TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tpiecer Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by tpiecer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

So because I disagree with the confusing mixture of things that you've thrown at me as a group I'm biased towards it? I'm sorry you were unable to comprehend the materials further. I'm sorry the material was incomprehensible too. Complex Question Fallacy If you define me simply asking what you believe and why as the 'complex question fallacy' then it's clear you don't really want a discussion at all as what I asked simply doesn't meet the criteria to be considered fallacious. I'd ask the same ab…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:17 PM
20

What have I disagreed with before learning it exactly? I've read your sidebar material and I've talked to other people in the forum but that doesn't tell me what you specifically believe nor does it really tell me what 'theredpill' is because the material is just a mixture of different topics and random anecdotes. Why can't you just answer what you believe and why?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:55 PM
25

You're going to need to state what you believe and why before we can have any form of discussion. I don't know what you believe so asking me to make an argument against it doesn't make any sense.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:50 PM
3

Well at least you've proved me right. Nobody can answer what they believe and why here. Which is a shame but I didn't expect anything less from this obscure little subreddit. It just seems if you actually want to be taking seriously and not ridiculed as this thread discusses you might actually want to show clearly what you believe and why. . Sadly instead you point to a chaotic collection of different articles on your side bar that range from anti-feminist rants to sad stories about a nice guy j…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:39 PM
4

Oh boy. I've heard that logic before , it happens when any group becomes an echo chamber and is a result of confirmation bias. What you're saying doesn't actually align with anything other than the few others who believe what you believe and you just ignore any contradictory experience or evidence. Much the same argument is used by white supremacist groups , religious cults, alien abductees and the flat earth society.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:31 PM
2

I'm sensing you're getting really angry. This is confusing to me as I've been told only women are emotional creatures ?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:28 PM
2

There is truth ? Now you're making this sound like a religion or cult. Marxist brainwashing ? Really? The conspirator overtones don't help the cult idea either. Still at least all you seem to want to do is lose weight and get laid but I think you could say that without dressing it up like you're trying to be the next Scientology.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:27 PM
3

I do have a worrying bias towards reality yes If you're going to make the claim that gender roles are evolutionary then you're going to need to actually provide substantial evidence for that while also ignoring the huge variation in gender roles within different societies and different eras. Your biggest problem is confirmation bias, you use anything you can to support the conclusion you've already drawn and you ignore anything that contradicts it.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:24 PM
8

Notice the part where I ask why its true? That means provide evidence.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:18 PM
1

Where's the evidence women say that? Where's the evidence this certain type of man is what all women want and what exactly defines it? Where's the evidence society is conspiring against men to make them subservient? The definition of masculinity changes based on what era and society we look at. You should really qualify that you're specifically talking about western, modern society and in a vacuum at that. I'm seeing a lot of speculation but that's about it.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 05:30 AM
3

Well I'm glad you accept your views have no meaning or evidence.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 05:15 AM
7

You don't need to refute anecdotal evidence and observation with peer review lol. It's just not very valid in of itself. Anecdotal evidence is incredibly vague and not really something that's trustworthy as it's so open towards bias. But hey, if you really trust anecdotal evidence as a good source of knowledge then I assume that you believe in bigfoot, ufo's, god, jesus, brahma and apollo right? Because there's huge amounts of anecdotal evidence proving all of them to be real.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 04:16 AM
0

So in other words you can't support the speculation you're making. Okay well at least we're on the same page. Well at least you almost told me something. 'the red pill' when you move away all the crap is just you guys trying to work out how to get laid? That's it? Not sure why you needed to lace that one up with sci-fi movie references, or why you couldn't look at all the material already out there on the subject. Guess if you make getting laid a giant conspiracy you feel better about devoting a…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 04:07 AM
9

No I asked what 'red pill theory' is and what evidence there is to support it. Then people gave me what they personally thought it was, all of which was different, which makes it pretty clear that you all think entirely different things and there's no actual evidence or clear point of any of this at all.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 04:02 AM
-3

My personal story So we're using anecdotal, personal and emotional evidence? You believe it because that's how a woman made you feel? Hang on, I thought only women did that to justify things?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 04:00 AM
2

I asked a specific question, nobody can answer me it's all just crickets.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 03:58 AM
0

There's a vague mish mash of unsupported points on a huge range of different topics. There's nothing I've yet to read that's clear or substantial and any efforts to actually get anything out of posters is met with silence, aggressiveness or pointing ineffectually to the sidebar. When you want to actually answer my question let me know. He was referring to their evolutionary cousins -- Humans. Best he use some examples that include humans then eh?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 03:54 AM
0

I've read the side bar material. I've explained that none of it provides a clear explanation of what you're about what so ever it's a complete mish mash of entirely different things. Then someone summarizes it for you. But they didn't at all? They talked about ape society and that humans find certain traits attractive? So what? Is the red pill we should all be like apes or something? start asking for peer reviewed scientific references You're against me asking for evidence now? As a man, are you…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 03:15 AM
1

Okay, again I'm not actually sure what the point on attractiveness is meant to prove exactly? I mean "Research has shown that most men enjoy the sight of female breasts" No shit? Is the message of the red pill 'be born genetically attractive or look forward to dying alone?' then?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 03:09 AM
-2

If you can't sum up what you believe and support it then you don't believe in anything worth believing at all. No need to get angry either. I thought only women could show emotion ???
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 03:00 AM
3

You've said a lot of words but you haven't actually said anything specific or supported it with anything substantial. This type of talk is why people think you're cult like. I just asked for a simple explanation of what this is about with evidence to support it not vaguely thought out conspirator y dialogue.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:56 AM
0

Any evidence to actually support that? Sounds like this subreddit wants to revert to the 1900's.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:55 AM
4

Well thank you for being the first person to actually reply with something clear and concise. The second thing I'd ask for is evidence to actually support these points?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:49 AM
0

Which part? All of it?? Human societies and ape societies are vastly different things, trying to draw comparisons between them to somehow prove a point screams of a false analogy. Equally trying to use biology, and the biology of apes at that, to draw comparisons to humans fails to take into account just how many things are a result of society rather than any inherent biological imperative. Would it help to show that women are most aesthetically attracted to men with strong jawbones Based on wha…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:48 AM
1

Link? Is it supported by peer reviewed evidence?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:31 AM
0

It's just the recognition that men don't need to be ashamed to be masculine. Define masculine and explain who is suppressing and shaming men from being it and how ?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:24 AM
0

Well thank you at least for confirming that nobody on this subreddit will ever answer what the 'red pill' is actually about and provide any evidence it's true. Your crass generalisations regarding supposed female dating advice and sitcoms leaves a lot to be desired in demonstrating anything other than you watch too much television. How is the objective observation of past events When you want to provide some evidence like this to support whatever claim you're making let me know.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:23 AM
10

Pointing to me a thread doesn't answer me anything. I asked for a simple, clear explanation from somebody with evidence not a link to a thread that is equally just a random mish mash of stuff. Both your 'blue pill' and 'red pill' example seem like gross oversimplifications and still don't actually have anything to support them. I mean if we're to go to the matrix analogy that you're using then everybody else is the 'blue pill.' So where exactly is the evidence that everybody apart from you guys …
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:11 AM
1

That's the problem, everybody points to the side bar but nobody ever actually gives a clear direct and supported answer themselves. Then when you look at the side bar material it's a chaotic mish mash of dating advice, self improvement advice, anti-feminist rants, anecdotes of men being scorned by women and random mens rights stuff. But nothing actually substantial that shows what exactly you guys are talking about. So, still nobody can actually tell me what it is.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:04 AM
3

I'm a guy.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 01:03 AM
25

That's incredibly vague. I was hoping for something clear supported with evidence. Both men and women have emotions. Humans in general are 'emotional creatures.' So what exactly?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 12:05 AM
6

What is red pill theory and why is it true?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 12:00 AM
23

I'll start rethinking my position when somebody shows me proof that I'm wrong. That's the problem, nobody within this community will ever actually say exactly and specifically what their posistion is and why they believe it. I've yet to hear anybody here just come out and actually say what they believe and why hence how can anybody argue against nothing exactly? Seriously what is red pill theory and why is it true?
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 10:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter