TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

-AveMaria- Archive

View 0 posts and 405 comments by -AveMaria- on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

" I still look pretty good" CAN CONFIRM
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 12:19 PM
1

Whether its on sale or not is irrelevant for our conversation. Browsing the websites gives a good idea what higher end designers are making and how its being marketed. Same with farfetch. As for the bustle, I get the point and I agree. High end fashion has evolved and hasn't always emphasized the things it does now, but I still think a focus on breasts and butts has always been low class. Which was my point. And what I said is definitely true for contemporary times.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 12:37 AM
1

Huh? The bustle was not meant to emphasize your butt. It was first used for pragmatic reasons, and later became fashion. It didn't hug your body and emphasize your butt. That's ridiculous. You can see my point by browsing low end fashion websites and then going to somewhere like Moda Operandi or Farfetch, which are higher end. The former have models whose pose and clothing emphasize their 'assets.' That is rarely the case for high fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:25 AM
1

Not ironic at all. Homosexuality and pedophilia have a huge overlap.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:04 AM
1

Hahahaha go f yourself. I'm not going to bother explaining it to you since you are too stupid to understand how time works, I guess. And btw, I think its far better to say what I think about people to their face than behind their back like a gossiping bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 01:28 AM
1

So you can further display how moronic and/or dishonest you are? No thanks. I know when not to bother. If anyone thinks the Bible isn't explicitly against homosexuality, they are not worth arguing with at all. And fwiw, u/Atlas_B_Shruggin who studied religion and is a million times smarter than you can ever hope to be has already told you that you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 01:27 AM
1

I had premarital sex after becoming religious? Weird, because I don't remember that. I remember being abstinent for nearly 3 years, but I guess you know me better than I do? I never criticized anyone for what they did in their past, fyi. As long as they were honestly trying to change and repented, I'm fine with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 01:16 AM
1

Lol okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 01:11 AM
3

And? Its a sin to not have sex with your husband unless its a mutual agreement for the purposes of worship. Its also a sin to commit homosexual acts. Both very clear rules from St.Paul
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:01 PM
1

I was not pretending to be friendly with you. I WAS friendly, but that changed. And fyi I would have told you personally if you had been online. These aren't my standards of Christianity or marriage, they are THE standards. But yes, I was upset at your behavior towards your husband and religion, and that made me act uncivil.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 07:44 AM
1

I'd find this a lot more funny if you hadn't married him literally a year ago and weren't already cheating on him and pretending you are a lesbian when before you married him you were 'bisexual.' All this while pretending to be a Christian too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 04:01 AM
1

Well, by 'realistic', you mean animalistic, primal, savage. The poorer, less civilized, and stupider you get, the more you tend towards those things. Civilization as whole is putting many layers of unnecessary, unrealistic things to mask our base natures. I'm just saying the things we choose to mask as we grow more civilized tend to be things that accentuate the butt, hips, and breasts. Things that appeal to base male libido. And instead the culture tends to emphasize gracile figures and facial …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 02:11 AM
1

Yes, it is degenerate. Animalistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 01:54 PM
5

Kardashians are not high class people. They are wealthy. That isn't the same thing. Fashion in high class circles has not changed much at all, and butt lifts aren't exactly really common. That's more for middle class women and girls. No doubt the Kardashians and all the instagram models are influencing THOSE WOMEN. But if you have a look at any high fashion website, nothing there really accentuates the butt.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 11:10 AM
3

You are. This whole big butt obsession is just a result of the influence of hispanic and black prole cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 11:03 AM
2

Yes, 'voluptuous women' are probably more attractive to men in a primal way. So I'd say less civilized men (who make up the majority) would probably prefer those women. Whereas in more civilized, high class circles, women with slim figures and natural facial beauty are more highly desired. Maybe its cultural, learned, whatever you want to call it. Sure. But its also seen across most cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 01:53 AM
6

Imo, in more civilized, high class societies, skinny is more attractive. Focus is on gracile figures and facial features. In more savage, low class societies, thick is more attractive. Focus is on butt and breasts. America is moving more towards the latter preference due to the impact of minority culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 12:44 AM
1

Porn is disgusting. It's probably one of the main problems in society right now. But the girl above? " A bit on the bigger side" lol. She's upset and jealous. I would be too if my husband preferred porn over me, but that's not going to happen. Also, pretty sure all men are into teens. Buuut probably not with the same kind of obsession that incels and TRPers are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 12:41 AM
1

Ahahahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 09:31 PM
2

Well, as a good looking woman, xD, my experience is that beyond a certain point of beauty you do start getting hit on less. The normal pretty girl gets hit on a lot. But girls more attractive than that actually do get hit on less. I think the main reason is that there are just far less men who are in or league. Men are rather insecure, (even the attractive ones can be!) they subconsciously don't want to get rejected, and women are picky. So why would you want to be rejected by a gal you probably…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 07:58 PM
3

Don't marry unsuccessful/mediocre men?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 07:14 PM
2

Browse reddit with a bf? Ahahahah no
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 10:45 AM
8

Gossip. Making up rumors and stories. Faking niceness. Vanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 08:42 PM
1

nope!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 05:14 PM
2

Omg, I took an astronomy class for some reason in my sophomore year. Same experience. It actually involved math! Was not expecting that ><
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 06:52 PM
2

Maybe among the lower class. I live in Houston. Among my circle of friends and acquaintances about 2% have tattoos, afaik.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 06:24 PM
6

It's actually quite accurate for Reddit Rollo. He always makes a low effort post and links to his blog.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 06:23 PM
1

90% of young people dont have tattoos lol. Tattoos are suuuuuuuper trashy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 05:49 PM
2

uhuh... You seem kinda unstable
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 05:33 PM
3

SirNemesis and TheBlackQuill Atlas and Silvah Notworthmuch and PBRStreetsquad Fiat and me BPremium and PJ of course Electra and JordanPeterson
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 01:49 AM
1

aahhaahhaa
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 05:45 PM
1

Oh great! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 01:48 AM
1

I have no idea if mine was even posted :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 01:39 AM
3

You can be a jew and an atheist. So are you Jewish? What has Catholicism done for society Ahahahahahahaha Nice one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 09:07 PM
8

awww looks like I offended a Jew :(
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 08:46 PM
4

Tbh most of the gals I've seen here aren't ugly at all but aren't like super pretty either. About so and so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:25 PM
0

You must be on the IRC for sure. Theambivalentrooster!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:19 PM
2

Automod vs electra - who's the better robot?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:17 PM
5

Electracute? I didn't know you could vote for robots In that case I vote for Automoderator! She's perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:59 PM
0

Maybe. And whooo are you :o
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:58 PM
0

Ohh Smallwindowpane? He doesn't seem autistic enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:57 PM
1

Yuck
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:54 PM
1

If women think that then they are ugly xD Dating was super super fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:33 PM
1

I love you THIS much. spreads arms as far as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:29 PM
0

Blasphemy! Burn him! Seriously though :(
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:26 PM
0

OMG WHO ARE YOU
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:24 PM
10

She's also autistic, a jew (ew), thinks women shouldn't vote, is totally fine with genocide and killing babies, and etc. BUT that still doesn't mean no one should care bout her opinions. Her opinions are super awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:18 PM
2

Cool! :) Also Jesus wasn't short.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:51 AM
1

I've been alpha widowed :((
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:47 AM
2

YOU ARENT EVEN THAT SHORT Everyone shorter than me + heels should be shot. Completely objective opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:27 AM
2

Are you cheating on me???? :o
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:27 AM
2

Omg I didn't think of that! Come to think of it my h would look pretty chic in Valentinos.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 04:37 AM
1

I'd date short men but I like wearing heels. Heels are hot. Unlike short men. xD Seriously though short guys should kill themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 04:13 AM
2

I can show a photo of myself. I think that should be sufficient xD
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 04:06 AM
1

lmao quilly
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 02:01 AM
1

Well her personality is insufferable but she's had a ton of boyfriends, so she probably is above average at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 01:34 AM
3

There are multiple subs for rape, assault, divorce, feminism etc. too. The point is that this is what liberal women have constructed as a CORE part of their identity. Being victims. It's reflected in the fact that on a general female topics thread, women are overwhelmingly talking about victim narratives. I don't like that. I find it gross. I mean, many women get raped, many women get abused. But most don't, and it's ridiculous to consider this a part of the 'female experience' and something tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 07:10 PM
2

Yep. That is what normal women talk about. We talk about guys, talk about husbands, talk about kids, talk about cooking, fashion, decor, exercise, sex, health, dieting... etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:48 PM
2

They don't just get upvoted. That's all the posts there are. Let me demonstrate. Lets go through the 'new' list on twoX right now and make a list. 4 are about sexual assault and harassment, 1 about abuse, 2 about abortion and contraception, 6 about feminism and general oppression. So 13 out of 25 posts are about a victim narrative. And half of the one's that aren't are men asking the women questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:40 PM
2

The scale shouldn't change what we discuss. These people have no individual identities. It's beyond crazy. It's like how even can you just talk about abortions, rape, abuse, divorce, oppression, ALL THE TIME. That's not what being a woman is about. Not in the traditional sense. This is collective victimhood. People coming together to feel sorry for their collective identity. And it breeds a lot of toxicity. Liberal women are extremely toxic. Its just toxicity that has become acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:20 PM
1

It's a question of values. I happen to think that protecting the most vulnerable members in our society is of paramount importance. You think that bashing the skull in of a human fetus and then ripping its limbs out piece by piece before taking a vacuum and removing whatever parts remained of the poor thing is totally cool. Yes, thats what happens in second trimester abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 06:03 AM
1

Yeah it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:48 AM
2

Women don't have testosterone. We never commit mass murder. But killing your own child? It's the sickest thing in the world for me. Especially the late second (and THIRD, in the case of Canada) trimester abortions that feminists promote.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 10:34 PM
3

The narrative they construct is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 10:33 PM
2

And there was no other significant cultural/social changes that happened since then that may explain the drop?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:13 PM
2

yeah I don't believe those studies. There are so many other factors involved
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 08:33 PM
1

Psycho.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 08:17 PM
4

Do you think so? I think porn causes more rape, actually. It encourages disordered male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 08:17 PM
3

Things would be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 07:45 PM
1

I mean, like, it's just something that happens naturally. When you are young you have less responsibilities, so you select for different traits than what you do when you are looking for a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 07:44 PM
3

You assume incorrectly. I'm not a guy. And lots of women are prolife. Not all women are so happpy to murder children. So you lost the argument. Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 07:03 PM
0

Thanks for taking the time to prove my point. The point is, this is not how normal people behave. If my friend group and I were to have a women only online chat space, it would not include repeated instances of subjects like rape, abortion, domestic violence etc. The reason that this is the case in TwoX is that these women place their collective identity above their individual one. So whats the point about talking about stuff like fashion, cooking, gossip, movies, etc? Better to talk about thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 06:24 PM
2

Manslaughter as a legal term holds the person responsible for that manslaughter guilty of a crime. Because they are held to be responsibile through negligence or etc. If its a total accident without any malicious intent or a result of any actions taken by the female, it is NOT MANSLAUGHTER. THIS IS NOT A MORAL ARGUMENT, its you not understanding legal terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 06:05 PM
7

The frequency at which they talk about negative things is astounding to me. That's not what my group of friends talk about at all. It's so rare to come across them talking about normal feminine things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 06:03 PM
3

apron gives the best knee support so they can give blowjobs Ew. Well lets see.. my friends and I talk about movies, celebrities, guys/ husbands, fashion, cooking, dieting, marriage, random gossip etc. I dont know what your group of friends talks about, but I find TwoX incredibly weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 06:01 PM
1

Yeah, feminists in Canada pushed for third trimester abortion. Every single baby that was terminated in the third trimester (or the second or that matter, but definitely the third) was killed by every definition of the word. So that's blood on all of their hands
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 05:57 PM
1

Imagine basing your identity on collective victimhood. As a group who is raped, abused, oppressed etc. That's what TwoX is. And its quite pathetic and toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 05:55 PM
1

Right. It's not murder. It's just killing. Nice distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 05:54 PM
3

Doesn't matter whether they see it as murder. Criminals often don't see what they are doing as crimes. how science-based vs superstitious your system of thinking is. Neither science nor 'superstition' is supportive of Roe v Wade laws. Babies become living, breathing human beings in most manners of the word in the first trimester. They become human persons (develop early consciousness) in their second trimester. Your ''bunch of cells' excuse only works for the first few weeks. Fortunately we can …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:11 AM
5

Good guess! I'm traditional Catholic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:07 AM
11

It creates a really toxic environment when you just keep on talking about negative things, and just base your entire identity on collective victimhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:06 AM
3

Hyperbole
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:06 AM
1

Its beneficial, so I am going to convince myself that it's not murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:05 AM
1

This is absolutely ridiculous. Are you saying that I am being a hypocrite because I don't hold women responsible for miscarriages? Do you realize how insane this argument is? If a mother's 1 month old child dies of some illness, is she to be held accountable for that too? Because miscarriages are often equally as out of the mothers hands as illness is. Your argument only makes sense if the mother could somehow be held liable for the miscarriage becasue she could have prevented it somehow. As I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 09:04 AM
2

I do if she was doing crack - because then it's directly on her. But if it was an accident, then obviously it is not. But it's still treated like a loss of a human life. By the mother and everyone else. Because it is a loss of a human life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 02:48 AM
0

Lol, that must be the most stupid thing I've heard all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 02:16 AM
3

Omg there was this one post of this guys field report where he was just talking to girls, and the post was like 2000 words long and had FOOTNOTES. That was a true gem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 02:15 AM
18

It's sooo super toxic are you kidding. Half the topics are about abortion, domestic abuse, divorce and feminism. Like do these women have NOTHING else to talk about other than how they are such victims? It's kind of sick (not to mention delusional and weird.) It reminds me of incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 01:56 AM
6

I'm not a red piller xD
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 01:54 AM
2

literally ending a human life. not murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 01:53 AM
3

Of course. Idk if it would be a huge loss though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 01:53 AM
2

Ahahahaha! That's an awesome insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:56 PM
24

TwoX is literally a celebration and promotion of baby murder. It's literally like: 'Hey everyone, I just found this subreddit. I'm pregnant and I...' " GET AN ABORTION!" But baby murder is considered a good thing by the left, so TwoX is literally on the top bar. The people in power get to define what is positive and what is negative. And reddit has always been left wing. It was only a matter of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:53 PM
1

Ahahahahaha. What the heck is a tzecrukheneh xD
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:50 PM
-3

Ahahahahahaha. This is awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:47 PM
1

Just get married. Then do whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:46 PM
2

Well having a child out of marriage is a horrible idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:09 PM
9

Less people marrying early. Less poor people and minorities marrying at all. This doesn't mean that there is less degeneracy in society. There is more. It's not like divorce is becoming more taboo among millennials. It's just as permissible, if not more so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 06:08 AM
3

Kinda does. Iykwim Hahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 06:05 AM
5

Traditional Catholic marriage as described in the Bible and Church doctrine. Traditional roles for the husband and wife. Focus on family and children. No divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 05:11 AM
4

Dating has become kind of like marriage, and marriage has become glorified long term dating. Both now pale compared to traditional Christian marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 04:58 AM
2

I came here to post this and saw that you already said it xD I'm starting to think like you :o
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 07:58 PM
1

Err... you do realize that having 20 men and 80 women wont solve the 80/20 so called problem right? Women will just desire the top 4 men. -_-
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 07:53 PM
1

So.. I have a cousin who's super good looking. Like everyone in our family is pretty good looking, but he stands out even among us. BUT he's been having a hard time finding a girlfriend. He's like 17, and always complains about girls. But he looks SO HANDSOME. It's so confusing to me. But that's just it.. half of it is attitude and he doesnt have it. What do women like? Confidence, firstly. He doesn't have it. Humor, he doesn't have it. Maturity.. nope. I don't mean maturity as in 'oh I don't do…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/18 02:02 PM
3

Idk whether he's a chad. He hasn't had lots of sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 11:38 PM
3

Why dont you go out and try
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 10:57 PM
2

1. But I am sure you have too! You think you are an incel. You think Betty 25-BMI with acne and a flat nose would turn you down?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 10:06 PM
5

I've talked to incel men who turn down those opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:35 PM
2

The degree of compromise varies. The degree to which you may desire someone better also varies. For example, my fiance is over 6 feet, attractive, has a decent job, comes from a wealthy family, is kind, quite religious, confident.. There aren't very many men above him, from an objective pov.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:35 PM
1

<3 Looove this song.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:14 PM
7

I think all unattractive couples have had their relationship built on a compromise. Which is... 'I wish I could have better, and I don't find you that attractive, but it's better than being alone.' Seems to me that more women are willing to make that compromise than men. Incel men seem super entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 09:12 PM
1

No you didn't. The context was that is a prostitute in a dominant relationship with the man, and furthermore, is prostitution an institution that could be considered a form of female domination? It obviously is not. And your reply didn't add anything to that conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:33 PM
1

Why would it be? Why would I care. You are responding to a conversation. You should respond within the context of that conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:33 PM
1

Well, I expected that your reply was in context to the conversation I was having with the other user. If you were just making a random comment, that's unbelievably stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 06:22 PM
1

haha are you making an Hilary? "the real victims of war are women" :') u/louplop you two talk exactly alike ahahahha
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:45 AM
1

Okay. I do think that lol. Outside of my values, there is no harm in having sex with alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:44 AM
1

Whether it's 'myth' or not is irrelevant to our discussion. You said that despite prostitution being a form of female 'domination' (🙄), feminists oppose it. And your implication was that this means feminists are not supportive of dominant female sexuality. However, feminists don't believe that prostitution is a form of female domination, so your point is irrelevant. Understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:41 AM
1

If its a SERVICE she provides, it's not a dominant relationship is it!? Its an effing service she's being paid to do. A man could tell his slave to dominate him during sex, that doesn't mean that slaves dominate their masters. But that is literally what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 08:27 AM
4

Prostitution cannot possibly be a form of domination. It is literally a man paying for a woman's services. The man is a consumer, the woman is a good. Individually, a woman may have the choice to engage in prostitution (although many do not and prostitution often leads to sex slavery but thats another topic.) Institutionally, it's a system where men with money are allowed to abuse and humiliate women who come from poverty and need money.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 08:06 PM
5

Not entirely true. Feminists do encourage sex positivity, but only on their terms. They hate the traditional, submissive, romantic sexual expression of feminine women. However, women who dominate men sexually, or ignore men completely and express their sex positivity through lesbianism are celebrated. I think that's something most leading feminists have in common. On the issue of casual sex itself, there is clearly a lot of divide. It really comes down to whether you think casual sex is empoweri…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:49 PM
1

And women got raped in wars. And lost their sons and husbands. I'd say that's worse than just dying. But who curr, this is so irrelevant to the modern day anyway. A lot of women would have a problem with your statement that men want sex more. lots of AWALTs. And masculine women. PPD is full of masculine women. guessing what's in the woman's head, how to approach her, how to deal with the possible rejection. That'll always be the nature of male, female relationships. Because regardless of what so…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:57 AM
8

It's simply due to biology. Women have less birth defects due to having two copies of the X chromosome TRPers are whining about female biological privilege now? Seriously? Women have tremendous sexual power. That 'privilege' is just a consequence of men desiring sex more. If men collectively have a problem with it, y'all should just stop pursuing sex. Oh wait, that's never gonna happen xD. A woman in a powerful family had it insanely better than a poor man getting shot in a pointless war. And a …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:35 AM
1

ah gotcha, should have known xD
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:15 AM
1

You sound hysterical. When did I suggest they should seek STRs with alphas? My advice was to not seek LTRs with them. That doesn't automatically mean 'have sex with them.' As I said, I do not believe in premarital sex or casual sex, so why would I suggest that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:02 AM
1

I'm not even considering the guys pov. but... give alphas sex for free and make betas pay for it I don't believe in premarital sex, and certainly not casual sex, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 02:44 AM
3

Hi Atlas! Well, that is what it is to BPers. The actual definition is "prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex." I mean, I guess you can say that different treatment is discrimination. Although discrimination means unjust differential treatment, so we'd have to describe what we mean by unjust... Ugh, whatever. If it is sexist, then I guess everyone with a brain is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 01:13 AM
1

I'm always right xD
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 09:27 PM
5

80% of this of this was just whining about men and women being different, not actual sexism. 20% I agree with. Oh look 80/20, I'm becoming a Terper :(
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 09:25 PM
1

Nice guys are boring. Chads usually aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 09:23 PM
1

I would say most alphas get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 07:14 PM
1

Who said they don't. They get married and have LTRs, just like anyone else. Maybe in their 30s or something, but they get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 02:45 PM
4

Don't marry or ltr alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 04:25 AM
1

Lamentations, Ezekiel, Isaiah and many others show that God will not be trifled with. That He does not suffer fools quietly and He does not put up with unfaithful, mouthy, arrogance. That is not towards his Church though.
/r/RPChristians12/02/18 08:00 PM
1

So any place where men gather and talk about their sexual desires is a look into male sexuality? Obviously, genius. If so, can we identify "male nature" by looking into /r/MILFs ? Well there isn't much discussion there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 07:52 PM
1

What the f??????????????
/r/RPChristians12/02/18 04:36 AM
4

Well late 30s/40s men should be married. And thats ten times more true for late 30s/40s women. The idea TRP espouses that middle age guys who maintain their value (i.e. stay fit and employed) will have an abundance of women to choose from seem illusory. That was probably true in like.. 1950.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:01 AM
1

Aww so yall came here. Cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 12:59 AM
1

:/ what are you doing here? I thought it was all about Bots now. :o
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 12:16 AM
7

only women that will want me are those who were not able to get any other guy I think thats the way it is for literally everyone who is not very good looking. It's usually a compromise because they can't realistically get any better. Why should that upset you? And what does that make you sad about FEMALE nature? Its male nature too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 11:07 PM
1

You can read about their desires. Young, very young women. Older women do not attract them. Granted, some of this, as I've always thought, is a result of late bloomer sexuality. But it's still male nature. You can read about what they want in relationships. How they desire multiple women. How willing they are to 'dread game' and the like in order to get power in their relationships. You can see what they fantasize about by reading about the porn they watch or the fantasies they have (not TRP, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 10:08 PM
1

Amazing! You understood nothing of what I said!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 09:26 PM
14

Nah. A gynocentric (in a feminist sense) marketplace inevitably devolves to these uncivilized mascularchies. The only reason white communities aren't like this is because we've been civilized for over a thousand years through the strong influence of patriarchy, religion and culture. But we are getting there too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 09:16 PM
2

Wow thats so interesting. Tell me more. http://media.gallup.com/GPTB/religValue/20031216b_1.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:07 PM
2

All changes. Can't narrow it to any one change. The continuity of Church teachings was important in many ways. For the clergy, it meant that any deviation from tradition meant heresy. For the faithful, it meant that they could have faith in the doctrine, since the doctrine were mostly unaltered for centuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 07:39 PM
3

Don't believe in divorce. Don't believe in prenup. So if he asks I'll kick him. But marriage for me is a lot more serious than it is for most.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 07:23 PM
2

Who said I want complete freedom. Civilization is about limiting human freedoms, and teaching them morality and discipline. We've been regressing from that since the sexual revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 07:09 PM
2

Catholicism has been a joke since 1960 (and I'm a devout Catholic btw.) But it didn't just become a joke because of cultural changes. In 1960 Catholicism was still very influential. The church shot itself in the foot with Vatican II, and embracing progressivism. A church that stands for nothing will have no adherents.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 07:06 PM
1

religious organizations played a role That was entirely religious organizations. If men want to restore traditional power structures then they need to embrace traditional ideologies - religion for example. You can probably restore traditional ideas through a new ideology, but it's quite difficult. And men tend to not get behind ideologies like women do. Religion is probably the exception. Fascism was another example I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 07:04 PM
3

Collective female hysteria from feminists to make you guys shut the eff up. And then everything continues as normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:47 AM
1

Being at the top doesn't mean you dominate politically and socially. Look at the US. EVEN NOW, with Trump in charge, feminist ideas are dominant. What legislation is being passed to damage women rights in any way. In some southern states they are tough on abortion, which does damage the feminist agenda. But that's not men getting together to oppose feminists, that's religious people getting together to oppose feminists. Men are too fragmented. MRA and TRP have like.. zero real relevance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:43 AM
2

This whole thing about women not liking guys above 6' is bullshit. See this is what I mean. Who the heck told men that it's BS in the first place??? Height is something we obsess over, a LOT. I guess it's something that isn't egalitarian so the postmodernist left pretends to shove it aside as unimportant. Just like facial beauty and fitness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:39 AM
2

Yeah.... well what I realized after I heard all these things is that men that are close to me have been culturally conditioned to be different than men actually are, or behave differently. Most men accept monogamy. Why? Because of centuries of Christianity. So that made me respect culture and religion a lot, but not men so much. That said, yes you can deal with a lot of the negative aspects of the nature of the opposite sex if you have a good partner, but many don't, and it only enhances your re…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:35 AM
2

Yeah! Christianity only lasted like what... 1950 years??? So unsustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:31 AM
4

I don't think so. I never wanted to know the disgusting stuff men watch in porn, their disgusting fantasies, or how they are biologically incapable of monogamy unless forced to by cultural norms, or how they always desire the youngest women possible, or how they objectify women naturally at a primal level, or how much they can hate women if they get rejected and etc. Even second wave feminism was probably a result of women realizing that they can be the best wives ever but it doesnt matter, male…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 02:20 AM
1

Meh. The more we learn about the opposite sex the more we dislike each other. That's really the whole thing about feminism and TRP. It's impossible not to dislike the other sex a little bit because of how different we are. This wasn't much of a problem back when women and men just accepted that we are different and didn't try to learn too much about each other. Now some post-modernist idiots have convinced the world we aren't so different. And then some TRPers go and actually read about female n…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 01:45 AM
1

Idk if 99% of men watch porn :/ Maybe HAVE watched. But anyway. These men probably never developed properly into mature adults and wont be able to put forth any policy changes in a future where feminists will probably dominate. Now I might be being unfair to them. I don't really now any of them irl. I'm just judging from what I've seen of their character online.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 01:34 AM
1

I'm in Texas, and most men that I know (UC, UMC+) are super polite, sophisticated, charming men that are somewhat beta but who I would classify as 'high betas.' Definitely not cucks and I cant see them having much trouble dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 01:17 AM
2

It's because of lack of religion. This whole experiment is never going to work. But good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 01:13 AM
1

Probably never. Because the men who are hooked on porn are unlikely to be in power positions. But idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 12:35 AM
1

No I'm not saying that. Nor would that be a logical conclusion to make from what I said. Porn in and of itself is making men more misogynistic. But other cultural factors have lowered misogyny overall, I guess. Also important to note that porn probably doesn't breed misogyny of the 'abusive' type. I doubt a guy would be more likely to beat his wife if he's addicted to porn. But im 100% sure that it makes men objectify women more.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 08:25 PM
1

Well I'd imagine if porn didn't exist at least half of these guys would go out and actually talk to gals and improve themselves. Half of the incels here have never approached a gal to ask her out, and the other half are unfit with horrible hygiene, dress sense, hair etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 12:34 AM
2

There is a lot of degeneracy there, true. Y'all need religion. But I think it's a) lack of understanding of female sexuality. A gal can have rape fantasies without actually wanting them. Guys seem to do everything to make sure their fantasies come true. Visually, and irl. And b) Even so, if half the things I've heard about porn from the PPDIRC are true, then its 100x worse than those books there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 09:51 PM
2

Right right... well, porn and erotica are very different, as I said. It's mostly bored housewives that consume erotica, so its a far different fantasy than porn and I doubt it effects the dating environment much at all. It's mostly a fantasy for housewives to escape their boring lives. Not nearly as destructive as porn. And like... okay...? Maybe it makes women more submissive? I don't think it does. I think most feminine women are naturally submissive to men they find attractive. So erotica is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 09:26 PM
3

True. Point?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 09:10 PM
2

They had misogynists too. Doesn't mean porn doesn't make men more misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 08:46 PM
2

Erotica is very different from porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 08:45 PM
8

Lol no.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 06:59 PM
6

Do men and women learn sex from porn or through their peers or first-hand experience? I've watched porn just once. It's disgusting. And how the heck would you 'learn sex' from watching porn? Is the male power fantasy represented in porn misogynistic/problematic? It's super problematic. In more ways than just creating misogyny. I'm convinced it creates incels. And bisexuals, transgenders and homosexuals. And misogyny on top of that. And this whole disgusting BDSM thing. I think porn has caused mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 06:12 PM
1

No!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 07:03 AM
2

lmao, you are a genius xD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 06:39 AM
2

Why do most men, cross culturally, who have the most casual sex, embody the values, behaviors and attitudes towards women that the red pill advocates? No they don't. You can't 'advocate' those values, behaviors and attitudes because it's all natural for them, and it can never be natural for red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 07:11 PM
3

lmao that's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 10:21 PM
3

It'll probably push away some men from engaging in degenerate culture. But those men were probably the socially awkward, neurotic, paranoid males who probably didn't engage in it much in the first place. Meanwhile women and most men continue to engage in it. It really is just 19th century female hysteria over libertines, but now in the 21st century. It makes far less sense now though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 10:20 PM
1

Femininity isn't strictly necessary. If they wish, the neuroplasticity of our brains will allow feminists to create a culture where women will stop behaving in a feminine way. I'm a traditionalist, so of course I oppose that. Marriage satisfies two things mostly: 1) desire for children and 2) desire for a stable partner. Your solution means less stability for the children, and a partner who will leave you after 18-30 years. Idk how old you are or if you are feminine, but I'm sure most feminine w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 07:47 PM
1

If women want to follow gender roles, let them. If they don't, that's OK too. Okay thats great. But you do realize that this isn't what most feminists think? Men are pressured to because it is a mark of success and maturity. It is that to some degree for women too, but sure. Anyway my point still stands. I'd argue slut shaming is good and necessary to preserve femininity. Masculine women are usually the unapologetic sluts, not feminine women. Too many sluts slutting around damages marriage as an…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 06:50 PM
1

Right, well why can't most women follow gender roles and the outliers can do whatever they want. Masculine minded women are surely the minority. But this whole post was nonsense anyway. In my income class, women don't have to work. Some do, some don't. I'd argue fem women would prefer not to work any grueling job. But women in most income classes have to work anyway. And women are pressured to have kids and get married because thats what most women want so that becomes an expectation solely due …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 06:25 PM
2

Gender roles are great. I love them. Y'all can go ahead and be men. I don't see why most women would want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 07:01 AM
1

Yeah okay. You are in denial. But fine, keep thinking you are not missing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 06:38 AM
1

Lol, in most modern marriages both the wife and husband are working. And anyway, there is a big difference. A prostitute sees many men and isn't MONOGAMOUS. There are no CHILDREN involved. There is no LOYALTY involved. You dont LIVE together. You dont SHARE all your finances and assets. You dont HELP each other You dont do other things than just sex. I mean that's just such a ridiculous thing to say. The family, formed by marriage, is the basic unit of civilization. Prostitution is just degenera…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 06:19 AM
2

Oh, nvm. Got confused. Yuck. Most girls are, in a sense The 'rolling eyes' emoji would be useful here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 06:15 AM
2

Why would they go if its stigmatized and they can get casual sex if they wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 04:11 AM
2

Look,I don't want to say anything about your 'profession', but I'm pretty sure the guys I've known would rather have bad sex with a girl who wants them than good sex with a woman they paid, and who probably saw a different client a few hours earlier. A very certain type of man goes to prostitutes, not all or most men. Or more gals would be prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 04:07 AM
0

All the men I've known other than the men in my family have been young and wealthy. I'm pretty sure none of them ever needed to go to a prostitute. As I said, ugly men, dead bedroom men and older men. Young, attractive, wealthy men? naaaa
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 08:18 AM
3

They don't. I think its mostly less attractive or dead bedroom types who would do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 05:04 AM
1

If he never acted on his bisexuality, it doesnt matter whether he's a monk or a marine officer or whatever xD.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 03:19 AM
1

I have a lot of choice, like most people, in who I want as my partner. If this was purely based on choice and I already knew the sexual history of my potential partner, then I would choose to have a partner with no bisexual past, regardless of if he is clean or not. But if I was to fall in love with someone, like what happens to most of us, and then find out that my partner has had bisexual sexual activity in the past, then I probably wouldn't leave him over it - provided he doesn't consider him…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 03:00 AM
1

I actually don't agree. that straight women are more likely to have a sexually transmitted disease than straight men Only because some of us have sex with bisexual men. more sexual partners, That is actually not true. The median, which is the only thing that matters in this context, number of partners women have is less than men. The mean is different because of sluts. But if you take the average man and woman the man is more likely to have had more partners. more anal sex received. That's obvio…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 01:33 AM
1

sure xD
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:01 PM
2

If someone is part of a group that has, on average, 10 times more partners than the average male, and 500 times more likely to have HIV, that is a rational reason to avoid dating them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:01 PM
2

Wait... WHAT? Insecurity? Explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 09:53 PM
1

Google
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 09:41 PM
2

I gave you rational reasons. Are you kidding me?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 09:40 PM
1

It's a visceral response but it also has a rational basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 09:23 PM
1

There is a huge overlap. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 09:22 PM
1

I never said it's exclusively young girls. I said it's big among young HP fans. Try to make sense please. And yes I did. Not fan fiction, collaborative writing. But it was also mostly gals, and mostly young. Do you know caution 2.0?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 09:00 PM
0

A bisexual who hasn't had anal sex. Huh. Still a high likelihood that they might have anal someday. Bisexuals and gays also have a ton of partners, so their chances of getting STDs from any sexual activity is higher. As are the chances that they'll cheat on you and leave you. And anyway, I find it disgusting regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 08:57 PM
0

Oh I was part of that community. I used to do collaborative writing in Harry Potter online communities when I was like.. 11-12. But a) enjoying fan fiction of two male characters who you absolutely loved falling in love with each other doesn't necessarily mean you'll enjoy dating a degenerate irl. b) The fan fiction community is almost exclusively young girls and liberal women. From my own experience, it's primarily the former. But either way it's hardly representative of women as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 08:42 PM
2

It's really big among young HP fans. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:39 PM
0

a) I don't care what liberals think is disgusting b) Its not purely prejudice, it's also rational. In my city bisexuals and homosexuals make up 80% of the HIV population. And they are 1-2% of the city population. They are almost definitely over represented by a wide margin in other STDs as well. Not to mention any relationship with a bisexual man is likely to be far less stable. There is also a high possibility he's a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:30 PM
6

I mean, good for her, good for you. But that's another topic xD
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:58 PM
3

Dominated in what way? Like the BDSM crap? Yes that is disgusting. And degenerate. But like, a partner behaving like a dominant male? Of course not. That's attractive. Most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:46 PM
1

It's degenerate and disgusting. And I don't want HIV.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:39 PM
5

Not in a million years. Not even if he looks like a young Brad Pitt.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:32 PM
1

Oh wow Mr Fiat, it's just a children's movie. They are just trying to brainwash kids with liberal values. Happens with like literally every movie these days :/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 03:34 PM
2

Who says its 'egalitarian and loving?'
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 02:55 AM
1

Dallas sucks. Everyone knows Houston > Dallas.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 10:18 AM
1

Unless you buy a mail order bride or stick to prostitutes So thats what you do? xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 10:04 AM
1

Oh yeah, I'm probably the only devout Christian here xD Doctor engineer and lawyer dont really impress me. Dont think they would impress girls in my church group either. Not that much. They mostly want romance and faithfulness. Younger men have an edge because yeah, promiscuity and also because society frowns upon large age differences at 21. Its not really as much of a problem by 23-24.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/17 11:50 AM
1

Thanks xD. The OPs post reads like a Rollo Tomassi blog post lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/17 11:40 AM
2

Oh Lewis, thats so horrible. Instead of posting here you should focus on your marriage so that you actually love your wife and she loves you. And I don't mean that as a slight.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 08:30 AM
1

Do you really want to lose a fight to a girl? :o Btw, Happy Thanksgiving mister.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 08:30 AM
1

Make me!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 01:29 PM
2

However, I'm just afraid that if I hold out too long then I will never find that right girl as most younger, christian girls will not want to date a 30 something year old man and the ones who do will have friends talk them out of the relationship. Yeah thats true. And don't listen to the TRPers saying we like older men. Young girls find them attractive, but rarely if ever date them. So if you are looking for a 21 year old conservative Christian gal, better start soon. I know few 21 yos who are d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 01:26 PM
2

:o
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 01:11 PM
4

Mbti works best when you use it to speculate to what degree a certain person resembles a type. Otherwise it's just a mediocre approximation of a wide, complex range of character traits to a four letter one-or-the-other representation. And to use THAT approximation to determine which is the best mbti type for a potential partner FOR YOU (and your type) is ridiculous. So basically what I am saying is... ESFJ is obviously the best type.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 01:10 PM
3

1-1 is clobbering now xD
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:46 AM
1

no mentally disabled people that seems oddly specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:39 AM
1

2) No legal marriage. Aren't you married?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:37 AM
1

No marriage? :/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:36 AM
2

Are any girls here sexually attracted to guys that they kind of hate at the same time? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:20 AM
2

Same religion and values Ambitious or well off or high status Can't be a pushover
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:20 AM
1

don't waste time on someone who isn't really into you. glares at Haley
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:15 AM
5

lmao Top 3 cast-iron rules Semicolon is like who currr
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:13 AM
1

Oh wow thats confusingg. Why isn't he sirnemesis on the irc??? But lol that troll account xD Anyway, Sern's been rockclimbing so he's strong enough to beat you as badly physically in strength as he beat you in chess. So... You are saying that we will be even, physically in strength??? /u/SirNemesis!!!! Fiat is still making fun of you :(
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 08:23 PM
1

He knows I'm certainly not talking about physical strength OMG! u/SerNemesis see what Fiat is implying??? :o EDIT: nvm, didn't read it properly xD
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 04:03 AM
1

The PPD irc is a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 01:38 AM
1

So men are like women, but worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 11:58 AM
21

Don't men ever second guess their choice of partner either? This is a common theme on TRP and PPD. A lot of the behaviors and 'strategies' TRPers accuse women of are widely seen in men as well. People in general are hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 12:02 PM
3

I think my desires for what I wanted in a long term relationship, or even if I wanted a long term relationship, changed a lot over the years. A lot of what I did was the result of pressure from peers and bfs, and immaturity. I was a year or two younger than all my peers (since I was homeschooled) so I started doing the things they did a year or two earlier, but was much younger and far too immature to think about long term goals. Anyway, I grew out of that phase, and it certainly wasn't because …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 11:59 AM
1

I was just kidding lol Btw I have to admit... I like dogs more than cats xD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 09:02 PM
1

How do you know so much about this? Was it your car? :o
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 06:10 AM
1

Who curr. I don't even like cats that much. But wait... err, thats a dead cat???
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 05:48 AM
1

Aww! Thats so cute and messed up :/ Cats are better than dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 05:20 AM
1

"Cats are trash" - u/drok007 -____-
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 04:10 AM
3

Omg yeah. I can't believe how they can even write so much about such a boring topic. Some of these FRs make Atlas Shrugged seem like one of u/drok007's posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 03:58 AM
2

Omg Fiat :o
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 03:50 AM
1

Afraid not :(
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 09:35 PM
18

Omg there was this one field report that was like 2000 words long, and it had FOOTNOTES and sources and everything! And to top it off, it was about a random, mundane encounter with a gal, and lead to nothing. I was like... yeah... no wonder you are having trouble getting laid -__-
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 08:04 PM
5

I mean, I'm just thinking about what you said compared to what I've actually experienced and it's mostly wrong. Like lets say I'm at a party, what I consider attractive male behavior is approaching me, and talking to me comfortably, with confidence, no awkwardness and humor. If that male was less attractive, but could still pull off that confidence and charm, then I would not consider him creepy, even though I would probably not be attracted to him. What I would consider creepy behavior is like.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 10:44 PM
3

Oh come on Lewis... This is so ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 10:12 PM
5

Omg I have a friend who had this SUPER creep after her for the longest time. We used to be high school classmates and he was obsessed with her. He had like almost no friends, and (even though she had blocked him.) often he would post her pictures on his facebook wall and make lewd comments about her. He did this for YEARS. Biggest creep I've ever known. But there have been a LOT of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 09:57 PM
1

Yeah that's probably true. Oh well, such is life!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/17 04:51 PM
1

naaahhh The article u/rollo-tomassi linked showed that while women found most men unattractive, we still messaged them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/17 04:44 PM
1

I don't remember what my old comment was, sorry xD I believe I was responding to Lewis though, not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 08:22 PM
1

Omg you actually reported my post? wow
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 04:49 PM
1

http://www.yourtango.com/2016285828/women-find-80-percent-men-unattractive-says-crazy-study Yeah I've heard of this one. Can't argue with statistics so I guess it's true! Which is kinda nuts lol. I mean I find 80% of men unattractive. I would think less attractive girls would be less picky, but apparently not. So yeah, its TRUE that 80/20 is probably the case for attraction. But that doesn't lead to 80/20 distribution in sexual partners, mainly because, I guess, our society has evolved to promot…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 02:37 AM
2

It's the black influence on American culture. Also, Emphasis on facial structure, grace, slenderness, etc -> civilized Emphasis on exaggerated 'assets' -> primal nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 08:43 PM
1

Rollo!! <3 17 to 1 was a long time ago! The statistics don't support a 80/20 distribution now. The median male has had 6 partners! its almost impossible to have a proper 80/20 distribution with that median Rollo. The average male seems to be doing alright now. Back then there were probably much scarcer resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 05:28 AM
1

So? Back then it was probably pretty horrible to raise children without them dying or getting sick. A wealthy man with land was a safe option for women. 17 to 1 does seem insane though! I wonder how accurate that research is. Also HI!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/17 09:14 PM
1

Age gap has about halved in the last 80 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/17 12:22 PM
1

Well here's a graph: http://www.genealogyintime.com/Images/image_US_marriage_age_1890-2010.jpg So it is significant I think. From 4 to 2. I'm not sure what effect this has on the SMV though. Surprisingly, the US has the lowest gender age gap in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/17 12:04 PM
1

Half the guys who work with my fiance in auditing and finance look like Chads. They're all pretty successful. Chad's have charisma, looks and great social skills. Outside of STEM, those are some of the most important traits for success.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 09:21 PM
3

I didn't know that. I thought men wanted to feel ugly. Thank God for PPD IRC for teaching me such obvious things.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 08:16 PM
1

You think those moderators are bad... lol. You should go to the PPD irc xD
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 09:47 AM
2

Just because the Pareto Principle is observed in some areas, doesn't mean it applies everywhere. Are you kidding me?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 04:54 AM
1

A Catholic marriage with a non-c*nty wife who is supportive and obedient? Pretty sure it's a good deal for a guy. He gets regular sex, food, emotional support, possibly financial support, children. But If you are a late bloomer sexual fiend who wants desperately to f**k 100s of women, then maybe it's not a good deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 04:53 AM
2

Yeah, you did
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 04:49 AM
7

80/20 is statistically wrong. Women aren't less faithful than men. Women aren't children. Women are just as capable of love as men are, if not more. Marriage is often a pretty good deal for a guy, imo. Amorality and hedonism leads to self destruction and lower long term happiness. AFBB happens but not as much as men think it does. It's not as hard for an average man to get sex as TRP pretends. Women don't peak in their teens. Although that's TRP reddit belief. I kinda agree with u/Rollo-tomassi …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 10:40 PM
1

YOU HAPPY LEWIS??? I gave you stats! What more do you want from me! :(
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 10:22 PM
1

CDC sstatistics bring up interesting points. Like 90% of women and 85% of men have had 0-1 partners in the last year. That is almost no difference. Furthermore, if 80/20 is true, then the median of men should be lower than the female median. But.. okay, women lie or men exaggerate for these numbers. BUT STILL, the median of men should be much lower than the mean, relative to the difference for women. That's not the case. Median for women, 3. Mean? 6. Median for men, 7. Mean? 9. Basically if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 07:36 PM
1

Personal experience? Meaning you are a chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 07:31 PM
1

AWWW LADIES FIRST. You are SUCH A GENTLEMAN Lewis <3
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 05:16 PM
1

I thought women effed poor alphas because we're actually attracted to them, and LTRed betas cause we are attracted to their money, not THEM. So which is it? :/ If men need to get into college more, for whatever reason, they should work harder in school :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:32 PM
1

I know, atlas
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:07 PM
1

Got any statistics to back your assertions?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 03:03 PM
1

I think AT best it means that the top 20% of men CAN have sex with almost every woman. But that's obvious... The actual behavior of people does not match 80/20. At most it's like 55/45, and only in the 18-25 age group. And yes, that's from statistics, which show most people are having sex in relationships, and most people are in relationships. Further, the promiscuous crowd is mostly promiscuous with one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 02:37 PM
1

:)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 12:34 PM
2

AFBB is true for some women, not all. 80/20 is statistically incorrect. Some of the effects of the Wall and how it changes behavior are true. Having an 'abudance mentality' is probably extremely important. The divorce rate is a huge issue, and makes marriage quite risky. Feminists are generally quite insane. However, they also have a point. Most of TRP theories are partly true. However TRPers take these things to the extreme, and so these theories become absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 06:37 AM
1

For each woman that graduates, there is one man that did not. So? On what basis should men get college seats and not women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 06:32 AM
2

u/popularpoplar is funnier than anyone on PPD. On the other hand, incels aren't funny, and they don't get laid. So you might have a point. .
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:51 PM
1

I'm an 11 on the Fiat-Drok scale. But mostly cause they love me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:45 PM
1

If you or Fiat can find proof of the third chess game where you presumably beat me, I'll actually join software engineering. Btw, is software engineering computer science? Same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:23 PM
2

...But are not practicing? I used to be a blue piller like you actually, and was not as religious as I am now. But I thought, why not try to be genuine in practicing my faith? So yeah...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:22 PM
1

Thanks I guess. Are you Catholic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 06:43 PM
1

Yes. Why? WE CAN BE GOOD AT CHESS TOO!!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 12:18 PM
2

12-0? We played 100 games, I won every single one. 100-0. Also I'm elo 3000+. Stop lying Fiat :P #FragileMaleEgos Btw I'm just joking. I'm making fun of your memory since you seem to have added extra games that I never played with SerNemesis xD
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 03:38 AM
1

Nope, 100-0 :o
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 03:37 AM
1

And you are black!!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 03:37 AM
1

It's not 5-0! It's 100-0. Reread my post. Stop lying Fiat!!! You have such bad memory smh. I don't know why you're doing this! Aww thats cute. You know why I'm doing this >< G loaded? And wow thanks! But yeah i just think it's like a really boring thing to do.. Oh, and I'm also super intimidated by the misogyny :(
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 09:24 PM
1

Gosh Fiat, I already beat you in chess 100-0. You want me to beat you in computer science too? :/ Sounds tempting! Though I doubt my philosophy degree is super valuable in the 'software industry' xD
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:55 PM
1

That amazement is because of your internalization of enlightenment 'values.' Following moral codes that are beneficial for society as a whole, even in the absence of religion, was not considered strange pre-enlightenment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:44 PM
1

Not me, I follow the morals of my religion, for God and for society. But everyone has some moral code, and often in the absence of any religious beliefs. And morals are most often measured in how beneficial or damaging they are to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:24 PM
1

Religious morals (well, Christian morals) are practical for humanity. Following these morals is beneficial for society, which everyone is a part of.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:06 PM
2

Fact: I'm better at computer science than u/SirNemesis and u/Fiat_Lux_
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:58 PM
1

Clearly you are not a member of the AtlasB club
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 10:06 PM
2

My fiancé (top 20% naturally, yay for hypergamy!) hardly ever talks about gender politics. I'm sure he barely ever thinks about it. If you prod him for his views, he's pretty against feminism. But he just thinks they are idiots, he doesn't harbor bitterness or hatred towards them. Overall I guess most top 20% men barely think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 07:27 PM
3

I know a super smart ESFJ https://www.reddit.com/user/-AveMaria-/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 07:08 PM
1

Go read your teenage angst novels Richard Dawkins books.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 09:32 PM
-1

The motivation for most Christians is that they want to do their part in helping the poor. Hence why Christian volunteering and charity is extremely high, while atheists sit at their computers edgelording on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 07:45 PM
1

Atheist propaganda. Boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 06:14 PM
3

If you believe in heaven and/or hell and that being good gets you into heaven/out of hell then NOTHING you do is selfless. Actually it is. A Christian is not required to go to Africa and do volunteer work to get into heaven. We do it because God has taught us that it is the right thing to do. So religion is merely provides the impetus to go and help, but is not the motivation itself. The motivation for most Christians is that they want to do their part in helping the poor. Hence why Christian vo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 04:23 AM
3

It depends on what you mean by 'shitty.' I already stated what I believe is a selfish act and what is not. I believe it is an intellectually consistent position. I think your position is just based on edginess.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 12:31 AM
0

I edited the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 12:19 AM
2

Found you :P
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 12:18 AM
4

What a ridiculous argument. It's the same argument by moron bravetheists who sit at home and scoff at how Mother Teresa was 'selfish.' "AGHHH EVERYONE IS SELFISH, IM SO EDGY" The kind of 'selfishness' that directly benefits others and does not require THEM to do anything in return for you to feel good about it should not be weighed equally with acts of selfishness that disadvantage others or are done in expectation of receiving repayment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 12:13 AM
1

That's not how terps misunderstand this stuff. This IS what TRP is. From ROK: "Elimination of traditional sex roles and the promotion of unlimited mating choice in women unleashes their promiscuity and other negative behaviors that block family formation." "Men will opt out of monogamy and reproduction if there are no incentives to engage in them." "Past traditions and rituals that evolved alongside humanity served a net benefit to the family unit." Conclusion: 'Men engaged in monogamy because i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 06:44 PM
2

Lots of girls must have wanted to f*** you hyperrreeeaal
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 11:31 PM
2

Ugh, this conversation is becoming so pointless. You align yourself with TRP. What you said originally is not consistent with the general rhetoric of TRP on this topic. That's all I said. And I'm right. So lets move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 11:30 PM
1

Blah blah blah
/r/MGTOW19/10/17 11:28 PM
1

What? The only part of my post that was 'moralizing' was the last part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 10:56 PM
6

Here's the thing. IF you are right that this is what TRP is about, then yeah, I accept your point. HOWEVER, I've been on TRP related websites for over 2 years now. The MOST GENERAL core TRP teaching that I've seen (from Reddit TRP, Roosh, Rollo, Dalrock etc.) is that women are no longer worth your commitment, therefore you should PUA. That first point is important, because TRP can then (and it does) blame US for THEIR degeneracy. Since women have become sluts, men MUST learn game to take advanta…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 10:34 PM
-1

This is so fake news.
/r/MGTOW18/10/17 10:16 PM
1

If all women are like that, why did he have to dig up a 2 year old post to prove his 'point?' It's sample selection bias, as often seen in echo chambers like this one.
/r/MGTOW18/10/17 09:58 PM
4

Reread the post I was replying t See what part he crossed out? He's saying that REGARDLESS of a woman's past, if she holds out on sex you should next her. Doesn't matter if she has an N count of 0, if she doesn't give you sex immediately you should next her. And these are the same people that complain that all women are sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 09:36 PM
6

Yeah but a huge part of TRP is bitching about how women are so promiscuous now. And yet at the same time you are saying that you should next any woman who holds out on sex, FULL STOP. No, condition like 'she's had sex with multiple men period.' She could be a chaste Christian gal and you will be like, nope, either I immediately get sex or soft next! And then you turn around and complain about sluts? What the heck?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 09:35 PM
7

So... If a woman is chaste, and wants a guys commitment before having sex, he should soft next her? YET simultaneously you are going to bitch about women being sluts and practicing 'AF/BB'? This basically proves Terpers are always going to bitch about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 08:31 PM
1

OMG ITS YOUUU
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 08:28 PM
1

no, we are moving towards crap, Your opinion. My statement was, however, not an opinion. The norms after the 60s have been referred to as post-enlightenment. So I don't know why you said "no." Your opinion does not make my statement false. And fyi, i agree with your opinion, but it's still just our position on this matter. Women who enjoy promiscuity and most men who can be promiscuous easily are fine with these sexual norms. I oppose them because of religion. You oppose them because, I guess, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 07:07 PM
1

can you see how so many men don't have the balls to approach because of how they are taught to not be predators? Yep. This is a sexual norms system that doesn't work, mainly because we are now moving towards post-enlightenment sexual norms. It's something new. Enlightenment era 'masculine' traits like persistence and seduction are being demonized. But at the same time, we aren't moving back towards pre-enlightenment sexual norms (one to one monogamy.) So I understand that there is a whole lot of…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 12:56 AM
1

cheat on her boyfriend, Never did that engage in homosexual activities Never did that. all while actively claiming to be Christian I didn't claim to be Christian then. Oh I was also under 18. Nice alt though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:05 PM
4

I mean, you can just lie about it. Or date a man who doesn't care that much. Or, be bisexual and poly throughout your 20s and then convert to Christianity when you are 29 and nearing the wall. It works apparently. Anyway, I'm guessing it depends on the type of man. The average guy probably doesn't care much. The average devout Christian male probably wants a bride who has at least been abstinent and chaste for the last several years and takes her faith seriously. The average Red Pill man wants t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 09:28 PM
5

I don't feel sad at all for him. I don't fault men with a cheating bitch wife for trying MRP stuff to try to repair their relationship, but even then they should be moral enough to not cheat. Doing that proves he's just as or almost as bad as her tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 08:06 PM
4

Sounds like a couple not meant to work. I don't advocate divorce (I'm Catholic) but since they aren't I'll be honest and say this is never going to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:58 PM
2

I mean, this all sounds fictional. But if it is true, then whatever problems that guy has in his relationship aren't his wife's fault lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:16 PM
3

I think any man who cheats was never worth dedicating yourself to in the first place. if you reached 'Dread Level 12' just divorce her and go live like the degenerate you already are - but without the hypocrisy.
/r/MarriedRedPill13/10/17 07:14 PM
1

I wouldn't say so. I can get a lot of sex I guess. But I don't want it. I want a permanent marriage with a person of the same ethnic, socioeconomic and religious group as me, who also possesses the traits I desire in a man. That's actually not a lot of people, and therefore I wouldn't say I have 'abundance mentality.'
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:53 PM
1

right, so.. you got my point? Apparently not. Nice dodge though. Next time don't deny something that's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:51 PM
1

Strangely polite reply from a TRPer :o I think there are a few really good pieces of advice there, and interesting thoughts about what most males think and what most girls probably don't understand. However, for the most part the entire post is written from the angle of a man who seems to have trouble approaching and 'playing the game.' By 'the game' I mean post-enlightenment anglo-courtship where we give subtle hints and act feminine while men pursue and act masculine. Instead, the poster clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:49 PM
1

Why is your post so long? I was interested but got bored super fast :(
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 10:12 PM
1

You can read and enjoy it but your conclusions to what it teaches should be consistent to what is in it. Like you suggested God is okay with premarital sex, but... that's obviously not the case because St.Paul is very strongly against it and a large part of the New Testament was written by St.Paul. And the fact is that this is what the Bible teaches, regardless of whether you are far removed from Corinth or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 09:51 AM
1

Oh you are an atheist. No wonder you know nothing about the Bible. Stick to reading your teenage angst novels Richard Dawkins.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 12:17 AM
1

I just did. You brought up the attitude towards sex in the Bible, and when madscilove countered with St.Paul's teachings in Corinthians you said that you are 'too far' culturally and geographically from Corinth. Do you really not see the fallacy in that? You started off debating what is in the Bible, and when madscilove challenged your point, you did a ridiculous bait and switch by saying that you are not from Corinth, and those are the words of Paul, and not God. When in fact literally every Ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 12:13 AM
1

So why are you debating Biblical morality? Newsflash, it was all written in areas from which you are 'far from' culturally and geographically. The amount of logical fallacies you are bringing up in this exchange is ridiculous. Please stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 11:12 PM
3

This is in the context of a guy who wants to sleep around and does not want a relationship, but you do. Wtf lmao. Why would i want a relationship with a man who doesn't want one? Why do people ask these stupid questions?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:32 PM
1

Can you love BeyondTheLight next?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 02:04 AM
2

First you ban me, then you call me bb. You are like an abusive ex drok. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 12:44 AM
2

I don't think he was ever bringing up abortion as a legal issue (or maybe he was, idk.) As you know, I'm not particularly well read in Law. But even with my limited knowledge, I still think there is a case to be made that American law regarding abortion is logically inconsistent and an overreach of federal powers (there is nothing in the constitution that has anything to do with it, and therefore it should be left to states to determine what is murder and what isn't.) And I am aware that you, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 12:43 AM
1

Omg, read some effing history. It wasn't just 18 year olds. You think the Roman's gave a F about our age of consent laws? It was common for grown, old men to rape 12 year old boys then. Homosexual acts were acts of dominance and submission, just as they are now (and by the way, a free man who participated as a submissive was often punished even in those societies.)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 12:11 AM
2

Abortion being an immoral act does not require belief in a soul. The question of when a human being is a human being is complicated. It is the LEFT that refuses to acknowledge this fact. Before birth = okay to murder. After birth = NO WAY YOU ARE THE WORST PERSON EVERRR. The question then is, does something significant happen during that point that transforms the act of murdering the baby into an immoral act? Of course not. The baby is every bit as alive before the actual birth than after it. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 12:08 AM
1

.k drok (hi!)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:43 PM
3

Mainstream feminism is aligned with minorities, because minorities are disproportionately supportive of degeneracy progressivism, even if they aren't the main advocates. So it's of course taboo to criticize blacks, hispanics and muslims, even though they are much more patriarchal and misogynistic. However, feminists who aren't so deeply tied together with mainstream progressivism probably have criticized rap music.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:39 PM
3

Welcome back u/hyperrreal!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:35 PM
0

Well, morally the argument is bullshit. Your body, your choice, but it's still your choice to get rid of your baby, who is a human. So it's still murder and therefore immoral. But I do agree with you. It's mostly about avoiding parenthood. With parenthood comes responsibility, and they don't want that. If there were artificial wombs that could carry a fetus to term, would women who chant “my body, my choice” agree to a ban on abortion? They wouldn't chant that. They would have to come up with so…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:33 PM
1

Y'know given the other recent post SWP made recently, I'm starting to doubt he was ever even autistic to begin with. Anyway, adios!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:31 PM
2

Most people just feel too disgusted... appreciate the weird humor. Yeah Fiat, that's me exactly xD. I can't even read more than a few posts there. Feel too much pity/disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:30 PM
2

When did I say I had a problem with drinking alcohol? Do you think porn addiction was as prevalent then as it is now? Male homosexual sex in ancient greece and rome were almost exclusively older men raping adolescent servants, slaves, apprentices and male prostitutes. Do you think we should legalize pedophilia?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 11:29 PM
1

What you call "anglo saxon sharia" is also known as Civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 10:04 PM
3

Both are mortal sins
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 04:24 AM
3

It totally is in the same place as far as Christianity is concerned. As far as YOUR morality (based on modern progressive secular 'values') is concerned, they aren't morally comparable. But I reject that morality, because it is not based on Bible and Tradition.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 02:12 AM
1

https://www.irccloud.com/irc/rizon/channel/purplepilldebate
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:37 AM
1

No doubt. Lots of cafeteria Catholics in many dioceses. And yet many of the most successful religious communities in America are Catholic (Lincoln diocese for example.) It's a pretty wide range.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:36 AM
1

Oh you are not even Christian. LOL I think my brain just exploded.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:33 AM
2

You do realize that Christians believe (because its true) that the apostles taught Christ's message right? Their teachings came from Him and the Holy Spirit. You can't just pick and choose. You have to take it all together to get the overall picture of Christian morals. So your bullshit about letting people commit fornication, homosexuality, bestiality, incest, divorce etc. has no place in Christianity, and if you had an IQ over 90 you would realize that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:31 AM
5

lol you mean 'not judging' and 'loving the sinner' type Christianity? The type of 'Christians' who scream DONT JUDGE if someone brings up that homosexuality is clearly a sin in the Bible? The type of christians who support a 'woman's right to choose' even though it is clear that murder is a sin and abortion is murder if you believe in a soul? Blue pill Christians have destroyed Christianity. Christianity cannot exist alongside moral relativism, it cannot thrive while it bends itself to better fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:26 AM
1

I'm quite different. I consider many Protestant churches to be quite unsophisticated and undignified. Nothing beats a Solemn High mass at a good Catholic Church imo. And yeah it can seem dead if you don't have God in your heart. The priest does not engage you, you and everyone else there, including the clergy, worship God together.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:20 AM
1

ELCA are degenerate liberal scum. To call that Christianity is the height of stupidity and hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:15 AM
2

AWESOME! A FELLOW DEVOUT CATHOLIC PPDER. I am no longer alone!! Please join the irc xD
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:13 AM
1

Occasionally they address topics which are interesting. Oh and you should sooo join the irc Rollo. ( link is in the sidebar!) Also just to let you know there is someone impersonating you here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 11:12 PM
1

:)) Love how you just disappeared during Purge week xD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 11:11 PM
1

Seems rather unnecessary since most people here have already seen me and would instantly recognize.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 11:08 PM
1

That's interesting madscilove. Though I confess I don't personally understand what part of it is WRONG and backwards? Or unfair? Care to elaborate? And, no offense, I must say this is a rather odd opinion for a Christian to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 07:10 AM
1

like me
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 07:01 AM
2

Porn is degenerate. So yes, I'd prefer a man who doesn't watch it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 08:45 AM
1

right, so.. you got my point?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 08:40 AM
1

Once upon a time, on the irc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 11:39 PM
1

Not trying to offend you or anything, but you should understand that comments like 'I don't understand why it's necessary to ban abortion' do the opposite of this. Proselytizing is great and all, but the main reason Christianity is declining in western countries is because we are no longer enforcing Christian morals and Christian culture onto the whole society on a community, county, state and (if possible through constitutional loopholes) federal level. It feels wrong to people to do this becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 11:08 PM
3

I should rephrase. 'I'd like to see you do all the housework and raise 3 young children well.'
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 12:14 AM
4

Labor saving devices? Like what? :/ My mother, grandmother, great grandmother had servants ! None of them worked. I guess it depends on how big your family is too and family culture. Regardless of labor saving devices, if you have 4 kids a stay at home mom is a good idea. Especially if your family culture doesn't promote putting these kids in day cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:49 PM
4

Just because your mom didn't do anything doesn't mean all moms are like that. Many put in a lot of effort and care for their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:45 PM
6

Lmao I'd like to see you do all the housework and raise 3 young children. 'Bare Minimum' rolls eyes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 09:44 AM
1

Am I me???? :o Yes I am me :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 09:37 AM
2

lol quilly you are the craziest person here xD
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 09:37 AM
3

Kittens and pictures of hannibal everywhere xD
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 11:29 PM
1

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh it's a well kept secret dork!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 10:52 AM
1

Is she what? :O
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 10:50 AM
3

Fuck - I can't I'm abstinent Marry - I have a fiance already. Yayyy Kill - u/Drok007, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:22 PM
3

As a centuries old tree, approximately how many years ago did you hit the wall?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:55 PM
2

She tried so hard not to raise you as a degenerate and you ended up becoming one anyway :'(
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:21 AM
2

Yep
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:48 AM
2

errr did you mean to link me some stupid family guy video? :/ I didn't really choose the username cause of the piece. It just means Hail St.Mary. But yes, the piece by Schubert is lovely, as is the music by Bach. The Gregorian Chant is great too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:38 AM
3

To be funny? I thought it was just to shitstorm PPD and have a little fun. See any correlation? :/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:20 AM
1

TRAITOR!! :o
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:18 AM
3

I'd kill you for having higher RMV than me :(
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:18 AM
2

Well, that's what used to happen back in the day. After women hit the wall at the age of 16 and had to hop off the Chad carousel, they were instantly killed for being ugly post wall trash. But then the beta male came along and decided that he didn't mind having this post wall feeeemale slut leech off his money, even though Chad's thundercock had already stolen all the life from her. So what the patriarchy should do is kill all the betas, then all the post wall women. nods
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:05 AM
2

I wonder if she's hopped off the carousel yet :/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:05 AM
1

Idk her, how is she terrible? :/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:49 AM
4

HMMMMM IM NOT SURE LET ME THINK
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:23 AM
1

Men are shoes. Women choose the shoes that fit and leave everything else. They gravitate towards the top 20% of shoes, your Valentinos, YSLs etc, and leave the bottom 80% to be sent to the garbage. Really, women's shoe preference is proof of 80/20.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:19 AM
1

Every so often to tell us off in his typical gruff manner and advertise his blog. xD It's hilarious. Offtopic: Come on the irc!!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:17 AM
1

lolol that makes no sense but it's actually true xD
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:15 AM
1

u/Rollo-Tomassi of course. He graces us with his presence far too rarely though xD
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:14 AM
1

I'm not dating someone shorter than me. "Upper Class" women don't date ugly men with lots of money. They have other options. Like... attractive men with money. The 5'3 billionaire can probably easily get a MC gold digger though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:28 AM
1

Would you marry a Black guy, or a dark-skinned Filipino dude No What comes afterwards is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 11:17 PM
1

YOU are a goofball!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 11:11 PM
1

So he says, maybe Hannibal was a documentary :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 11:08 PM
1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 11:03 PM
1

0 QUILLY! SERIAL KILLERS ARENT HOT. Source: AtlasBShrugginnn
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 11:01 PM
1

lolol I knew yours would be the top post saying exactly that atlas xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:58 PM
1

Female. Upper UMC or lower UC, not sure. Err no idea. Neutral I guess. Nope. Yep Of course They would HIGHLY disapprove of me marrying below my social class. They would be okay with anything else. Uhhm at my age right now the income is not that big of a deal. But when we have kids going to school then I think 200k is bare minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:33 PM
2

Idk, you didn't give their wrist sizes PopularPoplar! Don't you know its the wrist size that counts in poon slaying?! Smh no wonder your N count is so low xD No one invented PSL, it's been around as long as becky has been around. They say that even in the stone ages there were beckies sipping PSL in Stone Chad's cave harem. Source: history. I'd say neither xD Well u/Hyperrreal looks like this: http://img.wennermedia.com/social/rs-158544-thor-624-1366729764.jpg so I'd say him xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:27 PM
1

Huh?? What makes you think that? I mean this is an alt, but literally everyone on PPD, TRP, TBP and Rollo's blog know me pretty well. Why do TBPers assume most conservative women are fake?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 03:50 AM
1

well... if you are both working then yes it is a shame that you are expected to do most of the housework, but I don't think someone should do things that he or she really dislikes or isn't good at. I dont think how you divide work should be focused on whats 50/50, but what each partner can do best.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 01:28 AM
1

its time to stop xD
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 01:26 AM
1

Nope. But even if I did I woudn't want my husband touching the broom. If I don't have time, I'd rather hire a part time maid
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 09:55 PM
1

900,000 karma?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 09:54 PM
1

err I really really don't want my man cleaning dishes, organizing stuff, doing laundry, dusting, mopping etc. Like I can't even imagine the thought. a) he would be awful at it and probably just cause more work and b) It doesn't seem to me to be a manly thing to do . Men do things like taking care of the car, tending to the yard, fixing things. That's their contribution, and it's not always 50/50 but it doesn't have to be. Men shouldn't do things we are supposed to do, and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 07:40 AM
1

This is like attacking a weatherman for supporting disasters, just because he's saying a hurricane might come. lol Like all I did was note that there are women who enjoy sex, and the open SMP is better for them. At no point in this convo did I give any indication of supporting an open SMP. And I don't have to defend this, if you had a brain and were able to read my post history you could piece those two together. I'm done with this. Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 03:01 AM
1

Do you have trouble understanding English? Like wtf. I refuse to participate any further in this ridiculous conversation if you don't show an OUNCE of BASIC effing logic and understanding. Me: Nope... It's good for some women (stacies), and it's good for some men (chads.) Many women enjoy sex, and with state subsidized birth control and abortions (and without religion), there is literally no reason not to be promiscuous for many women. You Putting aside that this isn't true, this argument is hyp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 11:32 PM
2

Yep! Exactly my point. It's all enlightenment era thinking of having your own individual desires satisfied and teaching amorality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 08:52 AM
1

O...k, where to begin with this? It is however, very easy for the poor man to understand what it means to not have concerns about money. I was thinking more about the economic impact of a welfare policy. You know, how it will effect the collective society. But you just looked at it from an individual point of view. Which really highlights the difference between us, you don't really care what's best for society, you just want what you think is best for you. Which is fine. Most people think like t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 07:16 AM
1

Yeah, it's like a poor person supporting welfare. He's the one who is going to be reaping the rewards of that system, so he's going to support it regardless. But a wealthy person is in a far better position to recognize the nuance of the issue. So similarly... I think TRPers and incels only support a 1:1 model somewhat because it benefits them. Because that means they don't have to feel jealous about Chad. That's a position motivated by bitterness and jealousy, not rationality. They aren't carin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 03:37 AM
1

Right, but would they like to return to pre-enlightenment era puritanism? You know, like libertines being executed, no more than one partner for most people etc.? I don't think so. And further, I think these opinions are just motivated by bitterness and jealousy. Like, I can easily get partners, but I'm still very supportive of monogamy and sexual conservatism because I see the merit in it for the whole society, and because I am religious. But I think it's far less of a convincing stance when yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:49 AM
1

They generally don't agree with socially conservative stances (or at least don't really care about them.) For example, they are not very supportive of religion, aren't against abortion, not really against homosexuality, fornication, contraceptives. Why would they? They want to be macho men. They just want to reel in women's rights, thats not the same as conservatism. They want to return to enlightenment era thinking that male sexuality can and should be expressed but women's sexuality should not…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 12:36 AM
6

I think most of them are liberals actually. They seem to generally support liberal social values and where their thoughts diverge it's usually motivated, imo, by bitterness towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 08:39 PM
1

You really think women in Italy are much easier than in the Netherlands or Sweden? If thats what you think I guarantee that you never got with gals there at all, let alone like 'shooting fish in a barrel.' Yeah Catholic gals in Latin America are easy af. They are also super poor, sex crazed degenerates. You are comparing apples and oranges and trying to use the difference to support your assertion. Use stats in similar countries, not anecdotal evidence in two completely different countries. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 10:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter