TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AndaliteBandit Archive

View 5 posts and 222 comments by AndaliteBandit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I've never heard of three doses of Benadryl being described as a party drug.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 08:32 PM
11

If it happens so often, then wouldn't it be trivial for you to link to a handful of said offending posts? That you willfully chose not to support your claim, despite how easy it would be if we are to believe you, doesn't exactly lend credibility to that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 07:11 PM
5

Ok, so how do you explain women initiating more than 2/3 of divorces? That same study concluded that there was no significant difference between the percentage of breakups initiated by women and men in non-marital relationships. Are you even familiar with it? You can deny evolution all you want... No one here is denying evolution. Nor does your belief in evolution lend any credence whatsoever to your wholly unsupported pseudoscience.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/17 03:32 AM
12

No, your worthless anecdotal data does not sufficiently supplement a study about fruit flies to the point that generalizations about human beings can be reasonably concluded. Your ill-contrived scientist roleplay is never going to fool anyone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/17 03:16 AM
11

What's a lot more important is that science has shown that unlike men, women lose their ability to pair bond the more sexual partners they have. There's nothing scientific whatsoever about extrapolating generalizations about human beings from a study about the mating habits of fruit flies.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/17 03:07 AM
–

Women are always taking Advils and tylenol for their PMS so they should know what they look like. Advil and Tylenol are just brand-name Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen, respectively. In addition to those coming in both gel capsule and tablet form, there are also a variety of other brands and generics, also often coming in multiple forms.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:49 PM
–

So do you buy the "will not fare well in prison" excuse? You think that's the reason a rich man convicted of raping a toddler was spared prison?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:48 PM
–

If the shoe was on the other foot, her boyfriend most probably would not have been given a pass. As she's from a very wealthy family, it's more likely that this is a class issue rather than a gender issue. If you're rich, you can apparently be spared prison for stabbing someone in this case, or raping a toddler in another. http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/justice/delaware-du-pont-rape-case/ He received an eight-year prison sentence in 2009 for raping his toddler daughter, but the sentencing order s…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:21 AM
–

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/21/5-facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/ft_17-02-15_crime_640px/ Violent crime in general has been on a decline since the early 1990s. One theory is that it's the result of removing lead in gasoline.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:24 PM
1

Indeed, and it was completely made up out of thin air. Please elaborate on the specific issues you take with that paper.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:08 PM
–

The source for that claim is a paper published by former US Surgeon General C. Everett Koop in 1992. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/397750 Before you assume statistics from 1992 and prior couldn't possibly be so drastically different from 2000-2014, according to the Bureau of Justice, the overall rate of intimate partner violence in the United States declined by 64% from 1994-2010, declining by more than 60% for both males and females. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbde…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:49 PM
–

I never made a complaint. I stated facts. I stated that the ex-boyfriend is responsible for his actions, and that a hitman is responsible for his or her own actions. I never stated that the person who hired the hitman or who "persuaded" a hitman through other means is innocent. Now are you done fighting with the strawman arguments? Take care.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:30 PM
–

But that doesn't mean she isn't also guilty of a separate crime. And that will have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The only evidence that the article offers is that she owns a book by someone once attacked with acid. Not exactly a smoking gun.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:21 PM
–

Yes, that hitman would still be responsible for his or her actions, regardless if they're BFF with their cilent.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:39 PM
–

Unless she persuaded him with threats of bodily harm, he is responsible for his actions.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:43 PM
0

No, i'm pointing out that as things stand the doctor will have to tell you that you need to take 24/72 hours. No, they are under no obligation to inform the patient of what the mandated minimum waiting period is. They are simply required to impose a minimum of 24-72 hours depending on the state. If your hypothetical doctor wanted to impose a waiting period of weeks at a time, there is nothing stopping him. If you change it to "the doctor should provide time for the patient to reflect on the info…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 11:02 PM
0

Because if the period of waiting is fixed in law and your doctor tries saying anything different you'll have the law backing you up. You're conflating a minimum mandatory waiting period with a maximum waiting period.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:35 PM
0

If it was possible to do it with one doctor then we'd probably have a mandatory waiting period. Now you're merely speculating. What is to prevent them? Nothing, including a mandatory minimum waiting period. How would that prevent a doctor from telling someone they have to wait weeks?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:16 PM
1

And what happens when two doctors have differing opinions? I'm sure that happens sometimes, how does that work out in Great Britain? How would a mandatory minimum waiting period resolve that? What do you do if your doctor decided that you wait for weeks? Are doctors doing that arbitrarily without a valid medical reason? If they're not, then what's the issue?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:00 PM
1

If a doctor thinks that there should be a waiting period for whatever reason, I respect their judgement over a legislator imposing a mandatory minimum waiting period.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:37 PM
1

But there again under the American medical system you'd be required to pay two doctors for an abortion. How is that relevant? Do you really believe there should be no kind of reflection before abortion? Maybe you're confusing me with someone else, because I've never made that argument.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:27 PM
1

It's required by law that two doctors sign off the abortion before it takes place. This dual control creates a natural waiting period. Which is not the same thing as having a minimum mandatory waiting period required by law.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:09 PM
1

It all comes down to the fact that you're voting for a moron to hold public office (maybe not you personally) Which brings us full circle to the original discussion. So why not leave it up to the discretion of the doctors themselves? There are many places such as Great Britain which have no waiting periods required by law for an abortion. How are they managing without such legislation?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:46 PM
1

When there are legislators who thought a woman could swallow a small camera for a doctor to conduct a remote gynecological exam, or that women can't get pregnant from rape, I should hope they didn't get those ideas from doctors. So you do believe that a legislator is more qualified to make that call over someone who's been to medical school?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 05:57 PM
1

Why is it so important to you as an issue then? Would you ask this same question to an intactivist who isn't circumcised? I wouldn't, but I suppose that's just me. You seem to think that there are no consequences for a decision, or that those consequences shouldn't be considered by the person making the decision. I have never made that argument. If a doctor thinks that there should be a waiting period for whatever reason, I respect their judgement over a legislator imposing a mandatory minimum w…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 03:40 PM
1

Because most procedures that can be done in a couple of hours are simple and will not require reversing. As simple as taking a pill and promptly being sent home? Because that's how an increasing number of abortions are performed these days, and even moreso outside of the US. It's how the majority of abortions are performed in England & Wales, the vast majority in Scotland and Sweden. This is a good idea. Maybe then transgender people seeking surgery won't have to wait years. No, they would still…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:06 PM
1

Why single out this procedure? There are a multitude of invasive, riskier medical procedures out there. So why not have legislators sit down and evaluate each one, determining how long of a mandatory waiting period should be legally enforced for each one? And many states have apparently gotten along just fine without finding the need to impose such mandatory waiting periods. If they're necessary, how are these states managing without them?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 12:13 AM
–

The doctor could make you wait six weeks if they wanted to Did that actually happen to women attempting to obtain an abortion before the mandatory waiting periods were enforced? Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:02 PM
–

Then it sounds like it never needed to be mandated by law.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:26 PM
1

A federal judge issued a temporary injunction against the Arkansas fetal heartbeat law in May 2013. In March 2014, it was struck down by Judge Susan Webber Wright, who described the law as unconstitutional. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/17/ark-heartbeat-abortion-law-blocked/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/15/arkansas-abortion-ban/6453807/
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:16 PM
–

The shrinking window of opportunity, unless you're an absolute moron, is a pretty large one. That depends on the state. While I was stationed in Arkansas, they passed a law banning abortion after 8 weeks gestation.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:57 PM
–

Thank you for providing an example. There isn't a shrinking window of opportunity to obtain a vasectomy in the first place, but I didn't know that waiting periods were imposed by law in other states.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:35 PM
–

That sounds more like an argument in favor of overturning Roe v Wade, rather than an argument for women's health.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:28 PM
–

Actually, pretty much all of them will have some kind of waiting period built in But not mandated by law. This is not to make access to this type of birth control harder, or more expensive. It's too be sure that the patient fully understands the implications of the procedure and is not making a rash decision. Perhaps the legislators behind these mandatory waiting periods genuinely had good intentions this time. However, you can see where that would be hard to believe when they are also behind bi…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:11 PM
6

The law treats prescriptions of the same drug for birth control and non-birth control very differently. If you're being given a drug for hormonal effects without the intent to prevent pregnancy, it's not considered "birth control." Can you link to the text of this law that differentiates between the intended purposes for a birth control prescription? Because this hasn't been my experience at all.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:06 PM
–

Don't compare someone's unwanted disorder to a quality of life choice a healthy person makes so that their body doesn't work as normal. Birth control is prescribed for a variety of unwanted disorders.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:39 PM
–

What other medical procedures require by law a 24-72 hour waiting period between consulting a doctor and having the procedure performed?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:35 PM
–

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5l3fki/every_brick_in_every_building_a_reminder_to_the/dbsuj7d/ Did feminists invent the internet or twitter? No they did not, it's all men, white men. The main drivers of science, technology and social progress has been white men sharing the fruits of their knowledge and paving the way for the rest of humanity, and what did they get in return? Hatred. They hate us. We're racists, we're bigots, we're oppressors, we're the cause of society's problems. I…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:58 PM
–

It's a very valid issue, so it's brought up rather frequently around here. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=draft&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=selective+service&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
/r/MensRights30/12/16 08:58 PM
–

You know what else dogs, among many other animals, do? Let their young fend for themselves almost as soon as they're weaned off of milk. Sometimes animals even eat their young when resources are scarce or when faced with a natural disaster. That's natural. You being coddled for 18 years isn't.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:10 PM
–

When men were not allowed to do something they wanted to do, they moved somewhere they could. Women not being allowed in history is a poor argument, it never stopped men. Men in the US aren't allowed to vote unless they sign up for the draft. By your logic, American men must never complain about that because they know they can just move to a country where that isn't the case if it bothers them that much.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 06:48 PM
–

Victims took qualudes and boom. Rape. That actually isn't the case in the instance he's being charged for. On page 8 of the affidavit of probable cause (page 11 of the scribd document), Cosby's statement to the police includes him admitting that he never told the accuser the true identity of the pills.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:44 AM
–

Merely not having the evidence to convict isn't evidence of a false accusation. In the second graphic, it categorizes those accusations as false or baseless. If they're all false, why not just say that? What do you suppose the graphic is suggesting is the difference between a false and a baseless accusation?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:05 AM
1

Then Baltimore should have done something about it. If Baltimore really is that much better at rooting out false accusations than all but four other cities in the country, then they need to prove it. Charge the accusers, convict the accusers. Ripping up the police report helps absolutely no one.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:41 PM
–

Assuming all unfounded accusations are false is no different than feminists assuming that every rape accusation that doesn't lead to a rape conviction means a rapist walked free. Posts like yours are what /u/kragshot was hoping didn't happen in this sub.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:34 PM
–

Where does this false equivalence that claims that we want accusations that are dismissed to result in the accuser being arrested come from. I got it from the thread title that lumped in all of the unfounded accusations in with the false accusations.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:16 PM
–

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2003-12-03/news/0312030211_1_audit-unfounded-internal-affairs Baltimore police underreported rapes to the FBI by more than 15 percent last year, according to an internal audit. The audit found that 33 rapes had been improperly ruled "unfounded" and should have been reported to the FBI, increasing the city's rape total last year from 178 to 211. The audit found that the majority of the 33 cases did not have enough information in reports to justify ruling them as "…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 05:21 PM
5

I honestly don't find that part to be too weird. Unwanted sexual advances from a guy (and from the account, he had likely been drinking) doesn't mean he's a creepy rapist unless he doesn't take no for an answer. While her trust in him might have been misplaced, it would be nice if more people these days shared her mindset about that.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:11 AM
1

Also, a "rape kit" is a misnomer, it is only a test to see if sexual fluids are present (as far as I'm aware) and since rape is a matter of consent, physical evidence is not a sufficient condition to proving rape occurred. While this wouldn't apply in these kinds of cases, in the case of forcible rape, the nurse who performed the rape kit can be called to testify about evidence of physical trauma that she observed and noted, and whether or not the injuries sustained are consistent with victims o…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 01:54 AM
–

I suggest you all actually read the arrest warrant, specifically the part in which Cosby admitted to the police that he did not tell the accuser what the pills were. Page 8 Cosby admitted that he did not tell the victim, on that night or anytime thereafter, the true identity of the pills.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 12:18 AM
–

When police initially asked who attacked her, she named the man who later confessed But the police decided to follow up on the dream ID instead, and against a court order disposed of the rape kit that could have identified the actual serial rapist.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 11:44 PM
3

I don't agree with deleting comments that go against the flow, but to be completely fair, no one in the thread about the guy being accused of molesting the kids he was babysitting considered that the kids could actually have been molested either.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:47 PM
–

And this is why rape kits need to be processed. Physical evidence that was recovered could have exonerated this man 28 years ago, pointing instead to the man who has confessed to raping her.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:59 PM
1

DNA from the 17-year-old was found on the outside and inside of his pants. His patrol car's GPS corroborated the accusations, showing that he did in fact make longer stops than usual when confronting these women, that he repeatedly visited them at their homes, and that he drove them to more secluded areas. His department records showed that he continuously searched for these women in the police database, checking to see if they filed police reports. This false accuser is being prosecuted, and th…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:05 PM
–

This is about how forward boys and men are perceived as rapists and creeps if a woman is not interested in them, but they are perceived as awesome, take-charge, assertive, and confident good men when she is interested in them. Honestly, this mindset is not exclusive to men or women. I don't know who your dream girl is, but I would be willing to wager that her behavior that you would find charming, cute, and sexy would be repulsive if that same attention was coming from Melissa McCarthy.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:14 PM
–

This article goes a bit more into it. He lived in the area where the crimes were committed. He was the same race, similar age, had a similar tattoo, and had a prior rape conviction. Everyone involved was probably positive that they had the right guy, and this is why we can't afford to leave it up to the discretion of the officer or prosecution to decide whether or not a rape kit (or three, in this case) is worth processing. We can't afford to be wrong.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:58 PM
–

possibly And that's why, because it would have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that three women who were raped conspired to wrongly convict an innocent man, at the expense of keeping the real serial rapist on the streets. That's why this sounds more like a case of a mistaken identity, rather than a false accusation. If you're looking for someone to hold accountable, whoever decided they weren't going to have the rape kits tested that would have exonerated this man might be more to blame.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:16 PM
0

It is rarely performed alone. This means that while it is commonly performed, it is commonly performed along with either a partial or complete clitoridectomy. Therefore, it's extremely misleading to draw a direct comparison between MGM and the common removal of the clitoral hood without disclosing that the common removal is commonly followed by the removal of the clitoris as well. MGM is barbaric, and it deserves awareness to be promoted, but not by by either ignorantly or intentionally attempti…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:55 AM
2

And THEY joke "men worry women will laugh at them, women worry men will kill them" Wasn't that Louis C.K.?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:36 AM
–

An upvoted comment from that thread-- The removal of the clitoral hood, a completely ILLEGAL and common form of female genital mutilation, is DIRECTLY BIOLOGICALLY COMPARABLE to the removal of the foreskin, a completely LEGAL and common form of male genital mutilation. Please do not post or upvote misinformation like this. This isn't the first poster I've seen doing it, and it's a disservice to the MRM. Type I is subdivided into Ia, removal of the clitoral hood (rarely performed alone),[n 7] and…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:24 AM
3

Really tall people have shorter lives? That seems to be the case, yes, and it applies to women as well. A study of about 1700 deceased men and women living in Ohio finds that shorter people live longer (Miller, 1991). Miller found that men and women lost about 0.5 years per cm of increased height. Several unrelated studies also find a 0.5 year per cm reduction in longevity (Samaras and Elrick, 1999). In addition, Miller also finds that men and women of the same height have about the same longevi…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:59 PM
–

It is interesting because the discrepancy is observed worldwide, across all cultures. I wonder if as working conditions become more dangerous in other countries, if pregnancy and childbirth similarly become more dangerous in those same countries.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:47 PM
–

There is, though it won't cause as large of a gap all on it's own. It's the size difference. For example, a male dog of a smaller breed is more likely to live longer than a female dog of a larger breed. Likewise, there is evidence that smaller humans tend to live longer than larger humans.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:32 PM
–

Agreed. If 50 men came forward and said the same woman falsely accused them of rape, I don't think we'd be as skeptical.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:01 PM
2

I don't know enough about affirmative action in Spain to make that call.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:54 PM
–

Your intentions are noble, but I don't think it would have the outcome you're hoping for. A radical feminist would just take it out of context and uphold this as an anecdotal example that affirmative action benefits everyone.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:39 PM
–

Wouldn't this be affirmative action tokenism though? Are we suddenly in favor of that? The job should go to the most qualified person, regardless of gender or race.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:03 PM
–

I think we can raise legitimate concerns without resorting to hysterical hyperbole. That makes us no better than those using the "1-in-5" statistic.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:00 PM
–

if a man in Saudi Arabia got off Scott free with sexually abusing little girls. Yeah, it's not as if it's completely legal to sell your nine-year-old daughter into marriage.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:28 PM
–

I'm sure you would think the same about a thread on TwoX about why you should never date a single dad.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:30 PM
–

Also it's worth noting that this woman decided herself to go off her depression medication - so even if she's having trouble controlling herself, it's still her own fault. I agree, I was just talking about in general. However, it is really scary how a change in brain chemistry can change you. When I was in junior high, I was prescribed Celexa for depression. It obliterated my impulse control. Within a few days of being on it, I went from a kid who'd never so much as had my name written on the bo…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 04:15 AM
–

Oh, it's just her hormones playing up To be completely fair, there is some truth to this. The effects an excess of hormones can have on a person's mental stability is nothing short of terrifying, and this isn't something exclusive to women. Roidrage isn't called rage for nothing.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:40 AM
38

Successful single parents deserve all of the praise they get. It's a full-time second job, plus overtime, always on call, no sick days.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:11 PM
1

They're also denied regardless of age or whether or not they already have children because Catholic hospitals insist that such a procedure is sinful.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 01:47 PM
1

It isn't really surprising given the gang rape that happened on campus there. Some guy talked three strangers into raping his passed out girlfriend, luckily they were stupid enough to film it and incriminate themselves.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 10:15 PM
–

No legal action could be brought against the men Jackie accused because they didn't exist. The story was a complete fabrication, including even the mere existance of the accused rapists.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:44 PM
1

That's the defense attorney's job. Let's just hope that if that's the best he or she's got, that it isn't enough to sway a jury.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:57 PM
–

She just told her boyfriend things, she didn't force him to kill himself; that was his choice. This really is a matter of free speech. Charles Manson never actually killed anyone. The ringleader of the Vanderbilt gang rape never raped the girl. Doesn't matter, you can be charged with criminal responsibility for someone else's actions if you facilitated them.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:53 PM
–

Can't design or build a building It's funny you mentioned that one, as architects also have a hard time finding a job, actually moreso than psychologists and sociologists.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:06 PM
2

This young man may have sealed his fate when he lied to the police. When it comes down to he said/she said, it doesn't look too good when he's documented as dishonest.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:19 AM
–

How can women have be privileged in this case if, "Men and women have exactly the same benefit from the site in exactly the same ratio," as you said?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:39 PM
–

https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/3cezlp/online_dating_in_one_picture/
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:34 AM
2

I have 1 bottle of shampoo And short hair, likely. Hair care is a little different when you're planning on keeping it instead of hacking it off in a few weeks. That's not necessarily excessive, it's just playing the long game. If you like girls with long hair, such is life. The last time my mother moved she needed 2 trucks, and a trailer for just her 76 pot plants. Did you mean potted plants, or..?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 11:46 PM
23

Did you skip over this? We both discussed how we were into knife play. I voiced that though I was into it I would never ever do it with someone I did not know or trust completely. They meet for the first time IRL, and he pulls out a knife on her. That is not what she said she wanted at all.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 03:32 AM
6

I'm betting that having to look him in the eye and tell him he has to go to prison for not being a mind-reader is something that you couldn't get 12 sane people to do. Call me crazy, but if you're that confident that the majority of people out there would agree with you, then why are you hiding behind a 6-hour-old throwaway account?
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:54 PM
–

But here in the real world, it still takes criminal intent to be considered guilty of a crime. Incorrect. It can change the type of crime you're charged with, for example, manslaughter instead of murder. In this case, in some states, it could change the degree of rape of which the accused is charged. Also, a judge can take the lack of intent into consideration during sentencing.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:17 PM
–

How recent is your experience? That is interesting information if it's current. My husband was medically retired last November. Where we were stationed, a lot of the fresh meat weren't planning on being lifers, they intended to do their time and use the opportunity to jump start their career without a mountain of debt. They might change their minds about that, but I can see why that was their motivation at least at first.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:06 PM
–

In my experience, a lot of male and female recruits in the United States are there for the perks, especially the education. That GI Bill starts to look pretty good when your peers are practically signing away their firstborn child to student loans.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 06:40 PM
6

Correct. While not all of today's feminists might be on board for that, historically many feminists and Jimmy Carter were before the Tumblrinas of today were even born. In 1980, Congress shot Jimmy Carter down when he urged them to include women in Selective Service. A group of attorneys, provided aid by ACLU Women’s Rights Project, challenged this ruling on the grounds of gender discrimination. However, the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the law as it stood. http://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/22/u…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:36 PM
0

Incorrect. After the second attempt at the Darby Phase, three female and two male students on May 29 were given the option of a Day One Recycle, which is a normal course procedure that's used when students struggle with one aspect of the course and excel at others, said officials at Fort Benning, Georgia. http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/careers/army/2015/06/19/ranger-school-women-third-try/28929569/
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:42 PM
1

Probably, like the lawyer for the Vanderbilt gang rapists. Hard to offer a good defense when your clients go and incriminate themselves.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:12 AM
–

You're right, it'd been a while since I'd read the article. It still stood out to be after all this time, as the argument was founded in such ignorance. Birth control simply doesn't work like that. Aside from the placebo days, it should be taken every day around the same time to be effective, and it's recommended to take it at night after the last meal of the day or before bedtime. Oral contraceptives aren't like condoms, you don't bring one just in case.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:01 AM
–

It honestly depends on the school. University of Kansas considers taking birth control as an indication that a student intends to have sex. The accused confessed to campus police, by the way. It's because of schools like that that we're in this mess now, where giving the impression that rape never happens on a college's campus is now less favorable than giving the impression that the college shows no mercy to accused rapists, at the expense of due process either way. The fact remains, colleges s…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:09 AM
1

How are they planning on proving it? This is India, where they're trying to bring back the only recently banned "finger test" for rape victims to (attempt to) determine if sexual activity took place.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:14 PM
4

When was this about the US? The London Marathon runner, Kiran Gandhi, is originally from India.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 05:08 AM
–

Those would be helpful, but when it says access to sanitary products are limited, they unfortunately probably mean all of them, not just tampons.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:42 AM
–

Such as these, right? While cloth strips have traditionally been used by Indian women who cannot afford sanitary napkins (70% of women in the survey said they could not afford them), the survey finds that unsanitised cloth, ashes and husk sand are used by 88% of women leading to more cases of urinary tract and other infections.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:35 AM
–

Am I the only one who thinks the phrase "divorce rape" is as ridiculous as "eye rape" or "emotional rape?"
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:45 AM
–

Unfortunately, in some countries, that's enough to put them out of reach for many girls. Lack of access to sanitary products in India causes 23% of girls to drop out of school when they begin menstruating. I don't think this free bleeding nonsense is the right way to go about raising awareness, but it is an issue in some parts of the world nonetheless.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:41 AM
–

"Witness testimony" is notoriously unreliable: Do you think the accused shouldn't be able to call on witnesses to testify in their favor either?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:15 AM
–

Passers-by saw "Cheyroux" partially-dressed and struggling with a woman on Caledonian Road in the early hours of 1 March, the court heard. He ran off, but was caught by witnesses and held until police arrived. Multiple witness testimonies. Are you sure you want that to be inadmissible as evidence? That would mean an alleged rapist couldn't call on witnesses to testify in their favor either.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:33 AM
3

That is one reason. Another is that they legitimately want to die, but they're afraid of pain, so they resort to methods they think will be painless. Apparently no one's told them that overdosing isn't going to cause them to just fall asleep and never wake up. Acute liver failure is excruciating, and the victim is usually conscious for it.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:35 PM
0

I never said it was guaranteed, was just sharing my personal experience.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:25 PM
–

You have to rack up multiple copyright violations before Youtube will permaban you. Are you sure those were his only videos, including unlisted videos, and that he owned all of the content used in them, including any music? If it's truly an error, he needs to file an appeal. I once had to, and the matter was quickly resolved.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 09:37 AM
0

Perhaps this isn't the case in your country, but in that man's state and country, self-defense includes self-defense by proxy. The defendant must have a reasonable belief that the third party is in a position where they would have the right of self-defense, which in certain circumstances, includes the use of deadly force. In Texas, sexual assault is such a circumstance.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:46 AM
–

the term "beating to death" is used when describing aggressors, not defenders. Unless a man did it. :) http://abcnews.go.com/US/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071 He easily made a case for self-defense by proxy. No jury in Texas was going to indict him.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:19 AM
–

Alright, you're right. Crimes often aren't identical carbon copies of one another, and in this instance, there were some differences, notably the age difference. To return to your original question again-- Do you honestly believe that there is any situation in which a mother would have been justified in beating her disabled child to death with a cricket bat? http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/noah-crooks-boy-13-killed-1868899 Would that mother have been justified in killing her 13-year-old …
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:34 AM
–

Did you read the news story I linked, or just the headline? A mother was actually sexually assaulted by her son. Is that not the allegation the mother made against her son in OP's story? Alexander McDonald, 27, also sexually assaulted Catherine McDonald (his mother), 57, at their home on 30 September 2014. And the question that I was replying to asked if there was any situation in which a mother killing her child with a bat would be justified.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:53 AM
–

Do you honestly believe that there is any situation in which a mother would have been justified in beating her disabled child to death with a cricket bat? http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-somerset-33253728 I think this mother had the right to defend herself, yes. Because she was unable to do so, she's dead.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 09:28 PM
1

Actually, it is possible. A possible complication from brain damage is a loss of impulse control, sometimes completely. After my father's motorcycle accident 14 years ago, he can't stop himself from making frivolous purchases or shortsighted decisions that he can't afford. What would be a passing thought for you or I-- "Hm, I'd like to have an RV/multiple motorcycles/third car loan" or "I don't like my job, I'd like to quit" --quickly became crippling debt that my parents will never be able to e…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:57 AM
–

and if they commit murder then they sure as hell should not be allowed to kill again. Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying to turn them loose on the street on their 18th birthday. I think they should be hospitalized and rehabilitated, if possible. I'd leave it up to doctors rather than a judge to decide if/when they're free to go.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:59 AM
–

So is this going to establish the precedent that if A tells/coerces/bribes B to do something illegal, then A is in some way responsible? I don't know about Indian law, but that's already a thing in the US. Charles Manson never killed anyone. In more recent months, the boyfriend in the Vanderbilt gang rape incident was found guilty of aggravated rape of an unconscious woman, even though he never actually raped anyone. He invited three men into his dorm room, told them to do it, passed out condoms…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:41 AM
1

And that might be why he's been charged. Once is one too many times. I'll need more details before judging the daughter. How young is she, and what's been done to her? Like the 13-year-old boy who's being charged with raping 8-year-old and 9-year-old girls, I think someone needs to be investigating the very likely possibility that he's been abused.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:29 AM
–

Cooper said Falls had what police are calling a “kill kit,” which included four sets of handcuffs, an ax, a machete, bulletproof vests, knives, a box cutter, a large container of bleach, and a large number of trash bags. That does make self-defense sound plausible.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:39 AM
–

Progress certainly has been made. Last year, India finally stopped subjecting alleged rape victims to a "finger" test. even if the medical tests say that the woman wasnt raped. Medical tests cannot prove that a woman wasn't raped. In fact, Indian doctors have been instructed to stop using the word on medical charts, as rape is a legal definition, not a medical diagnosis. An absence of tearing or bruising can be explained by a variety of factors, such as a lack of friction. Sometimes they can pro…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 01:59 AM
–

Routine MGM is equivalent to only the most horrific (and thankfully uncommon) forms of FGM. Incorrect, the "worst" form of FGM to which you're referring is actually infibulation, in which the clitoris and labia are removed, and the remaining flesh is sewn together, leaving only a tiny hole for urine and blood to pass through. The most common type of FGM is Type I. The most comparable form to MGM would be Type Ia, however this is rarely performed alone. Type I is subdivided into Ia, removal of th…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 07:04 PM
-2

Yes, it's used frequently, so much that it's even controversial.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 03:31 PM
–

An inmate will not care whether you're a 200 lb man or a 130 lb woman - they can and potentially will attack. Pepper spray does not care if you're a 200 lb inmate. The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:58 PM
1

TIL: People can't dye their hair.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:18 PM
-1

Age of consent in New York is 17. And if you don't consider statutory rape to be rape, then I guess you're one of the ones who would consider these three boys to be lucky.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:32 PM
2

It's an indication if she acts exactly like you would expect, in that she's outraged, afraid of her attacker, etc. Yes, I think it would be best for all if we all stop acting as if we "know" the correct or expected way for a trauma victim to react. Their reaction is not proof of the accused's guilt, nor is it proof that the accuser is a liar.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 04:28 PM
–

The comments that were evaluated were made toward the "male" and "female" voice manipulations, not toward friends.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:16 PM
–

The other factor is how do the researchers decide what is a negative statement? It's commonly observed that a statement applied to a male can be perceived as an insult when applied to a female. I don't know, but I wonder if the inverse is also true. The researchers found that the better that male players perform, the more likely they are to give positive comments to female players that they don't give to male players. Are they white knighting, just voicing disagreement with the trash talker, or …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:23 PM
–

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0131613#sec009 There is the actual study. For the examination of negative statements, there were two focal players in the female-voiced manipulation that made 10 more negative statements than the next highest individuals (greater than 5 standard deviations from the mean). As a result, we removed them from our analysis to ensure they did not skew our results towards significance. Focal players stated more negative statements in the …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:46 PM
–

Trash-talk is a time-honored tradition in many games, not just video games either. You try to psych-out your opponents in order to decrease their confidence so they are more likely to fumble & lose. The study only evaluated comments made toward teammates.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:26 PM
4

The judgement of what is abuse and sexist is purely subjective. The study actually only categorized the comments as positive, neutral, and negative. Now, where you and I may agree is that I don't think the shittalkers were necessarily misogynistic. They're going after whoever the outlier of the group is, which in this particular instance was a male player using a female voice. "She" wasn't being targeted for being female, she was being targeted for being different. I suspect the researchers woul…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:25 PM
3

Feminists tend to be against this, but I don't see a downside to the decriminalization of prostitution. It would be safer for the prostitutes if they didn't have to associate themselves with other criminals, if they could go to the police for crimes committed against them without the fear of being arrested themselves.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:25 PM
–

Maybe, but the baker that refused to bake a cake was actually sued because they posted a document containing the gay couple's private information on facebook to invite harassment.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:12 PM
–

They're for the Military Working Dogs.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:06 PM
–

Says the guy who linked to a blog, okay.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:08 PM
–

Did you even read your own link? Or did you just throw "sharia law testimony myth" at Google and paste the first link? It states that while not every country using aspects of Shara Law does, some countries do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_women%27s_testimony_in_Islam Countries where in some cases a woman's testimony is worth half of that of a man: Algeria (in criminal cases)[13] Bahrain (in Sharia courts)[14] Egypt (in family courts)[15] Iran (in most cases)[16] Iraq (in some cases)[1…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:52 PM
–

In some of these countries adopting aspects of Sharia Law, a woman's testimony is legally worth 1/2 of a man's. So in some instances, sure, perhaps the law does favor women. And in others, it perhaps favors men. In other words, it sounds like sometimes in these countries it's a disadvantaged shitfest for everyone, the shit just comes in different flavors. There are no winners.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:33 PM
3

You are probably very right about that. I imagine in these countries if 2 women were ever seen having sex they would have just as harsh of a punishment if not more so. It's probably one of those things that is not on the books, but plays out in real life to as darkly as expected. In some of these countries, male homosexuals are sometimes jailed or executed. Male and female homosexuals are sometimes murdered by their own families to restore the family's honor. Male and female homosexuals are also…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 10:22 PM
–

For more than 30 years, Lon Watts said he shared his life and his love with partner, Jim Heath. But that life came crashing down in 2011 after Watts says Heath's sister successfully forced the pair apart, evicted him from the house and has prohibited him from visiting Heath in his new nursing home. Despite having power of attorney over Heath, Franks, an organist and music leader at the local Methodist church, convinced the court to give her guardianship. Arguing that Watts was neglectful, she pu…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:05 PM
6

You are discussing a women who by her own admission did not expiereance and orgasm until her late 20's Not defending anything else about her, but this actually isn't that uncommon. It isn't as obvious how to pleasure some women, and it simply isn't talked about in some communities, particularly religious and/or conservative. It would almost be like as if many men were unable to orgasm without prostate stimulation, and to ask someone why they cannot orgasm would be admitting that they were trying…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:02 PM
4

Honestly, I don't think her being a feminist has anything to do with this. It's just a red flag that she's a cheater too. I've seen both men and women perform mental gymnastics to try and justify why they cheated. Their needs weren't being met, it's their partner's job to make them never want anyone else, blah blah blah. The truth is, they already consider the relationship to be over, but they still want to reap the benefits until they're ready to move on.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:42 PM
1

No, it isn't. Shit, all he would have to do is take the 16 year olds to another state and suddenly no rape. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3c1cth/predator_teacher_jennifer_fichter_gets_22_years So this wasn't rape then? Then what was it? Just some teenage boys who got lucky?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:02 PM
1

Age of consent in NY is 17, so if some of those girls were indeed 16, it is statutory rape. Is that what the scandal is about? No, but rape is rape.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:33 PM
–

Evidence as in some sort of independent testimony from someone who saw something or heard something at around the time of the alleged events. Like this guy? http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/bill-cosby-paid-women-ex-nbc-employee-article-1.2020464 Ex-NBC employee Frank Scotti claims Bill Cosby paid off women, invited young models to dressing room as he stood guard Scotti said Cosby also had an arrangement with a Manhattan modeling agency in which the owner would deliver young women …
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:57 PM
3

Both Caballero and Alvarez will now have to register as sex offenders. http://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article20191164.html
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:20 AM
5

In this case, I was referring to the complaint against Sweet Cakes by Melissa, in which an Oregon judge fined them $135,000 for telling a lesbian couple they didn't want to create a special wedding cake for them. Actually, the owner of that bakery posted a document on facebook containing the lesbian couple's private information to invite harassment.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:56 PM
0

Sounds like militant feminism downvoting for sure! So why are you starting a discussion when apparently what you're actually looking for is an echo chamber? Contamination can mean a hair from mom was recovered on the clothes when she was putting them in a bag. Any half-decent lawyer is going to seize on that and get their client acquitted. While it still doesn't explain how their client's DNA got in the kid's underwear, if that's the only hard evidence, there's still reasonable doubt thanks to t…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:50 PM
2

It can, yes. I don't know about affecting the baby directly, but there's been a study that showed stress during delivery can affect the baby's food.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:01 PM
–

Have you read the discussion? We've had some clickbait trash titles, so what you might be seeing are people upvoting from the title alone and people downvoting who actually read the link. I recall this one from a couple days ago, as an example.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:02 PM
–

Isn't a large part of Japan's problem also caused by overly-high expectations - being expected to get an amazing job in a country that has been economically struggling for decades is not good. Their society has no patience for late bloomers. Many parents begin preparing for their child's future in preschool. If you see a middle schooler who is acting like the world has ended, it might be because he didn't get into the right high school, which means he won't get into the right college and he's al…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:16 AM
–

There are certain advantages to getting married such as being able to make life-death medical decisions but that is still a very moot point. If you have been together for 10-15 years without marriage , chances are you've talked to the family and you would be able to talk it out if anything happened during a real life and death crisis. Odds are, the two of you are going to outlive your parents. That means there might not be any other immediate family members to make those decisions in your place.…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 01:22 AM
–

There was a study done by the BJS in 2008 I think it was in New York City that showed 50% of the children trafficked for the purpose of sexual exploitation were boys. 98% of sex trafficking is of women and girls (page 6), though it certainly is possible that the 2% of men and boys therefore end up getting concentrated into certain markets. This would be supported by a report done in the UK which showed 41% of trafficking victims were male, though this included those sold exclusively for labor. I…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 01:11 AM
1

That must be a really old podcast. In the past 100 years, over 40 women have been executed in the U.S, including 15 since 1976. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/women-and-death-penalty
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:26 PM
–

And still alive when she was swallowed, to be dumped in an acid bath. We saw it opening night, and kids in the audience were in tears. I think what set this death apart isn't that she was a woman, it's that it happened during a civilian crowd scene, so it could have happened to anyone.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:41 PM
1

Exactly. The men are there to see the ladies, the venue is doing this so it doesn't turn into a sausagefest instead.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:50 AM
–

How would that poster know that you're a man?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:01 PM
2

Look at India's gender ratio. For the girls who weren't aborted, Indian girls under the age of 5 are 75% more likely to die than boys. However, it isn't just the men, female family members are also often the culprits.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:18 PM
2

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/02/university-of-kansas-rape_n_5731668.html Yeah, it's Huffington Post, but they have screencaps of the documentation. This young man confessed to campus police, and he was punished with probation, counseling, a ban from university housing and a mandatory reflection paper. The university also accepted evidence that the accuser intended to have sexual intercourse that night because she took her birth control pill. It's because of universities like this that t…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:37 PM
1

AWALT. There you go. Just as ridiculous as every single time a woman has said all men are the same.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:21 PM
2

Not always in this subreddit. We just had that scenario, where a cop crashed his car with his daughter inside into his ex-wife's car, then opened fire on it. We had people portraying him as the victim because of the ongoing custody battle. It really paints us in a bad light sometimes.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:11 PM
2

I live 10 minutes from Steubenville. It was sad a lot around here while that case was being investigated. They're just boys being boys, she's just a slut trying to save face.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:57 PM
3

Agreed, just like you wouldn't cast a white woman as Allison Ng.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 02:43 AM
–

Well, as long as they don't outdo Jackson's attempts at thwarting it, who was completely against having a central bank and fought having one at every turn.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 02:31 AM
–

I don't see a reason for Hamilton to be taken off the $10, but Andrew Jackson was against having a central bank in the first place, so I doubt he appreciates being on the $20. Were they trying to insult him? Eleanor Roosevelt would be a great candidate.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 02:27 AM
2

It's possible to lose a hymen all sorts of ways. Some women are born without one, while others still have an intact hymen even after giving birth. The hymen is elastic and is designed to return to its original state after being stretched. It's torn sometimes due to inadequate lubrication and anxiety tensing the pelvic floor muscle, which nervous virgins are likely to experience. Despite what many people would like to believe, the truth is that there is no such thing as a credible virginity test.…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:14 AM
3

It is, it's because people look at texting while driving as just a mistake anyone could make. It wasn't that long ago, wasn't until the 1990s that drinking and driving stopped being treated as leniently, after in 1988 a man drinking and driving crashed into a school bus, killing 27 people and injuring 34 more.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:44 AM
–

It is, but that wasn't out of institutional sexism. A 21-year-old man killed three kids by texting while driving, and wasn't even charged at all.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:27 AM
1

It would be nice if we could all accept things that really should have been obvious-- that lower pay is a consequence of choosing children over a career, that once having a cunt for a boss doesn't mean women can't lead.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 10:43 PM
–

If men get paid more, it is unjust. If women get paid more, it is competence. You cannot have it both ways. Either inequality is unjust, or it isn't. Then there's nothing unjust about these women making more. Perhaps these women negotiated for better salaries, made better choices in life, and worked longer hours. We know most women don't, but that's why most women aren't CEOs.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 10:06 PM
0

I don't find it sexist, considering there are straight, gay, and "gay-for-pay" male prostitutes. edit-- alright guys, downvote factual information when it doesn't suit your sexist double standard narrative. It's a fact that men are victims of human trafficking just as much as women are, though they will find substantially less support at every turn than female survivors, apparently even from MRAs. Though of course not all prostitutes are slaves, many are, which is why these laws don't criminaliz…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:49 PM
–

“There’s one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I’m not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts. Hurry up and die, bitch, so I can bust this nut all over your corpse from atop your shallow grave. I used to be a nice guy but then you became a slut. Guess it’s not your fault you liked your daddy raped you. So hurry up and die, bitch, so I can forgive you.” "Enough elementary schools in a ten mile radius to initiate the most heinous …
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:44 PM
1

“There’s one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I’m not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts. Hurry up and die, bitch, so I can bust this nut all over your corpse from atop your shallow grave. I used to be a nice guy but then you became a slut. Guess it’s not your fault you liked your daddy raped you. So hurry up and die, bitch, so I can forgive you.” "Enough elementary schools in a ten mile radius to initiate the most heinous …
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:40 PM
1

I can't help but suspect we would be up in arms if a female politician or professor refused to close the door only when meeting with a male staffer or student, so she could call for help in case he attempts to force himself on her.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:53 AM
2

Not here. And we should still be outraged. Just like how circumcision isn't going to be of a concern to many of our male European allies, just like how most of us will never be subjected to junk science "finger tests" to test for homosexuality, virginity, or rape. It still matters.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:19 AM
–

Both men and women face widespread misconceptions about how rape victims are supposed to behave. Lt. Adam Lamboy, commander of the Manhattan Special Victims Squad Does a woman who claims to have been raped ask for a female detective? That’s taken as a sign of possible deception. “I am betting nine out of 10 times, when a woman asks for a female detective the story is going to be untrue,” says Lamboy. The operative theory is that women who are lying think female cops will be more receptive to the…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:45 AM
4

It does in pregnant mice, it might in pregnant women. “It is important to note that the study was carried out in animal models,” Ghaem-Maghami told the BBC, and for ethical reasons “it is not possible to translate the findings into a recommendation regarding what would be safe or unsafe in pregnant women.”
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:40 AM
5

but I was checking my comments for some links I remembered posting You're posting links in your comments. You could be getting moderated, but it's also very possible that you're getting caught in the spam filter. A lot of websites have to have a filter to stop the my grandmother's brother's dog makes thousands of dollars from home and you can too with this one weird trick spam.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:12 AM
6

The husband probably took it personally when she voiced against circumcising their son-- oh, so she doesn't like my dick, does she?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:06 AM
5

Canada is very lenient on crimes by women, against women, and just crime in general. http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/01/29/quebec-woman-suing-cop-who-left-her-locked-in-back-of-police-truck-with-man-who-ended-up-raping-her/ http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/01/native-american-woman-handcuffed-in-police-cruiser/ A 17-year-old girl was raped after being locked in a police cruiser with a 24-year-old man who already had four sexual assault convictions. He received 39 months for the fifth. He's ba…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:10 PM
4

They aren't merely Christians, they're of the Quiverfull movement. The Duggars do not allow anything more than a sidehug before marriage. And you find nothing wrong with treating teenagers kissing before they're married and a teenager molesting a four-year-old as acts that are equally as bad and can be forgiven with equal effort?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:12 AM
2

While we're on the topic of double standards, how would this family have reacted if one of the teenage girls had fooled around with a boy her own age? Remember that, to this family, fooling around consists of anything more than a sidehug. Everything else must be saved for marriage, even hugs and kisses. Unless you're a teenage boy who molests his four year old sister in her sleep. Then you can just ask God for forgiveness, and have the arrogance to think you can declare that he's forgiven you.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 04:27 AM
2

They are basically denying that Sansa chose to put herself in that position because of her own designs. She has essentially sold herself into sex slavery to further her goals. It falls somewhere into a gray area between prostitution and rape. It isn't desired, but she endures it. She's a victim, a doormat. As usual. Events just happen to her. Let's draw a parallel to an actual men's rights issue. Men are much more likely to die from work-related accidents than women. As men are pressured by soci…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:25 AM
1

Last but not least that they had a feminist come in and fuck with the story, if they wanted to strengthen the female leads they should have brought in other female actresses not a feminist. From what I've read about the making of the movie, she made no alterations to the script whatsoever. Her only role was coaching the actresses in how to act like victims of sex slavery, based on her work with sex slaves in other countries.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:26 PM
–

It was based on a recommended from the Institute of Medicine (an independent org of medical doctors) who estimated that with the huge influx of patients to the system, there simply would not be enough capacity to accommodate every single pregnancy. Could very well be true. A single preemie can cost over a million dollars. Say what you will about ACA, but before it was perfectly legal for certain insurance providers to enforce lifetime caps. In the case of a preemie, some ended up hitting their l…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:09 AM
6

There is definitely a double standard at play if female condoms and surgical services are covered for women but not men. All Planned Parenthoods do offer free condoms though. Male or female, you can just walk right in and take some. They will also refer you for free or low-cost vasectomies.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:48 AM
–

People can pay for small things like condoms and birth control pills on their own. There are many different kinds of oral contraceptives, not all of which offer a generic version for $9 a month. My birth control costs $90 a month. It was prescribed after I was left bleeding continuously for three weeks because of what an ultrasound revealed to be ruptured ovarian cysts. Not everyone would consider that to be a small thing.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:47 AM
2

Depends on what's considered normal for the mother. http://www.webmd.com/baby/tc/cesarean-section-what-to-expect-after-c-section Avoid strenuous activities, such as bicycle riding, jogging, weightlifting, and aerobic exercise, for 6 weeks or until your doctor says it is okay. Until your doctor says it is okay, do not lift anything heavier than your baby. Do not do sit-ups or other exercises that strain the belly muscles for 6 weeks or until your doctor says it is okay. You will probably need to …
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:30 AM
–

It can be for a cesarean. In the case of a cesarean, the father should get a lot more time than 10 days to help the mother recover, who cannot even lift the baby at first.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:36 AM
2

More information for those who haven't been following this case-- http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/32traz/mother_files_federal_suit_to_block_sons/
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:59 PM
1

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/02/08/amish-beard-cutting/1902757/
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:42 PM
1

There are members of MRM that believe the man has the godgiven right to be the head of the household, and that his wife should be subservient to him. There are some that believe marital rape isn't rape. Is that something we should all agree on?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:12 PM
1

No, they shouldn't. That's why if a couple of girls ganged up on a boy with long hair and shaved it off, I would hope they would be held accountable for their actions as well. It's a violation of bodily autonomy. Sure, if your hair will grow back in a month, it's easier to laugh it off. If you've spent years growing and diligently caring for your hair, that's not so easily replaced.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:06 PM
1

Then you are ignorant. The wage gap shows that men are pressurized to earn more than women. That is because as a society we say men collectively must pay for women. Does that mean the wage gap also shows that society pressures women into giving their husbands children, into prioritizing their children over their career? We should all start taking personal responsibility for our choices in life. Enough with the victim complex, boys and girls.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:48 PM
1

Feminist, okay. But what about being a lesbian makes her unreasonable?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:03 AM
3

Many victims of trafficking are men sold for labor and sex.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:45 AM
8

One of the largest problems female athletes, firefighters, police (beat cops), and soldiers is INJURIES. Sport medical professionals have known this for a long time, the Female body is not built to handle carrying around lots of weight while performing hard exercise. Women suffer significantly more joint injuries and their recovery time is higher. Nurses too.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:05 AM
1

Like financial rape?
/r/MensRights10/05/15 05:56 PM
6

According to The Miami Herald, the couple were noticed by a 3-year-old girl. 15 years Meanwhile, in California and Delaware, men who raped three-year-olds received 10 years and probation, respectively. In the first case, the judge concluded that the man "didn't mean to cause harm" (I'm sure his 3-year-old victim appreciates his benign intentions), while in the second it was decided the man "wouldn't fare well in prison."
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:02 AM
–

Many reasons, most of which aren't anything new. In short, a son carries on the bloodline, and a daughter carries on her husband's bloodline. A son's parents are typically cared for by their son and daughter-in-law. This caused many families to consider a son to be a pension and a daughter to be a waste, which influenced a surge in sex-selective abortion and female infanticide when the one-child policy was enacted.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:12 AM
2

This is an expected consequence. For decades, daughters were considered to be a greater financial burden, leading families to favor having a son. But now that those sons have grown up, it's harder for them to marry thanks to the shortage of girls.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:37 PM
12

To be completely fair, if their society actually did value men and women equally, then their men wouldn't outnumber their women as much.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:11 PM
2

You're absolutely right, both men and women should probably avoid drunken casual sex. It comes with huge risks for both sides.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:10 PM
2

They must be better negotiators. /s
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:21 PM
2

Vanderbilt and Stanford did, yes. SUU also got a lot of coverage when it was originally reported that the rapist would be allowed to serve his jail sentence on the weekend. There's also understandably a lot of outrage about how a rapist can confess to the police, but then be sentenced to 180 days in jail. I guess the privilege normally reserved for female teachers also applies to athletes. As I said, those are just from the most recent months. I would have to go back 9 years to list all of the h…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:37 PM
–

In the last few months, there was Vanderbilt, University of Utah, Southern Utah University, and that Stanford swimmer that got caught in the act. If we go back a few months further, there was also the guy who confessed to campus police.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:11 AM
2

Wasn't just men, there are a lot of horrible instances, especially from those decades, of human experimentation on men, women, pregnant women, newborns, mentally disabled children, and even entire cities, typically without consent. In 1939, at the Iowa Soldiers' Orphans' Home in Davenport, Iowa, twenty-two children were the subjects of the so-called "monster" experiment. This experiment attempted to use psychological abuse to induce stuttering in children who spoke normally. The experiment was d…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:01 AM
2

What if we reverse the genders? Should a woman be allowed to keep a man's frozen sperm against his wishes? I would be against that as well.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:10 PM
–

Guess you never heard of the Du Pont heir who raped his three-year-old daughter, but was spared a prison sentence because he 'wouldn't fare well in prison.'
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:08 AM
–

Unlike adult offenders, their names won’t be included on publicly accessible websites, and they can request to have the sex offender classification removed later based on their history of rehabilitation. Looks like in this case, the girls were shown leniency because they plead guilty to lesser charges. It's the same bullshit that let Darren Sharper get away with nine years for pleading guilty to drugging and raping nine women.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 02:20 AM
2

Yeah, we know that he plead guilty to drugging and raping nine women. What more do you want?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 02:10 AM
0

He agreed to this as part of his plea deal. If he prefers, he could spend those years in prison instead.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:10 PM
-4

It's still more than the Steubenville rapists got.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:08 PM
2

No shit, most women in the Western world aren't choosing between being raped and being raped AND beaten to a pulp. That's why wife was in quotation marks.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:27 PM
2

It certainly doesn't apply to society as a whole, but what they say might be correct when applied to a prison setting, where some men assume the role of being a "wife," submitting to the role of sex slavery in exchange for favorable treatment and protection.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:13 PM
2

You have to wonder though, if you asked the participants of the study how seriously they would take female-on-male rape, what would their answers be? The perpetual belief that male victims of rape are lucky is so widespread, it's very possible that some men don't even acknowledge that their fantasy of a beautiful woman being the aggressor, of not giving him a choice in the matter, is technically a simulated rape fantasy.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:07 PM
4

Aren't women more likely to fantasize about being raped than men? Yes and no. What many women fantasize about is a man being the aggressor, about not taking no for an answer-- but, the women want it. They want to simulate not having control of the situation, but they don't want to be forced to do anything they don't actually want to do. In other words, it's usually just a typical dominance/submission fantasy, not actual rape. Many men fantasize about the exact same thing, about being "taken by s…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 06:54 PM
–

Usually when people speak, it's to some form of audience. I can see why you'd be used to being ignored though.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:16 PM
–

Why should we listen to you? What do you do that deserves respect?
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:04 PM
–

All professions involve selling your body, just in different ways. What do you do? Why should we listen to you?
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:58 PM
2

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-12-22/features/9612220045_1_pay-child-support-child-support-behalf From 1996. Might want to fetch a bucket before reading, as the entire article is nauseating. '"Our point of view is that the newborn is the victim in these matters," said Carol Ann White, a lawyer who heads the attorney general's child-support-enforcement unit. "No matter what the circumstances of their conception, babies deserve to have two parents.' '"And this was a consensual relationshi…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:14 PM
2

While the definition does need to be broadened to include envelopment, penetration usually also applies to foreign objects.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:07 PM
–

Yes, while the government tries to put the interests of the kids first, sometimes it's far too much at the expense of a parent. Similarly, if a male rapist impregnates his female victim, he can sue for visitation rights or even custody in 31 states. http://www.thewire.com/national/2012/08/31-states-grant-rapists-custody-and-visitation-rights/56118/
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:58 PM
1

Daily Fail, but MTA ads actually do also address women's bags and primping. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2910783/Cheeky-adverts-MTA-tell-New-York-City-commuters-NOT-subways.html
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:08 PM
–

Claiming most rape allegations are false is as hysterical as claiming 1 in 5 women are raped. Don't be like them.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:27 AM
1

An exception must also be made for unviable fetuses. There are many fetal abnormalities that simply cannot be detected until the routine ultrasound scheduled at around 18-20 weeks gestation. http://www.babycentre.co.uk/a557390/anomaly-scan-20-weeks
/r/MensRights22/01/15 09:22 PM
1

Do you really want to be the subreddit that complains terrorists should have killed more people to be fair?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:32 PM
–

Wasn't able to find a lot of details on this case, but I remember this one-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Nixzmary_Brown The father got 29 years for abusing and murdering his daughter. The mother, while she didn't abuse the child, got 43 years for knowing about the abuse and not stopping it. With these boys not even knowing how to dress or eat, it was probably the mother who was most responsible for their neglect. If we apply the same logic, like Nixzmary's mother, the father had a res…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter