TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Akodo Archive

View 0 posts and 346 comments by Akodo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

2-1-3. First two are honestly pretty crucial for me to want to pursue/continue things while 3 is really a non-issue. Though ceteris paribus I would probably take a higher earning partner over a lower earning one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 07:04 AM
1

Anti RP I guess. Wouldn't say alpha/beta whatever, I'm just me. Though I do tend towards leadership roles in groups. ENTJ
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 11:06 PM
4

Add me to that list. For someone her age, she's surprisingly immersed in modern/internet culture. It's the little things that stand out, like the one time she talked about MOOCs like they were just some ordinary/common thing. Even the fact she used that acronym instead of "online courses" really stood out in my mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/15 03:29 AM
3

http://imgur.com/gallery/YsbKHg1
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 03:31 AM
-1

It seems like when people say "a genuinely nice guy doesn't expect anything in return for his niceness" they are basically telling them to be more of a doormat, which won't solve any of their problems. It's not saying to be a doormat. It's saying do nice things because you want to, not because you think it'll get you something in return. It's the difference between helping out a friend move because he's a friend and helping out a friend move and then demanding $20 at the end it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 08:40 PM
1

Are they doing any other controls for background? ~42% of MIT grad students are international students so it's not exactly surprising that population doesn't match up with American sexual norms. EDIT:virginity statistics as a proxy for the harder-to-measure romancelessness statistics, but these are bad enough. In high school each extra IQ point above average increases chances of male virginity by about 3%. Any more info about how this was determined? I feel whatever janky curve fit they used to …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 08:09 PM
0

You do realize your dodging of both mine and rad's questions is really transparent right? We aren't trying to hedge anything, we're just pressing an issue you're obviously avoiding. You can keep doing what you're doing if you want, but it's not helping your case. ¯\(ツ)/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 07:12 AM
0

I have repeatedly restated their argument and thoroughly refuted it. Help me understand your failure to follow along. Where? Please show me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 04:45 AM
2

I love how RP's make things up to fit their narratives. ProTip: He's RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 12:16 PM
3

AMALT. Am I doing this right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 06:37 AM
2

Keep people off-balance and in the dark by never revealing the purpose behind your actions. If they have no clue what you are up to, they cannot prepare a defense. Guide them far enough down the wrong path, envelope them in enough smoke, and by the time they realize your intentions, it will be too late. I'm with you on this one. Anyone doing this sort of shit will make themselves known hella quickly. 40watts, do you think this isn't super transparent? Because it is. EDIT: Like I don't need to kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 07:22 PM
1

Male, Not-RP. My main three in order of dedication: Hobbyist electronics, sim racing and getting drunk with my fraternity brothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 02:31 AM
1

I don't even know where to start with this. It's like the dating equivalent to timecube. Men on the other hand are pretty much invisible unless they are in the top 20% in looks, money, and status. Whenever I see this I wonder if all the guys saying this who are in the bottom 50% all think they're really at 70+%; and if it weren't for that gosh darn Pareto Principle they'd be swimming in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 07:34 PM
5

Well, you still need to quantify how you judge it. I can write a math exam on Galois theory, but its judgment isn't objective without a set quantifiable marking rubric. The method of judgment itself has to be quantifiable, not just the content you're looking at.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 11:01 PM
3

Where are your metrics? This isn't looking too objective to me. Does all art need to be symmetric to be beautiful? How do we quantify harmony of colours?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 10:26 PM
4

So it's objective? Give me the rubric for beautiful art then please.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 09:44 PM
2

male hedge fund manager saved his investors thousands.... Either you're off by a few orders of magnitude, or that's not even newsworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 05:14 AM
2

Or...She likes sex? Don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 10:53 PM
3

The people I date? Very. It's a requirement for me. I don't have time for liars. If she's lying about her reasons, it'll probably come to light as you continue to discuss things. If that blowjob thing is an issue for you. Leave. If her honesty is an issue for you. Leave. It's pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 10:22 PM
0

I think the motive behind certain actions means a lot. That was covered. Will you communicate and work on it? If the motivations/reasons aren't coming up when you're communicating. One or both of you are doing a bad job of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 09:59 PM
3

Because back when society was just a baby, a brutal violent baby, physical strength meant power. Men obviously had the upper hand there and obtained power. Men leading became entrenched in society and women didn't have the power to start to tip the scales back until recently (in terms of human history). If you were to "reset" things but maintained the framework of modern society (where physical strength is less of a requirement to be a leader) I'd imagine things would be quite different in terms…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 09:56 PM
1

Agnostic. EDIT: Seems I fit right in. Heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 08:34 PM
2

If the people who criticized TRP would instead explain the correct way to talk to women, how to be attractive, what to do with their life, and put it into a sub, they would easily break 100K subs, no issue, if they got advertising. The thing is though you're looking for an answer that doesn't exist. There is no singular cheat code to women. No matter how easy that'd make everything, it simply does not exist. That's the disconnect between BP and RP that I see. RP is demanding there be a step-by-s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 06:58 PM
0

Nope, found it and linked above. But this looks like it could be a good example too. Thanks for the link!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 07:06 AM
1

Found it! http://web.archive.org/web/20141111232833/http://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/2lydxn/mindfuck_with_ex/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 06:52 AM
1

Haha thanks! I'm not sure to be honest. It got linked to either here, BP or SRD under a name sorta like "TRP user gets RP used on him" or something along those lines. I'll keep looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 06:51 AM
2

I'm having problems finding it, but wasn't there a post a while back on TRP or askTRP where a woman was using RP style tactics on the OP. The responses to it were about as hypocritical as you'd expect. Anyone mind helping me out with that link? Found it: http://web.archive.org/web/20141111232833/http://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/2lydxn/mindfuck_with_ex/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 06:33 AM
1

This is obstinacy; what, there are no smart sociopaths because you said so? She said orthogonal, not opposed. lrn2linearalgebra
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 10:30 PM
2

Dude, you equated wants and needs and are sticking by it. That's literally all that needs to be said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 12:03 PM
2

I've never seen someone lose this badly at anything before... Thank you for making my day haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 10:50 PM
1

IIRC not so much fuel as larger fuel lines. It's a vasodilator i think.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 10:27 PM
2

Add one more to the barely any (and what was, was terribad) advice given category.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 08:03 PM
6

Wait what? You were told pretty bluntly that your understanding of the pill and the hormonal mechanisms behind it were wrong. Which then makes your inference wrong, yet your response is basically I'm still right. Come again?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 08:10 AM
1

According to a recent study by iVillage, less than half of wedded women married the person who was the best sex of their lives (52 percent say that was an ex This makes perfect sense from a statistical standpoint. The only way it wouldn't would be if "how good he is at sex" was the driving factor in deciding to marry someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 01:32 AM
16

Let me ask you: if TRP hates women, why do they spend so much damn time and effort trying to succeed with them? Because TRP's general obsession with sex overpowers their hatred for women? Why do you think sexbots come up every few days?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 08:40 PM
1

Sounds familiar :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 11:00 AM
2

AWALT, even if it is not true is still useful to help frame an alpha mentality To me being alpha would be to have the confidence in your "value" and your ability to read people to adjust to each woman individually. Generalizations seem like a social crutch to me. Plus. It's worked well for me so far and I don't have people hating on me for it. So I got that going for me, which is nice. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 11:49 PM
0

Personally, I don't care what TRP says about women in AWALT (Well at least not online), I think it's fundamentally a retarded idea. It's generalization to the point of ridiculousness and uselessness and represents only fraction of the people on this planet. If AMALT were a thing, and I truly struggle to think of even one example that might be true, This is the kind of thing that annoys me. I don't understand how someone can be so strong on AWALT but then say this about men. If women follow very …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 10:24 PM
1

Yeah, but I guess I'm missing something, because I don't find your position controvesial in any way. Like I think AMALT/AWALT isn't correct, but as long as you're consistent it's alright with me. Differing opinions are ok. What annoys me though, and this is something some of the posters here are doing, is go "AWALT but it doesn't exist for men, or it doesn't matter". Because if AWALT exists, AMALT probably does too and it certainly does matter as I've outlined above. I frankly don't think it mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 10:04 PM
-1

3
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 09:18 PM
1

I think the self improvement aspect is unrelated to AMALT. You don't need to know about other men to understand yourself and what you need to focus on to improve. AMALT includes you. Other men don't even picture into the point I'm making. There's two routes here. AMALT for dating behaviours only or AMALT for all behaviours (TRP jumps between the two for AWALT). I'll take the dating behaviour one first. If you need to know yourself to improve, and you are a man; Then you should have found the beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 09:03 PM
-1

I see you picked 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 08:58 PM
-1

Waiting on Drok's response, and then I'll elaborate from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 08:56 PM
-4

That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking a very specific question. So once again I ask, don't you need to know yourself in order to improve yourself? What you're trying to do is dodge and derail, and it's transparent as fuck. So let's cut to the chase. You can either: 1) Answer my specific question. 2) Say you aren't answering my question. 3) Keep failing at dodging and look like a fool in the process. The ball is in your court now. Pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 07:54 PM
0

You skipped the first part of the question. So once again I ask, don't you need to know yourself in order to improve yourself? I'm not trying to turn TRP into anything. I just want your answer to my questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:58 PM
-1

Then it should be easy for TRP to come up with a list then? If they know themselves like you state.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:57 PM
1

I will after drok answers my questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:55 PM
1

TRP uses AWALT in far more than just pick up. So once again I ask, don't you need to know yourself in order to improve yourself? And if so, why wouldn't AMALT then be something you need to know?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:51 PM
1

Because if TRP is so focused on self improvement, wouldn't it be pretty crucial to know yourself to actually do that? And since you're a male, it would follow that AMALT would in fact be something you should be giving a shit about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:40 PM
1

Poker...Get girls? Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I wish. :p
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 06:44 PM
1

If it was a girl I had no interest in anything more than a ONS then I'd peace and just go find someone who doesn't act like that. They aren't rare in my experience. If I did want things to be a repeat affair I'd just wait. I don't see a reason to rush things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 07:47 AM
1

Like I don't think situations where someone isn't into it but then changes their mind aren't real or anything. Just want to point out I said the opposite to LMR never happens. Other kinds of LMR (the "insecurity" type I mentioned elsewhere) take more of a "push" to get through. I guess I just prefer ways of managing that which leave a more balanced control dynamic, which I feel really lowers the odds you'll end up in a situation she feels coerced.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 07:24 AM
0

That I have 0 issue with, and I don't think anyone short of the most trollish of BP would either. It's some of the "active" approaches that I feel takes things to a bad, dangerous place. It's like the difference between being that salesman you trust and that sleazy high-pressure salesman. It feels predatory in the same kind of way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 06:43 AM
0

I can't commit to fulfilling the emotional needs of someone who is not my wife. Hmm, for me you don't need to do that for the relationship with your wife to be poly. Don't see being anything more than casual with someone else as a criteria for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 06:29 AM
1

Oh k. That one I've seen in relationships, but it was always more of an insecurity thing. She wanted to, but was embarrased/woried/etc that I'd get grossed out and want to stop or something along those lines. I'd pretty much always say it's fine. She'll either ask if I'm sure (I'll say obv, and we'll continue) or she'll shower at some point and carry on then. (EDIT: I always stop when this gets said. I take a step back and then say it's fine. Fine that she hasn't showered, fine if she says no, f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 06:22 AM
0

I guess I'd still put that under the poly umbrella. You defined the boundaries that works for you, like in any other poly relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 06:13 AM
1

Ah, I guess that's another thing too. And flattering that she would make the effort. The whole chaste, innocence thing I think you're talking about here doesn't do anything for me, to be honest. It's a complete meh, for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 06:08 AM
0

Now I'm curious. Mind telling the story?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 05:57 AM
0

"Oh, my! I don't know what is happening to me - I've never done something like this!" Nope, that'd line would probably kill my mood too to be honest. EDIT: Def would kill the mood on further thought. Usually it's a lighthearted fun mood or a hyper-lustful (I think that's the best way I'd describe it?) race to see who can get the other's clothes off faster. They usually win.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 05:25 AM
0

Like I don't think situations where someone isn't into it but then changes their mind aren't real or anything. Hell, I've been the one who changed their mind before. (I was the "resisting" one, that sentence might not have been clear) I think in a lot of situations it's a pretty skeevy thing to do, and it can lead to a lot of risk on your part (Either ended up being an actual rapist, or being accused of it) I just don't understand how someone could be thirsty enough to consider breaking through …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 05:03 AM
1

Ok. Here's the point she's trying to make. You've been dating this girl for a few months are things are going just amazing. You then find out she is/was a "slut", no amount of studies changes the fact that your relationship is going amazingly. The people in the relationship didn't change, you just learned something new about them. If the relationship tanks after finding out, it wasn't some graph that killed it. It was you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 04:59 AM
-1

I don't put effort into keeping track but in the 10<x<20 range. It's rarer for me to have an extended gap between kissing and having sex than have things progress quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 01:58 AM
0

Count me out of that "every guy" category. Every girl I've been with has wanted it just as much as I did. Like, am I the only one who feels a girl who does "LMR" would be a pretty massive turn off?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 12:51 AM
1

Well... I'm not wrong to be fair. ¯\(ツ)/¯ ^^<sup>Plus</sup> ^^<sup>i</sup> ^^<sup>said</sup> ^^<sup>i</sup> ^^<sup>think</sup>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 09:51 PM
0

a few years twenty years Poly? Because if not, I think you might be an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 09:27 PM
1

A lot of the things in that book are extremely transparent and doubly so when executed by someone who's trying to "act" like the book describes instead of being naturally that way. At least for me, following that book would just get you put into my mental "dude seems shifty, don't trust all that much" pile.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 08:32 PM
1

http://students.sae.org/cds/formulaseries/fsae/ http://blogs.mcgill.ca/fsae/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 04:24 AM
1

no, none of it provided industry relevant experience. You're kidding... right? Could you walk up to a FSAE tech lead and say this with a straight face? impressive portfolio because of his enthusiasm So... Projects. "how many side projects has this kid done to make up for their shitty GPA" It's not the quantity that matters. It's the quality and the skills gleaned from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 12:25 AM
1

Copypasta
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 10:22 AM
2

Heh, that's a good attitude. I wish you good luck, dude. Thanks! Honestly, I'm already the black sheep going in (Health has kept me back, so not only do I probably have the lowest grades out of all interns coming in and, from what I've managed to find out from linkedin stalking the other interns, also the least experienced in industry by a substantial margin.), but on the flip side many of the current employees I've been speaking to were, for a lack of a better term, astonished, at my technical …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 06:34 AM
1

Personality: ENTJ Pill: Blue, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 01:32 AM
1

They're called student/design teams or hell, even your own projects, and you make time. A lot of companies do expect you to know your shit, I know mine does. You get like 1-2 weeks of babying and then you're expected to carry your weight. Same jobs and responsibility as the full timers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 01:19 AM
2

I'm a lot like you in regards to learning. Just a warning though, the things that make you good at learning will make you a terrible teacher. Source: Can chew through most university courses in <24h. Can't teach for shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 11:33 PM
2

Out of curiosity. What qualifications do you have? Or rather, what makes you so sure you'll handily out educate any university?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 10:53 PM
3

This is something promoted by Elon Musk and many others. Can confirm they practice what they preach. For my upcoming internship I've been warned the department I want to eventually break into is Stanford city. Despite going to one of the best schools in Canada I have an uphill battle waiting for me and I'm going to have to really kick some ass to get what I want. My body is ready. EDIT: As an extension to your comment. It amazes me every day how many of the top students here completely freeze up…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 10:46 PM
2

It's the biggest / most well known poker forum. I'm not saying you couldn't make a lot of money being not so great but playing only with rich people. I'm saying you can't win that much without people catching wind. He wouldn't have to say how much he won, people in the poker community would be doing it for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 11:28 PM
4

great poker businessman, he says he won 50 million bucks. Yea. No. That's BS and then some. Poker players are hounds, they constantly track the poker economy, see where the money is and where the money is going. Because those are the games you want in. The going theory on 2p2 is that he's using poker as a cover to funnel in offshore funds his dad hid away. It makes sense, and is more likely than him winning that much money without people getting a sniff of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 10:27 PM
5

I play a lot of poker, and thus hear a lot about Dan. At the end of the day he's a joke. Everything in his life was bankrolled by his Dad's spoils from being a corporate raider. Everything he does is the easy way out. Want to get buff? Roids. Want girls? Hire escorts. Want to be a marine? Buy yourself a role in a movie because you failed out of training. His entire being is superficial. It's not a life I want to live, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 10:12 PM
1

That's completely irrelevant to my question. Your wording is implying that it's the actual getting, not the fact they "could" get that's attractive. I'm asking you to justify that wording.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 06:15 PM
3

I noticed something about your words. guys that get a lot of pussy and women that could realistically get over 90% of men Why? What justifications are there for changing the wording from could to get? The male version is just "People are attracted to very attractive people" but the female version is specifically towards men who have a high partner count. I'm not so sold on your reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 07:13 PM
1

Uh, both? The combination of both those situations is literally what she was describing. Her options were go along with it, or resist and have those efforts be futile. She chose the former. It's like if someone is mugging you. To restate your question "Were you pressured into giving them your money and gave in, or that they would have forcibly taken it form you had you been unwilling to give it away." Notice how those aren't exclusive statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 11:58 PM
4

Except for the part where you're almost certainly weaker and most likely slower than the other party. Can you see how that could make a dangerous situation substantially more so?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 10:00 PM
3

Please, in detail, explain how you came to this conclusion. You surely must be able to, right? There must be underlying justifications as to why you couldn't just take what she said at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 09:59 PM
3

If he's a rapist, don't willingly have sex with him; make him rape you and then call the fucking police afterwards! I think that right there pretty much sums up the level of disconnect the OP was talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 05:48 PM
1

...Ok, there either was a huge misstep in communication or you're being really obtuse on purpose. Obviously I don't accept that or follow it. This whole thread was about people who do strive to be and believe in the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 05:08 AM
1

Obviously you're not forced in general. But to exist and be accepted within the RP framework you are forced. And that's what I was talking about. To take the red pill means you must change yourself to become X manly prototype. This is the point I was trying to make. RP says that within the true reality of the world, you must be that prototype in order to be a man who is successful with women and if you aren't, you're beta and essentially worthless for anything else other than your wallet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:38 AM
1

Because it's (IMO) wrong, damaging and borders on being a hate group. I call out racism and homophobia when I see it too. You're free to make whatever choices you want, and I'm free to criticize them as I please. The inverse is also true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:28 AM
1

They are forcing you to some degree though. The underlying tone I was talking about earlier is pervasive in the sidebar material. This sidebar material is "required reading" and posting contrary to the sidebar is bannable. The mods are saying read and follow this or GTFO. That's as much forcing someone to follow something as you can possibly get on reddit. EDIT: And on top of that, it's not like TRP presents itself as a possible approach of many to try. It literally refers to itself as the "trut…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 01:16 AM
1

I don't really think TRP tells people to change their "inner self". If you aren't the kind of guy that naturally takes up the stereotypical masculine/dominant trope then that's exactly what TRP advocates from what I've seen. TRP makes it very clear that if you aren't that image of masculinity/dominance you need to change yourself to fit that role if you want any hope with women. Luckily, this isn't true at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 07:41 PM
3

Err. Just a heads up. I'm def on the BP side of things. TRP to me comes off as " YOU NEED TO FIT THIS PROTOTYPE OR YOU'RE A USELESS MANLET", as opposed to "be the best you that you can be". But if you get a different message from it, that's cool too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:08 PM
3

Sounds like the opposite of being yourself. No, it's showing the side of yourself that fits best. I'm an athlete, movie/music nerd, mechanical engineer, hobbyist sim/auto-x racer, electronics hacker/maker, a good cook and so on. I have many facets that certain women could find attractive. I pick which ones will get the best reception and present those to the lady who I'm trying to get cozy with. Different women will mesh best to different facets. I'm presenting the best side of me for whatever t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 06:04 PM
2

Except different cars require very different driving approaches for optimal pace, even different cars of the same model can be drastically different due to manufacturing errors or chassis fatigue. If you tried to race competitively with a ACALT mindset you're fucked. So fucked. The mindset you need to use to be a decent race driver is literally the antithesis to what you're trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 10:19 PM
1

You can drive a different car, and paint it a different colour, but the race is the same. Please never use this analogy again. It's terrible. -Signed, someone who has experience racing cars.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 08:38 PM
1

He does realize those girls with Dan are likely escorts and that he's sort of a running joke in the poker community...right? Also, the ridiculousness of him going off on the "hot" girls while completely ignoring the type of women who make up the majority, average ones. Average just like him... EDIT: Also, when he starts talking about club attire he comes off as creepy as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 08:37 AM
8

BP I guess. I have quite few. 2 of my 4 closest friends are women and about 30-35% of my normal friends are women. And my view on women? They're just like you and me, not some alien race from afar. I don't have a special way of treating them or anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 09:52 PM
10

This just came up in a different thread and this was my addition to /u/CFRProflcopter's repsonse. To add to this, I'll take an example from my life. My background is in computational mathematics, specifically fluids. Every month someone comes forward with a new "proof" of the Navier-Stokes Conjecture, and every time these proofs have massive flaws and are discredited. When we do this, myself and others who are critical of these proofs don't have proofs of our own, we recognize we don't have an a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 10:55 PM
0

To add to this, I'll take an example from my life. My background is in computational mathematics, specifically fluids. Every month someone comes forward with a new "proof" of the Navier-Stokes Conjecture, and every time these proofs have massive flaws and are discredited. When we do this, myself and others who are critical of these proofs don't have proofs of our own, we recognize we don't have an answer that's sufficient and thus don't put anything forward. /u/emize, what you're saying is that …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/14 10:01 PM
1

Heh. Pleasedon'tbanmeImsorryifthisiswrong
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/14 07:24 AM
-2

Bright enough that I'm on academic scholarship at one of the best colleges for my major. Your ego stroking is vigorous. Newcomers aren't supposed to post on TRP. You're supposed to spend time reading the sidebar and other endorsed opinions there until you thoroughly understand the ideology. Doesn't this support the notion that TRP is to be taken as gospel and not questioned? They go there to learn A massive part of learning is to critique what you've been told. Without that, ideas don't grow and…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/14 05:15 AM
2

Just found an example of the kinds of posts that people talk about when they bash TRP. I honestly can't believe how this happened because what i observed so far is that it's difficult to get to that pussy rub because they try to stop you before you can reach there and when you do, they can't fucking resist the urge to fuck and it gets a lot easier. I can't even imagine how a wet pussy that is crying for dick do not want it. Was at +5 in a newish thread as of this post. I'm sorry, but what? Is he…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 12:38 AM
2

IMO there's a huge difference between international conflict where lives are constantly on the line and dealing with some dude who's pissing you off by running his mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/14 07:26 AM
12

And on top of that, it's more about physical ability than gender. It just so happens that women are weaker than men more often than not. Like seriously, if Little Timmy-in-a-wheelchair tries to start something with you, are you going to knock him out? Let's see how well that goes over. Pretty much, if you think physical violence is an acceptable method of conflict resolution you're probably an asshole and you should grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 09:39 PM
5

Uh... Are you for serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 09:29 PM
1

However, if they all come from the same group of friends, it's safe to assume they study together and more often then not have a similar level of academic achievement. If all of them are used to crushing classes it'd be entirely reasonable that all of them would expect to pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/14 08:51 PM
2

It's not just females, go into a physics class and you get them thinking that they and all 15 of their friends are going to pass, even though the prof said only 1 in 2 or 2/3 will pass. Humans are immune to stats though. ...You do realize how stats work right? It's not like every arbitrary subdivision of the class automatically has to have those ratios of passing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/14 06:12 PM
1

Yea. I wasn't expecting that much blatant dodging. I find it really funny though just how badly TRP types tend to break when they're met with a woman who doesn't fit their prototype. It's either dodging, rationalizations, accusations of lying or just straight up "I'll tell you how you actually are". So much effort to desperately try to cling to their "truth". Oh well, ¯\(ツ)/¯.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/14 04:14 PM
1

You're relentless. I love it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/14 03:55 PM
1

Kk. Sorry for the snark. To be honestly I really don't agree with the TRP/PUA idea that there's a set framework or a specific set of steps that will get you women. There are certain things that just don't have simple guides or explanations and I believe human interaction is one of those things. This comment thread goes over the kind of things I've been successful with in the past. If you have any questions just toss them my way. EDIT: Also, just peeked at your post history. In all honestly, just…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/14 05:18 PM
1

Don't. Make. Shitty. Generalizations. Without. Solid. Evidence. Simple enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/14 05:02 PM
6

/u/muchpriviloge
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 08:12 PM
8

/u/myfriendscantknow fo' sho.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 06:54 PM
2

Ah kk. Yea you're spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 05:29 PM
2

Isn't that because Terry has an alleged history of being sleazy with his models? No sex, no shoot sort of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 05:18 PM
1

yeah, ALOT of people said "shes not like that" or she would NEVER do that, she doesnt even have the time to!" before or after finding out that actually their SO cheated. Cool story bro. Going to get to those sources any time soon? I'm getting hungry.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 04:46 PM
1

If this is something I'd feel there was a reason for worrying about I wouldn't be dating her. Pretty fucking simple. I don't date shitty girls, standards yo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 04:39 PM
1

i can tell you that men feel uncomfortable Really? Because I'm a man, and I don't. None of my friends do either. Have you considered the possibility you're just insecure and projecting? confidence to have bounderies. Keep the boundaries, lose the relationship constricting insecurity. its not. you think its only TRP men who think like that but its not. Do you have a source on vacation cheating statistics specifically? Go on, I'll wait. You'll surely deliver.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 04:00 PM
2

Here's the thing. On a global scale, 70k people is shit all. Tens of millions of women go travelling each year, and how many cheat? Are you really going to try to tell me it's most of them? Please go ahead, it'll let me know just how far gone you are from reality. And plus, it's like what in actuality? 10? 15? Posters who will respond? Pretty far from 70k. And honestly, it'd just be reinforcing the whole "TRP should stop picking bottom of the barrel women if it wants to stop seeing shitty women"…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 02:48 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2exl6l/bp_women_with_all_this_talk_of_the_cock_carousel/ck53zuf In this case, yes. It's very much so less valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 12:29 AM
2

Dude, do you even read before you post? I addressed this exact point 22 hours before yours. Seriously, get it together. Yes. And what BP or others try to tell you is that 80% probably isn't actually 80% and you're making generalizations that the majority of women don't fit in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 11:51 PM
6

Yes. And what BP or others try to tell you is that 80% probably isn't actually 80% and you're making generalizations that the majority of women don't fit in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 12:43 AM
5

Rigormorits is the ultimate in keeping frame and utilizing dead game in one. FTFY Gotta keep that frame as strong as a coffin.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 12:20 AM
4

Please note that those generalizations are recognized as such, and implicitly understood as falling under the 80/20 rule. What justification is there to using the pareto principle in this manner? Also, just FYI saying "it's not all women, just 80%" isn't really all that much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/14 11:31 PM
2

If you are from the United States, then the locker room analogy should be clear. I'm Canadian but have played sports in the states. I know exactly what a western-world locker room is like. And what I'm saying is what TRP's atmosphere is isn't anything like it. EDIT: "TRP is trying to create an environment similar to what is perceived by the general public as a locker room by media and culture living in the United States of America except that it is not a physical place, but a virtual one"? Sooo.…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/14 09:20 PM
3

When you say it's like a locker room, what do you expect people to think? That it's not actually like a locker-room? TRP does this all the time and it's actually annoying the hell out of me. If you're going to use words to describe things, stick to the established definitions or make it clear what the new meaning is in TRP's context. It honestly feels like there's this theme of using wishy-washy definitions for everything just so you can backpedal easily if someone calls something out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/14 08:04 PM
5

Doesn't matter what age you are, competition is competition. A lot of those sports I was playing/competing with/against older people. Sure people brought up girls after the games in passing but at the end of the day we were there to win and other shit didn't really matter beyond that. No rants, no politics, no field reports etc. It's a locker-room, not a soapbox.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/14 12:15 PM
8

Yea. You either talk about funny shit (which sometimes is the crass stuff TRP tries to ride), or the god damn game. Serious topic? GTFO, we're here to win a game/playoff/championship and there isn't room for distractions. EDIT: Fuck it, I'll say it because it's bothering me. Anyone who uses that "it's like a locker room" defence about TRP probably hasn't stepped foot in a locker room since Div-3 soccer when they were 14.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/14 06:24 AM
6

virtual locker room. Then where the fuck is the penis showing game at? Like seriously, before Uni I was very good at many sports and therefore in many different locker rooms. TRP isn't like any locker room I've been in. You guys try to copy the style but fail even more at the substance. The vibe is just all wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/14 05:13 AM
3

I just can't get over it reminding me of a little kid going "But Jimmy's parents got him a Nintendo! No Fair!". That's how it sounds to me. :/ she's the one burnt out on sex. If we're counting that as baggage then what other instances of getting burnt out or moving on from something count as well? A hobby growing old? A change in foods you like? Quitting a sport? Painting your house a new colour? See what I mean? If you can justify it for sex, you can justify it the same way for at least one of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 10:32 PM
3

, look at the guys disheartened to learn they got married but are never going to do any of that fun kinky stuff they always wanted to do with their wife, only to find out she did it with a load of guys But like... People and thus their sexual desires and preferences change over time. It's pretty simple IMO and I find it ridiculous that a lot of RP men (well men in general) struggle with accepting this. Like from where I am, the issue you brought up sounds more like the guy's baggage than the wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/14 09:14 PM
12

Extreme examples that don't account for most peoples day to day lives. Just something to watch out for and be aware of. But the difference IMO is those stories are often recognized as just that, extremes, on other subs. While on TRP many posters seem to hold onto these stories as "proof" that the status quo is that extreme. By recognizing that the examples are extremes and not the norm you by definition have NAWALT. But that's not what happens, people look at the posts and then paint all women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/14 01:25 AM
4

Good. Hunter green is a terrible colour.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/14 01:22 AM
6

You'd be surprised how easy it is to train a man when you control the only source of sex in his life, You don't really think all that highly of yourself and other men eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/14 01:21 AM
2

1993/1994, probably in October. And I'm going to guess hunter green.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/14 01:03 AM
1

No no. Like actually consider what the person is saying and learn about them. People give off clues and parts of themselves all the time in conversation and if you can pick up on those the conversation will be much more engaging and intimate. RP all too often will tend towards blatantly not paying any attention to anything a woman says and treats conversation solely as the kinda thing a child see's broccoli as. The shitty thing that they don't want that's in the way of them getting what they do …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 11:38 PM
1

Expand that shit, grow your circle through work, sports, hobbies etc. You're bound to meet tonnes of people who like the go out and aren't tied down. EDIT: This is exactly what /r/seduction is for. A lot of people don't know how to start a conversation. This is something that bugs me about PUA. IMO they aren't really teaching someone how to start a conversation, but teaching them how to start a specific (or a few) one. Most PUA stuff I think is dumb, and the stuff that's not I feel it's trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 11:15 PM
2

Better marriage or the appearance of a better marriage? I could see those kinds of pressures leading to people holding off a divorce that they should of had to the point of being a net detriment to their lives. But for the marriage to be legitimately better? I'm not so sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 11:14 PM
1

For the most part, honestly, use the power of your social circle. If you know an in, it's... well, an in, and if you have a group with you (especially mixed gender), it's pretty easy to integrate your and her groups from there. If your group looks like they're having the time of their lives, very few people will turn down invitations to combine groups. People don't often turn down chances for more fun with little risk attached. That appearance of risk is a world of difference between if you're o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 09:19 PM
1

Go with the flow. Seriously, just pay attention to how the conversation or whatever is going and make the most of it. Everybody has different things they like, and if you pay attention you can figure out what those are and roll with it. There isn't some cookie cutter one size fits all. That's why my advice is so vague, it's to allow someone the flexibility to actually do well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 08:34 PM
2

Don't be a dickwaffle. Don't suck. Actually learn about the person you're going for. Use the first three steps to your advantage. Adjust as you go. TLDR: Become sliced bread from the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 07:41 PM
1

Left before 8th edition. The ruleset is terrible, and IMO made it too easy on new players at the expense of competitive play. Sadly, it doesn't look like I'll ever be back playing since the rules I have issues with (mostly moving and magic), are here to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:14 PM
1

I know other's do, in fact I've said it's possible that the majority does as well. What I'm disagreeing with is the RP assertion that 99% of guys caring while barely any women care.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:12 PM
1

Fantasy>40k. Please don't hurt me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 03:53 AM
3

Women certainly are more demonized, correct. However, I'm sure you know of the term vocal minority? How do we know that this is a general feeling among men, and not among women? Or are you saying that the effect on attractiveness caused by promiscuity is the same for both men and women? I'd say for most people it's a negative or neutral trait. On that note, I would very much so disagree with someone saying it's an attractive trait in men in the eyes of women as a generality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 02:35 AM
4

, its just that men are generally repulsed by promiscuous men when looking for LTRs or wives. It's funny you keep repeating this as if it's some universal truth. This entire thread is me disagreeing with you on this assertion yet you keep trying to slip it in like I won't notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 12:32 AM
2

Bingo. This is actually my biggest issue with TRP. Everything is just as convenient as possible. That a young man's SMV is going to the moon, that women are actually really simple "AWALT", the wall and so on. It's a fairy tale to made to comfort, nothing more IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 11:08 PM
4

"youre more than your number" Because people are? Like it's fucking 2014, how is this controversial. I'm more than my number, my skin colour, my sexual orientation. I'm me, and I'm more than any single component of my being. Ive NEVER seen a man complain about women negatively judging him because he had sex with so many wonen. I have, a lot actually. And it'd be even worse in places that aren't as secular and liberal as Vancouver Canada. Anywhere with a highly religious make-up? Yea, good luck w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 11:03 PM
2

Yes. I feel that statement is inaccurate. I would say some, possibly most, people would avoid relationships with a higher count person. I don't think it's a gender specific feeling, I don't think the disinterested party is "repulsed" except for a small percentage of the time, and I don't think it's as ubiquitous as you think it is. Like I said earlier, personally, I don't really give a fuck about my partner's number. And I'm far from alone in that feeling. Also, you've stated that this article i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 10:37 PM
4

I'm not saying I don't believe the self reporting. I'm just recognizing it for what it is. Self reporting. You're the one trying to stretch "women self report lower quality marriage as partner counts increase." into a) "Women with higher counts make lower quality spouses", and b) "Men are repulsed by higher count women" when neither of those are actually stated, or supported by the data. I'm taking the results as they are, you're the one trying to "prove" a narrative by loosely mentioning the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 10:22 PM
8

Men generally are turned off by women who have sex with lots of men when considering them for marriage or an LTR, more so than the other way around. Source? Becuase this study sure isn't one. BPers wonder why RPers wonder why BPers wonder why RP is claiming facts with no back up. Because you can't make a hoe a housewife. This is just more evidence that you can't make a hoe a housewife. Actually you can't say that about the data. You keep trying to use the data in this way, but with the way the r…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 10:14 PM
2

I mention it above with my whole "men are more solipsistic" hypothesis. And why would there be a disparity when the couples have low counts? What disparity would you expect there to be based on the disparity with higher counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 10:10 PM
7

There is no mention in the study about men being repulsed by women with high partner counts. So I'm not sure how you're saying it's more evidence. EDIT: And to your question, I'd say some men are. Some women are too. I don't think it's gender specific. I personally don't really care (unless it was something crazy like fucking around for coke), if anything the more experience they have the better in bed they probably are. That's a good thing in my mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:58 PM
3

"We further found that the more sexual partners a woman had had before marriage, the less happy she reported her marriage to be." That section is important because the discrepancy of the self-reported results between men and women. That men didn't seem to have the same decline in self-reported quality that the women did. I've already tossed up a logically consistent explanation as to why. But that first section that I've quoted pretty clearly makes it known that this increase in marriage quality…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:56 PM
4

That's not at all what the data says though...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:50 PM
4

True, but the language still suggests that living together before an engagement is detrimental. That's not something I think you'll get many people guessing, or even really agreeing with. I'll edit my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:49 PM
5

Actually, the data says the correlation is to whether she's slept with someone that isn't you. Not the actual number. Additionally that set of data also shows the same correlation for men. It's literally in one of the lines I pasted in my comment prior. That minority of men and women reported higher marital quality than those who had had sex with other partners prior to marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:45 PM
4

As per my edit: EDIT: To your last question, because men are more solipsistic. They're fine with the fact they've slept with another/many women so they don't feel like it has any impact on the quality of marriage. They are unable to realize that this causes their wives discomfort and thus will not report it as to have caused a lower quality marriage. Do I actually believe this no. But based on the data, this hypothesis is logically sound and there isn't a way to discredit it. This is the fun thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:25 PM
10

And why would I want a wife that's more likely to think less of me (and maybe cheat?) because she's sampled a plethora of penises? If you're going to hardline the data to this degree, I take it you'll be also shelling out for a 200+ person wedding? That group had some of the highest rates of a "high quality marraige" in the entire study. EDIT: To your last question, because men are more solipsistic. They're fine with the fact they've slept with another/many women so they don't feel like it has a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:18 PM
14

Here's my big issue with you. You've completely tainted their reporting to fit your own world view. I want you to look very carefully at your words. lower quality wife Nowhere in any of this literature is there mention of either spouse being of lower quality, only the marriage as a whole. Furthermore: That minority of men and women reported higher marital quality than those who had had sex with other partners prior to marriage. Suggests that this supposed benefit goes for both partners, not just…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 09:09 PM
17

One thing that really sticks out that makes this seem more of a correlation than a causation is that living together before engagement or marriage brings a 25% decrease in likelihood of reporting a "Higher-Quality Marraige". I think people would intuitively think the opposite should be true. Also, it seems to suggest a larger wedding also leads to higher reporting of "high-quality marriages". So should Red-Pill start advocating that men get loose with their wallets during the wedding planning st…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 08:46 PM
0

There are plenty of houses in Detroit ready to move into! For as low as a dollar! Liens ain't no thang homeslice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 01:41 AM
7

I've done my part. I went above and beyond the call of duty in my youth. I am worthy. I'm sorry if this is petty, but it's actually bothering me. Who talks like this? I just can't see someone actually describing themselves in this way. Like I think I'm pretty awesome, but going above and beyond the call of duty? Living isn't like being conscripted into the 81st regiment of life-cavalry, there is no "call of duty" and there is no nebulous bar of being "worthy".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/14 01:30 AM
1

Check to see if your surge protector has any damage protections. Some manufacturers will refund any damage received while using their device up to $X amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 04:11 AM
0

I'm half Jamaican and I've seen plenty of female sex tourism first hand. It's kinda fun to watch the island boys trawl for middle aged white women on the tourist beaches. Moral of the story, female sex tourism is decently common if you look in the right places.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 06:50 AM
4

My biggest beef with SMV is that god awful Rollo Tomassi graph. It's so...bad. It has very precise demarcation and curves yet it literally is something he made up one day. Much STEM shame. EDIT: I guess also the implication about it being near universal due to the way it's talked about. There's too much variance in perceived attractiveness to talk about it like that IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 02:55 AM
2

Bro, do you even ZFC?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 11:57 PM
1

It confuses me too. It hasn't happened in a while, but too many times I've had discussions with posters here that could be phrased as "I will have sex with anyone who came up to me and asked" Like, really? Do you not have standards? I've turned down quite a few women and I have 0 regrets about doing so. Having sex with someone I don't find attractive doesn't sound fun, in fact it would probably make me feel painfully pathetic. The thirst levels would have to be way too high, and that would be ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 11:53 PM
5

Can confirm. My girlfriend loves me dearly (and I, her). Also, don't think she's ever said no in regards to something sexual. ¯\(ツ)/¯ Like, I wouldn't exactly say it's red pill specific to GTFO if this "blue pill man gets boring sex twice a year and a bunch of annoying nagging" is what your relationship was like. I have no idea where this BP=spineless, supplicating retard stereotype came from because that's not how most non-RP dudes are...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 11:38 PM
2

Yup. It's a better fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 02:36 AM
3

I may or may not have just searched my itunes library for songs with bitch in the title and picked the best one from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 02:32 AM
3

BP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRYNYb30nxU&feature=kp RP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qx1WmxSwNbk&feature=kp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To5bUpOEHcw&feature=kp
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 02:27 AM
2

Err. I'm with sleuth on this one, I'm really confused how there being more single women than men means that the women are more in demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/14 08:15 PM
4

I work in Canada. I'm a CFD monkey for a lab on campus for the summer. The supercomputer never sleeps. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 10:47 PM
3

WOOORRRKKK. FML.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 07:45 PM
3

ENTJ with weak E also reporting in.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 07:44 PM
1

Loooots of different stuff. I posted my some of my iTunes lists here: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/27j95p/bro_out_thread_for_debates_and_stuff/ci1cfm9
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 08:13 AM
1

You mean a biological truth? Tell me about all of the men you know who can breastfeed. TIL formula never existed and I survived my early childhood on hopes and dreams alone. Oh, but you can mention that you were raised by a single father, and you're not showing any biases at all? I'm sorry that this fact is hard for you to hear, but I'm going to say it again: fathers are more likely to abandon their children than mothers are. Well, just to get it out there. I never said my father was a good one.…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 02:47 AM
1

Just that there are more good mothers than good fathers. And if you want a source for that, I can find them. Sure, let's see what's out there. But women do 99% of the work in ensuring children's survival after men squirt their sperm. So, you found the thread insulting to women. Then you go and say this? Two wrongs don't make a right. Don't fight ignorance with ignorance of your own. And that's the case for a lot of fathers. It's also the case for a lot of mothers. Your personal bias showing and …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 01:34 AM
2

K so most of this is going to be based in the language TRP uses, the methods and outlook you share, my interactions with members and my experience as a poker player. Also this post applies to two types of people: the complete doormat and your average TRP poster. Also note, the former is a prime candidate to become the latter. Starting with the doormat. People often use phrases like be yourself, be courteous, be funny etc when talking about how to attract a woman. Now a complaint I hear often is …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 09:31 PM
3

K. I'm going to go back to my poker analogy. But I need some time to flesh it out better so I can just refer to this one post in the future. Is it cool if I defer posting my response for an hour or two?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 07:22 PM
1

Yea... I'm just going to go ahead and say this thread has been pretty insulting without any actual facts to it. You're right, a woman does carry the fetus for 9 months but after that? A parent is a parent is a parent. Doesn't matter what gender they are. I should know, I grew up with a single father pretty much my whole life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 07:18 PM
1

There will always be people that will revile something that works if only because it requires them to take responsibility and put forth effort. Oddly enough, this is my problem with TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 07:13 PM
2

k.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 06:57 PM
0

I'm not American, and /r/formula1 mostly is if I'm remembering the last survey right. For the citation, hunt around TBP and you'll see many instances of them saying I'm subbed just to watch. I'm not trying to make it seem like TRP is like half non-RP people. But the number of people who aren't is non-negligible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 08:50 PM
6

Formidable is a stretch IMO. Using /r/funny as our baseline for total reddit useraccounts (it's the largest sub). At 60k subscribers RP/RPW hasn't even broken 1% penetration yet. In the grand scheme of things, on reddit you guys are still very small and in the real world even smaller. As of right now, you're still pretty niche.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:23 PM
6

He's saying 50k isn't big. It's still very niche. Add in the fact that a lot of TRP subscribers and viewers aren't red pill and this is even more true. I was most likely in that count of 600 and I'm certainly not RP. EDIT: For example. /r/formula1 has 60k subs and 400 viewing currently. I can count the number of F1 fans i know IRL on one hand and none of them subscribe to the subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 05:11 PM
1

You do realize, we can see when you edit right? How bout you quote yourself from when our responses were actually made. :p
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 10:15 PM
7

You don't believe the ideology that has as one of it's baselines that women should be treated as children is explicitly anti-feminist... I'm completely baffled. No, because that says dick all about the feminist movement. If you're anti something you should be targeting that something. From the sidebar: Welcome to The Blue Pill Why are we here? So a link to the TRP equivalent. Then a hyperbole about TRP. If that's your definition of being a feminist movement then you're setting the bar pretty dam…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 07:04 AM
9

Dude. Just stop. No. It's there to lampoon TRP. Hence why it's called TBP. IMAGINE THAT!? Furthermore, it seems to be a minority of TRP members that would say that RP as a whole is ideological "anti-feminism." Can you cite anything about what you think BP's stance is? Is there a sidebar with recommended reading? Are there endorsed contributors attacking anti-feminism specifically, not TRP itself? You're trying really hard to conjure up a much deeper holy war of us vs them than what really exists…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:58 AM
5

Could you stop responding to things I didn't say? I'm not talking about feminism, I, am not, feminist I'm talking about BP. Not all blue pillers are feminist. Is that clear? PS: Your joke wasn't even witty.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:15 AM
6

Because those for the most part were already covered by the OP in that thread. And in regards to your earlier question, that would be somewhat better yes. BUT I still wouldn't be completely happy because it's not addressing my main issue with RP. That they distill people down into these neat little prototypes with nearly zero room for deviation. That goes for how RP describes women AND men. This also goes for how they try to find 'rules and formulas' for human interaction. I think it's dumb, lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 02:17 AM
8

You do realize that BP isn't some homogenous movement...right? I have my own thoughts on the topics of patriarchy and rape culture that would probably get me banned from SRS. They don't particularly like nuance, but judging by the response to my first reply you and sh1v don't really either. Maybe you guys could bond over that or something. Semi-serious question, does your inability to see things as not black and white in the metaphorical sense also translate to your actual ability to see colours…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 02:11 AM
7

I don't think there are problems that are caused by women OR men specifically. At a very local level you can have issues caused by individuals or even groups, but once you get up to the level of an entire gender problems tend to be created by society as a whole instead of whichever divide you choose. Also there's a huge difference between saying for sure it's because of issues like this: too lazy to actually file for divorce abusive prone to adultery and saying those are possibilities. I saw a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 01:18 AM
1

I think love exists. You could even say, I believe in a thing called love.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 07:34 AM
2

My family on the other hand, were worried about me, as they did not hear from me for a month. Yea this is a big issue for me too. I'm really bad at communicating with the people in my life when I'm trying to get a lot of work done on something.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 07:48 PM
1

That doesn't disprove what I was saying though. Like, I've straight up heard way more women say something directly about a dudes promiscuity as a negative and then shut him down than a man doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 02:59 PM
2

Yea I've had a few multiple week stretches of only sleeping 7 hours 3 nights a week. You haven't lived until you've had the 96hour no-sleep milestone hallucinations :/ EDIT: I should add, I have pretty substantial ADHD. And with that comes hyperfocus. I'm glad I can do it, but it fucks with my shit hard sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 06:10 AM
3

I tend to put everything else aside and power through. While I've gotten through a lot with method, I tend to seriously neglect other parts of my life while doing so. At times it has cost me friends, relationships and even my health.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 05:59 AM
0

At least in my experience. It's been the girls who have been more turned off by promiscuity. Heh, funny how things are sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 05:39 AM
0

Not really... Anyone who say's it's hard to get laid isn't actually trying or has social issues that go well beyond not getting laid. Even if we assume what you said was true though, why would that even matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 03:38 AM
5

Even if his story is 100% factual. He left the scene of an accident. That's never a smart idea... EDIT: Da Fuq? This is an ancient rule of thumb for when you're dealing with women and the police: If you and a woman have a disagreement and the police are called, you best prepare for the bitch to turn on the tears and accuse you of assault and/or rape. Always be filming.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 09:22 PM
1

Planning out some new car audio purchases. My wallet will be crying but my ears are going to have the biggest fucking grin ever on them. Also shopping around for a decent lowish cost arbitrary wave generator. Current frontrunner is the DG1022. Other than that, just listening to music and chilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 10:48 AM
6

Sort of, but I still don't agree with it. In other words they get the best of both worlds. 2 to 1 male to female ratio on dating sites. Women receiving far more messages on sites and offers of sex in all areas of there lives. I've never understood blaming women for this. I look at it like this: This is like getting mad at someone for accepting money that's being thrown at them instead of the people who are throwing it. Women aren't forcing men to be the pursuers. We're doing that all on our own.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 10:18 AM
3

That's true about you don't have to care about other men. But I think the focus of the issue is that it doesn't apply to themselves. They'll say they only want to settle with a girl who's slept with 0 to some small number of men, but at the same time go out every weekend to try to find a new girl to get with. It's perfectly fine to have a preference for lower partner count, but if you're acting the complete opposite way that's pretty hypocritical IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 08:23 AM
6

A bluepill would say absolutely not that's sexist. A redpill would say that a sexually unrestricted person is more likely to cheat and divorce. I'd say the sexist issue comes up when TRP says that this only applies to women. It's the double standard that's viewed as sexist. Plenty of BP posters have stated they don't want someone with a high partner count. But they also hold themselves to that standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 07:38 AM
2

Nope. What matters is what goes on while she's dating me. I'm not those other guys, and my relationship with her isn't the relationship she had with them, I don't give a fuck about her past exes/flings. Plus. She probably picked up a few tricks along the way, who doesn't like good sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 06:39 PM
11

smart engineering student good-looking frat boy It was the people who were both those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 10:27 PM
2

You didn't actually read it did you. I wish I could live life as blissfully ignorant as you. That'd be nice. among certain racial regional groups then? FTFY! Do you also think saying brown and black border collies are the same, is PC bullshit too?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 07:00 PM
3

Brah, it was the first fucking link in google.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 06:40 PM
6

If we don't do the proper studies without PC bullshit interfering than I guess we'll never really know for sure. Yea... The Human Genome Project was sooo PC. Looking at and publishing raw data and shit. Who do they think they are? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 06:34 PM
6

I don't need to know about your family's history. This is about you, not riding the coattails of daddy's money. I grew up surrounded by racist shits like you, and you know what? I crushed every single one, in school, in sports, and in life. I fed off that racism, I devoured it. The best thing that ever happened to me was having no shortage of people telling me I couldn't do something. Race is simply a genetic adaptation to environment. Too bad that has nothing to do with a racial divide. Regiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 05:38 PM
4

Soo... The age where we actually had the technology to do this properly. And really? You're complaining that racism is frowned upon? Here's the thing, even if we went back to the 1800's you wouldn't be some grand plantation owner, you'd still be a scrub. The only difference being you'd die of sepsis at 32.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 05:16 PM
4

sickle cell anemia, It's better than malaria IMO. significant differences on average between the races. It's been pretty well studied that there isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 04:53 PM
11

Uh... That seems to support what I was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 08:20 AM
5

Biology isn't my forte, but aren't genetic differences between people of different skin colours extremely small compared to, say, regional differences?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 05:56 AM
1

I just want to make myself proud and be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 11:01 PM
3

If anything, I'd argue that it's BP more so than RP that argues for difference. With RP, while they argue that men and women have these significant differences, within genders there's a prototype which all follow. AWALT and such. With BP, or at least my feelings on BP, we say that within genders there's more variation between people than there are between the average man and woman. This is where the whole treat people as individuals comes from. Don't assume because one person is a man or woman h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 03:48 PM
1

Confession time, I've never given it a thorough listen. It is my shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 02:52 PM
1

Def, he's put out some solid features on top of GKMC.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 02:40 PM
1

Have you seen the Wire? If not, watch it. If you have, watch Treme.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 02:37 PM
1

Amon Amarth Just watching them hair mill puts hair on my chest. Also have you seen this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-z8SS--1IM
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 02:31 PM
2

Music. What ya'll listening to? EDIT: Current iTunes top 25. http://imgur.com/67p5LZa, and recently played http://imgur.com/a/quZmq#0
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 07:11 AM
4

Looks best, which doesn't necessarily translates to wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 06:51 AM
1

dumbconclusions Except for the part where we've both said you didn't get any last night. You obviously enjoy a lot of zero bitch nights lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 06:25 PM
1

What the fuck are you even talking about? I made a joke about how you didn't get any last night, despite how awesome you tried to make yourself seem. You then wrote a paragraph rehashing how you didn't get any last night, when you could have just said that in a single sentence. Repeat with me now, "I, duckducklandwhale, did not get any last night." Simple, and concise! Literacy!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 06:16 PM
1

So... You didn't get any last night. K.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 06:11 PM
1

You mean, explain how you didn't get any last night? Naw, it'll be tomorrow eventually right? Oh wait...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 06:03 PM
1

dumb bitches to suck my dick in the future. K.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 06:00 PM
9

Dude, do you masturbate to the pages of a thesaurus or something? Doesn't it like...chafe?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 05:44 PM
1

sleeps with a Black man has "devalued" herself Woops. Sorry brah, I'll stop ruining them white girls for you. Yeafuckingright
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 07:32 AM
2

/u/mentalfork I assume. She coo'
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 07:26 AM
3

Turns out... I'm half white! Bamboozled again!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 03:17 AM
3

If you're white that would absolutely be icing on this ridiculous cake. PS. Don't call me nigga, my ancestors were slaves. Bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 02:14 AM
7

Yes, blanket statements about how you simply cannot respect a group of people totally isn't hate. While we're at it, might as well add black people, jewish people and most importantly aboriginal people to that list. None of them have ever done anything worthwhile, right? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 01:53 AM
7

I wonder why?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 01:43 AM
2

Who knew Ford hires sex pillows?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 10:15 PM
1

Yup, sorry about that. For some reason I thought it was a response to the 2nd post. Mah bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 10:12 PM
2

Last week Thursday.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 08:45 PM
9

he respects me as a person first. That's the kicker RP misses by a mile. The D/S dynamic is a layer on top of an existing, respectful and equal relationship. Not the foundation of one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 07:47 PM
13

There's a world's worth of difference between a kink D/S relationship and a RP one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 07:15 PM
5

Reposting the two responses from the old thread. "A) Currently in a relationship, but when I wasn't it was pretty much whenever I wanted to. Sex isn't really high on my priority totem pole, but I never caught myself thinking "Damn, I wish I was getting laid more" B) Quite. I have high standards. An example people like to bring up is my last ex. NY/Vancouver runway model who then became an engineer. C) Social circle mostly, though college parties are good options too. Not much of a club guy excep…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 06:35 PM
3

Also, why did you delete your "how often do you get laid" thread? I had a long ass reply typed up. Aww, he deleted it? Might it be because he wasn't getting the responses he was looking for? Must suck to hear people say they're getting laid and are happy when you were expecting people go to "I'm so blue pill my virginity practically irradiates the room!" EDIT: Reposted it myself, check the mainpage.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 06:32 PM
1

Hahaha oooh. I feel like I should have been able to guess that. Upsetting.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 06:02 PM
3

I'm so beta I don't even know what that acronym is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 05:40 PM
1

Actually I broke up with her, wasn't feeling the spark anymore. Our relationship had a few negative quirks and the sex was only okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 04:30 PM
11

TRP never stated that women were stupid You're kidding right? Stickied posts have never included gems such as "Women, the most responsible teenager in the house"? EDIT: Accidentally a word.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:34 PM
2

A) Currently in a relationship, but when I wasn't it was pretty much whenever I wanted to. Sex isn't really high on my priority totem pole, but I never caught myself thinking "Damn, I wish I was getting laid more" B) Quite. I have high standards. An example people like to bring up is my last ex. NY/Vancouver runway model who then became an engineer. C) Social circle mostly, though college parties are good options too. Not much of a club guy except for going to see a show.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:15 PM
8

If you're starting at 0, which seems to be a decently common trend on TRP I'd say so. However, this is with the caveat that it'd only really be with a certain kind a girl, one who's a bit wonky. If you're someone with good social skills and isn't having issues with women I'd think that going TRP would probably cause your sex-life to suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:11 PM
4

Err. RP is overly defensive of their supposed "self improvement" schtick, so you can't really talk. For the most part BP is like 90% pure satire and links, it was some of that 10% that I didn't want a part of. PS. Your flair isn't fooling anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 10:38 PM
2

You're telling me things I already know, I've seen RP for myself, I've seen BP for myself. I have my own opinions, I don't need you to feed me one... I used to be subscribed to BP, saw some things that made me want to distance from the community, so I left. Let's leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 08:35 PM
5

Well, to be honest, I do cringe at a lot of RP stuff. I think they take a lot of legitimate things too far and try to use simplifications as a scapegoat to actually learning how to interact with people. But that's another debate for another topic. That said, I'm not currently subscribed to BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:48 PM
4

Not entirely sure what makes up the PP/BP distinction so I'll say not-RP. Only child until I was 10, had an older stepbrother from 10-14 then now a younger stepsister from 16-present. Don't think it affected my views, I wasn't really close with the stepbrother and me and my stepsister aren't really close now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 06:44 PM
2

1) Physical attractiveness 2) Personality 3) Intelligence 4) Common interests. Pretty close to yours all in all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/14 06:02 AM
1

Yea. The atmosphere around online dating kind of makes me hang my head in shame for my gender. It's pretty bad. I don't know what's worse, the messages, or the fact that a lot of guys will take literally anything they can get when it comes to women. Maybe one day it'll change, until then, keep on keeping on CheddarGirl.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 02:19 AM
1

Uh dude. I'm not claiming anything with those numbers. The OP was the one doing that, and I was telling him why the numbers are biased. I was arguing why his RP interpretation of that data was bad... Take a step back from this Red/Blue pill shit and take a chill pill. Relax. Also, take a look at that data again, they explicitly say 0 is "least attractive". So it seems that's their interpretation of a 0 in the context of the analysis OKTrends tried to do. I don't agree with their methodology, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 01:02 AM
1

Then if you can't rate 0 through skips, how is the rating peaking at .8333? That wouldn't be possible. Hell, how is 0 anything BUT 0%?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 12:12 AM
0

Having issues finding an official explanation. I'll keep looking for it. That said, it's all over the OKCupid offical forums and the OKCupid subreddit. I'm sure someone would have spoke up to the contrary at some point if it was blatantly wrong. See here: http://www.okcupid.com/forum?tid=3066910342203564064 And here: http://www.reddit.com/r/OkCupid/comments/n3tm6/im_confusedskipping_someone_on_quickmatch_gives/ for just a few of the many examples you can find on a quick google.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:48 PM
0

FFS. I've laid it out pretty clearly. When you skip rating someone, the back-end assigns an automatic rating of 0 to that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 10:24 PM
6

Actually it peaks at .8333. Remember the part about skipping = 0? The whole curve has shifted over. You can't tell me that women think men have a mode attractiveness of .8333 out of 5. That's just ridiculous. Also, you say that women compete for the highest majority of men. Why is it then the the VAST majority of messages from women seem to be messaging men who are <2.5 if we take the data at face value. Why are the few messages they send out going to these supposedly sub-par men if they're comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 12:54 AM
4

A highly rated male will respond to the female Not necessarily. A highly rated male will only say something like "U wnt sum fuk?" No Most males will only say something like "U wnt sum fuk?" It was intentional hyperbole. I would say that most men don't particularly put too much effort into their messages though. Most males message a large percentage of the females they visit/rate/however it works on that website. Not an overwhelming majority, but a majority none the less. Yes. I'll agree that it …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 08:19 PM
3

Yes. It's not just one more time per day, it's one more time every damn time you rate someone a 4-5 pretty much. If they could, they'd stop those messages from the unattractive ones too, but they can't. They prevent the ones they can. Plus, once again, if it takes more than being physically attractive to get a girl going, what good does a guy who's only got his looks going for him do for her. It's still a no, no matter how chiseled his abs. You want this dynamic to stop? Guys need to stop being …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 06:24 PM
1

b) A lot of the messages women get are just straight up fucking retarded. Who'd want to get 20 messages a day about asking "U wnt sum fuk?" It takes more than being physically attractive to stand out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 06:06 PM
14

Ok, just to get this out the bag. There's a huge data influence that OKTrends fails to make clear, or even mention in a lot of cases. We know that women get messaged more than men do, so the men are the pursuer dynamic becomes more amplified in online dating. A negative side effect of this is that a) it makes the men look trigger happy with their messages to women and b) A lot of the messages women get are just straight up fucking retarded. Who'd want to get 20 messages a day about asking "U wnt…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 05:45 PM
4

Yea. Isn't the crossover chain something like TBP leads to SRD leads to TiA? EDIT: YUP. On SRD, SRS is a mighty 36 posters while TiA is at 297.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 03:49 PM
1

Err. By not doing something you've made a choice. That choice is an action no? So I asked if her taking action to have sex with him was equivalent to her taking action to drive a car. And your response is no, because (a) driving drunk is illegal and (b) he's a rapist. Uh, I was explaining why we still charge people with drunk driving despite the fact they're drunk as a skunk. he's a rapist Where did I say he? Who's the one assuming all rapists are men now?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 10:21 PM
2

What does that mean, and how does it apply to, for example drunk driving. If you are not "you" then why are "you" held responsible for what you did? Because you committed a crime. One with very grave potential consequences. It's not your actions that leads to someone else being a rapist. It's their actions. I think short-term memory remains relatively intact, but that the process of shoring the connections that constitute the memories doesn't take place, so that when you wake up you've forgotten…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 08:22 PM
3

When you say "blackout" drunk, you realize that the blackout happens later, yes? Actually it happens during, you don't "forget" what happened. Your brain just simply stops recording memories at all. Because of that lack of memory you're pretty much an automaton at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 07:53 PM
3

Errr. Did you miss this? And most blue piller's would disagree with that person. So to answer those questions. (1) Some blue pillers conflate "drunk" with "passed out and unconscious" You can be drunk, but not passed out and unconscious. Correct. What about being blackout drunk but still mobile? (2) other blue pillers have completely unrealistic views of human sexuality (and I gave one example) That person was wrong. Most of us would pretty easily agree about that. Ok. Your turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 07:22 PM
2

For myself, I'd agree. But I wouldn't tell someone they shouldn't feel that way in that situation. In either case, male or female, it'd be difficult to call it rape, but sexual assault is a possibility. However, call it whatever you want, the chances of anything actually getting anywhere legally is pretty much nil. EDIT: Either as the initiator or the receiver it's just not something I'd do and I do think it's kinda scummy. Good sex for me is when she really wants to be there, so I don't have an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 02:48 AM
0

I just hate the general attitude our society has where we try to relieve people of their personal responsibility. If you do something stupid fucking admit it, learn from it, and move the fuck on with your life. Don't blame other people, don't blame alcohol. Blame yourself for being an idiot. Everyone does stupid shit they regret, me included. That's just a part of life. There's no point running from it. And for the most part, that's what they do. Hell, most of these cases don't even move beyond …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 01:08 AM
0

Quite a few times. The reasons to do so fall under a few different categories. 1)She was too drunk. 2)She was too ugly. 3)Wasn't a place to be fucking. 4)Wasn't in the mood for sex. 5)Sleeping with that person would cause problems I did not want to deal with. 6)Didn't care enough to notice her advances until later, or when someone points them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 12:45 AM
1

However, I don't think it constitutes rape if you simply don't get in the way of a drunk person doing whatever it is they're trying to do. I think this boils down to was there a reasonable justification for non-action. As a more extreme example to demonstrate that: If a parent sees that their child is having a severe allergic reaction, but does not respond to help, were they negligent? Sure they didn't give the kid whatever caused the reaction, but does this inaction despite being aware of the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 12:41 AM
4

According to this blue piller, he's raping her. And most blue piller's would disagree with that person. You're trying to use a single fringe case as a excuse to avoid a question. So yea, that one person was a little off their rocker, I then ask you. So what? It's one person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 12:34 AM
0

I don't share this view. The way I see it, you choose to get drunk and you know the consequences. You know the potential consequences. There's a bit of danger in your line of thinking. Let's say I choose to go ride my bike in the city. I know by riding my bike, instead of walking, means that I am more likely to be killed by a vehicle. Can you say in any way though that it's my fault if it does happen? My view is that if someone is clearly initiating or asking for a sexual situation to be initiat…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 12:30 AM
1

Lol, implying that I actually want something other than sex from these women. Actually I wasn't. If I'm looking to hookup the last thing I want to deal with is some random chick who needs to play games and do shit like that. There's plenty of women out there, no need to stick your dick in crazy when you don't have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 11:38 PM
2

To be honest, I think that stands true for a lot of TRP. With the no thing, yea you can tell a lot about what they're meaning from other cues. Though to me, the women who do that kind of stuff (Say no but actually mean yes), are just not worth the risk. I'd just move on and find someone else who doesn't play games. The biggest issue most people have with it, and I'm inclined to agree, is that the person pushing through becomes the arbiter of what the no means. You aren't that person and you'll n…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 11:04 PM
2

That's opinion, not fact. I suspect most people (if they were being honest) would probably say their love life has room for improvement. That's where this: Plenty of people are succeeding by simply interacting with people, learning from their experiences and adjusting in different situations. Comes into play. The Red Pill is like writing a set of theories about how to write "The best song ever". Except it only deals with Grindcore and when people bring up or ask about other genres the author ada…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 10:46 PM
3

That sounds desperate as fuck. Like literally the farthest thing from something 'alpha' you could do. If you use a dryspell to convince yourself that taking the chance that you'd be raping someone would be worth it that is retardedly pathetic. I know you're just tossing up possible explanations, but anyone who actually thinks that way needs to take some time to reevaluate their priorities before rejoining society.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 10:39 PM
1

Did you just laugh at your own joke twice in one post?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 07:22 PM
1

Yea, recognizing that people are different is such a cheat-code. Most of us called that Kindergarten. And the crazy thing, that was talking about a similar, but slightly different situation. This is what we call nuance, it's something that's really useful to learn! Here's the thing, I really don't give a shit if you actually change or not. But maybe, someone else reading that might realize that treating people like people and simply having fun go a long way. It's not something that hard, nor som…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 07:08 PM
2

I cant see social retards functioning in that area if they think "asking someone to finger them in a dark club is what's up"? Even the social retards know that fingering girls in clubs should stay where it belongs. In the trailer park. Oh really? Well, damn. If that's the case the pros and experts need to rewrite the whole game. No longer is it a hunt for most males. Gotta kick them some of this new knowledge, yo. You know because having the power to turn society, dating, and mating norms on it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 06:31 PM
1

That sounds like a really sad way to look at the world. Shit, I hope you change your mind on that eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 06:12 PM
2

If you can't get her to the point where she'll pounce on you in a night, your game isn't as good as you think it is. The thing is it's not a fucking situation AT FUCKING all. It's par for the course for much of casual sex situations. No, not in my experience. My entire post was about one night stands. Again, I would say that's a coin-flip of a chance here. So am I. I'm saying taking that chance is thirsty as fuck. Are you just taking what you can get? Move on and find a girl who doesn't play tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 06:56 AM
3

First of all: Don't lump BP into the SRS/SJW/Radfem crowd. BP isn't even a thing beyond a sub-reddit that makes fun of stupid shit on TRP. I post on BP, but that doesn't mean I don't think the SJW crowd is filled with overzealous idiots. Because I do, and, they are. Second, "no/no, let's not do this/we shouldnt do this/ tihs is wrong/i barely know you" The first three are pretty damn clear, if a girl is saying those things but actually wanting to progress I'd probably GTFO. Sticking your dick in…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 12:22 AM
2

That one comes up a lot. You're with a girl you just met. Things seem to be going well. But the whole time you're together, the girl's smiles are fake, her laughs at your jokes are forced, she struggles not to jerk away at your every touch, because she's afraid of you and doesn't want to turn the encounter into something angry or uncomfortable. And by the end of the night, it's gone too far and she's having sex, pretending to like it, but the whole time, she's been fearful for her life in your p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 11:04 PM
6

Someone correct me if I'm wrong here... When enthusiastic consent is brought up, the TRP/PUA crew always mentions "What? Do I have to explicitly ask about every little thing? That'll Kill the mood!" I don't think that's what they mean, or at least that's not the sole way of meeting the requirement. If a girl is very actively participating, like guiding your penis or kissing you all over your body, I don't think you need to straight up ask in that situation. It's when a woman/man in some way seem…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 10:53 PM
4

The blurred lines thing makes no sense to me. If the artist says that's not what it's about how can you try to argue otherwise? It's like people who search through movies to find the most ridiculous allegories and despite the director saying they're wrong they start arguing with the person who's view actually matters. I think victim blaming is still all too common, and that some people wrongfully revere certain people/things to the point where their sense of justice becomes woefully blind. Think…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 10:32 PM
1

Now, if women are not really into relationships at that moment or are under the impression that putting out promptly is the way to get a relationship with a social demi-god they will shower the most attractive men with attention and a lot of men who would have been perfectly good partners will be left out or compete for scraps for over a decade. If the situation was reversed guys would do exactly the same thing. Once again, why sell yourself short? Sure those guys might be perfectly good partner…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 09:20 PM
2

Isn't that more about the obedient part than the being a girl part? Obedient boys get praise from teachers as well. Were there no girls who caused a ruckus at your HS? At least for me I think there were more fights between girls than there were between guys. While yes, the guys got sent to the principles office more, it was often for being a complete retard or drugs and things along those lines. While the girls, though went less often, went for more severe offences when they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 09:11 PM
2

Isn't it by that logic just a difference in body parts as well? But instead of genitals, it's brains? If emotional and physical endeavours can be so easily separated, why can't the purely fantasy based endeavour have the same separation? Maybe it's the fantasy that they seek, and the other person is just a means to an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 07:20 PM
3

Do you accept complacency from your partner? I know I sure don't, but I also know I as well need to progress as a person. In team sports, do you not expect your teammates to build their skills as well? By becoming better as individuals, you can become better as a team. This applies just the same to relationships. Why should you, or anyone else just accept a relationship as "good enough"? The day you stop progressing, is the day you stop living and start simply waiting for death.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 07:16 PM
2

The difference is that there are social constructs in place to shame men who cheat, and protect women who cheat. Can you elaborate on this? I've seen both genders get flamed pretty hard about cheating, but that's just my experience. There's social expectations for men to be loyal, forthcoming, supportive, etc, in LTRs, and the one's who cheat are irredeemable, cowardly pigs. Meanwhile, if a woman cheats in a serious relationship, she was probably emotionally neglected, or he was violent, or he p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 07:10 PM
3

So...? If she had so little going for her, why are all these men tapping that? It's not her fault that these guys are just throwing themselves at her. Wouldn't you do the same if women jumped at the same opportunity to get with you? This is like getting mad at someone for accepting money that's being thrown at them instead of the people who are throwing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 07:01 PM
3

Whenever a guy questions anything about women and the things they so, the first knee jerk reaction is to call him sexist. Most of the time this happens though, especially with TRP related things is because they're said without a shred of self awareness. You can't just spout off women are bad because _____, if whatever that blank is, is something that also applies to men. This is especially true when some claim of superiority is attempted at the same time. That's the sexist part. I don't think an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:50 PM
2

But why is different good? See what I mean? You can't quantify that, so there must be some feeling as to why different is better. If it requires a subjective feeling, how do we keep emotion out of that? If different carried the exact same utility, then the logical argument should override the benefits of different. So there has to be a component that is more important to us than the logical argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:11 PM
1

But all I meant was that young men get taught from a young age the lie that women are somehow morally superior than men (which we learn is definitely NOT the case). But shouldn't this become apparent at a fairly young age? Do people just completely ignore all the signs that women are just as ruthless as men? I just don't understand how someone could take that message, look at the world and people around them and yet still believe it. You didn't actually believe a woman's fart smells like roses r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:06 PM
3

But why let that other person do that? From a logical standpoint, cheating creates a logistical nightmare and unnecessary risk. Why is that pussy, better than the pussy you currently get? That's the emotional evaluation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:58 PM
1

Oh I don't disagree with that. To a degree. (I think TRP overestimates just how much a below average girl can pull) But as I mentioned in a different comment. But if that's what those women can get, why in the world would they aim lower? It'd be like telling Usain Bolt he tried too hard and should have just went for the bronze medal, to give the others a chance. If you had to put the blame on someone, why not put the blame on the men who are reaching down, for whatever reason. Why is it not fair…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:55 PM
2

It's always emotional. Emotion is what differentiates their current partner, from the one they cheat with. Without an emotional evaluation there isn't a reason to cheat in the first place. The one instance you could argue is purely physical is if the partner isn't capable of getting them off, and even then, the choice to stay in the relationship instead of initiating a breakup is emotion based.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:49 PM
2

She's saying that physical cheating is a superset of emotional cheating. In one instance you actually pursue the fantasy physically, in the other the fantasy is merely created mutually with someone else on an emotional level, but not acted on.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:38 PM
2

Is this similar to what you're looking for? http://www.statisticbrain.com/infidelity-statistics/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:13 PM
2

A woman is more likely to have many guys pursue her But once again, this suggests that those higher tier guys are aiming low, for shits and giggles for all I can tell. Why doesn't TRP blame them? If some 10 came up to you and showed interested, wouldn't you act on that? How can you put any blame on someone who's simply doing the best they can? (Pun not intended)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:12 PM
2

If my girlfriend starts to let herself go, acts all mean and just turns into a grouch, I'd drop her too and look for an upgrade. Who the fuck is telling people this? Where is this message coming from, and why aren't alarm bells ringing in people's heads when they know that they themselves, would not stick around in that situation? I just don't understand how people could carry this mental disconnect between their own feelings of attraction and those of others. It's like the people who think thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:08 PM
2

But the way the community frames it comes off as blaming women for their inability, as men, to become complacent. Why you do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 05:02 PM
2

(average women are too busy hooking up with hotter guys to create relationships with average men, and hotter guys are too busy hooking up with average women to create relationships with attractive women). But if that's what those women can get, why in the world would they aim lower? It'd be like telling Usain Bolt he tried too hard and should have just went for the bronze medal, to give the others a chance. If you had to put the blame on someone, why not put the blame on the men who are reaching…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 04:59 PM
0

Why is it male skewed though? Doesn't that suggest then that men are selling themselves short? Shouldn't they be tightening up their standards if they're the ones reaching down? If someone is to blame for that skew, I'd have to put the onus on the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 04:56 PM
2

Its the 5s, the 6s and the 7s who ride the carousel because those little hyperganauts use their sexuality to boost themselves into an alpha orbit. That necessarily means that some men are drowning in,um..., female attention, whereas a lot of men who would be their peers are simply ignored. But that same cutoff applies, and I'm sure for even better looking guys the cutoff is even stricter. If I feel that you're not near the peak of what I can get, I nope the fuck out. Out of all my male friends, …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 04:51 PM
2

Haha it's all good, sorry if I was being overbearing. I can usually figure out how people rationalize various things but this I just can't figure out. I hate being confused about things so I'm kinda desperate for answers. Thanks for your responses though!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 12:26 PM
1

Well Alberta=Texas so that's out. Ohio has that combo of being full of farmland and full of sometimes subtle, sometimes overt racism. Couldn't think of a state that lined up with that better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 12:02 PM
5

I touch on this in a different comment: Like for me personally, beyond any moral reasons, cheating has never crossed my mind because I don't settle in the first place. And doesn't that line of thinking support that hypergamy is a good thing? If you date the best you can date, any possible temptations look shittier in comparison. Also, other may feel differently, but isn't someone feeling like they settled in a relationship a bad thing? Who the fuck wants to be someone's consolation prize? Find a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 11:57 AM
10

women basically always go for deep and meaningful relationships. How did this notion come to exclude some basic level of physical attraction? For me with LTR's, looks only take you so far; A woman would also need to be intelligent, have a great personality, be good in bed and bonus points if you bring something unique to the table. How did the idea that deep and meaningful are exclusive to physical attraction come about? IMO they're intertwined, and I don't think I know anyone who thinks differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 11:43 AM
8

I can agree in hookup culture this hierarchy becomes more apparent, as LTR's have more diverse requirements based on the person, but again I just can't wrap my head around the way TRP views it. It's focused strictly on women, and they act like it's a witch to be burned at the stake. It's almost as if they view it as evil. I just don't get how that's something you could ever hold against someone. Do they expect these hot girls to hookup with average/ugly guys out of the goodness of their hearts? …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 11:36 AM
1

Don't know if it's a black person thing. I'm a biracial guy who grew up in Canada's version of Ohio. Most of my friends were white, but if someone needed to get called out we called out their shit. One thing I noticed too, does it seem like a lot of the guys in this thread are taking the advice given from their parents ('the lie'), and trying to apply it to hookups? They're older, and they're your parents, I thought it was a given that kind of advice would've been about LTR's.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 02:33 AM
2

I think most of the actual relevant points come from a misunderstanding of RP theory. The main part that I'm trying to get a dialogue on is that TRP seems to be a good thing for a guy to follow, assuming it's true. It directly addresses things that a good number of guys on reddit struggle with. Why is it then, that reddit as a whole seems to reject TRP with such vigor? We don't see this on other improvement subs, and even on other subs surrounding sex. If there was as much to gain as is suggeste…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 03:51 AM
2

I don't think I agree but I do see where you are coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 02:11 AM
1

This is the TRP culture and this is what men feel when they understand the reality of the situation. Who the fuck wants to be an non-respected undervalued beta-orbiter? Am I wrong though in saying that it's not an us vs them thing like it is with the 1% but instead the goal is to become one, or at least exhibit more traits that an alpha would have? Isn't that the self-improvement aspect of TRP that gets mentioned a fair amount? You can be whatever you want. RP doesn't tell you what to be. People…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 02:09 AM
2

Just to be clear, I don't think it is a bad thing. TRP doesn't either, some people are just bitter because they feel as though they have been lied to about women's sexual desires/strategies. If that's how you feel, I'm not going to tell you you're wrong. But I will say that the bitterness and shaming of women for 'hypergamy' stands out considerably for someone who is looking at the sub, and maybe that's something the community should look at addressing if that's misrepresenting things. I don't k…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 02:05 AM
2

But look at the language used to describe people who aren't alpha on TRP. The vast majority of people on RP seem to look down on them, beta-orbiters and other such terms. There definitely is a narrative that they are superior than those betas/BP. If it was for the sake of knowing, wouldn't the main target of the malice be on those alphas? Much like the hatred towards the 1% that we see? If it was all about knowing, why do we have RP Theory in regards to picking up women, or field reports? Aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:59 AM
2

Also the number of sexual partners someone has doesn't have anything to do with hypergamy. A women who sleeps with a thousand morbidly obese heroin addicts, is not as hypergamous as a woman who will only sleep with professional athletes. Hmm, maybe I don't quite understand the concept in TRP's view. With your example though, why would that be a bad thing? If they can continually get someone who meets a high standard, why shouldn't they? Same goes for guys, why would a guy lower his standards jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:52 AM
5

What about CMV? :( Some people there have a lot of success on some pretty varied and controversial topics. And I kinda agree about taking it seriously, I get a funny mental image when I think about it in my head. That said, there are some people out there who are pretty good at gaining sway online.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:45 AM
3

Being able to compel people to listen and accept what you say. Being able to disarm someone who tries to undermine your point. Pretty much being able to carry yourself in a way that grants you social or political sway.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:29 AM
2

Well, considering that you're the one who first used the "If ____" I'm not sure how I'm the one moving goalposts. You tried to preempt a different rebuttal while ignoring actual question I posed so I shut that down before it got any further. It's hard to say that I might use that as an argument if I show that I haven't even got close to bringing it up, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:25 AM
0

In the manner you've described it, and with the justifications you've used I can def jive with that even though I'm not sure I agree. To me it seems that TRP as a whole lets some anger blind that legitimate reason for the difference, and buries it in a tonne of vitriol and unnecessary crudeness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:23 AM
2

Ok, if that chart isn't enough, how about the census data straight from the government? https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0096.pdf These tables show an even greater difference between men and women. Men are more twice as likely to have >15 partners. Also, once again, those who haven't got any attention are pretty similar. Note that this includes oral, which is like a pretty base level sexual encounter. Once again, the data pretty clearly suggests it's the guys, if anyone, su…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:20 AM
5

I do agree to a point. The two skills are different, but there is a considerable amount of overlap in the kind of persona that does well at either IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:06 AM
5

Oh, please. We know why you included them and have seem those accusations several times before. Dude, then my argument would have ended up being "Why does the red pill reject the red pill despite the red pill seemingly being an attractive option?" That sure makes a whole lot of sense eh? No those statements weren't about the red pill. This is meant to discredit an opposing view without dealing with the merits of the counterargument." Yes, but what's the counter argument? I was saying X group of …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 01:05 AM
1

It doesn't offend me, but it bothers some people. It's not so much the offensiveness factor that I do kinda take issue with, it's the fact it seems so unnecessary. The words used to describe these negative behaviour in women seem to exist in their current state for the sole purpose of being vindictive, and to elicit a specific emotional response in both RP and BP alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:50 AM
3

Right well I am guessing a pretty huge percentage of men get absolutely no sexual attention whatsoever. And I am guessing the percentage of men in this category is much larger than the corresponding category in women. But doesn't that chart pretty much explicitly say that this isn't the case? That the number of men and women who get no attention are almost identical in number? I would agree most men don't. Not sure what this changes. My point was just about how those accounts of being an unattra…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:48 AM
4

I don't want to debate whether or not women who have higher partner counts are less desirable as long term partners. But I am curious why this assumption doesn't carry over to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:45 AM
2

Don't be obtuse. You know what we're talking about. No I don't in fact. They help people get laid, you help people get laid. So obviously the issues people have go beyond just "sexual strategy". Plus, the steady criticism of feminism from the MRAs there attracts a lot of negative attention from Reddit. Really? A website who's demographics primary include young college age men who are tech focused will be influenced more by feminists than men's rights? The more abrasive feminists get more flack o…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:41 AM
3

says the researchers omitted anyone with 0 That was for the average calculation, not for the number of partners chart. they aren't getting a lot of sexual attention, and as a result have to initiate to get intimacy. But those women weren't saying they don't get a lot. They were saying they don't get any at all. Even moderate manosphere blogs encourage tons of volume (1 approach a day for years, 20-25 approaches a day for 6 months, etc.) But most guys don't do that kind of volume either. So even …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:20 AM
6

Seriously? How are false assumptions and insults relevant in a debate? Except that most of those things you pointed out weren't even about TRP members. They were about the general population of reddit to bring up the question of why do they not flock to TRP. Soo... Unless ad hominem now includes statements used to create a point, aren't used as a means to refute, nor are even about the person that the statement is opposing, I'm failing to see the ad hominem here. It's basically turning the discu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 12:10 AM
1

Well check out some fat acceptance/HAES blogs and you'll find a fair amount of hate towards fitness and nutrition, but sure on reddit almost nothing get more hate than TRP. Have you seen TiA? HAES gets shit on pretty much anywhere, even TwoX shits on them. I'd personally put the blame on the fact that the really bad subs, GreatApes , AntiPoli ect, don't ever venture outside of those subs the way TRP tends to. TRP is a much more visible target and thus gets the most flack. The fact that the sub a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 11:52 PM
2

Why not use direct language? Why dress it up to make it seem extra negative? Simply put, women see men with a high partner count (of quality women) in a positive light, and men see women with a high partner count (with men in ONS/FWB) in a negative light. If that premise is correct, what compels the onus to be on women to not sleep around, instead of men accepting women that do?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 11:38 PM
8

Errr... You do realize that you're cherrypicking fragments out of complete sentences right? Even so, how are any of those things irrelevant? Ad Hominem isn't "he said something bad about me", it's bringing up something irrelevant to the topic at hand and using that to discredit any arguments. All of those topics are directly related to what I was talking about, thus, by definition not ad hominem. Notice how I didn't go you're wrong because ____ , where ____ is something completely unrelated. I u…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 11:33 PM
5

How many people actually claim to be charismatic leaders? I see far more self-loathing and people decrying how beta they've been. It used to be quite often that people would make threads about how they're backsliding into "beta-behaviour", but I think the mods have been deleting those posts now. Isn't charisma completely within TRP's definition of alpha? Is that not something the sub encourages working towards? I don't expect every member to be charismatic, but outside of a few communities (That…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 10:54 PM
3

To me though, it's not so much the claim as the language used. For a guy, the words used are positive. However, for women the terms used are all negative or crude. Like cock carousel, that's just a silly phrase with little reason to exist except to paint those women in a negative light.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 10:49 PM
2

Thanks for your post. There's a lot of substance to this response. As for the SMV and sexual market stuff, we can debate that, but you are not really offering much of a reason to reject it here. I would agree that it could seem like 'revenge fantasy,' and no doubt some treat it that, but that doesn't say anything about the accuracy or usefulness of the content. I didn't want to directly debate any specific RP tenets because it's been beaten to death and never gets anywhere. What I did want to fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 10:45 PM
10

I'll get to this post in a bit. In the meantime though, that post was never meant to be "standard debate". On that topic though, what'chu prefer, cross-x or parliamentary? Anyways: The narratives many have been fed throughout their lives from their parents, BP friends, authority figures, books, TV shows, movies, music, etc. about how relationships and attraction work are false. This can be startling for some who expected to find their unicorn and have a dream marriage. But the RP constantly beli…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 10:04 PM
1

I'm 6'2", so yea I know that helps me. The point I'm trying to make though, is that I feel that the reason why they aren't having success is because they're looking for that quick reward. They look for these guides that boil dating/hooking up down to a bunch of easy to follow tomfoolery. Same goes for the overly nice guys, they just turn off their brains and try to let their wallet and favours do all the talking. Sure both of these will work on a certain segment of girls, but it isn't addressing…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 07:51 PM
3

There's another thing that I've never really understood about the red pill that I'm hoping you can explain. The target audience of TRP, especially on Reddit, is a guy in the 20-25 range that's had struggles with girls or has had a girl wrong him in some way. And the TRP is supposedly some "harsh truth" that shows them the reality of the world. But if you think about it, what's exactly so harsh about it? You're telling a bunch of dudes who've had some variety of issues with women that there's the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 08:43 AM
2

Personally, I think the issue comes back down to what I was talking about in that other comment thread. Women are complex, each one is different and responds to different things. Instead of recognizing that and learning how to be socially intelligent a lot of guys try to find the easy way out, they seek out these prepackaged guides instead of actually doing the real work. They look for these guides because they think they can just blindly follow steps 1 through 9 and a girl will magically fall i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 04:49 AM
1

A RP guy telling me that's not going to work? Colour me shocked. Simply shocked. This is absolutely a groundbreaking revelation. PS: Before you start spouting off a bunch of anecdotes, I have just as many of my own. So save yourself the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 03:06 AM
1

And I used an extreme example to show how MOST guys think. Except it's not. Notice how all your generalizations are met with A) disagreement and B) downvotes? You know why? Because they're fucking retarded. Why the fuck would I want sleep with some girl who just molested me? Like fuck bro, do you not respect yourself? The fact you'd jump at that chance is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/14 05:34 PM
3

The fact that you said that like its a valid thing to do shows what kinda dude you are. You sound upset. I suggest you calm down. When you say that to a guy with less experience you should break it down & let him know that you can't "be nice" to women the same way you "be nice" to guys. Wait... So you think being nice to a guy is overusing compliments, spending a lot of them and so on? Dude, if that's what you do, I think you might be... you know how to attract that 1 woman Yes, because she's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/14 12:22 AM
1

Right from the jump any guy who knows anything about women will start laughing. Because let me guess, you think being nice is letting people run all over you? To just throw money, time and compliments at girls? If so, that's exactly the shit I was ranting about in my previous post. You have no idea what it's like to attract women. Uh...Sure, if you say so. I'll have to double check with my girlfriend about that though, just to be sure. airing on the side of boldness than being nice. First of all…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 09:52 PM
6

Negging is stupid. I'll tease someone if I think it'll make the person laugh. This is so spot on. There's nothing wrong with playful teasing; Getting a girl to laugh and enjoy herself is a good thing. Negging is like taking that concept, throwing out any sense of social nuance and just making her feel shitty. It's not even a fine line, it's not hard to tease without venturing into mean territory, but for some reason a lot of people seem to struggle with that. They went too far, then made up a na…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 05:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter