TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Amazing_Rope_Police Archive

View 11 posts and 558 comments by Amazing_Rope_Police on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
145

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights22/07/21 08:24 AM
131

False AccusationAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights28/01/20 08:19 AM
85

Social IssuesAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:28 AM
83

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:00 PM
73

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights29/08/20 11:19 AM
61

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:04 PM
27

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights30/09/20 05:01 PM
19

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights08/07/22 11:32 AM
19

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:17 AM
16

GeneralAmazing_Rope_Police/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:06 PM
8

Amazing_Rope_Police/r/AntiFeminists04/01/20 08:21 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

And why did he hit his kid hard enough to draw blood? It's a 4 year old. When my sister was 4 years old, she hit the curb with her push bike, faceplanted, and tore up her chin so bad, it had to be stitched together. Little children are fragile as shit.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 10:00 PM
9

Yeah, well Eliot Roger and a couple others went out of their way to make their violent acts supposedly emblematic of a movement. Should we make a list of domestic terrorists and violeng saboteurs who claimed to be feminists?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 08:38 AM
2

There have been great social experiments in history, some with success, some ending disastrously. And with yet others, the jury's verdict is still not out. I think we should give TRUE equality - read, the abolishment of gynocentrism - a try. Two things can happen: 1: Society gradually collapses. It can't be much worse than feminism, honestly. In this case we know that traditional gender roles are the way to go, if we want stability. 2: It works. In this case, this is clearly a preferable option.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:49 PM
10

Every time this BS comes up, I always point out that according to contemporary science, at least 500 individuals in a 50/50 split are necessarily to maintain genetic diversity for continued survival in humans. Not 1 man and 499 women. So this whole "one man can repopulate the earth" logic is MASSIVELY flawed.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:43 PM
16

how can you be accused if there is no proof? Have you been in a coma for the past 4-5 years?
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:32 AM
1

The post specifically asked not to bring up pro choice/life No, the post say don't make it about that, and no, I didn't bring up pro choice, pro life. I asked you if you support women's right to abortion, because: The post ays: I forgot to mention but this would only be a option for the same time period a women has abortion available. ...and... This just gives men the same rights as women Meaning female abortion is a prerequisit for male financial abortion. Your reasoning says: both people invol…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:52 AM
1

I've read your comments, and you're all over the place. Stop beating around the bush: Do you, or do you not support legal abortions (as in, pregnancy terminations for women)?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:25 AM
2

I think you're getting downvoted purely because of your 8 week - 4 week example. That's a massive, and unrealistic time gap. 8 weeks pregnant - 7 weeks to financially abort would, for example, help. There would also have to be a clause that if the mother doesn't legally notify the biological father, the father has no responsibilities.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:20 AM
2

Well you will be surprised, but such systems already exist around world, usually they called social support. ...and yet that's not the standard system used, and we still force fathers to go into debt for children they don't even have custody over. For reference: in the US there are around 19 million single parent children, and 123000 outright orphans. The cost of raising a child is an annual 15k on average - for single parent children let's cut that in half, so that's 19M * 7.5k + 123k * 15k = 1…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:52 AM
1

Every single person who uses the "for the good of the child" argument is henceforce forced to pay $2000 extra per year in taxes for social welfare. Would they all be happy with that I wonder? I had an argument about this with a female friend of mine recently. She's about to divorce the dad, and become a single mother, living off of 20k annual, plus around 15k giften by rich parents, according to her own admission. She recently had 3 sexual adventures, all without rubber, and according to her per…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:44 AM
4

Was what i have said in favor a particular gender ? Don't think so. Why? I simply reflected on your comment. I think putting women and men in two sides of a ring only makes it worse I think acknowledging that they ARE placed in two sides of the ring is important. Feminists have been getting away with giving women privileges that indirectly snub men for decades, and their go-to reasoning was always "it's not a zero sub game". But whenever men apply for the same privileges, they shoot it down. "Sh…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:16 AM
10

Ok, for real tho - ever noticed that whenever stuff like this happens, they always pick the most Instagram-ready picture of the woman? If you google Marka Bodine, this image comes up, among others. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to attach this to the article, and not the one where she looks... let's be honest. Attractive? For reference, this is the picture of a male child rapist.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:59 AM
1

>Then what a normal girl with income and a life expects from a man Emotional support. The majority of women are incapable of living without a spouse. Spend a significant amount of time with a terminally single woman, and you will see that women without a partner often start behaving like actual goddamn sociopaths. They will jump onto radical ideologies, join cults, become unbearably bitchy and self-absorbed, and in general become a nuisance to society. You think single men in their 50s are bad? …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:50 AM
4

I'm fine with my right hand, but for real - I wish there was more social acceptance for those realistic looking sex dolls. FACT: If you put someone in a room with a realistic sex doll, they WILL slap their tits. Realistic sex dolls are THE SHIT. So why the social stigma? But getting a realistic replica of Mandingo's dick, with a suction cup at the end, is totally normal.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:44 AM
1

The toiler scene was gratuitous, but it was a lawyer, and a scummy one at that. I know it's movie logic, but the only reason that scene existed is because Spielberg wanted social commentary on how much everyone hates lawyers. And as I said, there were quite a few gruesome deaths, but very few were presented from the perspective of the victim, with the camera following them around, and going from one peril to another. It's just overall a very weird scene. There's also something about seeing the f…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:05 AM
1

Yup. Not just deaths though. Movies and shows in general are a lot more relaxed about showing the suffering of men, than those of women.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:47 PM
-2

To be fair, the issue with that scene isn't that it's a woman, but that: She wasn't someone who got her comeuppance, unlike most deaths in previous movies. Her death was shown in WAAAY too much detail. I don't recall EVER seeing a death in a Jurassic Park film where a character's death was followed by the camera in close-up. EDIT: You mf'ers need to chill, and stop downvoting me just because I have a different opinion.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:46 PM
2

Well, I don't think they are anti-male, maybe it's just the women are wonderful effect. I am sorry for your hearing loss, however. Maybe if they listened to patients more, instead of treating them like idiots... I will say this. I have MS. My neurologist is the most respectful, professional, and concerned doctor I have ever had the displeasure of meeting, and she's a woman. Generally doctors are just a mixed bag. If there is a well defined bias and hatred in healthcare, it's towards elderly or d…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 08:08 AM
2

Once again, a troll.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:37 AM
2

Gynecologists might not be able to treat all issues, but they are able to organize a comprehensive treatment plan for sex-related medical issues for women, and do this with reasonable confidentiality. This is not true for men. You can commit to any kind of mental gymnastics, but you're still wrong.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:02 PM
1

You just spenr an entire comment explaining how the system works, giving anyone reading it a headache, and you ask at the end where the "gap" is. That's it. I'm not worried about a gap, I'm worried that tbe whole thing is too segmented to be really focused. Think of it from a "user" perspective. You're a woman? "I'll just visit my ob/gyn!" You're a man? "Let me book an appointment with my proctologist**, my urologist, and my endocrinologist." And then if there is an issue affecting more than one…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 12:23 AM
2

You're moving the goalpost. "University hospital" - read, the most up-to-date hospitals out there.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:11 PM
2

Hospital. They don't exist in hospitals for a reason. The only utility of andrologists for you, and the general populace, is doing vasectomies and circumcisions. I.e. elective surgeries. They don't deal with men's health issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:10 PM
0

The vast, vast majority of male specefic health concerns can be addressed by one of three specialities: endocrinologist, urologist, or a fertility specialist You completely forgot proctologist. The whole point of my post is that by creating a profession that does all 4, you make people's lives much easier, and make treating certain diseases more efficient. This would introduce SOME redundancy into the healthcare industry, but it would also make men way more likely to actually go to a doctor. Ima…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:07 PM
4

On the other hand, if you wanted to be a contentious brat... Well, you're doing just fine. Have you read my post? Did you understand everything written in it? Including this argument: "if you've been around the medical field a while, you know that finding and treating certain diseases is greatly enhanced if the medical professional treating you has a wide perspective on the multiple organ systems of your body affected by said disease." Simply, concentrating issues related to men under the same d…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:39 PM
3

If you go to your local hospital, and ask for a direction to the andrologist's praxis, they'll point you towards the door. It doesn't exist as a standard medical practice.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:33 PM
-3

Aaand another person who has never visited this sub before.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:31 PM
5

I think an andrologist would essentially be an endocrinologist who specializes in men's issues. Well, it's fourfold at least. Endocrynology, prostate, testicles, penis. Again, I think creating a whole new profession for this is more than warranted, given how segmented men's healthcare. If you want to get your prostate checked, proctologist. Hormones, endocrinologist. Penis and testicles, urologist. Frankly, that's crazy.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:31 PM
2

I mean, why does my dentist help me with my vertigo? If you knew you had vertigo, would you find it weird if your dentist had to treat it? Once again, you didn't even read the post. Gynecologists are a redudancy in the system that exist solely to provide some intimacy, and more effective care to women. Men don't get this kind of treatment. You have low T, endocrinologist. You have prostate issues, proctology. You have penis related issues, urology. Just off the top of my head, that's 3 times as …
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:26 PM
1

As it is we have enough trouble getting guys to go in for a basic annual checkup with a general doctor and prostate exams. Perhaps if you could go to a specialist with issues you don't want to tell your GP, this wouldn't be an issue. I mean, should we also just make GPs do psychologic evaluations? After all, most people don't have the time to visit a mental health professional. Not sure if guys feel judged, think it's a sign of weakness to get checked out, or think they know more. Where are you …
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:20 PM
2

So... "Buckle up and take it like a man" Right? Such men's rights, much wow.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:14 PM
1

Yes. And why did you write this?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:13 PM
1

No, I just wanted to spare words, and convey the meaning in the most concise fashion. If you can't humour my arguments despite the intentionally bare bones presentation, maybe you're nust debating in bad faith.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:12 PM
1

Which specific medical issues do you think men have that don't appropriately fall under any current specialty? Read the post more carefully. Women's reproductive health issues tend to be a bit more complicated than men's. I have a hard time believing this comes from a men's rights activist.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:10 PM
-3

Urologists cover men’s health care and sexual organs, (men’s health clinics are usually run by a urologist) gotta consider the long urethra in comparison to female parts That's not a description of the discipline though. That's the point. Why is the pee doctor doing the job of a man doctor? Sounds like you're just not interested in a discussion.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:48 PM
1

Well, urologists deal with the diseases of the urinary tract.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:23 PM
6

Whether it's true or not, I don't care. I remember talking about the Depp-Heard issue YEARS back, and feminists universally rejected any evidence pointing to the innocence of Depp; some even went as far as saying they note the evidence, but the message (metoo) is more important. The way I see it, if you didn't stand up for Depp when he was being clowned out of court in the UK, you shouldn't do it now. End of story.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:30 PM
1

I'm happy to agree with a feminist for once. Rare occasion indeed. The problem is - what if women conceal the pregnancy? I have to side with the men on this one, out of practicality. The woman in this situation would have to submit a formal notice of pregnancy, and the appropriate authorities would deliver it to the guy. Then it would be on the guy to notify the woman of his decision, and burden to do so under the allotec time would be on him. Granted, this is an uncomfortably complex way to do …
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:00 PM
1

That's fine. But this post isn't really about abortion. There are infinite resources to promote women's interests in this regard, so I don't think another post really adds anything. My problem is that the same people who want abortions for women think that men consent to parenthood by having sex, and that a broken condom is an invitation for financial responsibility for a child, even though only women have control over whether the child is born or not. What's your position on men's responsibilit…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:31 PM
2

Having a healthy sex life is not being paranoid that the condom's gonna break You SHOULD be paranoid, given that condoms have a 97% success rate. That means if you have sex twice every week, that puts your chance of becoming a father in the coming year at about... 95%. Yup. Sure, it's not this simple, if you avoid ovulation periods, you can be fine, but the odds aren't really in your favour. or that your erection's gonna die forever if you don't relieve it. You're essentially shaming people for …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:24 PM
2

You're an insipid little caveman who can't control his dick. Having a healthy sex life is being a caveman... I guess we're back in the middle ages again. I don't have to experience any of this shit because I actually have this thing called "personal responsibility". So, how does responsibility prevent you from the condom breaking, or the pills not working? Or maybe you just can't get any poontang. Is that why you're so frustrated? You are exactly why I refuse to contribute to the global populati…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 08:45 PM
3

You know, I'd report you for rule 8 violation, but I think it's better if this stays here. Shows the attitude men have to deal with in life. It takes a special kind of asshole to come to a community he despises, and insult people he doesn't know, holding a position utterly lacking in empathy or understanding. I just hope one day you experience the things that have lead to the existence of this sub.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 06:52 PM
19

Seriously, living in Hungary, and regularly going to the capital - a city of roughly 2 million people, and way less "progressive" than the Netherlands -, I don't think I've even actually seen someone be catcalled. I bet it happens, but it's such an unlikely thing to happen... the people I can imagine doing that are also the people who would harass you with cheap perfumes, or donating to their sick little girl (who doesn't actually exist). The trope of construction workers whistling at women is j…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:57 AM
2

Apparently it's "different" because pregnancy is stressful or something... Typically this is the point where I ask - if in the future artifical wombs become available, would you change your position. And this usually gets ignored. But I can already see the rundown of this. Pretty soon someone will develop an effective artifical womb that can develop a child from as little as a cell. The argument against male child support will be "well, it's not widespread enough, it's not affordable, most women…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:44 AM
4

Many people think that their reasoning doesn’t need to be sound due to the fact that women carry the pregnancy and give birth. That's the reasoning I got as well. Which I guess would be fine, if it was carried through to its logical conclusion. If women are to be given special treatment for their biological predisposition, we should do the same for men - for example, men are built more robustly to protect, fight and lead, so let's prioritize male individuals in the military, business, political,…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:19 AM
4

The really crazy part is you can’t even get a majority of women to agree with mandatory paternity tests at birth. Oh yeah, that too. I remember having this discussion. Apparently this is a way to slut shame... But telling a man he shouldn't have sex if he doesn't want to pay up is NOT slut shaming.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:11 AM
4

I refuse to believe they are self-owning themselves that way. We can ban abortion for women then. I know right? It's such an obvious logical conclusion that just as you read it, the hypocrisy button just flashes red... But apparently no. The reasoning I got was that childbirth sucks for women, and this legitimizes the hypocrisy... Of course, this wasn't conveyed in nearly such a neutral tone. Ultimately, it would appear that as lo g as there are even infinitely small inherent differences exist b…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:09 AM
0

Bunnies, dogs, and cats aren’t able to communicate really well either. Actually, they are. But get this. Human trials are always voluntary. And they were voluntary for the last contraceptive pill, that killed people. Fuck that. If your medication creates worse side effects than the condition you intended to cure or prevent, then you should be responsible for the damages, even if the test was voluntary. Otherwise one could make a cult, have them sign a permission slip to allow the cult leader to …
/r/MensRights26/03/22 11:06 AM
1

I'm not holding my breath. First of all, let's not act like the "male contraception" debate so far hasn't been mostly about feminists bullying men for not taking what literally amounts to a drug for permanent chemical castration. A drug that's trials literally resulted in fatalities. If a drug came out today for women that would aim to reduce menstual pain, but would instead induce menopause, women would be rightfully pissed off. Secondly, the article you link simply says "without any observable…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 07:47 AM
1

Well, for one, delete this post, and in general, don't reveal details on the internet about the case. And find an attorney.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 09:37 PM
1

You know, urinals don't take significantly more space than toilets. The problem are the stalls. Maybe ladies would be fine peeing next to each other without walls separating them, and we could alleviate crowding! Clearly women don't do this because toxic femininity prevents them from sharing in the natural act of peeing.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:18 AM
4

And here I thought trueoffmychest would be way more reasonable than offmychest... It used to be. But the people who ruined offmychest ruined trueoffmychest as well. I never really posted there, just lurked. Watched the quality of content decline rapidly. This is why "true" subs are eventually replaced by "truetrue" subs. There is a group of people on Reddit who are addicted to toxifying any community they frequent, but they themselves can't survive in theirnown toxicity, so they parasitize other…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:26 AM
7

Offmychest, and even trueoffmychest are bullshit subs. I had a post removed from trueoffmychest because... I'm quoting because I still can't concisely explain it "Post must be personal" This means that the topic has to be just general enough that it's relatable to people, but not general enough to be impersonal. Of course, this is not enforcable. My post was removed because a mod disagreed with it. Most venting subs are trash. I was also temp muted from rant without reasoning, after a post that …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:06 AM
25

But if that is the generally accepted history. Why don't modern people rally against capitalism? They do, but generally, it's always been intentional division. Poor against middle class, women against men, black against white... Dividing people ensures that they always stay in perpetual infighting, and you can always control them. Capitalism is just another red herring.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 01:50 AM
2

I don’t think there’s usually a valid case for war that wouldn’t be otherwise negotiated. I'm not talking about starting wars, just fighting in wars. Plus, when an enemy starts a war, as a collective, a country, you hardly have options. You either fight, or you lose. Sadly, we can't make wars elective. But we CAN make participation for the individuals elective.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 03:44 PM
2

Yup. And I think it's a valiant thing if people choose the military, ESPECIALLY in time of war, when your country REALLY needs you (not that Vietnam crap). But forcing, coercing, and emotional manipulation to get people to sacrifice their lives is just messed up.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:59 PM
4

Also, "Men are creating wars, women are peaceful! Women should be leaders!" war is declared "If you don't go to war to fight for us, you're not a real man!" war ends "Look at this mess evil men made! If only the world was lead by women!" You can't win. If in step 2 you somehow avoided being sent to war, you're a coward again... Even though supposedly women would do the same.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:38 PM
2

Yeah, so how about we have women past birthing age fight, say all women over 37? LMAO based
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:34 PM
9

"Men are responding for war". There are billions of men in the world. Men in Ukraine are not responsible for Putin deciding to invade. Plus, I love the argument that men are responsible for war... While demanding men go into battle and perpetuate war for the amusement of women. Do you know what many women will do when your dead body is hauled off into a fucking ditch and covered with bloody mud and a thousand other bodies? They will fucking fornicate with the invaders for better housing and rati…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:33 PM
2

I love how this is so predictable. "I don't want men to be conscripted and detailed if they leave the country." "So you want women to be soldiers?!" No, he doesn't want anyone to be forced to die in a war. "So who's gonna take care of the elderly and children?" (implying men can't do that...) Again, he just doesn't want men to be conscripted. "Women are fighting too! Why are you not a real man?" Women are fighthing out of their own volition. He just doesn't want men to be conscripted. "Why do yo…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:26 PM
6

I've now heard people say it means healer, META strategy, and skill. Meanwhile distionary says it means human rights. I think this is intentional disinfo capitalizing on the fact that Westerners don't know shit about Japan.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 09:59 AM
1

you happen to be surrounded by women that just may be. So work on yourself, bud! This whole comment is such a stereotypical feminist comment... Let me ask you this. You say I'm surrounded by bad women, but not all women are bad, and that I should work on myself, and find new company. Provided I really am just some bitter husk of a man crippled by the abuse of women around me - how is this not victim blaming? Do you go around telling abuse victims that it's their fault they are in an abusive rela…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 02:46 PM
2

In no way did I invalidate you. You did. This is a very common thing women do, where if something someone says doesn't align with their worldview, they assume the person who's saying it either has something wrong with them, or they are in a unique and not at all common situation - basically, you assume the other person is the exception. In your example (I'm paraphrasing) 'I don't know what horrible women you're surrounded with' = most women are categorically not like this, you just had bad luck.…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:38 AM
5

I don’t think women being legitimately bothered by men harassing them is the “paranoia of a few Karens.” That is a serious issue Just because you have had a bad experience doesn’t justify you invalidating someone else’s. She said, while invalidating my bad experience, and validating her own, based on bad personal experience. Just like I don’t go around thinking all men are rapists/molesters. Frankly, I don't give a shit what you think about men in general - so long as you don't want to make legi…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:07 AM
6

That's fucked up. I can't imagine that being conducive to good gender relations in the workplace, and in general; let's segregate people, and disincentivise ever talking with each other. What could go wrong...
/r/MensRights28/01/22 01:31 AM
16

For every dude that’s interrupted by a lady at the gym there’s like twenty thousand women made uncomfortable by dudes at the gym. Love accurtely sourced statistics. Really I get why there’s women only, men only gyms in this scenario. Of course you do. Because you're bigoted. You come off like you don’t have any real legitimate criticisms I know of a thousand men who got raped by scary girls in the gym, yet I still support legally regulating gyms to be unisex. Is that enough victimhood credit for…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 01:28 AM
10

gyms are not a right Nothing is a right, at least in the US. Service can be denied to anyone. I guess then I'm allowed to say "no blacks allowed in" and then just say I personally denied entry to every person who just happened to be black, right? They don't have a right to MY gym after all! gyms are not a public institution Neither are universities. Again - what's stopping universities from saying "no blacks welcome"? men and women seek different things from gyms privately; the same cannot be sa…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 01:20 AM
34

And again - I don't care. I don't like to be interrupted in my weighlifting routine by some thot who goes to the gym to do stretches and roll around on a bosu ball for 45 minutes, and occupies half the place, but I don't ask for her to be banned from the place, along with every woman. And frankly, every time my girlfriend, sister, or mother tell me a man has looked at them in a nasty, strange, or unsettling way, I think of the cases I have been identified as a creep, a loser, a horrible subhuman…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:56 PM
8

For the same reason I am not OK with black/white only establishments. Because living in a modern, civilized society means you tolerate the presence of individuals even if they are different from you, so long as they conform to the society's moral and legal norms. In other words, And if you don't, then society shouldn't bend over backwards to accomodate your bigotry. Personally I don't like the idea of sexually separated locker rooms either, and I would prefer entirely private locker rooms - for …
/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:38 PM
18

Women only gyms are fine. Hard disagree.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 09:21 PM
8

Are you talking about on dating / hookup apps? Suggesting the hot ones are either seeking validation or a potential affair and not an actual relationship Not necessarily dating apps, but in general, yes. The crux of my comment is that most conventionally attractive women are one way or another not available for a relationship. They are either taken, have some issues that make them undatable or unwilling to date, or are non-monogamous. Whether they look for validation on dating sites is secondary…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 10:46 AM
5

Most women are at least 15lbs heavier than their profile pics Not entirely true. Many have a fitting profile pic... They are mostly in relationships already.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 10:23 AM
8

If you have some principles that go against a political trend, that doesn't define you by your obstacle, it just clearly states your position on a certain issue. There's a difference. If I say I'm against murder, I'm anti-murder. That works. But feminism isn't just a political trend, it's an ideology - and therefore by necessity anti-feminism has become an ideology itself - or at least people act like it has. I am against the insane policies and behaviours of feminists, but I am not anti-feminis…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:50 PM
23

No. I see feminists as a group of misguided cultists. I don't waste my time actively fighting them. I reject the proposed dichotomy of feminism and anti-feminism. I obviously reject the patriarchy theory, but that's not reall, a defining feature of feminism anyway. I simply want more equal treatment for men, and if feminists cross my path in these efforts, I express my discontent, debate them if it means something, and hopefully change their mind.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:51 PM
55

I won't participate simply because I'm not willing to position myself on the axis of feminism. I am NOT feminist. I'm not anti-feminist, because that would define me by my obstacle, not by my goal.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:44 PM
-6

The question she's answering is "would you rather potentially destroy an innocent man's life, or potentially provide a sense of retribution to a possible victim of rape?" The question is, which comes first - justice, or revenge?
/r/MensRights28/07/21 03:30 PM
4

Hey man, sorry for downvoting you, and contributing to the shitpile of downvotes... I tend to get carried away when I see provocative opinions. I hope your karma doesn't get permanently fucked by these downvotes. I removed mine since then. I'm sorry. This was toxic behaviour on my behalf.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 05:23 PM
0

The subject of subversion is not men in general, but vikings as badass warriors. The henpecked husband, the headstrong bravado, and the squeamishness about his braids all serves to undermine the stereotype of vikings as badasses. As for his friends telling him to wear it too, the friends not being able to convince him, but the wife instantl, doing so is also a symbol - it shows that the wife has more.power than either of those friends. He's, once again, a henpecked husband who does whatever his …
/r/MensRights22/07/21 05:17 PM
2

Difference is, feminism is an ideology, "man" is just a sex. You choose to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 02:46 PM
7

Nah,there is definitely a good chunk of feminists who acknowledged that Usually the one you're currently talking to is a member of that group. Because the majority of feminists, when backed into a corner, revert to "well, not ALL feminists"... But then keep posting about male tears on Twitter.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 08:55 AM
1

You absolutely can have too harsh sentences! Tell me this: Which is worse? Murder or sexual assault (rape)? I'd say murder is a worse crime. Do you think a murderer deserves a life sentence by default? At that point we might as well make regular assault punishable with up to 40 years! Let's make everything a functional life sentence! ​ The reality is, while the acts she has commited were evil, the damage she has done is corrigible for the most part, and she's probably capable of learning a lesso…
/r/MensRights01/07/21 03:49 AM
-9

Equal sentencing or not, 64+ years for sexual assault and child abuse is too much I think. US justice system at it again. This is true for men too, obviously. Sentences are way too long. At this point you can't even say it's too punitive - punishment stops being punishment 10-20 years down the line, and becomes the personality of the individual. They become a member of the prison, no longer someone who is punished there. 64 years is essentially a life sentence - for molesting children? Come on! …
/r/MensRights01/07/21 03:40 AM
1

I'm splitting hairs because I have a fairly in-depth understanding of psychology and early childhood psychology, as well as being an avid proponent of men's rights. This is one area that is 95% in the child psychology realm and 5% in men's rights. And I guess you quantified that how? Because your whole reasoning of dismissal rests on your arbitrary quantification of how much this issue pertains to men's issues, or psychology in general. Considering the child's issue is related to the manosphere,…
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:17 PM
2

That is not men's rights. Most of the issues mentioned on this sub aren't about explicit violation of rights, but about general issues pertaining to men. I'm starting to think you're splitting hairs because you just want to be a contratian. Edit: read the sub's main goal. Any issue regarding men's relationship with society is fair game.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:12 PM
2

Yeah. This isn’t a men’s rights issue. It’s a messed up kid who needs help. It's a men's rights issue because the therapist is clearly incapable and unwilling to understand the view of a kid that is the negative outcome of interacting with the manosphere without enough experience to understand the subtleties of life. This is a classical delusional teen. The problem is that the therapist doesn't want to understand the kid's situation, because he/she has a bias against the manosphere and the whole…
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:53 PM
7

In my experience - as someone who is biased against feminists of any type, and hates them unilaterally -, if I'm being honest, it's probably ignorance. I realize that many feminists like pretending that they sympathize with men, and then backstab them every opportunity they get... But there really IS a crowd of self-proclaimed feminists who are completely ignorant to men's rights issues. My sister isn't a feminist, just to be clear, but she might as well me - 20something woman attending higher e…
/r/MensRights27/03/21 03:57 PM
1

Oh, didn't see the switcheroo. Now it's you replying. There are no excuses made - he wrote in his comment that in a normal society if you dress attractively, people will stare at you. He said he also wouldn't ever take photos of someone in the gym. There is no way you could POSSIBLY misconstrue that as being an excuse for taking photos.. I know you are wrong. What I'm curious about, is your motivation. Why are you so defensive of something nobody argued against?
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:22 AM
1

I addressed the "point" you were making, and told you that your point can't possibly make sense to a sane, logical person. They would only work if you were an idiot, or a racist. So which one are you?
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:13 AM
1

Exactly. He never said. It's a strawman. You ignore the other person's real point, and argue against a point they never said, fervently.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:09 AM
1

He's being downvoted because he's just posturing. The original commenter started with the statement that taking pictures is not OK anyway, but this dumbass just HAD to say iTs nOt oK tO tAkE pICtUrEs!¡! This is textbook SJW posturing, and a fallacy. I am not even sure if this has a specific name, whether it's technically a strawman, or a motte-and-bailey, but the point is, you take the opposite position to some unacceptable and highly controversial position, and you imply that your opposition is…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 02:21 PM
2

Ok we’re not talking about actual discrimination. Yes we are. Do you really think discriminatory actions are the only form of discrimination? Stereotyping and hateful language can be discrimination too. Comparing things that are more similar makes a better point. How is the relation of men and women more similar to blacks and non-blacks than to jews and non-jews? Can you actually give a concise argument why you think that? Substitute Jewish men, idgaf Of course you don't... Here's what I think. …
/r/MensRights26/03/21 01:58 PM
4

I think their example is clumsy. Substituting black men would be better. You're exposing yourself not only as a sexist, but an anti-israelite or anti-semite. There is no functional difference between discrimination towards jewish, or black individuals.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 01:46 PM
18

Honestly, yeah. If I want to work out, I dress comfortably. That includes being mentally comfortable. If I was a 300 lbs bodybuilder with rippling muscles, I'd expect MANY PEOPLE would check me out. If that bothered me, I'd wear clothes that are less revealing, like a sweater and loose shorts. Thankfully I'm not a 300 lbs bodybuilder (cries in mediocrity). The difference is, for a man of that size, hiding his bulk might not be easy. For a woman to hide a nicer-than-average butt or a decent set o…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 11:24 AM
45

So discrimination towards someone's inherent characteristics is fine so long as that group is men, but not for other groups? For the record, the world for "discrimination towards someone based on their sex" is sexism.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 11:10 AM
2

Completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 07:58 AM
1

"When I post about men's mental health..." Literally has like three posts about men's body image issues, and that three is: Obesity Acne Crying Because those are the cardinal problem men deal with - that they aren't accepter as fat individuals (not that they should lose weight, god forbid), and that thex have acne...? And we all know what the "boys should be able to cry" thing is all about. I mean, it's in the name. "Boys". You stop being a man in these people's eyes if you start crying. Wanna t…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:52 PM
2

You aren’t oppressed because of a sword joke in a pop song lmfao. First, the song is full of anti-male, misandristic jokes. That's LITERALLY the point of it. But I guess objectivity is a high standard for you. Second, I don't know where you get this oppression narrative (I mean, I know where you do, but you don't get it from me), but don't bring it here. This isn't about who is or is not oppressed, it's about misandristic lyrics and messagery in this pop song, and in fact in most pop songs sung …
/r/MensRights16/03/21 11:40 AM
2

It really isn't. And even if it was - it would be because it's sexist. Why are you here again? I saw that you're a radical feminist. What do you want? Does it entertain you that the music that you like insults men? Don't you think that's wrong?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 10:28 AM
2

Why are you here?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:15 AM
12

The blatant transphobia is distressing! /s Seriously, how do you go from "men who claim to be women are actually women, deal with it!" to "men should be second class citizens"? Don't they see that this is just stupid?
/r/MensRights15/03/21 11:05 PM
2

I say make it happen. Maybe then people will wake up.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:01 AM
74

Do not drag women back, you will become like them. Force the company to pay the bonus equally. Sadly, that's not his decision. All he can do is accuse the company (rightfully) of discrimination. But the company likely won't give men a break, they'll just take away women's bonus. This is inevitable. However, if you don't do anything, they'll just keep discriminating. It's a question of a little evil today for a greater good, or a little good today for the greater evil.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:03 AM
11

Dating these women is the equivalent of spending your monthly salary on buying an entire crate of products 3 days before expiration. Many of them are reasonably attractive for their age, but they're literally days from climaxing (if not already past it), what little beauty they have left will fade in a year or two, and they bring a massive baggage with them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/21 10:25 PM
-1

I'm a peaceful man, but if I ever find some tranny going after me because I didn't have a bandana with "superstraight" written on it, I might commit war crimes. I was tolerant until lgbtetc peolle had their iwn fantasies. But don't tell me what to call MYSELF. EDIT: Also, just realized that now "supergay" is no longer a slur. Yeey
/r/MensRights08/03/21 10:41 AM
3

Guys, false accusations don't really happen. But if they happen to you, just kill yourself, and then we'll acknowledge it! (Obviously this is satire, so /s)
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:11 PM
3

Ah yes. Board Gaming. Back when I used to hang out a few times at R / incelswithouthate (essentially controlled opposition for incels, as I slowly found out), Board Gaming was arguably the most influential figure there. She's a bigtime crybully feminist who uses a facade of objectivity and civility to drag her corpulent corpus to a moral high ground, while her rabid fans downvote you and rush you with replies. She even has a few mods as her simps, which is funny, because she claims to be a "femc…
/r/MensRights11/02/21 12:39 PM
7

Honestly, at least it's Joss Whedon. He's like one of the 2 or 3 talented woke directors in Hollywood. Without him, the already crumbling filmmaking business will just fall even faster. But yeah. Obvious metoo bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 12:19 PM
1

I knew someone will misunderstand that. The exact quote is: ​ I don't think it's a double standard because she thinks all women are beautiful. The emphasis is on BECAUSE. As in "I think this it's a double standard BECAUSE she thinks all women are beautiful, I think it's a double standard FOR SOME OTHER REASON."
/r/MensRights10/02/21 10:23 PM
9

I don't think it's a double standard because she thinks all women are beautiful. She consciously knows the fat woman is ugly, but likely sympathizes with women in their struggle with their weight, so she learned to seamlessly switch to sympathizing with her, and suppressing her own distaste for her ugliness. However, she likely doesn't empathize with men's body image issues, so when she sees a man she perceives as ugly, she just calls it as it is. The issue is that you self-correct your opinion …
/r/MensRights10/02/21 02:59 PM
10

Hard disagree. Feminists have curbstomped freedom of speech in one direction, doing so in the other direction just exascerbates the issue. Removing moderation is a better initiative.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 09:18 PM
3

It's because women are doing better in public education prior to higher education. That was easy. That doesn't answer the first question though. Now the real challenge is to figure out why all of the resources are being allocated to recruit, retain and generally assist women when the aforementioned gap favors women Honestly, I think that's just the cherry on top. In terms of education, I think it would suffice if men and women got the same education. Obviously that doesn't happen, as evidenced b…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 07:00 PM
14

Tangentially, let me mention this on the topic of dating: I've spent a few years of my life examining the mechanism of dating, and there's something that I noticed. Now, it might not come as a shock to you that women are status-oriented or image-oriented in many cases. What might surprise you is that: 1) status doesn't change how women perceive your looks. They can be actually physically attracted to someone they find butt ugly, and they ADMIT he is butt ugly, but status trumps that. That's craz…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:38 AM
23

"there may not be enough educated men to go round. Is it time to widen the search?" No, it's time to examine why women are doing better than men in public education, and why their admission rates in higher education also exceed men.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 09:56 AM
3

The response to blackmail is punishment, not violence. I understand wanting to punch someone like that, but mandating or legitimizing violence as a response to perceived minor trasngressions is just as bad as not doing anything about it at all.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 07:44 AM
6

It seems like we're repeating the same talking points over & over again, That's not unique to MRAs. The thing is, this is a culture war, and the frontlines are solidifying. Initially, as traffic and by extension discourse on the internet grew rapidly, there was an influx of ideas. A while ago, probably since the 2010s, internet platforms started becoming more and more "mainstream", more left wing, more feminist-ey, call it whatever you want. It was a calculated effort. On Youtube it was Breadtub…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 09:54 PM
2

The women are not the ones sitting in court for perjury. This is about the guy.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 08:13 AM
2

You don't deserve to be downvoted, but read the post more carefully next time. He probably raped nobody. One girl came up with a claim of rape out of revenge or regret, and the next 19 women created fake stories to give credence to the original accusation.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 08:11 AM
0

You go from condemning me for being an Ebenezer Scrooge type to calling me a bleeding heart leftist, Those two aren't opposites. As you yourself proved. and now you are projecting me as saying someone suffering is better than someone else suffering? You said exactly that. if you were so far off on your first evaluation of me, ever think your second evaluation (which is mutually exclusive from your first) might also be off? Prove me wrong then. when I say accept it, I mean figure out how to make …
/r/MensRights23/12/20 05:35 PM
0

they are not entitled to be attractive to anyone. I don't think I've actually met a lot of incels who had this attitude. Most of them either just want to be happy, one way or another, or they just want to die. I don't think they expect anything be given to them. Exceptions exist, but those are exceptions. Accepting the hand given to you is a lot easier if you have a partner that loves you. I used to be a sort-of incel (never went as deep into depression as most incels though), and even my curren…
/r/MensRights23/12/20 09:40 AM
2

Yes, the issue is they can't accept the hand life dealt them. First, you sound like a heartless person. Typically your type, the "bootstrap" people, are the type who never really experienced the flip side of life; or experienced it too much, and thus became desensitized to smaller issues. Both of these approaches are wrong Second, individually, you might have a point. But in terms of social phenomenons, it's a fact that a portion of people WILL NOT have the ability to simply overcome their compl…
/r/MensRights22/12/20 02:27 PM
3

From my experience: the most powerful tool in the arsenal of an empty ideologue is an audience. I grew up with kind parents, but they had their flaws, and they definitely saw me questioning their authority as a form of betrayal, as something that is not only idiotic, but evil. They thought I was evil. They still do when I argue with them. Now, 1:1 I could handle them easily. I'd always highlight their failures, and they'd eventually buckle under the pressure, and break down. I am not proud of th…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 02:54 PM
29

This is the good old "damsel in distress" theme affecting people. Men are built in a way that they instinctively see women being portrayed as being in genuine trouble and needing help as a motivating thing, and women, well... Without wanting to sound like an asshole, based on experience, women DO show greater empathy/sympathy towards women, than towards men. If you add the fact that it's uncomfortable to accept the thought of being advantaged, and that being at a disadvantage relieves you of res…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 12:03 PM
20

While I am sure some men's idea of sex might be one-sided ("you give head, I do the sex, and that's it"), your way of looking at this is deliberately misleading. Men typically go on dates because they seek sexual and/or romantic connection with the woman. Obviously if the date goes well, sexual acts aren't off the table, but it's a very stupid perspective to see this as the man paying the woman with a dinner in exchange for sex. In fact this shows that you see sex as a service provided by women,…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 09:17 AM
1

it's not "irrational", that's incredibly invalidating So you'd argue rape victims RATIONALLY hate themselves? They have a LEGITIMATE REASON to feel hatred for themselves? Do you know what irrational means, or do you take offense to things without actually caring to understand them? you obviously don't have sympathy Says the bigoted bitch who literally posts to a sub called "against men's rights". As in, you want to take away men's rights, because you hate them so much. You disgusting, two-faced,…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 02:15 AM
1

Imagine what it would be if you had D.C.-style cross traffic in the zentrum. I don't have to, because I know what it's.like. where I live there are too many cars im.downtown. in the netherlands there are too few. The balance should lie inbetween. But for what the cites wanted to accomplish, it works--sorta. Yeah, but at what cost? How much more difficult does this make people's lives?
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:08 PM
1

Ok, now you've lost me. On one hand you have irrational self-hatred. On the other hand you have badly fused bones, torn ligaments, knocked out teeth, flayed skin, torn out fingernails, poked out eyes, cut off legs, I could go on. I have sympathy for rape survivors, but let's be fucking realistic. No, someone inserting their penis in your vagina is NOT worse than screaming in agony as your body is slowly mutilated in front of you.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 06:35 AM
1

Worship cars or worship bikes..what is the difference? How about neither? In a place like Rotterdam or The Hague, a lot of auto traffic would be horrendous. I highly doubt that, considering Rotterdam ALREADY has massive car traffic - they just make access to inner city areas tedious and severely limited. BTW - the netherlands, as of 2018, had 8.531 million registered (i.e. operational, not garbage) passenger cars overall - with a 17.28 million population. That means every second person has a car…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 04:35 PM
74

Additional interesting thing - Satan's name in Hebrew means "accuser". In fact Satan originally fulfilled a prosecutory role in judaism and christianity - he was literally the guy who accused humanity of being unworthy of paradise. Meaning the devil doesn't need an advocate - first, because he's a lawyer himself, second, because he's the prosecution. If anyone needs a lawyer, it's humanity.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 10:03 AM
2

i have never experienced 40+ degrees and a lot of people havent either, doesnt appear a lot in this country. Figured so. Honestly, take it from me - it's horrible. One time back when i was little, I was biking with my family, and the asphalt got so hot that the rubber on my mom's tire straight up weakened and blew up - there was a two thumb wide hole on the outer tire just from the excessive pressure and molten rubber. Wasn't fun finding a bike shop, and then changing tires in 40+ heat and direc…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 10:06 PM
1

Well, Sweden does have more radical feminists than other countries, but I guess it depends on what cult took root in what country. IMO no feminism is the best feminism. I honestly don't care about prostitution, but I would prefer it be legalized, and REGULATED. I'm kind of tired of the idea that somehow a woman selling her services for money is "exploited", but a man taking his services, because he literally can't find satisfaction elsewhere - because he's broke, ugly, depressed, or any other pr…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 10:02 PM
1

you can still fully acces everything while driving Except downtown and highly populated areas. And of course where it is possible to either with a car, you have to pay extortionate parking prices. it makes sense that when there are more bikers than drivers, Except this wasn't always the case. There is ample proof that bike worship in the netherlands was the result of powerful government propaganda from the 1970s to change people's perspective against cars, and towards bikes. The fact is - it's n…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 09:55 PM
-2

i dont get why you hate on bikes And THIIIIIS is where the Dutch indoctrination starts. When your irrational dislike of cars makes you blind to neutral viewpoints, so you just brand everyone who has a contention with the overabundance of bikes as a "bike hater". I don't hate cycling. I can't do it right now due to my medical state, but I used to cycle a lot. Now, that's one problem - not everyone can cycle. Should people who don't have fully functional legs just roll around in a motorized wheelc…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 09:13 PM
1

Oh, I think we misunderstand each other then: By reputation, American feminists are all abusive loonies, and the kinda legislation that derives from them are referred to as "American antics". And I'm telling you that's not an American thing. That's a feminist thing. There were plenty of radical, manhating feminists in Europe too. I understand your point, I just disagree with the assessment that this is an america problem. It isn't. The average American feminist is just as much a normal person as…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 08:53 PM
6

Where?! Yoghurt belongs in cartons, just like other dairy! Well, she told me she couldn't find regular yogurt, just this. Maybe it was a regional thing. I still find it indicative of the pretentiousness of the green movement. On a more serious note, Dutch feminism is much more sex positive overall and look at American feminists as "those kinda feminists", their history is much different as are their spearpoints. 90% of feminists look at the rest of the feminists as "those kinda feminists". The p…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:56 PM
1

On point number 2, I would disagree, I think that rape is way more abhorred than murder. People believe that you can murder someone for a good reason but there is never a good reason to rape someone The only good causes I can think of for murder is revenge, or preventing further damage. And rape as revenge is an option, certainly. That being said, I think this is an incorrect way of looking at this. Just because something can be justified doesn't make it less abhorrent. One could justify torture…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:44 PM
-5

Good on Dutch people I guess. I just wish developed Western European and Northern European countries didn't come with their own baggages - for example, rampant political correctness and feminism, hatespeech laws, worship of authority, complete distaste for any for of civil disobedience or critique of the system, and blind consumerism in the face of environmentalism. I have no direct experience with the Netherlands, but my girlfriend spent two months there this summer, and told me a few things th…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:17 PM
3

I can feel from your tone that you actually agree with the removal on some level, otherwise you'd be more upset of some poor guy potentially killing himself right now, because mods took a dump on his head. Quick question - how do you know that the post was about suicide? The title doesn't contain it, and none of the comments seem to imply the poster ever expressed desires to end his life.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 11:58 AM
7

On the other hand, isolating suicidal people from society, and treating them sick animals is only going to make them more suicidal. Ban encouragement of suicide. But don't ban people expressing their feelings. That's bullshit. Suicide is not an irrational state of mind anymore than being tired, happy, or fearful is. It's not healthy, but it's not a disease. Suicidal people need help, not a pat on the back, and "it's gonna be OK". Tangent here - as someone who has talked with previously suicidal …
/r/MensRights08/12/20 10:42 AM
11

Well, that's really stupid. "Hey y'all, this is a support group where you can talk about your darkest thoughts. Except suicide - we don't like that, so don't expect any help with that. In fact we'll ban you.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:21 AM
34

This genre called PRACTICALLY EVERY ACTION MOVIE OR SHOW WITH A FEMALE CENTRAL CHARACTER. Seriously, have you not watched any movies from the past 50 years? EDIT: here is a non-comprehensive list of movies where groin attacks are played for laugh. Many of them feature women doing it: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/GroinAttack/LiveActionFilms
/r/MensRights07/12/20 01:40 PM
27

I mean... Wouldn't that be the universal defense for pedophiles? "Officer, I has no idea she was 12. I was under the impression that she was the exact legal age for consensual sex." Don't wanna be arrested for child diddling? Just never ask the children their age. That way you can always fall back on "I had no idea." Other amazing defenses include: "Sir, I never would have thought stabbing someone 37 times in the chest kills them!" "I thought that car was just left there by a cheritable soul who…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 08:04 AM
6

Why shouldn't a person, no matter the gender, have unlimited access to their SO's phone? There's this thing called privacy. It's kind of an important thing in most democratic countries. I mean, if they can't check whether the other is cheating, they are possibly wasting years of their lives, money etc. True. But there's a big ass difference between being cheated on, breaking up/divorcing, and then finding a new partner... and being cuckolded, raising the child of some other men, and never forwar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 05:00 PM
1

That's a more than valid issue that needs attention. Why MY attention? I don't have the time or resources to help these people, I barely stay afloat myself. You know who could help with that though? Perhaps a massive international non-profit organisation funded from my tax money... like the UN maybe? Oh wait, the UN just failed in this regard. They also failed to create representation for men (despite making up 50% of the population), while giving representation to women (UN Women). But the date…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 04:49 PM
2

if I were you, I'd put my energy in legitimate injustices You mean, like this? The united nations deliberately blocking male victims of natural disasters and other tragedies from receiving aid as a standard policy? I bet that's a fucking conspiracy theory too, right? I know you probably came here to troll, but in case you didn't, and you genuinely care about men's issues, how can you say it doesn't matter whether that the UN refuses to acknowledge men's struggles, and puts fucking toilet day on …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 04:09 PM
1

It's also World Philosophy Day... Well, looks to me like November 19 is a bit overbooked, and for the UN, the shitter was more important than either phylosophers, or 50% of the population. BTW, this just came to me - you say sanitation is very important, as it affects the lives of a lot of people. Well... 50% of all people are men. I'm guessing that's at least on a similar scale as people who don't have proper sanitation. And since November 18 seems free, maybe move one of them on that day. See?…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 03:22 PM
1

Whether sanitation is a real problem or not doesn't change the symbolism in putting toilet day (named after an instrument typically associated with excrement) on the same date as men's day. Imagine if say, International Manure Day was on the same day as womens day, and the UN put THAT in its calendar instead of women's day. Iean, manure is really important, it saves lives by helping produce food... But at the end of the day, it's still shit. I don't know how you don't see the symbolism in puttin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 02:31 PM
2

Sigh... Your ideal response to echochambers across reddit is to create your own echochamber? Can you read? My ideal response is creating open forums for people to voice their opinions without being silenced - regardless of affiliation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 08:05 AM
4

I actually think you might be right. They are so brazenly anti-male that I don't see how they could do that without closely following the ideas of men's rights activists. They might not closely monitor subs like this, but they are definitely aware of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 08:44 PM
1

So you're literally claiming that I can't use a philosopher's beliefs to justify my argument if there isn't 100% guarantee that they would have agreed with the conclusion I draw? Yes. And your argument is not even a direct conclusion of his views - you make a bunch of assumptions, and treat his quote totally out of context. You have no idea if Locke would agree with you or not, if he knew your opinion. Am I only allowed to parrot the beliefs of dead philosophers in their entirety and not extrapo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 08:42 PM
1

Because I did not in fact claim anywhere in my response that Locke knew anything about fetus brain activity. I never said you did. I merely stated that he proposed a broad criteria for identity, and that I'm using that to make a distinction between "a person" and "human cells". See, this is the issue. Locke's definition was written without extensive knowledge of the human body, stuff like brain waves, cells, zygotes, etc. Quoting him as a justification for your views is a misattribution of his q…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 07:47 PM
2

Because some women on those subs are not androphobic. And I bet a bunch of people on r/MensRights don't hate you, or women, or anyone else either. So why trashtalk MRAs, and simp for misandrists? If they were, it would be quite a troubling sign. Troubling that people on TwoX hate men? More like mundane. That sub is a female chauvinist hatesub. Many people have not been presented rational arguments for men's rights, and there is no point staying in our little echo chamber screaming about how the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 06:17 PM
2

it allows me to enter feminist subs without being immediately banned for my comment history In other words, it's a way to troll. You (and I) were banned for a reason. They don't want you there. Going back is either foolish, or rude. I just want to have discussions with groups that would immediately ban me otherwise. I am all for discussions, but why waste time on people who hate you? Also, why hate platforms like r/Mensrights that DO facilitate open discussions (apart from overt trolling), and t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 05:13 PM
1

Left wingers are not a perfect group, like, at all. It is full of identity politics and can lead to thinking about eugenics and genocide. Sigh... If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and smells like a duck, why do you call it a beaver? If "aryans better than jews" is right wing, then how is "black better than whites" a left wing view? Or were nazis left wing? Seriously, I thought they were right wing because of their radical views on race, since their economic policies balances on Keynes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 05:03 PM
12

The crazy thing is that people are slowly starting to adapt men's day into their lives, and more and more people, including a few countries acknowledge its existence. Yet the United Nations just doesn't want to accept it as an official day, going as far as putting toilet day on the same day as men'a day. If this was 20 years ago, I'd say fine - they just don't have any men's rights people around. But there's absolutely no chance the UN doesn't know about this. Even from an ivory tower you can se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:41 PM
1

I consistently delete my comment history Do you also delete karma? Don't bullshit me. Why? Sounds like you are covering up your trolling. consecutively delete and create accounts. Again, textbook troll.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:36 PM
1

Eugenics, genocide and apartheid are not related to political affiliation. Oh come on. Killing people based on their genetic makeup has always been a "right wing" thing. Lefties typically prefer genocide based on political views and economic status. Even RadFems would be considered on the left wing. Explain to me how saying "aryans are better than jews" is a right wing things, but "women are better than men" is a left wing things. I'm not really sure why you want to argue with this so much Becau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:33 PM
0

Locke Show brian activity Unless Locke travelled forward in time, I highly doubt these are his views. This is a false attribution. Also, electric signals can be seen in embryos/fetuses (I don't know the terminology) as young as 5-6 weeks. Of course, by the same standard you can see electric signals in most invertebrates too. And "memory" is a pretty badly defined word here - we know that out-of womb effects can have an influence on the development and behaviour of fetuses, to the point where the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:29 PM
2

We never saw right wing feminists even during first and second wave...feminism has very much been a left wing, progressive movement, pretty much always. Are you... Unaware that stuff like lesbian feminists existed? I.e. women who hated men so much they deliberately became lesbians? How about trans-exclusionary radical feminists? Women who believe women are a superior form of life, and you can't get the keys to the castle just by changing your gender? Are you unaware that Marhared Sanger, early f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:15 PM
2

The top poster of all time is a stringent conservative and has commented on various pro life subreddits and has argued for pro life across reddit. I mean, r/MensRights has 286647 members as of now. You only need to prove that another 143323 members are pro lifers to have an actual case. Of course, he was last active 3 years ago. Sounds to me like he's just a lucky nobody whose post just happened to become top post. If you want to make an actual case, find a pro-life mod at least, or something al…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:05 PM
2

I don't think caloric intake is an issue. TBH, yeah it is. Food is expensive, especially if you want to eat healthy. As a guy who tries to eat healthy, and whose girlfriend does the same, I am always amazed at how little food she and her mother store at home. For example, they have a half a kilogram of rye bread at home. And that lasts them 3-4 days. I come over, and I eat half of that in one sitting, because I was hungry. I could literally eat them out of their budget if I stayed over for a wee…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/20 06:28 PM
1

Go troll somewhere else, dickwad.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:54 PM
4

downvoting facts really doesn’t help your cause People aren't downvoting facts, they are downvoting your attitude. The smile at the end of your comment is telling - your bias shows. actually he violated a restraining order, so not a victim He was a hearing-impaired old man living alone. He should have been given hearing aid, not a restraining order. The discrimination in the system manifests itself this way - for men there is little to no leeway given. Music too loud? Fuck you, restraining order…
/r/MensRights30/11/20 08:45 AM
1

the girls were there more or less voluntarily. As voluntary as a 10 year old girl can be. the sentences would have been longer if there had been violence. In the US these guys would be sent to jail for 20+ years at least. We both know that. Just because there was no violence doesn't mean the sentence was just. It was just way too lenient. It's not just about how bad the act is, or whether it is voluntary - how fucked up do you have to be to think you can do this? I rarely say this, but this is o…
/r/MensRights27/11/20 11:28 AM
1

I'm actually not that certain now. I have found a case in Finland where recently a group of migrant men raped and sexually assaulted underage girls as young as 10 years of age (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oulu_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal). The men who commited these crimes were sentenced comparably to the woman - 2-4 years of prison. And I can't really imagine a much more heinous form of rape than the contiuous gangrape of an underage child. There are two possibilities. Either Finnish co…
/r/MensRights27/11/20 08:16 AM
8

" 3 years and 2 months in prison for aggravated robbery, robbery and deprivation of liberty in addition to aggravated rape. " Excuse me what? Literally one of those charges would be enough for a 3+ year sentence. Granted, Finland's rape laws are lax compared to well... anywhere else I have seen - minimum 1 year, max 6 years -, but this is still a bullshit sentence. Here are the guidelines: Rape: 1-6 years Robbery: 4 months - 6 years Aggravated Robbery: same thing Deprivation of liberty: 4 months…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:11 PM
12

Good point, but in the case of Singapore, equality is at least codified in law. The crazy thing is that we're talking about the same Singapore where you can get jailed for importing or selling chewing gum... Singapore is crazy strict. For example, kidnapping with a non-murderous intent can can land you 10 years in jail, and a caning. Kidnapping with a murderous attempt is death. Suffice to say, this woman's sentence is bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 06:24 AM
3

Why should the Law determine what is right and what is wrong? I specifically added "good ethics" to law, since I think legislation should only derive from ethics and universal human rights. Do you understand how corrupt the legal system has become? Yes, I do. I understand and agree with your frustration with the legal system, and how it is a hammer to beat the poor and unfortunate down, and a gilded escalator for the wealthy, but that really wasn't my point. That's the problem with most ofYOU as…
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:31 PM
23

I don't need support to be "safe, loved and included" - I need support to do whatever the hell I aspire to do with my life, as long as it is within the bounds of law and good ethics; I need good healthcare, I need legal justice, and I need reproductive rights. The problem with even "good" feminists is that even though they do care somewhat about men, they do so only under their own terms, requiring men to be on board with whatever crazy misandrist BS mainstream feminism cooks up. That's like say…
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:39 PM
2

I've never said that that is justified. I think it is bullshit that so much focus is dedicated to perceived, past, and present racism, misogyny and homophobia, but none whatsoever to misandry.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:06 AM
3

Don't get greedy. It's a day because there are other people who have problems needing awareness. Don't fall into the same trap as tribalistic feminist, lgbt and minority activists. There's a day for cancer, for AIDS, a month for ALS, a day for the homeless, for widows, for war heroes, I could go on. As important as men's rights issues are, the most important thing to staying true to the core principles of equality is to not demand more than you might need at the expense of others - and that incl…
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:44 PM
9

The same UN who officially still doesn't acknowledge international men's day, rather favouring international toilet day. Why are they even commenting on this? This is just rubbing salt in the wound - they don't even officially acknowledge men's day, but informally they take a dump on it. Fuck the UN. They are a bunch of self-important inbread bureaucrats playing pocket hockey and wasting tax dollars not doing practically anything of use. They don't even have legislative power, they just throw th…
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:36 PM
6

A major MRA goal should be to get men to vote more Problem is, democracy has a very slow feedback mechanism - to the point where it is almost none, if not accompanied by hard activism. What do I mean by that? Think about this. OK, more men vote - but for what? No candidate represents them, unless they create one. Logically one would think "well, they will see us voting in higher numbers, and so they will cater to us". However, even if that did happen (and the politicians didn't just fuck men ove…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 09:15 AM
1

I tried to reply, but Reddit doesn't allow me to comment. I'm not banned, I'm not timed out, it just doesn't. That should tell you who has the right idea. I am tired of arguing with you. You are obviously too ideologically driven to see the anti-male rhetoric coming from mainstream media. I have only one question - what are you doing on this sub if you are this insensitive to prejudice and hatred towards men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 05:48 PM
1

How is archiving tweets "punishing" anyone? I dunno... do you think keeping an open registry of someone's most controversial opinions, alongside their home adress, contacts, and photo be considered a punishment? After all, none of this DIRECTLY affects you, now does it? I'm sure nobody would engage in organized harassment or lynching of said person... This would be directed at the people in the administration, not his voters Well, his supporters understood it differently, because the Trump accou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 03:45 PM
1

I burst out laughing at the length of this. You put way too much effort into this when I barely cared in the first place. Ok. If it's a male power fantasy then why were you just arguing that it's not a male narrative? Where did I say that? I said it is not a blanket male empowerment trope, and that the hero's journey, while mostly appealing to me, is not universal to men, and not unique to men in their appeal. Until Disney started to forge viewer demographics for progressive reasons, we had a pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 07:23 AM
2

https://abcnews4.com/news/beyond-the-podium/biden-urges-unity-while-some-democrats-heap-scorn-on-trump-supporters AOC: “Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future." Robert Reich, a former Labor Secretary during the Clinton administration: "When this nightmare is over, we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It would erase Trump’s lies, c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 06:06 AM
6

If you actually believe this you are horribly uninformed Well, I asked why you think so. Why not just answer, instead of ad hominems? and have no business posting on this sub That'sbnot for you to decide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 06:34 PM
21

The thing here is this was a 14 year relationship and the guy had proposed several times and referred to her as he would a wife. So why didn't she accept? Sounds to me like he wanted more from the relationship, she just wanted to be fuckbuddies. I'd understand if he was deliberately dangling marriage in front of her, but never actually asked her, or accepted her proposal, because then there would be the argument that he was leading her on. However it seems like irnwas HER that was leading HIM on…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:41 PM
1

Biden is better than Trump but only because Trump is just an abysmal leader and human being. I'm not American, so I don't care so much, but why do you think Biden is bettee than Trump? What makes Trump such a horrible leader? And why does him being a bad person count? Need I remind you that bad people in bad times can do good things? Churchill indirectly caused the deaths of millions in India, and was a ruthless, umempathetic leader, one might say bordering a dictator - but he DID stop Hitler. W…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 03:32 PM
9

As someone who recently stumbled on this post, and who is technically left leaning liberal, but is commonly associated with the right due to the overton window shiftling like the entire political compass was rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise, I gotta say - if you voted for Biden and/or the democrats, and now you are surprises that they don't give a damn about issues affecting men... Congratulations! Again, I am left leaning, I guess you could say I am a classical liberal - liberty, equality, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 03:25 PM
1

Then why is it so rare for women to get stories like this? Maybe because this is a MALE power fantasy? Women by and large desire different things than men. Men want to be big and strong and powerful. Women want to be secure, and important and desired - high status, an even highee status mate, and economic and physical security is what best suits women's biological imperatives (which is, "protect children" , while power and proving oneself is what best suits men's biological imperative - " collec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 07:36 AM
1

Just throwing it out there - the UN world toilet day is also on Nov. 19. Goes to show where the rest of the world, and the establishment stands on male issues - a joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 12:01 AM
2

Sorry I'm late for the party. What do you mean there are no narratives empowering to men? Then why are so so many stories focus on the idea of a boy becoming a man? Is that not an empowering narrative? That is not a narrative that is exclusive to men, and general to all men. Hell, it's just about the furthest thing from the "empowerment" trope. The women's empowerment trope is essentially one where all, or most women are "queens" - morally good, or at least justified through evil men, hypercompe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/20 11:47 PM
-2

That's just my username, dickhead.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 09:25 AM
-3

Report him for what? Giving bad advice? And basically admit you may have hired a prostitute? The whole issue is with the system, not the cop alone.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 06:44 AM
3

A quick question - do you get off on hating men? Of all things you could have become, why are you a female chauvinist?
/r/MensRights15/10/20 09:12 AM
2

The idea of impulse control being stronger in girls is the one I'm most interested in. If it's true, then I wonder if the classroom environment just isn't suited for the majority of boys. The classroom is just a room, what matters is how you utilize it. Empirically boys have a higher need for physical activity, lower attention span, and better analytic thinking, just to mentionna few positives and negatives. Perhaps boys could benefit from shorter, more demanding and more engaging studying sessi…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:54 AM
1

I already cited a scientific article that shows higher impulse control in girls contribute to greater academic achievement. Sounds like perhaps the system is set up for the more moderate nature of girls, as opposed to boys' more rumbunctious behaviour. We know that these same boys years later outperform girls in STEMM fields by a wide margin, showing that they DO have the ability to perform as well as girls, but perhaps they need a different form of education. For example, a thing to consider: d…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:21 AM
7

The logic goes like this: "Women don't excell somewhere? It must be the fault of the system. Let's help women. Encourage them. Revise education!" "Men don't excell somewhere? They are clearly lazy. If men want to be as good as women, they need to work harder, because it seems women are just better overall!"
/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:15 AM
2

Argument from normality fallacy.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 04:18 AM
1

What's funny is that these are the exact arguments made by those who oppose paper abortions.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 04:13 AM
1

The same nonsensical argument could be made for women. "Well, if isn' sex that gets them pregnant, but dropping am unfertilized egg on their uterus wall. Just don't drop eggs on your uterus wall, and yoi won't be pregnant" Do you know of any way for men to have sex that doesn't involve sperms, without castrating themselves, or being infertile? I sure as fuck don't. Sex for men DOES involve sperms. That'd what sex is. Condoms help, but condoms are not 100% reliable. Again - if you think abortion …
/r/MensRights08/10/20 03:58 AM
3

Not "a" job. She's a lead writer for the NYT. She's literally making millions, and influencing millions, and not despits, but BECAUSE she's a racist androphobe.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 09:39 PM
-1

Can you delineate between thosr longing for the old system, and those that want to burn it down? Grandpa might want kings, the grandson might want a republic. Which of them would you send to the guillotine? This is why civil war is way more complicated than a regular war. Because one man's liberty is another man's discomfort, or downfall, and because you might use radicals to inflict change, but you can't please radicals all at once.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 06:17 PM
3

Those revolutionaries also ended up executing 40000 mostly innocent people, including the revolutionaries themselves, and ended up with Napoleon as their emperor. It's our job to learn from their mistakes. The US is different - they were fighting for an external enemy. Fighting against your own people is very very different.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 04:10 PM
4

It's ironic that she looks like a man... Also: She decided to not listen music made by men, read books made by men, or film directed by men... While I know this is not healthy, I'm slowly getting there too... Sadly. I can no longer suspend my disbelief and enjoy movies with female leads as easily as before - partially because of the feminist messaging, and partly because I expect feminist messaging -, and I am usually turned off by movies made by women for the same reason. With music I am more t…
/r/MensRights04/10/20 04:05 PM
3

What?? I don’t think most women think they’re superior to men due to gender. You'd be shocked. When I first met my girlfriend, who lives with her single mom - she has a half-brother, but he's 10 years older, so there's just the two of them -, so, when I met her, she has these weird misconceptions about men and boys. For example, for some reason she was really impressed that I can cook, and that I can do basic crafting - woodworking, smithing, screwing shit together, painting, that sorta stuff. A…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:01 AM
2

or I sing it in reverse. LMAO that's some Exorcist level shit right there.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 03:47 AM
7

Not just A song. Almost every other song. And movie. And tv show. And news article. And commercial. And forum. And social media platform. It does get tiring after a while.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:34 PM
5

Yeah. Freud might have been wrong about a lot of things, but penis envy seems to hold up.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 05:44 PM
17

If we all went on strike, no water, electricity and other basic stuff we risk our lifes developing and maintaining ...then our respective governments would announce a state of emergency, and would start recruiting men at gunpoint into the military, and then send the new found recruits back to their old jobs, at minimal wage or lower. The corona epidemic showed that human rights are nothing but a nice facade governments put up to look legitimate, and the moment it's THEIR life, livelyhood, or eve…
/r/MensRights29/09/20 10:02 AM
1

Eh... Something something prejudice and power. You can't achieve anything with morality when debating someone who adjusts their morality to their politics.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 09:54 AM
3

One thing I want to mention - while I know prison back then was harsher than today, it speaks volumes about how fucked up our view of justice is that a suspected serial rapist was given 6 years. Apparently people back then thought 6 years in prison was a fitting punishment for a monster. Nowadays you can get more for weed possession in many countries. This should tell us something. I know that the rehabilitation vs punishment topic is hot enough as it is, but nobody seems to talk about the fact …
/r/MensRights19/09/20 07:45 PM
3

Honestly, the UN is such a fucking useless organisation. They don't have direct legislative power, they don't have a predefined goal - they are just a bunch of overpaid bureaucrats fed in taxpayer money who love to throw their weight around in media, without actually having any hard power. Occasionally they do something that could be interpreted as good, but they balance it with shit like this, which is an overt violation of human rights. The fact that the UN is just the biggest kid on the playg…
/r/MensRights18/09/20 09:15 AM
33

*Gesundheit /e
/r/MensRights16/09/20 05:23 AM
3

Ah yes. The dreaded ADRENALIN! Quickly, ban any kind of sport, and rollercoasters too! Hide you wife, hide yo kids! Adrenalin is coming to town!
/r/MensRights13/09/20 08:29 AM
3

Nevermind the downvotes, man. You're right.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:48 AM
3

First of all, I don't know a single religion that requires anyone to be vegan. There is no "religious conviction". You're taking "religious conviction" way too literally. In a broader sense religion is a world view based on superstitions and arbitrary moral teachings that may or may not have an objective foundation. Veganism matches this description. As for ideology, eating meat is just as much of an ideology as not eating meat. False. People don't eat meat because they want tk eat meat, they mo…
/r/MensRights30/08/20 08:41 AM
3

Because they want to spread their ideology. Any ideology that dictates people how to behave can become sinister, and as such it is inherently worse than a lack of ideology. In simpler words - if you're telling people what to do out of religious conviction, you're misguided, and potentially dangerous.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 07:50 AM
3

Well, why do they want to overcome it? Because they want to use it to promote their own ideology. Fighting for a good cause with bad intentions can easily lead to bad results.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 07:31 AM
4

Then you are lost.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 03:02 PM
5

I get that it takes care of the problem short term, but I feel like this encourages more underhanded tactics, more misandry, and gives more power to radical feminists and their ilk. I get the idea, and I have thought of it myself, but ultimately you're playing russian rulette here. Woke people already cannibalize each other. If your intentions don't completely align with theirs, they will figure it out, and undo anything you have achieved.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 02:54 PM
6

Wait, are you being serious, or sarcastic?
/r/MensRights29/08/20 02:51 PM
-9

their organization is entirely female and they recruit from severely disenfranchised women Sounds like a men's rights issue...
/r/MensRights20/08/20 06:24 AM
1

I think you should. I think if someone is dumb enough to try it, good, that'd natural selection.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 04:26 AM
1

Look at it like this. There are millions of people just in the US who take steroids recreationally. If you don't know what to look for, you can't tell. Cocaine on the other hand... That's a bit easier to tell. Steroid users can maintain their usual lifestyle. Cocaine users not so much.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:47 PM
1

It has one positive effect, and a host of negatives. One can be "very little".
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:18 PM
1

How again? Cocaine has very little no positive effect, and a bunch of negative. I am actually pro-legalization for all drugs, but these are really not the same.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 04:03 PM
2

No, this is just not understanding biostatistics. Sigh Chairs are used by hundreds of millions of people in America daily, the absolute risk of injury is extremely low This isn't a "risk of injury" question. It's not a chance. By sitting on a chair your lumbar spine takes excess pressure, which damages it. Look at how many people suffer from lower back pain in their 40s onwards, or even earlier, and how prevalent they are among those working in office environments. It's a widely acknowledged top…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 03:51 PM
2

See that you think this is a valid argument really brings home what I said above because this is very basic biostatistics... This is a VERY valid argument. Hundreds of thousands of people EACH YEAR are diagnosed with various debilitating back injuries, as well as obesity, cardiovascular problems, etc because they live a sedentary life, and SPECIFICALLY because they sit more than 6 hours a day. In contrast I can count on my two hands how many people have died SINCE THE 1980s as a direct result of…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 07:13 AM
1

let's make sure that men have a MUCH more active place in the parenting structure! Sounds to me like you are trying to force men into relationships legally. Pretty sinister and fascistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 07:04 AM
2

Men have the exact same right to an abortion as women. This is like saying "well, women always had the right to vote! Provided they had a penis..." What paternal surrender demands is not equality. It is a whole new "right". As opposed to abortion, which was totally legal since forever, and totally not an illegal, immoral act for the at least 2000 or so years precedung the last half of the 20th century. that just so happens to bulldoze the rights of the children men sire. Uhm, how does it hurt ch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 07:03 AM
1

if you don't gain the right to abandon the children you sire, you want to deny women the right to basic medical care. As he said, this is a bad faith argument. See this for abortion: So you want to murder a child because you were irresponsible and now don't want to take responsibility for the child? It's the highest level of cognitive dissonance when you can say the mother's right to have bodily autonomy precedes that of the soon-to-be-born child to live, but then go on to say that the child's f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 06:53 AM
1

Uh...taking testosterone isn't the same as drinking alcohol until you feel drunk. You can do irreparable damage to yourself with testosterone/hormones. Ah yes, dementia, alcohol addiction, liver damage, nerve damage. No irreparable damage with alcohol at all. BTW do you want to ban high places too? No human should be allowed to jump from a height of above 2 meters. It could de irreparabke damage. We should live in mud huts underground.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:26 AM
2

Why do you need more T anyways? Why not? Increased physical fitness, better overall mood, better sexual health, more "energy" (as in, initiative to do stuff)... I think it's pretty much a drug that more than justified the side effects.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:24 AM
1

I have heard but cannot confirm, that testosterone is only safe and only truly works when it is an injection. Not really. It works orally too. The problem with that is that it gives the livers or kidneys a lot of work, and that can result in liver damage or kidney damage. If the injection form is so bad, the why do people with broken bones have to inject anticoagulant into their abdomen for days? Clearly that's too dangerous for a patient.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:21 AM
1

Hey, why don't you just make people have an in-house doctor all the time? Let's live in a medical distopia, where even a simple Ibuprofen needs a medical exam first! You're way overselling the danger of these drugs. More people are crippled from using the wrong posture or a bad chair every year than from testosterone use (in fact despite popular mantra testosterone and its derivatives haven't been shown to cause too many dangerous side effects, and certainly not in small dosages). So, should off…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:19 AM
1

Testosterone has provably beneficial effects on self-image, confidence, it makes the person more energetic and upbeat, it's a general wellness drug for men. That's all the reason you should need. The information about it is pretty straightforward. You can easily learn it yourself.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:15 AM
2

It's not inherently more powerful than estro, it just has a more visible immediate effect. But try taking the equivalent amount of estrogen, and see how fast your bodyfat increases and you grow tits! It's fast. If the rule is to keep people safe, why not do the same with estrogen? Someone could really fuck up their lives misusing that. In fact customer misuse is never a relevant reason, because people always have the ability to misuse anything. A fucking framing hammer is more prone to misuse, s…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:11 AM
1

On Aug. 10, 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act, formally apologizing to AJAs [Americans of Japanese Ancestry] and providing reparations of $20,000 to each surviving victim who was incarcerated during World War II. That's a reversal of a bad decision though. It's not something that came out of nowhere. The elderly men in question weren't wronged legally, they never HAD the right to earlier pensions, whereas Japanese Americans were obviously falsely incarcerated. the Germ…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:16 AM
1

Honestly, while I see your point, that's really a debatable topic, paying backwards. Typically laws don't apply backwards - whether they be positive or negative. I can't see a rationale between changing things only for future generations, but I can see the logic behind not paying retroactively - that's just not how it is supposed to work. Sure, it would be nice if we could correct the failures of the past, but it's unrealistic to give lump sums of 5 years of pension to every man above 65. That's…
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:32 PM
6

Well I assume it's because saving for retirement takes a lot of time Uhm... state funded retirements are not "saved" ahead of time. The retirement of the current elderly generation is paid from the taxes of the current adult generation. and changing the rules suddenly throws off these calculations considerably. Well, then find a midpoint. 62.5 (62) years for both sexes, and then lower it with time, if the country will become wealthier. Maintaining a sexist practice is just sexist. No justificati…
/r/MensRights12/08/20 06:39 PM
25

Now both men and women have to register for the draft after the successful law suit of National Coalition For men. Not true. Every source I have found says women still don't have to register.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 05:53 PM
6

"They are phasing out the difference gradually." Why though? Nothing is limiting them in phasing it out now. Sounds like an empty promise made by the governing party to get votes for an act for which a future party will have to take responsibility. There's no logical reason why current day elderly men should have to work more than women, now do they? Again, excuses. Also, is there an actual official source for this claim?
/r/MensRights12/08/20 05:47 PM
8

No, it means AT LEAST ONE OF THEM was abusive, and they had a toxic relationship. We don't know which one if them, and the husband isn't exactly able to tell his case. If you are in an abusive relationship, go to the authorities. Don't kill the other person. I have seen abusers cry very convincingly in court. I don't trust the verdict 100%. Why haven't the kids testified?
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:59 PM
1

Approaching someone is looks. Asking them out is a combination of things. And emotional investment can be the sole result of looks.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 05:49 AM
1

DISCLAIMER the saying applies to AVERAGE men. For attractive men it's a different story entirely. in a way men DO get proportionally more quality dates - when a woman asks a man out, most men will say yes regardless of their deeper attraction to the woman. So out of two people only one is emotionally invested, the other is just desperate. When a man asks a woman out, the woman has a wider range of selection, so if she says yes, she's likely emotionally invested in the guy. And if the guy is also…
/r/MensRights07/08/20 02:57 AM
3

Am confirm, can also gen Z.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 08:25 AM
1

Consider I said 10 hours, and he replied 18, it would be illogical to assume he used a different unit of time measurement. YOU are an idiot if you misunderstand that.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 05:07 PM
1

No one sleeps 18 hours unless they're depressed or have some disease. Well, you just answered a rhetorical question I haven't even asked yet. Also who the fuck questions the "night" part of that? I wasn't questioning it, I was just laughing at the absurdity of saying someone was sleeping 18 hours every night, when a night is shorter than 18 hours. Maybe he is somewhere in Scandinavia and thats a completely normal thing, That would only be in one half of the year. Also most people who sleep "8h a…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 05:06 PM
1

No. Sometimes it's interesting to talk to stupid people, just to understand their thought process, or expose their stupidity.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 09:21 AM
1

You're just an unintelligent sorry sack of shit. You don't know how to write, understand humor, You don't use a comma at the end of an enumeration. Instead you say "and", "or", etc... Pretty ironic how you're calling me unintelligent and telling me I don't know how to write humor, when you can't write in general. or realize that insulting someone over being butt buddies because I agree with a dude Agree over what? Sleeping 18 hours? Or TROLLING with sleeping 18 hours? He didn't take a position. …
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 09:06 AM
-1

Because 18 hours is not a night, it's either a night and some part of a day, or even possibly two partial nights in a row... Either way you can't just say I sleep 18 hours every night, because you're not sleeping exclusivelt during the night. And I don't understand how this is a joke. This is not a joke. A joke has something humorous in it. This is self-deprecating trolling. Either way I don't understand why treating a troll as if he was telling the truth is obliviousness. In fact I don't unders…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 08:27 AM
-1

I don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 08:10 AM
0

No, and if you have, I have a very low opinion of you.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 07:54 AM
-3

You're a weird, weird person.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 07:44 AM
-5

Is this a weird larping attempt to discredit this sub?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 07:22 AM
-9

"a" night? Half of that isn't even DURING the night. And what else do you do in the remaining 6 that you're so tired that you gotta sleep 18? Not mocking, I'm curious.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 07:01 AM
11

Who sleeps 10 hours? Seriously. Some people are so out of touch with reality...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 06:01 AM
2

To be fair, that's still bullshit. Just being the voice of reason - I think we can all agree that this is bullshit. OK, she hid assets, so that's not a nice thing - but she wouldn't have had to if divorce wasn't a retarded institution.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 11:58 AM
0

That's why you do it anonymously. There are websites that do that. There's still a chance that you'll get an FBI guy, but they won't have evidence against you.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 11:56 AM
3

Sounds like the murderer was a troubled, mentally ill, and surprisingly, based on his writing, a quote simple minded person. I'm just surprised such a person could become a lawyer. I was under the impression that law school was quite challenging. I certainly didn't think you could become a lawyer while having the expressive capabilities of a 14 year old. All thar aside, while he indeed wasn't an MRA, I think this shows that the MRM is facing the same radicalisation problem that consumed feminism…
/r/MensRights25/07/20 02:59 PM
4

What the FUCK is your problem? I've been on this this sub for a while. I just saw two contradictory statements in some matter I knew nothing about, and I asked (kindly might I ask) for clarification. If this was a copy pasta, you fucked up. If it wasn't, then you need to become a more attentive reader, and less confrontational. Because I haven't even suggested anything that you say I said.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 02:49 PM
1

I don't doubt that. I'm just looking for some indication for WHY he would be a misandrist. I'll look around in the comments tho.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 01:52 PM
8

I'm confused. Wikipedia says Hollander was a men's rights activist/feminist. Not saying that's true, but why do you guys seen so convinced he was an anti-MRA? I'm just trying to understand, please don't take this as an attack.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 01:49 PM
1

I'm saying genes mean fuckall in comparison to steroids. Not to mention the future's soldiers aren't necessarily the biggest and most muscular. There are a host of reasons why smaller soldiers are better they eat less, they are lighter, take less space, less likely to suffer medical issues due to carrying gear all day, and less likely to be hit by gunfire. Ultimately there are positives and negatives, and it appears that a diverse selection of physical traits are a better tool to success than sp…
/r/MensRights22/07/20 10:20 AM
0

I think the fact that it's reversible is a pretty large difference between these two, first of all Chemical castration is not reversible, you... Stupid person. It permanently destroys your natural endocrine system and your capacity to produce sperms. Even simple male contraceptives left users infertile and with erectile dysfunction for 3 years, and those are just contraceptives, not castration. None of those things are remotely commonplace, 1) yes they are, you just don't know about them. 2) irr…
/r/MensRights17/07/20 05:25 PM
1

Who cares? No amount of super soldiers are worth stooping to China's level. Not to mention it's worthless - guns kill you no matter how tough you are, and special ops guys are already on Adderal and steroids, so genetics takes a backseat.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 05:57 AM
3

Accidentally I am against the castration of dogs. BTW nowadays they usually perform vasectomies instead of castration, especially because you don't mess with the hormonal system of a creature. Same applies to humans. Even mandatory vasectomy sounds better than chemical castration. That's just horrible.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:58 PM
11

In 1927, Not to be a dick - but this was a century ago. Not only that - it was BEFORE everyone had to face the fact that eugenics is evil - arguably Hitler's greatest achievement is inadvertantly ridding this world of eugenics, at least for a short amount of time by setting the worst of examples imaginable. So yeah. I agree that this whole thing is just disgusting, and every time I read about it... I'm gonna be honest here - if a mod sees this, please just message me to edit this comment instead…
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:56 PM
10

I think if there was a chemical way to compel people not to be violent, it would be okay to use on people who commit violent crimes. First of all, how far does that go? Because the problem with these controversial revolutionary ideas isn't how they could work - it's how they could go wrong. With massive levels of overpolicing everywhere, police brutality, mental institutions abusing their rights for involuntary confinement to drug and abuse patients, cops injecting people with ketamine to make t…
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:46 PM
38

Now imagine they were inducing permanent infertility in violent female prisoners, and watch the protests ensue... Criminal or not, you have a right to not be forced into hormone treatment. That's bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:13 PM
4

I don't know why you are getting downvoted, but you are correct - swinging can absolutely work, but only if both sides have respect for one another, and understand each other's boundaries not only in a fetish sense, but as human beings. The problems start when one party starts using swinging as an excuse to seek validation elsewhere.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 02:17 PM
2

Forced into what? Pregnancy? So you are telling me that straight men are revenge-raping teenage girls just because they are gay? Sounds like a looney conpiracy theory. Or do you mean hating men? That doesn't explain the pregnancy. Honestly, try to express yourself more clearly.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/20 04:46 AM
2

The judicial system is just a way of approximating morality with laws and legally binding decisions. Morally a person who rapes deserves punishment. The legal system aims to serve some kind of punishment for this crime. When someone defames another, they should pay compensation. That's another thing the judicial system is meant to do. They are also meant to absolve innocents who wete accused of wrongdoing. Whether this happens in a civil or criminal court is irrelevant from a morality standpoint…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 08:35 PM
2

Criminal court, at least in the US, uses "beyond a reasonable doubt", that standard is for all criminal cases. Apparently victim testimony was enough to convict Weinstein. He got 23 years. I'm not saying he's innocent, but if you think the victim saying "He raped me" is beyond a reasonable doubt, then you are gravely mistaken.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 10:45 AM
2

Defamation happens effectively all the time unending as long as humans exist. As opposed to sexual assault? Proving it was intentional and it caused damages is the part that needs to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Sure, but in current day criminal justice the line between consensual and unconsensual sex is judt as narrow. I'm not asking for defamation to require lower level of evidence.. I'm asking for rape to require a higher one.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 10:39 AM
14

defamation cases are not easy to win in general. Those kind of cases are a "beyond a shadow of a doubt" level cases. Crazy how the standards for defamation from the prosecution side are higher than for sexual assault or rape.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:08 AM
58

She USED TO BE attractive. Now she looks, well... Not that attractive.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 08:26 PM
2

sexist sub being homophobic I'm glad we know what kind of person you are. A rabid SJW. queer people also want children These were teens. Do you think they had sex because they wanted to settle down? Or because a condom broke... I just can‘t stand this narrative you guys push about us filthy queers being actually wrong about ourselves See, that's fucking funny. Because guess what? The LGBT+ community and intersectional feminism has been pushing the SAME AGENDA on straight people. The idea that EV…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 06:00 AM
1

Hey, OP, can I have your permission to use this image as a demonstrational tool when debating spousal support?
/r/MensRights04/07/20 04:05 PM
3

Wow looks like you‘re not a big fan of facts and logic muh fAx AnD lOgiC!!! Seriously, the culture war made me hate this combination of words. but rather someone to marry himself to conspiracy theories desperately to justify why some woman are into other woman and therefor won‘t be interested in you. Actually, no: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295869277_Adolescent_Pregnancy_Among_Lesbian_Gay_and_Bisexual_Teens " A growing body of evidence suggests that not only do some lesbian, gay, b…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/20 04:20 AM
1

Hm... Now I don't know what to think
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 03:33 AM
4

Really? That kinda makes me sad.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/20 03:32 AM
8

Sweet jesus fuck, I had to look it up, and that's almost exactly what she said. What a fucking piece of shit.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:54 PM
5

Don't confuse legality with morality and ethics. An eye for an eye is a horrible basis for a legal system, however morally it can be justified. Wishing misery for someone who caused identical misery to an innocent is an understandable, hell, logical response. If I bought you a candy bar, you'd be indebted to me for a similar favour, and would find it correct that you'd buy me a candy bar the next time I am out of money. Yet if I punched you - suddenly it's bad for you to punch me back? Hell no. …
/r/MensRights25/06/20 12:42 PM
6

Sigh... You DO realise that Trump's policy HAS worked out, right? Unemployment decreased drastically. Sure, this is a long con, but the right direction. Not because Trump does it, but because it's sensible. You completely fail to understand basic market mechanisms.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:54 PM
4

Yeah, but what kind of change? Many politicians promise change but positive change hardly ever happens. I'm not trying to evaluate Trump's presidency, I'm just stating why people voted on him. I didn't see him advocate any "isolationist" policies except for putting tariffs on other countries, That's economic isolationism and mercantilism. It disincentivizes importing, which essentially forces the country to become more autonomous economically, and later down the line increase its exports. which …
/r/MensRights24/06/20 10:04 PM
6

That's also true. But voting for a slim chance of change was still better than voting for the status quo I guess. Also, Trump advertized isolationist/mercantilist politics and withdrawal of military from abroad. The former appeals to the working class, the latter to the massive military population.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 09:44 PM
5

Do you have some quotes of them hating catalans explicitly? I am not spanish, I am just skeptical when it comes to accusations of negative nationalism and racism.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 05:46 PM
4

That party is openly against catalans, an ethnicity in Eastern spain and want catalans to basically be converted/colonized into being Spanish Are they against catalan independance, or do they just hate catalan culture? Very different things.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 05:39 PM
3

The reason lots of people vote for Trump is because he is against abortion too. Is it though? A lot of Bernie voters who were cheated out of their candidate ended up voting for Trump too. And many conservatives who voted for him are not anti-abortion. I think it's more because the guy is an outsider, and thus offered people a cleaner slate in politics.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 05:37 PM
1

Disabling the bodycam is sketchy as fuck and should not be allowed. Great. Well, that's one of the reason people started protesting. Do you know how often it happens that the bodycam footage JUST so happens to me missing or damaged? And if it's missing, the officers only get a verbal warning from their superiors. I couldn't count how often I have read on sketchy cases that bodycam footage was missing, turned off, or turned on well into the arrest. This is not a rare phenomenon, this is standard …
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:52 PM
1

Ok, here's another one for you: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/06/16/fize-j16.html The seven-sentence press release then states that “the subject was non-compliant” and “allegedly threatened the deputy by stating she was armed and going to shoot him.” The very next sentence alleges that “The incident escalated quickly and the deputy discharged his weapon, striking the suspect.” In an interview Sunday morning with the Sedalia Democrat Pettis County Sheriff Kevin Bond confirmed that there w…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:30 PM
0

Cameras are everywhere these days. They can't just throw a gun down on an unarmed victim, claim they were armed, and get away with it. Another commenter literally recounted a case below where the cop used his own dropped weapon as a justification to retroactively claim the person was armed. If you think cameras defend against lawful abuse of human rights by the police, then you're dangerously naive.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:17 PM
-3

Can you prove to me that they weren’t armed? Can you prove they were? I have no reason to not believe the statistics. You have proof that these same statistics had been unreliable before.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:42 PM
-8

I'm sorry, but you're just being ignorant now. There's saying you don't know, and then there's stating something you can't POSSIBLY know. There's ample precedence of cops blatantly lying in their testimonies and reports, and getting away with it. This should at least make you doubt the validity of those statistics.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:19 PM
3

I guess so. Still, that's just so disappointing, seeing how even intelligent people can be manipulated so easily.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 02:57 PM
6

Are you kidding?
/r/MensRights14/06/20 10:56 AM
3

However, nowadays, women are being encouraged to let this hate roam free. They are specifically told that this hate is virtuous, and that they are liberating themselves by expressing disgust against men. Sure, and I can see this working on dumb people. But both Brie Larson and Elizabeth Banks are quite articulate and educated actressed. I just find it improbable that someone with above average intelligence would fall for such a primitive ruse, and not realize that they are on the wrong side of m…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:01 AM
6

Personally I've had a couple of comments in the past by fat, out of shape women telling me I need to train 'this' or 'that' more. Yet they look like a donut. Fucking this. So many clueless people spouting clueless shit. It's not just that it's patronising or insulting - it's just wrong. Why would you give advice when you don't know anything? Stop projecting your insecurities on me.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 03:15 PM
16

Women with single digit bodyfat look horrible, because the essential level of bodyfat for women is around 10%. A woman at say, 7% is practically malnourished.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 03:12 PM
1

Uh-huh, that’s one definition - did you scroll down? It’s very common for a word or expression to have multiple meanings depending on context Then provide this alternative definition. I couldn't find such a thing. I already told you my meaning Except you're flip flopping between two meanings, as evidenced by the following quote: A judge ‘shutting down’ a lawyer’s line of argument is a judge rejecting that argument, not silencing the lawyer. Except the judge is in a position of power, and by reje…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:39 PM
1

Nah. I'm just saying, if I was a nazi, I wouldn't halfass it.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 01:26 PM
1

The definition of "to shut down": cease (or cause something to cease) business or operation. This clearly shows that this isn't about refusing to acknowledge an opinion, it's about silencing the other party. Keep your language barrier, and learn to speak English. BTW - a judge shutting something down is literally a judge putting a stop to something.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 11:01 AM
1

You don't understand the fundamental difference between calling someone out, and shutting them down. This is why you're an authoritatian.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 08:23 AM
1

would you agree that MRA subs have their own form of visible toxic members? It seems pretty apparent in this comment section that they do. Do you feel these members represent you and, if not, do you think you are being active enough in shutting them down? See, this is why nobody likes feminists. Because you're SOOO KEEN on espousing authoritarianism when it fits your goals. Shutting down people for being mean? How about talking with them? Even better - if you're offended at me, don't come crying…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 04:39 AM
1

equates any form of gender quota to racial segregation and I see you're not entirely aware how the holocaust started. Hint: it was with quotas for jews in firsr public, and then private institutions. You’ll be horrified to hear then that the Scottish Parliament is considering introducing a hard quota of 25% minimum men for all university courses in order to combat the female dominance in subjects such as veterinary medicine, nursing and teaching. You don't change my ideals jusy by flipping the s…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 04:35 AM
1

Ok so will you acknowledge that my post was expressing my concern about the legislation theoretically discriminating against men? This is irrelevant. You keep beating around the bush. What is "theoretically" discriminating? It's plain old sexism, nothing else. This is not a maybe situation, any kind of quota is inherently discriminatory. I will acknowledge that you can't talk straight for dear life. How are you missing the part where I repeatedly say that I don’t think quotas are the best way to…
/r/MensRights11/06/20 12:24 AM
2

Here's what you said: I also agree that trying to balance a perfect 50/50 balance on every board would be overly burdensome and counterproductive. Accordingly, I’m much more inclined to either have no provision for quotas at all or to have a smaller minimum for each gender (e.g. 40% women; 40% men; 20% either) So, you're not against quotas that discriminate against men, just 50% quotas, because that's SOMEHOW worse than 40%. Either way, someone will get there because of their gender, and not the…
/r/MensRights10/06/20 11:04 PM
4

I think it’s pretty clear in my post that my concern is the theoretical discrimination against men. No it isn't. In fact you expressed on r/ askfeminists or something, that your main concern is that it will be repealed over time due to laws; you also said you support quotas in an of themselves. But go ahead, let's clear things up. You don't think this is discriminatory. Then why do you say this piece of legislation should be unmade?
/r/MensRights10/06/20 10:08 PM
0

Is the strawman argument - nothing in my comment legitimized anything. You are defending this evil piece of legislation. The previous commenter appeared to be under the impression that it applied to all companies in Scotland. See, now THAT is a strawman.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 07:37 PM
0

You are arguing against a straw man. I wasn't arguing. I was making a statement, explaining the rationale behind this legislation, since you lack the spine to admit it. BTW, laws apply to the whole country, regardless of the subject of the law..
/r/MensRights10/06/20 06:44 PM
15

If you want to brainwash a populatiom, start with the youth. Let's push men out of public education jobs, and then see how motivated the next generation of evil penis bearers will be to participate in higher education. You are legitimizing evil.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 05:15 PM
10

Where have you seen me arguing in favor of legislating creating gender quotas? You're arguing that a specific gender quota that OBVIOUSLY discriminates against men is only wrong because it can snub trans people too. I think it is safe to say that you are NOT against quotas that discriminate against men, since you don't acknowledge this as being one.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 05:13 PM
11

Ah yes, r / politics user. Fucking cancer. But let's hear it. What are people supposed to do?
/r/MensRights10/06/20 05:07 PM
11

Scotland has been quite PC and feminist for the last decade or more. There's no pendulum, this is good old misandry.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 05:06 PM
2

But this is the prime example of discrimination. Prefering one group over the other for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 06:24 AM
2

Regardless of how you look at it, it's discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 05:46 AM
6

Not even that. Apparently the witnesses testified in his favour. He had solid alibi. They just didn't care.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:02 PM
6

With guns. Don't underestimate the power of state mandated violence.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 02:22 PM
7

Well, this seems appropriate
/r/MensRights26/05/20 02:21 PM
7

"usually the side that results to insults is the side of wrong" Unless you're arguing with a psychopath, or a troll. Psychopaths can be despicable hellspawns when it comes to arguing, because they don't respect fundamental human values. And there is just no respect when someone doubts your very existence, the sanctity of life, or that of of the human spirit, to mention a few. When someone says something that makes you go "Wow... You're a piece of shit!", that's not your fault, that's theirs. As …
/r/MensRights26/05/20 12:07 AM
0

I hear the argument that T2 and Kill Bill were "female leads done right". The thing is - they were only a predecessor to the current day trend of androgynous men. Hollywood has a trans fetish, if anything, but not the way you think. They are obsessed with the takeover of women over men. Thing is though, traditionally masculine values are needed for leadership. So Hollywood is promoting masculine women, and by extension, feminine men.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 01:32 PM
2

This. With my current knowledge I often find feminist and anti-male references and implicationa in many many movies that very much predated the metoo era. These themes really are only noticable when you deliberately analyse the film from a creater's point of view.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 11:27 AM
38

I recently started reading 1984 once again. Looks like the Ministry of Truth is at it again.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:57 PM
1

It wasn't me who made that claim tho.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/20 02:23 PM
1

I hope you get a lot of gifts then.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/20 02:03 PM
3

From the head of the penis.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 06:55 AM
-7

If the foreskin is not forcibly retracted, it will remain attached to the glans for the first 10-16 years of the boy's life. What the ever loving fuck are you on about? If the foreskin doesn't detach until you are 10, you need to see a doctor. 16 is WAAAY past time for it. I get that you are an intactivists, I've run into this argument before. It is still not true. I don't get why it's hard to admit that yes, circumcised dicks are purely mechanically easier to clean. It doesn't take away from yo…
/r/MensRights16/05/20 04:54 AM
5

They have an inflexible and morally deficient ideology. So they bend morality around it.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 04:46 AM
3

I love how this guy makes a living by painting red pills blue, and selling them to desperate women. Then again, it only works if you are hot.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 01:01 AM
1

What the fuck is your problem? Take a page out of your own book, and get a hold of yourself
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/20 07:54 AM
2

Men uniting to corral women's sexuality isn't feasible unless justified/framed in a larger context - to preserve order and stability, to keep the population growing, to follow God's word. Fair point. First I thought that the common goal could be an even redistribution of women, but then I realised that on a purely sexual level this wouldn't work, as for Chads it is counterintuitive to relinquish their privilege, and the rest of the men can't do much to curtail women's freedom without instituting…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 08:45 PM
2

I have no doubt about that. But trust me in that I've seen enough cases od ugly guys dating hot girls that I notice from where the wind blows. I'm sure you struggle yourself though. Sometimes it's all in the head BTW. Maybe you need to change how you lool at yourself. I'd help you, but I don't know if you want MY help, since I'm not necessarily that experienced. If you want, hit me up.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 06:03 PM
2

Flirting with other women is a net positive. It confirms to your spouse that you're still desirable to competition (pre-selection) and conditions her to be on her best behavior lest you decide to leverage said attractiveness. Women long to be with a man that others covet but who chooses her. Also true. But you definitely need a balance. If you make it a habit to make your partner insecure, that's just mental abuse. Let's not be obtuse. The "system that punishes young, inexperienced men" is calle…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 05:58 PM
15

I meant gloating on my part due to your misfortune. Don't be so defensive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 04:39 PM
13

That's exactly what I am doing. I'm just explaining why people who gaines sexual market value, and went from undesirable to somewhat desirable don't dismantle the system that wronged them before. It's like getting caught up in a fountain, and being carried by the stream - it takes a spine to stick to your ideals.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 04:24 PM
23

No need to feel bad LOL And really, gloating is not a good mentality. I'm just happy you woke up. Plus, I needee that proverbial red pill too, otherwise I would still be nowhere.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 04:14 PM
28

Indeed. The only thing you can do is improve yourself, and accept compromise. BTW, I have to admit, my view has changed a lot since I became commited to self-improvement. Trust me, you won't stay affixed to the "settle down and be a good husband" mindset for long. The more successful one might become with women, the more their internal chad comes out. I'm in a commited relationship with someone I am happy with, but I still feel the urge to flirt with women, and frankly, my internal monologue abo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 04:12 PM
68

Women in the 25-40 age range (approx.) are looking for stability. They certainly won't get it from a young guy with no money or established existence. Older women (40+) are looking to recapture their glory days. Unless you are some 6'2"+ hunk with a wrist thick cock, she won't care about you, and certainly won't settle down with you. Generally if you are attractive, you won't have a trouble with women. My statement applies only to average looking men - which, according to women, compose 80-90% o…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 03:44 PM
105

It doesn't always help. Being short, and good friends with a tall (but frankly, unattractive) guy it infuriated me that whenever we hung out, both of us single, o matter how hard I tried, I couldn't get any girl I could... click with, while this guy literally had 8/10 chicks ask him out left and right. And the guy had an annoying, passive aggressive personality too. It got to a point where I sometimes had to stay away from our group of friends, because sometimes it just ruined my mood if I hung …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 03:11 PM
495

Men need to open their eyes to the amazing women in their own age bracket. Women in their glory years - 18-25 - often don't even look at guys who are in their age range, rather someone who's older, and financially stable. Why should men not repay this "favour"?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 01:36 PM
2

Indeed, can attest to this. In my language women were called "fehérnép", literally meaning "white people".
/r/MensRights14/05/20 11:51 AM
1

First of all, if the audience is equally extreme, how do you differentiate between trolling, and genuinely being a manhating piece of shit? Secondly, does it really matter?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 07:32 PM
3

I mean, that's not THAT extreme from a manhater. Contrary to popular belief hatred can be a rational thing. These people build their reality around hating certain things, it is what gives them energy to push through life. Crazy would be something self-destructive. Hatred pays, indirectly, or even directly.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 07:13 PM
10

I'm not sure you are familiar with the TheFairerSex sub... The number of upvotes might show you that this is far from a troll account.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 06:32 PM
2

I wanted to comment that it's probably a troll, but I checked her profile (r/psychic_rosa)... It's real. She seems to be a regular on radfem subs. Alternatively this is uberhigh effort trolling.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 06:31 PM
9

She should be jailed for a long ass time. I am not a fan of making an example of people, but in this case, she deserves it every bit.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 11:42 AM
-1

The guy isn't bragging about raping someone, now is he?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 10:23 AM
0

But if a male rapper rapped about raping someone, there would be outrage, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 08:49 AM
11

Well, yes. That's also true. I'm just pointing out that the two cases were treated as one due to insincere reporting.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 08:01 AM
23

Maybe because it's been established a hundred times that there was no connection between the boy, and the instagram group. None. The connectiom came from a news article that intentionally mixed the two together to paint the boy in a negative light. Edit: also, why is someone who posts to 2X lurking on this sub? Looking for screencaps to show off?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 07:46 AM
6

It's apples and oranges. But if we're measuring, I honestly have to say being falsely convicted for rape is worse in most cases. Rape's main problem is the psychological damage it causes - the victims become distrustful of society, insecure in themselves and their own worth, and they might develop guilt for something they didn't do. ALL of these things are potentially true to someone falsely convicted of rape IN ADDITION to having their life taken away (10-20 years of prison). An accusation can …
/r/MensRights07/05/20 01:12 PM
0

Don't tone police me. I am free to express myself as I find fitting. And I'm free to call you out on being an asshole. This is not kindergarten. Then why are you acting without proper manners? Alleviating the pain of a natural body part? It was red, inflammated, and itching, as far as I remember (again, I was 4). The doctor that we went to was a well known and respected one. And he hasn't performed a single circumcision BTW. So don't bring me the bullshit about him being biased. The fact is that…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:49 AM
-3

Where did I say it was your fault? Then stop using a vindictive tone. You can still get him investigated for medical malpractice. For alleviating my pain? What an asshole, right? Foreskin tear due to overuse and too much force? It's like saying it's fine to cut off legs because if sprained ankles. You DO realise that a foreskin tear can be worse than a circumcision, right? Should I show you pictures of serious foreskin tears? But to be frank, as a kid, the frenulum in my upper lip tore. By your …
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:17 AM
-1

Of course I’m aware, because I’m a mind reader. Well, maybe don't go around assuming things next time. What exactly were you diagnosed with? Phimosis. OK, I’m telling you: “There isn’t a serious risk of a foreskin tear”. Porn scene sex isn’t any more vigourous than the way millions of couples have sex around the world every year, and the foreskin naturally glides forwards and backwards during sexual intercourse. I'm done here. You're to the brim with shit, if I nudge you anymore, it will spill.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:00 AM
-5

Are you aware that all infant males are born with Physiologic Phimosis, where the foreskin is naturally attached to the glans of the penis to protect it and stop urine and faeces entering the meatus? Are you aware that I was 4 or 5 when I was diagnosed with it? Roll your eyes all you want, I don't care, but it's not fun when you have pain every time you have an erection. And kids CAN have erections ever since birth. Yes, and if you eat too much your teeth will fall out It doesn't take a genius t…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:41 AM
-3

Not a baby, no. We agree there. But a 3-4 year old kid, yes.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:31 AM
3

I don't know about the sub - personally, I am not against it, as long as it is done for a medical reason, and of course, with the consent of the participant. Examples of medical reasons: You have phimosis. It's a tough question how old a child has to be to consent to a circumcision if he has phimosis, but as someone who actually had it, and who is affected by it to this day, I'd say that therr are cases where the word of the parent is more important. A kid might be scared of the operating table,…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:00 AM
1

Regarding sitting wherever they please... in India there are female only train carts. There are no male only train carts. She's so far up her own ass, she could probably circle back around.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:52 PM
3

That's actually really insightful.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:50 PM
-3

I actually farted in my girlfriend's face on our second date. Granted, we'd been talking for a while online at that point, and had good chemistry... pun intended... But still. Sometimes a bit of vulgarity can come a long way. It's a weird sort of ice breaker. EDIT: Why the downvotes?
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:48 PM
4

Yeah, and then you get expelled, get campus police called on you, get accused of rape, etc... SJWs play dirty. Really dirty. Don't underestimate them.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 03:39 PM
8

Well, she should probably be working then. Making those 10 dollars. Not begging for them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 04:41 AM
2

That's neat but what if it's a case I'm going to lose? I got 20000$ on the hook so I just miss all my court dates, which don't get rescheduled for weeks or months. Then you are given X strikes- say, 3 -, and if you fail to apper the 4th time, you will be represented by a court mandated lawyer, and the lawyer's default fees will be sent to you in check. This lawyer will have to deal with your case as best as he can. I think I'm done discussing litigation with you. You don't know how civil trials …
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:13 PM
1

I'm downplaying it because by taking her claims seriously, despite her not seeking justice through the proper channel, we're validating cancel culture.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:34 PM
6

He should win the case. Don't you see the pattern? Woman goes out with famour, wealthy man. Woman makes accusation. Woman goes to civil court instead of the police There's zero evidence Judge rules in woman's favour anyway. He would have lost whether he showed up or not.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:57 PM
3

If the case is so clear cut, why didn't she go to the police? The answer is because she's lying, and she's a gold digger.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:51 PM
1

I don't know about you, but right now most of our "human rights" got revoked... So, that's that. What you are doing is a mix of Stockholm syndrome and schadenfreude. You are gloating in someone's misfortune, while feeling like an authority on who can or cannot complain, because you YOURSELF are oppressed. Newsflash - being oppressed is not a privilege. Stop bragging about it. since in these pandemic times we are all kept indoors for "our protection" I strongly suspect those guys got the better p…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:34 PM
2

Actually, yes. India has become quite feminist. For example: https://youtu.be/ZANtaO5ulN4 There's ZERO actual evidence anywhere that female only carts would decrease sexual crimes. But it's feminism.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:30 PM
2

Fucking India. Fucking feminism... I'm tired.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:28 PM
2

Uhm... There's a fucking block button on the app.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:22 PM
4

If there is no penalty for not going to court, then why would anyone ever show up? There's a BIT of a fucking difference between "he didn't show up, that reflects badly on him", and "he didn't show up, it's open season on his assets, take whatever you feel like" I doubt you have better ideas. I actually have a fuckton of better ideas. Here's one. Not appearing in court caries a default penalty of between 50 and 500 dollars (or whatever), INDEPENDANT of the case at hand. See? So, where is my job …
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:53 PM
4

In other words, if you can't get to the court, and can't get an attorney, your money is up for grabs. You think that's OK?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:15 PM
2

If someone can't go to court they have someone go in their stead, like a lawyer. Well, then where was his state mandated lawyer? You can have a civil and criminal trial for the same thing. Have you heard of OJ Simpson? It doesn't even sound like there was a criminal trial. Which is the issue. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. She claimed rape. Rape has a relatively high burden of proof in criminal court. She's asking to be awarded money for a crime (with a burden of proof) in …
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:40 PM
-1

Are you dense? I’m not blaming anyone. It sounds like you are though. Your tone suggests it. It's fucking irrelevant why he lost the case. Judges should have enough common sense to say "ma'am, if he raped you, you go to the police. Goodbye." And anyone can sue anyone for anything. And I'm saying you shouldn't be able to sue someone for a criminal charge, and exploit the lower standards of civil courts. You are justifying her and the judge being moneyhungry pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:37 PM
2

But the whole basis of the lawsuit is a crime. How the fuck can someone sue someone in civil court, based on a crime (sexual assault) which requires a criminal court with a higher standard of proof than civil court? It should be illegal to sue someone over otherwise criminal activity, this is straight up bullshit. It's pathetic that you're blaming the victim here.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:30 PM
9

But she was accusing him of rape. That's not a civil suit. If you accuse someone of rape, you should be forced to do it in front of criminal court, due tk the higher standards of proof. This should simply not be allowed, whether you appear in court or not. What if someone CAN'T go to court? Should they then be susceptible to any kind of robbery by a corrupt judge?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:26 PM
135

What the actual god damn fuck?!?!?!? Judges can do that now? Just take and redistribute intellectual properties that were in no way related to the case? What is this? Medieval europe?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:54 PM
18

Whether you show up in court or not, the judge simply doesn't have the right to dish out any sentence. This isn't the medieval times. Certain crimes constitute certain sentences. And under no condition can someone accused of sexual assault have their assets and IPs given to the victim. That's not in the least bit how this works.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:53 PM
33

How did they get manslaughter out of it? I mean, that's a pretty clear cut case.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 01:42 PM
3

On our fourth date with my girlfriend (we clicked, so it was kind of obvious that we'll be serious), I mentioned her that I'm not a fan of makeup, and that because of my beard, I can tell instantly when someone's wearing foundation - because after kissing them, I start to intensely itch. She also mentioned that she often has to deal with pimples. I figured it's worth a shot to solve both of our problems - I suggested her to stop using foundation, eye shadow, and lip gloss at the very least - bas…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 03:33 AM
1

This doesn't really prove anything though. These are all "studies" completed with a very small sample size. The participants' gender could be an irrelevant or tertiary factor
/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:56 PM
1

I'm not confused, I gave you a simplified analogy as to why you can't have two genes serving the same role expressing themselves symultaneously. You're deliberately ignoring this crucial flaw in your own, and the "genetic researcher"'s reasoning.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:03 PM
1

But expression of ACE2 is NOT a genetic disorder. It's one thing that a surplus X genetic matter allows for self-correction, and less faulty genes - but as you said, it doesn't lead to two opposite genes expressing themselves. That's nonsensical. You yourself said that only one gene out of every pair will be expressed, and it is fixed. And yes, on average it is 50-50%, but that's not really relevant. This is like saying a woman whose one X chromosomr says she has blonde hair, the other says brow…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 05:36 PM
1

That sounds like a genetic disadvantage to me. A disadvantage is not an inferiority. It's no big deal. Men have many genetic advantages too. Are you a woman? Because you sound like a manhating woman. That is not what he said. If he said that then quote him. He literally said that there' a greater diversity of ACE2 genes causing greater immune response - this is not true, demonstrably so. one of your inherited genes in a pair suppressed the other, so both genes won't affect your immune response."…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 05:12 PM
1

So you're conceding that there is a genetic component to men having a higher death rate. Correct? What? Yes, the genetics component is them being male. The question was never whether men had a higher death rate, but why that's the case. And the article made the case that the reason is men's genetically inferior immune response. This is what I am rejecting. You're trying to move the goalpost, but in an astonishingly clumsy way. Why aren't you phrasing that as "you're just genetically inferior!"? …
/r/MensRights06/04/20 05:00 PM
4

How can someone actually be this daft? The man almost has his finger amputated, and she thinks HE must have done it HIMSELF to incriminate his wife. How does that make sense to her? Doesn't she realise those things are grossly disproportional?
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:46 PM
1

No one knows the infection rates Well, now we know neither of us read the article carefully. Quote: "more men than women are testing positive for coronavirus, with 55 percent of all cases. They also are dying of it at even higher rates. As of Friday, 1,159 men in the five boroughs had been killed by COVID-19 — 62 percent of the city’s 1,867 deaths." Let's suppose these statistics are reliable. 7% difference between the rates of infections and mortality is well within the tolerable margin of erro…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:39 PM
1

No, what is in the article is plain pseudoscience. Immune response doesn't get "better" by having more chromosomes, because the two X chromosomes in women aren't active simulatenously. That would lead to all kinds of crazy stuff as far as I know. Point is, women having two different X chromosomes is completely irrelevant, and the fact that a DOCTOR of all people spreads this obvious bullshit is kind of telling of his intentions. Well, that's if you haven't looked at his smarmy face.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:24 PM
1

Well you can discount that because the lockdown probably won't have affected mortality rates yet so it must be something else. Have you considered that this affects INFECTION rates? Have you seen mortality rates separated by gender? "“Sure, there are some behaviors that might affect the number of infections" "...but I'll jusr wave it away, since I'm a bigoted manhater." He mentions smoking too. It would probably be best to actually read the entire article rather than just the bit I cut out. I kn…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:11 PM
1

Those differences also make women with somewhat better immune systems and somewhat more resilient to some diseases. Care to show us what these differences in immune response are? Because as far as I know, male and female immune systems are on average indistinguisable.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:51 PM
1

For one, as mentioned, men are more likely to keep working even during the spread of the virus, since they are the majority breadwinners. Secondly, higher rate of cardiovascular illnesses. This can be attributed to a more stressful life. Also higher obesity. Third, the virus reproduces in the lungs, the kidney, ans the testicles mainly. That means women lack one of the tree dangerous organs for the disease. Generally the only point we should jump to the conclusion that genetics is at play is eit…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:47 PM
1

What we are actually seeing is that males do not do well once infected,” Moalem said. “So it comes down to genetics. Uhm... Preeety quick to jump to conclusions there. Almost too quick. EDIT It's really disingenuous of you to try and spin this as the person trying to help. Az best his remark about genetics is misguided, since he hasn't closed out other factors. At worst it is malicious and misandric.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:28 PM
2

This is exactly the kind of misconception that feminists love to spread as facts. Show me a study proving this.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:26 PM
4

So we're back to square one. I can understand how this is a necessity on your part, but would you say this is the right path to take?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 08:21 AM
5

How do you know if they do feel that way if you don't ask?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 08:11 AM
8

And what if it's a colleague you just click with? For the last 50 years workplace romances made up the majority of relationships.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 08:00 AM
7

Just don't hit on chicks at work. It's not hard dude. You're at your job to work and get money, not flirt and date. I feel kinda sorry for you. That's a horrible mindset to have.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 07:37 AM
-13

How is speech inherently sexual?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 07:35 AM
29

That leads to a world really sparse in positive reinforcement. I'm happy to some degree that I live in a country where political correctness and social justice hasn't become the norm - and as someone who has suffered from low self-esteem and body dismorphia for a long time, I feel like compliments even from random people can help you in overcoming certain boundaries that limit your happiness and success in life. Maybe women get a little too many of these compliments, and I can empathize with the…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 07:34 AM
0

I mean if you keep going? Yeah? I've known relationships to end over literally this exact situation because they felt like they were taken advantage of. Taken advantage of in a relationship? How? They were already having sex... If you don't change positions, why would it be more exploitative? Maybe if she didn't want him to finish in her... But that's still a stretch. That's not true. Literally no-one thinks this. Well, I do, so you're wrong. It's literally how BDSM works. No it isn't. There's n…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:51 PM
6

She was unconscious. It doesn't matter if she enthusiastically gave consent to begin with, continuing when someone is unconscious is sexual assault. So apparently if your partner falls asleep during sex, you're a rapist. Well, that's bad news for a lot of housewives with overworked, tired husbands. He was drunk, she was drunk. He very well could have failed to notice her falling unconscious. Which brings me to my last point: Both parties were similarly drunk, both parties consented to sexual act…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 08:15 AM
2

I don't know why you are being downvoted. It's definitely a... bold strategy
/r/MensRights04/04/20 06:33 AM
14

I feel like you being upvoted will be taken out of context. This is indeed the most fair account of the events based on what we know. In fact the woman Turner was dryhumping went with him out of her own volition - since it's pretty hard to imagine Turner dragging her hundreds of meters through campus against her will. The only contentious issue is whether she was conscious at the beginning of the sexual act to give consent, but We don't know that. Based on that logic your girlfriend waking you u…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 05:10 AM
2

Wow... That's messed up. I never thought I would be glad to live in a post-communist hellhole rather than Canada.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 11:11 PM
2

Oh yeah. i see. Where are you from BTW?
/r/MensRights02/04/20 09:22 PM
6

Yes, and most of the actresses called Harvey Weinstein a friend, a mentor, hell, a GOD during their career. I'm not here to take a side. I'm just curious if you think people would react the same way if it turned out Jason Statham was chasing Ruby Rose with his dick out, after locking her in his dressing room, against her screaming protest, on the set of Meg. Whether Fry is her friend or not, we have admission that he was running and screaming in terror, or at least appeared to be doing so. You d…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:39 PM
1

It's not about maths, and keep your sarcasm. It's about creating a divide between the malleable, high inhibition virgins who will never even break the cycle, and the lower inhibition men who will either become radicals (worst case), or men's rights activists (way better case). First they create a sub "without hate". Then they systematically ball out the low inhibition incels who have their own thoughts and desires, and aren't just self-flagellating losers. Then they strike the other incel subs w…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:58 PM
2

Strange. Fuck youtube.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:47 PM
1

Hm... Strange. Try it this time maybe? It's the same link in theory, but who knows... https://youtu.be/5Ve9pm12VJA
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:38 PM
1

It's fine to occasionally cry in front of women. Just don't be an emotional basketcase that can't keep it together. Nonsense. I've seen this documentary where this one guy was talking to a woman about how much he hates sand, and massacring an entire arabic village, and the woman was all over him. I think women must be attracted to emotionally unstable, sociopathic mass murderers.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:37 PM
1

TBH reddit admins did a "great" job of removing even vaguely misogynistic content. If you are referring to IncelsWithoutHate, it's a dummy sub put in place as an excuse to ban other incel subs. It's controlled opposition. The lead mod of that sub is a fat, narcissistic feminist, and the entire sub is about only tolerating self-flagellating virgins. Anyone expressing any level of individualism will be banned immediately.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:30 PM
4

Fuck me sideways... I don't ever advocate for violence, but I'm sure we all had similar feelings before - or at least me and my girlfriend had; I just had this flash of a vision of slaming the writer of that article's head into hard stationary objects while asking him/her "how's surviving now? You like your chances, huh?" I'm sorry, but I'm worked up. We're literally talking about people dying left and right, and all this piece of shit can talk about it getting a leg up on men. While we're at it…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:26 PM
1

What the fuck
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:09 PM
3

OP, we're interested in details, this is despicable, and most likely illegal.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:07 PM
1

Humans do have in-group bias, but while society encourages us to shed out biases, and treat each other like equals, in-group bias is reinforced and encouraged in cops. But we didn't, and those we did eroded with time. In many cases for ostensibly good reasons. I'm curious what these reasons were.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 10:54 PM
1

And does that mean they also see men as more likely to commit crimes? Is this a self-perpetuating thing?
/r/MensRights31/03/20 05:10 PM
1

And do you think they consciously do this? Because if they do, I wondee how they think of themselves, seeing how most cops are male. Or are they the ultimate form of the white knight? The "good men"? Or do they do it subconsciously? That's hard to imagine.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 05:01 PM
3

For onw, it's not just the bad apples. Cops tend to stick together, and see the world as "us" and "them" - "us" being cops, "them" being the common rubble - the not-a-cops. A dirty cop is still better in their eyes than a member of the mindless, irrational horde of not-a-cops, so they'll help each other out. Favouring self-preservation and the interest of the group over selflessness and empathy is imprinted in their brain from the first moment they enter their training, or in some cases, from th…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:58 PM
0

Circlejerking is not expressing an opinion that is officially unpopular. Circlejerking is essentially creating an echochamber of self-congratulation. While r/unpopularopinion users DO have the capacity to engage in circlejerks, since the majority of the users are refugees from other subs that chased them away with THEIR circlejerk, simply expressing a popular, but inconvenient opinion is not an act of inciting circlejerk. AT BEST it is karmawhoring, and wrong use of the sub. Moreover if the opin…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:38 AM
1

To swear? Come on... When you're working with kids it is inevitable..
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:12 PM
4

I interpreted what she said as "lick my ass", which is an insult rather than a sexual comment. "Suck my dick" or "fuck you" also aren't sexual comments - at least not in most instances.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:56 PM
1

Well, that's a different matter altogether.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:29 PM
-2

Am I the only one who doesn't care either way? Teachers should be allowed to swear and say profanities, as long as they are good teachers. She might not be, but this alone is no reason to fire or suspend anyone.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:47 AM
15

Then maybe you need better laws. I was physically bullied for a while in middleschool. The whole thing culminated in a massive brawl between me and the kid who was picking on me. I beat him pretty badly. I gave him the same kick - light kick to the back/ass. It's not about hurting the other person. It's to establish the rules. The first time I was in a similar situation I just walked away. Guess what happened? The kid was lying about him beating me up, me running away, and I was bullied even mor…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/20 07:13 AM
2

I mean, obviously you don't cry on or not cry on command. He wiped his face and composed himself.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:11 AM
6

I agree. That being said, martial arts coaches are often not selected for their skills as a teacher, but their skill as martial artists. And the guy was an olympian silver medalist, so his ego was through the roof.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:15 PM
1

Hey, I'm no expert, I just remember reading this stat somewhere. I don't know the specifics. If what you say is true, then it's really quite insidious. Ultimately we agree that there's ulterior motive written all around this.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 08:33 PM
0

Tall people have higher cancer risk, partly because they have more cells That too. Also, they have higher amount of growth hormone, meaning they are more likely to develop cancer. Brain size mediates the association between height and cognitive ability Wrong, because 1) cognitive ability is dependant a lot more on the surface of the brain rather than its volume 2) There's no correlation between skull size and height. There are very large headed short peopel, and very small headed tall people.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:05 PM
1

It's actually the hormonal aspect aka testosterone, which gives men a worse immune system. Wanna show evidence of this claim?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:34 PM
3

Wow... That's an astonishing amount of bullcrap. it's true that we have weaker immune systems. It'a tradeoff for physical and mental power. Wrong. The tradeoff for physical power is the inability to give birth. Evolution is not a roleplaying game with point balances. And no, men don't have weaker immune systems, they have diseases that are more likely to kill them - like corona, which attacks the testicles -, and they have certain lifestyle choices that make them liable for certain illnesses - f…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:33 PM
1

Yeah, CNN, good job. Nevermind that the virus literally reproduces in the testicles, which only men have...
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:15 PM
24

Unpopular opinion (probably): Telling people to stop crying in the appropriate moment can be important. It takes a level of intelligence to know that moment, but generally speaking there are situations fit for self-reflection and self-pity as a way of calibrating your own moral compass and releasing the pent up stress in yourself... And there are places where you should steel yourself. I remember in martial arts class there was this reaaaaaally unathletic kid. The coach was mocking him and yelli…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 04:10 PM
5

Jesus... What a piece of shit. I didn't have the time to read the article, thanks for doing the work for my lazy ass :)
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:42 PM
2

Ah yes. Nobody gave a sbit about the fact that men are more susceptible to the virus WHILE it was raging and taking its victims... But after it is done, let's force men alone to stay at home, and favour women. I smell feminism.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:09 PM
2

https://youtu.be/OJbqplkBBv8
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:07 PM
-1

To be fair, there's evidence that circumcisiom reduces contraction of HIV by 50%, and HIV is a massive problem in Africa. Now, given the UN's history on male issues and their absolute lack of care for the topic of male circumcision, I wouldn't give them the benefit of thinking that they are doing this to help men (and women), but I'm sure they're using the HIV argument as justification for it. That however begs the questiom - how much does female circumcision prevent the spreading of STDs? Becau…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 12:54 PM
0

Who cares how strong they are? Aren't you the one who was measuring men by their athleticism? Six packs are attainable goals, And my question is, why would you want to.be a twink with a six pack instead of a powerhouse with a belly?
/r/MensRights22/03/20 06:13 PM
2

I was trying to make a joke with anecdotal evidence. And yeah I agree mostly.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:58 PM
2

I said substantially because it's not entirely clear whether spot fat reduction is possible, but overwhelming experience shows it isn't. So on one hand you have two studies that say it's possible, on the other hand there's an army of people who have tried and failed. I don't know if it's possible, and if it is, to what extent is it. What I do know is that I don't know a single person who has lost belly fat doing crunches, or lost far from his asmr doing pullups and benchpresses. Basically, I don…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:34 PM
1

Yes, but oestrogen goes up too. Which results in slight gynecomastia... And that's about it. Bodybuilders aim to get ripped, despite downsides. FtMs aim to increase male sex characteristics and decrease female sex characteristics. Wrong. Bodybuilders want to avoid the downsides, hence why they ALSO take estrogen blockers. Feminisation is an unfortunate side-effect to bodybuilders No it isn't. It's a side effect for idiots who don't know what they are doing. BTW FtM transition includes estrogen b…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:31 PM
3

Average test level around 1950 was around 50 ng/dl above the current level. That's 650 vs 600. That's not nearly in the ballpark of "3 times". Anyone who is interested can look up the statistics. Grow up and stop giving into broscience. And that 50 ng/dl drop is probably explained by the obesitx epidemic anyway - obesity decreases Test level. But what the fuck do I know. See that's a good fucking question. My answer is "not enough".
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:45 PM
1

Excess testosterone will get converted to oestrogen (don't know if that's all men or specific to trans men). It's a natural process, but that doesn't mean you can't increase your test level above natural. It's heavily drilled into trans men that that will happen, and one thing trans men do not want is more oestrogen. I'm sure professional bodybuilders want to look more feminine, that's why they take often 10000 mg of anabolic steroids a week. BTW FtM transition includes estrogen blockers, which …
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:42 PM
0

Your reminder that THIS IS STILL NOT TRUE. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:31 PM
1

Yeah, same as for men with TRT. But for some reason most men on TRT have supranatural test level. Seriously. This is like saying people who take medical weed only take as much as they need - we all know they smoke it because they like it.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:22 PM
1

What's your point? These two guys alone prove that you don't have to have a six pack to be strong athletic, or take care of your body. I'm pretty sure the strongest people in the world are also fat.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 02:14 PM
3

That's not true though. Doctors typically highball TRT dosages. Most trans men I've seen developed hypermasculine traits - thick, bushy beard, overly mudcular physique and massive hair all over their body -, simply because they are MASSIVELY overdosed on TRT. The same is true of cis men on TRT. It's a running joke that TRT is steroids light essentially.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 10:41 AM
1

But do you WANT to be "cut enough"? I have no problem with seeking physical adequacy, but does that mean you also have to be "cut"? Daniel Cormier and Mark Hunt are some of the most prolific MMA athletes out there. They are role models for many aspiring athletes. They are both chubby, not by laziness, but by choice.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 10:38 AM
23

There's a lot of misinformation here, so I wanted to make a post that clears some things up. I'd be grateful if you could updoot this, kind stranger, not because I'm karma whoring, but because the top comments simply contain a lot of incorrect or incomplete info that would take a lot of time to respond to one by one. As someone said before - relaxed six pack abs ARE attainable for most people. That's a fact. There are three factors that contribute to how aesthetic your abs are. Bodyfat percentag…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 10:33 AM
1

Women do get lighter sentences in general Lighter as in 8 years instead of 10? Or 3 instead of 20+ for premeditated murder attempt? "We don't know if it was premeditated!" This is what she said: "I consider that a moral act. And I consider it immoral that I missed. I should have done target practice." If this was a man, he'd be put away with maximum penalty immediately. and evidence of a difference is not evidence of bias. But it can be. And I'm asking you to propose a reason why Solanas was giv…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:16 PM
1

You don't know if she intended murder. It seems likely to me, but this thread is arguing that the prosecution gave her an easy ride because she's a woman. Well, Weinstein was sentenced to almost a quarter of a century WITHOUT FACTUAL EVIDENCE, based only on testimony. He got more time for a rape that may not have ever happened, than Solanas got for a most definitely happened killing, where the only debate is why it happened. Call me crazy, but women DO seem to get an easy ride.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 02:41 PM
26

So they just ACCEPTED that it was self-defense? Come on... Ridiculous. When you are attacked, when you defend yourself, your hands are shaking, your legs are shaking from the adrenaline, you are in a state of hype and shock. You don't take fucking selfies. This bitch is a psychopath. She tried to murder her ex-husband.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:31 PM
1

You are just making up excuses for a murderer.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:41 PM
1

Without wanting to be exact, Eastern Europe. Not nearly as bad as elsewhere, that's for sure, but women have the upper hand everywhere. Plus in cities the liberal bias is magnified.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:29 AM
8

Same here. When I was first looking for a job as an intern, I had a hell.of a hard time with it. 3 months of searching. A female classmate of mine in uni found a job on the firsr try... after failing her lexical knowledge test on the interview... And she was given a higher position ( position required an MSc, she was doing her BSc at the time). Meanwhile the same company didn't even call me in, just sent a letter that I was inadequate. Same resume - both beginnera without meaningful.experience. …
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:08 PM
13

To the surprise of no one. No offense OP, this is valuable data. But I've seen this myself a few times. It is probably partly ingroup bias in HR, anti-male bias in HR women - remember, 80% of men are ugly according to women, and you GOTTA put your face on that resumé -, and finally, feminist indoctrination. Social sciences and HR are closely connected.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:01 PM
13

The curriculum favours lexical knowledge over logic - male brains work using connections, female brains are better at remembering disjunct pieces of data. I've read an anecdotal mention of one experiment where a teacher gave male student the option of drawing a map of Lord of Flies's island instead of reading it and giving a report on it. Most male students chose that option, and they got better grades than the average for male students. This is most likely because drawing the map required pieci…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 09:59 PM
5

I get it. Honestly, as someone who is slowly overcoming the handicap of being male, I am genuinely grateful for the benefits of it. Maybe this is how it is intended to be, each gender being proud of being in line with their inherited gender values. But I can sympathize with you not wanting to be male. It's a grind, and I got a relatively decent hand. Others got way worse. All I can say to you is to hold on, and if something bothers you, speak your mind here; or at least not in public spaces. Tha…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:50 PM
6

Where do you work that a secretary makes more than an engineer. That's f*cked up. Engineering INTERN. Apparentky being an intern means you can be robbed blind. And of course she's NOT an intern, because being a paper pusher doesn't require expertise. It does help though that she's a decorative young woman. My only hope is that we get to be women in the next life This might seem hypocritical, but I'll say that I wouldn't want that. I'd rather be a guy. I enjoy the perks of being a man, and honest…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:56 PM
7

I try to think as little about this as I can... But just today I had a video pop up in my feed. It was from ItsAGundam about that chick singing about boomers, or whatever... The video was basically Gundam getting bent out of shape (rightfully) about the chick saying during a livestream that "women deserve to be worshipped" and that "there is nothing wrong with men simping". That fucking drove me over the edge. She's an attractive woman who literally has everything handed to her in life. I mean s…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:16 PM
3

I recently started working at a company as an intern. They produce electronic components. The company's leadership is based in Germany. On my first day HR made me fill out a 6 hour test (work safety, ESD, fire, etc). One of the tests was a long and essentially meaningless faux-test (press the answer that sounds the most like politically and lawfully correct drivel. There was a long segment about how we especially have to look out for women. How our environmental efforts are for bettering the liv…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:18 PM
38

The whole premise is disgusting. "Women don't have to help men with their insecurities". Great way to oversimplify human relations to an interaction between the two sexes. How about this: People don't have to support other people with their emotional problem, but if you call someone a friend or a lover, you should help them in their time of need, regardless of their sex. Relationships are difficult, people's lives are difficult. I've helped female friends of mine when they were down, I've helped…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:55 AM
-1

50 rapes? Come on. There are 73 episodes, meaning almost all episodes contained a rape scene. That's bullshit. Like, straight up bullshit. What is likely is that whoever counted it counted not-really-rapes that only qualify as rape attempt by SJW standards. By these very same standards yes, rape was pretty common throughout history, since husbands had the right to have sex with their wives, and nobody would bat an eye. It's not that hard to imagine a wife pointlessly resisting his husband's adva…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:45 AM
9

You know, I don't typically advocate for violence, and neither will I do so now, but let's be honest with themselves. 500 years ago people who were this much of a piece of shit would have been exiled from society, or even killed, for betraying their people's interest. I'm not saying that that's a good option, not at all, just that these people are parasytes who abuse the rights given to them on the basis of peaceful coexistance. It's just sad, because my principles say they do have the right to …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:13 AM
4

I don't care about the interruptions, what irritates me is that I feel like they are walking on eggshells. Before the interviewee could say something controversial - cut.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 06:25 PM
5

I've seen some of these videos, and no offense, but it's obvious they were made by The Guardian. The videos always dance on the edge of actually tackling the real issue, turning the whole thing into a feelgood documentary full of macho, masculine guys helping other guys. It's taking the core sex/gender related issues, selecting the less uncomfortable ones, and then adding them a nice sugarcoat. But what do you expect from a newspaper that has platformed open misandrists several times.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 06:01 PM
7

Good idea, but I certainly won't participate - not living in America, or even Western Europe, this is inevitable. Still, it's a thumbs up from me. I hope this gets somewhere.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 06:10 AM
3

I would contest that. Women have a better ability to establish connections, and they are better at remembering unrelated pieces of information, by a small amount. But language has other, far more important aspects. Most historical speakers were men, and they keep being men. The problem is that men aren't taught critical thinking and skepticism, which women naturally master due to the backstabbing of other women as early as kindergarten.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 05:26 PM
1

That's DEFENSIVE use, and any 2A activist will tell you that if they decide to grab a gun in a home defense scenario, they ARE ready to kill, if need be. Solanas wasn'r carrying defensively, she grabbed a gun to kill men.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:14 PM
1

I mean, the way she said it, it indeed is humorous, but not in an insulting way. She referred to it as a battle scar, and never passed judgment on him. If I had a scar like that, let's imagine a fictional situation where I show it to someone. "Look at this!" "What's that?" "This is where my ex girlfriend stabbed be in the back!" "Damn... She must have been one crazy bitch" "Well, there's a reason she's my ex" See? You don't necessarily have to pass a direct judgment on the case, it's enough to a…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:11 AM
2

the accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong. Except Solanas knew EXACTLY what she was doing. She had an ENTIRE MANIFESTO about killing men in the name of feminism, and establishing a new world order. This is like acquitting a neonazi after he releases his manifesto about killing minorities, and attempting to murder a family …
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:05 AM
2

The higher mortality rates could be partially explained by the fact that the virus reproduces in the gonads too.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:04 AM
1

For the record, out of context it starts at 6:25. And it's so strange... I don't know if this was a joke, but the guy out of context started explaining how the time spend making your food directly after you broke up with someone is inversely proportional to how much you cared about them, therefore you are a piece of shit if you have a glorious sandwich for yourself after the breakup, and therefore you deserve to be stabbed... If this was a joke, it was in bad taste. If this is really what he thi…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:02 AM
1

https://imgflip.com/i/3qjcqx
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:44 AM
27

Don't forget the best part: On June 3, 1968, she went to The Factory, where she found Warhol. She shot at Warhol three times, the first two shots missing and the third wounding Warhol. She also shot art critic Mario Amaya and attempted to shoot Warhol's manager, Fred Hughes, point blank, but the gun jammed. She was charged with attempted murder, assault, and illegal possession of a gun. She was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and pleaded guilty to "reckless assault with intent to harm", se…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:29 AM
11

Wondering if I'd get there quicker If I was a man And I'm so sick of them Coming at me again 'Cause if I was a man Then I'd be the man They'd say I hustled Put in the work They wouldn't shake their heads And question how much of this I deserve What I was wearing, if I was rude Could all be separated from my good ideas and power moves And we would toast to me Imagine bitching about not being recognized for your talent as Taylor Fucking Swift, a nobody turned billionaire whose only talent in life …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:01 PM
2

Lol? No, we aren't You do realise that you saying that is irrelevant, right? I'm not arguing that this outcome (aka, the first conviction) is good in any way, or acceptable Actually yes, you are, because you are arguing the system's as good as it gets, no need for substantive changes. That's literally what "acceptable" means. the secondary action of the false accuser and their relative lack of punishment being a double edged sword that is not close to wholely a bad thing. And I ask again, how fa…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:14 PM
2

I'm defending the innocent person accused of rape That was one possibility. You didn't make it clear. So, in an ideal world where justice prevailed 100% of the time (one way or another), and falsely imprisoned people wouldn't have to rely on people coming out as liars to redeem them, what sentence would you give to those proven to have accused someone falsely?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:07 PM
2

this is still not the norm. What do you mean "this is not the norm"? This kind of mentality is unacceptable. If a court publicized recordings of a rape victim's name, picture, and recordings of the rape, and this sent the victim into suicide from harassment, would you say "well, this ain't the norm, but it's not that bad"? No. You'd call for the head of the person who made the mistake. But who cares? Arguing with a lawyer is pointless. You are trained to be disingenuous.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:23 AM
3

It's not about what SHOULD happen to people who do X, it's about how we cause the least amount of harm to innocent people False accusation is a crime. You are not defending innocent people. Wanna do as little harm as possible? Here's an idea higher standards of evidence - especially in cases like rape or sexual assault. In most rape cases there's no cleae evidence, so for the courts to dish out sentences the standard for proof beyond a reasonable doubt is often "he has a penis, and she had sex, …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:12 AM
3

If they were to make an example out of this girl for coming clean, It's not about making an example, it's about heavier restrictions. Not necessarily on this woman, but in general. Every change in law results in a transitional period that inconveniences people. But that's not a valid excuse to never change a law. Here's an idea. Make a law that says false accusations of rape COMMITED FROM THIS MOMENT will result in harsher sentences. Thus the people who have already lied have no reason not to co…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:02 AM
1

What a beautiful duwang!
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:46 AM
1

Case in point.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:29 AM
2

From their opinion on the feminism issue. How they are willing to sacrifice the liberty and prosperity of fellow men to appease women. And again, not all Indian men. Maybe not even most. Just enough to turn the tide of politics.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:35 AM
4

that doesn't mean men are walkovers who would take shit lying down. But a significant portion are. There are places in India where feminism is actually needed and men actually need to step up for them Maybe. And? How does that justify anti-male behaviour and discrimination?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:46 AM
3

Now I am curious. What did you think I wrote?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 12:00 AM
3

Exactly my point. You are not Indian American. You are American.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 11:59 PM
3

I’m an a Indian American So you didn't grow up in India? So you don't live im India? Then you are only marginally different from me or anyone else not living there. I should shut the fuck up, because what? Because you'll kill me? Quarter me? Chop my head off, rape me with a spiked club? Because these are the treatments Indian men get when they are SUSPECTED of having sex with an underage girl, or suspected of sexual misconduct. But you wouldn't like to talk about this, I'm sure. How about, once …
/r/MensRights22/02/20 11:46 PM
2

Usually the more old school (i.e. "patriarchal") a culture is, the higher it values women. In these cultures when feminism eventually hits (usually from above, through government propaganda so that the country fulfills the expectations of rich Western democracies), the so called "push for equality" is likely to become even more anti-male, since instead of shifting from "we discriminate against women BECAUSE we protect them, BECAUSE we love them so much" to "we must protect women even more, and w…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 11:21 PM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:29 PM
2

*utmost, not up most :)
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:25 PM
3

You can't blame people for getting emotional over the umpteenth time the same thing - men being abused by violent women, and people watching. In most internet communities the opposite wohkd result in people flexing on how hard they would knock out the abusive guy. I don't see why everyone here should be expected to exercise restraint. This is a men's rights subreddit, not a pacifist subreddit. Obviously the ideal situation would be peace, but again, you can't blame people for feeling vengeful af…
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:23 PM
2

OP, there's no shame in taking a break if Reddit/the internet is taking over your life. In fact you can probably make a greater change by just taking about these issues with people you know, in circumstances whete the topic is relevant rather than spamming comments on a board all day. You are not a coward. You are a 17 year old kid. Before you can help others, help yourself. Focus on becoming a better person, and if the cesspit that is reddit is pulling you down, don't hesitate to quit temporari…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 06:28 AM
1

I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 08:22 PM
0

Her policies are NOT left leaning.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:36 PM
0

Tulsi will never achieve anything though. She's a DINO, and as such she will only ever attract the attention of democrats soon to be republicans, which will always be a small base. She would be better off going full red, but then she would betray the people she represents.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:32 PM
1

Funny thing is, when I wrote this a few days ago about a woman who seemingly posted MRA stuff, but was, on closer inspection, a tradcon postergirl who used anti-feminism as a platform to promote traditionalism, I got downvoted to Oblivion.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:29 PM
6

Admitting you are wrong gives certain people a "handle" on you, and they hit you with it any time another disagreement comes up. Acknowledging that you are wrong is a good move in an adult atmosphere, not so much with people who still mentally haven't outgrown puberty. Ironically this perfectly encapsulates the attitude of woke redditors. Maybe Reddit has a toxic femininity problem?
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:54 PM
8

No downvoting at all, there’s absolutely no post regarding the updated situation. I don't think that is true. I once posted there in hopes of getting some valuable answers before my inevitable banning, but apparently the mods review "unsavory" posts before making them public. So I have zero doubts they are censoring posts about the topic. There's no way not a single MRA or anti-feminist decided to troll them by posting there at least once.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:51 PM
11

Sh... That's just a conspiracy theory. /s
/r/MensRights09/02/20 06:08 PM
1

Well, that's why I'm waiting. In my opinion it's a bit early to judge. The story is just getting mainstream. Remember, even the cancellation of Weinstein took a long time, and the entirety of Hollywood was pushing the narrative.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:04 AM
1

generally speaking, you get banned and the mods remove the post, I question how effective this will be. About as effective as telling people who already know Amber Heard is a POS that Amber Heard is a POS. In fact, a little more effective, because there's a chance you won't get banned everywhere. It's a stupid situation - as you said, the system is rigged. I'm just saying that if you want to make a ruckus about Heard, wait for the reaction of the rest of the world first. The worst case scenario …
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:54 PM
1

Or never. Never is the usual occurrence. I said if she will ever be arrested. That presupposes she will be. I mentioned she mighz never be, in which case we should make as much noise as possible. It's over-optimistic to assume that the wheels of justice are turning unless against Johnny Depp. I am not necessarily guided by optimism as much as fair and equal treatment on all fields. I understand that it's wishful thinking that she will face legal consequences. But I ask you - do you think the cha…
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:08 PM
2

This I can agree with. I guess I was just frustrated by the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:00 PM
1

The idea that less exposure of Depp's case on MensRights would increase it's positive impact on the community is strange. The story has already made it to mainstream news, you can't give much more exposure with a reddit post. And if you want to, post it in other subreddits. But frankly, there's really no point of posting about it here. At least we can agree on that, right?
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:51 PM
0

As long as people like you tell us we need to play nice, it sounds to me as nothing more than cover for the opposition. Take your accusations, and put them where the sun doesn't shine, please. I agree that they play dirty. It's the personal opinion of mine that there is some value in being moral against an immoral and dirty opposition. If you want to, call me naive. But don't call me a traitor.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:46 PM
2

So are you saying that Amber Heard has been arrested for DV and is awaiting trial? No, but there's still time. The recording has just recently surfaced. We don't know whether the whole issue is abandoned, or someone's already working on it. Expecting a quick arrest is unlikely, since they are no longer together, so there's no imminent risk of DV. So I'd say if she will ever be arrested and tried, it could be today, tomorrow, or a months from now. We should start making a noise when, and only whe…
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:40 PM
2

I agree that it is necessary for her to be removed, I'm purely saying that the fuze is already lit - if there is a chance she will ever "get cancelled", further posting about it here is unnecessary. And if her position is strong enough, then another post on a men's rights subreddit won't change anything.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:36 PM
-1

Well, to each their own, I can't convince you to care about the PR of the movement. I agree that justice should be sought, but you and I both know you were speaking from a place of hatred. Maybe I just have different experiences, and thus I can remain more vicarious to the events, while it induces strong emotions in you. But I personally would rather have her punished by the cold, calculated machine of the judicial apparatus than the court of public opinion. And if other misfortune finds her, so…
/r/MensRights04/02/20 08:29 PM
0

Again, this is seeking revenge. It's not constructive, and it just plays into the stereotype of MRAs being bitter misogynists. Take the moral high ground.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 08:11 PM
-5

I can see your point, but again, if you want the benefit of the doubt for yourself, you have to let things play themselves out. Wait a week. If they still haven't disowner her, it's fair game. The story only recently became widely known. Plus, calling for the ACLU and the UN to disown her would only help their case. I don't know about you, but if my opponent is about to make a mistake (i.e. not disowning a domestic abuser as their ambassador), then I won't break myself to correct them, I let the…
/r/MensRights04/02/20 08:10 PM
1

I'm sorry that happened to you. That's messed up.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:34 AM
5

To be fair, it's miniscule compared to MGTOW. As someone has already pointed out, there are far worse subs that are not quarantined or banned.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 06:06 PM
20

BREAKING NEWS: Man Pretends To Be A Woman So That People Finally Care About Him
/r/MensRights01/02/20 06:04 PM
11

Why were they getting that much money in the first place? But that isn't much money. That's like, the annual wage of 4 workers.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:42 PM
1

You have a good point. Have an upvote, among the cavalcade of downvotes :)
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:50 AM
13

Assuming he is innocent: My girlfriend mentioned that her vagina was bruised every time I fingered her. I try to be more gentle, but people underestimate how easily vaginas can bruise. Bruises around neck are consistent with kinky sex. Blood on clothes can be from minor injuries. I was bleeding from the mouth one time from passionately kissing - she bit my lips a bit too hard. He denied ever touching her probably because it's what the lawyer told him to do. She was dragged through shit by his le…
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:47 AM
12

Hitting her with that gay card: https://i.imgflip.com/3niqj9.jpg
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:38 AM
1

Well, I don't necessarily agree with avoiding women if possible, but I live in a somewhat conservative country where false allegations of harassment aren't that common, probably because of the ineffectuality and corrupt nature lf the state apparatus. So your viewpoint is understandable. I think the bottomline should be no gender segregated carriages, because it's plain unfair. But if they exist for women, then they should provide equal opportunity for men. And I admit, there is something to be s…
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:22 AM
1

Excuses, excuses. Your mom is a bigot, and seems like you didn't fall far from the tree. I have no patience to explain to you why your position is wrong.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 05:42 PM
8

Why are you responding to yourself?
/r/MensRights28/01/20 10:46 AM
9

Women have more power in Japan in some ways and less power in others I guess. I'm curious where women in Japan have less power. Care to enlighten me? I don't know how often a fals accusation happens. Apparently often enough that out of 4 random young Japanese guys 3 said it is an issue, and 1 has already been the victim of a false accusation. And the women in the video also corroborated the claim that men easily get labeled a pervert. All women where super nice I met and helped me just as much a…
/r/MensRights28/01/20 10:32 AM
7

Did you watch the video?
/r/MensRights28/01/20 10:18 AM
11

It's all so different and unique. Yeah, until you get labeles as a chican, get sentenced before a kangaroo court, and get thrown in jail.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 10:14 AM
3

in some middle eastern cultures and countries it's completely different mate, there are female only train cars(2 out of 10), due to the enormous sexual assaults that occur Actually that's not the whole story. I've dug into this after seeing a similar female only cart from India. As far as I know India and Japan, among others, also applied these. And the common theme across the board is that they were NOT a response to high rates of sexual assault. No, I am not kidding. The core of the issue is t…
/r/MensRights28/01/20 07:49 AM
12

Everyone can find reasons for bigortry. Sorry, this is bullshit. If I opened a store, and I put out a "no women" sign because my highschool girlfriend cheated on me, that would be justified by your logic. The common denominator with assholes harassing people in your store is that they are assholes, not that they have penises. If you infer the latter, you're a sexist in denial. If I was you, I would have a good long talk with your mother about this. I know I have talked with my female relatives a…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:35 PM
5

I actually agree with you, partly If anything, this should be seen as a positive thing. The woman is safe, the guy did something heroic - this is to be celebrated, there's no need to look for victimhood here. However, extending this to the entire sub is disingenuous. Some people want to feel like they are oppressed 99% of the time, but there's still legitimate content here. Enough to legitimize the existance of the sub.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:26 PM
6

Let me correct that: This annoys everyone. When anyone other than you cleans your space it's annoying to not find that thing that was just in that place you had it. Every man I know who has a wife that cleans even complains about disappearing items that end up where they don't belong because the house got cleaned. And besides, I've found a reallt useful way to combat this issue. I don't have a wife, but do have two parents, and since the majority of my stuff is at their place still, I deal with …
/r/MensRights27/01/20 10:12 AM
-6

Sorry, I don't agree. Let her make her movie. People should be asking for her to be investigated and prosecuted - and hopefully convicted, because this is the exact type of behaviour that should get people in prison. But attacking a movie won't do anything. Maybe she will get a bit ricker from the role, but she's already loaded, so it's not like she can't afford a good lawyer otherwise - on the other hand, I think cancel culture is simply disgusting. If you don't want someone to make money from …
/r/MensRights26/01/20 07:29 AM
1

No problem. I'm sorry you are getting downvoted for this :(
/r/MensRights25/01/20 11:31 PM
11

Oh, yeah. Understandable I still have criticism though. What you describe can really be applied to every movement advocating for substantial social change, and can be explained with a certain level of inertia to society - simply put, some people will always respond negatively to change. However throughout history humans left to their own devices have done a decent (not perfect) job of eventually separating good changes from bad changes. When this natural selection of beneficial ideas doesn't hap…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 03:22 PM
12

But the source can be.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:30 PM
50

People think men's groups are misandric so they get banned Wait what? Last time I checked, most people didn't give a shit about misandry.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:24 PM
1

For IQ, the male variance is indeed higher. But not enough to make women in that IQ range an anomaly.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 04:41 PM
1

So basically everything you randomly claim is irrelevant is just that, without backing it up. If you think women are grossly underrepresented in the 115-145 IQ range, you are an idiot. EDIT: i picked 145 arbitrarily, but it should be enough for any kind of engineering.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 03:04 PM
1

I don't think the administration has much control or care. I suspect decisions like this are the work of lobbyists loosely connected to the feminist movement. And since the government gets more money by taxing the person who earn the more, the resr of them probably didn't make a moral issue out of it.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 10:49 AM
1

As far as I know, alimony is no longer deductible so I'm having a difficult time parsing your meaning here. That alone is bullshit. The government should decide if taxes are more or less important than people. If taxes are a priority, tax both. If people are more important, make it deductable.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 09:22 AM
1

To be fair, I do not think her sentence was necessarily too light. The Us already has a really punitive judicial system, so I will ignore the completely unrealistic sentences people get - one injustice does not justify another. With that in mind - what she did really wasnt a crime. More precisely it shouldnt be. she never forced the guy to do anything, and he never objected, so even harassment is off the table. And realistically speaking it shouldnt be incitement for violence, because suicide ha…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:30 AM
25

Alimony was also made non taxable to the recipient as of Jan 1, 2019. That's some bullshit. If the guy has to pay after the money, the woman should too. I'm not trying to be vindictive, but any other income is taxable. Why isn't this?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 09:10 PM
2

The best women are "similar" to the average men in STEM. The best in STEM are all men I don't think you understand standard distributions. Unless you are talking about the absolute cream of the crop, 170+ IQ people, women WILL be represented, just at a smaller number. And since again, this website is occasionally the victim of scrutiny, I feel like pointing out that that is a pretty sexist thing to say. Not to mention STEM isn't homologous. An engineer or biologist doesn't need as much intellige…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 07:33 PM
7

Hey, don't say it like that. It can be taken out kf context very easily. The women who DO get into high end places in STEM usually DO perform on a similar level, they are just more rare. Empirical evidence actually shows women in STEM will have on average BETTER scores than men. Speaking from experience - this is mainly due to help from all around. A woman in physics or electrical engineering will have a bunch of white knights trying to aid her. It matters a lot. At least this is the case where …
/r/MensRights23/01/20 08:09 AM
2

Well, suit yourself. And yeah, it's kind of ridiculous that they erased all credible incel communitied, when subs like gendercritical, female dating strategy, or twoxchromosomes can exist.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 07:36 PM
2

Not necessarily money. First of all, I'm talking about an idealized situation here. The solution I am going to propose can't work on the US right now, as it requires some level of tax funded healthcare. Now - where I live, mental issues to some extent are covered by state insurance. So I don't find it unimaginable that you create a utility for people with very severe social anxiety where they can practice social interactions, get a "trainer" (life coach) who stands by them and gives them tips; h…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 12:31 PM
3

So what you're saying, people (society) did a doodoo in their backyard, and it's up to these people to clean it up. I'm not really a big fan of collective justice, and I will probably never endorse anything like that. However I don't see why these people can't receive support from society as a whole; why we shouldn't feel obligated to care about them. If it was some other group being disinfranchised, people would have no problem saying "we have to do something". When it is incels, it's trivial t…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 12:13 PM
2

So what would you say is the solution to this issue?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 11:56 AM
2

Another hot take from Miss Jessica Valenti, from years ago - misandry isn't a real issue: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/13/feminists-do-not-hate-men
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/20 06:10 PM
3

I have a dog Well, now I feel bad for the poor thing. how could I be enabling rape if I’m a “feminist” How are those contradictory? I've seen people who call themselves feminists advocate for rape, genocide and tyranny. Feminists hate men, not rapists.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/20 08:54 PM
1

False assumptions? It's all there. And I wanted to check if you're a feminist, which I still don't know. But if you post on inceltears, and harass unfortunate, depressed men for not getting laid, being a feminism wouldn't be all that surprising.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/20 08:59 AM
2

He was given drugs that were specifically meant to break down his self-control. You are exercising the good old "it's not rape if he wants it" bullshit. How is that feminist? Really? Toxic masculinity bullshit? I have a safe bet you're actually a feminist. Am I correct? Edit: wow, you're like the worst person I've ever exchanged words with. Well, second, after a murderer. You hate dogs to the point that you post to a sub that hates dogs, you're an inceltears user, and you're also enabling rape. …
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/20 08:34 AM
1

Who represents liberalism? Conservatism? Those are abstract moral values, not movements. This is my problem with feminism. People have no problem calling out, say, the Australian liberal party for not being liberal, or the UK conservative party for not being conservative, because ideas like conservatism and liberalism are well understood. Feminism is both an ideology ANDa movement, and people defending feminists often commit a motte and bailey fallacy, taking the arguments of the movement, but d…
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/20 03:22 PM
2

He's from NY though.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/20 02:46 PM
1

If you criticize feminists respectfully they're mostly happy to talk to you, especially in that dedicated subreddit. My experience stands to the contrary. Usually if you ask a feminist, they end up attacking you, whether on askfeminists, on quora, or in general. You said "every time" feminists have talked down to you. I don't think I'm doing that, so there's one positive example. Well, you also got banned from askfeminists, so maybe you're not exactly a textbook feminist. On the other hand you b…
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/20 04:36 PM
1

I got banned from r/askfeminism after two years, as a feminist Well, that should tell you about the issues with feminism. It's a cult of victimhood, and anyone who steps out of line, and assumes women to have agency of their own - like consenting for a BDSM session - is a sexist in their eyes. The original commenter said they want to know what feminists think of them, and they have questions with "no harm intended." If you really want to have a good faith discussion about feminism that's what th…
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/20 03:25 PM
2

Honestly, MGTOW is pretty passive. There are some dumbasses there (like everywhere on the internet), but it's overall just a group of (rightfully) pessimistic men. Meanwhile shit like gendercritical or ppf are just plain hategroups. I used to visit braincels to give people advice, and I can tell you, there was less toxicity there than in the average gendercritical, ppf, or femake dating strategy post.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/20 09:07 AM
1

Bullshit. Askfeminists is better than r / feminism the same way an ideological dictatorship is better than a concentration camps. In a concentration camp you're killed either way - in a dictatorship you may stay alive if you repeat the dogmas of the leadership. Neither is conducive to constructive discussion - askfeminists mods are just looking for an excuse to ban you.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/20 08:59 AM
3

Shoutout to fuckmylife5000. Maybe get him in on the joke.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/20 08:25 AM
1

Well, to be fair, Australia is hardcore terrain for anyone, since guys are usually really good looking over there. Locations skew the difficulty - for example i've heard that in Russia men who wouldn't be rated that high elsewhere can score pretty smoking how women, simply because Russian women are on average pretty attractive. EDIT: forgot to send it, sorry about the delay.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/19 02:06 PM
1

I don't think it's because anyone makes it look like it's easy - I think they simply operate on personal experience. If you speak to a few women about how they have met their current partners, you can find something in common - they usually invest very little time and effort into dating. I'm not going to lie - the girl I am with is not the most attractive girl out there, she's kinda chubby, and I am pretty sure right now I could do better (but I don't want to, I like her, she's cool, and I would…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/19 07:19 PM
2

In highschool no, but after getting more into online dating in university (not enough girls to go around in engineering, and I had some issues that I had to work out too), I started thinking about it (obviously because I wasn't getting any matches). So yeah. You start thinking about it when it becomes a problem. I suspect that is why many women find the idea of attraction distributions - or in fact any kind of statistical analysis of attraction and relationships - offensive - because they've rar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 05:21 PM
0

Shiny pointed head? What do you think I am, some alien? And sure, be in denial all you want. You're still a toxic person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 02:09 PM
-1

You're so tender to the touch. I can't talk to you when you're so emotional. Well that too a weirdly erotic turn. Lay off the girly books for a while, it creeping everyone out. I don't care about your post, and I never wanted to take it down. Don't project your frustration at me. I just wanted you to know that your antagonism towards men, and the utter deflection of any level of responsibility away from yourself is not a good look.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 01:43 PM
-1

Not really, and pathetic that you went for an insult from the getgo. You keep harping on about how your husband's a bitch, your father's a bitch... Are you just were to went and yell "men are trash"? There are better subs for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 01:21 PM
3

Are you perhaps active on gendercritical or femcels? Because you would fit the bill. Misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 01:05 PM
-1

Looks to me like you are desperately looking for someone to blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/19 01:04 PM
1

I never said it isn't. Just that it' amateurish.
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 05:21 AM
1

I don't want to sound like a dick, but the new Terminator game looks like shit. I mean, graphics aside - it's basically a lifeless corridorshooter, and plays like something made by a student as a fan project. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy that there are games that don't go full SJW, but that shouldn't absolve the game of having to produce quality.
/r/MGTOW23/11/19 12:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter