It is ironic though that you would make another strawman to accuse of something absurd again, given your last sentence.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:21 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:12 PM
1

All you have done was make up bullshit, and then try to put the words in my mouth. A lot of men in here drag out the "men get drafted" to downplay sexism towards women. The implication is that it is women's fault men get drafted, because there is no other reason to bring it up. But the fact is that sexism which pervades our culture impacts both men and women in different ways. That cultural legacy of systemic bigotry, just like it's cousin systemic racism, is used by "an incredibly small minorit…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:07 PM
1

No, it is not. It is literally the issue.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:57 PM
0

Semantics can matter. They can also be used in bullshit rhetorical arguments in a fallacious manner. My anecdote matters, because you directly accused me of "hav[ing] the stereotype that A Man Is Always Eager". So you can go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:56 PM
-1

Who created that system? Why did they decide the system should be this way?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:55 PM
2

Why would you make such a disgusting semantic argument? Also, you can shove your fucked up strawman up your fucking ass. I've been raped by men and women, and spend a lot of time explaining the poorly named Sexual Arousal Response to people of all political persuasions.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:36 PM
1

And why is it?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:36 PM
-3

So what?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:17 PM
1

Because it doesn't have to be sexually biased, or used for combat.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:11 PM
2

Not inherently.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:46 PM
-4

That's just moving the goal posts.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:06 PM
-2

Except it isn't women drafting men into wars. And your comparisons make no sense.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:05 PM
1

I think you are well aware that I was using an illustrative example to show how the wording of the law impacts both men and women, and not supporting pedophilia like you are trying to imply.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:56 PM
-3

Whatever, kid.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:55 PM
-4

The vast majority of people on this site are American. And we can reform SS in America without using the draft in weird arguments using a system created by men to prove women are sexist.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:55 PM
-4

no.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:54 PM
0

Weird strawmen, kid.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:35 PM
-2

Google it. By "impacted" I mean we could require women to sign up for selective service tomorrow. The main reason we don't is because a bunch of sexist men also think women shouldn't be in the military, but that doesn't fit the "us vs them" narrative in this sub. Fuck your strawman, there would obviously be reasonable exceptions.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:42 PM
5

That you are making a disingenuous argument which detracts from real issues that men and women face today.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:12 PM
-2

If a man forcibly performed oral sex on little boy, then he hasn't "raped" them under the same legal framework. That doesn't mean he is not colloquially a rapist. It just means they have a different legal term for it. That man is still going to the prison he deserves. There is a legitimate problem with sexual violence against men being dismissed, but your absurd and disingenuous bullshit only detracts from actually addressing the problem.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:10 PM
-3

I'm not "fighting for a cause that was already won." I am pointing out that the discrimination is relatively recent, and is still having an impact today. Despite your claims, there are plenty of women alive today who were legally raped by their spouse, and men alive today who think it is fine. Even in your semantic argument, it is perfectly possible for a man to rape another man with an object and not have technically "raped" them in that jurisdiction. Or a man could forcibly perform oral on the…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:05 PM
-6

The CCC was a work program, and is just an example of how conscription doesn't have to mean cannon fodder. And yes, we are all still at risk of being drafted, since the Constitution just gives broad power to "raise and support an army". The only way to never "be at risk" would be to amend to constitution to make conscription illegal. But since the form of a draft is created whole cloth by the legislator it is wholly and deliberately misleading to claim that only men will ever be impacted by a dr…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:55 PM
-10

That is just a semantic argument. Some states also call manslaughter involuntary murder. And men can rape people without penetrating with a penis too, so your point is idiotic. There are real problems with how criminal justice systems approach sexual violence. There are still gender norms which unduly impact our justice systems. We can acknowledge those facts without also being sexist idiots.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:46 PM
-3

They're still alive. Stop pretending it is ancient history.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:41 PM
-52

And you are also two generations past there being a draft in America, but that doesn't fit your narrative. And before you say it, I support universal conscription into CCC like programs. You also are not being targeted.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:08 PM
-68

A generation ago women could be legally raped by their husbands, and had to have a man cosign contracts for them. Your strawman is stupid.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:56 PM
-25

They are.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:55 PM
2

No, it did not.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:33 PM
-31

You realize that not all jurisdictions have community property laws, and that the ones that do are gender neutral?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:32 PM
0

The question is based on an absurd premise, and deserves nothing but ridicule.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:39 PM
0

You're question is based on an absurd premise, and deserves nothing but ridicule.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:35 PM
0

You're question is based on an absurd premise, and deserves nothing but ridicule.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 11:40 PM
0

You're question is based on an absurd premise, and deserves nothing but ridicule.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:13 PM
0

You're question is based on an absurd premise, and deserves nothing but ridicule.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:10 PM
0

Already gave one, kid.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:42 PM
0

That is why there is both soundness and validity, kid. But thanks for making it clear that you don’t know formal logic.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 07:10 PM
2

A conclusion based on false premise is unsound, and the conclusion is invalid either way.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:17 PM
1

The argument is that it is a absurd sexist bullshit with no basis in reality, kid.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:09 PM
1

I made the only argument this sexist drivel deserves.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 04:07 PM
-1

Whatever, bigot. Men literally legitimize women in society.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:29 PM
-3

It is a pile of bigoted bullshit. Men literally legitimize women in society. Y’all need to touch grass.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:29 PM
4

No, they do not.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:28 PM
9

Men literally legitimize women in society. Dude has some serious issues.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:27 PM
-14

This is absurd.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 02:41 PM
0

This idiotic meme clearly states that women have never been oppressed.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 07:37 PM
-17

Right. So when a man volunteers for the army, retires, and becomes a police officer he is the one being oppressed. But even though his wife couldn’t vote, divorce him, and was able to be legally raped by him she is not oppressed.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:13 PM
0

Progressive politics bias detected. Why the fuck do you people get so hung up on that?
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 02:26 PM
-2

That has no basis in historical fact.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 01:09 PM
1

What fucking embrace of socialism?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 09:58 PM
1

Women tend to have a lower emotional reaction, but allow their emotions to be expressed more. Saying that men are "rational" and women are "emotional" gives women more power in the sexual economy, because it continues tricking men into thinking that their emotional response is actually a rational one (a very common post-hoc fallacy). The issue of double standards in sexual assault and rape also affects men, because it allows women to "steal the goods". Because emotions like lust don't give a fuc…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 09:37 PM
2

Well, I see you clearly have no intention in having a good faith dialogue about the double standards our society creates about men's experiences with sexual assault and rape.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 08:23 PM
-6

LOL, you think something I whipped together for a creative writing class is going to somehow shame me? I rather enjoyed the practice at speed writing, eliciting emotion by showing rather than telling, and the classic use of bait and switch. Plus the topic was required to be "horror". Also, I'm pretty damn far from a socialist, and public education is not socialism. I assume that is what you are referring to since you went through my submissions. Not that that has a damn thing to do with men's ri…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 08:16 PM
1

I see you didn't actually bother to read the fucking quote. Nor are you considering how your prejudice is only reinforcing the thing you are claiming to oppose.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 08:00 PM
-9

We live in a gynocentric society. Oh, bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 07:30 PM
-19

A man's primary dimension is reason, a woman's is emotion. That isn't accurate at all. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4928818/ The emotional responses elicited by emotional videos were inconsistent between emotional experience and emotional expressivity. Men had stronger emotional experiences, whereas women had stronger emotional expressivity. Gender differences in emotional experience and emotional expressivity depended on specific types of emotion, not only the valence. Of course…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 07:29 PM
73

It isn't a lack of empathy. The issue is that we have a culture wherein men are assumed to always want sexual attention from women, and that stereotype is constantly perpetuated by mass media and inaccurate data on sexual assault and rape.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 07:23 PM
0

Just your users.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:22 PM
2

Dick is a sexist insult as well.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:54 PM
2

LOL, no. I’m not sure why you think that, but it is one of the most absurd things I’ve heard all week.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:53 PM
2

Yes, language evolves, but bitch is still sexist and nigger is still racist.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:50 PM
1

Lol.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:08 PM
1

You really just don't get it, do you? Consider when a white man calls another white guy "nigger" as an endearing term, the fact that they both think it is a term of endearment does not make the word itself not racist.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 07:28 PM
2

What I’m trying to tell you is that it is not my definition. The meme (the viral concept of the word in society) is sexist. You are the one trying to come up with a specific definition while ignoring the how the word is perceived at large.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:05 PM
2

The bloody point of connotations is that it is not what you mean when you say it - it is the meme of the word. Well officer I didn’t mean I want to hurt you when I said, “I’m gonna fuck you up.” You can’t tell me what my words mean! Jesus fucking Christ, that is not how language or communication works.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:43 PM
2

Do you realize the irony of that statement?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:32 PM
0

Never said I wasn’t a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:31 PM
1

Or it's fucking temperature dependent.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:21 AM
0

That does not magically get rid of the connotations.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:21 AM
7

We use bitch in that way because it is implied that woman are cowardly. Are you all just being retarded on purpose?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:35 AM
4

We do have words like that, and the term bitching as most certainly not lost it’s sexist connotation. I’m not sure what fantasy land you’re pulling that from, but i suspect it’s somewhere near your rectum.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:34 AM
1

Because I didn’t want to use to many words out of fear you would be easily confused.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:28 AM
0

And I’m calling bullshit, since I have testicles and know basic anatomy.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:28 AM
5

No. Just no.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:27 AM
1

Any man can cross their legs. The balls move. All balls are both saggy and scrunched up (assuming you went through puberty, which I'm guessing you have not).
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:32 PM
1

.... did I say war is always unjustified?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:30 PM
20

The reason calling a man a bitch is an insult is because you are equating them with whining female. Why are you having a hard time understanding how that is sexist?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:28 PM
12

You do realize that carrying about equality and political corruption are not mutually exclusive? Also - the women's march is a thing.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:28 PM
11

Did you know that it is possible to care about two things at once?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:26 PM
1

Conscription is fine. War is bad.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:24 PM
22

Saying your male friend is bitching is to literally say they are whining like a female dog in heat.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:21 PM
3

Good lord, take a fucking anatomy class.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:19 PM
-7

I really wanted to agree with you, but then you had to go and call liberal arts worthless....
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:59 PM
2

Most state colleges.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 03:29 AM
1

Well, I know what schools it isn't.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:33 AM
1

I know the conclusion. I’m wondering what bridge of logic they leapt off of to leave us with this gore.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 07:33 AM
1

The fuck are you going on about?
/r/MensRights31/10/17 12:58 AM
1

No, no. The matured human body is t naturally sexualized. We made it like that with society.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 12:57 AM
1

Okay, buddy. Not sure why you think saying, "no" to things so retarded there is no point arguing with is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:18 PM
1

No. Just no.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:07 PM
1

I already made my point. You're the one off base.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:06 PM
1

How many candidates have you seen collude with foreign powers during an election in the last two hundred years?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:36 PM
1

I didn't say he invented the term. Keep up.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:35 PM
1

No. No, it was not.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:05 AM
-1

The left invented the term, trying to claim that all positive coverage of Trump or negative coverage of Clinton was "fake news" Talking about missing the point...
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:45 AM
1

A list that also does not include Breitbart and Mr. "Gay Frogs".
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:50 AM
1

I'm glad we could agree on that.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:27 AM
1

Considering that his own fucking son admitted to it....
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:14 AM
0

No. The "fake news" was things like the Bowling Green Massacre. You're just pushing an agenda, buddy.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:54 PM
1

It's almost like facts came to light for the general public.... I mean, progressed my ass. We've known that our voting machines were hackable for awhile now.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:44 PM
2

You do know that the term "fake news" came about due to people in other countries literally writing fake news to generate clicks from Facebook idiots? And I mean ridiculously off the wall shit that could be very easily fact checked by a 12 year old. Trump then adopted it to refer to any and all media which he disagrees with (including opinion pieces that aren't even news).
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:41 PM
1

I think you dropped this.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:38 PM
0

Too late. This sub already went off the deep end.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:36 PM
-1

.... I can't fix stupid.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:16 AM
-1

Why do you think they call it that?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:10 AM
1

No. Just no.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:07 AM
0

Society demonizes MRA's BIG time. Do you know why that it is? Also, if you think The Red Pill is men's right then you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:01 AM
-2

mmhm
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:56 AM
-1

Have you tried PBS and NPR? Oh, wait. You're not actually interested in nuanced debate, are you?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:13 PM
-1

You do realize that you are just the opposite side of the coin for the caricature you've invented?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:53 PM
-4

It's not viciously dissected in the same way other political ideas are, not in the slightest. Yes it is. Perhaps you have never heard of Fox News?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:50 PM
-4

Where does the post imply anything about men not being able to make a living? You completely missed the point of their argument.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:48 PM
0

Honestly, people like you are why no one takes men's rights seriously.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:43 PM
-2

Fucking horseshit bro.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:41 PM
11

Yep. I'm a survivor.
/r/PussyPass01/06/17 11:01 PM
10

No, no they are not.
/r/PussyPass01/06/17 10:37 PM
1

I think they are $40 at Wal-mart.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:29 PM
2

Scabies.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:26 PM
5

What pisses me off is that they never put the toilet seat up when they are done, and suggesting such is like "literally Hitler".
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:19 PM
1

her reward is great sex, then doing my cooking, laundry and cleaning. How is this not weaponizing sex?
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 07:43 PM
3

Got some sauce?
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:39 PM
3

HAHAHHAHAHA
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:04 AM
5

Criticizing a person solely on their heritage is just down right bigoted no matter what. Criticizing Jews in Israel is hardly anti-semitic or racist. .... Is everyone in Rome Catholic too?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:50 AM
9

Not sure why you're being down voted. There was a reason the Nazi's spread "Jew gold" rumors.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:39 AM
2

The police do determine who is the aggressor, and who is the victim, based on available evidence. The prosecutor's job is to prove the cop right. I know anecdotes are fairly worthless, but I have been in several street fights. I've dodged drunken punches to subdue the aggressor without closing my fist, and I have brawled with a mob of young men. I've even swung first; when the threat was immanent. I once boxed a kid while surrounded by a crowd in front of the police department. I just wanted to …
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:01 PM
2

The issue is he never should have been arrested.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:16 PM
3

I'm not familiar with New York law, but in Florida seventeen seconds in she committed assault.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:11 PM
3

Assault does not have to be physical. As soon the woman verbally aggressed him, and surrounded him so there was no escape, he had the right to defend himself with reasonable force.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:08 PM
4

Urinal etiquette classes. Thirty minutes of silently staring at a wall.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:42 AM
7

Florida has a law that restricts people arrested for the charge of domestic abuse from being released on bond. She was charged with battery causing bodily harm. Which makes since if they claimed to not be a couple, and were acting like roommates having a scuffle.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:31 PM
3

I f*ck'n write how I talk.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:13 PM
8

If you do not practice good dental hygiene you are more prone to tooth infections. Obviously we should just remove everyone's teeth to prevent this.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:32 PM
2

Are you saying that a man can magically make someone stop raping them, because as a victim of rape from both sexes I am going to assure that it is not that simple.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:19 AM
2

Much in you is still man, and much in you is not yet man, But a shapeless pigmy that walks asleep in the mist searching for its own awakening. And of the man in you would I now speak. For it is he and not your god-self nor the pigmy in the mist, that knows crime and the punishment of crime. Oftentimes have I heard you speak of one who commits a wrong as though he were not one of you, but a stranger unto you and an intruder upon your world. But I say that even as the holy and the righteous cannot…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter