TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnAdultWoman Archive

View 1 posts and 128 comments by AnAdultWoman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The article states: N.C. broke off the relationship, reported him to the police and an abortion soon followed which led to an unfortunate infection of her uterus . The pregnancy is over.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:49 PM
5

This is insane - insane that a 16 yr old boy is facing a 30 year sentence for this! The legal system needs a fsking intervention.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:24 AM
7

She is claiming battered women's syndrome - even though she has no discernable proof. If anything her diary, text messages, and voicemails all seem to point to her being a more than willing partner. She not only cut his throat, she stabbed him 29 times and shot him in the head. There were three lethal wounds 1 stab to the heart, throat cut ear to ear and the bullet through is brain. This is not a killing, it's an over killing. Having said that, I don't think she'll get the death penalty, unfortu…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:51 PM
1

Well, I'll give her this - her story was very creative. I suspect the first responders knew this wasn't going to turn out to be true from the onset.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:11 PM
5

Layne Hardin, 44, said he made the sperm donation specifically for another woman with whom he already has a 12-year-old child. He claims however that his ex-girlfriend, Tobie Devall, walked into the sperm donation facility and “bluffed” her way into receiving vials of his sperm. It looks like he didn't put his sperm up for donation at large but, rather, intended it for one of his past relationships. It's pretty disturbing that someone else could blithely walk in and get inseminated like that.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:05 PM
1

Thank you. In my case it would have been a straight out she said/he said. Since I didn't struggle and he could've gotten rid of the knife I doubted I'd have much of a chance to win at prosecution. Either way, I was too scared to report; sometimes the bad ones get away with it. All that said, I don't blame men. I admit that there was a time, directly after, where I was undoubtably more standoffish and frankly even rude to guys I found 'creepy.' But, my point is that it didn't ruin my life - not e…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:47 AM
1

I've played out the scenario in my head. For example, if someone tried to kidnap me in a mall parking lot with a gun to my head, I'd rather get shot there than taken to an out of the way place and who knows what happens. And, if someone that close to me were to betray me again like that; I'd honestly rather not deal with the pain and disorientation that comes with it. But, don't worry about me, there's an astronomically slight chance some random person is going to try to kidnap me. And, if my hu…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:08 PM
1

Yea maybe. When I think rape, I think someone in a dark alley looking for a victim. I guess I don't ever think about Joe Blow the next door neighbor. Those are the rare cases of rape. It's sort of like murder. Yes, there are random killers out there but most of the time, people are murdered by close family members, friends, girlfriends/boyfriends, wives/husbands. Sure there are some men who are that predatory but, most often, rape happens between two ppl who know each other - even people who've …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:56 PM
1

Right. She should just start making plans to be with someone who wants marriage. I agree. I also understand that 6 years is a long investment to throw away and people aren't always perfect with the way they handle emotional situations. If she can't bring herself to be the one to pull the plug on this dysfunctional relationship, then maybe he just needs to do it for both their sakes.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:42 PM
1

A prime example of this is making an ultimatum to someone, "Do X or I will do Y." This is a concrete example of manipulation no matter how overt. I agree that this is a form of manipulation. It's often used because people don't know how to communicate basic needs correctly. In this case, if marriage was my ultimate goal I would say, instead, "I'm going to leave and pursue a relationship with someone that wants to be married someday" thereby not leaving him a choice or making him choose while sti…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:32 PM
1

I asked something along those lines in that thread. Getting the fucking shit beat out of you, and getting raped, I don't really understand how these two things are that far apart. For me, the difference was that it was someone I knew. If you're mugged, it's not usually by a friend. Being beaten up by a family member (especially one that you chose ie. not your parents) is probably about as bad as a rape by someone you know. Most victims know their attackers and trust that they are safe with them.…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:26 PM
2

I have been raped when I was around 19, going to college, and was breaking up with a boyfriend (we were sexually active). Upon finding out I was breaking up with him, he talked me into getting into his car (bad move on my part), drove me out to the middle of nowhere, pulled a large hunting knife and told me I had to consent to sex to make it better and prove I wouldn't break up with him. I didn't report or go to a hospital because I was afraid I wouldn't be believed and because I had "given cons…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:19 PM
1

Hopefully
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:01 PM
1

Uhm...aren't you supposed to black out identifying information?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:59 PM
1

Asking for what you want isn't manipulation, it's communication. At least she was up front about it and didn't do stupid things like cut out rings from jeweler's magazines and paste them all over his house (yes, I know someone that did this) or ask him for a promise ring and two months later start planning the wedding (yes, I know someone who did that, too) I compare this to a situation where you don't want kids. It's best to be clear on what the other person's expectations, hopes, dreams, and b…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:18 AM
4

I wonder if this law requires that the rapist be convicted in a court of law.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:58 PM
0

If marriage is essential to her and he's not going to get married why stay with her? It seems like it sets him up for a big fall when she encounters someone who dangles the white dress and the ring in front of her nose.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:35 PM
3

We only had 6 people at our wedding (counting us) and it was completely private in a natural spot. Then we threw a small reception around a month later (around 1k). It was beautiful, meaningful, and what we both wanted - and we paid jointly for it. I just watched someone I know spend a lot of money she didn't have (nor her husband to be) on a wedding. Oh and the magazines... shudder edited to add: For the OP, do you know if she wants a wedding or a marriage or if she differentiates the two at al…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:33 PM
3

Any woman I have known like that is more about the wedding, than the fact she has found someone to spend the rest of her days with. This is a great point. I'm a woman and I hate weddings but I love marriage. I know too many women that are all about the wedding being the happiest, most special day of their lives. They seem to be all about the wedding and not as much about the marriage. Specifying the beginning of a relationship as the "best" day of your life kind of sets you up for a let down whe…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:12 PM
1

I'm just contemplating how codifiying into societal rules that only n% of men will pass on their genes does not seem to help the 100-n% of men that don't. With regards to how the n% will be chosen it seems murky since men are fertile from puberty till death. My basic question was: what are all the men who don't get to breed do about their needs for sex, love, companionship, etc?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:53 PM
5

From what I know about common law marriages, just presenting yourself as 'married' can create a common law marriage. If you do the wedding, the ring, the circus and the clowns but don't sign the marriage certificate, the chances are very high that you'll be found to be common law after a certain amount of time. I think if you want to keep the messages about your relationship consistent with non-marriage then you should simple live close to each other but not with each other.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:08 PM
3

she doesn't have your best interests at heart. This isn't always a bad thing. At least she's upfront about it and not sneaking around trying to manipulate him. It's out in the open for him to look at and consider. If being married is important to her - it's better that they find out now that it's a problem and make decisions about the future viability of the relationship. I realize 6 years is a big investment but sometimes it's just not meant to be.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:25 PM
2

And, for her part, if getting married is important to her - and you don't want to be married - then it's better that she goes off and finds someone a bit more like minded. I compare that to two people who may love each other deeply but have differing opinions on children. There are some things that can't be compromsed over - if it's a huge source of anxiety for you, then marriage is probably a bad idea. But, I think it would be unfair of you to hold the fact that she gets wants to get married so…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:22 PM
1

I don't know if he's extra - I was wondering what you would tell them besides that they're not good enough to breed. As already mentioned, do you envision them raising the other men's children and contributing towards their welfare. I don't think a majority of men want to be mgtow if the other option was available for them. Whereas I do see a lot of men feeling badly treated if they're in the 100-n%-ile that aren't allowed to reproduce. Do we ask these guys to be celibate? Gay? Give them all vas…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:32 PM
2

Oh, well, at least they do something worthwhile/s
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:23 PM
0

What do you suggest we do with the 'extra' men? Or, should we shoot for a n:1 ratio of women:men? (Kind of like China but reversed.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:33 PM
1

Arranging for some professional therapy might give him a safe place to talk about his feelings and work through what's going on.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:45 PM
2

Enough talk of death... everyone who lives long enough has to encounter it in whatever myriad of ways it comes. I'll just leave this out there - maybe the ideal solution for the child would be stranger adoption by two people who desperately want a child to love and nurture. It doesn't sound like the young man is quite ready for parenthood yet. Thank you for the discussion.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:51 PM
2

I think you're not paranoid and the gender bias (the clueless man...) is anything but subtle.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:19 PM
2

As a general rule, I would not wish suicide on someone either, unless they were a person with no regard for others, or malice towards the innocent. You know, like someone who had gone off the pill without telling their boyfriend in order to get pregnant by him to sue for child support. Such a person still does not exist as an island. Suicide hurts everyone that loves or cares for the person - as far as what happens to the person that kills him/herself, I believe it's just the end. No more suffer…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:35 PM
1

As for the color of the sky in my world? Blue, though I find it gets a little brighter every time someone inferior leaves this mortal plane. You know, I just came from a thread where a father found out his son committed suicide. I don't know how to respond to your assertion that your life gets a little better when someone 'inferior' leaves this world. I get too distracted by the pain such choices leave behind. It's not like that person is the only one affected. And yes, I realize you were being …
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:02 PM
16

I am so sorry for your loss. Please take gentle care of yourself in this time of sorrow.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 04:34 PM
3

If you look past the financial aspects, there are intangibles that come with a long term relationships. I've spent 21 years with my husband. We had a lot of life milestones in those years: bought our first new car, bought our first house, graduated college, no kids - but we have a cat. Other conviences are included such as being considered next of kin, inheritance, health benefits, pension benefits/social security benefits and a well understood definition of your relationship by others. None of …
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:46 AM
0

Best case scenario, she kills herself. Well, hell, in that case do everything you can to get her to suicide before the kid is born. BOOM. Two problems solved /extreme sarcasm. Seriously, what color is the sky in your world?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:39 PM
1

Did it say how far along she is?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:06 AM
2

If she agrees to amniocentisis - taking fluid out of the sack the fetus is in - it gives full genetic information for the fetus. Paternity and other things (like medical conditions) can be determined from this test. It is not without risk and he would need her full consent to get an amnio, though.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:37 AM
6

From the original post, she's already said she's going to seek child support from him. But, as long as he isn't in danger of his rights expiring, then I see your point. FWIW: My personal feelings are that I would want to know as soon as possible (if I were a man, which I'm not) and then make choices based on that. I might actually want to be part of my child's life, unplanned or not.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:47 AM
29

If she decided to stop taking her pills and not tell you about it - you might want to come to terms that this is not an unplanned pregnancy on her part. That said, try, but don't hold out false hope.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:32 AM
7

She makes $10/hr now. If the pregnancy proceeds and she has to cut her hours... then cut them more to take care of an infant... she might actually be better off leeching off you than trying to stay in the work force. $10/hr is not a very good income. Also, she can go on welfare then the state will come after you any way. I honestly think you're being scammed. It's too convienent that she suddenly turned up pregnant.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:25 AM
1

Ah, fair enough.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:20 AM
3

Well, contact is a whole other thing than financial support. The state will aggressively pursue you for child support. Getting the system to enforce custody is a bit harder. Let's assume it's not yours (considering you have a 6 figure income, you're probably a better choice than the real father). Then, would you still want to raise it or even have contact? My guess is you would be happy to walk away and let the real father and your stbx girlfriend deal with it. Assuming it is yours then you migh…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:20 AM
5

Question: Can it work against him to get a paternity test?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:16 AM
16

Let me back up a second. If you don't want to raise this child then suing for custody doesn't make sense unless it's joint to lower any payments you would be liable to pay.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 10:33 PM
67

It matters because if you're the implied father and you don't contest paternity then she can come at you after a few years (it depends on your state - normally it's like 2 years) and the child will be irrevocably determined to be yours to support, regardless of record - and you'll be held liable for back child support payments. Do it while 1.) it's easy to prove and 2.) your time window has not expired.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 10:31 PM
66

You can try and talk her into an abortion, but with her family standing behind her, it probably won't work. If she keeps it, get a DNA test pronto - heck, do it via amnio if she'll let you - this might not be your child. In the meantime, decide if you want to stay with someone that deceived you like that - if you do, I can only say good luck and go to it. If you don't, document everything and resist showing any interest in the pregnancy, her, or the birth until you are 100% certain (ok, fine, 99…
/r/MensRights16/02/13 10:27 PM
1

Wouldn't that be an annulment?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:43 PM
6

She might not know which one he was...
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:22 AM
10

That's no fault divorce for ya!
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:30 AM
2

What seems so odd, though, is that proponents for gay marriage are so obsessed with the benefits of marriage. If it is really of such little value, it makes me wonder why so many people are so impassioned about it.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:19 AM
2

And, I'd wager after 11 years you know her character very well. You'd have seen her in her good and bad. But, if you have a phobia, you have a phobia.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:14 PM
1

There are also a lot of legal benefits to marriage: being next of kin, inheritance, benefits if only one partner works (or in this economy has lost a job). The issue of gay marriage is because these benefits automatically come with legal marriage.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:07 PM
2

I wasn't trying to disparage non-marriage as an option. If in doubt, I'd say don't do it - that goes for marriage and children. As long as you're both happy with the situation, I think it counts as a success. The problem would be is if she wanted marriage.. as long as she knows it's not coming with you then she can make her own choices just like you can. Out of curiosity: If her life long goal was to be Mrs. Somebody how would that affect your views towards continuing the relationship?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:55 PM
6

I responded that I don't trust anyone when they are angry. I recommend that before marriage a couple should see each other at their worst. When they're angry, hurt, sick, sad, depressed, petulant, feeling righteous, stubborn, etc. Some people handle those things better than others. If you don't trust someone when s/he is at her/his worst then you might not be quite ready for marriage.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:25 PM
-5

I think that if, deep down, you can't commit to a woman because you're scared for your future financial and emotional well being - you absolutely should not get married! It's more likely to become a self fulfilling prophecy since the first time she does something that trips the trigger all those doubts and fears will surface. That's likely to kill the marriage. There is nothing wrong with protecting yourself There is also something to be said about saving other people from your views of reality.…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:18 PM
1

Here is how it actually is - secret paternity tests, as in without the consent of the parties involved OR without a court order, are not legal. I think the key here is secrecy. I don't think the mother's consent should be required but, I do think that the mother should know. If he doesn't trust that the baby is his, then I think the mother has a right to know that and then decide whether she wants to continue the relationship and rebuild/build trust or not. Just like a man would have the choice …
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:27 PM
22

This is nuts. It's a temper tantrum on the part of the judge. How would that ever be enforced? Are they going to supply him with a personal police officer with a stop watch?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:12 PM
1

Er... unless the woman used a donated egg .. watching the child come out of her body is pretty convincing evidence towards maternity. My problem with genetic testing (of every newborn) is the access for the government (or some agency) to the genetic material of everyone who is born.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:04 PM
0

I believe mandatory paternity testing at birth has a side benefit. The big problem with having mandatory genetic testing at birth is that someone, somewhere (say the government) might decide they want a nice, big database of everyone's genetic material. Make it easier to solve crimes .. blah blah blah .. until it gets abused (and it will get abused). In this case, I don't think the benefits to men's rights to discover paternity without a big drama gets trumped by everyone's right to privacy.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:58 PM
7

I am in my 40's and childfree from choice (and biology as I found out later). When I was younger, people used to try very hard to convince me that I needed to have kids cause "I'd make such a great mother..." my mother told me that me and my husband were the ones that should make children for society. (?!) Anyway, after I found out that, due to a congenital defect, I can't physically have kids without help, I started telling people I wasn't able and then leaving a sad little pause. That shut up …
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:54 PM
6

Ok, fine, it's crude. Write a letter or go in person and complain that you feel they're being discrimatory and unnecessarily bashing men. Send it to the office manager. Things being what they are, that will probably solve the issue.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:31 AM
1

First, thank you for the information on what FPS is about. I saw a suggestion (I think in this thread) about an opt-in system rather than an opt-out system - both with very strict time limits like the ones imposed by most states for safe haven drop offs - I think I like that better since it requires the woman to inform the man/men. I don't think, however, it is very doable from where we are as a society so it's probably a moot point. I don't think anything approaching FPS will happen in my lifet…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:21 AM
2

found the same poster at my doctors office in the unisex bathroom, was above the toilet (for standing males to see) You should've pissed on it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:53 PM
1

I think we should re-revaluate the conditions and consequences for divorce in general. Yes, and men should be working alongside women to negotiate how divorce laws are reframed. Right now, they're horrible (in the US) and men do not have an adequate voice. Simply going back to fault divorce only and their current conditions is too simplistic in my opinion. Simplistic, yes, and eminently doable. It's a step in the direction but it's not a lasting solution because we'll just be back to people lyin…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:18 PM
2

That's not entirely true - safe haven laws in the U.S. were put into place in response to a slew of news stories about teen girls dumping their newborns in public bathrooms, trash cans, and dumpsters. Right. These weren't cases where the woman had the child in a hospital but, rather, when the birth was elsewhere - most likely because the pregnancy was hidden. So, it would be hard to go through an adoption if you're bound and determined (ie. enough to dump the baby in a dumpster) to never let any…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:09 PM
1

I'm voting for deranged. This is just un...incomprehensible...I'm at a loss for words..
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:02 PM
2

"Best interests of the child" seems to go out the window when it comes to abortion, and other things that are in the best interests of the child are not having parents separate which would imply not allowing divorce except in the case of abuse and forcing both parents to work 40+ hours a week once the children enter school. Anyone who cries "best interests of the child" without qualifying it is just pulling on people's heartstrings unless they support everything that's in the best interests of t…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:37 PM
3

If the father is paying child support, then the woman probably has, at least, 50/50 custody. So, she's involved in the child's life for 18+ years, too. A better solution would be to give fathers more say in raising children.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:03 PM
1

What goes on between the mother and father isn't really a concern of the child. But it might have something to do with whether or not LPS is appropriate. If he exercises LPS and still sticks around possibly creating more children to LPS...
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:55 PM
1

The time period during which I'd support a financial abortion for a man would be within the time period she could still abort. If he stuck around the entire time then decided he wanted out after the child was born I have little sympathy. If he's told in the first month and is clear that he wants no part of it (while she can still choose to abort) I see no moral issues. I have a question about this. For LPS, what provisions are there to ensure the father does stay away? As complex as relationship…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:52 PM
1

Save Haven laws are primarily written to care for infants when a child is born and somehow adoption at the time is not available. Most of the scenarios that I imagine this happening would be that the father does not want or won't agree to an adoption. It's a sneaky move but it's considered better than the alternative of a dumped/dead baby. I don't think fathers who are a victim of safe haven laws are fathers that were forced into fatherhood - rather I think they're being denied parental rights.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:44 PM
1

Singapore does not have a robust safety net, and there is little poverty and unemployment is extremely low. It is one of the least regulated and economically free countries in the world. Only the very poorest of the poor are subsidized, but this seems to be people literally incapable of working. Singapore is an excellent choice. I did not know much about it. Singapore also has 3 national health plans based on what you can afford to pay - which I'm assuming would cover free birth control pills to…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:38 AM
1

My apologies.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:07 AM
1

Because people tend judge policies based on their intentions and not their results. What can we use as a basis for comparison? I can't think of a 1st world country willing to not subsidize the poor - and poor children. If you look at the portions of people in poverty, they only climb/remain stagnant when you expand welfare. Reductions in actual poverty come from economic growth, and taking money away from the economy is antithetical to that. Subsidies add money to the economy by giving it to poo…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:04 AM
1

You're quite right in that women don't "get themselves pregnant", they choose to have sex knowing the risks without taking adequate precautions to protect themselves despite having a plethora of options to choose from. Fair enough. There are vastly more options for women than men - something I hope to see rectified in my lifetime. There's even been cases where men have been forced to pay child support when sperm was "stolen" from them, even one case where a woman saved sperm from oral sex and th…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:19 PM
1

Governments are made of people, so that's just hypocritical. *edited to add: Governments are formed by societies which are formed by people. In this case we know which came first. If there were only 2 people in the US, we wouldn't need a government. Ok. So some people (who ever is in charge) seems to think that subsidizing poor people is a good idea. I've seen calls for welfare reform but none for ending it out right. The existence of welfare seems based on that assumption. So, then, people who …
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:42 PM
1

More accurately, the populace is okay with using someone else's money for their goals. There are certainly people willing to use their own money to help people, but that doesn't imply the government should, since it uses more than just their own money. If they want to help people with their own money, they can directly or through a charity. As a society, we have made the choice to use other people's money to create a safety net for those who are unable (yes, or unwilling) to provide for themselv…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:22 PM
2

I was responding to your reaction to me saying women "get themselves pregnant" as if its somehow 50/50, when thats really a very superficial outlook. Women don't get themselves accidentally pregnant. Short of using a sperm donor she's just as prone to human error as men are. Quite true, but talking about mens responsibility and womans responsibilities in pregnancy are different. Women have much more of a biological issue, its their body, they need to protect themselves and they have a myrad of o…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:16 PM
1

So, her execution is now scheduled for April. The appeal might very well take longer than that anyway.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:36 PM
1

At the point the populace is willing to let the government decide. Thus far, the population has been very leary of the government having that type of intrusive jurisdiction in their lives unless there are pretty dire circumstances. Where you would be comfortable? And, what happens if I can afford the baby until s/he's born but suddenly during an economic downturn I can't. Do we adopt out 2 - 17 year olds? *note: US population
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:57 PM
1

It's only our reality because we make it our reality. There are other solutions. Look, if we can't agree to talk about actual reality, then I don't think the discussion will be fruitful. A logical construction that relies on a false premise is trivially judged to be true. Other solutions most certainly do exist - some more palatable than others. But, right now, biological parents have a much stronger claim to their children. What are the steps that would need to be taken to convince the majority…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:29 PM
2

If its my body and it affects me to such a huge degree that pregnancy affects a womans body and I choose to have unprotected sex, I would be extremely stupid to make sure someone else doesnt get me pregnant. I have to take steps to protect myself. Then, making those steps easier would be a Good Idea(tm)? Besides, just having bc in your cabinet doesn't help anyone if it's not used. More on that below. And when women have a myriad of different ways to have practically complete reversible control o…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:56 PM
1

Reality does not support that preposition. Reality is that the state (you) end up paying for children's food, clothing, medical, education, housing, et.al. At some point you are going to be giving away free stuff. I'd wager that supporting just 1 child for his/her lifetime of needs would pay for quite a few women's birth control. I'd fully support your opinion if it wasn't for pesky reality coming in and messing it all up.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:55 PM
2

Because that strategy has been working so well up till now...
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:53 PM
1

I say hand out as much birth control as the cost to the state of supporting 1 child.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:51 PM
3

I agree and somehow she's claiming self defense - of course he was abusive. I can't figure out how you go from taking pictures of someone in a shower to slashing his throat in a minute. Where the hell was she hiding the knife?! The whole thing makes me sick. So, no. She's not guilty. Absolutely not, yet. But I'd by lying if I didn't say I was highly predisposed to a guilty verdict (which is OK cause I'm not on the jury).
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:47 PM
1

Like that woman who has 16 (16?!!) children and thinks someone needs to pay for all her kids.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:32 PM
1

Don't get blinded by the fact that the solution doesn't prevent all occurrences. If it prevents some occurrences (say n%) then that's a step forward.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:29 PM
3

What's the alternative to the government stepping in? Letting the children starve to death or die from neglect. How sad would it be to see those commercials on TV about other countries children change to children in the US.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:28 PM
6

Oh, c'mon. Where have you been? Women don't get themselves pregnant. There is generally a man involved somewhere. Birth control protects both parties Unless you're preaching abstinence.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:26 PM
3

I'd just like to add that it doesn't follow that she's necessarily immature or shallow. If for example a man is dating a woman who has no interest in facebook/lulu and the likes, but a friend or daughter or whatever does and tells her that he's labelled as a creep or rapist because some vindictive ex girlfriend put that in to spite him. I'm not suggesting the woman is shallow by any means. By immature I mean that she's someone who is not exercising good critical thinking skills. Whenever you're …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:58 PM
1

There's some poor guy out there with your false name that's fighting for his reputation from women he never met! /s
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:10 PM
2

If the point is that basically stripping anyone of their right to privacy (except movie stars or whatever) is absolutely wrong. There's no proof the allegations and, from what I understand, they're anonymous (whatever that means in this day and age). My point is that getting a 'chance' with someone who's so obsessed with what the internet culture thinks (they can't put it on the inet if it isn't true) is not the type of person that looks at herself to see where she might have a place in situatio…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:09 PM
3

This is a mens right's issue, don't get me wrong. I think it's awful that people can cyber-bully and affect real lives with what they put out into the ether. I just also assert that if the woman is that wishy washy, she might not be a stable (mature) person yet. Find someone who is or wait for her to grow up.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:03 PM
4

Florida is a weird state. When we were married 21 years ago, in Arizona, my husband took my name. The only entity that complained was the electric company (go figure). They gave in after I explained I had a driver's license, passport and social security card with our married name and I had a better chance of proving his identity than they did. It might vary by state but in AZ at least a marriage license was a legal name change in either direction (or you could even make up your new last name).
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:00 PM
1

As a woman, my opinion is that if she's basing her judgements about people on an internet rating site - and not giving you a chance - you just dodged a serious bullet. Look for someone who is more inclined to make her own decisions and not depend on the whims of what other people think to date. Anything less than that is risking serious crazy.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:54 PM
1

The article states that she stopped twice to request help (ostensibly from others). I would be pretty intimidated by someone jumping on top of my car and not letting go after 10 miles. It wouldn't matter what gender the person was. Note to self: Do not cling to the outside of moving cars.../s
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:35 PM
2

Is there any chance she's still in some sort of employee training (you mentioned you had more hours than she does in certain areas). I used to work for a job that always hired more people than they really needed (because the turn over rate was so high). They'd give a bunch of hours, early on, to the newer hires to train them, and then pick who they'd like to use based on personality, effectiveness, or whatever.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:03 PM
2

It depends on what your goals are. Is the child yours? Do you want partial custody? full custody? 50/50 custody? How did the relationship end? Is there a lot of acrimony? Has she moved on? Are you two friendly? In the end, it all depends on what you're looking to get. edited to add: Or what you're looking to avoid.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:18 AM
3

Signing up in this day and age just doesn't make sense, anyway. The gov. already has all your information - it's just a database search and an algorithm. But, yes, women should be included, either way.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:34 PM
1

Are you concerned with the correctness of the diagnosis? Do you think boys are more likely to be falsely diagnosed? Do you think girls are less likely to be diagnosed because of gender?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:04 PM
4

Sociopathic lack of empathy also isn't treatable (to my knowledge) so keeping her locked up sounds like an even better idea. In fact, if it could be found that she was really suffering from this, it would make a good case for remanding her for life - which is done with some sexual predators - because the chances of her reoffending would be very, very high.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:15 PM
3

Generally, unless a person admits responsibility and remorse, parole boards do not release them.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:13 PM
1

I assume that you mean once the child is an adult. This is true but then he'll also have a lot of explaining to do, I would think.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:00 PM
1

Men want out of all obligations and rights to a child that was conceived in a drunken one night stand with a girl he had previously never met, and who then proceeded to irresponsibly bring this child into the world against his will (or sometimes even his knowledge). Ok, I conceed that in this case LPS would solve the issue. Thank you for the clarification. The feminist rebuttal to the "paternal surrender" is usually the straw man that men want this so they can, at any point in the child's life, …
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:54 PM
1

LPS does nothing to enable men to get better visitation. It's an all or nothing approach. Given that no one is arguing that there shouldn't be limits on LPS - say deciding after 10 years of parenting the child the man shouldn't be able to disavow the child. This solution only seems to offer one path for men. Have no rights and no child support because you signed them away or have no rights and pay child support w/without adequate visitation because you didn't. (Situations where the parents get a…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:49 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:44 PM
1

I feel people are misunderstanding me, I just think if you have a little one, your blood, you (father/mother) should do what's best for the baby. If it's rape absolutely not. You shouldn't have to pay child support or have it. But otherwise, there's innocents involved (kids) that are so fucking innocent. They don't know anything about mens rights or feminism. And they need to be taken care of by both parents. It's just the right thing to do. Of course the optimal situation for the child is that …
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:51 PM
1

Do men really want out of all parental obligations (and, I'm assuming rights) to their children?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:53 AM
-1

Men's only choice is to never have sex. Assuming the man never wants children or finds a like minded woman he can trust.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:10 AM
1

These days, if you say the word 'knife' on an airplane or in an airport they will arrest you for making terrorist threats. (I am wishing I was being sarcastic)
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:44 PM
2

How does refusing a woman an abortion after a rape accusation do anything to help the situation or Men's Rights? It seems to me that it just makes it worse for every one concerned but most expecially the child.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:55 PM
5

My question is why didn't the guy consent to finding another seat? Sure, he shouldn't have to .. but if I were getting kicked in the back, I'd want to move. Still it does seem like a huge overreaction to kick the guy off. At least he should have been warned to move or get off (if his sitting there was a threat .. ?)
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:32 PM
7

I think this has been happening for a long time. Every "new doctor" survey I've had to fill out has questions regarding domestic violence, smoking, drugs, and such. But, it seems to be for everyone - not just women.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:13 PM
1

If the laws were really about family, this would not happen. This is true. But, it seems like the government is more worried about getting some money from someone in any way they can than justice. And, sadly, it looks like your ex wife knew the system much better than you did. Do you at least have a good custody arrangement with your son?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:13 PM
2

Aside from the mentioned immorality, this is a good way to get in a lot of trouble and end up in prison for a long, long time. Unless he has custody and she has lost all her parental rights, taking the kid across state lines will be kidnapping on a federal level. He won't get far once the Amber alert goes out and if he even shows up at a state organization they will take the child AND arrest him. (And, rightly so.) Then, his biological child will really be left without a father to support him be…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:33 PM
1

This is way out from left field but I truly wonder what would happen if you turned around and sued her for full custody and child support for both kids. Yeah, you'd be raising a child that isn't biologically yours but it sounds like s/he is young enough to be able to bond with - people do it with adopted children all the time. If you're on the hook, you may as well have the joy of parenting and save your child and that child from what sounds like a really dysfunctional mother.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:21 PM
2

Once you ask for a break, distance, or whatever she might suddenly become more interested in you and do a complete 180 on her behavior to be more like it was before you were engaged. Plan for that ahead because this is very common in abusive relationships. Just as you feel you don't know what to do without her - she probably thinks the same thing about you. Only, it won't last. As soon as she gets you committed - by buying a house, getting married, or making a baby - she'll revert back to her ab…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:31 AM
1

I'm definitely not in the 'need to protect' category at all. I was thinking along the lines of women not holding their comrades back (due to PT requirements) not specifically for segregation in any other way. I was just wondering if there were some combat positions (guarding) that are less physically intensive that women aren't allowed to do. Of course you do have a good point. If that's the case segregation is not necessary. So I changed my mind.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:18 AM
1

Oh, and by the way, I know she's only consenting to sex once a month (or whatever) but you need to extinguish that sexual relationship immediately. It's bad enough to be in this situation as it is... adding a dependent will not help the situation any. This isn't meant to be punitive to her - rather it's a rational decision about the life your future child(ren) might have. Do it for him/her.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:53 PM
1

I'm not the poster who said this but I will tell you that being inside emotional abuse can twist you around like nothing else. You're not healthy enough to have a healthy relationship (with anyone) right now. Get some distance before you commit further.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:21 PM
1

First, call off the wedding. If this doesn't incite a non-recoverable spin in the relationship then try couples counseling. If she won't go, go yourself. I've seen the effect of emotional abuse on several family members and, if you want me straight out honest, I'd tell you that your 'love' for her will fade quickly once you get away from the abuse.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:17 PM
1

Why would a white man not want to mug me?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:48 PM
1

I'm in favor of a gender neutral draft. But, if you want a counter argument then it could get sticky socially if children are involved. Say both parents are drafted. What do we do with the kids? Limiting the draft to one sex vs. the other does, for the most part, eliminate having to deal with that issue since the gender that stays home would be the one tasked with raising the children. Another point is that most countries have fought off invasions or forces fighting on our soil. We haven't since…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:44 PM
1

How would you feel about segregated (men only/women only) squadrons? There are probably some combat roles that would be able to be done by a female platoon that would still give them the opportunity to help do their share in combat.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:25 PM
8

If there is a draft (a whole other argument) then, yes, women should be required to serve - in combat positions - with the right training.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:10 AM
1

I invite friends (male or female) out to dinner and I always paid. The only ppl I can't seem to get to let me treat (at least once in a while) are my parents.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:55 AM
2

If you consider the physical strength of the average woman compared to the average guy - he'll win out. It's physics - if I weigh 2/3 of what you weigh, you have serious leverage against me. Obviously, this isn't always the case and fitness and conditioning come into play on an individual basis.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:54 PM
0

What I find to be a clear ideological contradiction with Feminism is the idea that women can be strong and independent, whilst simultaneously being weak and vulnerable. Surely one can't be both? I don't see any cognitive dissonance depending on how you define strong, independent, weak and vulnerable. A soldier (male or female*) can be strong - and well armed - but still be vulnerable because of hazards like bombs, snipers or the sheer number of enemies. A person and be independent but have a wea…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter