TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AndyAndrophile Archive

View 92 posts and 485 comments by AndyAndrophile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2013

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights13/06/16 04:41 AM
1121

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:19 PM
665

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:45 AM
572

DiscriminationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:56 PM
516

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:13 AM
418

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:09 AM
345

DiscriminationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:41 AM
294

False AccusationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:53 PM
291

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:47 AM
281

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:15 PM
279

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:33 PM
266

NewsAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:23 PM
250

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:52 AM
238

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:33 PM
219

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:12 AM
217

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:40 AM
213

DiscriminationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:58 PM
208

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:02 AM
189

Social IssuesAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:27 AM
179

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights09/11/13 01:25 AM
170

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:07 AM
156

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:15 AM
153

FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:07 PM
148

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:33 PM
142

OutrageAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:51 PM
134

Social IssuesAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights04/11/15 09:45 AM
122

GeneralAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights13/03/16 08:48 AM
117

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:10 PM
113

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:52 AM
109

Edu./Occu.AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:00 PM
101

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:47 PM
99

Social IssuesAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:00 PM
97

DiscriminationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:10 AM
89

FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights04/07/15 10:30 PM
87

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:36 PM
80

GeneralAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:38 PM
79

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:12 PM
79

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:30 AM
64

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:33 AM
61

DiscriminationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:10 AM
60

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:21 AM
57

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:49 PM
48

Blogs/VideoAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:23 AM
48

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights22/10/12 06:07 AM
46

Legal RightsAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights23/12/15 12:19 AM
44

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:01 PM
43

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:19 AM
41

re: FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:58 AM
40

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:47 AM
38

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:35 PM
37

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:40 PM
36

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:51 AM
36

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:26 AM
33

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:18 PM
30

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:37 AM
30

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:53 AM
30

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:14 AM
29

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:21 AM
29

FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:16 AM
26

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:17 PM
26

re: FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:49 PM
26

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:22 AM
24

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:34 PM
23

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:10 AM
22

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights01/01/13 10:29 PM
20

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:04 PM
19

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:55 AM
18

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:58 AM
18

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:39 PM
17

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:21 PM
16

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:28 PM
16

FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:04 PM
16

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:58 AM
13

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:04 AM
12

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:11 AM
12

FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:53 PM
11

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:23 PM
10

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:38 PM
10

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:11 PM
9

Social IssuesAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:32 PM
6

DiscussionAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:41 AM
6

DiscriminationAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:47 PM
6

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:15 PM
6

FeminismAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:35 PM
4

Cross postAndyAndrophile/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:37 PM
4

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:12 AM
2

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:19 PM
0

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:31 PM
0

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:29 AM
0

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:21 PM
0

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:20 AM
0

AndyAndrophile/r/MensRights18/01/13 04:30 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Meanwile.... Shit like this is nothing new, it's why I started becoming skeptical of and then ultimately rejected feminism as an ideology about a decade ago. What's disturbing is that now this toxic misandric insanity is the mainstream opinion. It's the default position of national news outlets like NBC which publish it front and center on their home pages, and thoroughly saturated in the halls of places like Stanford University where this retard teaches. THAT is what's really so disturbing abou…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:45 PM
1

Edited to comply with rules. Please restore.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:24 PM
6

I assumed it is shadowbanned because while I can see the comments perfectly well, no one else can. It seems a very manipulative and deceptive technique of censorship.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:51 PM
14

Is there any actual recourse on this site when censorious ideologue "moderators" behave in this manner?
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:41 PM
24

Well kids, this is what we call being LITERALLY. BLOWN. THE. FUCK. OUT. The weird thing is, halfway through reading it I scrolled back up to see who wrote it while thinking to myself "huh, this sounds like gww...oh, well I guess not". lol
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:12 AM
33

And the systematic dismantlement of all male spaces continues to accelerate - even for young boys now - while of course the girl scouts remains open only to girls. I sincerely hope the blowback from scout leaders and parents is so great that it forces them to reconsider and ultimately renege on this decision; but given the general zeitgeist of misandry and obliviousness to the intrinsic developmental value of male only activities for boys which both now seem to be in vogue throughout Western soc…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:42 PM
-2

He accompanied his photo with the message, "Do u like it babe? It's for you". Oh god, the horror of it all! Someone fetch my smelling salts! I take it all back, thank god this ghoulish monster is behind bars!
/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:51 AM
-2

Who cares what his priors are. They aren't relevant to the case being tried. A 17 year old sent a dick pic to a 22 year old and HE's going to jail. There is no other information necessary to know that is fucking insane.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:14 AM
19

Some patriarchy. This is one of the most egregious and disgusting cases of its kind that I have seen in years. Punishing young men (in the eyes of the law a child, even) as adults for victimless "crimes" of normal male sexuality in which the court apparently expects us to believe the perpetrator is his own victim. A court decision that would be of course utterly inconceivable if the genders were reversed in the case. Vile misandric insanity.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 03:11 PM
7

I find everything about this story highly implausible. The alleged victim is a self-described leftist feminist. It seems vastly more likely to me that he has simply internalized the victimhood olympics worldview of his peers and realized he could get attention / sympathy for his cause by claiming he was raped, rather than a knife wielding psycho jumping out of an alley to rape him (a rather large man of imposing stature) for his political beliefs.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 03:03 PM
14

It's legit hilarious that you just chastised someone for using a biased source and then used fucking everydayfeminism.com for your information about how horrible 30something women have it in life. top kek
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:54 AM
3

Dem sweet sweet victim points doe, gotta catch em all!
/r/MensRights04/09/17 09:06 PM
12

Is this what this sub is now? Going full thought-police reverse hysterical femistazi about a fucking lame harmless joke? k
/r/MensRights04/09/17 07:12 PM
16

turned that shit off ages ago https://www.howtogeek.com/243263/how-to-disable-ads-on-your-windows-10-lock-screen/
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:39 PM
1

free vagina owner's money.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:42 PM
16

"The sessions will cover a wide range of topics including male privilege, masculinity and the language of dominance, sexuality and gender diversity as well as intersectional feminism. ... “[The curriculum is about] questioning how you can be accountable to feminism, to the women in your life and to the larger community,” Bhowmik said. Smith noted that he hopes the program will help participants undergo a process of “deconstruction and reconstruction.”" I don't think I could possibly come up with…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:05 PM
2

I know, I was disappointed by that. I need to try harder.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 12:22 AM
1

Wow, that should be it's own post!
/r/MensRights15/06/16 03:48 PM
2

http://www.debunker.com/texts/ruleofthumb.html I urge you to watch the whole thing if you can stomach it. It's filled to the brim with every insane feminist myth and fear mongering victim culture fairy tale imaginable. This man is clearly far beyond delusional and into feminist hysterical senility territory at this point. The beginning especially, he sounds completely fucking unhinged.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:39 PM
37

Well as you know, when men are murdered it is always women who are the primary victims. The dead male bodies are of course merely incidental proxies for female suffering. how many women were among the victims? This is something that annoys me very much about the all the coverage and commentary and even the presidential statement on this horrific attack. No, this wasn't an attack on the 'LGBTQIAARMNOPXYZ community'. This was an attack on GAY MEN. 90+% of the victims of this attack are MEN. Imagin…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:02 PM
4

5spooky
/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:19 PM
13

can't archive.is this because of formatting so make sure adblock is on, obviously.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:19 PM
1

copy your comment, gonna delete and resubmit in a minute with fixed link https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4nc4sp/boston_globe_stanford_rapist_is_a_product_of/
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:18 PM
1

can't archive.is this because of formatting so make sure adblock is on, obviously.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:16 PM
2

Actually, that wouldn't negatively impact anybody unless they were taught it was wrong. A breathtakingly idiotic statement of there ever was one. Then again, you want Donald Trump to be the next president, so I suppose one shouldn't be too surprised.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 06:58 PM
1

This is really sad, he was very handsome and unlike a lot of such activists quite soft spoken and unusually eloquent and persuasively rational. How did you know he killed himself, did you know him personally?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:47 PM
1

I've read the full story. "Grooming" can mean essentially whatever the prosecution wants it to mean in these cases. In this case it seems to mean exchanged sexually charged text messages with.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 06:40 PM
10

This seems to be some sort of slime mold or bacterium that has been trained to simulate human speech on reddit. Fascinating. What a time to be alive.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:24 PM
9

even for a troll account this is lazy.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:52 PM
11

This is garbage and the photoshops are fucking beyond laughably bad. Stop whining like a victim obsessed feminist and fucking exercise if you want a better body.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:55 AM
1

This is a really good and important write-up. I've never heard of this organization before but they seem to be doing the same things as FIRE.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 05:52 PM
6

Are there any sources for the story not apparently written by a semiliterate 10 year old?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:13 PM
1

yes.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:25 AM
2

As others have already pointed out, rationalwiki is anything but and mainly run by deluded feminist ideologues from PZ Myers' personal harpy harem. The more fundamental principle you are looking for which subsumes the special case of the Russel teapot is Popperian falsifiability. See Karl Popper. Feminism is a totalizing theory which purports to explain virtually everything and is thereby unfalsifiable. Such worldviews which seek to explain everything without evidence usually explain almost noth…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:03 PM
7

You got exactly what you said you wanted Canada. A male demonizing gynocentric female supremacist cuck. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 08:42 PM
20

One wonders if the Star and the CBC (now essentially functioning as apparently little more than a propaganda wing of the Canadian government) will issue an apology for basically trying and convicting him within mere hours of the false accusations coming to light. Some historical "LISTEN AND BELIEVE" for context: https://beta.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/10/29/jian_ghomeshi_8_women_accuse_former_cbc_host_of_violence_sexual_abuse_or_harassment.html https://beta.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/11/…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:07 PM
30

The previous story about the female offender: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3252949/Schoolboy-seduced-disgraced-teaching-assistant-reveals-sex-50-times-told-pregnant.html
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:56 PM
11

Reading the article, it's good to see the bbc has finally given up all pretense of journalistic unbiasedness and pretty much gone full buzzfeed cancer at this point.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:42 PM
13

This despite the fact that aboriginal males experience a murder victimization rate 3x higher than aboriginal females. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/151125/dq151125a-eng.htm That sure is some evil patriarchy you've got there, Canada.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:14 AM
1

Yes, it's an idiotic law, you will additionally note that (thankfully) Kansas isn't "most places". I also find it hilarious and rather telling that they specifically felt the need, apropos of nothing, to reiterate the illegality of incest within this stupid law. lol. fuckin hicks.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:18 PM
1

The particular law in this case may not stipulate strict sentencing guidelines; lower court judges have A LOT of leeway in sentencing these things, which is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:48 PM
1

I'm not arguing the point. I'm arguing that the man in her position should be receiving the punishment she is receiving, rather than the reverse.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:42 PM
2

Sex with a student is NOT a crime under current law in most places and shouldn't be one de facto. A 28 year old high school teacher having sex with an 18 year old student or a 50 year old professor having a relationship with their 22 year old college student is an impropriety, an ethical lapse whose punishment (if any) should be civil, not criminal.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:39 PM
2

uhhh, those are already crimes
/r/MensRights16/02/16 04:44 PM
3

I am aware of this line of reasoning and disagree with it completely. Such ethical breaches are rightfully the domain of the employer to punish with eg. termination, not the courts.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:27 AM
10

I find this an entirely reasonable and appropriate punishment for the ages involved if the sexual encounters were not coerced or otherwise forcible. The problem here should be getting the other 50% of the population the same sentence for this crime, rather than increasing incarceration times for females.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:36 AM
2

That's what I was wondering. One of her favorite stories she tells is how she repeatedly sexually harassed Stephen Fry by exposing herself to him when he wasn't expecting. I wonder how THAT would play genders reversed. Actually no, I don't wonder.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 04:46 PM
1

That was certainly a dip into the rather more disturbing end of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 04:30 PM
1

I lost 7 iq points reading this.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:47 PM
3

titlequotegore
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:41 AM
3

Like that inscrutable Jesus, the patriarchy works in mysterious ways.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:10 AM
1

Superb. Feminist sex hysteria and sexist bigotry is now the default of what is taught to adolescents and young adults. The only people in society with IQs lower than self-proclaimed "safe sex activists" of the last generation are these new "consent consultants" that troll the college speaking circuit to regurgitate their vapid dogmas. Listening to this John Kalin kid speak for about 20 seconds makes it abundantly clear he's about as clever as a box of hair.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:59 AM
3

why do you hate women?!?
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:25 AM
8

"Sailor Grace"? Are you fucking kidding me? "Bristol’s rep David Martin slammed Meyer for seeking child support despite being a decorated member of the Marine Corps that has received the Congressional Medal of Honor." perhaps the relevance of the latter fact to the former can be explained to me here, because I'm not seeing it.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:16 AM
7

This 'sex don't real' phenomenon in feminism is fucking BEYOND hilarious. Listen to the whole interview, it's a riot.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:22 PM
2

Just like the mid-20th century and all those papers and 'expert consensus' that gay people have a much higher suicide rate because the problem is that they're so psychologically damaged and deviant that, well, what else would you expect? It's obviously not the society they live in that's at fault in any way, it's their own doing! Psychology is such a joke "science".
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:28 AM
0

lol, of course it's an Atheism + forum
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:22 AM
1

Quite ridiculous. Are vacation pictures with an ex husband or wife now the province of the state to decide ownership of because it's a "copyright issue"? Very absurd indeed.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:58 PM
9

I would love to see how the Bundesgerichtshof intends to go about enforcing this ruling. Perhaps sexually themed memories in the minds of men post-breakup are next up for them to legislate out of existence because the holder of such memories can be said to "have a certain 'manipulative power over his ex"?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 12:24 AM
1

I did see that.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:01 PM
1

It's also a claim which is more likely than not to be true.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:42 AM
0

mmmmmno, I assume this sort of thing involves deception whatever the source first, then if there's an uncut clip or the video is long enough, I will reassess that judgement in light of a fuller picture of the events.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:52 PM
1

Sorry Ami, gonna need more than 2 minutes of HEAVILY edited quick cut clips (none of which I note, actually contain a shot of a student agreeing to sign the petition after being directly told it's to repeal the 1st amendment) to get me to believe those signatures weren't deceptively obtained.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:43 AM
1

No, fuck you, verily.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 12:42 AM
45

Are these comments a fucking joke? This thread is a shitshow. People talking about this guy's "lifestyle" and urging everyone to consider that the abusive father is really the one hurting and whose feelings we need to consider here, still others below suggesting the father is somehow rightfully upset because he isn't going to get any grandchildren. Where the actual fuck am I here, r/truechristianparenting? Who gives a shit what the abusive parent is "feeling" in this situation! They beat up thei…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:33 PM
4

Fuck everything about this piece of shit comment and the laughably unlettered form it comes in.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:51 PM
6

called this shit a few days ago / last week when I replied to an unsolicited pm from a mod of that sub: http://i.imgur.com/kXSBUWy.png haha, hilaaaaarious!
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:04 AM
5

People actually thought this article was "good"?? Even leaving aside my admittedly biased and subjective views about the article's contemptible apologetics for domestic violence, this is a terribly written piece of garbage. It's a casuistic, mealymouthed, stream of (un)consciousness, incoherent babblefest that could've been written twice as well with nearly half the words.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:22 PM
12

It's so fucking creepy how these ideologues are so hell-bent on imposing their delusional obsessive androgyny fantasies on adolescent boys and girls. None of it is about actually wanting to help young people learn more or adapt to and meet daily challenges in their lives better; it's all about forcing their fashionably wacky "sex is a social construct" and 'genderfuck', etc. ideals on them. Dr Amy Godoy-Pressland qualifications: BA Hons French and Spanish, University of Leeds (2003-2007) MA Colo…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 10:24 AM
0

One would think, but no. Here's their charming founder being as non-bigoted and pro-equality as ever. But remember, feminism is definitely NOT about hating men, no way!
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:41 PM
56

to your back or your ass?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:49 AM
373

This was such an unbelievably oblivious thing for a self-proclaimed "anti-rape activist" to say I had to read it 3 times. I'm aware that nymag is one of the most rotten feminist cuntholes in the "journalistic" world for this kind of shit alongside infamous sites like Salon and Feministing, but this....this is simply beyond. It's superlatively idiotic, it's incredibly solipsistic, it bounces, it pounces with stupidity, it exceeds all bounds of imbecility and conceitedness that came before it. The…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:47 AM
6

He does a lot of anti-feminist videos. Quite good ones at that.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 09:49 AM
1

Oh ok, just wanted to be sure it wasn't some bs take down notice by npr.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:12 PM
1

what happened to your NPR interview?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:28 PM
4

Actually, given a number of recent relatively well controlled studies it could be argued that lifting is one of the best ways to get and stay physically fit. I'm so tired of this 'it must be the subconsciously nefarious objectification mind virus that's making men/women do x'. It's an unfalsifiable and useless victimhood cultivating narrative when feminists say it's what causes women to be anorexic and it's just as ridiculous and specious here.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:55 PM
9

What about this is "perfect" and what is the relevance to this sub?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:14 PM
9

"There is no ongoing feminist bias in BBC News" LLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:05 PM
842

The judge in this case, one Mr. Dennis Wiley, is an absolute piece of shit who is well known for handing down excessive sentences for petty crimes. Last year he was censured for misconduct after he had someone charged with contempt for mumbling “fuck this shit” while in the courthouse dealing with a traffic ticket. A court clerk overheard the woman and told the judge. He then made her spend 10 nights in jail for this heinous crime including Christmas, after she couldn't pay a $5,000 bond. Someon…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:18 PM
1

lol, what a pompous retard.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:29 AM
29

I don't want to give that shitty site any hits so I don't really know the specifics, but it does please me as a gay man to see this finally happening. They certainly have an uphill battle on their hands though, a lot of feminist dogma is unfortunately HEAVILY entrenched in the "gay community", god I hate that phrase. Their best bet is going to be to emphasize their stances on anti-infant circumcision, increased availability of domestic violence and suicide aversion resources, and child custody r…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:25 PM
1

Perhaps. I have seen truly bad science reporting from the BBC, but I still much prefer to get news from a source that at least pretends toward maintaining the kind of dispassionate, unbiased reporting attendant to high journalistic integrity. A lot of bias in media, the great majority I would argue, is simply a matter of what topics an outfit chooses to cover; eg. you are never going to see a truly critical story on the violent, anti-gay nature of Islam that gets it right on NPR, and you'll rare…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:23 PM
3

As a tabloid, they trade in sensationalism and hyperbole. Admittedly the BBC appears increasingly intent on sliding down this path as well in recent years, especially with respect to their lefty biases regarding feminism, but it's clearly still nowhere near as bad as a tabloid like the Mail.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:09 PM
5

"I feel like this question has some insincere, disingenuous undertones. This isn't a place to debate whether or not Scientology has merit, but rather to ask sincere questions about the specifics of Dianetic theory and/or how they apply to real life. If this question was sincere, then I apologize for the response you're getting. In the future, I would suggest being careful to phrase questions in a way that shows that you accept the teachings of L. Ron and his values. This community can be skeptic…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:33 PM
3

This is yet another sexist article the BBC is running under its "treading" headline. An article tacitly endorsing a sexist and racist tumblr blog run by Finnish feminist Saara Sarma. So is this topic actually trending, or is it something that the BBC merely wants to see go viral? If you visit the tumblr in question you can see it was started about a month ago, most of its posts have about 10 notes, its most popular post has 300 notes. The twitter account of the feminist running it has a few hund…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:23 AM
2

Err you are lumping together two very different groups there. Fine then a list restricted to false accusations and exonerations. you can constantly read about new cases while they remain extremely rare. It's sort of funny to me how desperate ideologically driven feminists are to preserve this "extremely rare" narrative of theirs. Or at least it would be, if it weren't ruining so many people's lives.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:47 PM
7

Are you SERIOUSLY claiming there is some kind of congruence with a feminist activist's exhortation to simply "listen and believe" the claims of an accuser in a sex crime case, and accepting the verdict of a jury who has been presented evidence at a criminal trial? I mean, are you fucking serious, because even for someone from SRS and againstmensrights that is some next level retard "logic".
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:51 AM
1

There is more information on the trial in other articles. http://www.henriettapost.com/article/20141209/NEWS/141209707
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:46 AM
1

Uhhh, not to be flip but....how about the cops? If he was assaulted and wants to pursue a prosecution, that's probably where you need to start.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:18 AM
1

Hi, are you the owner / editor of the COTWA website?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:11 AM
8

Confirmation bias of what precisely, a fucking suspicion? Do you even actually know what the logical fallacy confirmation bias really means, or are you simply regurgitating the phrase because you read it somewhere on the internet and think that vomiting it up in front of someone magically refutes any point they're making? Did I say somewhere in my post that actual rapes never occur? Did I claim that false accusations outnumber actual rapes? Did I say that rape is somehow not important because fa…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:32 AM
26

Is there any kind of database that compiles these acquittals and false accusations for reference? The constant refrain from feminists that "false accusations are so rare they aren't even worth talking about" needs something like that as a response, because I'm CONSTANTLY reading about new cases.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:56 PM
37

Incredibly vile. So much as suggest a little girl's genitals be poked in a simulacrum procedure of FGM to placate that barbaric assault's proponents and you will (rightly) touch off a firestorm of national outrage culminating in a swift rescindment and apology from the organization suggesting it. Force your spouse to agree to your demand to allow doctors to cut off a piece of your own nearly 5 year old son's penis and you get judges and a court system agreeing with you and forcing the child's mo…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:18 PM
24

This headline is inaccurate though. There's no push to end these women's incarceration (one or two extremist idiots on the internet don't count). No push, huh? Just a couple nutjobs on the internet? Does this Washington Post op-ed count? http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/ How about this Guardian article? http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/18/scottish-women-jail-offenders-crime-children Is a BBC article urgi…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:52 AM
27

I file this under "discrimination" because could you POSSIBLY ever imagine them organizing such a ridiculous farce garnering teary-eyed sympathy for these women's male counterparts? It's an idea so absurd it could make a cat laugh. Just more in the same vein as this proud new brand of bigotry.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:17 AM
174

Toxic femininity. But you'll never hear that phrase in a gender studies indoctrination camp classroom.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:59 PM
0

Women fake orgasms far too often in porn. Who gives a shit. They do things that it would be highly rare to find in a normal relationship, not because people are prudish but because they're painful or dangerous. And the male performers don't? While getting paid substantially less then the female ones I might add. It's called ACTING. but it's pretty fucked up to say that there's no problem with a 13 year old kid who doesn't know what sex is finding a video of a woman getting DP'd. No it isn't. Whe…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:48 PM
5

You can't be serious. Oh but I am! Watching an action movie is so far away from porn it hurts Like I said, citation needed. It's just fantasy and diversion. if a confused teenager googles porn right now, as i just did, one of the first 6 results is this[1] . Seems like pretty standard fare to me. I was watching way harder shit as a kid about 20 years ago. Are teenagers really that fragile these days? lol That is not normal sex, Yeah, it's called porn, as in fantasy, as in... not real life. Do yo…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:39 AM
8

Nobody in this post has really touched on it, but while porn in theory isn't a bad thing, the bizarrely over-sexualised and almost violent sex that a lot of porn involves could be very damaging for teens. You mean very damaging just like all those violent rap lyrics, viciously brutal Hollywood action movies, and awful blood filled fps video games the kids are into these days? yeah. citation needed.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:04 AM
0

wait, did that happen? I was aware of it and where it came from, but the BBC itself actually used it?
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:42 AM
15

This is always the most insidious and obnoxious part of these stories, the incessant pathologizing of male, especially heterosexual male, sexuality.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:20 PM
9

thingsthatdefinitely100%happened
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:17 PM
20

I particularly like how the headline ridiculously inverts their findings, saying that 1 in 10 children (the actual figure they claim is 9%) of twelve or thirteen years old are worried about being "addicted to porn", rather than saying the overwhelming majority, over 90%, of children AREN'T worried about it. A finding which I'm sure was in no way influenced by questioner bias from an organization that demonizes viewers of porn as "zombies" and which uses animations shown to kids to demonstrate "t…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:14 PM
6

More fear, more rape hysteria, more innuendo, more moral panic, more wildly inflated statistics, more rumor as fact, more witch hunts, more victimhood obsession, MORE accusations as convictions, MORE demonization of all males everywhere, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The left has lost its fucking mind.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:48 AM
18

Oh that is NOT true at all. Stop lying! It says right in the article the women were required to attend a Women’s Community Project for 20 whole days in one case. The paper snowflake building, animal play therapy sessions, and group therapy guided macaroni and glitter glued art projects these women will have to suffer through is going to be positively unspeakably tortuous and grueling. Their crimes are certainly NOT going unpunished.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:13 AM
-1

lol good reading comprehension, genius.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:10 AM
-5

misconduct
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:36 PM
-4

Who said prosecutors ever need follow those irksome law things?
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:06 PM
12

I'm pretty sure if someone made a public allegation of murder that resulted in a national mediagasm and police inquiry that consumed hundreds, possibly thousands, of hours of department investigation time which resulted in not a shred of evidence to substantiate that claim, that the DA just might manage to find something to charge them with.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:14 PM
51

No charges, of course, for the woman who made the false claim that set off a national pique of rape hysteria witch hunts that vilified hundreds of men, had their living spaces vandalized and earned them death threats, because "that could discourage other women in the future from coming forward" according to the police chief. And naturally, as he repeated 10+ times in the press conference, he "can't say something horrible didn't happen to her that night". Maybe she was abducted by aliens and take…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:49 PM
-1

It is well known. It's also false and dumb.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 02:51 PM
24

Lol "I'll take incredibly shit science for 500 Alex"
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:28 PM
1

Upworthy no.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:20 PM
-6

I support and respect what these women (and men) are doing, but men and women are not fundamentally equal. They never will be. Downvotes to the left.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:58 PM
3

I find it increasingly difficult to read anything by this publication anymore.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 10:47 PM
8

I can't see where the fuck else it could possibly have come from. It's such a specific thing, the similarity to "mansplaining", the fixation on only chastising men. The chances this shit wasn't proposed by some petty little middle manager that can't wait to browse the new pictures on some "move over bro" type tumblr on their lunch break has to be nearly zero.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:19 PM
125

Show me what rape hysteria looks like?! THIS IS WHAT RAPE HYSTERIA LOOKS LIKE!! I hope feminists are really really proud of themselves. All the Jezebel articles calling anyone who had the slightest doubt about this obviously bullshit story a "piece of shit", all the hysterical moral panic articles of Salon, MSNBC, and the New York Times calling all frats "rape culture infested bastions of toxic masculinity", all the usual disgusting demonization of men. The new satanic panics of the 21st century…
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:32 PM
1

It genuinely feels like the entirety of print, online, and video media is headed straight into the shitter at this point, and I am not someone usually prone to hyperbole and generalization.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:13 PM
2

That it's a terrible, backward, homicidal cult?
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:57 PM
3

I did read for myself. I took the top ranking countries directly from their lists. Start at page 63 in their pdf.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:24 AM
25

At first I thought this must be bullshit, so I read the 300 page pile of wank for myself. Nope. It's real. They're actually rewarding gender disparity in almost every category considered as long as it's in the "right" direction. So who comes out on top of their "gender equity" ranking for life expectancy? SYRIA, apparently the feminist utopia wonderland where because of a recent horrific war, men live to the wise old age of 55, but women (who as Ms. Clinton rightly taught us are the REAL victims…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:01 AM
2

I thought there was already one from some other organization too.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:13 PM
2

mmmno, it's definitely not me. he has a reddit account, I don't know what it is though. Just a big fan of his stuff.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:44 PM
3

I absolutely love this guy's stuff. Always thorough and intellectually rigorous with his content.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:40 PM
6

Oh this should be a laugh, especially if you remember the hysterical feminist bullshit that erupted the last time he dared even suggest something like male and female sexuality were different and that, shock, horror, women don't need sex as much as men.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:27 PM
10

DS has been circling the SJW drain a lot more in recent years. An appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast recently caused me to lose a LOT of respect I once had for him. "The exact same interactions but with a woman—the wheedling, the begging, the asking and asking until you get the answer you want—would exist in a context of male-on-female sexual violence. It's not an apples-to-apples comparison. I'm not saying that you should treat men the way that marine treated you or that the way the marine treat…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 11:30 AM
2

A.) This article reads like it was written by a fucking retarded kindergartener, I couldn't even force myself to get more than half way through that tired old feminist horseshit. B.) What the fuck are you talking about with this "inherent/cultural masculinity" crap? It's contrived "gender theory", "critical studies", "pstmodern semiotics" bullshit. It's just another way to demonize men and masculinity. Ever notice there's no talk about "cultural femininity" or "toxic femininity" in this feminist…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:50 AM
0

this is my favorite comment here. lol I sincerely hope Shermer 'fucks him right into the ground'.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:27 AM
1

It's a closed comment system. There's no facebook comments or Disqus comments, you have to have an NYT account. It's all the same retards.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:19 PM
-1

The kind of readership a publication cultivates says a lot about the institution itself.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 03:50 PM
8

ACTUAL
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:43 AM
2

If we should be so unlucky as to lose this woman for some reason, perish the thought, you could officially consider the men's right's movement if not outright finished, at least set back by a decade. The power of this woman's intellect and her ability to extemporaneously deploy thoroughly cogent, razor sharp logical retort to devastating effect in an argument is utterly matchless. I continue to be astonished at her intelligence and factual knowledge every. single. god. damn. time. I. hear. her. …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:35 AM
-1

Diggin' deep, eh? It's called hyperbole.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:15 AM
17

Quote comes at end of long rape hysteria mongering article with all the usual 1 in 4 bullshit. Truly astonishing, the absence of a crime being reported is now considered as evidence that the crime is even more rampant and insidious than usual. What town but one made of a coven of witches would never report or prosecute a witch?!! Insanity.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 09:00 AM
4

Hey genius, it's a direct link to the relevant part of the video.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:48 PM
4

WHY CAN'T YOU JUST TRUST WOMEN!!? Women never lie about things like this, it just doesn't happen!
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:44 PM
2

That's EXACTLY what it's like. They're whipping themselves up into the same hysterical moral panics as their polar opposite christian conservative ideologues.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:32 AM
3

Note how solemnly and completely uncritically the correspondent portrays the Rutgers drama portraying a man raping a female student, shocking and "infuriating" the audience, and how she largely regurgitates the views of feminists she's interviewing. How many rapes actually occurred at Rutgers recently? Well, fortunately universities are required to keep and report statistics on such things. According to the Clery report for the most recent year for which data exists, 2012, there were about 10 ra…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:14 PM
2

Why is it that without even looking at the byline anymore I can now predict with startling accuracy that this profoundly idiotic article and a thousand others like it were written by some newly hired little girl who graduated with an English degree (minor in gender studies no doubt) in the last two years? Remember when outlets like Time and Newsweek, if not bastions of intellectual scrupulousness, were at least committed to SOME semblance of unbiased, moderate, disinterested reporting? Am I gett…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:48 PM
8

Aside from being very irritatingly written as if by an escaped schizoid mental patient on a meth bender, this is pretty much just the usual cliched feminist party line bilge I'd expect to see in a partisan rag like the New Statesman. Still, Robert Webb though? That's a shame. Oh well, too bad.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:39 PM
1

?? this was ONE speech out of many others at TAM that had nothing to do with the subject. I see histrionic nutjobs like Watson et. al. as being increasingly marginalized in the skeptic movement as a whole. A majority of people in the biggest conferences have largely rejected her and PZ Myers' brand of insane feminism.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:30 PM
2

TAM isn't an atheist conference. It's a skeptic conference. Important distinction, and they are not really on board with the crazy feminist thing at all: http://thunderf00tdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/omg-a-smiley-face.jpg
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:20 PM
3

She never said men can't be raped or that women can't be sexual predators, and I STRONGLY doubt she'd agree with anyone claiming that. She was just presenting things with the unfortunately very mainstream cliched views of sexual relations. You have to start somewhere when beginning to present skeptical views of feminism to the public, and that starting point isn't going to be Karen Straughan for the overwhelming majority of people.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:16 PM
2

That was certainly the one point that I disagreed with the most and was equally disappointed to hear made. It sounded completely ridiculous as an analogy and I do wonder who was "wooo, yeaah!" ing it from the audience.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:11 PM
5

Becky Twatson burned those bridges pretty thoroughly. She called DJ Grothe a rape apologist and thinks Randi is a supershitlord now because TAM wouldn't adopt the ultraradfem Skepchick brand of conference rules that say introductory handshakes lasting longer than 4 seconds are sex assaults and unwanted hugs that you don't get consent for first are rape.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:00 PM
11

At least that's how I largely parsed it. You aren't going to agree with everything she says, for instance the speech largely accepts the mainstream view of men as potential perpetrators and women as potential victims, but in spite of that and a couple other relatively minor points, it is an excellent sober speech that exemplifies (true) skeptical rationality on a topic fraught with unproductive emotion. Also note that the video was put up by Michael Shermer, who was accused by the loathsome "fre…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:27 AM
8

I'm sorry to say it, but the great majority of circumcisions performed to "treat" phimosis are completely unnecessary. If you're reading this and you've been told you need this procedure please look a little further into the issue. Circumcision is overprescribed as an easy "fix" that makes the hospital a quick buck in a society where the procedure has been normalized and is not seen as a big deal. In fact a simple topical steroid can be used to treat the vast majority of cases.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:50 AM
11

Are women against feminism right or wrong? Coming up next let the ladies of the Today show decide for you! Can you guess what they'll say?!? What a joke. "These women wouldn't even be able to say they aren't feminists on Facebook WITHOUT FEMINISM!!" lol. Are you serious with this hilarious shit? My favorite is the constant "these women just don't UNDERSTAND what feminism is REEEALLY about; if they just had it explained to them that feminism is only really about equality then they'd ALL be femini…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:01 PM
9

This was a real eye-opener. Notice how unwilling she is to believe that the feminist narrative could possibly be wrong here. Telling him -after he slowly and carefully explains to her that the same organization that kidnapped girls is killing boys - "yes but isn't this really about sexism against women??". One wonders how it's possible to be sexually discriminated against if you're ALREADY DEAD.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:59 AM
38

Jesus fucking Christ. But remember, what we all need to solve problems like this and stop these things from happening again is MORE FEMINISM.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:05 PM
17

I'm a gay liberal atheist and I'm honestly very close to doing the same. I can hardly stand the show for more than a few minutes anymore before switching off. The zombie-like leftist party line Stewart takes on EVERYthing in the show and the obnoxious levels hypocritical partisan bullshit are just getting to be too much, to say nothing of the insufferably, nauseatingly sycophantic audience that claps and cheers like a pack of mentally retarded seals at every fucking point he makes in the intervi…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:27 AM
35

And part 2, wherein the falsely accused players (if they 'really are' innocent) are blamed for their own false accusation because they were drinking and hired strippers, so they should've known what would happen. The hypocrisy of victim blaming here is breathtaking. And where Jon manages to tun the conversation around to the real victims in the case, women on college campuses. Absolutely astonishing. http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/wj3h9h/exclusive---william-d--cohan-extended-interview-pt--2 B…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:34 AM
6

Even if true I don't find that to be a good enough reason to just vanish a post.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:29 PM
20

Not sure where else to post this, but does anyone know why this thread was just deleted from the front page? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/22mik1/talked_to_the_mods_of_rlgbt_this_was_their/
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:49 PM
1

scroll up. or, longer: http://www.reddit.com/r/2012Watch/comments/opuxr/rlgbt_mod_melt_down/
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:58 PM
13

Oh misandry definitely don't real. The 3 main original mods of the r/lgbt sub are: "rmuser" - Zinnia Jones on youtube and a member of Atheism Plus and PZ Myers' schizo lunatic "freethought blog" brigade "SilentAgony" - Zinnia Jones' wife; I'll leave it to the reader to decide how much of a disgusting hateful bigot she is and "RobotAnna" - an insane person They are ALL HEAVY SRSers. Normal, sane glbt readers left that sub years ago and went to /r/ainbow when the nutjob bigots took over, but that …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:30 PM
5

Why is this downvoted to -2? This is exactly what happened as anyone who remembers what occurred there a couple years ago can attest.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:18 PM
5

I'm afraid so. https://www.google.com/search?q=cuntini&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=rcs Also if I may say, as long as you're here, I think you did an absolutely fantastic job hitting major important points in that debate and I cannot wait for you to make it big in the public eye with your message. PLEAAAASE consider writing a book. It would be HUGE.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:40 AM
16

This is a person who had to take a 6 month hiatus from writing because someone at a dinner party she attended used the word "cuntini" to humorously describe shell pasta. Obsequious audience pandering and ingratiating herself to the "moderator" is hardly surprising.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:20 AM
5

Yes, the organization does seem to be Christian based, no I don't care, even as an atheist. I don't see very many other organizations focusing on helping boys like this even in places where rates of abuse and abandonment are far worse for boys (though abandonment appears to be overall somewhat worse for boys in most places).
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:30 PM
7

Lol, Rebecca Watson single handedly created thousands of new anti-feminists. It actually wasn't even so much her herself, but the disgusting immediate rolling over of large parts of the skeptic community that did it for me. eg. Phil Plait telling his readers that all men should be considered potential rapists and should therefore cross the street when a woman is approaching to make her more comfortable. Holy fuck that shit was an eye opener.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:42 PM
3

Please don't do that. Teenage feminists do that. which is why I'm satirizing it.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:40 PM
15

The extent to which feminists are willing to go to grossly delude themselves with perversely tortured illogical distortions in order to deny reality is truly astounding.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:21 AM
0

It took half the video to get to the fucking point but it's just the same old feminist garbage everyone's heard a thousand times before. It's in line with the other feminist party-line dogmatic crap they release. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8UU2SWdIBI
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:24 AM
3

How low does someone's IQ have to be exactly to think this isn't currently the fakest shit in the universe?
/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:11 AM
2

waaaaaah, why aren't there more women with millions of subs making science videos on youtube!? I don't get it, it must be teh sexizimz!! I know, I'll make a self-pitying obnoxious video whining about shitty troll comments on youtube! waaaaaaahhh. Do you know who my favorite science youtuber is? bionerd23. She's fantastic, her channel is totally fucking awesome. You know what she doesn't spend her time in videos doing? Making retarded self-obsessed solipsistic videos about fucking youtube troll c…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:33 AM
5

As an aside, take a look at the comments ticked as "editors picks": "Well it's hardly true to say "men contribute so little". They have an X chromosome too, after all. But, speaking as a man I would agree that the Y chromosome is generally more trouble than its worth. No great loss if we are able to get along without it. I've always said that whilst women are impossible men are actually useless." "It has been known for some time that the human male chromasome has been disintegrating to the point…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 07:38 PM
7

The BBC is an absolute shithole of science journalism. If the byline isn't Pallab Ghosh, I don't even fucking bother at all anymore. He's the only decent science reporter they've got holding that department up at this point. This particular article is exceptionally odious. First they start with the idiotic clickbait title on the science subpage of "Male Y chromosome 'could be scrapped'", a hyperbolic reinterpretation of the research here so grossly editorialized for maximum sensationalism it lit…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 07:29 PM
2

superultradoubleplustarded
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:19 PM
2

ultradoubleplustarded
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:32 AM
3

doubleplusretarded
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:52 AM
4

you are literally retarded.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:41 AM
0

I mean, when you see other people on the street talikng in coherent sentences and tying their own shoes etc., does it hurt inside to know you'll never have that kind of cognitive capability?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:30 PM
0

It must be very difficult being so intensely dim. Does at least the medulla of your brain still retain some function, or do you have to be reminded to breathe lest you forget and asphyxiate?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:18 PM
0

It's hard to believe there are people in existence as stupid as yourself. It's quite astonishing really.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:05 PM
2

sockpuppet much? christ, get a life.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:15 AM
2

Me restating your original premise fuckin' verbatim is "strawmanning". Right. I'm guessing your mother smoked a lot of crack during your gestation, yes? To anyone else actually reading this, this is an absolutely textbook perfect example of feminist "argument". 1-Make idiotic assumptions. 2-Shift goalposts and change underlying argument without admitting it after idiotic assumption is shown false and idiotic. 3-Accuse opponent of "strawmanning" or some other bullshit and obviously inapplicable l…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:58 AM
0

It was based on the assumption that you think men are stronger than women. Can you not even read your own fucking commentary? You seem extraordinarily dimwitted. You said: Are you claiming that physical strength is a trait that all men share and that women can't have? I said: No. All of your subsequent bullshit being based on your original assumption being true, a stupid assumption that was shown false, you proved exactly fuck all. Now please, fuck off.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:48 AM
0

Your whole premise was based on an idiotic false assumption. The end. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:36 AM
0

Your argument was shit and based on moronic assumptions. Not my fault you're the one who made it.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:26 AM
0

Are you claiming that physical strength is a trait that all men share and that women can't have? No. And if this is the general pathetic level of argument you're deploying I think it's pretty safe to say that I'm not missing much by skipping the rest of your comment, dumbass.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:11 AM
3

As an avid outdoorsman and skier (I ski without a trail map, only avoiding double-black diamonds and moguls), I've been in the company of many women who were stronger and more athletic than myself. Athletic, maybe, that's subjective and encompasses skill, etc., but stronger... I seriously doubt it unless you are a very unusually small male or ski with some massive >3 sigma women. Even comparisons between athletic women (not talking bodybuilders here, where things like doping obviously confound h…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:52 PM
3

Repugnant myosin privileged misogynistic shitlord.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:35 PM
46

This is a hilariously common delusion among feminists. The idea that women are on average physically weaker then men because of "patriarchy". And that if only we lived in a perfectly feminist utopic (read: sexless) society, all sexual dimorphic traits would vanish and women would be competing in the exact same powerlifting classes as men. No...seriously, that's what they actually think. Here's a feminist anthropology PhD on here regurgitating this hilarious nonsense. And an actual book (written …
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:59 PM
3

To the contrary, I think one of the main reasons there have been so many new interested individuals of late is the calm, levelheaded, sober analysis of commentators like GWW. I know that's the reason I'm here.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 07:55 AM
-7

I generally like the points TJ makes and find them to be fairly well argued, but the fucking screaming, Christ the screaming. I can't take it. I hate when people make that obnoxious shit their edgy 'internet persona'.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:03 PM
23

True empowerment of naming and shaming your oppressor and smashing the patriarchy! obviously.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:14 PM
1

a lot. I'm not arguing for its illegality, but, eugh.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:38 AM
18

Are these not the inevitable rotten fruits of this country's recent and increasingly common sinister collusions between the hyperconservative religious right that tears its hair out over even the remotest hint of the existence of teen sexuality on the one hand, and the leftist SJW "academic" feminists on the other who've largely succeeded in their campaigns of total demonization of masculinity to the point that a mere glimpse of an unclothed male teen body is now considered to be a crime so hein…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:49 AM
3

Are you planning on attending and filming what happens? Why not stir shit up by asking "inappropriate" questions and publicizing the response?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 12:39 AM
1

The single most important speech Hitchens ever made and an instant favorite when I first saw it years ago. I return to it again and again and again, and find it more prescient and correct than any other I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 12:10 AM
1

One wonders, are these the sorts of languid casuistic apologetics that pass for incisive argument at your other anti-MRA hangouts of "bluepill", etc.? The point Harding is obviously trying to make, if you can manage to actually read her blather honestly or at least read Sokal's (2008, p.120) clearly forthright synopsis of it, is that she in fact IS attempting to indict the project of scientific inquiry as a whole by presenting various scientists' explanatory metaphors as "rape metaphors". Rape m…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:28 PM
25

Brought to you by the same sparklingly intelligent mind that finally revealed to us the ugly truth that Newton's Principia Mathematica is a RAPE MANUAL.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:14 AM
14

I have to agree. Out of all the Abrahamic religions I loathe Islam the most. Even so, however. Why? A few traditionalist points that I don't endorse not withstanding, the first 4/5ths of the speech were clearly HEAVILY influenced by a viewing of GWW or reading of this sub. That in and of itself is heartening to know. With the exception of the religious ones at the end, most of the points she was making were the meat and potatoes of antifeminist MRA arguments, and spot on. Also, the fact that fem…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:16 PM
5

EXTREMELY close identification with basically everything here as another gay dude. Especially: They understand my desire, happiness, and personal growth when I embrace traditional masculinity, and spend time around men doing manly activities This was one of the major points that eventually lead to my finally completely rejecting feminism. Feminists do not merely hate men, they denigrate and demonize masculinity in general. This is absolutely disgusting to me. Along with a number of other miscell…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:36 AM
30

HEAVY SRS brigading throughout the thread, FYI to anyone wanting to wade in. Especially anywhere MR fails to be overtly denigrated: http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1maqj9/this_proves_sexism_exists_if_these_were_boys/cc7g4zu
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:36 PM
113

Why use satirical internet memes? There's plenty of examples of actual outright violence against men in media that's played as a joke which would support your argument more resolutely. http://www.genderads.com/page9/slideshow-59/
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:47 PM
32

Conversely, there ARE a select few women who absolutely can compete and succeed under the same criteria as men and should unquestionably be given the opportunity to do so. In addition to being a foolish gamble with people's lives, lowering the bar for physical fitness to allow more women to become firefighters is a gross insult to the women like the one in that video who worked their ass off and can and do make it in under the original rational criteria.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 09:01 PM
5

They aren't trying to appropriate it, per se. They are trying to turn it into an epithet like nigger, chink, or faggot, which is specifically used to demonize men, denigrate masculinity, and synonymize it with evil. Observe carefully.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:50 PM
6

It sounds very much like you don't know what this is or what exactly you are in for here. Judging from other comments here and the very low number of upvotes this post has, I don't think anyone else in the thread does either. What you will be viewing will be pure unadulterated misandry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw9SCll9DmI It does absolutely nothing less than demonize men, masculinity, and male sexuality, paint all men as potential rapists, all women as perpetual victims, and everyone und…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:39 PM
8

I seriously hope this level of derp is a joke.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:11 AM
22

Note that the woman, Kelly Heaphy, has had no charges pressed against her, the police are apparently uninterested in pursuing any charges or questioning for an obvious physical assault with injury, and virtually all media outlets, including, of course, the delightful feminist Jezebel network site Jalopnik, are outright mocking and laughing at the victim of the assault. But remember, we live in a "patriarchy" where women are oppressed nonstop in every aspect of their lives at all times and are fo…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:02 PM
3

It is. In a conference in Malmo, Le Sweden, home of goodthinkultrafeminism, natch.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:10 AM
2

I'd've used the word "all" if that were my intent. The one blonde clearly asked him to stop saying the word. It's obviously not the most important video in the world of some super-grave, ultra-serious issue. It's just a humorous minor incident involving some dumb sluts. :)
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:49 AM
2

A.) It's not me in the video. B.) Were the two people carrying the MRA Edmonton signs not men?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:29 AM
7

What were you misled to believe by my title, exactly?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:39 PM
59

Let it be known that use of the word "slut" by non-wombyn-identified persons is only authorized in circumstances where appropriate trigger warning notices have been posted in at least four minority spoken languages, and where sufficient levels of privilege checking and patriarchy, cissexism, thinism, heteroprivilige, transphobia, and ableism denunciation is continually occurring at requisite frequency. Thank you.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:46 PM
11

Even the recent site redesign makes it look like a tumblr blog. What a shame for what used to be such a reputable outfit that I trusted to maintain an appropriate dispassionate unbiased stance and journalistic integrity even on extremely controversial issues. I've watched on its website and listened on the radio over the past decade or so to it consistently slide further and further down the sleazy, trashy slope of angling itself as the anti-Fox News, as unashamed now of its heavily subjective b…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:30 PM
1

uhhh yeah, in a different font and color...for some reason. seems legit.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:42 AM
5

what am I supposed to be looking at? I mean besides a fake photoshopped mugshot, that is. http://www.homefacts.com/offender-detail/VA35074/Frederick-Jay-Horton.html
/r/MensRights17/08/13 09:57 AM
22

Skeptics Skepticism is an important philosophical standpoint because it is the only method by which one can truly validate one's own convictions, become aware of the cognitive biases which threaten to cloud them, legitimate the veracity of truth claims about reality and apprehend the reality of the physical world as it actually is using empirically derived and objectively verifiable solid evidence. It is the only worldview at whose very core lies doubt, and it is the requisite foundation upon wh…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:42 AM
5

"On February 17, Triplett called 9-1-1 to report she had been raped while looking for banana slugs along one of UCSC’s campus paths." Sigh. Classic, classic case of rape. When will the world learn that women simply never lie about rape. It's just too much of a hassle! "...Triplett is currently in counseling and is close to graduating UCSB with a bachelor’s degree in sociology." Shocking. I would've thought astrophysics, or computational biochemistry, surely! lol. I don't know what's more stunnin…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:28 PM
1

There are absolutely no ends to which the Kremlin Russia Today will go to construct a deranged, Alex Jonesified, paranoid schizophrenic, conspiracy saturated view of the US. The depths of their craven cynicism are nearly boundless, and exceeded in measure only by the breathtaking stupidity of the gaggle of delusional idiots that they use as commentators like Barr herself.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 11:55 PM
2

l2logicalfallacydefinition, Einstein.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 06:56 AM
1

Anything on To say everything written on a major news website like Huntington post is garbage is taking it too far. No, it really isn't. The Huffington post is a trashy, clickbait riddled, starfucker tabloid. It is as safe to thoroughly ignore as supermarket checkout rags like the Weekly World News.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:38 PM
1

Ignoring the entire opposition certainly isn't enlightened. Ignoring the incredibly vapid duplicitous subset of the opposition so dogmatically and reactionarily brain dead its acolytes need to remind themselves to breathe so as not to asphyxiate is entirely safe and reasonable. Ignoring shit that spews from the likes of Amanda Marcotte and Rebecca Watson is no more unenlightened than ignoring the raving schizo lunatic on the corner who sells pencils from a fucking cup.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:08 PM
58

Anything on Alternet, Jezebell, Buzzfeed, Newser, Huffington Post, Upworthy, Raw Story, Daily Dot, etc., etc., etc. is completely safe to totally ignore. It's all shit garbage "news" written by 24 year old hacks with degrees in bullshit like semiotics and queer theory. It's not real.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:41 AM
1

well I guess I'd ask how you first discovered you had a sexual fetish for asking incredibly banal rhetorical questions that you nonetheless perceive as revelatory and profound. it's quite a specific paraphilia.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:23 AM
12

Think about your lazy question for more than 4 seconds, then you tell me why dragooning young boys into having part of their dick cut off so they can "prove to everyone they're real men" and who may or may not DIE of the procedure just might be a bad thing.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:49 PM
7

Indian media is highly salacious and unusually obsessed with tabloid like sensationalism involving domestic violence. The reports from one outlet to another vary so wildly here it's impossible to tell what happened. Many other sources are reporting he had sex with her presumably under-age niece. Still other sources say she recruited a posse of her male relatives to beat him up, killing him, other sources report still other inconsistencies. None of this would justify the man's murder, obviously, …
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:43 PM
36

In the video in that very first link they interview Karen Smith, the director of the Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton who created the original bigoted "men, don't rape!" campaign, who says she's "angry and disturbed that someone would put a message like this out, because people just don't lie about [rape].". Oh, right Karen, totally. Except when they do lie about it, like the case that happened practically right in your own fucking back yard of Edmonton where a taxi driver was falsely accused o…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:27 AM
13

It isn't just feminism that is a cause of misandry I didn't claim it was. Furthermore, the study referenced in the OP to which you linked suggests that heterosexism is in fact linked to a fear of being hit on by another man. Assuming the study was conducted well, it represents scientific evidence for something that may contradict some of our beliefs here at r/MR (especially gay MRAs) Presuming you present as masculine enough to have your homosexuality undetected by strangers, when you're hit on …
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:15 AM
39

It's much more irritating that my response to such stupidity that's actually explaining why it's a bigoted and dumb meme, is voted to -30. Evidence and reason in /r/science only matter if they align with one's preconceptions, apparently.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:44 AM
8

Hold on, let me get my trusty rape manual.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:38 PM
13

"April M. Short is a Bay Area journalist focusing on social justice reporting." oooh, that's some Edward R. Murrow level prestige there.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:04 AM
3

Are you genuinely unfamiliar with the hugely infamous troll to whom you are responding?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:55 PM
2

Then you have a very low bar for being offended by things. I am of the opinion that leaders of state should have the fortitude to rise above such pettiness without throwing whimpering tantrums when such things occur.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:01 PM
2

No. It's just a dumb stereotype. Is assuming all Chinese takeout delivery people are Asian racist? No, it's just dumb.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:59 PM
26

It wasn't even homophobic. I'm a gay dude, it wasn't offensive in the least to me anyway. Saying that all male hairdressers (or theater actors, or fashion designers, etc.) are all gay isn't really anti-gay, it's just dumb and false.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:10 AM
88

Is there now anything whatsoever, good or bad, correct or incorrect, flattering or insulting, that can be said to this woman which will not be instantly claimed as a "sexist attack"?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:51 AM
2

The comment that I was expecting to have to write after reading this piece, but now clearly do not. Flawless analysis.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:25 AM
2

Ok, that's a good start. It's teeny tiny but at least it's something. Can we display it in the links on the right?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:22 AM
1

did you miss the part where he repeatedly refused to answer when asked what exactly would constitute rape between teens?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:11 AM
1

goddamnit. I have to check every goddamn time I visit the bbc to make sure the story I'm reading isn't from 8 fuckin years ago because they never do anything to separate their feed lists by publication date. I forgot this time. So annoying.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:09 AM
9

How mature. Ok though, I'll play. Let's take psychology. A field that apparently, for the umpteenth fuckin time in the last few decades, is having yet another apoplectic fit about just how shitty and rife with outright fraud their "research" really is and how often the researchers obviously fabricated significant p values to get a paper published (the distribution of published p values in psychology papers is shown to be a statistical impossibility). Add to that the painfully obvious predilectio…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:44 AM
6

Though rather inexplicably, it doesn't for a surprising number of its students, while a STEM education indeed does not qualify one to be an expert in fields like economics or 18th century Asian literature, it SHOULD (and does for a great many of us) qualify one for the job of being able to separate truth from horseshit. Specifically the kinds of colorful and multiodiferous brands of horseshit that gush ceaselessly from the halls of humanities departments. THAT is the true fundamental purpose tha…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:50 AM
3

Huh, look at that. I'm upvoting a Chomsky video. First for everything I guess. He is of course 100% correct here, still, I feel slightly dirty.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:27 AM
14

I've noticed it's popular in college, for sociologists, etc. to teach alongside the thought that "being gay is not a choice", that there is a correlation between men with less muscle mass (presumably less testosterone) and being gay. Oh? Come at me, sociologists. I would not even study for exams and I would make a perfect score just by always choosing the most stereotypical, liberal answer. lol, yes, that sounds about right for a number of humanities courses, unfortunately. What does bother me i…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:13 PM
5

Hush, you! You're undermining our phallocracy!
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:52 PM
73

Thank you thank you thank you thank you for making this video. As a gay man myself who's been saying these things for some time now, this video articulated my thoughts and concerns absolutely perfectly. Feminists are taught to HATE everything about male sexuality, and masculinity in general, by psychos like this. If you're a gay man that likes stereotypically masculine things, who doesn't display feminine mannerisms, who, horror of horrors, actually loves everything about being a man, who likes …
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:18 PM
8

Probably because it's a classic fad diagnosis like practically every other fucking thing in psychiatry and since psychiatry isn't a real science (or if it is, it's an extremely shit one) it has no real self correcting mechanism to identify, let alone actually fix the problem.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:43 PM
46

What an utterly bizarre and ironic situation things have turned into. Academia and University, the one place that historically was usually looked to as a refuge and paragon of freedom of thought, speech and ideas is volitionally transforming itself ever more rapidly into the most hostile place in society for all those same virtues; a thoughtcrime policed world of hypersensitive goodspeak and verboten untouchable topics that musn't be spoken or thought of. Disgusting, cowardly stupidity.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:10 PM
6

The link essentially proves my point for me. I'm a gay man, I have nothing in common with polyamorous two spirit intersex asexual leather fetishists. I don't necessarily oppose their various individual causes per se, but they have little if anything to do with me or the causes I support. When asexuals have their rights taken away by state and federal law, and experience widespread discrimination and sometimes violent stigma at work and school, they may have a case. Until then, they and their gag…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:21 AM
19

You are going to be chatted up by gay men, so, yeah. I don't dislike the design, just sayin that's might gonna be happnin. If I saw a guy wearing this shirt and I wasn't familiar with MRM issues my thought process would commence thusly: -hmmm, that's a neat shirt I don't recognize -is it a band's symbol? Hm, nope I'm pretty familiar with even the obscure ones and I've never seen that used as one. -oh, it's an equal sign, like for the "human rights campaign" pac for gay rights. This must be one o…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:55 AM
2

"They present an image of cooking, primping and singing as if it were in some way life-fulfilling," Only ze approved lifestyles vetted by das Fempire are permitted to be lived by ze citizens! All variant lifestyle choices must be submitted for examination by frau feministischendirektor before requisite approval is granted! "The Barbie Dreamhouse is the expression of a conventional role model that isn't OK." Only role models approved by das Fempire will be permitted for play by das kinder! Only u…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 09:55 PM
1

The word pretentious doesn't even begin to touch the Everest like heights of champagne communist self-absorbed whimpering art-faggery bullshit this magazine reaches. And you worked at this establishment? My condolences.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 09:26 PM
2

Youtube channels can be shut down for abusing the automated DMCA takedown feature of the website, can they not? How might this consequence be expedited for this odious little channel.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:39 PM
0

Somehow I doubt a shoplifting dumpster diving gutter cretin is in college at all, but if you are, you have my condolences for wasting your intellectual career as a student. I don't have to read Dianetics to know it's bullshit; some things are self-evident - but usually only to those of us with a functioning prefrontal cortex - so admittedly you may be out of luck there.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:45 PM
3

Uhhh, no, it isn't.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:54 PM
3

Oh, you're a feminist who believes in the patriarchy and rape culture. I didn't realize who I was talking to initially. I use trigger warnings because I know victims say they are helpful for them and I want to avoid unnecessary suffering. It takes literally ten seconds to write, one second to skim, and makes the world a little easier and safer. No, it doesn't. It creates an illusion of making the world "easier and safer". What that actually ends up doing is making the world more difficult and da…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:43 PM
35

Please, no "trigger warnings". They're pointless, stupid, and do nothing but cultivate a neurotic victim culture. If merely reading discussions about rape is sufficient to "trigger" a person into some mental breakdown, they need to get off the internet and see a psychiatrist.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 05:00 AM
3

Are you being intentionally obtuse? The GP was obviously asking about what the term gender studies in its capacity as a university course meant and the answer was accurate and humorous. MRAs never describe their causes and interests as falling under the purview of "gender studies". If you have some semantic circleflick obsession with getting MRAs to describe what they do as being gender studies, good luck with that, I'm sure they'll be ever so willing to oblige your abstruse feminist word games.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:18 AM
1

my mistake, this sub doesn't have a warning for duplicates
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:04 AM
12

You DO realize that gender studies courses in university have fuck all to do with ACTUALLY studying gender and everything to do with coming up with new and innovative ways to demonize men and perpetually inculcate solipsistic victim culture in women.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:35 AM
1

So as long as a rapist can prove in a case against them that their accuser consensually fucked them on other separate occasions, then the instance in which they didn't have consent from their accuser is suddenly not a crime. Wow, you should be a defense lawyer with flawless rapier logic like that.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:00 AM
2

I'll be at your house later tonight to fuck you. I'm going to lock the doors and tell you that you'd better let me fuck you, or else. I'm built like a brick shithouse, 6'4 and 260lbs; you will not find it easy to resist assenting to my advances and when you say no I am going to ignore you, and then, I'm going to fuck you. Since we're both over 18 it won't be rape, right?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:47 AM
7

See my other commentary in the thread for rationale on using a DM link. I'm well aware of their noisomeness.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:34 AM
1

I checked the main points with some other independent sources before posting to make sure the Fail's story wasn't BS. In any case, I make no claims as to the veracity of either party's allegations, since such judgement would necessitate access to event details unavailable to me as a mere uninvolved outside observerk hence my use of the qualifier "allegedly" in the title. I post the story here simply as an illustration of the kinds of disgusting double standard bigotry a claim of rape made by a m…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:31 AM
44

Well if he didn't physically resist then he obviously wanted it and he wasn't raped, I mean it's not like she could've threatened to tell the cops he raped her or something if he didn't acquiesce to have sex. Women Don't Do That<sup>TM.</sup>
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:21 PM
22

Justification for using a Daily Mail link is the particularly disgusting nature of the comments there.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:34 PM
2

Ooooh you're really going to totally blow the lid off this sub's sekret misogynistic underbelly with your fiendishly clever and subtle ruse! Retard.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 03:49 PM
10

Axl thinks he was raped as an infant because a quack conducted "past life regression" on him. Past life regression is pure pseudoscience bullshit and it does serious harm to people by convincing them they suffered traumas they couldn't possibly remember and that usually never even happened.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:05 AM
14

I wonder why that is, given there've been entire historical civilizations practically constructed around the idea of nakedness being at worst, a total non-issue, and often, even a virtue.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:36 PM
17

Because you come from a time when male sexuality is demonized by the neurotic paranoia of feminism, and when all men are suspected to be rapists and pedophiles as a consequence of society's endorsement of that neuroticism. I'm not going to defend the gross double standards outlined in the article, they're stupid, sexist and indefensible and their denunciation is justified. But I do think something has been lost with the puritanical attitude men have progressively been convinced to view their nak…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:11 PM
2

Outrageous. This is really, really important and a gross injustice. A huge stink needs to be made over it in a very public way, not just on a reddit sub practically nobody reads. How do we force this as a mainstream media issue that a significant number of people will see and complain about?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:20 AM
10

Don't worry, it's all totally fine now. Bloomberg made parents sign a consent form before their kid is sliced up and sucked off by an old Hassidic ghoul. There are no punishments for Rabbis who do the procedure without the form though because that would be religious persecution. Sequence the strain the infant was infected with, match the SNPs to the strain of the suspected Rabbi, AND THROW THAT FUCKING CUNT IN JAIL for the rest of his life for serial sexual assault on infants.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:56 AM
5

Because the Huffington Post is sooo much better. lol
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:38 AM
16

All attempts to point out statistics showing men are victimized at comparable rates are heavily downvoted and responded to with variations on "shut up and stop mansplaining! everything doesn't have to be about yoooou!". Pretty annoying, reasonable people in the thread could use a hand with presenting rational arguments.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:40 PM
59

Moderate/liberal atheist gay dude here, so yeah, I'd say it's pretty possible. More important to me than any of that though, WAY more important, is a philosophical worldview of scientific skepticism; which is the ultimate reason I eventually found myself here.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:59 PM
23

Just another dumbass who can't even keep up with research in her own field of study, apparently. This shit was debunked a year ago, I'm sure retarded feminists will get a lot more mileage out of it for the next decade despite that fact. http://www.nature.com/news/the-human-y-chromosome-is-here-to-stay-1.10082
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:25 PM
3

How do I FEEL about it? Uhhhh, uninterested? What does some random asshole coach have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:23 PM
8

The interviewer casually asserts the innocuous dongle reference was "misogynistic" and I think the anonymous MRA could've done a better job refuting all the bullshit surrounding the reporting and spewing from the feminist Aja Romano they had on. Nonetheless it was at least good to see a media outlet go so far as to attempt to get the opinion of the opposing side on this rather than simply interviewing a group of feminists all in agreement on it. You will note that the feminist interviewed twists…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:13 PM
-3

Dehumanize? Let's not go nuts with this kind of hyperbole. I'm content to leave that kind of hysterical exaggeration to feminists who appear to be enjoying their near monopoly on that ridiculous tactic.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:16 PM
0

How factual is the saying that women have more suicide attempts than men, but men commit suicide at twice the frequency because men choose more effective methods? ftfy. See, we can't say it like that though, because not using the word violent means we loose out on the opportunity to demonize those ebilll menz and implicitly blame them for their own misfortune, when we all know that really if men weren't so gosh darn VIOLENT well then maybe their suicide rates would be just as low as women's!
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:57 AM
44

Because every goddamn time someone even dares to assert in public that there are issues of systemic inequality that men face in society, they're met with exactly this kind of screaming HATEFUL fascist insanity from feminists. THAT is why I will continue to speak out loudly and unceasingly in places like this sub against their bigotry.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:15 PM
2

Islam. Is. Not. A. Fucking. Race. It doesn't matter how many times you repeat it, it will never be true.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 10:56 PM
22

But it DIDN'T only happen because of her childish actions. That's the point. In a sane world where an attendee to a conference comes to you saying they were sexually harassed because they overheard an innocuous play-on-words pun in a semiprivate conversation not even involving them, the appropriate reaction is to laugh in their face and walk away. What happened in this case however, is the guy had his picture taken so he could be pilloried on twitter and then was fired from his job. And why did …
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:48 PM
86

A lot of other mainstream outlets are even worse. The two men are now being smeared by such MSM names like The Atlantic as predatory misogynistic sexual harassers....for a fucking Disney-level-tame pun about a dongle. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/03/adria-richards-sendgrind-fired/63400/ How dare they even merely tangentially reference the existence of male genitals! Why they nearly raped that poor damsel! Fucking insane. Any last lingering vestiges of sympathy to feminist think…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:44 PM
1

We can't even link in comments section? I thought it was only for posts.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:01 AM
6

"caricature". Maybe you want to take a little break to actually look up the definition of that word, because it clearly doesn't mean what you think it does. If you're not trying to crusade for SRS you certainly doing a good job of just that in spite of yourself. We're talking about a thread in which feminists are LITERALLY confessing their hate of men to one another and coming up with justifications and excuses for that hate. If you can't see the plain-faced obviousness of that fact in a thread …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:14 PM
6

Your reading comprehension skills aren't really my concern, but if you need things spelled out for you here you go. "I'm not trying to argue that misandry DOES real" ie. the op saying that if you hate all men it isn't misandry, because men really are all bad you see, so it's ok. "I don't think it's my place to tell another person how they should feel" Put that response in the context of someone saying they hate black people, or better yet, women, and tell me what you or for that matter anyone, w…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:47 PM
124

Dude dodged a huge bullet by cutting that shit off before he married. That whole sub is fucking astounding. Remember, actually hating all men doesn't mean you're misandric (the fuckin' literal definition of the term, I'll just note here), it means that you're identifying your oppressor and you shouldn't be told by other people how to feel because really all that hate is hurting you and it's YOU who should be pitied (highest rated comment). I don't use the term often or lightly, but what a bunch …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:04 PM
9

Dammit you beat me to the exact same comment. She's beautiful. Looking at some of her other videos it's pretty clear she's also quite intelligent and talented, that Condolezza Rice spoof is great. Subbed.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:59 PM
14

Are you seriously categorizing Richard Dawkins with Andrea Dworkin here? They're at total polar opposites of every possible political opinion (regarding gender at least) I can think of.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:51 PM
24

I support trolling the insane retards at SRS as much as anyone, but if you're going to do it you can't make it this ridiculously obvious or they'll notice. Like they obviously did in this case. Too many tip offs, not subtle enough.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:15 AM
7

Dammit guiz, don't get me all excited to hear new Twatson retardedness when it's this ho-hum. On a list of idiotic shit this woman has said this wouldn't even make the top 50. This is a person who nods in assent at meetings where Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris are called white supremacist misogynists.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:59 AM
-8

I generally can't stand the Amazing Atheist's videos and have trouble banishing from my mind images of the Michelin Man covering himself in chocolate syrup while ramming home a banana in his asshole whenever I hear his voice, but despite any of that, this video was, well...damn near perfect. Non-screaming, intelligent, reasonable, observant, incisive, adroitly argued. Great, really.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:04 AM
10

posted this earlier but it only got 2 upvotes. surprised at how little interest there was given the absurdity and bias of the article.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:48 AM
75

I see no story or source to corroborate the claim of the poster here (whose only post is this one) that the man suffered permanent injury. If the poster has evidence that wasn't simply sensationalistic editorializing they should note it in the comments now.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:03 AM
6

video?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:31 AM
17

The science community is full of omegas, aspies, and manginas. They are desperate for pussy and socially awkward enough that even loads of cash often doesn't work. They'll cave in hopes of catching a waft. The science community also practically single handedly invented the fucking entirety of the utterly mindblowing magic that is modern technologically refined civilization, blew the doors off our view on the cosmos we inhabit, and permanently shattered our crippling superstitions about our origi…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 11:27 AM
-2

I don't know what comment you're replying to, but it obviously isn't mine.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:53 AM
18

It seems like this is reposed here constantly. Look, it's not like Uni. of Connecticut doesn't have it's problems with the typical disgusting misandric feminist bullshit such campuses often do, IT OBVIOUSLY DOES. But there's more to the story than what's presented in this deceptively isolated screenshot. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q8df3/uconn_police_reporting_a_suspicious_occurrence/c3vm5i3 It doesn't justify the hyperventilating suspicion of men likely at least partially motiva…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:57 AM
-8

It's obviously not a rigorously vetted fact of the incident and simply my guess at what happened, which is freely admitted. I am also, you will note, not a news source like RT, which ostensibly is obligated to at least pretend toward some kind of journalistic integrity and refrain from sensationalizing speculation.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:27 AM
-8

And I certainly DON'T trust RT. Thanks for the reference. I note that there is still no reason given for arrest though. The cops can't arrest someone for merely walking up to someone else. It's likely they attempted to question him (on suspicions which I'll grant were unjustified), indignant at being questioned for doing nothing he then got belligerent to the point of becoming a threat in the view of the arresting cop, then as the report indicated, physically resisted arrest requiring use of a t…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:51 AM
-7

More like this is what happens when reddit credulously eats up another turd of a story shat out by Russia Today. We have exactly zero detail on what altercation actually lead up to the tasering, no names given, no court docket, no interviews, no third party references, no way to double check any facts of the case whatsoever. But no matter, that's enough for the "THIS IS OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE FASCIST 'MURIKKKA JACKBOOT PIGS RUN RAMPANT DRUNK ON POWER", "FUCK TEH POLICE", "AMURKKKIN SHEEPLE NEED TO RI…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:29 PM
1

Retard.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:46 AM
8

I present this here for historical interest about the "debate" over porn and largely for it's potential to initiate conversation. The sick, misandric anti-porn crusaders of today like Gail Dines are still flogging the same exact shit as back then and are just as wrong with all their shrieking hysteria about how it's "increasing violence" etc. It is perfectly clear to me from viewing this documentary that it was feminists who were doing much more harm to women in the porn industry than the indust…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:29 AM
45

So Jezebel doesn't have a problem employing an attempted murderer as long as he's providing them with a continual fountain of idiotic shit like this I guess. Good to know. As a gay dude, I can assure you that this is one of the stupidest fucking articles I have ever read in the femosphere, and that, gentlemen, is saying something. I guess I'm doing it wrong since my dude loves to fuck and I seem to be becoming more of an anti-feminist every day. Holy fuck these people are retards. E: oooh gold, …
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:32 AM
-2

ok, how much?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:52 PM
-1

Nope.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:27 PM
0

Most people who get raped aren't scantily clad or "showing off the goods". Nor did I say they were. Perhaps reading comprehension isn't your strongest suit.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:23 PM
0

I'm organizing my own event like this next week, it's called a Dandywalk. We're going to get together to dress up in our finest fur coats, Valentino suits, extravagant jewelry and Rolex watches, because clothes don't rob people! Muggers do! This sick robberculture we live in blames the victim all the time! Don't tell me how to dress! 4 out of 5 street robberies happen to people wearing downmarket trash, NOT bespoke finery! Stop telling the victim how to avoid being robbed! Blame the robbers! fuc…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:42 PM
3

goodmenproject.com NOPE
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:24 PM
3

A.) That wasn't the only thing that influenced my decision, it was merely the last straw. B.) I never said I wouldn't read anything they published, I'm just not visiting their site and I'm not giving them my page views. I'll read an article if it's reproduced elsewhere without me having to go to their site. C.) Argumentum ad populum. I don't care how prestigious a publication is perceived by other people as being. I care about journalistic integrity, how dispassionate, and how accurate it is.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:14 PM
10

I'm sorry I don't read or visit the New York Times since they decided to publish this last year. If you want me to read the shit they churn out that demonizes and slanders men and boys you'll have to post the text here.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:22 AM
9

Yeah, we're serious, and outside of your deranged feminist SRS world of all men being evil "potential rapists" and all women being perpetual victims of everything, it's a completely reasonable stance to take that this person was NOT raped. See, in the real world we have this thing called nuance and subtlety, and hey wouldn't you know it, not everything is the stark black and white your wombyn's studies faculty organized anti-rape seminar you had to take during orientation week said it was. Surpr…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:25 PM
2

Sam Harris made a very interesting point similar to this in The End of Faith, noting that at least Christian and other Abrahamic fundamentalists still know what it means to actually have beliefs about things. The beliefs are wrong and ridiculous superstitions, but liberal moderate Christians often won't even commit to the idea that beliefs exist, let alone firmly hold any themselves, retreating into a kind of postmodern solipsism where belief is relative and only meaningful in terms of what it p…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:33 AM
9

This is why we laugh at you, feminists. Woman could weave a fucking misogynistic victimhood narrative out of a goddamn Teletubbies episode. When I was younger I used to be worried about the censorious power of the perpetually offended fascist Christian right. Now, with their recent seemingly inexorable slide into irrelevance, I never would've imagined who would so eagerly take their place. In some ways I increasingly see the thoughtcrime panic-mongers of the far left feminists as actually being …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:51 PM
10

"had sex with students" "took advantage of students" "engaged in improper relations with students" "inappropriately propositioned students" Change her gender to male: RAPED students
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:54 PM
1

I meant de facto or similar.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:38 PM
22

I hope I can be that brave someday.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:34 AM
2

First comment? Mock him for potentially being gay because he didn't want to have sex with her. Great.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:27 AM
4

...wat
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:15 AM
-7

I swear some contingent of reddit could be reliably counted on to upvote the fucking unabomber manifesto if it had correctly formatted paragraphs and the kind of sufficiently polysyllabic sophistry to hoodwink the naive and clueless on prominent display here. Read what this person wrote. ACTUALLY READ it. Go to the links they're endorsing and read that shit. Look at what you're upvoting. Don't just upvote shit because you think it looks plausibly long enough to actually be a thoughtful and well …
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:21 AM
10

That makes sense. The anticapitalist conspiracy stoking line about advertising "dictating men's desires" made my spidey sense tingle. This is crypto-feminism masquerading as male-positive egalitarianism. Notice that all the examples of stereotypes against men needing attention they give are ways in which they not-so-subtly suggest men should be permitted to act in more stereotypically feminine ways. Equality, for these sorts of people, always has to be filtered through the lens of "smashing the …
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:27 PM
3

ARE YOU KIDDING ME. This has got to be a troll. Dogs aren't human beings. We do lots of shit to animals that we don't do to other humans.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:24 AM
3

I think this is more an antisrs thing than a mensrights thing.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:19 AM
5

Are you serious right now? "Cebrity Katherine Heigl and her husband Jason use human castration and hatred of men as a promotional device for their charity to neuter dogs." She's listed at the site for using violence against men as an ostensible comedic vehicle to increase rates of pet neutering. Whether or not you choose to neuter your dog, whatever sex it is, doesn't have shit to do with men's rights. This is absurd. It's probable a neutered animal doesn't even know what happened to it.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:12 AM
1

Oh fuck off. Honestly now.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:00 AM
2

Oh noes! Someone insincerely provoked debate in the subreddit between atheists and christians ON WHAT'S PROBABLY THE BIGGEST FUCKING ATHEIST POPULATED SITE ON THE INTERNET. Whatever will we do!? So divided! We're doomed! Please. This is the lamest "troll" I've ever seen even if it actually is one. Troll more, whoever you are, if your aim is to raise salient points about the similarities between feminist dogma and religious derangement.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:11 AM
14

Jesus fucking Christ I couldn't even get through the whole thing for all the goddamn screeching and shrieking. Why does Reddit have such a boner for Ellen anyway? I never found her or her lame schtick even remotely funny.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:17 PM
2

you say toe-may-toe
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:10 AM
3

I think that actually is a poe. Although I suppose not even that really matters, as the Agent Orange files lifted from RadfemHub show there really are feminists that maniacal and hate filled out there who only say such things when they think no one else can hear.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:55 PM
35

This is one of the most repulsively vile things I have ever read by a feminist anywhere. And that, gentlemen, is saying something. There is no indication this is a poe or satire of any kind, they have a podcast feed on the front page and numerous other stories obviously written in earnest. It's funny isn't it, how feminists will explode across the web with apoplectic rage when a Whoopi Goldberg clumisly attempts to make a distinction between violent and statutory rape in her "rape rape" fiasco. …
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:53 PM
1

Be careful with this stuff. Skepticism is highly warranted with these sorts of Robert Winston-esque social science shows. There's lots of fluffy, poorly controlled studies with sweeping conclusions based on the merest whiff of statistically meaningful results.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:02 PM
1

Bring a stopwatch and see how many seconds it takes you to get kicked out of the class when you note men are demonized by feminist dogmas like "Schrodinger's rapist", this latest garbage, etc. My bet's on <20 seconds.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 06:08 PM
2

lol. Portlandia barely needed to change anything at all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCHAcplVurQ
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:33 PM
5

The Twinkie defense, for women. Except it's the converse of that with regard to its efficacy. The Twinkie defense is notable for the outrage it provokes when it's used and is (increasingly) rarely used successfully. Battered woman syndrome is notable for the outrage it provokes when it DOESN'T work, and is almost always used successfully.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:08 PM
11

Strange this sort of obvious dimestore sophistry would be so highly upvoted here. In particular the effort to frame the "good rape" story as an anomaly in an ostensibly otherwise laudable and decent show (the vagina monologues) is particularly laughable. The entire production is rife with anti-male bigotry. "The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could" is not an outlier of creepy hypocritical rape endorsement, it's perfectly representative and at home with the rest of the VM's misandric feminist dogm…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:34 AM
2

I've learned much more than a mere thing or two by attending (numerous) things such as these. I'd say most importantly I've learned that feminism is a bigoted ideology that's incompatible with critical skepticism. And it's most ardent adherents, the "radical" feminists, are undeniably a hateful cult. "Privilege checking" and the other nonsense that comes as a package with these sorts of dogmatic ideologues is merely the soft 21st century version of pi pan dou zheng.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:08 AM
14

I just use MS's free defender or whatever it's called for windows 7. It seems to be good with resources and finding viruses and it never bothers me to update.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:12 PM
15

I have not found that is the case if you go even slightly beyond just saying you're gay. I'm actually gay and if feminists find out you're a conventionally masculine dude who is NOT all about their "smash the binary!", "gender is just a social construct", "if you don't feel 100% comfortable at a drag show or with androgynous/trans people hitting on you it's because you're a self-hating gay misogynist!", well then they dismiss you with a casual slander just as quickly as if you were straight. To …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:44 PM
13

It happened in the French revolution too. See: Jacobin cult. It happens again, and again, and again throughout history. There's something sinister in the human condition that self-organizes into these terrible purity cults that rapaciously consume everything around them until there is nothing left and they ultimately turn inward and eventually consume themselves. I don't think feminism is powerful or well subscribed enough in the West to become one of these cults any time soon, but some academic…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:25 PM
29

"Hi, I've posted a grand total of one comment consisting of a single sentence to this sub over the past year but now I'M LEAVING because you're all just a bunch of woman-hating stupid heads!" Lol. bye dude. It amazes me how this shit's invariably upvoted to the front page in here every week it's posted.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:42 PM
1

Ah I see, so simply noticing that the constant feminist dogma of "women are shamed for expressing their sexuality and men are always congratulated and praised for it" is in reality actually bullshit, and the reverse is often true; that's "overreacting". I see. Have you any other sage pearls of gender studies wisdom you'd like to bestow upon us this afternoon?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:31 PM
2

Great, I'll be sure to consult you in future on which topics it is permissible for me to consider interesting without exceeding the apparently strictly proscribed bounds of "overreaction".
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:18 PM
0

So merely finding it interesting that the general public finds a great deal of humor in a prom picture with the father of the girl in the background readying his rifle to ostensibly maim or kill her male date in a posed shot made for comic effect is "overreacting", got it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:11 PM
3

Oh gosh, I don't know, how about the fact that it's seen not only as perfectly normal, but lightheartedly humorous to threaten severe violence or death against adolescent males for even thinking about expressing normal male sexuality in a consensual relationship? Yeah, why the hell should males expect to have THE RIGHT to develop sexually in a normal manner without being assaulted or killed for it. After all, it's not like shit like that ever ACTUALLY HAPPENS, right? RIGHT?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:59 PM
68

Rebecca Watson is great. Her and her histrionic self-righteous tirades are the reason I began seriously questioning the legitimacy of feminism (ultimately rejecting it) and largely the reason I'm here and am now of the conviction that feminism and scientific skepticism are utterly incompatible concepts. Thanks Becky!
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:43 PM
13

Well shit you should break the news to the other MRA's that feminism is long dead and no longer wields any serious influence in politics, academia or cultural conception of gender. I'm sure they'll be glad to hear it. And if that were even remotely what I was saying, I'd do that.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:21 AM
79

It's almost like feminism can mean whateverthefuck people who profess subscription to its tenets want it to mean, and is therefore a borderline meaningless term that, when it isn't being used as a cudgel to slander its skeptics as bigots, is at best an anachronistic vestige of a thankfully long gone reactionary era.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:43 AM
12

My cousin is having a boy probably next week. I've tried raising the issue in as lighthearted, haha only serious a way as I could, but got an answer of "ew gross why would you want to talk about THAT!" and couldn't tell one way or the other what they were planning on doing. It's not the sort if thing our family talks openly about at all, but it's such a disgusting injustice it would eat me up inside if they did do it and I knew I could've prevented them from having it done if I'd just said more …
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:27 AM
-3

Strange that this would get so downvoted here. huh. Maybe as long as they're being demonized /mr likes cozying up to bigotry more than I suspected.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:25 AM
216

"Hi I'm vachette and I have huge rape fantasy issues! But those thoughts are evilnastydirtybad so I don't get a partner to play them out with safely like a normal person, instead I just pretend all the men around me are secretly rapists so I can feel better about myself by projecting my self-hate onto them via demonizing and vilifying everyone who isn't female!" Or at least that what I read most of the time when I see those sorts of total whackjob commenters.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:10 PM
8

Uh, excuse me, why doesn't this post have like 50 upvotes by now? This is the definition of a men's rights issue. This guy had a hose forcibly rammed up his dickhole -by a female cop apparently no less- so cops could take his piss for a drug test. That is a forcible medical procedure and constitutes a clear case of sexual assault. And what does a judge have to say about it? Basically, 'shut the fuck up you have no rights'. Are you fucking kidding me? Do you doubt for a second if this procedure h…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:21 AM
6

Not female rhetoric, feminist rhetoric. But, yes.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:27 AM
9

What's "more mature". Reddit has never been "mature". Enough with the holier than thou routine. I've been a reader of this sub for a long time despite the recent age of the account I'm posting under and there is a definite increase in "stop being such meanies to those sweet virtuous feminists, you nasty evil dudebros!" here lately, and I seriously doubt that I'm either the only one to have noticed it or the only one getting sick of it.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 11:43 PM
0

Is there some SRS or circlebroke2-like brigade going on lately or what?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 10:46 PM
18

Harsh criticism about feminism is practically intrinsic to the men's rights movement. If you don't like that, then maybe you'd feel more comfortable with fence-sitting nicey-nice accommodationists somewhere else.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 10:33 PM
23

They are essentially interchangeable. The reigning queen of fascistthoughtblogs/skepchick/a plus theism/etc. Rebecca Watson is quoted as saying "SRS is the only good part of Reddit".
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:20 AM
16

Did you miss his blowup with fascistthoughtblogs a while ago? Pretty good stuff.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:17 AM
2

No
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:13 AM
6

Rich text format, the choicest of all text formats of 1992.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:40 AM
6

How singularly hate-filled and pathetically empty must someone's life be to actually run a blog like that. Oh noes this guy thinks women should shave their legs, he's LITERALLY HITLER! It's basically just a bullying forum, doesn't tumblr have some policy against that?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:38 AM
3

An even littler exercise: piss right the fuck off and take your "men need to prove to me they don't hate women" misandric attitudes with you.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:02 PM
0

when my best friend was raped, it wasn't feminism telling her that her life was ruined and beyond repair, it was her family, her friends, the police, her doctors etc Filed under shitthatneverhappened.rtx
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:40 PM
7

The point of truly good satire is to caricature reality in such an incisive way that some of the audience inevitably will be oblivious to the ruse.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:16 PM
8

I think you should give it a biiiit longer. ;)
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:08 PM
13

ELEVATORGATE
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:09 PM
-4

Why is this even here, who gives a shit? You're an adult, move out, get a job and tell your mother to join the rest of the planet and get a job herself to support her other kid.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:46 PM
1

3 years in an institution so posh many other pensioners throughout the world would be desperate to get into it. Justice is served!
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:20 AM
69

This should have a huge number of upvotes. It's difficult to think of a more objectively clear case of societal discrimination against boys. Feminists like to pretend to egalitarian attitudes and love the 'girls can do anything!' trope when it comes to girls breaking into conventionally male activities, but boys wanting to do a conventionally female oriented competitive activity? Well, who really gives a shit about them. They're probably just trying to keep the girls down and get early lessons o…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:24 AM
6

It reads like a 15 year old's civics class essay. Not altogether unexpected for commentary coming out of a site that spells America with a k.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:17 PM
0

Turn off the tv, go to the library with your boy and find the science section. Start reading, see what topics he's interested in and target those specifically. Take some books out and do some experiments at home. Save the internet browsing for science related content for later, after he has had the benefit of learning about the patience and self-discipline involved in focusing his attention on a topic for long periods of time that's presented in NON-interactive media like books. That might sound…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:10 AM
1

I'm surprised it took someone so long to figure out my actual goal, to have as many women raped on college campuses every day as possible. That's obviously been the real objective all along. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:43 PM
62

TIL virtually the entirety of Japanese salarymen are "abused" by their wives. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19674306 Oh, sorry! My mistake! I'm so sorry, I didn't mean to veer from the mantra of perpetual female victimhood! What I MEANT to say of course, is that those poor Japanese housewives are CRUELLY FORCED BY PATRIARCHY to saddle the burden of managing the household's finances while the lazy abusive men take money from them constantly!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:37 AM
18

"a big problem with rape and sexual assault". The university's own website lists an average of about 10 "forcible sexual assaults" campus-wide per year for the past few years. A sexual assault being anything from an unwanted grab of tits at a party, to full on violent rape at gunpoint. The statistics don't break down what the actual crimes were. However, judging from stats given by other universities that do break things down further, generally less than a quarter of assaults are rapes. But let'…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:12 AM
2

I would too, being both a supporter of MR and fan of MMA.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:43 PM
24

Among the other suggestions here, I would ask that you keep in mind that people who identify with the MRM, and even those of us who consider ourselves anti-feminist (hi there), are nonetheless pro-equal rights for women.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:00 PM
5

I wish more MRMs realized the absurdity of the feminist objectification gambit. It's garbage. Sexual objectification in and of itself is harmless. Feminists have successfully conflated objectification with harassment and abuse in the public's mind. It's absurd. I objectify male bodies all the time, pretty much like every other gay dude I've ever met, where's the epidemic of rape and oppression I'm told such habits invariably lead to? Nonsense.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:53 PM
2

What was the main conclusion of the AIDS show he did? Just doing a quick search around it looks like he interviewed the infamous denialist Peter Duesberg, but I don't really have time to listen to an hours long podcast. Was he overall credulous or skeptical about the idea that HIV doesn't cause AIDS by the end of the show? I'll admit I pretty much turned off on Rogan completely quite a long time ago when he revealed, among other things, that he thought the moon landings were a hoax. So, I'm not …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:02 PM
3

Hijacking. Hey, so I made /gayMRA a few weeks ago basically for the reasons you're outlining here but never did anything at all with it and am basically sitting on it so some shitty SRS goon doesn't use it. Your motives seem genuine, so if you want to be a mod I'll make you one (after I figure out how, lol.)
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:59 PM
3

I know, I've seen it. Terrible. His brother also killed himself after too. Psychology is not a science. Maybe it will be someday, but it isn't now and its practitioners' delusions can be very dangerous.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:28 AM
5

Suck my fat cut-without-my-consent dick.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:19 PM
4

Jezebel.nope
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:16 PM
12

So what ever happened with this? I'm guessing nothing since the story is so old, if it ever passed it would be the fact that they had such a tax there that was the headline. Why is this creepy shit so common in Sweden but not Norway or Finland?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:10 PM
6

Google seems bent on ruining youtube for some reason. This problem with flagging things as hate speech to get them removed has been going on a long time now, I think since they made the whole process automated, and they refuse to do anything to correct it. Don't get me started on the new layout they pushed out to everyone a few days ago. It's a fucking horrible hideous train-wreck top to bottom.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:58 PM
22

I disagree with a lot of your politically informed ideology around here, but this is spot on. In particular the line in the article: "Even if Eliza is prompted by nature to interact with a train in a stereotypical female way, that is no reason for her parents not to energetically correct her." is very disturbing and reminds me of the "sissy boy experiments" of the 70s that were designed to cultivate shame and disgust in young boys at their displaying effeminate characteristics. Who knows how man…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:50 PM
6

Fuckin' hate that question. There's no woman, goddammit! That's the point! Do either of us look like women? No! Do we sound like women? No! Do we act like women? No! We're both just normal bros who like hanging out and doing all the normal stuff bros do; plus fucking. That's it! /annoying rant
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:03 AM
5

What does that even mean? How is an entire country "feminized"?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:28 AM
10

"democratic" is often used on the far left merely as a kind of codeword. It's a kind of Orwellian goodspeak that acts as a sort of dogwhistle for acolytes and cudgel against opponents. It's also perversely often used in the ever obnoxious shrieking chants of "this is what democracy looks like", usually by angry threatening mobs "occupying" public places, or wherever the mob deems a place "should" be public. See also: The Democratic Republic of The Congo, The People's Democratic Republic of Korea…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:21 AM
6

This is fascinating. I absolutely loath the endlessly woo-mongering Oprah and all the other talk show trash like it, but clips of these old shows really do offer an interesting insight into what people actually thought at the time. It reminds me of this other show from the 80s about AIDS. It's amazing to see how attitudes shift over time.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:03 PM
33

Supervisor on your ass about that last round of ads shitting on men? Need to cultivate a whiff of even-handedness in your misandric anti-rape media campaign? Use a token gay couple! You still get to demonize men all you like but also deflect the suspicions of egalitarians who probably wont notice since you were "inclusive"! Win! I love being used as a pawn in feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:38 PM
1

Thanks, I did see your post on that and I liked it a lot.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:50 PM
0

I'm making the men's rights sub look bad by slagging off humanities majors for their lack of scientific rigor in tangentially related submessages? You must have a pretty dim view of this place if you think it can be tarnished so easily. I'm not posting here for "support". I posted the link because it's a huge ongoing conversation with hundreds of messages on a front page sub with direct relevance to MR.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:47 AM
0

Why? There are plenty of links here to other subs with MR relevant conversations going on. This one in particular especially so, given the several recent threads on the topic here over the last few days.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:57 AM
23

Or, when they discover that you're a normal dude (eg. "cis"), who is conventionally masculine and kind of a bro, they're DONE with you. You may as well be a straight misogynist to them at that point. You're "part of the hegemonic toxic masculine binary and a rape-enabling, patriarchal, ableist, blah blah blah blah". That's one of the things I really hated about feminists when I identified as one, is how eager they were to demonize not only straight, but gay men's sexuality. Read some of their fo…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:13 AM
2

Creep shamer!
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:31 AM
16

Well, I'll be honest, I was going to look up some obscure taxidermy technique to make a funny joke, but I got distracted and spent the last hour reading about 17th century fur trading posts in Ontario and New York. :/ #immanerd
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:38 PM
-6

What a waste of perfectly good loads. There are plenty of dudes on xtube who would pay you to send them your used jizzbags. :D ....I'm not joking. I'm not one of them, but I have seen it done several times.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:13 AM
75

Dammit. I was just going to post that. Haha. Oh noes! A politically radical group of far left Canadian students doesn't like us! We're done for! I hope they tackle the pressing issue of unethical 18th century taxidermy techniques next. #supercerialissuesguise
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:07 AM
1

Fix the title. It's annoying enough how frequently "woman" is incorrectly exchanged for "women" in titles, but "womans"? This stuff makes the sub look less intellegent than it should.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:51 AM
11

They fucked his dick up, man! It's not just some dude complaining about lacking a foreskin.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:07 PM
3

Redditor for 1 hour, seems legit. Hi David Futrelle. This is absurd, feminists are cowards and paralyzed by the fear of their own shadows. The only grandiose fantasies they'll ever be acting on will be played out in tumblrland and radfemhubville.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:36 AM
2

The comments on the last story about this here were absurdly ridiculous interpretations of his cartoon's meaning. People thought he was somehow mocking feminism or something. Clearly not. He jokingly tweeted to Watson that she "should cut Richard Dawkins' dick off and say Dworkin did it" when Rebecca was recently slandering Dawkins for some bullshit he didn't really say. I subscribe to smbc's youtube channel, but after this I think I'll unsub. I just don't feel like excusing this kind of shit an…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:47 AM
2

Thank fuck it isn't.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:21 PM
-1

It seemed to be a yearly thing created by feminists there, thus its at least tangential relationship to MR. My interest was mostly in what was being stated in the interviews.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:58 AM
2

I thought it was "Zir" ...or some shit.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:23 AM
0

I did watch the video, and since it was pretty difficult to get exactly what was happening since I don't know swedish, I posted it here to solicit for translation.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:21 AM
1

Probably because you don't "see" the rest of us who just look like normal everyday people.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:18 AM
2

Exactly. So let it happen and record it. This stuff is so ridiculously cheap now, anyone can do it.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:28 PM
-1

Why do you say that?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:56 AM
-2

If it really is what I think it is, I will RAGE if this idiotic shit ever appears in the US.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:16 AM
8

Did you challenge them on any of their shit?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:06 AM
13

A couple years ago Fry dared to offhandedly make the utterly banal and obvious statement that men need/want sex more than women in some boring interview somewhere. Well ho-lee-shit, you'd thin he fuckin' praised Nazism, claimed to like eating babies and said he hated kittens for the apoplectic feminist outrage he provoked. The fuckin Guardian practically dedicated an entire issue to tarring him as a misogynistic, woman hating, apotheosis of hateful bigotry. All this for a statement that's perfec…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:56 PM
5

Rambling unlettered moronic garbage. Sometimes there just aren't enough downvotes in the universe. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:56 AM
8

Because people who care about righting societally endemic prejudicial injustices against men hate filthy 'cripples' and the lame, obviously. It's just base slander. If anything, I would expect MRAs to be MORE attentive and aware of discrimination against the disabled, considering the perpetual stream of tragically maimed soldiers our various foreign misadventures are currently turning out.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:17 PM
14

"Dangerous visions of equality". Does this not tell one virtually everything they need to know about these people? The extreme left/socialist/anarchist/radfem world is indistinguishably dogmatic from fundamentalist religion at this point. It astonishes me how easily and thoroughly it has infected humanities departments of academia. Pure subjective opinion cloaking itself in the unquestioned authoritative vestments of higher education and masquerading as objective fact and scientific truth. Disma…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:06 PM
5

It's amazing how easily one can make a career for one's self simply by spinning a story that villainizes men.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:24 PM
5

It seems like the only people truly giving radfems a run for their money in the rabid misandric hate department now are transgender tumblrites like this one. Ironic too, since if the radfems ever had their ghoulish fantasies realized, they'd exterminate every last trans person in existence along with all the "cis" men while they were at it. I get that transgendered people feel outcast, marginalized, discriminated against and generally shat upon by society, and I support their objectives toward e…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:28 AM
10

Great to see. India has some very nasty bigoted and politically dogmatic radical feminists like Vandana Shiva. It's the country I'm most excited to see what happens with over the next few decades though. They have a really good native skeptic movement and I think the things they're going to do with what I suspect will remain the largest democracy on the planet for some time to come, will be amazing.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:31 AM
9

Pretty sure, but the important point to notice is that it doesn't matter if it's actually a joke or not. What matters is that it's indistinguishable from what some radical feminists are actually saying and openly fantasizing about.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:07 PM
9

They're obviously small automotive purpose fire extinguishers using standard dry chemical. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnUiq2cbA5s "news reports" are usually written by journalism majors, aka. clueless retards.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:28 PM
5

Shoving your way into the middle of a crowd with various "fuck your X" statements painted on your chest while screaming vapid slogans and spraying people in the face with monoammonium phosphate dust isn't hateful. Got it. I'm an atheist/anti-theist and even I find that shit indefensible. And you should realize you're on pretty shaky ground as a feminist whining about someone else objecting to YOUR ideology's craven appropriation tactics when feminists organize whole conferences and write entire …
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:57 PM
3

The first link seems to be misandric, and significantly downvoted. The third link is treating this disgusting image with the facetious flippancy it deserves. The fourth violent link is downvoted as it should be. The only comment you linked to with any significant number of upvotes was the one casually and perhaps clumsily attributing the "humor" of genital injury of men to all women. Frankly, when sick shit like this is so utterly pervasive, I think he has a salient point.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:42 PM
1

So are you calling me a misogynistic pig, or what? The overwhelming majority of misogyny I've ever seen around here either comes from obvious trolls or is downvoted and chastised almost immediately after being posted.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:35 PM
0

I don't see it nearly so much as splitting up or breaking away as just providing a consistent consolidated area that gay dudes who are finding themselves disillusioned with feminism and concerned about men's rights issues can come to and know that there are quite a few others like them.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:26 PM
11

\m/
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:14 PM
7

I know, part of the reason I found and posted this. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:13 PM
6

I think it's time we organized our group somewhat, if only here on reddit. Girlwriteswhat created feMRA for women who support the mra, there are quite a few of us gay bros who support it too. How about /r/gayMRA ? I don't have time to do anything with it this instant, but I'll try to get some things together there over the next few days.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:04 AM
88

It disgusts me that so many gay men robotically defend these deranged bigots because they've been so thoroughly indoctrinated with the misandric lies of academic feminism. These dogmatic radical lunatics don't give a shit about equality for gay men, they are sick bigoted wackjobs and they are absolutely NOT my allies. I see the nascent men's rights movement, especially here on reddit, as being much more a natural friend of gay dudes and the cause of equality under law. You are my brothers.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:50 AM
6

I've seen feminists blame burnt microwave popcorn and chipped press-on nails on The Patriarchytm so it wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:52 AM
0

Oops, clumsily worded title is missing a comma. Oh well, too late now.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:29 AM
6

I'm gay, I've never even heard of the word hen being used in this context, let alone heard of it being popular in "my circles". Do NOT assume gay dudes are in agreement or lock step with feminists because that's what you see depicted in mainstream culture and media. There are a lot of us who reject feminism as the bigoted dogma it is, and even quite a few of us who sympathize strongly with the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:31 AM
0

They can write this well, but it is exceedingly rare for it to be the case.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:09 PM
1

You're welcome to do so. It's not me you should be appalled at though, it's parents and an educational system that churn out kids by the million who don't know the difference between the words "your" and "you're". You will also note that the op suspiciously hasn't responded to a single reply here.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:05 PM
24

But ya know, it'll be totally rad and all about the guys because arm wrestling! Lol. How much more pathetic and patronizing can these people get? Looks like this misandric bigot will be there too. If you can, why not attend and offer a dissenting view (while recording video, preferably) of this hateful indoctrination?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:19 PM
-7

I strongly doubt the veracity of this story. The the command of vocabulary is extraordinarily high, and the grammar, spelling, and syntax are practically flawless for a 16 year old's writing. Go ahead and call me paranoid, but that along with the incongruous 'women are dumb and bad because x' lines set alarm bells off all over the place as being contrived in attempt to provoke misogynistic responses.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:03 PM
2

A someone who's definitely actually used tumblr.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:37 AM
5

It's not ad hominem. I'm not arguing that your assertion is wrong because you're retarded, I'm just saying you're a retard.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:27 AM
10

This is quite literally the stupidest comment I've read all week. Are you fucking serious? You're going to compare STATUTORY RAPE OF A CHILD to teen dating? How many chromosomes do you have?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:18 AM
6

The Good Men Project is basically just SRS. I'm gay, I don't give a fuck about fashion, let alone women's fashion, I don't touch women's tits, and I don't care about women's bodies. Fuck this article and the ponce who wrote it.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:26 PM
1

They're women on vacation IN JAMAICA. The overwhelming majority of the population is black there. It isn't "fetishizing" black masculinity over white masculinity, it's statistics, you fucking retard.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:54 PM
0

Yes, and the relevance of that fact to this conversation is precisely fuck all.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:51 PM
0

What the fuck are you on about. You're a racist and an idiot.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:08 PM
2

Good for them. What's the problem with this? I'd certainly be careful as Jamaica has a phenomenally high crime rate, but as long as they know the risks they're taking, have fun. One wonders, do the uni tenured radfems pity these poor "objectified" and "commoditized" men being victimized by those perverted, predatory women and their "female gaze"? Gosh, I wonder why not?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:44 PM
2

I'll take that as a yes.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:33 PM
2

Wow, we posted at precisely the same SECOND. haha
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:43 PM
4

This is an SRS troll whose account is minutes old and who contrived a fictive story around a set of images posted to another sub yesterday.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:42 PM
1

Mykeru?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:31 AM
0

Redditor for one hour. Sure.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:07 PM
2

I have been forced to play the sexist hermit just for my own safety. How so, though? Despite being a former feminist I still believe that the kind of woman you are describing -ones that you have to actively avoid as a result of their various toxic victim complexes- are very much in the minority and most women want nothing at all to do with feminism and its innumerate ghoulish attendant derangements. Again, I have had virtually no interaction with women romantically and don't desire such, so perh…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:25 PM
1

It seems like with every new story I read or video I watch, that Girlwriteswhat's maxim that feminism is simply "patriarchy in lipstick" gets more and more true. It's all the same old chivalry bullshit repackaged with sexy powerpoints filled with made up statistics and men and boys reinterpreting old chivalric etiquette codes as "gender equality" studies. I'm continually shocked at how differently I see these things now after having considered GWWs alternate view of things. It's astonishing.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:47 PM
1

I guess when I think of mgtows I think of youtube personalities like barbarossaaaa and that pinegrove guy who've both made a point of saying some reactionary anti-gay shit (and I consider myself generally very permissive and laid back about mild forms of that kind of thing), so your comments are interesting here. I've read all the responses above and I'm still not sure that I know what it's all about, but I'm reading.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:38 PM
10

I'm aware. It's one of the cruel injustices that lead me to become interested in men's rights.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 10:08 AM
7

I'm going to be blunt and perfectly honest here, I really don't get the whole MGTOW thing. Like, at all. Now granted, I haven't delved to the depths of all the writing and video that's out there on the subject, and since I'm into bros I can't really claim to know in much detail about what hetero dudes experience in the way of such things, but it just seems so, I don't know, cynical I guess. Are guys really feeling so dejected and mistreated that they want to swear off all relationships with wome…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 10:07 AM
32

The general public simply has no idea that the concept of equal rights for men even exists, or when they do, they dismiss it as unnecessary. When I look at the current state of the men's rights movement and compare it to where the gay rights movement is today (and how grueling and long the fight took to get it where it is), it's difficult not to despair at the fight ahead.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:29 AM
9

Pretty scant on the info there wouldn't'cha say?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:47 AM
11

I think it's a reading of that chapter.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:57 AM
4

Unless the science is extremely explosively controversial and widely publicly known, in that case it's actually quite good simply because there are so many eyes on the page. That said, I gave up editing years go.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:06 AM
8

Or at least those are the sorts of things you'd be tarring him as if you were a 70s radfem wackjob, apparently.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:54 AM
5

That's so fucking conspiratorially cynical and deranged I don't even have a word to describe it besides retarded. Learn how to use a fucking apostrophe correctly.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:50 PM
3

Well I am not an expert on trans things nor am I a doctor, but I can certainly say that a person's gender identity is not dictated by their hormone levels. If that were the case, the many horrific cases of men being given female hormones to "treat" them for their homosexuality (eg. Alan Turing) among other things, would have seriously fucked with their gender identity. There is no evidence it ever has done that. I'm a gay dude, all my hormones are perfectly normal and I've always totally loved b…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:14 AM
4

I submit that the suicides of people like David Reimer constitute pretty devastating evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUTcwqR4Q4Y
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:04 PM
23

It was ok I guess. Mostly I'm just sick to death of the "men are childish clueless idiots" trope that's the default in commercials now. A rare and really good commercial that surprisingly recently ran counter to this was the j&j nursing spot that was posted a while back. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PVeOq60GcA
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:58 PM
2

She's pretty clearly joking. It's a lame attempt at a joke, but she IS a comedian.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 10:18 AM
27

Whoa, It's like reading my biography! As a gay man, whenever my dude bangin' duties aren't preventing me from doing so, I'm usually out trying to stab random bitches on the street with my big hard dick. If someone has a better idea how to keep all those millions of worthless cunts in their place and in a perpetual state of fear, I'd certainly like to hear it! My cock head's gettin' awful sore! Oh well, cis-gendered man's burden I guess. E: and in case there are any room temperature IQ radfems (t…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 10:11 AM
1

Very interesting reading.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:07 AM
5

I haven't read the book but have heard several interviews with her and she always seemed to be pretty even handed. She appeared to come to the conclusion that relationships between men were closer and more kind than she originally suspected.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:57 AM
-1

Of course.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:01 AM
-2

Gosh, I don't know why anyone would think you're an op sock. Maybe because op's account is literally hours old, all of grand total of seven posts on your account were made within the last half hour, and both of your commentaries are practically interchangeable on a few hour old post that hasn't been linked to by any other subs yet? Maybe it's that.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:56 PM
-5

How many sock puppets are you going to make for this story? E: for anyone unclear, I'm not the author of the above deleted then quoted post.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:46 PM
4

I would've given this post an upvote for providing the background facts I suspected were missing from the original story to begin with if it hadn't been for the idiotic editorialization the op apparently couldn't help themselves from including with it.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:31 PM
2

Do you remember when you decided to trade rationality for hypersensitivity and reasonable reactions to innocent innocuous accidents for hysterical panicked overreactions? Pepperidge Farm remembers
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:54 PM
49

RAPIST! RAPIST! *blows rape whistle* THIS GUY IS A RAPIST, EVERYBODY!
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:09 AM
49

You're not quite sure? I'm just in from planet Sanity, let me help you with this: It isn't.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:24 AM
4

I see it as satirizing the superstitionalist view that "life begins at conception" by making the "every sperm is sacred" joke. The fact that all the protestors are women though may mean he was also going for some kind of commentary that underscores parallels between them and feminist anti-porn attitudes.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:09 PM
0

Are the upvotes a consequence of SRS brigades or is reddit's atheism sub actually that clueless about what's going on here? The FIRST comment in the thread is a thinly veiled rehash of Schrodinger's Rapist.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:05 AM
33

The depths of po-faced humorlessness of feminism know absolutely no limits. You cannot ever use humor to laugh in the face of devastating tragedy or to defuse the often crushing darkness of human suffering because "that's insensitive!", or "you don't care about X oppressed group, you privileged asshole!". If feminists aren't ensuring everyone around them is as fully miserable and sanctimonious as they are, well then they simply aren't doing their job.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:56 PM
21

It is easy, all you have to do is regurgitate the various misandric, racist, classist bigotries of your instructor using as many polysyllabic inkhorn terms like "heteronormative" and "cisprivileged abelist" as possible and you ace the class. Not willing to ingratiate yourself at the altar of anti-male hate and subjective political newspeak unconvincingly masquerading as objective science that is Sociology? You gonna fail. Sociology is bullshit, just like postmodernism, semiotics, wymyn's studies…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:47 PM
4

Now this, this is the heart of feminist ideology. Pwecious pwecious feeewings trump absolutely everything. You cannot use logic and reason whenever a woman's feelings are in discussion according to feminism because feelings and emotions are always right by default. If you feel that you were raped even if the man was asking for consent every 8 seconds during sex, well then you were raped! It's a stunningly idiotic and toxically narcissistic ideology.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:15 PM
10

Given Reddit's average user age I thought no one would get the reference and I would end up having to explain it, like grandpa Simpson and belt onions. Lol
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:15 PM
23

GEMgemgemgemgemgemgem
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:25 AM
7

Oh shit I almost forgot about "birth rape". Those sneaky pervert medical doctors with their "degrees" and "science"; we all know it's just a big racket to shove those silvery speculums of sexism into wymynns' vaginas without consent!
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:15 AM
8

Oh you silly! Here's how to check to see if you're objectifying/dehumanizing/othering/sexualizing/demeaning/silencing/devaluing/shaming a womyn. Step 1: Check your pants; do you see a cock and balls? If yes, you are dehumanizing wymyn. There is no step 2.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 10:27 AM
1

I am really not a big fan of "lists" like these where there is no recourse for the person added, but I read the article and she's clearly making fun of the fact, if not outright endorsing, that her female friends physically injure their boyfriends. It was obviously not written as satire or farce. Put that bitch on the list.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:42 PM
5

Who cares how hard the Navier-Stokes equations are to solve when you're a humanities major? All you have to do to get an A in your post-structural wymyns semiotic queer theory whateverthefuck class is come up with some batshit "criticism" that demonizes men or masculinity in some manner. It doesn't matter if you get to that endpoint via regurgitation of Simone de Beauvoir or by claiming Einstein's general relativity is a form of rape apology.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:23 PM
1

That's my concern. Circumcision is seen as so routine and easy to make a quick buck off of that doctors aren't even mentioning alternatives in cases of actual medical disorder.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:22 AM
2

Right but they never had you try using a device like this before recommending surgery?
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:09 AM
4

Oh noes, we fucked the statistics on a meaningless web poll. Consequences will never be the same!
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:48 PM
2

How did it "not stretch"? Did you have to use some kind of device on it that you wear or did they just have you do it manually when you remembered or something?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 11:44 PM
10

I was being sarcastic, I don't believe in The Patriarchytm. At least not in the developed modern Western world.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:11 AM
34

Gold digging is just (usually) women who seek out rich men to marry and then mooch off of buying expensive crap until they die. This is much more than that, they're actually deliberately manipulating men to get as much money as possible out of them before dumping them and moving on to the next victim, pickpocket-like. It's more gold strip mining than digging.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:35 AM
34

Lol, what the fuck am I saying? With the practically yogic levels of intellectual contortionism feminists have mastered in their "postcritical theory" brands of histrionic horseshit, I'm sure they'll have no trouble at all convincing themselves that actually this "rinsing culture" thing is really oppressive to women and a result of patriarchy....somehow. That sneaky patriarchy! The cause of all things bad that happen to and are perpetrated by women everywhere.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter