TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anonym2481 Archive

View 9 posts and 48 comments by Anonym2481 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
201

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights05/01/25 03:00 AM
92

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:27 AM
91

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:57 AM
69

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:05 AM
62

ProgressAnonym2481/r/MensRights12/01/25 05:03 AM
59

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:37 PM
42

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:34 PM
38

Activism/SupportAnonym2481/r/MensRights08/01/25 07:12 PM
34

social mediaAnonym2481/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/25 06:56 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

"Most women don't want equality, they want the special treatment of being infantilized but then want to be considered strong and independent!?" This is the classical empowered/victim tandem that feminists employ, adopting the status that suits them at a particular moment in time. And English barrister by the name of Ernest Belfort Bax highlighted this strategy of feminists in his book The Fraud of Feminism (1913), indicating that feminism divides into two strains - political feminism and sentime…
/r/MensRights24/01/25 02:43 AM
6

Yeah, especially in movies or TV shows where a man getting slapped or kicked in the nuts by a woman is seen and depicted as comedic. Terrible. That's how far we've gone as a society.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:34 PM
3

Bax highlighted that male solidarity is far weaker than female solidarity, and that men are willing to turn against their own sex if it means winning a woman's heart. This is what sentimental feminism advocates for - twisted versions of chivalry in which men defend even the most heinous of women simply because they are women.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 10:15 PM
3

Yes, exactly. I am currently reading the book and have learned a lot. As regards WWI, it only got worse, with the white feather campaign and all. What is interesting to me is that people will assert that feminism is anything but for chivalry and traditional gender roles, but little do they know that feminists specifically reserve traditional roles for men, deriving upon twisted notions of chivalry that men are to demonstrate in favor of women; no one knows that feminists equally advocate for tra…
/r/MensRights12/01/25 09:56 PM
1

Yeah, the restaurant one someone mentioned that to me as well.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 04:05 AM
1

Especially the guy who helped the woman with slapping the man... Jeez these men at an instant are rendered women's personal subservient lapdogs who believe they are some alphas or something.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 02:10 AM
5

Precisely, this is exactly how everything, unfortunately, operates in this psychologically under-resourced society. As regards men fighting on behalf of women, with as much as a tearful sob story they are at an instant rendered the women's personal subservient lapdogs who believe they are alphas; as one English barrister by the name of Ernest Belfort Bax put it, male solidarity is far weaker than female solidarity, to such an extent that men are willing to go against their own sex if it means wi…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:02 AM
3

Yes I believe I saw that one as well, people were smiling and laughing as that was going on.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 05:50 AM
7

Wow, unbelievable... interesting story, thanks for sharing. I will look into this show more. No wonder why men don't open up nor reach out to support services.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 05:50 AM
7

Society has internalized the notion that the woman is constitutionally the weaker sex, interrelating on average lesser musculature and shorter height with physical frailty. And anyone who possesses this so-called physical "frailty", is regarded as precious, sacred, as someone who therefore must be protected at all times.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 05:48 AM
1

Exactly. And according to feminist rhetoric, when a man displays competitiveness, assertiveness, and leadership, this is toxic, undesirable and oppressive, but when women do the same things (including combativeness and being confrontational and aggressive), that is deemed strong, virtuous and noble.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:21 PM
2

There is a book, called the fraud of feminism, written in 1913 by barrister Ernest Belfort Bax. He highlighted that female solidarity is way stronger than male solidarity if there truly is one; that men are willing to without hesitation condemn and go against their own sex to defend the woman even if she is in the wrong, even without being at all familiar with the woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/01/25 04:30 AM
2

Very nice explanation! One hundred percent agree. I also heard that feminism is rooted in the occult. There is a book called Occult Feminism, by Rachel Wilson. You know it's funny that feminism is of the philosophical lineages that you just mentioned, lineages that rely on deception, while also being rooted in the occult, essentially of the devil, who precisely relies on deception.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:02 PM
4

It is no coincidence that feminists take up linguistics courses, inventing such ambiguous language. Janice Fiamengo, a Canadian professor, breaks this down very well.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:58 PM
2

Haha, typical of feminists. Debate is futile against them.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:57 PM
2

Yes, ambiguous terms such as patriarchy, toxic masculinity, rape culture, and even outright made up words such as mansplaining and manspreading, are the go to tactics of feminists, plus of course the shouting, insulting, and talking over others; it is no coincidence that feminists take up courses in linguistics. Janice Fiamengo, a Canadian professor, breaks this down perfectly.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:54 PM
5

Oh there's no doubt about that.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:47 PM
4

I see. It is funny that feminists claim men are emotionless, when men more often than not refuse to show emotions (and by suppressing emotions, one is in fact on the inside more emotional, more sensitive, because they are hurting on the inside by suppressing the emotions) because those same feminists, and people in general, will turn around at them and say, "oh man up, stop whining."
/r/MensRights05/01/25 07:28 AM
5

Interesting, I have not heard of normative alexithymia before, but I will look into it. Many therapists operate on such dogma, and I remember that in one of the textbooks I was assigned, the author used feminine pronouns to refer to victims of abuse, and masculine pronouns to refer to perpetrators of abuse.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:42 AM
7

Yes, 💯.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:35 AM
7

Yes, 💯. As regards masculinity and femininity in general, such things ultimately do not exist; there's no point calling certain behaviour or temperament "masculine" or "masculinity" if it occurs just as much in women, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:34 AM
6

💯
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:32 AM
10

I can't count the number of times I seen feminists claiming to fight for men's issues, then turning around and saying that "it's not our responsibility, but mens'" and then proceeded to protest and shut down men's issues lectures, campaigns, and male shelters, pulling fire alarms, shouting into megaphones and making bomb threats when men DID actually attempt to fight for their issues. I am actually writing a book regarding this matter and discussing feminism's true intentions, been on my mind to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 02:11 AM
1

Yes one hundred percent! However, as regards the first wave of feminism, I too thought that the first wave was well-meaning and about equality, but upon further digging I saw that that was never the case; feminists even back then abided by the same empowered/victim tandem, adopting the status that suits them at a given moment. They committed arson, bombing, property destruction, and smashing of windows so as to win the right to vote, but without the responsibility of meeting certain prerequisite…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:28 AM
1

Wow, thank you for putting this on my radar, I will definitely look into this! Yes, other users on this sub also mentioned that it is women who typically mock and shame men, including male victims of abuse.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 07:01 PM
1

You're very welcome!
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:08 PM
1

Yep, that's true. One professor named Janice Fiamengo, when she recounted receiving thousands of mail from men, recalled how surprised she was with men's mildness and their support for women's rights despite being hated by women.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:20 PM
2

Yes, absolutely. The term toxic gender norms, as well as the term internalized misandry, are especially appropriate in these cases. The most toxic of such gender norms as regards men, is the imposed obligation to provide, protect, and self-sacrifice for women, even women who are complete strangers to them. I understand doing it for the loved women in their family, more precisely the women who reciprocate their love, but doing it for complete strangers and women who hate men is just absurd.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:24 PM
2

Yes exactly! I have not seen feminist women be as hostile, if at all, with other women challenging them, only to men. They repeatedly talk over, raise their voice, and insult the men presenting their own points, and I remember seeing one female tv host outright encouraging the female guest to interrupt the male guest! Talk about silencing and oppression! By the way, I wanted to recommend to you one book, The Fraud of Feminism, written by Ernest Belfort Bax in 1913; he highlighted even back then …
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:20 PM
2

Yes, I am of the same position. I have seen feminists on video pulling fire alarms, protesting and yelling so as to interrupt and shut down men's issue lectures and campaigns, and name calling MRAs and men who wanted to see those lectures. I cannot help but see that these feminists know what they are doing; they themselves perhaps don't believe in the lies they are saying, but they cannot afford to have male issues taken seriously and have spaces for men, as that would mean that half of the fund…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:11 PM
1

Oh ok got it! But I decided to share it to spread more awareness.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:04 PM
2

Yeah, although it is impossible to argue with feminists and win, it is quite easy to stump feminists with their own inconsistencies and expose them.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:04 AM
1

Yeah, I remember him criticising either Plato or Socrates, or both. He did love one philosopher Heraclitus.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:37 AM
1

Yeah, Nietzsche is one of my favorite philosophers, his Antichrist is my favorite book.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:30 AM
0

Um, what is this post?🤣
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:29 AM
1

Will definitely check it out!
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:34 AM
2

Also I want to recommend to you a professor named Janice Fiamengo if you're not familiar with her already. She does YouTube videos highlighting various feminist themes such as the white feather campaign, the vote, that feminism was never about equality, etc. She introduced me to one very notable book titled the Fraud of Feminism, by Ernest Belfort Bax. It was authored in 1913 and even back then Bax called out what feminists are exhibiting today - the dual empowerment/victimhood tandem.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:05 AM
2

Yep definitely.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:52 AM
2

Yeah that definitely can happen too. What I meant was in the context of a woman forcing herself on a man or a boy, and thereby forcing her vagina on a man or a boys' penis.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:51 AM
2

Yeah I am familiar with the Honey Badgers, maybe will mention them on this sub at some point.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:48 AM
2

An mra named Karen Straughan was the only one out of any well-known MRAs, as far as my knowledge goes, who compared feminists to nazis, highlighting that feminists view men as subhuman, the same way the Nazis viewed the Jews.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:16 AM
2

Yes I heard of that one! I may get to reading it at some point. There is a small wooden table under glass in a museum; the suffragettes used it for seances.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:36 PM
3

Yes, i recall reading in one of my classes one textbook in which one author referred to perpetrators of abuse using masculine pronouns, and victims of abuse using feminine pronouns. Also it is no coincidence that feminists of academia take linguistics so as to devise ambiguous language and terminology such as 'rape culture', 'lived experience', and outright hateful terminology such as 'toxic masculinity'.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:50 AM
5

You're very welcome! Glad I could help! Yes, Janice Fiamengo (university of Ottawa professor) highlighted these facts about women in the US, as well as mentioning UK women in the 1700s and 1800s being very successful businesswomen, journalists, educators, and such. I really enjoy watching her videos.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:23 AM
5

Actually, what you have witnessed in those subs is what real feminism is. Initially I too believed that there was such a thing as "true" and "false" feminism, that the first wave meant well and it just went off the rails during subsequent waves. As it turns out it was never the case if one looks into feminism's history.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:09 AM
2

Yes this is 💯. Also, as regards the term "made to penetrate" that seems to be established in some states, or at least mentioned in studies, even this term never sat well with me, because it reduces or takes away from the agency of the female perpetrator and still makes it seem like the man was the actor and the women the one acted upon, the man is essentially seen as the one raping the woman, as said term derives from the definition of rape as an inherently penetrative action. Laws need to call …
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:14 AM
2

Yes this is 💯. Also, as regards the term "made to penetrate" that has been established, or seems to be established in some places, even this term never sat well with me, because it reduces or takes away from the agency of the female perpetrator and still makes it seem like the man was the actor and the women the one acted upon, the man is essentially seen as the one raping the woman, as said term derives from the definition of rape as an inherently penetrative action. Laws need to call female on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/24 02:51 AM
1

This was the way feminism was from the outset. An English barrister by the name of Ernest Belfort Bax called this out more than a century ago in his book "The Fraud of Feminism". Feminists committed arson, property destruction, burned buildings and stored phosphoric bombs in parcel and envelops which would combust upon contact with oxygen. Furthermore, feminists partook in the white feather campaign, sending men and underaged boys via shaming tactics to enlist in the army and die on the battlefi…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter