TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Appropriate-Use3466 Archive

View 50 posts and 196 comments by Appropriate-Use3466 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
406

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights08/03/25 01:32 PM
310

ProgressAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights13/12/25 08:59 PM
275

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights18/07/26 10:56 AM
243

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights14/07/26 09:41 PM
198

DiscriminationAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:32 AM
185

DiscriminationAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights06/01/24 12:49 PM
182

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 10:53 AM
161

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 09:44 PM
146

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 01:35 PM
139

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:17 AM
131

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 09:27 AM
130

resourceAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/24 03:17 PM
128

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/25 10:59 AM
127

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 09:30 AM
126

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/24 02:12 PM
119

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 01:20 AM
118

ProgressAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:55 AM
116

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights12/12/25 08:10 PM
111

resourceAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 01:29 AM
104

Social IssuesAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights07/12/24 05:47 PM
102

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights09/04/25 11:00 AM
101

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/25 08:41 PM
89

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/24 12:09 AM
89

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/24 07:41 PM
77

Edu./Occu.Appropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:08 AM
75

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights31/01/26 09:18 AM
74

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 02:40 PM
73

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/25 02:51 PM
70

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights14/01/24 07:36 PM
70

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 01:51 AM
69

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:45 PM
66

GeneralAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:51 PM
64

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/25 08:44 PM
63

resourceAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 10:40 PM
62

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights05/04/25 03:40 PM
62

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 09:48 AM
57

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:37 PM
57

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights04/04/26 02:11 PM
56

Activism/SupportAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights06/08/25 01:20 AM
55

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights13/12/25 08:40 PM
53

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:11 PM
50

legal rightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 08:16 PM
47

Social IssuesAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights08/07/24 08:18 PM
45

resourceAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 02:35 PM
36

healthAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 02:23 PM
36

Activism/SupportAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights22/11/25 08:20 PM
30

Legal RightsAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights26/12/25 08:44 PM
26

FeminismAppropriate-Use3466/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:37 PM
21

discussionAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 09:43 PM
1

discussionAppropriate-Use3466/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 01:44 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

As always, lifetime vs 12 months statistics: there is a recall bias for non male on female violence, so 12 months prevalence is more accurate than lifetime. So lifetime prevalence and perpetrators is not accurate. You should see 12 months perpetrator
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 12:59 AM
8

The senator of this DDL is head of the Femicide Commission (a bicameral commission born in 2017, 8 years before the femicide law) so it is actually higher than imagined. Especially now that femicide law is passed and the taboo of having non gender neutral laws is destroyed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 12:45 AM
7

Where are you reading from? The text says: Nelle disposizioni legislative vigenti, le parole: « violenza di genere », ovunque ricorrono, qualora riguardino atti compiuti da un uomo in danno di una donna, sono sostituite dalle seguenti: « violenza maschile contro le donne ». https://www.senato.it/leg/19/BGT/Schede/FascicoloSchedeDDL/ebook/59801.pdf
/r/MensRights19/07/26 12:33 AM
28

The move is from Democratic Party (the Italian one) so it's not right wing, but it's from the feminist wing of DP that loved the femicide law. It's now that there is the femicide law that the gender neutral assett is starting to crumble :(
/r/MensRights18/07/26 04:14 PM
43

Yes but this is from Democratic Party (the Italian one) so it's not right wing, but it's from the feminist wing of DP that loved the femicide law. It's now that there is the femicide law that the gender neutral assett is starting to crumble :(
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 04:13 PM
17

The move is from Democratic Party (the Italian one) so it's not right wing, but it's from the feminist wing of DP that loved the femicide law. It's now that there is the femicide law that the gender neutral assett is starting to crumble :(
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 04:12 PM
12

How can they stay neutral if they want to replace violenza di genere (gender-based violence) with violenza maschile sulle donne (male violence against women)?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 04:09 PM
1

Cyprus, Moldova, Romania and Macedonia are Orthodox...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 07:58 AM
2

More than religion, the point is Spanish influence: Spain is the first to have created a law no more gender neutral (Integral Law against Gender Based Violence/Ley integral contra la violencia de genero or LIVG or VioGen). They said that unjust laws are "affirmative actions" but for the law. A sort of DEI for laws. They also said that it was equality because it was substantive equality vs formal equality (which according to them is discriminatory because not "gender-sensitive/gender-responsive")…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:51 PM
3

I'm Italian ex Catholic now Pagan. However most Italians are Catholics by name only and 90% of the rest are for political reasons (anti-Islam/anti Immigration). People don't go to mass or to Church and people who believe pray at home before going to sleep (maybe). The only thing is that you find the opinions of the pope in the news but is usually very stereotypied opinions such as "no to war, war is bad" (wow, how deep :D ) For the rest, the point is Spanish influence more than anything: Spain i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:50 PM
2

The point is that PR needs to wait the Tribunal Supremo (PR's Supreme Court). If it will confirm the decision, ALL the sex discrimination difference will have to be removed by the law, and so the law will have to be rewritten in a gender-neutral way. The vagueness critique is in the single part of the law, but the sex differentiation critique touches all the law. This might create a precedent in all American States, included outside USA.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:19 AM
1

I quote from the Deontological Code for Italian Psychologist (I know she's not Italian, but I know my rules not American ones, however I think the main pillars will be the same or very similar) She didn't respect the equivalent of many articles of the Deontological Code. I quote: From Article 3: "The Psychologist shall be aware of social responsibility stemming from the fact that exercising the profession can have a significant influence on the lives of others; he shall therefore pay particular …
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:28 AM
1

Ok no if she did something like nonverbal or some hints is a thing. If she stops you (NEVER stop a patient, apart if they are derailing and you have to do or assign a homework or the time is almost finishing), then no, that behavior is unprofessional. One of the main things that you learn is to validate the patient. You have reformulation in psychodynamic therapies, active listening in rogersian therapies and validation in CBT therapies. So there is no justification to a therapist not knowing th…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:31 AM
22

The point is that you cannot be an ally with a movement based on the thinkers or the single activists. You need to watch huge giants like UN Women and CEDAW who lobby against states who have gender-neutral laws for DV. I mean, during WW2, two n4z1 soldiers protected my grandma from an assault. But N4z1sm isn't defined by those two soldiers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 09:26 AM
8

When I read an old Men's Liberation Movement book, I was surprised to find a LOT of male issues that are still relevant today, and even many that were abolished and now feminists want it back. I think the movement was never pro-feminist, I think it were simply the leaders that were doing the peacekeeping work in order not to clash with feminists. However, now they are taking it again as a term related to masculinities groups, and the problem is the Model of Gender Roles. Ie, there is a Social Mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 08:53 AM
1

I don't know, as a therapist myself I can assure you that I've had a lot of patients whose views I don't agree with. I'm an animal rights activist and vegan apart from being an MRA, and I have patients who go specifically to meat events, follow carnivore diets, and some even hunt. I just self-disclosed when a guy told me how they flayed a rabbit and then I said "sorry I cannot", and felt it wasn't a right thing to do because I should have endured, but I felt like puking in that moment. Apart fro…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 08:26 AM
3

Follow Al3x Flores, he talks about how Mexico approved DV (Gender-Based Violence) laws for women only, Femicide Laws (but no Androcide laws), Gender-Based Self-Defense Laws (Ley Alina) ie a woman can kill a man and say it was self defense without evidence and gets away with it, Political Violence for Gender-Based Reason (you cannot criticize only women politicians but you can criticize men politicians), Vicarious Violence Law (if a man alienates or harms his children is seen as a violence agains…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 02:12 AM
2

Actually it feels to me that a lot of people are doing more. What we have is less youtube-level debates. See for example Obama reading Richard Reeves' book. It wouldn't be imaginable even some years ago. Or Milei saying in Davos that the idea of Femicide as a distinct thing than Homicide is sexist. Or Britain's first Men's Health Strategy. Or the Lost Generation article going everywhere. Or anti-male DEI shouting down. Yes, we have less protagonism, less frontmen, less public faces doing debates…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 01:14 AM
9

Also Misandry kills with "False Self Defense" aka "Post-Mortem False Allegations", where a woman kills a man and then says it was for self defense. So she is free or receives a lesser penalty. This is called "Battered Woman Syndrome Legal Defense" in USA and Canada, and "Ley Alina or "Gender-Based Self Defense Law" in Mexico. Even if it wasn't true, because "dead men can't talk", or if it was excessive or delayed (so a revenge and not self defense) or the violence was mutual (but nobody would ju…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 02:48 AM
6

Thanks to you for reading. Sadly as an Italian I discovered all of this while searching why our president was proposing our anticostitutional Femicide Law that was just approved a few months ago :( I also discovered she went to CSW69 (69th Commission on the Status of Women), connected to UN Women, in New York a few days after she proposed it* to talk about it... *Sources: https://italyun.esteri.it/it/news/dalla_rappresentanza/2025/03/nota-stampa-new-york-11-marzo-2025-ddl-femminicidio-valorizzat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/26 07:29 PM
7

You can see it's not true by the Bangkok Rules and the pressure for Femicide Laws and Women/Gender-Based Violence Against Women courts and the "Gender Perspective" in Fighting DV that CEDAW and GREVIO ask. This is not CEDAW, it's GREVIO, but they usually go in the same direction for pressuring states, and it's the same country, Netherland: https://www.reuters.com/world/netherlands-must-better-recognise-role-gender-domestic-violence-expert-body-says-2025-10-24/ https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 09:47 PM
8

I answered you here
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 12:13 PM
4

Done :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 11:01 AM
3

Done :) https://youtube.com/shorts/q35FgSmbDMs It's Al3x Flores channel, where he talks about the Anti-Male Discrimination Laws, including the Ley Esposa
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 10:57 AM
9

I think that these laws will actually benefit men, because male politicians voted for a lot of anti-male laws, so the male politicians percentage was useless to prevent them and to make male interests. When they will see how these laws will impact on them, probably they will consider their impact on the average male citizen. At least I hope so
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 10:28 AM
3

They changed the Consistitution in 2014 for having "Substantive Equality" rather than Formal (real) Equality. Moreover, they got away with other blatant misandric discrimination and nobody said anything, so... In fact, let's remember the Ley Alina (Law for Gender-Based Self Defense), in which a woman killing a man is labeled as self defense even without evidences while the reverse is not; the Ley Vicaria in which a man harming or alienating kids is considered Gender-Based against the mother whil…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 10:25 AM
16

Let's remember the Ley Alina (Law for Gender-Based Self Defense), in which a woman killing a man is labeled as self defense even without evidences while the reverse is not; the Ley Vicaria in which a man harming or alienating kids is considered Gender-Based against the mother while the reverse is never; Law against Gender-Based Political Violence, that censors and punishes verbal attacks against women politicians but not men politicians; Femicide and Gender-Based Violence Laws, that punish male …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 10:22 AM
32

Let's remember the Ley Alina (Law for Gender-Based Self Defense), in which a woman killing a man is labeled as self defense even without evidences while the reverse is not; the Ley Vicaria in which a man harming or alienating kids is considered Gender-Based against the mother while the reverse is never; Law against Gender-Based Political Violence, that censors and punishes verbal attacks against women politicians but not men politicians; Femicide and Gender-Based Violence Laws, that punish male …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 10:22 AM
32

Not after the Constitutional change in 2014 in Mexico that talks about "Substantial Equality" and not formal equality
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:35 AM
2

Start from parental leave, then all the "this is also insulting to men because" when she talks about female issues, then about expectations about women being the housewife connect it to "this hurts men too see fathers after divorcr", then talk directly about fathers' rights, then fathers falsely accused, then fathers physically battered and falsely accused, then battered men and how they are not allowed in victims shelters and centers, then male victims, then the rest. In sum: Make her see that …
/r/MensRights25/12/25 01:32 PM
1

In Italy prosecutors are also judges and can change to become the other kind of judge
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 08:24 PM
4

And this is happening when the victim is alive, imagine what happens when he is killed by her. She claims self defense and the case is that she is innocent because is a justified murder for self defense even when she is not. So post mortem false allegations are the worse because they distort the number of victims and are able to create this narration about femicide and Femicide Laws
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:35 AM
1

Yes prosecutors are a kind of judge, the same judge can change from being prosecutor to being a judgment judge, even if only once in his career
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 01:03 AM
2

I hope so, I'm Italian but we're afraid they will do the same as Spain ie considering these kind of laws as "affirmative actions". We'll wait and see, otherwise we'll need a EU-level action to get rid of all these laws, including the Spanish one
/r/MensRights16/12/25 01:02 AM
3

In case of unwanted kids without the dad's consent, how to possibly avoid paying child support: 1- block her, disappear and never talk to her again, avoid places where you went together. No contact with her and with whoever tries to reach to you for her behalf. 2- wait for her to formally ask for child support 3- ask for the DNA test, not now but AFTER she asked for it 4- don't pay anything at all, oppose to everything and make it be longer and longer 5- continue to be no contact, disappear 6- s…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 07:26 PM
1

Don't worry, you couldn't know. I usually suggest meditations from MBSR program, so it's a completely non-spiritual practice. It's that in the Structural Dissociation protocol, the PTSD and Complex PTSD treatment is divided in 3 phases, and the Stabilization phase is before the phase of Elaboration of traumatic memories. So before EMDR, the person needs to be able to stay in the present moment and avoid the worry and rumination cycle, otherwise he's so activated that exposing him to the traumati…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 08:29 PM
1

I don't know, because we are talking about the hypothetical future, so who knows anything about hypothetical futures?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 04:55 PM
1

I think that if a woman p3gg3d without consent a man, she now is arrested. Before no. Moreover, now that Israel will expand the definition of rape outside of penetration (because a woman can be victim also for receiving oral without consent, so feminists will want this definition expanded), it will incorporate new sexual acts and therefore also forced to penetrate
/r/MensRights14/12/25 04:40 PM
2

Thank you, I didn't know, but before was even worse. For example a woman who penetrated an object into a man wasn't even charged. I'm not at all defending Israel, I just think that if a government is committing atrocities, adding another atrocity (like continuing to have non-gender neutral laws) is not solving the rest of the atrocities that government is doing. Also, a new like this could be seen in the bigger perspective of influencing other countries with the idea of having gender-neutral nor…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 04:34 PM
1

The problem with dissociation is usually with imaginative meditation, or mindfulness meditation for hours. A friend of mine suffers from both Dissociation and Psychosis, and she worsened when she used imaginative meditations, but improved when she used non-imaginative mindfulness meditation. Essentially, this is because dissociation is an extreme version of both daydreaming and absorbtion. If you do imaginative meditation, then it's like a willing daydreaming. If you do mindfulness meditation yo…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 04:19 PM
1

I think it's the same
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 11:39 AM
4

Damn... does anyone have the full text of the law?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:38 AM
2

If it's overturned in Canada this will have massive repercussion in all 30 countries where this kind of laws still exist. Let's hope so In Latin America and Spain they framed it as affirmative action to avoid incostitutionality. I hope this defense will not be judged as right in Canada too
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 06:30 AM
2

Yes, so how is it possible that we live, or even that in the early XX centuries people lived, in a Patriarchy if it was already destroyed by Marx's times?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 06:29 AM
3

In fact I was dubious about posting it, however a new is a new so I posted it regardless. Let's say that at least the crimes went from 10million to 10million-0,1
/r/MensRights14/12/25 04:50 AM
2

I quote from the Communist Manifesto: "The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary part. The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”. It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervour, of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 04:21 AM
8

I'm so sorry for what happened to you... You definitevely need to change environment, going away from that, change University, change friends, change city. Then you need to do News Detox. Avoid news related to this world but for supports for accused, as others suggested. Otherwise these news could tear you down. Read stoics, understand that there is a difference between what we can control and what we can't and we should focus on what we can. Begin meditation, mindfulness or yoga or tai chi. Med…
/r/MensRights13/12/25 02:28 PM
11

Exactly, but this is what CEDAW says: "An ostensibly gender-neutral policy, while not excluding women per se, may result in a de facto discrimination against women." "The substantive equality approach recognises that women and men cannot be treated the same, and for equality of results to occur, women and men may need to be treated differently." https://cedaw.iwraw-ap.org/cedaw/cedaw-principles/cedaw-principles-overview/substantive-equality/ Of course substantive equality for men "recognizing di…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/25 12:31 AM
1

Ask "how to receive the money from gender gap if im a man" and you'll receive the truth: The Difference: Gender Gap vs. Equal Pay The gender pay gap is the average difference in pay between all men and women in a workforce or country, which is influenced by many factors like career choices, working hours, and industry segregation. Equal pay is a legal right, which states that men and women must receive the same pay for performing the same, similar, or "equal value" work for the same employer. It…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 09:48 PM
8

"Netherlands must better recognise role of gender in domestic violence, expert body says" "A European expert group has urged the Netherlands to ensure its policies reflect that domestic violence "disproportionately affects women", and said its gender-neutral approach could leave women at risk. The Netherlands ranks highly within the European Union on gender equality and the country has brought in new laws against harassment and discrimination. Gender references have been removed from some polici…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 09:09 PM
1

Yeah, these are some sources related to the interference of these organizations: UN Women, GREVIO, CEDAW, and Convention of Belem do Para. All of them are against gender-neutral laws and want "substantial equality" which means inequality for men. For the direct influence to States, I quote: Italy: CEDAW in 2024 asked Italy to do this: ""Amend the criminal code to specifically criminalize femicide, including violence against LGBTI persons, and define all forms of gender-based violence against wom…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:29 AM
1

We need to give a name to the feminist organizations that are pushing for this inequality: UN Women, CEDAW, GREVIO and Convention Belem do Para
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:25 AM
6

Yeah, but it's similar to our 2013 Femicide Law, ie in 2013 there was a law that was called "Femicide Law" but was actually gender-neutral for the penalty BUT for the help, telephonic number, ads, antiviolence centers and shelters. I think there are degrees of discrimination: to say that the penalty is the same but services are only for women is the OLD discrimination. NOW even the penalty is gendered. (Of course it was gendered even in the past, with Juridic Sexism ie Gender Sentencing Gap and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:23 AM
6

No, femicide laws fail: https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sbm/research/research-insights/femicide-laws-are-failing/ Femicide laws are failing This research insights brief sheds light on the alarming high number of hate killings of girls and women, known as femicides in Mexico. While legislation targeting gender-based violence has much improved, our research reveals a stark truth – over a decade of implementing femicide laws has shown no reduction in femicides, homicides of women, nor the number of girls an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:19 AM
9

The change is due to UN Women, GREVIO, CEDAW, and Convention of Belem do Para. All of them are against gender-neutral laws and want "substantial equality" which means inequality for men. If you asked me about why do people accept it, it's because once an international organization proposes something that is not gender-neutral, we accept it like gender-neutral policies and laws, because if for decades gender-neutral policies are publicized and popularized as "measures against violence against wom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:18 AM
3

Yes, it's so bad that even left wing Spanish newspapers said it's censorship masked as gender equality: https://elpais.com/mexico/opinion/2025-06-26/violencia-politica-de-genero-un-comodin.html
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:58 PM
3

That we know that these laws did this: Spain -> Latin America -> the rest of the world Based on what is happening now in Latin America, we know what will spread all over the world, and Mexico and Brazil are case studies which will help us to understand the new fads, because these laws that now they want to extend to the rest of the Western World have been in place there for 10 years now
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:46 PM
20

My chronology: 0 wave: 90s: USA (VAWA), not really working because then it included male victims -> UN connects IPV and gender condition in the 90s 1st wave: 2004: Spain, Ley Integral Violencia de Genero --- -> creation of UN Women 2nd wave: Latin America, from 2008 to 2019, Feminicidio and Femicidio Laws (but nobody cared) -> in EU the Istanbul Convention Between 2nd and 3rd waves -> in UK there are the proposals of Misogyny Bills, to treat Violence against Women but not against Men as an Hate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 02:26 PM
1

Yes it's that, while the Penal Chamber was against it even for discrimination against men in their document, when they were invited in the Senate they just talked about the lack of taxativity which is also unconstitutional. Similarly those 77 jurists. There is the impression that they were afraid to be labeled as misogynists for talking explicitly about men, so they used indirect arguments but for indirectly saying that it was discriminatory. I know, this fear and the need to use indirect argume…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/25 09:24 PM
20

Nice to meet another Italian here. The Milan antiviolence shelter for men too, Ankyra, says that according to them there's a hope for the constitutional court to oppose it, because of the bigger history of our law compared to Spain (that had a longer dictatorship, less jurisprudence and a civil war after). LUVV (Lega Uomini Vittime di Violenza, ie League Men Victims of Violence) said that they will try to do something, try to stay updated, maybe they'll try a referendum or petitions to extend it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 07:17 PM
1

Yes of course :)
/r/MensRights27/11/25 03:51 PM
35

As an Italian I'm ashamed. We tried a manifestation in June, Antiviolenzaxtutti (antiviolence for all), 77 women jurists were against it, the Penal Chamber (that represents penal code lawyers) said it is unconstitutional, but despite all this, it was approved by unanimity. It's a shame... I hope Constitutional Court will delete this law or at least extend it to men too
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 03:48 PM
9

We should do an Initiative of the European Citizens (ICE). But in order the EU to listen we should gain 1 million signatures. Is it possible? https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/_en
/r/MensRights24/11/25 10:57 PM
30

The European Parliament created a Plan that will make Men second class citizens: It says: - recognise femicide (the killing of a woman or girl because of her gender) but not androcide as a distinct crime. - similarly with gender-based violence ie violence against women but not men So gender sentencing disparity for IPV, homicide and violence in general will be implemented by law Yes means yes/explicit consent (that makes harder to prove innocence, invert the burden of proof, makes the word of th…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:08 PM
4

We can also start only from domestic violence and false accusations by female abusers / fake self-defense (DARVO) if we think that people are not yet ready to talk about sexual violence. But the point is to talk in ads on TV. Not so much the theme, but the medium is important.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 08:28 PM
14

Try to talk about this together with LGBT+ victims, such as "gendered approaches ignores and marginalize male victims and LGBT+ subjectivities". Because shelters' exclusion of male victims and victims from women ignores not only male victims from female violence, but also lesbian violence victims, male victims from men included gay male partners, and nonbinary and trans victims. So yeah, try to put them together, even with surveys that show that LGBT IPV violence is similar to straight ones, tha…
/r/MensRights22/11/25 08:11 PM
3

I'm doing the equivalent of a PsyD (more like school med here, but paid by us) in my country and OMGs this is so true!
/r/MensRights09/09/25 07:03 PM
9

Sadly you need to talk like extreme validation + just a tip of criticism, such as "oh what you do is wonderful perfect and divine" and so on and so on, and then "there's just a little tiny detail that I would adjust, to avoid this procedure next time", and then coming back to validation "but your work, oh is excellent, your guide here is a light in the darkness" and so on. When you talk outside of rational people (even many men, not only women), it's best to talk in a DBT way (DBT is the therapy…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:30 PM
1

They now say that man bad because it's the landlord that is creepy, not that the landlord is misandric because he thinks that men are not safe or men aren't as clean or tidy as women or other stereotypes about men. So it's either to blame a man (the renter) or presuming the landlord is guy and man bad even there
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:24 PM
1

I'm not Christian, I'm Pagan (it's like similar to Hinduism, a bit like a 'Western Hinduism'), so I reply you by my religious point of view. In Paganism, God is the Universe, because the Universe is illimitate and so there is nothing outside the Universe, so God is the Universe. But being so illimitate it cannot have a personality, so God-Universe is impersonal (for this reason is called "the One"). Just like the Universe is made by different natural forces, so God/One is made by different Gods,…
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:32 AM
20

Kicks in the balls, eviration, castrations, killings or extreme violence or mutilation as a response for harassment or even just words (as if it was a balanced response)
/r/MensRights02/09/25 12:45 PM
8

Moreover, for the violence, just look at what BLM says: blacks are not more violent, they are just suffering arrest bias, sentence disparity, police brutality, implicit bias, and so on. And this is reflected in the official statistics of crime which are unreliable. If this is true and you recognize it, then how can you not apply this to men, in which the juridical sexism is much higher? Also a lot of men are killed and misclassified as missing people (often not seen as murder victims from women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 09:35 AM
12

Because nobody is facing discrimination at the hands of the other sex, but at the hands of society which is supported by both men and women. Before women's vote it was supported by formal male power and informal female power (mothers education, influence of the mistresses and wives on male kings ministers and head of states). Now both by informal and formal power due to politicians voted by both men and women (included men voted by women, which represent their voters, ie women, more than the gro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 09:21 AM
8

"Women and children first" Wait, I'm a single dad with a robot-born child! "Oh... well therefore Adults and their children first!" But this implies that people are rational and they do things because they think about them. However, it could all be related to habits, ie the WCF crowd could be doing all this not because they THINK about it, but just for the habit of "we always did this". So my question is: will this eliminate WCF politics? Because if it was for logical reason it should have been e…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:50 AM
1

It's trueee, thank you!!
/r/MensRights13/08/25 09:23 AM
4

Men are killed more by strangers, so not because of being a partner or somebody they know, just for their external characteristics and not for their story, attitude nor personality. So it means that if it's not 50/50, it's because there is a sex-selection. Killing for sex selection is misandry, chivalry for excluding women means selecting and targeting men, which is targeting and selection because of gender, which is androcide and misandry. So yeah, misandry kills. Misogyny doesn't kill as much,…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:17 PM
27

Because UN is the same organization that let men die and women survive in Srebrenica
/r/MensRights08/04/25 07:33 PM
2

After what percentage prevalence of violence on women is it acceptable to take rights away from men? And after what percentage of violence on men and unfounded accusations is it acceptable to take away rights from women? To say that it is acceptable to take away men's rights - like making laws that exclude their protection or women-only seats or wagons without equivalent men-only seats or wagons - because there are so many incidents of violence against women and therefore we can take away men's …
/r/MensRights07/04/25 08:20 AM
3

"In all four samples, there was no significant difference between males and females in either the overall prevalence of physical aggression or the prevalence of severe attacks. Among the 553 couples where one or both of the partners were violent, in almost three quarters of the cases (71.2%) there was gender symmetry in the sense that both partners engaged in this type of behavior. When only one partner was violent, this was twice as likely to be the female partner (19.0%) as the male partner (9…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 05:16 PM
4

Are discriminatory laws for one ethnicity acceptable if in a given context that ethnicity commits more violent crimes than the others? If not, then this same logic cannot be justified by saying that there is a lot of violence on women in X Place/Country/Context/etc. And anyway, if even one single discriminated person suffers an injustice, even if other people around that person with their same gender or ethnicity are committing more crimes, if that single person is killed for false allegations o…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 04:35 PM
5

If you include men, fine, but here in the Alina Law the assumption is only for women. Law should include ALL the cases, not just a certain amount or demographics
/r/MensRights06/04/25 04:17 PM
3

We talk about assumption of self defense. If this is so right, then ok, make it gender-neutral!
/r/MensRights06/04/25 04:13 PM
6

So are we going to allow murder to stop murder?
/r/MensRights06/04/25 01:53 PM
5

In Italy we introduced the Ni Una Menos latin american feminist group as our Non Una di Meno, and the term Femminicidio from the Latin American Feminicidio/Femicidio, so it's spreading from there to all the West...
/r/MensRights05/04/25 09:24 PM
6

The Bangkok Rules are in effect since 2011. The Alina Law is already in effect in Baja California since 2023, now they are debating about extending it in all Mexico. I don't know if it's going to pass, I'm Italian so I found this new by chance by comparing our new Femicide Law with the Perspectiva de Genero in Spain and I found this, after finding that the Femicide law in Italy was due to the request by UN in the CEDAW that reprimended Italy for not having a Femicide law. However, in 5 seconds I…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 08:22 PM
4

It's the "Gender Perspective" (Perspectiva de Genero), even in Spain they want to give "agravante de genero" because the "gender-based violence law" (ley de violencia de genero) was "too limited" because it applied only to partners and former partners and now they say that it has to be extended to all the Penal Code (Perspectiva de Genero en el Codigo Penal, ie Gender Perspective in the Penal Code): https://www.abogacia.es/actualidad/noticias/el-tribunal-supremo-establece-que-agravante-de-genero…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 06:51 PM
8

But the cultural revolution would impact everybody. Also not true because men kill mostly men and women kill mostly men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 03:49 PM
15

Ok therefore we should have also violence against men just because they are men. When a criminal says "I would never hit a woman" is targeting men. So it's hate crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 11:38 AM
5

I don't know, I already heard the argument that because in other countries they had no inconstitutionality, here it will be the same
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 09:54 AM
1

A link in English about the new here
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:05 PM
8

1) che bello che c'è un altro italiano su questo sub! 2) lo spero tanto, ma temo che i tribunali, inclusa la corte costituzionali, siano ormai abituati alla misandria sistemica
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:11 PM
34

In Italy this government also banned surrogacy but not in vitro fertilization, criminalizing fathers and not mothers. It sucks so much
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:22 PM
30

All Europe is doomed 😭
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:21 PM
24

In Italy almost everybody is intact, so I don't know this statistic is US-only
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:19 PM
70

Men only. We are sadly so much becoming like Spain 😭
/r/MensRights08/03/25 01:49 PM
6

In a normal world, this would be a sign of hate crime and society would implement higher penalities and special lessons in primary schools in order to destroy this situation and de conditionate people starting from their childhood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/25 06:10 AM
11

Most perpetrators of violence would spare women. If you spare women it's a hate crime, because you target specifically men. If you target specifically men, you hate men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 11:29 PM
1

Here I am :) "Does anyone have experience when you behaved like stereotypical gay vs not gay men around others ?" Sometimes people assume that I'm hitting on them because I'm gentle, and this is both for women who don't know I'm gay and men who know I'm gay. But I'm simply gentle. If I like somebody I act like that person is invisible to me. "Does females take advantage to gay men ?" I think women are as homophobic as men, they just don't say it outloud. It's not dating bi men, and is excluding …
/r/MensRights04/01/25 12:29 PM
2

Gay guy here :)
/r/MensRights07/12/24 05:45 PM
0

I interpreted this as admitting to having committed the crime, not the label of hate crime
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:09 PM
1

It's not in silico, we are talking about Organs on Chips and microfluidics. Please get updated. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35338360/ See also Quasi-Vivo: https://kirkstall.com/alternatives-animal-testing/ And even vitro methods are improvable, see 3D in vitro models: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15982899/ And 3D in vitro co cultures: https://focus.gbo.com/blog/3d/advantages-of-3d-cell-culture-over-animal-models-greiner-bio-one https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6209241/ P.S.: for t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 06:08 PM
1

It's not true, there are a lot of research charities that don't use animals, see for example here: In Italy (I'm Italian) there is RicerCARE https://www.ricer.care/ , which is our main animal-free charity. In the UK there is "Animal Free Research UK" https://www.animalfreeresearchuk.org/ (former Dr Hadwen Trust). Here you can find a list of other charities: https://www.animalaid.org.uk/the-issues/our-campaigns/animal-experiments/health-charities-list/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 06:28 AM
1

This is not what we are talking about, however. It's not a debate about generally what do we think about animal models in general but how can we minimize animal use. If we can choose animal-free research projects, that's all it counts. If in this field there are researchers who don't use animals and we should fund them rather than researchers who use animals. Regardless of our opinion about animal research in general. The utility of animal models is completely irrelevant. We are talking about fu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 06:22 AM
1

This one can help: https://www.animalaid.org.uk/please-think-supporting-movember/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 09:42 PM
1

This is not what Feminism says. The original birth document of Feminism, ie the Declaration of Sentiments of the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, says: "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. [...] He has made her, morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided th…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:59 AM
8

Thanks to you, it's a pleasure to meet other Antispeciesist MRAs! Yes it would be very helpful to see the intersections between Animals' Rights and Men's Rights. Even the fact that Feminists say that forceful impregnated cows are raped while bulls being anally electrocuted (electroejaculation) to force the release of semen aren't seen as victims as well, while at the same time males are the most killed of farmed animals, mirrors the bias that Feminists have for human male victims. I'm Italian so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 04:49 AM
7

The regulatory tests cannot be avoided due to law, but this is applied research/basic research, and in this field researchers can decide the model to use. So we should support only animal free research.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 09:19 PM
2

Feminism is misandry not because of its intention but because of its worldview. Patriarchy Theory is the basis for Feminism. So if you want equality as intention but your worldview is that men are privileged and/or the only responsable for their own oppression, then your intention is necessarily informed by this worldview. To compensate an inexistent privilege is equality in intention but oppression and discrimination is results. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Because good inten…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:17 PM
2

It's been debunked a lot of times: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 "Are gender differences in intent dependent on method of suicide attempt? In terms of the association between type of suicide intent and gender among different suicide methods, results illustrated that for suicide intent, SSA was rated significantly more frequently in males than females in the most frequently used method of attempted suicide (intentional drug overdose, N = 3542, 67.9% of…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 02:46 PM
10

Please review the underreporting of female-on-male homicides, like abuse excuse, fake self defense not counted but seen as justifiable murders, bias on the arrest and lack of suspects for women that lead male victims of intimate partner homicide and other female-on-male homicides as being misclassified as missing persons, suicides or natural death.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 09:58 AM
2

I'm just saying that, if they think it's due to difference, we cannot exclude that it's due to socialization, so even if it's not the totality, the logical consequence is to increase this kind of socialization for girls too. If the issue is completely social it would resolve. If it's both biological and social, at least it would diminish the problem on the socialized part. Of course I'm not agreeing with this. It's just the logical consequence and useful to unmask their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 08:03 PM
6

If the problem is socialization ("boys want it more"), then the person is implying that to solve it, we would need to socialize girls to like it more, so it doesn't hurt them as much. Of course I'm not agreeing with this logic, but the logical counsequences are these. If the person, however, doesn't want to socialize girls to like it more, the person automatically agrees that it's irrelevant the will of the abused ones, and that the point is the act and the maturity of the abused (ie even if the…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:09 PM
19

The point in fact is that they don't start from the presumption of innocence. False accusations are all accusations apart from those that become condamnations. The reason why they are false doesn't matter. The alleged victim just took LSD before suing? Who cares. I don't care if you sue me for having had a dancing cactus tell you I raped you and you really believed it when you sued me. It's like saying a crime is not a crime if you didn't know it was a crime before committing it. Justice doesn't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 08:23 PM
27

This means that women are more likely to be women's rapists than men are to be men's rapists.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 10:01 PM
4

Accumulate evidences, be as quiet as possible while making her answer to you in written form (such as whatsapp or sms) while you ask her the reasons why she did this and also other stuff that could be classified as abuse (such as slapping, insulting, etc.). After having accumulated the evidences (and if she slaps you just go to the hospital to have the report of what happened, without her knowing that you went to the hospital, for example tell her - not write her - that you are in a friend's hou…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 02:33 PM
-1

Trans Movement is saying that gender is not based on appearance. This means that all the exclusions that feminists do, like excluding men from running away from the draft, or going away from a State in war, from antiviolence shelters, and so on... can be eluded by not identifying with a single gender. Feminists are frightened by this. Instead, if we really wouldn't assume the gender of people as much as we are not really really sure of the color in their eyes and we need to check it again, ask t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 05:19 PM
1

Happy Birthday!!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 05:14 PM
32

Definitively, considering that in the past police reported equal percentage of Intimate Partner Homicide between the sexes. Probably in the past it was either more female-on-male IPHs or less underreported, nowdays equal but underreported, and similarly now it's shown for sexual aggression, but inversely. In the past women killed their husbands more overly/it was more noticed but raped men less overly; nowdays women kill their partners less overly but rape more overly/it's more noticed. Moreover…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:10 PM
1

Ah right, you counted the 2016 NISVS. However, if you see the 2010, 2011 and 2012 12 months NISVS, male victims of forced/made to penetrate are more than female victims of rape. Maybe in 2016 feminism had an increasing and therefore male victims didn't feel comfortable to open up as they did some year before. Because paradoxically, in the years around the gay marriage legalization but without huge interest in feminism, not following gender roles for men was easier, because homosexuality has been…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 03:20 PM
1

I thought it was 1 in 4 women and 1 in 6 men. This list doesn't count men and boys who were SAed but not penetrated. It's 1 in 9 because it's counting the Lifetime vs the 12 Months. Even the 1 in 6 vs 1 in 4 is still counting the Lifetime. In the 12 Months it's Gender Symmetrical. I quote: “One-year prevalence ‘are considered to be more accurate [than lifetime rates] because they do not depend on recall of events long past‘” [Bert H. Hoff. (2012). US National Survey: more men than women victims …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 12:21 PM
2

It's 1 in 9 because it's counting the Lifetime vs the 12 Months. In the 12 Months it's Gender Symmetrical. I quote: “One-year prevalence ‘are considered to be more accurate [than lifetime rates] because they do not depend on recall of events long past‘” [Bert H. Hoff. (2012). US National Survey: more men than women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 4 Iss: 3, pp. 155 – 163.]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 12:15 PM
6

This is a good point and related to the dress code double standard.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 01:40 PM
3

Yeah but in that case it's only after being pregnant and it's only for the baby. I never heard of pregnant women who dirtied the seat in the bus with milk, but I sadly heard about "period equality activists" who dirtied public bus seats with blood.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 01:38 PM
2

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights12/07/24 08:02 PM
6

Well but the point is that nipple showing are not nude according to me. For me the actual reason for flashing as a crime is that you show something that emits liquid (sexual liquid, blood, piss) and/or feces, so it's banned because beyond what you find attractive, you show a part that when exposed can infect other people with diseases.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:58 PM
6

I also think that if you grab a man's chest with lust then you are sexually harrassing a man. But I also think that it's not the body part. It's the intention that defines a sexual harrassment. For example I'm not a feet fetishist, but if a maniac would inappropriately touch my feet with sexual intent, it's sexual harrassment even if feet are not sexual for me. They are sexual for the harrasser.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:53 PM
7

I'm gay so it's very strange to talk to straight men, because the first thing you do when you have sex with another man is to lick/suck each other's nipples. And it's really strange that straight men don't receive a similar stimulation. I think this different treatment that straight men have towards male chest and female breast is due to deprivation of sexual stimulation for male nipples. In fact, in Japan where also men's nipples are stimulated in straight sex, people talk a lot about how it's …
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:49 PM
0

Ask her to accompany you home, at least as much as you accompany her. If strangers attack you, don't let her hide behind you, don't try to shield her with your body, don't go on, don't let her run away while you stay with the aggressor. In a few words, don't be a human shield for her. For the car, I would say that it's best to go with her car with her driving as much as she goes with yours.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:39 PM
12

I think there is a difference between upper body and lower body. I mean, upper body parts, pecs/chest for men and breast for women, don't release liquids. So I think the equivalent for a flasher is a girl who exposes her pubes and/or ass. I wouldn't consider a man a flasher because he goes shirtless. Similarly for women, I wouldn't consider them a flasher. Differently are those who say that thay can bleed wherever because of "period equality". Because lower body produces liquids and feces, upper…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:30 PM
1

If, as you said, "Yemen has the worst record for equality", and suicide is a good indicator for oppression, well men are more oppressed. I quote: "The suicide rate among the Yemeni population, according to World Bank, is 5.8 per 100,000 population in 2019, and based on gender it was higher among males than females with a rate of 7 and 4.6 per 100,000 for males and females, respectively [3]. According to World Health Organization (WHO), suicide is considered one of the leading causes of death in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 08:00 PM
2

Since when is Brazil an Islamic country??? Facepalm I cannot believe that people think that Brazil is an Islamic Country... o.O By the way, for the Intimate Partner Homicides (that you incorrectly call Femicides, which implies the existance of Masculicides/Malecides), rates between men (masculicides/malecides) and women (femicides) are similar in countries like Panama and Brasil. https://masculinicidio.wordpress.com/masculinicidio/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 07:45 PM
2

Suicide attempts are not suicides. Men commit suicide without announcing, so even in the West most people who commit suicide are men while suicide attempts are mostly women. Moreover, in Sharia law, women who work or are rich have no legal responsibility to use the money earned to support their family or even themselves. Men could be thrown in prison for this i.e. spending their pay on drink instead of on their family: "A husband is obliged to earn the living for his wife and fulfill all her nee…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 07:41 PM
3

Yeah, it's toxic male competitivity. We should be united against feminism, not divided.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 11:11 AM
1

Why do we have to start from the basics every time? First of all, there is a regime in Afghanistan, so no one votes or has the power to do politics except what the regime wants, not just women. In fact, the men who had been in politics before the Taliban returned were so terrified of what the Taliban might do to them as soon as they were captured that they clung to planes taking off and died falling rather than be caught by the Taliban. In fact, in extremist Islamic countries, no one really has …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 10:46 AM
11

Well, but always indirectly, through supernatural means. While men were seen as fearful directly, even when they weren't magical. And also seen as fearful when associated with magic as well. For example 20-25% of all the people condemned in the witch hunt were men, with men being the majority in Iceland, Finland and France, for example. Also, most accusers of female witches were women. So it was mostly a woman-on-woman issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 06:18 PM
17

When ALSO women were seen as predatory, feminists reinterpret it as ONLY women were seen as predatory. Male priests were as innocent as female nuns, but the ordinary man wasn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 05:56 PM
0

The point here is not what single people do in bed, but what is said in news and media as the de-normalization to refuse to do oral sex on women, which de-encourage men to refuse to do oral sex if not protected in order not to receive social shame.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:45 PM
0

Humans are a social animals. Being labelled as sexist and selfish for refusing to do oral sex on women, discourages men to refuse even when they don't want to do oral sex on women for safety reasons (risks for HPV and STDs, refusal to do it with dental dam, etc.), apart from other reasons which are still valid (even not being in the mood to do a sexual act should be respected and not insisted on).
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:42 PM
0

"the only reason it doesn't is because people be too horny to say no to their men/women." No, it can also be due to fear of being labelled as sexist or selfish. The point here is that due to the orgasm gap narrative men don't feel comfortable to express their denial to oral sex even for health reason, like risk of HPV and other STDs, in order to avoid being labelled as sexist and/or selfish. This is leading men to have oral sex on women regardless of protection, which makes a lot of men dying.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:35 PM
0

Abstinence is not all or nothing. Many people accept safe sex for intercourse but not for oral sex, because they feel less. It's now acceptable to refuse to do oral sex if not safe if done to a man, but it's not an acceptable response if done to a woman, because of the orgasm gap narrative. It's not possible to have abstinence for oral sex on women, even in the case of the refusal from the woman to wear a dental dam, so the abstinence option is PRECISELY what is unable to have here. In order to …
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:25 PM
2

I'm literally gay so I'm talking as an external. I'm talking about it even if I'm gay because a straight friend of mine died from throat cancer due to HPV when he was 21. So when I see orgasm gap-related content and the pressure to have oral sex on women, I think about the double standard of safe sex, ie when feminists wants you to do sexual acts, without being concerned at all that some of those acts should not be done without protection, and so it's best to avoid those acts entirely if you can…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:28 AM
1

The issue here is the double standard: gender reversed, a societal pressure all over the media that leads people to believe that if you don't perform oral sex on a man, and you make him come before you do penetration so that you're sure he's going to come, and then do penetration and make him come again or even two or three times as much as you do, otherwise if you don't like to do it or you don't feel comfortable doing it or it bothers you gustatively the tongue or mouth sensation of doing it o…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:27 AM
2

I'm gay so I'm talking as an external. If you see hostileness it's because a straight friend of mine died from throat cancer due to HPV when he was 21. So when I see orgasm gap-related content and the pressure to have oral sex on women, I think about the double standard of safe sex, ie when feminists wants you to do sexual acts, without being concerned at all that some of those acts should not be done without protection, and so it's best to avoid those acts entirely if you cannot do them protect…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 06:22 AM
1

I'm Neopagan, however I think that all religions are equal paths to the Divine
/r/MensRights05/07/24 12:06 AM
3

If the affirmation is the evidence, this will lead to put the affirmation and reputation of the so called victim into the trial, ie the so called victim blame they wanted to avoid. So, in order women not to bring any evidence, they'll have as counter-evidence, attacks on the women's allegations, finding evidence of incoherence and therefore traumatic victim blaming that could have been avoided if they asked for real evidence instead of pure affirmations by the accuser.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 11:05 PM
2

You can find a deepening here: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/03vZNWAJPD
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 10:53 PM
14

First, it appropriates Men's Liberation Movement. It's true that in the past there was one only Men's Liberation movement, with some members aligned with Feminism. The original Men's Libs were much more concerned about Traditional Male Roles than feminism, and Warren Farrell was both a Feminist and a Menslib, however when the NOW decided to oppose shared custody, the movements definitively splitted, with Pro-Men "Men's Rights Movement" and "Male Pro-Feminism" movement, which then changed name in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 02:42 AM
8

Because nobody invest money in Men's issues.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:59 AM
5

Choosing between Men and Bears reveals the bias in official statistics on violence victims The game of having to choose between a man and a bear indicates that the statistics on how much men and women are victimized are unreliable and biased, because it means that in collecting them we already start with a baseline bias, and therefore there will definitely be more arrests against men than arrests against women. This in turn will affect the official statistics, which will then be completely rigge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 09:33 AM
37

In order to answer this question I should talk about the Normalization of Male Virgin Shaming, Ableism against Autistic Men who are suggested to "cultivate social skills" (they cannot, being neurodivergent...), Heighteism and discrimination against Short Men, Pressure to Economically Provide and Protect and feeling the pressure as too high; Incel-Shaming as the new repackaged Bachelor Tax, Bachelorphobia, and prejudices against celibates/bachelors as "gay" and/or "criminal"; Incels have actually…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:04 PM
2

Just make him go to the doctor and fake a back pain condition. Once the doctor moves the back, he has to say that it hurts or moan (not too much in order not to appear as fake). Once the doctor certifies it, make the doctor write that he can not lift heavy weights for his health. So the only way to lift weights should be with forklifts.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 12:50 AM
1

Sexual satisfaction is not the same as orgasm. You can be sexually satisfied without orgasming and orgasming without the orgasm being satisfying.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 10:28 PM
2

Sexual satisfaction is not the same as orgasm. You can be sexually satisfied without orgasming and orgasming without the orgasm being satisfying.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 10:27 PM
1

Yes, sexual satisfaction is not the same as orgasm. You can be sexually satisfied without orgasming and orgasming without the orgasm being satisfying.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 10:27 PM
2

Moreover, the idea that men should make more oral sex to women in order to reduce the orgasm gap is against the consent. And oral sex to women is more likely to carry HPV than oral sex to men, therefore to push men to make more oral sex to women is to force sexual acts (lack of consent/sexual coercion) and risking men's lives (because HPV cause throat cancer more to men than to women, and straight men are more exposed to throat HPV infection due to oral sex than viceversa). In fact, no discussio…
/r/MensRights28/02/24 10:24 PM
2

It depends, because it means that if women stop maturing earlier, then men in the subsequient years continue to mature. So men mature more than women in later years, when maturity is more important.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/24 08:04 PM
2

So are they saying that if women mature before than men, then men continue to mature way after women stopped?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 10:56 PM
3

https://www.fighting4fair.com/uncategorized/the-invisible-male-victims-of-sex-traffickers/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 09:00 PM
5

See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/whN9B2zF7P Men are usually raped as much as women in normal stuff, but trafficked more than women, and mostly into forced labour (but less in sex). And for the general population rape, the amount of total rapes is not changed so much even if you add small populations like trafficked women, because you would have to add stuff like jouvenile facilities that rape mostly boys. Male teenagers are underreported as victims of trafficking, but they appear …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 08:57 PM
3

Menstrual Leave means a Gender Pay Gap against Men. Another thing is that you either have an Enthusiastic Consent or you have an Orgasm Gap. You cannot complain that men don't want to do stuff in bed and then say that people should do only things they are enthusiastic about in bed. Last but not least, women should accompany their boyfriend at home as much as men, otherwise this is done under the assumption that in case of street aggression the men should sacrifice for the women. So right now men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 08:39 PM
2

If somebody is uninformed and it's their job, it's negligence. It's WORSE, not better. Moreover, Academia is not so sexist as those politicians, in fact academia itself has the freedom to publish debunkings from Family Violence researchers against Feminist "Patriarchy Theory of DV". So to blame academia makes no sense. The only thing that is wrong is to answer with violence to injustice. Coming from Animal Rights Activism, one of the main principle even for radical groups like ALF is to never hu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/24 08:50 PM
3

I don't know if the amendment is appliable for the articles or the premise, and if it's for the articles if it's like in Spain where you still have the crime but if it's against a man the penalty is less, and in case of for example a man that acts in self defense, he is guilty for gender-based violence while the primary aggressor being a woman is receiving less penalty or even go away with this crime.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:01 PM
2

I don't know if the amendment is appliable for the articles or the premise, and if it's for the articles if it's like in Spain where you still have the crime but if it's against a man the penalty is less, and in case of for example a man that acts in self defense, he is guilty for gender-based violence while the primary aggressor being a woman is receiving less penalty or even go away with this crime.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:01 PM
1

As I said in other comments, for the enemy country at war, the military is military and civilians are civilians. Even civilians forced into the draft would still be considered military because it's not their responsibility to distinguish between civilians masked as military and military. Similarly as doing a robbery with a fake gun but believed to be real is equal to doing it with a real gun. But for the country that forces men into the draft, on the other hand, it should be equal to using civil…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:46 AM
1

Well, they should give them to the UN in the beginning of the conflict
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:57 AM
7

It is not a ban on killing conscripted civilians, but an obligation to consider them civilians. It should not be considered a war crime for the enemy country, which is unable to distinguish between civilians obliged to conscription and the willing militaries. It would, on the other hand, be a war crime for the country that forces these men into conscription, because it would be using civilians as human shields.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/24 10:57 AM
7

As I said in other comments, for the enemy country at war, the military is military and civilians are civilians. Even civilians forced into the draft would still be considered military because it's not their responsibility to distinguish between civilians masked as military and military. Similarly as doing a robbery with a fake gun but believed to be real is equal to doing it with a real gun. But for the country that forces men into the draft, on the other hand, it should be equal to using civil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/24 10:51 AM
2

Yes but still in the macro-category of civilian killings
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:49 AM
3

It's simple, the statistics would be like a table like this: Number of Civilians not Forced to the Draft -> X number Killed Number of Civilians Forced to the Draft -> X number Killed Total number -> X number Killed In this way it's possible to create a sub-group that still is inside the macro-category of Civilians killed. For example, in the UN report, they could add a specific paragraph called: "Killings of Civilians Forced to the Draft" And in it to specify that, while the number of Civilians …
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:49 AM
1

It's simple: calculate the number of those who were drafted and left for war, and compare it with the number of those who returned. The difference between those who left for the draft and those who returned is the amount of civilian deaths forced to become military by conscription.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:48 AM
13

Yeah sorry I'm Italian, English is not my first language
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/24 08:00 PM
9

Just say: "Can you please send me this in a written form? Thank you"
/r/MensRights12/01/24 07:47 AM
1

Hello to you :) Internalized Misandry, and Suffraggettes supported Women First. I quote from the New York Times: "SUFFRAGETTES DENY CHIVALRY ON TITANIC; "Women First" Is the Universal Rule, Says Sylvia Pankhurst, and This Is No Exception." https://www.nytimes.com/1912/04/21/archives/suffragettes-deny-chivalry-on-titanic-women-first-is-the-universal.html
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:41 PM
9

It's like false allegations. They say that "false allegations undermine real accusers' credibility", however there are two ways to fight false allegations: 1. To actually fight them 2. To allow and even encourage them, but to deny that they exist and/or even that they were false in the first place (saying, instead, that rapists went away with their crimes even after being aquitted). Similarly, there is the possibility to allow and encourage Women and Children First policies, and then to deny tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/24 01:41 PM
5

Mustard, I'm Italian and gay not Polish and tradcon ahahaha I think you refer to Breadfruit, which is not the OP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/24 09:18 AM
3

You know, "sacrificing" is also the term used by vivisectors while they kill dogs and rats after having poisoned and experimented on them. Maybe it's relevant this choice of words.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/24 09:16 AM
8

Mostly when women died more than men it was because either accidents (for example: women where mostly in areas in which the accident didn't allow to esc/exit or they died because the ceiling fell and killed the women before anybody could be saved and put in ships either men or women; so there was no way to help women in those situations) or because more men then women died but women were less of the passengers, so in total numbers more men than women died but feminists twist this on percentages …
/r/MensRights06/01/24 03:16 PM
5

I'm just talking about the statistical equivalence, ie to say "WCF was not done all the times so male disposability doesn't exist" is incorrect. Male disposability wouldn't exist in this regard only if MCF was said as many times as WCF.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 03:06 PM
2

"Women and Children First" was not always implemented, and it happened because prior to Titanic there were shipwrecks where woman survived less than men! The idea that Titanic was an exception or justified has been debunked: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/aWyRWj37jF
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/24 12:58 PM
1

Of course. It makes no sense and it's horrible. However, what I mean is that the idea to have citizens of X state to report to Y state is not possible under the international law. We need to find a way to make them take legal responsability that is allowed under the international law.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:21 AM
0

Gay and MRA and the thing that I see most is how men's issues are so much worse than dating issues, but sorry straight men complain about them more than male-only drafting, arrest bias and sentence disparity, lack of help and sensibilization for male victims of abuse (which could lead to death for killings and suicides), and "women and children first" policies, which are really deadly. I mean, I know dating s*cks, however I think Srebrenica is way worse and how to avoid it again should be the pr…
/r/MensRights05/01/24 10:25 AM
3

Men are not listened nor helped but by their family and friends. For friends, while most women have friendship around talking in front of a coffee, most men have friendship with talking while doing things and also men have more a group of friends which hang out together, both situations which don't allow men to speak and open up to their friends. Since most humans are straight, men are too, and being straight for men means having a girlfriend. So the only person to which is possible to speak and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 12:50 AM
1

The problem here is that Vatican is another State, so priests are citizens of another State. Even here in Italy, the Churches are not Italian. They are Vatican proprieties
/r/MensRights04/01/24 02:18 PM
4

I'm not from the US so I don't know if it's the same there. However, I think you are putting as priority the wrong thing. You need to screenshot everything and record all the bad rumors that people say about you. Then you need a lawyer to see if there is an allegation against you. Here it's 50€ to have an attorney to check it. Maybe in the US is more. If there is no allegation, then you can sue for defamation the bar official, using as evidence both the absence of allegations and the screenshots…
/r/MensRights04/01/24 01:52 PM
6

Thank you! Yes women were often incitators in blood feuds/vendettas between clans and families. See (it's in Spanish): https://hombresgeneroydebatecritico.wordpress.com/2015/05/09/la-incitadora-el-papel-de-la-mujer-en-la-guerra-y-las-deudas-de-sangre-i/ And even in honor killings women are involved in similar ways as co-authors of honor killings: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277539516300528 And, I quote: "As this study shows, women play a very active role in honor-base…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 10:06 PM
2

But women who kill them usually report and say that they were violent since they were born and so it was obviously necessary to kill those male killers /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 09:49 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 08:03 AM
1

"The research checked biases around seven indicators by asking whether or not men make better political leaders; women and men have the same rights; university is more important for men than women; men should have more rights to a job than women; men make better business executives; physical violence by a partner is ever justified; and, finally, whether or not women should be granted full reproductive rights." So, for riproductive rights it means that anti abortionists are as much women as men, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/24 04:11 PM
2

Well, in that case the difference between male on female facesitting vs pegging disappears, because it's simply using sex toys. But if the idea is to bring this with a temporary or stable partner, I think it's better something associated with empowerment (like facesitting, with or without a strapon/dildo) and not submission (like pegging). Not because pegging is inherently submissive, simply it's been associated for so long with submission while facesitting is associated for so long with empower…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 04:01 AM
21

Because there is the idea that sex is something done by the man for the woman. For example the lenght of time of the intercourse, "how long do you last?". It's not "how long you LIKE to last", because it's not about male pleasure, but how the intercourse has to be long enough to please the girl, not the guy. So the only good answer is "I last until I feel satisfied". We should talk about male sexual satisfaction, while we talk about sex, and not about other "measures", because to "measure" male …
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:37 AM
2

Also, it's really bad that anus stimulation is so associated with femdom. In fact, maybe a male empowering alternative could be male-on-female facesitting, before (and only, for who prefers it) as simply rimming, and (for those who want prostate stimulation) facesitting with a dildo/strap-on on the face of the woman facesat. In this case we could separate the anal stimulation from the femdom/female domination aspect which could be seen as an obstacle. I mean, it's more empowering for a guy to si…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:24 AM
3

Also rimming. I mean, male-on-female facesitting is a thing for men too: even if facesitting is seen as a female-only thing, it's not true. Similarly, nipple licking/sucking. Balls licking/sucking. Pleasure is all the body, not just a part. The simultaneous stimulation of many erogenous zones is a very good "all-body" pleasure really different than "only-genital" orgasms.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:10 AM
3

I think - as a gay man - that if I gave pleasure to a man that I really like I would be more satisfied than orgasming myself. So maybe having a "guy all the girls are fighting over" could be more satisfying than orgasming for many women. But this also means that orgasm, again, is not the right measure to measure sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:02 AM
8

There is a difference between orgasm and sexual satisfaction. It's true that women have less orgasm than men, but usually studies show that sexual satisfaction is the same or even better for women. Men, in fact, during the intercourse tend to have to care about women's pleasure, while the opposite is not true. To cum is a mechanical response in males, but it doesn't mean being sexually satisfied. There are good orgasms and bad orgasms. And there are good intercourse without orgasm and bad interc…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:01 PM
2

The problem is that there is a compelling evidence that injuries are underreported. I quote: "research shows that men under-report their injuries yet may suffer grave consequences" [Khurana, B., Hines, D. A., Johnson, B. A., Bates, E. A., Graham-Kevan, N., PhD,, & Loder, R. T. (2022). Injury patterns and associated demographics of intimate partner violence in men presenting to U.S. emergency departments. Aggressive behavior, 48(3), 298–308.] More often than not, doctors ask to women not to men i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 05:42 PM
4

Yes! I also want to add that the two other studies that show asymmetry (Fanslow et al., 2023; Cunningham & Anderson, 2023) ie paper 2 and paper 3, are based on lifetime and not on 12 months. "One-year prevalence “are considered to be more accurate [than lifetime rates] because they do not depend on recall of events long past”” [Bert H. Hoff. (2012). US National Survey: more men than women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 4 Iss: 3, pp.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 05:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter