TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Argentarius1 Archive

View 8 posts and 323 comments by Argentarius1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Use of AI to prep for something doesn't necessarily mean lying though.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 03:04 PM
4

Let that be a lesson: It's shitty activist types that want to portray women as cruel and arrogant and men as inept not normal women.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:25 AM
4

Abusing statistics is their main trick. Same with the idea that murder by men is one of the highest causes of death for pregnant women. It's true, but it's still incredibly rare because pregnant women are the most medically and socially supervised people on the planet and deaths by disease and accidents plummet when a woman is pregnant leaving rare murders a large relative fraction of what's left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 11:42 PM
-1

I advocated for sanctions and military actions against countries that are degenerate towards their women. Does that sound like a feminist point of view to you?
/r/MensRights14/07/26 10:46 PM
-5

Your point is very much worth remembering for Western men. I appreciate you making it and offering some perspective. There may be some nuances on which we disagree but we do not disagree on the level of mistreatment of women and girls being out of control in many non-Western countries. It becomes important in things like child murder, infanticide, sex selective abortion and IFV gender preference. Those things are moderately skewed against boys in the West. In parts of Asia and Africa those thing…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 06:23 PM
230

How do you have this attitude and not realize you're scum?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 07:32 PM
2

I don't know whether it would benefit you to engage with people that messed up or not. Depends on whether you could convincingly win the argument from a 3rd party's perspective or come up with something so insightful that it forced them to change their mind or learn something about how they think that would enable you to protect yourself better.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 04:08 PM
25

Arguably the US. Fewer misandrist laws than other developed countries and less oppression of war and poverty and disease than developing countries.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 09:28 PM
15

Yeah. 98/99% comes from including particularly craven female accomplices and trans people and other edge cases like that. But UK law does have rape laws defined as requiring the penis which skews things agains men.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 08:59 PM
4

95-99%ish comes from "rape is only forcible use of penis / male fingers + occasional female accomplices / edge cases like intersex/trans perps" 90-95%ish numbers come from if you include women using fingers / objects / disguising assaults as medical care / bathing etc. 75-85%ish numbers come from including "forced to penetrate" as a form of rape which is kind of a definitional matter I'm not entirely sure about.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 12:54 PM
4

Pearl reads as incredibly insincere and morally unmoored to me ngl.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 10:49 PM
1

I don't actually think that political change isn't part of it. I think its both political change and self improvement but self improvement is the one any particular young man has more control over and will produce more immediate effects and stabilize them personally more than political activism on behalf of men would. Political activism is necessary but its no substitute for personal growth. That's why career activists are nuts. Healthy normal people stop being political activists when their ori…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 12:48 PM
38

Feminist interactions are getting less sophisticated because the more perceptive among them have started to realize there's problems and risks to their behavior and it's mainly people who are generally behind the curve in stuff that are recent enthusiastic converts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 03:02 PM
1

70% of 1/5 the wage isn't that helpful. Neither is abysmal medical care and a life expectancy of 65.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 05:59 PM
1

Also it doesn't change the original point that birth rate is required for a good society.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 05:21 PM
1

I think you're underestimating negatives in most of Russia. The kind of American man who ends up in the armed forces is financially better off AFTER being divorced than the equivalent Russian ethnic minority is without that happening at all from sheer lack of economic opportunity. Their culture is also MORE oriented towards controlling men by their emotional weaknesses than even the West is if you can believe that.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 05:13 PM
5

Those are separate problems. I agree education needs massive reform (I actually just got offered a teaching job today at a boys' school and intend to help that way) but my point is not to underestimate how much damage a lack of young people will do to the wealth and safety and existential needs of a population. If there's no young men around, there's also no super geniuses or warriors around and your country will not be safe or rich for long.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 08:45 PM
12

There is no such thing as first world quality of life without a young educated population working and innovating. It is genuinely not possible.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 06:14 PM
3

Because the children need a lot of direct care from the mom in the early years and the dads need to earn more money to sustain all of them. What kind of question is that? Lol
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:20 PM
29

Imagine being such a hopeless piece of shit that you damage suicidal people with your ideology to control them.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 04:22 AM
27

Obvious propaganda to demoralize lol. Don't let it work on you. The only way they get to steal society from you is if you're too demoralized from all the conspiracy since you were a child to fight back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 07:11 AM
–

To me, not acknowledging there's a streak of dishonesty/social aggression in women that needs rules to manage is very odd. To me it reads as roughly equivalent to not having rules against the streak of overt/direct aggression in men. I mean I know the OP is an unsophisticated generalization but if there's a kernel of truth it would be that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:36 PM
5

Boys and disagreeable/autistic/socially disfavored girls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/26 05:19 PM
0

Had to be Alberta. No way the rest of Canada would get that right.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:18 AM
3

I'm gonna be honest with you man, the amount of rapes of little girls alone has put Europe on the brink of war. The ONLY option for you to be accepted at this point is to be on the side of Europeans defending themselves against the psychotic horrors committed by a large amount (not all) of migrants. It's not your fault personally but the hour is late for this.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 03:54 PM
0

That's really funny. Appreciate the impulse to lighten the resentful mood.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:51 PM
13

Genuinely awful. Like a shitty feminist but for men.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 06:01 PM
9

Genuine blood libel at this point. There has to be a price to pay soon.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:15 AM
6

Chess is like the worst area to pull that shit in too because the gender difference in obsessiveness and visuospatial IQ is bananas. Judit Polgar is the real deal tho. She broke top 8 in the world in her prime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 09:17 PM
-5

Retarded lie from people who deserve to be severely punished. Glad I could clear that up for you.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 07:58 PM
10

There's nothing worse than burdening children with gender politics. One of the worst things about feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 01:24 AM
1

Yeah. It's often disguised as something legitimate like parenting or workplace criticism or creating a welcome university environment.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:40 PM
2

This is the case everywhere where physical violence is under control. Women's social aggression is harder to control so they seem like worse people even though they're not.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 08:51 AM
2

What makes you think optics matter at this point? What if we just focus on inflicting unsustainable social, legal, financial, and reproductive penalties? Feminist behavior towards boys and vulnerable men already suggests they would be at war if they thought they could win. Why not take that level of cravenness and hostility seriously and give it the response it deserves?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 10:20 PM
1

You even argue like a woman, changing the subject to things I didn't criticize to avoid the things I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 04:39 PM
1

You are definitely a feminist because this is scientifically illiterate, superstitious self expression instead of an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 03:07 PM
18

This is why you never let feminists have power over boys.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 09:01 PM
-19

"Twice as violent" implies in all areas of life which is clearly not true and the phrasing is intentionally misleading. That is obvious to everyone including you.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:18 AM
-5

I agree with you that "twice as violent" is not fair. It's reasonable to say that and push back on it.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:44 AM
-15

Twice as violent is not an honest or realistic way to say this and you know it.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:43 AM
31

Yeah the rule should be don't donate sperm unless you think it's the only way you'll reproduce. If word gets out that's the only sperm available, it'll screen out misandrists and gene shoppers and leaves only the truly grateful still doing it.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 03:18 PM
-19

They don't all claim that. Don't be dishonest.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 08:03 PM
3

Obviously poor character lmao
/r/MensRights14/04/26 07:52 PM
0

It's heavily biological with many exceptions and changes in expression caused by culture and upbringing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 07:41 PM
8

Seriously considering that study or basically other feminist lie or power bid is failing a shit test. If you don't stonewall or punish people touting it you're showing weakness to these pathetic monsters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 01:52 PM
3

No worries lol. It's not an offensive error just sounds funny because it sounds (to me) like the phrase "Oh the humanity" which is a dramatic thing characters in very old movies used to say in response to disasters.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:06 PM
1

"Lesbianity" lmao Not really. People kind of have the opposite response and have contempt for men with too little sexual or romantic life not too much.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:56 PM
2

I really appreciate the effort and clarity of thought that went into this. I have more to say later when I have the time but you're totally right about the tension between viewing women as inept and as deserving of blame. That's a clear tension that has to be resolved for anyone to have a worldview that isn't utterly confused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 03:24 PM
10

This woman will reach the end of her life without her sons' forgiveness. I only wish she was capable of understanding why that's bad.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 02:46 PM
-5

Interesting question. That's essentially what Bryan Caplan said in "Don't Be a Feminist" That he's a feminist in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan just not in the West. Maybe you could say the brutality of those places to women is such an emergency that if feminism can make the slightest dent in it then it's doing good. I'd also want to be interested in how low-status men can be treated with extreme brutality too in those countries don't get me wrong but it's a point worth considering. On the other ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 12:55 PM
-2

Give yourself a break on the politeness stuff. You're not being rude or unkind at all.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 03:35 AM
12

Zero tolerance. Punish or stonewall misandry whenever you find it.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 08:26 PM
11

This is what got me. So much of it, like the pay gap, is just vulgar lying in their own favor. Feminists aren't my moral equal because I wouldn't pull a cheap lie like that.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:54 PM
-2

Lol
/r/MensRights28/02/26 03:20 PM
16

For men it's that overcoming the discrimination and getting what you want out of life anyway can be a clarifying challenge that improves you a lot. And also to remember that most women genuinely have no idea that a lot of things cheat in their favor and many wouldn't have deliberately cheated so its very important to refrain from indiscriminate anger towards women because most can't reasonably be blamed.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 10:23 PM
-2

That seems really unlikely ngl. Sexual attraction to neoteny (on the opposite end of the spectrum to savagery/hirsuteness) seems like more of a male sexuality thing.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 06:13 AM
30

The fact that men are significantly more likely to be positive taxpayers, last decades in careers, tolerate risk and danger, and invent new things will eventually reassert itself. It's not something that can be ignored forever.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:40 PM
8

True.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 03:47 PM
11

What else would you do if you hated Britain and hated the West but ruin the people who would defend and maintain it?
/r/MensRights21/02/26 03:43 PM
-3

It won't. Female dominated jobs are either based on women's genuine interpersonal talents which don't go away with AI and will remain useful or are fake sinecures which are ALREADY unprofitable but still safe for cultural reasons.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 09:41 PM
6

Some of them have been treated unjustly and some of those injustices do need political and cultural remedies in addition to the man healing and improving himself, which I agree is required.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 05:47 PM
-14

This is petulant and ungrateful.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 04:11 PM
74

They view boys as a vulnerable part of the patriarchy they can attack. Deserves life-altering punishment.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 12:23 AM
41

We're failing this shit test by not punishing these people
/r/MensRights29/01/26 09:38 PM
3

I wouldn't stay.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:54 PM
1

Because the tax base and the birth rate actually depend on them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 06:55 AM
12

Depends on the context. There are certain things men are gullible about. Women also have more vague autoimmune health issues that degrade quality of life in a way that standardized medicine can't always help and consequently more willing to try strange folk and new age remedies. Men don't have that same immune system sensitivity but the trade off is we get cancer more often and die sooner.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:24 AM
7

Other women in your field will fight you for taking this seriously because genuinely helping men requires you to deviate from feminist / social constructionist frameworks which are deeply counterproductive for most men. Here's my litmus test. Do you understand the following concept: The most obvious problem is not understanding that men need to feel admirable and capable and not just loved and it is a mistake to regard this need as a socially constructed artifact of patriarchal conditioning or t…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 01:42 PM
6

They took a framework originally designed for violent criminals in prison and applied it to little boys in school. Some think violent criminals are uncared for little boys and some think that little boys have something in common with violent criminals. Degenerate misandry either way.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 04:42 PM
15

Men are much MORE likely to be attacked on the street than women even if the men are not criminals themselves. If they mean sexual violence specifically then yes that happens to women more.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 03:57 PM
1

Thats why I said or knowing dishonesty or extreme assumptions relative to the facts they know. Theyre also sometimes dumb enough to brag about damaging people with lies which can be caught on tape.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 08:44 PM
22

" At the same time, I don’t believe someone should be punished simply because there wasn’t enough evidence to prove sexual assault. A lack of evidence isn’t the same thing as a false accusation, and treating it that way would discourage real victims from coming forward." Agreed. We shouldn't charge someone with a "false accusation" crime without some kind of evidence of malicious intent or knowing dishonesty or extremely reckless/unreasonable assumptions given what they knew at the time. It shou…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:13 PM
0

That's not a good enough reason not to help them.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 07:54 PM
1

You're good no worries. Happy New Year!
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:16 AM
1

I know I'm agreeing with you
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:01 AM
1

They're not remotely comparable. Chinese foot binding is a crime against humanity which should receive gigantic pressure campaigns, threats of sanctions, prison time etc. if it ever comes back and height surgery is voluntary self harm men should be advised against and emotionally supported through.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 11:20 PM
2

Even that doesn't make it painful to walk for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:05 PM
3

Yeah it's not comparable at all. Against their will as children with no anesthesia by their mothers and older relatives whom they should be able to trust are gigantic differences that make it a true nightmare.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:30 PM
10

The medical supervision and anesthesia available to Western men doing this as well as the fact that it is not done against their will as children make it vastly less barbaric. I'm not saying its not terrible but lets have some moral distinctions here.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:00 AM
8

This is one of those situations where your personal response and your political response have to be different. Political response: This is deeply unjust and we have to fight against it. Men need to win EEOC lawsuits and vote for politicians who are against these policies. Personal response: You have a responsibility to reach your full potential and develop yourself EVEN IF YOU ARE BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST. There's a real silver lining to this situation in that they wouldn't need to actively c…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 08:27 PM
2

No you name the crime against you with your full chest you don't play passive aggressive games.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 03:13 AM
8

Sometimes but it's still awful even then.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 12:00 AM
47

Yeah, he exists to trick men and boy moms back into feminism because the Democrats have some understanding that they're upset but no real insight into why or what to do.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 04:58 PM
5

The fact that you noticed and were upset when feminism damaged men instead of valuing equality means you can be confident your core character and values were always very good. It's very admirable.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:34 PM
2

Yeah I feel you there. Evil HR officers discriminating against men don't deserve the same sympathy as factory workers.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 06:26 AM
14

Don't gloat. Shithead feminists did that when men lost their livelihoods and I don't want to be like them.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:57 AM
3

There's no way. That'll turn into revenge accusations immediately.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:20 PM
8

Objecting to something that was taboo to even notice takes guts and decency and I appreciate it very much.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:55 PM
82

I don't think women should be in charge of boys anymore. They should learn standards of decency to women from good men but female teachers and counselors are too intemperate with authority over vulnerable males.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:44 AM
1

There will be mysteriously less once there starts being a punishment for it.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 12:57 AM
7

Female groups flatten the disagreements but it doesn't mean they don't exist.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 07:05 PM
0

This is why I have a weird sympathy for the type of feminist who is insulted and angry by accusations of mistreating men or failing in intellectual standards. Having the temerity to reject that means they have good fundamental values and don't really understand that a lot of the movement is more rotten than they are.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 07:02 PM
27

If this is sincere: It's evil and retarded. If it's a secret plot to make sure British boys are implacably anti-feminist forever: Carry on lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 05:08 AM
83

Do you think they know they're radicalizing boys against female authority for decades?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 03:09 AM
6

Lmao no. It's totally immoral and young men don't need a handout anyway just to get the boot off their necks. Absolute nonsense.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 06:11 PM
16

Well we all knew this was coming. Stupid cruel grift would happen in the mens issues milieu just like it did with feminism because men aren't actually morally better than women just easier to punish.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 10:24 PM
1

In the west no (in fact it's the other way around with sex selective abortions and child murder affecting more boys although not to the same degree) but in asia its been atrocious. That's why ultrasound techs aren't allowed to tell you the sex of the infant in India. I'm completely comfortable with western countries threatening war or economic sanctions to get countries to crack down hard on that because it's so degenerate.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 01:22 AM
-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 06:07 PM
5

The root of ALL gender issues? That's nuts
/r/MensRights05/12/25 07:55 AM
9

What the fuck?? Are you saying we need each other or something?? /s
/r/MensRights29/11/25 07:13 AM
12

I follow a simple rule: If it sounds like something a deranged / retarded radfem would say with the genders reversed I'm not interested
/r/MensRights29/11/25 07:12 AM
14

It's probably a good idea for you to develop a little more emotional sturdiness and not allow emotional unkindness that is likely to come from non men's issues people to throw you off balance.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:49 AM
-33

8 years seems like too much. Maybe that's just the maximum and the sentencing is likely to be less.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 12:17 AM
3

Yeah. Even 2x had more people trying to be reasonable about Doordash girl lmao
/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:11 PM
6

https://x.com/TheTinMenBlog/status/1759561848355946730 Men work longer hours, more dangerous jobs, do better in the math heavy end of STEM despite being actively discriminated against in it and in education and corporate hiring generally, more likely to move, less likely to take vacation. Correcting for those things erases the pay gap and for those under 30 its the other way around. Partly because of discrimination, partly because of the damage done to boys by families without fathers in them, p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 06:25 PM
9

I've stopped correcting people on that. It's a useful marker of either an ignoramus or a liar and a cheat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 06:25 PM
6

There are definitely exceptions. There will never be zero ultra high performing women if the system is meritocratic either.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:00 PM
5

Yeah for sure. And those roles are valuable, pay enough for a comfortable life, and are socially rewarding so women are often sincerely comfortable staying with them.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:17 PM
14

Almost everyone who is ok with tolerating huge amounts of risk and personal blame for failure for years on end instead of getting a quiet comfortable job is male. And there being more men than women with iq above 130 pushes things in that direction too. Now men being psychologically more extreme also explains a lot of the negative outcomes like criminal insanity too but you'll never have 50/50 CEOs unless you radically alter the nature of the job or unmeritocratically engineer the outcomes. Edit…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:16 PM
4

Yes. Intentionally. You have to unapologetically believe the in the value of men as they are to rebel against that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 02:51 AM
14

It's kinda funny how women turned into sexists and tyrants like men literally the minute they had the power to.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:05 AM
3

It's a minor semantic thing in this context so please don't worry lol
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:18 PM
3

I believe you. I think you meant well and used a term with which men's issues people happen to dislike / find problematic but you nevertheless meant this post and your comments compassionately. Thank you for that!
/r/MensRights11/11/25 07:00 PM
55

There's plenty of female tyrants in modern workplaces lol. Idk what these people are smoking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 04:35 PM
25

I got it mixed up with IVF but white women pick girls for IVF 70% of the time even if it costs much more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 11:00 PM
25

They abort more girls in some countries in Asia. That is utterly degenerate sexism without question. Applying pressure to those countries to make them stop is morally justified. But given all that, we should also think it's awful that we abort more boys in the West. Although one caveat to that is that murder gap against born boys in the West is much smaller than the murder gap against girls in developing countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 08:36 PM
5

French Feminists are almost as bad as British ones.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 05:44 PM
9

Honestly I'm at the point where benevolent sexism seems like the only thing that has a chance of working.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:00 PM
4

What young men want to see is heroism. Some forms of heroism involve violence but not all. This is why male oriented media nearly always includes coherent justifications for violence and villains who are killed or forced to reform by the end and why, in my opinion, stories about bad people who get away with it are more common in female or LGBT oriented media.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 08:10 PM
13

The expectation comes from believing the lie that feminism had an adequate answer to male issues. The correct orientation in my view is to expect nothing positive from feminism and remove its power to damage boys and vulnerable men and build separate structures to help them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 05:41 PM
8

I hate the idea of redshirting. It's based in misandrist assumptions of inferiority. Boys are amazing when there seems to be a worthwhile purpose and they slightly overtake girls in overall iq and equalize in verbal ability around age 16. Anyone who thinks they need special help as opposed to the basic expectation of male teachers (or uncommonly insightful female teachers) who understand their impulses and drives and don't treat them with contempt like girls have is out to lunch on this topic. T…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 08:59 PM
22

The instances of porn that result from coercing and manipulating mostly women and sometimes girls or boys or men are obviously horrendous crimes for which everyone involved needs to go to jail for decades. No argument there. I'm on their side finding those cases. But intrinsically misogynistic even when its consensual and transactional? No.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 10:45 PM
104

Genuinely can't help themselves can they? Hopeless bigots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 05:07 AM
1

Yeah agreed about Justin Bieber and situations like his. There probably need to be taboos for sexual harassing / misbehavior from women worked out in our culture too. I just think the Kathy Griffin thing is not one of those situations.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:29 AM
-20

I actually agree that people would be more upset if it was a straight man doing it to a woman as opposed either way with a gay man and a woman. I think you're right that they would be viewed differently but I don't think the cultural taboo against straight men sexually touching or joking with women in most contexts is overall bad. I don't want to remove that taboo because there are reasons for it although if it was done as a joke that the woman was in on and ok with then I agree the man shouldn'…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:22 AM
-23

He does the same double act with her every year on TV fully clothed and laughing and joking the whole time. And they're playing up a known dynamic which is straight women jokingly act horny towards gay men who play up how exasperated they are and the whole thing is overall safe.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:10 AM
-54

These are clearly just bawdy jokes come on man what are you doing.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:00 AM
4

Lol. Greater male variability is an established fact dude. Takes one google search. But here you go lol. Make sure you pay special attention to Figure 1 which shows that the ratio of men to women 3 standard deviations above the mean (roughly 145 IQ) is 9 to 1. (That figure also happens to show that the male mean is slightly higher but that's actually irrelevant for my point). You're out to lunch on this because of your social constructionist beliefs and its no longer a tenable position. https://…
/r/MensRights02/10/25 05:56 PM
2

Men and women are basically alike on average but the extremes make a difference. Almost everyone with an iq above 145 is male and that's why the top 1% of everything is male. To equalize that requires cheating in women's favor.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 05:35 PM
2

I'm not looking for a fight. I'm trying to show you that feminism convinced men to damage our own sexuality and sexual identity and cultural identity in a way that has weakened the only type of society in human history that gives a shit about women (the West) That's bad for you and bad for women.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 04:59 PM
6

Gender equality rankings are about women. No one judges a country by how well they treat men. And the birth rate and islamist rape and violence problems in these countries are severe and connected to this.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 03:10 PM
2

I have been to France and Britain. And the Rotherham scandal is breaking Britain. The rates of rape and extremism and the birth rate collapse being worse in more culturally masochistic countries aren't really debatable at this point.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 03:03 PM
5

There is no place in the developed world where men are treated better than America. Britain and Germany and Scandinavia have collapsing birthrates and are culturally masochistic to the point of being completely unable to stop Islamist rape gangs and extremists. These things are downstream from no longer valuing their own men and cultural identity out of fear of cultural or sexual chauvinism. France is even more destructively feminist than America is although they retain a little cultural chauvin…
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:54 PM
4

I think it's time to recognize that you were raised to be small and unobtrusive and to fight women's battles for them instead of your own on purpose because feminists and lesbians don't like or understand men and reclaim some of what was suppressed in you. Its immoral to attempt to flatten the male character and there need to be severe enough consequences now that that point is firmly understood. You should reconsider children. There should be part of you that survives instead of the civilizatio…
/r/MensRights02/10/25 02:03 PM
31

Men just realized we have to act as a political class 5 minutes ago. We've barely started. And if you think the sex that pays all the net taxes, does all the dangerous work, manufactures all the physical goods, refines all the natural resources, invents most new technology and builds all the buildings has no leverage with which to assert its own interests you've got another thing coming. This demoralization is exactly what the world does to us on purpose because it's the only thing misandrist wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 10:24 AM
8

Men need to gain status and power using their skills and other advantages and force it to. There is no choice. We must develop ourselves despite all the cheating that goes on against us and then pull younger or more vulnerable men up.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 10:19 AM
4

That's not necessarily true. It could be appended to something to emphasize how toxic it was like "toxic sludge". And I don't think that's the major problem with young men at all because they've never had more female media influence or been more likely to have single mothers or attend schools with almost no male teachers. There has never been a lesser expectation of traditional masculinity and they've never been worse off. If someone is typically masculine then they've had that intentionally stu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 04:52 AM
10

That's the ideal way of using the term not what it is commonly used for. "Defund the police" is similar. It has an acceptable technical definition of reforming police finances to support other services but it became a big deal because it sounds like abolishing the police altogether. Similarly toxic masculinity has an acceptable technical definition of only expressions/expectations of masculinity that are toxic but it became a big deal because it sounds like masculinity is intrinsically toxic. An…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 04:21 AM
8

Yeah I'm sorry but that framework/phrasing is way too easy to abuse and on shaky psychological ground so I'm done with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 04:09 AM
17

Yeah. It only ever serves as an excuse to promulgate abusive theories about it being self inflicted due to "toxic masculinity" or men being innately limited. Loathsome bigots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 02:11 PM
18

Myron Gaines is obviously a twit and Andrew Tate is a fucking criminal. Scott Galloway and Richard Reeves are condescending misandrists who view men as defective yet pretend to care about men. There's a lot of scum that needs cleaning out.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:53 AM
7

Yeah those people are malicious. Intentionally or unintentionally I don't care they need to be marginalized.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 10:53 PM
12

For sure. They think ill of men and do not deserve to benefit when men's strengths reassert themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 10:56 PM
11

Galloway is a traitor who needs to be thoroughly punished and discredited
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 06:11 PM
1

Blatant prejudice in education and work and family law and criminal law are the problem. There's going to be severe consequences for all of those.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:40 PM
3

Yeah that's why we have to stop lying to men that feminine evil doesn't exist or that defending ourselves from it is wrong. Utter horseshit. Vigorously rejecting any instances of misandry in your life is a great first step and will make you feel better even though it comes at a social cost. Sure, there's a handful of feminist ideas about men's behavior and women's negative experiences that make sense but their movement is infested with such colossal assholes that we're safe to reject it all and …
/r/MensRights06/09/25 03:26 PM
10

Women's dark side is not the same thing as their true nature or their whole character. You'll be able to see the good in them eventually if you're open to it. Feminist jerks have made it seem ok because they can't tell the difference between the male dark side and the whole male character so it feels normal to do the same in reverse but it isn't actually right.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 03:04 PM
19

University will become significantly less important when companies realize how meaningless degrees have gotten and start setting IQ tests and training young men themselves.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 02:34 PM
4

You need them to model monogamy for you. That's one of the main stabilizing forces of developed countries
/r/MensRights03/09/25 01:36 AM
31

What are these stupid clickbait mean videos? Absolute nonsense and bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:27 PM
5

I'm not interested in gloating about stuff like this. Vulgar and unkind to women and doesnt help men at all.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:20 PM
38

Nah, the education prejudice is the reason I tutor and the fact that the boys meet someone who cares even a little about their talent makes them improve sharply. Men just realized 5 minutes ago how thoroughly liberal women have been taught to treat us as direct economic and political enemies. We're just now starting to fight back. Young men are capable of incredible things when they're motivated and when they realize everyone was JUST LYING about how toxic they are out of degenerate resentment o…
/r/MensRights31/08/25 04:48 PM
12

Women have no vision and no theory of mind for men and they intentionally ruin things when they're upset. In other news: Water, Wet.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 07:21 PM
10

We all agree its a degenerate practice and we pressured India and China to stop it and YOU WANT TO REINTRODUCE IT IN THE WEST AS REVENGE ON PEOPLE WHO NEVER DID IT?? Feminists are morally and intellectually limited people and giving a single one of you an ounce of power is pure self abuse. We'll continue the make the world less degenerate for both boys and girls without you hopeless villains.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 03:48 PM
20

Feminism has been hopelessly degenerate and rotting women's minds for a long time.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 03:34 PM
2

To do this for him and come to a MensRights forum was all really generous and fair minded and kind. Especially defending his character against a woman's negative word. Men can't really fight back against that so you helped tremendously. You've already done above and beyond what's expected and don't deserve to be given a hard time.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:47 PM
13

Dr.K is a little too feminist for me in general but this is pretty good. A decent job or a social milieu that doesn't treat him with contempt will cut suicide down more for a man than any amount of mental health treatment.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:35 PM
1

Having women on his side will lessen the social damage for sure. He probably feels that he cannot accept that much help or show much emotion without being viewed as pathetic but I'm sure he appreciates it. It was a kind and decent impulse from you for sure. Offering to be character witnesses in a lawsuit was really brave and generous and I do commend you for that. I'd be extremely grateful in his position.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:28 PM
8

Some women ruin things with lies and gossip just for the love of the game. It's their version of antisociality because they can't hit people like shitty men can. Also, men don't really realize how much women view them as direct political and economic competitors now and how social aggression disguised as morality is likely to be the weapon shitty women use to express that.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:25 PM
22

Shit testing / bullying/ genuine delusion about their abilities relative to men. People just enjoy cruelty and feminists are under the impression men will never retaliate because theyve had so much undeserved social power the last 30 years or so.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:40 PM
3

Feminism has been cheating bigoted filth for years why are we even pretending otherwise anymore?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 09:20 AM
152

Let's start with him
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 07:33 PM
10

That show was utter blood libel. The British media and government milieu is genuinely irredeemable.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:48 PM
13

I think this sub leans towards kind of broader political issues rather than the interpersonal relations you're interested in but you're right that those are important. General reciprocal decency towards men and boys is all you need like 99% of the time and your examples like being against catcalling and being patient during periods are more than reasonable most of the time.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 02:12 AM
2

No only misandrists and people who mistreat men and boys. The other women genuinely don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:10 PM
7

Do you think they secretly know that hyperradicalizing British boys against Feminism & unchecked immigration & identity politics is the only thing that can save the West and are attempting to speedrun that outcome?
/r/MensRights10/08/25 05:37 PM
3

Depends what you do with it. If you say to men "As a society we choose to emphasize your intrinsic human value even though evolution treats you like a disposable worker/gene tester and advertiser the same way women shouldn't be viewed as valuable but inagentic incubators even though that's how evolution treats them" its ok.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:14 PM
30

Its not just the word that is misused. People espousing that concept are invariably people who cannot tell the difference between good and bad forms of masculinity and attempt to stamp it out in boys and vulnerable men out of ignorance arrogance fanaticism or fear.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 12:01 PM
1

You weren't wrong for wanting people to be nice to you about your good qualities lol. That's really understandable. I want that too. Honestly most of it is just being willing to be charitable about men's intentions when there's no risk to yourself, openly disagree with discrimination against men and boys in school and work etc. No need to overcorrect or punish yourself. An orientation towards decency/fairness/charity is like 90% of it most of the time
/r/MensRights31/07/25 04:41 AM
13

The real optimism is that men can do almost anything if they're motivated and they're ONLY NOW starting to get angry about the rot that the world has been injected with while they were AWOL.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 12:19 AM
1

These concepts of patriarchal conditioning and male entitlement are articles of faith being assumed for the argument. I have no reason to accept them and I don't believe they will do anything but damage. Frankly I don't believe anyone with this view has their value system aligned to do anything other than damage men and boys to lessen them and ameliorate their own fear or unrealistic ideological view of males. I want it to stop since it's already turned schooling into something profoundly bigote…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 09:06 PM
1

It's no problem about the mixup. Sorry I was harsh about it. It doesn't mean femininity is contemptible. Something can be bad for many men but normal for women because we are different. And yes men go to the doctor more with women around because women's influence convinces them to value their bodies more but men's ability to set their bodies as secondary to other concerns is why nearly everyone who risks their life for a stranger or does dangerous or disgusting work or risks their life for any c…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:33 PM
7

If you still hate them you haven't learned to disregard their opinions or put up enough emotional barriers and removed yourself from jobs/relationships/groups where they have access to you yet. Ironically the more firmly you reject bad people from your life and genuinely disagree with their shitty opinions (as opposed to secretly wondering if theyre right about you which many men do with feminist ideas) the less hostile you feel. Sure, they're not 100% wrong about everything all the time but you…
/r/MensRights21/07/25 02:39 PM
9

Low birth rates select for right wing pro natalist people in the future because that's who has the most children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/25 06:28 AM
54

When I'm in shape or exceptional at the job it's great. If its neither of those two I'm subhuman lol.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 05:34 PM
1

There are different versions of masculinity but with core elements in common and they're all distinct from femininity. The fact that Italians and British disagree on whether cooking is mostly women's work doesn't make them not competitive and brave and ambitious as men. Your beliefs won't win unless they produce healthy children. Its the same fatal flaw feminists have.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 05:56 AM
1

Men will try whatever versions of masculinity appeal to them. Strength and ambition are likely to be found in all the versions that actually succeed in making lots of men happy.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 05:53 AM
1

Expecting men to develop their talent and ambition is not slavery. Especially if those men have the confidence to insist on excellent treatment for themselves in return.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 05:48 AM
1

Most heterosexual relationships will never work like that. We have different strengths and temperaments and need to tell the truth about that and compensate for it.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 05:47 AM
6

Women kill more children than men do and they kill about 1000 to 1500 male intimate partners for every 2000 men who kill a female intimate partner in the US despite being at a 10 to 1 physical disadvantage because women's capacity for evil and aggression is substantial and is expressed as relational aggression most of the time but in family life when theyre in conflict with children or with men who won't fight back or can be killed with hard-to-detect methods like poisoning or killed by other me…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 04:11 PM
115

Ironically you could not have picked a worse thing to attack to radicalize young men against you forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/25 06:11 AM
6

Never seen so many willful misunderstandings (I never once acted like women's fear was an overreaction or a feminist invention. I said that to say it needs context) and a handful of outright lies (domestic violence and violence against children are roughly as common between men and women). This is a profoundly disingenuous comment that seems like it's motivated by either intense feelings or ideology. I don't really care which but I'm gonna respond later when I can straighten out this mess.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 01:43 AM
6

The vast majority of crime is repeat offenders not the majority of men. 1% of the population does over 60% of the crime. Those people do not listen to "Toxic Masculinity" theories they just do whatever they want and they need to be in jail. (And there need to be lots of good men who are nonetheless aggressive enough to put them in jail) The only ones who listen are men who already had the decency to worry about women's feelings and for them its pure damage. Women may feel safe with feminine men …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 09:12 PM
7

I don't agree with you. I think you find it more oppressive than most men and you're taking that to mean a bigger problem than it actually is. And that's why I dont want to remove ambition and drive and preference for masculine demeanor as the norm for most men and instead I want to remove obstacles to achieving them which currently exist in work and school. I dont want to denigrate the feminine demeanor either but its not typical and you shouldn't assume most men's problem is not being allowed …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:58 PM
4

No but I used that word because heteronormativity and an orientation towards making heterosexual relationships and families work involves expecting men to have drive.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:54 PM
7

Most heteronormativity isn't destructive to most men. Yes extreme versions of it exist but that's not the overarching problem rn.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:50 PM
5

No it isn't. Heteronormative expectations of masculinity are destructive for the minority of feminine temperament men like you but they are edifying for most and trying to extrapolate your experience to men of typical temperament simply will not work and it is arrogant of you to assume it would.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:44 PM
11

Society decays and nothing new or valuable is created and criminals and invaders gain ground when men don't have drive. And the reason they don't have drive rn is misandrist retards attacking their ambition and sexuality from the time theyre children.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:30 PM
0

Its a minority of women who are evil just like its a minority of men and you need to be able to show decency and get along with the ones who aren't. If you don't limit your anger to genuine misandrists (and have a high bar for what constitutes misandry) you'll terrorize normal women who didn't do anything wrong and who never had the power to do anything in the first place. This means hurting them achieves absolutely nothing for men and in fact hurts their happiness and social life by alienating …
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:22 PM
4

Fucked up women and some men are the core of the issue. The majority of both are either already great or fully redeemable.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:15 PM
6

Galloway is the same way. He disgusts me. He exists to continue demoralizing men under a veneer of just enough compassion to stop boy moms from voting against Democrats.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:21 PM
5

How deplorable misandrists are. Women as a whole are good and will come around even if they have unkind attitudes to grow out of.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:20 PM
2

These goons have literally been just lying for decades
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/25 06:26 AM
2

It's a minority of men who arent imprisoned or socialized like they should be doing the killing. The victims have nothing in common with the killers. Men are not actively choosing not to go they're overpunished and undergraded from the time they're children and thinking that's not a severe form of discouragement is completely illogical. The suicide rate is not caused by that at all and we know this because if it was then the social constructionist framework of education and mental health which e…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 06:10 PM
3

So I didn't actually use Ben Shapiro's line about "Facts Don't Care About Your Feelings" and the reason you tried to use it on me is because you think people who are interested in men's issues are mean right wing people who need to he scolded and put down. But I don't actually deserve that because it isn't true of me. And my main hobby horse is that males are treated extremely badly in school. There is a wealth of evidence for that. The original book that outlines it is called "The War on Boys" …
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:53 PM
3

My dude this is getting comical. You've implied that I wanted to engage in selfish/toxic expressions of masculinity with no evidence in this very conversation. When did I ever say that I wanted you to assume that all men are good people? Most are good people and some are bad but redeemable and some are irredeemable. Appropriate cultural expectations and systems of punishment are required but injustices against males are nevertheless real and I want them to get better whether you understand what …
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:45 PM
5

You're the one who isn't listening dude. I'm not talking about doing toxic things. Youre indulging yourself in ignorant ham fisted shaming of men you perceive as low for women's benefit and your own ego not understanding what's going on.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:35 PM
6

The patriarchy and toxic masculinity frameworks are inadequate and uninformed frameworks and skewed towards women's biases which nobody notices because accommodating women's biases is something every civilized person thinks is extremely important. But it's wrong and it's not helpful. I don't care that theres a minority of men genuinely raised with a daft patriarchal view of relationships when clearly the modern problem is boys who were raised and educated with the intention of stamping their mas…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:28 PM
1

That's fair
/r/MensRights11/07/25 07:17 PM
1

They're literally the biggest problem. Active discrimination in women's favor in every domain means hugely more resentful and talentless women are more likely to end up in teaching. The hopeless cretins take their personal issues with men out on little boys, try to stamp out their masculinity and ambition, and openly cheat in favor of girls at every opportunity. That field needs to have a lot of bad people burned out of it. The young men end up demoralized and low skill and unsocialized and can'…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 07:10 PM
1

I think the fact that there's so many adult men in weird forms of pain and anger here means you are very likely to be emotionally harmed by reading here and have your opinion of men as soured as men are on women when feminist authority figures damaged them as children. I don't want that outcome for you. It's a little early for you to have to deal with these things.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 06:38 AM
2

Whatever you are is good enough that your flesh and blood shouldn't be raised by misandrists
/r/MensRights09/07/25 06:23 AM
13

That misandrist and fatherless family types are more likely when you don't need the man's permission for anything and that misandrists are more motivated to form families that way should be obvious. You're playing ignorant. Fatherless and brotherless families produce girls to whom men are alien. Especially because the birth rate means smaller families and fewer schools and less interaction with other children over time. And Western women DO in fact abort boys and choose girls more often.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 01:43 AM
11

Read the post again please.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 01:36 AM
13

I don't like the way women treat boys and I don't like engineering men out of their children's lives. I think they're both extremely destructive. And if women's primary political concerns are reproductive warfare then men should have some ways to protect ourselves.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 01:29 AM
4

That doesn't solve the problem. Just means you accepted money to participate in it. Like a surrogate mother.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 12:39 AM
82

Distinctly better
/r/MensRights04/07/25 05:20 PM
34

Adios asshole!
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:36 AM
5

Her level of attractiveness doesn't really make being a jerk better or worse. It's basically irrelevant except inasmuch as it affects how much social power someone has not how intrinsically good of a person they are.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 11:55 PM
70

It's the youngest men who are going to retaliate the hardest. Their wicked mothers and teachers made it abundantly clear that they viewed them as loathsome and defective and evil and those authority figures are going to pay hard for that betrayal.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:16 PM
2

I've never heard that although I'm sure its rough on many people. I just think it's extremely unwise to try to gloss over something as deeply ingrained in us as obsession with female beauty.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:58 PM
2

I agree popular culture fights it but it's still an underlying motivation.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:45 PM
15

That's ridiculous. Sexual promiscuity is the only thing that gets women ostracized more than men. Every other "failing" gets men fired ostracized imprisoned made homeless or divorced more.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:27 PM
1

Social constructionism is one of feminists fatal mistakes. It takes ignorance of biology to believe and it leads to profoundly misunderstanding serious relationship dynamics like why the divorce rate spikes when women have more money than their husbands. Males gathering resources for females and females preferring males with resources is present in all biparental animals. Just because you think something is ugly and don't want it to be true doesn't mean it isn't and you shouldn't speak if you're…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 11:17 PM
4

Males also overtake females in overall iq on average around age 16.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 10:56 PM
3

If you're lying about the results sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 11:03 AM
10

Upvoted for a literate and good faith disagreement. I disagree I think their allergy to evolutionary psychology is one of their core pathologies and the source of a lot of their mistakes. GMVH for example is why they will never damage boys enough in school enough to replace male geniuses. Biology is not wholly deterministic but over large numbers of people the pattern is inescapable and knowing that is the reason you should never expect to have as many male nurses or as many female engineers as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 06:21 AM
37

I consider the Patriarchy framework to be dishonest and geared towards allowing awful women to cheat in society. For example, men's hatred of the idea of raising a child that is not biologically theirs is deeply ingrained by evolution but French feminists made it illegal to get paternity tests without the mothers permission to allow women to cheat and still parasitize male resources for their children. Men needing to be professionally accomplished is just as biologically ingrained but misandrist…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 03:47 AM
4

Document everything and complain to HR. If HR is full of irredeemable misandrist cheats who turn on you instead (which it probably is) then it's discrimination lawsuit time.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:53 PM
3

Agreed
/r/MensRights23/06/25 04:27 PM
0

Not every attempt at decency is simping. Dont be silly
/r/MensRights23/06/25 12:26 PM
-3

No. Just insist on good treatment for men when we do something good for women.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:34 AM
4

There's a lot of truth to this and I appreciate you coming here to say it very much. It's a good reminder and a good guideline.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:33 AM
1

You are the one who doesn't realize their sex has a dark side and is in for a rude awakening. Not me. I already know my sex has a dark side and I want them to be valued anyway. That's the difference between us. You think women can't badly mistreat men and other women? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 04:18 PM
1

I'm not hateful to women. Criticism and noticing patterns is not hate. I'm in favor of men being treated better in society not siding with all men everywhere all the time even when they're wrong or wanting bad things to happen to women Women are not angels who always do the right thing and you are going to have to come to terms with that if you want to interact with people on a subreddit who have disproportionately been treated maliciously by women. You're like the men who go on feminist subredd…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 04:00 PM
1

You've badly misunderstood what I'm saying and what my intentions are. I am aware men commit more crime I wasn't saying it was a statistical artifact. But you won't be able to understand that. You just want to project your hurt onto me and inappropriately demonize men and lionize women. I have no interest in having this type of shitty conversation anymore where women accuse me of being horrible and of saying things I didn't say and I have to fight and grovel to be seen as human again. Have a nic…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 03:49 PM
19

I honestly really doubt that people would be happy with that instead of genuine companionship. I also don't like mocking people about them supposedly going obsolete. Feminist shitheads have tried to do that to men many times and I've always thought it was vile so I won't be doing it in reverse.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:14 AM
1

I don't have a clear sense of what to do except to frame it as all configurations of institution (all female majority female, 50/50, majority male, all male) are allowed to exist with some exceptions where something is really vital (having zero men in teaching and zero women in politics is dangerous even though those being not 50/50 is fine) and accept that all of those institution types have specific problems that you must compensate for. E.g. Men being vulnerable to social abuse and easily bor…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:46 PM
1

I appreciate you as well. Clearly I've become a bit cynical and I kind of wish I'd been kinder about the fact that OPs post is indecent to women and that's frightening. I also wouldn't want to insinuate that strengths more common to women's personalities aren't extremely valuable as well.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:10 PM
3

I don't think that women are unfit for high level contribution and I don't think feminization ruined everything. I'm saying to exclude those things by talking about male dominance in these fields as purely an expression of power is what's inappropriate. Although me saying men built those fields was as much of a generalization as you saying men railroaded women out of them so that's fair. I don't think they're exclusively masculine traits either but that they turn up in male and autistic personal…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:28 PM
3

It wasn't fake concern I was asking you to refrain from what I consider to be an inappropriate statement about men. Don't put words in my mouth again. And you're out to lunch on your concept of fairness. Given the lies about the pay gap and college gap over the past 50 years and the abject damage to freedom of speech and rates of innovation the feminization of the academy has done have left me with very little patience for this type of dishonesty. Male variability hypothesis explains this all no…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:13 PM
2

I agree OP is too harsh and extreme and becoming unhinged. But be careful how you go about this. Men built all those spaces they didn't colonize them And women demand they be reengineered to suit them even at the cost of the original endeavor.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 04:50 PM
10

Literally every animal behavior paper I have EVER come across entails differences in behavior that are hormone driven and in line with evolutionary incentives. The claim against it genuinely comes of as nuts if you're at all familiar with the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 06:15 AM
12

Continuously committing the cardinal sin of feminism on a men's issues sub is bad news indeed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 06:05 AM
8

Check my latest response. And the reason for the passion is in the previous comment. Lack of epistemic humility and pushing social constructionism when it contradicts the evidence is the key mistake that made feminism go wrong. Edit, they're here too in case someone only follows this part of the thread: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091302210000580?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091302211000306 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30892813…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:56 AM
4

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091302210000580?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091302211000306 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30892813/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22097 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11781715/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8603719/ [https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02964?utm\\\](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02964?utm) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.12265 https://www.r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:53 AM
5

I don't want you to grovel because I'm not a feminist or a bully. I want you to have some epistemic humility and understand that evolutionary psychology and biology in general is a field which requires earned knowledge before you start drawing conclusions about the nature of male and female behavior and to make a claim that is flatly contradicted by the vast majority of studies published on the subject means you are going about this irresponsibly. This cannot be trivialized. It is the exact same…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:37 AM
3

If you admit it was irresponsible of you to assert otherwise without any knowledge I will yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:26 AM
6

You could not possibly be more wrong dude. Abandon this line of thinking. It leads absolutely nowhere good. Gendered behavior in line with evolutionary incentives is so common and translates so directly between other mammals and ourselves that the only way you could think otherwise is being completely unfamiliar with ethology and psychology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:19 AM
23

You sound like such a compassionate and forward thinking young lady and the men in your life are fortunate to have you. Like with feminist groups, in men's issues groups there are a few men who are in pain or unkind people or unreasonable to women. Please please do not absorb any emotional harm from conversations with them. Give yourself permission to block people and abandon conversations. You are not responsible for the cruelty some men have experienced from some women. Talking to men who are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 11:37 PM
1

I really don't see the point of continuing this if you're going to oversimplify what I'm saying and put words in my month so you can fit me into the "tradcon" box. Have a nice day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 04:10 PM
1

Abolishing biological gender won't work out well for men because people place no intrinsic value on our lives and well being unless they're in love with us. That's why men's economic advantages have to be leveraged into good treatment as much as possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 03:59 PM
1

Yeah, for men to do the shit jobs and be cheated out of thinking ones where their facility for knowledge and thinking about how systems work makes the world a better place. That's DEFINITELY what I want...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 03:40 PM
2

Lol you really think men have no psychological strengths relative to women only physical ones? You think I'm just talking about physical labor? I'm no tradcon but it seems you let the feminists gaslight you into thinking women have better minds than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 03:22 PM
7

That's the best argument for mild benevolent sexism. It makes the women in your life happy and it prevents serious misogyny lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 04:33 AM
1

Yeah but the thing is that this is true even when something deeply awful is going on because evil comes from high-negative-impact deranged minorities within a group.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 10:25 PM
2

This is a good faith point and I appreciate you making it.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 10:14 PM
2

Some of feminism is genuine evil. Self reflection emboldens evil it does not placate it. It has to be defeated so profoundly that it's not tempted to misbehave again. Undeveloped women think self reflective men are weak and unworthy and bad feminists see them as targets. Both of those things would be solved by being a LOT scarier politically economically and verbally.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 10:06 PM
11

Yeah if he's not a troll he's morally broken. Which is one of the main evils of feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 07:03 PM
15

Quite alright. The optimistic interpretation is that he's a troll. That's disgusting behavior but it would mean he's not about to disintegrate from self loathing like his posts and comments imply. If not, then I meant what I said. His self loathing will attract female bullies and they'll either succeed in destroying him psychologically or he'll realize it soon enough to reclaim his identity. It's men's genuine principle and compassion for women that makes us vulnerable to evil from them. If he's…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 06:43 PM
22

Sexual violence is done by a minority of repeat offenders whom women vote to keep out of jail out of deranged social constructionist ideas of crime and rehabilitation. This fact is then distorted to lie about men as a whole. The numbers also contain things which no sane person would classify alongside rape like drunk sex which is ubiquitous. You will not be able to understand this until your self loathing attracts feminist sharks who badly mistreat you so just get the fuck on with it and stop bo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 06:24 PM
35

There's nothing I can say that will convince you better than just letting you persist with that false belief and letting it backfire. Feminists will betray you and attempt to ruin your life if you attempt to apply any fairness towards men using their principles, they will tell obvious lies, and they will gleefully cheer you on as you damage your own psyche and sexual identity more and more and it will never be enough for them because they are deranged and hate you. They do not see your compassio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 03:55 AM
6

To me it's a deranged point of view that comes from profound distrust between the sexes and an excess of wealth that obscures the necessity of our differences. Civilizations that have been consistently wealthy for generations have that problem and consequently stop having children. It's very bad and radical feminists weaponize it to damage male identity. They have to be defeated and expunged from public life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 03:51 AM
31

They still want him to suppress men rather than empower them. That's why he needs to be defeated even though he's factually correct on certain things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/25 02:33 PM
69

Galloway is democrats' controlled opposition on men's issues. I find him completely insincere and ineffective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/25 05:15 AM
8

Atrocious behavior to put that on him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 03:14 PM
5

This is such a thoughtful question. I can't tell you how much I appreciate the selflessness of recognizing unfairness to men and boys when women's issues affect you more directly. It really is incredibly admirable. As for your question, even if the right seems more appealing right now because it promises to get the boot of feminism off of men's throats, the fact remaims that you always need both a left and a right. The left at its best looks after vulnerable people rather that cheating people wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 02:48 PM
28

The UK really is cooked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 03:54 AM
3

100%. No wonder the boys feel like they have to use violence against every perceived slight. Their masculinity is CONSTANTLY in question if they don't.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 06:20 PM
1

Yeah I can see that. Clearly it's not always that. And boys behavior is always more rambunctious and harder to control and they're pretty demoralized by adult women shaming them when they shouldn't and tend to lose motivation. But the handful of startlingly precocious boys do exist because of greater male variability and female teachers do not react well to them in my experience. Now, are those boys sometimes arrogant or disruptive and need to be corrected? Yes, but the way they use lies and pub…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 09:55 AM
22

My school experience taught me that women are really afraid and disturbed by the fact that they can't always control boys and that, because males are more psychologically extreme (more intellectually disabled and lunatics, but also more geniuses) than females and teachers these days are usually women of pretty average intelligence, they run into a small minority of precocious boys who are smarter and braver than they are and feel the need to destroy them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 07:55 PM
25

I feel like this show must secretly have been made by anti-feminists to ensure boys are radicalized against female authority figures from an early an age as possible lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 06:54 PM
3

It's an exaggeration but there's some truth in it. Women are also loved conditionally but a lot more of them naturally meet men's conditions lol
/r/MenSupportMen01/02/25 06:23 AM
1

Yeah, I think it's partly to do with the fact that male and female depression and health problems in general are different but people mistake different parameters for solving them as being the same as mattering different amounts
/r/MensRights24/01/25 11:40 PM
2

I still think it's a kind impulse so thank you. Is there any topic you were hoping someone would bring up which you'd like to flesh out?
/r/MensRights24/01/25 09:43 PM
5

Thoughtful of you read and to talk to men about their issues when women's issues affect you more directly. Appreciate that.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 09:27 PM
11

You should make an effort to remove misandry from your social media diet. Block, downvote "don't show me this", "show me less of this", "don't recommend this" etc. because it will prevent you from being happy if you don't. Yes, this will not mean that mistreatment of men and boys will go away but you'll be more effective in helping them if your personal happiness is in better shape. If you want to be any real help in this keep your psyche healthy by not inflicting misandry on it every day on soc…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:25 PM
9

They hate masculinity and they want to destroy it in any male over whom they have power. Is that finally clear enough?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 12:57 AM
8

Yeah sounds like you were goaded into overreacting to take advantage and it's very empathetic and thoughtful of you to think that this can happen to men too. I hope things go better for you in the future.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 12:42 AM
12

Sorry but does the school thing not fit what I was talking about? Direct prejudice that he just doesn't believe?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 01:02 AM
23

I don't think he'll get through to them if he's under the impression that their core complaints aren't at all real. That's kind of a key thing in politics. You have to tell the truth if something is hurting people even if part of the responsibility to fix it is on them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/25 10:28 PM
11

I have a negative hunch about him which is that he is oriented towards pandering to women and unconstructively, uncompassionately, and uninsightfully criticizing suffering men. Criticizing men when you are insightful and compassionate about what they're going through but still believe they need to improve something can be totally legitimate but something tells me he's not fully sincere about it. The hunch is also influenced by how he dresses and my perception of the social milieu he's in in the …
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:30 AM
1

You're misunderstanding me. The issue is the moral component not whether or not they would work.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 04:36 PM
2

The fact that male-only endeavours scale better and last longer doesn't mean it's not a hideous and fruitless thought. The problem with radfem fantasies isn't that they wouldn't work (although that's true) it's that they're evil.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:42 AM
18

This is just vicious radfem nonsense with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:22 AM
300

It's so unbelievably kind of you to be able to think about men's perspective having been through what you have. Men and boys in your life need to have your back and sympathy for you in return no question about it.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:46 AM
9

They mean it as an act of hostility so no I don't want to do the same.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:03 AM
7

Kearney always gave me bad vibes. Doesn't really understand the value of men or the negatives of feminism. Probably a net good for drawing attention to the problem but I still don't trust her.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:42 PM
51

Don't worry about not feeling great about the MRA label (I don't like it either) or not having the same experience as men or any of that stuff. Noticing and disapproving of bad stuff happening to men and boys the same way we do with women and girls is already pretty good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 06:25 AM
10

With unmitigated contempt, thanks for asking.
/r/MenSupportMen26/12/24 11:22 PM
2

Fair enough. Hopefully we can move away from that direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 11:40 PM
2

Masculine ideals have to be pushed with forgiveness for failing. Feminists can't push masculine ideals, conservatives can't forgive for failing them, ergo a new category has to come about to get the balance right and that's what I see LWMA as.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 10:51 PM
10

"tend to understand these feminist aims as not “freeing men”, but attempting to undermine masculinity itself and believe that those “gendered expectations” aren’t chains by which men are bound by, but a North Star to guide men to societal acceptance and purposeful living and by undermining traditional masculinity you are by extension harming men and their ability to find a fulfilling and rewarding life." This is so well put and it's more or less what I believe but I really dislike the MRA label …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 09:34 PM
32

Yeah. Being more capable of violence than women has never felt like a privilege to the vast majority of men because psychologically normal men don't want to abuse it and view it as a responsibility to keep order and safety.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 03:53 PM
45

Young men don't have any privilege over young women other than being physically (but not morally or socially) harder to commit violence against. They haven't for decades. What kind of thinking is this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 03:29 PM
2

True. I was a little taken aback by her referring to Steven Crowder as a "Wonderful comedian." But she was right about the things she talked about in the book.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 09:52 AM
58

They literally cannot help themselves can they. Not a single person in that thread had the slightest concept that young men were anything but degenerate and dangerous. They deserve the poverty that is gonna come from screwing working age men, the only people who produce more wealth than they consume, out of their future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 04:03 AM
1

https://youtu.be/ZKe8BxvjZIs?si=hpxBbZzNtDX2mRmA
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/24 04:18 PM
38

The War on Boys by Christina Hoff Summers was incredible and unfortunately no one listened to her and everything she talked about got much worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 06:02 PM
-6

This is pretty silly man
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:23 PM
1

I'm not sure I could quantify it that way because it varies a lot based on your accomplishments and personality. The way I would view it is that physical attractiveness matters a lot but people's individual taste varies so much that most imperfections will not stop a motivated person from finding a partner because they can develop another attractive quality that people like and don't mind the flaws or the person's taste actively includes the flaws. A lot of people hate themselves for being fat, …
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:46 PM
2

That seems a bit extreme to me. Where does that 95% number come from?
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:24 PM
-3

Yeah I'm not saying don't fight back against actual misandry I'm just saying that's not the case for every femcel and I don't want to be horrible to the ones that don't mistreat men.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:12 PM
3

There are different examples but its possible for men and women to have romantic problems because they are on the autism spectrum, are immigrants and have language barriers, have a disability or injury that people find difficult to ignore etc. and I would not want to be unkind to them because of those things.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:11 PM
-9

Leftovers is a little mean and I wouldn't want to use it on women who are not misandrist but rather struggling because of an unfortunate flaw or life circumstance. Kind of like how we wouldn't want to unkind to male incels who aren't horrible to women but rather struggling with a flaw or bad luck.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 05:55 PM
1

Women with weapons covers women with weapons in confrontations with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 10:54 PM
1

Right, so women with weapons or in confrontations with children or the elderly have moral obligations like men do in confrontations with women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 10:29 PM
3

Yeah, a mechanism for policing social/emotional/reputational abuses from women as well as non-reciprocal domestic violence when men don't fight back is also required if men are going to consent to heavy restrictions on our behavior and the obligation to use measured amounts of force even when we ourselves are being physically hurt. Maybe it could be culturally emphasized that hitting a man who won't fight back is morally reprehensible in the same way as a man using his strength to hurt a woman. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 02:50 AM
3

I think the problem with that is that there can be acts that are immoral because they are reckless or disregard others rather than malevolent in the sense that they are specifically intended to cause harm. If I had to come up with an example I would say its more immoral to drive drunk vs driving sober on the basis that anyone doing it knows they're choosing an action with a higher likelihood of killing another person. The intent to drive drunk could be not malevolent at all, they may just want t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 07:16 PM
2

Do you think that acts which cause more harm or have a higher chance of causing harm are more immoral than acts which cause less harm or have a lower chance of causing harm?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 07:08 PM
0

I don't think that analogy applies because the two attacks are materially different in a way that the weights of the two sets of material there are not. But as I said that's also true of women vs children or the disabled or the elderly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 06:55 PM
1

I think having restrictions on women's use of social abuses and manipulating others into violence is a safer way of making things equal than degrading restrictions on men's use of direct personal aggression. Either with law or with cultural expectations that women police those actions in one another. My preference would be the latter because its less heavy handed but Im open to either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 06:54 PM
2

I equally awkwardly edited my last comment to respond lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 04:19 PM
-15

I take your point and that distinction becomes very important with adult women and male children which is a situation wherein the woman has more physical ability to cause harm and is constrained by the same moral obligation I was talking about. Its just the fact that the strength difference flips so cartoonishly about age 13 that makes it a serious thing in adulthood. I don't think the male/female distinction should be baked into the law or the basis for anything though. Women attacking young bo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 04:13 PM
-17

Even at equal height and weight men are much stronger but it is the physical parameters that affect the moral parameters yes. You have moral obligations to people that scale with your capacity to hurt them. Women attacking men with their bare hands is less likely to be lethal intent because a normal person's understanding of violence involves an understanding that women are extremely unlikely to be able to kill men with their bare hands. Men, even small ones, are likely to be able to kill women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 03:59 PM
-12

While I agree that the greater degree of injury is not evidence of malicious intent and men and women generally should not be viewed as different in their psychological capacity for cruelty or intention of harm, the fact that men have a rational understanding that their strength is potentially lethal when used against women does mean that a man punching a woman is a more serious crime than a woman punching a man. Men therefore have a moral obligation to use zero physical force against women when…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/24 03:31 PM
16

No thoughts on women as a whole. Generalizing an entire gender is wrong. You might've considered that before you made this post. Insane beyond belief and you only think its plausible that men might think this because the equivalent insane belief about an all-female society is a genuine thought among radical feminists because they're broken people. We're not like you. We don't fantasize about you killing yourselves or disappearing because of your inherent badness like you do with us. Not exactly,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 05:12 AM
4

I'm certainly not. I happen to be a very talented teacher with a master's so I'll homeschool my boys or take them someplace better if this keeps up. Having a gender preference for your children one way or the other is utterly degenerate to me. You should NEVER make your boys or your girls feel unwanted and I NEVER EVER want to make future daughters or sons feel like I was disappointed in the wonderful gender they ended up with. Anyone who doesn't realize men and women and boys and girls are incr…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:12 AM
11

If you can talk about beauty, competence, masculinity, wealth, children, and family life in a left wing way that feeling will get weaker. The right seems appealing because they're willing to unironically talk about these things and value men. You have no choice but to talk about those things more effectively than they do and in a left wing way if you want to prevent men's issues from empowering them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/24 11:38 PM
21

That approach is what leads people to supplant their entire value system with feminism. I don't want men to replace their entire value system with men's issues rhetoric and principles because then they will become poorly adjusted and their psychology geared towards that instead of their own happiness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/24 04:35 AM
12

Hard disagree. Aspiring to toughness and a commitment to do your best in a dangerous situation because they happen whether you want them to or not isn't the same as delusion or "toxic masculinity" or whatever loathsome term we're using now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 12:57 PM
3

Harm and Fairness are still higher than everything else for men. They just also have the 'conservative' (According to Jonathan Haidt and the moral foundations theory) higher than women. Which is exactly what you would expect if men and women were diverging politically. What your title should say is that men have a moderately more conservative morality profile than women and I do mean moderately because some conservatives value the other dimensions as higher than harm and fairness and that's clea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 08:24 AM
12

Yeah seriously, did OP look at the graph?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 08:22 AM
6

Now that I know where the slogan comes from I always report it as such yeah
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 09:58 AM
2

I'm glad you're able to see it as alongside feminism/not hostile to the healthy types of feminism. I think that's the healthiest approach. But in that spirit, this concept: If men are somehow able to get it to happen, it's possible that the feminist movement could be changed from within. If we troll them for long enough, that they start having to say "feminist and para-feminist" whenever they're talking about social justice, that would be hilarious and a win for us. Is a bad idea. You're still t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 04:59 PM
14

As far as new ideas to inject, my personal hobby horse lately has been that it is wrong to try to shame or stamp out the "inconvenient" traits of boys because they can all be refined into wonderful traits in men. "Boys are gross?" No, boys are curious about and not easily disturbed by mess and disgusting things. That's why they can be refined into men who find interesting insights in gross things and take care of them for other people. There's a reason 95%+ of sewage and sanitation workers are m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 04:09 PM
14

Are you very good at anything? Can you teach it to young boys without using shame as leverage? That'd be the place to start. The school system works best for neurotypical girls. Boys and neurodivergent kids get shafted hard and so you might be in a unique position to help boys navigate the school system. If there is ANYTHING you can do to train or teach or help boys in school that would be my focus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 03:55 PM
10

There is no method for "counteracting" a political swing in a direction you don't like that substitutes for: Making a better argument Genuinely attempting to address what is hurting that group. That's it. The left would need to make and keep promises to do with men's problems. It is literally the only way. Any type of force or manipulation or coercion will only make the problem worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 02:48 PM
19

I hate that the algorithm wants me to think that. I started unfollowing and downvoting stuff to do with looking down on men and liking and following stuff to do with treating men well. The fucking algorithm keeps trying to show me Andrew Tate and I have to keep blocking those creators. If I was a teenager I might've gotten caught in his bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 04:36 PM
10

Commenting to hear more. Kinda need this right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 03:10 AM
8

90-100% Not surprising, I have a master's degree in Biology. This is good though. I infer from your questions that your hypothesis is something along the lines of "Absolutist views of hypergamy/male disposability predict MRA affiliation" or something similar. I.e. Apocalyptic beliefs about the disposability of men and the cruelty of mate selection makes MRA beliefs more likely. I would appreciate very much, however, if you would clearly indicate in your paper that it is possible to have a sincer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/22 04:16 AM
1

I don't really mind OnlyFans or porn/sex work in general as a concept. The problem is that the women in traditional porn are exploited and the men who feel the need to use porn as a substitute for healthy social and sex life are also kind of exploited. Idk, maybe I'm unusual but I don't have a strong aversion to women doing stuff like that freely. It falls under personal freedom to me. Although I do understand that sexual exclusivity is a very stabilizing thing in relationships and you don't hav…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:34 PM
1

One good moment doesn't redeem Candace Owens
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 01:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter