TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AlexSpoon3 Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by AlexSpoon3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Sex selective abortions.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 03:39 AM
9

"Female-specific conditions weren't even considered until the 1900's." No idea how you came to believe that, but it's a lie. The Hippocratic corpus has gynaecological tracts dating back hundreds of years before the time of Julius Caesar. "Women weren't included in pharmaceutical clinical trials until 1993" Women's birth control pill came out decades before that. Do you honestly think that they tested women's birth control pill on men first? Your claim is just wrong. Women DID get included in cli…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:08 AM
17

"However, female healthcare is still miles behind in terms of quality and informed consent." Women's healthcare gets significantly more spending. The number of offices for women's health in the United States exceeds those for men's health by a large margin. "They didn't even consider women humans." This is just nonsense. I simply don't know who convinced you of this, but it just reeks of a nonsensical statement. "Just because men are slightly disadvantaged in early education (because men don't b…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 06:46 PM
2

They were not 'ladies', but otherwise, you are correct.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 03:08 AM
7

I think men's rights includes the right to view games, tv series, or movies usually intended for women. You don't want to read Pride and Prejudice, fine. But, it did get written well. You have a right to read it (assuming you can legally obtain a copy of it... you might have to purchase a copy or have a library card). A few years ago a movie theater tried to bar men from viewing a public showing of some new version of Wonder Woman. The movie theater got sued for violating anti-discrimination law…
/r/MensRights25/09/25 06:40 PM
1

I'm 46 and never had a child. I don't recall minding at all in my 20s and 30s, nor having any second thoughts until a few years ago. Something though changed recently and I started wondering about the value of my life (maybe because of a game I've played). When I've stayed present-oriented, I've managed to think that just being alive is enough. But when I think about the future, I've started to doubt that just being alive is enough. We all will die someday. What value does one's life for people …
/r/MensRights17/09/25 07:56 PM
2

Cat-calling is not contrary to the laws so far as I know. Harassment does NOT mean "annoyed" in law. It refers to a *pattern* of behavior. Leaving people alone *is* anti-social. Encouraging others to leave other people alone is anti-social, since there doesn't exist social interaction if such happens. "Ohh right, there's no issue with catcalling, of course, let's listen to 1 bloke on an MRA subreddit instead of literally every woman you could talk to about the topic." No, it's NOT literally ever…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 10:14 PM
2

Cat calling is NOT anti-social. It takes place in the context of people. It's not a solitary activity. There is no issue with catcalling. There does exist an issue with censorship and those who can't imagine positive intentions to other people's speech, nor can realize that words are never harmful like sticks and stones can be.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 10:21 AM
3

I think u/SidewaysGiraffe meant to refer to the Eastern Orthodox Church, not The Vatican. But, I think your points still stand.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 09:29 PM
37

Lies, lies, and more lies. There are so many lies, that you may as well avert your eyes.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 02:13 AM
1

"In fact a large percentage of women in academia, especially at the doctorate levels, are also coming from useless majors like Gender Studies, Women Studies, Sexuality studies etc." I think that there exist women get those degrees and then go into human resources or to work at domestic violence shelters. So, though they almost certainly are wrong with respect to the real world in their pre-established conclusions that they indoctrinate people into, calling them "useless" doesn't seem accurate.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 01:58 AM
7

I get unwanted links to cam "model" sites plenty of time. I don't know what they are "modeling" though.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 03:58 PM
3

Aren't women the majority of elementary and secondary school teachers though? Seriously, there have to exist women who deserve blame if talking about how the education system disadvantages men.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 03:56 PM
2

Except mothers are often the people who "decide" such. But, I thought of circumcision first when reading this question.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 03:53 PM
0

We are all on the electromagentic spectrum. We also end up somewhere on the spectrum of political opinion. A pharse like "on the spectrum", thus isn't clear as to what you mean. And for anyone who asks you "are you on the spectrum?" you may as well not respond to such a person for being insufficiently specific. O. K., I'm not on an antibiotic spectrum.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 12:55 PM
16

Yea, and you're in finance and have a trust fund too, bro!
/r/MensRights10/06/25 02:38 PM
5

There is no fear shown in saying that no medical intervention can make a man a woman or the other way around. It's simply a truth.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 08:15 AM
2

Or as if women weren't the vast majority of practicing psychotherapists.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 11:46 AM
2

No, they do not advocate for equal outcomes in college graduation rates, since women have LONG made up the majority of graduates. They do advocate equal outcomes *for women* though.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:08 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 02:30 PM
6

Genital mutilation laws are not gender neutral in the United States. They don't protect boys usually, if not always.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 03:56 AM
22

Anyone you can quote on this? This would indicate one way in which feminism is a supremacism movement. But moreso, feminism says that men have oppressed women throughout history. That's another way of implying female superiority, because such a claim means that men are morally inferior, and women morally superior.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 07:56 PM
9

Some people have said that her sentence wasn't long enough. I don't know what punishment would be like for a male perpetrator and a female victim, but they probably should have equal penalizations, and not some sort of discount for being a female perpetrator, as Sonia Starr's study of 2012 demonstrated often does happen.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:25 PM
9

My empathy is turned on her, because there is a clear male victim. You show very clear evidence of the empathy gap, because you're not showing empathy for a male victim in this case. I don't care about what you hear otherwise or in other situations... you are the one here who lacks empathy for a victim of a serious physically harmful situation.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:23 PM
23

"never called out..." I'm pretty sure that there are male judges convicting other men for domestic violence.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:48 PM
31

I'm pretty sure criminal punishment is not getting away with things.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:48 PM
27

Comes to men's rights subbreddit... Thinks men should just shrug their rights off when some men suffers from assault and attempted murder.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:47 PM
18

Lock her up. That's my reaction. Oh... and don't spare the prison labor requirements on this one also!
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:44 PM
4

"Sickles is better!" - Harvey Lembeck/Eric Von Zipper
/r/MensRights15/05/25 01:09 AM
13

I don't know. I know plenty of women in some games I play these days. Some have more hours than me easily.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:18 PM
35

All I have to say that is... GAME ON!
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:15 PM
13

Their historical illiteracy goes back to the Declaration of Sentiments. They said in their that men had throughout history denied women their rights. Then in the next sentence, the first right in their list is voting rights. Clearly they didn't know that most governments have been NON-DEMOCRATIC and often monarchies or had a sole ruler. Or they knew and were willfully implying the falsity that in most historical periods men had voting rights.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:52 AM
-1

She's said before that she calls certain individuals who are male adults, "boys". Of course she has good points, but she's an advocate for a certain type of manhood. She's not an advocate for men she deems immature (even if those men are adults). Oh wait... maybe you meant "fantastic" literally, as in being a fantasy version of an advocate.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 06:35 PM
1

Looking up Florida Rape Laws, I find this: "Or, the prosecutor must prove a union by the defendant's sexual organ with the victim's mouth, vagina, or anus." https://www.findlaw.com/state/florida-law/florida-rape-laws.html
/r/MensRights13/01/25 11:08 PM
1

It looks like this is a story from Orlando, Florida. At the very least, Orlando is a major metropolitan area in Florida, and the lower right part of the video says "Orlando", and that usually refers to the city of the news program on television in the United States. 8th grade gets mentioned in this video, and that's often 13 to 15 year olds. She, at 26, is too old for Romeo and Juliet type rape law exceptions to apply. So, this is rape according to the laws of Florida according to this source: h…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 11:01 PM
19

Don't worry, we don't want our masculinity in your feminism either.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:19 AM
0

According to the citation process, a citation is needed for the University of Mary Washington source. But there is no citation for it! Also, I'm fairly sure that we aren't at the University of Mary Washington. Nor adhere to their ridiculous and absurd standards. For example that link says: "Use numerical data, such as statistics." No. A citation is not categorically needed for that. Someone has to do those calculations. Or someone has to come up with those statistics. Whoever does that, comes as…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 12:44 PM
-1

A citation on your request for a citation is needed.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:56 PM
4

I would advise against being so sure. Men's ability in chess might get underestimated by these sorts of gendered tournaments. I remember a while back some stupid television discussion with John McEnroe where some of the panelists said that Serena Williams was the best tennis player. That undervalues the top male tennis players, since a few to a few dozen of them could beat Serena Williams.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 05:33 AM
0

For something like chess, yes, if biological factors affect whom your models are, then an inference of someone being a bigot strikes me as fair. Biological factors though can be important for role models in other areas like say parenting or imparting wisdom or life advice to younger generations.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 05:29 AM
6

This concedes the argument though to those who say that "men are smarter than women" (in chess). I mean it implies that the best male chess players have more intellectual ability (in chess) than the best female chess players, a priori (before the games are played). But, what's our basis for saying that the best male brains work out that way, because of their physical features? And why should women get this sort of special favoritism for a competitive activity? Are girls so dumb that they need to…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 05:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter