TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

30min2thinkof1name Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by 30min2thinkof1name on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What does this have to do with feminism ?
/r/AntiFeminists09/04/23 07:24 PM
1

Lol
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/23 11:47 PM
1

If these were all based on self reporting, wouldn’t it be possible that people who would lie or obfuscate their past number of sexual partners would also lie or obfuscate about having been unfaithful?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 11:26 PM
1

A Ted talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:34 PM
1

Don’t worry the scientists who studied these things made sure they knew how it worked. Also men and women are in fact different in some ways but fundamentally both human beings and certain elements remain universal between them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:27 PM
1

I mean yeah, it’s a good thing I do know or else I wouldn’t be talking about these concepts
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:23 PM
1

No that’s not how sociopathy is measured
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:21 PM
1

My dude what you see in “the media” is not an accurate cross section of human behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:21 PM
1

the whole “some people just have different standards” idea is EXACTLY why I’m challenging these kinds of ideologies. Everyone here is talking about love and sex like they have the rules written down like geometry proofs. No one is using language to establish that this is their own personal experience and preferences and that their standards are no more valid than anyone else’s. They’re all writing manifestos like “if someone’s n=>10 then they are emotionally unstable and a pathological liar.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 01:15 AM
1

I was being facetious
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 01:12 AM
1

Here are a couple of articles describing the relationship between gender and empathy: This one concludes that the women in this study were found to be more empathetic but it also shows that men and women showed no difference in their ability to forgive which I found interesting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963313/#!po=1.04167 This one talks about a study done with adolescents also concluding that females were more empathetic than males https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 01:11 AM
1

The only trait in the Wikipedia article you linked is intelligence and I’m failing to see how this demonstrates that empathy is distributed in the same way. As far as the “performance” bit you’re arguing here, I’m also having trouble getting behind the notion that the content that news outlets choose to produce for the purpose of generating ad revenue constitutes anywhere near an accurate cross section of human behavior. It is your perception that the overwhelming majority of hero stories presen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 12:14 AM
1

Yeah but you’re way more likely to get punched in the face than falsely accused of….idk what exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 11:05 PM
1

Women can be but the sad reality is, they’re just less so. They’re demonstrably less sociopathic and more empathetic. So while yeah, women can absolutely be malicious it is less frequent and less intense than it is with men. This is due to both biological differences and social conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 11:00 PM
2

Naw I used to fuck a guy who talked and acted exactly like an incel but of course wasn’t one because he got laid. The title you’re looking for is neurotic obsessed misogynist. Incels fall into that category as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 10:50 PM
4

No one is saying “man bad” her except you. But also, which would you rather have, permanent brain damage or a group of people you didn’t like in the first place calling you a loser behind your back?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 10:48 PM
2

Ok but what would one have to have done in order to incur the wrath of a woman like this or do you believe all women are evil and spiteful and would ruin a person’s life for sport?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 10:46 PM
1

Yeah, any woman who actually gave a shit about things that haven’t actually happened to them would automatically know how to cope with their partner’s PTSD. The fact that not all women are mental health professionals is just proof that they all lack empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 10:44 PM
1

Yes but I perceive them in a much more nuisanced way involving factors which cannot be uniformly standardized or quantified. You’re thinking about 3D concepts using 2D tools.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 10:33 PM
1

No you weirdo that is not how everyone thinks lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 09:58 PM
1

Honestly it sounds like a lot of people here are suffering a from a severe deficit of love, sex, and social interaction and are coping by pathologizing normal, healthy behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 09:57 PM
2

I was attracting them. Not picking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 09:50 PM
2

Go google how abuse works I don’t feel like answering your questions because you seem insensitive
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:26 PM
1

What you’re positing in the first paragraph simply isn’t true as a rule. Engaging in less serious sexual and romantic relationships DOES NOT mean not wanting or being capable of having more serious relationships. It just doesn’t. I think you may not have much experience with relationships yourself because it seems you have little understanding of how human being acquire wisdom and grow as people in these circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 06:06 PM
1

Dating a new person every year and 3 months is considered “serial dating syndrome?”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 06:04 PM
3

Abusive people are highly attuned to the vulnerabilities they need to exploit
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 06:03 PM
1

Lol but why? Why this specific number? And 35? If the 35 year old lost their virginity at say, 16, that’s fewer than ONE new partner a year of their sexually active life. How on EARTH is that anywhere near controversial? Do you happen to be particularly young?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:38 PM
1

Heh?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:35 PM
6

I…..don’t think it’s sad at all, I don’t understand your statement tbh. Edit: that’s like saying to someone who went through chemotherapy and beat cancer “it’s sad that you needed chemotherapy to eradicate your cancer. Hope you’re doing better nowadays”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:30 PM
1

But the conclusions drawn here are speculative at best and someone who has had multiple long term relationships could even potentially be more flighty than someone who has had fewer. Maybe the person who has had fewer long term relationships has done so because they view commitment more seriously. Maybe the person has had more “experience” with long term relationships because they are codependent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:28 PM
0

Wait, it sounds like you’re saying that men superimposed a system of control because women were having too much sex with too many partners based on their poor impulse control…but also men have poor impulse control? I’m confused about what your stance is here about how artificially limiting the number of partners a woman could otherwise have would be a benefit to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 05:35 AM
1

Lol, I think it’s pretty wishful thinking to expect anyone using these terms/numbers/phrases not to get overly invested in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 05:32 AM
1

Sorry, I edited the hell out of my last response to you so check that out if you’re still interested. Also, the number of sexual partners here has no context. How old is this person? When did they start having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 05:31 AM
1

You’re neglecting the part of my hypothetical where this person has had experience in long term relationships. And I’m not suggesting that improving as a person in how you interact with others in romantic relationships is simply a matter of “doing the opposite of what you did before” The various relationship dynamics I described earlier ranging from strictly sexual to friends who hook up to people who are in love and committed all come with nuisanced interactions through which we make mistakes, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:58 AM
1

I agree with everything you said in that last little paragraph except the notion of viewing the complexities of human connection through love and sex as a “sexual marketplace” which I know is such a popular framing these days that it’s practically canon. I’m not saying it doesn’t exist nor that something so intimate and sacred as our instinct to connect, to love, and to procreate hasn’t been reduced to something transactional. It has been. I agree that for society to thrive, these elements of ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:58 AM
0

Sure, in a “Guinness Book of World Records” kind of way, but at that scale we are completely removed from any relevant cultural commentary, and are just experiencing the phenomenon as a kind of bizarre curiosity. Our senses of morality/propriety are only being engaged on a theoretical/hypothetical level. Oh, and I’ll amend my previous statement to say “the actual number ON ITS OWN is not relevant.” The reason I bring this up is because these discussions doesn’t consist of statements like “people…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:45 AM
0

Sorry I accidentally pressed “reply” before I was done responding. If the impulse to suppress the number of sexual partners a woman could naturally pursue is not one rooted in a patriarchal system aimed at controlling women, in what way does this impulse actually benefit women?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:41 AM
-1

The fact that it is all contextual is all the proof you need that the number itself is not relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:34 AM
1

Yeah, when someone is looking for casual sex, they will go seek it. When someone is looking for a relationship, they will seek that too. Sometimes while they are looking for a relationship, they find casual sex instead, and as long as both parties are open to the prospect, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that. Not wanting a relationship during a given period of your life does not mean you’ve never wanted one, nor that you will never want one in the future. I can totally see being wary if s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:32 AM
2

So you’re saying that people who enjoy causal sex as a rule are not interested in long term relationships and people who are interested in long term relationships do not enjoy casual sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:01 AM
-4

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:58 AM
5

You guys keep thinking about human connection in terms of stats and percentages like this and I promise you, you will never be happy and you will certainly never EVER understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:57 AM
103

I was sexually and psychologically abused by my father as a child. Because my (straight f) primary male caregiver was abusive, I came to conflate abuse with love. When I met someone in my young adult life who showed very subtle and subliminal signs of being abusive when first getting to know them, it would look and feel to me like I had found someone familiar. The nervousness and excitement I later recognized as my body giving me warning signals to stay away felt like falling in love. It wasn’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:50 AM
1

Lol I love how you couldn’t just take the L without begging for pity
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:28 AM
-9

Wait what really? Having sex once every three months is questionable behavior ??
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:24 AM
3

If you’re talking about evolution with regards to human promiscuity, lemme just fuck up your worldview right quick. The shape of the head of your penis has evolved to be that shape because for many thousands of years, female members of our species would regularly copulate with many males and the dome shaped head of the penis is meant to squeegie out semen that may already be present inside the female’s vagina. It was so common for SO LONG in our human evolution for females to have multiple partn…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:24 AM
-5

If she had first had sex at age 15, having 15 sexual partners would mean an average of one new sexual partner every 3 months. Is hooking up once every 3 months really something to take note of?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:12 AM
1

Women lie in this way particularly more than men do you’re saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 11:31 PM
1

Explain your conclusion
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 07:52 PM
1

Yeah I reread this. It’s batshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 07:15 PM
4

Not my experience
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:35 PM
4

The conclusion you’ve come to is not a given one
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:33 PM
4

Bleak
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:28 PM
5

Lmao wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:27 PM
2

I think you’re biggest mistake is viewing the human experience as something procedural and standardized.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 02:34 AM
0

Have you gone to an endocrinologist to determine that you have higher levels of testosterone?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 02:30 AM
0

Ok so you just answered your own question. You say you feel as though because you’re not able to sleep around, you are not able to develop a dimension of your personality. In order to be a viable mate for anyone in a LTR, one would ideally feel as though they had developed into the kind of person they want to be. Part of that development is having sexual/romantic experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 02:29 AM
2

Question. Does a “hoe period” just mean, not in a relationship but occasionally hooking up with people?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 02:26 AM
1

I think what they’re saying is that they’ve seen the same types of social media posts that you’re describing, but that they haven’t met women like this in the real world, and because of this they don’t believe that the obnoxious overtly incendiary opinions being circulated on social media constitute an accurate depiction of the views of average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 07:01 AM
2

Wait like what for example? Abusing their singleness?? Please explain what this phrase means.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 06:56 AM
-1

A lot of times the things you see on the screen are not things that were explicitly consented to in contract form
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 03:18 AM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:17 PM
1

Lol no I didn’t. Have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 07:35 PM
1

Oh I’m not going to be trying to prove anything to anyone here I thought I made that clear and I believe I gave my reasons as to why. I’m going to stop interacting with you now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 07:29 PM
1

When did I sa say it was impossible? It’s like you can’t wrap your head around the concept that I think what OP said is bullshit and is not worthy of being honored. He hasn’t once shown respect for the opinions he’s arguing against and has given predictably skewed and cliche rebuttals that are not thought provoking at all, they provide no new information, and are basically just OP venting his contempt for women. Indulging these arguments like they have intellectual merit serves no one but OP and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 07:17 PM
1

No I am not doing that. Please read what I wrote to OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:31 PM
1

What you’ve said is that if I can’t explain in simple terms why he is wrong than he must not be wrong or must not be completely wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:30 PM
1

It’s what you’re implying
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:25 PM
1

I explained to this dude why I wouldn’t be trying to convince him he’s wrong. I’m not doing it again for you. You can read what I said to him. I dgaf what you think my unwillingness to participate in fruitless tiresome discussions implies.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:25 PM
1

So someone is only wrong as long as the explanation as to how their wrong is simple enough according to your standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:23 PM
1

It’s much easier to make the points I made here than it is to walk through every detail of how he is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:06 PM
4

Yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:33 AM
3

Nothing I’ve said is remotely far fetched
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:23 AM
0

I’m not disinterested obviously or I wouldn’t be commenting on what you’re saying. I’m just not interested in doing what you want me to be doing in particular which is participating in this reality in which either I change your mind or I am wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:23 AM
0

Yeah this is my leisure time. Don’t want to spend it honoring each and every one of your arguments. Do find enjoyment giving this more abstract analysis. Whether or not you feel insulted idgaf about. And yeah. Of course when I tell you I’m not going to waste my time trying to convince someone who is so obviously not going to hear me, you’re rebuttals is that I’m just making an excuse and I don’t actually have a valid point because that is the cliche that is used in virtually every scenario simil…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 04:17 AM
-1

You’ve made a lot of baseless claims and used a lot of flawed logic and the overall theme is that you seem to have a pretty obvious negative bias towards women. The chances are high that if someone were to actually go through your counter arguments one by one, take the time to explain to you how your perspective is shortsighted and under-informed, and provide resources to help you conceptualize that, you still would not be willing or perhaps in fact able conceit that you are wrong and need to re…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 04:05 AM
3

I repudiate your call of horse shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 03:42 AM
8

Well, I mean, men created a system in which women were bought and sold as property, not legally allowed to learn trades or control their own finances until as recently as the 1970s, ignored women’s specific anatomical needs in medical research, and played games with her rights to control whether or not she reproduces, etc etc and because women have historically been SEVERELY socially/politically/economically nerfed, they have for generations upon generations been at the mercy of these circumstan…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:41 AM
2

This is some “the right can’t meme” shit
/r/AntiFeminists19/09/21 12:59 AM
1

I have never dated a man that made over 100k a year (that I know of), I have had long term relationships with men who had large penises and men who had small penises, and as a 5’11” woman, I have dated ONE man who was over 6 feet tall. I prefer men who are smart with a wry/dark sense of humor and I especially like men who are just way too cool for the kind of lazy regurgitated bullshit you’re saying here. There’s whole swaths of dudes getting pussy out there completely shitting all over your not…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/21 02:41 AM
5

So you truly believe that all relationships with women disproportionately benefit women?
/r/MGTOW225/12/20 02:48 AM
2

Why do you have to keep reminding yourselves why you’re “going your own way?”
/r/MGTOW225/12/20 02:40 AM
6

So, you’ve collected this data from your feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 02:08 AM
0

Lmao. You ironic.
/r/MGTOW223/07/20 08:06 PM
2

Lmao. Tf is “divorce rape”???
/r/MarriedRedPill04/06/20 08:34 PM
13

Yeah. That’s just as bad dude. And women can tell that you hold these beliefs. Either consciously or unconsciously, you emanate red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 11:59 PM
17

Maybe because “some many women” can/could totally tell you’re the type of guy who considers women cum dumpsters who are past their prime. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 11:40 PM
3

What even is this and who made it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 05:58 PM
2

It’s funny because that’s exactly what they’ve said about feminism in the past.
/r/ExRedPill11/01/20 07:01 PM
0

I don’t understand how “going your own way” means continuing to obsess about women in subs like this. You’re allowing that which you hate to continue to control you, to occupy space in your consciousness. Why?
/r/MGTOW19/06/19 12:13 AM
-1

This definitely happens to chicks too
/r/MGTOW19/06/19 12:08 AM
-2

Wait a minute. This is a hypothetical scenario invented by an anti-feministc, and yet you’re still getting mad like it’s real?
/r/MGTOW19/06/19 12:05 AM
8

What if one is just an ally of humanity? Like, one believes that masculinity and femininity are equally valuable and inextricable facets of our symbiotic coexistence? Would this someone be considered a “real ally” or a “chameleon”?
/r/MGTOW19/06/19 12:03 AM
1

Jennifer Aniston is 50 years old
/r/MGTOW17/06/19 04:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter