TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

18Apollo18 Archive

View 3 posts and 566 comments by 18Apollo18 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

If you read the article you'll see that it's one hour (10-11 am)
/r/MensRights21/04/26 11:08 PM
-9

This is literally for one hour (10am -11 am) 3 days a week (Mon-Wed) I don't really understand why people are freaking out so much
/r/MensRights21/04/26 11:07 PM
11

It was never about protecting children in the first place. They just hate trans people
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:45 PM
34

I'm a for this being a voluntary thing When a judge offers it to you instead of whatever amount of jail time they arbitrarily comes up , it's not really voluntary or consentual. If anything it's coercion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 04:17 PM
7

The law should ban circumcision already like they did with FGM. It's all mutilation so circumcision should be banned as well. When a cosmetic elective procedure kills babies that the babies can't consent to, then it should be banned. FGM is banned so why is MGM not banned? The law never should've been written gendered in the first place. It should've included men and intersex individuals from the get go. If feminist had any integrity they never would've accepted it
/r/MensRights28/04/25 01:39 PM
2

She should've just kept her legs closed or gone on birth control /s
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 03:18 PM
11

The majority of women I've known have preferred it to uncircumcised. Not sure why that's relevant at all. Your baby's not gonna be having sex. Most men prefer big tits but you'd end up in jail if you got your infant daughter breast implants
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:43 PM
-3

Hillary literally one the popular vote...
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:23 PM
3

Internalized misandry. Not sure what your point is or why their gender matters. Men can promote misandry too
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:37 PM
17

Beat them or threat to kick them out? Scream at them and verbally abuse them until they get in the car? It's not that hard to imagine
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:35 PM
2

If a doctor presents something as the standard medical procedure that all boys go through, and tells you there are medical benefits, that's different than just peer pressure I highly doubt they asked around at all. They put more consideration into buying their refrigerator than they did into surgically modifying your body
/r/MensRights12/11/23 12:42 AM
-1

I don't blame my parents, either. Circumcising was basically a default position where and when I was born, and my parents did not have the benefit of an informed decision. They made the wrong decision, but it's not something I hold against them on a personal level I can almost guarantee your parents told you something along the lines of "If all your friends jumped off a bridge would you do it too" since it seems like every part tells their child this. So I'm not sure how the fact that everyone e…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:37 PM
3

What's really racists is denying people the rights to bodily autonomy and personal religious freedom because they belong to a certain ethnic group
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:31 PM
24

It's still not illegal in any European country. Jewish and Muslim parents still practice it in Europe
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:31 AM
2

Most doctors would not chose that actually The benefits of circumcision don't outweigh the risks Numerous Health Organizations from around the world have come out against the practice Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when “medical necessity is not established, …interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.” Royal Dutch Medical Association …
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:53 AM
7

A. This isn't a medical procedure B. The medical practitioner is the one who caused the issue in the first place
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:14 PM
4

He had a problem and I offered a solution. I don't understand why you have such an issue with it.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 11:55 AM
9

Wtf is your point?? Foreskin restoration isn't only for adults and there's nothing NSFW on that page?? How isn't it age appropriate?
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:24 AM
11

It not 100% the same but it does bring back a lot of the sensitivity
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:23 AM
1

They want to sell it
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:59 AM
1

Rates were 32% and falling way back in 2009. Now almost a decade and a half later it's likely 20% or less It's a similar situation in Aus and NZ The circumcision of newborn males in Canada has become a less frequent practice over the past few decades. This change has been significantly influenced by past recommendations from the Canadian Paediatric Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics, who both affirmed that the procedure was not medically indicated. The rate of neonatal circumcision h…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:58 AM
5

You should look into r/foreskin_restoration If you start now and keep with it , get it done with you still have your whole sexlife ahead of you.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:51 AM
9

Yeah, like if I want to call someone a 'fat bitch' I can just put 'energy' at the end and that makes it not offensive to fat women? No one's going to fall for that. Well technically there is the term "skinny legend" which is also problematic and controversial
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 05:35 PM
7

Not only does it violate the child's bodily integrity and autonomy but it also violates the child's religion freedom.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:03 PM
1

Masculinity and feminity are stupid and useless concepts. What we need is to let people express themselves however they want without trying to force them into boxes.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 02:25 PM
-2

It somehow went up to 1 in 3 and something ridiculous like that. That's all types of sexual violence and assault. Not just full on rape. Similar rates were found for men. Do you think that's ridiculous as well?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:42 PM
4

I agree but I'm not sure why you feel it can't also be high for women. Honestly I don't think either gender respects consent as much as they should
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:40 PM
1

Both men and women are unlike to report rape and even if they do try to file a report, there's a good chance it'll be ignored. Like using reports only isn't useful
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:38 PM
1

How do you explain the fact that men report similarly high rates of sexual violence and rape then? in 3 men have experienced sexual violence involving physical contact during their lifetimes. 1 in 7 men have experienced completed or attempted rape. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:22 PM
2

Do you also think that the 1 in 7 men are lying?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:20 PM
1

Both men and women are unlike to report rape and even if they do report it, the officers may not take it seriously
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:19 PM
2

Do you feel the same about the very similar 1 in 7 men figure?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:18 PM
3

Do you feel the same about the statistic of 1 in 7 men being victims of completely rape and 1 in 3 victims of sexual violence?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:17 PM
5

Especially when you consider that 1 in 9 men were forced to penetrate vs 1 in 26 forcibly penetrated Meaning that 3 times more male rape victims had female perpetrators and yet these victims are being completely undermined
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:15 PM
7

Scientific data triumphs personal anecdotes
/r/MensRights14/10/22 04:07 AM
6

There were no significant differences in Premature Ejaculation between the circumcised and uncircumcised group. However difficulty reaching orgasm and pain were more common among circumcised men https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/and.12851
/r/MensRights14/10/22 04:05 AM
4

Yikes, major r/badmensanatomy It's literally an irrefutable scientific fact The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis.The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the circumcision scar on the ventral surface. Five locations on the uncircumcised penis that are routinely removed at circumcision were more sensitive than the most sensit…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:54 AM
6

Ya. I get sensation on my whole penis, tip is more sensitive of course. I don't feel robbed or cheated at all. If you feel that the glans penis is the most sensitive part of your dick, that just goes to show how little you feel. The glans penis is literally the least sensitive part of an intact penis and contains no fine touch receptors. The only part of the body with even less nerves than the glans penis is the heel of the foot. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce …
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:53 AM
6

I'm glad I had my color vision destroyed shortly after birth and that I don't remember what it feels like /s You're literally insane. You might want to speak with a therapist
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:42 AM
3

Circumcision shouldn't be viewed as a medical treatment. Even if you literally had cancerous or necrotic tissue that needed to be amputated, you wouldn't need to preform a whole circumcision with completely amputation of the foreskin, frenulum and ridged band. You'd simply amputated the infected tissue.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:41 AM
5

Treating Phimosis with Circumcision is barbaric A Circumcision for Phimosis is basically the equivalent of chopping off a broken arm instead of mending it An amputation, even partial is extremely invasive and completely unnecessary even for severe causes of phimosis. Even if surgical intervention is needed there's several surgical reconstructive techniques which amputate no tissue. Treatments for Phimosis include: Stretching Exercises Steroid Creams Preputioplasties Z-plasties Amputation of peni…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:38 AM
2

Phimosis can be avoided by pushing the foreskin back, while washing to keep it from sticking to the tip of the penis. Thus basic hygiene avoids phimosis. Forced retraction causes phimosis and adhesions!
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:35 AM
8

Yikes, major r/badmensanatomy The glans penis doesn't contain any fine touch receptors. It only contains basic pain and pressure nerves. Male circumcision removes the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis, the foreskin, frenulum and ridged band. All of which contain the same fine touch receptors found in the clitoris, clitoral hood and labia minora. It severely impacts penile function and sexual pleasure. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive regio…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:34 AM
8

Bullshit, early life stress within the first year of life permanently alters the brain development and neural network. It cases increased chances of developing anxiety, depression and other mental health problems in adolescence. Just because you can't physically remember it, doesn't mean it won't affect you Early life stress (ELS) and function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis predict later psychopathology. Animal studies and cross-sectional human studies suggest that this process might…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:32 AM
3

Bullshit, early life stress within the first year of life permanently alters the brain development and neural network. It cases increased chances of developing anxiety, depression and other mental health problems in adolescence. Just because you can't physically remember it, doesn't mean it won't affect you Early life stress (ELS) and function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis predict later psychopathology. Animal studies and cross-sectional human studies suggest that this process might…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:32 AM
5

Bullshit, early life stress within the first year of life permanently alters the brain development and neural network. It cases increased chances of developing anxiety, depression and other mental health problems in adolescence. Just because you can't physically remember it, doesn't mean it won't affect you Early life stress (ELS) and function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis predict later psychopathology. Animal studies and cross-sectional human studies suggest that this process might…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:31 AM
9

The African trails are extremely flawed and have been heavily criticized Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:57 AM
6

It's inaccurate to call them Christians when they are following Jewish law from the Torah.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:52 AM
2

Religious circumcision of minors is just as wrong.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:50 AM
1

People really need to stop using the term "body count" it's gross and dehumanizing. Literally makes it sound like you're a serial killer or some shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 04:32 PM
-1

You shouldn't have to legally surrender your parentally rights. Women can put a child up for a an option adoption and still be involved in their child's life without ever contributing a cent. Pay or Surrender your parental rights isn't the solution
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 06:26 PM
-1

Partner ? When would 2 firefighters ever be alone ?? The crew normally has 8-10 people
/r/MensRights10/09/22 04:40 PM
0

You are purposely being obtuse. Why should people need to make special schedules so that physically incapable people can feel happy on the inside. They literally always have special schedules making sure enough people are always on call. No matter what emergency you want people to be able to do the job and not sit there thinking I hope the physically competent didn’t call out today. That could literally happen anyway?? Which is why they should take as many volunteers as they can get. A firefight…
/r/MensRights10/09/22 02:31 PM
-1

That would never happen They can literally radio back up? I mean what if there's a 200+ Lb person. Most men couldn't carry them on their own either
/r/MensRights10/09/22 02:23 PM
-5

Not all firefighters need to be able to lift extremely heavy objects or people. They work as a team with many people doing different things And they literally never send someone regardless of gender into a building alone
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:35 PM
-5

What’s the point of being a firefighter if you can’t save someone from a fire You think all firefighters do is carry people around all day? And you think regardless someone who was physically incapable of carrying people couldn't still be a useful asset? Also do you think they're sending women or really anyone into a building alone ??
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:32 PM
-12

You think they'd send a women or anyone who wasn't capable of carrying someone into a building alone, dumbass? The whole squad doesn't even normally all go into a building at once. And when they do, they go in a large group
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:30 PM
9

In 2019, 67% of firefighters were volunteers in the US compared to 83% of female firefighters. NFPA estimates there were an estimated 1,080,800 career and volunteer firefighters in the United States in 2019. Of the total number of firefighters 358,000 (33%) were career firefighters and 722,800 (67%) were volunteer firefighters.In 2019, 88,800 firefighters were female (8%). Of the career firefighters, 14,900 were female. There were also 73,900 volunteer firefighters who were female..)
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:24 PM
-9

Biological males have on average more muscle mass than biological females. It's just a basic fact
/r/MensRights09/09/22 08:32 PM
0

if you have one or two guys on the squad that are the only people who can do it, and they're out of commission for whatever reason, be it injury or not in the area, who's going to be the back-up? That doesn't even make any sense. Firehouses normally try to have a surplus of volunteers on call at all times. How is having women gonna mean they won't have any male volunteers? If there's only 2 male volunteers then that's a problem with lack of volunteers not because they allow women as well. Why wo…
/r/MensRights09/09/22 08:29 PM
1

Yes and every firefighter needs to simultaneously carry a person out of a crumpled vehicle?
/r/MensRights09/09/22 08:22 PM
-11

Why does every soldier need to be able to carry an Injured man with his body armor and weapon? They literally can't tho Even men have a weight limit they can't carry.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 08:04 PM
-24

Why does every single firefighter need to be able to lift a 170 lb person? There's a lot of different things fire fighters do. The entire squad isn't going to be carrying people at once
/r/MensRights09/09/22 07:50 PM
-22

The majority of firefighters aren't "hired" and don't receive financial compensation. Nationwide 70% of firefighters are volunteers and in some states it's as high as 100%
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:06 PM
11

Most firefighters aren't getting paid at all Nationwide 70% of firefighters are volunteers and in some states it's as high as 100%
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:05 PM
11

Most firefighters are volunteers.. Nationwide 70% of firefighters are volunteers and in some states it's as high as 100%
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:04 PM
-11

Yet she won by a landslide
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:09 AM
2

Perks wouldn't be worth it at all
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:51 PM
2

Why are you married to such a toxic partner?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:29 PM
1

it hadn't been for conscription, my national flag today might be the Swastika. I guarantee people would've volunteered to defend their homeland. But if the majority of people decide to flee and let the country get invaded then that's their damn choice and it should be respected. Every individual should decide if they want to flee or if they want to flight
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:19 PM
1

How would you prevent Russia from invading Ukraine? If people want to defend their homeland then they will. If the majority of people want to flee and let Russia take over Ukraine, then that's the will of the people
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:16 PM
0

You can't easily get of beer and cocktails at home. Plus the atmosphere is different than sitting alone at home
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:15 PM
-1

Some people just want to have a drink and watch the game
/r/MensRights03/08/22 02:28 PM
11

during boys nights no girls allowed, during girls nights no boys allowed I don't really see how that could be enforced.. Especially among LGBT members. Fem presenting guys, masc presenting girls, trans people.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 02:22 PM
1

For example, the two rules are there to "avoid making an intimidating place" and they replaced a huge sign I used to like that had pictures of a bunch of body builders working out was replaced by giant words saying "No Critics" But both those are fair points. You shouldn't need to be hyper muscular to feel comfortable at the gym
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:51 PM
-57

Staring at people is creepy. But there's a difference between looking and staring
/r/MensRights29/07/22 11:47 PM
6

I think you mean almost certainly irreversible. Vasectomy should be considered a permanent sterilization since in 80% of cases it is
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:58 AM
18

Cutting of parts of someone's body without their consent is pretty fucking serious
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:56 AM
8

Apparently you haven't heard about intactivsts protests? They happened all across the US.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:55 AM
8

On the other hand, I don't think I know a guy who hasn't gotten a ruler out to measure his dick at least once. And, off the top of my head, I believe 5.5" is average because I've heard it so often. Is that supposed to justify it? Like you're just showing how much pressure is put on men by our society
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:58 AM
13

I mean the term skinny legend was popular to describe a badass But that's kinda dying out now
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:47 AM
5

This post made me wanna vomit with how disgusting it was https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/k3qtje/met_a_guy_who_got_circumcised_today/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:48 PM
0

That defeats the purpose of universal healthcare in the first place. You don't get cuts or have to pay more depending on what preexisting conditions you have Everyone plays the same amount based on their income
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:41 PM
0

It's not like women are getting tax breaks though.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:09 PM
-2

Bruh it's Switzerland... Nobody pays at hospitals regardless of gender
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:38 PM
12

Literally how? Circumcision is unconsentual genital mutilation
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:39 PM
22

Circumcision is genital mutilation so yes there was
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:25 PM
26

If you stab somebody and leave them to bleed out you wouldn't say they died of blood loss You'd say they were murdered by stabbing
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:24 PM
8

Apendicitis can normally be treated with antibiotics Finnish researchers showed that appendicitis had not recurred five years later in 172 of the 257 patients randomly assigned to be treated with antibiotics. Of the 85 patients in the antibiotics group whose recurrent infections were then treated surgically, seven turned out not to have appendicitis, and in only two had the appendix ruptured
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:49 PM
1

¿Dónde? Muéstrame un post o artículo.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:51 AM
1

They shouldn't get it from the victims phone itself. That's terribly unreliable and unprofessional. The should get records and logs from the phone company
/r/MensRights01/06/22 03:08 PM
4

Sure, but womens breasts are sexualised in western culture so a woman being topless in the same situation wouldn't be equivalent. Shirtless men are sexualized in western culture
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/22 02:40 PM
7

Vulva = Balls Testicules would be analogous to the ovaries not to he vulva
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:22 PM
5

Wearing less clothing isn't an invitation to be harassed
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:13 PM
6

They never said anything about American slavery
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:49 AM
1

I would argue it's part of the social contract The thing about contracts is you have to fucking consent to them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 02:19 PM
5

Why should you be forced to serve the government against your will? Why should you be forced to die for a cause your don't believe in?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/22 09:35 PM
4

I believe that conscription should only be a thing if we are being invaded Why does that matter? Why should men have to stay behind while adult women are allowed to flee?? Those who want to leave the country should have the right to. Those who want to stay and fight should stay and fight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/22 09:32 PM
11

Medication Circumcision is fraud 99.9% of the time. No doctor would amputate your hand for something so minor
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:33 PM
3

Manipulated by Doctors as well it seems
/r/MensRights09/04/22 05:12 PM
3

Itching?? And amputation for itching??? Your problem could've been solved with a simple cream
/r/MensRights09/04/22 03:38 PM
13

Piercings don't amputate any tissue. In fact, if the piercing is removed the hole will completely seal up. It's not even comparable to amputating 1/2 of external penile tissue
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:11 PM
11

With blocking STDs forever, painless sex, hygiene, no smegma etc. What a load of bullshit
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:09 PM
3

I don't see why you would willing do such a thing
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:08 PM
13

Help???? Op doesn't have a tumor, frostbite, or a flesh eating virus Ampuation is literally insane and most definitely not a valid treatment in this case.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:02 PM
28

i got phimosis,already talked with my doctor and told at this age the only reliable solution to my problem is circumcision,b Well either he lied to you or he's undereducated on the matter Treating Phimosis with Circumcision is barbaric A Circumcision for Phimosis is basically the equivalent of chopping off a broken arm instead of mending it Even if a surgical intervention is needed, Circumcision is not a valid surgical treatment An amputation, even partial is extremely invasive and completely un…
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:00 PM
36

Last resort??? Amputation shouldn't even be on the table at all. That's literally insane
/r/MensRights09/04/22 01:58 PM
0

Gross
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:42 PM
3

First of all that's not even true. Second of all, the original meaning of a word in Latin is pretty irrelevant. Most words borrowed adopt a new meaning only slightly related to the original meaning in Latin. fētus (feminine fêta, neuter fêtum); first/second declension adjective pregnant, full of young fruitful, productive youthful, young of one who has recently given birth; nursing fētus m (genitive fētūs); fourth declension A bearing, birth, bringing forth. Offspring, young, progeny. Fruit, pro…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:40 PM
0

Nice try but I also think it's also wrong to kill an animal outside of self defense. *Note: killing predatory insects like mosquitos, ticks, etcetera would count as self defense
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:40 PM
1

But it doesn't stop at age 10 either, it just peaks at age 10. It doesn't come anywhere near stopping after age 10. As I said development of the prefrontal cortex continues well into the 80s and 90s. By your logic the human brain never develops.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:25 PM
2

Actually that's not true That's specifically the prefrontal cortex not the entire brain. It actually peaks at age 10 and there's just a slight decline after the mid 20s. It continues to develop and change well into the 80s and 90s. It certainly doesn't stop at age 25. Petanjek, Z., Judaš, M., Šimić, G., Rašin, M. R., Uylings, H. B., Rakic, P., & Kostović, I. (2011). Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(32), …
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:38 PM
2

So you support child support then? A man choose to have sex so he should accept all responsibility to rasing a child?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:21 PM
1

Generally speaking I find abortion unethical, but it's not the govt's business either, it's the family's business. Is it not the governments business to prevent unethical and abusive behaviors??
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:18 PM
0

By definition a fetus is a person. A sentiant and conscious human being. The fetal stage starts at week 8 , by this point the central nervous system has already fully developed and the brain finished developing. A fetus is self aware, capable of experiencing thoughts and feeling pain.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:16 PM
1

You said biological differences. Other than size, can you please tell me what these biological differences are??
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:10 PM
-1

Aborting a fetus does not directly affect anyone else. It effects the fetus. It effects the other parent
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:56 PM
2

What biological difference are there ??? The fetal stage is actually one of the last stages of development. By this point the central nervous system, brain and all major internal organs are already developed
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:55 PM
-1

Do you know what a fetus is? The fetal stage starts at week 8. At week 8 the central nervous system also starts developing. A fetus therefore is capable of feeling pain and experiencing thoughts. Fetuses by definition are sentiant. Embryos and zygotes aren't though.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:03 PM
7

A fetus is human The fetal stage doesn't start until week 8. This ban isn't banning abortion after week 8 but rather banning it completely.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:01 PM
0

A zygote isn't anymore of a human than the sperm cell and egg cells men and women release all the time. It's literally just an egg cell and a sperm cell. An early embryo isn't any more a human than the dead skin you loose everyday. It's literally just a cluster of cells. The embryo doesn't even start slightly resembling a human until 5 weeks. A heart beat can be detected around 6-7 weeks. The fetal stage starts at week 8, at the point the brain and central nervous system start to develop. At min…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:59 PM
9

Edit: I mispoke, I meant to say fetus. (Or baby, or whatever you see fit.) Fetus isn't even correct. The fetal stage starts at 8 weeks. This bill prevents abortion at any stage including a zygote and embryo
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:52 PM
2

You're baffled people want to defend rights to an intact body without any unconsentual modifications??
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:14 AM
2

Abortion is a completely different issue. The fetus has to grow in a woman's uterus. Circumcision exclusively affects the child's penis alone.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 05:12 AM
0

It would be nice to just workout and not have someone in front of me trying to get me to look for their ego boost. There's definitely men who try to show off at the gym too
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:09 PM
-1

Yes. You fertilize several eggs during an IVF attempt. You can pull a single cell out of each early embryo and karyotype it to determine sex. Implant the selected sex, freeze the others. Apparently it's also possible to sort XX vs XY sperm, but I don't think that's how clinics do it yet Chromosomes don't have to aline with external genitalia and primary sex hormones.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:40 PM
5

It's a girl! But she has a penis. We can take care of that. You say that as joke. But that's literally what's done to intersex children. They're assigned one binary sex and then forced into that sex by surgical intervention
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:39 PM
-6

It's not because it's straight up bullshit. You can't even get on puberty blockers until you're a preteen. And they literally just pause puberty while you take them. When you stop taking them puberty continues as normal. You can't start hormone treatment until you're 16 at which point he could be emancipated and living on his own.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:37 PM
-15

Ohh fuck off with your transphobic bullshit. You can't get any treatment until you're 16. He could get himself emancipated by them
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:33 PM
4

Have you seen how male animals are exploited by the animal agriculture industries? Male chicks are ground alive because they're considered waste. Male calves are either send to slaughter or kept in tiny living quarters while they're forceably stimulated to ejaculacion many times before being slaughter There's many many more examples
/r/MensRights15/03/22 11:35 PM
7

Ironic how the same conditions never require ampuation of vulvar tissue in women. There's almost no medical reasons which actually require ampuation of penile tissue.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:06 AM
15

The Son of God was circumcised, and so was I. Lol, you don't even understand your own religion
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:23 PM
8

Get over it period because that's all you can do. Telling men to get over human rights violations and misandry? What the hell are you even doing here ?
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:21 PM
10

I don't see how any reason could make it right
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:19 PM
5

Really, why don't you ask them what other body parts they recommend ampuating for no reason?
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:19 PM
14

Why do you value how long you last more than your own sexual pleasure? A heathy sexual relationship isn't a stamina competition And it's not about a man giving as much pleasure as he can to a woman. The goal of a heathy sexual relationship should be to have both parties equally enjoy themselves
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:18 PM
1

I consider it borderline slavery. It's not only forced labor but also forcing someone to risk their lives. It's an awful concept. A terrible human rights violation. A relic of the past which has zero place in our modern society.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:57 PM
1

And conscription was created before democracy was ever mainstream. Ex-freaking-actly! Conscription and Drafts are literally remnants of the monarchy and feudalism. Where the King would decide when to fight wars, using human lives like chess pawns. If the people want to fight for a cause they can voluntarily join. If few people join then it's not the will of the people. Why should a few people (the government) get to take away the people's rights and force them to die for something they don't bel…
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:52 PM
1

I specifically had the US in mind. But yes really in just about every country heathy is on the decline. Heart conditions, obesity, diabetes, etcetera are all ok the rise around the world.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:46 PM
0

Do you believe in the principals of democracy?
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:45 PM
0

If the draft was enacted, the majority of men are going to fail if they have thorough medical screening. So if they aren't drafting women then they're gonna have to lower the heath requirement.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:44 PM
-1

Also if I need to be carried or dragged out of danger, which gender do you think I want doing it ? Preferably a fit woman over an out of shape man
/r/MensRights27/02/22 06:25 PM
1

Odia is my first language Wow, that's interesting. I've heard of most of the other Indo-Aryan languages but I actually didn't know about this one.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 04:19 PM
0

idk man I am actually Indian, and English is my 3rd language Hindi and what else?
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:55 PM
2

There was a story on YouTube a few months back from Saudi Arabia , where two girls apparently had a bad relationship with their father and brothers , so they seeked asylum in Turkey. They said they were abused and put on house arrest , but at the end it turns out they are a lesbian couple who made all this story , just so they can leave their country and go live some place where they can practice their same-sex love without consequences. That doesn't really make any sense. They could have sought…
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:38 PM
4

, I have seen trans men beg on the streets, whereas, I have never ever seen a Trans woman... I think you have the terms reversed. A trans women is an individual who was assigned male at birth but now identifies as a woman. MTF A trans man is an individual who was assigned female at birth but now Identifies as a man. FTM
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:36 PM
2

There's never any need for a draft in any country
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:13 PM
2

Rights aren't something you get or have to earn. That sounds like a freaking fascist regime
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:11 PM
1

Why should everyone have military training?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:10 PM
2

You don't need a draft regardless
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:07 PM
6

though you can’t deny that generally speaking, a man is more likely to be able to carry the weight Yes but how is this revenant when every draftie goes though a medical screening? Women who didn't appear to be fit enough to handle the military would be disqualified anyways. Although regardless I don't see the need for a draft to exist
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:20 PM
0

Is the mandatory draft sexist or not? But my argument was that mandatory drafting itself is unethical itself. However if there is going to be a draft then having it only apply to one sex it definitely is. There's women who are serious athletes. There's men who are severly overweight or have preexisting medical conditions Every draftie has to pass a medical screening. So if a women means the requirements why shouldn't they be drafted? It's also pretty transphobic. Trans women are included in the …
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:13 PM
6

There's women who are serious athletes and there's men who are severly overweight. It's more an issue of how much the individual can carry than their gender.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:00 PM
2

However, when shit hits the fan you kinda want to have a chance at winning. Forcing people to fight for a cause they don't believe in is a great way to ensure you win /s The draft is a shitty concept anyways
/r/MensRights26/02/22 08:34 PM
20

Yes, men and women are physically different on average I don't really see how this matters. It's not fist fighting with your bare hands. Women aren't capable of holding firearms?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 08:31 PM
2

Unfortunately you have invading countries that in some cases need to be fought Do you believe in democracy? It should be up to the people themselves when they want to fight back and when they want to surrender. Why should the state people able to force people to fight for causes which they may not believe In? These a people's lives not a freaking chess match where you can decide when to sacrifice a pawn.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 07:45 PM
4

Why do we need a draft at all?
/r/MensRights26/02/22 04:07 PM
23

A draft shouldn't exist, period. The people can fight against causes they believe in, not whatever the government thinks is a just cause. If people don't join then it's clearly not the will of the people
/r/MensRights26/02/22 04:07 PM
17

Actually the draft doesn't care about transitioning. Trans women are forced as well
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:04 PM
22

In babies or young children, violation of bodily autonomy Adult Circumcision without proper Informed consent is a seriously issue. Doctors rarely properly inform the patient and often push them into Circumcision. Informed consent is the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention. The patient must be competent to make a voluntary decision about whether to undergo the procedure or intervention. Informe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/22 05:33 AM
-7

The death penalty should be abolished
/r/MensRights11/01/22 07:21 PM
9

It's really all men that are disproportionately killed by police. Most minority men are killed more frequently than white men yes. (Except for Asian men who are killed less than white men) However white men are still killed way more frequently than women of any race. Among all groups, black men and boys face the highest lifetime risk of being killed by police. Our models predict that about 1 in 1,000 black men and boys will be killed by police over the life course. We predict that between 36 and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 05:00 PM
28

They're literally both genital mutilation. How does the victim''s gender matter ? Or if you mean rape , they're literally both rape. How does the victim's gender matter ?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:48 AM
33

How the hell is it not the same ?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:36 AM
9

"the doctors are gonna cut off your penis if you don't clean it". That's a disgusting thing to say to a child and completely false. Why would you threaten your child with genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:25 AM
5

Like...Illegal Circumcision This doesn't make any sense. By your logic we should legalize rape because otherwise it will happen illegally? as well as a breach of "Freedom of Religion" rights. Uh what? Do you even understand what freedom of religion means? This doesn't violate freedom of religion, it protects freedom of religion Freedom of religion doesn't mean you have the right to force your religion on to others by literally carving it into them. Freedom of religion means that each individual …
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:02 PM
3

A. It sounds like OP didn't have it done as an adult B. Consent with bulling, harassment, and manipulation isn't proper consent
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:59 PM
4

So you think that you should literally go as far as chopping off parts of your body because of asshole bullies ?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:56 PM
42

This study finds that more than 100 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes. Because infant circumcision is elective, all of these deaths are avoidable
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:54 PM
4

Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. —Galatians 5:2
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:37 AM
3

I've been informed and I'm pretty sure after a little more research I'll change my opinion. That's good but there's just a few things I want to know first. Such as?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:57 AM
12

Not trying to force my beliefs By allowing the circumcision of male minors that's exactly what you'd be doing
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:02 AM
12

Actually Circumcision is forbidden in Christianity. What you are referring to is in the Old Testament (and inapplicable to modern Christians) and the Jewish Torah. But either way, there's all kinds of horrible things written in religious texts. Martial rape, Slavery, etcetera. That doesn't make them justifiable. You don't get to violate some else's rights because of your own personal religious beliefs. Your rights ends where another person's lies
/r/MensRights28/11/21 02:33 AM
12

Can you please explain your reason for wanting it banned because I just want to know why many people are against it. Not only does it severely impact proper penile function, but even if it didn't it'd still be a violation of a man's right to bodily autonomy and integrity You wouldn't preform cosmetic surgeries with less impact than circumcision on an infant so why would you preform an extremely invasive ampuation???
/r/MensRights28/11/21 02:29 AM
6

Circumcision in the first world isn't comparable to FGM. Name one third world country that practices FGM and doesn't practice FGM in just as horrible conditions as MGM? In fact third world MGM is much more prevalent than third world MGM Also the only reason first world FGM is basically non-existent is because just about every first world nation has banned FGM Circumcision rarely has complications and all of them result from a failed surgery it does have potential health benefits. There's no reas…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 10:39 PM
5

Female circumcision happens in foreign lands; That's only because it's been banned in first world nations and MGM hasn't they are entitled to their culture and it’s not our place to ‘correct’ them. A. Every Muslim country which practices FGM also practices MGM B. Nope. Culture isn't an excuse for humans rights violations.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 09:22 PM
6

FGM isn't any more dangerous than MGM
/r/MensRights27/11/21 09:20 PM
3

Yes they only conclude that because of pain and temperature sensation. The conclusion is biased but the result do support past research and do show the foreskin was the most sensitive parts of the penile Clearly in terms of sexual and masturbatory pleasure tactical stimulation is going to be the most important. And they found the foreskin was the most sensitive part of the penis to tactical stimulation
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:44 AM
5

Actually some of his evidence even supported what we were saying as well The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites, but this finding did not extend to any other stimuli (where foreskin sensitivity was comparable to the other sites tested). This study also found the foreskin to be the most sensitive part of the penis in terms of tactile stimulation But they just concluded it's not because it wasn't more sensitive to pain and temperature. Cuz …
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:15 PM
7

The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites, but this finding did not extend to any other stimuli (where foreskin sensitivity was comparable to the other sites tested). Thanks for proving our point. That study also found the foreskin to be the most sensitive part of the penis in terms of tactile stimulation They just conclude it's not because it wasn't more sensitive to pain and temperature. Cuz those are most important during sex, right?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:09 PM
7

The patients were tested on the dorsal midline glans of the penis (foreskin retracted). Quantitative somatosensory testing was performed and included vibration, pressure, spatial perception, and warm and cold thermal thresholds In our study of neonatally circumcised men, we demonstrated that circumcision status does not significantly alter the quantitative somatosensory testing results at the glans penis." Somatosensation is the perception of pressure, temperature and pain. All basic nerves in t…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:06 PM
6

Using a Circumcision fetishist as a source an then claiming intactivsts are biased ? Come on man. Brian James Morris[1] is a molecular biologist and professor of molecular medical sciences at the University of Sydney, Australia.[2][3] He is an avid circumcision advocate,[4] who's never heard an argument for circumcision he didn't like.[5] He's the most vocal Australian circumcision promoter, stating that circumcision should be mandatory,[6] and uses regular scare tactics in an attempt to frighte…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 07:04 AM
1

You could try to get a recording of her saying anything like that so you have hard evidence?
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:12 PM
1

I'm offended that "man" is inexorably associated to being the "provider". It's as if we have no value if we aren't one? "Thanks for being an awesome provider" would totally piss me off. But there's no reason a man can't be the primary provider. It just shouldn't be an expectation. If he was the main provider he deserves some praise for working this ass off.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:01 AM
6

“90 percent of perpetrators of sexual violence against women are men. Moreover, when men are victims of sexual assault (an estimated one in 71 men, and one in six boys), 93 percent reported their abuser was a man. It’s true that women also assault men, but even when victims of all genders are combined, men perpetrate 78 percent of reported assaults.” https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf That's because rape is defined as penetration with a penis or object More than 1 …
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:13 PM
1

Ampuating a health body parts from a child is indeed child abuse
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:13 PM
1

I hope that when our boys are older the eldest doesn't compare himself to his brother and wonder why we chose to do that to him You should tell him before this happens. He's gonna find out eventually and hearing an apology will make him less likely to resent you. You could also bring up foreskin restoration and Foregen so he know he's got options if he dislikes it
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:08 PM
1

Nerve endings do grow and populate the new skin along with all of the other specialized sensory cells, etc. that are still there. Basic pain and presser nerve endings. But not the highly specialized fine touch receptors only found on the palm of the hand, the feet, the lips, the nipples, and the genitals.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:05 PM
4

I don't understand single gender spaces in the first place honestly...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 09:53 PM
5

if there is a need for female only spaces, there is also a need for male spaces. thats the end of the conversation. But is there a need for either ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 09:53 PM
1

Silly names?? Even a strange combination like Gutherson-Davis doesn't sound silly It just sounds like two names
/r/MensRights02/10/21 12:33 AM
-4

Who says the children would take the husbands last name??? In many cases where each parent chooses to keep their last name their children would have a hypenated last name. There were at least 3 or 4 kids at my school where it was like that for them
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:38 PM
1

Yeah it really only words with certain names. But some people do it and it works for them
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:02 PM
4

I thought you meant actually combining the two names, which is something people do as well i.e. Greenwood + Anderson = Greenson
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:53 PM
3

What if men want a fancy diamond ring?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:38 PM
6

Or each keep your names. Or hypenate
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:37 PM
-13

Why would you need a different last name from your kids??? That's not what the question asked
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:35 PM
5

Because it's primary spread through anal sex and vaginal transmission is not only less common but also harder to protect against?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:33 PM
2

Well paying after sex could be an issue too? You either don't pay them or pay them less than the agreed upon amount
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:25 AM
0

But what if they went and spent the money or you changed some other type of goods or services for sex?
/r/MensRights22/09/21 12:47 AM
2

But the exchange of money or goods for sex can be problematic because forcing someone to have sex after the exchange would be way more immoral and problematic than forcing them to perform a laboral task
/r/MensRights21/09/21 06:38 PM
-2

People sell and buy all kinds of labor, I don't see why fucking should be any different Because legally requiring someone to have sex even if they change their mind after is way more unethical than legally requiring them to do a task
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:52 PM
2

Really? Every job I have had required clean shaving and short hair, for men at least. Well that's illegal. Both freedom of religion and more recently freedom of gender expression are legal protected in the work place
/r/MensRights19/09/21 09:25 AM
12

to Mutilation to cut up or alter radically so as to make imperfect https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilate Mutilation an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilation#:~:text=1%20%3A%20an%20act%20or%20instance,accident%2C%20or%20deliberate%20mutilation.%E2%80%94 Please tell me how circumcision doesn't fit these definitions?
/r/MensRights17/09/21 10:44 PM
8

Don't forget about intersex genital mutilation as well
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:53 PM
6

Why aren't you just as shocked about ampuation of the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:53 PM
2

Let me know which cellphone company is harvesting organs to be used in their products
/r/MensRights26/08/21 02:51 PM
2

It'd still be unethical regardless
/r/MensRights26/08/21 11:18 AM
2

Is that relevant?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:44 PM
2

Well of course. We don't harvest (other) organs from people without their consent to save people.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:44 PM
3

She previously prompted SkinMedica which uses human fibroblasts harvested from intact foreskins. So unless she's denounced the company then she isn't
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:42 PM
1

Not all women, but enough to make the generalization work. So you think it's ok to make generalizations about men based on a large amount of assholes??? That's the same logic that the people saying "All men are rapist" "Men are pigs" etcetera use
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:58 PM
2

it’s an example of female nature. Uh what? Not all women are like that. It's not "female nature"
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:32 AM
3

Non-medically required cosmetic surgery is fine too, as long as it's a legal adult requesting it to be done to himself. There's no other part of your body which you can legally get ampuated and have it be considered a cosmetic surgery
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:49 AM
2

I was circumcised myself - willingly What are you doing on this sub then??
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:48 AM
18

It's disgusting how much bullshit they post about male genital mutilation and how they censor factual information, such as the foreskin being shown to be the most sensitive part of the penis along with the frenulum and ridged band.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 03:06 PM
15

They said they basically are never afraid of walking home alone. Which is idiotic because 80% of victims of violent crimes are men and men experience rape at a pretty close rate to women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 03:22 PM
7

Why do deadbeat father's get any hate at all. When a women can get an abortion or put a child up for adoption just because she feels like it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 03:34 PM
1

Totally no author bias there <sup>/s</sup> Brain J Morris
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 02:19 PM
2

There are both studies that argue it doesn’t reduce sensations and studies that say it does.. Who’s right and who’s wrong? Find me a single study that measured nerve responses and/or studied the structure of the prepuce as opposed to asking people their biased opinions about their subjunctive experience and found it doesn't reduce sensation and/or function
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 11:35 PM
2

Because the knowledge is extremely suppressed and there's a lot of pseudoscientific bullshit spread in cutting cultures
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 11:29 PM
2

the clitoris has a high concentration of nerve endings As do the foreskin, frenulum and ridged band amputated during a Circumcision
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:29 PM
6

So fucked up. Male and Intersex genital mutilation victims are completely ignored
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:28 PM
2

A penectomy would essentially render the victim sterile as sexual reproduction without artificial intervention would be impossible. No type of FGM leaves the women permeantly sterile
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:14 PM
5

Penectomy?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 02:52 AM
1

They're based on what gender you're assigned at birth but not really your biological sex. Intersex individuals are often put into a binary sex category Chromosomes, Hormone levels, and secondary sexual characteristics are completely ignored and it's exclusively assigned based on the appearance of the external genitalia Also not every law is based on gender And not all of the are disadvantageous to those assigned male at birth Other than that you are correct though
/r/MensRights02/07/21 07:45 PM
-1

Grammatical gender and human gender are two completely different things
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:19 AM
-4

am spanish, also this can happen with underage kids, so basically a kid with no psychological tests can change their gender smh And? What's your point?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:18 AM
4

Women's sports are pointless anyways (Because sports segregated by gender assigned at birth is dumb not because women shouldn't participate in sports)
/r/MensRights02/07/21 02:50 AM
-5

So, to add detail. A 16 yo guy can go to a gender change office and say "now I am a woman". If the parents disagree with this, welp, goodbye custody and legal rights over your kids. And why they hell should parents have any say in their childs gender identity?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 02:49 AM
2

It's literally a meaningless social construct. So of course it does make sense you can change it whenever you feel like it
/r/MensRights02/07/21 02:48 AM
0

A consent body modification isn't mutilation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 10:50 PM
1

Some people get it as a medical procedure you know. It's considered a last resort thing but it can happen There's no medical ailments which would require amputation of the all prepuce tissue and require no amputation of other tissue. There are certain skin conditions which could require ampuation of penile tissue. Cancer, frost bite, a flesh eating virus etcetera All of which are extremely rare on the penis But even if you did by chance get one of these conditions The changes of it exclusively a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 10:49 PM
17

and not shaming men who had it. Is it shaming rape victims to call rape a disgusting human rights violation?? Most definitely not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 04:49 PM
3

Because they don't follow the strict gender roles and status quo pushed by society. And women have had years of movements fighting again these gender roles and men haven't
/r/MensRights12/06/21 01:38 PM
1

Regenerative therapy with will regrow a foreskin using your DNA
/r/MensRights11/06/21 03:50 PM
1

Hopefully r/Foregen will be out soon. But to be honestly I don't see it being available to the public for at least another decade
/r/MensRights11/06/21 03:48 PM
1

Then a little too late for me It's never too late
/r/MensRights11/06/21 03:45 PM
1

The human population is so big and diverse that averages are actually pretty useless and irrelevant
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:42 PM
0

There's plenty of women who could overpower man and assuming they can't is harmful to male victims
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:40 PM
-4

How exactly is it stupid?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:34 PM
-96

Gender is a social construct and what constitutes masculine and feminine varries from culture to culture and from time period to time period Also you're completey ignoring the fact that intersex individuals exist
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:56 PM
-21

On average. But there's plenty of strong women and weak men. Generalizations of do more good than harm
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:53 PM
1

normal school in middle and high school, while I enjoyed being with other people that weren't ultra religious, This has little to do with homeschooling and more to do with the ultra religious There's ultra religious private schools and public schools in ultra religious areas There's homeschoolers who are athest
/r/MensRights08/05/21 05:57 PM
1

Just insinuating it
/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:00 AM
7

it really is about putting blinders on a child though, Specifically homeschooling your kids to shelter them , yes it is Homeschooling in general, most definitely not
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:30 PM
4

Outside of the pandemic homeschoolers have meetups, homeschoolers have play dates with neighbors, homeschoolers do sports and join in clubs, homeschoolers do all kinds of things where they interaction with other people their age
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:35 PM
8

Homeschool your kids unless you want them converted to the perverse woke ideology. There's many reasons to homeschool your kids. But trying to shelter them from opposing viewpoints certainly isn't it. That's controlling as hell and low key abusive
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:12 PM
-1

And what does this have to with homeschooling?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:11 PM
9

How the hell does homeschool deprive your children of social interactions??? You honestly know nothing about homeschooling at all Homeschoolers have meetups, homeschoolers have play dates with neighbors, homeschoolers do sports and join in clubs, homeschoolers do all kinds of things where they interaction with other people their age
/r/MensRights06/05/21 07:10 PM
1

Oh shit, you're right! Dick as a word, is gender-neutral as an insult but it is used to refer to male genitals. I'll make an edit. It's not like being a cunt or a pussy are good though...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/21 01:49 PM
1

. I grew up in communism and while it ended while I was rather young I know history of my country enough to be able to tell you that all the points applied during the 45 years of communism we had. And I think it also applies to communist countries like China and North Korea right now. That's not Communism That's authorization capitalism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/21 01:46 PM
5

Never personally but I've noticed that men who are virgins are considered losers and men who have had multiple sexual partners are considered asshole players, you can't win
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/21 02:40 AM
25

But that is literally assaulting something without their consent vs trying to save their life
/r/MensRights11/04/21 03:59 AM
-3

Hmmm, I'd say it's debatable. What's considered "hot" is based on unrealistic cultural standards and expectations. But you also can't control what you do and don't find attractive
/r/MensRights29/03/21 09:33 PM
2

Misandry and unrealistic standards
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:10 PM
8

I've been manscaping for years, and not for my Mrs approval, just for good hygiene If you prefer it that's fine. But pubic hair is not less hygienic
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:09 PM
19

They're also commanded to mutilate their children's genitals so that's not really the best example
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:08 PM
2

All children should be educated about consent and why it's important.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:10 PM
5

Even if they're were which is debatable. It'd means the company is admitting to breaking the law and instead of paying equal wages they're giving bonuses to try to make up for it
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:31 PM
8

Even if they're were which is debatable. It'd means the company is admitting to breaking the law and instead of paying equal wages they're giving bonuses to try to make up for it
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:30 PM
3

It's also illegal to have laws specific to one gender yet look at the rape laws and FGM laws.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:29 PM
-3

I wish I was joking. Because of the fact that someone can indentify with a different gender than the sex they were assigned at birth or the fact the OP would have to lie about their gender identity to receive equal treatment?
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:26 PM
1

oh I may have signed myself as male all this time but now on this very bonus day I'm a woman But on paperwork and things you have to put the sex you were assigned at birth, unless you transition and get it legally changed Where as you could indentify as a woman, or non-binary
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:23 PM
1

FGM includes homologous procedures like labiaplasties and hood reductions. First of all. Male Circumcision removes 1/2 of penile tissue, and the 3 most sensitive parts of the genitals so those are not homologous at all as neither comes anywhere close to removing that much of vulvar tissue Second off all MGM includes procedures such as Penile Subincision, Penectomy and Castration which are much more severe then any of the types of FGM Even with infibulation the most severe type of FGM (while horr…
/r/MensRights10/02/21 04:04 PM
1

Though, I also think that FGM is more horrific How ?
/r/MensRights10/02/21 03:37 AM
0

The circumcision in Korea is 100% Christian influence. Circumcision is forbidden in Christianity. It's literally only practiced by US Christians and SK Christians due or US influence
/r/MensRights10/02/21 03:26 AM
0

Christians have literally never practiced Circumcision. The US and SK are the only majority Christian nations to practice it
/r/MensRights10/02/21 03:24 AM
3

The Circumcision rate is less than 20% in the Western US
/r/MensRights10/02/21 03:22 AM
3

That is neonatal too. Hoovering around 70% circumcised for the midwest. That was over a decade ago
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:31 AM
4

It's the only non-Muslim country (And Israel) to practice Circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:29 AM
6

Even brought his father in to talk about it. The general consensus he left with was that if it wasn't don't properly in hospital they would go underground and put the kids at more risk. Uhhh.. so??? That's like saying rape, foot binding, FGM, or any other abusive action should be legal because otherwise people will do it underground. That makes zero sense. There's always gonna be criminals. That doesn't mean we should legalized shit
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:27 AM
12

Allure that women want Plenty of women are chosing not to circumcise their sons and plenty of men practically insist on it as well It's not just women who are pushing it American women majority prefer it. Saying they "prefer" it isn't accurate. Neither American men not American women know shit about male anatomy. They hardly even know what a foreskin is let alone a frenulum or a ridged band. You can't prefer something if you've never experienced anything else.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:24 AM
8

while some men complain about dating troubles on Tinder. Yet there's no posts on r/MensRights complaining about that so why are you associating that with them? the point is when women want to advocate their issues That makes zero sense. There's honestly really no such thing as Men's issues and Woman's issues. Just human rights issue. Would you be ok with someone advocating exclusively for white rape victims? Because I'd say that's fucked up as hell. Feminist are the ones who are making issues wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/21 04:12 AM
114

Because the Spanish justice system is fucked. Men who have been attached by their wifes are often arrested because well they must have done something to her first that provoked her and she was just defending herself
/r/MensRights04/02/21 07:26 AM
1

There's no benefit to fgm, but there are benefits to a labiaplasty. This makes zero sense. Labiaplasty is a form of FGM
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 08:38 PM
1

Europe has very low non-religious or medical circumcision rates. How isn't religious Circumcision also an issue? And unnecessary medical Circumcisions actually is pretty common in Europe as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 08:33 PM
1

Islam doesn't even command FGM. It's mostly a man made thing. It doesn't call for MGM either. Neither are even mention in the Qur'an. However both are recomended in the Hadith. O The fitrah is five things, including circumcision Note that the rule of hadith dictate that if it is not mentioned specifically or if the pronouns do not point to a certain gender, then the hadith is valid for both sexes. Hence, the following hadiths are applicable for both men and women. Abu Hurayrah said: I heard the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 08:28 PM
4

Exactly, you're not even supposed to use soap unless it's special soap made for the sensitive genitales. Just literally rinse with water. It takes 5 seconds
/r/MensRights28/01/21 10:52 PM
1

my ex refused to go down on me even if I was fresh out of the shower Ok but is they're anything wrong with asking your partner to freshen up before putting their genitals near your mouth? (As long as you're willing to due the same) I personally don't think my partner needs to shower literally every single time but I could see why some people might feel that way. Plus you could even make showering beforehand something you do together. As a fun way to start and get things going beforehand
/r/MensRights28/01/21 10:45 PM
3

Probably also somehow finds a scared and dried out penis as more appealing than a natural one due to many years of propaganda and cultural brainwashing
/r/MensRights28/01/21 10:38 PM
25

A. Random boners happen all the time B. You can be turned on and still not want to have sex with the person
/r/MensRights17/01/21 07:02 AM
2

Women have all kinds of contraceptive options and that's honestly all you think men should have for options?
/r/MensRights10/01/21 02:55 AM
4

Genital mutilation especially an unlicensed surgeon mutilating a minor without proper anesthesia is disgusting and an extreme human rights violation But I don't think we should have the state castrating men as punishment even if they are convicted of a horrible crime like this
/r/MensRights08/01/21 03:01 AM
6

Cutting off the most sensitive parts of a minors penis and leaving their genitals scared and dried out is gross
/r/MensRights31/12/20 05:43 PM
34

https://youtu.be/aca0KWoHtqQ She's says Jonny always walks away and never fights back and makes fun of him for doing so. She literally admitted he never does anything back to her.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 05:23 AM
22

Amber Heard admits that Jonny always walks away and never fights back. She calls him a coward or a pussy (I can't remember exactly) for doing so https://youtu.be/aca0KWoHtqQ
/r/MensRights26/12/20 05:22 AM
1

The mass amounts of enslavement of immigrants equal to when Hitler Yet the same thing is happening in the US and no one is batting an eye
/r/MensRights23/12/20 03:33 PM
3

I think it has to do with being offshoot words from "male" (fe"male") and "man" (wo"man"). Anyone who thinks that should brush up on their linguistics and etymology. https://culturacolectiva-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/culturacolectiva.com/history/origins-of-the-words-woman-and-female/amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16078094929649&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fculturacolectiva.com%2Fhistory%2Forigins-of-the-words-wo…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 09:50 PM
2

Lol, did you even read that article? It in no way recommends Circumcision. Encourages seeking alternative treatment. And never once mentions Circumcision as a preventative mesure like it's done in the US. In most cases, circumcision will only be recommended when other, less invasive and less risky treatments have been tried and haven't worked. Mild cases of phimosis can be treated with topical steroids to help soften the skin and make it easier for the foreskin to retract. In paraphimosis, a hea…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:17 PM
2

The Bullshit benefits are what's batshit crazy It takes around 100 circumcisions to prevent a single UTI, and UTIs can be treated easily by other less invasive ways, like antibiotics. Not to mention, it is easily prevented with basic hygiene. 1 case of UTI may be prevented at the cost of 2 cases of haemorrhage, infection, or, in rare instances, more severe outcomes or even death. This negates whatever minuscule protective benefit circumcision might have against UTIs. And it should be noted that …
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:11 PM
2

all your sources are besides the point. You contend NHS and WHO give bad advice, I said the WHO and CDC, not the NHS. The NHS doesn't recommend infant circumcision. They conspire to cut prepuces without medical reason ? For what, for fun ? sadism ? For money Performing a surgery makes much more money than giving out free condoms Not to mention that the main funder of the WHO is Bill Gates who's obsessed with manipulating impoverished men into getting their genital mutilated Male genital mutilati…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 12:44 AM
1

You had a surgical treatment such as a preputioplasty or Z-plasty (which solve phimosis without removing any tissue) and it didn't work? I highly doubt that Even if stretching exercises and steroid cream don't work , there's other surgical techniques
/r/MensRights11/12/20 07:25 PM
1

I don't care how you spin it a guy in a dress is NOT masculine. It's disgusting. Dresses have only been considered feminine for the past 200 years So that's just straight up bullshit
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:54 PM
12

Forbidding circumcision is a direct clash with the religious practices of Judaism. Not it wouldn't. It would stop your from permanent branding with your personal religious beliefs But it would in no way take away individual religious freedom It would instead give religious freedom back to children who are it stolen
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/20 08:04 PM
2

Treatments for Phimosis include: Stretching Exercises Steroid Creams Preputioplasties Z-plasties Amputation of penile tissue isn't medical necessarily
/r/MensRights02/12/20 05:04 PM
2

You had absolutely no reason to be circumcised Treatments for Phimosis include: Stretching Exercises Steroid Creams Preputioplasties Z-plasties Amputation of penile tissue isn't medical necessarily Also you somehow decided at 36 that it was a problem ??? Why??
/r/MensRights02/12/20 05:01 PM
2

Maybe the WHO should change their name to the US international health organization. Because they certainly don't represent most of the world The US's stance on circumcision and it's claimed benefits is extremely biased and based on pretty flawed science. Most medical organizations around the world have come about against the practice. Circumcision is unconsentual Genital Mutilation. It's a serious human rights violation Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the rout…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 04:55 PM
3

And how does a fully developed human being who is 100% capable of surviving outside the womb not also have bodily anatomy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:01 AM
1

Ok so I looked so average weight charts by week online and it seems like he was actually born around 22-23 weeks but he was just a little bit over 1lb when he was born so there's absolutely no way he was over 24 weeks tho. So he was still born before what is considered "viability"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 03:43 AM
-2

Pro abortion up to a point (I think 23 weeks is the widely accepted point) Seeing as my younger brother was born at 20 weeks that's a pretty shitty point
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 09:03 PM
-1

How is it not your business when it's literally your child too? Women can get an abortion or put a child up for adoption without even notifying the father How is that not fucked up? It's both parents business
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 09:02 PM
4

65% of abortions are before 8 weeks 91% of all abortions are before 12 weeks. 1.3% occur after 21 weeks Less than 1% occur after 24 weeks. I fail to see how this is relevant at all to whether or not abortions after 24 weeks are moral and should be allow? It's like saying only 1% of murders happen at before 7pm so murder before 7pm shouldn't be allow Like really it's completely irrelevant
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 09:00 PM
8

Only 39 states require an abortion to be performed by a licensed physician. 19 states require an abortion to be performed in a hospital after a specified point in the pregnancy, and 17 states require the involvement of a second physician after a specified point. Just 21 states have laws in effect that prohibit “partial-birth” abortion. 3 of these laws apply only to postviability abortions. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws 24 states have no term limit at all …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/20 08:54 PM
2

The ethnicity of the person is irrelevant. The law is the issue. It wouldn't have matter if the person was of Swedish decent or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 09:36 PM
0

Diet, Exercise, and Frequent ejaculation.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:15 PM
27

Ehhh, I mean black men are killed at higher rates than white men. However men of all races are killed at higher rates than women of all race. Black women are killed at higher rates than white women but lower rates than white men So it's not just a race issue but it's also not just a gender issue either. It's an overlap between both race and gender Source: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/34/16793
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 07:03 PM
2

If you can have your genitals brutally mutilated then have the sick bastard only get 180 hours of community service then no the quality of life is not higher than the US. Not for victims of violent crimes that is
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 02:43 PM
8

All I'm saying is that it's a reliable source.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 01:59 PM
2

Why would that matter?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 04:09 PM
6

A joke about 9 boys having their genitals brutally mutilated with a soldering gun? That's not fucking funny and this isn't a comedy sub
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 03:41 PM
6

r/MensLib is a sorry excuse for a men's rights sub. They don't consider men forced to penetrate to be considered rape and they don't consider Circumcision to be genital mutilation. And they consider advocating against these issues to be sexist because it takes away from women's issues. No joke that's literally why I was banned from there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 05:18 AM
2

And maybe after years they could be rehabilitated or at least make parole But certainly not in such a short time after commiting such a hellish crime
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:11 AM
4

They should be charged with conspiring yes if they did. But the one doing the action is more responsible
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 01:40 AM
1

Why are they attacking the other man when the two of them both made a consentual decision to have sex? The violence against him isn't justified. Yelling at both of them, sure But assaulting the other man? No
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:17 AM
7

Even fucking worse. It was actually only 180 hours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 11:56 PM
14

I mean most Circumcision is either due to children or teens and adults who were pressured due to religion or BS heathy benefits And he never said anything specifically about fully consenting adults only
/r/MensRights12/11/20 11:54 PM
8

Well fuck that's 1000 times worse
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 11:53 PM
28

How they hell am I the one making this a gendered issue? If a man cut off the clitorises of 9 girls with a soldering iron he'd probably get life in prison and get because it's boys he gets a slap on the wrist
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:41 PM
41

If you're not against male genital mutilation then why are you on this sub?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:34 PM
39

And 180 days of community service for something like shoplifting or littering makes sense. But after you commit a hellish crime that violations the bodies of 9 children you can't be rehabilitated for a long time if ever How could someone like that ever be trusted in society?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:30 PM
3

What are you even trying to say?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 09:37 PM
6

How can someone who collaborated or committed a crime of sexual violence against a child ever be trusted to be a free member of society? Maybe they could get parole or restricted freedoms or something But how could they ever be trusted around children again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 09:28 PM
13

How can someone who collaborated or committed a crime of sexual violence against a child ever be trusted to be a free member of society? Maybe they could get parole or restricted freedoms or something But how could they ever be trusted around children again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 09:28 PM
25

And what would be the right tool for forced genital mutilation? I love how you're referring to a violent crime and a humans rights violation as a "job"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 09:24 PM
22

All that means is the parents should be thrown in prison as well for collaboration. If parents conspired to chop off any other part of their children's body they'd definitely loose custody and get jail time. But either way he deserves a much harsher sentance
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:26 PM
5

All that means is the parents should loose custody and be thrown in prison as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:23 PM
6

I don't think the legal system should have the right to cut of people's dicks. That'd be problematic for many different reasons. But he should definitely be in prison for many many years if not for life
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 07:17 PM
33

I wish it was ! But nope it's legit. Published by Sweden's National Public Radio Broadcasting Service Sveriges Radio AB is Sweden's national publicly funded radio broadcaster. Sveriges Radio is a public limited company, owned by an independent foundation, previously funded through a licensing fee, the level of which is decided by the Swedish Riksdag. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sveriges_Radio
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 07:12 PM
1

How about the fact that this is literally happening in the US as well?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:07 PM
14

It's not like he was shoplifting or something minor like that He fucking violated and mutilated 9 boys penises with a soldering guns. He's either a fucked up based who can't be a functioning member of society or he's an extremely mentally ill person who also can't be a functioning member of society and needs treatment If you mutilated and/or violate someone's body you shouldn't get 8 months of prison or 180 days of community service I do agree that people should be able to repent their actions b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 07:06 PM
67

Even if he had been sentenced to prison it would have only been for 8 months!! Can you imagine how long it would've been if he had done this to nice girls? Most likely for life. Granted I don't know Swedish so this could be a translation issue but it appears the article also refers to this as Circumcision? Circumcision? With a soldering gun? This is Mutilation. This is a violent crime
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 06:32 PM
301

Even if he had been sentenced to prison it would have only been for 8 months!! Can you imagine how long it would've been if he had done this to nine girls? Most likely for life. Granted I don't know Swedish so this could be a translation issue but it appears the article also refers to this as Circumcision? Circumcision? With a soldering gun? This is Mutilation. This is a violent crime
/r/MensRights12/11/20 06:32 PM
1

I have seen his podcasts. He says trans athletes shouldn't be allowed to compete alongside their gender identity despite the fact that they have the same testosterone and estrogen levels as cis athletes after getting on HRT and he accusing them of juicing despite the fact that he himself takes T. He's very hypocritical and biased.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 05:23 PM
4

Least horrific aspect of MGM??? Male Circumcision removes 1/2 of penile and the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis. It's extremely server and definitely horrific. It's extremely damaging to the penis The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing …
/r/MensRights05/11/20 09:53 PM
2

Did you even read my original comment? "African, Muslim, Jewish and American boys also be getting the male equivalent to the clitoris cut off"
/r/MensRights05/11/20 09:50 PM
4

I'm in no way defending FGM. It's a vile human rights violations. But saying that FGM victims completely loose the ability to have sexual pleasure and that it's sexual effects are way more damaging than MGM is completely false and scientifically inaccurate The group of 137 women, affected by different types of FGM/C, reported orgasm in almost 86%, always 69.23%; 58 mutilated young women reported orgasm in 91.43%, always 8.57%; after defibulation 14 out of 15 infibulated women reported orgasm; th…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 07:01 PM
5

Downvoters don't know how a clitoris and a glans penis are related. They're not really related at all They form from the same tissue in utero. And they have a similar appearances. But the similarities basically end their. Their nerve distributions and functions are completely different. The male equivalent to the clitois, labia minora and labia majora are the foreskin, frenulum, and ridged band. All of which are removed during Circumcision The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. I…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:52 PM
17

I am. It's genital mutilation full stop
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:43 PM
10

Men's Lib is trash. They don't consider Circumcision genital mutilation and they don't consider forced to penetrate to be rape. And they consider activism of these issues to be sexist as they take away from women's issues It's a poor excuse of a men's rights sub
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:41 PM
12

Can you name one third world country that practices FGM and doesn't practice MGM? There aren't any In first world countries FGM is illegal So what's your point
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:37 PM
13

IMO a penectomy or castration is an equivalent to FGM. This paper is worth a read for those interested: There's are the types of FGM according to the World Heath Organization Types of FGM Type 1: this is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals), and/or the prepuce/ clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans). Type 2: this is the partial or total removal of the clitoral …
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:35 PM
16

but FGM occurs more often and extensively in the third world. Name one African country that practices FGM and doesn't practice MGM? There aren't any. MGM is practiced in just as unsanitary conditions. Also MGM is practiced in the first world as well while FGM is illegal in nearly every country in the Americas and in Europe If anything MGM should be more of a priority because it's practiced in numerous countries compared to FGM and isn't legal in a single country in the entire world
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:28 PM
17

Why is this getting downvoted?? I'm a circumcised dude and being circumcised is nowhere near as bad as removing a clit/labia etc. Yes it fucking is.Circumcision removes 3 erogenous zone from the penis, 1/2 of penile tissue and effects urination. It's extremely damaging to the penis. The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and lab…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:27 PM
37

Circumcision removes 3 erogenous zone from the penis, 1/2 of penile tissue and effects urination. It's extremely damaging to the penis. The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue.…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:26 PM
6

Circumcision removes 3 erogenous zone from the penis, 1/2 of penile tissue and effects urination. It's extremely damaging to the penis. The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue.…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:25 PM
185

African, Muslim, Jewish and American boys also be getting the male equivalent to the clitoris cut off
/r/MensRights05/11/20 03:19 PM
2

I got banned from r/menslib for saying Circumcision is Genital Mutilation and being forced to penetrate is rape. What a poor excuse of a men's rights sub
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 08:56 PM
3

Even if this specific story is made up. This happens all the time and there's numerous confirmed cases of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 02:10 PM
2

Got a source for that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 12:54 AM
0

That makes literally zero sense. Why does it matter what you've got in your pants?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/20 01:51 PM
5

Polygraphs are shit and should be illegal because of their inaccuracy
/r/MensRights22/10/20 05:47 PM
1

And what's your definition of a "biological female" and how do trans people not meet that definition?
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:55 PM
0

SRS exists buddy. If a transwomen is both taking estrogen and has had SRS then how are they any different than cisgender women?
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:54 PM
-2

Literally the only good thing is that he's anti-MGM.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:50 PM
-4

The only thing good about Joe Rogan is the fact that he's anti-MGM. But he's extremely transphobic and encourages stupid gender roles.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 02:18 PM
1

That's completely wrong. If you're gonna spread sexist lies and unscientific bullshit. Get the hell off this sub The group of 137 women, affected by different types of FGM/C, reported orgasm in almost 86%, always 69.23%; 58 mutilated young women reported orgasm in 91.43%, always 8.57%; after defibulation 14 out of 15 infibulated women reported orgasm; the group of 57 infibulated women investigated with the FSFI questionnaire showed significant differences between group of study and an equivalent…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:35 PM
13

Plenty of times the father wants his son to look like him and the mother is the one who is against it. So no that's not good justification at all
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:10 AM
14

Men can be whatever the fuck they wanna be (within the law obviously) that's the whole point of this sub
/r/MensRights06/10/20 05:03 PM
2

How about you just open doors and help out everyone?
/r/MensRights03/10/20 09:48 PM
8

Pinpricking the female genitals without medically necessity is considered female genital mutilation and is a serious crime in most North American and European countries. Meanwhile removing half of penile tissue and all erogenous tissue from the penis either without consent or with misinformed consent (say an amputation is medically necessary before trying less invasive alternatives) is 100% legal in every single country in the world. Men deserve bodily anatomy. Men deserve equal rights. Type IV.…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:03 PM
8

That's just plain wrong. If you're gonna spend sexist unscientific bullshit then get the fuck off this sub It's mutilation whether you like the term or not These are the types of illegal FGM Type 1: this is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals), and/or the prepuce/ clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans). Type 2: this is the partial or total removal of the clitor…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:27 AM
3

In the Hadith sorry
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:12 AM
5

Do you have neutral views on FGM too or are you just a sexist?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:31 PM
2

I'm so so sorry. That's horrible
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:29 PM
7

Would you support a law that only gave rights to one race? Cuz I sure as hell wouldn't. So why would you do the same with sex ?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:28 PM
-1

FGM is mentioned in the Qur'an too tho so that doesn't even make any sense
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:26 PM
1

Who cares if it ain't common. It's still legal and that's fucked up
/r/MensRights21/09/20 04:50 AM
1

Amputation of penile tissue is only required in extreme cases such as cancer, a flesh eating virus or an extremely several infection which could spread and result in loss of the penis. I highly doubt your brother had any of those since they're all extremely rare.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 04:49 AM
-3

I mean the genitals drawn in the picture are already mutilated so why would they respect men's bodily anatomy when the default penis they draw is mutilated?
/r/MensRights17/09/20 02:28 PM
1

But the foreskin doesn't just protect the head. It's the most sensitive parts of the penis. The head isn't very sensitive at all
/r/MensRights19/08/20 05:21 PM
2

Medical Circumcision should really be restricted too. Since 90% of the time there's a treatment option less invasive than tissue amputation.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:19 AM
1

Treatments for Phimosis include: Stretching Exercises Steroid Creams Preputioplasties Z-plasties Amputation of penile tissue is barbaric and unnecessary. Like chopping off a broken arm instead of mending it
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:18 AM
1

I doubt highly doubt you never jerk off and never want to have sex ever
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:33 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights16/08/20 08:31 PM
0

personally i have yet to deal with almost all of this How would you know how it affects your sexual plesure if you never had sex prior to being circumcised?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:37 AM
12

Circumcision completely fucks up the penis The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It is linked to frequently orgasm difficulties in men and pain and discomfort in their femal…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:22 AM
4

The glans penis is not an erroneous zone. The foreskin isn't just a protective covering. It's the most sensitive part of the penis The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It i…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:21 AM
3

You shouldn't mutilated your child's genitals in the first place
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:19 AM
19

There's many downside. Circumcision nearly completely destroys penile function. The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It is linked to frequently orgasm difficulties in men a…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:16 AM
29

Both those statements are completely false The four major types of FGM, and their subtypes, are: Type I. Partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals, with the function of providing sexual pleasure to the woman), and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans). When it is important to distinguish between the major variations of Type I FGM, the following subdivisio…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:10 AM
1

Clitoridectomy is not worse. Male Circumcision removes the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It's more invasive than a clitoridectomy. Hell you a low and tight Circumcision could actually be compared to infibulation since nearly all erroneous tissue is removed from the penis The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 02:23 PM
1

Why the hell shouldn't they ever be mentioned together? They're the same damn thing. Imagine saying that white genital mutilation is much worse than black genital mutilation and you should never mention the two together. Why are we dividing issues based on sex? That's as stupid as diving them on race or eye color
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 02:19 PM
-13

Young black men also commit the most crimes overall But there also more likely to live in poverty which in turn leads to more crimes
/r/MensRights23/06/20 11:48 PM
1

These are the types of Female Genital Mutilation according to the World Heath Organization. All of them are illegal in the US. Type I. Partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals, with the function of providing sexual pleasure to the woman), and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans). When it is important to distinguish between the major variations of Type I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 07:57 PM
1

These are the types of Female Genital Mutilation according to the World Heath Organization. All of them are illegal in the US. Type I. Partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals, with the function of providing sexual pleasure to the woman), and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans). When it is important to distinguish between the major variations of Type I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 07:51 PM
38

But we all know that "men's rights" is code for straight white male rights. Not at all. Gay men being told they're not real men for being feminine is as much a men's rights issue as an LGBT issue. A large majority of homophobia stems from misandry and societies ideas of which roles men and women are supposed to fit into.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 02:47 PM
1

and managed to convince her that male circumcision was the equivalent of cutting off a woman’s clitoral hood. But it's not. It's much worse. The foreskin is the male equivalent to the clitoris The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 10:47 PM
1

FGM is often much worse than MGM, but MGM is a lot more common & accepted. Often??? Infibulation makes up 10% of cases. That's not often at all
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 10:39 PM
1

Definitely not. Male Circumcision is much more severe. The foreskin is the male equivalent to the clitoris. Removing the foreskin, frenulum and ridged bad is the female equivalent to removing the clitoris, labia minora and labia majora The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 10:33 PM
1

The male equivalent to the clitoris is the foreskin The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It is linked to frequently orgasm difficulties in men and pain and discomfort in th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 10:30 PM
1

You're serious comparing adding pigment to the skin to completely mutilating the genitals? Genital mutilation is much worse
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 10:28 PM
1

Clitoridectomy is worse No it's not. The foreskin is the male clitoris The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It is linked to frequently orgasm difficulties in men and pain a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 10:27 PM
5

Here's the text summary if you want to read it The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It is linked to frequently orgasm difficulties in men and pain and discomfort in their f…
/r/MensRights05/06/20 10:25 PM
4

A. I summarized everything at the top. Then put the sources below B. I did post links
/r/MensRights05/06/20 10:06 PM
11

Male Circumcision is just as damaging as removing the clitoris, the labia minora and labia majora The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It is linked to frequently orgasm dif…
/r/MensRights05/06/20 07:53 PM
0

And what's the criteria on what an orgasm is??? Ejaculation and a full body orgasm are most definitely not the same thing. Just because men tend to ejaculation most of the time doesn't mean they're having a great orgasm either. Also men can go soft or have trouble pretty often. Not to mention that males are often subjective to genital mutilation which makes them enjoy sex even less
/r/MensRights01/06/20 08:36 PM
0

Go back 100 maybe 200 years and it completely was. And this effects are modern society still
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 08:33 PM
1

A form of social organization in which the father is the supreme authority in the family, clan, or tribe and descent is reckoned in the male line, with the children belonging to the father's clan or tribe. This along with the strict gender roles of the past definitely still effect our current society. But they're just as harmful to men as they are to men
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 06:52 PM
-5

The patriarchal society of the past was always harmful to both men and women. The father was the leader of the household, he could beat you if you defy him. He'd decided who you married. Men and women had very strict roles they were expected to follow. The way of thinking that men have to be tough, can't cry, don't taking male victims seriously all date back to the patriarchy as well.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 01:51 PM
-10

The patriarchy isn't a myth. It most definitely existed and still effects our society today. But it's not beneficial to men at all. The patriarchy is oppressive and forces roles onto both sexes
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 01:20 PM
1

Well studies have indeed shown that women reach orgasm less often and experience more discomfort with cut men (as well as a male partner experiences less pleasure and more discomfort) but yes obviously we shouldn't make MGM about women. Men are the victims. But a secondary side effect would be that your partner will also experience less pleasure
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 03:36 PM
1

That happened to me too. I used to just think it was normal and bathing suits were just uncomfortable. Now I know that's not the case
/r/MGTOW30/04/20 03:32 PM
2

You can't wear a backpack in most stores or restaurants
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:48 PM
1

Removing half of the penis isn't a minor surgery.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:56 PM
3

I'm very aware of the anatomy of them You're extremely uneducated about male anatomy as you've said several times now the foreskin isn't the most sensitive part of the penis and that's scientifically false Why are people speaking to me about dicks as if I was a woman? Because you're acting ignorant and uneducated and are spreading false information I'm merely stating the foreskin ITSELF is not sensitive. But that's completely false. Did you even read my post at all? The Foreskin is the most sens…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:34 PM
1

Benefits??? There's zero benefits to male genital mutilation. It's purely cultural Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when “medical necessity is not established, …interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.” Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010) The KNMG states “there is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessa…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:53 PM
2

What would you get circumcised?? Are you crazy?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:45 PM
3

The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue The foreskin, frenulum, and ridged band are the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and all contains fine touch receptors such as Meissn…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:41 PM
6

The glans penis (head) is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It can also causes the meatus to shrink which at worst can making urination difficult and painful and at minimum cause weak urine strea…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:37 PM
2

Well yes and no. Women do take longer to pee yeah. But you get some guys who take a dump for 3 hours so I think it evens out.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 02:30 PM
14

I see nothing wrong with gender neutral bathrooms but the fact that women have a separate bathroom is super fucked up
/r/MensRights26/04/20 04:22 AM
2

Giving children religious freedom??
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:45 AM
1

They just interviewed circumcised men. It's not a very accurate method at all. They didn't measure nerve responses or brain patters or anything like that.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:36 AM
2

The fact that male genital mutilation isn't legal is very worrying
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:30 AM
1

It'll probably never change for religious communities, It violates religious freedom though. Babies aren't religious. And forcing your religion on a minor by literally branding them who later might grow up to want nothing to do with it is taking away their religious freedom.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:29 AM
1

No it's false. In certain states yes it's 70 or even 80% but national wide it's only like 50%. In the West of the US it's only 30%
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:26 AM
2

If you think how long a man can last for his girl is more important than how much he enjoys sex than what are you even doing ok this sub?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:33 AM
1

The foreskin, frenulum, and ridged band are all attached and all important
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:32 PM
1

One of the 3 most sensitive in a man No the foreskin, frenulum and ridged band are ALL removed during circumcision The clit is gouged out making it hard to enjoy sex at all. Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in their female partners, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. the most sensitive of the woman. The ciltoris is just one of the most sensitive par…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:30 PM
2

It should be but urologist always jump right to circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:18 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:25 PM
2

No not at all. Not even close. Removing the clitoris is equivalent to removing the top half of the penis. The other comment has it right. The hood of the clitoris = foreskin of the penis. Idk how practically it may be = since positioning but in no way or form is removal of the clitoris the same as the foreskin. The glans penis is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band lik…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:24 PM
1

I'm not saying they're not sciences. But studying and understanding science doesn't make able to just magically guess what treatments are effective, what's heathy or what does and doesn't cause cancer. Actual scientist, (even though most have PHDs) never just assume things because of their knowledge. They can make predictions, theories, or hypotheseses. But then they try to prove them through scientific studies. Seeking medical advice from a doctor who doesn't read scientific studies and researc…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:37 PM
1

Male circumcision is the equivalent to removing the clitoris and the labia
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:23 PM
1

The equivalent to the foreskin is the clitrois. Not the clitorial hood
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:22 PM
1

Neither does the average doctor if we're being honest. They extensively study biology, chemistry and anatomy. But they don't read scientific research
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:22 PM
1

The only time it's necessary to amapuate penile tissue is in extremely rare cases like cancer, a flesh eating virus, frost bite, or an extremely severe infection that could results in loss of the penis if it's not removed Circumcising for Phimosis or a UTI is absolutely not medically necessary
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:17 PM
3

Not really voluntary when you're doctor lies and says penile amputation is the only option. Streching with or without steroids creams is extremely effective and even if it doesn't work and a surgical method is required a preputioplasty will do the trick without removing any tissue at all
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:14 PM
1

FGM was never religious, not part of Judaism nor Islam FGM is indeed part of Islam. It's literally mentioned in the Hadith which is the same book that mentions MGM. FGM is practiced in dozens of Muslim countries.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:10 PM
1

The glans penis is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It can also causes the meatus to shrink which at worst can making urination difficult and painful and at minimum cause weak urine stream and l…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:09 PM
1

performed in the correct clinical environment Every African country that practices FGM also practices MGM in just as poor conditions. In Malaysia, Indonesia, and Egypt FGM is done in a hospital setting, that doesn't make it any better. Removing the clitoris is of course much more horrific than male circumcision The glans penis is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band lik…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:07 PM
2

Treatments for Phimosis include stretching, steriod creams or a preputioplasty. A circumcision is never necessary
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:00 PM
2

Talk to your doctor next time you visit. Horrible advice. Doctors will jump right to circumcision even though it's unnecessary.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:59 PM
2

The glans penis is not a sexual erogenous zone. It only has pain, pressure and temperature nerves. It does not contain fine touch tactile nerve. The foreskin, frenulum and ridged band like the ciltoris and labia do contain fine touch receptors. Male circumcision is extremely severe removing the 3 most sensitive parts of the penis and 1/2 of penile tissue. It can also causes the meatus to shrink which at worst can making urination difficult and painful and at minimum cause weak urine stream and l…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:54 PM
1

It can easily be sewn back open again. It's not permenant like male castration. The testicles or penis can't be grown back
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:45 PM
2

Even feminist against MGM act like it's not as bad. When they're both just as damaging
/r/MGTOW14/04/20 01:20 AM
8

Both of these organizations should be sued for medical fraudulence. Especially the WHO claiming to the World Heath Organization while ignoring 90% of the world's stance on male genital mutilation
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:41 PM
1

I'm all for religious freedom. But forcing your religion on a minor by permently branding them and altering their genitals isn't religious freedom. If anything it's talking away their religious freedom. Everyone has their own individual religious freedom but your freedom ends where another's lies.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:23 PM
0

FGM is illegal in a hospital setting so what's your point? If you're not for men's rights then get the fuck off this sub
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:21 PM
9

Still don’t understand what’s wrong with circumcision. It's the equivalent to FGM but still legal that's what's wrong with it The mean length of prepuce in this sample was 6.4 cm (range 4.8-9.2) and covered 93% of the mean penile shaft (6.9 cm). Ten prepuces were as long as or longer than the shaft of the penis to which they belonged; three of them were > 10% longer than the shaft and glans combined. 51% of the length of the mean adult penile shaft, or more from nearly half the penises. CONCLUSI…
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:19 PM
14

MGM has been shown to only reduce the risk of hiv slightly in men from their partner No it hasn't. The study that found has several flaws in the methodology and and not a single other study has been able to confirm the findings
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:17 PM
2

I'm all for religious freedom. But your freedom ends where another person's body lies. By branding a child with a religion they might not want to be a part of when they're older you're talking away their religious freedom
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:12 PM
2

Just because something is legal doesn't make it moral. Beating your wife used to be legal. Slavery used to be legal. It'd still be against people who did these even though they were legal
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:05 PM
2

The Who should really change their name to the United States international heath organization. Cuz by no means are they they the world heath organization Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when “medical necessity is not established, …interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.” Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010) The KNMG states …
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:03 PM
2

Long ass labias look funny too. Ask her out she'd feel if her labia and clitrois were cut off at birth
/r/MensRights08/04/20 03:58 PM
0

And what makes someone a real "man"?
/r/MensRights06/04/20 12:25 AM
2

Penis, testicles, sperm So you're saying men you had testicular cancer and had to get their testicles removed aren't men? If a man had to get his penis removed or lost it in a injury does that make him not a man? Are infertility men not men. Y chromosome is what makes me a man. Not everyone who's XY is born with male genitals. Not everyone whos born with male genitals is XY. Also XX and XY aren't the only possiblities. XXY, XXY, XXXY, XXYY among many others exist. Have you ever gotten your chrom…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:26 PM
1

Not necessarily
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:09 PM
1

Biology Maybe you should study it. You obviously don't understand how sex works
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:08 PM
1

What does a biological girl even mean???
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:07 PM
1

And what's your definition of sex??
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:07 PM
1

Trans men who have transitioned will still experience a lot of the struggles of being men. Genital mutilation and the selective services aren't the only issues men face
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:04 PM
0

I just don't want to be forced to support lies How is it a lie?? Trans men are as much of a man as any of us are
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:01 PM
0

What makes them any less of a man than you?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:00 PM
2

How aren't they men? What makes you a man and then not??
/r/MensRights05/04/20 09:59 PM
0

The only ignorant one is you. Tissue expansion has been used for years by dermatologist to treat burn victims and for a ton of other things. It's an effective and genuine method. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901915/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tissue_expansion
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:37 PM
0

False. All men even those with the lowest cuts have some remaining innerskin on their dick. By placing your skin under tension you cause the cells to enter mitosis which is a process in which cells divide and create new tissue. Your knew foreskin is a foreskin the same way your foot is always a foot even though cells are constantly dying and dividing
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:57 PM
3

I'd an adult who gets cut for cosmetic reasons is fine. But anything else is a no
/r/MensRights20/03/20 12:09 AM
2

A doctor telling a patient that an invasive surgery is necessary when less invasive treatments exist is indeed horrible. Imagine if they were amputating other body parts when it wasn't necessary?
/r/MensRights20/03/20 12:01 AM
2

I meant to say cosmetic. Medical Circ is BS and completely unnecessary
/r/MensRights19/03/20 08:41 PM
2

Any circumcision besides an adult getting it done for cosmetic reasons is bad
/r/MensRights19/03/20 06:08 PM
1

Sounds like someone's been watching some of those YouTube videos where people think eating just lettuce and a banana is a vegan diet
/r/MensRights13/03/20 02:07 PM
7

It's literally a piece of skin that has no use The mean length of prepuce in this sample was 6.4 cm (range 4.8-9.2) and covered 93% of the mean penile shaft (6.9 cm). Ten prepuces were as long as or longer than the shaft of the penis to which they belonged; three of them were > 10% longer than the shaft and glans combined. 51% of the length of the mean adult penile shaft, or more from nearly half the penises. CONCLUSION: CIRCUMCISION REMOVES MORE THAN HALF OF TOTAL PENILE SKIN Circumcision ablat…
/r/MensRights08/03/20 03:38 AM
5

You don't see why forcibly removing half of someone's penis without their consent is a problem???
/r/MensRights08/03/20 03:27 AM
3

Even if a surgical method is needed , a preputioplasty will do the trick. The only time it's ever medically necessary to amputate penile tissue is in rare cases of frostbite, cancer or flesh eating viruses.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 03:26 AM
1

Good job I'm British then. I mean this is basic information on the NHS. Phimosis isn't usually a problem unless it causes symptoms such as redness, soreness or swelling. If your glans is sore and inflamed, you may have balanitis (inflammation of the head of the penis). There may also be a thick discharge underneath the foreskin. If both the glans and foreskin are inflamed, it's known as balanoposthitis. Most cases of balanitis can be easily managed using a combination of good hygiene, creams or …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:28 PM
1

I could go and find plenty of 'studies' that say that vaccines are bad for you, or weed has no medicinal properties but that wouldn't be true either. ITs just facebook BS gone crazy as usual. Find me a study that proves my studies wrong then. There aren't any. The only ones I know of have major flaws in the methodology Ts just facebook BS gone crazy as usual. Scientific studies from the nation center of biotechnological information? Yeah that's totally Facebook BS
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:13 PM
1

US doctors don't know shit about natural male anatomy. Most of them don't even have have idea what the ridged band is
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:06 PM
1

Outside of the US it isn't recommend (excluding Muslims and Jewish countries who have a religious reasons to promote circumcision) Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when “medical necessity is not established, …interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.” Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010) The KNMG states “there is no convincing…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:46 PM
1

How do I know? All I know is the only pro Circ study people actual reference is one done in Africa in 2005 and 2007
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:39 PM
3

The mean length of prepuce in this sample was 6.4 cm (range 4.8-9.2) and covered 93% of the mean penile shaft (6.9 cm). Ten prepuces were as long as or longer than the shaft of the penis to which they belonged; three of them were > 10% longer than the shaft and glans combined. 51% of the length of the mean adult penile shaft, or more from nearly half the penises. CONCLUSION: CIRCUMCISION REMOVES MORE THAN HALF OF TOTAL PENILE SKIN
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:36 PM
4

What would be a small issue anywhere else on your body is reality a big issue when its on the end of your foreskin and interferes with your sex life. If you're talking about Phimosis then treatments include stretching, steriod creams or a preputioplasty. It's never necessary to amputate any penile tissue
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:33 PM
6

Amputation of half the penile tissue? maybe you should look up what a circumcision actually is before commenting I know exactly what circumcision is and all the negative side effects it causes The mean length of prepuce in this sample was 6.4 cm (range 4.8-9.2) and covered 93% of the mean penile shaft (6.9 cm). Ten prepuces were as long as or longer than the shaft of the penis to which they belonged; three of them were > 10% longer than the shaft and glans combined. 51% of the length of the mean…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:32 PM
3

That's anti-vaxer logic and I'll have none of it. Antivaxers don't use actually scientific evidence. However if they could provide Meta-analyses comparing hundreds of studies done on hundreds of people then I'd believe them. I'm not gonna believe everything a doctor says just because they have the word Dr. in front of their name. Even the shittyest doctor's expert opinion Means absolutely nothing. Going to Med school and understanding how the body works sure it makes you more qualified to make a…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 05:51 PM
1

I wasn't being sarcastic either. That's the only major study in the world in favor of circumsison. But yet doctors and articles online reverence it all the time
/r/MensRights03/03/20 05:37 PM
5

Basically they slice the skin dorsally, resposition it and then stich it back up. A small barely noticeable scar is left on the underside of the penis, other than that it's no different than an intact penis. A dorsal slit just slices down the middle of the foreskin and leaves it cut open in a V. Here's a diagram comparing the procidures
/r/MensRights03/03/20 05:17 PM
7

According to this study Only 18% of clinical practitioners make prescribe treatments based on scientific evidence. Most is based on "expert opinion" https://ebm.bmj.com/content/22/3/88 Which expert opinion doesn't really mean shit. If for some reason all of your patients that smoked just out of sheer luck didn't happen to get cancer then you could say in your professional and expert opinion smoking doesn't cause cancer and might even help you live longer. This is why we need to use actually scie…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:51 PM
0

That's like saying straight people can't support LGBT rights and defend gay marriage. It doesn't even make any sense.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:25 PM
1

Circumcised fathers are some of the biggest endorsers of MGM. A lot of women, especially mothers are against it. Anyone who fights for men's rights is an MRA, also just having a penis doesn't make you an MRA
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:24 PM
1

Muslims try to push for FGM to be legal in the US yet it's still illegal. Your own religious freedom ends at another person's body
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:19 PM
1

The circumsison rate in Canada and Australia are both 30% and dropping every year. They both used to circumcise just like the US but it's dying out.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:14 PM
2

I’m getting treated like I just went on a woman’s rights subreddit and said something like “rape should be legal” But that's exactly what you did. You when on a men's right s subreddit and defended male genital mutilation
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:12 PM
1

Shit actually backed up by facts not just wild accusations. There's only one study that I know of that actually shows circumsison has any benefit at all. Literally just one. And it was done in subsaharan Africa not in the US or Europe (completely different conditions), circumcised men couldn't have sex for several weeks after the surgery, and they were instructed on the importance of condoms. First of all this is only one study (there's always anomalies you can't rely on only one study), second …
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:10 PM
7

The foreskin and the glans are fused together until puberty. There's no reason to circumcise a child ever. Circumsison isn't even a treatment for Phimosis in teens over 16. Treatments include stretching, steriod creams, and a preputioplasty. There's no reason amputate 1/2 of penile tissue
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:56 PM
5

Circumsison removes 3 erogenous zones, 22,000 nerve endings, and 1/2 of penile skin. It's by no means mild and way more severe than FGM type 1 and FGM type 4
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:54 PM
3

And men like big tits and dislike big roast beef flaps does that mean we should get our daughters labiaplasties and boob jobs as infants???
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:51 PM
3

The one sibling who decided not to have her boys circumcised ended up having to pay for complications with both her boys because one had a foreskin that grew to cover his urethra (don't ask me how. I wasn't overly interested in finding out about my nephew's penis.) And the other got kicked in the penis which caused a tear in the foreskin. Sounds like pure bullshit to me
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:48 PM
2

Since you said a small issue then I highly doubtful it was serious enough to require amputation of half of penile tissue
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:44 PM
14

That's just proof that circumsison desensitizes your penis you can't even feel it
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:42 PM
2

There's zero scientific evidence of that bullshit
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:35 PM
5

Preputioplasties are better than dorsal slits.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:27 PM
1

Last time a check having a dick doesn't effect what type of music you like. And there's no requirement for which genre men have to like
/r/MensRights01/03/20 07:54 PM
48

Both procidure are done fully asleep understand anesthesia. Babies getting circumcised are lucky if they even get some weak ass nubbing cream
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:29 PM
0

The man is the victim and the women is the the one being penetrated by his penis. So as fucked up as it is this wouldn't legally be considered rape
/r/MensRights19/01/20 05:52 PM
0

Forcing yourself down on someone isn't oral penetration. The male is still orally penetrating her. Hence the probably with this definition
/r/MensRights19/01/20 05:09 PM
-1

Forcing yourself down on someone isn't penitration A man can have another man or woman force them to go down on them and then their sexual organ will penetrate their mouths. In a force blowjob the man's penis is penetrating the women's would. So the would not fit the current definition of rape.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 04:35 PM
5

That's not penetration and it's not in the vagina or anus
/r/MensRights19/01/20 03:00 PM
7

I definitely agree. She totally raped him I'm just saying that as shitty as it is, this wouldn't hold up in court as it doesn't meet the legal definition of rape
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:08 PM
-6

Legally a man can't be raped thought. The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” This was copied directly from the US department of Justice's website Edit: Why am I getting downvoted??? Here's the link to the US department of Justice's website https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:01 PM
-12

What would that do? What she didn't isn't legally defined as rape as fucked up as that is
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:05 PM
2

It's impossible for a male chicken to rape a female chicken. Male's have no penis. The preform a clocal kiss where they basically touch butts. The male can only reproduce will the female if she extends her vagina through the cloaca. Otherwise no reproduction can occur
/r/MensRights09/10/19 01:34 AM
2

I'm vegan but these people are just insane. They don't have a clue about chickens or anything really
/r/MensRights09/10/19 01:31 AM
2

I didn't see anything about FGM and Male circumcision
/r/MGTOW29/09/19 12:32 AM
17

Just say you can't because of your religion, then they can't do shit! Also could you imagine how people would react if schools forced girls to shave their legs?? People would be so pissed
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:39 AM
1

That's total bullshit! It hurts like hell for babies. In fact it can even cause brain damage having such a tramatic experience at such a young age. Even Israel, the most Jewish country in the world has banned it until 6 months
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:20 PM
1

There is ongoing controversy as to whether Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a religious or cultural practice. On one side of the debate are determined activists whose main goal is a crusade against FGM, which they view as a form of child abuse. On the other side are traditionalists who have assigned to religious belief a cultural practice involving barbarous and sometimes fatal forms of female genital mutilation. In order to determine where Islamic view stands as far as FGM is concerned we hav…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:51 PM
1

First of all the Hadith isn't mandatory in Islam, second the Hadith also mentions female genital mutilation and yet that's illegal in most countries
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:36 PM
1

Exactly my point. Should only be done on those over 18
/r/MensRights27/07/19 05:56 PM
1

Never mentioned in the Qur'an. It's mention in the Hadith but so is female genital mutilation, yet that's illegal
/r/MensRights27/07/19 05:47 PM
1

No it's not. It's never mentioned in the Qur'an
/r/MensRights27/07/19 05:44 PM
0

It's neither better nor worse. Both are genital mutilation. Both have negative effects. And both sound be illegal
/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:01 PM
2

Infibulation is worse. Where the entire vagina is stitched up except for a small hole for menstruation. But it only makes up 10% of cases. So 90% of the time FGM is the same or less invasive than male Circ
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:10 AM
2

FGM can literally be a pin prick. How is that worse than removing the three most sensitive parts of the penis equalling 1/2 of penile skin?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 11:50 PM
4

Well first of all the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.(nsfw diag.) (Full study.) Not to mention that your penis has completely lost the gliding motion of the foreskin. Making sex worse for you and more uncomfortable for your partner. You've also lost the protection the foreskin provides making your glans (head) desensitized and calloused Plus you've lost the immune protection provided from the foreskin, and your risks of HIV (and possibly other STIs) are higher Your metus (peeho…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:29 AM
5

It's a dick not a painting. Genitals look weird, get over it. Pussies can look weird too especially if they have extra long lips or roast beef curtans as some people say. But yet we don't cut them up do we? It doesn't matter what your dick looks like. What matters is it works and yours is extremely dysfunctional
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:21 AM
4

It's a dick not a painting. Genitals look weird, get over it. Pussies can look weird too especially if they have extra long lips or roast beef curtans as some people say. But yet we don't cut them up do we? It doesn't matter what your dick looks like. What matters is it works and yours is extremely dysfunctional
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:20 AM
3

And in Africa most men are weirded out by a woman with intact genitals. Does that make it right?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 06:15 AM
6

Muslims practice female genial mutilation yet we still banned that.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:54 AM
7

There isn't a single religion in the world that requires male circumcision
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:53 AM
2

Why would you be glad?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:51 AM
2

Isn't RIC banned there ? 🤔
/r/MensRights10/07/19 04:24 PM
1

What if the child doesn't want to go to heaven? Maybe they don't even believe in God
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:09 PM
2

Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when “medical necessity is not established, …interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.” Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010) The KNMG states “there is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene.” It regards the non-therapeutic circumcision …
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:48 PM
1

Circumcision isn't required by a single religion though. But even if it was, why can't we wait until age 18?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:44 PM
1

Neither is compulsory in Islam. But both are incouraged
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:36 PM
1

What are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:54 AM
1

Nope. Only 50% of the US population is circumcised. 30% out west
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:45 AM
1

Babies still get erections idiot
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:44 AM
1

That's even more messages up than Ric. Sünnet should be illegal, it's disgusting
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:03 AM
1

You restore man?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:02 AM
1

I agree
/r/MensRights31/05/19 07:35 PM
1

But boxing is still gendered
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:25 PM
1

What makes someone a man or a women? If you take female hormones how are you not a woman?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:20 PM
1

But trans women take estrogen not testosterone.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:20 PM
1

In school we used to have reading groups. Based on skill level. And the difference groups would read harder or easier books. I think it'd make sense if it was like that.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:19 PM
1

Then what does make you a women??? If you take female hormones doesn't that make you a woman??
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:18 PM
1

Circumcised women in Africa say the same thing. It's common to want to defend yourself and what was done to you.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:45 PM
2

What are you talking about??? Circumcision is forbidden in Christianity
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:43 PM
6

We're the perverts for wanting people to leave childrens dicks alone? Where's the fucking logic there.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:38 PM
3

More like 15-20%.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:59 PM
3

Men in Africa say the same thing about uncircumcised women. That doesn't make it right
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:58 PM
3

Some religions used to practice human sacrifices to go to heaven. That doesn't make it right
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:57 PM
3

So if in my religion you have to cut off childrens' arms and legs I have the right to do it?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:57 PM
3

Muslims also circumcision women too. Which is illegal in most countries
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:52 PM
15

That wouldn't even be anywhere near as bad. The labia isn't even an erogenous zone. 3 erogenous zones are removed during male circumcision. The foreskin, the ridged band, and the frenulum. Even removing the clitoral hood isn't as invasive as male circumcision
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:07 PM
16

You can get an abortion up to 24 weeks in most states. That's no longer a zygote
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:02 PM
1

40-50% of the surface of the penis
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:00 PM
1

Religion is irrelevant. You can't do what ever you want in the name of your religion. If my religion requires human sacrifices to enter heaven should we legalized that then?? Also the Hadith mentions both male circumcision and female genital mutilation. So should we legalized FGM so they can have their religious rights?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:22 AM
1

Parents can make medical decisions for they're children. But they don't own them. They can't get them body modifications. Hence why tattooing minors is illegal. And there's no medical reason to circumcise a child. There's nothing medical wrong with their penis and circumcision has no benefits. From the Canadian Paediatrics Society: “It has been estimated that 111 to 125 normal infant boys (for whom the risk of UTI is 1% to 2%) would need to be circumcised at birth to prevent one UTI.” And they c…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:53 AM
1

Medical Associations out way religion. Hence why they're making vaccines mandatory regardless of religion Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (2015) The CPS does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male. It further states that when “medical necessity is not established, …interventions should be deferred until the individual concerned is able to make their own choices.” Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2010) The KNMG states “there is no convincing evidence that circumcisi…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:40 AM
1

Only in the US is there a "both sides" most non Jewish and Muslim countries think circumcision is barbaric and unnecessary
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:24 AM
1

The way you said it like that made it sound like you were glad that you weren't Christan because they forbid circumcision
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:20 AM
1

Why? Circumcision is barbaric and unnecessary
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:27 AM
2

She should have been fired. That type of behavior is not appropriate for a teacher.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:24 AM
1

1/3 to 1/2 of penile skin is removed during a circumcision. The average adult foreskin is the size of a 3x5 index card.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:23 AM
1

"Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you." — Galatians 5:2
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:52 PM
4

Circumcision is actually forbidden in Christianity. Paul goes as far to say that if you're circumcised you've severed your connection with God. Apparently US Christians didn't get the memo
/r/MensRights03/05/19 03:10 PM
3

Apparently they don't even understand their own religion because circumcision is forbidden in Christianity
/r/MensRights03/05/19 03:08 PM
6

Even if she did think he was 16, it doesn't sound like she had his consent. She just started touching him. Oh yeah that's right. Only women need to give consent
/r/MensRights01/05/19 03:42 PM
1

There's no religious text which supports male circumcision either. It's never mentioned in the Qur'an. It's forbidden in the New Testament. And circumcision in the old testament only removes the very tip not 1/2 of penile skin which is currently done.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:32 AM
1

Circumcision
/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:16 PM
2

What assholes, I mean it's not like it's your body or anything 🙄🙄
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:10 PM
2

Why'd your parents get so mad? Have they come around??
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:43 AM
1

You literally could have cured that will steriod creams and stretching. A circumcision isn't necessary
/r/askTRP12/04/19 07:45 AM
10

Fuck you!! People like you are the reason infant circumcision still happens. Quit bragging about how you didn't loose any sensitivity. Every person is different and every circumcision is different. It's a surgery that has many different styles and produces many different outcomes. Just because you are fine with your circumcision doesn't mean everyone else is. Also if you think many should get circumcised because women think it looks better then you're not a men's rights activist, so leave this s…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter