TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArchVileRespawned Archive

View 10 posts and 1,191 comments by ArchVileRespawned on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
368

Edu./Occu.ArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:04 AM
59

Edu./Occu.ArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:35 PM
54

FeminismArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:44 AM
33

Activism/SupportArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:33 AM
33

ArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights10/12/16 02:42 PM
24

Edu./Occu.ArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:41 PM
11

FeminismArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:13 PM
7

Edu./Occu.ArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:37 PM
6

False AccusationArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights21/08/16 10:40 PM
1

FeminismArchVileRespawned/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:35 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,191 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This shit is so fucking dumb. Nearly 100% of men don't want to dress like that. Nearly 100% of women wouldn't find men dressing like that to be attractive. None of this is particularly important. This jackoff dressing like an idiot helps no one except the brands involved. What is with this obsession to get men to be feminine? It seems degrading to masculinity to me.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 03:46 AM
2

Social Autopsy
/r/MensRights17/11/20 03:31 AM
1

Democrats control the house.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 12:41 AM
1

Harris is going to probably be even worse. She is only in politics because of being Willie Brown's mistress.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:00 AM
2

Yep. He was one of the main advocates.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 02:58 AM
1

blah blah blah Bitches can't even open a jar of mayonnaise.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:17 AM
1

Why are they suddenly making a sequel or remake or whatever to a nearly 25 year old movie?
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:09 AM
–

I think this thread is being brigaded. This sub usually has a mix of conservatives and liberals, and the liberals usually aren't the "I hope those who disagree with me suffer and die!" types that are all over this thread.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 11:08 PM
2

Investigations determined that Russia made some shitposts on Facebook. So, are you angry?
/r/MensRights13/11/20 11:07 PM
2

People are against delusional asshats with conspiracy theories that aim to invalidate the elections in our great nation. you must have been really angry about Russiagate bullshit, then.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:49 PM
1

The actual left got basically fuck all concessions from Biden. He promises to be a corporate Democrat. He campaigned on how "not Bernie" he is and not supporting M4A while Bernie was holding impotent rallies to support Biden. The whole display was pathetic. The only concessions they will get will be on minor environmental issues that amount to a wet fart in a hurricane. You might see more subsidized solar panels! The most drastic thing I could see him doing is imposing some austerity on the foss…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:35 PM
–

Despite being right-wing, I'm actually not all that familiar with him, really. I never took up listening to the radio. I think he coined the term "feminazi" so points for that.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:12 PM
10

SJWs are the system you fucking idiot. All the corporations support woke bullshit like BLMA, feminism, LGBT pride, etc. all day. Even the guy who has Dick Cheney's old job at Haliburton is sending memos to his employees telling them to read Kendi. GTFO with your LARPing as oppressed.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 11:43 PM
2

What is even the basis for this settlement? He was already famous and successful before he met her.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 05:05 AM
2

Flailing Away From Me? Make Me Rad? Here to Sleigh (great for the Christmas Spirit)?
/r/MensRights22/10/20 05:18 AM
1

Everyone knows alcohol is a performance enhancing drug.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:40 AM
1

Korin? Did you mean Korn?
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:35 AM
17

Police are useful. The UN is not.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 03:24 AM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if this were total bullshit anyway.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:57 PM
1

The chemical Alex Jones was complaining about was just lemon juice.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:56 PM
1

Body positivity was always a farce meant to distract from how unhealthy our diets are in the Western world so we don't get crazy ideas like "stop eating processed garbage and fast food." It was never about immutable things like height.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 08:24 PM
8

Men jerk off to them. Women buy the products.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 04:42 PM
4

I tried to appeal to the decent person inside of him by adding that he's a good person deep down who was out of line at that moment. His response was less than stellar. He argued it was just a game and that if the woman who was harassed (he put harassed in quotes) really cared she would have said something instead of me saying something. I don't get why he didn't just tell his friend that the woman was uncomfortable about it.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 04:02 AM
1

Never forget Biden was a big proponent of the dear colleague letter.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:07 PM
1

$600M would be enough for a small Island.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 01:54 AM
2

Black women vote nearly 100% Democrat so they must love garbage like this.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 03:42 PM
8

You would need a joint to listen to it and crack to be high enough to believe it.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 02:41 AM
94

Women don’t want to be in our spaces either. They want to turn our spaces into theirs.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 10:01 PM
1

It’s the dominant feminism for sure, but it’s not all of them.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 02:08 AM
2

Radical feminists believe in patriarchy. That’s it.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 08:20 PM
2

Why is the main problem with TERFs? This author is not a TERF. She is just a radical feminist.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:14 PM
10

Yes. You can bet your ass they will be the first people to tell you to go fuck yourself if your issues go against the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 02:47 PM
5

Any government worth its salt would have barred feminists from serving in government positions.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 11:41 PM
1

She was going only in the first two, not the third.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 03:20 AM
2

They want to hurt you.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:29 AM
0

I’ve come to the conclusion that we’re stuck with them. Women don’t want to have our burdens, and we’re in no position to change that. Even worse, I don’t think women can hold up to them as well as we do, even though they take their toll on us.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 03:24 AM
6

The best part is when they pretend they are trying to help after all the bullshit they pulled. The Dear Colleague Letter is a great example. As if we don't have enough problems, these assholes decide to create more by unrepetently violating male rights - as ruled in various courts of law - and then tried to attack and smear critics of their dreadful policies as "rape apologists." They put their boots on our throats and only pressed harder when we asked them to stop. Now they act like they're ext…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:04 AM
4

Feminism is an obstacle men face.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:39 AM
0

You literally started insults from your first reply: "Progressives hate men so therefore I'm going to hate Mexicans and buy lots of guns and roll coal on Priuses" is kind of just silly.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 12:18 AM
1

Well which is it? Immigrants or automation? Make up your mind. Why on earth would anyone say something so stupid? Both of these will have a negative effect on wages, one by increasing the labor supply, the other by reducing the number of jobs. Are you even smart enough to figure out which is which, or do I have to spell that out for you, too? I mean are you saying having more open immigration will help women or something? Is automation a liberal plot in your mind or something? Like automation is…
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:54 PM
0

Immigration is not a right Mr. “what does this have to do with men’s rights?” Why do you want to flood the country with immigrants when there is a looming, potentially massive, automation-induced job shortage?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:55 PM
0

If that has nothing to do with men’s rights then this whole discussion has nothing to do with men’s rights. You are really evasive about discussing the horrendous consequences progressive policies will actually have on men. I should have known better than to waste my time talking to you.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:26 PM
1

is not an economic policy You said "socioeconomic" in the comment that I originally replied to, not that it matters anyway. This just looks like an excuse to avoid discussing the harmful materialist consequences that would (and are) befalling men as a result of progressive policies. Not a men's rights issue, unless you think there aren't any male immigrants. What? Do you have absolutely zero understanding of the nature of the potential economic upending that automation is predicated to bring? Ar…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 11:18 PM
1

I did acknowledge that, but that wasn't the point. Not really. You talked about problems with progressives' tone, not their policies. You can dislike identity politics without disliking the economic and other policies. The economics of kicking men out of jobs and education to replace them with female affirmative action hires are bad for men. "Progressives hate men so therefore I'm going to hate Mexicans and buy lots of guns and roll coal on Priuses" is kind of just silly. None of this wealth dis…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 09:48 PM
1

You can’t always do that. I usually skip through them, true, but that’s because I don’t call customer support unless I have a weird problem. Customer support is already heavily reduced by things like FAQs and the automated portions handling common issues. My cable company now allows resets without talking to a person now, for example.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:58 PM
1

In order for white men to be in charge of anything, they have to have a certain level of approval from women and even non-whites. There is no way an unapologetic advocate of white or male (let alone white male) interest, particularly when it clashes with others, will get any serious power in any Western country today.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:23 AM
1

I can't remember the last time I called a customer service line that wasn't answered by a robot.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:59 AM
20

Well, progressive policies like kicking men out of all the safe, well paying jobs to replace them with women undermine it, just a tad.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:43 AM
7

Feminists will acknowledge women can harm women (see "internalized misogyny"). They won't acknowledge that women or feminism could be a root cause of harming men.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:59 PM
10

It's worse than just the subreddits. It's part of wider movement of feminism trying to dominate conversations about male gender issues. The rise of the MRM made it obvious that male gender issues were going to become increasingly visible, and they weren't going to be able to outright shut everything down so they want to control the conversation rather than stop it.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:58 PM
13

Fuck off Polanski. You actually did your shit. Creeps like you provided ammo for MeToo. GTFO.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 01:44 AM
2

40%? Those are rookie numbers. We gotta drag those numbers down.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:35 PM
1

To be fair, the body positivity movement for women is an embarrassing disgrace.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 08:25 PM
1

It's 4chan.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:04 PM
1

It’s impossible for blind anything to make any bias worse. You cannot bias yourself based on things you do not know.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:35 PM
1

If the ERA wouldn't pass without it, so be it. It won't pass. It won't so it might as well not be optional. Some feminists might not be for it without that rider, but there are plenty of people who actually want equality. "Some feminists" ? There is no way the feminism-industrial complex - which John Oliver is part of - is going to support an ERA if they can't keep female privileges. I wouldn't support ERA unless every feminism-aligned media personality, organization, academic, politician etc. w…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:21 PM
2

The Hayden Rider is not optional because there is no way feminists would allow ERA without it. Getting men to support ERA is a big scam. Feminists will just lie about the Hayden Rider, get the support from men needed to promote ERA, then shove the rider back in at the last minute. How many times are we going to let Lucy pull the football on us before we learn our lesson?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:24 PM
2

been corrupted by the small 10 percent What is your circle of feminists doing to combat this 10 percent? For that matter, what are the other 90% of feminists doing? 90% of feminists is a large number of people. Where were they when shit like this happened?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 05:16 PM
5

There's a reason feminists want this all to be about "toxic masculinity." They don't want anyone peeling back the curtain on their "progress" and holding them accountable for what they've done.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 02:22 AM
5

That’s due to technology which is still going to be here as the third world floods in.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 02:54 PM
15

No, it’s not good for them either. Societies without feminism will continue to breed. Those places tend to give fewer fucks about the environment.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 02:14 PM
0

Feminists would rather us die than allow us to have our own movement.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 05:40 AM
1

Fake and gay
/r/MensRights01/08/19 05:28 AM
3

Looks like trolling to me
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:34 PM
89

I love that the kid is wearing a NASA shirt. It suggests he has a futurist mindset and interest in sciences. So what do we do with a boy like that? Should we help guide his education in math and sciences to maximize his potential? Nah. We have too many males in STEM already. Let’s make him look at naked, morbidly obese, political lesbian perverts instead.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:21 PM
1

The clip is old. It might have been true at the time. Last I heard, she was in WWE for a while anyway.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:52 AM
3

Feminists (at least the vast majority of them) don't hate men. Yet none of you do a damn thing to stop those that do. Power is what matters, and feminists wield theirs against men. And what do the supposed masses of male-sympathetic do? Diddly fuck all, until your movement comes under fire. And no, nobody supports false accusers NOW gave awards to Emma Sulkowitz as an example. Who supported Jackie Coakley to the bitter end? Fucking Santa Clause? Whose ridiculous world view (rape culture hysteria…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 01:23 AM
6

Picking fights with other groups of people because you feel persecuted is toxic as fuck Said in defense of fucking feminism
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:51 AM
2

No, you fucking don't. You support declaring your hatred of us and do so in one of the country's largest newspapers for everyone to see. That's not what people who care about men's emotions would do. You support obvious false accusers. You are anti-due process. You support female supremacy and male disposability. You support Duluth. You're just here to do damage control for your megalomaniacal hate movement. Feminists like you are a dime-a-dozen.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:48 AM
9

Feminists only want men expressing feminism approvedTM emotions. Tell me something I don't know.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:32 AM
1

No, I’m talking about the Dear Colleague Letter.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:29 PM
1

He defended DLC and the wage gap.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 06:13 PM
2

Yes, we’re talking about wha we think he would do because that’s all that matters.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:52 PM
2

The policies he wants are less important than the policies he is likely to implement. He will continue to fold and do what they want.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:22 PM
2

Reject their complaints and mock them for having made them.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 11:55 AM
2

Folding isn’t going to get them off his back. It will make them worse. These people don’t just go away.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 11:53 AM
2

Despite seemingly making them play by their own rules, I think this subtly cedes ground to feminists. You are giving them ammo for their body image complaints that they will then use to censor things that are mostly enjoyed by men.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:37 PM
4

Bernie folds like a cheap suit whenever the crazies pressure him. See his confrontation with the BLM activists.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 09:32 PM
0

Trump is not alt-right.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:31 PM
2

The fact remains that, in general, speaking of the big picture, violence against women is far more normalized by a toxic sense of entitlement. This you can argue however you want, believe that men are marginalized or victimized and forgotten because society is suddenly only concerned about the wellbeing of women. Fine. Hard to change your opinion. Violence against men has been more prevalent. Not too long ago it was regarded as personal business if a married man beat his wife. Not too long ago t…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 12:05 AM
1

Yep. And after all feminism's critiques and examinations of the systems of "patriarchy" and the collective guilt they lay at men's feet, when one of their own does something like this, they suddenly become radical individualists. "It's just one person the I disagree with," they say. What happened to systems" Why aren't they examining why their movement is producing such horrendous people?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 10:52 PM
3

Claiming that we need to address a "white problem" isn't fundamentally different than claiming we need to address a "jew problem". They know. That's the point.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:23 AM
2

Plans to fix non-existent problems usually are unworkable.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:20 AM
1

Feminists' obsession over men expressing emotion is just a Trojan horse to make men's issues about women. When you go down the rabbit hole enough, you will find that they believe men are forced into stoicism due to hatred of the feminine (misogyny). Thus, the solution for men's problems is to fight misogyny. As the Church Lady used to say, "how convenient."
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:52 PM
1

Aborted babies are disproportionately black. Limiting abortions will boost black birth rates more than white ones.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:12 PM
4

That's a feature, not a bug.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:44 PM
1

That’s not doing to make the end results of her policies any less damaging.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:11 PM
5

Flood it with accusations against feminist professors.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 10:23 PM
1

They get the same accusations by leaving them up so fuck off with that. You see anti-male hate so you’re going to defend it no matter what. That’s what you always do.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 11:48 AM
2

They won’t even remove those particular tweets.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:39 PM
1

How many readers does the NYT get?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:37 PM
1

Because they too are rotten, horrible people just like her
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:35 PM
1

Straw balloon
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:35 PM
8

In fact I think that most of the gender issues that we as guys have to deal with are self inflicted (for example guys making fun of male victims of domestic abuse Feminists put the victims in jail with their Dulluth model so fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:32 PM
5

We really should stop funding these assholes.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 05:15 AM
3

Incel propaganda isn't particularly spread. You practically have to seek it out to find it unless you are reading something critical of it. What these people need are a guiding hand to show them that they have value to the world. I agree. I don't see them getting one anytime soon with masculinity and male spaces constantly under siege now.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 06:49 PM
3

Why did "mental illness" suddenly rise sharply among young men?
/r/MensRights06/04/19 08:01 AM
2

Biden is a legitimate topic for this sub, but there are some low quality posts about him.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:41 AM
3

Anything is better than being a self-loathing dweeb who defends an ideology whose goal it is to promote hatred of you and subjugate you.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:38 AM
7

These are the intellectuals in charge of gender studies. Have fun being a self-loathing, pathetic dweeb.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:12 AM
2

Wondering that is sexist according to Joe. That's a shame.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 08:32 PM
3

Eat shit Joe.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:50 PM
13

Japan’s suicide rate suggests gun control is not the answer .
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:03 PM
2

Yeah, it's almost as if childcare isn't and has never been free. To be fair, u/antilopes is a man-hating retard so you shouldn't be surprised that his "solution" actually hurts men.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 11:29 PM
6

Fun fact: women in New Zealand are a net burden on taxes while men in New Zealand are net payers. Too bad the government doesn’t represent the people who fund it.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:48 PM
1

Why are dumb feminists so obsessed with comparing abortion to viagra?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:32 AM
1

Game journalists aren't people.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:19 PM
3

This has to be a troll.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 09:36 PM
2

"worse"
/r/MensRights05/03/19 09:34 PM
2

Anyone who says this isn't attacking men should not be taken seriously as a debater. They should be taken seriously as a threat, however.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:14 PM
3

It's because feminists believe that domestic violence is a method for men to enforce patriarchal dominance over women. Feminists never should have been allowed any influence over the legal system. If you want any chance of fairness, you will have to expel them.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:50 PM
20

It's not gate if it's a feminine penis.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:25 AM
3

This meme has reached levels of boomerism previously thought to be impossible.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:53 AM
4

What a surprise. Our resident man-hating garbage human wants us to stay under the thumb of feminist censorship.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:14 PM
4

Support who you wish but: Women receive less pay for the same work as men do That'll be a no for me. To be fair, there are also massive issues that I have with his platform that aren't related to men's rights issues so I won't get into them here.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 02:02 AM
1

Indeed, if you want children, that demands sacrificing. And men also want children. So it is fair to consider both partner's life goals if both want children. Men make sacrifices. Children cost a shitload of money. In my case, I do not want children but my partner may perhaps want them. I may be convinced to do the childbirth, but since I am not the one wanting children, I could not be convinced to then also take on the childcare role just because of some notion that "couples are happier in trad…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:56 AM
1

You can't always get what you want, and you can't get everything you want. If you want children, that demands sacrificing. I don't really care if women want to perform the traditionally male gender role of being the provider. My own mother and father did it this way. However, I get tired of the endless cries for accommodation that will place even more burden onto men.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 10:43 PM
2

Now Brie Larson's statements have been met with widespread bad publicity fostered by rival studios. What did rival studios says? I haven't seen that yet.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 09:55 PM
1

It's not what I think. It's what most people are saying. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/20/americans-see-men-as-the-financial-providers-even-as-womens-contributions-grow/
/r/MensRights24/02/19 09:54 PM
1

Yes, it is true that me saying 'we women have to ask our partners more to take care of the children' is not a simple solution in practice, and also I did not mean to imply that men would be unwilling to do that. A solution to what problem? Both men and women prefer men to be the primary income earners.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 09:40 PM
1

He used to write for Feminist Frequency. It looks like he was the brains of the operation because he is doing better than they are since he left.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:14 AM
5

Good. Burn their shit to the ground and salt the earth.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:17 AM
4

Jokes on you! Concern trolls aren't guys because concern trolls aren't people.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:05 AM
5

People who hate men hate MRAs. Shocking news!
/r/MensRights08/02/19 01:01 AM
1

lesser of two evils
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:04 AM
1

He'll just come back to life and kill your children in their dreams. That's how it works.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 10:27 PM
5

Well, I guess the good news is that the postal service is already immune to complaints.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 10:18 PM
1

I'm just a sane person who doesn't really care what they write and think it's more on us to not be misogynist idiots while we fight for our rights. Yet you have spent several posts defending their BS. You know, because I'm an adult, and this isn't a zero sum game. It is zero sum in many places. For example, you can't "believe women" and have fair processes for adjudicating rape and sexual assault allegations. You did say that. Here is what I said: You aren’t going to get off the SPLC’s radar if …
/r/MensRights03/02/19 10:17 PM
1

I never said feminism pushes circumcision. The SPLC will accuse us of anti-semitism for opposing it eventually. Similar organizations have called circumcision bans anti-semitic before. What's funny is I finally dug up that SPLC article and it says the same thing we are arguing about - that they noticed extremists inside the ranks, and that's the concern. I'm not one so this doesn't bother me. Why does it bother you? There are extremists in every movement. The SPLC only pretends to care about ext…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:04 PM
1

You aren’t going to get off the SPLC’s radar if you oppose circumcision or anything feminists are doing.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 05:34 PM
1

"Maybe if we lick the boots of feminists and the SPLC they'll be nice to us." -Zoenboen
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:48 AM
2

Somehow that quote did not set off my alarms in anywhere near the same way the APA hitpiece did. That's a sign that they got better at propaganda.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:38 AM
4

Your welcome! I didn't know this for a long time either. Feminists don't usually talk about it this way outside of their own spaces. I learned about this from talking to them on FeMRADebates, reading some of their literature, and reading MensLib. They are more comfortable talking about in MensLib because they know their readers have bought into the phony sympathy feminism offers. Even there, they pick their spots to work this angle. They know how bad it can sound. It's like Scientology. They don…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:42 AM
9

You overlooked one of the worst parts of "toxic masculinity." Feminists think it's rooted in misogyny. In other words, men would rather kill themselves than "cry like a girl" because being a girl is the lowest thing you can be. All those men killed themselves because they just hate women so damn much. That's what they believe. An astute observer my notice that, if men's issues are in reality caused by misogyny, then all we have to do to fix them is to fight against misogyny. Feminism's answer to…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:31 AM
1

Yep. The "alternative masculinity" feminists celebrate is being pedo-bait. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:49 PM
9

11 year old drag queens who do stripteases for adults are celebrated so there's that!
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:44 AM
217

And feminists dominate colleges. Pulling it into that arena allows them to torture male students without any accountability. It's homefield advantage.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:30 AM
4

It's almost as if an actual masculine man has a more empathetic view of masculinity than man-hating political lesbians.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 11:09 PM
1

You say this like misidentifying the Patriarchy as the cause of problems is some minor hurdle. It's not. Blaming the patriarchy is blaming men. You're arguing that men have problems. Feminists believe men are problems, and that they are the only ones who can solve us. And do you really believe feminists give a shit about men's feelings? If they did, they wouldn't call for us to be hated. There is no common ground.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:30 AM
1

Did you even read what I said? Feminists think all of that stems from misogyny. You didn’t address that point.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:53 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ag6x8d/lack_of_masculinity_is_the_problem_with_todays/ee5f0ba/
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:57 AM
3

https://i.imgur.com/k2aMdxb.jpg
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:50 AM
1

You have only a basic level understanding of toxic masculinity. Do you know why feminists believe men do not express their feelings? Feminists believe men do this purely because we don't want to be thought of as feminine, and they believe we don't want be thought of as feminine because we hate women. I'm sorry your grandfather killed himself, but do you really believe telling him, "grandpa I want to help you deal with these issues you are going through. Have you considered that the source of all…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:41 AM
2

A wall will be here after Trump leaves office. Your solution would be stopped as soon he leaves if not before.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:13 AM
2

Oh no! feminists will disapprove of us! We've never experienced that before!
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:19 AM
1

It’s not me.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:11 PM
6

Feminists censor everything. They don't want to be questioned.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:05 AM
3

For instance the idea that ur somehow lesser or a beta if your not going to risk throwing your life away fighting another man. This video is promoting that kind of self-sacrifice. It's message is "man up and stand up to to other men to protect the women and children."
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:02 AM
-1

The only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:00 AM
2

That’s an interesting and possibly helpful alternative. Too bad it will never be popular.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:37 AM
3

Well, too bad because the APA bows to man-hating radical feminists who think male dominance hierarchy therefore men are the root of all evil so some feminazi bitch telling suicidal men that they are toxic and the problem is what you're going to get out of these guidelines. People who hate men should not have a say in men's mental health.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:09 AM
4

I'm sure telling suicidal men to check their male privilege is going to help. If you want men to seek help, perhaps stop putting people who hate them in charge of things.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:53 PM
2

Shavers are over. Shavers don't need to be your audience anymore.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:49 PM
-5

How fucking stupid do you have to be to think portraying men as protectors of women and children is challenging gender roles? That’s not even a rhetorical question. I actually would like you to explain where your extreme level of retardation originates. Did you eat paint chips as a child? Head injury? Too many drugs?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:39 PM
2

So would we be better off creating programs to keep them out of jail and give them a better chance getting into college? The best programs to keep males out of jail are legal systems that are fair, just, and have a high burden of proof and stable families. Advocating for either of those is going to make you an enemy of feminists. They want a legal system that "believes women" and lionize single motherhood. Quotas help create the atmosphere of equality in the short term but in the long term we ac…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 05:09 AM
8

They shouldn’t, but they do. I’ve long had a scorched earth mentality on stuff like this, as in “attack the credibility of the institutions until they reform or are completely destroyed.”
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:18 PM
1

It has more to do with the time frame than choosing the graduation rate as the statistic. I wasn’t alive during this time frame that I would have allegedly been privileged, and I’ve been out of college almost eight years. The current and future crops of students are even further removed.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:14 PM
3

Women have been a majority of college graduates since before I was born. Anyone who sees it that way is just wrong.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:45 PM
3

I don't get your point. Having more gender-exclusive scholarships for your gender isn't a perceived advantage. It's a real advantage.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:37 PM
1

Keep in mind that feminist push this garbage. Their always talking about how harmful traditional masculinity is, but they consider 10 year old burlesque stripping for pedos to be ideal masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:20 PM
1

If he wanted to suck a dick or go muff diving, would it be OK to let him do that?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:19 PM
4

As someone with a libertarian mindset I understand your point perfectly, but you have to understand, your thought process is never going to apply to women. Everyone is happy to play the phony ancap and let private institutions benefit women, but men will not be extended this same freedom. Things that benefit us will continue to be eradicated, what little remain. All that's going to happen is that you will put men at a massive disadvantage.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:15 PM
28

What's so sickening is that this garbage is going to be used to "treat" men. It's not going to do anything other than harm male mental health and increase suicides. When men continue to have little faith in the institution that is actively killing them, this will also be played up as "toxic masculinity is making men not seek help." No, men are not seeking help because the only people offering it are malicious. Feminism is fatal for men. We need to rally and defend ourselves from this attempted m…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:07 PM
1

We wouldn't even have huts.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:04 AM
9

They hate white people.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:04 PM
5

From the same author: https://www.bolde.com/contracted-genital-warts-im-not-ashamed/
/r/MensRights06/01/19 03:07 AM
179

You can't escape the shrimpy, limp-wristed arm of the law.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 02:58 AM
0

All they have to do to Sanders is accuse him of sexism or racism, and he will shit his pants then go in the corner and start weeping. He isn't going to lead shit.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:21 AM
2

You will face social consequences for abusing this, even if it's legal. "Women in X" type programs are also run by feminists. They will try to find a way to get men using this out of there, like making false allegations of sexual misconduct, rape, harassment, etc.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:36 AM
4

because at every possible moment they will very quickly bring up how women (mothers) are oppressed by the assumption they are primary caregivers Yet they milked their role as caregivers in order to get custody. Custody used to be tied to the provider role (which was and still is almost always the father). It was the Tender Years doctrine that changed that.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:33 PM
2

Where would someone even go to learn to become a "real man" today? Thanks to feminism, almost every institution, system, or space imaginable is overwhelmingly concerned with pandering to entitled women.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:35 AM
1

Don't stick your dick in crazy. Focus on your career while you are young in order to advance and increase your income, but don't get over obsessive and end up with a shitty work/life balance.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:22 AM
1

MeToo has been blowing up in their faces, though. I don't even see it as having much to do with Trump. Jackie Coakley was getting her made up bullshit uncritically published in Rolling Stone years before the election. Feminists have been clamoring to play up the rape culture bullshit for years and would have just found another example eventually.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:13 AM
1

"Toxic masculinity" is a controversial phrase even in MensLib. Why would promotes it's usage when feminists aren't even entirely settled on using it themselves? I also don't think you understand the insidious nature of "toxic masculinity" as used by feminists. It's used to frame men's issues as women's issues thereby refocusing gender equality as being all about helping women and combating misogyny. If you think we can cede control of the lexicon on gender to feminists yet somehow still have a s…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:00 AM
0

The rise of Trump has been a push back against a lot of that neocon garbage. The Bill Kristol types absolutely hate him for that.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 07:55 PM
2

Why is the male suicide rate so high? Gee, I don't know.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 01:24 AM
3

Women being attracted to men who commit all sorts of negative, destructive, violent, and anti-social acts is a men's rights issue, IMO. We are constantly told - especially by feminists - to be these "good men" who are allies and make a big fuss at the slightest hint of a man even making a women slightly uncomfortable, yet women are getting wet for this fucking guy. I think this is a bit of an extreme example, but still, this constant bullshit of being told to behave one way and seeing the opposi…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:14 AM
4

And it's label other feminists are mostly comfortable with gender studies nut jobs using.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:31 PM
3

most women identify as feminists Where did you get this idea?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:28 PM
5

Victor Orban goes after the free press, free courts, the opposition inside and outside of the parliament Are you sure he's not just a feminist?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:23 PM
10

No, they specifically went after gender studies. We need more of that. Gender studies isn't harmful because it's useless. It's harmful because it is a major cog in the anti-male hate machine. It exists to promote hatred and disenfranchisement of males. As such, it deserves to be abolished. Crybullies will piss and moan about "muh academic freedom" when presented with this idea, but don't fall for their bullshit. They don't believe in academic freedom for anyone who disagrees with them.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:20 PM
1

I’ve said it before: kick feminists out of everything
/r/MensRights23/12/18 12:00 AM
6

But much wage gap!
/r/MensRights22/12/18 11:48 PM
3

Reminder: Women get a net game from taxes in New Zealand.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 12:23 AM
1

I can read it.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:34 AM
2

Poor communication skills will limit your earning potential, just a piece of advice.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:08 AM
1

Yep. It was ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:00 AM
1

Foster just got signed by the Redskins. The Monday Night Football crew spent a good 10 minutes virtue signaling about how bad it is that he's still playing.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:56 AM
3

It’s my impression that these kinds of assaults are not considered sex crimes most of the time either so the women who commit them don’t have to register.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:29 PM
2

They're certainly doing a great job.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:37 AM
2

Is BBC funding notably controversial in the UK? If not, it should be.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:33 AM
1

Anarcho-tyranny
/r/MensRights24/11/18 06:25 PM
3

Feminism is a supremacist movement. It's undeniable.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 06:24 PM
1

Do you have sources for these numbers?
/r/MensRights24/11/18 04:22 AM
3

That'll do it.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 04:15 AM
2

We let feminists gain the power to define it and impose their view on us, big mistake.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 04:11 AM
3

It's almost as if they are lying their asses off.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:41 PM
0

It's a good thing there are no germs in piss, shit, and blood then!
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:31 PM
19

Not the person you asked, but I've heard horror stories from women. I think part of it is the sheer volume of usage the toilets get. Urinals in men's rooms allow the toilets to get a fraction of the use, and toilets are what's going to really become a mess.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:20 PM
26

Accuse them of transphobia and oppressing men with vaginas.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:17 PM
2

Yes...loosen
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:54 PM
61

They didn't make a movie about that one, did they?
/r/MGTOW23/11/18 04:17 AM
1

I absolutely agree. I'm just saying it's good to know these things. If no one ever read it, we wouldn't know.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 08:59 AM
17

The hair dye is seeping into the brain.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:40 AM
1

What are you even talking about? Hamil is saying men are incompetent. I guess pretending his words mean something completely different than what they say is the only way you can defend them so of course that's what you are going to do. /u/antilopes and defending misandry - name a more iconic duo.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:37 AM
2

There it is. Yeah, feminists want men expressing our emotions and talking about our feelings alright, so you can use them against us just like you are doing now.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:10 AM
2

The biggest problem I have with feminism is that it betrayed us. Feminists had to bargain with men to gain power. When that was happening, feminism's definition of equality was to treat men and women equally. Once feminists gained power, they stopped using that definition. Equality now means only ever doing things to benefit women, stepping on any men who might get in the way. In reality, feminism pursues wanton female supremacy. Men never agreed to that, but they don't need us to anymore. That'…
/r/MensRights22/11/18 04:05 AM
1

Like others have said, you aren't trying to convince them. You are trying to convince an audience. Them replying to you doesn't mean they are "winning" or something.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:55 AM
2

I actually read menslib quite a bit. I don't post because I was "shadow banned" from there from the get go (my first two comments were automatically hidden). Did you read what they said about Kavanaugh? Overwhelmingly, they used his anger and tears against him as "evidence" of either his guilt or that he was unfit to be a judge.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:48 AM
1

It actually isn't a bad idea to see what your enemies are up to from time to time.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:45 AM
1

Another reminder that anyone advocating for more diversity is likely your enemy. Their goal is to kick you out of everything they can.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:10 PM
7

I haven't seen the CNN piece, but it's probably biased garbage since it's CNN.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 07:18 AM
6

Feminism causes men's problems, not patriarchy. Look at this pathetic dweeb saying he wouldn't run for office because he wouldn't want to take a women's "spot." There's nothing mentally healthy about that. It stems from a lack of self worth and esteem. Now where do ideas like that come from? Not, patriarchy. Feminism has also colonized and destroyed male dominated spaces. Men are almost constantly under the thumb of feminist women's standards, and we have very little room to be ourselves. You as…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 06:02 PM
5

Who is it referring to?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 05:52 PM
1

I believe you, but it's not my job to rescue Northeastern US liberal women from their own stupidity.
/r/MGTOW16/11/18 04:40 AM
2

I doubt many people here are going to watch 80+ of what sounds like feminist propaganda garbage just to comment on it.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:59 PM
3

No one ever expects the Finnish inquisition.
/r/MGTOW15/11/18 11:20 PM
1

Chad Ford vs. Virgin Hamil
/r/MensRights15/11/18 12:02 AM
3

I'd want to be edited out of them after TLJ.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:58 PM
1

Putting women in charge of Star Wars worked so well, right Mark?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:35 PM
3

They were deceived by a lie: that feminism was about equality.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:34 PM
9

Feminists unironically believe this, but I think this is a troll account.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:46 PM
34

Unfortunately, I doubt anyone will care. Men naively let feminists ascend to power, and this is exactly what the feminists have always wanted. Men need to wake up. Feminists are an existential threat. They want to rob you of every penny to your name and disenfranchise you.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:40 PM
2

Once again, feminists need to get kicked out of everything. She was speaking not long after the publication of the first mandatory reports by UK companies on gender pay gaps and they revealed that JWT UK had the biggest gap in advertising, at 44.7% in favour of men. This is exactly the crap feminists were hoping to pull with their fake wage gap. Do you think they went through all the trouble to make that crap up just so they can whine on social media? No, they were always after your job and live…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 03:10 AM
3

u/antilopes hates white men so of course he defends this. He's a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 03:01 AM
1

I know. Those are exactly the parts of traditionalism that feminists want to keep.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:29 AM
1

Tradtionalism is better than what feminists have come up with, which is basically all the ways traditionalism benefits women and none of the ways it benefits men.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:24 AM
1

That's a big nope on the Green Party. Feminism And Gender Equity We have inherited a social system based on male domination of politics and economics. We call for the replacement of the cultural ethics of domination and control with cooperative ways of interacting that respect differences of opinion and gender.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:23 AM
4

Meme magic is real.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:41 AM
12

I think you are over reacting. Rockstar's games are known for edginess and gross out humor. I don't see how that's normalizing sexual assault anymore than the ability to punch out, murder, and otherwise abuse a vocal suffragette is normalizing violence against women.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 01:09 AM
3

It's true that there is discussion. May favorite discussion on MensLib right now is the one about whether men should be given the death penalty or life in prison if they are misogynists and make women uncomfortable. Quality stuff.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:32 PM
2

You won't. All gender problems being downstream from misogyny is a core tenet of the radical feminism they believe in. I wonder how many of their posters even realize what their overlords actually believe.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:22 PM
2

There are a few reasonable and well-meaning people there. The mods are total cancer and are what makes the sub an ass cancer as a whole. If you read the sub a lot, you will see the mods occasionally make these authoritarian posts about cracking down on disagreement (though phrased in ways that aren't as direct) or ensuring the discussion doesn't stray from a feminist framework.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:20 PM
20

I fucking hate these articles so fucking much. Just once, I'd like to see one of these articles acknowledge the possibility that maybe, just maybe promoting preferences for women to the greatest extent possible in the largest number of places as possible is making it harder for men to find jobs. I know they won't though. Too many men might realize who their enemies are.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:02 PM
1

Got em
/r/MensRights05/11/18 04:32 AM
3

I agree the posts you are talking about are too paranoid and hyperbolic. I think a lot of the problem is that men are so helpless against all of this so we lose perspective about the likelihood of getting singled out, which is quite low. If it does happen to you, there is no institutional support for you to clear your name so people go overboard with the paranoia. Having said all of that, I don't see how that's what this post or the other one is talking about.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 02:52 AM
3

Again, it's not all criticism. Did you even read my reply that I was referring you to? "It's not "anybody." It's you. It's you because, as usual you don't have much of a history posting here, haven't provided any evidence of the posts you don't like, and have immediate attacked and denigrated anyone disagreeing with you." If this sub actually wants to be taken seriously Taken seriously by whom?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 01:30 AM
7

Yeah, this is a good issue that doesn't get mentioned often. The extent of consequences people are willing to inflict upon men for the non-violent, non-criminal transgression of adultery is disgusting.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:58 AM
1

It's been several hours, and you have provided nothing, no evidence.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:52 AM
0

execute damage_control.exe
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:46 AM
4

Is this a place of ignorance now? no there are still sane people here You seem to just have your panties in a bunch because your post only has 52 upvotes Maybe if your post wasn't crap to begin with it wouldn't be falling to the wayside, while tolerance rises above your bullshit. The fact that any mens rights "activists" claim to want change but are okay with being insufferable You just want to sit around with the other men whining about women to each other Even in this post you've said: Unless …
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:45 AM
17

You can bet if some "smoking gun" emerged that made Kavanaugh look guilty, they would be talking about it now.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:31 AM
4

It's "someone." It's you. See above.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:27 AM
7

It's not "anybody." It's you. It's you because, as usual you don't have much of a history posting here, haven't provided any evidence of the posts you don't like, and have immediate attacked and denigrated anyone disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 12:18 AM
1

I don't see anything that would fit what you are saying.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:33 PM
10

Hey, you know what would improve the sub? More concern trolling. Is this a place of ignorance now? It is now that you're here so fuck off and never come back.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:26 PM
9

One? You said a bunch, and I can't even find the one when sorting by controversial.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 07:27 PM
5

It takes a long time, but it has to be done. If people's attitudes didn't need to change, none of us would be here. Pandering to gynocentrism and white knighting isn't going to do anything to change those attitudes. Those are the kinds of attitudes that necessitate this movement existing in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:39 PM
6

Anger is useful. Apathy is what you don't want.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:31 PM
3

I supposed my point is that it doesn't matter what the definition of hate is if people interpret mass criticism of women as hate anyway. It does matter. Being correct matters.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:13 PM
14

Thanks for making this post. This crap has gotten ridiculous since the Kavanaugh hearing. The top comment in the thread you linked is from an account created in August of this year talking about how much better the sub was a year ago. Come on people. Don't fall for obvious BS.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:12 PM
1

I remember about a year ago people where much nicer and thoughtful in comparison to today. You were here a year ago with your reddit account created in late August of this year?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:08 PM
5

Yep. Don't try to live up to your enemies' standards. They created them to defeat you.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:04 PM
13

I bet if we tone police harder, feminists will give us some doggy treats or something.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:00 PM
2

Yeah, I know the quote. I was just arguing with a feminist shill about it actually.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:57 PM
1

women who are trying to be traitors to their own class, most women cheerfully affirm their deadly class privileges and power I was with you until you put "women" instead of "feminists" in here.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:38 PM
8

The ideology is based on a hateful view of men so it churns out man-haters and grants them institutional power. How could I not hate people who put the likes of Suzanna Walters and Sara Jeong in charge of things and think "this is fine" ?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:38 PM
1

Which comments?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:31 PM
10

a bunch of the comments on here are showing how right OP is. Which comments?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:29 PM
2

That list has been repeated endlessly, the quotes have been checked by hundreds or thousands of people I guess, yet the truth has not been found to be interesting. I think you are drastically exaggerating how often those quotes get posted. I'm in anti-feminists spaces all the time and don't see them that often except maybe Gearheart, and that's because I frequently post it. My other point was that opposition to feminism is partly based on exaggerations and cherry picking, though most of the quot…
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:20 PM
5

As I understand it, they don't just want to have sex. They want romantic relationships and cannot get them. It's a social issue and has nothing to do with penis problems.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 09:35 AM
3

having incel comments on our sub What are you even talking about? What comments? When I write about the distinction on a feminist sub Who gives a fuck what the man-haters on feminists subs think of us? there are usually people to say "I have looked, there is a lot of overlap". And you believe them?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 09:33 AM
2

I never liked including Stone on these lists. She is just some goofy celeb, regardless of what she said. The rest of them are awful. I don't see the point of your comments. Your tone was combative and defensive, but you didn't offer any reason to not these people as misandrist garbage. For example, Here it is, I've restored the missing items which contradict the severity claimed in the misquote: That sounds defensive of Robin Morgan, but the full quote is still god awful.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 10:59 PM
22

It's "slut shaming" if you don't won't to marry a post-wall slut and raise her kid from some unknown dude.
/r/MGTOW03/11/18 08:27 PM
32

This is why we need to purge feminists from education. Letting them in, let alone putting them in charge, was an egregious mistake. All that bullshit they spewed about equality was a bunch of lies. They only wanted power over male students so they can abuse them and set them up for failure. Your sons should not have to be entrusted to people who hate them just to get an education. Kick them out.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:46 PM
2

Has there ever been a man-hater you didn't defend?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:41 PM
12

You can discuss men's issues as long as you frame men's issues as being caused by men.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:55 AM
2

social justice warrior Authoritarian Liberal bullshitters How is that distinguishable from feminism?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:49 AM
2

Deport her to Somalia instead.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:44 AM
8

I think they know they took a beating during the Kavanaugh hearings. They will lay low on this until they think they find something that fits their narrative and will use that to overplay again. That’s what MeToo was, a regrouping after Jackie Coakley and Rollingstone proved to be BS.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:13 AM
5

Because his bosses agree with him
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:09 AM
2

Looks like OP is blaming feminists and then blaming Democrats for being feminists.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:56 PM
3

Anger is productive as long as you direct at the people responsible. It’s apathy that is useless.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 12:01 PM
2

If it was gender neutral, why did Biden and many Democratic Congress members defend it on gendered terms when grilling DeVos? Why did it produced gendered outcomes? Wage gap was not fringe. Obama mentioned it and had it on the White House website. Dems were gearing up to terrorize any company (well, besides their pals and donors) who dared pay men more than women, even if it was deserved. They couldn’t finish their evil plans because the 2016 election blew up on them. You can’t fault a woman for…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:32 AM
2

Sadly, some publishers have done that. See EA and Battlefield.
/r/MGTOW30/10/18 02:36 AM
1

Nah, let it consume you. Don’t be scared. It’ll be fun.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 01:53 AM
5

Whether you agree with it or not, telling a political party that you will not be supporting them because of the damage they will do to men’s rights is related to men’s rights.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 01:49 AM
3

Did you miss dear colleague, wage gap, Hilldawg’s campaigning for more lenient treatment of women in prison, their overall treatment of men accused of rape and sexual assault, VAWA (both parties are to blame here, but Dems lead the charge)?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 01:18 AM
3

They understand it perfectly. It’s why they weaponize it. Feminists are evil, not stupid.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:41 AM
3

I would not trust "Foundation for Male Studies."
/r/MensRights28/10/18 05:58 AM
1

You don't need to hang out with feminists to defend their man-hating bullshit. You're doing it right here and now.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:50 AM
0

Let me guess: Places where misandry makes a difference - when it doesn't come from feminists Places where misandray doesn't make a difference - when it comes from feminists Anything to support the team, right?
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:42 AM
1

Has there ever been a man-hater you didn't defend?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:08 PM
6

We are standing up to injustice by telling that rancid, sexist, piece of shit Hirono and the rest of the "guilty until proven innocent as long you're male" assholes to fuck off.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:35 PM
11

It's not your fault. Feminists have a stranglehold on our education and culture. It's hard to cut through the crap.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:29 PM
26

The next time you see this, ask them how they know what men are afraid of. That quote is based on a quote from Margaret Atwood (Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.) who is, as you might guess not a man. She also did not base her assertion on any sort of study, survey, or any demonstrable knowledge whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:14 AM
1

Yep. Here is another example.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:18 AM
9

Your mistake is assuming good faith on the part of intersectional feminists. They don’t have it. All this “equality” talk is BS. They want you destroyed.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:38 PM
1

I think you are excessively optimistic. The most likely outcome of making misogyny and misandry hate crimes is men being subjected to anarcho-tyranny. In other words, we're going to have to walk on egg shells to ensure we don't get accused of misogyny, but the feminists will be free to mostly carry on being misandrist.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:26 AM
1

Are you paying attention to what I'm saying? You can't start male only spaces. They are going to sue the shit out of you. Legal teams know this and would advise any company not to even try. The legal team for this company should have done the same, but people are so blind to anti-male discrimination that it probably never crossed their minds.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 12:21 AM
2

That wasn't the claim. It was implied. The other poster said "Bring both on I say — because I think it will help men more than woman" which implies that misandry would be taken seriously. You are claiming that feminists will be in serious trouble because of their rabid misandry. The claim was that misandry is much more common than misogyny I agree. it appears literally every day in mainstream newspapers, is taught every day in schools etc.; indeed it is institutionalized Yes, I know. That's exac…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:52 PM
3

It's not bad behavior on the part of "bad apples" within feminism, which is usually the damage control you get out of them. Their ideology is designed to produce exactly that sentiment. They believe that male dominance hierarchy is the cause of all gender problems.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:31 PM
6

You and /u/Consilio_et_Animis are both naive if you think misandry is going to be policed as hard as misogyny just because both are considered hate crimes.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:29 PM
2

I'm surprised people are still falling it for it.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:27 PM
2

It would be more strategic to do that, yes. These people don't understand that they live in a bubble and underestimate opposition to their ideas.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:25 PM
2

Trump's election was a big defeat for them so they have been in a non-stop tantrum ever since and are trying to re-establish their power.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 04:46 PM
3

Feminists? Maybe one feminist, or even one woman who stance on feminism is unknown. It's not unknown. That's a male feminist mod of a feminist subreddit. I have to cover up names so our sub doesn't get accused of "harassment."
/r/MensRights20/10/18 04:14 PM
4

That doesn't make sense. What you said before: Womens only spaces have as much right to exist as mens only spaces. That's not going to happen unless we make it happen. Without suing over stuff like this, female only groups and organizations will exist and not male only ones. Your strategy is the reason male only spaces don't have the same right to exist as female only ones.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 04:10 PM
18

I don't think so. They'll be right back to ignoring it the next time a white man is accused. This is damage control about their failure to make BelieveWomen gain as much traction as they wanted. This poll makes it obvious that false accusation concerns aren't going away so they have to frame the conversation around race so they can avoid any culpability for the problems they've caused. They didn't want this conversation, but since it's going to happen, they're going to try to control it.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:00 AM
3

Are you saying they shouldn't sue over things like this?
/r/MensRights20/10/18 03:13 AM
1

Orban puts forth hyperbolic reasoning about undermining the family, buttressed by a simple-minded version of biological determinism that sensible researchers would not agree with. Is gender studies not partly intended to break down family structures? It certainly intends to undermine and abuse fathers and devalue fatherhood. This is pure and simple right-wing populism that has nothing to do with a search for academic progress, let alone men's rights. So what? Decades after debating feminists aca…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 10:20 PM
2

This is far too heavy handed - and, trust me, driven by right-wing, instinctual populism rather than any real concern for men's rights - or for that matter academic integrity. Hell will freeze over before Orban starts talking about, say, male victims of domestic violence or sexual assault by women. I find the growing trend of extolling the likes of Orban, Putin, Trump, and Bolsonaro as MRA-champions misguided and disconcerting. Sometimes you need a dick to fuck an asshole. What was everyone else…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:09 AM
1

What does it matter? Their institutions and policies are misandrist. Normie feminists don't mean anything except cover for the rotten core.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 12:30 AM
2

Wapo hates men.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 03:05 AM
22

"It wasn't rape rape." -Whoopi Goldberg
/r/MensRights13/10/18 09:37 PM
3

Just like every MRA actually hates women. Just like all capitalists are greedy and hate the poor. Keep drinking your flavor of kool-aid. Dumb comparison. Actual feminist literature blames every problem on male dominance hierarchy. Misandry is integrated into the ideology itself.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 09:33 PM
1

Have you informed LateStageCapitalism and ChapoTrapHouse that leftism and liberalism are the same thing?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:04 AM
7

Narrator: They blew all the weed tax on useless shit like feminists and natives.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 12:30 AM
2

Eating skittles will make your kid gay or transgender.
/r/MGTOW08/10/18 07:26 PM
1

But apparently we're simultaneously supposed to mock the idea that men should be concerned. It's not that men shouldn't be concerned. The "believe women" crowd either doesn't care or relishes the chance.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 07:02 PM
7

Does she not know how pendulums work?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:57 PM
1

I don’t care how nice your pals actually are nor do I trust your claims or judgment. Institutions and systems are what matters. Scum like her are in charge of things because that’s what feminists want, regardless of how nice you claim they are. Disenfranchisement as in the overall denial of rights, for example, the gender quota that passed for board positions in CA, the denial of custody, the theft of income, the unjust expulsion from schools, etc.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:44 PM
1

The fact that scum like this woman are too cowardly and impotent to act on their intentions is irrelevant to what those intentions are and what they would do if they could get away with it and/or not have to do the dirty work themselves. That’s why you kick them out of everything, so they don’t get that chance. Feminism has likely caused many deaths, but we can’t count them. How many men have killed themselves because of false accusations, having their children taken from them, or being abused b…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:44 AM
1

So...what's your end game here? Someone said gender studies didn't exist in Europe. I corrected that. I don't know why we're still debating whatever it is we're debating.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:29 AM
1

Your defense of murderous, misandrist loons make me doubt your credentials as a character witness.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:09 PM
2

You have one private university in Budapest that offered it. Which means it exists
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:08 PM
0

I don’t think you know what an arrest is.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:18 PM
5

Do you have any examples of the stuff you are complaining about?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:51 PM
1

I believe the bill is centered around gender identity.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 01:48 PM
12

Hungary just defunded gender studies. They couldn’t have done that if it didn’t exist.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:16 PM
73

One of their papers was previously posted here. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/91z135/feminist_journal_published_study_on_dog_rape/ Another note: They rewrote part of Mein Kampf to fit it into Gender Studies and got that published.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:05 AM
1

You are not so much a "glass half empty" sort of guy as You're a "you should align yourself with a political movement that wants you disenfranchised and exterminated" kind of guy, AKA a masochistic dumbass motherfucker. I've known a bunch of feminists. Married one. She was a wonderful wife and mother, and the eventual divorce was very civilised. So wonderful you divorced
/r/MensRights02/10/18 11:58 PM
6

Meanwhile, calling for the hatred, disenfranchised, and mass murder of men is totally fine. Higher ed was a mistake.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:21 PM
2

She kinda has a point. If you are here to defend a deranged loon calling for the murder of men, you are not a men's advocate. You are a piece of shit. Your mask fell off.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:53 PM
1

It was feminists who got you paternity leave (unless you are in the US, in which case you will catch up in the coming decades I guess). Please. Feminists aren't doing shit to fight the idea that men are providers so taking your paternity leave is going to hurt you more than a women taking maternity. Feminists got the laws on rape and sexual assault changed so it is now legally recognised that doing those things to men is not cool. Mary P. Koss called. She said "LOL what an idiot." How about sex?…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:49 PM
4

Progressive feminists hate men so it serves him right for siding with people who want us disenfranchised. I'd welcome him if he renounces feminism.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:42 AM
1

Well, as a scientist he probably wanted to talk about something that was factually accurate instead of made up feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:26 AM
2

archive http://archive.is/9A1rH
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:13 AM
2

Ironically, the creature who tweeted this is probably the least likely person to get raped in the history of the universe. Dig up pictures of it, and you'll understand.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:08 AM
1

Feminists need to be kicked out of everything.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:52 AM
7

Ironically, our friendly neighborhood feminist oriented men's issues subreddit has a post titled "At what age is a black boy when he learns he's scary?" without a hint of self-awareness that they are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:07 AM
0

From their view, it is an attempt at fixing it, as without it nothing would change. Their view is wrong. Also listed out on the bill - it is excepted it would take over 50 years for the inequality to "fix" itself alone - this is to accelerate the process How on earth could someone predict that and be even close to accurate? It sounds like they were looking for excuses for their bullshit supremacist law. They don't seem to discriminate against men - it doesn't state that a man should be removed, …
/r/MensRights02/10/18 12:04 AM
2

"the left" often proposes legislation utilising gender-exclusive language because part of the issues the left deals with currently are gender inequality issues Gender-exclusive language in legislation is a gender inequality issue. having some number of women in the board tends to increase company productivity and stability Feminist "scientists" investigated feminists policies and determined that they are double plus good! I take this claim with a grain of salt, but even if it is true, then compa…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 11:27 PM
6

"They will learn of our equals ways, by force!"
/r/MensRights01/10/18 11:06 PM
2

Diversity is just a dog whistle for anti-male and/or anti-white.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 10:06 PM
0

Don't bother trying to repair it. Just be wary of her. She might try to use any personal knowledge of your life to destroy you.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 10:01 PM
3

He is not a sociologist so his data graphics should be read very skeptically. Sociologist are largely politically driven feminist hacks devoid of any objectivity. I consider him more credible since he comes from a real field. I believe that was verbal and we have to go on the eyewitness reports. No, we really don't. A more plausible scenario is that, like the James Damore situation, feminists are bending over backwards to interpret him this way so they can justify unpersoning him for challenging…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:55 PM
5

Can you give me an exact quote or link to the slide where he said this?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:51 PM
5

Are they also going to make women work in sewers? Oh of course not. Feminism is a supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:15 PM
1

That's part of the problem I have with the bill. The other two are the wealth distribution along racial lines and that it looks like it will build a bunch of housing projects (not helpful for the middle class).
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:31 PM
1

Yet there is also a part to help people whose homes are in low demand. And it would invest $2 billion "to support borrowers" who owe more in a mortgage than their homes are worth. Shouldn't these people cut their losses and sell their homes? Helping them stay in the homes just further decreases the supply of housing. This looks a case of the government continuing to create problems and then trying to untangle the mess they've made. This bill even acknowledges that problem with the land use restr…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:16 PM
6

They changed it at the request of feminists. Thanks for participating and being an all around piece of shit.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:08 PM
6

Custody was tied to the male (provider) gender role until feminists changed that dumbass.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:10 PM
2

Ok. At least that's making some sense. However, as a middle class man myself, my biggest bills are taxes. Where is the tax relief in a program like that? Your description is also light on details. There are things in this bill that look dubious for the middle class. "The bill, called the American Housing and Economic Mobility Act, would direct about $500 billion, primarily to build and rehabilitate housing for low- and moderate-income Americans. It would also create incentives for local governme…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 04:42 PM
8

Male Genital Mutilation - Circumcision Agreed. It's all downhill from here though. Education is traditionally women's work. Another tradcon victory, although I will admit that feminism had a hand in it. Like another poster said, there were more male teachers under tradcon. The proportion of male teachers has been shrinking as feminism has increasingly dominated the education system. Teachers are also one part of education. The systemic bias against males through things like grade discrimination,…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 04:21 PM
2

I think it's getting brigaded from somewhere. I haven't usually seen this.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:59 AM
3

Senator Collins She's a Republican.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:39 AM
10

I could sum it up quite succinctly as "perpetual systemic marginalization, demonization, antagonizing, and disenfranchisement of males," and it dwarfs anything tradcons have done in decades.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:25 AM
15

It's feminism, and it's not even close.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:18 AM
1

That's how I view it as well. You explained it better than I could.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:08 AM
1

FYI, the person you are talking to also identifies as a feminist so he's probably just butthurt about number 3 and his shit movement getting exposed for what it is.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:02 AM
1

This is just another attempt by feminists to squeeze as much wealth out of men as they can. They need to fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 08:11 AM
1

Giving everyone shit doesn't make any sense either. Why would you take my shit, give it to someone else, then give me someone else's shit, paying shit takers at every step of the way when you can fuck off and let me keep my own shit?
/r/MensRights22/09/18 08:04 AM
2

Hopefully it starts a trend.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:52 AM
2

Hatred?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:31 AM
0

It's anarcho tyranny.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:57 PM
7

Feminism also hurt a man. The umpire had his name dragged through the mud over this bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:44 AM
1

Remember when you were wondering why we don’t trust you? You managed to turn this into a conversation about why we shouldn’t trust CHS and JBP. I don’t think you are interested in talking about why we don’t trust you. If you were, you would have gladly continued that thread. Instead you want to cast aspersions on more MRA friendly people. Your behavior comes across as a D/C shill.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:08 PM
1

I don’t know how she lives. She works for AIE last I heard. I think you just see feminism as so dogmatically correct that you can’t fathom someone disagreeing with it so you have to cast aspersions on everyone who does. You, as usual, dodged any discussion about the feminists movements betrayals of men. Somehow, I bet you still can’t figure out why we don’t trust you all.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:49 PM
1

You can make endless bank by being the person who claims to be or have been on one side but preaches to the other side's choir. Endless bank? Criticizing feminism as an academic gets you ostracized. Did she, for instance, use this point to build up to an even larger point about feminism = bad and/or mens rights = good? I don't know what you mean. I don't even remember what exactly she said. I find it odd that you are so skeptical of her. It's not like she has spent a century building a supremaci…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:21 PM
1

Yes. The audience she attracted with her criticisms of the education system is going to have a large pro-Trump contingent. It was risky of her to do that and was risky of her to write The War on Boys in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:02 PM
1

She has criticized Trump from a feminist perspective over the allegations against him.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:51 PM
1

I mean, she is a vehemently ant-Trump Democrat.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:26 PM
1

Why do you think that?
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:53 PM
1

Again, that's hard to do. Most feminists downplay, deny, or attempt to rationalize the wrongs their movement has done to men. I'm not going to trust someone who does that. Feminists allies would be more in the vain of Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:38 PM
1

That's really hard to do. Feminism's "successes" have been accomplished in large by betrayal.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:28 PM
1

It's not a matter of hearing you but of trusting you. We've pretty much had this conversation before. I'll repeat what I said then. You can't salvage feminism's reputation by talking on the internet. It will take prolonged, concrete, unapologetically pro-male action to earn my trust.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:11 PM
1

Feminism and most of social justice is about blame to the point of dehumanizing men and/or whites. Blame is almost everything to your ideology so it's odd to me that you are acting like it's unimportant. That's why I question your sincerity or understanding of your own beliefs.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:15 AM
2

That would make men more responsible. If you aren't obfuscating then you don't even understand your own beliefs and their implications.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:58 AM
2

I don't believe you. Based on your previous posts, I think you believe that men are the ones who have held all the power.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:51 AM
3

For me and for many (IMO most) feminists "patriarchy" is about recognizing a self-reinforcing set of social patterns, not about blaming men or victimizing women. Quit your bullshit. It's called "patriarchy" to blame men.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:37 AM
1

I call it boys policing each other to be boyish What a misandrist little shit Barbara Risman, a sociology professor Oh, that explains it.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:49 AM
2

I’m fine with men working more of the dangerous jobs as long as they are compensated fairly for them. The problem is that a lot of feminist pretend that women are doing the same work as men (so women should have the same earnings) when this is obviously not the case.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:10 PM
1

Why did you say you were deleting the account and instead of leaving reddit entirely then?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:07 PM
1

Ah yes rotating between accounts, mark of an honest individual if there ever was one
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:51 PM
6

What?
/r/MensRights13/09/18 02:57 AM
6

What?
/r/MensRights13/09/18 02:54 AM
1

I'm not talking about MRAs. I'm talking about everyone who is not feminist, especially men.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 10:02 PM
1

Not lazy, just too trusting
/r/MensRights12/09/18 09:52 PM
1

The reaction to her isn't insane. If anything, non-feminists are far too patient with feminist bullshit. We let you assholes take over colleges even when you were openly advocating genocide and continue to hold positions of power there even as you continue to advocate hatred of men. You should have been kicked out years ago.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 10:51 PM
1

I'm sure Serena's fantasy of being oppressed is appealing, but it's never as true as idiots think it is.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 10:40 PM
3

Stop taking the high road!
/r/MensRights11/09/18 10:15 PM
2

Does any part of you wonder if you might not be doing the same thing, at least a little, Once upon a time, but no longer, our culture is overwhelmingly dominated by feminism. You've got to see the "glitches in the matrix" to be anti-feminist. To act like Serena, you just have to go with the flow.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 10:14 PM
2

It's a reaction to the omnipresent feminist propaganda machine that consistently tells women their problems are the result of men and discourages accountability. This is exactly the kind of toxic behavior feminism encourages in women.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:56 AM
2

She's not lying. It's not a lie if you believe it, even if it's stupid.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:39 AM
1

No, there's really not. Look at the post you are replying to. Look else where on this subreddit where feminists memory-holed a study because it contradicted their agenda. They will not let you coexist.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:29 AM
2

The burden of proof is on her. She is accusing this man of being sexist. He will face dire consequences if enough people believe her.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:55 AM
4

Higher ed needs to be purged of feminists. Our nutless politicians need to get off their useless asses and start defunding them until they fire the useless swine.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:17 AM
1

There are many examples. The feminist media machine will be back with a new movement once they run MeToo into the ground, doing as much damage to men along the way as they can. That's what they've done before. Each time, they erode our rights a little bit.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 01:46 AM
2

How would you determine "because of their gender" ?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 01:40 AM
4

Because we let feminists run our education system, big mistake. Feminists would manage to make a lemonade stand anti-male if they ran that. Feminists should not hold any positions of power. We have to expel them.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:57 PM
1

Have fun...waging a campaign of gender based aggression against everyone who disagrees with you while demonizing them as evil and in need of driving from society. Feminists have been doing that for years. It looks like they're having a ball to me! However, feminism isn't a gender you fucking retard.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:38 PM
1

Feminists have formed entire fields around disenfranchising men (gender and women's studies). That doesn't bother you, and you've even defended it. Fuck off with this damage control bullshit. There is no reasoning with evil. The solution is to expel feminists from all positions of power and hopefully all of Western society.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:29 PM
1

Unless you're willing to abolish these women's advocacy groups, we will continue to get shafted in more and more institutions.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:50 PM
15

You must be a sharp dresser.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 12:57 PM
3

"Hold my latte!" -SJWs
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:52 AM
16

She isn't normal.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 12:34 AM
1

I'll try to do it in fewer comments next time. There's always room for improvement.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:42 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:01 PM
1

To me it seems obvious she's dishing back out shit she's used to getting from this community. No one here heard of her until she published that BS. There's no evidence it was satire. Regardless of satire or not, there's no way you could say that kind of thing about women and have it published in WAPO and be an academic journal editor.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:30 AM
1

I'll talk ideas. Gearhart advocated eugenics, essentially. History has proven how well that works out. I unambiguously condemn that. Ah, progress, at last. Jones I'm not familiar enough with. It was a screenshot I posted a few comments back. She's a Gulag employee. Walters was trolling her trolls. I didn't think it was particularly good or inspired, but I don't have strong feelings about flat satire. I don't buy that. We've had this conversation before. There is no indication that the piece is s…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:20 AM
0

I won't hold you accountable for them if you condemn them.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:50 AM
0

I never dodged you. It just took multiple posts to explain my position, in part because feminists being evil is an important part of my position which you, of course tried to shrug off. I don't understand how you sleep at night after doing the things that you do to defend evil. Most feminists are useful idiots. They've never heard of Gearhart or Walters. They don't hang out on MRA forums and get confronted with the evil of their movement so they are protected by their ignorance, but you, you hav…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:38 AM
0

agreeing that I oppose them just to begin to be taken seriously isn't how serious people start a conversation Funny how you wouldn't go any further until I acknowledged the possibility of your dumb shit manspreading. I meet you half way and do it, and of course, you aren't going to do shit to compromise for me. I don't think it's asking a lot to condemn Jones, Walters, or Gearhart. These people unapologetically promote discrimination and hatred against men. If you can't even condemn that, you ar…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:25 AM
2

Okay. So how do I bring it up while saying, "I come in peace" in a way that people will believe me? Establish a good reputation through good will, you know, the opposite of what you have been doing. Like I said, abolishing the genocidal gender studies loony bin is a great start. Instead, you are an apologist for those scumbags. My answer is that it had such an obviously explosive, potentially deleterious potential impact on his workmates that he should have raised it privately with the people in…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:53 AM
2

The connection to the Walters article wasn't clear. The connection is that there are institutions that are openly evil towards men and that these same institutions are heavily involved in gender policing men. The same is not true of women in the US (and probably just about every western country). That matters. If some guy complains about women taking up seats with shopping bags, it's reasonable to take that at face value. If some feminist complains about manspreading, I don't know if it's genuin…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:50 AM
1

If it's automatically hating or disenfranchising men to talk about something negative that's more common to them, is that equally true when it's something women do? What? I was clearly referring to Suzanna Walters' article. women's hips tend to be wider Yes, I misspoke. Men having skinnier hips leads to sitting with the legs further apart. But then, are we being as critical about the negative assumptions we associate with others? Like I said, you are ignoring context. It's not an assumption to t…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:51 AM
2

Great! I would define manspreading pretty much exactly that way; an unflattering trait more common to one gender. So is that automatically bad faith? I don't think so, although I get how it comes across that way, certainly. The part that's hard not to see as bad faith is "the issue isn't that it's men doing it." It is literally in the word that it's about men. What I'm not saying is that all men sit that way, or that only men sit that way, or that it's an indictment of all men. It's an irritatin…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:06 AM
4

If you mean things like mansplaining, though, the issue isn't that it's men doing it, it's that it's talking over people and usually presumption in a way that's more common to men. Do you have any idea how fucking annoying it is to read feminists say shit like this? That idiotic word was coined for a reason. If it wasn't about men, it wouldn't have "man" as a suffix. I appreciate you coming in here and attempting to discuss things civilly, but I have to bend over backwards to take statements lik…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:37 AM
5

Because when we police gender, we're not rewarding virtue or talent. We're rewarding conformity Great. So when are feminists going to fuck off and stop policing gender? https://media.giphy.com/media/erNeFhw83IkTe/200.gif
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:41 AM
5

she expressed that she wouldn't care to stay at home Did she ever express that it would be fine for you to stay at home? I don't blame you for inferring that, but remember, our modern feminist society is about women being able to do what they want.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:42 AM
3

This pressure to get companies to publish pay data is nothing more than a shake down. Feminists in the media won't care if there are justifiable reasons for the women to be making less. They'll just lie about it. They want you discriminated against. Even if you risk life and limb on a daily basis, they don't want you making more money than a woman working a safe job. That's because a man's life is worth $0 to a feminist.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:06 PM
316

Why the hell would middle class anything need to be dethroned? If you are middle class, you aren't throned.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:04 PM
3

There are hundreds of real tweets you could have picked. Stop circulating BS.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:03 AM
2

Yeah, I'm as anti-Jeong as anyone, but I haven't see any evidence she actually said this. She is evil enough not to have to make shit up to make it seem worse.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:22 AM
1

You really are desperate to talk about something other than how evil the NYT is, aren't you?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:50 PM
1

You are not qualified to define what is and isn't hate. And you are? You think expressing sadistic desires towards people because of their race and gender isn't hate. If it talks like a Nazi, supports and defends Nazis, looks like a Nazi, and votes in line with Nazis every time... well I could very well be speaking to a Nazi right now, now couldn't I? You are the equivalent of a Nazi except your hate is directed against white men. The moral high ground you think you have is based on fraud and li…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:44 PM
3

You're really very naive if you think she's the enemy. What? How are people who want you to suffer and die not your enemies?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:28 PM
1

Would you say the NYT has more power than the White House? Did I only list the NYT? No, I included more than just them. Stop pretending you can't read. We can argue all day about whether the White House has more power than the combined institutions and the Senator I listed, but that is a non-sequitor. First, you questioned Jeong's position. That didn't work. Now, you are questioning how power. That isn't going to work either. You have now spent multiple days and dozens of posts just to defend ev…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:24 PM
1

The NYT has power. The rest of the media that is defending them has power. The education system that teaches the same evil shit has power. Senators have power.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:09 PM
1

Did you miss all the eliminationist rhetoric and pro-sadistic cruelty? Did you even read what Jeong was saying?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:54 PM
1

miscegenation That clears things up a lot. You are faced with two groups that want you and your family dead and have chosen to align with and defend one of them. You are not faced with the same choice that I am.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:49 PM
1

I don't want him tortured to death, but Nazis do. Why would Nazis want to torture a random white dude? What do you think the Nazis in America actually want??? the expulsion of Jews and non-whites from Western countries
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:41 PM
1

I want more rights for men, but at the same time, I defend (generally) the right of women to be angry at the millennia of oppression they've endured and continue to endure. Supporting sadistic cruelty toward men is not supporting our rights. For me, it's not about individual people. Is this particular woman right or wrong? Why does it matter? Being right doesn't matter? WTF? Also, the NYT and the rest of pro-sadism media circling the wagons are not individual people. They are institutions. That …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:36 PM
1

This is probably the best sequence of posts on the "men aren't expressing emotions enough" them that I've seen.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:04 PM
0

Also, racism against white people does not exist Anyone who says this is racist against white people. You spread this lie in the hopes that it stalls whites from identifying who are enemies are (you) and how evil they are (very).
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:53 PM
2

You have to know who your enemies are, how evil they are and help make others aware.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:33 PM
1

Sounds like a good South Park episode.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:06 PM
6

Here, you're talking about liberals, like the majority of Trump supporters. They claim to believe in quality, while I do not. I believe in equity. There's a very big difference! You can google that if you want to learn more :) You are defending race and gender based hatred because it's directed at white men. That makes you a SJW. Correct. You miscategorized me entirely, too. We believe different things fundamentally about society. You're a liberal at least, or possibly fascist-leaning, it sounds…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:46 AM
2

I bet they are super concerned about the NYT hiring a racist piece of shit, right?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:49 AM
8

They're evil.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:41 AM
7

I completely disagree with this. Ignoring these assholes is how they were able to get into positions of power in the first place. You may not be able to change the NYT's mind by talking about this on the internet, but you can make men aware they are under attack.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:48 AM
16

what is the difference between that and Mein Kampf Supporting Mein Kampf gets you ostracized from society. Supporting the other gets you a job at the NYT or as a department in a tax payer funded university.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:38 AM
13

I hate people who have historically oppressed and enslaved people like me and continue to I never oppressed her. No one here oppressed her. She has no license to hate us. At least you admitted it's about hating white men, though. I commend your honesty. SJWs had previously put a lot of effort into lying about how privilege was never about justifying mistreatment of the privileged group. Thanks for helping to dismantle that bullshit. This incidence, along with the Suzana Walters piece, and the re…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:34 AM
15

It's easy to call them hypocrites, but I think that's too tame. They are actually quite consistent. You just have to understand that their goal is to sadistically torture white men to death because they are evil. In that context, their actions are consistent. They just lie about their intentions.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:20 AM
1

She was talking about the world. The US is part of the world. I stand by my statement in the context of the US. If she knew how shitty it was for men, she would support. Her goal is to torture white men to death, and the current incarnation of marriage in the US is a great tool for that.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:17 AM
1

I'm talking about the US.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:43 PM
2

What businesses? What families? Name 'em and shame 'em.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:55 PM
56

In other words if she's more a lone cunt, or if there are thousands of people agreeing with her, as well The New York Times agrees with her. They would only do that if they know it wouldn't hurt them financially. You can thus reasonably conclude that thousands of people agree with her regardless of her tweets' popularity.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:35 PM
30

She's probably too stupid to realize that marriage as a legal concept benefits women at the expense of men. If she realizes that, she'll support it.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:33 PM
4

They are going to bide their time until he does something like using the wrong pronouns for someone who identifies as a demi-queer trash compactor. Then, they will use that innocuous event to claim he is literally Hitler.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:30 PM
3

They don't care about that. They just say this as a smoke screen for their evil.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:53 PM
2

Good point. I think it's both. They are signaling others but being subtle enough to try to avoid more serious backlash. A lot of this anti-white and anti-male garbage originates from our universities which receive a lot of public funds, public funds acquired mostly through taxing white men.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:29 PM
5

It's because of the idea that you built your life together, and she is owed the lifestyle you lived together even if you were the breadwinner. You said it yourself, she is owed the lifestyle you lived together. Men aren't. She doesn't have to do your laundry, cook your meals, clean your house, etc. Those kinds of domestic duties aren't so easy for men who have to work long hours and/or in physically exhausting jobs to maintain this lifestyle, and he can't just change jobs or work less because he…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:06 PM
17

I got back that whites can not feel racism and nor was she sexist. Everyone take note here. This mentality centers around privilege theory, i.e. you can't racist against whites or sexist against men because they are privileged. Remember this the next time some intersectional feminist piece of shit wades into here to tell us that the privilege concept isn't about justifying mistreating the groups deemed privileged. They are lying. This is exactly the kind of horrible behavior the privilege concep…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:57 PM
2

I realize pretending to be retarded is about the best damage control you have left, but I just want to tell that it's not working.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:05 AM
2

Because the diagnosis was wrong. It was wrong on purpose.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:25 AM
5

It says it was published August 3rd 1918, i.e. 100 years ago
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:29 AM
5

I don't buy that excuse, not the day after fellow media bubble The New York Times' standing by an irrefutably evil piece of shit. The suffering of men was important enough to them to study it and write about it. The suffering of men is important to them in that it continues.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 01:15 AM
13

I feel sorry for the men who was dragged to that show by their SOs Those MGTOWs are really missing out, huh?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:56 AM
11

The economist wants you to suffer and die. They think that by saying these things they can cover up how evil they are.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:55 AM
1

Not a true study Not yet...
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:56 PM
1

The New York Times, the most influential newspaper in the US, just hired a virulent, disgusting, evil, sexist, racist to it editorial board and then stood by the evil little shit in spite of the surrounding controversy. I'm done giving a fuck what my enemies think of me.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:54 PM
1

No, it's simple. Kill the news organization's credibility.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:16 AM
1

I think she has more of a point (perhaps like that broken clock?) than many of us assume. As of your last comment, you didn't seem to think so. The 1%: I meant that most instances of "positive" discrimination are for top positions in government and business. The people who qualify for such positions, male or female, are already some of the most competent and privileged in our society. Nope. This is happening even at entry level STEM fields. On the final point: you are of course right that we tal…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:16 PM
1

What is important is that we address the issues, not whether we put it in feminist, MRA, conservative, or liberal language They aren't going to be addressed if the source of the problem is wrong, like addressing false accusations by trying to prevent slut shaming. Not only because the men (or whites, Jews, Asians, heterosexuals) that suffer from them are small in number and tend to belong to an already privileged class - why should we speak out about people who already are in the 1%, when we kno…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:52 PM
14

There's no way to stop this rot other than for the Trump administration to act and change the rules I don't even think that will fix it. The anti-male forces are too well entrenched. Their lust for the destruction of male students' lives will compel them to find any loopholes in whatever rules you implement. It's about people, not just rules. When DCL was first implemented, universities mass hired Title IX inquisitors. Not all of those people are misandrist human garbage, but a lot of them are. …
/r/MensRights28/07/18 04:25 PM
1

The dominant belief among feminists is that all gender issues, including mens issues, stem from misogyny. That is one reason we are destined to clash. I cannot think of any actions on leading issues that (moderate) MRAs are proposing that would actually hurt women. That depends on what you mean by hurt. Feminists want preferential treatment for women in all institutions at all times (i.e. quotas on good jobs). MRAs want to end that kind of discrimination. Feminists don't.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:42 PM
1

I fail to see that we disagree about anything apart from nuance and formulations. Correct. It is nuanced. Like most people. Most people are neither feminists nor MRAs. They simply don't think about mens' issues. And, honestly, most feminist dissenters who agree with some or several of our talking points. Feminist dissenter will get driven out of feminism eventually. It's a highly tyrannical, conformity driven movement. Those who experience problems or see them - actual problems, not just reflexi…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:44 PM
1

Sorry, I don't see much of a silver lining here. Even the boys who tough it out are likely to grow up conditioned to accept discrimination against them. Men accepting unfairness toward ourselves for the sake of helping women is one of our biggest obstacles.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:56 PM
1

But at the same time, the likes of Paul Elam and a vocal minority of commenters on this site, prompt other moderates to distance themselves from us or keep mum. I observe this daily. Like who? MRAs are a threat to bank accounts: Not sure about that. In fact, I think you could argue the opposite. Feminists are delighted there are radical MRA sites out there that they could mine delicious quotes from to sustain their claim that misogyny is rampant. I'm not just talking about shit-tier clickbait bl…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:42 PM
1

I'm using this to reply to both of your comments in this conversation. The MRM should work to rein in its radical elements and think carefully about how to get their messages through. Why? Paul Elam is not in charge of an academic journal or department. It was only a few weeks ago that the Washington Post published an article by a feminist department head calling for the hatred and disenfranchisement of men. The radicals we should work to rein in are our enemies, not our allies. No one has to ag…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:16 PM
2

I'm guessing the implication is that anything supported by corporations is right wing. That's fucking retarded by itself, of course, and it also ignores the massive support the government gives to feminism.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 09:51 PM
0

It's just a way of wearing men down so we don't stand up to feminists. Look at that "Why Can't We Hate Men" article. That was written by an "expert" in gender studies. They want to shoot down criticism of their evil bullshit by calling it "mansplaining."
/r/MensRights23/07/18 02:46 AM
1

I can't. I was born with an ass for a face.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 02:44 AM
1

not trying to accuse him of anything, just saying that's what it seems like to me rn You're accusing him of being "one of those mgtow guys thats really angry at women or something." Stop being a weasel.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 02:43 AM
1

Men are far too selfless. Men empathize with women more than other men. Shit like that is why we have so many problems.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:33 PM
0

I bet you're the type of dumbass who votes for gynocentric bullshit. If you wanna be selfless, feel free to give all your shit to the nearest woman.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:32 PM
2

Sure it is. Where do you think male disposability comes from?
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:23 PM
1

Selflessness is toxic to yourself.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 01:14 PM
44

Don't vote for feminists. Don't support any funding for feminists. Warn other men about feminists. Repeat for any other movements that stand with feminists in this misandrist bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:49 AM
1

Saudi Arabia recently allowed women to drive. Yeah, I knew about that. What I'm saying is that I don't know how common laws like that are. You perceive "misogyny" only; an objective view would regard the "misandry" as far, far worse. I don't only perceive misogyny. I'm more concerned about misandry in my own country than misogyny in the Islamic world is what I'm trying to say.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:23 PM
1

At -41 and counting, no one has yet answered my question. Well, I'll fat out tell you that I can't answer it. I don't have the indepth statistical knowledge about how common place the misogynist laws are in Islamic countries to compare.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:44 PM
1

It actually is. A related topic I've noticed is that there is plenty of criticism of how Islam treats women but not how it treats men.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:33 PM
1

Salon is a shit rag full of insane misandrists and racists. I'm not giving them clicks. http://archive.is/pJLzV
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:11 PM
3

I think he is apologizing for not being a rapist.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:31 AM
5

It's bigger than "adds one or two female characters." Like I said, anything considered positive and male dominated is attacked and being made to be more "inclusive." Female dominated things are ignored. Males are going to be left with nothing in the culture that caters to us. I'll ask again. Why do you think you are justified in doing this?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:21 AM
4

You didn't answer my question. Why does everything (except bad things of course) that is male dominated need to be changed to cater to females?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:50 AM
1

A lot of corporations contribute in order to virtue signal. That's why feminism's cultural reach is important.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:51 AM
1

A side note on the Presidents' families: We went 24 years with Presidents without sons.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 11:59 PM
20

Video games have been extremely male-centric for years So fucking what? Why does everything (except bad things of course) that is male dominated need to be changed to cater to females? You never see anyone pushing for female dominated entertainment, like romance novels and most pop music, to get butchered so males will enjoy it more.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 09:53 PM
2

The even sadder thing is that it's probably a dude.
/r/MGTOW09/07/18 02:21 AM
3

It's a good possibility. We'll have a hard time ever finding out. The institutions that study these things have been captured by feminists. They don't want your average guy to know how badly they've screwed him so I doubt they would look at this. I'm shocked I ever got looked at in New Zealand.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 10:51 PM
3

New Zealand women have a net negative income tax as a group.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:38 PM
7

they will have to remove some men from the jobs they have worked hard to achieve That's a feature not a bug.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:36 PM
1

This guy is a fucking loon.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 08:03 PM
2

You can’t just go around beating people up without any consequences even if they arguably deserve it.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:51 PM
2

geniice only comes here to post dumb shit like this.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:33 PM
1

It could be like a mix of Metal Gear Solid and LA Noire.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:08 PM
3

She then brings up the argument that the physiological reasons are the same used for men being drafted to war and not women. Men are better soldiers because of physiological reasons, but that's not the only reason we are drafted. We are drafted because of male disposability. It sounds like your sister wants affirmative action based mixed teams which is discriminatory toward men.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:06 PM
22

Google got a gag order on the case so there's no news about it. They don't want more of this coming out.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:59 PM
6

The couple is 77 and 68 years old. Those children should be in their thirties at least.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:57 PM
0

That (probably) single mom is going to raise an incredibly successful child that will surely contribute to the economy and not be a tax burden. Is this sarcasm? Children raised by single moms tend to have a host of problems.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:47 PM
2

Please send me the link showing when Terry Crews openly said that men who have been assaulted by women don’t deserve help or recognition. I never said he did. I said he's a misandrist. No feminist that I know gives a shit about these invisible lines in the sand that you’ve drawn, wether your a cis male or trans or gay or A-sexual, I and other people care about their rights. Are you fucking serious? Feminists routinely attack straight, white, cis men. So we’ll keep supporting everyone You literal…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:42 PM
1

We let a female supremacist movement take over many of our institutions. The fix is to kick them out.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:00 PM
2

So basically you only care about men who have been assaulted by women and men who get assaulted by men should just rely on support of women? If a man doesn’t meet every standard that you apparently have of what a male assault victim should act like your just gonna abandon them? No dumbass. I'm saying feminists only care about him because of the reasons I listed after stating "he is their ideal male victim for several reasons." Learn to fucking read. I feel so bad for you that you’ve limited your…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:57 PM
14

There have been several submissions about him here. He is a good example of how men can be victimized but is also a rabid misandrist. The only reason feminists have rallied around him is that he is their ideal male victim for several reasons. He was sexually assaulted by another man instead of a woman. He is, as I said, a rabid misandrist. They can make his victimization about his race and ignore that the racial stereotypes about him apply, albeit more weakly, to white men, thus the stereotypes …
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:12 PM
2

Pop Detective is Johnathan McIntosh, formerly of Feminist Frequency, Anita Sarkeesian's organization.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 11:36 PM
1

Truth is treason in an empire of lies.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:55 PM
2

But remember, we live in a patriarchy!
/r/MensRights28/06/18 11:36 PM
1

> every person who hates feminists is always saying “don’t they know the wage gap has been debunked many times. It’s just that women choose to work lower paying jobs”. But that’s what so many MRA don’t get. That’s what the wage gap is, it’s referring to women not choosing high paying jobs, but everyone here acts like every feminist thinks it’s all about sexist bosses. Why does [this](http://archive.is/3tl62) exist then? " White House officials said that the requirement was intended to bolster th…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 10:02 PM
1

It matches their virus malware ideology perfectly.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:39 PM
2

In the game of matriarchy, men aren't the opponent. They're the ball.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:33 AM
4

https://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/8pxg9u/please_convince_me_that_this_piece_written_by_a/
/r/MensRights25/06/18 09:31 PM
6

"The jerk store called. They're running out of you."
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:23 PM
6

I actually used to post there until I got banned. I had the exact opposite reaction as /u/woah77 despite actually hoping to get the same out of it as him. The bullshit out of feminists on that subreddit just made me even more angry and hard line of an anti-feminist. It was the feminists there that made their Patriarchy theory lens clear to me, in all of its misandrist glory. I still go back and read the sub sometimes. I was especially interested in its response to WAPO's "Why can't we hate men" …
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:03 PM
2

It doesn't disprove the idea that aspects of gendered behavior are socially-driven, however, though it does invalidate the hypothesis that all gendered behavior is social. Nothing can be driven without a driver. What it looks you are doing in this discussions is restating feminist talking points about patriarchy but using the passive voice and vague language to avoid blaming men in order to make it more palatable, yet anyone who isn't a novice knows that patriarchy theory is all about blaming me…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 07:50 PM
7

The person who said Please debate
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:25 PM
7

Dont men voluntarily join the military, and women are a tiny minority of the most “deadly” branches (army, marines)? This is only because most of the military is male? Also, yes, women do tend to choose lower paying jobs Responsibility is constantly removed from women for the second one and not men for the first, though. Aren’t the vast majority of male homicides victim to male assailants? Obviously we would like to bring these numbers down to zero, but how is this discrimination? I don't think …
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:18 PM
13

Gender oppression is more about how the culture shapes the relationships. In a traditional patriarchal society, men are almost always the ones in places of power and are typically looked to as having more agency than women. Feminism is the biggest promoter of this. It consistently casts women, even powerful and wealthy women, as helpless victims. Usually, this involves some forced penalty, discrimination against, or sacrifice on the part of men. Women can't get into the armed forces, police, fir…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:59 PM
13

To be fair here, the idea of patriarchy is supposed to also indicate the problems men face. Specifically, it's supposed to indicate the problems men caused for ourselves in our incompetent attempts to oppress women. Gender oppression is different from other forms because the oppressor suffers significant negative consequences as well. So not only are men evil oppressors of women, but we're so bad at oppression that we accidentally made ourselves worse off in almost every way imaginable for multi…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:36 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights23/06/18 11:53 PM
18

Gearhart (I forgot the first name sorry) Sally Miller Gearhart
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:58 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLj70zqM-dM
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:20 PM
1

I'd imagine the process of civil discovery would turn up quite a lot on how they chose who to villify which might just put an iceberg sized dent in the credibility of their little lists (and thus their credibility overall). This. Remember how bad Google looked early on in the DaMore suit. SJWs depend on apathy from their targets. If your average man only knew how hated he was...
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:45 AM
1

^This guys argues about patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:44 AM
1

A defendant only ever has to show reasonable doubt. A prosecution has to show beyond reasonable doubt. The burden of proof always rests on the prosecution. Affirmative consent violates this by redefining "reasonable." That's what our conversation shows. Just a few posts ago, you were ready to assume the man is a rapist just for not testifying. Not remembering that you did it isn't an excuse for doing it. I never said it does. Okay. Open to the argument, but how? We already have rape shield laws.…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:17 PM
1

Not being able to recall or not being willing to answer when asked if the woman gave consent wouldn't be as damning without affirmative consent. With affirmative consent, his counter argument for lack of consent would to prove she said yes, which he wouldn't be able to do in this case. Without affirmative consent, his counter argument would be for the state to prove that she was trying to turn him down. That's the subtle shift in the burden of proof. I should add that feminists want increased co…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:29 PM
1

No, it doesn't. She could be lying, and there's a good chance she would face no consequences even if caught since she isn't the one on trial.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:00 PM
1

No It looks like you kind of do. I'm asking you specifically in a situation where someone invokes the fifth after being asked, "did she provide consent," under what possible circumstance is an innocent man doing that? The most likely reason I could see is being intoxicated at the time and unable to remember everything perfectly.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:50 PM
1

We don't have the 5th so that you can be assumed to be guilty by invoking it. Do you really want to rehash arguments against self incrimination?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:25 PM
1

it's hard to imagine why anyone would plead the fifth to the question, "did she give consent" unless she didn't give consent That's exactly the sort of thing that bothers me about affirmative consent.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:04 PM
1

If they want to plead the fifth when asked if the woman (or victim) obtained consent, they're free to do so. Would do you think should be the consequence of them pleading the fifth? FYI, this will be my last post for tonight.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:57 AM
1

Lies like these tend to fall apart, particularly on cross-examination Are you implying they should have to testify against themselves?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:48 AM
1

We'd enforce it through the law the same as we enforce everything else. How the hell are you going to do that? Actual rapists will just lie and say they got a yes.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:44 AM
1

That's not even addressing my point. Sure it is. Under affirmative consent your example encounter would look slightly different. That's it. Speaking of un-addressed things, you never answered my question about how you would enforce this new standard. it's whether the "yes" was under duress or not. That puts us right back to "she acted like she wanted it."
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:29 AM
1

The point of this tactic is to treat early, polite refusals as playing hard to get and escalate things so quickly that by the time the person wants to scream "No!" they are scared enough to go along out of a fear of what else he might do. Rapists have more than one tactic. But of course, with affirmative consent if he did manage to pressure her into a "yes" he'd sure have a lot more plausible deniability to go on, wouldn't he? Sure...if he can prove it.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:09 AM
2

Sherlock and Dr. Who save the day by being clever. I can't help but notice that both those franchises replaced males with females recently, although Watson isn't a lead.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:06 AM
1

Did she give consent? No. She never said the word "no." She even physically struggled some I've interpreted "no means no" to mean any refusal, not that it has to literal be the word "no." "No means no" is just the sound byte version of it. How do you quantify how much objection is adequate if affirmative consent isn't required? He could have just as easily pressured her into saying yes before doing all of that. Isn't that supposed to be handled by adding enthusiasm to the mix, enthusiastic affir…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 01:40 AM
2

I should specify that I mean specifically in the sorts of fiction young men tend to watch. Wouldn't that include Ghostbusters? I understand Oceans audience is probably older. What about Star Wars? I don't think there are fewer numbers of male hero figures in media, I just think there are fewer types of hero. Can you give some examples of heroes of the past whose types you don't think are represented much anymore?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:33 PM
1

There's usually a lead up to penetration.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:30 PM
1

Affirmative consent doesn't shift the burden of proof, just the standard of behavior. How will this standard be enforced? Forgive me if you've stated this, but what notion of consent would you prefer? And would it protect people who aren't capable of granting consent? I sort of did. "No means no, and unconscious means no" works pretty well. "They acted like they wanted it" is a fairly common defense for rape. Usually that's not random. An easy way to not act like that is to say no.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:21 PM
13

When you go on dates, act as if every woman you're talking to is a reporter Does that mean we should leak confidential information in exchange for sex?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:17 AM
2

I happen to be of the opinion that one of the problems facing young men in society is an absence of a more diverse range of positive male role models. Why is that? There are plenty of non-violent male intellectuals in STEM and the arts. You have lots of examples of male heroes who solve their problems by punching them, but I think fewer examples relative to the past of heroes who solved their problems by being clever, or civic-minded, or cooperative. How much of that is due to the systemic repla…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:03 AM
1

The issue is that people who are put in a position where they can't say no, like if they are passed out or held at knifepoint, also need some form of redress. You don't need affirmative consent to fix either of those. Sex and knife/gun/whatever point is already a crime. Just brandish the weapon like that will be a crime. For passed out: "No means no, and passed out means no." The thing is, actually proving it wasn't consent under those circumstances is basically impossible. Which is why feminist…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:04 AM
1

All it says it that you have to be sure that the answer is "yes" rather than that the other person didn't say "no." If you have to prove this in a court of law, the burden of proof and presumption of innocence have been reversed. Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is a separate concept.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:01 PM
1

Why do you think women are driving this? In my experience men have more of a problem not being the primary provider than women do with them not being the primary provider. Pew Research reports 72% of men vs. 71% of women. At 1% difference, I think it's safe to assume the expectation is basically equal as far as polling is concerned. However, this research doesn't include the fact that women find wealth attractive in men (here and here and probably many more if you go looking). Yay for getting ri…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:08 AM
1

I would argue that the policies that make it easier for moms to work do help to liberate men from their provider role. That sounds like "trickle down equality." It might work working if moms didn't expect their husbands to earn even more. There is no effort to convince women to no longer expect men to be their providers. There's plenty of effort to convince men to do more house work to help their now working wives, though. Fancy that. I don't see that much evidence of modern feminist resistance …
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:30 AM
2

Since you can't hear my tone, I want to be clear I'm not on the attack when I say this: there's something about this statement that strikes me as condescending, as if a comfortable civilization has been handed to women from men rather than cocreated. I agree with the idea co-creation. My comment was meant to see agency along the same lines as the author. In other words, if men are responsible for the bad (her world view) then men must be responsible for the good. I think a reasonably fair synops…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:12 AM
5

That's significantly over-reductionist. I had a feeling you would say something like this. She pretty much addresses your argument, that the problems stem from masculinity, head-on and says that masculinity is a problem, but not the problem. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half. This was what you were saying her argument is. But, of course, the critic…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 10:56 PM
26

Maybe he has that disease where he can't stop drawing pictures of dicks.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:48 PM
3

"Masculinity" appears twice in the article. "Men" appears nine times (ten if you include the hash tag #NotAllMen). "Male" appears five times. I reject your assertion due to lack of evidence and existing evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:47 PM
1

Men did not always commit suicide at such high rates. Male psychology could result in men being destined to always have higher suicide rates than women, but that doesn't mean they have to stay as high as they currently are.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:40 PM
3

The comment as I rewrote it, which is pretty much just the inverse of the original article, would do just fine on this forum. I've seen people post paragraphs of exposition here about why they think women are awful. They get downvoted to hell. EDIT: Here is a comment trashing women in this very thread, and it's downvoted. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8pwwzg/why_cant_we_hate_men_the_washington_post_has_your/e0f3iid/
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:30 PM
2

There's a reason the logic sounds pretty much exactly the same. Yes, and keeping the same logic would result in a comment that is unpopular here.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:46 PM
5

This article is so bad it should have its own subreddit!
/r/MensRights10/06/18 07:46 PM
3

And how many upvotes would this post get on this sub? Zero? If you replaced women with feminism and tailored it to make sense in that context, it might get upvoted. Comparing feminism, an ideology and political movement, to gender is apples to oranges so it's a pretty useless thought exercise.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 07:45 PM
3

Especially when published by one of the country's most influential newspapers
/r/MensRights10/06/18 07:32 PM
2

The funding needs to get yanked on this department.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 07:27 PM
2

This was posted on r/feminism and one response has already tried to say it probably written by a MRA to make feminism look bad. To be fair, I don't think the comment was saying that it was written by a false-flagging MRA, just that it's of comparable badness. Note the comment goes on to say: I'm suprised to read that this was written by someboy who had been publishing since the early 90s I don't think that commenter believes an MRA has been posing as a feminist academic for almost thirty years j…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 07:26 PM
2

What it really meant was "stop giving them attention because you make us look bad."
/r/MensRights10/06/18 07:23 PM
3

Sure I will. I have a time machine.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:59 PM
3

At this point, you've probably spent more time replying to me than it would have taken to read the post you claimed you didn't have time for. GG
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:11 PM
7

Those are not even factions of MRAs. They don't even call themselves that. At best there is some overlap in people, namely with MGTOW. The various groups of feminists actually call themselves feminists. There are also feminists who claim to be fighting for mens rights so men don't need our own movement, yet where are these people when other feminists attack men?
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:10 PM
3

Yet here you are, replying again.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:41 PM
4

I'm guessing this is the work of Megalia.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:36 PM
2

Well, culturally (and not racially) speaking, black men with economic and social issues have a wicked tendency to place themselves in harms way, and to die deaths that we will not call 'suicide' as such, but yeah, it's suicide. Indeed. I mentioned that in one of my other posts in this thread. I think there are some common threads among these problems and some race-specific.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:29 PM
2

Some people really can't handle being proven wrong.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:22 PM
5

while white men have a rate only a bit over 2x the black rate But that's a huge difference. But again, the topic at hand was the data in the OP. Anyway you slice and dice it tho, it comes up dead men, and this is mensrights, so why quibble over the color of the dead bodies. There could be different reasons for it by race. I'm not saying black men don't count or something, just that more white men do commit suicide more. I also noticed your source had Native American rates higher than whites whil…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:27 AM
4

There are just more of you so the larger numbers seem significant. No, white men do have a higher suicide rate, particularly middle aged white men. The rate of suicide is highest in middle age — white men in particular. I mean, you even acknowledged this in your other post. "Other factors like hormone deficiency are more prevalent in white people than other races, leading them to be more prone to depression and suicide." Treat the problems that cause suicide for everyone. The problems may or may…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:46 AM
6

And if this post were about some subject that is affecting white men more so than black men It is. The rate of suicide is highest in middle age — white men in particular.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:44 AM
7

Why are you holding up black men as though you have some idealize way of dealing with mistreatment? Black men commit a hugely disproportionate amount of violent crime, probably for similar reasons as white men committing suicide actually.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:33 AM
5

It was in the article, but I truncated the quote too early. Half of pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned, so many women don't address chronic health issues beforehand.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 10:01 PM
5

I hate the way this article compares the US to other to other countries. They compare maternal death rates but not the prevalence of the influencing factors. For example Half of pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned How does that compare to other countries?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 07:24 PM
2

Most of feminism’s moves are an attempt to break white males hold on the economy To be fair, they do plenty against non-white men, too, but they pretend to give a shit about them. Ironically, some feminist ideas meant to target white men end up disproportionately hurting non-white men even more.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 06:20 PM
7

She is taking the "beatings will continue until morale improves" approach.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:21 PM
6

And who would want to give money to this joke of a paper?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:20 PM
18

Feminists usually fight men via white knight, government, and corporate proxies.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:19 PM
2

They will suck your dick for a story!
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:51 PM
1

I don't fully agree. There are some truly self-loathing male feminists out there. Also, some of these allegations against male feminists may be total bullshit, but their feminist religion makes it impossible to fight them.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:49 PM
19

"Looked into" does not equate to "believe."
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:46 PM
1

That's always been goal.
/r/MGTOW09/06/18 07:42 AM
3

No, that was Anna Kasparian of the Young Turks. Anita did get triggered by Sargon showing up to one of her speeches, however.
/r/MGTOW09/06/18 07:13 AM
1

And read what?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:39 AM
6

the attitudes that Gamergaters have towards all non-White Western men can be seen on the (semi) official GamerGate subreddit. Like what?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:08 AM
2

I doubt you would get much leeway with the school unless other parents were willing to stand with you. Public schools in this country are nearly impossible to hold accountable.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:01 PM
9

Yeah, get back to work guys! The empowered single moms need your money! Also check your privilege and go fuck yourself!
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:52 PM
1

What country? Private or public school?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:51 PM
14

Yes, it's reference to Atheism+ and the rift that it caused.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:12 PM
1

Gosh, I wonder why we have such a massive tuition debt problem in this country.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:55 AM
5

Remember Knocked Up when Paul Rudd was secretly playing Fantasy sports.
/r/MGTOW29/05/18 03:44 AM
4

Notice how she gaslights him about breaking shit.
/r/MGTOW29/05/18 03:43 AM
3

Exactly what I was expecting
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:04 PM
2

Could you flesh out your concerns better? This is really vague.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:26 AM
8

Men are a huge majority of workplace deaths, suicides, prison inmates, are treated worse by the legal system and law enforcement in virtually every way measurable, have no reproductive rights, and it's increasingly acceptable to openly discriminate against us in the private and public sectors and to redistribute wealth from us to women, just to list some of our biggest issues. A question for feminists: How is wearing a dress going to help any of that? Edit: To add another question for feminists:…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:15 PM
2

There are a lot of Bay Area transplants there.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:10 PM
4

It's more retarded than satire.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:09 PM
8

This looks like gay conversion therapy once you remove Jesus.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:09 PM
1

Yeah, CA has very strict anti-discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:59 PM
50

18 years a slave
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:55 PM
2

It's intended to be ironic. They aren't actually shaming the men. What's the problem?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:49 PM
1

Yeah because 17yo's who haven't gone through even a 101 econ course allowed to sign for 100k+ of high-interest private loans is entirely their fault. A poor life choice is a poor life choice. It doesn't matter how excusable the choice was. Making a poor life choice also doesn't mean you're human garbage or something. We've all done them with varying consequences. That said, you don't have to take econ 101 to figure out that some degrees have better earning potential than others. You can find thi…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:42 PM
2

No. It's just that, like /u/karatdem said, I expect tax payers to end up footing the bill for these people's poor life choices, especially as the gender of most of the debt gets played up. "But I didn't see that the joke was on me."
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:21 PM
6

It might be them defining rape to include retarded bullshit like people drinking and then having sex, which you certainly can do and still be a good guy. It's not rape, though.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:10 PM
2

Not his views on abortion. IT’S BECAUSE HE’S DOING WELL. Lot's of people oppose abortion so there's obviously more to it.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:50 AM
2

That’s one of the obvious fantastic byproducts of [the movement] is that men are being forced now to have to grow and develop force
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:38 AM
1

I'm not a lawyer. You could argue for disparate impact, but that's not going to get anywhere if it's part of the normal/necessary job requirements or some legalese way of saying that. In other words, you would have to prove that the degree requirement isn't a sensible standard for the job in question and perhaps even that the employers knew this.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:03 PM
3

Based on past experiences, that debt is likely to end up dropped in our laps, just like all the rest.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:10 PM
3

Administrative bloat doesn't get enough attention as the colossal drain on our education system that it is.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:09 PM
2

It's already been a hot topic here at times, especially Bernie Sanders' campaign.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:07 PM
3

They dominate politics, making up most of congress, the senate, and the house. There has never been a male president. Most of the richest people on the planet are women. You didn't even address the point /u/Draggonzz made. Assuming all men share in this power is an example of the apex fallacy. Men as a group get nothing out of what you are assholishly alluding to. Feminists love to bitch and moan about who is in positions of power, but you never actually look at which gender they are leveraging …
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:06 AM
1

If you want a direct comparison, I'd say go the the LGBT subs. There's a lot more positivity because there's more people channeling their energy towards positive ends. They are positive about things like the street in Tulsa that is getting named after them and the Pope being nice to them. We aren't at a point where anything like that would happen for us. The LGBT movement has done things like forcing Christian bakers to bake their wedding cakes, ousting Brendan Eich, boycotting Chick-fil-A, trol…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:05 AM
1

I hope that you see my broader point here that the bad faith becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. I don't. Because in the real world, most feminists are closer to my point of view than what the people on this forum think feminism is. Most feminists are not activists. They just answer "yes" when asked if they are feminists. I'm not that concerned with such people. I'm most concerned with feminists politicians, academics, media personalities, and ones in influential positions in corporations or mun…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:23 PM
1

Okay, if every point at which we might agree on is dismissed as me being one rando on the internet, this really won't go anywhere at all. I'm not dismissing you. I'm just saying don't expect feminism at large to get any points from this. For the sake of brevity, is there one or two points you'd like to focus on? Responding to all this will just snowball the exchange. Do you at least understand why we assume such bad faith from feminists? That's what I hope for you to take away from this.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 09:02 PM
1

Have you ever tried to argue with regards to something: "Yeah, I think your general critiques are valid but at the same time I think you're overestimating their importance and I don't think your line of reasoning is what will lead to a solution"? That's me with the Duluth Model. It's a hard position to argue. Happy to go into more detail on this should you wish. That's just one thing that I added to what Halafax already said. I don't see it that way. it's a societal way of thinking that both gen…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:03 AM
2

I think that feminists have, by and large, progressed past the concept that gender is a zero-sum game. I think MRAs are still in that phase. I'd add the Duluth model to the examples /u/Halafax said. I don't know how you square this with radical feminism's oppressor/oppressed gender dynamic either. Men are the primary victims (and women are frequently the perpetrators). That's not the overwhelming message I see from feminism. Like Halafax said, feminists name a lot of bad things after men. Again,…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 10:49 PM
3

What is it that feminists say that you think we are ignoring? What is it that MRAs are doing that you think we are ignoring?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:53 PM
17

I tried looking like that, but I couldn't grow a hunch on my back bigger than 3 inches. I even tried the 8-minute hunch workout. What's the secret?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:53 AM
2

I'm trying, I guess? I am just me. But I don't think I'm the exception; I don't think most feminists operate from the presumption of female superiority in 2018. Like I said, you're just one internet rando. There's no way you're going to redeem feminism as a movement by yourself. And the strange thing is my nicer comments get more downvotes. That's a thing I'm mulling over It's because people think you are basically concern trolling. Those rare occasions that I mentioned above? Many of them have …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:14 AM
3

I don't think it is the end-all-be-all and I don't personally see other feminists making that claim either. They don't literally say "toxic masculinity is the end-all-be-all." It just dominates their discussions, even when they don't call it "toxic masculinity" like Mens Lib often does not. I do see the "aggrieved entitlement" angle, which is considered part of "toxic masculinity" but not really argued that it stems from hatred of the feminine, to be fair. It's just not that often and usually is…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 02:18 AM
1

I think it's only a matter of time before there's a major schism between the classical left and SJWs/feminists. Plot twist: Already happened with the rise of the New Left in the 1960s.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:23 PM
4

I think fair way of describing it in non-dictionary terms would be, "Men being punished for being too feminine." That's a narrower view than encompassing all harmful gendered expectations place upon men. If you limit it to that, toxic masculinity cannot be the end-all-be-all of men's issues the way feminists seem to say it is. You want to talk about male disposability? I'm down. I think it's a real thing. I think we tend to hold men more accountable to the concept (misappropriation, really) of S…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:54 PM
1

Ah yes, the NGE
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:24 PM
4

Feminists have an irrational fear of men and male-dominated spaces in particular. It's where the authoritarian drive to control men comes from and why they intrude on and destroy male-dominated spaces constantly.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:09 PM
53

What kind of piece of shit has so many dicks in her while here husband is deployed that she doesn't even know who the father is?
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:47 PM
6

It's in it's low-grade but pervasive form of telling males, "Real men ________." Real men are good at sports, have big muscles and big dicks. Real men don't cry or show emotion. Real men are always 100% in control of their situation. Real men don't like pink, do anything that might even remotely be interpreted as faggots and don't have sons that are faggots. Real men pay child support - even to their rapists - for the "good of the child." Real men are fine not getting custody for the "good of th…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:47 PM
6

feminism is represented by the majority of people on this planet who believe in equality between men and women Are you saying you're the real feminist?
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:26 PM
1

Cuba's health care stats are notoriously dodgy. Your own source links to another source that says as much.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:28 AM
2

I'm not surprised. I actually read it anyway. I couldn't imagine the eggshells I'd have to walk on to post there. FeMRADebates was bad enough.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:43 AM
1

Did you mange to stay on unbanned? I tried to post there and was automodded right off the bat.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 12:58 AM
1

The hacker known as 4chin?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:42 PM
3

This is mutually assured destruction to me. Feminists want to destroy male only spaces. Fine. Female only spaces are coming down with them. We'll stop when they stop. Unlike MRAs, feminists have the ear of many powerful politicians (and the corporations who buy). They could easily lobby to get rid of some of these anti-discrimination laws if they are that bad.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:41 PM
7

You sound salty as fuck that the law isn't allowing you to "punch up" and discriminate against men (in these cases). Cry more and go fuck yourself asshole.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:39 PM
1

neutered men Like the Orgazmo villain?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:02 AM
2

I think that you do not understand privilege theory Ah yes, the go to flimsy defense of privilege theory. Where are all you people when some asshole employs your pet theory to justify their discriminatory behavior? Funny, there don't seem to be many people telling them they don't understand privilege theory. Imagine that. It does not have to do with individual condition Why do you guys jerk-off to "Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack" then?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:58 AM
2

The social justice police started this thread.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:37 AM
3

I thought you were being sarcastic. So...were you? You haven't spoken to her, I take it. No. Why would I need to speak to her?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 01:23 AM
3

An actual influential feminist said this: "I. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. II. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. III. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." Your implication that this is just a few nuts on tumbler and other social media is nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:56 AM
1

"There's no answer you can give that is satisfactory or correct."
/r/MGTOW06/05/18 04:23 PM
1

No dumbass. I'm saying it's literally impossible to stop from being discriminated against without having to tear down the people discriminating against you.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:45 PM
1

Ever heard of "lift yourself up without dragging others down"? Like who? Like what? Who else did this?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:28 PM
1

She was a genocidal misandrist. "I. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. II. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. III. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race."
/r/MensRights03/05/18 12:42 AM
1

Doesn't anyone have a single fucking valid point that can stand on its own without the need to fucking stab others? No? What do you think any kind of "rights" movement is going to do? You can't be discriminated against by nothing. There has to be someone doing it to you. Any issue you bring up is going to necessarily have someone responsible for it. Someone has to be part of the problem, even if you don't explicitly name people or groups.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:00 PM
1

Have you ever tried to talking to your friends in gender studies about Sally Miller Gearhart?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 10:56 PM
2

Liberals: MORE BLACK TRANS CAMP GUARDS PLEASE This is actually what passes as "minority rights" in $CURRENT_YEAR though.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:47 AM
1

Why would you expect your colon to have a ring? An echo, maybe
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 02:09 AM
1

It's rarely talked about even amongst people who distrust the media a lot. He won a Pulitzer in the 1930s, and they declined to rescind it in the early 2000s. Obviously, time is part of the reason, but it's still important to remember that institutions we think of as prestigious may not be quite so.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:22 AM
1

They gave one to Holdomor denier Walter Duranty and wouldn't rescind it even when the New York Times wanted to. Its value was inflated to begin with.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:05 AM
3

Or wear masks of ex Presidents, so lame
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/18 01:50 AM
0

IIRC the prevailing theory is that men have better spatial awareness, and that's why we are better at chess.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/18 12:19 AM
3

It's not going to be easy, but you've got to try.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:10 PM
4

This is what people think is acceptable behavior for women, being entitled, violent bitches.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:19 PM
6

Someone is using feminism to manipulate vulnerable minds to keep people apart. Yeah, they're called feminists.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:48 PM
10

http://archive.is/uzTaS
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:17 PM
4

UN women once cited a directory on someone's hard drive in an official report so there's that. https://medium.com/@KingFrostFive/citation-games-by-the-united-nations-cyberviolence-e8bb1336c8d1
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:31 PM
1

Wrath of Khan is too mainstream. I gotta drop B-movie references.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:17 AM
2

Hey man, you ever see Night of the Creeps? Based on a true story, yo.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:11 AM
5

Yep, but thankfully he lost according to the scoring method of that debate (and probably reality).
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:06 PM
9

Pound me too is just a re-branding of previous misandrist moral panics about hetero male sexuality. It's meant to make everyone forget about Rolling Stone, mattress girl, other obviously fake bullshit that pieces of shit like you insisted we believe because a woman claimed it, and the lawsuits over Dear Colleague. It is the same bullshit as #YesAllWomen, but that one was too close to Jackie Coakley so it tanked. Dear Colleague finally got repealed, much to the chagrin of pieces of shit feminists…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:23 PM
1

I suggest you go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:05 PM
13

Do you not know what you're defending?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:33 PM
13

Someone asking you out is not harassment.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:21 PM
8

Sacrifices must be made if you want to get ahead. For men, this tends to me working longer hours, having longer commutes, and/or working dangerous jobs. For women, you might have to put up with unattractive men hitting on you. The horror!
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:58 PM
10

He was ridiculed heavily for it not longer before pound me too blew up.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:44 PM
2

0
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:47 AM
-1

That's not a ghost. She just smells so bad it's distorting the air.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 11:47 PM
8

Why should only fathers be forced to do that and not mothers? Also, sending checks in every month isn't much of a connection.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:46 AM
14

Even if a father claims the child, the father can't just give the child up unless the mother agrees. Mothers decide if a man is going to be a father or not, unless you hypocritically stick to abstinence only.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:37 AM
8

It's pretty easy for a woman to say that she doesn't know.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:25 AM
1

Gay Straight conversion therapy?
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 01:25 AM
5

This is why the "wage gap" is a men's rights issue despite what the occasional concern trolls say here.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:12 AM
16

What I meant was that you can't just drop your kid off somewhere if you're a man. You can do that as a woman if the father does not know about the kid yet. It's kind of hard to give birth to a child and not know about it.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:04 AM
25

Getting sole custody so you can actually use them is not.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:49 AM
17

I don't think that person has the best understanding of biology.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:47 AM
6

It should fine people $100 for every day they don't masturbate.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:04 PM
2

I hope you're right.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:21 AM
5

I don't think it would work very well at all, but I don't think the kind of people who would do this give many shits about false positives. It would just be programmed to scrub "hate speech" just in case. I could see it being targeted at the MRM and banning Mens Lib type feminists, for example.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:03 AM
16

Kind of off topic, but I fully suspect there will be AIs deployed to heavily censor online communication (think Metal Gear Solid 2).
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:28 AM
4

I'm pretty sure that's Patton Oswalt.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:25 AM
4

It's basically a female "power fantasy" of sorts. The man being so "in love" with her that he is willing to die for her is part of the fantasy.
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 05:25 PM
5

You left out one of the key parts that relates directly to this. The husband is the villain of the film, and one of his villainous acts is sneaking aboard the lifeboat meant for women and children. Righteous men are those who are willing to sacrifice themselves. Refusing this self sacrifice is something only a bad guy would do. That's part of the film's message.
/r/MGTOW25/03/18 04:38 PM
1

same way in the US. I have no idea how this isn't illegal under gender discrimination laws. It doesn't adversely affect women. That's how.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:13 AM
2

Which is why Andromeda was a disaster
/r/MGTOW21/03/18 02:52 AM
3

Too bad Eric "The Clown" couldn't knock the gunman unconscious with his big shoe.
/r/MGTOW21/03/18 02:26 AM
2

Either women are too stupid to commit suicide effectively, or they don't actually want to die when they "attempt suicide." Pick one.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:42 PM
6

I doubt it would have much effect on suicides, at least long term. Japan has an even higher suicide rate and strict gun control.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:05 PM
1

Yep. See the the piece of shit ambivalent sexism inventory that we talked about a little bit yesterday.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:33 AM
5

Look at the headline though. Extensive Data Shows Punishing Reach of Racism for Black Boys If only affects black males, then there must be sexism at play as well. You can't be racist against only one sex. That, by definition, means you are also sexist, yet the only use of the word "sexism" is sexism against women. Previous research suggests some reasons there may be a large income gap between black and white men, but not between women, even though women of color face both sexism and racism.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:29 AM
1

That's not what I means, you fucking liar. It means your opinion does not or should not matter because you are male/white/straight/whatever, in other words the opposite of taking other people's experiences into account. Any veteran of this sub has seen it used before so we aren't going to fall for this bullshit. That's just what you lying shit bags say to take the heat off whenever the concept comes under scrutiny.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:56 PM
5

Notice that it took being linked to a bigoted man for them to face any consequences. They were given a pass for their own violence and bigotry.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:40 PM
4

It sounds like they used the ambivalent sexism inventory to measure sexism. That's a total joke. It considers negative opinions of feminism to be sexist.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 06:02 PM
1

What does that matter if you're already sticky? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:19 PM
9

Gotta reject those patriarchal beauty standards...after you make giant piles of money off of them
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:08 AM
24

Not anymore. She looks like Eminem from fifteen years ago.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:58 PM
4

You can't be a bad spouse and a good parent. Part of your responsibility as a parent is to provide a stable home for your children. Being a bad spouse will destroy that.
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 03:14 AM
6

It's about a guy falsely accused of rape. He is getting out of prison for it at the beginning. Everyone thinks he did it, and he's completely ostracized. He video tapes his entire day, even taking a shit, out of fear of it happening again. A bunch of weird conspiratorial shit happens, and I forget how it ends.
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 03:04 AM
1

Ever see the movie Freeze Frame?
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 02:51 AM
3

Does anybody bother, really, to prove that someone made a false accusation? Rarely
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:19 PM
1

That's not racist. Some parts of the world are rapier than others.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:59 PM
33

What does being multi-cultural have to do with not hiring men? Trying to appeal to the Amazon women on the moon?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 01:37 AM
2

What's racist?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:28 PM
3

That comment was in response to this article. Of note Authorities failed to keep details of abusers from Asian communities for fear of “racism” Lucy Lowe, 16, was killed in 2000 along with her mother and sister after her 26-year-old abuser Azhar Ali Mehmood set fire to their house. Cabbie Mehmood targeted Lucy in 1997 and she was just 14 when she gave birth to his daughter. He was jailed for murdering Lucy, her mum Eileen and 17-year-old sister Sarah. But he was never arrested nor charged in con…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:20 PM
2

Where do people get this shit?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:42 AM
5

I love the full quote. It's so Orwellian. “The new mantra is ‘We believe the women,’ and he is frozen in ‘I believe the men,’ ” Speier said in an interview. “He’s beyond rehabilitation in my view.”
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:58 PM
1

Most of the mentions of Obama are the phrase “Obama era policies.” I don’t know what else to call them. Not all universities are private, and even private ones have to comply with Title IX. They changed their policies to comply with the Obama administration’s guidance, not just to satisfy loudmouth feminists.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:51 PM
4

It's called a shit test.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:07 AM
7

The Obama administration issued Title IX guidance that empowered them. They did exactly what the "militant feminists who've overstepped rational thinking" wanted. How is it not relevant that the President did this?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:06 AM
4

Obama, Trump, Hillary have no place in this argument. Obama and Trump have no place in arguments about their administrations' policies? What?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:11 AM
1

I think she will try, but the DNC might shut her down. She will probably struggle to raise money for it, too, after such a devastating loss to Trump. Her attempt might not even become "official."
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:59 AM
17

What’s stopping Aziz from naming her other than the fact that his career depends on being a good little feminist ally and taking this shit?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:13 PM
17

No. Feminism rules the social sciences. They aren't going to raise these questions.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:06 AM
4

Vitamin Dick?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:05 PM
1

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/307014-sanders-dems-must-move-beyond-identity-politics That's the third straight post of yours with a link to the same article. I already responded to this. I know you are too full of shit to address my response so you will keep clinging to this and ignoring reality. You sent me two seperate messages, I respond to both. Where? I had one instance of accidentally submitting a reply before it was ready so I deleted it, finished it, and reposted. I don't see anyw…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:54 PM
1

Please consolidate your bullshit into one pile and stop spamming me. Your article is from November 2016. Within a year, he was invited to speak at one of their idiotic marches. This is his support base, so mired in identity politics that they lost their shit over having a man speak. Also within a year, he was defending Dear Colleague. Your sound byte that you must have spent all night Googling doesn't make up for this. You voted for someone pretending to be like Sanders. Trump was pretending to …
/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:06 PM
4

Did you even know what selective service was before this post?
/r/MGTOW15/01/18 05:47 AM
1

Its a deep state funded deception to get people arguing about race and gender instead of class issues. Your candidates do plenty of arguing about race and gender. One of them's party platform includes radical feminism. That's undeniable. Sanders took up class issues as his main platform and the idpol right wing of the dnc and media attacked him. He took up the wage gap and Dear Colleague on his own. He said white people didn't know what it's like to be poor on his own.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:43 PM
1

rejecting the idpol deception You don't know what rejecting means.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:34 PM
1

Once again, find out the difference between right wing identity politics and the left. You keep saying things like this, yet every left wing politician you support is a feminist, which according to you is right wing. Nah, just havent a clue what you are talking about. Again, says the guy who didn't know Stein's party or its platform.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:27 PM
1

Those are right wing politicians like clinton and obama, liberal identity politics is conservative because it plays groups off each other while being right wing economically and selling out the people. Those politicians are precious to me or the left. Once again, Sanders. Warren, and Stein undeniably do the same things. Stein's party include fucking radical feminism in its goddamn platform. Get a bit of political knowledge and get back to me. Says the guy who thought Stein was a Democrat, didn't…
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:17 PM
1

If men vote against it and women lobby for womens stuff to be included then obviously men won't be included. Most men aren't even aware of how screwed they are getting by these laws, and your precious left wing politicians are too busy supporting the misandrist laws and kissing the ring of feminists to do anything. It is historically accurate, the DNC and mainstream media blacked him out because of his workers The fact that they used idpol to attack him is irrelevant. They do that to each other …
/r/MensRights14/01/18 05:35 PM
1

Its much more complicated than that, firstly because its more costly being a woman, and not everyone is single Are you saying women’s healthcare should be subsidized at the expense of men? And if men tend to vote against universal health care, they will get excluded from it ACA is not universal healthcare. It requires insurance companies to charge the same premiums for men and women despite women being more expensive. It also requires coverage for female birth control but not male. He rejected i…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:51 PM
1

limited nationalized ownership So..."limited" state ownership of the means of production? Yeah, when the scrape that 10 million men are in serious trouble. ACA subsidizes women at the expense of men. You don't know what you are talking about. Yes, you cretin. I have said that wage gap is lies multiple times. You can read more about sanders rejection of identity politics and how the identity politics / right wing of the democrats used idpol against him here. Lying about the wage gap isn't reject …
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:44 PM
1

National ownership So..state ownership of the means of production? Im taking about 10 million men losing access to health care. You didn't answer the question. Are you talking about the ACA or not? They talk about the gender wage gap lie, while promoting policies that increase the real wage gap. Perhaps I was unclear. When I said "their policies," I mean Sanders, Warren, and Stein. Good video down the bottom here explains what they are about. See above. I was talking about Sanders, Warren, and S…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 06:49 PM
1

Re-nationalizing Do you mean state ownership of the means of production? 10 million men losing health care Are you talking about getting rid of the misandrist ACA? You can see by their policies they are aren't right winger that hide behind paying lip service to the wage gap lie like Clinton and Obama. Their policies include addressing a wage gap that doesn't exist. You have no evidence that they are only paying lip service. I also know for a fact that Sanders was not paying lip service with his …
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:57 PM
1

re- narionalizing What that hell does that mean? The lie that there is a gender wage gap isn't really a big problem compared to other problems men are facing. Purely subjective I said the left rejected neoliberal idpol as right wing divide and rule. You just said Sanders and Warren were playing along. That's not rejecting it. Trumps isnt worried about alienating people on his side by not telling the lie. Are you saying Sanders and Warren have a lot more feminists supporters than Trump thus they …
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:57 PM
1

This article extends Irigaray’s work in order to theorise breastfeeding from a perspective that is both feminist and queer. Someone got paid for this.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:12 PM
1

All the promises that trump and sanders made to the working class that trumo clearly has no intention of keeping ... Sanders means it. Promises like getting rid of the fake wage gap? The hall mark of liberal identity politics is engaging in identity politics while being right wing economically, and scapegoating men. Oh, so feminism is only bad when paired with right wing economics. "It's OK when we do it." Warren and Sanders are not this sort of politican, they may well have to play along a litt…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 03:51 PM
1

It’s been less than six months since Sanders defended the Dear Colleague letter. You expect me to believe he’s a changed man based on absolute fuck all. left wing of the dems They are a bunch of feminists. Are you saying feminists are left wing? Jill Stein is also not a Democrat. Elizabeth warren has done a lot of campaigning for the middle class - that mens predominantly white men - if thats where your interest is Supporting the wage gap myth is supporting the redistribution of wealth from men …
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:10 PM
1

Sanders Nope Jill Stein She is a member of the Green Party whose platform includes fighting the patriarchy. Mega nope. Elizabeth Warren The wage gap believer? You need to drag your system way back to the left to limit corporate power. Left? All of these people are feminists. Feminism is a right wing ideology according to you so how is voting for a bunch of feminists moving left?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 10:46 PM
1

So who should we vote for that would have stood up to Google, defended Damore, and has a chance in hell at winning anything?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:59 PM
1

It is the topic, the ability to take class action suits against corporate tyranny. Do you believe Google is committing corporate tyranny here?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:20 PM
1

Can you say anything about the actual fucking submission topic?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 09:26 PM
5

Winning it would be great, but just dragging it into the sunlight is going to red pill a ton of men.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 12:52 AM
1

So what does Mr. True Left Wing think about the bourgeoisie tech giant's treatment of its employees?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 12:49 AM
1

So where and when should we take a stand?
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:05 PM
1

What I bet is happening is that they are discriminating against men, whites, and Asians but not hard enough to satisfy insane SJWs so they files lawsuits too.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:30 PM
3

Don't worry there either already laws to "fix" that, or there will be.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:24 AM
4

Yeah, it doesn't assume you are guilty. I think if Hillary had won, she would have tried to move us toward something more like this.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:23 AM
6

Currently the age is 67 for both I wish they would put that in the article. Saying the retirement age was lowered without saying the previous age is just annoying.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 05:44 PM
1

I wouldn't be able to verify your version of events so I wouldn't trust you if you posted a thread like this.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:38 PM
1

Good argument. Maybe you should have tried it before trying to lie.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:02 PM
1

I don't even know who he is. I learned from experience to check comment histories when people complain about being banned from a subreddit so I can verify that their version of the banning checks out. Yours does not. You said you didn't insult anyone when you provably did. Now you're moving the goal posts by claiming you didn't insult anyone from the subreddit. That is not what you claimed.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:54 PM
1

i didnt insult anyone He was wrong in this video. Why mgtow is aligning with reactionary idiots like BPS is beyond me.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:35 PM
3

Private clubs that require membership operate under a different set of laws. In CA where this lawsuit is filed, ladies nights are not allowed. States are inconsistent on that one, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/17 05:01 PM
4

VICE Must be this one whipped as fuck
/r/MGTOW31/12/17 08:14 AM
2

You're very evasive. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 03:11 AM
2

If it's Marxist, it is left wing. Are you saying you think it's left wing but not Marxist?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 03:01 AM
2

Your first reply to me was: Who supports them is evidence of what they are. The context of this post lead me to believe you were claiming feminism was right wing or at least not left wing. If I'm jumping to conclusions then by all means, tell me what you think it is.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:57 AM
1

If it's not a left wing argument than what is it?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:50 AM
1

They are advocating for a different definition of protected classes, this time along oppressor/oppressed line. Quoted again: It can be argued that the reason why a law like the Unruh Civil Rights Act exists is to protect marginalized people, based on the categories named above, and that white, cisgender, straight, able-bodied men are not a “protected class” since they have always been protected by the law, both on paper and in practice, anti-discrimination laws or no. You never answered the ques…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:41 AM
3

No it's not. People are more than capable of supporting ideas against their own self interest. Let's cut the bullshit. Here is an idiotic misandrist article linked here from the Mary Sue that is an example of using feminism against men. http://archive.is/YPNEy This article argues that anti-discrimination laws should not protect men. How did the author make this argument? Most men understand the need for women-only spaces in a world that has historically shut women out. In other words, women are …
/r/MensRights31/12/17 01:43 AM
2

It's a fallacy because you are ignoring the content of feminism and instead characterizing it based on who supports it.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 01:09 AM
1

Even Microsoft Word is onto their bullshit!
/r/MensRights30/12/17 11:05 PM
3

That's a guilt by association fallacy.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 10:10 PM
21

"Male allies" are masochists.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:15 PM
1

Trudeau?
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:58 PM
1

"It can be argued" is just weasel wording, motte and bailey trash. The author is making that argument but wants that back door open to deny it.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:58 PM
1

Doesn’t that imply women do need men?? Yes. Feminists will say they don't need men then in the next breath demand that men protect them and give them shit. That's where "Particularity over universality" and "Partiality over impartiality" come in.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:56 PM
3

Can anyone find the full study outside of a paywall?
/r/MensRights30/12/17 05:23 PM
3

Ideas don't stop being Marxist based on who supports them.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 04:53 PM
5

It's ironic that so many people blame Marx for feminism, considering that the entire purpose of funding gender and ethnic studies was to reduce the focus on class. It's not ironic. When your thought process is Marxist (women are the oppressed class, men the oppressors, etc.), you identify as Marxist (there are more self-identified Marxists than conservative professors in the Humanities in the US), your theories have a Marxist lineage (Marxism -> Frankfurt school -> critical theory), then I'm afr…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:23 PM
1

If you think the police aren't doing a good enough job, the answer to that is police reform, not hash tags and mob justice. Also, police reform must be just and not "more scalps on the wall" that tramples due process.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:38 AM
1

If we're being pedantic, it's evidence. It's just not proof.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:24 AM
2

Nothing to see here, move along
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:22 PM
3

In space, no one can hear you nag.
/r/MGTOW18/12/17 03:13 AM
2

It has big money because it's good PR to give to to causes in the name of "equality." Look what the NFL just did to try to quiet down the shit show regarding the national anthem. The intellectual line of this stuff is Marxism -> Frankfurt School Critical Theory -> Lefty Identity Politics.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:37 AM
2

No, he did throw that college men that bone WTF does that mean? How is supporting the Dear Colleague guidelines throwing college men a bone?
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:43 PM
2

He also wanted to keep the Dear Colleague Title IX bullshit so tell me another one.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:36 PM
5

Just because Insectional Feminism throws around Marxist terms doesn't make it Marxism, it camoflouages it. The whole thought process is Marxist. It's "from each according to his abilities to each according to his her needs" applied across identity lines. The privilege concept, the progress stack, affirmative action, the wag gap myth, etc. are all derived from this idea. Where do you think the idea that you can't be sexist against men because men are the oppressing class comes from? You aren't go…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:30 PM
2

You can vote for emerging left wing politicians that reject identity politics, like Corbyn and Sanders. I live in the US so I'm not that familiar with Corbyn, but Sanders? Really? He declared himself a strong feminist, and Gloria Steinem declared him an honorary woman and campaigned for him. That's just one of his more glaringly obvious plays on identity politics. He has others like supporting the wage gap myth.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 08:00 PM
3

It's Marxism applied with race, gender, etc. in place of economic class. If Marxism isn't the true left then what is?
/r/MensRights17/12/17 07:49 PM
1

I think you misread the title. It said if "Moore were woman", thus it wouldn't be homosexual to have relationships with boys.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:21 AM
2

Future?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:11 PM
1

I'm confused. You've compared me to feminists and said I have a victim complex because you want me to to continue pointing out media bias and dishonest hit pieces? You have odd ways of attempting to motivate people.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:26 AM
1

Mods stickied a post about Net Neutrality.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:56 PM
1

No, but you have responsibility to those in your group say tho. As I told you before being vocal against things like sexism and what have you is going to be noted by others and makes it harder for the media to say bad things about you. They'll just lie. See the attempts to shut down The Red Pill screenings. Now your just making shit up because your panties are all in a wad. What part is made up? Someone posted on this sub about a Vice hit piece, and you've spent, what, a dozen posts complaining …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:55 PM
3

projecting her own experiences within her social circle I wouldn't even give her that much credit. I think she made that up.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:27 PM
1

The point, dumbass, is that we can't control what Vice media, for example, says about us. We literally don't have any responsibility of that. We can't make them not smear us. All we can do is destroy their credibility so their hit pieces aren't effective. You said you wanted the MRM not to be a joke, yet you want us to shut up about media bias and take dishonest hit pieces on the chin without complaint. That's a bunch of nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:27 PM
1

Yes it does. I just fucking told you that I said these things so people understand the situation.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:51 PM
1

You are completely ignoring the other things I've said.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:42 PM
1

No, I'm not. Read what I actually wrote. By all means, stick to your principles and call out any misogyny or whatever that you think should be called out, but if you think the MRM could be taken more seriously if only we just tone policed harder, you're a goddamn fool. That leaves plenty of room for the MRM to do things. If you had bothered to ask me more about this concept: The smearing of the MRM happens and will continue to happen because enemies of the MRM control powerful enough institution…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:07 PM
1

You don't have any evidence and didn't even make an argument. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:51 PM
4

Wait...what?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:48 PM
1

Fixing your image tho is going to make it easier for MRA's to do something about men's issues if they actually get off their ass and do something about them. We can't fix our image because we don't control our image.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:44 PM
2

You aren't an MRA. You are here to concern troll and stir up drama. As I said, it doesn't matter what we do. We'll never earn the approval of our enemies while remaining effective.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:19 PM
4

He was the former FCC chairmen who implemented Net Neutrality.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:13 AM
3

Not everyone has the memory and attention span of a fucking moth, you know. I remember before anyone talked about the alt right. Back then, notable "MRAs" included Elliot Rodgers and Roosh V. The smearing of the MRM happens and will continue to happen because enemies of the MRM control powerful enough institutions to do it without any meaningful consequences. They don't need any facts on their side. By all means, stick to your principles and call out any misogyny or whatever that you think shoul…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:38 AM
2

Meanwhile at Vice
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:24 AM
1

A leading sociologist said on Friday having a daughter is a way for men to instantly become feminists. WTF is a "leading" sociologist? "It's like he finally decided to read his own lyrics," Kimmel joked. You are talking about satire as if it's serious. Most men don’t know that gender is as important to them as it is to women because, “Gender remains invisible to men, and this is political,” Kimmel argued. Hey, he's actually sort of right but not in the way he thinks he is. He thinks that men not…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:00 AM
7

Lena Dunham?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:19 AM
1

shit
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:16 AM
2

The BBC needs defunding.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:45 PM
2

You can't bludgeon through bureaucracy. You can't protest through it either.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:34 AM
3

Easy there Harvey
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:19 AM
1

The guy from Phantoms
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:31 PM
4

I like th Bill Burr bit "There are no feminists in a house fire."
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:18 AM
7

I mean, what was the original context of the picture?
/r/MensRights05/11/17 09:00 PM
2

it seems stupid to make a financial plan for a divorce I don't intend to get Who plans to get divorced?
/r/MensRights05/11/17 07:19 PM
23

Where does this pic come from?
/r/MensRights05/11/17 07:14 PM
3

WTF are you talking about? Are you fucking retarded?
/r/MensRights05/11/17 05:52 PM
3

No one goes around telling men that we need to be white knights and protect m'ladies from car theft, though. That's what's missing. Feminists have used Weinstein and other similar situations to shit on all men for not white knighting hard enough. They haven't said much of anything critical of the women who take money to keep quiet and leave guys like Weinstein in a position to continue to victimize.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 05:45 PM
2

NPR needs to be defunded.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:02 AM
1

I like how the one area women aren't superior is the problem, and everything else is treated as the way things should be. So why aren't more young women also outperforming when it comes to making more money than their parents? It could be due to the gender pay gap.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 04:39 AM
2

make more money than women Men do indeed make more money than women overall. However, as it's already been pointed out, the trend is reversed so before long this won't even be true. You also ignore what men sacrifice to get to this point like working more dangerous jobs, longer hours, and longer commutes. comprise an overwhelming majority in government despite being a minority That only benefits the ones who are in the government. I've yet to see anyone who harps on this make a decent argument a…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:14 AM
2

Your wife sucks. You need an upgrade.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:29 PM
2

more of this please
/r/MensRights27/10/17 01:28 AM
3

On the politics sub people were talking about how much more reliable these comedy shows are for news. I don’t like to dismiss them.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:20 PM
2

Women are a much larger voting block than men, especially if limited to only black men.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:09 PM
3

It hasn’t been corrupted. This was always the intent.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:06 PM
3

If you save your heart for someone who has earned your trust as a friend then you are a “nice guy.”
/r/MensRights19/10/17 06:19 PM
5

Don't dump that shit on me. Your fellow progressives stood by enabling Weinstein in exchange for fame and fortune. Get mad at them.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 10:20 PM
1

I'm on that same list, but I didn't bother trying to post there after one or two times.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 10:57 PM
3

Did they finally ban you?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 10:34 PM
1

I meant that in a complementary way, FYI.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:38 AM
1

give men The problem is they don't give women anything. That's why they aren't covered.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:44 PM
2

It's not even equality. It's a tiny bit less privilege.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:36 PM
2

Click bait garbage Now, before all the dudes reading this think they're off the hook and can't help acting in their own best interest, note that all this might have a cultural basis rather than a biological one. Soutschek said it was unlikely the differences between men's and women's brains existed inherently, and were more likely the result of ingrained social attitudes. "The reward and learning systems in our brains work in close cooperation," he said. "Empirical studies show that girls are re…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:16 PM
1

It occurs to me that men have to pay for their own birth control already dont they? There aren't many options for male birth control. Insurance and medicaid don't cover condoms. Vasectomies may vary by company because there is no law requiring coverage of them. Men dont get free condoms-so doesnt this just make things more equal for men, meaning women will also have to pay similarly to men? The impact of this is going to be a blip, but yes, I'd argue it is technically more equal. This submission…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:00 PM
1

natural rights
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:06 AM
1

the balance of the benefits provided against the societal ills produced by fast food availability or car ownership I'd say are more positive (or less negative) than the same analysis for guns. Freedoms and rights aren't and shouldn't be based on contemporary interpretations of the "greater good." If you buy into that, there are no inalienable rights. That's why the UK put Count Dankula on trial for hate speech, and we wouldn't.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:27 PM
1

That two thirds of gun deaths in the US are suicides doesn't change the gun homicides rate, which is what I was under the impression we were talking about. You said gun deaths. It's been murky. The feeling that you need a gun for self defence is at least partially driven by the amount of guns in circulation, surely? Not really. For example, in the UK, the percentage of home invasions that take place when someone is home is much higher then the US. Burglars don't want to get blown away so they wa…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:54 PM
1

Yes. In all likelihood, it's going to be a very small number now paying their own.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:26 PM
1

While dead by gun isn't any more dead than dead by knife, or garrote, or poison blow dart, or anything else, killing someone with a gun is easier than killing someone with a different weapon, they have range, they inflict deep wounds and require little in the way of strength or skill to operate in a way that follows through on a momentary lethal intent. You're talking about homicides. About two thirds of gun deaths in the US are suicides. These people are just going to find another way to do it.…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:01 PM
2

Can you read more than three words at a time?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:47 PM
6

You're being sarcastic, but that is actually debatable. Women obviously pay taxes into the system, but there are so many programs like this one that exclusively or disproportionately benefit women that women as a group may end up paying a net zero or subzero amount into the system. A study found that to be the case in New Zealand. It's a different country so I can't say it's true in the US, just debatable. We'll probably never know here. The people who study gender issues are indifferent if not …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:28 PM
1

There are plenty here who would like guns for any one of the many innocent reasons one would want one, and they still campaign for losening of the restrictions. Not enough to do anything effective, obviously The case study which best applies to the current situation in the USA is Australia, they had the widespread gun ownership and the widespread desire for guns but tightened up their laws significantly in 1996 and 2002 (if memory serves) and saw a noticeable decrease in total homicides and a hu…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:06 PM
1

That's a faulty conclusion. Your country (and many others with lower gun violence) don't have the demand for guns that we have in the US. That's why you have gun laws in the first place. There weren't enough people who wanted guns to object to passing the laws. You would have far fewer people with guns with or without your laws. Gun control laws are prohibition. We have similar laws about illegal drugs. That's not stopping large numbers of people from acquiring them.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:50 PM
2

The law being changed required employers to pay for insurance plans that cover birth control. There are already existing religious exemptions for this as a result of a court challenge. The change is that more employers will now be able to get out of it. It's unlikely to affect many people. Most employers aren't going to be that religious. Many of them would include birth control coverage without laws requiring it anyway. Medicaid is our public health care program for the poor, and it includes co…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:26 AM
4

in your country you can't arrest somebody just for having a gun, they have to shoot (or threaten to shoot) somebody first. That's not even close to true. The laws vary a lot across states, but generally speaking, there is a lot of red tape and paper work to own guns. If you do not have the proper stuff, and a cop asks for it, you're going to be in serious trouble.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:04 AM
3

Because we're not a society of monsters If you want to make an argument that providing the birth control will reduce unwanted pregnancies thus unwanted children so we should force employers to provide it then by all means do so. But for fuck's sake, stop being a pompous, self-righteous ass clown about it.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:58 AM
13

Maybe someone who disagrees with fathers getting automatic joint custody is using this for publicity. That's some red pilled as fuck thinking there. However, this is Detroit. They aren't known for having tons of money lying around so they are probably going to try to get out of paying some of the welfare and getting him to pay child support.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:27 AM
9

WTF?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:25 AM
7

I'm not sure about Norway, but here in the US, there's been this ridiculous campaign to get the womens' soccer team paid the same as the men. It's been completely devoid of intellectual honesty. They claimed they deserve more pay because they've had more success then the male team, but pay is based on the revenue they are generating. They tried to refute this argument by claiming womens' soccer was also making more money but compared a womens' World Cup year to a mens' year without one. The prev…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:10 PM
24

When you're privileged, equality less privilege looks like oppression.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:32 PM
1

Good luck. I think it's great that you're aware of this: This data gap is no accident, for most politicians and bureaucrats either don’t care or would prefer such information to not be made available.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:20 AM
1

Defund them.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:39 AM
3

Or to defend the buffet from Michael Moore
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:23 AM
2

Many subs run bots that autoban or automod users who post on subs that feminists or the left don't like. This is against reddit rules, but the admin don't give a fuck because they agree with the politics of the people running the bots.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:54 AM
14

"I need feminism because men have nipples."
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:56 PM
2

This is just a copy and paste of "Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack."
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 06:45 AM
3

Social Justice is a religion.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:54 PM
1

Credit to /u/auzzydawg for posting this in a couple of other subs
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:36 PM
3

This is like gay conversion therapy for straight men.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:01 PM
1

Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:27 AM
1

Because some very powerful people and institutions don't want men becoming "class conscience" but are perfectly comfortable with black people doing so. Thus, they've steered identity politics in that direction.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:23 AM
3

How can you manspread in a chair by yourself?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:34 PM
2

It's not gay if Ben has a feminine penis.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/17 07:42 AM
14

Or just piss on her leg
/r/MensRights12/09/17 11:28 PM
2

It's going to be hard for them after the years of bullshit like Rollingstone and Mattress Girl.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:22 AM
3

The problem is that you have idiots running around shrieking about "wage gaps" while ignoring the sacrifices men make to their safety for those higher earnings (not the same as wages).
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:19 AM
7

This "fine whatever" should have been a big meme.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:17 AM
3

Most likely they are waiting for a good victim story to rally around. I've seen this floating around, but I don't think it's getting much traction outside preaching to the converted.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:11 AM
3

Identifying a news source as "non CNN" does make it more credible though.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:39 PM
1

You look like a retarded extremist to me. There are several other topics about this that don't link to Breitbart.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:54 PM
1

Yes, if we all played nice no one would say anything bad about us just like no one said anything bad about the guy who wrote this google memo.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:42 PM
2

If anything, we're undereacting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcTdlCtW2dA This video focuses on left/right politics. I know the MRM transcends that, but censorious cultists don't give a shit. MRAs might as well be neo-Nazis to these people.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:29 PM
1

Just wait a few years.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:19 PM
1

Fuck the patriarchy to death, as it were Death by snu snu
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:07 PM
1

yeah http://archive.is/OolNE
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:00 PM
11

More of that male "privilege" at work
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:08 AM
1

Women are a majority of voters so...
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/17 06:24 PM
11

Gizmodo is a shit hole. That's exactly what I would have expected there.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 03:26 PM
8

"I don't give a flying fuck." - the proper response to anything a "diversity consultant" says
/r/MensRights05/08/17 10:50 PM
1

the very first link I gave you - is the cia talking about how the french postmodernists are counter marxist They were opposed to the USSR's communism. You just told me earlier that there is more than communism. Now you're implying left = communist. Which is it? The Frankfurt School also went away from USSR communism because there weren't enough tankie idiots signing up for that moronic death cult. That's why they went with the cultural approach, repressive tolerance and all that, that we are bea…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:08 AM
1

They aren't marxists. They self-identify as Marxists. This conspiracy of yours is getting rather large. They vote for the likes of clinton, who is a right wing puppet of the oligarchy. Sanders was more popular among college students. I'm not sure about professors. They are way left of the general public so there's no reason to think they were especially thrilled about Clinton.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:15 PM
1

There are more Marxists than conservatives in the humanities. Whatever they're spreading either isn't working or isn't right wing.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:54 PM
1

It's fucking annoying.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:20 PM
1

Seriously
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:20 PM
1

Stop replying twice to every goddamn post.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:19 PM
1

it was intended to be a call for people to use democracy to defeat totalitarian democracy. WTF are you reading? They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc. That's not supporting democracy. It's an argument for censorship. That's exactly the thought pro…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:18 PM
1

I never read it So you know nothing about why modern feminists feel entitled to shit on men constantly then. CIA and capitalist foundations used postmodernism as a weapon and spread it around western universities. That doesn't make it right wing.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:59 PM
1

Still not answered
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:50 PM
1

Yes, the Ford Foundation is known for its left-wing pursuits. What's your point? You never answered my question about Repressive Tolerance.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:45 PM
1

What? I'm literally talking about OG Fankfurt Schooler Herbert Marcuse writings being horrendous bullshit that is still dragging us down today. Did he or did he not write about Repressive Tolerance? Ford, Rockefeller and Carnigie Foundations basically created gender and race studies. What page is that on? I read the first two, and there's nothing close to that.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:37 PM
1

Yeah, Herbert Marcuse's writings are right-wing propaganda.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:19 PM
1

No, it's not. You think the Frankfurt School is right-wing. You have no perspective whatsoever.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:10 PM
6

In the meantime, I want to thank the members of our community who were on the front lines of managing the events of the Campus Reform incident It's interesting that they call it the "Campus Reform Incident" as if it's Campus Reform's fault. Why don't they get all it the "We Hired a Genocidal Lunatic Incident" ?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:09 PM
1

Americans on the right dont seem to understand the political spectrum. Its not a choice between fascism and communism, there is lots of space in between. Do you even read your own shit? Right Libertarians, trump supporters and other fascists
/r/MensRights01/08/17 08:57 PM
0

Gulags and famines are obviously the answer, eh comrade.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:00 PM
5

The LA Times might as well change this headline to "Trump 2020."
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:47 PM
9

Maher was ahead of his time on this.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:40 PM
3

A lot of the comments are calling out the bullshit. Good.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:44 PM
2

I don't know. A guy gets his dick chopped off in Hostel 2 so it seems appropriate.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 01:28 AM
2

This is a Tankie, not a troll.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:19 PM
1

Yeah, it's a photo, but it's on all of their blog pages, even ones that have nothing to do with gender issues. https://gamilyf.com/blog/2017/5/10/weve-changed-our-name
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:56 AM
1

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic, but that image is just the header for their blog page.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:07 AM
5

This is where all that tuition debt is going.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:06 AM
3

Great post
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:07 AM
5

Apostrophes are phallic symbols of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:58 PM
12

this post, for example, doesn't just say: "hey, false accusations happen and you should be aware of that." It's not a post about false accusations. It's a post pointing out how batshit crazy anyone who believes in rape culture is.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:44 PM
78

Are the kids the difference, or is it the authority figures?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:34 PM
4

"Toyboys must save empowered wymyn from their lonely, childless existence or else they are misogynists." Is that better?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:40 AM
3

It's going to take some very very hard hits to change that culture. So feminists are bullying autists.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:21 PM
8

The comments tore this apart. There was like one supporting it.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 08:39 PM
1

Upvoted for Frank Drebin
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 02:12 AM
5

accurate
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:52 PM
40

That's not institutionalized racism - it's just regular racism. I wouldn't even necessarily go that far. People could just be more scared of what they believe to be a firearm than they are of a sword.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 04:57 PM
1

I don't know if I feel entitled to have society continue on, but it's certainly in my best interests for it to happen! And that means babies need to be born, preferably to married parents who are well educated and financially stable and capable of raising the next generation of useful citizens. And preferably to parents mature enough to know that having children requires great sacrifices and lifestyle changes Other countries don't allow employers to demand so much labor from their salaried worke…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:10 PM
2

no
/r/MensRights14/05/17 06:28 AM
4

Would kind of school schedules this vile specimen to speak?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 02:17 AM
1

married virgin autists, truly scammed by the system
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 04:29 AM
4

Can confirm, visit regularly, just noticed this
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:12 AM
1

I don't think it applies to curriculum materials.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:53 PM
10

Do you not realize that this film has nothing to do with the subreddit?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:28 PM
17

If you actually followed the men's rights movement, you would know The Red Pill documentary is not misogynistic.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:10 PM
9

The CEO of Netflix likes money? Holy shit!
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:56 PM
22

Is there a woman named "Netflix" ?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:53 PM
9

What's bizarre about that?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:53 PM
5

r/justconcerntrollthings
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:39 AM
3

There's text. You have to highlight it.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:06 AM
10

I always wondered where it came from.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:53 AM
6

Solutions are for problems. There is no problem hence no need for a solution.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:48 AM
20

You're all thinking about this wrong. It's not about "forcing" girls into STEM. It's about stacking the deck as much in their favor (which is a polite way of saying stacking the deck against males) as possible. This is only happening because STEM is one of the only good things that remains male dominated. Once it's about 80% female, feminists will move onto some other area for which to achieve "equality."
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:47 AM
5

old but funny
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:14 AM
2

We have many stupid laws. It's easy to mix them up.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 11:22 PM
13

Tactical asparagus incoming.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 11:18 PM
6

Being rational has no place in $CURRENT_YEAR.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:50 AM
2

I'm shocked you were ever allowed to post there.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 02:48 AM
6

Afraid of future humanoid sheep overlords?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:59 AM
5

You don't want to stay in this relationship. If you do, six years from now you'll find the message where she talks about how the side guy makes her cum so hard, but she still loves you, sorta, and doesn't want to disturb little Niala's and Valdimir's lives. You will have been wondering why her book club meetings ended so late and why she never wanted to have sex the morning before. This guy gets it.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:52 AM
1

I just noticed someone already posted this. Damn reddit's search is bad.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 09:59 PM
2

Here we go again...
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:41 PM
1

I actually read it fairly regularly. I tried to post there but was preemptively "shadowbanned" (LOL). To be fair, they do allow criticism of feminism, but it has to be done with "kid gloves." The top post on there now is about men not want to have sex and being coerced into anyway. They talk about stereotypes of male libido fueling that drive this. This is all a perfectly fine and legitimate men's issue. However, don't expect pointing out that feminist rape culture hysteria is part of the proble…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:03 PM
22

The delay is probably to wait until the controversy blows over. After that, they will probably let the women-only clubs stay, you know to "fight discrimination."
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:45 PM
1

Also, median number of cats owned
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:06 PM
17

Here is the link you asked for. You left out some key parts. In that sense, there was nothing in the article that should have shocked or surprised anybody (or so we thought.) Nothing shocking or surprising about disenfranchising people because of their race and sex? I guess it is technically true. It's just standard feminist theory to be an authoritarian, sexist, racist lunatic.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:11 AM
5

I have a notion that you only mentioned this case because the accused person is a woman. Pointing out the overwhelmingly better treatment women get in the legal system is one of the topics of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:08 PM
3

There's nothing emotional or unfair about what I said. Slapping a "post natal depression" label on her behavior changes nothing. Her child and any potential future children have to be protected from the crazy. No one would ever argue that a father who tried to kill his kid deserves custody even if he were suffering from PTSD due to experiencing combat in the military.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:47 PM
7

So basically, you want a batshit crazy person prone to murdering her young children unless a team of "helpful people" are around to manage her crazy out on the street. That's comforting.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:28 PM
34

They said it was "standard for feminist theory."
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:03 PM
1

She eats boogers.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:57 PM
2

What happens if she has another kid?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:47 PM
3

This is MTV. There's no way that's going to happen.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:53 PM
12

"The beatings will continue until morale improves."
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:29 AM
2

This is a new platform for you, redditor for one month.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:23 PM
6

Lauren Southern is a man, though.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 12:40 AM
1

How do you explain the rise of Anita Sarkeesian?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:21 AM
1

Right on queue
/r/MensRights03/03/17 07:24 PM
2

They get a lot of money from the government due to their strong presence in education. It's not just education, though. I did a little digging on who was getting grants for domestic violence prevention a while back. That being said, they get private funding as well, with George Soros being the most infamous. You can look at any wealthy progressive and probably find them funding SJWs.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:27 PM
3

If you really want something ridiculous, look up SVU's GamerGate episode.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:04 AM
4

Now that you hate black people, we're going to have to double the number of diversity training sessions.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:11 PM
6

If rape culture exists, it applies only to rapes with male victims. Male rape victims (unless they are children victimized by men) are largely trivialized socially, culturally, and legally. I still wouldn't call this rape culture since doing so is perpetuating a misandrist propaganda term. How many times have you heard a "don't drop the soap" joke on tv? The existence of jokes is not rape culture. It's the lack of taking male rape victims seriously that's the problem. You can take something seri…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:02 PM
1

"The culture is changing, and it no longer privileges [the stereotypical male] point of view," says Liu. https://i.imgflip.com/a2gvk.jpg
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:43 PM
2

He was pretty crazy in GTA V though.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:16 AM
3

I'm doing my part, m'lady.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:11 AM
3

I'm lazy so here's her wikipedia. http://archive.is/EOEOo#selection-205.1-205.203
/r/MensRights09/02/17 01:30 AM
1

How are you going to sit there and DEMAND to be accepted into male dominated things only to pull shit like that? Feminists demand to be accepted because they want to do things like this. They want men under their thumb in all facets of life.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:40 AM
5

"While retailers would not comment on the pay and conditions of their staff, industry insiders said it was difficult to compare jobs in warehouses directly with those in stores. Those stacking goods in distribution centres tend to be paid more than shopfloor staff, but some retailers said this was justified by the uncomfortable conditions, additional skills and unsocial working hours involved." This kind of thing is exhibit A of why I am anti-feminist. If these jobs are so similar, why aren't wo…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 12:09 AM
1

That's not a health issue, that's superficial The police that will eventually arrest you for not paying are not superficial.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:44 PM
5

This has always been one of the dumbest memes. I wonder if 4chan started it to troll feminists.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:08 PM
1

This has to be a troll account...right?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:43 PM
142

Just put a "College Students Whining" sign next to it.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:57 AM
11

Trump cheated. He used her corruption against her, not fair!
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:21 PM
13

It's called virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:20 PM
2

creating computer systems that link campus police with city police departments to help ID, track and arrest protection order violations on campus This is the only one of those that makes any sense for the federal government to do and only because offenders could cross state lines.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:39 PM
10

It's impotent rage at losing and having a President that won't bend the knee to feminism and is trying to cut some of their sweet patriarchy dollars.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:54 PM
2

Pretty Dentonish then
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:34 AM
27

Imagine if the college acted like Gawker. "This guy wants us to stop calling him a rapist. We won't."
/r/MensRights16/01/17 11:37 PM
9

He's still mansplaining.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:46 PM
2

For fuck's sake
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:44 PM
5

We believe in accountability and justice for police brutality and ending racial profiling and targeting of communities of color. Women of color are killed in police custody at greater rates than white women, and are more likely to be sexually assaulted by police. Interesting that a women's march chose to compare different races of women instead of comparing women to men. I wonder why... We also call for an immediate end to arming police with the military grade weapons and military tactics that a…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 01:10 AM
22

r/ OkCupid is cancer.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:22 PM
8

Are you daft? How have you missed this? You must have been too busy focusing on issues that only affect women.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 01:00 AM
6

I have literally no Idea what situation you're referring to and what that situation entails, so you're going to have to give me an explanation "We need to be deliberate about understanding the different paths that can land women in prison, be more attentive to women's unique needs while they are incarcerated, and do more to support women and their families once they are released. I will institute gender-responsive policies in the federal prison system and encourage states to do the same ..." Hil…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:42 AM
10

That assumes that "focusing on women" means focusing specifically or primarily on how women are victims. Perhaps I was too vague. I was alluding to Clinton's gynocentric prison reforms and similar proposed reforms in the UK. These women aren't victims. They're criminals. They are doing exactly what you said. They are focusing on incarcerated women instead of examining misandry in the legal system. I'm almost certain that a feminist world wouldn't believe those things. The education system is a f…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:22 PM
16

Focusing only on women leads to increasingly disparate treatment of men. For example, the legal system is already harder on men than women, yet some politicians still prioritize better treatment of women. One of your links has another example. It talks about medicine being male biased despite women living longer than men. Yet another example is in education, Women are the majority of college students and graduates. Surely this inequality is unacceptable! No. Instead, feminist complain that there…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:58 PM
1

If you think of a better title, by all means resubmit. I don't speak normie!
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:33 AM
11

The tl;dr - feminist groups and Democratic senators are expected to blast Trump Betsy DeVos over donations she made to FIRE. FIRE has filed lawsuits on behalf of men who claim to be wrongfully expelled from college for sexual assault. For example, Sen. Bob Casey, (D-Pa.) has said, “Ms. DeVos must fully explain whether she supports the radical view that it should be more difficult for campus sexual assault victims to receive justice.” Feminist won't give a shit what you have to say, but your sena…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:37 AM
5

If there is no one else left to claim it, just send it to Jessica Valenti. She bathes in male tears.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 07:48 PM
6

The best solution is to freeze sperm samples prior to deployment.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:58 PM
2

This just a bullshit excuse to subsidize themselves. Giesbrecht would like to see such training in all workplaces and professions. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Also READ MORE: 73% of Canadian women and children who seek emergency shelter are turned away: survey Fuck you.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:47 PM
2

There is the middle ground fallacy/argument to moderation.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:58 PM
4

create an activist fire under women to start treating other women and our America with more respect than we have obsequiously shown for our traditional male dominators. More respect? interesting
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:19 PM
1

I predict lots of literally shaking.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:17 PM
1

Maybe the person who made the graph has a fisting fetish.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:13 PM
2

The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory in all its cancerous glory.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 07:25 PM
1

That's the one.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 05:40 PM
4

The U.N. once published a report that cited the author's C: drive.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:37 AM
2

When men are thrown in prison because of false rape accusations yet women who are convicted of rape don't see a day in prison, that is a double standard. But things like this are related. The reason this happens is because of the way male sexuality is seen as something that victimizes women, but female sexuality is cute and non-threatening. That's the same reason a gender reversal of this ad would spark some outrage. People would claim it was a traumatic PTSD inducing experience for the woman to…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:48 AM
1

Perhaps my best typo ever https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um4-d7VzZiE Why do you think we say "holy shit"?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:08 AM
2

It's kind of like "accept Jesus ass your savior."
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:44 PM
21

You have to love social justice. It's perfectly acceptable to bash men, but putting certain words in front of the word "men" turns it from gospel into blasphemy.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:09 PM
1

They cite "50% of gamers are gurlz" to argue games aren't appealing enough to women. SJW logic.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:36 PM
6

The irony is that F-on-M rape would fall under the "sex wars," which is what he's complaining about, but there's nothing we can do about that. No one has trouble believing that men would rape other men.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:35 PM
2

Switch to baskets of fruit analogies?
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:12 AM
2

Because I read r/MensLib
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:08 AM
3

There seems to be a whole forest of low-hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:54 AM
2

It's not just twitter. He wrote an OPed in the NYT. http://archive.is/PJqDX Also, he is pretty much just parroting what Anita Sarkeesian has been saying for years. She's a feminist and got plenty of support from other feminists for her nonsense. This isn't just "some random guy says crazy thing."
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:23 AM
23

There are some decent points and some garbage. Male deaths do not prompt him to advocate for men; they prompt him to try to score points against feminists. He is advocating for men. He is preventing men who do dangerous jobs from being robbed of their just compensation due to policies to improve "equality." ...talking point in the battle against women earning a living Refuting 77 cents on the dollar propaganda is not battling "against women earning a living." But ideas about manliness are one ma…
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:06 AM
20

There are games with female heroes. Women are even the majority of players for some kinds of games (mobile and puzzle). This isn't good enough for SJWs. They hate pluralism.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 07:06 PM
1

I can only play Blu Rays because I bought an Xbox one about 2 months ago. I'm now contractually obligated to mock everyone who can't play them. It's part of a rebate program.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 04:21 AM
2

VHS?
/r/MensRights24/12/16 04:00 AM
1

"We [WAPO] can be more honest now that the election is over." - too jaded and tinfoily? Edit: Fooled by ancient article, shakes fist
/r/MensRights24/12/16 12:53 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRquPxdHNGE
/r/MensRights22/12/16 10:22 PM
1

a big melting pot More like a basket...
/r/MensRights22/12/16 05:13 AM
2

Stop mansplaining.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 01:41 AM
2

This list can go on a long way, so I'll leave it at that. I think you are conflating "moving right" with "being labeled right", and the two are not the same. I don't mean anyone's positions changed. I mean they support the political left less and less, especially with regard to actual voting. Most rational, critical thinkers in our movement seek a true equality of the sexes in all things. That's not right wing thinking at all, and yet we have allowed extreme leftist to badge everything we say an…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:12 AM
3

I have never fully understood why our movement is so commonly attached to right wing politics When the political left keeps attacking men, men will move right. It's simple.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:58 AM
2

Aren't le enlightened progressive feminist groups such as this supposed to be liberating people from gender roles and racial stereotypes? Why then are they telling people what to do based on gender and race? It's not limited to white males, by the way. See what they said about Kanye West.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:20 AM
4

The regulatory Tower of Babel is part of the plan, not a mistake.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:05 AM
5

Patriarchy
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:52 AM
1

I'm surprised posters here aren't auto-banned.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:55 PM
3

They finally had to put a Cork in it.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:51 PM
5

Nope. Accusers names will not be included.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 08:40 PM
13

But it is feminists whose fight is motivated by the belief that men can be better, if we can make clear that they, too, benefit from a safer, more equal and more just world. We have little choice but to try — men still control so much, and besides, many of us love them. "Unlike other authoritarian monsters, feminists are motivated by the greater good!" - I can't believe some people fall for this shit.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 02:17 PM
3

Worlds are colliding.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 10:17 PM
13

Yeah, I saw you commenting a few times. I was surprised they let you post anything. Overall, I think most of the users are well-meaning but struggle to grasp male disposability since it clashes with feminist doctrine about patriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:38 PM
3

http://archive.is/9MvRG Huh?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:30 PM
17

I've been lurking r/menslib and noticed this same thing (I was preemptively shadowbanned from there so I can't comment, LOL). Feminists who actually give a shit about men seem to have a problem understanding male disposability. Instead they focus on stoicism, but it's merely a symptom.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:10 PM
3

r/thatescalatedquickly
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter