TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

3vilg0d Archive

View 0 posts and 1,221 comments by 3vilg0d on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,221 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I am confused how the hell a 4yo know about procreation.
/r/MGTOW09/06/19 09:35 PM
1

Just like Christianity, I'd argue. It served a purpose at one point in time. Before we had science it provided answers and meaning so humans didn't feel aimless. Now we are in a rather post-Christian age as the West becomes more and more secular. We had Science before Christianity even existed. Also, if you really believe science provides answers and meaning then you are dead wrong. Science only proves possibilities. We are nowhere near the point where we could replace science with a Religion. F…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 05:17 PM
1

MFM is not that popular. It would take a generation or two to become popular like anal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 02:21 PM
1

It's not "The Rage", it's "be the rage". It's totally different.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 01:31 PM
1

Of course, it's lesser than if it needs protection that's how hierarchies are arranged. Do you think a rabbit and a lion are equals? Do you think a baby and an adult are equals? Do you think a young adult and old people are equals? It's kinda obvious. Why would there be minor protection laws if they are equal to grown adults? In my experience, a person who needs protection is always inferior to person who protects. Protecting something doesn't automatically qualify it as lesser but it automatica…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 01:28 PM
1

There have been cases of people able to control their organs so to speak. This is less so, it's controlling visceral jealously. I can. Just because you don't think you can doesn't mean others can't. I don't feel any emotion for any person except myself and cleanliness. I personally don't feel anything towards any woman unless she infected me with some disease or harm my interests. So, I am 100% sure it's not jealousy. Your heebeegeebees are your problem. I think rimming is disgusting yet it's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 01:14 PM
3

Sex is not instinctual to humans. You don't just feel like having sex and suddenly you become a pro. Sex Ed is bullshit if sex is instinctual.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 07:46 AM
1

What did you choose? I am guessing latter one.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 07:40 AM
1

The moment you grab life by neck, it escapes from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 07:38 AM
-2

Idealistic People only get exploited, a lesson every person needs to learn. The thing is women want equality, you can't take care of someone who is your equal. You should work at retirement centres or orphanage if it still exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 07:35 AM
3

You can't conquer your mind, that's just delusion. You can never be in control of your sub conscious, that's just a fantasy unless you control all your organs consciously. As the saying goes," The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it... I can resist everything but temptation." But it doesn't make you a ruler, at most it makes you an expert in temptation. If you only look into surface then everything is simple. I don't care whose dick she sucked a year ago but i certainly care abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 07:26 AM
2

There is still a high chance you have touched another man's semen indirectly. Your dick has definitely been touched by it. That's equally gross. Also, how the hell someone kiss a woman next morning when you saw her giving blowjob to another man with same mouth. That's also highly gross. You either all horny all the time to not get disgusted by this or the portion of brain which deals with disgust has been damaged severely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 02:15 AM
5

The transition from cohabitation to marriage is a tough one. Marriage is more than just a piece of paper and I am not talking about religious beliefs. Cohabitation is not trial period for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 10:33 PM
1

If a woman do adventures before me, I don't see anything stopping her from doing them while being with me. If I don't do it she would do it with another person behind my back. I rather avoid it altogether. For me, sexual, financial and educational history matters most for any partner while only latter is easy to find. I never used a locker room when it was filled. I have insecurity from childhood. Sex is just an over hyped status quo thing that is used for manipulation. Most people have weird vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 09:44 PM
5

What part of it makes it ok? I am not bisexual, I don't want my penis or balls anywhere near any man. I would be traumatized for rest of my life. I also don't like any person watching me having sex, it creeps me out. I am not into group sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 09:14 PM
1

It's Feminist Truth. Not Objective Truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:52 PM
1

You could come up with endless excuses if you had your mind set on villifing men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:50 PM
1

Not really, Newton wasn't trained in Scientific method nor was Galileo. And Scientific Method is not some rocket science. You could easily learn from books and experimentation. It's learning from errors in simple terms. Da Vinci was good at both art and science.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:13 PM
3

It's highly gross and there is likelihood that she would want you to be involved in MFM. I would start having PTSD if I would be involved with another man in any way and definitely not DP. That's why I don't even date nor i have any plans for LTRs. I can't be sure unless I violate a woman's privacy so I just steer clear from them. It's an insecurity but who doesn't have one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:08 PM
1

So, why can't women who are educated enough to become writers can't research?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:03 PM
1

It was certainly low cost. It was mostly theoretical. He didn't conduct research throughout his life at finest academic institutions. You could take Tesla as an example also.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:59 PM
1

I am talking about Victorian Era. I was just saying there was a low entry level for Scientific Research which was proved by Einstein so that you don't make it a case for high cost of Scientific Research as an obstacle for women's contribution in Scientific Research.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:57 PM
3

http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/764220/Family+Law/Common+Law+Couples+Exclusive+Possession+Of+The+Home
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:51 PM
1

Not really, to become a scientist you need high IQ, Curiosity , Reading and Writing skills. Most inventions were all personal endeavours and not a group effort like it is today. Albert Einstein proved the low cost needed to become a scientist. Not all great scientists were college graduates in that era.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:48 PM
1

Could you tell be Book Volume? I would love to read it. I would also verify that statement by looking into different translations. Every Translator inserts his or her understanding on the topic. You could say upper class women had their fair share of struggles but I know many greek female philosophers to even think it was that serious. Let's forget this. You could take Victorian Era as an example. There were many brilliant female authors and thinkers but hardly any female Scientist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:40 PM
1

Nope, I said it was Australian Problem. In other places, Common Laws aren't strict and thus don't pose any problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:28 PM
4

Spending Habits also matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:15 PM
0

They could have learned from books and experimentation like any great scientist. It's only recently when you need to have education to innovate. Aristotle and Plato didn't consider women inferior it's just a feminist propaganda to target all great men and character assassinate them. The Truth is Science was considered evil and scientists were marginalized so women avoided being one. Women only wanted comfortable jobs, there had been several great female writers so education wasn't as scarce as p…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:06 PM
2

You could get away with all your assets by hiring a good lawyer in Canada. Only in Australia common law is strict.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 03:49 PM
2

That's Australian Problem. In rest of the world, it's not that serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 03:20 PM
0

Are you saying Plato's mother wasn't considered a respectable woman? Are you saying Aristotle banned women from taking his classes? If women did take an active part in Scientific Research, I highly doubt people would have stopped them. If women can become empresses and rule entire empire, I don't see why they didn't became scientists either. It's a sorry excuse that women wanted to education but they were stopped by ruthless men. Today, Most Women pursue STEM due to feminism brainwashing and it …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 02:36 PM
1

Sure, I judge a belief by its modern form. That's fair, no? I am not accusing Christians of going on crusades in 2019 because that is quite ancient history. I judge them by their current values. Same goes for Buddhists or any other group. But Buddhism that you know exists today due to enforcement on ideology in monasteries and is still preserved by those rules. Modern Morals aren't high for the preservation of ideologies and knowledge. Nothing created in Modern Society lasts long as they focus o…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 11:36 AM
1

What you know of Buddhism is just modern Buddhism. Ancient Buddhism is also some what similar in enforcing values. If you prioritize the Truth I don't see how anyone could even tolerate Falsehood. And If you believe that there is no fundamental morals then why shouldn't you be tolerant of the intolerance of others. imo the best thing to do is to follow the simple maxim: "think as you wish but behave like others." That's just a recipe for disaster. How you behave affects how you think and how you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 10:06 AM
1

Any ideology that is confident in its own merit encourages you to seek knowledge and choose to believe the wisdom it gives you if it resonates with you. Christianity does the exact opposite. It shows gaining knowledge outside of what god wants you to know as "the original sin" for which humans are punished forever. While I am not a believer of Christianity, I personally think it is more about what do you think of GOD as a possibility. If you think God is an omnibeing and controls all its creatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 08:37 AM
-1

Not Really. In Ancient Greek where Aristotle founded Scientific Research. It was certainly not the case. While there was stereotype regarding education but people didn't actively stop or kill women who were seeking knowledge. Every Man has a Mother or a Daughter or Both, it's very bad to portray men in such ruthless characterisation. You could say because Women didn't contribute much in knowledge that's why they were denied opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:36 PM
0

97% Scientific Discoveries were done by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:28 PM
1

It was chakra fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:24 PM
2

That's what current tradcons say. It's such an misandrist idea that men need women to civilise given that most productive and intelligent men in history were unmarried and childless their whole life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:19 PM
1

I think Kaguya was a depiction of Eve in Naruto.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:08 PM
0

That's ingrained in Our DNA. Humans developed good and evil due to our fondness with categorisation. If it's true, it means God prioritizes Ignorance which makes God evil because Ignorance is evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:04 PM
1

The Story leaves an Important Part which is what kind of knowledge. Not all knowledge is good. I think it's bad to draw conclusions based on stories. It's a delusion that you form your own values and moral codes. the morals of a devotee and atheist are fundamentally same if they had different different morals then communication wouldn't even occur between them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 10:00 PM
-1

Maybe She did and then she returned after having a failed crusade of finding a better partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 09:38 PM
1

Marriages are like Colleges these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 09:29 PM
1

Earn Money, Play Video Games and Work towards some Materialistic Goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 09:25 PM
1

I have looked into this, a victim can sue perpetrator or employer. Also, litigation could vary depending on seriousness of sexual harrasment like molestation, forcible touching or rape, than state could file criminal charges. While most cases end up with fines but it would lead a bad record permanently and could be unfavorable for employment especially when HR head is a woman which is common these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 02:05 PM
0

I am not talking about sexual harrasment in workplace specifically. Don't tell me you can't sue the perpetrator if he harrassed a woman outside of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 05:46 AM
-2

But here's the thing, Those who humiliated him weren't the folks he was hitting on. It's wrong to say "if you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen" when you are cooking and other stove just explodes. Most women needs to see a doctor after such event. I feel flabbergasted at how ignorant you are about importance of public image. If after this event, the person got caught in a false sexual harrasment case, this very event could play a key role in ruining his entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 09:18 PM
0

So True, Should have flirted with Birthday Girl's Best Friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 09:00 PM
1

Anarchists advocate people should do all what they want to do like people despise 9-5 jobs which are very essential for functioning of society. That discourages people to do 9-5 jobs. Kids are raised with free mentality which makes them unable to do not so fun jobs. There could only so much of fun jobs in society at a given time. That's just cashing society for your benefit only.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:55 PM
1

So, Anarchy is just cashing people's money. It's exploitation of a system millions of people have devoted their life to regardless of willingness. Anarchy is just a bad apple who makes all good apples go bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:47 PM
1

Nope, for effective organisation people need to have common interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:25 PM
1

That's also impractical. In a society where people do what they see fit only makes it harder for society to exist. Society/Community forms because it involves division of labor. You can't do whatever you want for it to exist. Take clock as an example, if every gear and spring of clock is making movements that they want, how the hell the clock would function properly. Similarly, for a society to function properly people need to fit into models required by society but you could do work at your own…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:22 PM
1

Nope, you are acting as if science is a religion and applying your morality to it as if it somehow makes your views objective. I am not the one claiming unborn babies are clump of cells that miraculously becomes human after popping out of vagina. Sorry but there is no science that says babies that pops out of a woman are humans but babies inside womb are not humans. That's just logical fallacy. Science is very similar to philosophy. Both follow logical reasoning to express ideas. Science is base…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:10 PM
1

Cryptocurrency is the first true attempt at anarchy. And due to it's decentralised nature it became more vulnerable to pump and dump strategy. Similarly, Anarchist would be vulnerable against a group of organised people. Hierarchies serves a purpose that's why they exists. There is also your classic strategy of DIVIDE AND CONQUER. Anarchists could also be described as self destructive in this way also.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:42 PM
1

Just Read Plato and you would have clear understanding why democracy is impractical. But due to nuclear weapons, democracy has become most practical and stable political ideology. The longest Democracy has survived is in USA and that was because of it's location and meagre population.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:37 PM
1

It means anarchists are most vulnerable group.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:33 PM
1

Democracy existed before Middle Ages in Athens.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:32 PM
1

Clearly, You have different understanding about utilitarianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:31 PM
1

Cryptocurrencies are pretty anarchist and they are just meat on chopping board for non anarchist. That gives a clear picture about anarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:29 PM
1

Of course, that's why I said Democracy exist because there is no better option. Political Structures needs to get changed in 50yo or so otherwise corruption starts taking root.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:13 PM
1

I don't think that's relevant from utilitarian perspective. Either a fetus can experience agony and joy or not. Recently fertilized egg can't. Emotions are bad indicator. There are adults who don't experience agony or joy but that doesn't make them any less human.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 06:11 PM
1

But Wikipedia is written by people. It isn't neutral at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:56 PM
1

For Most, Better is anything that differ from current. You could say Trendy is Better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:55 PM
1

No, because Wikipedia doesn't praise anarchy like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:53 PM
1

That's the most silly comment I have seen today. when a human becomes a human. So, you do agree unborn child is a human. Science does not define Could you enlighten the lost soul lord jesus what defines a human being?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:52 PM
1

Communism is the better option or so people markets it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:48 PM
1

So, are you correct or Wikipedia?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:48 PM
1

The fact that difference between a human being and a clump of cells is popping out of vagina. That's just against science. It's Scientifically Correct, that human life begins at fertilisation, it could complete it's lifecycle or not doesn't make it less of human.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:19 PM
1

While I don't believe in organised religion, I sure don't believe Bible is a credible source given how many people have edited it. There is no original book written by yours truly JC.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:16 PM
1

Do you even think science is credible?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:12 PM
1

I don't know how the fuck pro-life argument could be religious when people were sacrificing babies to their god.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:10 PM
1

Cooperation is strongly dominant in short term scenario. Presently, I don't think any person would even cooperate with another person if the end result would be disposability at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:08 PM
1

That's Scientific Fact. I don't believe it, it's what Scientific Method says.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:06 PM
1

The majority has to settle down when there are no better options. Democracy exist because there is no better option.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:06 PM
1

Anarchy is regressive in nature. Technology wouldn't be there if anarchy was dominant ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:02 PM
1

I have never lived in both countries, most of what I know of is from history and brexit. I didn't pay much to any attention to Ireland in particular so how the fuck that I know there motives for pro-life are. I know mine are logically based and mostly to concur to democratic philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:00 PM
1

The fact that human life is a process. Humans don't just pop out of vagina. That's logically correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:58 PM
1

Utilitarianism is bad for trust. Without Trust I don't see peace.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:35 PM
1

China could have done the same like it did with Korea. It's more due to geographical location but it doesn't mean it was not colonisation. As was the case with British
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:33 PM
1

Maybe the fact Ireland is less gynocentric than UK.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:30 PM
1

It's beginning of human life. The actual human lifecycle begins at fertilisation. What you call human is a phase in human lifecycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:27 PM
1

Democracy serves majority and is thus most utilitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:25 PM
1

That's illogical. It doesn't even make sense. You should take class for critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:22 PM
1

That's same as colonisation and colonisation was ruling indirectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:21 PM
1

And if that happens with strangers then it's contract. Contracts were built to place trust in strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:20 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tributaries_of_China https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Chinese_Tributary_System
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:07 PM
1

Beginning of human life is at fertilisation because that's the only logically correct answer. Any other point is logically false if you don't bring metaphysics into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:05 PM
1

Japan was tributary state of China for a long period of time. That's in a way same as colonisation. Japanese Ruling Class needed to learn Chinese Language as well and thus culture of japan was similar to China. Japanese Art is also highly influenced by Chinese Art.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:01 PM
1

I am focused on prehistoric cunnilingus because to evolved as such it needs to have some benefit in prehistoric times. I don't see any benefits of oral sex for survival. There could be more efficient ways to make pussy wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:51 PM
1

Before saying porn I said it's based on feminist ideology. And in modern society it's driven by porn. Feminist ideologies aren't new in anyway, every civilization had feminist ideology at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:42 PM
1

It's philosophical not religious. It's mostly problem of democratic nations. UK is hardly democratic it's just uses democratic skin. It's a weakened monarchy with Socialist policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:38 PM
1

So, you are talking about 19th century erotic art? Of course it would be different, at that time Japan was not ruled by Qin Dynasty.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:35 PM
1

And that's why I said it's based on what you consider beginning of human life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:32 PM
1

Roman Empire is not that old. Feminism was always present in every civilization. If you could provide prehistoric or Scientific evidence then I would agree that it's natural and have biological imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:31 PM
1

If you didn't know, Japan used Chinese Art Style and Language because Japan was ruled by China for most part of history. And still it's not a credible source because there isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:25 PM
1

At least use credible source. I could create more convincing picture on PC.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:23 PM
0

Kama Sutra is from a nation who was ruled for 300 years by an island country. It's clearly a regressive behaviour if you have evidence of them only.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:22 PM
1

That's fake. Artist has only used chinese art style but it is not from any dynasty period.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:18 PM
1

It doesn't have any mention of oral sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:16 PM
1

Source? Actual Source not Instagram one. Because it's obviously digital art from what I see and not actual depiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:15 PM
1

It's democratic rhetoric from pro-lifers. The basic foundation of any democracy is all human life is equal regardless of life stage, class, ethnicity or merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:14 PM
2

But if human life begins at fertilisation then state is enforcing basic rights by banning abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:11 PM
0

You didn't read history but England started Feminist shit in late 16th century. Also, There is no oral sex in Japanese and Chinese History that I am sure of.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:10 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:09 PM
1

It's mostly what constitutes beginning of human life. Pro-lifers are making argument that life begins at conception and while Pro-Choice make argument that it doesn't and just when a baby is born instantaneously they become human. Pro-Choice people make invalid and inconsistent arguments so they are bound to ignored by other side. There is no common ground in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:08 PM
1

From Constitution, abortion rights are protected those amendment should be valid for similar situations so suppose a drug dealer smuggles drugs stored inside body. Government shouldn't have any right to check them or remove them or imprison the traffickers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:04 PM
-1

Anything that's not from France? And that's before feminism also. They are not prehistoric also. Evolution doesn't take place in just 200-300 years you know. Also, please avoid any French Books I don't like them. They are worthless crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 03:02 PM
1

So according to these, people smuggling drugs inside their bodies is legally possible?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:55 PM
1

What do you want from pro-lifers?Do you want women to be imprisoned for abortion or perhaps a capital punishment. No person's right is important than life of another person that's the main argument for pro-lifers. You should see where this is going.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:52 PM
2

Liberals are not visionaries that's why. What they see is only immediate problem and need an immediate response to that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:47 PM
1

What does it matter now? That's a question one should be asking before having an offspring of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:44 PM
1

But if you plan a vacation with your friends you do divide tasks and completion of those tasks is individual's responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:43 PM
1

If everyone thinks like that world would cease to exist. Responsibility is the trust every other person has entrusted you with in society. If there is any division of labor or delegation of power, responsibility would arise. It's not a manipulative tool at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:40 PM
1

Once a woman gets pregnant, man has no freedom. Also, I think penalty for most crimes are huge and illogical like rape should be compensated with monetary compensation only. I mean it's not person's fault that he was feeling horny and couldn't control urges. We do have Technology that would help in aborting any pregnancy and awesome health care that could treat any mental or physical issue a woman has suffered.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:35 PM
1

Main problem is what people on both sides considers beginning of human life and human life itself, if we can't have that common ground then all understanding is worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:28 PM
2

You do know what people think is utilitarian could very well be disaster for society. No human can evaluate which laws are utilitarian in nature or which mix of laws are utilitarian in nature. Also, who decides what is utilitarian, for ruling class killing homeless poor people is utilitarian but it wouldn't be utilitarian for working class. Or A rich murderer is more beneficial for society than a poor person. Democratic Approach is most stable and most correct till date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:24 PM
0

What I meant was female orgasms are mostly mental. Like Erectile Dysfunction is mostly a psychological issue in men. And also I have yet to see any case of oral sex before porn was founded.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 02:14 PM
1

I highly doubt men would go down in pre historic period where there was a serious lack of sanitation. It's more like women are so influenced by feminism that they feel empowered when a man goes down and that releases their juices.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 09:11 AM
4

Maybe you have a circumcised penis, circumcisions makes male orgasms weak. That's a Scientific Fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 09:05 AM
1

There could be a project like this on GitHub already.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 08:58 AM
1

Nope, Reddit is by far most useful Social Network. There are many awesome SubReddits. But for an individual data scientist it's useless because he doesn't have computational power to create good data models. But if you work in Google or Facebook, you could use their algorithms for ML and NPL so data is worth in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 08:56 AM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 05:09 AM
2

It does. Legalisation of Abortion was because women can't control pregnancy and thus abortion were necessary evil. But with birth control, women can control pregnancy and thus, abortions aren't necessary evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:44 PM
5

In Last 40years, have suffering decreased from killing unborn children? Even With Abortion Rights, Men are forces to pay child support unless women want to abort so that's irrelevant. People will suffer as long as they are alive whether it's from disease or from physical harm or mental harm or from different expectations. But people need suffering to mature. So, pro-life = pro suffering = pro adulthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:41 PM
3

Birth Control is made to avoid just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:32 PM
1

And I am saying Reddit is mainly used for Anonymity. So, You being attractive wouldn't matter because most people wouldn't upload their pics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:28 PM
2

Child abuse is another
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:25 PM
2

That's democracy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:23 PM
1

I wish I could package all progressive immoral smartpants to Venezuela and North Korea.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:23 PM
0

It's more about upholding democratic principles then any other thing. Also, Abortion is immoral if you look at the foundation of morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:20 PM
10

Human Beings are natural beings thus anything humans do is natural. You can't do anything that you aren't designed to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:16 PM
2

Yeah, no. It's not an independent life. It is dependent on taking nutrition, oxygen, etc, from another person Just because someone is dependent on another person for survival doesn't make him/her any less human. Nor any human has any right to kill another human just because he/she is dependent on him/her. No, the Church considers ensoulment to happen at the moment of conception. Baptism is a different beast, or un-baptized people wouldn't have souls hanging around purgatory Scientifically, there…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:11 PM
2

New life begins at fertilisation. Sperm and Egg are carriers for reproduction. New DNA that is different from mother and father is formed only in fertilisation state.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:04 PM
0

Nope, it's written in all biology books. It's not Church's ensoulment theory. Church didn't even consider a baby a human until he/she was baptised.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:59 PM
1

Feminist organisations are founded and funded by families like sackler family who make money by creating opioid crisis or people who sell people's data or by people who earns money by making people homeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:58 PM
3

Better analogy would be legalising murder based on preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:55 PM
2

That would be in case of danger to the mother. But You can't measure sentience, it's a dangerous game to play because AI could be sentient if you define sentient wrongly. Also, there is no scientific evidence of sentient. It's just metaphysical thought. Science is based upon empirical evidence and sentience has no empirical evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:52 PM
0

It's Scientific fact which I was taught in my biology class. Life begins at fertilisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:50 PM
0

Dating doesn't have any obligations. You could just walk away any moment you feel like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:49 PM
1

They are at most vulnerable stage if human life. Human life begins at embryo and dies in wheelchair.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:47 PM
3

Nope, Lawmakers and Scientific Community are against gene editing of embryos but are not against grown adults. The main premise is that they consider it as human life and they consider it immoral to make any changes in that young Human's DNA without his consent. Both are just trying to be diplomatic. There is no moderation in terms of abortion. You can't half kill a human. Either you kill or you don't kill it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:46 PM
3

Government and Scientific Community doesn't believe so. Edit: Sentient is very bad basis because we don't have any measure for evaluating sentience. It would make laws more irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:31 PM
2

It's not only western women per say but any woman who has means and lives in society without any stigma regarding abortion. Western women have most because government provides means and western societies in general are less stigmatized.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:31 PM
1

So, can we perform gene editing on a clump of cells?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:22 PM
2

People just make stupid arguments. When Abortions were made legal there was no safe birth control measure available so it made sense but in 21st century when we have viable and safe birth control measures it is no longer necessary evil. Also, people condemn when a scientist perform gene editing before fertilisation while they disregard a Fetus as just a clump of cells when it comes abortion. It's appalling really.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:21 PM
0

What I meant was it's not upto anybody else to decide whether a person is better off death regardless of that person's circumstances. Only he/she can make that decision for themselves, noone can make that decision whether they are his/her parents also.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:14 PM
1

That's not excuse to kill any human being. Life is much better than death regardless of conditions. Maybe we should kill all homeless people as well according to your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:11 PM
1

I don't think there is any subreddit like rate me. Most People who use Reddit like Anonymity. People who post their own pictures on reddit would be very small part of total traffic and thus would be bad for model. Like I said SubReddits are useless for such purposes. Facebook is much better for this task. I bet you could even buy datasets from dark web.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 08:01 PM
1

What would be the output? Any data scrapped from sub Reddits is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 07:32 PM
1

Nope, It's more respectful to write storybooks for kids than to teach them. That's a fact, Many kids would respect you more than they respect their own parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:43 PM
1

Teaching kids is not glorious task as it seems. Its a stressful, disgusting, law bounded job where you bear hate from kids, their parents and principal. Literally, I could imagine many times where I would have murdered myself if I was teaching my teenage self. But from what I have heard it's different in South East Asian Countries where teachers are to respected and kids don't have as much freedom and teachers aren't prohibited from corporal punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:24 PM
1

Were you home schooled?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:11 PM
1

From what I have seen in Anime and heard from my friend, they are just nightmares that supposedly help kids in cracking competitive exams. Also, China also have them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:09 PM
0

Testicular cancer is the worst. You can't transplant testis.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 02:01 PM
1

I do know people with testicular cancer have high suicide rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 05:49 PM
1

Suicide is biological death unless you don't consider brain as biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 04:55 PM
2

That's inaccurate. Maybe you can live without sex but some people can't imagine life without sex. People's mental health plays important role in their life and most often things that affect their mental health differs immensely from person to person and thus, people's need differ drastically. Thus, there are basic needs which are based physically common to every one and then there are personalised needs that differ from person to person based on their experience and genes. So, Sex could be categ…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 06:49 AM
2

He is talking about scales. For him, a fat chick with greasy hair is average nerdy girl and other girls are above average and are attractive to him. It's not a stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 04:10 AM
2

That's Called Basic Needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 03:53 AM
9

Never heard of Maslow's hierarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 03:08 PM
1

Huh? No I wouldn’t need to read any historians thing first. I could simply read all of said philosopher’s texts and do exactly what I said. Clearly assuming other ppl’s writings as law is your process and shapes your understanding. It’s not my process. Nope, you can't perceive what actually happened from any written text at all. What you perceive is what you think likely happened that's same as prediction. You assume what you think actually happened. Also, from what did you perceive I assume peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 07:29 PM
1

It’s a model with enough clustered statistics to derive directional insight, not rigid absolutes It doesn't give insights at all. It's based on personal reporting, any test which includes self reporting doesn't give any relevant info. At the end of the day they’re regular folk with ideas. Before deep-diving their teachings, I first deep-dive the the context of their era and their respective cognition. From there holistic understanding is better grasped. I could translate it into better language,…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:56 PM
1

MBTI have no significance they are dynamic and mostly change over time and thus aren't a good predictor of personality. MBTI isn't mathematically valid also. It's a Pseudo-Science Concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:29 PM
1

That's the problem with folks like you. You don't argue with reasoning but by making personal attacks and when people call out on that then you just attack on him by calling him/her a mindless follower on every issue every time. That's just modern liberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:15 PM
1

Nietzsche isn't an Idol. He is a philosopher. I know enough to know he’s not rolling in his grave by my comment. He ain't happy either. He’d probably engage to unpack my comment in the same I would do his. By claiming it as Girl Bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 05:58 PM
1

I have met with actual people who don't hold Nietzsche in high regard. That said that’s not a Nietzsche take I particularly resonate with. His male lens is showing. You know he is the most gender neutral philosopher of 20th century. If someone doubts his ideas as male bias, that's just disappointing. Edit: Also,when you think the philosophy should resonate with you to be actually gender neutral and meaningful then, clearly you never understood Nietzsche's Ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 05:39 PM
1

What you just did is violation against rules and regulations of reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 11:36 PM
1

It's not caste system but meritocracy. Every country had meritocracy for most of their history.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 11:31 PM
2

Have you read "Harmony of Women" by Perictione? That's the ideal wife for a conservative described in this book.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 11:29 PM
2

I remember a quote from Nietzsche "When a woman has scholarly inclinations there is usually something wrong with her sexuality."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 11:17 PM
2

That's why most MeToo cases were from big IT companies. It's their liberal policy that just fire any male who have some conflicting views really. IT companies have most gynocentric policies that's what they love to call being liberal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 08:30 AM
1

I may not know much about sex work but I certainly have opinions based on what I have heard. Also, Social Risks and Social norms are two different things. What I meant by every girl is a pornstar in a certain way is most girls have at least a photo or video of sexual acts they perform and possibly their partner also have. What I meant was I don't understand the distinction between this and porn. There could hardly be any clear distinction between your sex video and porn. What I meant by imitatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 05:33 AM
1

Men Sex work is more difficult, they need to have prefect physics. Women only need to have slim body only. That's the difference in amount of work a person need to do. Male Sex Work is very exploitative in nature, female customers are very rude and derogative. It's the true horror. If your mother is throwing a shit fit for you becoming a stripper then she's isn't a hippie and she is just imitating to be one. Also, Social Risks are baseless every woman is in a way a pornstar. If dancing naked for…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 03:16 AM
1

I think using word 'shit' and listening to word 'shit' causes negative emotions. They don't sound cheerful to me at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 07:51 PM
1

examples of health concerns would be stuff like customers assaulting you Dude, they have very good security. It's unnecessary concern. the risk of addiction (it's one of the only jobs I can think of where drinking is actively encouraged if not required) That's also unnecessary concern. Addiction is more to do with your life experience and genetics then other person's encouragement and woman would anyway drink without being stripper. I find it very difficult to believe you can't see any potential…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 07:43 PM
1

I don't see it as a tough industry. Women have to do just easy steps they do for free in clubs. I don't see any health risks like she isn't fucking the dude how the hell she would have any health risks maybe back pain etc. Socially I don't see any risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:45 PM
2

I don't understand why many men pay money for it. I don't find it appealing it's like paying money for building sexual frustration. It's better to pay a hooker. But anyway I believe anybody can learn to move like that with practice, it's not some complex mathematical problem. It's just a set of movements some learn faster some slower but I think anybody can learn them with effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:25 PM
0

Nope I don't understand how stripping works but I know how much a stripper earns and the life cycle of industry. I don't claim to understand any human being but I understand humans don't have any bottom line from birth, it's developed through morality and people tend to break their bottom lines if you provide sufficient price for it. Everybody has a price it's just matter of number.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:15 PM
1

Nope I don't think you are really talking about faeces but it's annoying when people use shit as metaphor for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:01 PM
1

I have never heard of a female #metooing another female. Just name one case it has happened. Also, I never said every word I say is a fact. I am very open about admitting my mistakes if you provide logical answer or a strong evidence to prove otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 04:36 PM
1

I never said female rape is good. I said females don't count it as sexual harassment when done by females. What I meant was females don't even consider it as assault or harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 04:31 PM
1

If you can't state a reason for me being wrong then you are just in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 04:29 PM
1

Stop ranting like a kid who got his lollipop snatched. Don't live in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 03:28 PM
2

On extreme, guys are more talented but on average women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:56 PM
6

Dude you forgot stripping. Females get paid a ton and there isn't really any stress about financial crisis for women at worse they need to just offer their bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:54 PM
1

That doesn't make sense. A woman who gets disgusted by male sexuality can't suck a penis. That's torture for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:41 PM
1

Segregation, suffrage, gay rights... it's a way for the population to draw attention to something they enmasse care about. This doesn't mean you're required to care -- it's less about how a person is "meant" to receive the message and more that enough people feel strongly about something that they want to act. Some people don't care to "act". That's inevitable. Feel free to be one such person. No one is saying you have to march, but surely you're not suggesting that other people shouldn't just b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:39 PM
1

So are you saying women who are competitive in nature are trans-male?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:14 PM
1

I saw an image of Ellen touching some models boobs without their permission on camera and I didn't see any models showing any signs of rejections. I also saw this thing more often IRL when I was in school. Women are only traumatized when it's another man and most of times a man whom she isn't attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:09 PM
1

So when women start marching naked and showing their boobs it is not considered normal and they should be thrown into mental asylum with their boobs cut off.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:04 PM
1

I don't care about that stuff. If I start to care about such stuff then I think we should seriously start questioning judicial system. We have laws made for these things, politicising cases is most foolish way of harming oneself and people around you. Just shouting and marching doesn't solve the problem if people started following rules by shouting and marching things would have been better but we all know it doesn't work that way. Instead popularising these acts make them more normal and thus h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:00 PM
1

so like.... basic teamwork shit? okay, I don't see how this applies to the conversation In a way, she do your scheduling. What!? At 3yo most folks could handle their shit on their own. "Handle your own shit" is just stupid advice that stupid Junior High failed stars have coined for their messed up life. It's more about not making unnecessary mess in your life but when you correlate it with shit you mean it as necessary mess in your life. There's a huge difference between both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 09:29 AM
1

You may not need your girlfriend to plan your schedule but you have to plan schedule with your wife to avoid clashing. “Handle your shit” is a bare minimum expectation of adults. Do you mean everyone's an adult when they turn 3yo?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 05:46 AM
3

Your statement is illogical and invalid. At first, you say men don't need a wife but in second statement you self contradict by saying you need her to provide you accompany and in second part of second sentence you said both need to build together but if everyone is doing their own thing how the hell could you build something, it requires teamwork which requires helping sometime or helping eachother with tasks they are individually bad at but if you replace it with tech why should men marry depr…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 03:05 PM
1

Any female older than 18y is a woman not a girl. In UK, one athlete got disqualified for calling a 19yo chick girl. It's better to be careful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 02:51 PM
1

Both probably teamed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 02:44 PM
1

But itbis affected by cultural norms. Girls often almost since the birth are dressed pink, boys are not. And it affects how they value colors later in life. But fear towards unknown is genetic. Culture evolved due to this. So, back to my point genetics play major role. You could get laid easily wearing pink I doubt any sane man would value color based on his upbringing than tangible benefits. Oh, wow, the US is so different. But still, cars and clothes are very different. There are far more yell…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 07:41 PM
1

This is the point. Familiarity. This is how culture affects preferences. It's basically skepticism of unknown. Culture has little role in it, it's genetic. Because wedding dresses are white? I don't see people preferring white often. I think a commodity that accompanies them for a long period says more about their preference. According to sales of Automobiles, white is best selling color with more than 50%. For shoes, sure. For other clothes I have doubts. Funeral Clothes. Blue is really popular…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 07:25 PM
1

Then their preference would be biased. Lack of intelligence, their preferences are mostly biased towards familiarity. It's better to just nurture them in b'day suit and then have them select the color. Otherwise it's near impossible to accurately judge the color. From what I have noticed White is most favourite color then black then blue then green then purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 07:04 PM
1

The article contains multiple sources saying "blue for girls, pink for boys". In the survey it says maximum preference for pink is 8%. Do you honestly believe pink color would be reduced to this state. It's baseless and politicised madness. Easy to forge couple of mad SJW create websites and an academia SJW make a stupid research which is baseless if you look closely but a news website would make a stupid article and a bunch of idiots would agree with it on reddit and twitter. That's your source…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 05:37 PM
1

Well, blue for boys was not always universally accepted. Then which color was? Red? Well, 3% was wrong, but you still can see that pink is far from the most liked color among women Individual experience are responsible. And norms can change, this is what I mean. I have hardly seen anybody disliking any historical architecture. I don't think it's gonna change anytime soon. Atheism is the norm in some places of the world, which was not the case a couple of centuries ago. Religion is hardly related…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 05:05 PM
1

Go read how pink and blue became gender colors. Name of source? Only 3% of women (and 1% of men) find pink the best color. Again it would depend upon year of study. Any recent study would be biased due to it's controversial nature. Companies - no, but society as a whole definitely can. To the degree. Society is composed of people, if majority didn't agree then it's not a norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 04:39 PM
1

In some cultures fatties are seen more attractive People in those areas would be starving. Somewhere flat women were seen attractive. Obesity would be common in this culture. See, it's not arbitrary. If you compare these with colors then you are proving my point color norms aren't arbitrary. Also, who decided color norms if they are arbitrary. It was inherent attractiveness towards that particular color that people purchased more and thus, companies only started producing more of those colors. C…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:50 PM
1

I certainly know that my aesthetics are very different from a dog or a pig and almost all human beings have a common consensus about what can be considered as a magnificent architecture. Also, I am not talking some ugly fashion that changes every season. There are selective features you feel attractive in opposite sex. These are all evidence of genetic influence on aesthetics. Culture can certainly play role in aesthetics by either magnifying or oppressing it but it can never override genetic in…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 01:47 PM
1

You also don't have any evidence to prove otherwise. Aesthetics are genetic and colors are huge part of aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 05:57 AM
1

if anyone can prove that consciousness exists, self exists otherwise it doesn't exist we are just biorobots.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:51 AM
1

You underestimate genetics way too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 02:46 AM
1

If it's latter then only it's liberating. You shouldn't play with players who have tendency to flip the board.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/19 02:54 AM
2

MRP has a big assumption that you are the problem which often is not the case. It's woman who has problems. She stops having sex not you. MRP is more of accomodating towards the problem but not fixing the real problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 09:03 PM
1

Don't know what you are talking about? Could you rephrase that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 08:17 PM
7

A day of a man starts with a simple breakfast and ends with takeout. I don't see any responsibility in man's life. Responsibilities are things that arises due to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 08:12 PM
1

Have you ever seen a cat woman(not divorced) living life of luxury?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 08:05 PM
0

Woman was having midlife crisis. The problem arose when he had most fun in his early 20s with his wife. He should be partying with his mates and banging different chicks and travelling alone in vacations. The woman married that handsome cool dude not a fat ass loser in his 40s. The moment it struck her sex disappeared. Any guy who spend amazing time with her wife before marriage can't have a happy marriage ever. It's Happy Married Life 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 07:59 PM
2

If it's arbitrary then all paintings are worthless and people can't understand their meaning because colors change their meaning due to trends and people appreciating art are screwed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 02:20 PM
0

It was red for boys and yellow for girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 01:58 PM
0

Of course it's recent, old folks didn't had luxury to choose baby products. And there weren't many companies competing for baby products. Consumer oriented marketing is a new thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 01:51 PM
0

It's not arbitrary. It's using preferences small kids like 5yo usually have. And different color codes also help in identification of baby's sex without doing something offensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 01:45 PM
1

Gender norms are based on biology. While some biological differences are minimised by technology it doesn't mean people can decide what they want. If any person wants to do whatever he/she wants then it's better for them to go to an island. It's more appropriate to reconsider gender norms and propagate those norms with collective consensus. Propagating bullshit ideologies are doing more harm then any authoritarian regime had ever done. It's such a simple thing I don't know why they don't underst…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 01:07 PM
1

Gender norms on baby clothing is just extension of overall preference of genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:39 PM
1

Homosexuality doesn't have anything to do with gender roles, it's just disgust against homosexuality in general. I don't like seeing two men kissing eachother it disgusts me to my core. It's because we live in rule by law nation we need to tolerate this. A woman can't outperform a man in physical activity. Women can't compete with men in physical strength. Just to create an entire different environment to fulfill their desires seems to me kinda opposite to your efficiency theory of no gender nor…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:37 PM
1

But babies do express their dissatisfaction with adults preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:30 PM
0

Babies are isolated from society, they don't have any understanding of social norms. They freely express their preferences. So, hardly any gender norms could be established there. Believing otherwise means there isn't any innate curiosity and preferences that exist in nature and everything is cultural oriented.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:26 PM
1

It's not even that. If it is then killing homosexuals isn't wrong. According to what we believe, homosexuality is genetic. It's not changeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:23 PM
-1

That's bullshit. The time I was isolated from society I didn't like Barbie or Tinker bell etc. I always liked Transformers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:21 PM
1

It's ideal scenario that is not affected by money. Money is most determining factor. Edit: A man is different from woman. They have different reproductive organs. Gender norms are catered towards sexual differences between genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:18 PM
1

Homosexuality isn't a gender norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:16 PM
1

Pink is on more female products because it sells. Any color that doesn't feel attractive to consumer, consumer won't buy products of that color. What you are saying essentially makes all consumers look like an idiot who spends his/her hard earned money on products he/she is brainwashed for.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:05 PM
1

Males are more physically dominant, people can't understand this shit. A female with brains is much better protagonist than wonder woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 11:57 AM
1

Play Battlefield 5. It's same shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 11:54 AM
8

Your articles only tell when any job became more complex it becomes more male dominating. Also, color can hardly be considered as a gender norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 11:00 AM
1

I say Government has unconditional love for everybody. Everyone gets to vote regardless of his/her mental health, merit and past. It takes care of poor people provide housing to poor single mothers without anything in return. Concept of self exists, thinking otherwise would endanger our society, liberalism would collapse and with nothing left to sustain the society fascism would prevail.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 07:55 PM
1

What I meant was a pushover would tolerate intolerant behaviour of any person he/she cares about which is in some form like unconditional love. But I think whole concept of unconditional love is bullshit. It's an existence that was born from tolerance as a virtue. Why should one suffer for another's sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 05:56 PM
1

Scientists only find true facts interesting. Just having tolerance for illogical false facts is absurd. Are you a social scientist by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 05:25 PM
1

If love is real then it should have a single definition and not millions of definitions. Hate have a single meaning for everybody but love doesn't have. So, please get a single real definition before claiming it's existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 05:17 PM
1

I think you're missing the point. I agree with OP on unconditional love, except for one particular point. Specifically, I think including God's love is actually irrelevant and incorrect by definition. I agree with you on this. I won't elaborate nor enter into a theological debate. It never ceases to amaze me that all you have to do is mention "God" and you get an automatic shit storm. You should avoid selective reading. It isn't god that is the trigger, it's that you can't comment on any post wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 05:13 PM
1

For showing sort of unconditional love. Low self-esteem is must have for being a pushover.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 04:20 PM
1

Blame OP for starting this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 04:10 PM
0

I don't see any reason not to. A person is talking about god's love and that god isn't punishing us and it's us who are punishing ourselves. Could anyone explain the existence of heaven and hell. To me it sounds more like carrot and stick. The very statement that we are born with sin is degrading in nature. It sounds like we are in hell and we are repenting for the sins we don't know anything about. And we need to repent seriously to get awarded a place in heaven with a complimentary gift of 33 …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 04:08 PM
2

Then it would be mentor not teacher.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 03:50 PM
1

Low Grade Depression could also be a factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 03:48 PM
2

There could be n number of selfish reasons, it may as well be a moral conflict. She doesn't want to have guilty conscience of abandoning a man when he was sick. It isn't love but a moral self centered choice. Also, men don't leave their spouse when they become sick unless its AIDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 01:28 PM
1

altruism isn't unconditional love.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 01:24 PM
2

Dude, teacher was getting paid to love you I don't see how it could count as unconditional. It's called unconditional if they love you even if you endanger their interests. Maybe your actions didn't threaten his/her core interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 01:23 PM
5

People punish themselves because of their beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 01:11 PM
1

It's mostly due to women behaving more masculine. I believe Schopenhauer had some truth in his books. If Feminism hadn't occurred it wouldn't be a problem. It's mostly ideological; when a woman is enterprising she's called an independent woman but a man has to be enterprising just to be become a man. That's some fucked up logic. If latter is true then all enterprising women are aspiring to become men, it's not men that are the problem but women who are aspiring to become men. ​ BTW Socially inco…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 01:05 PM
2

That's way old. Now, Woman don't want any commitment unless they want to have babies or they are too old and can't deal with loneliness and depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 12:36 PM
1

There isn't any behavioral distinction between male and female before puberty but after puberty it's way different. You are ignorant to believe men and women are similar just because they are from same species. You are disregarding the magnitude of impact hormones have on your desires and decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 12:30 PM
1

Everybody LDAR regardless of their choice. I say it's better to go in the direction where your curiosity takes you. It doesn't matter you have accomplishments or not, the thing that matters is to have backup plans because you would have hardly any family left when you grew old to really on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 12:20 PM
3

That's some respect you got for your mother. Mr. Factory Product.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 11:59 AM
1

Do you honestly believe in so called Free Health care? I don't know any good doctor who works at managed health care or any decent hospital for that matter. Prostitutes have high chances of cancer which can't be treated at managed health care.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 04:51 AM
1

Nope they don't. I highly doubt any prostitute have insurance really.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 03:25 AM
1

I have lost all hope that any woman can acknowledge her actions are problematic. Women could have done same things as men why the hell feminism exists. That's fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:08 AM
1

Not really, it's called checking consistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 09:02 PM
1

He looks more like progenitor of human species than Adam. Maybe he came from heavens to give eve a child like what happened with jesus.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 08:16 PM
1

I've said theoretically. It's not theoretically either then. It's fictionally possible. I meant dreams where some beings have visited me. I'm not saying there is no meaning of life, but who knows, maybe I won't like it? Then I will be a rebel. I get it. I do have some unique state of art dreams as well. And I thought you were stoic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 08:03 PM
1

If love exist for dna then hate also exist for dna. It would literally mean that Anti Semitism, Racism etc. Are okay. Love has nothing to do with dna. It wouldn't explain a person loving an adopted child. It wouldn't explain an owner's love towards his/her pet. Love and reproduction are two different matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:57 PM
1

Well, not clone, but basically a copy, which means all the synapses, etc. also are the same. Using which technology? According to my knowledge, there isn't any tech present at the moment that shows any promise regarding this. Also copy is also impossible if you are using stem cells. Mitosis have errors too. Sandbox idea is more just an attempt to explain my own experiences in dreams, etc. Why would those beings originate is another question, but still, they also probably have no meaning of life.…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:49 PM
1

Who said that I am going to have a family? Also, you shouldn't curse people whom you ask questions it's unethical. Also, it isn't necessary for it to either be dead bedroom or adultery. Enjoying sex and enjoying sex with different people are two different things. I was talking about enjoying sex with different People.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:40 PM
1

Is it something that constitutes an individual or is it an individual that constitutes other things? I am a physicalist, so I think it's definitely possible in theory to create a clone who shares all the beliefs, memories, etc. Not possible, it would mean that memories are stored in DNA and not in synapses. Synapses can't be cloned because they aren't dependent on DNA but their elasticity could depend on DNA so in theory it's possible to create a blank clone of yourself. I just think the world i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:36 PM
1

Blame evolution for this. Our brain have tendency to form patterns for a repetitive task. Once a habit of enjoying novelty sex forms in your brain it's very difficult to find any other thing to replace that habit because that pattern would always remain in your brain. It's more difficult than alcoholic or drug addiction. It would thus have negative impact on committed relationship so a fool would be in relationship with such person. There are philosophical reasons also but you wouldn't care real…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:28 PM
1

Love should be conditional but only based on choices otherwise it includes racism, discrimination etc. Love and Sex are different things altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:17 PM
1

Spread and Multiply does mean to be a kid-printer, it just means to leave offsprings. I don't see any purpose in leaving offsprings maybe I haven't learned enough about genetics. I will look into it. This is the difference between self-sufficient people and ordinary ones. Latter need meaning of life to have a will to live. I'd say existentialists are between them, they still are clinging to the concept of meaning of life and it's unnecessary. Maybe whole point of all this is just to find oneself…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:11 PM
1

Non sequitur. Family is a method to spread and multiply If spread and Multiply is the main goal then family is clearly not the best way to do it. Family places importance to quality and it restricts the number of children you could have. Or it might not have meaning. I don't care. I have meaning of me, and that's enough to me. I don't have a meaning currently, could you tell yours if you don't mind or way you found it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:55 PM
1

Incest is wrong because it scavenges on familial relationships. It's not wrong because it's just wrong. Eating synthesized human meat isn't wrong if it is wrong then abortion is wrong regardless of reasons, eating animal meat is also wrong. Spread and Multiply is no Ultimate life goal otherwise family wouldn't exist at all. Life may have goals and meaning but due to lack of knowledge we haven't found it yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:43 PM
1

As long as you don't disrespect parents nothing can spoil parental relationships. People do not like to spoil relationships with parents, that's the thing. Then problem isn't about parental pressure but problem is your self worth. If you consider your relationship with your parents more important than your aspirations then it's your problem. Most Parents eventually come around if you haven't challenged their bottom line and not having a family can hardly cross that line.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:33 PM
1

And many of the strictly patriarchal societies in history also collapsed. Not a good argument. All civilizations “collapse” (or more likely, evolve) eventually, nothing is meant to last forever. Chinese civilization haven't collapsed. And IF you are correct that civilization can only exist if my sexuality is oppressed, why would any sane self interested woman be pro civ? It’s like asking slaves to be pro plantation. Nah fam, burn it down. Civilizations are built by men on ashes of men. Women did…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:27 PM
1

Sex work would always accompany high risk whether it's legalised or not. There absolutely still is stigma around be lgbtq. I see it at my job every day. That would depend upon industry. Hi tech industry doesn't have any stigma.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:24 PM
1

For sometime they would nag after that they will just accept the result. In my case, I only needed to opt out of family inheritance. I don't know about most.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:22 PM
1

Not really. It's your perception. How could there be any peer pressure for having kids
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:14 PM
1

Nobody is forcing anybody to form Families.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:09 PM
1

Maybe she doesn't have qualities that are attractive to an attractive man for LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:09 PM
1

Like hell it is. There would be stigma around LGBT community if it was that religious. Cities aren't religious. People aren't religious for their actions they are religious for a way to release any guilt they have. Novelty of sex workers wouldn't go down. Like parental frauds haven't gone down due to sexual liberation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:08 PM
1

It's reflection of her poor choice of partner. She is at fault. Like Nobody owns a woman, No Woman owns a commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:03 PM
1

I don't have any problems with it. But these women do lie in order to settle down one day. That's when problem arises.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:02 PM
0

If it becomes legal then these women will force government to impose charges against companies that doesn't hire women with record of being sex workers. Stigma would be removed from society. Then the top career choices for women would be insta thot, twitch thot, YouTube thot, prostitutes. They would earn ton of money, they would go to ivy League schools and they could afford education also they would also get jobs easier because they are females. Female card works like charm in male dominated hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:00 PM
1

Because those who aren't into commitment can't disloyal about it. And if a person is saying "sluts if they aren't disloyal" it implies that sluts who are into committed relationship and aren't disloyal. You need to be committed to have any loyalty. And their habit of sleeping with different people has become a pattern in their brain and they are more likely to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:54 PM
1

Then it's the inaction of other person that's immoral in which case women who can't figure it out are immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:51 PM
1

It's because of her actions and habits. She is actually at fault and she isn't worth anything at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:49 PM
1

It's called Diplomacy not white house tactic. There are enough girls who do not pretend they are exclusive. I wasn't talking about those girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:46 PM
1

That's not a slut. You have very wrong definition of slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:44 PM
1

And all these societies collapsed after this which makes female sexuality foreign to civilization. Civilization doesn't cater for female sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:43 PM
1

Nope, if it is then it would imply it's morally okay to harm others for our own good which would also imply that capitalism isn't evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:41 PM
1

That's most nonsensical standards. It would mean it's immoral to use self defense. It would mean humans live a immoral life from birth till they die.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:33 PM
1

So, your point could be false about suppression of female sexuality as females were promiscuous in Athens and Rome. They were damn promiscuous in 1860s france.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:31 PM
1

But what is the standard for evaluating worst and good parts of human nature. I see no standard as such so no it's wrong. Capitalism is the embodiment of the way people are in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:28 PM
1

It's on her actually, she first commited to one man then she promised commitment to another man. She's at fault according to this logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:25 PM
1

Nope capitalism isn't evil. It's the inherent behaviour of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:24 PM
1

But that was like a century ago. He didn't hold much power in democratic country.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:22 PM
1

That's classic capitalism for you. There's nothing morally wrong about it. It's other person's fault to have low IQ and for not figuring out earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:19 PM
3

So, what does it makes a slut who had sexual activities with hundreds of men? A slut who viewed reproduction as an act for pleasure doesn't have same view. Because if she has that view then she is the biggest liar it would imply she made commitment to Hundreds of men and is in love with hundreds of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:16 PM
0

Being in a commited relationship is not lifelong self actualisation and nobody's needs are important than yours except your infant. Yes they do and yes it does. They know exactly what they’re doing and what they’re saying. They know it’s wrong That's delusional. Avoiding the topic or diverting the topic is not same as lying about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:13 PM
1

That's bullshit. Only in religion they held positions of power. In secular world, not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:10 PM
1

Men didn't lie and said that she has good LTR traits. Men will say she's sexy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:08 PM
2

That's bullshit. They were viewed as irresponsible. Unmarried men had to face isolation. They were viewed unsafe. They weren't given position of power. Society forced them to marry
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:05 PM
1

Rejecting someone for their genes makes a ton more sense reproductively than for their past decisions, genes are what you’re selecting a mate based on. Actions and mistakes are not passed on, looks are. That's why men just fuck sluts and not commit to them. Actions and mistakes are a pattern of neurons in simple terms. No man wants to commit to such women as a result. Men aren't rejecting women for reproduction it's about loving somebody. It's more dehumanising to love someone based on genes and…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 05:03 PM
6

Women are quite clear that we don’t like nice guy ass kissers and will never fuck them. No woman has ever said “nice guys are sexy, I want to fuck nice guys”. That's where you are wrong. Women are as ambiguous as men in this matter. They take full advantage of nice guys just as men take of sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:56 PM
1

Patriarchy also forced men to marry women and provide for them even against their will.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:53 PM
7

Love isn't free for all. It's conditional. You have to face consequences of your actions. There are few men who would love them they could be with them and most of them do end up with them. If not accepting a woman based on her choices is dehumanising then it's more dehumanising to not accept men due to physical characteristics. That's just bullshit logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:51 PM
4

just not dishonest or disloyal ones. That's like 99%.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:45 PM
-1

But does that give women high status than men? If so then constitution is worthless piece of paper.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:29 PM
3

Nordic countries have criminalisation of prostitution which apparently doesn't follow market laws. They are the countries which are least likely to legalise prostitution as prostitution will destroy what their twisted egalitarian ideology is. Sorry to break it to you but women have more intrinsic value than men, so she literally IS born with higher status and worth than you. That's just in violation of human rights act and constitution as well. So, please study more miss high o mighty. Either cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:24 PM
-1

You could either have feminism or legal prostitution but you can't have both. When unfairness increases drastically it would only create conflicts. You could view my view point as icky and undeserving of status but I believe no woman has higher status than me just because she has vagina and if you enforce such attitude you would feel the backlash from all men. Edit: Feminism mostly depends on gender pay gap nowadays, if prostitution becomes legal gender pay gap would reverse and it would make it…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 03:33 PM
1

It is baffling that anyone with a decent intelligence level would actually believe the bullshit of organized religion. Intelligence and Beliefs are not correlated at all. It's more baffling that someone can't acknowledge the fascinating nature of religion and despise intelligence of their ancestors. Religion had some truths in it like ten commandments, since they were written in time period before liberalism so any person of this time period would get offended by them. How any of them can't see …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 03:27 PM
1

It's because of those teachings that religion has sustained for so many years. It's your idiocy to believe it's because of insecurity, these practices acts as firewall for potential harm and let's not forget tolerance is recently built virtue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 02:56 PM
1

We are just struggling with past in reality. Not something that occurred in Athens and Rome.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 01:01 PM
0

It's only on the transactions for sex work that doesn't get taxed. That's a huge amount and that's the problem. A sex worker easily makes 6-figures atleast. You could have billions of untaxed transactions. The VAT you are saying is taxed anyways so there isn't any societal benefit for legalisation. But it would have societal costs that are immeasurable. While I am working my ass off to pay tuition fees for college and she is just twerking her ass on some guy's crotch, then she gets preference fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 11:51 AM
1

He needs to see a specialist. What makes you think that he wouldn't watch you getting raped or assaulted?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 11:30 AM
3

It's impossible to have emotional intimacy with an individual if you are having physical intimacy with others as well. They aren't separate just as your mind and body aren't. I particularly feel disgust against the very notion of open marriage. It makes marriage looks like a cage or burden that is forced upon you by society. Marriage is a system that was built to cater the needs of individuals without compromising the needs of offsprings. It's very arrogant thought that people in past were just …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 11:29 AM
2

In the end both civilizations had fallen. Resistance is futile.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 11:13 AM
2

Religions aren't insecure it's religious people that are insecure. Every Major religion is atleast 1000 years old they could hardly be considered insecure. You are insecure and ignorant fool to believe it otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 11:07 AM
1

You are saying it will be legal after 50 years? I could totally imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 10:51 AM
2

There are many reasons that makes it impossible for prostitution to be legal. The biggest one is how to tax them. I certainly would rather have a sex worker live in cracks than her enjoying all benefits of tax payers while paying negligible tax. It's near impossible to tax sex workers unless you want to eradicate cash altogether. Secondly, I don't want Sex Workers to be the majority of upper class. Thirdly, I don't want to compete for a job with a sex worker. I don't want to work for a sex worke…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 10:20 AM
1

Only dumb chicks would take criticism of men with man slut aspirations seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:28 PM
3

Thot is used for every young girl who earns using her body.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 12:10 PM
-1

If Monogamy is a death sentence then polygamy is life worse than death. If you can't manage one woman how the hell could you manage more?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:58 AM
6

Thot is used instead these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:56 AM
8

I have not heard a single person calling a woman slut for last 5 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:35 AM
1

So having grey hair means you have zero reproductive value?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 07:29 AM
2

So, a glossy black dye would do the trick?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 07:28 PM
1

Any woman who has any history of dating East Asians has a high possibility of being into K-pop. how lame it would make them look. I don't know about that. For me, watching Kardashians is lame or European movies especially French and Italian. They atleast are really good dancers and singers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 07:25 PM
1

It's a thing of young women mostly <25. Why the hell they would talk about it anyway if it never arises in conversation? The question only arises when you saw their poster in her room or find out about it from her spotify playlist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 07:10 PM
1

But any representative elected by people hardly reaches at top in China's so called democracy. The highest they could ever go is middle level and that also when they have very excellent record. Most top leaders are from different top families and their heirs gets appointed a lot and also they have set age limit after which they are removed like at age 60 if you can't become head of province then you have to retire and there is no possibility of further promotion. They essentially run same court …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 07:06 PM
1

It's more prominent in California.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 06:45 PM
1

Democracy means rule of laws and when laws can't protect people's rights it's not called democracy. Something like 90% of the people living there actually prefer it that way. That's just bullshit. Rise of Christianity in China says otherwise. The only real issue with their political system is that it is a single party system, so the checks and balances that would normally exist get kind it streamlined in comparison to, say, the United States The real issue is excessive central authority. People …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 04:19 PM
1

Germany was democratic after WW1. Before King had true power not like UK. China isn't democratic at all. Taiwan and Hong Kong are but China is in no way democratic. It's just propaganda that media is propagating. If there is any index of most sinful existences in this world China would take no. 1 place. People don't even have property rights what kind of democracy is this really?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 03:21 PM
4

Well I never claimed that women aren't cruel. I just don't think the source of that cruelty is a man trying to improve himself. It's a man failing to improve himself. They aren't junior high kids anymore. It's still not okay to shame somebody. What you are doing is just proving my point that women are bigots.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 01:17 PM
4

How is that hardly appearance conscious? That's called insecurity not being conscious. Insecurity!= Conscious Unless of course, they try and end up looking worse than they did originally That doesn't make it okay to shame. Like they didn't had any bad makeup day ever in their lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 01:03 PM
5

Hardly. The way most women try to hide their original looks by heavy use of cosmetics and surgeries. They should appreciate other people who do same and sympathise with them as they are going through same instead of criticising and shaming them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 12:56 PM
1

Doesn't explain some women's obsession with BTS & K-pop.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 12:51 PM
3

Many young women dye blonde. Do they have zero reproductive value?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 12:48 PM
10

Because Women are open minded and expects other people to be open minded about their choices and are extremely closed minded people towards men especially men they don't date. They are essentially like closet racists type people
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 12:38 PM
1

What you are claiming is authenticity of AWALT. Most men hate genuine women aka hypergamous woman
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 09:01 AM
1

Humans are historical creatures. Anyone without historical knowledge is bound to repeat history itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 08:49 AM
6

Nice guys don't get laid. They are the people who get toyed. Nice girls are the people who toy with guys. They are hardly similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/19 08:05 AM
2

China had Democracy before Mao for 40years approx. France had democracy since 1860s. It was sore loser against Germany. USA had long tern stability due to it's unique location. If nuclear weapons weren't developed and rest technology still existed. USA would've destroyed way earlier. Democracy can diffuse civil wars but it also makes more difficult to defend against outside enemies.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 05:08 PM
2

The biggest drawback of democracy just shove all responsibility to opposing party.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 04:52 PM
2

But your average illiterate joe elects the people in power to make stupid policies. You average illiterate joe is more vulnerable to social engineering. If every single decision is up for public vote, world would be destroyed just take example of Brexit. Edit: Intelligence agencies and scientific institutes work to make every claim of politician look legit. They don't give advice their work is to develop ways of social engineering.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 04:41 PM
0

Feminists mostly are rich millionaire wives and their daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 04:38 PM
2

It's democracy's true nature. I totally agree with Socrates on democracy. It's a system that steals from people and uses that money to trade with people's rights. When you decrease power from wise people and give them to average illiterate joes what else could you expect from this. When you replace classical music and etiquettes with pop, rap and tattoos, it's inevitable to occur. Newer have one thing in common that is tribal african origin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 03:03 PM
10

It's the feminism's truth. Most Hardcore Feminists and Public faces of Feminism are all privileged people. And any woman who had her share of struggles don't buy into feminism crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 02:50 PM
2

Calm down, most rich men are rich because of their family. At some point someone in their family did work like that to make it possible for their future generations to live luxurious life. Just trace how many rich people truly have aristocratic heritage. They are negligible. they weren't grimming it in shithole conditions. Most tech entrepreneurs are rich because they worked in shithole conditions first.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 02:11 PM
7

Nobody is stopping women from creating tech that influence whole society if they have guts to live without any health insurance for years working in shithole conditions with 0.1% chance of success at best. The only woman I have ever heard of who promised to created something good for society turned out to be a psychopathic fraudster.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 01:58 PM
2

Every Movement have vested interest. Identity politics has always been there from the start of civilization. It's just sheer size of movements are becoming larger day by day that it has become such a big problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 01:54 PM
5

Men with privileges are like endangered species if they are minority. Why do we talk about patriarchy and male privilege?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 01:44 PM
12

That's the main frontier of Feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 01:43 PM
0

It would depend on what shit she's on after breakup.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 01:00 PM
1

What I meant was they have relatively high testosterone levels compares to average female but lower than males.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 01:28 PM
1

You are a genetic outlier in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 01:14 PM
1

Having thin skeleton doesn't mean your shoulders are also thin.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 01:08 PM
2

How do you want women to own up to their hypergamy? I don't see any difference whether they really own it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 01:07 PM
2

It's mostly related to testosterone levels generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:57 PM
1

Dude, you could rant all you want But it doesn't change the fact on average men don't have their own shit together. As long as it's not due to biological disabilities , Men are mostly responsible for their own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:55 PM
3

The effects of testosterone remains same throughout their life. Men mostly experience shit after they are 15yo and in their 40s mostly. It's not men's fault I never said it was. But it makes women's life more complex and they would have more baggage than men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:50 PM
1

They are pain in ass imo. If they don't cry in front of their SOs they would cry in front of their friend once they get drunk enough and make a scene in public after getting drunk. It's damn embarrassing. Life is much better when there is no SO involved especially if they don't have any plans for setting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:47 PM
2

That's a poor indicator. Most drug addicts are Men. Most alcoholics are Men. Most homeless people are Men. Male Suicide rates are quite high compared to female. I could go on about this. Comparatively, Average Woman is more likely to have her shit together than an Average Man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:42 PM
7

Men don't have periods, pregnancy, motherhood, biological clock of wanting children, menopause. Almost in every phase of life women are occupied with their own biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:31 PM
3

Tomboys also have broad shoulders also.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:25 PM
1

What I meant was drugs, alcohol and smoking. All three addiction plus you could also add sex addiction. What I meant is that many guys actually can cry, especially because of "love". There are certain brainless fools. I only cry out of empathy. Ah, and some music can also make me drop a tear, but that's about tones Moonlight Sonata & Nocturne No. 9 made me shed some tears when I heard them for the first time. It was magical experience for me atleast.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 12:24 PM
1

My friend is combination of both. Plus add smoking in to it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 10:11 AM
1

My best friend is also like that. He was apparently born with silver spoon and nurtured by helicopter mother. Now his father has kicked him out, he is becoming somewhat functional. But he carries way more baggage than any average mid-20s person.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 09:02 AM
1

BS. Men do cry. I saw it myself. Even my friend, the former player. By player do you mean sportsman or Playboy sort. If latter, they are mostly sissies from what I have observed so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:43 AM
1

Habits are permanent neural networks. I do agree with you on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:32 AM
1

What is moral system? I have none Every one has one. Just because yours deviate from majority doesn't mean it isn't present. And my life was quite hard, that's why I would never cry for myself anymore. No man cries. It's mostly homosexuals, bisexuals and women that cry really. the person who had some struggles in life will experience some fuck up more easily than the one who had easy life. Every person have some struggles in their life whether he/she is born with silver spoon or not. People who …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:30 AM
2

Majority of veterans have PTSD. If "what doesn't kill us makes us stronger" is true then all veterans should be strong but this isn't the case. Every near death experience makes a person weak especially ones with weak moral system.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:20 AM
1

Tomboys have smaller breasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:14 AM
3

Whatever doesn't kill you simply makes you stronger. That's motivation given to people who have fear of unknown. If it's true then PTSD is strength. Probably, rape is an exception I don't understand rape so I can't comment on that. What I mean is fucked up relationships. Fucked up Relationships makes people weaker and it requires strong people to minimise their effects. Women are generally weaker in terms of mental fortitude than men so they carry more baggage as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:11 AM
0

Maybe it's because there are few women who don't have their own shit together.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:00 AM
1

Women live more complex life than men. So, amount of baggage would be more in women comparatively unless man hasn't messed with his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 07:56 AM
3

Majority of veterans suffer from PTSD.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 07:48 AM
2

So according to you, sexual preference is also malleable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 12:11 PM
1

How can you be so sure what they were doing is more closed to biological instinct than us? How the hell do you know that our practice isn't biological but their's is. Frankly, I don't trust this 4000years old crap. It's not based empirical data. Humans existed for like 80,000 years, they migrated how the hell does their practice became more biological centric? They also sacrificed girls to their gods and if you are considering their relationship dynamics I think you should consider their other i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 03:56 AM
1

Some old women have become prudes especially if they want to settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:55 PM
0

Most successful people are minorities Asians and Jews. It relates to parenting essentially.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:40 PM
0

It's only right if it's accompanied with no alimony policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:36 PM
1

We are fortunate to have the luxury of asking questions such as this rather than fighting for survival. Or, say, being confined to an actual prison. That's where you are wrong. We don't have luxury of asking questions either we are also fighting for survival, the difference is we are fighting in a concrete jungle. Once you stop you would be left behind and it would take forever to caught up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:29 PM
2

Your real self is a pattern of which your brain has taken form caused by your ideas and actions both.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 05:23 AM
1

You don't have any friend whose life's sole purpose is to enjoy? That's happiness to extreme and being maniac. I generally see people who are happy at the moment easy to get along while not so much with happy people.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 04:49 PM
1

Nobody gives a damn about judgement of others these days anyway. From the cases I have seen so far, Single Father and Married Father have to do same amount of work anyways especially in cases of babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 04:47 PM
0

But only maniacs are truly happy like your friend who doesn't care about anything other than parties. Truly happy people have chaotic live style and have impulsive tendencies. People call it as having an exciting lifestyle but its maniac lifestyle. I just can't see how someone can have an easy time dealing with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 04:42 PM
1

I read somewhere you could pay to have children these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 04:02 PM
0

Little adults are worst of them all. When they start taking birth control at age 14 and you have to support that decision anyway is the most horrible experience but you don't have choice in this matter. It's better not to have kids they are just ticking time bombs who will make you miserable, will violate your bottom line and you can't do anything about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 04:00 PM
1

I would consider latter. If every couple around me are like Mr.J and Harley Quinn. I would rather have every person miserable since it losses its meaning if everyone is miserable all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:39 PM
0

Maniacs are not very easy to deal with and they make general atmosphere chaotic. General People have happy moments maniacs have happy lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:37 PM
4

During Iran hostage crisis, there were 66 hostages out of which 13 were released. fun fact : all of them were women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:25 PM
0

Law positivism doesn't work, and infact it shouldn't. But that's where we are headed. Laws should be an abstraction of a value society has, not the other way around. I don't understand what you meant by this statement, is it about natural law?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:33 PM
1

That's in past. Now if a war occurs, society will stagnate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:25 PM
2

Cat lady says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:10 PM
4

Then let them die. It's not like society would collapse due to loss of some hundred women and children.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 11:58 AM
2

There should be no unwritten rule. Everything should be based upon first come first serve basis. If we are pursuing egalitarianism, it's of utmost importance to value each life equally regardless of age or gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 11:55 AM
2

That's a hoax. If you are online dating you would meet afterwards in real world. Online Dating is different from Your In-game date. Have you never gotten laid by online dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 08:19 AM
1

Open mindedness = willingness to try knew new things without judgement Open mindedness is willingness to receive new ideas but judgement is fundamental to know whats good for them to even try. Its not related to trying new things but trying new ideas. I said the swingers here seem to have some of the strongest marriages. I never said they were the only ones with strong marriages. And I am asking for criteria by which you decided they have strongest marriage. Whether its basis of passion in marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 04:22 AM
1

I’m talking about open mindedness in a sexual context. To me atleast it looks like a woman wants a man who don't judge her for her life choices. Open mindedness is a personality trait btw it's not subdivided into sexual or platonic. It's just plain rubbish. Based on what they say But what was your criteria for judging that swingers have strongest Relationships. The way I see it is a man just gives a free pass to woman to have sex with other men. TRP doesn’t even know what it means TRP sure does …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:27 AM
2

If you don't know the reason behind your dysfunction how could you possibly fix it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:18 AM
2

Adult is not a god. Study psychology before blabbering nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:10 AM
1

open mindedness So you are saying women particularly want creative people but most creative people lives at bottom of hierarchy. I particularly think that it's a bad criteria for selecting partner. Long term success have little to do with openmindedness of a person and women want a successful man not just some fuck toy. Success is correlated with IQ and Conscientious. So, it's better to say women want conscientious person. Ask yourself why some of the strongest marriages among PPDers seem to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 03:05 AM
1

Thus, there is rise in single motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 02:03 AM
1

They live wreck lives and wreck other people's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:39 PM
3

So, except children women have nothing to offer really.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:38 PM
2

its because of JLO
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:30 PM
2

It doesn't take time for love to become hate. If you like taking security risks feel free do so
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 05:23 PM
3

Men don't get love and support from any relationship that's a hard pill every man has to swallow. I won't argue on affection and sex as I am perfectly happy with buying as you are buying either way directly or indirectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:57 PM
6

There are worst cases where wife hires a damn expensive lawyer and husband has to pay the bill. He is literally paying for his own demise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:38 PM
1

most of them have dysfunctional mother which is why they can't take it anymore but nobody wants to admit this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:25 PM
1

Women offer the only source of having a human offspring. Everything else could be bought from the market.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:18 PM
1

Lol! I don't know what you mean by this. Those people are so influenced by allah to have a clear independent mind of their own. I don't know what you mean by this either. When culture has so much in recent years they didn't have any opinion why the hell would they have opinion on natural one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 02:12 PM
1

Huh? No, they don't. Look at cultures right now where polygamy is allowed, pretty much every rich man has more than 1 wife, whereas poor men are stuck with 1. I don't think Arab Countries are qualified for such matter. They are highly influenced by allah to give an answer. And I am saying that the "natural state" will definitely affect them. and i am saying they would have adapted to natural state by the time they would be having any opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 01:55 PM
1

If you are not consenting to have sex for weeks it does become a desperate situation, do you consent such behavior then?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 01:49 PM
2

Physical attraction is the major problem for those men. Personality comes second, attraction comes first.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 01:45 PM
5

I disagree. If a female isn't getting her desired partner then she isn't up to the corresponding standards herself, she could work to achieve those standards to become desirable but if she is just cussing that there aren't good men or something like mansplaining etc. then she should lower her standards for a potenial partner to the standard that she herself is qualified for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 01:20 PM
1

They get into monogamous relationships because they can't do otherwise. The average guy would love to fuck tons of women at the same time, he settles for just 1 because he has no other choice. That's a myth. People with that kind of resources also stick to 1. It's just bullshit. Right, but they're not really opposite, just very different. I didn't say they were opposite. I just said there has been tremendous change in culture and bottleneck for change is minimal. I agree, and I again don't know …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 01:08 PM
1

Huh? You've lost me. What I was mainly saying that if polygamy was natural then people wouldn't be getting into monogamous relationship especially after such failure in monogamous relationships these days. People want monogamous relationship but miserably fail at it only means we are doing something very wrong and most reasonable answer would be culture. There's a limit to how much you can change things, and unstable cultures cannot last very long anyway. If you compare 1950s to today, you would…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 12:08 PM
1

In this edition of Facts for Features, unmarried people include those who were never married, widowed or divorced, That's what I am talking about You are so exasperating. I don't know what you mean by this. What I meant was if you change little by little like how Hollywood did you would change the culture completely and when people realise this they would have adapted to the culture to have any opinions whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 11:45 AM
1

How are those stats baseless? Right now 45% of adults are unmarried, and never been married. That's rubbish. It could only be stats for single hood. I agree, but I don't think people would be such big fans of the "natural state" as you might think. People don't have any opinions regarding culture as long as it doesn't affect them directly at least from what I see. When people realise it's affecting them they become so used to that they don't feel anything wrong about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 11:24 AM
1

Those stats are baseless. Nobody can determine what would happen in future. I think 20%-30% people would never get married at all like only 25% of population say they are atheist. But it also tells that culture plays a vital role in interpersonal relationships and we seriously underestimate the impact of culture on our life. Handing such important thing to profiteers and uneducated celebs is the worst decision people have made. Culture should be community based to avoid such things and to have c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 10:49 AM
1

Not that many people are getting married nowadays. In fact, more people are cohabiting than are married under 30. More people are cohabiting under 30 but eventually they do settle down afterwards. puritanical cultures do not disprove female sexuality. Puritanical cultures didn't disprove female sexuality but females in that culture felt shameful and considered sex sinful. That's the reality of 1880s Germany I read about it when I was reading Neitzsche.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 10:28 AM
1

I believe they are the most conclusive evidence of adultery for past relationships. But culture still played a role in that era. Culture play a major role in human behaviour including attraction also. there are anonimous cheating surveys. How could you know whether it's today's culture that's on play or not. Since 2010, butts became attractiveness sign before it was belly before that it was legs. Culture plays a massive role and we have given that power to junk uneducated people that's what scre…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:31 AM
1

Paternal Frauds are about 30% max. If we look into ancestry studies it would be max 35% before invention of contraception. Majority is monogamous by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:45 AM
1

Dude people have committed several immoral acts throughout the history. I highly doubt a moral person ever existed in world. In times when women didn't had rights and couldn't do shit to their husbands monogamy was still practised. There has to be something more fundamental than morals involved here because it wasn't considered immoral for a husband to be unfaithful in past. I know jews who eat bacon, I could tell you Jews are pioneers in immorality these days. There are very few orthodox Jews l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:20 AM
1

99% people will lose self control because it's ingrained in our DNA to have delicious food we have tongue for that specifically. Monogamy is similar, it has been successful for centuries when women didn't had rights so it also has some genetics involved. What was stopping men given they even have rebellious phase as well if it was culturally enforced.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:08 AM
1

If there is a whole table full of delicacies in front of you and you are eating only veggies that can only sustain your life everyday, could you practise self control?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:02 AM
1

Men always want more that's why men innovate more. But it still doesn't change the fact that monogamy can't be practiced without having an genetic component to it. It's very difficult to have successful monogamous relationship if DNA is screaming for more pussy but it has been practised for centuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 07:58 AM
1

Getting a boner is a must for both Polygamy and Monogamy. What I am emphasizing about is the non sensical nature of argument that monogamy started with agricultural revolution and pre agricultural society were majorly polygamous. You can't force someone to be happy with a single object if it's ingrained in his DNA to have many objects. You could only induce him to believe that wanting more will lead to more happiness. Greed can't be suppressed culturally but it can be excited culturally. What i …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 07:17 AM
2

The prominence of FwB says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:19 AM
1

Then you don't mind getting drugged sex also like he used chloroform or some other shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 04:08 AM
1

There are weirdos who are into corpse sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 03:59 AM
1

She was making that shit up 100%. A raped woman don't fuck a stranger after 20minutes of meeting. That's a red flag. Dude you sure have guts, after losing that kinda cash you could again get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 03:38 AM
1

What I meant was people don't change their sexual preference from polygamy to monogamy depending upon their needs. Like people don't just quit taking drugs. Pre - Agriculture society could have less male partners due to low survival rate in hunting process. Communities needed large population for survival so Polygamy was practiced. If you look across human population, people know there is 50% chance of divorce but still they get settled down. Most polygamous people believe that it's natural to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 03:02 AM
1

Damn, dude, both are far from apes in their intelligence. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3553427/Ravens-smart-CHIMPS-despite-having-smaller-brains-Birds-performed-primates-problem-solving-tasks.html Read this article first. Many men simply suppressed their polygamous instincts by jerking We could only know this if we decrease cultural influences to zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 02:26 AM
0

Dark traits like?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 08:02 PM
4

A woman who can fuck a stranger in 20min doesn't show promise. It shows she has impulsive personality with lack of self control. She must be a massive spender IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 08:01 PM
1

Possibility of that happening is infinitely zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 07:33 PM
1

Nope. That's the bullshit religious people say.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 07:22 PM
1

Chimps are like crows and Humans are like Raven. pre-agricultural communities tended to not be monogamous. Most men in leadership positions had children with several women, that's why you have more female ancestors than male. That's pointless. Nobody saw what happened in that period. These things are easily forged it's stupid to believe these things. I even take history happened 50 years back as a story, don't give me that bullshit. In China, polygamy was practised for many centuries even after …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:36 PM
1

No reason is needed. Things happen, things get done. Even if there is no reason. It is meaninglessness, not stillness. For me meaninglessness is stillness. If there isn't any reason behind an action then no action takes place. Action always need a reason to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:17 PM
1

Chimps and gorilla aren't intelligent beings. Humans aren't polygamous in natural setting if it's in nuclear family mode. Tribe isn't natural setting for human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:11 PM
1

From what I understand about nihilism it is " Nothing matters why even do anything, why do you desire anything, why do you follow your desire if it doesn't matter." Nihilism is means there is no reason to do anything, why even do anything. It's stillness essentially. Really? Why? Origin of Life is more important than Origin of Universe. If we have accurate answer to origin of life we could figure out death and existence of universe also. It would mean an absolute truth exist in nature. Moral cod…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:09 PM
1

If you look at intelligent members of animal kingdom monogamy is only way of mating And they don't have other mates except one. So, according to this, polygamy and more sexual partners is essentially cultural. It doesn't have any biological imperative for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 05:00 PM
1

Freedom doesn't matter either. Why even go any way. Happiness shouldn't matter either because it's pointless. A full nihilism isn't possible. We still don't know origin of life or if evolution created life why it's even organic. If we have an accurate answer to that question 99% problems would solve on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:53 PM
1

That's one way to put it. But this contains assumption organic life was created by earth. And will this statement be valid if in next 200 years we became interplanetary lifeform.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:50 PM
1

What does it prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:45 PM
2

Do you really think reddit gonna survive for 50years?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:44 PM
1

Doesn't exist in animal kingdom.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:42 PM
1

Humans are best at messing up with nature for sake of curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:24 PM
1

Nihilism is not for everyone. It is just a starting point. If you can't answer the question "Then what?" in a way that fills you after falling into nihilism things are going to get bad. I was just thinking to experiment with my death to know the answer. It would prove all assumption about soul and consciousness that people have. When you start having living problem you don't think about nihilism but about solving living situation. Even now I have nihilist thought when I am idle.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:23 PM
1

Because of its mating process. And how much different it is from crow's mating process. Most importantly, it has wings and still fly in with it's partner. I could be biased as it's my favourite bird.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:19 PM
1

I think that you don't need free will in an AI to create a fulfilling conversation. No, it's not possible. A fulfilling conversation could be of two types, one in which you don't know anything about a certain topic and other person knows about the topic and second one is when both parties knows about topic and they discuss their own understanding. Latter one is fulfilling while you would get bored in first one after novelty fades away. I don't think you could have latter one with an entity with …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 04:06 PM
1

If the accomplishments only brought you pain and suffering I dare to say that you wouldn't chase after them. That's my goal in the end and it's called purpose imo. It is possible to pay the price for happiness in a way that is rational, smart and contemplates the buyer's remorse. Believe me people make most irrational decisions in face of happiness. Drug addicts are practically paying price for their happiness and this is the most straightforward example of irrational decision. Most problems peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 03:40 PM
1

I trust the market Dude, a free market will leads to profit maximisation and all companies makes shoddy products at expense of consumer. It's due to government supervision and regulation that free market acts the way it does and government is made up of people. So, you trust people in the end. I can see the programming, hell, I could alter the programming. I could literally adjust its behavior... seriously, humans are way too unpredictable and hard to control. Could you even read whole code of l…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 03:29 PM
1

I got happiness from accomplishments and I paid for accomplishments. That's the only thing that matters. I know it could mean I am indirectly paying for happiness but it's this mindset that makes me feel happiness daily. It makes me make rational decisions because if I think it's necessary to pay a price for happiness I would be willing to pay much greater price and will have a greater regret afterwards and it could result in nihilism at the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 03:14 PM
1

I trust a machine over a human any day of the week. The risks are worth it. But it was created by humans, you are indirectly trusting humans. Trust you seem to have in machine is due to humans fulfilling their promises and responsibilities. That's just irrational. You can satisfy that need with friends Maybe the time you needed them they were busy with their sexy robogirl. We are seeing such situations today also but it will enlarge in future. False dichotomy It's not, what you think is having c…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:45 PM
1

But my main objective was never happiness I wanted something and happiness just appeared as a complimentary gift with it after I obtained it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:36 PM
1

Except for some parts of Africa rest of world is having a decline in birth rate. As Modernity spreads more and more it would decrease drastically.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:34 PM
1

That's just shit Hollywood propagates. I mean what else do you accept from bunch of stupid people who traded all important things for some happiness. Happiness is an emotion how the hell do you know what sort of trade would make you happy, you are constantly changing your needs and perception changes everyday the price you paid for happiness today could become a price you paid for sadness and regret. So, it's worth less to pay any price for happiness and if you didn't feel sadness and regret for…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 02:31 PM
1

As long as there is an alternative for women as a source of sex/relationships things will be better than now. Let's assume you bring a sex robot home. Are you comfortable having a machine that could be hacked to program it to kill you while you sleep? Computers are hackable you know. So... people being happy? Without the problems that free will brings to relationships? Sounds perfect. It was meant to be a satire. You need humans to talk to and if it's intelligent enough to have talks that aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:52 PM
1

That's no solution. Have you thought of scenario where women will have more sex robots than men. Or maybe a scenario in which most people lost their ability to live with other person and they are happy with robots. This will lead to extinction or possibly enforcement on reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:11 PM
1

Maybe Raven
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:03 PM
1

Just look at how technology is used to solve human problems. Today we have lost any privacy we previously had due to a problem solved by technology. Technology was never within, it's anything but human; technology is application of natural laws that humans have knowledge of. Problems between humans should be solved by them only. Social Network promised better interpersonal communication but instead it made it difficult. If a man and woman are only in relationship due to money it isn't worth it o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 01:00 PM
1

South Korea also.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 12:47 PM
0

As Birth Rate is declining so cost of labour will increase, Companies will have more incentive to replace human labor with robots, this will result into more difficult employment scenarios resulting into more avoidance of children. This is a vicious cycle and it's impossible to break. Just wait for the day when police and army were replaced by robots, democracy will collapse. The only solutions would be cultural (For example, wait until conservative cultures out breed and out vote liberal ones) …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 12:38 PM
0

Welfare system also uses beta billy but at least in this scenario he is getting some reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 11:27 AM
1

Almost all Dota 2 players have played different games in their life. It's a Steam game. Are those who play only Forenite for hours a day are not gamers? Does playing a single music piece on piano makes someone a pianist? Does reading a single book every day makes a person a reader or someone who have reading as their hobby. If yes, then most Muslims and Christians have reading as a hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 04:29 AM
1

Playing different video games makes a person gamer. People who play video games regularly are gamers You also agree it's video games not a video game.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 03:56 AM
1

That doesn't make gamers. I know girls who play Minecraft but it doesn't make them gamers. If you claim that a person is a gamer even the most casual one, he/she has to play more titles. Just playing 2-3 titles doesn't make a person a gamer just like banging 2-3 chicks a year doesn't make a man a player.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 03:28 AM
1

Of course it will increase because your body would adjust itself according to new levels of testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 03:24 AM
1

Take Battlefield 5 sales. They catered female consumers and they suffered a massive loss in Battlefield 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 09:39 PM
1

That's not how correlation works. I know that's not how correlation works but its also incorrect to assume that people who places greater importance to one activity will do so for all pleasurable activities. gaming is a pleasurable thing It's a source of enjoyment. Pleasure is a component of life but not life it self.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 09:20 PM
1

Hedonism imply pleasure seeking as goal of life. I just meant that people who put greater importance to pleasure in one form also are more likely to put greater importance to other forms of pleasure. That's sick. According to you, I am a drug addict, sex addict, foodie, alcoholic etc. sexuality is linked with drug consumption, for example. People killed God then they killed romanticism. Now, some have developed a twisted version of romance called sexuality like a modern commie. These are messed …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 09:10 PM
1

Hedonism imply pleasure seeking as the main purpose of human life. It's way different. If you say women who play video games are hedonistic implies they are those kind of people who only view their pleasure as the only purpose and plays no importance to morality like serial killers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:48 PM
1

But you could take it as sample. Like all dating sites don't have whole population using them but their studies do have some truth in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:44 PM
1

Eating tasty food isn't hedonistic. It's tongue's function to make bland food distasteful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:42 PM
1

Now you are claiming hot chicks who play video games are hedonistic or maybe all people who play video games are hedonistic. You said it implicitly when you said that hot chicks I have met are 6 with makeup and plastic surgery if they aren't playing video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:39 PM
1

Just browse twitch. Except 2-3 actual gamers most are just selling their bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:35 PM
4

There are many factors at play which affects libido. Just having high testosterone level doesn't imply that guy would be thinking about sex all time. No study shows there is .9 correlation between testosterone and sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:34 PM
1

MK series aren't really brain intensive. I used to play MK series when I was 8. There are some games that are brainy but most games aren't brain intensive at all. You could play most games stoned. Nevertheless, 1-3 girls can be considered anecdotal not the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:17 PM
2

If you have a stressful job you would realise it's a myth. The only thing High testosterone leads is wanting to beat the shit out of somebody. Women are as amazing as any man is. Sex is just plain boring after sometime especially after teenage spree. It isn't stimulating enough for brain to feel excited.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 08:03 PM
3

That's anecdotal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 07:48 PM
1

People with high testosterone also have low desire for women and sex. It's so boring these days, video games and books are more interesting than women and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 07:39 PM
2

Mostly due to work. Technology only increases work load instead of decreasing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 07:36 PM
1

If you think Candy Crush is considered a video game then fine hot chicks play video games
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 07:25 PM
1

You are pretty self centered. Have you ever thought what happened to him after divorce or how he was dealing with it? There could be n number of reasons behind his behaviour. I am presuming he was a good person to begin with as you are saying he was a great dad before divorce. So all divorced parents should put their kids up for adoption? It's better than abandoning them to say the least. It's like argument of staying in a Bad Relationship Vs Divorce. Forcing Parents to take responsibility they …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 03:09 PM
1

Love and Family are also utilitarian. Everything in this world is utilitarian if you think like one. Please do not abandon your child either. Kids have no say in this, they didn't choose to be born, they didn't choose to have incompatible parents, please do not disappear on them just cuz you don't get along with the mom. It's better to give them for adoption. Since, you can't give them the childhood they deserve it's better to give that responsibility to someone else. Raising them in broken Rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 05:17 AM
3

I think you are talking about white supremacists.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 08:29 PM
5

Having high expectations is also an innate prescription for misery for both parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 08:25 PM
2

You probably got an ego problem by not having a girl fawning over you after sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 01:49 PM
3

It would be considered disposable before the payment of alimony and child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 08:40 PM
6

It could be result of increased working hours to meet alimony and child support payments or any other reason. What matters is standard of living not disposable income.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 08:25 PM
2

It would depend on illness. If you are suffering from an infection you would take medications to avoid death. No you would suffer pain rather than swallow a Tylenol and risk liver failure. It's something most people do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 08:05 PM
2

Nope you would take medications as the worst case would be death if not taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 07:58 PM
5

Alimony and Child Support keeps sucking blood out of men while women have a literal money tree after divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 07:51 PM
1

I was talking about LTRs and marriage. Attractiveness can only help in STRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 06:12 AM
1

Tell that to the intergenerational Wall Street bankers and legacy admits to elite universities. I see a few of them every single fucking day, and these twats are always the annoying leftist regressives. That's why I said intergenerational wealth is root cause of all evil. If there is no concept of intergenerational concept there wouldn't be massive inequality that we have today. It will make capitalist structure more perfect. Every Socialist or Communist party are working against intergeneration…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 02:15 AM
1

More Government Control.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 07:44 PM
1

The existence of trade unions says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 07:37 PM
1

People are more vulnerable in free society that's why trade unions and government supervision exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 07:36 PM
1

Russian Orthodox should be the most traditional women one can find today. You could try that if get any chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 06:09 PM
1

Bhutan also follows same concept I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 06:04 PM
1

Private property and wealth inheritance has been present in every civilization except in communism which is a western ideology. Intergenerational wealth is the root cause of all evil. It only creates inequalities and corruption. It provides most incapable people with most resources which leads to disastrous results. That's why Inheritance Tax is so high. Aristocracy was destroyed with the rise of secularism. It wouldn't rise again, it's gone for good. The only likely thing that could happen woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 06:00 PM
1

Living in a tribe is different than living in society which is so influenced by liberal ideology. Liberal ideology can't run in matriarchy. It conflicts way too much. If someday economy becomes least important factor in a society then matriarchy is possible to some extent. Otherwise it's a hopeless dream of fanatic Feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 05:37 PM
1

We will disagree on this one. What is any difference between a human and any other animal then if you are trying to achieve something an animal could achieve? If the results are good, then the mindset/plan/decision was correct under the circumstances. The assumption here is you know all the factors that affected the goal you achieved which is near impossible task as of right now maybe 200 years later it could be possible. If he didn't have the consent of the humans he was experimenting on... yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:14 PM
1

The goal tends to be always the same. "Have a happy/comfortable life" Today every average person have a comfortable lifestyle. So, it's useless endeavour. Happiness is an emotional state, just trying to achieve an emotional state is an insult to being human. You could achieve that by drugs no need to make a mess in society to achieve something you could buy easily. Changing your mindset may change the means you use to try to achieve that goal. Then you judge by the results obtained. The assumpti…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 06:58 PM
1

Let's assume this case only, a woman thinks "All man are rapists" daily, this thought becomes a conviction and a bad incident is all it takes to make her man hater. This would change her goals as well so will the result. Maybe she didn't want to have goals that she strive for as a man hater when she had that thought that's what I meant by first statement. Nazis were formed like this only. This could also result in her forming lesbian Relationships while she would was a heterosexual person. She w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 06:25 PM
1

What if it changes the goals itself? Maybe you achieve the goal you wanted through it but your succeeding goals would be influenced by the thought. When people lose themselves in process they screw other people also. You don't remember what you have achieved but how you achieved them. Goals exist to provide direction and are not a means to end. Results doesn't matter much anyway as you can't control world you won't get what you expect to get so results doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 05:49 PM
2

Results mean nothing in the end, it's the process that matters at the end. It looks like she's trading her soul to a devil really.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:51 PM
0

Maybe she wants to be raped. There are some psychos who have such desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:46 PM
2

Clearly someone didn't teach them science.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:43 PM
1

Could it transform a gay to a straight person or make a cis-male to trans-female?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:40 PM
0

It maybe a rational action in his twisted rationality. It is illogical to do this. Rationality and logicality are two different notions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:28 PM
1

Every thought should have be logical. Thoughts are dangerous, if every person should think about what is working for him without any logical basis it would lead to genocides. You shouldn't underestimate a thought, a thought can create a demon out of a person if it isn't restricted by logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:22 PM
3

So Basically FIRST GROUP lives in fantasy and SECOND GROUP lives in cyberpunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:25 AM
1

Chivalry is all about being considerate towards women. It's a good manner and both sexes should be chivalrous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 07:24 PM
0

Your standards are wrong if you don't live up to them yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 07:03 PM
1

Federal Reserve is debating to let inflation be free then current 2% control mark and it will skyrocket if they agree on not controlling it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 06:48 PM
1

Most Women don't mate in their early years and men lose their interest in later years.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 06:37 PM
1

If you want to be with a woman you need to be considerate towards them, it won't change. Any inconsiderate bastard is unfit for being a spouse and a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 06:28 PM
4

Then you have wrong understanding of assembly line workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 06:19 PM
5

People with beyond average moral character can't become successful in today's world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 06:06 PM
4

If their work is so insignificant it would have been replaced by AI. No company pays a ton of money for a drone when they can make one themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 05:57 PM
1

He isn't your father, he was elected to do a job if being a president requires a good moral character so does every other job in the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 05:54 PM
7

East Asians specifically Chinese corrupt people have fucked Vancouver.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 05:06 PM
13

Seattle is an artificial heaven built for women where they are being offered 72 virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 04:27 PM
2

It's called a niche market. This only shows niche doesn't exist for women or women aren't significant consumer of paid stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 06:27 AM
2

I was just stating why people live together for 35+ years. And I never said women are shit for either one. If you are saying you stayed 35+ years with someone due to love then what about previous Relationships did you not love the other person in previous Relationships so you could say love isn't the main factor for longevity of Relationships. Aversion to risk and fulfillment of needs are reasonable factors that can be considered for longevity of Relationships. It also explains why people start …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 08:08 PM
1

It is due to fulfillment of need and aversion to high uncertainty of future.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:37 PM
0

Porn and prostitution isn't similar in any regard. Porn can't be considered an sex outlet. It's masturbation that really acts as sexual outlet. It the rise of casual sex which decreased the rape cases. Porn only acts as a catalyst for rapes, let me give you an analogy if you see your friend driving a Ferrari ; would your desire to drive a Ferrari increase or will it decrease after seeing your friend driving a Ferrari?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:11 PM
1

I was talking about porn. If there was a causal relationship between porn and rape that would imply that porn affects males desire to have sex which many know isn't true at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:12 PM
2

There isn't any causal relationship between porn and rape. It's just a narrative big corps behind porn industry propagates.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:31 PM
1

Actually Chads have a bigger hit on their ego if women are faking. Relationships-minded guy who didn't get casual sex would be conscious about this because if he didn't make a girl satisfied, she would just start fucking chads. You are blaming this on men but the problem stems from Women's sexual history. Before prominence of casual sex, most men weren't conscious about women's orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:04 PM
1

You could say "Can we try something new during the action time" instead of "You suck at this". Waiting for a day or two days may lead to many uncertainties like a fight which lead to her bringing your incompetence into the fight which could lead to greater bruised ego and possibly a breakup.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:54 PM
4

Under age of consent sex is mainly considered first degree rape but it is considered a third degree rape according to article 227-25.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:04 PM
1

Maybe it has changed recently. Thanks for the update. Edit: I just checked, according to the bill it is considered an offense but not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 01:12 PM
1

You need a vacation in France, it's perfectly moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 12:33 PM
1

It's stupidity at extreme, only if government starts regulating inks and an extensive amount of research is done on ink that says inks are safe and there are zero long term effects on health then it's not a problem. It's simplest care one can provide to one's body. Jezebel are those women who gets tattoos but are skeptical of vaccines.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:19 AM
1

Holy crap dude everyone dies. The only thing you can do is live your life to the fullest and love your loved ones with all your heart. Death isn’t scary. I don't think it's a thread about women aging at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 06:27 AM
1

Because it resulted in many stupid abortion of men's spaces. Hardly any is left these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:55 AM
2

What you just saying is just bs that stupid people say. The only thing you can do is live your life to the fullest That's too ambiguous so it's a bad advice and a stupid person would advice like people from Hollywood. They live the most miserable life of all so I would take avoid doing that. The only thing you can do is live your life to the fullest Again too ambiguous. Also it conflicts with your first advice in many situations. So you are saying a contradictory statement which often idiotic sc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:53 AM
3

Money gave purpose to human life. It's not a catalyst. A person who earned money himself have a purpose in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 03:55 AM
1

When some people think men's spaces are discriminatory towards the rights of women so it's not possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 03:46 AM
1

And intellectuals are people who are mostly likely to oppose ideologies. So, you could say intellectuals are people who are mostly likely to die first in chaotic society. But today's intellectuals are the tools people use to propagate ideologies so maybe it wouldn't occur now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 11:11 AM
1

He wasn't a hermit. He was just person who suffered great misfortune. Slave = private property. It's owner who determines what happens to slave. There wasn't a slave protection law and court can't charge slaves it's their masters that determines offense of slaves. Which is why I often laugh when women say they were private property before feminism. You could see people like him who are dissatisfied with their lives in every bar and you could bet they didn't study philosophy but they will have so…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:53 AM
1

No body would give a damn about a broke ass with crazy behaviour. Most people didn't care much about him and they didn't believe in him. So, he was harmless but still a slave. If he wasn't a slave he would have been convicted as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:34 AM
1

Could you tell the source name for this because I have only read that it was Plato and Xenophon through which Socrates Philosophy was propagated. There wasn't any mention of 500+ followers. He did have some young followers but not that many.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:08 AM
1

He didn't had that many followers. Followers = resistance but there was no resistance in his execution. That's why, high status people are mostly last ones to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 09:57 AM
1

He was notorious. I don't think it's appropriate to regard people with notorious reputation as high status people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 09:39 AM
1

Socrates didn't had that high position. Philosophy is a marginalized subject in today's secular world I doubt it had any place in religious society at that time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 06:06 AM
1

Nope, in every country the ones with knowledge and wisdom are killed first because they oppose the government or their ideology. These often include philosophers, authors etc. For example Aristotle, Socrates etc. These are some famous ones that I know , you could know many more because in every revolution this type of thing has happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 02:28 AM
1

I don't understand how the values you have mentioned could possibly be useful for betterment of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 06:12 PM
2

If a societal progressiveness is measured by sexual norms then society is fucked up. Progressiveness is accepting new ideas which have scientific basis not some stupid ideology. Most elite don't give a shit about these things they are just more likely to hide their true thoughts. Only wives of those elites like to play with these ideas when they didn't suffer anything related to that ideology and have enjoyed all the perks of rightist ideologies. Feminism was also started by women of upper class…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 05:10 PM
1

If you look back in history, those with knowledge and wisdom are the ones who gets killed first.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 04:41 PM
3

feminism, queer acceptance, sjw values, liberalism, egalitarian relationships They are not elite values. They are stupid ideology that stupid people believe. Besides values are taught by parents it's not something an institution teaches otherwise it's called indoctrination not values. These are not even values, you have some misunderstanding about what constitutes values. the SMP and the RMP are inextricably tied with class and ethnicity, its impossible to have an honest discussion of sexual dyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 04:37 PM
0

No disrespect but if she had unfulfilled sexual desires she could have fucked anybody, women don't need to have money to fulfill her sexual desires. She had material desires unfulfilled and she wasn't willing to work herself and needed someone so it's not generally applicable now also. Women worked in 1950s and today also there isn't any increase in that sentiment. It's just women don't need to share her income today with anyone if she is unwilling to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 02:53 PM
0

OL. Are you in America? A college degree is a preequisite for any kind of living wage. It takes 4 years to complete college. You would be in early 20s after graduating from college. Adding to a work experience of 7-8 years it would result into 28-33 year old which is mainly the age men marry. It's reasonable to assume he would get a decent amount of salary after that much experience if he had good work ethic. The housework and childcare needs to get done. If you say you want your wife to bring m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 02:11 PM
0

What I meant was while you say it was not possible to monkey branch while I am saying it was the best arrangement for women they would be banging their lover while her husband was licking his boss ass in office. Paternal Frauds are clear evidence for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 01:59 PM
1

Any man who have an average IQ has a good work ethic didn't waste his early 20s in parties would have a pretty good salary when he is in late 20s. Husbands do step up these days, it is expected that they do 50% of housework Including child care. Nobody said women should quit their jobs but they have to reduce their work hours if they want to spend more time with their child. She has to make choices that she want to be with her child or in office working for the promotion she wants so desperately…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 01:51 PM
1

Maybe because women want it all. You need to make some sacrifices. In achieving their career goals and family they trade off their health. Also, there isn't that much house work except for child care. There was cooking which can be solved by takeouts. Cleaning can be done once a week by yourself or by cleaning service.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 01:34 PM
0

So you are saying paternal frauds occurred magically.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 01:24 PM
1

Have you ever considered that they might want to spend more time with their child that's why they do. You make it as though child is a burden that oppressing society have forced upon women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/19 01:22 PM
2

Now people are careful about they share on social media so it will only give false perception.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 08:01 AM
4

Are contracts immoral? They exist because of lack of trust. you have bigger problems than them fucking you over. Ignorance causes bigger problems like paternal frauds, STDs etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 07:55 AM
1

Men also want a mix of traditional and promiscuous woman but they can't have it. It's either one and most women would agree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 04:27 AM
1

Intelligence works that way only. World is grey but man needs the capacity to distinguish black and white from it. You have both masculine and feminine characteristics but it doesn't make you trans gender. You are either male or female.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 04:25 AM
1

Are you saying that young conservatives are zombies?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 04:08 AM
0

I doubt that. Tolerance doesn't mean increasing individualism. PC culture is the evidence of increase in collectivism. For you sexual freedom is individualism but it isn't. Just in one post I saw you saying you would donate eggs to Jewish couple which implies you don't believe in individualism at all because if you did you wouldn't prefer a collective identity over a person's individual identity. You only tolerate other racial groups which isn't individualism to say the least. Ivy League uses di…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 03:22 PM
0

Calling it a technological advanced tribe is more appropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 02:46 PM
1

It's easier to get married but tougher to maintain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 01:44 PM
6

It's not about what men wants but what she wants. It's her fault that 15 men she's being with only want casual sex. If she really wanted a relationship at that point she would be upfront about it especially after 5-6 consecutive casual encounters. Slut is mostly used for women who aren't suitable for LTRs and she clearly isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 08:32 AM
5

It depends on age of woman. A 22 year old woman having 20 partners is a thot but a 35-40 year old woman is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 07:36 AM
1

Apparently sex workers need to pay more taxes if they choose to invest. That's why they prefer cash and luxury items.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 07:22 PM
2

They could use same tech hololens 2 uses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 07:04 PM
2

Most women are super turned off by the thought of a neck beard and his advanced porn equipment. Did you ever got turned off by her toys?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 07:02 PM
1

When world's best economists were saying china's economy has no future I had lost any respect for economists, they are just leechers that uses pseudoscience to fit the narrative of interest groups. When trade schools would be closed due to AI when doctors would be out of business due to AI's superior diagnosis abilities, when only people with creative minds like writers, game developers etc. would be employed I highly doubt basic economics would apply. Then the only utility left for people would…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 03:15 PM
1

a sperm has 22 X chromosomes which can also play vital role in intelligence. So, intelligence inherited from mother and from X chromosomes are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 05:24 AM
1

But then present money would have lost value. It would be a huge loss for civilization. And also there would be people who are still required to develop new tech. So presence of these people limits companies actions. the only reason we're not seeing it yet is because companies haven't yet accessed all available markets. Nah, I think main reason is that government restricts these companies. But these companies are currently bypassing government and in near future could form their own government.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 04:44 AM
1

Being a consumer is also an important part of economy. If there aren't people to buy the products or people don't have money to purchase anything economy would get destroyed. Stagnation would occur.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 04:17 AM
2

Dude course also matters, any course except STEM is waste these days. Liberal arts degree doesn't imply intelligence in any way
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 08:36 PM
1

Considering that 23% of families in the US are the single mom types. This number doesn't make sense. This number should be greater because according to some people on PPD, divorced women doesn't get married that much and you add it to number of single mothers without marriage. Could you send the link for the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 06:01 PM
2

*excluding women with mental issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:47 PM
1

But people from both genders pay taxes. Not all women receive money from government. Those women who pay taxes and aren't leeching off government also suffers as much as men in this circumstance. Including them in this category only instigate situation more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:41 PM
1

Most men do live alone nowadays and do all this work by themselves so they aren't making this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:21 PM
2

Having an income of both extremes makes you more likely to have a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 04:15 PM
6

It's not men's taxes, it's people's taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 04:10 PM
0

why do you think money would magically appear to give everyone universal pay if they're not working? do you really think if jeff bezos replaces all of his wage slaves with robots that he will simply turn over all of his wealth to the government to get redistributed to you lazy NEETfags? It's common sense, if there is a situation of permanent unemployment universal pay would be implemented for social stability. You should read it first this situation wouldn't occur for at least 20 years. so you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 07:52 AM
2

It's easier for women to get laid so they won't pay to have sex but robots are a different matter. It would also become a companion for women which means it would have more demand for women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 07:14 AM
1

50 years maybe. The day quantum computers become accessible to general public, humanoid robots would become a reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 07:01 AM
1

Nope it's also a dopamine hit if you are a human being. Dopamine is part of reward system. You are into relationships because you feel they are rewarding.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 06:58 AM
1

Exactly. They would be early adopters of humanoid sexbots also. Men always like natural but women don't care but natural or artificial.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 06:57 AM
1

Relationships are also distraction according to your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:30 AM
1

Robots that can be customised to be sexbots can also be customised to be a worker this would enlarge scale of production reducing costs tremendously.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:26 AM
6

I do think there would be a large group of women who would buy a sexbot instead of cat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:24 AM
1

When it would be possible to develop these high tech robots, there would be universal pay as those times would result in permanent unemployment so you wouldn't worry about money. Also, the cost of manufacturing would also be significant low if they were used in all sorts of industries.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 05:17 AM
1

I just thought it's extension of "Payroll reflects how much a company cares about you" something like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 04:39 AM
1

From corporate world.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 08:31 PM
4

There are male victims who are totally ignored by everyone as it doesn't apply to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:26 PM
3

Actually opposite is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:23 PM
2

People who elect them should start living a moral life. Moral people elect Moral person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:15 PM
3

But elected officials don't run the country really. The hired people run the show. It's common knowledge, elected officials are the people who are elected to be responsible for the mess created by hired people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:05 PM
1

What I meant was an average female would have more partners than your average male. Mean would be same but you have to see variance also. Mean doesn't show whole situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 03:14 PM
1

X nodes on one side and X nodes on another side. Don't Know what you meant by this. You haven't considered small amounts of women who have high n-count and are virgins. There are mostly more males who are promiscuous than females and there are more virgin males than females. So, on average a woman is more likely to have more partners than a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 03:06 PM
1

Maybe. I don't know
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 02:55 PM
1

You need to understand income increases exponentially as you move upwards in society especially in countries with high income inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 02:14 PM
1

Dude I was talking about men who are 80%tile in resources only. Not your average scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 02:01 PM
1

There are many such women either. Average can't be different for men and women, that's obvious for any mathematician. If we exclude homosexual pairings, of course. It doesn't relate to my experience. The women around my own age have more partners than men I know except my sister. Lol, do they fuck ghosts? No, there is a very small percentage of men who bangs most women. Average can be spread out or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 02:00 PM
1

There are single men as well. The true thing is that bucks strategy here can't be used in LTR by 95% of men. Women have to work even in LTR. It's not about the work. It's about money. A man who spent most time earning money to have a wife would literally have more money than woman who would be willing to be with him. Since that, demand for bucks also is lower. Because women already have jobs. Like I said I was talking about people who only have money to offer. If that person is attractive it wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:52 PM
1

Nope, there are many men who would have way higher like hundreds. My best friend apparently is in 15-16 at 22. These are women I have met there maybe ones I don't know. But as men have 12-15, women have the same. I would highly doubt that. Most women would have higher number than men. They need to invest less time in getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:44 PM
1

I could apparently tell you Eastern Europe is way different than rest of world in dating except Poland. In Russia, there are more women than man so it's like that. The last time I read somewhere there are apparently 11 million single women in Russia. I don't know how much that is true but you would know better as you live in that country.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:36 PM
1

Time is money. Some people invest while some people spend it all. That N counts come to men in their 30s? I never claimed that. I just meant I can't have that high N-COUNT without making tradeoffs which I don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:29 PM
1

Any survey regarding sex always have dishonest answers even when it's done anonymously. So, those studies are worthless. It would still put you above most men. Nope It doesn't. It only means I wasted my 20s on some random chicks. guys that aren't very good at women in bed aren't going to be getting women worth anything in bed either. That's absurd. You just don't know how somebody is in bed unless you gave it a try. It also depends on many factors that determine how good someone is in bed. They …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 01:11 PM
1

Men don't have any incentive to just rack up their numbers while wasting their most valuable years(20s)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 12:56 PM
0

Government is the father of a child that goes by the name woman. Women don't have rationality, they cry for any loss and criticize men who don't feel need to cry by calling them insensitive jerk. Free will in women is also a myth I only see them blabbering same nonsense that is being transmitted to them through media. I have a bias in this as it's mostly true for women less than 25 years old. I don't see it derogatory in any way as it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 04:30 AM
1

What is post wall women according to you because women starts getting old in 40s if they take care of their bodies? They do get attractive guys after that but not 95%tile. But still 80%tile - 95%tile they can get if they are themselves good looking. It's implied they have some good looks otherwise why would a rich guy marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 03:55 AM
1

I seriously doubt authenticity of that study. The only way to confirm those numbers are to violate privacy of people because people lied when they were asked anonymously. You know you're in the top 20% when you stop counting and just guesstimate. Are you saying to bang some worthless chicks to rack up my numbers?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 03:43 AM
1

Men are less likely to marry a divorced woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 03:36 AM
2

majority of men have sex with a few partners their entire life and can only get that sex by offering commitment and resources of some sort. That's outdated view. Nowadays, women just settle for sometime then they divorce to get resources from them and enjoy with 20% physically attractive ones. Having 80%tile in resources only makes a person a fat sheep not a potential partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 07:22 PM
0

That's your fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 12:54 PM
0

Its innocent until proven guilty and not the other way around. If someone make some sort of allegation he/she needs to have evidence to back it up otherwise he/she is just blabbering nonsense and could pay for damages.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 12:11 PM
1

The whole system would only become more vital in future. It works as a social fabric you get to meet people from all walks of life. Previously churches did that function but now it's colleges. That's why they bribed their way through.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:59 AM
1

It's bribery and cheating. From moral standpoint, it's wrong. But it also represents how dumb these people are there are many ways that have existed for centuries to get into these colleges, they could have donated 500k directly to college and they would have accepted her. It's USC not Harvard. It only requires IQ and good work ethic. It's the brain washing they do after people get into these universities that make them elitist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:50 AM
1

I do think sports scholarships should be cancelled. So, I don't think hoe they have felt for this arrangement. Life is Unfair, Ivy League colleges aren't state college where you have any right to accept any equality. Otherwise Most Blacks don't deserve to get admission in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:36 AM
1

I only see it as disgusting nature of sluts and how hypocrite they are. I am pretty sure casting couch wasn't Harvey exclusive thing. It happens in all walks of life. Also, any rape case reported 4-5 months late should be dismissed. If somebody stole anything from me I wouldn't report him after 20years it makes no sense. Also, He isn't disgusting at all, he made money without breaking any law. Calling him disgusting for his face is same as calling a black man disgusting for being black. So it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:25 AM
0

Do you have any physical evidence other than victim statements to prove that he raped them? It could have been a simple exchange of resources between him and actresses. I don't think it's wrong in any sense possible. P.S. Trusting actresses who sell their bodies for jobs is just naivety.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:15 AM
1

It have a very deep impact on culture all over the world. Culture affects people. They have serious consequences for regular people It changes their perception of world. Every Movie impacts your brain whether you believe it or not as it happens subconsciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:10 AM
2

Is there any evidence of forceful rape against harvey? He just traded jobs for sex it isn't wrong in today's society. Sex only requires mutual consent. No Morality is involved in sex otherwise people with hundreds of partners deserve to die as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:08 AM
1

Plastic surgery and all things add up pretty nicely.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 03:56 AM
1

I doubt the authenticity of that well documented history of a country that was as closed as soviet union with their famed intelligence agency and any document regarding soviet union produced by west government have a high chance of falsehood. If you are not satisfied with soviet union. You could take example of Mao Zedong. China did have a democratic republic before him and they retreated to Taiwan after their defeat in Mainland China.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 06:56 PM
1

Nobody expected October Revolution to be successful even Lenin himself. They had failed in February Revolution previously. So, you can't say they had too much momentum.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 06:26 PM
2

My logic is you can't justify any behaviour by claiming it's normal behaviour. Just because most people take part in that activity doesn't make it good activity. I don't see it apply in your argument. I think you have misunderstood something here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 06:01 PM
1

I disagree with third one. Min. Age should be 12+. For driving at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 01:16 PM
1

Your opinions aren't definitely unpopular ones in fact many people think that way now. At least people I know do have same opinions. I believe every individual should have control over their own life and nobody should take that control from them unless it's from their own volition. If your positions on matter threaten this then they are wrong at least in my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 01:04 PM
-2

So you are saying any problem becomes a genuine concern only when it starts to affect collective. Dude, are you sure you are living in a democracy? Murder irrespective of sex is okay but murder which is sex selective is not okay. That just sick in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 12:54 PM
1

I doubt you have values different than others except regarding intersex relationships. That's what people call individual values these days. You can change values to some extent and that's called being open minded.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 12:39 PM
1

Ubermensch is basically secular values one creates himself that belong to him only independent of values of collective.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 12:27 PM
1

Ubermensch was core of his thinking IMO. He believed in individualism something Aristotle first introduced. His writings are very personalised, so People always come to different conclusions due to this like Shakespeare's plays. Regardless, his books are good if you gave some thought into them. But because of his utter contempt for science many views need to be filtered.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 12:17 PM
1

People in every country commits infanticide. Why the hell it matters when it's sex selective?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:56 AM
1

Did Marx changed anything? It's only because people picked on his ideology that communism was realised. If people didn't picked on his ideology, he would be same as him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:49 AM
1

It's difficult to translate his books in English so it's difficult to understand his translated books. Also, he didn't use Aristotle methods while writing so it looks like he is whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:39 AM
2

I was talking about interim government before October revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:34 AM
1

Did you read original German editions?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:33 AM
1

His life also sucked big time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:12 AM
1

What was before USSR? Democratic Government collapsed and an authoritarian regime aka USSR was established. The only example of Societal collapse is of Roman empire. USSR is only change in political structure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:11 AM
1

a decline and collapse of society would result in LOTS of women dying Men would be dying more if society collapses but it's impossible for it to happen in any nuclear power. Collapse would only imply change in political structure to a more authoritarian regime.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 08:44 AM
7

As a guy - I couldn't care less if a woman has a fair amount of sexual partners in her youth (I did too). This only implies you are comfortable with it because you did it too. If you didn't do it you would care about it. Its pretty normal to enjoy sex and have fun while you're single - I know a lot of come from puritan nations but we need to move away from the shaming culture. If you feel your actions are right and just you wouldn't feel shameful for them. The people who do these sort of activit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 08:39 AM
1

Care to explain double standard at play?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:06 PM
2

How so? He didn't make posts in bad faith unlike her. You’re acting ugly because your point has been debunked The only thing that is happening is a woman is getting triggered because someone reported her and insulting the reporter as a bait. It's the no.1 case of Baiting. She should be banned for that at least. But like IRL she gets away with it while insulting the reporter. How the hell would someone report anyone if people are insulting the reporter.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:05 PM
1

Lol if the longer people are together the more in love they get is bonkers. If that were the case then divorce rates wouldn’t be above 50%. That's true for most part. What you believe love is , in reality is just lust which is as materialistic as it can get. Don't disguise your lust for love that's sick. If this is not the case, please enlighten me what you call love is. Being cautious doesn’t mean you think everyone is naturally selfish. That makes no sense and is a logical fallacy. Being cauti…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 07:37 PM
1

Having kids at 12 that's fucked up
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:48 PM
1

We live in Materialistic society. You will get burned if you think it otherwise. What you are essentially saying is be delusional and orgasms are all imaginary for women. The only thing evolved in humans is their brain cells nothing more. You first say don't project selfishness on people and on other hand you say to remain cautious. The idea of cautiousness arises due to you thinking people are selfish in nature and could do harm. What you call love is an invest that becomes a habit. That's why …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:38 PM
2

Even exes from years still care about me and such, even though I don't reciprocate it in any way. Either they are very dissatisfied with their current partner or you are delusional and the moment you made any attempt to reciprocate you would realise you were delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:21 PM
2

Men have accepted their appearance and know it can't be changed its better to do things that could be changed. It's just waste to worry over something permanent which you have no control over. Also, Women were told to be careful while playing and avoid injuries from young age. Men played rough and it was a new wound every day while playing. If you implant same belief to men from young age maybe they would also be more conscious about their appearance like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:02 PM
6

That's why it suck. Love is investing yourself into other person and you only invest into something when you expect it to provide some value in return in near future.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 12:38 PM
1

That's why it's accomplishment. It's like a 5/10 woman won some beauty contest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 05:49 PM
1

Drunk me (who is my alter-ego) is not bad in reasoning Then you aren't really drunk. Having capacity to reason means you are sober. What I mean is that unrestricted women rarely become even more unrestricted when drunk. Restricted become unrestricted quite often. Most unrestricted women are dumb. It's because of lowering of defenses due to alcohol it may seem to be that women have become more unrestricted. If you take aphrodisiac, you become more unrestrictive does it tell something about you? A…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 04:53 PM
1

People only show how well their lizard brain works when they are drunk. Incapability of reasoning != Sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 04:19 PM
2

Being #1 Pornstar on PornHub is kinda accomplishment. It's what made her famous after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 04:13 PM
1

Say NO to social safety net then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:12 PM
5

Especially one that gets offended by her own accomplishments.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 03:42 AM
1

Do you believe in free will?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 02:38 AM
1

I was a way different person a year ago then I am now Then who are you devoid of identities you hold?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 08:07 PM
1

It's genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 07:51 PM
2

If people change all the time, the woman you once loved is dead and the one you are currently with isn't the same woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 07:50 PM
1

It's ungrateful to abandon family who nurtured you regardless of the reason. That person isn't a suitable choice of partner or friend for anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/19 06:26 AM
1

It would be result in extinction of human beings regardless of polygamy or monogamy in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:28 AM
1

Biological parents are no more forced to sit with their children all day long. Most screwed up idea of all time. No one is forcing anybody for anything in today's age. The Biological parents who sit with their children all day long do so due to their willingness. There are other options as well which they can opt for. I believe this social structure is more natural to humans, because in prehistoric times humans lived in groups of 50-150 people who were much closer to each other than neighbours a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 09:25 AM
1

I don't understand your concept of neighborhood at all. If you want to replace nuclear families with neighborhood, what you are essentially doing is moving the responsibilities of your mom and dad to your neighborhood. If you are thinking to replace nuclear families with neighborhood due to your desire for novel sex you are totally screwed. Also, in neighborhood people are forced into all sorts of stuff just live in a socialist state where it is practiced to some extend like montreal or take bla…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 08:33 AM
1

Not possible if (males, females > 1).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:28 AM
1

What you are imagining is "one wife, many husbands" model That's polyandry What I'm for is "Each man can have many wives, each woman can have many husbands". It would only increase complexity , chaos and would make it difficult for government policy making. It would also make it difficult to make family medical history of child for identification. And I don't see any fundamental that forms core for family in this condition. I wish to replace nuclear families with neighbourhoods Replacing nuclear…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:23 AM
1

Polygyny is one form of polygamy. I am talking about all forms of polygamy. Polyandry in theory does that even more. Polyandry is road to extinction. While it maybe appear to be complementing to polygyny but it isn't practical as it increases risk of violence for the woman. Also polyandry is very harmful for kids, I can't possibly see how it prioritize quality when there are many men present in house that can be predatory to young ones. It certainly will be harmful for young males.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 10:42 AM
1

They have all sorts of social problems which could be related to polygamy in some way. Cousin marriage is perfectly fine with them. There are many more such problems when they have fixed framework for polygamy. They have way shittier laws in the world, many arabs have to go other countries for looking partners they have that fucked up sex ratio. Entire world would go into chaos if every country legalised polygamy. I don't want to sound offensive but arab countries are just tribal people with res…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 09:23 AM
1

Monogamy is more in line with evolution. Great Britain a monogamous country colonised almost whole world while societies with polygamy had little to none development. Polygamy isn't naturally selected in humans animals maybe. You don't live in polygamous society how would you know there isn't any problem of inbreeding. Arab countries are currently best example of polygamous society and they certainly have inbreeding problem. While you may say it won't occur in our country but how can you make su…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 03:26 PM
1

Your whole argument is contradictory. First you say humans don't act in "what will happen if" scenarios and second you are justifying how inbreeding won't occur. Let's take your example, maybe APxBP will bred and result would be inbreds. Don't deny that. There will be all sorts of polygamy involved across the board which would increase possibility of inbreds which would possibly lead to genetic disorders which would lead to extinction. Grand childs would breed with grandparents etc. Which would …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:51 PM
1

Yup, most women are not masochistic in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:37 PM
2

Dude, monogamy would succeed in such a scenario if there are even number of male and females because the next generation in an isolated bunker would be inbreds if they happen to be polygamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:33 PM
3

*Everybody has an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:18 PM
2

You sure does have some quirky taste. I think you maybe the very first woman who gets turn on by ass holes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:17 PM
3

No sane man would want to date a trans man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:14 PM
4

Old man don't drink while typing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 02:03 PM
1

What advice they gave you was meant for women with similar taste so it useful in dating same sort of woman but if you are dating a totally different woman the advice only backfires.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 07:27 PM
1

I think it's better to consider problem in fishing grounds or in bait. Maybe waters in which fisherman are fishing requires a master while fisherman is a novice in fishing or maybe he is using wrong bait altogether or using a common bait which is bland for fish's taste buds.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 07:21 PM
2

That's Marketing Research.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 06:56 PM
2

I envision woman being bitch. Always using phone and doesn't spent time with guy at all. Guy starts doing his thing, Relationship starts to go bad. Woman start seeing another guy and guy goes to TRP with his special AWALT story and woman start bitching on PPD or some other sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 06:29 PM
2

Easier said than done. If you have a broken woman tracker or something like that could you sell me?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 06:17 PM
1

Incels Maybe not , Beggars Certainly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:08 PM
1

I only know girls who started having sex at 13. Most boys start when they are 15-16.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 02:13 PM
2

I find teenage girls being sexually active from age 13 more disturbing than porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:25 AM
2

Offset of feminism. When females become lesser men it's expected out of men to become lesser women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 07:29 PM
6

I am sorry but it's an old toxic concept. Women and men are equal. Ways have changed in modern times. Fighting in a ring is fun but fighting when life is at risk is just madness. For me world ends when I die.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 07:10 PM
1

I certainly object any action of risking your life for anybody. My Relationships will end when I die or when they die so either way my connection with them would cease to exist, it's better to live than to sacrifice it. Also, It shows ridiculousness of male worth really if it's instinctive to sacrifice. In case she divorces you a day after or some time after you risked your life for her, it feels ridiculous to devalue your life's worth in such a manner. You need to understand all possibilities f…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 06:49 PM
2

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 06:25 PM
1

I didn't know Extroversion was the main cause of single motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 05:58 PM
1

Then what are biographies and autobiographies? The existence of them only proves life is a story that isn't written on paper yet. The only difference between life and story is that of narrative. When you are telling about some event or incident that occurred in your life to somebody else it becomes a story.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 05:36 PM
10

CMV : Disney has brain washed women with false expectations from men which has caused an epidemic of princess fever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 05:00 PM
1

series of covert signals you didn't pick up on. Just how primitive women can be?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 07:48 PM
-2

Or Most Women live in Self Denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 11:58 PM
1

What about previous partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 11:45 PM
1

Maybe there are too many independent women who don't need a man that's why they seek women who actually requires their help.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 11:44 PM
1

Every person has some expectations in relationships and often other person can't meet them that's why he/she get dumped. Humans tend to have unrealistic expectations from other humans some tend to live through disappointments and have happy relationships while others can't so they break up. Edit: If you believe every person have sexual needs then it's justified because by giving it a place in basic needs pretty much justifies any frauds commited for fulfilling them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:43 PM
6

Most men would rather be a fraud than die of starvation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:30 PM
2

Quantity doesn't equate to Quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:58 PM
1

With friends is the worst. They set-up traps and invite for a fear test. I did one time when I was 14, never did again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:21 PM
1

By empty places I meant abandoned sites and alleys. I fear abandon sites not alleys
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:10 PM
1

No Possibility can be worth violating a person's privacy. Most parents I have seen use GPS in some way on their kids. The hysteria is real bro. What do you think kids who grew up in an environment where their safety is secured on expense of their privacy be taught. They would be okay on comprising their privacy for security. If you look back a few decades ago, if a man says he trust his gun more than any human would be considered paranoid and would be considered dangerous to society. But now it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:04 PM
3

Then why the hell it isn't quarantined by reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 04:03 PM
5

Sex Addict is an addict. No need to glorify an addict.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:59 PM
0

I also don't believe that it happens often but when some women are claiming that it has happened to them and to their friends as well you are bound to believe especially when victim is 10 - 13. But hysteria is real though. Parents are violating their kids privacy using gps watches etc. While it may be rational choice but it also passes a message it's okay to violate privacy for security purposes to kids who will then support more aggressive government policy in future. Also, you can't possibly m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:48 PM
0

What I meant by that was since she's an early bloomer, by dressing conservatively she would have at least delayed for sometime. You can't possibly know who's a possible pedophile. There isn't any possible solution that can prevent this situation which doesn't threaten constitutional rights. The only thing a person can do is make an effort on their own like dressing something that isn't sexy so to avoid or lessen occurrence of such scenarios. I am not blaming her for her clothing the person shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:12 PM
-1

I was comparing experience of a boy and a girl from same family. My sister never gotten beaten once. I have never seen a single bruise on her. My nose was broken due to my face smashed on pavement. It happened when I was 10 years old. I doubt any woman was grabbed by pussy. If it happened I doubt they got kicked on it. You didn't mention anything about beach. Also, 11 year old shouldn't go alone on beach. If they went with their parents they should remain around them to avoid such scenarios my p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:20 AM
-4

I do know very unpleasant experience like being bullied by cousins from age 5 including my sister, watching a girl getting a easy way because of gender. Being beaten in school for advancing way early than others. I highly doubt you have been beaten so bad that your nose factured or you have gotten a head injury. As for touching and grabbing it happens to boys all the time it's not a particular gender experience but women make a big deal about it like its exclusive to them. If I compare my experi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:59 AM
2

I think you are just overestimating your worth to a man. If he doesn't value you as a partner he will act in such a way that may seem to you as short sighted but from his perspective it's a long sighted behaviour. Women always overestimate their value and utility to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:46 AM
-4

I am guessing it's a neighborhood problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:41 AM
1

I am not some moral priest. If you show me some cases in which open Relationships ended with till death do us apart sort or if anyone introduced some other system that can replace monogamous marriage I will happy to oblige. I highly doubt that the woman in polyamory would want to divide her husband's assets at time of dead with other people whom they had sex with. What would be dynamics for child care in case of divorce etc. When you are insulting me by calling me authoritarian fascists, I do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:08 AM
1

Dude you are reading the conclusion of the marshmallow test but I am just using the test results and making an inference. If you have read about brain then you would know that every person have same amount of willpower but some people are more tempted for some things than others. Willpower controlling also makes the issue more worse and can damage your health. This I have also said that high n-count are good for open Relationships. But these are minority. Most people aren't cucks who would want …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 08:04 AM
2

I am not saying about impulse control, I am saying about temptations. Will power and Temptation are two different things. A person with high n-count will be tempted to have more sex with different people and thus are bad choice for long term relationships. The experiment only shows that some children feel less tempted for all things in life than others while it can also mean that some children are less tempted to marshmallows. If you look at either scenarios, a person with high n-count is a bad …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 07:51 AM
2

I don't know what to say about you. A girl that looks innocent and has high n count is way dangerous than any wild girl. There was a researcher who conducted an experiment on children in which he put a candy in front of them and asked them not to eat the candy for 15 minutes. Then he looked at them after 15 years or so he found out kids who ate candy very early were unsuccessful in life and those who didn't ate candy were very successful in life. The main point of this experiment is temptation. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 07:33 AM
0

I personally have never seen any man doing something extravagant stupid to impress a girl these days. So, yeah it's totally different.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 07:22 PM
2

Are you Alexa?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 06:47 PM
0

Love is same bullshit concept as think from heart is. The thing that doesn't exist can't win anything. It's a preconceived notion without any explanation whatsoever something like faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 06:00 PM
-2

They are two different things entirely. One is gifting while other one is instant self gratification. Doing extravagant stupid gestures means the person is willing to invest and knows delayed gratification while you can't say same for promiscuity. Also, I always thought wives demand same treatment throughout life while not with same enthusiasm but you could still count them as extravagant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 05:55 PM
6

Most of them is grey area. The most optimistic would be stripper & cam girl but only when they have a good reason to do so like funding for education etc. Still prostitutes and porn stars are total black area.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 05:21 PM
6

Women always lie about their stats in dating and Men for obvious reasons avoid some topics to get laid. But later this results in trust issues. Don't believe what women says at PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 05:14 PM
0

Definitely Mommy Issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 06:20 AM
1

Either way it's much better than suffer injustice in silence. It's an action that can be counted as rational one. Likewise not taking any action is also a rational choice. It's not about teaching any body any lesson whatsoever. It's just voicing your disagreement with injustice you have suffered. And punching her will at least make you feel good which is better than nothing. P.S. I think maturity is the only social construct present today. Mental maturity should be capability to make rational de…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 07:47 PM
1

I am not really a social person so I don't know that much. For me, there has to be a purpose for any conversation to happen and there has to be some different perspective involved and criticism if the person disagree on something and he speaks out his mind freely. If there isn't anything new in conversation it just makes it boring as hell. That's what's an engaging conversation is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 07:37 PM
1

If a woman perceive that relationship is going wrong that means she can now capable of seeing the relationship with clarity. After spending so much time with a person, she ought to be capable of judging the possibility of making relationship work and capability of other person to make changes. Just giving some time waiting for miracles to happen doesn't seem like trying to me. Please do advise if it's wrong because I wasn't the initiator of breakup I don't know about it so it's totally a recipie…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 07:29 PM
1

But in case of divorce rape you don't get refund that's why I said permanently lost. So, my dichotomy is correct you have only these two options but with difference in magnitude according to person. Rational means to have a reason for the given action. There isn't any reason involved for it to work but having a reason for doing any action is rational behaviour. What you meant is logical behaviour. They are two different things entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 07:18 PM
1

I totally disagree with your half baked ridiculous theory and you being the living proof of it which makes it ridiculous to say the least. If we follow your theory, women process break ups during the end/decline of the relationship then they shouldn't have any rebound period whatsoever. And you are currently in rebound period you have said yourself in your posts. I have my theory for this. Women tend to be one to break the relationship that's why they do all in their power to reduce burden on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 07:10 PM
1

But what made it possible? Conversation will only be helpful if you yourself is into the conversation and the other person is also really listening and giving you responses while being invested in conversation. I doubt any half hearted conversation will give you validation that you need. Also you need concentration and focus to make a conversation engaging. I am feeling you misunderstood meaning of concentration and focus. You can't have any sense of accomplishment if you make any thing half hea…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:55 PM
1

At least it will save an innocent person bearing the lash. Also, you can't say it's irrational in nature. It's just the legal action attached that makes it irrational. If someone tricked you and stole your money. Would you let him be or kick his fucking ass knowing full well money is permanently gone? What is rational course of action in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:43 PM
1

You said having a conversation with other people helps out and sometimes craft. The only thing in common between both is your involvement. So, If you involve yourself in something preferably something that you like doing and with focus and concentration, it will help you process emotions and gain clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:37 PM
6

Person didn't complete the analogy. If the shoes are broken and injures her feet, she will throw them aside and will probably walk out bare feet. While in some cases destroying the shoes if the injury is deep and had some blood loss in process.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:32 PM
0

Or you could say just doing something and investing your mind into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:22 PM
2

You do realise you can't take any decision in life without trusting the brain. Emotions come and go like a ONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:10 PM
1

It would depend on situation. If I am getting divorce raped a punch in face is deserved.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:04 PM
1

Crafts are the best way to invest your energy in making something constructive while contemplating your emotions in the process. It's best way to process emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 06:00 PM
1

Nah. They wait for a reason for breakup to make guy look bad. Relationships doesn't work without any input waiting for it to work only makes it worse but it makes easier for women to cut off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 05:54 PM
2

Its liposucted maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 08:11 PM
1

That's only for stable and intelligent ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 05:49 PM
4

Add cosmetic surgery in mix and you get a 10/10 supermodel.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 12:57 PM
1

Nah, His success comes from his mother. I do think Jeff Bezos was a good example or even elon musk.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 08:18 AM
2

English translators make a mess out of any work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 07:14 AM
1

I only read about Goleman, my mistake. But still it's a pseudoscience. Just IT industry makes whole theory invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 07:12 AM
-1

Emotional Intelligence is a term coined by a journalist. I doubt it's authenticity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 07:01 AM
1

I am not a psychopath. Stoic maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 06:53 AM
1

My point is it isn't in your living memory. You weren't present when incident occur so hate is unnecessary. It's between the culprit and victims. You can at most be sympathetic towards victim and have some resentment towards the culprit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 06:05 AM
1

It would probably depend on age of child. If child isn't an adult then it's justified otherwise it's not. I believe hate shouldn't be carried down through generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 05:58 AM
1

Are you saying that models are only beautiful people? That's just weird. And aesthetics are contemporary really, art and architecture doesn't change every six months like fashion. If Models and Fashion are beautiful why both change every six months only ugly things need to change, beautiful things are like art and architecture which are admired by people for centuries. I personally think every person should have a functional value in society. There are many beautiful lawyers, doctors or business…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 05:50 AM
1

Green New Deal should include artificial womb also. I totally agree on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 05:25 AM
1

I certainly do have them. I just don't understand why do you hate him when you weren't even born when that happened to your grandmother. If you were present when this happened it would have made some sense. Whatever some people are just way emotional. I never said Justification of any sort is required. If you start to hate someone, any way all rational view for anything related to him doesn't really make sense. Besides IRL I would have totally agreed with anyone who hated Hitler, A dead guy isn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 03:23 AM
1

That's just a myth. Does most women have a major health deterioration after 30s that they starts becoming ugly in some sense. It's Genetics that play role for beautiful people not health. It's just people become possessed with their looks that they start exercising to retain looks for longer time. For you, they are easygoing and pleasant for me they are just boring people who don't have anything interesting to talk about. They can't do any crazy shit also because injuries can ruin their careers.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:59 PM
2

I didn't say death is a good thing while it may be a good thing in some scenarios. I am just saying a person killing someone else should at most bring resentment but not hatred. Hatred is very personal thing, when a person didn't cause any harm to me I don't see any point hating that person. It's a behaviour in which your group identity outweighs your individual identity that can also be called lack of agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:45 PM
1

When did I ever used any antique merit for comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:34 PM
2

For me, your opinion on various things are of mentally ill. If thinking as an individual human being is considered inhuman and mentally ill, I don't know what is considered human. While it may sound rude and insane but did you really care about family though because people who care about family will always form their own family.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:28 PM
1

It's based on your perception of world. I doubt any woman at that time had any other thing in their mind. You can't use today's views on past hundred years.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 10:00 PM
4

What are the concepts that form merit if merit is a construct? my fiancée has a doctorate. A hundred years ago they would think it silly for a woman to have such a degree. This only implies women didn't require merit for mating in old days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 09:54 PM
0

When somebody kills a pregnant woman it is considered double murder regardless of trimester. So yes it is considered a legal entity. In comma, it is only allowed when situation is dire enough but when fetus isn't in dire situation it doesn't make any sense. It's not a different matter when you define a human being as a sentience lump of cells.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 09:23 PM
0

You are using an authoritative position. Does a person in comma not considered as a human being? My Uncle and Aunt who are doctors also considers that clump of cells a human being. You are also a clump of cells, maybe I will hit you in head then you wouldn't be considered a human being and I can kill you legally. P.S. Worms don't have heart. I don't know which garbage college you graduated from. You should consider reading more about animal kingdom especially chordata.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 09:09 PM
2

Simple solution should be to develop artificial womb in which the child to be aborted could be transferred so that both sides could be happy. It's much better than New Green Deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 08:33 PM
8

Don't like murder? Don't murder. I will commit murder. Your logic makes no sense. Laws need to be consistent, if somebody murders a pregnant woman it is considered double murder regardless of trimester. But when women abort a child it isn't considered a murder. I have agency of my house it doesn't mean I have right to murder someone in my home.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 08:24 PM
2

Still it's inherited hate, If somebody killed family members whom you don't personally know I don't think you would feel something about them at least I won't feel anything. It's probably hate from your grandparents and uncles that transferred to your mother and you , empathy truly do wonders sometimes. Being influenced by other people views regardless of their relationship with you only shows lack of agency really. Anyway, it's your business to hate a dead guy but at least don't expect every on…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 07:57 PM
2

Did you really know your grandparents personally? or Is it just inherited? If you really known your grandparents and someone killed them then it makes sense to hate that person or else they are just some old folks that are blood related by you. If some distant cousin whom you didn't meet personally gets killed, would you really hate the killer? Anyway you have right to hate anybody at least till some fucked up person pass a bill for hate crimes. P.S. Only miserable people hate dead people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 07:05 PM
1

Only Jews. I am not Jewish. Why hate a person if he didn't cause any loss for me personally. At most I disagree his methods that he used in genocides and his fuck up aryan race concept. The only resentment I have is because of using swastika for his fucked up party. It's was a cool and meaningful symbol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 06:55 PM
1

I know a person in IRL with whom this sort of thing has happened a few times because his mother would sometimes comes home drunk and starts doing in living room.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 04:26 AM
1

Most times single mother is a fucked up situation especially with young single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 04:08 AM
1

I think your intention was of desperation. Making an human feel comfortable is worst crime. Comfort kills any possibility for change. Also, bottom line isn't something that can be sacrificed for someone. Values can't be changed it will only make person guilt ridden or shameful of self.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:13 PM
2

No beta agrees all the time. Everyone is assertive to some degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 07:21 PM
2

While it may sound cold but you aren't really a conservative. A true conservative woman won't give any leeway like cohabitating. I know what conservative women looks like. They are stuck up bitches.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 06:19 PM
4

So are people who constantly challenge your decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 05:03 PM
1

That's sexist. Man of the house comes under traditional concept of masculinity which also adds. Into the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 04:18 PM
1

Intelligent people won't sacrifice themselves for survival of species. If you have a major problem like cataclysm, the most optimal solution is to find a viable solution earliest and work on it. Finding better and better solutions isn't any better if there isn't any time left for implementation. A major quality for a soldier is never ask questions on orders given. Intelligent people are worst kind of soldiers. There will always be a small but excellent quality of strategists and large excellent …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 04:12 PM
1

What your perception of single mother is way different . I know a guy who gets disgusted by the very idea of sex due to this very reason. Sex isn't as natural as breathing, what makes you so sure that a child that didn't hit puberty understand anything about sex. Would you teach a 10 year old to drive a car? It's also natural as car is a necessity in modern world.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 04:02 PM
0

Males and females process their emotions differently. A teenage boy will get into more fights and will blame others while a girl will play self blame game. That's common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 03:42 PM
1

Having more clever people will only accelerate cataclysm. Having few clever people and a large workforce to follow their orders will help in cataclysm. When people are more smart they are less likely to follow orders and will only make selfish choices which will provide more benefit to them even at the expense of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 03:37 PM
1

Bringing a bunch of strangers in home doesn't mean social life. It's called sexual life. If a boy is less than 10 years old and his mom is bringing different men and having sex it will have some effect on his growth. That's why porn is 18+ only. Mother and Father are two inherently different roles. Child have different perception of his mom and dad. Your rational view doesn't make any sense to a young boy. It's his own perception of sexuality that matters. A boy who didn't hit puberty will only …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 03:27 PM
1

It's like asking are there any side effects of porn on young kids. When you see live porn starring the only woman you trusted I doubt it would result in any good inferences. And I don't know why women always associate any protective behaviour with ownership. There is a sense of belonging and when any rando invades that space any person will have some reaction. No one likes a third wheel in family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 02:52 PM
1

Wrong. There is infertility in non-humans too, and add homosexuality on top of that. Procreation is just a natural process, bacteria do it, earthworm do it. It can be asexual also. But procreation as an important natural process is vital. Errors always occur. You can't survive without insects and plants procreating. The world itself can exist without living beings. That's illogical. You live on earth, It is a planet with ecosystem. You can't exist without other living organisms procreating. Ah, …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 09:34 AM
1

Do you think that the worth of existence is to procreate? I only know every living being procreate. While some humans don't because of some weird reason but almost all other living organisms procreate. If procreation occurs in all living beings then it's safe to assume that there is some purpose for it. If all other creatures won't procreate then you will die so the act of procreation is the best way to contribute to the world. It's a duty to procreate because your life is sustained by procreati…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 04:51 AM
1

A person with strong morals and a good childhood will form a better society. Intellect only understand dissection, it creates identity crisis, moral crisis. Wisdom is what matters essentially. Incest often results in impaired child. It's not because of IQ that incest is prohibited but because of the hellish life of the child that he/she lives in most cases. It's truly unkind to allow incest. Incest is illegal in most countries. But its way different in a case of average person, discouraging him …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 07:55 PM
1

Because you don't know what could happen next in your life. It's a thrill seeking behaviour. While the only two things that makes women create in bed are great blowjobs and genuine wanting to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 07:23 PM
1

But you are saying that society should reward good genetic people. Economy won't pay someone for having good babies unless they are selling them. Genetically good women shouldn't have any utility unless they are really procreating and all pregnant women have some privileges in society so society does care for pregnant women. What we need to understand is that being a living human is most important thing. If a person is having good genes is just better luck than other person and he should be work…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 07:08 PM
1

No, I still look people as individuals. Hard work is good, but "better" people hard working will achieve more. It's not about potential but whether there are people who are willing to achieving their true potential. I would rather have only people who are hard working than better people who can be hard working. How so? If society rewards a good genetic person for something he didn't earn I doubt it will do any good to society. It will actively propagate that good genes are all that matters every…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 06:15 PM
1

Some men are hopeless romantics through and through so not gonna happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 04:57 PM
1

An aspect of love is sacrifice. I don't think women prostituting for relationships is wrong likewise. Women can earn by themselves so welfare states doesn't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 04:49 PM
3

Women will leave a bankrupt man anyways with or without welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 04:29 PM
2

If this occurs we will stop looking a person as an individual. It will prioritize genetic makeup and will demonize hard work. It will increase suicide rates in population. There isn't a guarantee that high quality people won't give birth to trash. It also increase discrimination and encourage slavery. No offense but this sort of idea is absurd and no one in their right mind would encourage awarding someone for something that they didn't earn. ​ Also, saying don't have kids and adopt someone else…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:48 PM
1

Surveys are conducted anonymously for a reason. I seriously doubt any survey in which women are asked questions in which they are capable of virtue signaling. Most women don't even consider having sex or engaging in any sexual activity with other people as adultery. They have a standard of emotional intimacy for adultery which is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 03:20 PM
1

There is a huge difference between them. In career, it is often done to gain leverage hoping to get same compensation in current job but in hypergamy a woman gives up on current partner and is searching with intend to quit not as a backup option.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 02:47 PM
1

People find new jobs for having something real to negotiate with his/her boss to get his/her desired compensation and if negotiations are unsuccessful they quit. I doubt this analogy is appropriate in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 11:36 AM
1

What makes you think that women won't lie in these surveys as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 11:32 AM
1

Or she will get physical but will push all blame on man and start dating the new guy the very next day. Just a matter of convenience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 11:28 AM
3

Does LKF have some sort of fetish for this kind of stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 08:13 PM
2

And what I am saying is buying bunch of self help books doesn't mean much. I read somewhere about how parents screwed up parenting relying on parental books. So, I seriously doubt intelligence of someone buying guidance books regardless of their nature. If I buy books about quantum physics doesn't mean I am working hard on becoming a theoretical physicist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 06:42 PM
3

That just proves my point. They want some ready made solution and not using their brain cells for analysing and working on their relationships. Every person have different genes, different environment different life experience so looking for a ready made solution for their problem is pretty idiotic. Any person reading any self help book is just lazy dumb procrastinating person. Also, if a person doesn't know what he/she wants and needs some stranger who don't know a fuck about him/her and gives …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 05:35 PM
4

It's the spirit of giving up that's at fault really. It's because society demonizes giving up, if people stop demonizing it hardly anyone would blame women for bad relationships. The only thing that most people can make out of these stats is women quits way fast which could also imply women didn't put much effort in relationships in first place. Blame publisher for such statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 05:13 PM
3

But the universal standard for men is a suit. There is little change over course of history which simply implies it's damn good not like women's clothing that becomes ugly every 6 months. A man wearing a nice fitted custom suit will get attention on every corner of world whether it's middle east or Scotland.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 03:26 PM
1

There will always be some conditions attached like what you cannot teach them, what to give them to eat etc. They can do whatever hell they want to because they paid for it. If society pays what it needs to pay then they would expect the labour they want for their use. Dystopia is a step away while utopia is miles away. There are small restrictions today because society pays little for what it needs. It will change with investment from society.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 03:17 PM
1

You would have restrictions on what you can do. It's like hiring a babysitter. I doubt anyone would want to babysit their own child.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 02:46 PM
3

You want to be a parent of a child or a caretaker of nation's child?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 09:00 AM
3

Nope, Feminists are just about why we need men? To protect us from bad men. Its better to eradicate all men and leave some for sperm donating purposes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 09:08 PM
1

Everyone is just making noises. It's your brain that makes meaning of the noises. Just stop making sense of negative sounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:49 PM
1

Its same for rest of the world. Sometimes, this makes me question the moral aspect of rape itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:23 PM
7

That's what traditional roles are ,miss. Being equal means also handling important things equally. That's the problem with modern women they don't want to take responsibility. I always thought more happiness leads to less stress. If someone is required to have less stress to be happy why would they be in any relationship to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 06:57 PM
1

I consider myself a collection of memories. If he's a citizen of UK then it's their responsibility. He didn't choose his family it's just some bad luck. You shouldn't care about what he can become in future. He didn't do anything wrong currently. Human rights or some other organisation could solve his situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 02:42 PM
1

Nonsensical ideas are what they are called. Anyone who believes in existence of good and evil is a fool. Humans only do things that either makes no sense or makes some sense. There was a sudden rise in Superhero movies from 2004. Maybe they are subconsciously thinking like that due to them. Movies do impact worldview to some degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 02:23 PM
1

For intercourse consent is required. But during abortion only woman's opinion is required. That's make all the difference. It's her decision to have a baby or abort it. If you have your reproductive rights you should also take responsibilities for it. If a man or society has any right on abortion of that baby then they are responsible for his/her well being.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 01:52 PM
0

Maybe that's what Hitler thought during his genocidal operations.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 01:28 PM
1

It's just making men and society be responsible for a woman's reproductive system. Either be capable to bear consequences or don't do that action. c. Let those women bear severe consequences so that rest of women choose their mate wisely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 01:24 PM
1

People make nonsensical decisions what can be done about it. Just feel sorry for the kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 01:15 PM
9

Blame Facebook for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 01:00 PM
2

I was raised in a traditional family so you need to know my understanding of marriage doesn't apply in today's world so I am just trying to understand modern dynamics of marriage. I am now 21 years old, I consider myself a growing man. But you stated that marriage is responsible for family and at other instance you said it's kids that helps in family making. I am little confused about this. And you just reply it with feel free to have kids without marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 05:14 AM
1

Are you talking about trans women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 04:47 AM
1

Because it’s pretty dope to have a family who has your back or feels obligated to have your back even when they hate you. And for the marriages that last into 60+ age range. It’s pretty cool not to be old and alone. You could have just said if you don't want to bother with marriage then don't bother with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 04:43 AM
3

But it seems marriage don't have any importance at all. You just need to have kids with your gfs to include in family. Marriage doesn't serve any purpose now. Also, anything kardashians do you believe it is just stupid. They are embodiment of all evils of capitalism. I believe it's just publicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 04:29 AM
4

Because it’s pretty dope to have a family who has your back or feels obligated to have your back even when they hate you. Well that's the problem these days most are not sure that his/her SO won't walk out any moment. I have seen families in which people walk out suddenly. And articles like this doesn't help the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 08:34 PM
2

You would care when there will be a substantial part of population childfree leading to low labour force which will only burn you in long run. MGTOW can also become a serious problem if it increases to 20-25% of population. It's essentially losing trust in opposite sex and society at large. It could threaten democracy which could result in disastrous consequences. A rise of authoritarian regime will be the end result in best case scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 02:44 PM
4

He is just making money using MGTOW. If you gave me enough money I will be willing to become a radical feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 02:05 PM
2

Love don't have any physical , chemical or mental basis. It's a construct originally created by artists to fuck married women in old times.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 01:56 PM
-1

So according to studies, women becomes evil on birth control. If this study is correct then statistics of psychopaths among genders is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 09:33 AM
2

Women becomes SEXUALLY unattractive to men AFTER sex
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:19 PM
1

The man in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 08:20 PM
0

That's for opposite sexes only. A heterosexual male have no need to find heterosexual male attractive for healthy offsprings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 07:09 PM
-1

They are unreasonable. You make it sound like guys are actively looking for healthy guys for mating. It's just healthy makes you look superior that's why people subconsciously seek healthy people.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 06:57 PM
3

First of all, It's a worthless thought experiment. You could never know the way she will treat your old self as he is long gone. Everyone have some preferences for mates and its not something that they choose themselves. You need to be the one they want to have them or move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 06:43 PM
1

Then why the hell there are 50% fat people.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 06:09 PM
3

However, guys seem to have a need for female companionship. To satisfy this need you have to learn to accept women for what they are. That's the moment you realise free will is a sham.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 05:36 PM
1

Hitler isn't the only one immoral. Having a larger number doesn't make an immoral thing moral. If one can improve one self for sex and better chance at women I don't see any reason to not do so for children. Hitler and all others are same. Hitler used crude methods to extinct a race, they are just slowly destroying next generation which will do same to next one. I don't see any difference between them except for methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 05:27 PM
1

It does, if there is a life under your care you are responsible for his/her well being especially when he/she isn't capable of it himself/herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 05:10 PM
12

Just accept that the women you happened to met previously were bitches and you have rage over them. Start treating each woman as an individual not a part of collective. Rage will disappear after having a bunch of happy memories with some women. That's just how male brain works.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 05:08 PM
1

If I am Fat I will go to gym. I will work hard if I am poor. I will avoid all sorts of extreme sports, you have a life that depends upon you it's irresponsible to put your life at risk just for fun. If there is anything that could be done about certain things they aren't considered life choices because you didn't choose it in that case an explanation is more than enough. But for things that you could change an explanation is just an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 05:01 PM
1

If your life choices are hurting your child's well being they can hardly be considered good life choices. They are immoral as they are hurting an innocent's well being.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 04:52 PM
1

I never bullied nor have seen children bullying others from divorced background in my school days and it's fairly common to have single mother these days. Yes, children who are born without arms can't go to normal schools due to various reasons. It's a very rational argument. What I meant was a criminal. He will always be a criminal whether he committed again or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 04:19 PM
1

I highly doubt that. Children don't have political correctness, they could be cruel especially towards peers. Also, you can hardly make enough time for one partner and child these days so nah I don't believe it one bit. Also, sometimes explanation doesn't help the situation. As long as crook fulfill his commitments towards me, he is trustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 04:01 PM
1

Morals are principles which aren't biased towards any species, race, religion, family or self at least for me. How could you possibly seen an actual polyamory family. People put on acts in front of others all the time. Like I said quantitative can't compensate with qualitative we have nuclear families for a reason. The child watches his mother being intimate relations with different men and his father with different women, It may change his perception of intimacy in his day to day life with oppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 02:58 PM
1

You killing and eating a cow, pig or fish is against well being of them. So, moral Philosophy isn't really based on nature because nature doesn't discriminate against any animal. I am currently reading end of faith so it will take time to reach Moral Landscape. If in a house there are more people than father, mother and child it will take attention to them. While, there isn't any evidence because it's not supported by society but it's logical and reasonable to assume a minimum attention to each …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 02:13 PM
2

When you make an natural argument you can't suddenly use philosophy. Nature doesn't care about individual well being otherwise you would only starve to death. Modern Moral Philosophy is shit in which anything could become moral or immoral by bunch of laws made by bunch of old farts. Also, all humans will cheat, lie and use violence in all sorts of Relationships, does it make them immoral? Also, Children born in polyamory is a much greater concern. Attention required for child's upbringing would …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 01:31 PM
1

Killing people is also natural, we should also celebrate murder. Rape is also natural as male biological role is to impregnate women by any means necessary. There isn't anything to celebrate about polyandry. It only increases violence in society. There will be high risk of violence between men and also potential high rates of female homicides. I don't believe that polyandry wasn't practiced in history, but it wasn't passed down in civilizations only says it's a fucked up concept that should be f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 04:56 AM
0

What you are saying is because you grew old you stopped partying. It's the growing old part that made it unable to provide happiness. When you say you would repeat the same if you were young that only implies it's the physical aspect that's restraining you. As such it's because you weren't feeling happy that's why you stopped. There is nothing in life that happens suddenly everything has a cause and effect. Ultimate Meaning of life is to strive for happiness. There isn't any other meaning in lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 01:59 PM
0

It's called herding effect. Followed by overvaluation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 12:45 PM
-2

It's called being rational. I perceive it as there are various factors that influenced you that rendered that particular activity unfulfilling. Also, by saying that Mr. Abrams made you "happier" also implies that there is a person in world that could make you happiest and you would leave Mr. Abrams for him/her. I don't know anything is more disturbing and mentally ill then that. I think you were not really happy being single and you started looking for a way to regain happiness you opened yourse…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 12:35 PM
-3

You quit your party days. If a human is happy doing something, why the hell would he quit it. A serial killer will always murder people and can't quit because he enjoys killing people. Likewise A person who likes partying won't quit partying. Sadness, Guilt, Shame, Pain are indicators for a change. And if you want to do again but you aren't doing it now only implies you don't want to do what you are doing right now. Also, if a person is having sex for fun, fun makes sex meaningful. No one can ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 11:17 AM
1

That just makes her stupid. Stupid isn't shallow it's just stupid. How could any assumption on her part make her good. She is just expecting something in return that makes her shallow as well. It's her personal gratification which she's looking after. I am looking for mine. How can not having same self gratification that of her makes me shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:43 PM
4

I didn't make any outlandish claim. It's common sense wars and competition occurs only when there is a conflict of interest or ambitions. So, its sensible to assume if there is any competition between genders it's because of interests. Men started staying at home for only few years but females started competiting with males for provider role since feminism started. It's a valid argument that gender competition started due to feminism. While I may have made an assumption that every person do thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 07:27 PM
3

Females gave birth to men, females nurtured men. If it is patriarchy that's at fault then also it's women's fault. Also, you have a wrong understanding of natural selection. If patriarchy exist for ages and it exists now then natural selection have selected patriarchy. Also, I don't see patriarchy as at fault anyway. Women were designed for birth and nurture by nature and men for provider. It's when women challenged men's role of provider that genders started at war. So being a feminist, it's hy…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 06:41 PM
1

I am not judging people here you are. I am just asking what makes a woman shallow or deep. Or this concept doesn't apply for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 06:15 PM
5

This is what word feminism means. Most iconic symbol of feminism also says so. Behaviour of most feminists says so. If you have an opinion put a rational argument with evidence if you are capable of it. It's just painfully true otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 05:52 PM
2

Does thinking her love and commitment is priceless and man is fortunate to have her makes a woman deep?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 05:11 PM
2

I imagine Beyonder. I will believe that 80% women are bisexual. Women can't be reasoned with, any question will only get one answer "don't do it" without any logical reasoning involved whatsoever. As a heterosexual male, I won't be interested in men so skipped them. If I imagine thanos, I will only think them as trash to be cleaned.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 04:24 PM
6

If you believe that competition between genders is bad then you aren't a feminist. Feminism has arisen from belief that women are better than men in doing male tasks and they should do them sugarcoated by financial independence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 04:14 PM
8

Animals don't have feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 04:05 PM
1

Are you saying females are dumb?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:41 PM
2

Making False Accusations. Definition of sexual assaults and harassment. Leniency in case of traffic offense. Clubs biased towards females. Absurd awards for females. More Preferred in STEM job hiring. These are just some few privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:36 PM
1

What I meant was anything that can't be quantifiable can't be taught. Creativity isn't quantifiable so it can't be taught. What I meant by proven fact is many researchers have tried to devise methods for teaching creativity but they had no results whatsoever. But there have been results in improving one's creativity qualitatively to some extent. I think the rational view is the most healthy view. While an average person can use hard work to achieve above average results but he can't beat a gifte…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 08:21 PM
1

If you think rationally then its not possible. How could you know that the person didn't have any creativity before and then he developed it through his own efforts. Maybe the person had creativity before this raises the question again how do you measure creativity. But creativity isn't quantifiable so no one can measure it or teach it. Also, If creativity can be taught to a person, it can also be taught to an AI.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 12:51 PM
1

There isn't any sexual activity I would exclude during our time together if I did with previous partners. But If you compare sexual with your normal intimate thing then it isn't fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 04:36 PM
1

In casual encounters, there will also be women who also explore sexuality which they feel embarrassed to do in LTRs which sucks for men in casual sex. You can't possibly quit at night after all the troubles you have been through so it's way bad for men if they aren't into some of that weird shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:56 PM
3

Creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:49 PM
6

All men at top have good hygiene, proper routines and proper mannerisms. In this situation, I would rather quit and open my own business but if I really want that position I would do anything I want to. Also, There isn't any lack of talented people for top positions really I need to use every advantage I have for myself. At least It's way better than actors and models who need to be fucked by Gay men. If I don't do it anybody else would do it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:34 PM
1

What most people will see is only rising male suicide rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 10:22 AM
1

When you don't follow cultural norms you are going against people who follow cultural norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 10:05 AM
1

There isn't any successful example in which a person without creativity had been imbibed with it. So, it's proven fact that creativity can't be taught. Anything to be taught needs to be quantifiable that's common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 09:53 AM
2

They will just say that it's toxic masculinity that causes these suicides. Everyone knows there are way more autistic males.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 09:32 AM
1

The only thing that can be cultivated is divergent thinking. There is no need for citations for creativity because we can't quantify creativity. Quantifiable data is required for any analysis. Every researcher knows creativity can't be taught however divergent thinking can be taught which can affect creativity on some level. So, it can be said that creativity depends on luck you either born with it or not. Creativity isn't a skill that can be taught.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 09:27 AM
2

Autistic children aren't included in OP's virtues.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 09:04 AM
2

That's what Hitler, Mao and every tyrant did. You need to know any change in world always create suffering and often more than what previously existed. Also, showing the path is overrated otherwise quarter life crisis wouldn't occur more frequently. It's better to find your own place in this world in which world and your own goals aren't in conflict with each other without compromising your values.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 09:03 AM
1

Not all men are creative. Creativity can't be cultivated or taught that's a proven fact. All people have fear in them. Any person without fear and guilt can't be a normal person. Also, risk taking is a double edged sword while women like risk takers but only when it's in their acceptable range. While you may criticise a person of not having your self made virtues that modern women need you need to know bravery has no place in modern society. While it will be applaud in entertainment but it will …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 08:53 AM
2

Just home made Sichuan Hot Pot.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 06:40 PM
1

Mentoring in modern society is relationship between senior and junior in which junior comes to him for any problem in his work. If you ask everybody it just disturbs productivity of everybody and you could get poor evaluation. Mentorship is most common in doctors, lawyers etc. Mostly industries that deals with dynamic problems. It also helps in networking which is very important.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 06:09 PM
2

Most commonly, woman who pays more attention on makeup have less productivity. They are the ones that gets fired.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 05:51 PM
3

Billionaire earns about $200 per minute average. There gotta be a woman worth that much at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 06:59 AM
1

That's the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 06:27 PM
2

Does rating people in tiers not considered shameful? How is it any better than your so called Shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 06:02 PM
1

You haven't really engaged in sex work so you don't know the market and making a stupid generalisation. You could do anything with sex worker albeit you have to pay extra tips for some services.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 07:16 PM
1

It's more like toying. A followup after passionate kiss is a must especially after 2-3 dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 07:03 PM
1

Some things are set in stone from start while some aren't and with time more things start to set in stone. You said luck is false loser's concept then what making your own luck is? Creating your own false reality. Also, claiming that nothing is set in stone makes whole loser and winner thing baseless because nothing is determined if they aren't fixed at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 06:11 PM
1

What are true winner concepts?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 05:28 PM
1

You could say that. If you were born with higher IQ that you could have gotten in IVY League with full scholarship I doubt you would have met your wife. Destiny isn't like destiny in fairytales just as love isn't like love in fairytales.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 04:48 PM
2

Luck and destiny are the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 02:52 PM
1

Do you give a shit about cells that die in your body?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 02:33 PM
1

paternal fraud stats are trustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:12 PM
1

Why is world so obsessed with feminity? If we don't require masculinity then why is feminity required.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 03:27 PM
3

Nope, it wasn't your natural inclination. If it was your natural inclination you wouldn't have stopped. It was only your lack of knowledge and wisdom.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:25 PM
1

I just believe an average person has high chance of dating women who knows him. There is a low chance of getting a date by hitting on random strangers for average person. I didn't know this makes me a fatalist. Plus your example only implies there is a person for everyone. You should have specified it as rhetorical example not by imagination. I personally prefer my imagination to be logical. I didn't know that one could become an intellectual by using personal experience as an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:04 PM
3

If 99% women deemed by a man's genes unqualified for mating I highly doubt he would be a healthy person after such encounter and this seriously raises the question about the woman that accepts him. You should also realise that there is a very slim chance of her being great in such scenario. But then again, beggars can't be choosers a man accepted by only one woman will have no reference to evaluate the goodness of her. Seriously, just by giving such soulmate bs to any man only makes you worse th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 08:09 PM
4

I highly doubt that most women on Instagram have a niche. It's pure ignorance if you think having a niche can make you popular, if so most autistic people would have highest popularity. You only need a nice rack and good camera to become popular. Niche will always be niche on Instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 12:28 PM
2

Life imitates art.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 08:57 PM
1

Don't advocate celibacy here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 08:23 PM
0

8 litres of water could kill a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 09:24 AM
1

It would depend on age at they were friends. If they had pre pubescent friendship it will mostly be platonic relationship for whole life. Any friendship between age of 15-20 can hardly maintain its platonic status. But what is essential for prolonged platonic relationship is physical antipathy. Sometimes feelings can be formed in most platonic relationship depending on situation, no human can control his/her feelings so physical antipathy is necessary. Also, its very absurd to think it's for und…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 01:57 PM
1

Now it should be high school age that's prime pair bonding time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/19 12:57 PM
1

Its half of his wealth not 20 bucks a month. In 90% of cases man will be raped by alimony and child support which some women use for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:20 PM
1

But you said that situation isn't applicable for 99.99% of population. I am just stating that there is large population for which that situation is applicable. Just not getting in large enough numbers doesn't mean that they aren't. Stats are significant enough to consider that situation. Assuming the worst case scenario and making preparations for it is always better than to leave everything on some shady hope and fate. There is no bigger picture involved in divorce other than protecting your as…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 10:12 PM
1

Many Monks do live in isolation which also proves that social creatures is kind of generalisation. It just needs a right mindset. If you actively contribute something in society you would hardly be denied any social contact but happiness can only be found within oneself, you don't really own anything except your consciousness. Besides, not banging new chicks every night and committing in serial relationships doesn't make less of social creatures. They really are more for entertainment purposes o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:55 PM
1

Technically any person with high salary like 100k p.a. can have millions in worth with wise investments and controlled consumption especially single person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:19 PM
1

You could say same for girl also. Anybody who finds his/her happiness in someone else will always suffer. It's funny though how people create their own bindings for proper functioning and living their lives like a caged bird.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 09:14 PM
2

Life is a zero sum game. We all have limited amount of time and limited capability. Marriage is faulty BS because the only contractual part is that of divorce. If marriage is treated as a contract from start nobody would suffer from it. P.S. Women don't suffer from anything in 21st century.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 08:48 PM
1

Monks are no exceptions also.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:53 PM
1

Do you believe their civilization is better than ours?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:29 PM
1

Loneliness only affects negatively to those who find their happiness in others. When a man finds his happiness within himself loneliness only helps in increased productivity, creativity and deep thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:25 PM
2

I highly doubt that all men who commit suicide and crimes adhere to traditional notions of masculinity as most of them don't even have a father in their growing years to teach them anything about being a traditional man. Men are less likely to seek mental health care because it's hard for mentally ill man than woman in society. No woman dates any man with mental illness while most young women suffers from some mental illness they don't have any difficulty in most cases. I have never met a succes…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 06:41 PM
2

What I meant was they just used facts like male suicide rate, crime rate etc. and used them without any objective analysis. They used these facts just for validation purpose and used their authority as a professional organisation to validate it. Trans female have 40% suicide rate which could tell that male suicide rate isn't due to toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 10:49 PM
2

IQ is reliable and there are few more well documented and scientifically proven studies. Modern psychologists messed up psychology. While it may sound misogynistic but any field that is female dominated is fucked up like education, psychology, health care, law etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 10:31 PM
3

Dude, you need to first define toxic feminity. If toxic feminity doesn't exist then toxic masculinity also doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 07:40 PM
6

They conducted zero studies and just used the facts without objective perspective to fit their claim that masculinity is toxic. They are a sorry excuse for a science. Maybe the problem we are having is living in a gynocentric society which makes masculinity toxic due to dominance of feminity in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 07:33 PM
1

Do you have Precognition?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 06:34 AM
1

More like obeying genetic programming without consequences. Your genetics or hormones don't force you to have kids it only influences to mate. Now, if a person with high sex drive doesn't have sex or a gay person engages in heterosexual relationships that's overriding.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 05:47 AM
0

Our society is transforming into bee hive sort of structure. A career woman is like a queen bee which only sought most superior man especially high paid one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 07:31 PM
3

Probably a super soldier serum.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 07:15 PM
2

Maybe measure could work for low IQ spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 08:30 PM
0

You are right. Humans have brain. Women tend to be way evil than this. It's way crude for them. There are many worst cases at least their life was not threatened or suffered major setbacks like jail time, financial loss etc. P.S. While Fucked Up women comprises like 10-12%. Many men have atleast one such relationship in their entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 08:25 PM
3

You are perfectly fine. They just view relationships with Disney lens.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 08:13 PM
0

Nah. I don't think so. Only guys that can't get laid really wants to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 07:04 PM
0

Today some men are getting married and those getting married are in their late 40s. In their age, I would personally start planning my retirement not adding more liability. I don't know what to call these people other than idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 05:54 PM
1

You have some delusions about love. Love is just attraction and fascination. There is also no chick that can respect you forever. Best decision is to go your own way with dating girls occasionally. There is so much to learn and experience in life than any girl. No Hope is always better than hope, Hope only cause torment in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 11:49 AM
-3

No sane man marry a slut. You can't change a hoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 11:37 AM
3

When people realise humility is a virtue, narcissism will decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 11:35 PM
3

Basically, women fight dirty and without fighting spirit. But I always wondered if religion and spirituality are bogus why the hell there isn't a female spiritual leader considering their expertise in art of deception.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 11:23 PM
3

Firstly, I don't know why people call unveiling of gender deceptions as sexual revolution. Nothing is changed since centuries except people realising deceptions around them. Secondly, I never met any woman who is sexually candid and isn't vapid. There is hardly anything to talk to these women really I don't know how can they possibly be smart at anything except partying. Lastly, Niceness is really a big problem if you ever listened to a woman who dated nice guys. You could ask your sister or any…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 11:20 PM
1

What about price?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 11:29 AM
-2

Do you really know anything about being nun? It's way different than cat lady. I believe you meant I rather be a cat lady than marry some men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 11:22 AM
-2

Nun means slaving your life to some vows which can't be broken unlike marriage. It means living life of poverty and celibacy. So, You should say goodbye to your farm if you become a nun.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 11:12 AM
1

Late 40s.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/19 07:14 AM
3

You should take less reference to animal kingdom on these topics, we have an advanced brain they don't. You shouldn't ask anyone's advice on these topics, humans can't really empathise with something they aren't suffering or suffered. You shouldn't make sex and women a priority of your life either. Its like a cage which you can't break easily. There is nothing more valuable than freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 08:56 PM
2

Spider?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 08:31 PM
2

Which would mean that there is innate difference between male and female brain and nurture has little to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 11:38 AM
1

Sexually dimorphic nucleus is in brain and self perception is also related to brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 11:30 AM
1

Shouldn't that person fall into transgender category
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 09:45 AM
1

Do you believe in egalitarianism?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 07:51 AM
1

Can you explain to me difference between elite mentality and supremacy according to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 07:33 AM
-1

I don't watch movies and TV shows. Recommend book or game.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 08:42 AM
2

You have Cluster B personality (Narcissistic).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 08:19 AM
2

So you got bigger budget for merch : " Ivanlee Drinks, You should be one of a kind"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 08:16 AM
1

Dude, LTRs are just retarded you get into a habitual comfort zone. Secondly, Love that is shown in shitty Disney movies doesn't exist. Love is just combination of oxytocin, dopamine and serotonin. Romantic love is just fucked up dream that Hollywood sells, historicly there wasn't a romantic love in last centuries. Marriage is also fucked up, if you need to fulfill a shitty dream just choose a woman who is in same income group. But Love and Marriage are dreams, its better that they stay that way.…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 07:19 AM
1

Marriage is investment. Love is self gratification. Premarital sex and adultery have no effect on marriage whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 07:26 PM
1

No one gives a shit about normal man anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 07:12 PM
0

It would be gender discrimination if you put principle as strong person shouldn't hit weak person. So, it would imply that women are inherently weak and men are superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 07:00 PM
1

Then, it would be Gender discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 06:53 PM
1

Ninja Cats in short
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 06:26 PM
8

Research has shown that Gaming helps in development of cognitive skills both in kids and adults. You should update your facts. Game Enthusiasts and Game addicts are two different types .
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 05:56 PM
1

Don't know maybe primal ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 11:47 PM
1

How could human civilization colonize planets without a population.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 11:09 PM
1

I hate psychiatrist. Secondly, if you got hit by LEGO house on face you will change your perception of kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:56 PM
1

Kids are Monsters that do stuff that makes you cringe while woman laughs when bad stuff happens to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:44 PM
2

Not possible at least for a century. If they ever did, humans will be manufactured by machines. It would mean machines rule the society not humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:28 PM
0

If Artificial Womb became a thing, all women who doesn't want to have a kid needs to donate an egg. Men can have bidding or any other process to acquire those eggs to have their own kids without a bitch with a gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:21 PM
1

Support Transgender then, Female PRIVILEGE will be null and void. If any man gets falsely accused, just say you are Trans Woman probably need to dress up like one but who cares its not shameful in 2019.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:13 PM
2

Are you MOST WOMEN?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:05 PM
1

A Woman's PAST IS PAST. Whether recorded or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 10:04 PM
1

Probably post it on YouTube
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 09:55 PM
1

Some may choose both: Vegito
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 09:51 PM
1

You could say " With Kids you realise a woman isn't most evil thing"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 09:48 PM
3

Lesson Learned: Never listen to a woman about manhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 09:38 PM
1

Women's behaviour these days are toxic . When no man will risk their life for bimbos then they will understand what they destroyed .
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 08:40 PM
0

You should change your accountant.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 08:04 PM
2

Perfect woman are higher type of human than perfect man.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 01:32 PM
3

Thoughts are shadows of emotions. If you are feeling negative emotions, your thoughts will be darker and depressing with pessimism. If you are feeling positive, the thoughts you perceive will be optimistic in nature. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:48 PM
1

It's women and feminists who have problem with legalization, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:35 PM
5

Dude, either make peace with it or fight for it. You aren't an entitled woman that you need state to provide every thing you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:29 PM
3

High N count is not responsible for all this . High N - count at best represents dumbness of a woman. They aren't cause of social degradation but consequence of social degradation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:01 PM
3

They are perfect women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 11:36 AM
1

I don't really care if a woman is raped or not .We all live in society in which everyone mind's his/her own business and people only speak out if it threatens them in some way or other. If we talk about convictions for paternal fraud, this never gonna happen ever. Women aren't capable of empathy for crimes that aren't applicable to them. Nowadays, women can destroy a man's life for a rape that he may or may not have committed years ago but no woman has any sympathy for a man who suffered from pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 09:44 AM
1

People who says don't slut shame it's bad. That's pure hypocrisy. You have every right to say whatever you want if a person has freedom to make their own choices. You don't have to respect anybody who you don't want to, no law can force it upon you. Morals are dead. You should do what ever you want . I don't personally care about whether any woman is getting assaulted, raped or they are becoming slut . It doesn't matter to me as it's not affecting me. But what you are doing is pathetic. Women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 08:09 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:44 PM
1

You should read Waiting for Godot.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:18 PM
2

Puzzle Books, Philosophical works, Sci-Fi, classics, Stephen king books . News from McKinsey's Insight, Bloomberg. Red Pill Feminism - I don't associate myself with morons and retards.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 11:50 AM
-1

Any tips for faking Love especially in LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 02:28 AM
0

If ask such questions in social circles, It becomes difficult to date in social circles which creates difficulty in finding dates when needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 01:49 AM
4

It depends on life experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 01:43 AM
0

How do you fake it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 01:29 AM
1

20M Red Pill Deal Breakers Models Psychiatrist Journalist Writers High Empathy Former Sugar daddy types Fat Small(<5.5) Clingy Talkative Low Sex Drive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 12:54 AM
2

You haven't included open marriages 5-7%. You can't include abnormal people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 10:56 PM
2

AWALT is bad concept to begin with. It's literal meaning "All Women Are Like That" is misogynistic. I don't believe in AWALT but I do consider myself red pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 10:50 PM
7

" One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 10:22 PM
1

Could you describe some logical flaws?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 10:07 PM
1

It takes CASH.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 06:12 PM
1

But still they do take chances due to their impulsive behaviour and while I was only considering the worst case scenario, I never said it would occur normally. There are always other methods than doxxing. But I don't know any information to argue about this topic anymore. Can I message you after I know more about this topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 01:02 PM
1

Did they commit crimes ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 11:04 AM
1

rando probably work at large corporations. Most psychopaths live double life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 10:58 AM
1

I don't have anything particular to do these days anyway. I am always open for new ideas especially ones that are opposite to my ideas. I do know all women cheats in one form or other consciously or unconsciously. Cheating in relationship can be physical, emotional or internet cheating. Every person is capable of cheating but mine is male perspective. Relationships that are till death are mostly from 1930-1950s. So, data is insufficient to answer your question. Any support system without surety …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 10:05 PM
1

You don't identify as I am Heterosexual, I am Gay but you identify yourself with Name, Age, Gender. Trans gender has more social cost than LGBIQ. If transgender becomes legal, you have to abolish gender division in sports which will only suppress women in achieving their goal of being sportswoman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:24 PM
1

What will happen when some douche will put age change idea. Fuck any pedophile can claim to be age 16 and rape any minor. But women will be very happy to entertain according to your idea because its something they will enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 09:04 PM
1

I am having bed rest for few days and nothing to do except play games.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 07:34 PM
3

Relationships are just a big dream that world constantly sell you from your birth till death. Anything done for any woman at your expense is worthless and stupid. Every Relationship is destined to fail. Woman always cheats, the question is about when she will cheat. Any Relationship is just a fake support system that is flawed to its core. It's a support system that can only make one need more help. Its a total seller's market. Either you buy it or fuck off. Its better to fuck and move on like o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 07:31 PM
1

I have stuff to do in morning. I have limited time to accomplish more things. I don't think wasting time in shower is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 07:05 PM
1

Nope. Didn't have that much time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 06:54 PM
1

Walls are investments for future generations. Berlin Wall would have been a good tourist attraction secondly to Great Wall of China and best thing about walls is every war inflate the value of wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 06:42 PM
0

Because foundation starts to fall apart starting from 30, initiates with reduction in bone density, calcium decrease etc. Logical Reason - LISTEN TO MAN UP, Do more work etc., It would be more challenging when child comes to picture. Ilogical Reason - I don't want to last station for a rundown wrecked train. Edit: It mostly depends on her mental baggage and my interest in starting a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 06:16 PM
1

That's why according to statistics, women with more sexual partners don't have stable long term relationships. Some partners will give sexual pleasure, some will give both but why would they settle with her, some will provide only things which she's gonna end up with and cheat. Women can't be satisfied ever which also benefits the society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 06:04 PM
2

If women stayed beautiful forever, world would literally burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 05:58 PM
2

Don't like injections on scrotum
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 05:44 PM
1

Scientific development is most important because it's waste to die out of boredom. For me, science helps with boredom.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 04:33 PM
1

No, It sounds waste of time. I only once dated at age 16, it was kind of fun only at one night. It become increasingly boring. But still lasted for 1 year. I did want to try casual sex but it was kind of pointless to just lie or date 2-3 weeks for one night. So, worked freelance just for escorts tried 3 times. Did not help situation. Because of nihilism, I wasted 3 years without doing nothing. Universities didn't accept me. So, now studying for masters and working for survival purposes. I didn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 04:29 PM
2

It depends on mother bonding also. A child with mother by side has better brain development. Science hasn't progressed that much yet to say what occurs accurately. But It will in few decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 03:33 PM
1

Intelligence doesn't come from sperm in most cases. It is X chromosome gene. Only Primal features come.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 03:22 PM
2

You should say no men would marry a women who is not working. Prostitution in countries like Greece isn't because of work problem but because no men wants to marry them. After sometime, they themselves won't accept marriage until no one wants them like post wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 02:45 PM
4

Egalitarianism fucks with women in very subtle way. If all the women takes stupid degrees like in Scandinavian countries, they will end up in brothels like in Greece when their jobs will be automated.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 02:26 PM
1

I never known any being called society, did you by any chance heard of him? If you have, please tell him to come forward and take responsibility for his actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 02:21 PM
2

Society never allows any gender to surpass other. It allows more competent individual to take responsibility. If a female is more competent then its be it. If females are equal to Men, then you will also have to risk your life in every crisis not enjoying safety with children because of these tradcons.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 02:04 PM
3

Do you know every man can get laid now very easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 01:29 PM
1

Society is taking responsibilities that individuals never took while enjoying freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 01:18 PM
1

Its like this, when you get screwed, it only feels better when someone else also get screwed same way. The Old Hags that are suffering from loneliness and what not will only feel better when other younger ones get screwed same way they had.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 01:08 PM
3

Condoms are much better while they may be less safer than male contraceptives but they won't mess with my hormones. And females also have problems with birth control pills that are developed for decades. Its better not to take any unnecessary risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 12:55 PM
2

There is no alpha gene. It depends on upbringing of child. An Alpha Man would be controlling and thus, child will be beta because of father. If there is a beta as father, he will always be testing limits and become alpha because beta can't speak to his wife much less child will listen to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 12:50 PM
2

They aren't wealthy independent woman. They are leftovers. They have high standard for partner but why would any sane high quality man want to be with her. Wealth doesn't grow on trees. High intensity work will also give a toll on her body during pregnancy which may cause complications . After pregnancy, she would either take work that was pending or take care of child. If she isn't available during growth years, any genetic material is worth shit. Growth Years are most important for any baby. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 12:45 PM
2

A doubt on one's existence is shame. Many look for external validation and few don't. Every person's understanding of world and oneself is different. One may feel other person is shameless but this is according to his understanding of self and world.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 12:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter