TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnUnknown Archive

View 1 post and 102 comments by AnUnknown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

AnUnknown/r/seduction06/08/13 10:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

You don't think it has anything to do with his relationships with teenage girls that have also recently become public? Or the context of these now public text messages considering some of his public statements in podcasts? Seems like the article you linked is glossing over them just to focus on the DV charge. I like (liked?) Roiland's work and would agree that these professional consequences to simply being charged would be excessive. I also can see how a media organization may not want to be as…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 03:17 AM
1

I'm convinced all these guys who insist their physical traits are the reason they can't get women have never actually had a real conversation with one. If you can make her laugh, make her feel unique and valuable as a person, and hold a 10 minute conversation you can get laid. The problem is too many of these guys think that "you're so hot I would walk to the end of the earth to worship the ground you walk on" is going to make a woman feel unique and valuable, and that self depreciating humor is…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:40 PM
-8

What the fuck is a "femocrat" exactly? Or is this just some right wing ragebait aimed at disaffected men taking a legitimate issue and turning it into an ad for shitty politics?
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:01 PM
6

I disagree with your principle that gauges what should be hidden. I think using subjective measures like what is or is not "very common" is an unintelligent way of making guiding principles much less laws. What is or is not "very common" hinges on numerous factors and changes over time.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:23 PM
2

Uhh, you know your butthole is where feces comes from, right? Like, the least "clean" excretion our bodies generate... Yes, I agree with keeping those hidden. I don't want your skidmarks, thanks. Also if you don't believe necks are common to be securely stimulative I don't know what more I can possibly say on the matter.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:20 PM
7

Erogenous zones also include armpits, soles of feet, and necks. Are you saying we need to cover those too?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:16 PM
4

Should we hide all erogenous zones in public then? Lips, necks, armpits, palms, soles of feet, scalps....all erogenous zones. By your logic they should also be hidden, correct? Maybe we should all wear a burka... I believe genitals should be hidden in public for cleanliness reasons, not erogenous reasons. I don't want your excretions left behind after sitting on a public bench, for example. Breasts are not genitals though.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:11 PM
4

I can see the best-of post now. "/u/FeminismMustGo absolutely DESTROYS another commenter with FACTS and LOGIC that DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS"
/r/MensRights05/03/20 01:57 PM
2

You send them an innocent child who can not read, can not do math, and loves everyone Perhaps if you send them a child who can read and can do math you will end up with a better outcome. Perhaps...
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:33 PM
2

My apologies, I didn't mean to suggest you were misogynistic, just, a little down on yourself. Gotta know you're awesome to convince others of that fact.
/r/seduction20/12/16 09:14 PM
5

Read some books. The Game by Neil Strauss and Models by Mark Manson are commonly trotted about here. I got a lot back in the day out of a guy by the name of Eric Disco, his stuff really spoke to me. Really, though, it's a numbers game. The best guys get a phone number 20% of the time, which means 4 out of every 5 women they approach get them nowhere. I know I'm not one of those guys, so what's my percentage? 10? 5? Say it's 5%, that means I have to approach 20 women to get 1 phone number. Rough.…
/r/seduction20/12/16 09:03 PM
15

It's all you, man. Cliche as it sounds, and is, it's true. You will never find a real connection going out of your way to find a "not you but better" to introduce to the world. But I'm going to take a step back, first. What do you want? You say you've had lots of sex, but your friends have better hook ups. What does better mean in this context? Hotter girls? Better sex? Same question, but about relationships. You say your friends have better relationships. What does that mean in this context? Do…
/r/seduction20/12/16 08:32 PM
4

I feel you man. Frankly I've struggled with this since starting down the Seduction path. Yes, I want sex. Yes, I want women. But what I really want at the end of the day is a relationship. The seduction body of information isn't great at separating these. What are you looking for? Do you know? Where are you looking for it? Are you sure that you're looking in the right places for what you want? How do you tell if a woman you're looking at has what you want? To oversimplify, you are less likely to…
/r/seduction07/12/16 09:23 PM
1

Step 1. Quit looking at yourself as fucked up. Quit blaming external influences for who you are. Just be who you are, flaws and all, and own it. You just have to own you. Everybody's got their own battles to fight - including the pretty girls you're trying to talk to - and nobody's going to judge you for having them.
/r/seduction29/12/15 09:01 PM
1

It's not your looks - it's something else. Kevin James can pull models, so can you. You say people avoid you before you even open your mouth, perhaps there's something in your body language or expressions. It's impossible for the Internet to narrow in on this and tell you exactly what it would be, though. Try talking to everyone instead of just girls, and try talking to people just to meet them, instead of talking to them with further intentions. Worst case you make some new guy friends and you …
/r/seduction29/12/15 08:27 PM
3

Go have fun. Get out there, rock out like nobody's watching, and focus on having the best time you can there. Almost universally, in my experience anyways, they'll make themselves known to you - you'll barely have to approach.
/r/seduction28/04/15 11:28 PM
1

Ask yourself; what does my dream girl(s) want in a man? Then work on becoming that person. The rest falls in to place naturally. I know. That's as contrived as canned answers get, and it severely oversimplifies the problem, but it really is the truth, and at least for me, is exactly what I needed to do. For me, my dream girl treats her body well - whether that's eating somewhat balanced, living an acceptably active lifestyle, or some combination of them. In my mind, a girl like that probably wan…
/r/seduction24/02/15 09:13 PM
2

Your female friends are telling you what you need to do - loosen up. This is some of the most frustrating advice to hear until you figure out what's on the other side - what they're really saying is to further elaborate your movements. You appear "tight" because you're not moving very much - even if in your head you might feel like you are. Get in to it, picture yourself in a movie rocking the joint and be that person. You don't really need to be any good to have a good time, and having a good t…
/r/seduction07/03/14 04:08 AM
6

The world is your oyster - these environments are perfect for meeting people, making friends, building relationships, and getting lost into moments. It doesn't really matter what it is you're looking for - whether you're trying to find a wife or a hot body to lie next to - they're there. All you've gotta do is talk to people and be open to the experience. Dance while walking between venues, make eye contact with a pretty girl walking the opposite direction, grab her hand and bring her in for a q…
/r/seduction23/12/13 02:44 AM
1

Probably because you're writing them all off as women you don't want to go approach. If you're working on AA - approach anyway! An approach doesn't have to have sexual intent in order to be beneficial.
/r/seduction02/12/13 05:38 PM
1

Isn't that pretty much what I said? That prosecuting with child porn isn't the best remedy but is understandable given the current state of the law? Or is there somewhere that our viewpoints diverge?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:56 AM
0

Unneccessary aggression is going full retard. Kinda like what you're doing.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:19 PM
1

Yes, the picture and ensuring situation they cultivated in the school. That should be punishable regardless of gender and irrespective of the consensuality of the actions depicted. But punishable as sex offenders? No.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:34 PM
4

I stated at the beginning I don't agree that labeling what was going on as child pornography is the best recourse. That's not the question here. The question is whether or not the boys did something that was wrong (they did) for which they should be punished (they should). The question of whether the parents also did something wrong (they did) and should be punished (they should) is not relevant. What this really speaks to is the failure of the legal system to keep up with the times, as it were,…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:27 PM
3

So you don't believe there is anything wrong with spreading images of minors engaged in sexual acts? See, I disagree with you there.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:40 PM
2

What are you talking about? Did you even read what I wrote? Where did I say anything that led to your response? Do you disagree with anything I wrote?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:18 PM
7

Whoa there, do we really need to go full retard here? Ignoring the question of rape, can we agree that there is something wrong with sharing illicit photos taken of sexual encounters between minors? Just as a baseline, forgetting about gender and the question of rape, can we at least set down that the photo sharing is wrong and should be punishable by law. That's what they're being prosecuted with. Now, I'm not sure I like the association of child pornography which suggests inappropriate coercio…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:34 PM
1

I couldn't say. I'm not so well versed in the art of day game to really comment.
/r/seduction10/05/13 12:08 PM
3

You can still be an AFC... The difference is the mindset - fun first. I'm out to have fun, so I'm going to have fun, and I go out and have fun. The rest just happens.
/r/seduction10/05/13 03:07 AM
7

Hence the qualifier. If you're looking to fuck... Not a mechanical PUA? I'm not really sure what that's supposed to mean. I'm not a PUA in any sense of the word. I just love music; I get really into it in the club, and that attracts women in that environment. Dancing to the beat and singing along when the mood strikes is natural to me. Maybe it's not to you, but it is to me. Maybe that's where we differ. Which is not at all to say that I disagree with your assessment of the caliber of women you'…
/r/seduction10/05/13 02:58 AM
4

I might argue that there's more than one kind of night game - ie. club game is not pub game is not late night coffee shop game. I'm going to speak to club game because truthfully, it's the only area where I have consistent success. Night game it's possible to pick up without even saying a word. In fact, it's probably better that way - words fuck everything up. Clubs are all about being so physically close that you can feel each other's vibe yet being unable to speak to them. That's just what the…
/r/seduction10/05/13 01:09 AM
4

Disagree. If you're looking to fuck, the club is an awesome place to meet women. You don't even have to do anything beyond looking like you're having fun and they make themselves available to you. I dunno, maybe I have some sort of secret sauce that other guys don't that only comes out in the club, but for me the club is by far the easiest place to get action. No question this comes with its own set of caveats, hence my qualifiers, but it's there and it really is not hard.
/r/seduction10/05/13 01:01 AM
1

I was going to try and give specifics, but I stopped myself. I do the same thing I do when I encounter those situations when out with my friends As cliche as this sounds, this really is one of those "I don't know what to do with my hands" type moments. The only reason you don't know what to do with your hands is because you've never thought about it before.
/r/seduction03/04/13 03:36 AM
4

Sometimes I'll do things when telling stories like intentionally avoid interesting details, dropping enough to make her curious so she takes advantage of a gap and asks me about it. It gives you a chance to make those details and therefore the story more familiar. It also gives her ammunition for conversation lulls later. They don't all hit, and on some women, none of them do. Unfortunate truth. So, you ask a question, interact with the response, and then she winds down whatever story she's tell…
/r/seduction02/04/13 11:26 PM
4

This almost happened to me once. I was okay with getting all hot sweaty and naked, but not with penetration. I made that clear as soon as clothes started coming off. So we had fun, then she tried to make it happen. I stopped, and again made my position clear, figuring it's easy to get caught up in the moment. I didn't feel the need to stop everything just for that. She tries again, and again, and it quickly escalates to the point where the fact that I'm stronger than her is the only reason she's…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:55 AM
2

I feel like you have an immediate chip on your shoulder when the subject is broached. The concept of a mother forcibly excluding a father from contact with their child is a very different one than that of a mother raising a child on her own. Common, perhaps; but not common (and most definitely not documented) enough to assume that of a study in this one. There's no discussion here about women who restrict their child's access to their biological father. In fact, that raises the question - what o…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:57 AM
4

Why is this here, exactly? How does this have anything to do with men's rights? Why is there no mention of the variety of levels of interaction the children have with their father? Certainly a child who sees their father weekly or monthly will be affected differently than one who's never met their father. Why are the terms divorced, single parent, and single motherhood thrown around interchangeably throughout the article? They do not mean the same things. Yeah, I know that statistically women ar…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:55 PM
1

I fully support what you hope to accomplish here, however I maintain a healthy dose of skepticism. And by skepticism what I really mean is that it needs to be maintained at every level that actual experience (getting out there) is the single most important variable in terms of their progression.
/r/seduction19/09/12 02:36 AM
2

I really identified with what you have here, which honestly surprised me. I'm not insecure in the sense of worrying whether or not I'm attractive or whether a girl's in to me (I am, and they usually are); but the "this isn't me" and "I don't care about hooking up," is totally me. Fuck you. You called me on it. I'd love to see more uncomfortable truths from the perspective of challenging who you believe yourself to be. I already know I can take women home, but do I want to?
/r/seduction30/07/12 11:09 PM
2

I can't tell you the number of times I've had women compliment my car. I drive a mid-2000s Corolla, for reference. Granted, I've made a few tasteful upgrades, but the point is - it's hardly a fancy car, and it's hardly flashy. That being said, nearly all the women complimenting my car were already on their way home with me, so there's that. The car didn't get them on their way home with me. It may have raised my value even further, but it isn't what got me laid. I got me laid. You can do the sam…
/r/seduction25/07/12 11:21 PM
1

ITS ALL YOUR FAULT ITS ALL YOUR FAULT ITS ALL YOUR FAULT
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:33 PM
0

You're hilarious. You really don't see it. Good ol' reddit. There's as much evidence that my second paragraph is the be all and end all truth to the causation of the results to this study as there is that this has anything to do with "Men's Rights." But that doesn't agree with your preconceived notions and the horribly editorialized title given to this post, therefore DOWNVOTE BRIGADE AWAY. I hope one day I can be as smrt as you.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:32 PM
0

You're not very good at sarcasm, are you?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:22 PM
-4

Obviously this means that all men are financially disadvantaged after a divorce and this is the result of an unfair judicial system levied upon all of us to further marginalize men in favor of women. Derp. I choose to believe that this is due to how inherently irresponsible men are with their money. Obviously women are far better suited to be in control of finances, and it is due primarily to their influence that married couples are able to do so well. This is further exemplified by the fact tha…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:12 PM
-4

Actually I have read the article. Where else do you think I came up with quotes from it? Have you? Where exactly does this come up as a men's rights issue, anyways? There's nothing here that discusses causation, much less associates the cause with a "lack of men's rights"
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:01 PM
-1

No, I'm calling this a circle jerk because the headline is sensationalized to get upvotes and is only barely rooted in the study itself.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:50 PM
-1

You are indeed confused. I was stating that the results of this survey could not be extrapolated to apply anywhere outside of Australia due to cultural and legal differences. I was also stating that the results of this survey are not indicative of, well, anything. The core conclusion the study and article make is that divorcees (regardless of gender) who do not remarry tend to have smaller net worths than those who stay married. And, that this effect is considerably less pronounced if individual…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:36 PM
-4

Some days I feel like this sub is little more than a pro-man circle jerk. I do say that as a man who feels particularly concerned about the continuing gender divide on all sides. a) This is a study done in Australia on Australians, obviously a place with different rules regarding how assets are split, alimony, etc. b) It also suggests that you're more likely to divorce the less money you bring in It found those who divorce were likely to have had lower household incomes prior to their marriage b…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:57 PM
2

Hey now, a zero ain't that bad!
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:13 AM
2

YOUR OPINION DIFFERS FROM THE PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS I HAVE THAT AGREE WITH THE HEADLINE. DOWNVOTE.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:11 PM
-7

Durrr, what's a percentage? Condescension doesn't hide your ignorance, so I'd recommend not making yourself out to be a complete ass. I'd hate to be both stupid AND an asshole. White men are statistically more likely to be encountered, meaning that encountering one is "business as usual" for an officer. Brown women, on the other hand, are more unusual, and therefore puts the officer in a different frame of mind upon approaching the vehicle. Whether that's a positive or negative change is up for …
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:22 PM
-4

Eugh. Hyperbole, assumptions, and logical fallacies abound. There's no discussion of the distribution of data - if white men are more common to be encountered, they're more likely to be pulled over. There's no discussion of the events taking place at these stops - if white men are less likely to treat the officer with respect, they're more likely to be given a ticket or worse. To put it simply, there's no analysis of the cause of the situation, just the outcome. Just because you can draw lines t…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:39 PM
2

Get out of this mindset that there's something wrong with you. I get it, you're "old" for a virgin, whoop-dee-doo. You're a unique snowflake, similar but not quite like any others, and one of the ways you're not quite like the others is because you're no philanderer. Congratulations. Them's the facts. You can choose to either own that shit or to hide and lie about it. Now, if I was out with a 28 yr old and she told me her longest relationship was 10 months, I probably would've responded the same…
/r/seduction09/07/12 06:53 PM
1

I wouldn't call that a dichotomy. Read enough material and you'll see that nothing I said is revolutionary and most cover it in their materials, they just don't shine much of a light on it.
/r/seduction02/06/12 01:59 PM
5

Wow. I mean, I'm gonna call you out in a second, but holy shit reading the rest of the comments I can understand not only why you might feel this way but also why nothing said here will change your mind. The seduction community is about getting laid first and foremost. At least, the surface stuff is. It's about getting experience in a sexual and romantic atmosphere, and is almost always promoted as involving vast numbers of women. For this, it really does work. The women you're seeing getting tu…
/r/seduction02/06/12 12:29 AM
10

I'm going to write this as someone who sits on both sides of the fence. As a guy who's turned off many a woman in my life by being too needy, and as a guy who's attractive enough to be pursued by many a needy woman as well. None of this stuff is near as gender-specific as the "community" likes to believe. There's a distinct difference between chasing or indicating desire and being a puppy dog. I want to be chased. I want a girl to show interest in me, and to be interested enough to be persistent…
/r/seduction30/05/12 05:39 PM
1

Is this you?
/r/seduction25/04/12 02:11 PM
10

the pffff is perfect. Blow off her pride like you're not convinced, or have heard it a million times before.
/r/seduction26/03/12 09:48 PM
2

Perhaps the American system is far more gone than I had understood. You'll have to forgive me for that, I'm a mere layman observer. Here in Ontario, there has been a lot of legislation throughout my lifetime addressing issues of wage gaps and discrimination. I don't necessarily agree with all of it (minority employment quotas, etc); but one of the key tenets that was rather recently overhauled was "Equal pay for work of equal value." A change from "Equal pay for equal work" to address the inequa…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:00 AM
-18

I'm not going to argue that a wage gap doesn't exist. In fact, I totally believe that it does exist in one way or another. Of course, without proper study, there's no way to say either. However, for some reason the way the US Government has decided to assess and address the phenomenon is completely out of left field. In Canada we have legislation regarding equal pay that is "Equal pay for work of equal value." The value brought to the company from a CSR is very different from that of a general l…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:50 PM
-44

And yet, the downvote brigade has spoken.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 08:44 PM
-48

Another example of the US sucking at statistics, then. Big surprise there. If things like level of experience, education, etc are ignored then the statistic is completely meaningless.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:58 PM
-108

That bullshit is just as bad as the feminists insisting that men are the primary drivers of rape and domestic abuse. This is just 4chan circlejerking you and the rest of the MRA "crowd" around. Any statistician, analyst, or HR person worth his or her salt would never limit their inputs to just wage and gender to come up with a result like this. The whole story reads of one thing - an inherently flawed analysis. You don't determine whether group A and group B are being compensated equally for the…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:32 PM
7

As one of those children, I do feel the need to point out that correlation is not necessarily causation. The article itself refers to the study author's own suggestion that the issue may have more to do with the dominant figure's gender than the divorce itself. What I'm trying to say is, don't abandon your kids, and don't let the mother force you to abandon them (or be geographically distant). As an adult I can now look back and see just how much work my father put in to getting his time with me…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 01:05 AM
3

Oh, you caught me. Shame on me for trying to avoid the irrelevant topic that obsesses you so. The shame, shaaaaaame, shame and horror. Yes yes.
/r/seduction22/02/12 08:07 PM
5

Wait....did I just piss you off so much that you went sifting through my posting history, pull something out of context, and come up with some abusive narrative that you believe defines my life to try and have something to use against me? Damn. That's a new low, even for a redditor. On the plus side, I just watched your dick grow a whole 3 inches. You should be real proud.
/r/seduction22/02/12 07:43 PM
3

Holy geebus overreact much? Just because you take the worst possible understanding of what was written doesn't make you right. Me doing the opposite doesn't make me any more right, but neither side of the coin justifies the implication that OP is a "sick f_uck." I think you just like starting witch hunts because you're too repressed to use the word "fuck" without excess punctuation to soften the blow.
/r/seduction22/02/12 07:14 PM
17

Don't live life focused on regret. Live and learn.
/r/seduction22/02/12 02:35 PM
5

Do we really need to get up in arms over a highschooler list of relationship faux-pas being primarily aimed at men? I mean, today must be a slow news day...
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:00 PM
7

Upvote for similarity. Whenever I (make the mistake of) tell somebody new that I'm generally an introvert or somewhat antisocial they tilt their heads and give me a look like I've suddenly become a martian. I have the skill to be and the experience of being a leader; I can converse with relative ease, read social cues, and essentially "make do" in whatever situation I find myself. If getting laid as often as possible were one of my goals, I'd be doing that as well. It isn't all that challenging.…
/r/seduction21/02/12 07:24 PM
1

Thank you for posting this, I wish I could upvote you higher. I know this isn't r/atheism, but that's not terribly relevant to me. I was (mostly) raised in a somewhat isolationist church that would rather arrogantly say that their way was the only right way, they were the true believers, and dissent meant 'discipling' or excommunication yet prided themselves on being 'non-denominational' and 'open to all.' Man, if you were merely 'dating' a girl and you did more than hold her hand or give a brie…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:01 AM
1

I think we're all pretty guilty of that one. Only makes sense, right? Being rejected by an object is a whole lot easier to deal with than an actual human being.
/r/seduction01/02/12 06:02 PM
2

Oh trust me I know. I come off abrasive because of how I put things to exemplify my point. Now, because you seem to be a nice girl, I'm going to tell you what works for me. I make no representations about this working for anybody else; my issues are my own and nobody else's. What works for me is knowing that whomever I'm with wants to be with me for who I am, not what I am. I'm not the guy you wan't because I make "nice guy" attractive and you're tired of assholes. I'm not the guy you stumbled h…
/r/seduction01/02/12 05:44 PM
0

I guess that's my cue. You and I may not know each other, but I am one of those guys. I will do most things in the right situation, but when it comes to sticking my dick inside I will immediately put on the brakes. You could blame my religious upbringing (no, not a Mormon) if you wish, or perhaps the experiences I have had with relationships after sex, it really doesn't matter. You're not doing anything wrong, ifnotnow. I mean, it's entirely possible that you are, in fact, doing something wrong …
/r/seduction01/02/12 02:11 PM
6

STOP There's your advice. Clearly you're both interested in spending time together. Stop thinking so much about this shit, it's not worth it. Just do. At no point during your writeup did you clarify what it is you are looking for here. If it's a relationship, then why aren't you communicating with her? If you're like me and just genuinely don't know what it is that you want, I'd tend to say that's a pretty good reason for not having that communication with her. But if neither of you are going to…
/r/seduction27/01/12 05:19 PM
1

That's pretty much exactly what I'm doing, attempting (very half assed) to illustrate the issues that arise with any and all "productivity" metrics I have ever been able to locate to compare between countries.
/r/seduction20/01/12 04:19 PM
1

You're right, the first link (as I accurately described if you cared to read what I wrote) is describing the change in GDP output per hour. The second link also shows that the US has a rather high GDP per hours worked, however as I also mentioned GDP is a rather poor measure to use to determine "productivity," especially when you're trying to compare the country with the largest GDP in the world and whose currency is referenced as the "world's reserve currency" against everybody else. Here is a …
/r/seduction20/01/12 04:13 PM
1

You do? The Bureau of Labor Statistics has a very convenient PDF file here that you can use as a source if you'd like. Output per hour year over year growth in the US is less than half that of the Czech Republic, a third of Finland, and is considerably smaller than Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, the Netherlands, and even France Italy and Denmark. Not a good enough source? Fine. Let's look at the OECD instead.
/r/seduction20/01/12 03:49 PM
-5

There's a place for advertising. It's right here.
/r/seduction20/01/12 03:26 PM
0

On the one, awesome. I'm interested in many of these links. On the other, self-promoting blogspam much? Half of the links are Wikipedia articles and the other are a website promoting your pickup training.
/r/seduction20/01/12 03:20 PM
2

Having a government that doesn't legislate paid vacation time and thus working a higher number of weeks per year doesn't mean that Americans work any harder, are any more dedicated, or work hours any longer than any of the other countries in your source. Sorry, 'merica. You ain't got shit on the Japanese when it comes to actual work ethic. You just think getting shit on by your legislators is fair compensation.
/r/seduction20/01/12 03:18 PM
13

Try re-reading what you wrote here, and note how much of what you are saying is things you are thinking or doing. It's all internal, it's all about you and what's going in your brain, and you know what that means? You are in control of all of these things. I can't tell you what line of thinking is going to work best for you and your situation. Some people like to villify their ex, some prefer to inflate themselves above their ex (she couldn't handle me, I'm too good for her, she doesn't deserve …
/r/seduction13/01/12 07:45 PM
5

Friends can be a great filter. You're statistically more likely to find common ground with somebody that's friends of a friend than you are swimming in the sea of average. For this reason it is worthwhile to meet this person, at the very least. That being said, there certainly are indicators that suggest that this particular woman may not be the best to get yourself wrapped up in; but the truth of the matter is that that is all completely assumption based on third and fourth party knowledge. Whi…
/r/seduction11/01/12 03:36 PM
5

Fuck, does nobody else think these guys and their guru names are just a little ridiculous? I mean, come on, what kind of woman fucks a guy that calls himself "Keychain" or "Shamwow"? I'll listen to "Yad" instead, thank you very much.
/r/seduction30/12/11 05:38 PM
1

I have no intention of suggesting such surgery to be acceptable.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 03:36 AM
10

Children do not magically learn cleanliness, it's taught by parents. That was my point.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:55 PM
16

Cleanliness - totally a non-issue. In young boys, the foreskin does not retract. You teach them to wash the same way you teach any boy to wash, with soap and water. My son is 11 now, and I don't think his foreskin has retracted, although he's embarrassed to talk about it. I occasionally have talked to him about the need to pull back the skin on his penis and wash. No big deal. As an uncircumcised male I do feel the need to point out that cleanliness can be an issue. As a parent, it's your job to…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:38 PM
7

Protip - getting defensive when she wants to be safe meeting a stranger on the internet is going to make her all the less likely to decide to meet you. It's not about men, women, black, white, young or old; it's about meeting a stranger off the internet, an inherently dangerous thing to do.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:05 PM
2

She noted that in most cases of divorce, at least until recently, mothers obtained custody of the children, and the lack of regular contact with a father may take a particular emotional and developmental toll on sons. “The loss of a male role model for the boys may seriously impact their well-being,” she said. “Other research has indicated a positive father figure is very important for young men and boys, to develop their gender identity and learn ways to regulate their emotions and enhance thei…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 09:22 PM
1

this man gets it
/r/seduction27/02/11 04:41 AM
1

I love Eric, and have enjoyed his writing since he started this blog. However; Omega. The least confident. Think of a nerdy guy with no friends who stays home all the time alone on his computer. Fuck you. I like my alone time.
/r/seduction26/02/11 07:37 PM
-2

Every time you think about sex just remind yourself of the torture it leads to in the depths of hell. Eventually you'll hate yourself enough that you want nothing to do with other people and the rest just takes care of itself.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 04:47 AM
1

Clearly you didn't catch the reference
/r/seduction14/02/11 11:42 PM
3

Funny, this is a situation in which I normally excel. Funny, because I can't approach a woman to save my life. I have, however, been called upon as a "savior" many times. All you need to do is interject yourself into their interaction. You can be direct about it, "hey guys how's it going tonight?" or you can be more sly, bumping in to her to break in to their bubble, apologize, then introduce yourself to both. You don't need to do much, just give her an excuse to talk to you over him. She'll han…
/r/seduction19/01/11 02:49 PM
2

FWIW, the statement on the edit was aimed at downvoters, not at OP.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 05:28 AM
0

Oh, right, 'cause you know the ins and outs of my particular situation better than I do. The truth of the matter is that if anyone got fucked over by the situation it was in the other direction. He's the one that skipped off with someone new and chose not to pay child support. That really isn't any of your business, though. All I'm saying is that if you're a single father you need to be very careful where your displeasure regarding the situation is aimed. Your child will know if you resent them.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 09:36 PM
-1

So, you're still married and continue to live with a woman who's mentally unstable and you're going on as though you're a single father screwed by the system? Sounds to me like you're just here to complain about a shitty, partially related situation rather than making things happen to fix it. You've got some pretty good grounds for a divorce right there, and for maintaining custody without child support payments. All you gotta do is document this shit properly prior to proceeding with a divorce.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 05:52 PM
-3

As a child of a situation such as this, I feel it's my responsibility to tell you that your child knows you feel this way. You don't need to outwardly act like it for them to pick up on the cues that you feel like you're getting fucked because you had a child. I always knew. I only brought it up once, I think it was when I was 9 or 10 or so, and it was vehemently denied. It wasn't until much later upon speaking to his other son that I confirmed my feelings as being true. The only advice he ever …
/r/MensRights07/01/11 04:58 PM
2

The same way you get over any other form of AA, just fucking do it. We have the opposite problem - in my journey I've become rather adept at trusting my signals and the like, making things at that point rather easy for me. However, showing up with social proof and keeping the energy high to build the attraction doesn't work near as well for me. C'est la vie!
/r/seduction02/01/11 07:19 PM
2

Upvoted for your awesomeness.
/r/seduction14/12/10 03:55 AM
8

Yeah, that's a bit of the pot calling the kettle black here I think. Neil is ideologically sound, and this is a primary reason keeping my head out of the "seduction community." However, that's part of humanity, and you would ignore that to your own detriment. Each individual is going to do what is profitable to them, and riding the seduction trend as The Game has inevitably brings in lower quality providers seeking their piece of the market. All Neil's letter is saying is that he recognizes that…
/r/seduction12/12/10 02:10 AM
25

...so what if you go to the bar alone? or is it just expected that everyone has a wing?
/r/seduction25/10/10 11:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter