TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AnotherDAM Archive

View 57 posts and 1,905 comments by AnotherDAM on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
83

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights13/01/17 11:12 AM
60

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights12/05/20 04:44 AM
58

GOAL REACHED!AnotherDAM/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:33 AM
56

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:11 PM
42

HumourAnotherDAM/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:56 PM
40

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights30/01/19 11:18 PM
39

Legal RightsAnotherDAM/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:58 AM
39

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:36 PM
39

Marriage/DivorceAnotherDAM/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:45 AM
38

GeneralAnotherDAM/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:23 AM
38

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:22 PM
36

HumourAnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/07/17 01:43 PM
35

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:06 AM
32

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:50 PM
27

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:53 PM
26

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:02 PM
26

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:30 AM
21

Legal RightsAnotherDAM/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:58 PM
21

GeneralAnotherDAM/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:09 AM
20

GeneralAnotherDAM/r/MensRights01/06/18 05:15 PM
16

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights16/04/17 08:58 PM
15

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:13 PM
15

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:34 PM
15

AnotherDAM/r/MensRights02/01/17 01:53 PM
13

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:20 PM
13

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:24 AM
13

False AccusationAnotherDAM/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:25 PM
13

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:21 PM
12

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:31 PM
12

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:42 PM
11

DiscriminationAnotherDAM/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:41 PM
11

Legal RightsAnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:08 PM
11

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights14/01/17 06:08 AM
11

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:06 PM
10

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:54 PM
9

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights02/01/17 02:06 PM
9

False AccusationAnotherDAM/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:59 PM
8

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:14 PM
8

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:01 AM
8

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:58 PM
8

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:47 PM
7

AnotherDAM/r/MensRights03/10/18 04:52 PM
7

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:20 AM
6

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:58 AM
3

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:47 AM
3

GeneralAnotherDAM/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:57 AM
2

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:48 PM
2

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:35 PM
2

GeneralAnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:02 PM
1

Social IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:30 AM
1

HumourAnotherDAM/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:21 PM
1

GeneralAnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:59 PM
0

Activism/SupportAnotherDAM/r/MensRights04/02/17 12:04 AM
0

Global IssuesAnotherDAM/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:31 PM
0

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:15 PM
0

False AccusationAnotherDAM/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:36 PM
0

Edu./Occu.AnotherDAM/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:37 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,905 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wow - MORE passive aggressive. YOU owe me an explanation - either your are incompetent at your job, and I don't give a fuck if it is voluntary because you took up the mantle, or you are dishonest and are capriciously applying the rules. If the RULES are "we remove posts if they receive two down votes reports" then THAT should be clearly written in the side bar. But that ISN'T the rule - the rule is if a post receives two down votes reports a mod reviews the post and makes a decision. The fact th…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:39 PM
1

iainmf: You post received two reports about not being about men's rights. I suggest you make a text post with a link to the video and explain how it related to men's rights in the text. Go fuck yourself - that is some serious passive-agressive blame shifting. It isn't your responsibility -- other people made you do it. Your job is NOT to be a show pony who does what (s)he is told to do by a mob. YOUR JOB is to apply the rules - you get a report - you review it. YOUR JOB is to explain why the "De…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:26 PM
1

You fucking, sanctimonious, self-serving, jackass. Right now this has been stickied to the front page - a rant about feminism - but yea, my post breaks your bad interpretation of the rules. Fuck you. Discrimination against men Police are overwhelmingly men Issues that disproportionately affect men Police are disproportionately men Problems that prevent men's issue being addressed The Constitution of the United States was written by men. The Bill of Rights was written by men. An officer, acting l…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:05 PM
4

I know a lot of purest will ask the inevitable "what does this have to do with men's rights" - but THIS MAN is an example of someone who believes in the rule of law. The very type of man who will support and defend men's rights because they are human rights.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 04:51 AM
8

Not to mention that 396/(30-18) = 33 men/year. So, approximately a new partner per week taking one week off a month for "lady alone time".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/20 03:56 PM
2

The very best I can do on short notice is confirm that an account @bhavissalove did once exist and it followed two users. Hardly incriminating
/r/MensRights05/05/20 07:17 PM
96

Always leave the seat up.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 02:20 AM
1

I would suggest rewatching the first one as it is insanely relevant AND it has awesome conspiracy theory potential given that it was shot in the 70s. Opens on top of WTC Tower 1 - 911 comes up prominently - and is all about how the smallest of things can topple our society.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:20 PM
1

"Connections"? In this time of need I feel we should all be suggesting great binge worthy TV and Connections with James Burke should be at the top of that list. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connections_(TV_series)
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:51 PM
1

For the purposes of gender equality, the number of men in the sub must be reduced to 10% You know -- there is a word that means literally this, right??? A word that encapsulates the value of men throughout history nonetheless. Edit: actually decimate means reduce by 10% - you want to reduce to 10% -- mea culpa
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:12 AM
0

I was simply speaking WRT the Corona issue. The bartenders, cooks, and wait staff are all very happy to see everyone.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:54 PM
1

and took it as braggadocio Only a true braggart would use such a word ;) Last night I went out of my way to eat a hamburger at a local pub. I tipped the amount of the bill because the staff have always been good to me and I know that they are hurting more than I am. Now I am not saying that a chain smoking, loud mouthed, take no prisoners, internet sensation had anything to do with it - but I did pray a silent "thank you Karen" to the matron saint of every hard working person who makes life bett…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:58 PM
1

I think it also has a lot to do with humanity's inability to reexamine a situation as facts come to light. My childhood friend, euphemistically "Dabney", was told his entire life that he was the product of an exercise of 'free love' in the back seat of a VW Bug in 1960's Haight Ashbury district of San Francisco. That his mom knew who his father was but 'dad' did not want anything to do with his son. Dabney's very reasonably response to his father's rejection grew into a visceral, albeit barely c…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:27 PM
1

And it was progressives who opposed Persky’s recall. You will need to substantiate your wild speculation here as it was Stanford (not a lawyer, but an radical feminist) "ethics" lecturer in their law school who spearheaded the charge. Further, the voting population in question is overwhelmingly "progressive" - so if they opposed his recall then exactly how did it happen?
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:11 PM
3

Scratch a feminist, find a liar.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:54 PM
2

I have no mouth, and I must scream - I wish Icould thinkso well
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:26 AM
2

What right do I have, as a woman, to an equal say in the decisions of a government that can compel my sons or my brothers, but not me, into risking their lives to enforce those decisions? This is so dumb, were women the ones who created the idea for the draft in the first place? The "idea for the draft" was created at a time when men, who had created formalized laws and were acting in the interest of society, placed the burden on men. Men have always balanced rights and responsibilities. This is…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:50 PM
1

I don't know why but my mind likes to reduce things to the obvious. /u/Trusty_Pigeon becomes "TP" in my mind ... and then I see "Tone Police". Coincidence? Maybe, but much more likely Freudian on her part. Feminists always gotta tone police, shame, and control.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:32 PM
1

And thanks for confirming that you are homophobic. Either you don't know the meaning of the word or you are intentionally misrepresenting a position. This entire paragraph is pure projection on your part. I mean how exactly are you "sensing" anything? Perhaps your ever handy Ouija board?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:40 AM
1

How precisely is it EITHER irrelevant OR inflammatory? It is 100% factually correct and this is another example of YOUR particular overreach. This wasn't about a (just) a (white) MAN who was a pedophile - it was precisely in fact his HOMOSEXUAL PREDILECTIONS which caused is pedophilia (used, as is quite common, in place of the actual hebephilia). Are you positing that had this priest NOT been homosexual he could have, or would have, performed the acts described?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 12:37 AM
1

Sitting in my car with a friend along side me I got into a verbal scuffel with a teenaged douchebag male (yea, I know... I was that kid once upon a time). Kid's girlfriend comes over to his defense and says, "I am going to call the cops and tell them you raped me". She was dead serious, and that is when I just started laughing uncontrollably.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 03:59 PM
-4

No, that's just the standard terminology used in the court system to describe such an event. You are often a great poster, but on this you are a liar. It isn't "standard terminology" in any academic sense. It is only standard because the media often wants to "lead the bull by the nose" and they use this phrase (ergo, "standard" in the "I see it used a lot" sense) to encourage readers to think of a jury as an amorphous blob. Go watch 12 Angry Men. OK then, looks like it's #BelieveAllAccusers for …
/r/MensRights26/02/19 03:54 PM
-2

That is real funny that you are "suspicious" of me, an internet nobody but have NO suspicions about The Guardian, a large corporation, and ITS headline: George Pell: cardinal found guilty of child sexual assault Wow, "CHILD" - with the gender of the victim (yup, victim because the bastard was found guilty) buried in the article. Almost as if the Guardian was covering up the fact that George Pell was a HOMOSEXUAL PEDOPHILE. If the overwhelming majority of Catholic sexual scandals were not adult h…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 03:18 PM
-3

Psychologically speaking there is anecdotal evidence that women will go on decade long persecution sprees. Much less anecdotal evidence for men. The fact that the accuser maintained his position for as long as he did tells us either there is something there or he is clinically delusional. Given the vast power of the Catholic Church you can be certain the accuser faced tremendous pressure to recant ... and he didn't. the first trial ended after the jury was discharged for failing to reach a verdi…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:56 PM
-1

As a recovering Catholic all I can say is fuck this asshole and everyone who protected him.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:33 PM
1

Concern troll just gotta troll y'know.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:35 AM
6

Lol you are a fucking dumbass. Someday you will get to look back at your self with honest eyes. I predict you will not like what you see. No "shitty insults" sprang from me. I simply am guessing that you were raised in a very feminist household and can only see the world through "negging". Let's face it - you used the term "legalized bribery" which is beyond an oxymoron. Bribery, by definition, cannot be legal - so you conflate something legal with bribery so you can justify your jealous anger. …
/r/MensRights24/02/19 07:21 AM
6

You are mentally ill - and lazy. All complaint, no substance. Lovely feminist troll I presume.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 07:11 AM
7

It is a signed court order - just because you don't like the message doesn't mean magically it is untrue. You don't like it so you attack the information channel - the Times of San Diego might be shit (I don't know, and I really don't care) but even if they are shit it is unlikely they would go to the trouble of writing an entire legal decision. Read the PDF jackwad, don't just bury your head in the sand because you are unwilling to accept reality.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 07:02 AM
5

So you purporting that the order is fake? Effectively forging a Federal Judge's signature? That is a Federal felony you know?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:05 AM
23

No treaty can supersede the US Constitution The appellate court found that the requirement violated the US Constitution - ergo treaty obligations are vitiated.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:44 AM
1

You are quite boring ,,, it would seem you have no original thoughts. You have repeated yoursel 3 times ina row ... I win.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 11:21 AM
2

And the feminist brigade has arrived. Attempting to conflate her assault on an unconscious man with some theoretical abuse on his part.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 06:31 AM
2

I am concerned that no one pointed out to her that she fundamentally misunderstands the word "equality".
/r/MensRights23/02/19 06:03 AM
3

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of human interaction. That or you are concern trolling, please let us know which. When YOU are aggressively attacked out of the blue do you rationally stop and think about it or do you react? She was "put in the hospital" by her own actions. He reciprocated "in kind" and I will bet you a year's salary that she fractured her skull when she hit the ground; not when his fist met her face. So ... an idiot woman decides to go all MMA on a man but doesn'…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 06:03 AM
0

Still keeps feeding me Still keeps imagining I should care about her opinions...
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:55 AM
6

$10 says she never hits another man in her life.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:56 AM
5

Apply that same plan to child molesters & pedophiles. When you consider the inter-generational nature of these predictions I can only stress how correct you are.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:54 AM
1

So, do fuck off, Mr. Concern Troll. /u/MarkIsMENINIST -- Username checks out, nice catch Gaki-San :)
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:49 AM
5

More importantly since when did we LINK to Rolling Stone? Archive.IS link for the pure
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:43 AM
4

CANCEL AMAZON PRIME. Don't be afraid of the multiple screens they make you jump through, this ONLY cancels your auto-renewal. You will get the remaining use of your Prime Membership and it gives you the opportunity to send Amazon a strong message.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:21 AM
12

I think she is CORRECT. Women "lying about rape" is much more akin to MURDER than it is to rape. I think giving false testimony which could lead to lifetime incarceration, or state sanctioned murder, should be a CAPITOL CRIME. Put one convicted false accuser to death and watch the crime simply disappear.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:18 AM
1

I am happy to give you the attention you say you need.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:13 AM
1

Clearly you have an absence of attention in your life. I am simply giving you what you say you need. Al the while you repeat yourself and never substantiate a thing you say.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:13 AM
1

Oh? Can you cite an authoritative source for this magical definition that exists outside of your delusion? Yea, didn't think so.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 02:54 PM
1

(But you're not MRA) Once again you are pretending that you get to decide this. (A very feminist quality) Can't remember you being elected to that position, let alone actually attending any of the meetings. So your claim is worth exactly dick.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:06 PM
2

u/Meistermalkav has a better idea: Better approach. Congratulate them for fat, slut and bodyshaming men. Congratulate them for shaming the fatties, and being grease headed meatheads who lift religiously.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:05 PM
1

wearing his gun slung over his shoulder. You are being, again, disingenuous. Dixon wasn't alone, but part of a cadre intentionally armed with "assault style" semi-automatic rifles at the event. If someone such as he, was threatening you, with a group of also armed folks, you would as I said earlier Shit your pants. No one with any integrity would posit that any untrained civilian would be rational after being confronted with someone who admits publicly that the use of deadly force at civil event…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:04 PM
52

The "artist" who created this campaign has quite a bit of Feminst Nutjobery to look at. No fucking way I am linking direct. Archive.IS link to Martin Firrell's website Want to do something? Contact Clear Channel UK and ask them why they support ugly misandry.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:51 PM
4

so : There are only two kinds of women. Child murderers and child murderers in waiting. is perfectly within the bounds of Twitters rules?
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:46 PM
1

Hmm... Yea, this is a bastion of Alt-Right GroupThinktm. seems that this "college professor aimed a rifle" theory is only propagated on conspiracy and right-wing hyperbole websites. Yes, conspiracy websites and his own FaceBook page. With witnesses to his presence. I adore how you dismiss reality when it contradicts your narrative.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:36 PM
0

You know nothing of what organisations I have supported in my private life... Correct - because you are so busy telling OTHER people to GET TO WORK. Maybe you SHOULD focus on yourself. And I'm not about to enlighten you. Modus Operandi of the Feminist Mind - claim you are a bigbig person but you know ... wouldn't want to brag. Humble Brag much? But you can assume safely that I paid my dues No, I cannot "assume" that. I can only assume the opposite absent evidence. At the end of the day, there is…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:14 PM
1

I told you, part of the MRA mission is showing compassion to the mentally unstable. Have a cookie.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:09 PM
0

I love how you talk about how OTHER people should "fix" the system for YOU.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:36 PM
7

"All posts must come from an educated indoctrinated perspective" FTFT
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:34 PM
0

Of course with taxes it's different. Of course, I mean naturally who would ever think differently than you. Spousal support is a matter between two human beings who used to live together. A man will be forced to pay a woman a certain amount to keep up the standard of living she has become accustomed to, which in my view is highly unfair and unreasonable. Two human beings AND a government. And your opinion means what exactly? I could not refuse to pay taxes without actually hurting the state and …
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:28 PM
-1

I don't think you understand even the basics of how the system works. Your "ideal" is just that, yours, in your head. Are you suggesting that "ideally" you should get to decide exactly which projects your tax dollars are spent on? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:19 PM
0

I love how you have not understood by now that all i do is provoking you You broke the #1 rule of being a troll by admitting that is all you are. You keep putting me in a box you think I should feel negatively about hoping to make me angry. You aren't a very good troll.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:16 PM
1

I am a bot - like I said, keep typing as I am happy to help you with your issues.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:03 PM
1

Again with the projection and the intentional mislabeling. So Feminist, so delusional.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:02 PM
1

And you still a follower of anti-male ideology and not a MRA The more you write the more I begin to believe that you are a fatherless female. You seem to think that repeating the same BS somehow makes it true - but your "lived experience" seems to lack in both categories. You seem to think that your opinion matters to me (or anyone outside of your ego). Both of these, and other items in the overarching thread, lend credence to a possible diagnosis of female entitlement syndrome.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:29 PM
1

That's easy If you support an ideology that treats men like shit - you're not for men's rights. Basic logic. Period. Thanks for the fantastic example of Begging the Question This succinctly demonstrates how very bad you are at logic.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:54 PM
6

As the marital therapist stated towards the end of my marriage: The person who wants something less, or even merely appears to want it less, has all the psychological control. Much of the PUA teachings can be boiled down to this - appear to not give a fuck and the women who need to control men will tie themselves in knots attempting to make PUAs "care".
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:52 PM
1

you're not a MRA Wow, who appointed you as the gatekeeper? That is some Grade AAA delusional thinking on your part. (more projection as clearly your subconscious is screaming for therapy)
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:28 PM
2

Kind of hard for women to shoulder responsibility when they literally weren't allowed to leave the house without being chaperoned (like it is in hardcore muslim countries now), and weren't allowed to work. Ah, the Feminist Lie at work - I really don't give a single fuck about what does, or does not, happen in "muslim" societies. So, when was it exactly, that women were not allowed to leave the house in AMERICA or other Western Countries. And - the moment women were granted suffrage why weren't t…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:26 PM
0

text walls Sure princess... what you are doing is fairly classic projection. Demanding others need what you so desperately crave subconsciously. But part of being an MRA is taking care of others so that all of their pain and anger can be channeled in a positive direction. Keep writing, it is good for you.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:16 AM
0

you promise to find a phsychologist to talk to. Deal? You don't have to SAY you are a feminist. But you ARE behaving like one; have to guess that you were raised by a single mother and the very best you can do is to attempt to (poorly) psychologically control others. Keep writing, I promise I will continue to point out your hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:11 AM
10

For anyone that is gonna comment on another post on this sub and say, “Feminism is about fair treatment for everyone!” Please kindly refrain from doing so. Pretty certain no one here would do that. Feminism was originally designed as a system to put women on par with men when it was not so; No, it wasn't. At no time have women shouldered the responsibilities required of men. That means feminists have always, ALWAYS, wanted MORE than men had. however, now it has morphed into mostly female suprema…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:01 AM
1

My god Dude you really need to take a break. More shaming from the person behaving like a feminist.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:57 AM
0

Wow, you LIE just like a Feminist. That being that you literally MADE UP a "quote". Dude, flush what's in your head More Feminist shaming. Clearly if you ACT like a feminist and demand that we enforce some collectivist mentality you would probably be happier if you came out of the closet.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:32 AM
1

Good attitude!!! (no snark)
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:02 AM
1

Did you just call me a feminist? I haven't looked but I seriously doubt it. I probably said that you are ACTING like one, or perhaps using their style of argumentation. With more examples to follow. Man, if you're a traditionalist - please, do not ever call yourself a men's rights activist. Feminist Deceptive Techniques: Labeling someone with a word meant to be a pejorative. Turns out you CAN be a "traditionalist" (note I am not claiming this title as you keep implying) and an MRA. The ONLY thin…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 12:02 AM
2

I said that a lot do. This is the truth. What is "a lot", and why the fuck does it matter? That is a Feminist Deception Technique you are using brother.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 11:57 PM
1

Dude, why can't you just accept that some MRAs have different opinions than you. So you are going to use the Feminist Deception of pretending I said something that clearly I did not say? And then argue from that false premise. MANY (in fact ALL) MRAs will have SOME opinions different than mine and that is fine. Insofar as we are talking about advancing the rights of men (or full egalitarianism) we are talking under the umbrella of the MRA movement. The MOMENT we start talking about religion (for…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 11:56 PM
1

Calling BullShit on you. ust because we don't live in a patriarchy in this country, in this moment, doesn't mean patriarchies never existed There is a WORLD of difference between a patriarchy and THE patriarchy. And conflating the two is a form of intentional deception. THE PatriarchyTM has never existed and is a whole-cloth invention of feminism designed exclusively to support the notion of women as an oppressed class (which, of course, they never were). in this moment, doesn't mean patriarchie…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 11:51 PM
10

Their central argument was that 'because men have done bad stuff to women throughout history, therefore its only 'fair' that: This is called COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT - because some hypothetical forefather might have committed an offense I and all other men owe a debt. And I call bullshit right then and there.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:05 AM
1

We are being brigaded. Some Gender Studies midterms must be due and the brain dead are trampling over here to earn extra credit.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:02 AM
0

You realize that a lot of MRAs believe in liberating men from traditional gender roles, right? Here is a GREAT idea - how about YOU speak for YOURSELF and not pretend to know what is in OTHER people's heads? And, this is a blatant LIE - MRAs, by definition, are advocating for the RIGHTS of men. If those people have views outside of the scope of advocacy that has NOTHING to do with the advocacy itself. What you are selling is 100% Intersectional Feminist Bullshit. SOME MRAs have Christian beliefs…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:00 AM
1

If you look at any of the "rights movements" throughout history you will find that they are ALL "Men's Rights Movements".
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:52 AM
-2

by it's nature opressive And the feminist brigade has arrived.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:50 AM
-4

Feminists and tradcons align on about half of all gender issues. Oh bullshit - This is a simple argument meant cause divisiveness inside the MRA tent. I have seen a few people on MensRights and MGTOW imply that the traditional patriarchy is better for men. This is the moment you prove yourself a feminist, as you are demanding that there exists a thing called The PatriarchyTM A lot of western men would be horrified by the responsibilities of men in more traditional societies. False conflation. Wa…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:49 AM
5

Send a message and Cancel your Amazon Prime. Amazon makes you jump through lots of hoops, each page seeming like a grave warning, but in the end IT IS SIMPLY CANCELING AUTO RENEWAL. Your Amazon Prime WILL last through your current subscription and if Amazon were to see 10K "cancellations" they will get a message, even if they never acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 03:01 AM
1

So we agree that all feminists are necessarily narcissists? (as an aside it is interesting that this is named after Narcissus. It is a trait we detest in men but sadly simply accept in women.)
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:02 AM
1

"I'm a guy" ... On the internet you can pretend to be whatever you want "There's no such thing as a good guy" No doubt OP is correct /s "... Some guys rack up their unpayable debt ..." Women pay more in taxes /s "And to be honest, when I hear about an innocent man ... I get a little flash of happieness" This tells us more about OP than about society
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:59 AM
3

The admins actually have the power to do that? Methinks you knowest not what the term "admin" means vis-a-vis computers.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:41 AM
2

Well now it does all make sense. We should follow women of color because as the Ozone Hole grows all of us pasty types will die of horrible cancers and cankers; they will be the only ones left.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 03:47 AM
2

clearly a woman pretending to be a man ...
/r/MensRights15/02/19 03:27 AM
1

Your logic troll, not mine.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 03:26 AM
1

My prediction? Kamala Harris will win the nomination Sadly you are certainly correct; and sadly the only way that the DNC could hope to have a chance would be to get Valerie Plame Wilson to run. But a beautiful, white, heterosexual woman who has literally put her life on the line for her country isn't in their sights. Re 3rd vs 4th wave feminism. I have absorbed most of JBP's lectures and generally agree with him. Feminists may vocalize a disdain for hierarchy while obviously fighting among each…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:21 PM
1

SO .... Are you finally admitting that we should all un-follow you due to your obvious lack of pigment?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:58 PM
3

Your parents made a medical decisionand a doctor performed a medical procedure on you. So you ARE saying that infant clitorectomies are OK by your standards? And you are saying that the governments of the world need to stop enacting legislation against FGM? Sort of disgusting by every advanced measure.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:54 PM
2

Interesting - I always thought it was because typesetters were traditionally midgets who had trouble reaching the upper case.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:27 AM
4

Note to narcissistic OP: Your opinion about your experience isn't a Men's Rights Issue. The fact that there is a DIFFERENT APPLICATION OF THE LAW between men and women IS. The US Constitution is quite clear on uniform application of law.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:55 AM
1

It is, unfortunately, reality.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:58 PM
1

I am not suggesting all women have always been looked down upon, but it seems patently obvious many have in the past. Of course not, feminists rarely put things in concrete terms - it is hard to wiggle out of an absolute position (having painted themselves into a corner with Patriarchytm the only safe position involves constantly changing definitions and using vague language) The reasonable position that SOME woman may have been looked down upon by SOME men is a deceptive and obnoxious place fro…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:52 PM
2

For some reason I imagine the clickfarming industry to be male. TOGTFO, or put another way: On the internet you can be whatever you want to be. The author, or authors, decided on a female pseudonym. Clearly you are misgendering her by referring in any way other than feminine.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:43 PM
2

Why listen to them then? You seem to have a feminist's absolutist binary perspective - namely that if you find one area of disagreement then there is no value to the other person at all. I loathe feminists, that doesn't mean I won't talk with them, and it certainly doesn't mean I feel that they have zero (or negative) value.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:39 PM
0

More proof that the most mature teenager in the room is always the wife.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:56 AM
1

You are being disingenuous by pretending what she did was "justice". One cannot get justice by their own hand since, by definition, they are judge, jury, and executioner. That is called REVENGE. Justice, by definition, is via the laws of the land. But I know, you want to smoke your hillbilly crack and have it too.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:53 AM
0

You twist just like a feminist. I didn't "go through" your posts - you only have ONE - and it was a pretty bizarre read. I didn't "insult" you, I simply demonstrated with your own words the likelihood of a micropenis AFTER you brought up my equipment. You are an MRA in exactly the same way Big Red is an MRA.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:49 AM
0

Says the guy who wanted a butt-plug with a dildo attached so he could fuck his boyfriend. Pretty certain that tells us all we need to know about the size of your equipment.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:22 AM
0

You are really, really angry. (and bossy) Personally I hope you get help for that.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:21 AM
27

I often listen to The Men's Room while driving and their NUMBER ONE ADVERTISER in terms of play time is a national jeweler constantly pushing the "buy her a diamond' meme. NOTHING could be worse for a guy then proposing near a holiday, other than being convinced that you "need to make her feel special" by buying an otherwise useless rock. The radio show, purporting to support men (and their beer sales do help vets) spend more time throwing other men under the bus than not.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 01:53 AM
0

(Replying up here so that anyone new to the conversation has a chance to see it.) Becki - I neither know nor care to know your real identity but I do know your post history. Given how pedantic you have been in other threads it seems genuinely interesting that this is hill you wish to die on - the sad destruction of the English language in order to anonymize, even hide, individual identity. That you appear to be a gay man doesn't bother me a whit; that you affect a "mean girl" persona is what is …
/r/MensRights12/02/19 01:29 AM
1

True, but the pseudonym is FEMALE therefore it is quite safe (kill me now) to assume that the person, or team, "identities" as a woman.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 01:15 AM
2

or be looked down upon as "only" a woman throughout history, Are you suggesting that this is the experience of every woman throughout history? This seems very unlikely to be real and more an artifact of feminist revisionism. MY grandmothers were badasses, MY mother endured suffering that is literally incomprehensible to intersectional idiocy. Not one of them complained about being looked down upon for being "only" a woman. So you make a truly false comparison by suggesting "being looked down upo…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:47 AM
0

Quit dictating what is and isn't masculine. HAHAHAHAHAHA, I am not dictating anything - you are playing the feminist technique of putting words in other people's mouths. And seriously, ONLY A PUSSY would make that spurious claim. I'm revoking your "man card". Pretty certain you don't have that authority (checks online) yup - still valid. Empty threats of a feminist. No u. What, now you communicate like a teenage chick? Dear god the humor is just inescapable. I know your feelings are hurt but if …
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:24 AM
1

As I review your comments and posts I see a lot of pain. You need to prioritize and I cannot tell you what that is; only you can, but from experience I feel strongly that you need to deal with your suicidal issues BEFORE you deal with anything else. PLEASE consider checking yourself into an in patient program where you can resolve the most important problem.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:56 PM
0

I don't believe that these pronouns ... Right, because your feelings are what rule the world. You ask why I doubt that you are male? Because you are pushing "feels before reals" really, really hard. I'm not pissed off... I have a naturally aggressive masculine writing style that sometimes gets misconstrued as anger. You go to incredible lengths to sell your masculinity; no man would use the phrase "naturally aggressive masculine writing style". It reads exactly like a woman, with no real idea ab…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:48 PM
2

I know that reaching out can be difficult and everyone here has felt some form of severe pain but I don't think the advice you find here today is going to be consistent. The first thing you should do is talk with people who have a more intimate understanding of your immediate pain. PLEASE consider posting to https://www.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/ the moderators are specifically trained and you won't have to sort through potentially contradictory advice.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:36 AM
1

Well, if he happened to live in Canada and had been found not guilty then the Canadian Parliament would enact a law requiring that you cannot demonstrate the falsehood of your accusers. The Great White Dopes
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:50 PM
8

TLDR: though many on this subreddit can see a men hating agenda in the form of feminism, please understand that most women are not like this and just want to get through life unobstructed as a result of their gender, race or personal situation Actually this group is renown for pointing out that fewer than 11% of women identify as feminist. So I am not sure of your point.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:47 PM
1

Bilbo? Is that you? Welcome home.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:45 PM
9

I am told that Tabasco Pepper Sauce does an exceptional job of killing sperm in condoms. YMMV.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:41 PM
2

I think it is less likely to be a "boy girl" dichotomy and more a "fem / butch" dyke one.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:09 PM
-1

I was asking a legitimate question. Sure princess. All I knew is that it is something that will piss people off. HOW? How will it piss people off? Why would ANYONE be pissed off? The only person that is pissed off is the one claiming everyone else will be pissed off. I disagree. The pronouns are still refering to one single person. I see you have a vast CV in linguistics. Perhaps you can elucidate the masses on the transition from "him / her" to "them / their". If you think that an author refusi…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:07 PM
16

are we just trying to piss people off? Classic projection; assuming other people's motives. It also demonstrates a particularly obnoxious form of close-mindedness. Unlike how you are trying to shame me right now by implying (incorrectly) that there is no benefit to MRAs (and don't kid yourself, you aren't genuinely asking a serious question but instead begging the question by hiding your assumptions in plain sight) shaming an Anonymous Coward for promoting intolerance might actually bring some g…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:17 PM
2

You defend your thesis precisely like someone who says she has been "thinking a lot" but who is clearly better at saying than doing. But on the bright side, if I am truly toxic then you will wither and go away. Sounds like a win to me.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 07:38 PM
4

Yup, this pile is a great example of a deepity
/r/MensRights10/02/19 07:01 PM
2

I've been thinking a lot about this lately and it seems And yet somehow you manage to share not a single thought. by having a separate men's rights movement, we alienate ourselves from others. The only people we alienate are people who feel men don't deserve equality. I am OK with that. I don't know what the solution is but it feels like there should be a group, There it is - promoting 'Feels before Reals'. That hardly sounds like deep thinking. Were you, by chance, raised by a single mother? th…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:52 PM
29

The author is too afraid to publish under their HER name. Take back the English language; use gendered pronouns.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:38 PM
2

This is the part of feminism that drove me away from it. The parking did it for you? For me it was: Arson Bombing Murder Torture Endangerment But sure, parking spaces is a little too far.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:32 PM
3

Well, feminism IS about equality, Clearly you are all about toeing the party line and avoiding even remedial research.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:20 PM
1

To me ... Textbook projection
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:10 AM
1

So ... either my ex has a twin or ...
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:14 AM
0

Really? I don't see the guy above me using the word "feminine". That is you doing what is called projection. But like I said, the First Rule of Feminism is LIE. Kind of exactly like what you are doing.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 07:02 AM
20

You forgot to apply the first rule of feminism: Lie. Lie about everything. Lie always. Chances are this event never occurred. It just made a good story so she made it up on the spot.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:51 PM
1

Sounds an awful lot like masturbation. I prefer the Paul Elam school of "get shit done". Not that I have any interest in changing your mind.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:48 PM
1

So you regularly buy lottery tickets I presume.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:07 PM
1

The question is, what do I lost by engaging a person like this with the assumption they are acting in good faith? Assuming that an otherwise organized opposition has a few "lost souls" whom you can save is very dangerous. It is how wolves find themselves in the sheep's pen. This guy is particularly great at breaking down political operations - Freedom Alternative on Black Propaganda
/r/MensRights09/02/19 07:14 PM
-1

he was talking out of his ass but I've no interest reading what other people are saying. Unless it is Karen a WALL OF TEXT is usually a bad sign :(
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:30 PM
-1

WTAF? Not a single one of /u/uly-sses 's links backs up his claim of hearing some phantom feminist purporting to stand up for mens's rights WRT financial support. Some feminist are speaking up to give fathers the right to opt out of the financial burden of having a child. One credible link would suffice. WHO has been saying these things? This is the first time I have seen a feminist say something that actually made sense. Link please. There is no reason that any man should be forced to pay for a…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:09 PM
4

You must take into account the first rule of feminism - LIE, lie always, lie about everything. So a feminist walks in here claiming she just got woke. Fourth Wave pushed her over the edge. Fourth Wavers pulling fire alarms was just too much. But First Wavers actually setting churches on fire was OK with her. Doesn't that seem fishy to you? Doesn't her reluctance to review Karen's extensively documented history seem fishy. What is more likely a woke former feminist (like Cassie) or militant grad …
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:41 PM
2

The first wave was about women getting the right to vote, I don’t know why you guys think otherwise So, the end result of this little journey we call feminism is clearly too extreme for you - but you aren't willing to dig deep into its actual history. You aren't willing to take an honest look at the pablum you have been taught?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:23 AM
2

There is a reason that the English language contains words such as: harpy, harridan, prick, asshole, et c. It turns out that what is between your legs doesn't predetermine your ability to be a decent human being or a douchewad. Funny thing is, women can be cunts and men can be dicks - and NO ONE wants to follow those people.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:10 AM
1

No he incited violence when he promoted rape which is a violent crime Just because you repeat yourself doesn't make it true. Now, if you want some credibility go get a law degree.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 05:25 AM
9

Brief history lesson, 1st wave: right to vote, 2nd wave: workers, and legal rights, 3rd wave: individualism and diversity, 4th wave of feminism: extremism. Yea, I would have to say /u/mdhunter99 it isn't good etiquette to go into anyone's house and tell them that your narrow understanding of history is the one and only true story. You have been overly broad and generous to the first three waves. While all of the HoneyBadgers are very well versed on history, you have wandered into Karen Straughan…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:22 AM
1

My psychiatrist laughed at the anecdote. You appear to be losing whatever little shit you have. The only person who seems angry here would be somewhere near wherever you're located. You know they have a term for this, ay?
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:56 AM
1

It's inciting violence where he incited a violent crime This is a poorly articulated thought. Are you trying to say that he incited the violence against him and is therefore guilty of having been hit with a baseball bat? Not sound logic there; she was charged, he was left alone. If your rights are abridged by the logic you seem to express, then they really aren't rights, are they?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 05:00 AM
1

I am CERTAIN that women like the Honey Badgers (/u/typhoonblue for confirmation) would all, to a person, spring into action and take care of the situation. The problem isn't gender, per se, but upbringing. Too many women were raised to believe that their contribution to the world was telling men what to do. My favorite metaphor, which I conceived over 15 years seeing a male therapist who turned out to be a stealth feminist: Psychologists, and do-nothing women, are a lot like (ok, maybe simile) s…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 09:17 PM
1

Thank you for the clear confirmation of my point. What you are doing is called "projection". Since you do not know me, and the entire basis of your analysis is a tiny sliver of text anything you see, emotionally, is purely of your own manufacture.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 09:07 PM
1

1800-waaaambulence And of course now I know just how petty you are, and how very likely I hit the nail right on the head. Not that there was ever any chance of having an honest dialogue with you - you have been preaching entirely out of the holy sermon of feminist rubbish from the start. So I guess you suck at insults too because if I cared any less about your opinion on any topic I would be dead.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:30 AM
1

I am typing slowly because I know you have a hard time with difficult concepts. Willie Wonka ALSO "won"
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:10 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaoySOGlZ_U
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:52 AM
1

fine,fine,fine. youcanhavethelastword
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:15 AM
1

See, now THAT is a joke.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:34 AM
1

You are clearly as good at jokes as you are at insults. Good day sir. . . . . . . . . . . . . I SAID: GOOD DAY, SIR!
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:10 AM
1

Of the ones I know, systems of education and support for developing minds (education), systems of support for victims of abuse. Efforts to educate and bolster deficits in human rights for women globally. Creation of organisaions for literal aid for women in third world countries. Absent the word "women" you could easy use your screed here as a sales pitch for Dianettics. And like L Ron Hubbard feminists are building a government subsidized religion. Systems of education. Yup, indoctrination camp…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:09 AM
1

I don't need strength, by your own admission. Per you I am the most energetic material outside of a singularity. I get you were trying to insult me, but you might want to talk to your doctor about upping your dose if you want to keep up.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:49 PM
1

Excellent! I saw it by meeting feminists and women in real life and talked to them about their experiences and struggles and what they are doing in their communities to try and make it better. I would say "nice try" but it isn't. Feminists are atomic entities that are all alike. You cannot measure one the same way twice, and you cannot measure two and get the same answer. This is sad to hear you think like this :( "Feels before reals". I don't care a rat fart what you feel, nor does it do our co…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:47 PM
4

I am 100% behind Hillbillarry sinking the DNC in 2020. Between her and Howard Schultz Trump won't even have to show up and he will be reelected.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:33 PM
7

That's like 90% of reddit. And 100% of feminists. They pretend to be helping women (and the rainbow coalition) but really the ONLY thing they are doing is helping themselves to the cookie jar.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:16 PM
6

For over thirty years I have been harassed by high school mate's mother. Her man left her for an older woman, her son married two different older women, her son's college chum had a hook-up with one of her friends. For thirty fucking years - "Joe must see something in that older woman" / "Darby married an older woman, I wonder what it is" / "Mark and Alison totally hit it off" / "YOU should come live with me". HEY SHARON - YOU ARE OLD AND NOT THAT INTERESTING - YOU HAVE NEVER DEALT WITH YOUR CHI…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:11 PM
3

CANCEL YOUR AMAZON PRIME (step buy annoying step guide). FFS -- encourage everyone you know to do this. Stop being friends with feminist supporters.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:00 PM
1

I am very energetic, thank you.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:53 PM
2

Just because you cannot see it doesn't mean they aren't trying to 'build'. Yes, yes it does. As a matter of fact that is EXACTLY what it means. "but, but, but, you can't see air". Yes I can, if we expand the definition of "see" to any INDEPENDENTLY REPRODUCIBLE measurement technique. I can "see" gamma rays, neutrinos, quarks. I can "see" OZONE holes. I can teach others how I am measuring these things and they can "see" them for themselves. The ONLY thing feminists are building are lies. Feminist…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:36 PM
1

Dear god, an emergency, calling the WAAAAAAmbulance now. 100% upvoted? HAHAHAHAHAHA. It has a score of 1. It gets a score of 1 by you submitting it. YOU are the ONLY person who has upvoted the thread you useless douche.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:25 PM
1

BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA. You seem to live in a universe where you can use being "offended" to pretend you don't need to follow the must rudimentary rhetorical requirements. YOU cited "study / data / stuff" in the most lazy way possible. The CDC has terabytes, fuck petabytes, exabytes, zettabytes (ok, probably not this one) of data. YOU demand everyone believe you and demand THEY find your needle in the haystack. But the burden is on YOU not me; you made the claim. My claim is much simpler - no re…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:22 PM
0

Jesus fucking Christ on a stick - pull your feminist "get angry at every comment" stick out of your ass and lighten up.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:17 PM
1

You madam, are head bangingly stupid.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:16 PM
2

myth ? Argue like a feminist much? Always putting words in other people's mouth and then pretending they said it so you can get all kinds of indignant? I never said what you are pretending I said. But since you asked. I have never met a competent woman who called herself a feminist. I worked closely with many, many flight nurses in the Air Force. AWESOME people. No feminists. Feminists want OTHER women to step up into STEM / Emergency Services, et c. Feminists by and large seem to relegate thems…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:14 PM
13

I suppose you need the cognitive validation to help you sleep at night. So, if it helps you to sleep at night to spit on a reasonable proposition more power to you. But one other truism about feminists is that they are incapable of building anything on their own - they are only capable of tearing down the work of men and then demand men build stuff to their (insane) design. EDIT: But an aside and to add a specific answer to your question: What if the man in this scenario that steps up first is a…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 06:00 AM
1

hmmm. So the majority of people here feel you are incorrect in posting here. At the very best you are tangential to a tenuously tangential issue that might belong here.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:56 AM
1

All fair, and I am not going to boo the repo man when he kicks you out and hauls your doublewide away.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:05 AM
1

that is significant enough to impact the numbers in this survey. And you know this how? I am assuming the answer is some magical variant on "muh magixal thynkn". f course that's only one factor and does not explain the "3x more" number, but it certainly factors in. You are disingenuously pretending the 3X number is REAL. Come on, use the googles. Fucking find something on the CDC from which this tweet might derive some credibility. Basically this whole thread is TL;DR: How do you know a feminist…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:03 AM
1

I also think he is harsher on men because he knows they need it. I disagree. I think fatherlessness is the black plague of our time and I think it stems entirely out of the feminist movement (up to that movement being the useful idiots of some very clever assholes). Women need to be told to own there shit; they need to be told loudly, and often. As I pointed out to a friend, there is a difference between harpy and harridan, and there is a reason we have these words and have had them for centurie…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:00 AM
1

Bullshit, universities do it all the time, from admissions to hiring to scholarships. Men are starting to file Title IX complaints about these things, but we've yet to see a Title IX office response. You are being pedantic. ANY business or university CAN discriminate. I mean FFS you literally contradict yourself above. First you tell me a clinic can't "becuz muh lawz" then you say "universities do it all the time" ("despite muh lawz"). So sure, they CAN discriminate, and they can make themselves…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:56 AM
0

Finally, I'm sure you know how to use Google, and you failed to ask for the source in a polite manner; so you can look it up yourself. The magical bullshit lie. YOU are citing data, not me. Since I am not psychic I cannot know with any certainty that any data I find is the data you found. So I come back and say X and you say .... "no, no no, that isn't the data I was citing .... but I am still not going to tell you my source". So, go fuck yourself Senorita SelfCite.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:48 AM
2

Or there are far more women in college than men. See, here you are having to use inappropriate adjectives. That makes you dishonest. Even your bullshit number isn't "far more". The actual number is, AT BEST 1.3:1. Which is less for those of you who cannot math.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:44 AM
1

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=princeton+fields+math+hawaii+piper+harron
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:41 AM
1

No it isn't. It is a PROPERTY issue. This is in Canada and I have no idea if there is a thing like the FDIC but even then it doesn't really apply. Some rube decided to invest in cryptocurrency. Said rube VOLUNTARILY handed over his money to a for-profit corporation that was certainly NOT set up as a bank. The government WILL attempt to recover and return the monies involved but is under no real obligation to make whole anyone who invests in tulips.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:36 AM
3

I want you to know I meant this tongue in cheek. There are exceptional women but very, very few of them identify as feminists (nod to CHS). A dear family friend, a 60 year old former anesthesiologist who weighed 100 lbs (er ... 45 kilos, ay?) on her very best day was at a non medical conference when a larger man needed CPR and the call went out for a doctor and only two hands went up. After all was said and done the other doctor's wife said to her, "thank god you were here, my husband is a psych…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:32 AM
1

This isn't a "rights" issue you fucking moron. Rights are due to you from the government. A private corporation fucked up. Not the government. A private corporation has a locked wallet. The money is still there. AND this is a god damn FUD hit piece. There is ZERO probability that this turns out to be true. All the money will be back and the accounts fully accessible in the near future.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:22 AM
15

From their website: Income has been generated solely via individual or organizational donations and government programs. While they are free to discriminate they are not free to discriminate while accepting any form of governmental aid.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:07 PM
1

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:00 PM
266

As a play on the "no atheists in foxholes" meme ... There are NO feminists in an emergency (and this is actually always true as opposed to the foxhole quote). Drowning person needs saving? Someone needs rescuing in any way? Every woman in the room will look to the men. They value male competencies when shit gets real and cannot admit their dependence on us when it is every other day.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:59 PM
8

Possibly, but I am going out on a limb here and guessing you haven't spent hundreds of hours listening to his lectures online and seeing him in person (before he was famous ... cannot get in to see him any longer). Jordan has (self admittedly) some daddy issues and holds men to a general higher standard. He has, before the current avalanche of attacks befell him, been generally harsher on men than women. You may be 100% correct about why he doesn't lecture directly to females as he has explicitl…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:42 PM
0

First of all, "much" is subjective. There is no mathematical definition of "much", so calling me out "in a mathematical sense" for something subjective is ridiculous. Hardly, I am calling out your INTENT. And your intent is to LIE without sounding like it. By saying "MANY more" you are implying that it is so very easy for this fake statistic to be true. By saying "there are 30% more ...." you are doing the same thing. You are telling the reader "don't think about it, trust me". Telling people th…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:35 PM
1

But not a 30 ought. /s
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:44 PM
2

One stupid fucking idiot of a radical feminist attempted to attack Physics MATH with a postmodern critique. Know your Meme // FTFY It is WAY worse than you report. She got into Princeton's Math program but quit. After a while she decided she quit because of oppression. Princeton FORCED a Fields Medal (and don't kid yourself, when Nobel Laureates need someone to envy THESE folks are the only people left standing) winning Professor to be her advisor. Here PhD is based on utter shit and by all acco…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:43 PM
2

AVERAGE SALARY, $49,468 - AVERAGE MALE SALARY, $52,101 - AVERAGE FEMALE SALARY, $45,346 Not really sure of your point here seeing as how you have left out all context. The USPS Pay Scales are based upon the Federal Governments GS model and is entirely predictable and not based upon sex. It is based ENTIRELY on Pay Grade (what job you are performing) and Pay Step (which is based entirely on years of service). So if women are earning less it is entirely because they don't want to do jobs paying mo…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:34 PM
3

Hehehe I know that I personally contributed to some feminists throwing fits of rage as I chased their stupid down the road ... I have to imagine your score was even higher.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:24 PM
15

Actually I like the ad A LOT. It is brilliant slut shaming while casually looking as if you saying "you go girl". Jordan Peterson is correct in suggesting that young men crave a responsibility message; he is just myopic in ignoring the fact that young females need the message even more now.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:22 PM
0

The population of college women is much higher than the population of college men Only if YOU are really, REALLY, bad at math. By there VERY best numbers there are 1 POINT 3 (1.3) women for every man. That isn't MUCH higher, it is just "higher" (in a mathematical sense). it's possible that college men have more non-college partners than college women. Yea, it is possible ... but it is also possible that the survey is rigged. Maybe they are only looking at the number of partners each person had w…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:18 PM
1

To which I only have one reply -- (wait for it) BAAAAHHHHH.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:12 PM
2

Both of those explanations seem plausible to me, plus the fact that men are probably more likely to exaggerate their number of partners while women are more likely to under-report their number. Lie much? The "men are more likely to exaggerate their numbers" canard is designed to elicit mental image of the "bro culture" obviating any rational analysis. Because if you contend that men exaggerate their numbers you have directly contradicted the purported claim. The notion that college boys are goin…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:10 PM
11

Yea, my point also. The only real way this works out is if every college community is surrounded by vast hoards of uneducated females fucking the hell out of the college boys.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:03 PM
17

I cannot help but notice that you haven't linked an actual study; nor is there a cite by anyone else in this thread ... so do you care to share your resource or are you talking out of your ass? And unless these purported college aged men are going on exotic sex romps exactly how does this 3X partners work out in a relatively closed community? Mathematically that is. Are you suggesting that all of the non-college females around campus are super sluts? Because the only way this works out is if the…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:00 PM
3

There aren't enough actual misogynists to justify the scope of feminist ideology. And the biggest problem here is that (so far) every actual misogynist I have ever met was seriously abused by either his (or her) mother or grandmother.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:46 PM
1

And I am just say'n that puts you further into the "feels before reals" camp. We are Men's RIGHTS Advocates here. If you think some rights just aren't worth protecting and fighting for then maybe this isn't the best group for you. Or do you just whinge on about only the rights that are affecting you at this exact moment?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:25 PM
0

Hey if you look in the mirror real quick you might just get a glimpse of your confirmation bias. But I doubt it.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:03 AM
2

So if I don't misunderstand you - you are arguing that giving into your emotional desires is completely OK if someone else pushes your emotional buttons if they intend that or not?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:32 PM
1

What if I said all men should die then what. Then you would be exercising your right to free speech. Saying a thing doesn't even mean you actually believe a thing, sometimes it just means you are an emotional tool that likes to provoke other people. Who knows, we might even have an actual discussion or possibly change the world
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:31 PM
3

Oh, did you read the article? Maybe you can point out where he raped anyone. Otherwise you need to take remedial reading - because since he was neither inciting anyone, nor actually raping anyone, he wasn't committing a crime and was, in fact, exercising his rights to both "assemble" and "free speech". But I get it, you only approve of rights for people who walk in lock step with you.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:27 PM
0

due to some legal loop hole Yea, because the idea of a society based on, you know, LAWS has never produced anything of value. And all the times that societies allowed for emotions to rule the day were sunshine and parties.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:24 PM
5

Either you believe in the Constitution of the United States (and preferably have sworn an oath to defend it) or maybe this isn't the right country for you. Pretty simple actually.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:10 AM
7

Link to the actual article and not just the screen cap. and archive.is She was charged with felony assault - he was presumably treated by a medic and released.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:07 AM
9

Charged with what exactly? Exercising his right to assembly and free speech?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:00 AM
7

me: wait aren't you doing exactly what he is doing but you think you have the high ground even though you are actually using violence and he's using words? lol Either you are trolling with a false equivalence or you need to take some remedial logic. Doing the same thing to him would be SAYING "you deserve to be hit with a baseball bat". Actually hitting him with a baseball bat is intentional assault with a deadly weapon. So yea, holding a sign with (OMG) words on it is the same thing as assault.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:59 AM
5

I remember a member of the right running down a bunch of protesters with his car, killing a woman. But what you are leaving out (of course) is that a college professor aimed a rifle at him (and has admitted to doing so) just before he fled down a narrow alley. I honestly wonder how your type feels it is morally justifiable to omit essential details. Because odds on if someone pointed a rifle at YOU while you were driving the streets of America, you too would shit your pants and hit the gas.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:55 AM
6

Let's be pro free speech i support his right to hold the sign and vigilantes when they crack him in the dome. Just to be clear. It appears that you said you SUPPORT the vigilantes? That aside she cannot claim to be a vigilante as she didn't first witness a perceived crime and then become incited to violence. Shej picked up a baseball bat, got in her car, drove to a demonstration, and beat someone with that bat. That is premeditated violence. She started with the notion of doing violence and then…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:47 AM
5

I actually did YOUR work for you and linked a (feminist approved) wiki link. Now you want me to do your reading for you? Holy fuck you are stupid. The Brandenburg test (also known as the imminent lawless action test) The three distinct elements of this test (intent, imminence, and likelihood) have distinct precedential lineages. Judge Learned Hand was possibly the first judge to advocate the intent standard, in Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten,[13] reasoning that "[i]f one stops short of urging u…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:51 AM
6

I love how you completely gloss over the word "imminent" and don't even mention the word "credible". Almost as if you are in here shilling.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:44 AM
5

There is no such crime as "inciting rape" so the only thing we can do is apply the abstraction to the actual crime that might be charged - namely inciting violence (as rape is, in fact, a form of violence). We have established that he cannot be charged with inciting violence since he has not met the tests required of such a charge. If he cannot be charged with the actual crime of inciting violence then he cannot be charged with your imaginary crime of inciting rape. Since you also clearly don't …
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:42 AM
1

This is the fucking problem. “If you don’t agree with me you’re a feminist” Nope, I said you are behaving like a feminist, and that you are using feminist argumentation techniques. Therefore, absent any evidence to the contrary, I have to assume you are a feminist. This latest post only underscores the same point. Here you are WHINGING that I (oh my dear god) called you a feminist (I didn't, I said you were behaving like one). And what do you do? The feminist technique of demanding that I said s…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:11 AM
11

You are either very stupid and cannot read cited material - or you are willfully being deceptive. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are an honest person. In the cited article are the TESTS that the US requires to be met to be eligible as legally defined "incitement". It doesn't matter what you feel is "violent speech" as it is very clearly defined. This speech does not meet the test and is therefore not an incitement to violence. And therefore a person hitting this man is committ…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:06 AM
9

He is inciting violence, which is not a form of speech protected by the US's first amendment. Kind of curious where you got your law degree. The University of IMadeItUp perhaps? "You deserve to be raped" is not an incitement to violence. But you know, I understand how difficult it is for you to educate yourself before spouting your self serving opinions is. So take a look and come back when you can credibly discuss "incitement to violence".
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:22 AM
1

Sorry I don’t follow your “poor me” vision for this sub. So either you can quote me in some way that backs up your lame bullshit or you are just using feminist shaming and "put words in their mouth" techniques. You talk like a feminist, you act like a feminist, so chances are very, very good that you are in fact a feminist shill. And that means your opinion means fuck all around here.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:57 AM
10

If you watch through his lectures and his many, many interviews you will learn that he had a pretty rocky relationship with his father. You will also notice a pretty strong likelihood of throwing men under the bus in his pre-fame (and pre C-16). He will also say, over and over, that young men are flocking to him because he is advocating their responsibility. As he gained fame you can see the information integrating its way into his lectures as he realizes the most marxist of the post modernists …
/r/MensRights02/02/19 04:48 AM
1

Get woke, make millions. And I think he is dedicated to using his new celebrity and resources for good (i.e. anti post-modernist education).
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:43 AM
2

I don't always love JBP but when I do I love him with all of my heart. This was an awesome read and I have to wonder just how woke he has become. When I saw him in McMinnville, OR he was still throwing men under the bus (Adam was despicable, Eve didn't bear as much blame as I think she deserved) and I noted it in many of his lectures and speeches. But it is becoming less and less frequent.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:42 PM
9

I’ve been a huge supporter of the MRM for the last few years, but recently I feel like this sub has been turning into a sort “reverse feminism” if you will. Note the magical "feels before reals" and the very typical "I am one of you ... but". Just remember kids, everything before the BUT is a lie.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:22 PM
1

Yup, little concern trolls like /u/kettelkorn just gotta troll.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:20 PM
1

There is nowhere else to go but piracy though. Oh, my, fucking, god. Go to the goddamn LIBRARY. And if you think "piracy" is immoral then I think you need an updated education
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:12 PM
3

Shill much? I have to presume that you are stalking this board as part of an extra credit to prepare you for a life of misguided activism and victim politics. There's nothing wrong with asking men to be better. Better? Where is the "ask" to be "better". There is nothing wrong with men the way they are naturally. In fact YOU owe everything you have in very large part to men; European white men in particular. In what sense is demanding that men police other men asking men to be better? In what sen…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:09 PM
1

I stumbled upon these guys at a local independent hardware store and am damn impressed by both the quality of their products and their advertising. Refreshingly and unapologeticly pro-male.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:25 AM
3

Ditto - although the wording left me deeply confused.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:13 PM
3

I think "outed" would be a better word. Less confusing.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:12 PM
2

Amazon continually demonstrates its anti male bias but its latest is probably the most extreme - Creating a series about Lorena Bobbit's point of view; that is the victim's point of view. Creating Homeless Housing in association with an organization that actively excludes men. Pushing many, many feminist "original" series. Don't be afraid; while they do their best to scare you into thinking the cancellation will be immediate it won't be. You will be forced to "confirm" your decision 3 times ulti…
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:20 PM
3

Real TL;DR - YES
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:57 PM
10

While Mike Rowe isn't explicitly calling out women or supporting men if you read the article you will understand why I am linking this. On RTF, I’m not concerned with rewarding beliefs – I’m concerned with rewarding behavior. Likewise my foundation. Mike Rowe's foundation's behavior while egalitarian in word directly impacts traditionally male arenas. His S.W.E.A.T. pledge reads like everything your father told you that made you great. His BEHAVIOR is pro-masculine and anti-feminist (by calling …
/r/MensRights30/01/19 11:22 PM
8

in an age where they have been cultured to feel expendable ... disposable. Uhm.... when was this mythical age when men WEREN'T disposable? Inquiring minds want to know.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:17 PM
5

because feminism is supposed to be about destroying sexism Words are cheap, action isn't. A feminist saying feminism is about X doesn't mean shit unless she actually works towards X. Ask a feminist about MGM and you will get the most banal blowoff of you life -- so much for working towards equality. If their words don't match their actions then their words are lies and should not be allowed to spread as truth.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:12 PM
3

Pretty much nailed it. Been thinking it JBP terms although I haven't heard him or anyone else really mention it. We have a MALE hierarchy based upon task competence. Nominally the dominant male in a situation isn't the one who can force other males to do his bidding but the man others want to follow because he is the most competent at a job. Female hierarchies are much less discussed but they appear to be nearly identical. Namely the alpha female is the one who can get the most males to do her b…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 04:27 AM
2

I have been pondering this quite a bit lately - specifically with regards to the Portland State professor who helped expose the fraud which is feminist journals. Which has sent me down a rabbit hole. Is it possible that the PSU IRB violated Title IX and should I file a complaint backed up with a demand of the IRB's past adjudications via Oregon's Open Record Law. Critical theory describes all cultural texts as artifacts that can tell us something about social norms, power dynamics and ideologica…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:26 AM
6

According to Reddit's policies this community may not be up to spec. It isn't vibrant, it isn't healthy, the moderator has not made any attempt to follow the guidelines (setting up a description and a set of rules). Possible (but sadly unlikely) to get the reddit admins to step in and appoint a new mod.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:56 AM
10

Read the article, IT GETS WORSE. The "victim" (quotes because the evidence in the article is 100% 'she said') initially claimed she did not know her "attacker", "was forced to give q BJ in a truck..." and then later identified a man with whom she had had a relationship who terminated it after he found out another woman was pregnant with his child. Sounds very much like she could have staged the entire thing as revenge.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:12 AM
1

Tom Golden's content is a great read but his ASMR speaking voice creeps me the fuck out.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:56 PM
1

Your tweet perpetuates the false and damaging sterotype that math is harder for women. What a fucking great comeback. This should have been the headline. :)
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:39 PM
3

I bet a mountain of Jerry Brown 'Psychic Bucks' that someone at CNN wanted to throw her a bone; maybe to test the waters WRT her possible return. So do the world a favor and flood CNN's feedback with your outrage that she was paid to be on air because in a just world she would have to pay the broadcasters to air her image -- she has a face for RADIO and the voice of a klaxon.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:38 PM
18

I guess you didn't watch the video. TL;DW - The problem, according to Prager, is MEN not being masculine enough. They are selling the same old shtick - MAN UP (whatever the fuck that means). Allie (bless her otherwise great heart) says "Women want REAL men" - that is code for "you don't have a woman? Well you must not be man enough to have a woman". No where in that entire video does Allie call out WOMEN for the shit they have wrought on this society. Women are the ones driving divorce. Women ar…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 10:22 PM
14

God I loathe PragerU - it is a burning pile of rat feces. The problem isn't men, as Prager keeps demanding. The problem is women who refuse to acknowledge the vast benefits men have brought them.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:54 PM
4

Not so sure. Might have replied "Fuck off cunt" if he replied at all.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:49 PM
1

This seems very, very likely. But the Femosphere would, of course, take it out of context. Biologically pregnant woman and nursing mothers need to focus gaining extra calories. Their female peers are the least likely source of those nutrients. Males who can empathize are the most likely to give even though there is no short term reason to do so.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:36 PM
5

Bless George RR Martin regarding the word BUT
/r/MensRights01/01/19 04:56 AM
8

does this prove men's lower empathy levels compared to women is a result of biology and not "toxic masculinity". Classic "Begging the question". You have assumed, without proof, that men actually have lower empathy and then asked if you have proven the claim. Men are actually very likely to be far more empathic then women. When a child is drowning it is invariably a male stranger that risks his life to save the child. Whenever ANYONE needs rescuing it is invariably men who step up and only the v…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:40 AM
1

by your brilliant dialogue I can see that your mom is also your sister and likely to bare your first three children. Not sure how insulting my mother gets you any points for originality.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:29 AM
7

I clicked on the link so you won't have to. a website perhaps best known for its endorsement of statutory rape Stopped reading right there. Clearly this is a poorly written hit piece that has to use sensationalism and weak ass arguments to enrage its readership.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:57 PM
1

Old non-news is best news (go team karma whore)
/r/MensRights31/12/18 08:53 PM
0

And here I thought Seattle-ites had a monopoly on passive aggressive douchbaggery. I love how you reframe everything in your mind to make you the benevolent and innocent party. You aren't. You are an asshole with a Martyr delusion.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 07:00 PM
0

well it's pretty exhausting walking with a big belly.. I don't care as it isn't my problem. America has an obesity problem; are you suggesting we have "fat people" parking because it is pretty exhausting walking around with all of that excess weight? I suffered from gout for nearly a decade; I often crawled to the bathroom. I cannot remember ever seeing special parking spots just for people with arthritic conditions. If being pregnant is such a burden then she should go to her doctor and get a t…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:58 PM
1

Man, I just thank god every minute that YOU are here to explain the internet. Don't know what I would have done without your brilliant leadership. Have a nice day :) As if that isn't a mid western's way of saying "Fuck off". So "have a nice day" back at you asshole.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:37 AM
0

Well yeah I do get to decide that. And so do you. That’s kinda how reddit works. Every time you upvote a post or downvote a comment you’re deciding what content fits a sub via natural selection. Not even close. The upvotes and downvotes are just a natural extension of high school popularity contests. Witness the brigade patterns in our sub. Thousands and thousands up votes well beyond the readership of the sub. Yea... that is the "community" deciding. Sure, you have the right to say what you thi…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:19 AM
2

Kind of pointless to "look up the term" when you spell it out. I mean it is pretty god damn self explanatory. And my experiences just reinforce the hypothesis that TERFs are just the extreme end of an already hateful movement.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:10 AM
1

Kind of hard to keep pointing out the obvious to the oblivious but who knows ... maybe a thought will get through to you. I keep pointing out your specific behaviors (e.g. see above) where you make banal and baseless accusations. As if you can make me angry or even upset. You just keep being predictable and bland. Hope that works out for you.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:08 AM
2

meh I am far, far more annoyed by the "pregnant parking" at many businesses. At the hospital? No problem. At work? Fuck that shit; it isn't my kid and it isn't helping the company. It is just pure pander.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:06 AM
0

So, you think you get to decide what is right for this sub? Kind of full of your self.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:04 AM
7

Link because god only knows why OP submitted a crappy ass screen capture. Alt-Right Wikipedia has become (or always was?) a landfill of spoiled word salad. It relies on the magical circular reasoning so prevalent in Feminism. The entire basis for this claim is a reference to a biased author who has a once sentence blurb that is, itself, without citation. So Wikipedia in a nutshell: * Make shit up * Find someone who has made up the same shit, or maybe claim that but cite something behind a paywal…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:33 PM
4

More like Feminism: Pretending to help women (but really throwing them under the bus) as part of a mad power grab benefiting only the Feminist Priesthood.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:16 PM
1

More baseless insults -- another favorite tactic of feminists. You should take up Troll Bingo, you are a natural.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:12 PM
1

where is the lie? you certainly like the long line, don't you?
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:09 AM
2

The implication being that those two statements constitute a lie ... or you finally admit you have no legit response and will now leave?
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:45 AM
2

And comments like yours only serve to further its decline. Wow, fast jump right to Feminist Shaming Tactic. Nice try. If it is so bad then please, PLEASE leave.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:44 AM
0

Suuuuuurrrrrrreeeeee.... That is you, always switching accounts.... troll
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:43 AM
2

Citation needed. Just saying something doesn't make it true. The fact that you think that way makes you far closer to being a feminist than the overwhelming majority of posters here.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:59 AM
2

Feminism has nothing to do with women's rights; never has been. Feminism is an easily demonstrated power grab. But you already knew that.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:58 AM
3

Feminism is cancer. Everyone in this forum is well aware of that fact. More proof that you are a troll. We are all glad to see you go.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:57 AM
3

wow, great job misinterpreting and misrepresenting. Must be a feminist, you have lying down pat.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:56 AM
-4

/r/noshitsherlock
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:49 AM
0

Wow, you have embodied the Concern Troll to the very core of your soul, or perhaps sole. Hard to tell which. Fake concern for others is cancer. Let me guess.... you are a feminist.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:49 AM
3

Glad to see you go.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:48 AM
13

I suppose you have difficulty reading. It was never about "equal" rights. All the rights and privileges and none of the responsibility. From the very beginning.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:48 AM
4

Yup .. that falls into the "no shit Sherlock" category. But if it was a sub you don't care about any longer you would just let it go... which clearly you cannot.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:30 AM
2

Here you promised to unsub ... either keep your word or just admit you are a Concern Troll.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:28 AM
-2

And here you promised to unsub... Either keep your word or just admit you are part of the Concern Troll Brigade.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:27 AM
-2

oh, poor baby, someone points out your obvious lies and you cry. Like I said...Concern Troll
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:27 AM
12

Modern? Go spend some time digging into Karen's archives. Feminism has been cancer at best, and a terrorist organization by any measure, from the very beginning.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:16 AM
5

bwahahahahaha --- from an account that is barely 9 months old.... Posts like these from the other side are the EXACT reason why this subreddit was created. Yea, you know why this sub was created noob. Concern Troll gotta troll them concerns.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:15 AM
12

You need to think in more expanded terms. Men, far and away, get off by knowing just how much they are pleasing their partners. All this weird talk about sex dolls for men is literally humanizing an object. Putting the human qualities men desire into objects because they are not getting their needs met. Women reduce men to vibrators - now ask yourself which sex is more guilty of 'objectification'.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:13 AM
-6

Please do go... far, far away.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:10 AM
3

Look, the feminist concern troll brigade has arrived.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:10 AM
2

Concern Troll gotta troll them thar concerns.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:09 AM
14

Please do go ... it will raise the quality around here substantially.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:08 AM
4

Almost???
/r/MensRights29/12/18 08:24 PM
5

Cool beans. Sadly this author doesn't know what religions are. Just that there is this class of "things" that we assume everyone knows the definition of, but no one has ever scientifically documented. however. I will instead contend that Social Justice is a similar kind of thing to the thing religions are.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:04 AM
8

So this thing which has made us the most successful species on the planet, and for all we know the broader universe, is bad. Time to fund Daniel Dennett's research into religions so that we can have an actual scientific investigation into the topic. Then we can have an academic definition of both religion and cults; I wouldn't be surprised if you could use anything feminism touches as the definition of "cult".
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:41 AM
5

It is just a logical canard: You are against this one (obviously barbaric) practice that we cannot rationally defend. THEREFORE you must be against every aspect of our religion. This is prima facie a logical fallacy. Since the people speaking these words are generally quite bright there is another word that we can use - it is a LIE. A lie meant exclusively to throw you off balance.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:49 PM
12

That just sounds rape-y But really it is just exposing your biases.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:44 PM
4

Look through /u/bleepitybloop555 's ENTIRE post history Notice how the ONLY post made by submitter to this forum is the one bitching about how "we" need to change. In the immortal words of someone much smarter than OP: Be the change you want to see in the world, bitch!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:41 PM
-1

Oh Bullshit. There is a HUGE difference between saying: What is /r/MensRights Opinion about X? Which creates a monolithic (seeming) response. And asking AskReddit: How should I configure my grandmother's computer? Which creates a stack ranked response. This isn't ASK MRAs (i.e. a forum for outsiders to come in and be educated). This is /r/MensRights (i.e. a forum for primarily the discussion of MRA issues among existing MRAs)
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:01 AM
-2

You are trolling ... you ask "what does the SUB" think so that you can report back to your professor that you got an individual to say something that you can pin on the community. Hope that works out for you.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:18 PM
-2

No, you asked the SUB'S opinion it is right there in your posting. Otherwise you would have posted: What is YOUR opinion about R/MGTOW? But you didn't do that, did you?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 06:55 AM
12

There is a very good reason that collective punishment is a violation of the Geneva Convention. So I ask every person who trots out the crap you are discussing: Can you name a time in history when collective blame and punishment turned out to be a good thing? Then follow it up with: Well those who refuse to learn from history are damned to repeat it. (and I don't want to be the victim of their stupidity).
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:39 PM
2

I think you should reframe the question a little in your mind. It isn't permission that our dear submitter is seeking but something closer to acceptance. In as much as /u/your_godammn_right is advocating for Men's Rights (or even egalitarian equality) then this is a great sub to discuss those topics. This isn't really an appropriate place to demand that the definition of "man" be broadened or in any way redefined. Experiences, such as gender dysphoria and dissociation, are welcome here as they r…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 02:06 AM
2

But I don't know too much about trans issues ... Interesting - and yet here you are positioning yourself as an expert. It is not cherry-picking to note the high correlation between AGW denialism and anti-trans campaigners. Actually that is definitively "cherry picking". You are suggesting an "obvious" correlation has an equally obvious causation which you never bother to establish. (scare quotes because I know you are pulling this so-called fact out of thin air because you cannot believe anyone …
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:47 PM
1

The top posts on this sub are what give me that impression. You can call it whatever you like, but spending all your energy yelling about tabloid misandry isn't doing anyone any favours. Agreed! But (and everything before the "but" sadly gets overlooked) it IS important to not allow the tabloids to redefine words for political gain. "Men", "Male", "Boy", et c. ALL mean beings who were born with a penis 99.9999999999% of the time. Allowing others to redefine the words is called "tyranny of the mi…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:33 PM
3

You know scientists overwhelmingly say you are wrong, right? You know saying that doesn't automagically make it true, right? You are cherry picking at the highest order and then desperately attempting to paint your opposition as anti science. Gender dysphoria (thinking you were born into the wrong body sexually speaking) IS a disorder ... you know as defined by SCIENTISTS in the DSM. But you do you, maybe it is working for you.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:06 AM
1

Could you clarify your comment, or are you going for an intentionally easy to misinterpret statement. Are you suggesting that tampons should be in the men's room? I find it to be trivially easy: If you have a penis - use the MEN'S room. If you have a vagina - use the WOMEN'S room. Now, barring sever nose bleeds, there is never a need for tampons in the MEN'S room. Barring sever lacerations there is similarly no need for pads. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:00 AM
1

Because it is a stupid question. No, it is a question. They'd take that as an opportunity to dismiss everything I've said. Favorite Feminist Fantasy Argument - tell other people how they behave; never confine yourself to controlling your own behavior when you can tell everyone else how they are going to act. I am a straight, white, man. So?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:37 AM
2

You're not redefining shit. You are correct, (((you))) are redefining shit. Males == Men. Those words do not convey separate meanings.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:35 AM
2

Some trans men on T also have ... I think you mean "biological females who identify as male". They aren't "guys on T". Redefining words to fit a particular political agenda puts us in a Post Orwellian Society and I am not ready to concede absolute authority to Big Brother.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:42 AM
2

Love that you are getting down-voted for pointing out /u/apexbreed 's clearly intentional obfuscation of the truth. /s Sigh.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:38 AM
1

You're a woman, aren't ya. I cannot help but notice how you refused to answer Pepe's question. Admittedly Pepe didn't use a question mark ... but FFS it is obviously a genuine question.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:12 AM
5

I'd just appreciate having more genuine discussion here Yes, you do expect it. That is *literally (i.e. what the words mean) what you are saying. You want everyone else to abide by (((your))) definition of "genuine discussion". That is, you want to enforce (((your))) rules on a forum that, from the beginning, has had an explicitly open post policy.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:10 AM
12

Hmmmm... How about you stop the feminist style shaming technique? You are real close to being a bona fide concern troll. What exactly do you expect from a forum open to everyone with an extraordinarily liberal mod policy? Every day thousands of men "awake" to their condition when their world turns upside down and they need to confront reality. Specifically the overwhelming geocentrism found throughout the world. Yet for some reason you expect every man and boy who comes here to behave as some id…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:59 PM
4

you can't just accept that raw figure without looking hard at exactly how "interrupting" was measured What raw figure? There is no study cited, there is no data provided, just a claim. Clearly the presenter went to MSU (i.e. Make Shit Up)
/r/MensRights16/12/18 06:19 AM
1

It couldn't happen to a nicer group of pandering simps.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 06:04 AM
1

Feminists angry that men can now have sex with sexdolls. Claim silicone dolls are women. "Make no mistake, that isn’t a doll he’s doing, or maybe raping, choking, or hitting — it’s all those women he can’t measure up to." FTFY
/r/MensRights07/12/18 05:53 AM
9

I have to assume that you are blind as a bat and using a Braille reader. But in case you are seeing capable might I point you to the PICTURE on the right hand side of the image. They say a picture is worth a thousand words; but in your case it isn't even worth one.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 05:47 AM
12

The notion that the average woman can hold a fire hose by herself is absolutely laughable. Yea, I know, physics is sexist. Maybe we should mandate fire hoses that deliver less than half the water so women can hold them solo.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:02 PM
2

I articulate poorly. My hope is that the forum can help me come up with a smooth Marx style (Groucho not Carl) retort. The very best way to get a moron to STFU is to have everyone in the room laughing at them. Yea, she will feel bad, but at least the rest of us won't have to listen to her grating voice. Something like: Wow, clearly you failed simple logic if you think that because a few men have power that every man is somehow powerful.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:57 PM
6

Dude, you just doxed ncfm.org /s
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:52 PM
8

It is a fundamental, insane, notion that needs to be rebutted at every opportunity. Just because SOME men have power does not mean that ALL men have power. Seriously, just because the speaker is an utter, fucking moron does not mean all women are morons ... just that a few women are too stupid to breed and should be kept the hell away from microphones and other means of communication.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:51 PM
7

There we go. Not "certain men" or "the men who are into these dolls" but "MEN." I have been struggling to articulate this concept in an easy to understand way. In formal logic there are two fundamental concepts about group inclusion "For all" and "There Exists". "For All" says that the proposed property is true for every member of the group. "There Exists" says that for a given property you can find at least one member with that property. Feminists, and pretty much any lazy rhetorician, seem to …
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:44 PM
3

(((looks at rules to the right))) Notices a "no bitching about bannings" rule. Hmmm.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:13 PM
6

So, a white woman whose childhood was at worst upper middle class, who had a private education and attended swanky colleges. And who made a name for herself DEFENDING the tobacco GIANT Phillip Morris thinks ... that poor, gay, black women are best served by voting for her. The woman is a living example of extreme cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:30 PM
8

At the beginning: Yesterday I came across an article on Jezebel about a community in Syria that purportedly frees women from the oppression of patriarchy and capitalism. Contrasted a bit further with: There is one in Kenya that is being funded in part with tourist dollars. According to an article by The Guardian, “The women charge a modest entrance fee and hope that, once in the village, the visitors will buy jewellery made by the women in the craft centre.” Methinks neither Jezebel nor the Guar…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:20 PM
5

It is the bane of a fatherless society. Too many children since the 70s have gone a lifetime without hearing the variations on the word "no" (e.g. "too fucking bad", "not my problem", "it is time you grow the fuck up", et c.). #metoo is (from the start) an insidious evil. Simply put it demands that every man be 100% perfect his entire life in order to have his contributions valued. And since no one, man or woman, is perfect: #metoo is isomorphic to the notion that men are valueless.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:14 PM
25

Wait ... I am 200% behind equal rights for women ... Either you need to state clearly that you are also 200% behind equal responsibilities for women or you are just virtue signalling.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:11 AM
2

Holy Shit Batman. Twenty people will be on the street soon and we will know who this "anonymous lawyer" is when she suddenly goes missing.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:08 AM
1

That the author is presenting the narrative as if he had been there - but is really a third party assuming the narrative. The cultural zeitgheist is this narrative, assume the woman is the victim. I mean, it isn't as if YOU cherry picked out of the lyrics to make your point ... no wait, it is exactly that. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU? Find the Feminist Troll is a fun game :)
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:49 AM
-1

Flip it and see what IS overplayed: The Men's Room, a nationally syndicated radio show, plays Sublime's Date Rape - link to lyrics near the end of every show. Yea - let's celebrate ambiguous situations ending in prison rape.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:55 PM
4

Flip it and see what IS overplayed: The Men's Room, a nationally syndicated radio show, plays Sublime's Date Rape - link to lyrics near the end of every show. Yea - let's celebrate ambiguous situations ending in prison rape.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:51 PM
1

Goodmod stickies posts to start conversations These are retarded conversations as there is a huge wealth of data demonstrating feminists will never, ever, engage in an honest conversation. Not unlike you Pollyanna.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:21 AM
1

At this point I have to assume you are just trolling (poorly). Farewell.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:18 AM
9

I want feminists and MRAs to stop hating each other Cough, bullshit, cough. While I agree that feminists, in general, hate MRAs base upon their simply existing I have lots of experience with MRAs who only "hate" feminist actions (you know, like pulling fire alarms at events, hitting people, et c.) Most MRAs simply don't care if someone calls herself a feminist. They care how she BEHAVES. and actually discuss how to reach equality together. Again, name a SINGLE right that men have which women do …
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:36 AM
1

I think /u/goodmod should be banished from this board for deciding to "sticky" shit posts like this one. Want to test a feminist's beliefs? Have her watch The Red Pill for free with Amazon Prime. If, at the end of watching it she cannot see how Cassie had a change of heart then she will never, ever, "get" this board. Whether or not feminism actually is pushing "equality for women" is its own issue No, it is the FUNDAMENTAL issue. if a well-intentioned feminist didn't believe that feminism meant …
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:26 AM
23

So there are only two real possibilities here: 1) You are brand new, never having looked into either feminism or the men's rights movement. or, 2) You are a troll. Because if you had done even the smallest amount of research you would quickly discover how completely Quixotic your mission is. Feminists, from the beginning, are about endowing rights upon women while concurrently removing responsibilities from females. Neither you, nor any feminist, can name a single right which women do not have t…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:15 AM
2

So let me get this straight. You walked into an echo chamber and expected something that wasn't an echo?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:07 AM
8

Seems this virtue signalling dickwad need a remedial course on correlation =/= causation.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:01 PM
3

Seems reasonable. You come in with a shit title (forcing people to click into your post to see what it is about) - and then, surprise, surprise, surprise you present the forum with an abysmal run on sentence. YOU are forcing people to do extra, unrelated, work so that YOU can take the lazy way out. Perhaps you do this so that when someone presents you with a reasonable criticism - namely that punctuation matters. WHOA HORSEY, now all of a sudden you get to play victim. Here is a suggestion - CLE…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:58 PM
177

You have to wonder - do corporations get tax breaks for creating scholarships (they do), and is any of that largess funneled through the Department of Education or its funding bills (no idea)? If so, would this be a legitimate target of a Title IX complaint?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:30 PM
2

i am not siding with these guys, they are assholes So, can you give explicit reasons for why you feel they are "assholes" or are you just virtue signalling?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:01 PM
1

You are missing the point; either intentionally or not. Good luck.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:41 PM
1

It might be a generational thing - but my thinking is that online dating is focused much more on hook up culture than it is on relationships. In the olde timey people met in church, and taken to an abstraction I think it affords your best odds of meeting quality people. Find a thing you love, or at least can get into, that is semi social and hang out with like minded people. Cycling seems to attract older people, so if you are looking for a guy in his 30s (not judging or suggesting) that might b…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 10:47 PM
6

then you are NOT a welcome part of this movement. One question. Who the fuck elected you our leader and dictator for life?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 02:05 AM
1

Personally I could do with a lot less Warren Farrell style moderation and a little more Paul Elam. (note that those two men consider themselves friends and I believe that both contribute to the movement ... I just prefer Paul's straight forward style and dislike "can't we all just get along" proponents)
/r/MensRights27/11/18 02:03 AM
1

You need to be very careful not to fall into a statistical fallacy; we are talking about large groups, not individuals. You can behave exactly like everything says you should and still not get what you want. We are also talking about our more animal instincts here. I assure you that you can get laid tonight; you might have to compromise your standards but it is 100% going to happen. BUT it sounds like you are talking more about romance and that is an entirely different ball game. Due to my famil…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 01:55 AM
2

The point is not that women aren't funny - but that they do not have to be funny. Funny guys often get the girl; sometimes it is the only thing that gets them the girl. Funny guys are asserting a particular dominance in one of the male hierarchies. Funny women are not sexually advantaged. It is OK for women to be funny, but it really doesn't benefit them in any external way. I am sure you are plenty funny, and good for you!
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:48 PM
8

Currently - there is no reason that cannot change; and I advocate for that change: You earned it - you deserve to spend it.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:45 PM
1

I can make you laugh tho. Not so much. Ayden Paladin explains
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:57 PM
30

Write to Lowes and let them know you do not like politics mixed with your purchasing decisions. Tell them that you are perfectly happy taking your business to Amazon where you can research alternative products that do not try to emotionally manipulate you. Men still earn the vast bulk of the income in the United States - men need to start voicing their displeasure with bullshit PR.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:52 PM
1

When you and other posters go off on tangents like this one here, my main thought is that you are trying to prevent any further discussion or study into how such terms, like the word "toxic," have become over a period of time very bigoted and misandrist. Spoken like a true shill. I am having a conversation. I am bringing up points of discussion. You on the other hand are trying to shut down discussion. You come across as a very "my way or the highway" type of person. Anyone, and I mean fucking a…
/r/MensRights22/11/18 09:41 PM
1

That is just plain retarded. Because any word can be "bigoted" that gives you (in your mind) a trump card to play in any discussion. Think of Christian Bale's role in American Psycho. Such men (and women (and of course Xemen)) exist. Those people, in real life, are an absolute net destructive force in the lives of every person who comes into contact with them. "Toxic" is a perfectly acceptable adjective to use when describing such people. As is "retarded" when responding to your point.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:11 PM
2

She is smart, but she still panders. FTA: Yes, toxic masculinity exists. No it doesn't. Toxic MALES exist. Singular individuals. Dysfunctional, abnormal, deviant males. Any of those words aquatically describe the problem. "Toxic masculinity" immediately infers collective guilt and responsibility. There is no time in history that collective guilt has proven to be a good thing; indeed, it has invariably been proven to be a very bad thing.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 07:49 PM
4

Countdown to some nutcase Stanford (not a lawyer) Law Professor creating a Go-Fund-Me to recall a sitting Federal Judge. Sigh. The only sentence in the Judge's writing that I disagree with is this: No state offers refuge to those who harm children. I am sure you understand why I feel this one sentence falls flat.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 07:29 PM
1

You are kidding right? This is a well documented topic. Foreskins are used A LOT in the First World Cosmetic Industry (yup ... women be rubbing baby penis on their faces) and in medical research. They are also used to grow "vast" (i.e. from the source available) quantities of skin for burn victims.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 05:53 AM
1

I[t] can cause infections if done wrong and that you lose a lot of feeling down there It can cause death if done wrong - and does although you have to be very tenacious in digging out the stats as no hospital codes the death as "botched circumcision". It has also been the basis for neonatal "gender reassignments". Those kids grow up to have a suicide rate orders of magnitude greater than the general population. But who knows ... maybe it is possibly the billions of (US) Dollars generated each ye…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 06:12 AM
1

As an aside, you are just a smarmy cunt (think that with an Australian accent) who pretends to be nice but is really an asshole covered in honey. MMMMMM - honey covered asshole, sounds so nice. /s
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:35 PM
1

My father has been circumcised all his life, not religious related just health related. What health relation? You know, from the day, not new stuff. What you will find is that everyone who jumped on the "protects from HIV" bandwagon was a preexisting circumcision fetishist. Back in the day Kellogg (yea, that one from the cereal fame) pushed it for "health" reasons but it did come out he was entirely about "stopping the masturbation". Now much older I feel like I would have liked to be circumcise…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:32 PM
1

You see insults everywhere I am sure - glad you are seeing a psychiatrist. Talking to people who don't understand basic social norms can be tiring. Talk about cognitive dissonance and an entitlement complex.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:23 PM
42

This isn't bull shit, Karen Straughan talks about it fairly often. The data, and the research, are for New Zealand; however there is a lot of anecdotal evidence that it is generally true around the world.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:46 AM
6

I thought I would end up hating this woman when she was first nominated. I love her, and I hope to god she is Trump's running mate in 2020; she deserves a promotion.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:59 AM
4

Bill Watterson is and was great. Breathed sold out the moment the opportunity availed itself to him so you better believe he is a Pander-bear.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:57 AM
1

Or maybe I just feel... Exactly, you are a "feels before reals" type. And you are welcome to it, but I like actual data.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:18 PM
1

shit happens :(
/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:27 PM
2

I did. You haven't.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:54 AM
1

And I simply a question. There are no "simple" questions. You didn't wake up and have a burning desire to have this question answered out of the blue. If you are trans, SAY you are trans and ask if you are accepted here (you are so long as you are supportive of universal equality under the law). But what you are doing is a favorite feminist troll tactic; so if you aren't a feminist troll you might want to consider taking the constructive criticism and reformatting your submissions in the future.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:42 AM
1

I have got to know. Is there some great reddit editing tool that you use to link your citations or do you really just copy-pasta and hand format your references? I want to imagine your bad ass rolodex of awesome links isn't some Notepad or Notes ever growing text file.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:39 AM
2

Studies [show] that they same sex relationships have the same likelyhood of being good parents Really? What studies? Define "good parents"; how long are these studies? (that is to say, can we truly measure "good parent" over a couple of years, or do we need decades?) Your rebuttal sucks balls. If you want to learn how gain the respect of this forum you will need to DOCUMENT your assertions and not just make a blind appeal to some nebulous academic authority. Need help? (that was rhetorical, you …
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:35 AM
2

What is telling is posting a "no win" question to a forum. This is a place to DISCUSS a topic; it is not a place for you to demand others publicly state an opinion. If you were being genuine you would open with YOUR position and ask for help taking it apart or making it stronger. But not you - you just build a gallows, hang up a straw man, and then cast aspersions at anyone for any opinion you dislike.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:26 AM
2

Her research, on which she set herself a limit of an hour a day ... Sounds more like a fishing expedition instead of actual research. But you know TWO YEARS worth of work.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:40 AM
1

I for one would REALLY like to see The Honey Badger Brigade, along with Aydin Palidin dissect Mz. Zuckerberg's academic work. PLEASE Alison, Karen, Hannah, et al., please take this apart. /u/girlwriteswhat /u/typhoonblue
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:31 AM
2

Seems to me we should be supporting the Girl Scouts in this decision (which is technically that the former BSA is now targeting 'leadership courses' designed for females). I want the de-pussification of the Scouting Programs. I want scout leaders (adults) to be able to drink a beer at the end of a long hike. I want the Scouts to promote the idea that males and females do have inherent differences. Do you really want the post modern notion that gender is a construct to stand? Anything that will d…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:41 AM
0

As a group yes. The accusations that intact males are dirtier/diseased ridden animals DON'T come from other intact males. Thats for god damn sure. Whatever the basis for your hate, it doesn't originate with circumcised men. In all of human history the notion of "collective guilt" has never once resulted in a benefit to mankind. So your statement: As a group yes. Is both hateful, and vacuous. And it is a favorite technique of Neo-Marxists, Feminists, and other Post-Modern thinkers. The circumcise…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:34 AM
1

You claimed that all circumcised men attack all intact men. That is a specious and lazy argument. This was the entirety of your argument. Almost as if you are a black flag feminist attempting to drive a wedge among men.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:05 AM
1

As Paul Elam has proven, pandering to concern trolls isn't effective. That you read (presumably) impoliteness in my phrasing is a matter best discussed with a psychiatrist as it is actually projection. You can dislike my style and that is fine; but to say I am "impolite" is either a shaming tactic or pure projection. Either way OP has deleted his comment attacking circumcised men en masse. So we can assume OP became ashamed of his collective derision of his fellow men. And to me that is a good t…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:54 AM
1

Cute how you removed your original comment -- kind of cowardly. You claimed that all circumcised men attack all intact men. That is a specious and lazy argument. It is a powerfully feminist trait to confuddle the notion of "there exists" (i.e. a few) with "all" in whichever way is most beneficial to their argument. Example: All feminists are beholden to a fundamentally flawed and unscientific belief, namely feminism. This is a true statement because the fundamentals of feminism are based on magi…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 01:50 AM
1

The key word in your tirade is the word some. Dear god, someone has a difference of opinion from you. Triggered! Take some advice from a cartoon squirrel Christ on a crisper you are no use to anyone if you feel that a differing opinion, true or not, must be censored. The MRM isn't your socialist utopia where dissenting opinions are silenced. Unless of course you are some black flag operative trying to turn us into the mob which is feminism.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:58 PM
1

You can bet THAT is already in the works. Lawyers are like hyenas in that sense ... they have no compunctions taking one of their own apart - judges and prosecutors have wrapped themselves in State immunity which is more difficult to penetrate.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:36 PM
17

A former prosecutor takes Patrick's case and gets his original conviction overturned on appeal. Not just overturned, "quashed" (as in, admitted this wasn't some technicality but an abject miscarriage of justice all around) and the appeals court took the extraordinary step of ordering there be no retrial. Personally I would like to see partial compensation come out of the original judge's pension.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:58 PM
-5

Travis has had both boyfriends and girlfriends since high school. But when his coworkers discovered his dating history at a board game night, they told him he couldn’t be bisexual. “Bi men don’t exist,” they said. “You’re just a confused gay guy.” Pretty much stopped reading right there because the article is bullshit. "They" ... told him he was gay. Always the ominous "THEY". Apparently every single coworker thought it was his or her place to tell Travis about his sexuality. So, yea, BullshitBu…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:29 PM
3

Dream on - "I like to play devil's advocate" is hardly something I "forgot". All manner of sins are prefaced with disclaimers such as yours. Content matters, and your content belies your claim to some form of academic hypothesizing.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:15 PM
9

We dont know exactly what transpired in the dorm room... Oh bullshit. The JUDGE knows what she told the police transpired in the dorm room. The JUDGE determined that her credibility was crap. Now you want us to go all "protect the poor woman because maybe". A trained professional, whose job is to determine truth as closely as is humanly possible said she was a lying skanky hoe. That is good enough for me.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:21 AM
1

She played a VERY successful game of "Who wants to be a Millionaire" funded entirely by morons.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:58 AM
1

You are the poster child for BPD. As far as I am concerned you can go fuck yourself to death with a rotting hyena pseudo phallus, or not, I genuinely don't care. I know that I am not the first person to point out how mentally unstable you are and while I may have some empathy for you I have absolutely no sympathy.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:55 PM
1

Just keep lying ...
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:49 PM
1

Just keep lying, just keep lying. What do feminists do? They lie, lie, lie.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:48 PM
2

They are like evil pokemon -- gotta catch 'em all. /s
/r/MensRights05/11/18 07:35 PM
2

you certainly should be nicer. Shaming - trying to control another by implying that they are "evil" (for various values of evil). it would probably get your message across much better. Concern trolling the way you have been treating me is toxic. no other MRA has ever talked to me like this. More shaming with specious claims - you called me a rapist, I suggested it seemed that you were raised in a home without a father. Based on the evidence it is you who are toxic. Based on your toxicity and you…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 07:24 PM
3

Note to the board, if you engage Maya long enough Xe expersses Xe's true colors and goes full tilt. Here is an insane rant of Maya's archived for posterity. Here is Maya bragging in 2X about how toxic the MRA community is. Neat thing about www.ceddit.com -- makes deleting your nutso comments impossible so you cannot pretend later you didn't say them.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 01:37 AM
5

Tearing down a successful woman does not make you a better man. If anything it makes you a feminist-acting one. Feminists have, for their entire history, attempted to "raise" women up solely by tearing down (white) men.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:51 PM
0

Your behavior makes it clear that you are either a feminist, or you were raised by one. Just leaving this here for you to review. As for the playbook ... I suggest you sack the fuck up and do some of your own work. In this case it isn't very hard considering that it is on the sidebar. I'm not a feminist. Where on earth are you getting that idea from? From the fact that you repeatedly played the "victim card" and when that didn't work you started claiming I was both misogynistic and racists (with…
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:49 PM
2

Way to take things WAY, WAY out of context. But I am sure you have done your research and know both how good a shot she actually was and how she came to be famous ...
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:44 PM
0

hahahahahahaha Wow, you go from "oh I am just this sweet little innocent (idiot)" to calling me a racist and misogynist (without citation). You are pretty much pulling out every stop in the feminist playbook -- I mean really, now you are concern trolling. But I am glad that I finally got to meet the real you instead of the person you kept trying to pretend to be. And again, this is just instructive for other folks so they can see the manipulative techniques that feminists always resort to. Hope …
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:38 PM
1

I didn't know MRAs discussed the 19th amendment. this is the first time I've ever talked to an MRA. So ... by your own admission THE FIRST TIME you talk to an MRA you accuse them of never discussing the 19th Amendment ... sounds like bullshit to me. I had to google the 19th amendment to even know I was choosing the right one cause the only time I remember it is vaguely from grade school. Playing the victim card (innocent little me) you gave me a good answer that made me think, 'cause I'd never c…
/r/MensRights04/11/18 07:28 PM
1

You are simply wasting time, mine and anyone else who decided to wade through this. At this point the thread only serves to prove how disingenuous you are about your intent. "only asking questions" is about as lazy as it gets. You brought up two points: that MRAs don't (in your universe) discuss the 19th Amendment (to the US Constitution ... that is unless you want to bring up some other 19th Amemdment). that the 19th Amendment is somehow (magically I think) "proof" that oppression of women was …
/r/MensRights03/11/18 10:04 PM
1

You are on a website called "Read it" which is devoted to reading the writings of other people. Oh, sorry, I didn't know you were a founder of this website, I mean how else could you possibly know what the actual intentions are - unless of course you think you are the final arbiter on everything (and the evidence does seem to point in this direction). Look, I am just playing the devil's advocate so I can learn stuff. I have half a mind to write that book just to spite you. Yes, sure you are. Sel…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 06:45 PM
3

I think you are an asshole because every reasonable person would assume, given the context of the conversation, that you are being a snarky asshole (bitch, cunt, pick your favorite word). Most people do not write books. Most people do not want to write books. Most people have little, or no, interest in making money writing books. And, there is the ever so little fact that if you were serious and thought it a great money making endeavor then you yourself would do the compiling and make the money …
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:06 AM
11

In the past, women have been automatically disbelieved. Would you care to substantiate this tripe? Because there is a huge history that demonstrates you are full of shit. Lynchings, shotgun marriages, fucking wars started over kidnapped women... Seriously, how do you look at yourself in the mirror each morning knowing that you are going out into the world to spew lies?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 04:56 AM
5

you should compile all these rebuttals and publish them under the title "Men's rights bible" it would sell really well. Are you a teenager? Because this is pretty childish. You must have learned from the snarky school. I would counter-argue that just because men were also oppressed by forced military service doesn't mean that women were not. This isn't a "counter argument" in as much as it isn't an argument, nor does it counter anything. As I said, the 19th amendment isn't proof of oppression. Y…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 04:50 AM
3

Feminist Argumentation Technique - Move the Goal Posts Karen Straughan, a.k.a. u/GirlWritesWhat, goes into great depth regarding suffrage, suffragettes, suffragists, et c. Claiming MRAs 'ignore' the 19th amendment is specious, even spurious, as we don't. Claiming the 19th amendment is proof of women's oppression is both retarded and opportunistic. Retarded because universal male suffrage in the US came at the point of a gun (male suffrage is bound inseparably to the requirement that all males in…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 04:29 AM
5

Sigh, the never ending logical fallacy from Social Justice Wankers of confusing "There Exists" (i.e. 'we can find an example of') with "For Every" (i.e. 'this thing I state is true for all members of a class'). Have there been people, who happen to have vaginas, throughout history who were oppressed? Yes, and no MRA would argue otherwise. Describe ANY proper subset of human beings and I am certain that we can find an example of someone in that class who happened to be oppressed. Does finding 1, …
/r/MensRights03/11/18 01:02 AM
1

Well, as much as you might reasonably hate the Patriots /s, encourage everyone you know fro the State of MA to get out and vote NO on this question. Even a large (minority) voice is enough to encourage legislators to stop enacting stupid laws.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 12:14 AM
2

I just watched this ad trying to convince people to force businesses to cater to gender politics. The false equivalency they are creating is that "free speech" (i.e. claiming xe's gender is 'Brenda') should allow the government to force private businesses to deal with crybullies. If you live in Massachusetts VOTE NO on Question 3 to repeal this retarded law.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:39 PM
4

Seems they are pro choice, as am I. Really? Are you pro-choice for both women and men? I can assure you that the women in the picture are not pro-choice for men. EDIT: No response? So I guess the notion of "equal rights" is outside of your wheelhouse.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 04:08 AM
1

regrets
/r/MensRights01/11/18 06:04 PM
1

TOO? Are you suggesting that "toxic masculinity" is a real thing? It isn't.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 08:08 PM
3

Proof that the media isn't about solving mental health issues but is focused on furthering an agenda. If a mentally unstable person shot up a mosque or synagogue in a (deranged?) attempt to protect an infant from being mutilated we might be forced, as a society, to discuss infant genital mutilation. But ... if a nutter shoots up a synagogue because he "hates the fags" and "hates the jews" (and even more hates the faggy, pedo, infant dick sucking, jews...) well, then we don't need a discussion; c…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 07:44 PM
11

Why don't men's rights activists ever address this sexual double standard? Why don't you bother reading the archives before posting? Oh, you are using a real "throwaway" account. How's about you post using a "real" account? Now, onto dismantling your contention (for the umpteenth time). If you truly care about equality ... In the cornucopia of topics which is "Men's Rights", "Human Rights", and even "Wymn's Rights" you choose such trivial, low hanging, truly unimportant fruit one must ponder you…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 07:32 PM
1

Acceptability is certainly always subjective, but in common morality I think family members would be upset and find it unacceptable for people who didn't know the deceased to come and kiss them, or to be admitted to their wake at all. I think the but above is your excuse to impose your personal, unsubstantiated, beliefs upon others. I also think you believe that having diarrhea of the mouth lets you "win". You must think to yourself, "look at how much I wrote, volume means correctness so I win".…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 07:15 PM
1

Raises the question... From whom would you need consent to kiss a dead person? Canada's Supreme Court has clearly stated that unconsciousness obviates any previous consent. She cannot say, even in writing, that not only is it OK to put that dildo up her bum after you have chocked her out ... but that she really, really wants it. Since she cannot agree to any act performed during even a planned loss of consciousness how can she grant consent after death?
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:29 AM
1

Yes, that ... should edit but was just low on coffee. THANKS!
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:37 PM
1

So, the author is read Ayn Rand and rewrote Atlas Shrugged to suggest that "going Galt"is effectively the core of MRA beliefs?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:29 AM
11

That the National Post names the women suggests mightily that he will win.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:16 AM
1

I am certain the exact same thing can be said about many, many feminist papers. The amount of "work" isn't an independently valid measure of worth. Taken point by point: Men and women evolved to be different (complementary) This is only true if you happen to believe that men and women are a different species. Men and women are the same species and the things we have in common are vastly more numerous than the things we have different. We focus on the differences only because they stand out. This…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 10:43 PM
20

Literally no real contact information on the website. Everything points to a gmail address. The website is registered via an anonymizing service in Canada: Name: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1241976427 Organization: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1241976427 Mailing Address: 96 Mowat Ave, Toronto ON M4K 3K1 CA Phone: +1.4165385487 Ext: Fax: Fax Ext: Email:[email protected] EDIT: I encourage everyone to report the website (using Google's Blogger) to Google as a violation of their T…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 03:51 AM
16

Almost as if someone was channeling her inner Aaron Sorkin (i.e. she got inspiration from The Newsroom) and decided to brand people rapists without due process. I would think anyone on this list would have standing to sue her
/r/MensRights28/10/18 03:06 AM
4

So, er, a post by a brand new account - without any comments gets STICKIED to the front page? Someone bribing the mods perhaps?
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:42 AM
1

He said the ordeal taught him compassion. No where does it even suggest he felt compassion for his accuser - quite the opposite (if you bothered to read the article): "I have a deeper appreciation of what it means to be falsely accused," said the chief. "I also have a deeper appreciation of what it's like to be on administrative leave. I think it will make me a better chief and a better human being."
/r/MensRights26/10/18 05:03 AM
4

The minimum revenue from cutting foreskins in America is 1.1 Billion each year. Keeping in mind that a single foreskin can, in fact, generate 10s or even 100s of pluripotent samples the actual number is likely much, much higher. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9p42hn/company_selling_human_foreskin_for_a_thousand/e7z4pbj/?context=0
/r/MensRights26/10/18 04:31 AM
1

Best damn idea ever. Learn how to file a good Title IX complaint which institutions cannot ignore.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:48 AM
11

Other than shotgunning a lot of Conservative / Donald / Progun / Christrianity subreddits with your survey what do you hope to get from this community? You seem to like the movie Solo, which is your right, but you have not contributed to this sub in any meaningful way - so what is the purpose of your survey? EDIT: Your survey seems to be getting removed from a lot of the places you posted it. You might want to consider giving more detail in your blurb. I took the survey, sort of to survey it as …
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:23 AM
1

For fair comparison here, you had likely kissed your grandmother prior to her death, so it serves as precedent that kissing is acceptable. It wouldn't be acceptable for Superman to come through a portal and do it though, because he didn't know her and hadn't kissed her before. Methinks you are projecting your mores onto all of humanity, and that isn't acceptable. YOU might not find it "acceptable" but that does not mean "it isn't acceptable". he joined her song without consent, Bwahahahaahah, wh…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 07:14 PM
2

allowing the abuse of corpses incentivizes murder or de-incentivizes lifesaving ... Er, wut? Prince Charming is at a FUNERAL - people are overwhelmed with sad emotions (sociopaths notwithstanding) and are processing their emotions. The last funeral I attended was my beloved grandmother's. I kissed her corpse and could only qualify someone claiming that I was "abusing her corpse" as mentally retarded. Seriously, I would posit someone making that claim clearly had trouble with anything more advanc…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 05:22 PM
0

My argument, obviously is that you are projecting your ethos onto everyone else. So, either you are a teenager or a very, very narcissistic adult. If you are a teenager I can dismiss you as not yet intellectually developed. If you are the other thing ... well then I can dismiss you because you will never grow beyond being a self-centered douchbag.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 04:54 PM
1

Like if you died, you might not want the undertaker to kiss you on the lips. This requires one to believe that there is a theory of mind past the death of the body. That is magical thinking. If I am dead then I simply will not "want" anything; there is no concept of "want" past death. (At least that is, from a scientific point of view.)
/r/MensRights25/10/18 04:52 PM
0

Says the gal apparently talking to herself; nice!
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:04 AM
-2

Setting aside a quickie in the local dive bar in the men's room with a gal you just met ... You are on a date, a first date, her "wetness" isn't really an important factor. If you are looking for a long term relationship she is either into your, or not, (i.e. "wet"). So - Costco is actually ideal - if she fucks on the first date then it is you and not your wallet that is getting her wet.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:12 AM
0

Any reasonable person would have assumed he sent them, As long as "reasonable" is defined by you, clearly not an expert on computer security.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:10 AM
1

You do realize you are on a chat board? You speak in deepities. The thing I am responding to is the piss poor use of emotional argumentation instead of rational reasoning. One may, or may not, like the idea of anyone being required to pay a monthly stipend to their exwife greater than decades of the average person's earnings ... but it is just plain stupid to pretend it is something to be angry about. Woman marries rich man. Divorces him some time later and extracts vast sums of money. YAWN. Not…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 08:28 PM
-17

The fallacy you are committing (notwithstanding your intentional conflation of the myriad meanings of the word 'think') is that you appear to believe that what you think is what society does, or should, think. It ain't true. It's a subjective issue. Denial much? It is subjective when comparing SOCIETIES. But within a given society it is materially objective. In the United States we know, objectively, that women fair far better in divorce proceedings. Once again. I really shouldn't have to repeat…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 08:23 PM
-37

I think 700k a month in alimony is outrageous, regardless of any possible context you could give. Yes, you think. That is my point. You aren't an expert. You have no context. You are simply reacting emotionally. Not unlike the Hilary voters whinging on and on about how "she won the popular vote". Nope; that isn't how the system works. The system is well defined; EVERYONE with a modicum of education knows how it works. So, either you have no education and you should keep your mouth shut until suc…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:31 PM
0

Hey thanks, it is always useful when someone gives such a good example of begging the question
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:07 PM
2

I even HATE the use of this Prince Charming trope implying a lack of consent. He fucking thought she was DEAD - he found his true love TOO LATE and was giving her a kiss good bye. He wasn't "stealing a kiss", he was mourning. But hey -- men should just open up and share their feelings -- no feminazi would ever think to misrepresent his intentions.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:01 PM
2

My troubles really started when my high school friend's father left his mother for an older woman. For 30 years I have listened to a non-stop barrage of how the men in her life seem to really like older women; and I should come live with her; and how she used to entice male underlings to come to her house to perform labor (wink, wink). Fuck her - she is 70 years old now; her milkshakes are not all that, if even they ever were. Whatever she had that I might have been interested in went bad before…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:57 PM
3

I would love to see /u/girlwriteswhat go off on this as she is a better researcher than I will ever be ... BUT the history of Human rights is mostly a history of fighting for Men's Rights. Albeit that the Magna Carta was wealthy landed men fighting for rights against a more powerful institution (in the form of a King) it is implicitly represents a fight for balancing the rights and responsibilities of all parties in a society. The US Revolution was a fight for rights fundamentally. These rights …
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:51 PM
-43

Until that man is out hitting the pavement and spending a lot of time with legislators to change this abortion it really isn't your place, or mine, to say his particular payments are "outrageous". So, he was smart enough to make 1 Million+ a month but not smart enough to protect his wealth from a gold digger? When I was younger I was truly stupid with my money WRT women. Fly to San Francisco for the weekend? I paid. Take 5 people to Cancun for a week? I paid. Now I go on dates and the first date…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:40 PM
1

Oh. now you know what "black propaganda" is but irony is still beyond you. Keep working you will get there.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 03:31 AM
1

You really aren't that bright, are you. There is this thing, it is called the interwebs, and on it are a couple of tools (you should feel right at home with that concept). One called "The Googles" and the other Wikipedia Britanica. Try educating yourself instead of spouting out retarded comments.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 10:53 PM
0

Yup. But you are deluded in thinking you speak for everyone. Actually as I look at your posts I get the feeling that you are a black propaganda op. But that would overlooking a lot of skepticism; your posts are seething with self hate.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:06 PM
0

We neither need nor want them. How about you speak for yourself jackass; some of us think you have mental issues.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 04:13 AM
4

Good, I hope those feelings only get stronger and that she carries them with her to the grave. you are projecting your own hate onto a stranger. That tells us so much more about you than her.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:14 PM
2

Whatever it is that you refuse to forgive.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:13 PM
11

A mother put her trust in physicians. Bwahahahaha - right, the physicians brain washed her. Not like she didn't have a lifetime before hand to ponder it and 9 months to do all kinds of deep research on her own. Nope, it is the physician's fault. Just not buying that line of self deluded reasoning.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:34 PM
3

There shouldn't be. Certainly if you want to carry that vitriol to your grave that is your right; but there is nothing healthy about it. Forgiveness doesn't mean trust has been rebuilt, and it doesn't mean that the person has paid their debt. Just that you aren't going to shoulder any of the emotional BS that they caused any longer.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:32 PM
5

And follow it up with: Which is of course supported by scientifically gathered data.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:29 PM
0

What would Adam say if he found out most women today are feminists? Most? Less than half More than half DON'T ONLY 7% in Briton But then again, if you are using FeministMaths I suppose that means "most".
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:28 PM
3

Not only are they old, I am pretty damn suspicious of the methodology. I think it possible that no one has reviewed the work in a long, long time and "everyone" just considers it gospel; which fits right in with the religious nature of feminism.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:30 AM
5

It's self-evident that boys need more attention. Again, citation needed. Unless you care to out yourself as a renowned expert on child psychology. Girls are more docile and they are better than boys in most subjects (on average, of course). Scientific citations needed. There is no proof of this; as a matter of fact the SATs and ACTs imply the exact opposite. Then of course there is a vast world of actual literature. Sure if you go by books sold, then we have to give a nod to Karen Straughan for …
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:29 AM
0

You have been nasty to me this whole entire time. Citation needed; pointing out your errors isn't "being nasty". Unless of course you consider anyone who disagrees with you as nasty -- which is sort of narcissistic and certainly myoptic. "Always ponder the intelligence of anyone who must express herself with another person's words ... and who resorts to speaking En español to make herself feel superior when flinging banal insults." Some guy on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:23 AM
4

Boys tend to need more attention because they are more trouble Your cliche aside -- Citation needed. What you might mean is that boys learn differently than girls and perhaps teachers shoudn't be taught to apply monolithic learning techniques. But fuck, why on earth would we want to invest in the economic workhorse of the world, boys can figure it out on their own.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 07:59 PM
1

I simply didn’t understand that, and never for a moment subscribed to the ludicrous and banal slogan of “Believe the Victim” — a classic example of the lexicon’s most misunderstood phrase, begging the question. Remember this folks -- "Believe the victim" IS the perfect example of Begging the Question. On any common-sense plane the allegation was incredible. What was credible about an alleged event from three and a half decades ago, brought up during the most critical moment of the most important…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 07:32 PM
2

The link referenced by the girl appears to be https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-educationalpsychology/chapter/gender-differences-in-the-classroom/ Cited from within that open source textbook is the nonsensical contradictions: On average, girls are more motivated than boys to perform well in school, at least during elementary school. contrasted with: In general, teachers interact with boys more often than with girls by a margin of 10 to 30 percent, depending on the grade level of the student…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:10 PM
10

The link referenced by the girl appears to be https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-educationalpsychology/chapter/gender-differences-in-the-classroom/ Cited from within that open source textbook is the nonsensical contradictions: On average, girls are more motivated than boys to perform well in school, at least during elementary school. contrasted with: In general, teachers interact with boys more often than with girls by a margin of 10 to 30 percent, depending on the grade level of the student…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:10 PM
0

Don't you just love it when the feminist shows her true colors. Pretends to be rational.... Pretends to be rational.... turns nasty when her manipulative techniques get her no where. I can well believe that you were one of the gals pulling fire alarm triggers at Red Pill screenings.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 05:48 PM
0

Don't patronise me I do not think this phrase means what you think it means. I cannot help but feel like you are intentionally trying to make me angry so you can point out I'm a triggered feminist. I'm not debating on the rest, I've said my peace and you are a toxic person to to debate with because you use manipulative, patronising tactics rather than actually debating. Bwahahahahaha, right. More you use dismissive tactics to avoid tough topics. You are right (at least in your own mind) so you p…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 05:27 AM
3

Pointing out your lazy, and trite, rhetoric? Yea, I admit it... it is I.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:50 AM
2

Pointing out your lazy, and trite, rhetoric? Yea, I admit it... it is I.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:50 AM
3

Pointing out your lazy, and trite, rhetoric? Yea, I admit it... it is I.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:50 AM
0

I'm kinda tired on internet debating atm I do understand that the echo chamber is a much safer place to live, no one challenges your assumptions; everyone assumes your intentions are pure. You don't ever get called on your BS when you are in your safe place. Places like Saudi Arabia, where it's normal for women to be completely discrimated against. I can say that it is almost certain that you know nothing of the culture of Saudi Arabia and that you are using a foreign straw-boogie man to prop up…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:48 AM
1

Well I for one disagree. They should go to prison.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:24 PM
3

Considering women are, by a large margin, the primary consumers on this planet maybe the Feministas should start by demanding all women give up all that extra crap no one really needs.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 06:01 PM
-2

God bless you. I fucking hate PragerU
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:37 AM
6

Someone clearly hasn't been taking their vitamin "Karen Straughan". Feminism has been rotten since the very start.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:36 AM
3

Some of you are getting close. No ... you just try and tell others how to live their lives.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:35 AM
5

Be a man. Classic shaming technique -- poor execution. 2 / 10
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:33 AM
1

Let me put it in slightly different terms. When i hear people throw around "isms" I tend to lose respect for them; when I hear people use "ists" I give them a lot more respect and time. Examples include racism versus racist (quotes below are for formatting, not attributing them to you, or anyone in particular) -- Racism is pervasive in our culture I ignore the person because he or she fundamentally applies the actions of individuals to entire classes of people. I have met racists in my time Well…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:16 AM
0

(((slow golf clap))) Passive aggressive much?
/r/MensRights19/10/18 01:50 AM
12

In 2002 some folks wrote the blueprint that was supposed to usher in the Utopian Democratic Permanent Majority. It was based largely on a strong adherence to identity politics (and the tacit assumption that women must of course vote as a cohesive block) Someone (cough, cough looking at you Dianne Feinstein) leaked Christine Blasey Ford's complaint for clearly political reasons. Tearing down the identity politics trope will be one of the most effective ways of advancing men's rights as part of a …
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:55 PM
2

TIL -- Thanks!!!
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:25 PM
0

your anger belies your brigading bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:58 AM
1

Yes. I too have mixed feelings. I wear being brigaded into oblivion as a badge of honor.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:56 AM
0

lame shaming foo --- feminist much?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:51 AM
1

says the cunt who tells other people how to live their lives?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:38 AM
0

riiiiiggggghhhttt. You are the mature one. How's about you fuck off?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:38 AM
-22

eh? Go fuck yourself, although I have a sneaking expectation that is the only fucking you actually know. But hey, a karma whore has got to whore for karma. So karma on dudette.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:03 AM
-26

Who said that. I hated the post. Lazy, boring, not useful. I hated the post. I downvoted as is my right. I expressed MY opinion. I didn't tell anyone else how to think. So fuck off for trying to shame me into silence. EDIT: if you want to feed the karma whores that is your right. vote your own vote.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:55 AM
-13

Upvote A man's right Not "mEn's rightS" The photo is of the right half of a man. It is a trolltastic post.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:54 AM
-7

Upvote A man's right Not "mEn's rightS" The photo is of the right half of a man. It is a trolltastic post.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:54 AM
-18

Retarded post is still retarded. And offensive named OP for the win.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:26 AM
9

So, for some quick off the cuff math. In 2016 there were 3.95 Million live births (rounding up to a rough 4 million). Going to assume that roughly half of those were boys (because we ain't China, yet). 2 Million baby boys born in 2016 (roughly going to stay constant) Circumcision is foisted upon 58.3% of baby boys (2010, the rate has been declining for decades but not fast enough) So approximately 1,166,000 foreskins are available in the US each year. At $1,530 commercial prices that is $1,783,9…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:24 AM
11

You are drawing false parallels. It was just locker room talk. This is not an endorsement of sexual assault. Famous misuse? Trump's "grab her by the pussy" comment is taken, way, WAY out of context. When you watch the video you clearly see this. When you read the NYT's "transcript" they go out of their way to present it as a linear dialog which allows them to isolate "grab her by the pussy" and present it as a declarative statement and not a reaction to the woman's enchantment from his wealth. "…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:10 AM
-57

So, um, no. Have a downvote.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:53 AM
2

God yes, keep reposting this story to the sub ... but please add a link to his GoFundMe
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:45 AM
2

Aydin approaches CBF's testimony from the perspective of a psychologist and scientist. Aydin appears to be honestly scientific in her methodology which is very refreshing. This is a long dissection but worth the listen. Highlights include: CBF uses nonsensical psychobabble during her testimony but should know better from her own research. CBF might actually have been deceptive with her high pitched, babyish voice. Her specialty would have certainly taught her that abuse survivors often present w…
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:54 PM
7

Like it or lump it Mike Rowe is advocating for men. I have no idea if he would consider himself an advocate or activist but sometimes a person's actions speak louder than words ... even if you principally identify a person by the way he speaks and the voice he uses. Mike Rowe strongly advocates for "the trades" (i.e. tradesmen) and has his Mike Rowe Works foundation is trying to bring pride back to the jobs traditionally held by men.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:41 PM
6

Just wow and holy shit. The fact that Vice Admiral who effectively ordered the convening authority to find this man guilty retired with full benefits mere moments after the Appeals court through out the conviction, with prejudice, floors me. Vice Admiral coward shit should have his entire retirement yanked and given to the enlisted SEAL he tarnished.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:29 AM
1

There are a lot of other reasons why I find a lot of feminists' eagerness to associate feminism with witchcraft relevant too, and we can just all draw our own conclusions about that. Buh muh feminism isn't a religion, it is serious academic science! /s
/r/MensRights13/10/18 10:25 PM
3

well done. golf clap x 3
/r/MensRights13/10/18 10:23 PM
4

Over a 26 year period, more than 99% of exonerated criminals were men. Patriarchy In Action (tm) /s
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:21 PM
4

What right does it endanger? I imagine that Brett Kavanaugh (the judge) would be the first person to uphold these lunatics first amendment rights.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:11 PM
1

Men don't generally, in anything approximating the female experience, have an overwhelming need to feel safe (in as much as they abdicate the responsibility to another human). Men act to make things safe. Knowing that the physical world is now safe men then relax. I don't look to a girlfriend or wife to make me feel safe "in the world"; I look to her to make me feel safe "in the relationship" (i.e. appreciated). After I have crawled around under the house killing all of the spiders, rats, whatev…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:08 PM
6

These photos showcase an evolution in the way men relate to one another What an unbelievably retarded statement by the blog's author. In the history of man photography is a brand new invention. It has been around for 200 years. It doesn't show an "evolution" of fuck all. Do paintings, drawings, and cave art show a similar, or in any way supportive, narrative? Fuck no. Olde Tymie Fotos were a new medium, difficult to expose and even more difficult to develop and subjects were wildly willing to be…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 03:58 PM
-1

Man will you feel wonderful when an old fat man hands you your ass.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:36 PM
0

Sure princess. Will do. Why not sack up and give an actual place? https://goo.gl/maps/UKCMGJVs2cs // Saturday // 1:00
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:35 PM
-1

I know, because an internet troll envisions everyone smaller than herself; I guess that makes you 5'6"?
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:32 PM
1

The female only reproduction is currently possible, not viable yet for humans. While Male only is continuing to be a failure, adding the difficulty of fabricating an egg without a female donor AND test tube babies leave male only reproduction in the realm of hard science fiction. Spoken like a true non-scientist. Clearly you don't understand the concept of "step". We also know the pieces which will need to be investigated. It isn't a question of if. It is strictly a question of when and possibly…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:28 PM
-1

Based on what? The fact that you are almost certainly a feminist pretending to be what she thinks "jock culture" is all about. Like I said ... happy to beat your ass into the ground any time you sack up.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:09 PM
0

hehehe. Any time, any place; I can say that with the certainty that you wouldn't show up.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:06 PM
0

See, here you are being an internet tough guy; almost certainly confirming what a pussy you are in real life. Nothing nice to say; the only way you can build yourself up in the world is by tearing everyone else down. Nice lifestyle.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:05 PM
0

I don't think you under stand the concept of "one", "step", "closer". No one said HEY WE ARE THERE!. The point about "steps" is that you take them ONE at a time. So ... a fetus created with nothing but the genetic material of males is, by definition, "one step closer" to a world were women would be superfluous. What might the next step look like? Hmmm... artificial wombs. Maybe. Artificial "eggs"? Could be. Steps man, learn to THINK instead of insisting on the stupidity which is this thread.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:04 PM
-8

I’m a man, but I thought we had it pretty easy. Kind'a proof right out of the gate that you aren't actually a man. Can someone enlighten me? See, a man would start by enlightening himself. There is a WHOLE HISTORY in this sub that you could dig through ... lots to mull over. Then you could come back and say, legitimately, "I read X, Y, and Z" on your sub and am still confused about points A, B, and C. Only a woman, or a pandering, simpering, fatherless, soy boy would come in with your claim. But…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 06:59 PM
-3

I post about it openly on Linkedin. Sure, you are a really big man... on the internet.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:17 AM
-17

That is stupid ... because the exact same study suggests that the world is (((one step closer to doing away with women))). OMG
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:16 AM
-2

So, I am pathologically paranoid. OK. What does that make you? Kind of a bully who likes torturing defenseless others? Does it make you feel big to rant at people who said "good idea...not for me though?".
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:19 AM
3

I decided the Democratic Party was not for me any longer about 3 months into Obama's first term. So I hope to god the midterms are another tsunami of disappointment for the Dems. Maybe, maybe they will finally ditch the feminist contingent and bring some semblance of sanity back.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:09 AM
-18

Jesus Effing Christ, did you BOTHER to read the article??? It was easier with double mums. The researchers took an egg from one mouse and a special type of cell -- a haploid embryonic stem cell -- from another. Both contained only half the required genetic instructions or DNA, but just bringing them together wasn't enough. The researchers had to use a technology called gene editing to delete three sets of genetic instructions to make them compatible (more on that later). The double-dad approach …
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:07 AM
2

You really think that sharing a story about your first male teacher will fire up 4chan to ID and doxx you? Ah, the old feminist trick of pretending the other person said something which he did not say. Good on ya mate.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:31 AM
-1

You are in a community that is generally reviled by the rest of reddit. Tell your story all you want, and when you are fired for being an MRA, best not pout here.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:30 AM
0

I almost certainly get paid a lot more than you just for thinking this way. How easy it is to single you out on the internet Wiki for the curious If you think the personal details of your life aren't as easy to assemble and reverse engineer then you haven't been paying attention.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:25 PM
3

I like this a lot. Could we clean up the punctuation? It would look better on a T-Shirt formatted like this: I have never met a single strong feminist. I have met MANY strong women. And feminists are nothing like them. (which might explain why they are single)
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:22 PM
3

When you watch this you will see some of the potential issues you will face whilst standing up for your rights. Stay safe out there
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:17 PM
1

A fantastic 15 minute video. A bit exculpatory, certainly exposing the massive hypocrisy in the feminist movement as mainstream publications use the exact methods to defend this lunatic that they decry when used to defend men.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:08 PM
1

Tom and Paul spend 45 minutes discussing topics in the media this week. Submitting both channels so that users can choose whose video to support.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:03 PM
1

Paul and Tom talk for about 45 minutes about 4 stories in the media this week. Submitting both links so you can choose whose channel you prefer to watch.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:00 PM
0

Seems a great idea - but a little TOO much potential for self doxxing for my comfort.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:56 PM
-4

Not only are you a concern troll (by shifting the discussion from Men's Rights to some dubious claim) ... you are also a condescending douche. Nice double play. And doing both under the color of authority. If you insist on posting moronic shit, at least do it from a non-mod account. YOU are making the forum look bad.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:42 PM
-1

whoever you are it is time to turn in your mod credentials. A concern trolling mod is a BAD mod.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:47 PM
2

done thanks!
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:46 AM
0

I donated to AVfM but as Paul Elam got more and more controlling, intolerant of differing views and raging, I turned my back on that site. Just your daily dose of hit piece against Paul.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:18 PM
1

Retarded is bringing up apples when no one was even tangentally talking about apples. Just remember, projection isn't just the psychological phenomena that you seem to be habitually drawn to ... sometimes it is a booth at the back of a theater.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:10 AM
1

You are an idiot. Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to change the title of his post. Nice.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:24 AM
3

ThePigmanLIESAgain: Jordan's actual tweet: I'm not certain that is the right move. It's very complex. But he would have his name cleared, and a figure who might be less divisive might be put forward. While Jordan is "wrong" that BK would have his name cleared - he would simply fade into obscurity he isn't wrong that a less divisive figure might have been put forward. But then again Jordan isn't an American and he doesn't fundamentally understand that our elections have different consequences tha…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:32 PM
1

And Jordan, unlike so many people, will change his opinion if presented with a rational argument. I find it hilarious that I get called a hater when I point out something Jordan said that I disagree with (e.g. before he was truly Jordan couldn't give a speech without throwing men under the bus) AND a blind acolyte when I quoted some of his academic findings.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:22 PM
1

Quite a leap to "homophobic". That you find it essential to fabricate emotions, thoughts, and actions on the behalf of other people only underscores how irrational you are. It is, almost, as if you are intentionally playing from the feminist handbook. Can you point to a single thing Paul has produced to substantiate your claim? I doubt it. You remind me a great deal of an acquaintance I had in college who had unreciprocated romantic feelings towards me. Much as I liked the guy on other fronts he…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:39 PM
1

Ah, more nonsense. At least you are consistent in that regard. Did you try and touch Paul in a bad way only to learn that 6'8" can pound your ass into the ground?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:18 PM
2

I know you put up a massive wall of nonsensical text to hide the fact that you haven't addressed a single point. But I know ... yer's gottem one of dem der Aenglish Dergrees frem der perstigeousnamous 'versities. Simple stuff ... like actually explaining your reasoning behind a MacKay quote more germane to tulip investments than fictitious cults of personality. (really religious/feminist thinking on your part -- namely any denial by me is even more proof in your deluded worldview). Simple stuff …
/r/MensRights07/10/18 08:56 PM
5

"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one." Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds 1841 Hmm. So you memorized one MacKay quote and you apply it without context as if to imply something? What is it you are trying to say here in quoting another man's words? Also very important here is that MacKay wasn't speaking about men -- the gender but instead about men -- the species. I…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 06:23 PM
0

It's not a court case, it's a job interview. As Daniel Dennett would say, "you speak a true deepity" I mean, seriously, if it were a court case it would be held under the auspices of the Judicial Branch. It is a Senate Hearing which holds exactly the same legal weight as a court hearing, it is being held under the purview of the Legislative Branch. Fuck, the Constitution is NOT a hard read, and yet even its simplest concepts seem to elude you.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:37 PM
2

I would pay big, BIG money if there was some kind of way to learn if the author of this piece was raised by a single mother. His "I hate white men" foo is way too high.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:22 AM
0

Hmm... you are the one calling everyone who doesn't kiss your butt an asshole. Easy for you to call me a right prick; hard for you to substantiate it. Once again, you do Olympic class mental gymnastics to avoid reflecting on your own personality. (moved to correct place in the thread)
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:51 PM
1

Indeed. Apologies!
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:51 PM
1

Hmm... you are the one calling everyone who doesn't kiss your butt an asshole. Easy for you to call me a right prick; hard for you to substantiate it. Once again, you do Olympic class mental gymnastics to avoid reflecting on your own personality.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:14 PM
7

The greatest con is convincing someone who has something you want it is worthless.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 08:32 PM
1

Perhaps not, but it is a really good indicator that perhaps our time and money should be spent elsewhere.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:41 PM
6

The health and safety of the Horned Frog Family is of utmost importance No, the education of your students is of utmost importance, followed closely by 'preparing them to be functioning adults in a democratic society'. Mike Rowe of Dirty Jobs fame explains this best.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:36 PM
1

So you are a slimy? Oddly derivative of the furry community but whatever floats your boat. You know that snails have no backbone, right?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:26 PM
2

Fucking sick of assholes and trumpists accusing me of it. Then perhaps you should look in the mirror and examine your behaviors which inspire people to accuse you of said activities. Out of curiosity, am I an asshole or a trumpist? Or are you saying that we are all both? Seems an easy (and sadly feminist) technique for dismissing criticisms directed your way.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:24 PM
1

Didn't answer my question in one of these threads RE being raised in a fatherless environment. I am really, really curious about your passive-aggressive style. Are you a dude? Were you raised in a fatherless home? I genuinely want to know.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:00 AM
3

The intent is for it to be seen. Dear god, take a hint. EVERYONE hated meta discussions so much we said, "hey, lets create a sub just for those folks who cannot help themselves injecting their 'brilliant' ideas for how we can be better so we don't have to see their shit". I can only wonder why you think you are so special, but then it woudn't be the first time this week that someone suggested you were trying to subvert this sub.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:57 AM
2

So you thought to yourself, "no one gives a flying F about /r/mensrightsmeta so I will go right ahead and post a [meta] to the main sub"? Interesting. Sloppy logic, but interesting.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:53 AM
2

This seems like a very low effort post.... Just say'n.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:49 AM
3

the FBI is deliberately non partisan. Really? Says who? You? The FBI is headed by a Director who is appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Decidedly not "non-partisan". The FBI takes its marching orders from the DoJ. The boss of the DoJ is the Attorney General, a Cabinet level post (go back to your Civics book) which also requires the consent of the Senate. Very, very decidedly not "non-partisan".
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:47 AM
0

Lots of people here seem to disagree with your assessment of "respected".
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:41 AM
2

Agree to disagree, then. Errrr.... No. I mean, we can agree that don't even have a grade school understanding of how the US Government functions under the Constitution. We can agree that you raise spurious points and then stamp your feet when anyone attempts to bring logic into discussion. We can agree that there is a good chance you are a shill.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:40 AM
3

There are supposed to be checks and balances. I can talk about procedure too. The Executive Branch "investigating" its own nominee is not a check. I mean seriously? I don't think you know how this is supposed to work. The Senate IS the check on both the Executive and Judicial branches in this case. The President appoints a judge with the advice and consent of the Senate. Not the advice and consent and investigation of his own branch.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:36 AM
0

"legit" ? In the sense that they weren't created by a thousand monkeys banging away on virtual keyboards? What makes them "legit"?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:34 AM
1

according to you ... Would I be correct in guessing that you were raised in a fatherless household? Only really feminized men do this thing of directly attributing their false argument to the other person. I never said any such thing. I have no concrete idea of what this journal represents, neither do you. We are decades removed and a lifetime of experience. That you insist on projecting your BS onto BK is much more telling about you than it is about him.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:33 AM
6

Looks like a very feminist argument to not look at the content of what someone saying but the who's saying it. Lazy attack on a long time poster to /r/mensrights. /u/EricAllonde isn't the person. Eric is dismissing the content because it it crap, and he is reinforcing the notion that it is crap by pointing out the regularity of some seemingly random newbie to come in here and make the same specious argument. Almost as if some Gender Studies Herfessor is giving extra credit for attempting to take…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:07 PM
2

Good thing you aren't under oath ... YOU lied when you said you had proof.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:02 PM
0

American Patriots care. So how about you leave it to the American Patriots and go back to whatever third world country you originally fled from? Seriously, "ralphing" could be induced by alcohol consumption, or food poisoning, or gasp possibly a lowered alcohol tolerance resulting from food poisoning. Fuck all ... the shit I ate as a teenager absolutely caused me to "ralph" with, and without, the assistance of alcohol. Clearly you have no concept of the meaning of "reasonable doubt". Send me you…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:01 PM
2

We can wait until the FBI investigates and reports their findings regarding the lies Kavanaugh has been telling, and the validity of the claims against him. We??? I wasn't aware that you were a member of the Senate. The FBI is a part of the Executive Branch of government. The Senate is not beholden to the FBI, nor the larger DoJ. The Senate's Job, not your job, not "our" job, but the Senate's Job is to hold hearings and ultimately a confirmation vote. The hearings, ultimately, are the investigat…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:55 PM
3

I literally cringed listening to her. Every episode of the old Loveline radio show (with Dr. Drew Pinsky and Adam Corolla) flashed through my mind. Well, at least the ones were some adult woman called in but was speaking with a distinctly childish voice. The complaint from such a caller was invariably something benign, such as, "my boyfriend refuses to put the seat down on the toilet". Dr. Drew (and later Adam) would zero in on the voice. Always the voice. Squeaky high pitch, childish intonation…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:29 PM
4

Much more important is everything she left out, That is a spectacularly spurious point - a well respected female prosecutor omits something you (with your Harvard Law Degree I presume) feel is essential. So you hang your disdain on her competence. Win Win for you I guess.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:22 PM
4

This is a fantastic miniature expose into the minds of Social Justice types. While no student interviewed came up with an actual argument you can watch the cognitive dissonance dial up to 11. Crowder's videos are instantly demonetized so he has no direct financial benefit from doing these discussions. I am not affiliated with Crowder but I do want to see him to continue challenging young minds. His ability to remember relevant facts is truly impressive. https://get.crtv.com/lwc/
/r/MensRights03/10/18 04:59 PM
1

What I have is a working hypothesis that I have been bouncing around my head and decided to get some feedback on to see if I can improve it or if I am wrong. Ok, so fine.... you admit that what you are putting forward is NOT a scientific theory. But all of your previous posts demonstrate your spurious claim that it was established. The fact that you have to rely on pedantic minutia outside of the scope of the conversation to "prove" yourself correct only further demonstrates your emotional inves…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:49 PM
8

Yea ... and they also struggle with a wide Jewish - Nonjewish disparity. Do we deal with that also? Seriously, in some retarded comment a Jewish Rabbinical Scholar postulated that circumcision is the reason Jewish men account for so many Nobel Prizes. [some debate regarding the sanity of religions with Stephen Fry] So hey ladies ... you want to narrow that Nobel earnings gap? Then support FGM.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:47 PM
0

You're acting as if the United States and soviet Russia are are moral equivalents. No... you are saying that I am acting a particular way so you can allow yourself to dismiss your cognitive dissonance. I am saying that nation states server their own interest and that the only reason that they would not is a legitimate threat of force. If you believe that, you're neither a patriot or someone with an appreciation for American values. Interesting how you project onto others; only on reddit could on…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:08 AM
13

Do not ever forget the Two Coreys who did go to the police, and did tell a lot of people ... only to be shut down and shunned.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:08 PM
0

Regarding your comment. DWS is a piece of shit. We all know this. We do? Then why is she still in control? She handed the Democrats their most unlikely loss in history. It's bullshit to say Dems hate white men because of a vocal minority. Using that logic one could say that Republicans endorse pedophiles because of Roy Moore. This is just lazy. Democrats "hate" men because of a controlling vocal minority. Hillary represented the "establishment" at the exact wrong moment in history for that. Ther…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 05:33 PM
2

You are being lazy BBH was using a shorthand. All of the politically active and powerful people who "hate [white] men" (i.e. grievance politics aimed against SWM) happen to be Democrats or caucus closely with them. Yes, the Republicans have their own subculture of grievance politics but it is less powerful and is not focused on hating a specific gender or color. One simply has to look at Hillary's failed campaign to understand the impact of the Democrat's miscalculation. I know...."but muh'russi…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:36 PM
14

This forum isn't designed to organize demonstrations or activities BUT /r/MRActivism IS. Also you can join a number of organizations that do publicize their activities and you can join in. In the US join https://ncfm.org/ In the UK join https://j4mb.org.uk/ In Canada https://equalitycanada.com/ has a very good egalitarian reputation But really what motivates YOU the most? Do: Engage everyone you meet and never be afraid to stand up for your beliefs Engage your local, regional, and national repre…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:23 PM
1

you are trying to redefine a word with a long standing meaning. Your reasons for doing so have little to do with science. gender has a scientific basis. "Gender" is not a word that was created because "science" found a thing without a descriptor. Instead some social "scientists" hypothesized a model and decided to redefine a word to fit their needs. Along comes you, the great unwashed, and unscientific, public stamping their feet and demanding everyone change to suit their political (not scienti…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:09 PM
1

Citation needed. EDIT: I mean JFC even the feminist Wikipedia admits that this is just ONE of many models currently in use. Ergo, it isn't "science"; it is a circle jerk of pseudo-academics trying to push a narrative which has no viable backing at this point. FFS - just admit you are trans and that this is deeply personal to you and WTF can't everyone just agree with you so you can feel OK with yourself.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:07 PM
2

So I break down the scientific definition of sex and gender in It isn't Scientific just because you say so. Who, in the Scientific community defines it this way? And by Scientific I mean, actual, reproducible, science. Not "Social Studies", not "Gender Studies", not some circle jerk community. I mean Chemistry, Biology, and the like.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:18 PM
2

Brock turner was a 19 year old who was supplied alcohol in violation of California statutes. His accuser, who was 22 at the time, could have reasonably been presumed to be the person supplying the alcohol ... just sayin' The Frontal Cortex is not fully developed until one is in his 20's. This is the area of the brain responsible for impulse control. And yet we hold a younger person accountable for the actions of both. Also, FND clearly doesn't know how the Judiciary works in the United States (s…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:57 PM
1

Gender and sex are clearly defined terms, No, they are not. The "defining" you are speaking of is only recent, and only by "gender advocates". It is not a "long standing" definition or belief. You are trying to demand that everyone speak the language as you define it ... and that is literally nothing more than thought control.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:47 PM
1

your screenname is /u/MRwhibbley ... that you identify as a "mister". is sufficient proof that you are a shit-lord-rapist-pedophile-tax-evading-bottom dweller. Q - fucking - E - D.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:55 PM
2

You are going to need to do much, MUCH better than that. From your linked article: The prohibitions, generally, of the due process clauses apply only to the actions of state actors, and not against private citizens. "State actors" doesn't mean "Judiciary" it means every part of government or anyone acting on behalf of the government. While the Judiciary is typically the branch which decides IF due process was breached all branches of government are subject to it.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:41 PM
2

However I hope all of you would kindly label him as a rapist, if he is deemed guilty. Why? There hasn't been a single accusation of rape. Seriously, you admit English isn't your first language -- I don't label you an "idiot" because it isn't perfect ... I label you a great person for trying, sure as hell you speak and write English better than I speak your language.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:36 PM
1

However I hope all of you would kindly label him as a rapist, if he is deemed guilty. Why? There hasn't been a single accusation of rape. Seriously, you admit English isn't your first language -- I don't label you an "idiot" because it isn't perfect ... I label you a great person for trying, sure as hell you speak and write English better than I speak your language.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:35 PM
1

I cannot see how anyone can argue gender is not s spectrum. It depends an awful lot on what you mean. The notion that "gender" defines something other than a binary "male" or "female" is relatively new. While I have no problem with anyone using the term any way they want in common speech it becomes much more problematic in either academic or scientific speech. If your usage is crystal clear from context, then fine; however, if it is used ambiguously I think it incumbent upon you to clarify your …
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:31 PM
1

Ok, you get the last word...
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:17 PM
1

Care to post your law degree for all of us to examine? Who the fuck said Due Process, as enshrined in the Constitution and derivative laws, applies only to the Judicial Branch?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:15 PM
1

"Due process" doesn't apply because it's not a court. This is a fallacy. The Constitution United States does not contain the phrase "these rights only apply to the Judicial Branch". Congress (either as separate bodies or together) cannot compel an individual to testify against themselves absent a grant of immunity. The Administrative Branch similarly cannot compel such testimony absent a grant of immunity or pardon. There are no Rights which are selective depending on which branch of government …
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:11 PM
2

Oh, I see....I am supposed to implicitly know what you are thinking. That is called being self centered and narcissistic. The only person who could ever genuinely know what is going on in your head is you. Warren Farrell is not, nor has he ever claimed to be, an expert in terms of human evolution, nor societal growth. He is considered an expert by some people on gender issues. Warren's conjectures, whatever they might be, are hardly in common usage and I don't have a fucking idea what they are (…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:37 PM
7

I completely agree - Toxic Masculinity is a spurious term. Toxic Femininity is a spurious term. Toxic Feminism however, is a very real thing.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:23 PM
1

Where did you get the idea that I was talking about the Kardashev scale? Hmmm. So you are claiming there is another "scale" of societies that I should magically know about. Almost as if you are talking in some secret language and because I cannot intuit your intentions you can dismiss me. That is some powerfully magical thinking. Care to explain your Societal "Stages" - because if you are genuine about a discussion you would not presume everyone knows what they hell you are talking about. (my be…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:31 PM
1

Why is your understanding/definition more "right" or "correct" than mine? Because my understanding isn't based exclusively on my so called personal observations like yours is. Mine is based on a distinct (academic) usage history. Read more Karen Straughan a.k.a. /u/girlwriteswhat if you need a very deep understanding of the history of this term. I know you're gonna complain about an ad hominem attack, but you sound like a jerk in your responses. The fact is, you are a person and I am a person. W…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:37 PM
1

hahahahahahaha. I mean, come on, you are a troll. You haven't contributed a single valid point to the conversation.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:29 PM
1

Irony is a bitch...but at least I know how to separate paragraphs.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:28 PM
1

You want to sound smart and use big words but the Kardashev Scale is not some magically true thing. It is simply a way of classifying the energy usage of theoretical societies. Not you, nor anyone currently on this planet, can provide an example of a Stage 2, or Stage 3, society. So to say that we are "evolving" into a Stage society is rubbish. We simply have no idea if such a thing is actually possible. So we can completely dismiss your SciFi example as unproven. Toxic Masculinity/Enforced Mach…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:25 PM
1

WHO told you this? Your mom? Your sister? Because without more details I am calling bullshit. Crying isn't a binary phenomena, one cruel word does NOT turn off your tear ducts.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:07 PM
1

You are really determined to ignore the person and attack the stereotype aren't you? You just cannot help but play the victim card spuriously. That is cute. Point out exactly what you are calling "an attack"....very curious what gets under your obviously thin skin.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:05 PM
1

I think I found your picture
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:17 PM
2

toxic masculinity (or Enforced Machismo if you prefer) is a valid and important one. Says the feminist in the room. 100,000 years of evolution suggests you are wrong. Feminists lie about everything: Women are, and always were, oppressed. Webster, Brewster anyone? Men force each other to be Macho - so say only the feminists. Men force each other to get the fucking job done and don't have much tolerance for anyone who prevents that from happening. Classic [male] society says "mind your own fucking…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:14 PM
1

I'm really loving all the defensiveness against somebody who's legitimately asking questions Really? You preface your "question" with a wall of text defining the "correctness" of your position. If you expect people to answer your genuinely honest questions maybe you shouldn't start by telling them how right your stance is. I'm really loving all the defensiveness Projection? I don't know. But claiming the other person is being defensive diminishes the potential honesty of your claims. (i.e. This …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:07 PM
1

again with the name calling, are you even capable of reasonable adult discourse? Feminist technique -- lie and pretend that some words spoken by other people delegitimize their entire being. or do you always act like a petulant child. Feminist technique -- attempt to "shame" the other person into obedience. Notice how you still haven't addressed the actual topics? Neat trick that, huh?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:50 PM
1

I've only heard of toxic masculinity in reference to things like "men shouldn't cry", Oh horseshit. You can claim "to have only heard" bla, bla, bla but it doesn't take a degree in http://lmgtfy.com to find all kinds of academic (so called) references to "toxic masculinity" outside of your purported experience. Seriously, you come across as deceptive when you make these claims (how dare anyone challenge "muh'xperiences"). And what the actual fuck: "men shouldn't cry" No one says this (other than…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:45 PM
3

Notice how you don't clarify which is which. The pedigree of "Hegemonic Masculinity" is very clear, and it is very clearly an attempt by feminists (like you?) to distance themselves from "Toxic Masculinity" since it doesn't poll well. Nice try however.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:39 PM
1

Holy fuck you are not to bright, are you? (That or you are using Feminist Argumentation Technique #2 -- Don't just move the goal posts, change the game altogether and play dumb). The points in question are this sub being a "collective" vs "individuals" AND for you to add credibility to your claim that "we" treat feminists the way you are attempting to treat this individual. I know walking is hard ... but the only way you will ever keep up is if you TRY to stop crawling.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:37 PM
1

Point out the personal attack. Clearly you have a massive victim complex. I said your words were retarded. That doesn't mean you are. Dear god you really are a feminist in our midst. Feminist argumentation technique #3 -- claim you are being attacked therefore you don't need to debate the points in question.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:28 PM
1

How to unpack this retarded statement? So many, many errors. Men's rights really need to sort its bipolar disorder out. "Men's Rights" isn't a collective, it doesn't have a single identity. This forum, and the bigger movement, is a place where individuals (such as yourself) can speak. You get to speak; I get to point out that your words come across as retarded. Win / Win. We can't say women who spread hate speech against men are bad and then defend this mans right to do the same. Oh my dear god,…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:10 PM
5

Let us play "spot the feminist shill"....FOUND ONE. Toxic masculinity does not refer to masculinity in general, but rather a specific type that requires "alpha"-type behavior to be validated as a man. What makes you an expert on the usage of the term? It appears that you are the one who is cherry picking (i.e. you use the term in its most convenient form for the argument to hand) According to to the feminist leaning Wikipedia Hegemonic (formerly "Toxic") Masculinity derives exclusively from the …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:58 PM
2

I don't think many of these women choose to not have the dad around? Not sure about the "?" but MOST of these women choose not to have men around. 70+% of divorces are initiated by women. Women in the entire "Western" world are the exclusive decision makers about bringing a child to term. That is, even in the case of women single from conception, these women decided to get pregnant either with a man they tossed out, or a man who they should have known was a flake. The unicorn here is the man who…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:04 PM
1

The problem I see with your list is that it is all non-fiction. That is, it is written by people with an axe to grind, a particular philosophy to push. Not that they are good or bad, but anyone who tells you that they personally know the secret is almost certainly selling you something. Taking a page from Jordan Peterson - I would suggest that the best books to read are in narrative form. We have archetypes for a reason. I could some up with a never ending list, but the two that popped into my h…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:31 PM
1

Keep digging. According to this 2013 paper homicide (per se) isn't even in the top 5 reasons accounting for infant mortality although "accidents" is suspiciously #5. But that doesn't account for this blurb in the second (relevant) citation from your link: Homicide is the leading cause of infant deaths due to injury. More than 80 percent of infant homicides are considered to be fatal child abuse. This study assessed the timing of deaths and risk factors for infant homicide. So a tougher question …
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:20 PM
1

when before Hussein Obama's fundamental transformation of the Democrat Party I don't think you have been paying attention - the long slippery slide down the "most important voters are women" hill has been happening for decades. Obama was perhaps endgame in the transformation, there was nothing fundamental about his input.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:02 PM
8

Don't forget that Joe "I was a prosecutor" Biden was super buddy, buddy with Ted Kennedy... It seems if you have nothing to say, because you are dead, then we don't need to believe the physical evidence (i.e. the body).
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:12 AM
2

OP gets to spout generalizations? This is you .... spouting a generalization. What is the point of bitching when finding the academic resources is the most trivial thing on the planet.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:06 AM
2

So, um, yea ... not. This is MEN'S Rights Advocates / Activists. We like thinking like stereotypical men. I don't mind teaching you how to fish - but I sure as fuck am not going to do your fishing for you. It really isn't that hard: https://scholar.google.com/
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:01 PM
1

Tony, HBC is a real person who is not in the public sphere - you are breaking our rules: Facebook and Twitter posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names. Absolutely no doxxing will be tolerated.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:32 PM
0

I am trying....but you keep talking.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:13 PM
0

I am trying....but you keep talking.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:46 PM
0

niggling, niggardly naggers are the very worst.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:28 PM
1

Sure...whatever lets you sleep at night.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:30 PM
1

FYI, pretending you are an English Prof doesn't make you sound smart. Interesting point, neither vapid nor shallow list the other as a synonym ... probably because while similar they are not, in fact, identical. Each offers particular qualities that are exclusive. RE: "I see dead people" - our thread's originator opined that the appellate court should have waved the magic wand and made everything disappear. That is a very popular opinion among know-it-all adolescents and folks who refuse to stud…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:05 PM
12

Both of my grandfathers served in combat in WWII, one at Wake Island and one at Normandy. Both suffered tremendously emotionally at the loss of their friends and comrades, and physically from the conditions they endured. The tolls this put on the relationships with their wives and children are incalculable, and the debt transferred down to us, their grandchildren. And my family is just one of millions with similar experiences. America paid a very high price for participating in WWII. So go ahead…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:54 PM
4

Your title leaves the instant impression that you are shallow but your post is actually insightful - I think you will get more traction if you reworked your title to something that isn't ammunition for the antiMRA. To whit: it isn't exactly showing off for the male viewers - that would be breaking the fourth wall and is more often than not off putting (Deadpool and Ferris Bueller notwithstanding). More I think it is a seemingly impromptu display of nudity within the bounds of the character's per…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:43 PM
1

You are vapidly shallow. I suppose you are permanently stuck at the mental development of an angry 16 year old. Lots, and LOTS of men have died for you to have the rights you should have. And all you think of is me, me, me.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:31 PM
1

True enough but there must be those who watch the watchers - who demand free speech. My concern isn't some 18 year old ragging on women -- it is folks coming in and enacting a false flag operation. So instead of saying we are against so-called "hate speech" (which is fucking retarded) make the rule something more honest: Creating posts that have the appearance of false flag motivations will result in permanent banning.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:29 PM
-6

Today I learned that this sub has retarded and capricious rules: Racism and other hate speech: This is a difficult issue to address. Messages that are purely for insult or hate purposes will be removed (e.g. "black people are lazy"). Alternatively, messages that discuss a person's opinion, or argues for a point, may not be removed. The goal is to encourage people to discuss and share their views, while preventing people from just making stupid posts. (i.e.: discussion of sexual preference is acc…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:36 AM
2

But as we see more and more feminist jurisprudence, the State is increasingly interested only in serving the interests of women. And there is your first major mistake in logic -- that feminism servers the interests of women. The courts are not serving the interests of women via your thought process; it is serving the interests entrenched bureaucrats and select, entitled NGOs.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:26 AM
1

Buzzword soup. Not going to waste my time.. Too late.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:25 AM
21

I think you do not understand jurisprudence in the United States. While it is theoretically possible to "skip Go, go straight to jail" and have your case heard immediately before the United States Supreme Court that isn't how it works in practice for myriad logistical reasons. Superior Courts, and other courts of appeal, serve the major role of reviewing and advising lower courts. So while it sucks monkey balls for this one defendant it is instructive to the prosecutor and judges of the lower co…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 06:31 PM
7

There are two white women tangentially in my life who both hate white men with a passion; when backed into a corner they will both hate on Black, Hispanic, Asian men but the bulk of their vitriol is squarely aimed at white men. Both learned at an early age how to play the "victim game" in order to manipulate everyone around them (I have often wanted to trap them in the same room to record the certain cat fight that would break out as they try to out victim each other). Both will paint on a smile…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 07:41 PM
2

That is about roughly true in any human endeavor. Very few people achieve the very highest pinnacles of any field. Rhetorically the original statement was that there is no path from E-9 to O-10, which is almost certainly true due to time constraints ... making it to E-9 takes most of your career, to then climb the ranks to O-7 alone would take you well past your likely mortality. On the other hand a great many men have made it from E-1 to O-7 and beyond. link My point was that once you have deci…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:37 AM
4

Well NCOs are very advancement limited... Can’t be a general as an NCO... There are approximately 2 Million people serving in the US Armed forces (Active and Reserve) Approximately 1% of enlisted service members make it to the rank of E-9 link So as not to have to do too much research for this comment I am going to that the various services have a roughly similar distribution as the Army' 2016-2018 report Less than 1/2% make it to any General Officer rank, and way, way less than that make it to …
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:18 AM
1

Invited to a party by coworkers, they conspired to get me really, really drunk, left me at the party location alone with their fat and very in debt friend. Forced to have sex (i.e. MTP). I played along later just enough to get the full story. They all felt I made enough to support her, she tried to get pregnant to entrap me. I am beyond fucking lucky that didn't happen. Quit that job, stopped talking with all of them. Moved on.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 06:34 AM
7

Sadly a lot of men believe it. And they often believe it while chasing their mother's ever vanishing approval. Case in point it took me years to understand a high school friend's marriage to a "reformed" lesbian (who left him for a woman more butch than he) after she filled her sperm quota. Retrospectively it was the perfect marriage for a boy raised by a man hating mother -- how better to prove you are a male feminist? Marry a man hating lesbian.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:51 AM
0

I rarely bring up my vet status unless I think it might get me laid. So, only for purely selfish reasons - gotcha.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:17 PM
0

Just trying to figure out what panty waist division you were in that you got windows. I know ... it was a bad day for you when the AC stopped working and you had to pound away on that keyboard in a balmy 78 degrees.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:03 AM
0

It really is very feminist of you to put words in other people's mouths ... hope that works out for you in the long run.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:01 AM
0

Going out on a limb here ... you made it to E-3 and got an "other than honorable" and have been crying "stolen valor" ever since.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:01 AM
-1

Both I and /u/Ragnrok are vets. Sure you are ... veterans of the tone policing wars of 2018.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:00 AM
3

Not even close to correct. Reminder that modern day feminists don't want equal rights, they want more rights than men. All feminists, always have wanted all of the rights and privileges with none of the responsibilities. It isn't a "modern" or X-wave thing. From the very beginning they have behaved thus. Reminder that modern day feminists don't want equal rights, they want more rights than men. You forget that they want more responsibilities for men and fewer protections for men as well.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 11:24 PM
-2

The point is that the application of "freedom of speech" is context specific and not absolute. While I am proud to have been both enlisted and commissioned for its own sake I am much more proud of the experiences and situational knowledge I gained. But hey, I completely agree that it is easy to be a condescending douchewad when your ass has never been on the line.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:58 PM
-1

Not very bright, are you? Someone has to uphold the law, someone has to provide for the defense of the country. Sometimes it is the same group of people, sometimes not. "Boots" in general are not interested in the actuality of the law - they are much more inclined to try to kick ass and possibly, although very unlikely, ask questions later. The nuance here is that burning a flag is Constitutionally protected speech with the caveats: 1) it must be your own flag, 2) you must do it on property wher…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:55 PM
-2

Wow, I thought it was a feminist thing to put words in other people's mouths. Glad to know where you stand on decent argumentation style. I have been in a war zone, but I was never in a combat zone. I have provided a lot of humanitarian assistance in the aftermath of a number of man-made and natural disasters. To the very best of my knowledge I have never killed anyone but I have supported missions where I can reasonably assume that people were killed. My point you self-anointed douchewad is tha…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:50 PM
16

Am not denying the sign he carried offends me. Why is virtue signalling with "offends you" part of the conversation? As a former member of the US Armed forces who repeatedly swore to defend the Constitution I don't give a single rat shit about how offended you may, or may not, be. Burn a US Flag off base as a private citizen? I may hate you but I will defend your right to do it. Attempt to do the same thing on base and I promise Gitmo would be a virtual Club Med by comparison. This bitch attempt…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:31 AM
6

But you need to factor in the time-weighted probability that you will encounter her at her "best". These women often spend weeks, even months, at their worst for a few minutes, once a month, at their best.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:25 AM
0

66.23008999999999% oh bullshit. This is way more digits of Pi than NASA needs to get men to the moon; the more digits after the decimal point the more likely you are being sold bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:21 AM
0

I'm pretty sure the point of this post was "keep politics out of this sub". Not "advocate your political views in the comments". THAT'S THE JOKE! I am pretty sure you have no idea how the internet works. Edit: clarity
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:14 AM
3

I voted for Trump. (not out of love for Trump, more out of my loathing of the DNC's "Super Delegate" BS) My vote didn't count. (seriously) He has been nowhere near as bad as the loons claim. Square the circle.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:08 AM
1

You cite it first. YOU made the claims, that puts the onus on you. Another feminist argument technique in your quiver - demand that everyone disprove your statements instead of proving them yourself.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:54 PM
1

sigh, you might want to invest in remedial reading. I did not say you were a feminist. I said you were behaving like one. You are a little bully, crying that you are a victim.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:53 PM
2

The majority of pervert priests aren’t homosexual. Citation needed; your personal beliefs don't actually count for shit. I’ve been to far more protests than you. ha, ha, ha. You think you are "involved" because you have been to a "protest". Hubris much? And for what it is worth; most people don't hate fags... they hate narcissistic 13 year old girls who happen to be trapped in an adult male's body.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:39 PM
1

You talk like a feminist. Projection isn't just the booth at the back of the theater.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:37 PM
1

We We? So, you speak for ALL homosexuals? Even the pedophile priests? Do they also disavow most religious ANYTHING? There is a bit of a flaw in your logic. then you yourself are even more responsible when it’s any men’s issue given that logic More responsible than you? You share TWO components in common: you are a male AND gay. God, I hope you don't share THREE components. I do go after the church, publicly and often. Time for you to man up and get out there with us. What gay person advocates fo…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:21 PM
1

Nice dodge, and very lazy thinking. Talk about using feminist projection techniques to further your personal agenda. NO ONE said that homosexuals were psychic. That is you laying down the victim card to change the debate away from a topic you know you are going to lose. The debate is about the larger gay community (i.e. prominent individuals such as Dan "I think straight white men need to be more like us" Savage) to call out the gay pedophile portion of the Catholic Priesthood. Dan, I am certain…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:17 PM
2

simple fix - stop buying Nike products and let them know why. By far the UofO's biggest contributor.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:23 AM
1

If they are gay, then they are part of the gay community. Stop passing the buck. Alternatively, as Karen /u/girlwriteswhat, has posited ... women have more responsibility to police feminists because they are far more likely to be effective. If the gay community came out and aggressively disavowed homosexual priests who engage in a little "harmless" buggery of young boys it would be A LOT more effective then the church, or men in general.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:38 PM
1

Deepity
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:08 PM
1

It is simply calling a spade a spade. By claiming the problem is "pedophile priests" one is basically saying masculinity is the problem while protecting an erstwhile "protected" class. By pointing out that the problem is otherwise homosexual men predating on young boys you force folks to face otherwise uncomfortable truths: a) boys and men can be victims, b) the homosexual community is not policing its own, c) homosexual predators are hiding in plain sight. But OMG -- you are saying that all hom…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:06 PM
1

"Aggressive" Driving is a purely subjective term of fart - everyone knows what it means because no one has ever bothered to objectively define it. Example: I have made the drive from Seattle to San Diego and back several times; most recently last week. I learned to drive in Southern California and that makes me an "aggressive" driver in Seattle; but my many years in the so-called PNW have made me soft so I am a damn pussy slowpoke rolling through LA, Orange, and San Diego counties at 85 MPH. Old…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 02:40 PM
7

So we file charges and prosecute men in part to dissuade other men from committing the same crime but we cannot do the same with women? We file charges and prosecute individual men to punish them for committing a crime but we cannot do the same with women?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:31 PM
0

YOU started our verbal fight with the following rude comment. It sounds as if you are admitting to being the person behind the deleted account. Because otherwise you cannot "retaliate". (Unless, sigh, again, you admit to being a feminist ... they love to pretend that they can fight other people's battles on their behalf). So, is this your crappy post that the mods deleted?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:33 PM
1

/u/typhonblue should see about interviewing this guy. Well researched, well spoken, maybe a male Honey Badger in the making.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:33 AM
-1

Oh? You think your state is any less corrupt?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:23 AM
1

, faggot.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:31 AM
0

I suggest you stop eating that Urine & Feces Cereal for breakfast. Dudette - you really need to work on your people skills, it cannot possibly be good for you...assuming of course you aren't trying to commit suicide by stress induced myocardial infarction.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:13 PM
0

Really isn't hard for me; but you have some work to do. Might I suggest http://selfauthoring.com
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:25 AM
1

Stay classy.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:56 AM
0

Now fuck off, you twat. Dismissive feminist technique much? You clearly failed the "lead by example" school. Also, only a feminist infers tone from text. So I guess we know exactly what school you come from. Lastly, don't mistake my curiosity in your upbringing for my valuing your opinion. The two are different. I am really curious to know if you are a militant female feminist, or an emasculated male raised by a single mother. Just building a database of personalities.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 12:03 AM
0

you dog's-dick-sucking piece of shit Rightfully telling people not to be rude =/= entitlement. I guess you can choose do define things as you want ... but the irony is palpable. You cannot point to a thing that I said in this tread that was "rude". I didn't put anyone down, nor did I ascribe insulting characteristics. Those are things you did. But I get it, a troll has just got to troll. Keep fishing.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:54 PM
0

You were being a bitch, and you're also an idiot if you don't get the difference. Feminist manipulation technique - well done. Are you female, or just a sackless tool? I really don't give a shit about your opinion (of me, or anything else really). This exaggerated sense of entitlement you have; thinking you can tell other people how to live their lives; where does it come from?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:45 PM
3

They aren't progressive - not by any definition. They are being abusive. They are being narcissistic and manipulative. In short they are being exactly like that Australian MP who put her 11 year old daughter directly in the public's eye just to score political points.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:40 PM
0

Wrong (again I presume). Every single mod on this sub regularly chastises people for shit titles. Calling people out on their click-bait titles is an essential part of keeping this (and every other) sub vibrant and as troll free as possible. Note that our wilting flower who posted this crap has already deleted his or her day old account. Smells like a troll to me. Call me a bitch all you want -- your approval hasn't even eked its way into my top-10-billion-things-I-care-about list.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:35 PM
1

Are you saying that it is true that HRC said those words, or are you saying that the words HRC spoke are true? Inquiring minds want to know.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:30 PM
2

One must first define "victim". If one assumes that a victim must be alive to claim that status then HRC is correct. Note I said "IF", because this definition would mean that people who are murdered are not victims, just meat.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:29 PM
10

I have little to no doubt that I wore my mother's shoes when I was very young. I am also certain that this is a very common thing the world around; all throughout time. Just because a child is exploring his, or her, world does not mean a "gendered" choice is being made. When I was a 4 year old child I also put a hairpin in an electrical outlet. Thank god my parents and grandparents didn't decide that I was suicidal and put me in therapy. What we have here is idiots projecting their beliefs onto …
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:18 PM
2

You should indicate the country that is the topic of this post in the title. In my late 40s; divorced; asked the doc for the HPV vaccine -- no problems, no questions, no co payment ... at least in the USA with the insurance I had.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:07 PM
0

One of the crappiest post titles ever.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:05 PM
5

Brand new account - trolltastic username - insists on expounding on deepities.... If it looks like a troll, and talks like a troll, even if it is stating the obvious ... chances are it is a troll.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:46 PM
9

Sorry, I had (and still have) no idea who this person is. All I saw was a young black man and I rolled the statistical dice.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:07 PM
36

Single motherhood is probably related to this variant of Stockholm Syndrome. Note that this young man is essentially saying "I am trash". All he has seen is his mother's "righteous anger" - violence directed at him - and in order to square the circle he relates this violence to the love that is so clearly absent.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 04:48 PM
4

you should have changed your user name to LookAFace :) Thank you for clarifying this!!! I actually read the poster that OP showed us. The women "studied" the activity at Hooters ... but did they actually interview the servers and patrons? My best bet is that in general the female staff do not generally remember the people they served (too many, yada yada) while the patrons probably remember everything about the waitress. Feminism, in addition to being cancer, is one giant DARVO operation.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:11 PM
4

WTF does this have to do with our sub?
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:16 PM
26

"Objectification" is really a deceptive redefinition. Really a play on what Daniel Dennett calls a Deepity. The truth is she is an object, as is everything you can touch in the world and this entire campaign is designed to make you feel shame for something that is absolutely necessary for proper functioning in the world. The assumption of the authors is that you assume she is an object without consciousness; more of a rock, not even a dog. But truth be told when we examine men's sexual fantasies…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:55 PM
1

Want to be helpful? How about a translation for the rest of us and a more useful title? Something like "international poster on sexism".
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:56 PM
3

As a consequence of this, most men are simply boys that are extending their adolescence for as long as possible. Stopped reading right there - assume the rest is just pure shit as well. This is, at its very best, an appeal to the "one true man" and Peter Pan tropes. Most men are just Peter Pans...but not you, you are a real man judging every other man. Fuck that shit.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/18 07:47 PM
0

Lots of things to consider before a survey can even be considered good. The most important thing is to ask yourself WHY am I doing this survey? It reads an awful lot like OP wants to come out of the closet WRT some topics but is nervous and is framing it as a "lets everyone say what we really believe". /u/149327 I assure you that you can write whatever you want in this forum and as long as it is informed and honest it will generally be well received. Quite seriously, what is it you really want t…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:47 PM
0

EDIT: Your PRIMARY job as a moderator is to protect the community and to ensure the rules are adhered to. It is not to encourage or support hair-brained notions. The ONLY comment you should be making as a moderator is "What is the purpose of your survey?" Assuming the survey has a legitimate purpose, AND WON'T DIRECTLY HURT this community, you allow it to proceed. If perhaps you think it will hurt the community, you allow it to proceed but you sticky a warning on it. You should apply for a mid-l…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:43 PM
1

You seem to operate under the delusion that you hold some sort of social power over others, that they need and desire your approval; and that your disapproval should upset them. Hope the chemo cures your feminist cancer.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:59 PM
1

The falseness is demonstrated by the intentional conflation of "there are some women oppressed ... by some men" with all women and all men. Swapping the gender generates an equally true statement: Just as men were once oppressed with strict limitations decided by women who held much more social power This is a true statement because in all of history at least two men (i.e. "men") were restrictively oppressed by at least two women (i.e. "women") who held more social power.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:56 PM
1

You seem to suffer from a pretty sad case of Freudian Projection. Hope it works out for you in the long run.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:12 AM
11

Old news is great news... Eric Schmidt was renown for his philandering while at Novell in the 80's and 90's and it was an open secret about his "casting couch" office when he took over at Google. If you want to know why female interns are such a desired commodity in the tech industry you really need look no further then the CxO offices.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 08:33 PM
2

Ditto, all I can say is You may be right
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:12 AM
3

So I wanted to see what was up with HBR and visited their website http://honeybadgerbrigade.com only to be faced with a "suspended" redirect. Did Alison forget to pay the bill or is this retribution for her lawsuit?
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:02 AM
1

You're just ignorant of reality. So you know the reality of things that happened before your self-described asshole life started?
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:59 AM
1

If you are gonna correct someone on grammar at least use proper grammar in a sentence yourself lmao. You misplaced the period. "lmao" is effectively its own sentence.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 09:46 PM
10

It really doesn't matter if they can, or cannot, control their emotions. It matters if they can control their actions. Just because I may experience suicidal depression after a bitter and unnecessarily hostile divorce does not mean I am compelled to act out those ideations. Just because her PMS is particularly bad this month doesn't mean she can take it out on anyone around her.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 07:07 PM
0

Really, and you are going to gloss right over: "Im"??? and He dont go to college and it just keeps going.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 07:03 PM
1

Yea, no shit
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:53 PM
0

I am pretty certain Joe Rogan eats a bag of dicks daily.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 09:31 PM
2

I don't know why I have to read about events happening in the US in a "paper" from the UK. Could there possibly be a more clear cut example of a mentally deranged woman getting away with destroying male lives?
/r/MensRights01/07/18 06:38 PM
1

god apparently.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 06:31 PM
2

Pretty certain Marie Curie would tell these lazy bitches to get off their asses. First person to be awarded TWO Nobel Prizes, one of only TWO people to have prizes in distinct fiels. OVER 100 YEARS AGO Just say'n / Mic drop
/r/MensRights01/07/18 06:26 PM
2

50 years old, no foreskin left as far as I can tell but plenty of sensitivity in the head. I went skinny dipping in some very cold water the other day and realized what folks who do polar bear plunges mean when they say "it makes me feel alive" -- I was randy as a teenager for the rest of the day. So go jump in some very cold water with younger women and see what happens. :) Also, being on a keto diet helped a lot; not sure if it was strictly the reduction in weight or the increase in foods whic…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:36 PM
1

Much to my anger, less about the loss of tissue and related joys and more about the absolutely staggering levels of betrayal and subsequent family bullshit; yes.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:13 PM
1

The overwhelming need to know; the anger and frustration at not knowing; the night terrors that some strange dude is cohabitating with the ex and has access to your children; the demanding that you have a right to know ... none of that is helpful to the man in question or his children. The Kracken has been unleashed and it will destroy everything in its path which will not yield. There are times when one must embrace Muad'dib and bend like a reed in the wind. Sometimes accepting that you are utt…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:10 PM
1

I stand cerrected.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:03 PM
0

while the wife didn’t have a job She was raising her children; that is a job as far as I am concerned. Putting women down for fulfilling so called "traditional" roles is not helpful. Beating up on women doesn't make men stronger. Hopefully you learn this before you reach adulthood. but ya know you’re the one who wants to condemn men to only being providers Repeatedly claiming I said, or even implied, something I didn't say doesn't make it true, it just means you have embraced feminist rhetoric a…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:02 PM
0

So your best response is a variant of "I know you are but what a I?" You are genuinely impressive. /s
/r/MensRights30/06/18 02:59 PM
1

So a whiny user makes an obviously fake report and you make a public post to determine if I am a good boy or a bad boy? That is BS, and it is what private messages are for. Doing it in public is less about determining my guilt or innocence and more about sending a message to the forum using me as a whipping boy. It is quite literally what legal scholars call a "chilling effect" with regards to governments cracking down on free speech. And while I realize reddit doesn't have "free speech" hard co…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 02:57 PM
6

I am just saying that your words to her will generally come off as snarky and she will dismiss them. If you really want to interact with her directly then you need to learn to foster an unexpected response. She says mean things about men and almost certainly expects a mean response creating a self fulfilling cycle. So, maybe: (with sadness in your eyes, not anger) ask her, "mam, I could not help but overhear your comment that my disability was 'being male'. How do you think your hatred of men ha…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:23 PM
2

(Just FYI, I'm not boning Paul, but if anyone wants to write erotic fanfic of it, I can't stop you.) Dear God, I know I don't write much but if EVER there was a need for /user/Poem_for_your_sprog/ to get involved in fringe political movements, this is it.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:07 PM
9

What are you long term motives? It really matters because it will greatly alter how you respond. Sure, it feels great to let your bile spill out on the people who hurt you but... It is always more effective to ignore the person while getting your point across. A comeback to her says, "you are important enough to merit my attention, no matter how much I hate you." Reading this situation from a distance I think the best course of action (if you can go back in time, or the next time it comes up). I…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:59 PM
7

What are my rights here? Wrong question, wrong forum. This is NOT the place to come for legal advice, especially considering that your liberty (i.e. your literal freedom) is at stake. TALK TO A FUCKING LAWYER. LISTEN TO YOUR FUCKING LAWYER. I think I should have the right to know where my kids are living. You don't. GET OVER IT. Quickly. Life is rough, life is unfair. You are now the grist for the mill. You will be tempted to do really, really stupid things that will only make matters worse. Pol…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:48 PM
1

Talk about undermining men - the original movie clearly shows Mr. I working his ass off at a job he despised in order to provide for his family. But I know, you are full of the feminist "but muh gender roles" crap.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:38 PM
1

Nothing says sexist like actively rooting against men Spoken like a true feminist: 1) Claim you are speaking for men 2) Insinuate anyone who disagrees with you must be rooting against men. Keep applying that dye. Your feminist roots are showing.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:35 PM
1

To be brutally honest there are two distinct ideas at play here: The original "new math" wiki pushed aggressive ideas at children too soon en masse, instead of tailoring advanced subjects to students who showed aptitude. Common Core Math has many similar flaws, demanding that everyone be taught the identical material (ignoring individual aptitudes) with a strong emphasis on narrative (read, female friendly) Interesting note, a Wiki on Common Core Math was not the top Google Return (if it even ex…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:24 PM
-4

It looks like the feminists are out brigading today. That your comments are negative tells me it isn't our real MRA members voting. Have a slew of upvotes on me.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:54 PM
2

Shhh... I am TRYING to demoralize this karma-whore from coming back. The only way to get rid of the script kiddies and K-Whores is to constantly be shaming and naming.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:49 PM
-1

Anyone’s first day as a dad is going to go poorly He has raised TWO OTHER CHILDREN but still is a fuck up with toddler number three. Speaking of new math, I guess that was your major? EDIT: nothing says honest dialog quite like down voting someone who points out the staggering flaws in your arguments.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:47 PM
1

new math to be a good dad! Wrong on so many levels - a good dad gets this stupid fucking idea out of our educational system. Would you rather train a generation of engineers and scientists who can get us to the moon, or a bunch of baristas who get confused when you hand them $26.05 to pay for a $15.80 bill? Source: has math(s) degree /// has raised children and seen the damage "new math" is doing. EDIT: guess I touched one of /u/maxcorrice 's nerves. Thanks for the downvote.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:45 PM
3

Pretty certain a showerthoughts X-Post is pretty much the quintessential violation of Rule #1 to your right. --->>> No clickbait titles, advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:41 PM
0

IANAD, perhaps you should consult one.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:38 PM
6

the bullshit door can swing both ways What the ever loving fuck are you on about? Bullshit? Whar' BS? Whar? The dude was put through a REAL, criminal procedure, not some Title IX kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:06 PM
0

So you are saying it is a great supplement to any weight loss program?
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:03 PM
1

It’s less enjoyable the more often it’s done. 50 years old here...when does this start to happen? I might need to slow down a little if you are correct. Additionally, if you’re seeking sex with someone, you won’t be as into the sex if you masturbate beforehand Not judgemental, simply curious, are you a man or a woman? Speaking as a man I can say this is hardly true, YMMV.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:02 PM
10

YAAFM It is a PARODY COMEDY. LITERALLY the first image when you search this term on da'google So unless you are channeling your inner Andy Kaufman you need to educate yourself.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:56 PM
3

I simply cannot stop loving this woman - like Casey Jaye she had a near literal red pill moment; became "woke" unintentionally, and came out the other side revealing just how awesome a person she really was to begin with.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:25 AM
14

So your reply is actually just: it isn't because I said so You might want to at least review the following before putting that B.S degree from Kracker Jack U on your resume: Pseudoscience Pseudoscience is often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and absence of systematic practices when developing theories, and continued adherence long after…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:16 AM
2

Props to you for saying her name, until now I didn't know it. I am curious to know how much damage she will cause other men over the course of her life. Mostly however I blame her parents, it may be societal but they made a choice to raise their daughter to shirk responsibility for her actions.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 09:35 PM
3

Truth - it turns out that suicide rates among psychiatrists is far closer to 50/50 when viewed from a gendered POV. Although it will be a very long time before women are equally represented in very high stress military occupations - the ones that feed a depressingly large portion of our homeless and suicides in the US. Sort of a graduation to early grave pipeline that generally filters out women.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 03:08 PM
3

And the title - and the fact that every person quoted in the article was a woman. I am with OP, NPR hires and promotes folks who create gynocentric content.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 03:04 PM
4

I would have added the "false accusations" flair - but we just don't know. Anyone who has bothered to delve even the least bit beyond the headlines knows: Both Brock and the woman were intoxicated The woman appears to have been black-out drunk, having no memories of the event and time prior but clearly having made phone calls. The "witnesses" rode past claiming they thought they saw two people having sex. They rode away, but then came back a little while later. Judge Persky followed the law, as …
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:36 AM
11

At some point we have to take away points because you haven't bothered to search this sub - do you really think you are the first person to ask this question? This particular question has been answered at least 500 times in the last year alone.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:21 PM
14

So you are saying that Gayle King will be fired in the next couple of weeks? (he says channeling his inner Cathy Newman)
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:24 PM
1

as revered as you might be around here, you are full of shit on this. Jordan unambiguously said he was sorry that he had a wicked sense of humor and his words were a product of that humor (i.e. ... a "joke"). There are myriad examples of Jordan's disdain for MGTOWs. I will be receiving a copy of his study as a result of my contribution to his work ... I have met him in person and have a lot of respect for him. But I will not anoint him a saint. He is a man, and he isn't perfect. And in this he i…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:25 AM
1

Clearly you need an education on two fronts: Rape is AV0. It is never, not there. A "vector" isn't a missile; your metaphor lacks wit. You do seem to relish antagonism. I am OK with it. Since other people will look at comment history to judge you this banter serves as a statement to your character.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:41 PM
0

And no, I'm not interested in you breaking something down to misconstrue it point by point. Nothing says "I will cling to my worldview no matter what" quite as succinctly as this. Thanks for confirming that you are a zealot.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:37 PM
1

As an unrelated, and mostly unwanted, foray into the depths of your psychology I did find this interesting: I think my upvote/downvote count reveals the exact opposite, and by a huge margin, except in this particular thread, which is populated by Peterson acolytes/cultists. This reads unlike a noob's reply and more like the reply of a reddit "old hand" who has to regularly create new accounts as her old accounts become too tarnished. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:36 PM
6

You win, I will block you and not have to see your ramblings any longer.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:21 PM
7

No idea, just quoting the post's title.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:20 PM
0

but you're trying to see it in the worst possible light and I'm not You are being Panglossian at best. I am a huge Peterson supporter; verbally, financially, and personally. I have a staggering amount of notes on many of his lectures -- and I HATE taking notes, but he inspired me. I can come up with a couple dozen specific times he has thrown men (as a group) under the bus in both his lectures and speaking engagements. I can dissect the entire transcript of that particular video if you really ne…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:19 PM
1

which is populated by Peterson acolytes/cultists. Feminist attack vector #4 - disparage anyone who disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:14 PM
0

He took it back. No, he quite literally said the equivalent of "they cannot take a joke". Clearly you didn't listen to more than 10 seconds of the video YOU linked. (~ 2:20 into the video) ... reasons and so yes I do regret that I have to be careful because I do have a satirical dark satirical sense of humor and I can utter epithets let's say for the sake of punctuating a point ... I love Jordan, I have given him considerable financial support and been to several events in before he was popular …
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:09 PM
1

I wasn't aware that people with new accounts are now allowed to make posts. Feminist attack vector #1, claim the other person said something which they did not. I am not the first person you have pulled this shit on today, your first day here. Frankly I think it's creepy when users go through other users' comment history. Reddit might not be the place for you then. Comment history is part of what makes this community viable. That notwithstanding... Feminist attack vector #2 - falsely claim someo…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:02 PM
7

If you knew anything... Do these personal attacks you keep making against everyone in the tread ever actually work for you? Has anyone, EVER, said, "gee, thanks for being such a douche-bag, but you are right"? I really doubt it.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:53 PM
7

he will end up paying child support. Unsupported speculation on your part, not fact. I understand you like to pretend your speculations are scientific facts, but history and reason demonstrate otherwise. With a convicted mother who is a registered sex offender the boy's family might fight for custody. No child support payments to the state or mother result. The child might be given up for adoption. Again, no child support. The child might die of "SIDS" because the mother is a whack job. Once aga…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:03 PM
1

Oh, sigh, FINE. Reddit describes you as an "active in these communities", which considering your 1-day-old account makes this more of a pedantic quibble on your part and less of a reasonable rebuttal to my mistake.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:58 PM
17

My open letter to the Salk Institute: I simply cannot begin to describe the level of disgust and disdain with which I am holding the Salk Institute today. No matter how you slice it your Institute has achieved the pinnacle of moral cowardice. Either Dr. Verma is a vile and disgusting human and you are willfully hiding evidence of his transgressions and your culpability in his career of harassment, or (and lets be honest, this appears to be far more likely) you are throwing a man under the bus fo…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:01 PM
14

seriously, how did society get to this point where alleged groping = rape in terms of gravity? FTFY My mother had polio as a child. She knew Jona Salk informally. Somewhere in the bowels of the San Diego Union Tribune is a photograph of my family while I was getting a polio vaccine. Salk, and his Institute waged a minor war over the injection versus oral vaccine. I received the injection because of my mother's reasonable disgust at the slightest chance any of her children could contract the dise…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:31 PM
65

...women should brag and support each other Right up to the moment when they start stabbing each other in the back and clawing out each other's eyes in order to ensure Chad gives them that oh-so-important final rose.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:22 PM
35

Your title is 100% pure conjecture on your part and you should do the right thing and delete this post. The article states that she will be in jail and be required to register as a sex offender. It also states that she became pregnant while embroiled in this rape conspiracy; but it makes clear that the father of the unborn child has not been determined (her husband and this boy are but two of the possibilities; there are perhaps other as yet unnamed men and boys who could be the father). But hey…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:19 PM
3

Take a look at his profile. One day old, subscribed to /r/jordanpeterson. Kind of smells like we have a self appointed fanboi trying to tone police references to Peterson.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:10 PM
2

You are being more than a little douchy here. If English isn't your first language perhaps we can work with you, but the remaining comments downthread belie any reasonableness on your part. Jordan B Peterson has many good qualities but like most of us he is far from perfect. In a great many of his speeches and lectures he eagerly throws men under the bus. Take a look at /u/girlwriteswhat's response to his emphatic denigration of MGTOWs. Ultimately his mea culpa on this matter was effectively "we…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:08 PM
1

manosphere You keep using this word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:55 PM
6

The article isn't bad but the title is typical Science Daily crap. That is, the title presents a completely misleading representation of the findings. Keep up the good work /u/thrway_1000 Fathers' early parenting quality negatively affected by mothers Study shows importance of devastation caused by maternal 'gatekeeping' FTFT
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:48 PM
2

/u/McGauth925 did write a sterling comment, but one note. because they like sexism when it's in their favor. Perhaps he is young and hasn't noticed how much women enjoy bitching ... they like sexism when it isn't in their favor also, because it gives them one more thing to whinge about. :/
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:42 PM
1

I once had a 25ish year old woman follow my dog and me into a coffee shop (he is specifically trained for off leash work) and attempt to grab him. When I told her to leave him alone she bent down and tried again to reach around me. I put my hand gently on her shoulder and pushed lightly causing her to rock back and land on her ass. She did end up calling the cops screaming about "muh assault". All of the regulars laughed but there were a couple of young construction workers who looked like they …
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:38 PM
2

Put another way ~ a 25 year old Hope Solo should think long and hard about picking a fight with an 85 year old man.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:29 PM
2

Teach people not to hit others unless they're prepared for what might happen. Yes, we do this with boys already so /u/Stripes1974's comment is perfectly rational: "Teach women not to hit!"
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:28 PM
0

By god you argue like a feminist. It isn't my measure, it is a measure that isomorphically meets every one of your criteria. It is a measure you keep attributing to me. If you think beating feminists is best met by perfectly copying their playbook, then you are well on your way to success.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:19 PM
6

Holy fuck you are annoying. Want to be useful? Complain to the newspaper, not this sub.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:16 PM
9

Are you new to men's rights? Seen /u/5th_Law_of_Robotics around quite a bit for a number of years. Your username does not ring any bells. Perhaps you have been around but singularly unmemorable. Forget the who do they identify as shit surely we've more important things to worry about. Someone hasn't been paying attention to the current affairs page. GtFU
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:14 PM
13

hehe --- first though, it would have been cool if your username was /u/PreuMD Second thought - he positively affected the lives of thousands, perhaps millions, of people saving extending lives and bringing comfort to untold numbers of family members. He upset a small handful of women. Lynch his ass. /s
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:49 PM
6

Methinks you are wrong; it was a bitch from the very beginning. :/
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:40 PM
2

I cannot begin to explain how much I loath the authors of "I am going to make the world a better place by forcing myself on everyone" automation. Properly great automation is invisible, not in your face and as annoying as Marvin (note intentionally short link)
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:29 PM
0

By any measure marriage is a business deal. Keep trying to pretend there are differences.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:23 PM
9

From the NIH: (Everywhere we looked we saw that significantly more males than females died because of SIDS) ... however, higher mortality among male infants should not be considered a characteristic feature for SIDS. Which sounds like a slick way of saying, "when we factored in deaths coded as SIDS with a coincidence of circumcision we found the rates were comparable".
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:22 PM
3

any woman can benefit from feminism That which you emboldened isn't a true statement in any meaningful way. It is what Daniel Dennett calls a Deepity. Yes, it is trivially true, in the sense that any woman can use feminism for personal gain (Looking at you Emma Sulkowitz) but in the bigger sense we can make credible arguments that feminism is directly responsible for things like school shootings. That leads to the destruction of society which benefits no one.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:15 PM
2

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:07 PM
4

Could we organize a recall effort on the judge who made this order? Feminists - specifically a NON-LAWYER professor in the Stanford Law School (read feminist plant - both "put their by feminists" and "has the IQ of a plant") went all torches and pitchforks on Judge Persky The only way we will rid ourselves of this "lifestyle she has become accustom to" crap is by evicting these leeches. Judges make well north of 100K in addition to not having to give up any partnership rights in their law firms …
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:58 PM
1

Here is the literal text of the top comment of this thread - so unless you are being a pedantic douche and playing games WRT your user name you will need to be a tad more clear about what you are trying to communicate. I got banned from another Reddit post for suggesting all the men should take a day off to see how the women go running things. Lol made someone mad. Some people get off on being misunderstood - some people obfuscate what they are communicating in order to play the victim card each…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:44 PM
1

I am really, REALLY trying hard to figure out how this has anything do do with /r/MensRights. I am also praying, with all of my atheistic heart, that /u/theothermod will do what he does and nuke this crap thread from low earth orbit.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:55 AM
7

You are being very intellectually lazy: You come in here and ask a very Generic question without a single qualification of your intent. Is he guilty of WHAT? A crime? Misconduct? Being far to ugly to bang hot chicks? Being someone the average guy is secretly jealous of? Seriously, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU GETTING AT BECAUSE IT MATTERS. Then you go off on this socialist clap trap: All actors and actresses are paid far too much, if anyone is guilty, its society, Hey, look around, notice anything? We …
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:51 AM
1

I just can’t believe the irony when I see this sub constantly pointing out awful feminist ideas , but then suggesting the equal opposite on behalf of men Citations needed. According to you the following are equivalent: Men should take one day off work to demonstrate to women how essential they are. Men should step away from power forever because women (despite 100,000 years of evidence to the contrary) would do a so-much-better-job. You write a mean wall of text but you are literally the opposit…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:39 AM
0

You can't provide that for Melinda, which is pretty telling. Not to you, because you are prejudiced. Bill Gates hasn't proven his intelligence by buying DOS and then turning around and leasing it to IBM for a substantial profit? So, Bill Gates procured something that neither he, nor his company produced in any way. A) He purchased a blanket license (because, as you didn't know apparently he did not "buy DOS") to a product which itself was demonstrably a complete rip-off of CP/M (Hey Look Guys, w…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:28 AM
1

Never stick your dick in crazy. Hopefully these genes die with her Like I was saying, I don't think she plays for the heterosexual team, so that shouldn't be a problem gene wise. Sadly she is spreading her memes like a syphilitic hooker.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:55 PM
3

I am putting this on a T-Shirt!
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:21 PM
10

XKCD explains why Karma Whores exist. Today's 10000
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:49 AM
1

FUCK THIS C### Not with your junk. Suzanna Danuta Walters, a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, is the editor of the gender studies journal Signs. Going out on a limb here ... I don't think she plays for the same team as 99.99% of women.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:41 AM
13

The ironing is delicious considering you are only suggesting what the author's last paragraph directly calls for: So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocod…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:39 AM
27

So you are saying that the fact that women represent 3% of combat deaths is way, way too high? /s
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:48 AM
4

Well then, Jordan B Peterson has proposed that women react to things such as temperature more negatively than men (e.g. the air conditioner is a patriarchal tool of oppression) because of their long history of caring for small children. The theory is that women are programmed more to operate as a duality - themselves and a small infant. Women then are more upset by cold than men not because they are bitchy but because evolution primed them to place themselves in their infants body. Men don't min…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:47 AM
1

[Serious Question] -- Why do you feel a subreddit dedicated to Men's Rights would be the correct place to posit this question and not a psychology sub or a sub populated by women? Certainly Karen, Alison, Hannah, et al. could have some valid input - but the rest of us? We are just men.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:39 AM
4

I am on a mission to accumulate folks spreading falsehoods - sort of documenting all of the Gender Studies undergrads who are assigned to come here and work on their rhetoric. As you can see they tend to sound like a CD that spent too much time in a microwave oven.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:07 PM
4

EDIT: ABOVE COMMENT DELETED BY /U/PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS -- 'CAUSE TROLLS RUN WHEN EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT. You are saying that feminism is inherently opposed to men's rights, no? And feminism and women's rights are synonyms. Nope, once again you are failing to explain your position - simply misrepresenting others. You are kind of a broken record. Feminism is directly linked to campaigns designed to deny and remove rights from men. NOWs involvement with child custody and VOWA come to mind. That all by it…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:02 PM
18

Your argument is specious, at best. You are pulling a reverse logic at best - feminists can conflate themselves with every conceivable definition, it is really fluid. And then feminists like you can say --- all of these men's groups are really the same thing, when they are clearly not. "Feminists" like you claim that the title is a "big tent" that covers oh so many factions and then you put words in our mouth by claiming these other things are part of the MRM. They are not. The MRM is a movement…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:20 PM
6

Tell you what, I won't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:25 PM
12

EDIT: ABOVE COMMENT DELETED BY /U/PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS -- 'CAUSE TROLLS RUN WHEN EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT. HAHAHA --- wow, now you resort to straight up lying. Good on you. It is 1am, and I am on mobile, so forgive me for not wanting to paste dictionary definitions. I really don't give a flying fuck what time it is wherever you are - you decided to have a conversation, and now you are trying to guilt me into feeling sorry for you. Booo fucking Hooo if you live in Hawaii and are a night owl. almost as if…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:15 PM
7

Please allow me to introduce you to two fantastic YouTube voices who could use your subscriptions and thumbs. Both are a breath of fresh air and inspired hope for the next generation: Blonde in the belly of the Beast and, Christy Omisty
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:04 PM
16

EDIT: ABOVE COMMENT DELETED BY /U/PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS -- 'CAUSE TROLLS RUN WHEN EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT. You like to fluff a lot, but you repeatedly fail to add actual content. You claim to be able to use your own, private, definition of "feminism" which is either delusional or intended to confuse the general discussion. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you have no ill intent but are genuinely mentally challenged? "it was merely a line break" - RIIIIGGGGHHHTTT. I can totally see w…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:56 PM
17

EDIT: ABOVE COMMENT DELETED BY /U/PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS -- 'CAUSE TROLLS RUN WHEN EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT. I assure you, it is entirely possible to be a feminist MRA. As I said, you can call yourself anything you want but that doesn't make it true. If you said you were an FRA and an MRA I wouldn't quibble with you. One can advocate for the rights of men and women concurrently. Although I defy you to name a single right men have which women do not, in the US or the country you are a citizen of. In the sa…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:32 PM
2

Hate -- vitriolic anger... you say TOE-MATE-O I say TA-MAT-O.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:01 PM
28

EDIT: ABOVE COMMENT DELETED BY /U/PM_ME_UR_PC_SPECS -- 'CAUSE TROLLS RUN WHEN EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT. You can call yourself anything you want, but you cannot be a "feminist MRA" - Feminism is literally, definitionally, and historically about obtaining rights for women at the expense of men. As Karen so succinctly put it: First wave feminism - demand all rights granted to men while avoiding all male responsibilities. Second wave feminism - expand female rights while doing nothing to expand male righ…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:59 AM
2

The ones who lecture you about feminism turn out to be sexual predators. Maybe the only relevant quote in this commentary - but I think it may well be worth the watch.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:36 AM
26

The last sentence demonstrates that no_tension has no clue about feminism's history. By definition true feminism is nothing but hate.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:27 AM
5

How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop? But seriously - I need to get a drone to follow my dog around, the amount of feminist stupid that I encounter each day is astounding. Most people are awesome, they love interacting with the dog but at least once a day some carpet bagging feminist with a satchel full of needless drama tramps up, "IS THAT YOUR DOG?" ... and you can hear it in her voice, not "I would love to meet your dog", but instead "I am going to steal that dog …
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:50 AM
14

Might I humbly ask that you edit your post to include the Contact information? Office of the President - Northeastern University And remind people to write polite notes.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:50 PM
1

Paul Elam's very credible reply to the four feminists. Best part is well worth the wait, video of a single guy moving a similar refrigerator. Alone. While riding a bicycle
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:46 PM
1

You could actually, I don't know... provide something she accomplished to prove her intelligence. Instead, you just keep touting her position. To you? I doubt it. Bill Gates is, by your admission, "intelligent" and yet by your own standards he hasn't proven it. Oh, you say, he "built" Microsoft. By himself? No, no he fucking didn't. So you are being completely arbitrary in your requirements for proof. your own personal Kobayashi Maro that you get to inflict on everyone around you. Melinda got in…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:44 PM
0

see how you completely ignored the rest... typical feminist thought process (note for the stupid, I am not calling you a feminist, just stating that you think and argue like one)
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:46 PM
1

Can't post a reason we should believe Ms. Gates should be considered intelligent Yup, you are trolling. You demand "proof" of her intelligence but won't define any criteria that needs to be met in order to be satisfied. You get to always claim "that isn't good enough". So, either you are not that bright or you are trolling. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt here. Neither you nor I am likely to ever to administer an IQ test to Mrs. Gates; nor are we likely to be privy to such information. …
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:41 PM
1

Yea, the "fool" with billions of dollars in the bank.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:30 AM
1

Which is why you will always lose at poker and get played by people. Assuming very powerful people always mean what they say is a fool's folly.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:09 AM
0

Meh, you are just trolling. Knock yourself out.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:07 AM
-7

I see you graduated from the Cathy Newman School of "Journalism", and also failed basic logic. You appear to hate women simply for the sake of hating women. There are lots of reasons to infer Melinda Gates's (nèe French) intelligence: She graduated college and joined Microsoft in the 80's She became a Partner at Microsoft on her own merits, before her relationship with Bill She turned failure into success Bill, whom you seem to admire, thinks she is intelligent. But I guess his opinion on this p…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 05:04 PM
2

It is a broken link anyways - back slashes are not valid URL characters - Kimberly you might want to look at this. Since Kimberly self identified (both username and post) I think it fair to ask why a Clinical Naturopath feels the MRA community would be an interesting (i.e. nonrandom) group of people to survey. Without offense it seems there might be a prejudiced thesis in search of a predetermined control group.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 04:43 PM
-6

As I said - naïve. Melinda French went from being responsible (business, not developer) for one of Microsoft's most iconic failures to marrying her boss's boss's boss's boss. She went from a net worth of a trivial (estimated) ~$40 Million to Billions. She may be a lot of things, stupid isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:57 PM
-7

Say what you will about Bill and Melinda Gates but call them stupid at your own risk. If you think this power couple operates on the WYSIWYG principle then you are naïve. My best guess would be that this is preemptive damage control. Bill was (maybe still is) a world class poon hound - the rumors of him paying hookers with stock at Comdex are legend - and "intern parties" that mystically became female interns and male executives are hardly secret. With #metoo allowing relative nobodies to see pa…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:35 PM
2

The only people who think that are scumbags. The only people who go around calling others "scumbags" generally fit the description themselves. Reading comprehension classes might benefit you as well. I was generalizing about womEn, not talking about "a womAn". The typical feminist/white knight tactic of insisting that generalities are negated because "that description doesn't apply to me". Stereotypes exist for a reason but it isn't because they apply to each and every individual.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:22 PM
0

I am going out on a limb and guessing you get ignored a lot.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:36 AM
2

So, your opinion is more valid than scientific research? Wiki for the weak minded
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:51 AM
0

Yup. Everyone in the entire world is wrong and you are correct. With this philosophy you cannot lose. Soldier on brave knight, but a few more windmills and victory shall be yours.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:37 AM
-3

So ... you "cherry picked"? That is par for the course I guess.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:10 AM
0

Go back to your basement and play with your lego The entire forum seems to be against you; you disparage by suggesting I am out of my depth using "ad hominem" and yet...you cannot help but continue to insult me personally. Pretty certain the group consensus is that I am the better person in this particular exchange.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:09 AM
1

Your settings are stuck on "Ad Hominem". I suggest you go outside and do some jumping jacks to knock things loose. Your insults aren't bothering me and it just helps the rest of the forum know what type of person you are. It is curious to know how you knew I was Skyping with your mom though, are you stalking us?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:38 PM
137

So what you are saying is that we should cling tightly to the facts you hold dear and ignore the facts that don't support your narrative? Contradictory facts: The BBC - a major news outlet - gives voice to two specific women who make blindingly stupid claims while short-sheeting those who by all logic made rational choices. The BBC gives column inches to a female "reporter" who make no attempt to demonstrate that the male selected might have actually been the best candidate while encouraging the…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:32 PM
48

I like saying: it is really interesting that you sound like a pro-lifer when talking about men's sexuality and a pro-choicer when talking about women's. I thought you were the type of person to support equality, so why the disconnect? Then walk away and let them ponder it for a while. Chances are you won't change their mind but the only proven tactic that might work is to point out the other person's connotative dissonance politely and let it stew in his or her mind for a while. Personal anecdot…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:16 PM
4

This is one of those rare instances where feminists actually address a legitimate point No, it isn't. Follow the link and you are greeted with the title: Demi Lovato sexually assaults bodyguard Read the actual MSN article and you discover the outrage is that this person Demi hired a prostitute to prank her body guard in Las Vegas. Her body guard didn't complain, file an assault charge, or talk about the incident other than her claim that he freaked the fuck out (whatever that actually means is l…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:00 PM
1

You claimed the woman in the top photograph was a feminist. There is nothing in the universe that demonstrates this to be true; it is pure projection on your part. I said fuck all about Everest. You made claims about me personally - ad hominem much? (my guess is that is all you have). "Today's feminists" are exactly the same type of people as "yesterday's feminists". Feminists have done exactly nothing for women except make them more miserable. You seem to want to come storming into a reddit - p…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:43 PM
1

How is that not feminism? Pretty simple actually - this is purportedly a photograph of a French woman working alongside French men to defend her country against Germans in WWII. This has nothing to do with Feminism. The woman in the picture never identified as "feminist" so you swiping a photograph off of the internet and spending a whopping 2 seconds of your life to add some unrelated text is about as low effort as it gets. EDIT: Google Image Search https://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&t…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:14 AM
17

Personally I would roll into school wearing the skirt, sans undergarments, and then raise high holy hell when the administration predictably institutes a biased "true Scotsman" test while failing to institute a "true Scotswoman" test. :/
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:52 AM
4

Let us pray (and say it with me): RIGHT?!?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:01 PM
2

I think this is the right place to post if you want understanding; just be aware that we have a high troll ratio also. On one hand I hope you are the older and your parents learned. On the other I feel for you completely. You may never get closure with your parents but it isn't a bad idea to talk to them about it sometime. just remember that they may be so upset with themselves that they might shut down. And check out https://www.Foregen.org - not a recommendation per se but they get a lot of go…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:35 AM
0

Having it be an option can only be good. Always easy to demand other people provide you free shit. That is the feminist way. In theory US law provides for 12 weeks of unpaid leave - ostensibly because the mother must recover from a medical condition. Men do not have this burden. However, US law also allows employees to take medical leave to support a family member who requires it. So men in the US have de facto medical leave with respect to child birth. Many, if not most, large US employers alre…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:42 AM
5

No idea, didn't click, just typed. EDIT: turns out I did click out of curiosity - and guess what? There IS in fact both a misandry and misogyny subreddit. OP is a liar.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:38 AM
9

oh, isn't that cute, a reference to your username. Do you literally spend your entire life going around asking inane questions and then when called out cry "bully"? I take it back, that isn't cute it is lame. You asked a question that has no meaningful relevance to this subreddit. Really your question is precisely what I would expect of a two year old. "Why" - which is to say if you ARE two years old i am fucking impressed at your technical savvy. But if you aren't two years old then perhaps it …
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:37 AM
8

Not going to help - you are unclear on what you are trying to express. Are you whinging that there is literally a /r/misandry sub but no /r/misogyny? Are your fingers broken? Fucking make one yourself - then hey, you get to be admin of your own private universe.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:58 AM
2

When in doubt always consult The Book of Karen The link is to one of her "favorites", in this case a two part series by Bane 666 - his audio style may be difficult but this is good information.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:52 AM
5

So, is this the new gospel? The Book of Karen?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:47 AM
7

eh? Your thoughts may be coherent inside of your head, but out here in the real world it is kind of difficult to understand what you are saying.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:46 AM
1

OMG today is your "lucky 10000" day. Transcripts on YouTube: Open the video on YouTube (click on the word YOUTUBE) Click the "..." directly under the video at the right Click "Open Transcript" Done.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 06:16 PM
1

She reported the incident to municipal police the next day, claiming she was “too drunk” to consent, but they didn’t charge Doe, who was 15 credits shy of graduation. Interesting Woozle, as if to imply the police didn't charge him because he was so close to graduation. Hmmm. Maybe the police didn't charge him because of a lack of supporting evidence and the status of his impending graduation is entirely an invention of the article's author.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 06:11 PM
0

...would break men and women further from gender roles And you think this is good for society? I disagree; I think we need to honor the roles people choose. If the great Nordic Experimenttm has taught us anything it is that the more egalitarian you try and force a society the stronger the pull into "stereotypical gender roles". A father having the option to commit deeper to fatherhood the way a mother does would eliminate an employers' predicament of seeing liability in a woman as an employee be…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:13 PM
-1

Hey look it is the GT / Miss Lead You On power duo of hype and bad reporting. Funny how I forget to check user names sometimes. Did you get that thing I sent you?<sup>tm</sup>
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:04 PM
1

Shit, despite all of the hype around the fucking wedding of two otherwise not so important people I had no fucking clue who she was.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:00 PM
6

This article should be pinned to the top - linked in the sidebar - and referenced each and every time some damn "moderate feminist" shows up here to have a "rational debate". There is no point trying to persuade a feminist that she’s wrong. If she were intellectually honest (and thus capable of admitting error) she would not be a feminist. feminists never argue in good faith (because they use the:) Atrocity Narrative method of propaganda: Making negative generalizations on the basis of extreme e…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:56 PM
2

I am not sure I agree with you here. What is the flaw? Yes, it was a long read; which is often hard on the younger "instant gratification" crowd -- but holy fuck was it full of goodness.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:47 PM
5

Maybe in your country; not in the United States. Why, exactly, should "dual-income households are on the rise" be viewed as a good thing, per se? And citation needed WRT "long term downward trend". Specifically you are using this "statistic" to prop up a vague proposition. But... What is the trend of immigration to the US? Do this included groups that are far less likely to get divorced? (e.g. Muslims) What is the overall trend of marriage in the US? (i.e. if the marriage rate is dropping along …
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:22 AM
7

Explain to me why I should care if women earn more. Use small words because I am slow. What I see has been the slow destruction of the family. I am all kinds of in favor of women working; I am all kinds of in favor of equal work for equal pay. But the thing that I am really in favor of, the thing that feminists want you to ignore, is men and women forming families. Typically where one partner decides to remove (in general) herself from the workforce to raise children. Family units need to be val…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:07 AM
2

I would love to hear /u/TyphonBlue comment on this article or turn it into a Badger discussion. Off the cuff it strikes me as ideology driving science and not the other way around. While undergrads everywhere can change the course of history (looking at you Sergey and Larry) and can bring novel ideas to the table this seems more a case of building a mathematical model to fit the presumptions and then crowing about a solution to an unsolved problem.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 05:21 PM
1

I saw this last night and am glad that you posted it. One of the reports I read said that the United States Senate Committed on Foreign Relations wrote a powerful letter to the Icelandic government expressing their opposition to this bill. Check out this committee's members; if one of them represents you PLEASE write them and express your feelings about the horror of supporting Child Genital Mutilation. Be polite, but let your senators know that the citizens of the US are not unified behind them…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 08:34 AM
24

Right now you are Concern Trolling. /r/MensRights is not a heavy handed sub where the moderators go on banning sprees for the slightest perception of wrong-think. That means all types come here; including pissed off teenagers who are still forming their thoughts. As Jordan B. Peterson says: The real meaning of "free speech" is to say rude, inarticulate, poorly formed thoughts in public. That is because it is the only way to develop well reasoned arguments. Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, J…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:39 PM
5

I should note that even though this is owned by a private business, Vector-Solutions Always, always, ALWAYS be asking cui bono. Vector Solutions owns SafeColleges.com. Vector brags the following: Our affordable subscription-based Higher Education Safety Suite Who do you think is paying this "subscription". The university is taking that out of your tuition at best and out of your student body fees at worst. Personally I would start attending student body meetings and demanding accountability. Saf…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:04 PM
12

File a Title IX complaint and write to Secretary DeVos explaining your experiences and the false information being foisted upon us.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:09 PM
3

Nope. Tucker has grown into a fine journalist and has championed some MRM issues; but this clip has fuckall to do with any of them.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 06:28 PM
10

Sounds as if she is laying a "rational" framework before advocating directly for Universal Basic Income (a.k.a. Socialist Wealth Redistribution)
/r/MensRights30/05/18 04:03 PM
3

Awesome Question! I HATED Tucker from his first appearances on TV through the end of Crossfire - I now think he is one of the finest examples of Edward R Murrow inspired integrity. I loved Jon Stewart from the moment he insisted on hiring his competition (Colbert) for the Daily Show through his ultimate departure - I feel betrayed and saddened that he squandered every bit of influence he amassed over decades. If you go through my posts you will find I very often call out Jon Stewart for "hurting…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:46 AM
4

/u/WildPhilosophy take a deep, no I mean really deep, breath and think this through. YOU asked: Help! I'm feeling lonely, sad and angry and looking for positive ways to cope. What do we know about exercise? It releases endorphins into your system. Exercise is a positive way to to deal with sad and angry. Doing it at a gym is a positive way to deal with loneliness. Just because /u/Mr_MRAndarchist might come across as a dick does not mean he is wrong because the facts are, he is right about a spec…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:16 PM
11

"hearing what I want to hear" shouldn't be conflated with "positive support". If you want support this is probably the best place for it. Just be prepared for a lot of "tough love". As Hannah Wallen (of Honey Badger Fame) often says: Anger is a legitimate response in the face of injustice. So don't be too quick to blame MRAs for being angry. I have never once witnessed an MRA advocating violence. Be very honest with yourself - how much of feminists anger is about stuff they imagine happened to t…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:07 PM
7

Thank you for posting this. Have an upvote to increase visibility.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 04:48 PM
1

I haven't made extraordinary claims about myself; you have. Requiring that I prove (to your satisfaction) that I am as good as you claim to be is stock feminist BS. By your ramblings I have to guess you have a gender studies degree. I have to stand by Jordan Peterson on this one; those degrees aren't worth the toilet paper they are written on. It isn't academic and it certainly isn't scientific. Just a bunch of angry womyn circle jilling. But the degrees and awards and publications say otherwise…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 04:01 PM
0

Again, thank you for leaving a smile on my face. When I see a crazed feminist spewing so much bile I know I have done good in the world.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:55 PM
1

So, stalker troll...makes perfect sense. Aww you follow a neo-nazi Propaganda much? Calling everyone you disagree with a "nazi" doesn't make you correct or superior. Just really bad at rhetoric, it pretty much admits that you suck at debate. Unless you are marginally inadequate at Photo Shopping your targets next to Hitler and Goebbles. Makes sense about all your baseless angry insecure arguments. You really, and I mean really, suck at emotional manipulation. Seriously does this work in your rea…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:49 PM
0

Looooooool "serious studies" go on link those journal articles I'm 3 types of scientist and I'll destroy your weak scientific argument. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. I am certain every 13 year old sitting in her mom's basement can claim to be "3 types of scientist" ... doesn't make it true. And, going out on a limb here, even if it is true in your case (setting aside a mountain of skepticism that a serious scientist would have the time and desire to police a little known subr…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:31 PM
0

Even more pathetic that you can pretend to know how 1.7 billion people think and feel; and that you can, in any way, represent them. You are arrogant to suggest that you know how these people think and feel and when faced with the actuality of how millions of them behave you duck, and run for cover. That is called moral cowardice (wrapped in a really lame attempt to side door a "no true Scotsman" argument). But then this started out a defense of circumcision and I shouldn't be surprised that you…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:04 PM
1

"rights" This word, I do not think it means what you think it means. You might be a little nuts with an inability to distinguish between a right and an entitlement. I have the right to possess a firearm in the United States - to the best of my knowledge there has never been a remotely serious attempt to require the Federal Government (i.e. the taxpayers) to supply me with said weapon or in any way subsidize my acquisition of one. What sane person feels that the taxpayers should be funding the "r…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:52 PM
0

"Attacking" is such a curiously chosen word - it inflicts moral depravity upon the other while allowing the speaker to appear to be superior. I mean "well duh, of course no sane person would even talk about this topic let alone advocate for it"... ... except that isn't one bit true. In the western world what have women done to deserve the right to vote? Owning a vagina doesn't really cut it. In the US, Canada, and most of Europe women enjoy all of the same rights as men with practically none of …
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:37 PM
2

All men suffer severe discrimination. I am very curious about the discrimination that Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Bill Clinton have suffered. Sadly many MRAs attack Judaism and Islam for circumcision. Sadly some people prop up straw men; just say'n. There is nothing wrong with criticizing these religions, along with others, for an ancient and barbaric practice while simultaneously lauding aspects of those religions that are agreeable. You are being lazy when you suggest that hating circumcision…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:51 AM
5

Jordan B. Peterson's lectures helped me out a lot on this as I didn't really understand what was happening on a conscious level. Outsiders don't usually "get it". When someone is so powerfully abusive it isn't as if she one day woke up and hated you; no one could ever treat someone they loved that badly. That means they never really loved you on some level and you spend an absolute inordinate amount of time reevaluating every aspect of your relationship from the very beginning. The National Coal…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:39 AM
1

Ok, I can get behind that. :)
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:32 AM
1

Really curious what you mean by "attacking women's rights". Personally I am all for women having the right to have an abortion; I am also strongly in favor of allowing men "financial abortion". With that said I would never, ever, try and shame another person for saying women shouldn't have the right to abortion. It isn't an "attack" to say you are against something. So what "rights" are you talking about?
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:29 AM
-5

Go fuck yourself. Pointing out that your sacred cow is a cow? You said you met a reasonable feminist, and then demonstrate that she couldn't possibly be one.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:24 PM
1

Jordan Peterson puts it into a good perspective - check out this post that hit the top 24 at about the same time yours did. TL;DW: Basically female hostility is generally expressed verbally. They learn to land psychological blows and have sold us on the idea that somehow that is OK while physical blows are not.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:23 PM
6

FINO - a play on DINO or RINO. Not a call to explain who the Hoff is. Republican In Name Only. So Feminist In Name Only is what I was getting at. Namely, find another feminist who agrees that CHS is a feminist. Sure, sure, she calls herself a feminist and we must "listen and believe" but when we examine her actions do we find that she is really a feminist or much more an egalitarian who calls herself a feminist either to piss off the sisterhood or to market herself into a higher tax bracket. Oh,…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:16 PM
12

Dots I had never consciously connected; mind overheating. My ex's father killed himself in a way that looked accidental but almost certainly wasn't so his children received his life insurance. I believe he did it due to the nasty divorce her mother dragged him through unnecessarily. When she suggested divorce I signed the papers, moved out, and thought "90 days and done, she wants this so no problem." Nearly 2 years of crazy until completion, followed by another year of unnecessary orders, follo…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:09 PM
4

FINO?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:57 PM
3

Calling bull-shit on this one. #MeToo is basically women not wanting to be asked out at work ever. So your "friend" speaks for all women? No woman, ever, wants to be asked out at work? My lived experience overrides your friend's delusion.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:54 PM
4

So, kind of a Venus fly trap of crazy?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:52 PM
7

Yes. You say you have met a "reasonable" feminist. But in the very same breath say: all of them operate on the presumption of male privilege and female oppression. Which is by definition without reason. (i.e. believing in something without supporting evidence)
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:51 PM
4

Methinks you might want to review the definition of reasonable
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:47 PM
5

Conservative elements on the rise today, especially around Trump, are taking an opportunity to attack women's rights. Citation, not milquetoast rhetoric, needed.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:45 PM
18

Pretty simple really. Some D-rate celebrity wanna-be sees an opportunity to get some free press. Sure it is a Wiffle ball on a T-Ball stand, but by god she is swinging for the fence.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:30 PM
1

NO! -- Educate yourself on Betteridge's Law of Headlines
/r/MensRights27/05/18 03:08 AM
5

You need to set Google Translate to Feminist in order to actually understand this comment: My mother was a crazy bitch and she drove my daddy away. I really needed my daddy and miss him terribly. However, due to complications involving Stockholm Syndrome I cannot express my anger at my mother, nor be honest about the tremendous loss I feel regarding my father. Psychologically my anger must be expressed but it cannot be projected onto anything as concrete as "daddy" so I project onto all men.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:42 PM
1

if appealed. If?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:33 PM
10

Yes, but as Karen has pointed out the only people who can police feminists are women. Real women need to stand up to these nutters and shut them down. Real women need to demand that so called Gender Studies programs be shut down. Think that is happening any time soon? En masse?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:15 AM
9

And George Takei said he would never have anything in common with Dick Cheney. Both have successfully gotten a victim to completely absolve them of responsibility.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:14 PM
3

What do you expect from someone who takes as a screen name a broken and whipped egg?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:56 PM
17

But she is failing to: Appreciate that she wouldn't have a car but for men. Know how to fix it but for men. Appreciate the technologies she is using to air this rant. Clothing? Men. Makeup? Men. Haircare products? Men. Camera built into a phone capable of adding text to the picture posted on social media? Men, men, and many more men.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:19 PM
2

In an AskReddit Serious - What are some of the creepiest declassified documents made available to the public? I found a link to the Dodd Report to the United States House Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Organizations a.k.a. the Reece Committee. Spend some time listening to this interview and dig up the report. A question was recently raised about why very rich people funded feminism. My best guess is not altruism, but instead simply as a means to further their own ends.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:48 PM
6

Want to be terrified? Learn about the Dodd Report to the Reece Committee on Tax-Exempt institutions. Norman Dodd Final Interview YouTube As early as 1900 various institutions such as the Carnegie Foundation had at their core a plan to dismantle the protections in the US Constitution. It is not at all unlikely that they saw in feminists the useful idiots every coup needs at their disposal.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:39 PM
16

So, a nutter teacher remains unidentified but the local press feel fine identifying a minor male? Crazy. Two people need to be fired (not reeducated, fired and marked "ineligible for rehire because they are so stupid we don't know how they sustain breathing"). The teacher because she as an adult should have a vastly superior sense of what constitutes a threat. Contact the Conroe Independent School District and politely ask why they feel having a clearly mentally unstable female in close proximit…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:49 PM
2

Dog pile! and in one of the scenes he post a very short but intriguing question Posits not post.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:28 PM
12

Seems to me they are a good stock to short. I "identify" as a 20 year old female and reap the wondrous benefits of lower premiums; when I die my beneficiaries get a full payout. Win / Win :)
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:26 PM
20

It used to be for equality When was that? I am pretty certain I have never heard a single feminist of any age demand that she be required to register with the selective service.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:53 AM
1

The artwork is the Western Tapestry at Seattle's Pike Place Market. This is the backside of the market; much less accessible than the front of the market. I suspect that the submitter is pointing out the (probably) homeless man in the wheelchair with a beggar's cup on the ground. Since this is the back side of the market, located on a fairly steep grade, he will see almost no traffic when compared to the level front of the market. I expect that the submitter is suggesting that he was persona non…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:20 AM
2

Seattle, Pike Place Public Market: https://goo.gl/maps/Eh16vF1dVrk
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:12 AM
2

A brief RPRF which succinctly examines why female victims are perfect for the Domestic Violence Industry. EDIT: Warren is in the shot, but this clip is just Paul speaking passionately about "glamorous" victims.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:49 PM
-1

hear watching Is that some new fangled way of saying "listening"? Or an Audible trope I don't know about yet? But for what it is worth the story is feminist 50-shades-of-stupid claptrap. Wiki link
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:44 PM
118

Every feminist is a princess in her own mind.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:35 PM
17

And still some nutter finds a way to spin it as men making excuses as opposed to womyn's false braggadocio: The declaration was welcomed by author Kathy Lette, who said: ‘Men saying they can’t multitask is a biological cop-out.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:56 PM
7

Methinks the poster has confused the meaning of "tackling" and "propaganda". Edit: also of note our poster's username is magically trolltastic; almost as if misleading people were a sexual experience for her.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:56 PM
1

No, it's "it's".
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:59 PM
3

No, YOU are saying that I am saying something. Kind of a classic feminist trait - to hear things that haven't been spoken.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:12 PM
1

I am informed, you are not. Educate yourself But I get your shtick; if you can pretend that they are the same you can say "derrrr, ders no draft so ders no compulsory service, herpaderp"
/r/MensRights19/05/18 07:37 AM
0

I have no idea if that user is male or female. Just trying to be politically correct in my pronoun usage. /s
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:41 PM
2

Not saying you typed or articulated poorly....just saying that was the first connection my mind created. In context it is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:40 PM
8

I think Karen said it best in the Red Pill movie: Feminists say, "we don't blame men", no, they just name everything bad after them. So you cannot write, or agree with the following, and maintain any facade of impartiality: ... at the hand of a patriarchal system that is enforced by those (men and women) invested in maintaining that system. It may be an Oligarchical system, a Bourgeoisie system, or some other descriptive but the moment you call it, or agree it should be called, a Patriarchal sys…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:50 PM
8

Your title implicitly assumes that at some point in the past women didn't have sufficient power to oppress men. That is a false sentiment hidden under the guise of conflating equity with equality. That is, you are implying that because women aren't 50% of the government, or 50% of boards that they somehow lack power. Note the United States Constitution, specifically the 21st Amendment. Women, in particular upper-class white women, forced sobriety upon an entire nation - all before any woman had …
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:38 PM
2

Men do not either, this is also true. Your words...followed by But men are legally required to agree to potentially being conscripted Hard to tell where you stand when your contradictions are so closely spaced.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:32 PM
2

You must be new to the language - "face compulsory military service" does not mean "perform compulsory military service". It means "confront and deal with or accept" the possibility of compulsory military service. Every man in the United States must accept the possibility of compulsory military service, and he must face it or be denied a driver's license in many states, Federal grants for education in all, and Federal employment at any point in his life, even after the potential compulsion has p…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:03 PM
15

Saw MGM and thought "Male Genital Mutilation"... Sigh, I have been on this board too long.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:54 PM
1

agree to potentially being conscripted what exactly do you think "face" means?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:46 PM
7

You dirty, selfish, self-centered, narcissistic, misogynist neck-beard. WOMEN ARE THE GREATEST VICTIMS OF WARtm Women are forced to stay home and WORRY about the men in their lives off gallivanting around merrily on some great adventure. Imagine the HORROR if your man survives and comes home with stories to tell and friendships so deep he insists on being buried thousands of miles away with other men he barely knew 40 years earlier leaving you to be interred all by yourself. God damn, the abject…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:42 PM
3

So, why aren't you working to either: Require females to register with the Selective Service or face severe consequences; or, Demand the government dismantle the Selective Service? Because if you personally aren't working directly on one of those two you are supporting the discrimination against men and sweeping it under the rug. No one here talks about required military service; we talk about laws that affect men in a very negative way that have zero impact on women.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:36 PM
8

Hey Conrad - Technically Correct is the best kind of correct. Where is the line on "compulsory"? If a judge says, "join the military or go to prison" I would say that is compelled. It happens to this day, but the submitter is trolling and too lazy to write "mass compulsory..." But it gets lazier: Women don’t face compulsory military service in the United States... We went from the actuality to the possibility with one little slight of hand. And then the claim that men don't even "face" it either…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:31 PM
2

I really don‘t see a reason why I would steal someone else‘s survey and collect data. It isn't about "stealing" other people's data. It is about corrupting other people's data. It happens quite often and can result from reddit "brigading". I am not suggesting that is what you are doing; just that it has happened and if you wan to be above board you will take prophylactic action against it.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:32 PM
1

There are a staggering number of problems with that paragraph: Hmmm I’m not sure how to prove that to you. Trivial, put your reddit username in the survey the next time you create one on AYTM. I wouldn‘t see the point in messing with someone‘s data. That is pretty naive and not terribly creative. LOTS of people mess with data; shit it is probably the single most discussed topic on this board. (i.e. the so-called wage gap is nothing but cleverly manipulated data, from collection bais to interpret…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 07:07 PM
2

Full context is needed. Ben Shapiro's audience tends to be relatively bright and pretty strongly conservative. There is a lot of snark in his work and a lot of snark in the comments he receives. You are correct that I do not know with absolute certainty what the commenter's true intentions were; however, I think the following are interesting: Feminists believe that gender differences are socialized, hence a daughter complaining she is made to make a choice between forced procreation and fulfilli…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:48 PM
2

It said no one and you are right, a single person is enough to prove that wrong. Yes and no. We live in a world where scientific dialog should use logical absolutism but it often doesn't. We also live in a world where common parlance isn't strictly logical and people come along and split hairs because of that opening. When /u/thrway_1000 (a user I greatly admire) wrote: No one cares when boys suffer. He wasn't saying "you cannot find a single person who cares" (a logical interpretation); he was …
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:38 PM
1

In as much as the typical feminist "academic" paper reads as a set of randomly chosen sounds strung together? Yes, I am 100% in agreement with you. :) Just saying that Michael above was talking tongue in cheek, not that he actually believes it is a false dichotomy.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:25 PM
1

How do we know that you are actually the author of the study and not just someone attempting to mess with the data in someone else's study?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:21 PM
9

I’ve been looking for information on this for a while I think you are being too pragmatic. There are two principle reasons why this wouldn't be the case: Alimony and child support are not earnings; they are at best transfer of earnings and more honestly takings or entitlements. Including those monies would shrink the gap which would be contrary to the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:29 PM
1

My heart goes out to them and you.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:25 PM
2

I asked my six month old... THAT's THE JOKE.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:20 PM
1

The primary difference with neonatal trauma is that there are no aspects to lock in - so the presentation will necessarily be non verbal.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:49 AM
2

No one cares when boys suffer. I care, I suspect you care.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:48 AM
17

Two reasons: It suggests that a vile post was made on this forum and that it is the norm. That is, that someone would post such a link here. It directly slanders /u/DrPlump who has, as far as I can tell, never made an inflammatory post here or elsewhere.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:35 PM
6

Karen's recent comment about ASD prevalence in males and PSD in females got me googling. Dr. Drew drilled it into my head that grown women talking with little girl voices were frequently the victims of molestation. That got me wondering how early severe trauma might present in males. This article gives a lay overview of a Danish longevity study of the impact of circumcision; of which shamefully few have been conducted.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:27 PM
1

This presentation has rattled around in my mind for days - creating perceived connections I hadn't thought of before. In the late 70s and early 80s I spent my teen years listening to Dr. Drew's Loveline on KROQ; time and again an adolescent or young adult woman would call in and speak with the voice and mannerisms of a little girl. Time and again Dr. Drew would correctly connect that to molestation at a young age. It never occurred to me to wonder what the overt male signals would be. There have…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:08 PM
3

...doesn't that make the disposable male issue originate from the military? I very much doubt that Warren, or any other MRA luminary, would agree with that; it is much more fundamental. Male disposableness is seen across a wide swath of life on earth - in general if males can generate vast amounts of sperm and are not fundamentally necessary for child incubation and rearing then it is a "winning" genetic strategy. Sending early hominid males out into the wilderness to secure resources (namely ca…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:11 PM
1

Corollary: Women can have equal rights today, they just have to be willing to grant them to men.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:53 PM
1

it wasn't to make fun of /r/mensrights Eh? It is downright slanderous to both the sub reddit and /u/DrPlump As far as I can tell /u/DrPlump has never made such a post, the three posts that user has made to this sub are non-controversial and certainly not vulgar.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:38 PM
5

I think you mean diluting although deluding works in a rather Freudian way. Warren Farrell is possibly the best known source that you should be referencing. Karen Straughan has a good primer. Look up virtually anything she has written here on reddit /u/girlwriteswhat Check out her blog
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:30 PM
1

I didn't doxx anyone; so is this another one of your hidden rules?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:46 AM
6

If you are a fan of The Red Pill Movie then you will definitely appreciate this 30 minute interview with Erin Pizzey. You can see and hear Cassie struggling with the information she is receiving. Mad props to both ladies for having unspeakable integrity and strength of character.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:36 PM
3

Amusing, yes, but one only has so much time in the day and constantly responding to people like "him" is ultimately a drain. I do agree that the more riled they become, the more it affects them, the more effective we are. I just wanted to rant about it.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:31 PM
1

I don't know what the due process process means to you, but in the United States it means that the government, or their agents, cannot take action against you without formal proceeding. This person was a member of a private organization; that organization censured the professor. Was it wrong? Sure, I can get behind that. Was it a due process violation? Pretty unlikely.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:28 PM
1

His/Her/Xe's posts include: Is it possible that the feminists are correct Women are better drivers than men Lim also likes to shit post in UnpopularOpinions a lot
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:25 PM
5

troll gotta' troll. As there seems to he a great deal of opinion in this sub that men are somehow superior to women Citationsneeded devil's avocado lolwut? I'll start with this little fact. Women are better drivers than men. This is not simply an opinion, it has been proven in numerous studies and is also reflected in their reduced insurance premiums. Women drive FEWER miles and have fewer accidents therein. Insurance rates are not based on how "good" a driver you are, insurance rates are based …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:18 PM
3

Great Question!
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:10 PM
13

With a single mother, you'll be number three. HAHAHA, as if. Lower than her kid(s)? Yup. Lower than her mom? Yup. Lower than her cat? Better believe it. Lower than her ex? For certain. She may hate him, but he has access to her kids so she will spend a LOT more time thinking about how to game that system then she will about you. I could go on. She will always find something more important than you are. The caveat might be a widow as the circumstances of her single parenthood were not of her maki…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:39 PM
3

The question wasn't to you (albeit you make good points in general). The claim "I am a male feminist" in the context of this post is what I am driving at. It is almost a claim of authority - "hey guys I am just like you, but I am a feminist so you should be too". We don't know if the poster is actually male and other than an attempt at creating a commonality it serves no purpose related to the rest of "his" rant. So the question is, why would a man want to be a feminist, unless he is a sub? hehe…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:14 PM
2

Ditto - whenever anyone does something right it deserves to be acknowledged and rewarded - direct link thumbs up. Also, it was a very long, and very powerful, read.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:12 PM
6

Simone Lucie Ernestine Marie Bertrand de Beauvoir was born into a wealthy family. The family struggledsnark to maintain their bourgeois status after WW1. LITERALLY STRUGGLED. Damnitalltohell she had a very rough lower upper class life possibly dipping into the upper middle class. You know her philosophy is utterly corrupt because if people followed her example it would die out: De Beauvoir chose never to marry or set up a joint household and she never had children. What type of woman hates human…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:41 PM
9

Hi there Uhm. Hi. Perhaps you have never heard of Betteridge's law of headlines but it applies. Sensationalizing your point does not make it more valid. as a male feminist Does your gender matter? Can it be proven whilst anonymously typing on the internet? (hint: the answer to both is no) Taking you at your word I can only say, "so what". Compare these two fragments: as a male feminist who is friends also mostly with other feminists and I find this subreddit a bizarre little bubble in denial of …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:22 PM
1

I’m trying to say it will offend people and then you have less supporters. The LITERAL definition of concern trolling. If you cannot handle the heat, you ought not be in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 06:48 AM
1

Wow, someone on the internet hurt your feelings. Need a Midol?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:52 PM
1

I lose faith in this sub a bit more everyday thanks to posts like this. This is called Concern Trolling with a side of Tone Policing. You are entitled to make your arguments, just be prepared to be dismissed out of hand. Gender Politics, while initially good for the Democratic Party, has progressively (see what I did there) become a worn millstone dragging the party down. So you want to go the Will Farrell speak gently route - we can see from decades of inaction what that got. If the Democratic …
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:49 PM
2

And, if we're talking about people needing housing, who makes up more of the homeless--men or women? You continue douching. We all know that there are more homeless males in this sub. We also know that a shameful percentage of those are veterans. Men who gave to their country are getting screwed. But you judging an individual for his choices is just plain douchy. Maybe his mother was an alcoholic, or some woman important to him. Just because he isn't leading the charge on your particular cause i…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:38 PM
1

Except the Soros camp and the Hunt Brothers don't meet for drinks. They actually hate each other at a primal level.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:35 PM
3

Why change? Vote for your preferred candidate in the primaries and vote rationally in the election. If you are a life long Democrat then go to party meetings and raise hell - take back your party. People ridicule me for voting for Trump, but I did so in a winner-take-all state that went nuts for Hillary - my vote didn't actually count.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:31 PM
2

Hey, every now and then a broken clock gets it right. When they do you got to try positive reinforcement. :)
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:27 PM
3

I remember an NPR piece in the 80's about how the Democratic Party convinced itself that if they could corral the women's vote they could never be beaten. They went in whole-hog on the division mentality. Do anything to make the target group hate the other party and you have a voter for life (or so they thought). What I don't get is how the high paid consultants and party leaders truly believe pandering is a long term win. Clearly it has blown up in their face.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:26 PM
1

Don't be a douche. David Wellstone can do whatever he wants with his time and money. He may, or may not, be misguided...I don't know. Are you suggesting that alcoholic women don't deserve housing?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:22 PM
1

What type of retard expects every post to be non-partisan, or sees insult and injury in every post about his party? Stop being so fucking lazy and cull through my comments before you make a prejudicial judgement. I posted this, as is, because I admired Wellstone a great deal and because I firmly believe that the Democratic Party lost its way when they embraced gender politics - I had hoped their loss two years ago would cause them to reflect on this. When Trump won the nomination I was happy - a…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:19 PM
13

Just more proof that the Democratic Party is refusing to face the reality of their loss in the 2016 Presidential Election.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:08 AM
0

Perhaps you mean the Federalist's.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:05 AM
0

There is a very good chance that had I been born later than I was that indeed I would fall on the "spectrum". Which you seem to be suggesting is a negative. Pointing out that you suffered from a horrible English education isn't "gatekeeping". I am in no way attempting to throttle you; I am attempting to broaden your reach and appeal. Take it as you will. Edit - p.s.: Jordan would be the first person to tell you that learning to write properly (i.e. for an audience) falls pretty squarely into the…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:50 AM
2

eh? I think you took too much adderall today - there was nothing ... OHH....I see what you did there. :)
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:47 AM
2

They made a point of importance out of Ted Kaczynski's very consistent and somewhat odd use of the original phrasing "eat your cake and have it too" versus the more modern "have your cake and eat it too". Netflix's show Manhunt.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:46 AM
2

Arrested or detained. It matters. Do you have an actual source?
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:11 PM
2

The fact that she is a lesbian, or has pink hair, is really not relevant. The fact that she is a nut-job is. Maybe they are correlated, maybe they are not.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:06 PM
-1

Part of being effective is learning to be clear. Both your title and the comment above are far less comprehensible than they should be. Either you don't care, in which case why bother posting, or you do care. Assuming you care about men's rights and want to be a strong advocate you should up your game. Certainly you could claim generational "in speak" - but WTF is that going to do for this movement?
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:04 PM
5

our submitter, ijm1505, has made a terrible fallacy. She assumes that people do not like her because she is a female. And then assumes that because of that men must hate females in general. My experience has taught me nothing could be further from the truth. Adults, both men and women, despise anyone who claims to be an adult who then behaves like a 13-year-old know-it-all princess. So either ijm1505 is a 13 year old girl - in which case she really aughtn't be in this sub discussing adult materi…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:44 PM
1

Well I can tell you one thing my ex sucked at -- sucking. :)
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:37 PM
2

Came here to say this - have an up-vote! Preach it loud and wide - encourage people to stop saying "wage gap" and start saying "earnings gap". Another subtle point is that "wage" is singular, it subliminally causes people to think "this applies to me specifically" whereas "earnings" being plural reinforces the message that this is a collective statistic applying to all men and all women.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:35 PM
27

Think about it - it really is just a funny way of saying: Women should work more to close gender earnings gap.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:30 PM
6

I really think this saying should be 'eating their cake and having it too'. Ask me how I know you have a Netflix subscription. :) However, the real saying in this case is: Eating their cake and having your's too
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:28 PM
1

A) No it isn't. It is a dismissal but it isn't an attack. If you want to have a debate or dialogue and not come across as a whiny child you will need to learn the difference. Instead you simply fall back on your privilege, claim you were attacked without evidence, and demand people (mostly men) defend your honor.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:46 PM
-1

Please fix your title, the English is incorrect which makes it hard to understand. Jordan Peterson's Right This literally means a Right that Jordan Peterson possesses; the apostrophe is not a contraction in this case. What you seem to mean is: Jordan Peterson is right...
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:41 PM
8

I cannot fathom why anyone would down-vote this comment. Have an up-vote while I rage against people against spreading good knowledge.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:34 PM
10

Says: masculinity and femininity shouldn’t be attacked And then goes on to attack masculinity: Masculinity implies that men can’t express their emotions. No it doesn't. Insisting that men behave more like women is toxic. Insisting that you personally know the answers for other people's "problems" is both puerile and narcissistic.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:25 PM
2

Well you are wrong so I guess I will correct you. By your own words most failed "attempted suicides" actually aren't so calling them that isn't helping anyone. Using the term "staged suicides" might help because it conveys the fact that these are not intended to end life. They are a problem but redirecting suicide prevention money away from people really contemplating suicide still results in more dead people (mostly men). Instead we need both suicide prevention and depression intervention.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:20 PM
7

Ever notice the folk that live under bridges come here to rile things up? I cannot help but notice that in the title she only uses the term TheRedPill but in her comment she adds "sub". Almost as if she wants to get some commentary on another sub but then pull a bait-and-switch later to use our comments against the movie. Still, if I assume her motives are pure; what the hell is she doing here discussing /r/TRP? Of course Paul Elam has a great video on Toxic Masculinity and assuming that she rea…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:12 PM
0

You lose the debate the moment you write: Why attack me? Where is the attack? (hint: it doesn't exist). Using the term "fucking" isn't an attack - you taking exception to it is a form of tone policing intended to control. Saying that TM is a made up term holds water. Look up the WIKI definition which literally and easily reduces to all men. When you need an adjective to replace the word "all" then something is wrong with your position to begin with.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:46 PM
9

You need to look up Concern Troll and stop focusing on just the "troll" aspect. What do we know? A man named Paul Elam started a website called A Voice for Men a.k.a. AVfM. It is a privately funded site; he allows others to write articles, he writes some himself, he and his staff have the right to ban anyone for any reason. Sounds reasonable to me. Seems you disagree. You claim to be looking for "clarity" but spend two large paragraphs basically taking Paul to the woodshed. You selectively choos…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:24 AM
1

Funny how you expect other people to answer your questions but you refuse to answer theirs. Never really cared about a conversation with you - just documenting your behavior for others to see. I didn't realize you were female though until this last comment - trying to shame and control me - so very feminist.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:33 PM
1

I believe in the presumption that you are innocent of knowing what "presumption of innocence" actually means. I am sure you have gone through life feeling you "won" because people stop talking with you. "Presumption of innocence" only matters if I am a judge or jury member and it can be shown, presumably on appeal, that I failed to apply it. Since I am neither a judge or jury member adjudicating a case currently then there is no point to your question. Nor is there any contradiction on my part; …
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:12 PM
1

You need help; I am certain there are free clinics near you. The fact that you rely on "gottcha" techniques to win arguments is sort of lame. What possible difference could it make if I believe in the presumption of innocence or not? It is a mandatory jury instruction in the US; but it has no effect with regards to the police or prosecutors, the people who bring charges as opposed to the people who decided if the prosecution has proven its case.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:18 AM
1

Too true - you are exceptional and unique, just like everyone else.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:13 AM
1

Speaking from personal experience?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:12 AM
1

user name checks out.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:10 AM
1

I can only guess that you are mentally retarded; there isn't any other explanation for repeating yourself when you already have been given an answer.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:08 AM
1

I believe you repeat yourself - I actually have proof. I don't "believe" in the presumption of innocence - it isn't a religious tenet. You really are grossly ill informed and could benefit from an education. The "presumption of innocence" is a legal fact in the United States encoded in our principle founding legal document.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:50 PM
8

A great explanation as to why we do not want men emoting like women and why we shouldn't shame men who are stoic. TL;DW - there is nothing wrong with men as they are.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:32 PM
1

Wow, you really are a red-herring shill selling stupid. The presumption of innocence has nothing to do with who does, or does not get prosecuted because by your implied definition no one could be prosecuted since everyone in the US is presumed innocent. Presumption of innocence is a directive the judge and jury must maintain while they consider the presentation made by prosecution and defense. Police and prosecutors do not (and should not) presume innocence - they gather facts and present eviden…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:20 PM
1

You can keep lying to yourself, that doesn't make what you say true. I was explaining something. Was an explanation asked for? Was what you wrote within context of the original thread? Was your original post to this thread actually relevant to the topic presented? Then you acted like you had told me information which you hadn't. I didn't "act" like anything; nor did I present, or not present, any particular information directed at you. So I posted the only logical reply... Logical - I do not thi…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:10 PM
1

then seemingly either claim... Spoken like a true feminist - imagining words where none exist. Not sure at all what "two wrongs don't make a right" means in any context - the only person wronged in Mark Pearson's case was Mark himself. First by whatshername's lie, and then by the police. I said that only provably false accusations should lead to prosecution. So we can see that you passed kindergarten level rhetoric; good for you. Do you think we should apply the same standard all around? Will yo…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:42 AM
1

You were defensive and out of context - that isn't reasonable in any universe that I live in; I understand that you might live in a secluded one however.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:36 AM
1

Your comment is utterly nonsensical. This is a clear and convincing case of a false accusation wherein the original claimant, Souad Faress, can convincingly, and immediately, be proven to be making a false accusation. The topic at hand is that women who make false accusations should be held to account. A more convincing case of the dried up pussy pass would be hard to find. Not only has this woman not been held to account for her blatant lie she is actually being protected by the state. One can …
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:20 PM
12

Just to be clear are you projecting gynocentrism? A man standing accused of rape is almost always grist for the mill - a man who had a 1 second long non-encounter was forced to endure a two year ordeal to clear his name despite a nearly instantaneously provably false accusation. Mark Pearson's ordeal While the same woman, Souad Faress , maintains the benefit of a near total media black out of the mention of her name related to this case. Use her name on Twitter? Insta-ban. AVfM explanation
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:12 PM
1

Deflection? You posted a tangentially related sub to a topical thread. I investigated and reported back to this thread my impression. Others are entitled to their own opinions.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:00 PM
1

I was simply commenting on the very long, and mostly retarded, rules. But you know - as a guy who has been drugged and raped with the intention of impregnation - I certainly wouldn't know anything about what a victim of sexual assault might want in a community.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:26 PM
1

Let us review. I saw a sub mentioned that I might be interested in. I looked at the sub and saw a literal wall of text defining the rules. I commented on said rules and my disdain for them. You attacked me personally; making unfounded claims. Which is of course an SJW stock tactic.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:24 PM
-1

See - SJW BS. Your opinion counts, mine doesn't. Or, put another way: Everyone who purports to support SafeSpaces (TM) is full of shit. The term invariably means "follow my rules or this space won't be safe for you".
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:15 PM
-1

Meh. I just read your sub's mile long sidebar of rules. When coupled with the fact that you use the term "safe space" twice in the first paragraph it seems you are much more interested in pushing SJW BS.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:49 PM
8

You can tell that this is one of Cassie's early interviews. She is pretty powerfully shaken by what she is hearing. My biggest suggestion would be when she admits that she doesn't understand men's issues because she has never walked in men's shoes Harry should make the following points: This is a powerful demonstration that "Standpoint Theory" is a load of crap. We are routinely fed the notion that women are "more empathetic" and this disproves that as well.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:45 PM
3

I have been watching a lot of House lately; your ability to misinterpret other human beings really comes across as a symptom of a mental illness that would be showcased on that program.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:21 AM
2

I understand English isn't your first language but your IQ comes through just fine anyways. Clearly you would benefit from taking another remedial English class. Try EdX.org for some great free classes.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:20 AM
2

Your logic is painfully faulty. Looking in the mirror and falling in love with your self is narcissism; no one would ever claim I am in love with myself so it doesn't describe me. Looking in the mirror and seeing Socrates - well that is just plain delusional.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:17 AM
6

There is a certain type of person who gets stimulation from pissing off others - from being impossibly dense. You are that person. Just because a username contains the appearance of a throwaway account doesn't mean it is. /u/thrway_1000 is very well known, often provides a genuine service to the community, and unlike you doesn't aim just to stir up shit.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 06:46 AM
1

The biggest difference is that on feminists forums you are a troll when you provide facts; on MRA forums one is a troll when he or she refuses to provide them. Just say'n.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:21 PM
3

HAHAHA. Cute. Move the goal posts based on some artificial criteria while insisting "you can provide proof...but won't because I don't deserve it". You are trolling - because you have provided no proof at any point. I spend a lot of time hunting for examples. And then never, ever, show them to anyone. Cute technique there.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:52 PM
1

I think its worth noting how childish you became because... You lie about being "skeptical" for some reason, one presumes to bolster your credibility, it isn't really childish to assume you are misrepresenting your gender for similar reasons. For anyone interested in academic overview of this topic, I suggest reading this post... I did read your "this post" and found it lacking - strike one against your scientific or academic standing. The fact that this technique (demanding others go out and co…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:31 PM
1

I think it would be fair to do away with both communism and capitalism. You forgot this cute little bit. VW keeps saying "but, but, but, we can do better" but never, ever is willing to put her money where her mouth is (see, I made a capitalist in-joke). At no point has an actual recommendation come forth from her about HOW we can do better. Classic feminist technique - claim all of the credit of "improving" the world by demanding some man fix things.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:13 PM
1

DA it is good to engage people but you have to know when it will be utterly unproductive. TR is a classic concern troll
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:00 PM
2

/U/DignifiedAlpaca this user is a bit of a troll who always does the very thing she is accusing Peterson of without substantiation. he misrepresents science as having certainty with regard to gender choice Note how this overly broad statement is made without citation? Jordan Peterson has hundreds of hours of videos available on YouTube so it shouldn't be hard to come up with specific examples but Bobby provides none. And is either unaware or is misrepresents how the variables work in this kind o…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:53 PM
1

And yet another disingenuous wall of text. Other than saying "I have read the literature" what have you done? Nothing. Quotes? None. Citations? None. You are pulling the classic feminist bullshit of saying "it is up to you to prove me wrong, not up to me to prove my allegations." That makes you a troll - you come into a forum and demand people engage you by your arbitrary rules and piss and moan that they don't. Wage gap. Singular - makes it personal. Saying "Wages gap" would be more accurate bu…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:44 PM
3

Did you know that? I am not sure if you are a really bad troll or a really good condescending douche; either way you are a particularly bad skeptic. Words matter as the nice people on Madison Avenue taught us. By calling it a "wage gap" the intent is to personalize it; individuals clearly take it to mean that Alice earns less than Bob for the same job. Everyone who sells this lie uses it that way. OTOH calling it an "earningS gap" (note the "S", it is important) causes people to pause and realiz…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:00 PM
5

When an author is adamant about using the term "wage gap" you know that they are starting from a disingenuous position. There is an earnings gap - in that the sum total of women in the labor force earn 77% of the sum total of men in the labor force. It really is that simple. Simplistically put, all women earn less collectively because collectively they contribute less to the for hire labor pool. Is this a good thing? A bad thing? I don't know. I DO KNOW that I have untold respect for couples who…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:54 AM
38

Can you see the same if it were depicting female genitalia? Could not care less... in fact I am all for this t-shirt. It helps identify women I would never, ever want to date.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:49 AM
3

You are sooooo right. Concern trolling is much more in line with MRA goals.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:25 PM
3

Wow, Cassie Jaye has a great segment in her Red Pill Files where she describes the feminist need to post editorialize and represent people out of context. You did that in spades -- at no point did I say what you "quoted" me saying. Nowhere did I write "your shtick", nor did I say you were trolling. So, maybe you will ultimately be happier on MensLib. They take people out of context pretty much 100% of the time. Good luck to you.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 04:02 AM
7

I really admire them... Why? I mean, other than trolling I am having a very hard time understanding why you would feel that way. You have made zero effort to explain why you admire them and stuck entirely to generalities. Seriously, it appears you simply want to burn time here on a pointless discussion. Discovering a sub that talks about men's issues from a progressive point of view didn't just make me happy, it was a huge relief. Men's rights, like human rights, are not a "progressive" or "regr…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:24 PM
2

The article is pure parody, entirely tongue in cheek so to speak.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 05:37 PM
15

Not bad - I needed a laugh. A FeMan doesn’t talk; he listens. Men have talked for centuries and women’s voices have not been heard. Feminists are making up for this iniquity by talking on behalf of all women. Feminists articulate the injustice experienced by women who are less able to speak for themselves. When a feminist talks, she represents every other woman and, therefore, has to speak very loudly. :)
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:22 AM
3

Sort of odd considering you opened your post with a line right out of internationalist feminism. Black, trans, and gay men are, let's be real here, in different and sometimes particularly tougher predicaments from straight white men. Says who? We all have problems and only intersectionalists strive to create an oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:22 PM
0

Look, a script kiddie wrote a pedantic little bot that goes around correcting people on the internet. My money is that the author is a feminist douche-bag.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:01 PM
1

While the submitter's posts generally fall into the "Trolls just gotta troll" category (and this post certainly does) your response isn't much better. It reads like a reddit TRP sermon. Men who take responsibility and are therefor masculine, don't end up alone. It is convenient that you get to define masculinity as narrowly as fits your needs, similar to the submitter. That said, taking responsibility is not a necessary and sufficient condition of pair bonding. You are effectively saying "I am l…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 03:58 PM
1

Ironically YouTube's Freedom Alternative has a great breakdown of the 10% Rule which is a barometer of sorts on what it takes to change, and even maintain, policy. The video is an hour long, and I feel well worth the watch, but in the interest of this conversation: TL;DW: Social policies which are not supported by the majority can be maintained if there exists a particularly rabid 10% who demand those policies. Discussion: Feminism is entirely integrated in the modern capitalist free-market libe…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 03:42 PM
5

Classic "lazy feminist" technique - demand MRAs rebut some made up claim. To whit - Why do MRAs think ... Really? All MRAs think the same thing? News to me. ... that "toxic masculinity" is a modern 3rd wave feminazi idea? Citation needed.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 03:27 PM
2

I reconnaissance any smart employer...
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:01 PM
6

Recon - short for reconnaissance / reconnoiter. Reckon - establish by counting or calculation; calculate.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:55 PM
2

To many females, feminists, men rised by single mothers truth has a much different definition. Truth isn't something that can be measured by observation, truth is the thing which gets you what you want.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:32 PM
8

Trolls gotta troll, ya' know.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:21 PM
2

Paul at his best!
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:26 PM
2

That really doesn't matter. He served his country, and the world, with his service. He earned a burial with honors and he deserved a modicum of sympathy for enduring the horrors of WWII Europe, even if that was a crappy VA bed and 3 hot meals a day.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:02 PM
1

I think you will find that feminism is the biggest advocate for "shitty parenting" which, by and large, has become synonymous with single motherhood. The forced removal of fathers from their homes is a men's issue - and it is directly related to this epidemic of bad parenting.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:59 PM
-4

Hasband? Unusual typo.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:28 PM
5

I suppose it depends a great deal upon where in the world you are situated. It depends upon the support you will receive from your parents and if you can stomach its potential absence. Sadly snark is not going to win the day - it will only give the administration an easily defended position from which to insist you rewrite the paper. Facts and honest reflection are your best option. You can honestly reflect that this mandatory course was tantamount to indoctrination in unsubstantiated crap. Patr…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:18 PM
1

What you said rarely, if ever, starts a balanced and open minded question. The point you are missing, unless perhaps you are trolling, is that your opening excerpt offends people. You are implicitly calling every reader a bigot for not meeting your criteria. If your skin is so thin that you need that opening statement then perhaps the internet isn't the place for you.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:34 PM
1

You are missing the point. One must assume intentionally given your mathematically derived persona. Not unlike most feminists I have encountered you not only expect conflict in your conversations you actually prime the pump so to speak. That is irrational, transcendentally irrational even. Ironic, isn't it?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:23 PM
-1

Here is a small hint. If everywhere you go people dismiss you and you cannot have "constructive" conversations ... the problem may lie other than with "them". You open with an incredibly abrasive and insulting narrative and have the temerity to wonder why people might not want to have a conversation. Nothing at all to do with your topic of choice. Perhaps take some time and do a deep evaluation of your conversational technique. I piss off people all the time, don't really care, but I don't blame…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:09 PM
1

Hello /r/MensRights. Before I say anything, please don't downvote this post immediately based on the topic, insult me, or otherwise be a disrespectful person. This is a discussion platform, and if you do that without trying to engage in this discussion, you are only emulating what many feminists do. Gotta love people who come into other folks homes and tell them how to live their lives. Best opening salvo ever.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 05:56 PM
-2

Nope because that isn't correct, BAD BAD BAD bot. 11!!! == ((11!)!)! which is a really big doggammed number. Like, bring down google big.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:01 PM
1

There are certain valid reasons for having it be a woman. Namely size. Smaller people require fewer calories and overall supplies. Can't think of any other good reason.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:00 PM
5

You are muddling morality and legality which is a very difficult task. To pretend it is black and white is both lazy and dishonest. And how, exactly, would you implement this "right"? We have medical confidentiality in the west for a reason, actually a number of reasons, and they are all very good reasons. So, a medical patient goes into the doctor's office to have a procedure performed. It is a legal procedure being performed on an adult. Where is the magic line WRT who gets to make the decisio…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:57 PM
0

Looks at sidebar... No policy about "hate speech" (a terrible term) Scientifically speaking women are "inferior" to men in certain ways EXACTLY like men are "inferior" to women in certain ways. It really depends on what one is measuring and what one is valuing. Since the dimensions of human capability are vast it is utterly senseless to claim that women are universally "inferior" to men and utterly senseless to claim the opposite. A world without women (men/gays/blacks/whites/browns/blind/blind …
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:37 PM
0

(best Homer impersonation) MMMM....Junk science
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:32 PM
1

Your reply reads like a thesis, not an actual event. YOU WEREN'T VIOLATED. There is no way around that. Nothing illegal happened to you. It just looks like to me you read just bits of my OP and made up your scenario. Well ok, is not the right subreddit, why didn't you just linked me the right ones, instead of calling me liar? Wow, the "i was raised by a single mother" vibe just gets stronger and stronger. How on god's green earth is it my responsibility to find the right sub for you? If you need…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:33 PM
1

I want all of those women to go to prison for a substantial amount of time, as individuals who committed a horrible crime. There’s nothing collective about it. What you want, and what you are advocating are separate things. You cannot have all women paying this price, so you will settle for this one taking the brunt of your anger. She committed a crime. It isn't a horrible one. No Mens Rea. You want to punish someone for a horrible crime. Throw her fucking parents and teachers in jail for teachi…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:29 PM
1

You're a lovely person. /s Midwestern passive aggressive bullshit that really means "I am such a better person than you are" but you aren't really. Just someone stuck at 7 bits worth of computing power.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter