TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AOCsFeetPics Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by AOCsFeetPics on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I’ll explain it in more simple terms since your skull is clearly filled with boogers and tic tacs. He compared woman having their subway car to apartheid South Africa. I told him that I hope he could have experienced life as a black person in apartheid South Africa, so he can see how much of a stretch his comment was.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:29 AM
-3

Fucking please. I hope you live in a white supremacist society in your next life, so you can understand how ridiculous of a statement you made.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 08:50 AM
-10

Ok. Well in the real world, problems require solutions. The current solution we have works a lot better then “hmm I don’t like it”
/r/MensRights18/12/19 03:42 AM
-4

Maybe because he isn’t blind and the video is out of context?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:40 AM
-9

What is your solution to stop sexual assault on trains and how is it better then providing women a safe space?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:39 AM
1

It’s incredibly unfair to complain that women don’t want to pay alimony, who you are doing the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:24 AM
1

You’re making the wrong connection. Alimony is awarded, to women, less often because they are more likely to have jobs and financial independent and therefore not be granted alimony.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 11:51 PM
2

Ok. Three times now and your ability to miss pretty simple concepts is astounding. Please make a YouTube channel. You’d make millions. You have a very, just straight up false, view of what alimony is, why it exists, and how it gets dished out. You don’t seem to understand what a trend is, and you continue to cut sentences in half, which obviously means they won’t make sense. Mature a bit. Honestly man. It’s kind of impressive how far over your head extremely simple points have gone. I’ve explain…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:02 PM
1

I’m not of the opinion women have it worse in everything, and men have it better in everything. Like I said, take a look at things from the other side, specifically things directed at people like you. Everyone is much more reasonable when you look through an unfiltered lens. One thing I respect about MRAs is they do mostly care about individual rights, of both men and women. Almost all the issues tackled by MRAs are also tackled by feminism. The breakup of the hierarchy of men over women would b…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:30 PM
2

Reading the posts on the feminist sub is probably the worst thing you can do. The content is meant for feminists. Not you. Obviously it doesn’t fit well with you. I’m intentionally not citing any studies, because I’ve been in enough political arguments, and changed my view enough of the time to know that you can’t rely on facts to change someone’s mind, because it won’t, and changing their mind isn’t the goal. The goal is to just make them think about why they believe stuff and why people believ…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:04 PM
2

Ok. For the third time. You. Need. To. Read. Things. Before. Responding. This is not a Sargon of Akkad video. You can’t just out half a sentence and pretend that’s all I said. I’ll explain it again. I think it’ll help you if you stop using the quote system when responding. Alimony is awarded to both men and women. It doesn’t have to be an issue of fairness to men. Ideally, it’ll only be awarded to people who need it. Opposition to this policy is fine, when coming from a right libertarian perspec…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:56 PM
3

Again, you need to read things all the way through before replying. I’ll make the point more clear. They haven’t ended it. It’s still a law, and probably always will be, as there always will be men/women who married at 16, got divorced at 46, and now have nothing. Alimony doesn’t even have to be a man/woman issue, I’m guessing you disagree because you lean right libertarian? They are making it less common, and less necessary. You agree that women being more financially independent is beneficial …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:36 PM
2

That makes sense.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:30 PM
3

I think you should read things all the way through before you reply to them. I told you why and how it’s different now then “back in the day”. I will repeat one point you clearly missed. Female empowerment is ending* alimony, because it’s allowing women to be more financially independent, and therefore not need alimony. *ending /= ended
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:29 PM
2

What did they ascribe it to?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:26 PM
-3

Lmao, I knew saying that quote would get you to think it applied to MRAs. It’s getting late, and we probably aren’t getting anywhere. I do disagree with the notion women are more privileged, evidently. There is a surprising amount of overlap between MRA and feminism. I hope we can work together for things we both agree on, at the very least. Respectfully, look at things from the other side. That how I got here. That’s why I’m subbed in the first place. And I know multiple straight white men like…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:25 PM
2

I’m subscribed to this subreddit because I used to be quite anti feminist. I’m a man. Do you really think in all my years on earth, I’ve never once thought about this stuff? I have. A lot. I listened to the arguments from the feminists side, and it convinced me, enough to change my mind. Not all at once, but it still happened. A lot of the data posted here is misleading, or more often, outdated. Especially true for figureheads in the anti feminist movement outside this sub. It’s also a movement …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:20 PM
2

Do you understand why alimony exists? Im guessing not. Back in the day, women didn’t really get that much education or work experience. They married young, had kids. Their job was cleaning, cooking raising a family. When their family fell apart, and they divorced, they were how on their own. Maybe 30, maybe older, and looking for their first job. Maybe it’s even their first time living alone. So the man has to give financial support to his ex wife. This family structure is hardly true anymore. M…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:12 PM
0

As a white male, in a country with no ethnic majority, I’m hardly worried about how nazis will effect me personally. I won’t try to convince you of anything, you’re clearly destined to be convicted of homicide. But to everyone possibly scrolling by, this person wants nationalistic movements to purge populations of dissidents. They consider these people no longer human, and utterly irredeemable. Read between the lines. This is a violent purge, of not only SJWs but ethnic minorities as well. If th…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:04 PM
2

Like I said in the post, the pay gap of 25% is discredited. The pay gap of 6% is not. Do you honestly think the people researching these things never considered simple facts like men and women making different choices?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:57 PM
2

The whole point of feminism and my being here is that women aren’t the privileged group. If you disagree, there’s honestly nothing we can do for each other. When you’re used to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:54 PM
2

You don’t understand the difference between legal autonomy of your own body, and paying child support? I want you to think about why men can’t opt out of children, yet women can. There are a couple of vital differences between the two sexes, relating to pregnancy mostly. You, like a lot of people seem to be missing the point of feminism and why it’s called “feminism” in the first place. They push for rights for women because they had less rights. Legally, in 2019, that’s no longer true. I’ll rem…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:53 PM
3

Ok good, I am glad that you had an actual point. Let’s assume all of those things are true, and ignore the reasons behind it. Women do better in education even in Iran, where they are obviously less equal. I’m sure I could pick these apart if wanted to, but it doesn’t really matter. You’ve given some good examples of things women do better in then men, but remember that there are a hundred metrics you didn’t include, such as likelihood to be sexually assaulted. Both men and women, whites and bla…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:33 PM
2

Oh so like whites are privileged because they experience things like shorter criminals sentences, Yes? bias in their favor in education Yes? face less violence from police Yes? are less likely to be the victims of violent crimes? Yes? and society cares more when they suffer? Yes? I really hope you’re gonna have a “gotcha” moment next, otherwise this is a weird comment.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:09 PM
-10

The difference is a privileged group vs one less privileged. You could have said the same thing for “we don’t need men’s rights...” and have had a more relevant example. Coming from the position that women hold the more powerful role in society, your analogy to white nationalism makes perfect sense. But I don’t come from the position. So a relevant example is “we don’t need Kurdish nationalism...” (copied from another reply that made the same point)
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:07 PM
3

To repeat my first point, the fact there are people who wish to take away those rights is evidence that social equality hasn’t been achieved. As an example, restriction of abortion or just your sexist uncle who doesn’t like his female mechanic. True social equality will never be achieved, and that is why the push for it should never stop, because to stop means that the existing equality will slowly be eroded back again. It’s a two way battle. I also disagree with your view that the “patriarchy” …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:05 PM
-2

The difference is a privileged group vs one less privileged. You could have said the same thing for “we don’t need men’s rights...” and have had a more relevant example. Coming from the position that women hold the more powerful role in society, your analogy to white nationalism makes perfect sense. But I don’t come from the position. So a relevant example is “we don’t need Kurdish nationalism...”
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:55 PM
1

Social equality isn’t communism, that’s economic equality. By social equality, I simply mean in the eyes of the public, people are equal. If no one is racist, then the races would be socially equal, as an example. The idea that people aren’t entitled to respects and rights only works to benefit the most privileged of society, who has that by default. As a functional society, we can pretend that people are entitled to certain things, such as not being murdered, to benefit those not strong enough …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:51 PM
-19

Again, the fact you think that is the reason feminism is needed, because so many people still don’t get it. Legal equality is important, but so is social equality, as it feeds into what the law is, such as criminalising abortion.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:11 PM
-26

“We don’t need feminism because it causes people to hate women” is probably the best example of why we need feminism. As long as someone wants to take your rights away, you shouldn’t stop fighting for those rights.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 11:32 AM
1

You responded in a way that made me think you were the same person. I don’t pay attention to usernames, it’s my fault. I was directly asking a specific person a question then someone else butted in, sometimes it’s hard to see people beyond “reddit user”. There’s no point continuing this conversation, as we both have nothing to say. Have a good day, remember that you are now manually breathing.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 12:54 PM
1

Cool. That was what I was referring to. I made references to you making the comment in like, the very next reply, so you could have avoided the confusion to begin with. I wasn’t talking about you then, simple as that. My bad for not recognising a different usertag.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 12:02 PM
1

This is the comment I was referring to I don't think I ever heard an AIDS joke
/r/MensRights29/11/19 07:35 AM
0

OK. That's weird then, but thanks for sharing I guess
/r/MensRights29/11/19 05:50 AM
0

I don’t know what you thought you were trying to say then.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:58 PM
0

Have you honestly never seen someone make a joke about AIDS? It’s made at the expense of gay people or black people. I didn’t invent the idea, don’t blame me.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 08:58 PM
-1

I can’t tell if this is an AIDS joke, but otherwise I’m suprised.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 12:00 PM
0

This seems like a joke about people with AIDS losing weight.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:56 AM
-2

using libtard unironically
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:56 AM
0

It’s a joke about AIDS
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:55 AM
1

This seems like an AIDS joke to be honest.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:55 AM
1

Doing it right now
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 03:22 AM
1

Lmao man stop taking this so seriously
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/19 10:24 PM
-2

Proud of their heritage or proud of their race?
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:38 PM
-1

Why?
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:32 PM
5

“It’s related because of an anecdote I made up” Your brain is literally made out of cheese.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:30 PM
1

Straight white christian men are the most oppressed group on earth
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:22 PM
4

The ven diagram between MGTOW and white nationalists is a circle.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:21 PM
8

Shut the fuck you deranged leftist. I built an ENTIRE Minecraft City. And I only pissed my self TWICE
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:17 PM
1

How far would you be willing to go?
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:16 PM
0

Is it great to be a race other then white?
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:16 PM
0

Because your life would be more difficult as a female?
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:12 PM
3

It’s not wise to piss off people who exhibit both a high IQ and organisation talent. Why do white people have a high IQ and a talent of organisation?
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:11 PM
3

When you’re used to privilege, equality feels like oppression”.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 03:08 PM
0

Smokes bongs, has Nazi tats, fucks girls, sounds like she’s living the american dream.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/19 02:37 PM
0

You’re just jealous
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 10:42 PM
1

It’s an iron cross
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:35 AM
1

Real reason is because of the issue of relationships with staffers, the pics getting leaked, the totally not a Nazi tattoo, and the fact thus is all about a member of Congress.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:18 AM
1

What little bitches are downvoting this hero
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:15 AM
1

annnnd no one wants to see her naked... Gonna have to dispute this bud
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:14 AM
0

She’s not a leftist and leftist doesn’t mean “left of centre”
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:14 AM
-1

If you tattoo an iron cross on yourself you’re probably not that PC
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:13 AM
1

Is there any non censored pics?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/19 05:12 AM
1

Yeah, I think the easiest way to explain privilege to people is “able bodied people are privlaged compared to disabled people”. It’s a clear easy to see conclusion with no issues with gender or race politics.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:32 AM
1

They are privileged. Because the comparison here is a disabled, elderly, black, female homeless person. I think you’re missing the whole point of what privilege means.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:31 AM
-2

Too true
/r/MensRights05/09/19 03:35 AM
1

Tucker Carlson.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 03:12 AM
1

You’re advocating for most of the population to have their lives actively ruined. It’s amazing to have that little empathy and get upset over incivility.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:55 AM
0

I’d rather be in a room with Nazis then libertarians. Nothing makes me madder then these wannabe psychopaths.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:44 AM
1

You think you’re immune from problems? If you don’t have empathy for millions of people who will have their livelyhoods stripped away, don’t expect them to show any mercy. You’re a selfish piece of shit.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:43 AM
1

You’re a bootlicker who’s willing to let his family starve because the rich controlling everything is more fair. Libertarians deserve everything that will happen to them.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:25 AM
0

How many rape victims have had their lives ruined by men?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:07 AM
0

How many false rape accusations do you think are casting votes?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 09:49 AM
-4

How many illegals do you think are making false woman accusations?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:50 AM
-4

How many illegals do you think are voting?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:34 AM
1

No automation without compensation.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:08 AM
7

People aren’t valued unless they get a good job or “contribute to society”. Everyone’s treated as temporarily embarrased millionaires.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:08 AM
-4

There’s like 7 cases of it happening. It’s such a non issue that I don’t know why anyone has fallen for it. It is a civil rights violation. We have a right to vote. That right should never be taken away. Unless you’re literally in prison for life plus 40.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:06 AM
1

That doesn’t sound like open borders though.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:05 AM
6

I don’t think Yang supports open borders.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:04 AM
1

Link to post?
/r/MensRights03/09/19 11:04 AM
1

“Oh okay” is obviously a joke, but otherwise seems about right.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 12:38 PM
21

Shit like this is why anarchists version of police doesn't work. Everything in run on emotion.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 08:15 AM
2

women often get more custody for being women, and this is does happen in terms of sole custody too. ur derailing from the actual point of the original post. This is the comment that we’re referring to. This is the context of what it was replied to. I think it’s pretty clear I was specifically referring to cases in which the mother gets sole custody as when the dad walks out, and not in general. This was the last comment in a chain about parents walking out. You argued that it’s only really black…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:17 PM
2

You do realise I’m able to see the comments you posted? I’ll give you one last chance to avoid embarrassing yourself.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:51 PM
2

Buddy, you very well WHAT the fuck that I’m referring to. You’re dishonest at best, have early onset dementia at worst. You can’t fucking lie to me when I can view the entire thread. You had no point. You brought up something completely irrelevant. I’m not here to jerk you off. When you were called out for misunderstanding something, you had a whinge about how it’s not what the original thread was about. You know this. You know I know this. Why are you lying about something so easily verifieable…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:42 PM
1

This happened before the detailing stuff.. I've already given a response. You're memory lasts longer then 5 hours.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:50 PM
1

Remember the time I called you out for not understanding something and you just completely changed gears and pretended it never happened.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:08 AM
1

Now you’re just completely shifting the goal posts in a really bizarre way. Also imagine using the word “ur” on reddit.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:51 AM
1

I know you don’t want me to say it, but’s that not what I mean. The graphic is clearly making it sound like men get custody 16% of the time, compared to 84% of the time. When in reality that isn’t the case, and most custody is split. The actual number of sole custody is much closer then 6:1. A disparaty also doesn’t mean discrimination. Maybe men are more often not deserving of custody which is what causes it? That being said. I appreciate getting to the point. I will get the number to what you …
/r/MensRights27/08/19 03:07 PM
1

I think it’s pretty clear I was specifically referring to cases in which the mother gets sole custody as when the dad walks out, and not in general.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:27 PM
0

I’ve claimed three main things. That most custody disputes result in split custody. That the system used to be much more discriminatory towards men, and that women taking sole custody is a small percentage of custody disputes. This is logically given by the first thing being correct, so it doesn’t need a source. The reason I was unsure is because these statements aren’t exactly disputed by anyone. So I was under the impression I’d link it and you’d make up so,e other bs about “that’s how what yo…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:23 PM
2

Isn’t that what I just said? You’re making this a white/black thing when it doesn’t need to be.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:07 PM
1

I 100% will if you tell me in clear terms what you want me to source. I’ve played this game before.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 01:08 PM
0

I mean I could find one if you want. Am I looking for a source that says “most custody disputes result in duel custody not single” or something else? Don’t want to waste my time,
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:32 PM
1

Sorry to say this to you, but black people exist and are in fact included in statistics.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:31 PM
-5

I'm not saying it isn't biased against men, but it isn't as biased as MRAs like to suggest. Also often the dad just walks out. A disparity doesn't equal discrimination, like with the wage gap.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 11:00 AM
-11

I can’t remember specifically what the numbers are, but at the very least, women taking sole custody happens in a small minority of cases. Many times, the courts aren’t even involved. Women do avoid child support payments more then men. So you have that I guess.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 09:51 AM
-15

The custody one is inaccurate, it’s much more common for custody to be split 50/50 now, and the figure includes outdated cases. It’s biased against men, but it used to be a lot worse.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 09:08 AM
2

You’re welcome
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:09 AM
0

I didn’t realise we were in court
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:56 PM
0

Even then I wouldn’t describe her as young (or as female), and the kids are definitely over 12, I wouldn’t describe them as kids in this context.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 11:49 AM
25

There’s a difference between “you should eat better” and “lol fatty”
/r/MensRights12/08/19 09:00 AM
8

100% of the time when I check Wikipedia’s sources, it’s meaningless garbage or not actual sources, such as links to archives that don’t exist.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 08:24 AM
60

Breaking news: man who spends hundreds of hours on the internet is overweight.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 08:23 AM
1

Not making a statement about her actions, but they're like 30 and 15 respectively. Young female and young children are the wrong words.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:22 AM
1

I read the OP, I am not that person. The comment I replied to was about gun violence. Stop pretending to be ignorant. https://krcgtv.com/news/local/two-dead-two-wounded-in-shooting-suv-crash-in-st-louis https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4-injured-in-shooting-along-7-mile-road-in-detroit https://pgpolice.blogspot.com/2019/08/pgpd-investigating-fatal-shooting-in_6.html https://pilotonline.com/news/local/crime/article_88ca35ba-b5e9-11e9-8336-eb334d1c27e9.html https://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/20…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:47 AM
1

Violence statistic are actually Jewish
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:27 AM
1

This isn't about fucking men as a whole
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:18 AM
6

It’s an order of magnitude compared to a lot of other countries. Even in Syria, 95% of people didn’t get shot. 1% of the country actually took up arms. Just because it isn’t the leading cause of death doesn’t make it not a massive crisis. The US has more then twice the murders that China has, despite having a billion less people.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 10:29 PM
1

There have been 10 mass shootings this month, killing 39 people and injuring 80. But ok it’s just a hoax.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 10:13 PM
1

Males are more likely to fall victim to mental illness Bullshit lmao. Men are just more likely to resort to violence, to get involved in violent crime, and to end their mental illness by jumping off a bridge.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 10:12 PM
158

Wait there are countries outside the US?
/r/MensRights28/07/19 03:10 AM
1

They hold no real territory. They have a lot of terror cells operating, and their leader is probably playing Minecraft as we speak, but they no longer have control of multiple cities and millions of people.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/19 12:45 AM
1

here’s a feminist society I forgot that progressive actually meant Islamist, my bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/19 12:44 AM
1

It’s impressive, but in my opinion the Kurds are fetishised to an unreasonable point.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/19 12:43 AM
2

There’s “small grains of truth” in the messege of every group ever.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 02:42 PM
2

They mean conscription, which females are not apart of.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 02:42 PM
6

“I’m not an incel, I just hate women because they won’t have sex with me”
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 02:41 PM
7

This honestly isn’t as impressive as redditors think. The Kurds aren’t some progressive deity race. Daesh, the SAA, and everyone else had female fighters as well. And the SDF is still fighting ISIS, as cells and attacks are still quite common.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 02:40 PM
1

(Reminder that anti feminist movements blocked women from entering the draft, but don’t tell anyone)
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/19 02:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter