TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Anti_PUA Archive

View 7 posts and 25 comments by Anti_PUA on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There's no point in continuing this discussion with you. It's about as fruitless/pointless as having a serious discussion with a flat-earther. The onus is not on me to prove they didn't, but rather on you to prove that they did. For even an amateur history buff, this is pretty easy which is why I qualified that a fucking few were discovered to be undercover chads. I don't expect to know this stuff since it doesn't help you in your ultimate goal in life, namely the pursuit of pussy.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 07:52 AM
4

Go and get a T shot and stop acting like an estrogen-filled harpy who argues only for the sake of arguing when intellectually cornered. As I fucking said, there were statesman and intellectuals who lived like chads and the truth came out whether they liked it or not. There was no fucking tinder you could hide away your sexual escapades back in those days. What about that is so fucking hard to understand?
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 07:40 AM
6

The top scientists, academics, industrialists, and statesmen's lives were well documented along with who their wives were seeing as there were countless events they attended with their families with countless pictures available. It would have been much harder to be a chad with the way society was structured back theb, Despite that, a handful were like Erwin Schrodinger, but they still didn't make pussy the focus of their life and pursued their passions regardless if it made the 'ginas tingle or …
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 07:25 AM
7

It's called history. Try reading up on it. Or maybe not since it won't directly get you more pussy or draw the attention of the "HB8" since that is all that clearly fucking matters.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 07:10 AM
6

No one was talking about the useless politicians that were elected by the mindless masses. Rather, I was talking about the great thinkers and intellectuals that revolutionized society over the centuries whose discoveries, modes of thought, and breakthroughs all gave us the systems of governance and technologies that have vastly improved our quality of life that we take for granted.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 06:40 AM
4

Nothing wrong with admitting you are 20%er. I was too at one point but long exited the SMP voluntarily and my SMV took a nosedive as a result, making me in the bottom 80% now. What you fail to realize is to women, a man who is in the 79th percentile(borderline objectively attractive, well above-average if attractiveness were placed on a bell-curve distribution and it interestingly isn't when it comes to women rating men) is just as unfortunate and invisible as the ugliest of them. They are equal…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 06:33 AM
11

I think men who are frustrated in life would do better than to take advice from some bluepill PUA 2.0 "TRPer" that can't meaningfully tell the difference between "conducive" and "conductive". Building your entire life around chasing loose skanks is the height of gynocentric pussy worship and is a true manifestation of BP thought. All of the great men of the past that have shaped this world and gave us most of the technologies and advances we see today were men who focused on their intellectual p…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 06:20 AM
3

As a man, you don’t have the right to get a fulfilling sexual life anymore. If you see a girl you like, you are not allowed to try to seduce her. What you fail to understand is this only applies to the bottom 80% of men (that includes the majority of TRPers in this sub as well). The top 20% of men do have a right to women's bodies and the overwhelming majority of women feel compelled to oblige due to their natural urges. These men feel very entitled to women's bodies but no one has any issue wit…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/16 06:04 AM
2

PUA is deception at its core. It allows a beta male to masquerade as an alpha and thus get into a minority of women's pants who can't see through the facade and would otherwise not let them participate in the SMP. It is extremely offensive because it slightly raised the chances of the 80% beta to pass their inferior genes on rather than playing their intended role of cuckold beta provider. Its the same reason the number one dating advice for struggling men is to just "be yourself" i.e don't ever…
/r/MGTOW30/04/16 08:43 PM
2

I agree, but unfortunately rather than transforming into self-respecting men of value I fear many will become sniveling depressed crybabies like the FA/TFL types and would either opt to self-destruct or decide to take innocent lives with them (a la Elliot Rodger).
/r/MGTOW30/04/16 01:00 PM
2

Do you really think the law will make any difference? As far as women are concerned, that "creep" you described and the beta who said hi are one in the same: sexual undesirables who don't respect their place in society and are thus menacing and potential rapists. This is how the female mind works. Have you truly swallowed the red pill? Personally, I would have no such issue with such legislation. I am a fairly good looking man and even though for now I am mgtow level 2, if I wanted pussy it in t…
/r/MGTOW30/04/16 11:53 AM
3

You're a certified moron and are beyond being educated. For the edification of others reading this however, I will say that your logic assumes that most of our history = the dawn of civilization, which was not the case at all. Monogamy, which allowed an inferior man like you to reproduce, was recently introduced along with the start of civilization to rapidly increase the population. In a truly unregulated SMP, those poor women join the harems of the wealthy and attractive nobles who would norma…
/r/MGTOW26/04/16 01:01 AM
1

That doesn't logically follow. In fact I question the premise.Our natural state manifests from our genes, whose sole purpose is to survive and reproduce. Our state when we're not mating probably is unpleasant (at least in our younger years), so that we'll do what we can to get out of it. The psychology community largely agrees that depression is not a natural state of a person. Rather, it is a condition that once diagnosed requires treatment. Do you disagree that most men's genes manifested in s…
/r/MGTOW25/04/16 10:36 PM
4

If I want to be of the opinion that virgins aren't mgtow in the same way as those who have actually got experience with women and genuinely chosen to walk away, that's entirely my prerogative. Likewise, it is entirely my prerogative to call you a shaming bluepill mangina who is still apart of the matrix. Also, you are simply wrong that sexual desire isn't hard wired. It isn't something we have been taught, it's ingrained by nature and present in all creatures, it isn't unique to humans. Perhaps …
/r/MGTOW25/04/16 06:58 PM
4

That is what makes this "alliance" many MGTOWs like to claim exist so insidious. They use the same terms we do, appear to espouse the same facts and philosophies that we do, but they are not truly redpill. They have not internalized any of its core tenets. They still seek validation from pussy and everything for them is done for the pursuit of pussy. Many of their leaders claim all men do every action subconsciously for the pursuit of pussy, which of course goes against everything we stand for. …
/r/MGTOW23/04/16 12:25 PM
4

TRP is not just a theory. It is a movement of chest-thumping undesirable betas who gain satisfaction in manipulating undesirable women to having sex with them. At its core it is pusdy worship and playing a woman's game I.e seeking her approval. There's a reason these manginas love to shame and attack MGTOW. They are bluepillers masquerading as redpillers. There is nothing we have in common and they are an important part of the matrix and,by extension, the natural enemies of all MGTOWs.
/r/MGTOW23/04/16 12:15 PM
0

But, why would women get with him when there are clearly better options that will also accept a given woman to join his harem? If I may speak using economic terms, a woman getting with a low SMV man has a very high opportunity cost. Since we believe that the SMP is a completely unregulated market where supply and demand forces largely determine SMV, it is logically impossible for a woman to choose to join the harem of the 3/10 over the harem of the 7/10 since the opportunity cost is the same. Th…
/r/askTRP23/04/16 07:28 AM
0

A true TRP alpha here. Is logical, understands that the SMP is not egalitarian, and prefers most men check out anyway so he can continue to monopolize it. This is exactly the mindset we should all have.
/r/askTRP23/04/16 07:20 AM
1

Personally, I think it's a shame that they aren't enjoying sex, and that there's some sour grapes element to their stance. In many cases it does start off that way, where some young MGTOWs are bitter and come across as "incel" and trying to justify their lifestyle choice. What needs to be understood is that this a defense mechanism constantly to being judged as a man by society based on our sexual exploits and success with women and having been programmed from a young age that a man must aspire …
/r/askTRP23/04/16 07:10 AM
1

The interesting thing is more modern studies now peg that number at 6% when agriculture was invented. Imagine that. 94% of men were dying without ever spinning a plate or having sex. 100% of women were being shared by the top 6%. What this proves is sex has always been an extreme luxury of the elite and was never meant to be a necessity to living a happy and fulfilling life to most men.
/r/askTRP23/04/16 06:58 AM
0

This is not a truth, so why would I accept it? First, women are not a monolith. There is always a women out there who will want to be with a guy who has a bad face but a nice body, interesting hobbies and a good, confident personality. Sounds like BP NAWALT nonsense you are spewing here. Women are absolutely a monolith and their sexual desires are practically uniform with very little variation. This is also another fundamental tenet of RP theory also known as "AWALT". RP also believes that 20% o…
/r/askTRP23/04/16 06:53 AM
0

Nonsense and this goes against everything the TRP stands for. Women will always seek the best quality male they can find, and a 7/10 will often have no issue with a 2/10 joining his harem leaving the 3/10 with absolutely nothing in the SMP. This idea of an egalitarian SMP is nothing more than BP PUA BS.
/r/askTRP23/04/16 06:47 AM
1

I agree with your definition of TRP, but according to reddit's TRP's own leaders it is really all about "sexual strategy" and there are many articles detailing how men who have given up or focused on other things in life other than sex and women are losers who need to be shamed. That sounds exactly like PUA packaged under a new label.
/r/askTRP22/04/16 08:25 PM
-1

Attacking science now, are we? Words of an utterly defeated gynocentric BP mangina. Isn't interesting you have the same exact view of science as the feminists?
/r/askTRP22/04/16 08:20 PM
-1

The true TRP is exactly as I have stated. One that follows directly from science and peer-reviewed studies on the mating strategies of humans. Anything that goes against that consensus and claims such strategies can be overcome by manipulation is utterly unscientific and that is what is at the heart of PUA and it's successor reddit's "TRP". I agree that there is a "redpill" and that redpill is the only outlined in the OP. A true RP man is a scientific man and yields to established science. Going…
/r/askTRP22/04/16 08:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter