TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Actuallyconsistent Archive

View 0 posts and 340 comments by Actuallyconsistent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

LMao rip this sub. It's fucking trash now.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/19 09:29 PM
1

Exactly as expected. 93% vs 87% but you have the fucking balls to call that "almost all" Seriously, get into the fucking real world I would insult you here for being so goddamn dishonest, but I'd probably get deleted for that. So I won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/19 05:36 PM
1

Okay, but what about donations? I could see volunteers being overwhelmingly women (95% seems high, but it doesn't matter the exact number) as they're more socially oriented than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/19 05:18 PM
1

That almost all who donate to homeless shelters are women? Yes, that is outrageous Youre obviously getting that from somewhere. It's either a source, or your ass
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/19 05:02 PM
1

Ok well currently almost all the people who run and donate to charitable organizations and soup kitchens and food pantries and homeless shelters are women, When people make outrageous claims they normally back it up with sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/19 05:00 PM
1

Every time a female enters a male space it fundamentally changes that space. Every. Time. You don't realize this because you're a solipistic woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/19 04:45 PM
2

I love how I had to scroll down this far to find this very obvious comment. This place is just a circle jerk at this point. He starts doing what RP says instead of reading about it, but it's RPs fault. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 11:29 AM
2

Like I said, women are more likely to do those types of chore. You don't have to be a stereotypical heterosexual male. Obviously. But dont expect to receive the stereotypical heterosexual female. That's not how life or biology works.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 12:33 AM
0

That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. But yeah, women are more content at daily chores. It's biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 12:24 AM
1

This should be a legitimate saying. It can be abused, but sometimes you have to grow some balls and be a fucking man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 12:22 AM
0

Yeah, women are different than men. They get more sympathy while men get more agency. It is a double standard, but you're a man. Be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:46 PM
2

It's a different form of criticism. Ugly girls get pumped and dumped forever, while ugly guys simply can't get laid. Fine, argue what you think is worse, but the detriment is there for both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:40 PM
1

I do agree with you, but that's not how the vast majority of people look at politics. What you're describing wouldnt have the "left" and "right" we think of today. They would both be pro authoritarian and pro war
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 10:45 PM
-1

So essentially no true Scotsman??
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 07:29 PM
3

But it's not true. Many communist dictatorships were pro war and also on the left
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 07:06 PM
6

Production for the sake of production and profit exists to benefit the owner class mainly No, it's how business works. It won't work any other way. I'm going to gatekeep here, but you can't be truly left leaning and believe in interventionist foreign policy either. That's BS. War isn't a right wing policy, nor is it left. I'm on the right and am as anti war as they come.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 03:03 PM
49

To me, fuckboi has like a trashy connotation to it. It either meant you were kinda dumb or just like a party bro. It's not all dudes who get laid a lot. You can sleep around and not be a fuckboi in my opinion. That's why it's used as a bit of an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 04:06 AM
2

Which is also disagreeing with the statement "trans women are women" because if they were women they'd be allowed in womens only spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 03:08 AM
35

Because to quote literally all feminists "feminism will help men too"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:43 PM
1

I think you're right. But you're framing it like women treat men they're not interested in any better than dirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 11:38 AM
5

This place has gotten pathetic. Every redpill concept is represented as some feminist caricature of itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 11:33 AM
11

And it's not like it means "don't approach women when you see them, they'll make the first move instead" that's simply not going to happen. When we say "women will come to you" it means you have to have your own mission and not care about women rejecting or not wanting you. Because you're on your own path. That doesn't mean you can get girls without hitting on them though. Like you (OP) really think that TRP says women will be approaching you left and right???
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 02:35 PM
3

I've had women enthusiastically want to sleep with me before. But acting like it's not a woman "giving it up" really misses the intersexual dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 02:31 PM
1

I think it's sociopathic to consider lying a normal part of social interaction. Ehh I think that's very BP. You really like all the time. Embellishing is lying. And everyone does that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 09:31 PM
1

So reacting negatively or lying is now manipulation and not standard social skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 06:35 PM
4

Honestly I think the Bible understood human nature and molded a world view that made for the best society. If you're reading it like a story of truth you will not find it. But if your looking at it as stories about truth (or human nature), I think you will find its an extremely accurate book. It's a book that knows the redpill truths of the world, but wants to bluepill society so it can be peaceful and grow.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 05:16 PM
7

I don't think theres any fundamental difference between the two. Like what you're calling "social skills" and what you would call "manipulation" is the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 02:04 PM
9

No one gets laid without manipulation. Everyone has their own form of game, whether it's BP or RP or something in between
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 01:27 PM
5

This is the very obvious answer. You would see a lot more rape and pedophilia. Like shitloads of it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 03:27 AM
1

This is very far from being true
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 11:43 AM
1

Because it has the word "national" in it?? It's actually a group run by UC Irvine. . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:52 PM
1

Also, that's not a federal source. . . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:48 PM
1

No, not at all Your point would be proven by looking at the total amount of people on trail for murder, and their individual conviction rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:47 PM
1

7 times more likely to be wrongly convicted of murder and overturned based on their population size not the murder rate. -Vox This is the definition of activist data and research. 7 times more likely to be convicted of murder in this sample This is a straight up lie. . .you shouldn't do that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:42 PM
1

People are convicted of violent crimes at a very similar rate
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:13 PM
1

Stop it. I'm talking about the committed violent crimes not prison population rates, not percentage of black men who commit crimes. You're coming off as ridiculous because you keep talking about different things to fit your agenda. I'll break this down just in case you're being genuine. Take the total number of VIOLENT CRIMES COMMITTED. Of the total number of THOSE CRIMES, how many were committed by black people?? It's at least 3 times greater than their representative population. This is an und…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 04:57 PM
2

victims of violence it's usually committed by a person fo the same race. That's only because the vast majority of my interactions are with people of my own race. Proportionally I am more likely to be a victim of a violent crime to a black man that I met than a white man. It's still wrong to discriminate against them. Men are more violent than women in every country I don't live in every country, I live in the US. So that really doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 01:44 PM
2

I was never, ever saying that 40% of black people commit violent crimes. That's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:25 PM
1

Lol, that's not what I said. Im saying 40% of violent criminals are black
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:21 PM
0

Alright so not getting into the nitty gritty of yearly crime stats, you can at least say that black men are orders of magnitude more likely to commit violent crimes than white men. My point doesn't really change regardless if the number is 40% or 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:11 PM
1

Where TF have all of these female incel/WGTOW types been coming from lately? Is it me or has there been a hugeeee increase in the amount of "men are evil and dangerous" posts
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 10:57 AM
7

The Reddit is filled with misogynistic incels. Im fine with the concept in general, but I would never do it personally, I like women. The Reddit is an awful, awful place though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 10:54 AM
2

It actually lines up pretty well. If you can group people statistically being more dangerous by gender, why can't you group them by race? People who will harm you are dangerous. People who won't harm you aren't. I know that most happen to be men, but most violent criminals happen to be black. That doesn't give me the right to say "black people are the biggest threat to non violent communities" Collectivism is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 10:44 AM
3

Yes I'm sure she supports it now too. No one grows up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 10:38 AM
-1

Ooooffff. Dat cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 10:36 AM
1

They really don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:30 AM
1

What's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:28 AM
1

Like you know, any man picking up a woman. We all have our own thought out form of game, RP just makes it more effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:22 AM
1

So you're saying cops are the more likely to protect their wife than non cops?!?! It seems like we're having two separate conversations lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 01:13 AM
1

I think protective and possessive do not have to be the same thing. They have similar qualities and often run hand in hand, but do not have to. You can protect without being possessive. Think of a father or uncle to a female family member. Cops are not the most likely to protect you. . . this is just false. they are most likely to protect you FROM OTHER MEN, but not from THEMSELVES, like i said This is very odd, I get why you're saying it but the line from protection to domestic violence just. .…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:49 AM
3

because they protect and decrease the danger from other men. That doesn't make a man less dangerous. I get what you're trying to say, and I agree with the sentiment. But less dangerous is simply the wrong way to describe it. The potential to commit violence is always there, whether he chooses to be violent or not has no effect on it's potent to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:25 AM
2

Yeah, I disagree completely with that statement. Cops are not the most likely to protect you. . . Most cops become cops because they have no other life prospects and desire power over other people. That is why cops also beat their wives. For the power. In my experience the people who are most protective of women would never actually harm them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:22 AM
3

This is closely related to male privilege. Where men say "men experience violence before", "yeah, from other men" Well it really doesn't matter who that violence is coming from. Men experience more of it, just the same. You're right, and I'm agreeing with you, I just like to point out this is an argument against male privilege as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:18 AM
3

Men in general have the potential to inflict greater violence on women than vice versa. That makes them more dangerous. By definition. You should have said more dangerous but also more protecting, then fine. But to say they're also less dangerous just completely fails to understand the word "dangerous"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:16 AM
1

It seems like you're trying to draw the connection between those who want to protect, and those who beat women. Is that true? (If not, my premise was off)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:14 AM
5

So you're suggesting that there's an overlap between the men who would volunteer to protect people and those who would beat their wives? And not the much more simple and easy to explain explanation that men who become cops are undereducated, power seeking men who don't actually have good intentions? If that's what you were going for, fine. But honestly I don't think I've ever met a cop who was a "good" all around person.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:08 AM
1

I mean if some woman drugs you and penetrates you against your will, sure. But if you get too drunk and fuck some ugly bitch, that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 07:18 PM
1

Apparently it’s only rape if the women is unattractive. That's true. (Albeit a bit hyperbolic) (Men are the worst) Odd conclusion if you thought about the reasoning. Men would always have sex with an attractive woman. It wouldn't matter if they got blackout and some hot girl fucked them. They'd be like "for real??? That's awesome!" Like c'mon, I know it sounds like an insult to unattractive women but it's more an understanding of male sexuality. This is written from the perspective of a male tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 07:16 PM
1

Context matters. If you're at a house party with people you know, fine. If you're at a college party with 100s of people who you do not know, it's reckless and dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 07:10 PM
2

I mean. . .what percentage of the black population frequents gyms that you do??
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 07:04 PM
3

Yepyep. Most girls who have tinder/bumble download it and get frustrated after some pumps and dumps or dates that go nowhere. They don't realize it's because they're only matching with the top percentage of men who have endless options, and their looksmatch who only has a handful options is infinitely more likely to commit. BP has left out a crucial point that isn't realized by the modern woman (or at least not practically implimented) that men have a higher bar (minimum looks) for commitment th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 07:02 PM
0

victimblamming
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 04:37 PM
1

This shows a complete lack of empathy (most likely because this is related to men) and I highly doubt you're consistent with blaming the dupee for being duped.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:00 PM
5

Uhm. . .the physics of the situation would not work out. Like at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:49 PM
1

Not if you follow the basic frameworks of human rights, and that the only privilege you get is voting. Voting is participating in the political system, therefore you are participating in the use of violence. If you do not have any stake in the matter, you should not be able to use violence in order to take things from the minority. This is the core reason why democracy fails where it is set up without the Constitutional framework of the US. Now that we completely disregard the Constitution, we a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:20 PM
1

Ehh while Im a libertarian so I have some sympathy for you ancaps, I do think you need some sort of body that governs through the Monopoly of violence. I don't think democracy is all that great though
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 02:29 PM
3

males that paid sufficient taxes No, it was all landowners. Women were actually able to vote if they owned land. This is also how it should be. If you are a net negative on the system you have no business voting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 01:58 PM
1

although I disagree with your position that the reason women detest rape is that it removes her sexual choice This is what "sex isn't about rape, it's about power" means. . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 01:54 PM
3

Sympathy is feeling bad for someone from your own perspective. Empathy is looking at a situation and realizing what it's like from their point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/19 03:51 PM
15

Most people struggle with empathy. The girls I've known almost lack of entirely. There's a huge difference between empathy and sympathy (which girls have a ton of) but empathy is truly hard to come by. In males as well. But I do believe women are more sympathetic, and less empathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/19 11:02 AM
1

But you still got 10% right. "Failing" is a completely subjective measure
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 03:55 PM
1

Dread game is just a way to demonstrate through your actions that they crossed a boundary you have. If someone suggested that women don't maintain solid boundaries they'd be crucified for it. like one degree away from emotional abuse It's not by itself. Yes you can emotionally abuse someone, but it has nothing to do with the concept of dread. People are going to emotionally abuse someone through a number of different methods. Teaching dread is not teaching emotional abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 10:00 PM
1

but there's also a lot of misogynistic edgelord crap. I can't deny that there is too much of this in the community. But I would say the cause of this is that RP is mostly made up of men who are resentful because they've been lied to their whole lives about women, and they blame women instead of blaming themselves or society. using emotional manipulation I disagree this is even a thing. Emotional manipulation and game are the same thing, and there's nothing necessarily wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 10:41 AM
3

Is your husband not the best, most important man in your world??
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 08:05 PM
1

So other women who stay at home do not feel a different way than you?? We are all different. The key philosophy of Red Pill is that we are all the same. And that is super flawed. We know all women's personalities are different. But you also have undeniable things in common. . .boobs is the easiest thing that comes to mind
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 08:03 PM
1

doesnt justify you plating women Plated women are always consenting. Plating is not immoral in any way. So if your wife someday disappoints you with her behavior are you going to plate her and fuck some other woman? If she crosses one of my hard boundaries, possibly. That's all the whole "demoting to plate" thing is. Setting good boundaries so you don't end up being taken advantage of. Advocating women not to do this would be the most misogynistic thing ever said.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:36 PM
3

I do realize that some people will do wrong with these ideas. It teaches emotional manipulation Alright, please explain the fundamental difference between emotional manipulation and game. And yes, before you BS me, I know you run game.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:32 PM
6

TRP states that men designed the monogamous marriage culture to lessen conflict among men and to control hypergamy, i.e. transcending biological male impulse. This is undoubtedly true. I don't think it was "men" who did this to "women". This was the elites at the time creating a religion that spoke to the most peaceful and productive way for humans to live. They knew that the only thing to reduce biological urges is to have the fear of God and eternal damnation. None of that means women are infe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:30 PM
1

What about that 'most responsible teenager' bullshit? Rp is exactly men saying they have indeed been a slave to biological impulses. Therefore they have listed a strategy to not fall for those urges again. They also acknowledge that men cant entirely deny them. This is all very vague, I'm not sure what you're getting at. I agree that men (and women) cannot fully resist their biological urges
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:21 PM
2

Haha that's true. I suppose I will have to make the best of it from ages 12-22
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:19 PM
2

What are you talking about? A male's biological imperative is to spread his seed to as many females as possible in order to facilitate reproduction and the greatest chance at species survival This is true for the vast majority of the animal kingdom, and it's no different in humans. (That's why I'm using male and female here, talking about the sex across species) Are you denying biological imperatives in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:18 PM
5

Men dont have to be strong, or stoic we are each a different individual with different emotions and saying one has to act a certain way to he considered a man is toxic as shit. I think strong men are benifical to society, and that women are attracted to strong men. Strong does not have to mean physically strong, and it also has zero negative connotations to it. one has to act a certain way to he considered a man is toxic as shit. I would agree with you. Weak men are still men. It's also a core r…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:14 PM
3

Alright, go for it and I'll point out the spots where you infer things I've never said.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:03 PM
2

So all the women who say that being a SAHM makes them feel uncomfortable because of feminism, you're calling them liars? I just want to get this straight. Women lie about feeling uncomfortable because they disagree with you? An example would be that men can have sex and "plate" whoever they want but a woman doing it means she has low self esteem, mental issues or is just a slut. See, I don't think this way. Women being hypergamous is their own biological imperative just like men "plating" women …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:03 PM
1

Those guys are assholes. But truth making people uncomfortable is no reason to deny that it's truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 06:35 PM
2

It's not just 'feminists' who interpret TRP in that way. Very true. It's feminists and sexists. That's entirely the point. Just like associating racists with the right discourages anti immigration talk. It really appeals to the racists and the non racists are left doggy paddling just denying being racist instead of making an actual point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 06:26 PM
5

I disagree. I think it's an intentional misrepresentation in order to discredit the ideas without having to engage with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 06:04 PM
3

Feminism actively discourages and makes women feel bad for being feminine. I'm not on the right either. I'm an anti violence libertarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 06:01 PM
5

someone strawmans "You're strawmanning!" "No true Scotsman"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:57 PM
-1

TRP all but infantilizes women, states they're slaves to a biological 'hypergamous' impulse Show me where TRP thinks that men are some fucking how not slaves to their biological impulses. Then I'll believe we think women are inferior. Sure, maybe there's no explicit statement regarding inferior and superior. . ., but the implication is certainly present. Hahahaha "ohhh it's not there, but I swear you really do think it! Let me tell you what you think!" I detest modern feminism. It's an attempt t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:56 PM
8

And no it teaches men that they are superior to women and that women will fuck a better alpha Chad given the chance. You are so silly in your extreme language. You're making it out to be something it isnt. Women like to date up. And they will go for the best partner that they can secure. Men also will go for the best partner they can secure. This is just teaching men that women won't love them like their mother. You must be a man for a woman to love you. Strong, stoic, and comforting. Anything e…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:48 PM
1

Only if you take it to mean personality traits. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:37 PM
8

BUT it spreads more toxic masculinity by indirectly saying women are inferior to men. This is 100% not true. You interpret redpill as saying women are inferior to men. You do not have to draw these conclusions. It's simply explaining how women actually work instead of the feminist/modern "women are wonderful" narrative. there's a reason it was on reddit's hitlist Because it disproves the sjw agenda. Actual Nazi subs were allowed much longer than trp because silly things like Nazism aren't actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:22 PM
1

A constitutional republic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 12:32 PM
61

It's pretty clear from your post and your responses in this thread that you have no idea what RP theory actually is. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 10:22 AM
2

evolution psychology based on animals Evo psych is based on humans. . .wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 10:18 AM
1

Possibly. That's not how nature works though. This is true for the vast majority of species
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 10:04 AM
4

Ehh, on here it's okay. Only on mainstream Reddit is Evo psych a revolutionary idea while sociology is somehow widely accepted
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 09:04 PM
1

thats why there are different schools of thought on feminism. radical feminism, liberal feminism, marxist feminism, anarcha feminism And within those groups you would also have people of conflicting ideas. So there would (in theory) be an infinite number of sub categories based on each individual's beliefs? I guess that is true. I find this hard to digest because that would allow for anyone simply to say "not all feminists!" when disproving a mainstream idea. Basically, I need solid goalposts to…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 09:02 PM
1

But what happens when it's scholars disagree?? Can you simply not say "feminism believes X" or "Republicans believe Y" because there may be conflicting views between members of the same group?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 08:39 PM
1

Ahhh, I see. However I would suggest the best strategy of combating this is convincing people that being not "normal" is okay. Not lying to people telling them they're normal. Which is exactly what goes on in the world today. Owning who you are and having confidence is a much better way to handle societal issues rather than blissful ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:44 PM
1

What they care are the female minorities (above and below average) who have a hard time because of social attitudes (average being universalized). Apologies, I don't think I understand what you're saying here
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:32 PM
5

No one is actually answering the why. Well, once again we find our answers in evolutionary psychology. Women are the sexual selectors and men are the variance through which a species evolves. It's why men have a wider bellcurve on literally everything than women. Men are more of an experiment to see which works best, while women are the selectors who pick the best males worth carrying on the species. So men's motive is to fuck everything that moves. And if they're able to do that, he can continu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:28 PM
2

That's actually an interesting point. Is a movement defined by it's actual scholars and their own merits? Or is it defined by how it is represented to the masses? As someone who considers themselves part of "TRP" I would be forced to argue for it's actual merits instead of the mainstream interpretations. Maybe they should - learning to critically examine a text would probably reduce the number of male retards who unquestioningly consume media not marketed to them and get their panties in a twist…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:42 PM
1

Objectively not true. But it's exactly what I mean. You were raised in a framework to praise democracy, even tho our representative republic was created as a hedge against democracy. And also illustrated by every time the US tries to "spread democracy" outside of the west it ends in complete disaster. Democracy is simply tyranny of the majority
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:04 PM
1

To me it seems like there's a gaggle of women on here who loathe redpill ideas and will do anything to disprove them. So they create nonsensical shit like this as some sort of attempt to discredit trp with no ability to imagine a perspective outside of their own
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:57 PM
1

It's like that always sunny episode where Dee is banging a bunch of dudes to give them a bad rating on an internet site. None of the dudes cared about the rating. They just wanted to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:55 PM
7

Modern feminism is the basis on which millennial men are raised to look at women. If that word triggered you, fine. Replace it with "modern take on womens sexuality" or something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:52 PM
1

Narratives are extremely important when forming your point of view. Just look how we've convinced an entire populace that democracy is a good thing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:40 PM
2

Your name is whiteknight with the tag hopeless romantic. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:39 PM
5

I must have missed where feminism praises and encourages dominant men. Like the entire basis of feminist theory is loathing the masculine man while at the same time hating yourself for fucking him the night before
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:38 PM
1

Most men here are on the spectrum. No, we had no fucking clue that women were so two faced. We actually believed they were holier than thou foreign beings that were opressed by men for centuries, therefore all we needed to do is be nice to them and they will love us with their pure hearts of gold. It took trp and things like that to get some men to realize women are people too, always acting in their own personal self interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:06 PM
3

I’m not sure why it’s being done, as anybody who has been through high school knows this is the case. Unfortunately that's not the narrative literally being taught in school. And socially awkward or on the spectrum men (all members of those subs) simply didnt get it. The type of woman who responds to a chadfish is by nature sexually bold and overly concerned with looks, and I don’t think all women are like this. Woah, looks like you fell for it too. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:01 PM
1

I'm going with the evo-psych answer as this is generally what trp is based off of. Men do not like sharing their women. They have a biological drive to make sure their woman is only sleeping with them, as he wants his kids to be his and only his. Women do not like sharing their man because a woman must have a man who is capable and willing to support her and her children in times of need. If a man has multiple women, he would be less likely to choose her and her children if anything bad ever hap…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 04:54 PM
1

Bullshit. You only "agree" because you got caught red handed I didn't actually agree with you, the I agree was saying "you have a point but are missing the actual cause" Some truth still equals wrong. It's either true or it's not. Lmfao. "there is no such thing as nuance" you truly are an entertaining character
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 10:54 AM
0

However, that freedom comes at a societal cost. I think we're better off accepting that higher hypergamy correlates to more incels and see how we can address the problem without taking away women's freedoms. Legalizing sex work is my top vote. I think this topic is actually really interesting, but no one ever honestly talks about it. In my opinion, incels will not feel any better when their only option is to pay for sex. Men need relationships and meaningful sex too. But as you said, the only ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 07:13 PM
2

You seem like a parody
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:58 PM
4

There are large numbers of women being exploited by the pornography industry, this absolute benefits men What?!? How in the world does women being exploited in the porn industry benefit men?? Just repeating "apex fallacy" over and over again is not really an argument Yes, it actually is. I'm arguing that you're applying a concept and saying it benefits "men" as a whole when it actually just benefits a small number of people, some of whom are men. Can you give me something of substance to work wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:50 PM
11

empowering or that sleeping around is etc. Sex positive culture has negatively effected the majority of men but positively effected the top percentage of males. Yet another apex fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:15 PM
9

1st and 2nd wave feminism was necessary and did some good things. 3rd (or 4th w.e) has tuned into a supremacists movement that uses apex fallacies to justify it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:05 PM
10

A lot of feminists will argue this but they don't actually do anything from the male perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:02 PM
1

this is simply very wrong. I've even seen guys in their 20s that eat 1200-1400 regularly and subscribe to that subreddit Ooooffff. That's embarrassing for such a strong statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 05:25 PM
4

Lol so basically "make men be better and more serving for women, make being a women easier and less painful"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 01:43 PM
14

Unfortunately it's the same mechanism that drives men to pursue women
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 01:42 PM
2

I’m curious where you possibly see this happening The entire 4th wave/modern feminist movement
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 01:23 PM
1

I think you should try and see a doctor if possible. If you're losing less than 1 lb a month and if you eat any less you're fainting, then there is something wrong. Perhaps a thyroid issue or something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 12:16 PM
1

If you lost 25 lbs eating 1200, if you continue to eat 1200 you will continue to lose weight. . .just keep up with your diet and try and have a positive attitude
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 12:02 PM
1

Lean literally means lower bodyfat percentage haha. I think you were talking about skinny. If you are, you're right
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 09:02 PM
2

Those formulas usually tend to overestimate lean people. . .it takes average bodyfat%, muscle takes more calories to maintain than fat
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 08:49 PM
2

Not at all. Being not the norm isn't the same as being freaks. You made that connection for some reason
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 08:47 PM
3

Not according to the bmr formula http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/bmr-formula.php
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:42 PM
1

<it couldnt be that 1200 cal diets ARE WHAT IT TAKES, no no, you must be miscounting? You said that, I'm disagree that a 1200 calorie diet is what it takes to maintain the bodyweight of a healthy woman
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:39 PM
1

Then they're usually a midget 90 year old
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:34 PM
1

http://www.bmi-calculator.net/bmr-calculator/bmr-formula.php
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:31 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1454084/ So you actually stopped believing that calories burned being more than calories eaten will make you lose weight because anonymous people on the internet claimed they eat less than that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:23 PM
1

Are you saying I'm wrong? I know it's not really science, it's more of a fact. But facts are discovered through science.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:14 PM
0

I realize that women have more essential bodyfat than men. But I'm disagreeing that women somehow do not use fat when eating less calories than they have burned. what it takes for a woman to maintain No, not at all. That's not true. To maintain, calories in = calories burned. That is 100% true
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:13 PM
1

Taking the average of 5 calculators with my stats (5'3" 120lbs 34 years old) and set to "lightly active" my BMR is 1264 I'd be interested in what you use. I may have been wrong in what I've read in the past, but I've never seen something close to that low.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:08 PM
3

This entire thread is about underestimating what it takes to stay on top of weight and you are only confirming that you don't know and further more you don't want to know. That's a very interesting take considering my take on losing weight is: calories burned > calories ate Yah know, because that's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:06 PM
0

it couldnt be that 1200 cal diets ARE WHAT IT TAKES, no no, you must be miscounting? The science does not back you up on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:04 PM
1

I disagree. I don't think women's bodies change the principles of physics and calorie burning. I'm still eating less than 2000 calories to maintain. A bit over 1900 Yeah, and 6 miles a day at 70 calories per mile would be 420 calories a day added on to the average of 1600 calories for a normal woman puts you around the 1900-2000 mark
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 07:02 PM
0

I like how people resort to violence when they don't like what others are saying. Especially coming from people who do not experience violence, and do not have the capacity themselves to see it through. Women who don't want to be FAT and struggle to keep it down eat 1200 calories a day The vast majority of women do not need to be on sub 1200 Cal diets. Fine, maybe a 4-11' 100 lb 40 year old has to eat 1300 to stay slim as someone pointed out. But I'm not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:45 PM
5

That makes sense honestly. I would think you realize you're not the norm though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:29 PM
10

I disagree. She was directly comparing to to the men who say "women just have to eat well, men have to eat well and build muscle" She, in classic "I'm the real victim" fashion, is saying that those men are wrong, and that it's actually significantly harder for women to eat well than it is for men to eat well. And one example she gave was other people giving her too much food. That's blame. Also absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:19 PM
2

Ahh feminism 101 Read this book that's full of flaws. If you don't read it, you're a bigot. If you do read it and still have disagreements, youre closed minded and stubborn. I don't have to address your logic, I am backed up by this book that cannot be argued. Therefore I am superior to you and my religion cannot be questioned because I believe in the book, and you are too evil to understand. It's a major frustration that I run into with feminists all the time. And just like with religious fanat…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:05 PM
2

It has literally nothing to do with feminism? What youre talking about is feminist theory, and I have principled opposition to it. But to dismiss it without ever reading it purely on the fact it’s not what you believe, that’s the definition of ignorant. I would disagree. I don't believe in God. Dismissing the Bible as a moral compass is exactly what I do, and there is nothing ignorant about it because of my thought out principled position.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 06:03 PM
5

Are you like sub 100 lbs? Or in your 50s? If not you have a fabulously slow metabolism or you're miscounting calories
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 05:58 PM
10

Right, so you eat less to compensate for eating more on other days. That's not 1200 calories a day. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 05:16 PM
4

Ahh feminism 101 Read this book that's full of flaws. If you don't read it, you're a bigot. If you do read it and still have disagreements, youre closed minded and stubborn. I don't have to address your logic, I am backed up by this book that cannot be argued. Therefore I am superior to you and my religion cannot be questioned because I believe in the book, and you are too evil to understand. It's a major frustration that I run into with feminists all the time. And just like with religious fanat…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 04:53 PM
5

Have a read at “invisible women: exposing data bias by Caroline Perez and then tell me theres no such thing as a gender data gap. I guarantee it never talks about the disadvantages men have. Like having to pay more for food. Which you completely ignored. A baseline with the stats of a 6ft and so many pounds man. That is the point. It’s designed around that man. There is no way to measure the calories burned. So they take the average person (Id love to see where you came up with 6' tall man) and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 04:45 PM
9

Who eats 1200 calories a day? That's the natural burning of calories for like an 60 year old 100 lb grandma Regardless, I know dieting is difficult. No one said it isn't. But to act like it's super hard for women because of serving sizes is just about the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 04:37 PM
7

ie treadmills etc are designed as if you’re a 6ft and so many lbs man It's impossible to accurately measure things like calories burned just from the spinning of a treadmill. It's more of a baseline saying "this is burning more calories" "this is burning less" She’s pointing out a gender data gap. It’s hardly blaming anyone, she’s just stating that this is how things are because the world is catered to men in more ways than you even realise. This is exactly what I'm talking about. You're saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 04:31 PM
14

Crazy, revolutionary idea I've got here. . . YOU DONT HAVE TO EAT THE ENTIRE MEAL YOURE PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT FORCE THE FOOD DOWN YOUR THROAT. Seriously, how the fuck do people even get through life if they think this way? Like there is literally zero responsibility and everything is someone else's fault. This is real privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 04:16 PM
104

And then here you see guys just talk like it's a given. "Just don't be fat" and dudes will be falling all over you. "Just don't be fat" and you are automatically 7+/10. Yeah no problem, we're just living in a world where serving sizes cater to a 6 foot overweight dude, and we're supposed to maintain a 1600 calorie diet. This is literally hilarious. You're blaming how much you eat on the goddamn serving sizes. I can't believe the lengths people will go though in order to blame other people and no…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 04:03 PM
1

More? I'm beginning to think you're serious. This improves the troll. 6/10
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 10:34 AM
1

Why are you continuing the bit? Are you actually an insane person?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/19 03:28 AM
1

5/10 troll. Coulda done better.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 08:37 PM
1

It's the best when you can't tell if you're talking to a troll or a retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 06:42 PM
0

You're ignorant of other peoples perspectives. You're applying your life to everyone else, while not being aware that the vast majority of people do not have the same experience as you. You're a walking definition of solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 03:05 PM
1

Well I would agree that most of TRP concepts have been corrupted by the 'manosphere' which is littered with misogyny. On top of that, feminists will often agree and amplify the already corrupted concepts in order to invalidate RP theory. That doesn't mean there isn't some truth in these concepts though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 02:27 PM
2

Lol are you being serious? If you are, I admire your blissful ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 11:14 AM
5

Ehh, most women who complain about doing dishes would die if they ever grabbed a weed whacker
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 10:45 AM
1

Then honestly please tell me what you are talking about. This topic is about whether women who are "beyond the wall" can "afford to be picky.". Yes we can, because we're picking among a different group. There is something to that, but just like everything it gets way overblown when people start talking about it. It's not that women can't be picky, it's that most women can't be as picky as they once we're at 20. Where it's the opposite for men. They can be pickier than they were at 20 at 40. Men …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 10:31 PM
0

"Most importantly it represents the threshold at which most women realize their lessened capacity to sexually compete with the next generation of women in their ‘actualized’ sexual peak (22-24). " This is strictly about sexual attraction levels. Men are the most sexually attracted to women in their 20s, regardless of who they're actually sleeping with or in a relationship with. A vast majority of men like relationships though, so they often seek out people around their own age who they're also e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 10:02 PM
2

Despite the conventional wisdom that men in their 40- 50s are still chasing 23 year olds, practically most of them aren't. They are mostly looking for someone near their age who is fun to be with. The conventional wisdom is that men are most physically attracted to 23 year olds. However, they cannot get with them, and even if they did, they most likely would be at different points of maturity. You're not going against "conventional wisdom" (redpill), you're misinterprerting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 08:49 PM
4

Wtf do you two think the definition of cliche is?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:52 PM
2

That's not how cliches work lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:20 PM
1

That doesn't make it not a cliche lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:20 PM
4

I understand the cliched feminist response. I'm simply rejecting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 07:40 PM
3

You don't need to ask if she's at your place alone. Just like it's on men to make women feel comfortable, it's on women to express their desire to stop somewhere between foreplay and sex. Especially if they're alone in your house. Obviously you stop if she gives you a sign. The only people who struggle with this concept are crazy feminists who project their own inability to handle their feelings or control their actions onto other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 06:57 PM
0

She said she isn't feminist so she believes women should not be equal because women are less worthy Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 11:17 AM
2

AWALT: This is an RP term used to denote the commonality of female human nature Correct and to act as a warning that every woman has the capability to act in this manner if they are not doing so already. This is your selfish opinion. No, I understand them. They're still very stupid concepts. One is used to generalize women as being evil cheating whores and the other one is used for revenge fantasies This is literally you not understanding them. You're moralizing concepts and drawing conclusions …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 11:11 AM
2

I thought no one would believe AF/BB and AWALT but I'm always surprised. And just like you with this topic, you misinterpret those concepts in order to apply them to something that better fits your own world view. Both concepts are undeniably true.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 05:59 PM
7

There are very few redpill men who say women are undesirable after 25. The wall is a naturally occurring phenomenon that happens when a women transisitions from child bearing years into being a grandmother, so she loses some of her sexual appeal to men. This normally happens to women between 30-40, depending on genetics. Again, you're strawmanning something (the wall at age 25) that literally almost no one believes, and you're attempting to virtue signal on how morally objectionable you find it.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 05:32 PM
8

hearing Red Pilled guys saying women are undesirable after 25 Lmfao is every post you make just a ridiculous strawman with no basis in reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 05:07 PM
6

This poster is literally one of the dumbest people here. Nothing she says makes any logical sense from outside her weird feminist world view
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 07:28 PM
2

Then I would point you to look at evolutionary psychology. That's what most of TRP is based on, and what we take as the fundamental differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 07:39 PM
1

May I ask what everyone’s general opinions are about all women? The question is weird. all women?? So you mean that they're physically weaker than men? That they're shorter? Or are you talking about the dreaded awalt that feminists are constantly shrieking about? In that case, you're talking about evo psych and the social differences between men and women. Ex women are passive sexual selectors.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 07:29 PM
1

This entire response just confirms your lack of empathy. Those women you listed had far more problems than life than Elliot did. Except for mental issues Lmfao You're not entitled to sex Obviously. No one ever said that you walking cliche machine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 11:15 AM
1

You said it replaces revenge. But you can take revenge through justice. Something can't replace something else if it can also be that thing. In order to replace you would need a discernable difference. The way you explained it does not hold up if you look at justice in any other form than the American justice system. That's silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 05:44 PM
1

You're wrong. There is no discernable line between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 11:15 AM
1

I would argue that justice in itself is a form of revenge. It may not be the desired revenge by offended party, but it is the agreed upon amount of revenge that society deems appropriate for the situation. As you say, we use the state as a consensus moral authority on how much revenge should be taken in order to make the situation just. With this consensus, it allows (forces) both parties to make peace with the dispensed revenge to avoid the endless killing sprees that used to plague humanity
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 11:02 PM
1

You going to jail is not justice to me No, that is justice under the moral pretence of the death penalty being wrong. You could argue the merits of the death penalty, but under our current legal (and moral) systems that would be revenge and not justice.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 10:51 PM
2

All good. I agreed with your breakdown at first glance, but after thinking about it I don't think it holds water as a proper distinction between the two. I wasn't trying to attack you but disagreeing, especially on the internet, can often feel like it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:34 PM
1

I don't think justice is something that changes from person to person. Justice is an objective moral response to a wrongdoing. Going to jail for a crime is justice
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:31 PM
1

I'm not sure what the legal philosophy is behind jailing guilty parties, Deterrents and a sense of justice. . . If I'm not mistaken, in criminal charges the public is considered the wronged party . . .thats kind of silly. The state is the one who presses charges on behalf of the victim, theyre not the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:28 PM
3

The fundamental difference between justice and revenge is 'does the punishment fit the crime'. Revenge can come in the form of justice, and justice can come through revenge. They are not two separate concepts. It's kind of like the square and rectangle. Justice always has an aspect of revenge to it. But revenge sometimes goes beyond justice, in which it would only be revenge, and not justice. Or, revenge could even come short of justice Actually I never really thought about this, but in typing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:26 PM
2

The goal of justice is to compensate the wronged party. Explain to me how this makes any sense in a crime where there is no lawsuit and the guilty party is sent to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:20 PM
2

Also remember trp is not a monolith, and it's often corrupted by crude language and deliberately taken out of context to make it seem more sexist than it actually is. Sure, you have the guys that think women are beneath them gathering in the same spot as traditional TRPers. Feminists, who are at odds with trp (at least modern feminists) will attack these people and try to attribute their words to the entire RP philosophy so they do not actually have to debate or argue against TRP tenants. It's q…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 06:53 PM
1

Yes, and this emphatically demonstrates my point. People feel sorry for downtrodden women. Homeless, single motherhood, sex workers, etc. But people (I would argue women moreso than men) lack empathy for downtrodden men such as Elliot Rodgers. I do feel sorry for him, specifically. And those who worship him (altho I do think the amount of those men are greatly exaggerated). It's called empathy. There is a strong difference between empathy and sympathy, and you clearly do not have empathy for men…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 04:03 PM
1

Why are you talking about someone shooting up a school like it's a common example?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 02:31 PM
1

Any proof that they secretly do it? They don't have to. Ignoring low value men is how women operate. And it's very telling that you're asking for proof that women talk negatively about features they do not like in men 🤡🌎
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 02:00 PM
1

They have their reasons, albeit I think they do not reach proper conclusions. You shouldn't be a stepfather without kids of your own. That will become a negative factor in your relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 01:58 PM
2

Did you think I said otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:52 PM
3

You're the male version of a blue haired feminist. It's pathetic. Funny how she says she likes ambition but not the kind of ambition to become the best yo-yo trick guy in the world They care about status. If a yo yo trick guy was so good hes on stage preforming and people want to go see him, they would love that. But you want to be a fucking mediocre shit who plays with yo yo's and want women to love you for it. That's not gonna happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:20 PM
1

They are only interested in the results, and will work backwards from there to ascribe motive. It's not how life works. You're proving this point that I made to finish my last post. Like Jesus Christ how do you lack that self awareness?? I swear you people are just like feminists. Commitment and security are exactly that. Commitment and security. Yes, money happens to be included in commitment and security.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:01 PM
3

Im a single dude, but I imagine that it changes from a hierarchical relationship between the women to a hierarchical relationship between the mothers in regards to their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:40 PM
2

Please, TALK ABOUT ALL OR MOST POINTS. I dont want this to be about one point I made here. No, as you've only made one point. Your point is that women don't openly criticize and make fun of men in public to their face. That is true. But the reason isn't because they're accepting of all men. This connection you're trying to make is laughable. If you honestly believe that, you're being manipulated. If you do not believe that (more likely the case) you're just trying to virtue signal. And before yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:34 PM
10

E.g. tell men acting feminine to stop being faggots so they get pussy. This is not criticism, this is help. This is something that is completely lost on women because they simply do not understand the entire concept of male relationships. It's the basis of feminist theory, and a highlight of female solipism. Men don't criticize other men because they don't like it. They criticize other men because society doesn't like it, and they don't want their friends to participate in something that is low …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:30 PM
6

All of your points are laughably dishonest virtue signalling. It's actually pretty funny to see the cognitive dissonance between your thoughts and reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:24 PM
1

I said nothing about money. I said commitment and security. Mgtow types are extremely similar to feminists as they have zero consideration of the other persons perspective. They are only interested in the results, and will work backwards from there to ascribe motive. It's not how life works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:15 PM
1

Women don’t need help in getting laid or dates. Women need help in securing commitment, not sex. It's a totally different game, looking for the best mate that will accept you and not just pump and dump you
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 04:03 PM
1

Ahhh okay, I misunderstood. I thought you were acting like women have the perfect counter and youre helpless to respond. But this makes more sense lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 07:27 PM
1

"I know what you're talking about and what you are getting at but I'm going to play stupid because you didn't directly say it". Then you make her feel stupid, and then change the subject. You literally described a shit test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 07:22 PM
3

Jfc this is the right answer. One of the reasons trp (and ppd) is so fucked is because no one actually understands the concepts. It's not "alpha gets you laid, beta gets relationships" or "alpha is a jerk and beta is a nice guy" as I see all over this thread. Alpha is the act of not looking for others for approval, and having a firm command over your own actions. Alpha doesn't necessarily get you laid. Beta is approval seeking actions with little to no self confidence behind it. Beta does not ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 07:20 PM
8

C'mon man, I'm okay with discussing the morals of what to do when you catch someone cheating, but there's no way violence should be legal
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 07:09 PM
1

Ohhh. . .well okay then
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 04:03 PM
1

Mostly racism and race realist shit
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 04:00 PM
1

You said right. Far right normally implies alt right or neo Nazis
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, sorry I said he. I guess I was influenced by the person calling you far right and assumed you were a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 02:57 PM
2

There is no irony in my response. The irony was not intentional. Just like the 'reward' of sex 🤣🤣 this just came full circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 11:31 AM
2

Nothing he said is far right. He said completely reasonable things that are typical of a modern conservative/libertarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 11:29 AM
2

It’s not my responsibility to validate your beliefs about my actions. That's exactly what you just did. The irony literally made me smile as I read your response. It's too perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 11:25 AM
2

It's a reward from the perspective of the man. I know it's impossible for you to look at life that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 11:20 AM
1

Wtf? You like her so you think TRP move is to pump and dump or leave?? Holy shit, you're a fucking pussy dude
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 10:51 AM
1

This person is not an honest actor. What they're saying doesnt make sense, and it's more of a 'thats what you get' kinda thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 10:50 AM
4

men like you not wanting to have to compete with women. You can’t claim meritocracy if you’re excluding people from the race. I dont want to exclude women. I also don't want to be disadvantaged or treated differently because of my sex. I'm sure you can understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 10:06 AM
3

It always is applied incorrectly. That's the problem. I agree it's applied incorrectly a lot, but not always there are in fact biological differences between how men and women act The only women who think like this are SJWs I emphatically disagree. I'd say a majority of women think this way. I dont think it's wrong either, and I don't put blame on them. Who doesn't want the best of both worlds? I would obviously want that if I was in that situation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 02:37 PM
9

this place believes all women are hardcore feminists. That is not a fair representation of my post. AWALT is a stupid concept. Only if applied incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 01:48 PM
20

Women want to have the same agency as men without the very real competitive environment men have to go through in order to succeed in life. They want to compete with men, but still be treated as if they're special. They do not want to fail as men do. They still want the natural privileges that come with being a woman, but also want to compete in all of the exact same arena's as men There is no 'proof' of this, as there is a classic feminist trope response to every example, and that feminism/wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 01:27 PM
10

“Blah blah sob story involving some trashy whore who was a red flag parade AWALT.” Yeah, some people misuse the term in order to absolve themselves of blame. That doesn't invalidate the concept though. What you're doing is the definition of a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 01:12 PM
8

I bet they do sound confusing if you don't understand them. But that not a reason to stop using the terms. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/19 01:09 PM
1

But if you're also paying your escort for maid and childcare services you seem like more of an overall employer than a client who has to follow the raw dog rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 11:50 PM
0

We just don’t think we’re obligated to provide it on demand. Obviously not. . .one of the aspects of the female condition is having to discriminate on who they allow to have sex with them. I'm not sure what your point is here
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 10:02 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is here. I don't believe women understand the male sex drive. You attach self worth and validation to your ability to get sex This is a fundamental condition of being male, it's not just me. Sure, you could argue that you don't get your entire self worth and validation out of sex, but literally all men do this to some extent. It's really proving to me that you simply do not grasp the male condition
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 09:35 PM
0

Are you a woman? If you are, you really can't understand a man's desire/need for sex
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 07:10 PM
2

This is failing to understand the point. It's not a game to aquire the biggest advantage
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:17 PM
6

It's literally a core tenant of TRP. . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:15 PM
4

It makes them more attractive. But it won't ever make them attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 03:49 AM
3

Read: I do not attach meaning to sex. LTR people like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 08:36 PM
2

Haha thanks, tbh I thought you were but I get it. Spelling is hard, more so while changing the tense of a word that I only see written.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 05:28 PM
2

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:57 PM
1

So you knew what I mean that decided to be a cunt about it because I spelt it wrong? Alright, that works. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:54 PM
2

Essentially interpreting the world from your own point of view and relating topics and issues to your own perspective and how it effects yourself, not from the perspective of the people involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:47 PM
3

most men who aren’t having sex will not join gangs and commit crimes lol I agree. That's why the fringe will be the ones who shoot up schools and commit to ISIS. But, there is a much larger majority that would do much tamer actions that are extremely counterproductive to modern discourse, and promote violence. They're the most likely ones to join antifa. To join the proudboys. To join the alt right. Men without purpose or prospects will look to something greater than themselves in order to find …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:45 PM
2

school shooter is a barely extant phenomenon. actual crime is at an unbeleivably low ebb in the west I completely agree. But school shooters are an example of one of the very rare crimes that can be attributed to having no economic motives that still happens in the west. If you look into what makes a school shooters, I believe you can find out what makes an individual violent (outside of monetary reasons). They have things in common, they're all low SMV beta males with bad social skills and low …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:40 PM
6

Porn and vidya will keep crime down as much as they're keeping sex down I disagree. School shooter have access to those but they still shoot up schools.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:17 PM
4

So why are men just not en masse joining ISIS You're in such denial about a fact that disagrees with your world view that you actually typed out this sentence and thought it was a serious legitimate argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:16 PM
22

simply a projection of male mindsets onto women. This is meta af. This isn't a projection as men don't feel this way. They are looking at typical actions of females and explaining why it happens. You're simply saying it's a projection because you're projecting your own view of yourself onto all women. (Meta af)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 08:25 PM
2

Have you experienced any tension/resentment?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 01:04 PM
1

now that men have opted out, This isn't a thing and never will be. That's what this whole thread is missing. Men aren't opting out of LTRs, they're opting out of marriage. Unless I have kids, I'm not getting married. But it's not like I all of a sudden hate companionship and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 11:34 AM
2

It depends on what you mean by "pro X" Do you mean in the intersexual relationship sense? Then youre right. But if you're talking about basic human rights and the rule of law, then you're completely off base.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 05:37 PM
1

Exactly!! This autist just needs to take a damn shower.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 06:06 PM
3

Is this an emotional rationalization that some of us would recognize as starting with an 's' sound and rhyming with 'rope'. Not me of course, I would never say that, not here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 06:04 PM
1

Yes, and they won't ever be. They can reject the people the don't wish to be with. Nothing like hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 05:36 PM
1

This is retarded. Women want to be caught. There is no prey that wants to be caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 05:10 PM
1

My point was this used to be a normal, understood method of intersexual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 04:42 PM
1

For sure. There's a reason why Christianity has enforced monogamy. It literally makes men less violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 04:28 PM
1

What about men checking out from dating? Men like sex, and a majority need it. This won't happen
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 03:22 PM
12

This used to be called 'dating'. But I completely agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 11:24 AM
0

But not to you? Youve had many unattractive female and male friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 06:03 PM
0

my male friends have had access to probably 100x the amount of girls they otherwise. so many hook-ups Meaning they're sexually attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 05:43 PM
1

Sure, sure, human females are monogamous by nature with a reproductive system that is deliberately designed to obscure the identity of the biological paternal parent and provide plausible deniability for it... You're 100% right. This is direct evolutionary evidence of the AF/BB strategy of hypergamy. Op is just talking about optimization, which is obviously a strategy for both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 01:43 PM
2

He missed the dualistic mating strategy that's required for hypergamy. You're right, the concept he explains is the exact same for men. I really don't like the arrogance of "anyone who says otherwise is wrong, I was there first" when he clearly is missing a key concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 01:40 PM
1

Yes, I agree. Good genes and good provisioning is the goal of hypergamy, but those are two separate goals. Hypergamy is the optimization of those two entirely separate goals to achieve the best a woman can get, and it doesn't have to be with the same man. You cannot explain hypergamy without those two separate goals, otherwise it's the same mating strategy as men. Alpha bucks is the goal of hypergamy I disagree. The goal of hypergamy is good genes (alpha fucks) and good provisioning (bucks). The…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 01:38 PM
5

Yeah, he's acting like men don't optimize and that monogamy isn't a thing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 01:26 PM
1

So what makes it specific to females?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 01:20 PM
1

Anyone in this thread who says that it means anything else to the red pill is simply incorrect and wrong. I disagree. You forgot AF/BB. It's this dualistic mating strategy that makes it hypergamy. Otherwise it's just optimizing and men do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 11:17 AM
1

In my opinion, the only consistent way to judge an ideology is to separate the two. Judge the normal ideology as a separate ideology from the radical one
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 07:33 PM
1

yea I've had girls talk about sex with thier current bf. . .and I always feel like in that scenario they see me as the "beta" to vent thier problems/ emotions too because they dont take me seriously I don't want to mislead you, so I wanted to mention this does happen with girls in a relationship. But only if you were clearly in the friendzone. And the talk about sex would be very short. If she goes on and on about sex while in a relationship it means she is sexually attracted to you, but it does…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 07:22 PM
2

Depends on the context. I would agree with you if OPs example was not something that was lumped into the "no means maybe" category. What the woman said in OPs story is not childish. But I would agree that "no means maybe" is childish. But then again putting a woman in the position where she has to say "no" is also childish.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:56 PM
1

Although some red pillers very strenuously will argue regarding what is or isn't the "correct" red pill. Agreed. But this must happen when talking about a philosophy. Non radical religious people would argue very strenuously when someone suggests their faith dictates they murder innocent people, with obvious reason. And they're 100% correct in doing so. but I am also not going to just say all the varying interpretations shouldn't count for whatever reason. Honestly I think that's the only way to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:53 PM
4

I completely disagree. All women like to have fun. I'm only 26 so maybe I'm wrong, but I've flirted with women in their 50s and it's the exact same thing as flirting with women in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:46 PM
1

I see people throwing around being autistic on men/ women debates often and it definitely makes me feel kinda shitty. I honestly think it's a bit of a joke. Most men don't "get it" naturally. They go through various experiences and learn from them. For example, you said you were hanging out with a girl, alone. Something I've learned long ago is that women who hang out with you recreationally 1 on 1 (especially smoking blunts together) means that they want you to make a move. Also, saying things …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:45 PM
1

"true" red pill theory I guess this leads to a discussion of what TRP actually is. I always looked at it as a set of principles and facts that are true. (Ex. AF/BB, hypergamy, the wall, evo psych, intersexual dynamic being complimentary) But the community on Reddit is a bunch of men interpreting those facts and attempting to discuss them as an avenue to improve their sexual relationships. This is where the misogyny comes from IMO, not the facts themselves. I view them as two separate things, one…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:10 PM
2

Heyy I know what you mean. I'm a RP libertarian so I'm obviously at least on the spectrum lol. But it's all about the vibes. Its weird at first, but like I now notice when body language and tone of voice don't match up to the exact words that they're saying. It kinda all makes sense now, because that's exactly what flirting is (well, at least how I do it). You talk with your eyes and your body language, not the exact content of the words spoken.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:57 PM
2

A lot of it is laughably false I disagree. Most of the laughably false things are interpretations and projections of RP theory. “Lol” isn’t an argument. We both know I know this. I was laughing at 28 being post wall. That's absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:49 PM
9

It's a game dude. And women love to play it. It's also pretty fun if you can play back. It's not meant for autists, and one of the side effects of the game is filtering them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:39 PM
1

why did you believe all of it? Because it's true. That’s sad, It doesn't have to be I too was “post-wall” I guess, being idk I think 28ish Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:36 PM
15

Lmfao this is hilarious when you contrast it to the unrealistic moralizing projection in the rest of this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:24 PM
3

That has absolutely nothing to do with what OP said. This attitude is the epitome of what TRP was arguing against.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:21 PM
1

TRP doesn't have, you. Far from it. We just understand you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 11:26 AM
1

Man, inequality isn't a problem. People having nothing is a problem. There is more inequality in whatever neighborhood Bill Gates lives in than any poor inner city neighborhood. The violence is in the place where people are poor (have no wife), not where there is inequality (one guy having 6 wives and Bill Gates having 47)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 08:22 PM
1

Why are you being silly?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 03:58 PM
1

I know I'm right, but maybe they're different than you. Have a good one
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 09:40 PM
1

Yes, it does. He's not my dad either. They are genuinely sexually attracted to him. He might not be a 10 to them, but he's still an 8+ which is genuine sexual attraction. They call your mom hot because it's fun. But sometimes older women can be hot in the same way younger ones are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 09:26 PM
1

Reading this thread, you're right. The guys you're arguing with are silly
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:54 PM
2

Alpha doesn't mean you're not insecure. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:50 PM
2

Women like to deny reality to make themselves feel better even if they know it's not true. You throwing it in her face made her upset because she shouldn't have to confront that reality
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:50 PM
1

These are the people they'd date, not find attractive. She's literally lying to you to push an agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:47 PM
1

I've had many of my 20s friends call a family friend hot. He's in his 50s. Yeah, none of them are going to date him, but they literally all think he's hot. What you're saying is not true, and I don't think you should participate in the whitewashing of an issue to prove your moralist view as a correct one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:46 PM
2

I have never dated a conservative man and just overall shittier partners. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 07:52 PM
0

Nahh you just deny facts in order to mold reality to fit your ideal perception
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 07:44 PM
1

"your" problems. You referred to all black people as "us" earlier, so I did assume you personally identify with the black community and their problems. -I’m betting if we compared resumes I know which one of us would have more “problems” to complain about. I'm not sure where you're going with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 02:44 AM
1

police because they’re 70% of the population. Black people are pulled over more often than white people relative to population. But once pulled over, white people have a higher probability of getting shot. So if a black vigilante shot a white kid in your neighborhood Travon was on top of Zimmerman beating his head into the pavement. He was shot out of self defense. They were doing what everyone else was. Drinking coffee They didn't order anything, they weren't drinking coffee. I'm sorry, but you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 01:06 AM
4

No, but it's the first kids who were fully raised in the sex positive feminist culture we have today.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:19 PM
1

This is covered enough in the news that feigning ignorance is beyond a cop out. Jesus there is so much research out there on disparities in stops, areatea and murders and case after case of black peoole having the cops called on us for walking their neighborhoods or sitting in a Starbucks. Ooooh fayk nooz! right? White people are more likely to be murdered by police when stopped. Yes, where the men were in Starbucks and asked to leave but wouldnt? Or that Travon Martin was peaking inside of hous…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 04:48 PM
1

Yeah, girls do not like guys who please them in bed, C'mon, stop being dishonest. You know that's not what he meant
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 02:02 PM
1

Men are more likely to out their career first. And for the women who graduate from Harvard, if they choose to start a family it will greatly impact that statistic Yes Source? I haven't heard of that one What industries are unionized and which aren’t has nothing to do with biology. Try again They do actually. Skilled labor unionizes more often than unskilled labor. Men are much more likely to be physically able to do skilled labor without an education. This is exactly what I meant from not being …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:59 PM
1

Eg male Harvard law grads are more likely to become partner quicker than female Harvard law grads. Men and women are different. Eg a middle class black man driving a nice car is far more likely to be pulled over by police than a middle class white man. In the same neighborhood? Eg an uneducated woman is more likely to be doing a very low wage job than an educated man who can take advantage of unionized manual labor jobs. That's biology. . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 01:30 PM
1

Are standards lower or aren’t they? Pick a side. You're the one who put the standards in my mouth. Or wait, are you conflating the two issues? Interesting. What does being a rich legacy/child of a big donor (nearly all of whom are white) get you? I already agreed class is the only privilege that actually makes a difference
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:19 PM
1

Harvard admissions. Being black gives you like +230 on your SAT scores. Every single one has major problem How convenient It's intentional, youre kind of proving my point. Because standards are lower, do I have that right? No, because parenting and culture matter. Standards are the same for the black and white kid in a suburban neighborhood
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:59 PM
2

A woman today is not barred from getting an education, a job and progressing, but the boys club that was created by excluding women in the first place is still in place, and they still prefer to surround themselves with people who look and think like them See, I've seen the complete opposite in today's society. Everyone is pushing diversity so hard that women and minorities have a large advantage in hiring and getting into school. You cannot dispute minorities have lower standards for getting in…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:18 PM
1

Laws that expressly denied women and POC the same rights as white men is not “rooted in biology.” No laws like that exist anymore. . . Once again, the same people denying that bias creates privilege for white men turn around and express the same bias they claim isn’t a factor. Im expressing that bias is not rooted in skin color, but instead in economics and culture. but feel entitled to judge people of other races and genders as a collective group who should be treated according to the worst ste…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:16 PM
1

A lot of privilege is rooted in biology, and separating biology from sociological impact is impossible. This (like sociology in general) allows you to make up your own lines separating the two in order to fit your own world view. It's has no basis of consistency. But there still is a practice of automatically shredding Shaniqua’s and D’Andre’s resumes but keeping Scott’s and Megan’s in the pile. I don't like to argue personal anecdotes, so I won't, but this is the study I'm talking about. So I'l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 01:38 PM
3

You’re totally contradicting yourself. No surprise. How? No. Society is not handing out ovaries to the people it likes so they can have the title of woman/sexual selector. So your definition of privilege says that its entirely society based? I’ve experienced PERSONALLY. Ask me how many interviews I’ve shown up for to be met with dropped jaws and “we’ll call you.” So you have a white name and when you showed up to the interview, they saw that you were black and their jaws dropped and then they ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 12:56 PM
3

Privilege is something cofeeeed to a person on the basis of their membership in a group. Exactly. Men are stronger because they're a membership to the group of men. And females are the sexual selectors because they belong to the group of female. The assumption that job applicants with names that suggest they are white males and thus more qualified, for example. You do know this was activist data and isn't true, right?? I truncated it because I’d like you to explain this female privilege to me an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 12:43 PM
4

Only you've truncated my point to not include the important part. Privilege must be applied to the whole (or vast majority of) gender, not just the ones at the top. Male privilege would be something like men are less likely to be abused by their sexual partner because theyre stronger. While female privilege is to be the sexual selectors.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 12:22 PM
7

How am I privileged because I share the same genitalia as another person who is rich. Like honestly, this Apex fallacy somehow being a privilege that all men have is just absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 11:29 AM
-1

Yes! Men are so fucking evil they won't even take one aspect of suffering from women. I honestly cannot believe the extent that men go to in order to control women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 01:33 AM
1

Very true. So it should be even less controversial for 12 year olds to be in Hooters, right??
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 09:00 PM
1

Because if just one woman doesn't do an action (singular action), then clearly all women aren't like that. So the saying awalt doesn't apply. But if women react a certain way given a certain set of circumstances (nature), you can say all women would react that way because of their nature
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 08:56 PM
2

I was with my dad, uncle, and grandfather. It wasn't awkward at all lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 06:33 PM
4

A pre-teen kid probably won't even pay attention. Wtf are you talking about? As a 12 year old remembering my first Hooters experience, it was amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:32 PM
1

I agree, and the original post talks about individual actions, which is failing to understand the concept
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:23 PM
2

Actions are a direct consequence of nature, yes. But when describing awalt there is a fundamental difference where you have to describe nature. Otherwise 'i don't cheat' would prove nawalt (a concept which doesn't exist)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 10:08 PM
9

Your 'awalt' examples are all specific actions. Obviously, not all women will take those actions so it completely disproves saying awalt. No one would ever say 'all women cheat' or 'all women will be emotional' that's just silly. Some women will never cheat. Everyone acts emotionally, regardless of sex Awalt is about nature, not specific actions regardless of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 08:59 PM
1

good at manipulation Question, what manipulation is required for you to have a ONS? The use of that word has always bothered me
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 07:38 PM
16

. . .OP what's the point of this post? You're strawmanning and don't even. Seem to have a point to this. Are you nawalt or awalt? This is an awful question. Like at least go to your point if you're asking awful questions. But no, you don't even do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/19 07:32 PM
9

Alot of phone's auto capitalize the first letter in all of you're sentances.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 06:40 PM
5

This is an awful interpretation of a study combined with building and tearing down of strawmen. I don't think you should be criticising anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 07:41 PM
1

I mean, a girl can fuck up a guy emotionally, but it's not alpha widowing. It's something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 01:50 AM
1

Serious relationships? 3, and they have all been close to my looks
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:42 AM
2

Looks matters the most in the majority of relationships. This isn't a controversial opinion. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:38 AM
2

Why? Looks are the most crucial aspect for reproduction for both sexes, not just females
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:24 AM
1

Looksmaxing is not a feminine trait in my opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 12:05 AM
1

I mean this approaches on a deeper subject of what does feminine mean? It's not as simple as what modern girls do more often than men
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 11:54 PM
5

It is a lot of effort, but putting effort into your looks isn't feminine
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 11:13 PM
0

Focusing on looks is a feminine trait? I agree that what makes you metro, but that's not what makes you attractive. Not all metros are attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 10:53 PM
0

Evo psych explains this pretty well
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:22 PM
1

Metro isn't feminine. . .I think you're confusing terms here. Most of the pretty boy celebrities have positive masculine traits and facial symmetry with lean but muscular bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:20 PM
1

"Alpha widowed" is not a concept
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:17 PM
17

This is it. Up until probably mid college I internalized and believed that women and men were the same because I was taught that all throughout my childhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 06:34 PM
1

I disagree. It's a relative chart based on contributing factors to someone's smv. It's not saying that 35 year old men are sexually attractive to 18 year old women. Women aren't looking for what a 35 year old man has to offer at that point in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 08:15 PM
1

I don't think you understand the sexual marketplace referenced by TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 08:00 PM
5

It's a projection of their own personal morals onto someone else in a relationship they're not in. In reality, you make at least some compromises in a relationship. Often times you make too many compromises and therefore end up sacrificing your own morals and boundaries. This makes you project that into your future you will not compromise when in reality you will inevitably make some in a relationship. You have to have a line, and people who aren't in a relationship will usually draw the line we…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:03 AM
-1

The only thing that makes them more attractive in their 30s are money and status Besides the fact that a far greater amount of men get more attractive with age, that's exactly the point. Money and status are not large contributors to a girl's SMV but heavily contribute to a man's.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:42 PM
1

No, not at all. Men will always be more physically attracted to a 24 year old than a 36 year old (relatively speaking of course) But for a relationship, they would prefer someone close to their own age
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:39 PM
1

Most people prefer partners in roughly the same age bracket Because of maturity and life experience, not SMV
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:52 PM
2

TRP claims women hit the wall at age 25 I'd say it's more like 35 and different for every women, but hey, we each have our own opinions. So you're arguing that men and women age similarly?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:26 PM
5

Yes, if you let yourself go you won't be as attractive. Trp must have never considered that, you just broke the whole philosophy and they're completely wrong about everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:54 PM
2

You think attitude is pre determined and not socially developed?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 11:42 AM
1

Understood, won't use it again
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 11:31 AM
1

Cope much?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 02:54 AM
3

Then why link directly to him? I get what you're saying, but I personally find it an impossible stance to hold without being dishonest. You directly linked his username and then he shows up to defend himself and your only response is 'this isn't about you anyway'
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 07:44 PM
1

Are you trolling? Or do you really not understand what you're doing here? I can't tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 07:28 PM
1

You linked his goddamn account name in a long post that is demeaning to those who disagree with you. You called him out and he responded, and now you're being a little bitch about it. You're pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 05:51 PM
1

Why would anyone want to restrict other people's behavior? That's literally how society works. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 12:35 PM
3

time dating, hooking up, or marrying, than ugly men. Maybe dating and marrying, I could see that. But hooking up is kind of ridiculous. Any girl can have sex, just not necessarily with the ones they want to. Unless you're morbidly obese (like 350+) you can find a hookup anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 04:42 AM
3

Orrr negging is something that just shows you're not afraid to make a joke. Negging is not meant to be taken seriously, similar to a shit test
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 04:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter