TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AryoBarzan Archive

View 66 posts and 2,304 comments by AryoBarzan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
440

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:03 AM
174

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:27 AM
124

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:59 PM
115

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:50 AM
110

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:10 AM
106

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:16 AM
84

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:57 AM
76

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:28 PM
74

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:59 AM
70

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:18 PM
52

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:00 AM
49

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:59 AM
47

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:15 AM
45

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:28 AM
45

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:50 AM
43

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:18 AM
41

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:29 AM
33

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:19 PM
30

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:18 AM
25

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:06 AM
25

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:57 AM
21

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:33 PM
20

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:37 AM
19

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:41 AM
19

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:18 AM
19

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:17 AM
17

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:11 AM
13

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:58 AM
13

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:08 PM
12

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:09 AM
12

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:40 AM
11

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:22 AM
11

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:08 AM
10

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:14 PM
10

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/05/12 02:29 AM
9

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:52 AM
9

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:07 AM
9

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:48 AM
8

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:34 PM
7

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights30/11/12 10:20 PM
7

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:37 AM
7

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:54 PM
7

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:58 PM
6

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:13 AM
6

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:08 AM
6

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:40 PM
4

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:28 AM
2

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:08 AM
2

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:26 PM
2

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:26 AM
1

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:14 AM
1

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:00 AM
1

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:18 AM
1

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights19/04/12 09:23 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:55 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:41 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:35 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:07 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:19 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:14 PM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:48 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:33 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:40 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:35 AM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:21 PM
0

AryoBarzan/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:27 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,304 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

I want every single person who read this hateful nonsense to remember one thing. These are the people who claim to be "helping men". These are the people who people who claim to care about "sexism". These are the people running organizations and helping legislate laws to help "gender equality". These are the people who claim that "MRA's are not needed, because feminism is already working on men's issues". Next time you think about telling us that "not all feminists are like that" and/or supporti…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:07 AM
1

I really cannot wait to listen to this! :)
/r/MensRights17/07/13 12:49 AM
0

Aww... Look at the cute whittle SRS mangina! :)
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:22 AM
1

Just because some feminists (maybe a vocal subset) are ass holes, doesn't mean all feminists are. Yes, because a minority of "good" or "not as bad" is certainly enough to ignore the overwhelmingly "bad" amongst them, right? I guess because there are some great White Nationalists running around, the entire movement should not be criticized, right?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:59 AM
7

You should read anything by Jackson Katz or Michael Kimmel. Ah, yes. That shriveling, emasculated self-hating feminist turd surely has all of the answers! Especially when he writes routine articles demonizing men. Great reading material, feminist! :)
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:50 AM
6

I assure you I am not the exception to the rule. Most feminists are like me, but as I have said many times in here, the loudest feminists often give us a poor image. Which is, of course, why the "loudest feminists" are the "leaders" of your "movement" picked by all of these "good feminists", right? Ironic how these "good feminists" don't seem to be interested in stopping all of these "bad feminists" and rather spend more time "calling us out".
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:47 AM
2

Keep trollin', trollin', trollin'!
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:45 AM
2

Sadly, I just think it's pathetic how this subreddit seems to spend more time trying to get people to question feminism rather than talking about solutions to fixing the problems you all agree exist Sadly, I just think its pathetic how feminists who enter this subreddit can't seem to realize how strongly feminism is hurting the rights of men and why it shouldn't be fought against. I guess addressing the strongest entity fighting against the rights of men is not a "men's issue". Feminist logic, n…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:40 AM
5

Great stuff! Every MRA needs to thank Men's Rights Edmonton. As time goes on, we'll be seeing more great awareness being spread on both false rape allegations and feminist bigotry. The very fact that feminists are literally tweeting these posters as evidence of "rape culture" proves how bigoted, hypocritical and idiotic feminist theory really is.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:41 AM
13

I was banned immediately (with no warning) a few months ago because I arguing the definition of rape with a redditor. I asked a mod why I was banned and they claimed it was because I was "triggering". Even after explaining that I was simply debating and wasn't implying to "trigger" anybody, I was still given the ban. This is literal proof that feminists utilize every single sympathetic means to disable debate. You have to be blind not to see it.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:20 AM
1

in fact I've never actually seen it, can you give me an example? Here. The fact that you don't know about this VERY POPULAR case shows you're not very literate in the issues concerning men.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:10 AM
1

Except we aren't talking about immature boys on the internet. We're talking about grown men writing such comments in to newspapers and magazines, or tweeting rape threats. You do know people say bad things over the internet on a daily basis, right? Why is it that suddenly "rape threats" are some horrible commidity that we have to get behind and cry over? There are REAL issues facing men, yet we're supposed to bend over backwards over someone getting butthurt over mean words on the internet? I am…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:05 AM
1

Have you taken a look around here? People say things like 'all women are x" every now and then. Those are called "internet trolls" and they're downvoted to reddit hell. Are you honestly dense enough to assume everybody that posts on here is some some established MRA? Not sure why this is even a response to my statement since I clearly stated that I view feminism as something that's 'for women, by women.' Then why do feminists say their movement is one for "gender equality", when you are literall…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:01 AM
5

Hey look! It's a feminist who, according to her ideology and numerous movement supporters, cares about men and particularly, male circumcision! Let's see what she thinks about it? Oh, she doesn't even acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:16 PM
1

Ah, lookie here! It's another feminist that thinks she knows all about the MRM, but has yet to even analyze her own movement's bigotry. Maybe if you spent more time researching your movement rather than slandering us in your little anti-male circlejerks, you'd too be an MRA like many ex-feminists here?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:00 PM
1

It's really hilarious the kind of "mentality" you idiots pretend is some serious "misogyny". All the OP did was claim "no, because that never happens" in regards to women reaping serious benefits in a divorce over men (which they particularly do, in many cases). Either way, that thread is a joke thread in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:58 PM
1

There are plenty of prominent groups and equality leaders who identify as feminist who preach no hate at all. So that somehow means your movement is not hateful? Especially when the vast majority are not interested in equality and only ever address women's issues and spend more time slandering the MRM with falsified information like you are right now? Every single one of your figureheads says concerning, scary things regarding women and attempting to divide through anger and hate is not a good a…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:52 PM
4

I just don't respect MRA mentality that necessarily rejects the idea of treating women with respect also. source needed
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:39 PM
3

There are fringe feminists (your tumblr crowd) who may embody this stereotype, but your general population and majority of the feminist movement do not hate men, do not want to keep men down, do not want to disrespect men, do not want to put men in the kitchen or whatever the fuck. Then why is it that the "Tumblr" crowd is much larger than any other feminist entity? Why is that the circumcision-promoting, man-hating Jezebel is literally the largest feminist outlet on the internet? Do you actuall…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:33 PM
1

How does this answer any of my questions? I find it funny that you (and fellow feminist-apologists) seem to always talk about the MRM "harboring misogynist extremists", yet provide absolutely no examples/evidence of the sort. If "feminism" was actually a movement for "gender equality", they would do what the MRM has been doing. POLICE their movement. Not letting everybody run around spewing all the hatred they want, then crying a No True Scotsman fallacy when they're called out on it. You have a…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:23 PM
1

No, I would not argue that. Rape is nowhere even remotely close to the realm of genital mutilation. You can still enjoy sex and overcome a rape. You can never overcome having your genitals ran through a garbage disposal. A life term is certainly not too much for this animal.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:55 PM
2

Now i didn't lose my temper in the traditional sense But i let loose in a floundering of accusations towards them, of how they were dismissive towards male circumcision (Which, i do NOT support being performed on young children unwillingly) and the downplaying of sexual assault and domestic violence against men! You know, I've argued with quite a few feminists on reddit alone who have attempted to convince me that feminists not only "care about men", but are certainly interested in "fighting mal…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:25 AM
1

Then why do feminists literally claim that they are already working on men's issues and we're not needed? Why do feminists claim they are supporting GENDER EQUALITY and not gender supremacy? How do you explain the extreme anti-male sentiment present in feminist theory and rhetoric? Attempting to argue otherwise is an attempt to trick people. The only person here attempting to "trick people" are feminist dolts like yourself with your illogical, ignorant rhetoric.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:19 AM
2

Or just don't waste your time trying to nitpick some archaic form of feminism as "good" and call yourself an MRA. Just a suggestion...
/r/MensRights29/06/13 08:14 AM
3

I'm not in favor of archaic punishments, but this could of easily resulted in him bleeding to death - which is why it should be factored into account when sentenced. I think the fact that he will not longer be able to enjoy sex, urinating or a PTSD-free life is a whole lot more important. Life in prison for literally ruining somebody's life is NOT "archaic" in any sense of the word. P.S, does anyone know what happened to the DV allegations? I couldn't find much. They're typical bullshit allegati…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:36 AM
7

That seems insane for not attempting a murder, though I guess you could bleed out. Why not? You honestly think drugging an individual, tying them up and mutilating their genitals is not worthy of a "life sentence"? It's incredible to me that people honestly think that way...
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:19 AM
3

I honestly don't understand how somebody can believe genital mutilation does not deserve a "life term".
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:16 AM
2

It's a bit of both. Unlike SRS, /r/MensRights isn't an echo-chamber but a collection of individuals interested in some degree in men's rights. Just like how there are feminists who are "pro-mens-rights" who will disagree with people who are ACTUALLY trying to help men's rights. There are also quite a few lower-level MRA's who've gotten so used to the intense scrutiny we get and have resulted in becoming far too PC.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:12 AM
6

EXACTLY! I honestly cannot believe this post actually makes users happy. This is literally the same thing as going "Hey look! Webster's dictionary claims feminism supports gender equality! Horray for progress". Feminists have been saying this garbage for years and what do they have to show for it? Literally ignoring every single men's issues and over-exaggerating every single women's issue? This just shows how easily people fall into propaganda traps. Sad, I must say.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:02 AM
6

the majority do care about men and their issues. Source Needed If the "majority" cared about men, then why is one propagandized newsletter the best they've done "for men" in the last 60 years? Why do they rise up in arms over comedians making "rape jokes" (against women), but gladly ignore an entire audience/cast of women praising and laughing over a man being drugged, tied-up and genitally mutilated by his wife? Why do feminists protest non-issues like "misogyny in video games", but have yet to…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:54 AM
2

Thank you! It's incredible how fast everybody here is willing to cry "misogyny".
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:34 AM
2

Yes, clearly. Because "Sharon Osbourne" is the only woman to have laughed and supported male genital mutilation. Clearly, the rest of the cast, the entire audience members and the overwhelming large amount of women at home laughing and praising this act are certainly not important. Isn't it funny how feminists undermine all of men's problems?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:33 AM
2

Oh my God people, don't downvote because "women" is in the name... Actually WATCH the video and LISTEN to the points being made before voting.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:36 AM
1

Top post on /r/ShitRedditSays and top-linked comment from feminists "showcasing misogyny on Reddit".
/r/MensRights22/06/13 01:42 AM
71

Yet feminist leader Rebecca Watson makes an ACTUAL male genital mutilation joke and feminists do nothing. The hypocrisy is incredible.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:52 PM
2

If you don't mind me posting, I'd like to clarify a bit on this stance. I highly recommend (if you have the time) to read this short article on why calling yourself a "feminist" endorses feminism as a whole. If you don't mind, I can provide you a short summary. Calling yourself any ideological name doesn't just support your definition (or what you feel is the definition) of any movement. It supports what that movement is doing. If my definition of Neo-Nazism was simply "civil rights for Whites" …
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:37 PM
1

Very well then. I guess I should just leave it up to John the Other and girlwriteswhat to explain it to you. This article should literally be a sticky in /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:36 PM
1

Isn't it funny how it's always the feminists and feminist-sympathizers that cry about bad names on the internet? If you're too chickenshit to deal with a few bad words (which adequately describe your ignorance on the topic), then you're obviously too thin-skinned to debate with to begin with.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:17 AM
1

You're going to go back and cover every thing No, I addressed your points adequately and efficiently. The fact that you can't reply to them and have to keep posting a "tubas" video only reflects on how horribly ignorant your arguments are. Good luck :)
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:08 AM
1

Look at all of this nonsense. I'm just going to go over your points quickly since I'm not going to quote every single thing here. Actual feminism, in my opinion, is the second wave and women's suffrage movements of yesteryear I'm so happy you have an opinion on "actual feminism". Too bad "feminism" will continue being "feminism" without your opinion. Also, you do know that some of feminism's most misandric leaders and characters are from second-wave feminism? Good going supporting Andrea Dworkin…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:08 AM
1

There is literally no way you're an MRA. You're a feminist-apologist and an idiot. Reading your post history makes me almost as sick as reading an SRS-ers. You literally think feminism is great because you know some "great feminists" who "aren't like the majority". Yeah, well there are some "White Nationalists" I've met who believe in racial equality, does that mean I can write off the whole movement as "cool". Idiots like you are a cancer to the MRM.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:24 AM
3

Like logic and evidence :)
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:13 AM
-1

Downvoted for being an idiot and supporting anti-male feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:12 AM
2

Unfortunately, what we often only see here at r/MR is the feminist extremists, and "third-wave" feminism. So... modern feminism. Actual feminism. Even though the "feminist extremists" have existed since its inception, of course. I like to call these people "feminazis" and "ALNFMs" (American Lesbian Neo-Feminist Misandrists), because random insults are fun and should be encouraged in order to provoke an emotional response, right? Wait, no. Let's just call them third-wavers and/or extremists. Cons…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:11 AM
4

I'm not at all against men's rights. Yet, you post on a subreddit called "against men's rights" I was hoping to find a middle ground between feminists and MRA's so that we could support each other on a common cause. How can we find a "middle ground" if you literally believe that all of men's problems are a result of men (ie. patriarchy theory). This is something ALL (I repeat: ALL) feminists believe in. The majority of posters here are more concerned with sticking it to feminists than to actuall…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:11 AM
5

Wow... you really are out of touch with reality. Ah, and that is why you feminists have nothing better to do than to post routine articles on how "dangerous" we are and how to censor us from the freedom of speech clause? Even create entire subreddits to complain about us? I just can't take this shit seriously anymore. Don't worry, your movement's lack of evidence (along with yours) proved me and many thousands of others that your bigotry shouldn't be taken seriously. I've tried to give it a shot…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:05 AM
2

Hardly, sweetie. Like an average feminist, your reading comprehension is about as great as your argumentation. I'm not sure if you know this, but feminism did not start off with millions of supporters. Just like the MRM, feminism was a small pond that was exponentially growing. The MRM has gained ENORMOUS popularity in the last 5 years and went from an underground set of blogs (like those "anti-circumcision feminists" you posted) to a legitimate movement which literally sends fear into every man…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:59 AM
6

This is verging on pathetic. I find it ironic every time a feminist cannot debate my valid points and examples (which is nearly every time), they sidetrack about how "pathetic" this is. If men's rights is actually a MOVEMENT then MOVE! Great, just give us the millions feminists have siphoned from the government and forced academic institutions to teach and we'll get RIGHT on it! :) DO SOMETHING instead of bitching about feminists. You mean expose the very people who are the very reason of 90% of…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:51 AM
2

(Though I will point out that many feminists do speak out against male circumcision) (and do absolutely nothing about it, as evident with its gross legality and acceptance in modern Western cultures as opposed to its female variant)
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:47 AM
7

If you honestly think that the only thing that separates MRA's and feminists are which gender they fight for, then you know absolutely nothing about either movement.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:46 AM
6

We don't only focus on women's issues. Then why aren't feminists ADDRESSING and PROTESTING men's issues like they do men's issues? Why is it that I only receive "words" about you supposedly "focusing" on men's issues, but never "actions"? Our goal is ultimately equality, as is yours. Your "goal" is putting the issues of women (no matter how petty) far above any of men's issues. Ours is stopping you. I don't see a reason why we couldn't work on two sides of the same issue together. sigh Maybe bec…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:37 AM
12

Or maybe feminists could focus on female circumcision, and MRA's could focus on male circumcision. Is that why feminists directly tell MRA's that we don't need to exist because "feminists are already working on men's issues"? Is that why feminists claim that they "talk about men's issues" and "don't only care about women's issues"? Attacking a universal problem from both sides, bringing us all together. It sounds nice to me. Like a typical feminist, you are incredibly ignorant and have no concep…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:16 AM
5

That's not at all to minimize how cruel MGM is. I have absolutely no idea how we, as a developed country (the US... I don't know where anyone else is from) with secular values, can do something that's so barbaric and unnecessary. Yeah, maybe its time a certain group of supposed "gender egalitarians" who call themselves "feminists" should actually use some of that money funded to them by the government to address this ACTUAL oppression.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:00 AM
10

Ah, another shit-head /r/againstmensrights poster who can't stand her own pathetic dwelling subreddit coming in here to "point out" an irony without actually pointing it out. Irony, indeed. Now, why don't you go run off to your all-inclusive "against the rights of men" club with a whopping 2k members. Oh wait. Is it because it's too much of a SRS circle-jerk for you?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:56 AM
28

This implies feminists actually doing something. A "women's studies" degree doesn't teach you how to program code and design video games. Whenever anything male-made gets popular, feminists do the same thing. Come in, cry "misogyny/sexism" and force people's hard work to be infected with their rhetoric regardless of what the general demographic wants. Good on Maddox, though. Makes me very proud to have used to read his material religiously in the early 2000's.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:52 AM
-2

GREAT post! I literally came here to make the EXACT same post. This same fat, filthy moron posted an article less than a year ago promoting male circumcision and claiming that if she had a son, she'd have him mutilated. It's incredible how easily Jim Norton destroyed her bullshit, feminist arguments. She keeps crying about "rape jokes" when they're perpetuated against women, yet how many comedians have poked fun at male prison rape? Where was this moron when countless male rape jokes are made? E…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:38 AM
1

I wouldn't say the effects are "over-exaggerated" when someone loses their clitoris which happens in several kinds of FGM, not just the worst type. I was speaking about sewing up the vagina and removing the clitoris. It is the worst form and it is the only form I ever hear feminists bring up (especially when they compare it to that "harmless" male circumcision). Also, it is exaggerated since feminists claim that women who are circumcised cannot have orgasms. This has been determined false numero…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:01 AM
2

The OP only addresses one kind of FGM. Right. And that kind is literally identical to male circumcision yet it is completely banned since its considered "genital mutilation". What purpose is there in playing oppression olympics with other types of female circumcision or discussing things people are already over-educated about anyways? Everybody knows female circumcision is bad, why not use it to show why we should ALSO ban male circumcision. Generally speaking, the effects of female circumcision…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:05 AM
16

It seems to me that you're fairly unfamiliar with both feminism and the MRM. I'm not sure if you've noticed, but feminists managed to gain their popularity with one large supposed concept: "equality". This supposed "equality" goal of theirs is what managed them to receive all of the funding for these shelters, lobby support and general power. When MRA's bring up men's rights issues that feminists have neglected since their inception, they claim that they are "already addressing those issues" or …
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:26 AM
1

I don't see anything about the toxic SPLC here, only the ACLU.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:08 AM
6

Let this be a warning to the feminist apologists that frequent this subreddit. THIS is what the fate of feminist ideology looks like. THIS is what happens when you fully support feminism and its toxic conspiracy theories. You turn into a self-guilting, emasculated turd of a human being that harms yourself for enjoying your most BASIC of natural instincts. Be-warned NAFALT-ers.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:06 AM
18

NO GUISE NOT ALL FEMINISTS ARE LIKE THAT!!!!111 THOSE ARE JUST THE VOCAL MAJORITY, THE REST OF ALL US ARE ALL ABOUT EQUALITY I SWEAR!111 /s
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:57 AM
1

Does it have to be? Did I state anywhere it was supposed to be? Is it possible to post a video of somebody providing decent rebuttals to feminism and supporting men's rights without being criticized to the nth degree?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:53 AM
2

Ah, yes. I thought you meant you had some real-life friends who were of the SRS hivemind. I've literally never met a real-life SRS-er and the closest I've met are a couple whipped eunuchs with feminist girlfriends. Still, it'd be so surprising for me to see men in real life actually being offended with your pro-male stance. Either way, keep being awesome :)
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:51 AM
5

It's very scary that some men you know will actually be upset at your positive views towards men's rights. Your friends are incredibly lucky to have you.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:24 AM
-2

To me being a feminist simply means I want equal pay for an equal job, the ability to have a chance at any job I'm qualified for, etc. Here we go again with another "what feminism means to me". Please have a read.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:42 AM
7

Feminism.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:40 AM
13

Those morons are always a great laugh, aren't they? :D
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:38 AM
2

Aww... What a cute little mangina he is!
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:37 PM
0

Well accusing me of being a crybaby is hardly logical. You are and I explained very logically why that is so. My point was reasonably logical - that this men's rights discussion area should be used for discussing men's rights. Yet, your "logic" fails to understand that feminism is directly correlated and responsible for the vast majority of "men's issues". OR you could drop the antagonistic attitude and realise that we're on the SAME SIDE, idiot, and you could treat my request does group consens…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:14 AM
1

I find logic more usefulness than emotion. Maybe you should try it yourself?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:41 AM
1

You don't deserve these downvotes.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:00 AM
1

Sure - but why is it relevant in this battle-of-the-sexes you see yourself in whether a feminist author was censored by other feminist authors thirty years ago for having an opinion about enjoying sex for its own sake? Because there are NAFALT-er's around that claim feminists are all a bunch of lovely "egalitarians" that don't censor anybody. But why is it it relevant whether or not feminists disagree with each other about censorship and sexuality? Once again, debunking the societal "myths" of f…
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:00 AM
6

THANK YOU. I honestly think these "not-a-mens-rights-issue" morons are almost as bad as the feminist apologists and NAFALT-ers.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:55 AM
11

It's incredible to me how so many of these trigger happy "not-a-men's-rights-issue" nitwits actually think anti-feminism is separate from men's rights. If you honestly don't think that feminism is a VERY large reason for disparities in men's rights and the very cause of issues we face, then you might as well go around believing in "patriarchy". I think that posts which attempt to mitigate every single issue here as not being a "men's rights issue" are the ones that don't belong here.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:31 AM
0

A gem amongst the feminist, victimizing shithole that is Tumblr.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:26 AM
3

Do they not understand how basic biology works? If feminists, let alone radical feminists, actually understood any real sciences, feminism would cease to exist.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:29 AM
1

Now, let's see all of those "gender-egalitarian" feminists post this up on all of their little forums and discuss how bad the "patriarchy" is in Russia. I'm sure the reaction would be just as severe as a male teacher beating a bunch of girls and deriving pleasure out of it.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:34 AM
3

Thank you for showing me this. Joe Rogan and Bill Burr are probably the best comedians at the moment.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:28 AM
-1

Wow, talk about a feminist brigade...
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:26 AM
-9

Absolutely outrageous. Take a nice look at what these despicable feminists morons are doing to this nation. Saudi Arabia is more "progressive" than this. It seems the older I get, the more I realize that the "progressive" doctrine is anything but progressive. It's news like this that I will proudly claim myself a "conservative". Feminist "progressive" filth.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:28 AM
-19

Christ I hate feminism. fixed
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:16 AM
1

My female friend did too. I couldn't be more proud of her (and I let her know it!).
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:49 AM
2

This hard-working man should be grateful we have feminists around to create laws which place hard-working fathers like himself in prison for being unable to pay alimony. Ironically enough, feminists don't seem interested in addressing an age-old, "patriarchal" law like alimony. Yay for those brave, gender egalitarians! Surely, feminists had men like him in mind when they made these laws.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:32 AM
6

I wonder if SRS-ers will shame this "neckbeard". Is it just me or are there far more neckbearded male feminists than most other demographics (ie. PZ Meyers, David Futrelle, etc)?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:26 AM
0

They got taken down quite a while ago if I remember correctly. I remember "talking" to some of the sick animals whom were supporting her actions in those groups. I find it ironic how there weren't any feminists that "care so much for men" bitching and exaggerating it to no end about it like they did for the Steubenville rape incident.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:20 AM
6

Well, I can see you aren't interested in a conversation but rather just yelling at me. I had no idea I can yell in writing without even using exclamation marks! Go figure! Or maybe, you have the argumentation skills of an average SRS-er and logic hurts your brain so much, you're going to use my supposed "tone" as a reason to not debate me. Fair enough, we might have had a productive conversation if your tone hadn't been so hostile. Coming from the person who posts on a subreddit which literally …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:33 AM
4

What are you talking about? The women was ACTUALLY showing signs of feeling threatened. So... if a white guy is "ACTUALLY showing signs of feeling threatened" to a black guy walking on the street, the black guy should "show empathy" to the "white guy", right? Oh wait... isn't that racist by SRS standards!? Man... it's so hard to build an SRS-paradox, isn't it? Yes, this is OBVIOUSLY what I said. Thanks for your brilliant analysis. Yes, it is. Idiots like you think its MEN'S responsibility to alt…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:23 AM
2

Awww... look at the cute feminist SRS-er! S/he thinks that all men should be forced to view themselves as constant threats to women in order to show "empathy" to them. SRS certainly isn't anti-male! ShitSRSersActuallyBelieve
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:50 AM
9

I work in the medical field and know about the health benefits etc. If you are aware of the supposed "health benefits", you should also be aware that there are MANY studies debunking these supposed "health benefits". In fact, you should know that only Americans (and Canadians to a smaller extent) circumcise their baby boys for non-religious reasons. The rest of the world disagrees with the procedure and its "health benefits". Would you be pondering whether to circumcise your daughter if people t…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:41 PM
0

This idiot is an SRS-poster. Go figure!
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:19 AM
0

What's ironic is that study after study proves that women have far lower pain tolerances on average than men. If I was to simply make a statistically correct article about how "weak" women are in comparison to men (even while citing these studies as sources), I'd be called a misogynist and instantly banned from posting on famous websites. This insufferable bitch writes an entire bullshit "satire" article about how "weak" her husband is when going through SURGERY and it gets published on the huff…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:16 AM
8

The only people "offended" by it are feminists and ignorant Westerners (which are a result of feminist teachings).
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:22 AM
7

Don't worry, MRA's and intactivists. Feminists are our allies and they claim to be against genital mutilation of ALL kinds. Surely, those brave egalitarian feminists will be here to protest this, just like they have done with female circumcision. No, need to worry, let us just wait.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:22 AM
-2

To a degree. Our tactics would be that of a hate group, but our rhetoric and ideology wouldn't.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:52 AM
-1

This subreddit alone provides daily examples. Take a nice gander at what the fine, feminist ladies over at radfemhub have to say about men. Until you find some MRA's spewing even a fraction of the filthy vitroil as these animals do, you can shut it with constant criticism over any of the miniscule "harm" the MRM is doing.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:51 AM
1

Too many MRAs are quick to fly off the handle and start swinging rather than stop and think strategically. I don't know. We seem pretty calm in every single "protest" video and general viewing... especially compared to the actual people "flying off the handle and swinging". Maybe you should stop criticizing and realize what kind of animals we're up against? The MRM is literally the calmest, relaxed and open-minded movement I've ever witnessed. Especially in contrast to its opposition.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:12 AM
15

It irks me every time some feminist-enabling idiot claims there are "bigots/extremists on both sides". They have NO idea how different things would be if MRA's were employing the disgusting tactics the feminists are using. Every single outlet would label us a "hate group".
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:41 AM
44

Last I heard, MRA's were not building forums discussing how to abort baby girls and violently protesting speeches about women's issues. Let's not pretend the hateful, bigoted, disgusting vitriol that comes from radical feminism is equivalent to "women's issues" or "men's issues".
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:03 AM
1

Dare I say it, Japan kinda needs first wave feminism (without all the patriarchy garbage). America kinda needs the Ku Klux Klan (without all of the racist garbage). You cannot combat sexism with more sexism. Japan certainly does NOT need any feminism.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 01:09 AM
11

If there's anything to be learned about feminism (aside from its direct bigotry), it's that they are completely uninterested in policing their own movement. Rush Limbaugh calls ONE woman a "slut" for demanding free birth control be given to her. Feminists lobby in full force to chastise him and suppress his speech. An entire daytime television show depicts 5 female talk show hosts and an entire female audience laughing at, praising and promoting a sociopathic woman's actions for drugging up, tyi…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:01 PM
6

"There's no reason to hate feminists" "There's no reason we can't work with feminists" "Not all feminists are like that" "Feminists are not against men's rights" "Feminists care about men" "Feminists don't want to censor men's rights issues" Pick your hypocritical, feminist-enabling phrase.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:40 PM
1

Oh hey! Lookie here! It's the deluded, schizophrenic femicunt that defends and "supports" feminists who directly censor everyone who disagrees with them's "freedom of speech"! Gotta love seeing girlwriteswhat deliver another brilliant destruction to another femicunt. Now go back to your crybaby eunuch shelter ;)
/r/MensRights16/04/13 07:18 AM
-1

You want the last word? You want the last word! Go on, take it! Good boy! :D
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:06 AM
-1

Ah, is the little self-hating eunuch mad? Are you going to report this post to the Eunuch-Defense-League?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:41 PM
-3

Hi. I'm a /r/againstmensrights with a degree in Eunuch Anthropology (specialized in "rape culture" and feminist conspiracy theories). Everything in this post is so fundamentally correct it gave me a moment of clarity, which then receded when I entered the pit of self-guilt known as /r/againstmensrights. You are speaking out of your ass, because you don't agree with feminist conspiracy theories. Now I'm going to go back and post in my own subreddit about how angry I am when I lose arguments. Fixe…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:51 PM
-2

Rofl, you got to love how the infamous eunuch Aparatii goes by to his SRS-cave to find lunatic man-haters like you to come to his rescue! Idiots like you are the type of people who stand up for the Steubenville rapist and agree she was asking for it because she was drunk and someone had slipped her a roofie. Um... no. Nobody said she was "asking for it", dipshit, only feminist fear-mongers like you pretend anybody claims this. The Steubenville rapists (you feminists love talking so much about) w…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:45 PM
2

Bravo! Bravo! This is MensRights in a nutshell!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:33 AM
69

Yup, never. Video games never give images of unattainable physical perfection. There are certainly no male role models with virtually unattainable physical perfection. No cartoon shows which exhibit virtually unattainable physical perfection. Women have it so hard!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:27 AM
11

Where were all the crazy feminist protests during this? Seems like you couldn't go two posts on facebook without seeing this Steubenville incident because the underaged boys had a lighter sentence as a result, but they have no problems with underage girls sexually assaulting a boy getting away scot-free.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:19 AM
4

In the US, the majority of Senators and Congressmen are men, there has never been a woman president, the majority of CEO's of Fortune 500 companies are men Jeez... that can't be because men SEEK to be senators/congressmen/presidents/CEO's more than women, right? Can't be that men work longer hours, calling in sick less, work more stressful, work more dangerous, take more risks, and graduate with more competitive degrees than their female counterpart? Can't be that those men (God forbid) actually…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:57 AM
-8

Great rebuttal, Apparatii! You've surely convinced the MRA's of ALL of our supposed "fallacies" and of how truly correct feminists conspiracy theory really is! What an excellent linguist you are! I'm sure feminists, SRS and radfemhub are all so very happy to have a castrated lapdog like you around with your spectacular debate tactics! :D
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:20 AM
11

I want everybody to please notice how she has NO issue with putting her hands on another human being (who kept his hands to himself) however not only cowardly backs away once the man begins to defend himself, but resorts to those "gender roles" feminists claim to hate so much and plays the "I'm a defenseless woman victim card". This is the motto of feminism, "equal rights when it suits me, traditionalism when it suits me".
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:14 AM
1

Absolutely. Five years ago I didn't even know about the MRM and people would look at me strange when I spoke of men's issues for the most part. Now, I mostly get supportive nods at the least and the MRM is nearly impossible to escape on the internet. I must say, it puts a smile to my face :)
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:58 AM
-9

Wow, you're a eunuch. Having sex with a "drunk person" doesn't make you a rapist, dipshit. If that's the case, then I've been "raped" dozens of times. And he's absolutely right in that American feminists and emasculated cowards like yourself are trigger happy with your rape accusations. You're so obsessed with making women out to be "victims" that you think that what a women DECIDES to put in her body (on her free will) and then decides to do afterwards make her a victim. Now go back to Manboobz…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:49 AM
21

She just can't seem to come to grips that she did something wrong and it sounds to me like shes trying to divert the attention away from her and try to refocus this on sexism and racism issues. Sounds like an average feminist to me. Stop trying to play the victim That's like telling a neo-nazi to stop being racist.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:46 AM
13

Isn't it amazing how an "apology" from a feminist and a self-entitled teenage brat have virtually the same general connotation? Really shows you how "honest" feminists are. Then again, their actions speak even louder in that regard than this bullshit "apology".
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:45 AM
2

Even though people seem to be very upset over this, I have to admit I think it's positive. With the white knightery present in modern Western culture, I completely thought it would be skewed grossly in favor of "no". I can almost guarantee you that just a decade ago would've given much more negative results. I think you can thank the exposing of feminist garbage for this.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:36 AM
-5

A literal Rapist. Source?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:30 AM
3

It's funny, when WOMEN aren't achieving success in an industry it's because of a "glass ceiling", "institionalized sexism" or because their aren't enough programs helping them in. When its men, it's all our fault and we should be more like women.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:06 AM
1

This Passover, I am particularly focused on the rights of women and girls, both in our own backyard and around the world. I'm so happy you're focused on the horrible oppressions faced by women "in our own backyard". Horrible cruelty like "misogyny in video games" and "rape jokes" truly do affect women. Horrible, horrible slaves those Western women are. Please do not ruin your nice Passover, Debbie, by hearing the screams of baby boys in your "own backyard" getting parts of their genitals cut off…
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:02 AM
16

It's incredible how idiots like this can even be taken seriously. Really goes to show you just how "useful", "intelligent" and "empowering" feminism really is.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:51 AM
33

Let's also not forget that the girl calls him a "Nigger" prior to being pushed.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:18 AM
2

Gotta love that feminist nitwit Lindy West quote in there. The same feminist who writes articles arguing in favor of male circumcision (even stating she'll circumcise her own son) holds no shame in also supporting firing men because of a "dongle joke". Anybody else wants to explain why feminists are for "equality" again?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:07 AM
1

I have a feeling they didn't "forget" anything.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:26 AM
-3

They really are scumbags. I've had the misfortune of debating with a few of them very recently and they'll gladly ignore feminists discussing how to abort baby boys on forums or prominent feminists supporting male mutilation, but BIG BAD ex-chairman of NOW Dr. Farrell gets taken out of context to no avail!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:31 AM
9

Absolutely disgusting that this has 580 fans: There is no princess culture. There is rape culture, gun culture, patriarchal culture and violent male culture in which women are raped, beaten and murdered while men walk free. We live under a patriarchy in which men control the governments, militaries, industries, religions, corporations, noosphere, energy. It is male capitalists who are selling pink and porn and the view of females as decorative sex objects. No one is stopping your boy from anythi…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:05 AM
1

Gee... I don't know. More support and more awareness for a movement generally makes victory easier.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:20 AM
1

Further, you truly have a warped view of the world. Which is why you've given me zero evidence of why I'm so wrong? Finally, as a man, I believe that you are dangerous to the Men's Rights movement. You do all of us men a great disservice. Why? You replies are full of logical fallacies which I will not argue with you. Which are and why? Not because I am impotent to argue, and not because I am a coward, but because you have demonstrated a tenacious grasp to your own personal paradigm. Or because y…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:41 PM
0

Yeah, feminists actually believe that /r/feminism is "under MRA control". Those who wish to understand what feminism looks like should check out r/SRS or /r/Feminisms for a better understanding of what feminism looks like. Warning: It's not pretty...
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:27 PM
7

This is AWESOME news! I can't wait to read the great follow-up article on AVfM! Victory is only going to get easier, ladies and gents :)
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:05 PM
1

Absurd. If this is your strawman argument, then I do not believe you and I can have a constructive conversation. Let's see. The KKK harms the rights of minorities. The Civil Rights Movement seeks to empower the rights of minorities. The KKK is the enemy of the Civil Rights Movement. Feminism harms the rights of men. The MRM seeks to empower the rights of men. Feminism is the enemy of the MRM. So, where's the little "strawman" now? Or is every genuine analogy a "strawman" to you? Disingenuous. If…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:16 PM
2

Ah, ol' femitheist. Just when you need reminding of the toxicity of feminist ideology...
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:04 PM
4

I am however getting alienated and annoyed at every thread that is either directed towards feminists or women. Threads aren't "directed towards women", they're directed at feminists. The reason why you read posts about comparisons between men and women is because feminists (and the feminist-influenced media) constantly assumes women have it severely worst than men in nearly every facet. These posts are done to expose the truth. The reason posts are directed at feminism is because feminism is lit…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:23 AM
2

The article you posted, as well as other articles I read afterwards, position the "Men's Rights" group against feminists. To insist on this division is counter-productive and pointless. Should the Civil Rights Movement also "team up" with the KKK, as well? You do know that it is feminists that have been severely damaging men's rights for the last uh... 5 decades right? Why is "insisting on this division counter productive and pointless? Seems like its very "counter productive and pointless" to t…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:24 AM
3

Everything you could possibly imagine is some sort of privilege Besides being a woman or a minority. I start to wonder if they are just picking random papers out of a hat to see what they will complain about next. Only if those "random papers" are self-written nouns relating to their personal traits. Remember, nobody has life harder than a feminist.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:17 AM
0

Watch out for dat dere patriarchy, razzertto! Misogyny is everywhere and all men (aside from local mangina Aerik) are all part of the evil patriarchy oppressing women! It's everywheree!!!!!!1111
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:14 AM
1

It's like "Patriarchy". Only feminists and crybaby Tumblr's believe in it.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:08 AM
15

Toxic ideology and bigotry. Controlling men's sexuality has ALWAYS been the biggest gripe of feminism. Radical feminism is a cancer and so is Gail Dines.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:32 AM
14

Ironically enough, it's almost exclusively the local Jezebelian's and Tumblr feminists complaining about "thin privilege". Could it be that feminists just like to complain more?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:25 AM
0

For as much you and your feminist friends pretend words like "bitch" are actual "issues" in the gender politics sphere, you seem to consider it pretty miniscule in this statement. How does it feel to contradict yourself? Then again, as a feminist, I'd imagine you're pretty used to it :)
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:16 AM
1

Then why do you suggest so in your statement? (ie. "why feminists are wrong" "we men are right")
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:15 AM
1

It is divisive in the sense of "why feminists are wrong" which easily suggests that "we men are right." So, you think feminists and women are synonymous?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 10:11 PM
1

but if this forum is geared for division of the sexes instead of equality between the sexes Uh... what makes you think it is? Where is any evidence to support this claim?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:59 PM
21

1 Billion Rising is utter feminist garbage. Good to see more people calling this out for what it is. Anti-feminism in a nutshell: Until we stop blaming only men and assuming that it is somehow in their “nature” to harm women, until we stop thinking the solution is to “teach” males that women are human, until we stop this nonsense about needing to somehow civilize the brutes that are men, until we hold mothers, girlfriends and wives just as accountable for their abusiveness, the cycle will contin…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:52 PM
6

Is it legal for a university to use its equipment to promote a political campaign? Universities practically are a political campaign these days. I agree that it would be great if we could all complain and do some damage though.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:37 PM
0

No. It was a facebook forum which was abandoned by me and the other mods due to some drama issues with many of the users. I officially abandoned it when I discovered /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:22 PM
1

Yup. JohntheOther and I have identical stances on this issue. As do most MRA's.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:17 PM
1

Excellent video. Certainly needs more praise than it is getting.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:10 PM
0

Oh, it was. This was circa 2009.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:04 PM
1

I used to be a mod on an anti-feminist forum a few years ago (roughly 2009-ish). The users called themselves masculinists and anti-feminists. This is straight from personal experience.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:52 PM
1

I disagree. These people are cancerous to our subreddit and I will call them out and warn others as I see fit. Seems many MRA's are gettin' soft around these parts, which is rather unfortunate.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:48 PM
2

Please read.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:19 PM
0

This an MRA forum. Let's see how quick an MRA gets banned from your bigoted forum against the rights of men, dipshit. Take your hateful rhetoric elsewhere, bitch.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:11 PM
-1

You do know this person routinely posts on /r/againstmensrights, right? Like literally cherry-picks posts from here and then goes back and cries to Aerik about them on /r/againstmensrights. Why don't you read this bigot's post history before telling MRA's to "go away" from an MRA forum, eh chap?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:09 PM
3

This may be true but is not their intent, and like I said, the real problem here is what they identify themselves as. Who they "identify themselves as" is important. If I told people I'm a Nazi, people would make judgements (and rightfully so). Even the supposedly "good feminists" subscribe to hateful, garbage sociological theories like "patriarchy" and "rape culture". Also, ignorance to a "label" you place on yourself is nothing to be praised for. Personally I like "equalitarians" because there…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:42 AM
6

Meaning the "good feminist" are not aligned with feminism at all, and should be called something else. If they are supposedly "good feminists", then they should be MRA's or "egalitarians". Calling themselves "feminists" only endorses and supports the bigoted feminist movement.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:36 AM
81

It's incredible how childish and socialistic feminist thinking is. They literally think that if there are no female "top executives" at a company, it's due to sexism. Can't be that those men WORKED to be top executives of a company, especially considering how men on average take bigger risks, work more hours and are more interested in technological fields than women. No! It's all because of patriarchy! This style of thinking and feminism are a societal cancer.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:20 AM
1

Honestly, "masculinist" is what MRA-minded people used before I had heard about MRA's.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:14 AM
5

their individual ideology is fine but they are not practicing what feminism as an institution is defined as. So, you listen to what a group TELLS you they are "defined as" rather than actually viewing their actions? White Nationalists claim that their movement is actually for "racial equality" as well. Are you going to believe that or are you going to watch their actions and make up your mind like a conscious adult? So these as I called "good feminist" earlier are actually just people pushing fo…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:11 AM
1

I am personally not anti-feminist, and think that feminism and masculism or MRAs can work symbiotically for a more equal world. Boy, do you have a whole lot to learn. I'm sure these lovely young feminists want nothing more than for you to be their "ally". Wait! Before you respond with your obligatory NAFALT, please read this and save yourself some time.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:07 AM
10

I find it refreshing when I come to read posts in this subreddit which showcase how "bashing feminism" is a large part of attaining "equality".
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:01 AM
3

I can see you're not one for reading comprehension so let me quote the answer to this question directly from the link I sent you: However, the humanist, liberal, sex positive, nice guy version of feminism you practice – and if i didn’t cover your particular flavor, go ahead and add it in — that humanist feminism is not the same ideology taught in university gender studies courses. It is not the feminism which informs the policies of United Nations aid agencies who render assistance to only women…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:58 AM
8

Horrible analogy. Please read this and stop NAFALT-ing.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:43 AM
0

AGAINSTMENSRIGHTS TROLL DOWNVOTE AND IGNORE
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:33 AM
-1

AGAINSTMENSRIGHTS TROLL DOWNVOTE AND IGNORE
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:32 AM
-1

AGAINSTMENSRIGHTS TROLL DOWNVOTE AND IGNORE
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:30 AM
2

Wooly deserves more praise than she gets. Awesome video! :)
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:24 AM
29

Now, I know a lot of feminists, see a lot of their complaints on facebook, but I didnt saw one complaining about this comercial. Nor any feminist society filed a complain. They also didn't complain when an entire daytime television show praised and supported a violent sociopathic woman who mutilated her husbands genitals over a divorce. But God forbid a comedian makes a rape joke! Feminists don't give a shit about men, plain and simple. Remember this the next time you think of supporting a femin…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:02 AM
7

Feminists claim that there is a "rape culture", where our societal institution actively supports/endorses "rape". Ironically enough, feminists will endorse this conspiracy theory, but neglect times when an actual culture exists. Unlike rape, a man being genitally mutilated is hilarious and frequently joked about with literally no feminist backlash. That is what my comment is about.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:36 AM
4

Bullet. Dodged.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:12 AM
5

Absolutely sickening. Let's hope this violent assailant get's a rightfully long and painful sentence like she deserves. We certainly can't expect any Columbian feminists to give adequate justice for this. Oh, and check out the lone comment: Morals of the story: a. Be careful what you share with your girlfriends. b. Always sleep with thermal underwear Hahahaha! So funny! Men should take precautions not to get their genitals mutilated, what a great concept! Now, if we can only tell women to take p…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:05 AM
8

Here is the full length version (along with Krazie's excellent assessment). Funny how when women get raped, anything less than sheer horror as a response is regarded as "hateful". However, a man having his penis cut off (which is far worst than the worst incident of rape imaginable) is completely acceptable to laugh at. Which crime has a "culture" around it, feminists?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:00 AM
1

Feminism isn't responsible for the male only draft or circumcision. They are largely responsible for it still being legal and it not be addressed. They are responsible for stating they support gender equality and not just women's issues (which is why they claim the MRM does not need to exist) and that they focus just as much attention on men's rights as women's rights. They gladly protested the streets to allow women to vote on issues that would potentially put men into war, but ignored the resp…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 03:06 AM
1

To the nice feminists
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:56 AM
4

But... but... but women had it worst! And patriarchy! Your average feminist
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:54 AM
0

I already explained this and I'm not going to explain it again. Reading comprehension is a skill and you seem hell-bent on defending this video/organization who'd rather talk up the already abundant topic rather than the men's issues topic.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:39 AM
1

AGAINSTMENSRIGHTS POSTER AND TROLL DOWNVOTE AND IGNORE
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:32 AM
3

More evidence of feminist bigotry: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/18tv7j/i_am_warren_farrell_author_of_why_men_are_the_way/c8i2jh0 http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/18tv7j/i_am_warren_farrell_author_of_why_men_are_the_way/c8i4r74
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:41 AM
1

Let's see... because the groups that make these videos claim to address "gender equality" and not just female advocacy/supremacy? They claim to care about men's issues just as much as women's issues, yet they NEVER address men's issues. There is ENTIRE legislature and a SURPLUS of identical videos/commercials of this, yet they prefer to make the same repetitive video's over and over again rather than addressing ANY men's issue even once. You should stop pointing the finger at the people that hav…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:31 PM
3

Ah, I see. We should totally address the issues of women (even though they're address in a gross surplus by feminists already) at the same rate of men (whose issues are literally never addressed by feminists). Stop being an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:36 AM
0

First off, the response was to the constant barrage of "feminism is about equality guise!!11". The sole reason we focus on "men's rights" is because feminist rhetoric, legislation and theology has severely hurt "men's rights". Which is why we are "Men's Rights Activists". Get it?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:45 AM
3

What part of what I said makes you think men's rights isn't about "gender equality"? I guess disliking the very people who push anti-male legislature and theology makes us against "gender equality", right Kinsey?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:32 AM
5

No. My point is that idiotic videos like this paint the image that only women have these sorts of issues. Abortion, for one, is not solely about a "woman's right to her body". It's an issue of morality determining when a human being "becomes" a human being. If you are to acknowledge that a "fetus" is a human living being (which, by default, grants it rights to life), then a woman does not have to the "right" to kill another life form and infringe upon another's right. Your right ends where anoth…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:27 AM
7

Shhh! Quiet you! Only WOMEN deserve to have rights to their body! Just like they're deserving of circumcising their sons and forcing their sexual partners into financial servitude! Goddamn sexist MRA's! /s
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:19 AM
-3

I always advocate against it, but you'd be surprised at how many men I've spoken to staunchly prefer it. Maybe if feminists weren't more interested in discussing how much worst female circumcision is than male circumcision (even though both have identical variants) than they were in labeling male circumcision a violation of someone's body, we wouldn't have men "staunchly preferring it". Men "staunchly prefer it" because they're: 1) forced into it 2) told repeatedly throughout the feminist educat…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:57 AM
0

You only "answered" one of my questions. Not to mention, in a very vague manner. Because extremists are always 'more interesting' than moderates and get more media attention. Then why are the "extremists" running your movement and get voted in by your supposed "nice, egalitarian feminist group"? Once again, why don't your feminist friends fight these hate-mongers rather than telling MRA's what to do? Why don't they protest? These "extremists" are the ones who are writing public policy and sexist…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:38 AM
-1

Then why don't these supposed "nice feminists" (that are apparently so commonplace over the "feminazi's") not elect the hateful feminists who run their movement in the media and in lobbying? Why don't these "nice feminists" (since they're the majority, apparently) condemn and criticize men's rights organizations while gladly ignoring all of the hate in their own movement? Why don't the supposed "nice feminists" who support "men's rights" ever fight/condemn/overthrow the hateful feminists who are…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:13 AM
-3

Don't bother giving evidence or anything.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:46 PM
-3

Isn't it funny how you idiots resort to using a line from a movie rather than debating like grown-ups? Then again, I guess we can't expect much better from a group titled "against men's rights". Thank you for proving to everybody in this thread the average intelligence of a /r/againstmensrights poster :)
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:46 PM
3

Obviously feminists have a view of the world that is totally illogical and divorced from reality. Fixed that for ya
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:57 PM
1

I believe that yes, women should be included in the draft, with special provisions marking which MOS (Military occupational Service) we're allowed to take. What "special provisions marking" are you speaking of here? I don't believe women should be allowed in combat positions, aside from the physical requirements, (I would need YEARS of training to be able to carry a 200-280 pound man with gear) there are psychological things to consider, as well as physical lust. Then why are women allowed to vo…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:43 PM
27

Read this article long and hard. 90% of these "we should work together" posts would be gone if feminists would do just that. TL;DR- feminism shouldn't be about women's issues, it should be about gender issues. Then why is it called "feminism" with emphasis on "fem"?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:14 PM
2

As much as I'd like to believe you, it got overturned some time ago. Circumcision is completely legal in Germany once again, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:39 AM
1

It's an insult to both men and women. Oh, really? I'd love to see some feminists fight against this. Because you know, equality and what not.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:35 AM
1

a rape apologist (aka victim blamer) is someone who defends or justifies rape (aka, she was drunk, she's a slut, she was wearing a skirt, she was flirting with him). pretty sure that fucking happens. it's called rape culture. Ah jeez, not this rhetorical feminist garbage again. It's funny how you SRS-ers turn from "troll" to "instant feminist" all of the sudden! For one, nobody "justifies rape" anymore than they "justify theft", you moron. If I was walking down a crime-ridden neighborhood in an …
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:16 AM
1

Ah yes, it's truly our fault. We're the subreddit that confuses a proven crime with a theology. We're the subreddit that posts pictures of dildo's and meme's nobody else thinks is funny in order to get our point across. We're the ones who do nothing but "troll" people who disagree with us rather than engage in discussion. Yup, we're the problem alright.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:14 AM
1

Funny, I don't try to "get under the skin" of feminists. Must be doing a pretty good job of it though if people need to create an entire subreddit in order to counteract it :)
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:56 AM
1

Ah, nevermind an SRS-poster. The lowest common denominator of intelligence on reddit. I should've known better, my apologies.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:49 AM
1

Wow, you're a dumbshit. Are you actually saying that a "false rape accusation" (an actual crime which occurs by the thousands annually) is somehow the same as a supposed "rape apologist" (a made-up feminist term to describe somebody that supposedly "apologizes" for rape)? Add the words "crime" and "theory" to your long list of needed definitions.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:48 AM
1

You should look up the word "slander" sometime. Oh, and stop believing in feminist garbage terms like "rape apologist" too.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:13 AM
1

Really great incite into the way feminists debate. There's a part two and part three as well.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:46 AM
-1

Imagine the "hilarious responses" to a thread about female circumcision.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:26 AM
5

As I was resting between sets of decline flyes, I spotted a shirt that said, on the front, “Please don’t feed the sorority girls.” And on the back, “Campus Beautification” and the Greek letters Phi Sigma Kappa. My empty stomach dropped. I unconsciously glanced at myself in the mirror and I fought the urge to cry. First world problems look like third world problems compared to this issue. Does anybody ACTUALLY think feminists are the people who should be talking about "empowerment" when they're c…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:04 AM
14

It's hilarious that you say this! When I was still in college, I took a mandatory bogus liberal arts course that dealt with violence. Of course, the teacher was a self-proclaimed feminist. She began the class with explaining that "violence" is virtually whatever the hell you want it to be. She referred to somebody yelling at somebody else as "violence". When I questioned her about it and stated that "violence" refers to ACTUAL "assault" from a legal standpoint, she stated that we're not talking …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:02 AM
2

Isn't it funny that these supposed "majority good feminists" excommunicate the ACTUAL decent feminists? So much for all of those NAFALT arguments...
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:16 PM
2

Hey, what a coincidence, this ex-SRS-er LITERALLY just gave me that excuse. What a group of mentally challenged nimrods.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:08 PM
2

What?? Are you saying blacks can't stop murder?? Blacks can stop murder by NOT MURDERING. Way to play into your own bigotry, feminist.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:46 AM
1

Oh yes, all of those university feminists' fighting feminist bigotry all the time! Give me ONE example of this occurring before you call it a simple "generalization".
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:45 AM
0

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:10 AM
15

Hey look, another NAFALT-er! This article should really be stickied somewhere...
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:37 AM
2

Whoa, settle down there buddy. I'm an intactivist. I KNOW there are people that have protested male circumcision. My comment was directed at the statement that FEMINISTS (as in FEMINISM) are responsible for anti-circumcision lobbies. They are not. Feminism is not "pro-men's-rights" as you can see from the clear hatred MRA's get. Feminist theory states that "misandry don't real" and that men's issues (which they consider to be far less severe than the pettiest of women's issues) are derived from …
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:32 AM
6

Soraya Mire also has something to say about this.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:24 AM
12

I hate that the word feminist has such nasty connotations. It is adequately applied to "nasty" people. If you want to get rid of "nasty connotations", you should stop supporting people who make signs saying "men can stop rape" and protesting men's rights speakers.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:58 AM
5

I'm aware of what intactivists have done, believe me. Intactivists =/= Feminists
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:46 AM
12

It would be AWESOME if GirlWritesWhat or JohntheOther could attend! :)
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:38 AM
5

I am happy to hear this happened and that this "feminist professor" admitted that misandry existed in some manner. With that being said, the problem is that feminists (like your professor) will babble on all day about any smidgeon of "sexism against women", but will generally refuse to address the issues men face. They'll protest a pamphlet which reversed the genders as "hate speech", but they'll ignore a pamphlet like the one you stated. They'll vehemently protest a comedian making a "rape joke…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:35 AM
4

Dont forget the loaners should be in prison for violating your consent.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:44 PM
58

The claims frequently involve aspects of conspiracy theory, as MRAs are quick to invoke the "Feminist Media," the "Feminist Government," and the "Feminist Agenda." Clearly, "patriarchy" and "rape culture" are not "conspiracy theories". Though cutting off the foreskin doesn't remotely compare with cutting off of the clitoris (and sometimes even the labia) in terms of damage done, Oh, okay. Well, what about the removal of the clitoral hood then (which is labeled as "FGM"), which is a form of "FGM"…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:37 PM
14

The most ironic thing about all this is that this'll be blamed on the male "patriarchy" which is supposedly utilized to 'oppress women'.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:02 PM
16

Symantec takes customer feedback very seriously. As long as policy has not changed, reporting the issue via the forums should result in the mater being resolved promptly. I think it's time we let Symantec know our feelings towards discrimination against MRA's.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:57 PM
13

At the time of the shooting, FRC president Tony Perkins accused the SPLC of sparking the shooting, saying the shooter “was given a license to shoot… by organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center that have been reckless in labeling organizations as hate groups because they disagree with them on public policy. You don't say!
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:50 PM
13

I protested at the AAP convention down in New Orleans a few months ago. People like you need more praise.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:46 PM
1

That's the implication :)
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:03 PM
8

I just responded to a post about this same thing. Let's stop pretending that what feminists SAY and DO are the same thing, okay? Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:27 PM
8

She was really nice despite the fact that she normally dislikes men. She dislikes men, yet she is "being really nice"? Do you not see a paradox here? Maybe you can stop supporting people who "dislike men" in the first place? Also, one supposedly "nice feminist" (who somehow dislikes men) certainly doesn't change what feminism is or isn't.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:55 PM
10

I'm going to teach you a valuable life lesson I wish was taught me many years ago: Stop LISTENING to what people have to say and start WATCHING their actions/behavior. Feminists will say many things about how they are fighting for "gender equality" and how they care about men's issues, yet they'll literally DO NOTHING to help any of these causes. In fact, when people come up and start bringing up all of men's issues, feminists vehemently fight against it (with no uproar from the supposed "good f…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:39 PM
2

Sociology should just be called Feminism-Lite. I took a sociology course in college (as a prerequisite for graduating), and it was riddled with misandrous nonsense and feminist conspiracy theories. I couldn't believe this garbage is taught and MAJORED in at universities. Incredible.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:32 PM
3

A feminist teacher literally told me that it was MY DUTY to attack/stop a man who was assaulting a woman. Yes, someone who supposedly believes in "equality" believes I should only intervene a situation based on the fact that I am a "man" and the attacker is also a "man". When I brought this issue up, she started asking me questions about what kind of friends I associate with and where they're from. She completely avoided the topic of debate (because she knew she had the debate skills of a ground…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:28 PM
7

How much evidence of daily feminist bigotry do you need before you realize that the vast majority of feminism is bigoted? If you read feminist theory, you'll realize that it is VERY anti-male and contorts history in favor of making "women" the constant victim. Feminist =/= Woman.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:23 PM
1

Feminists care about as much about men's sexual needs as they do with rapists sexual needs.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:20 PM
11

Lol @ feminists are not encouraging hurting men or trivalizing men's issues. Maybe you NAFALT-ers should spend some time studying the hateful garbage that comes out from the feminist movement on a basis before pretending anybody "for" men's rights should support this bigotry. "Feminists" are not equivalent to "women's rights activists".
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:11 PM
24

Welcome to feminism 101. If you can't win an argument , slander the opposition as a "misogynist".
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:06 PM
4

Exactly. Let's go find all those "good feminists" that love to criticize the MRM at every whimsical, yet will completely ignore bigots like this.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:38 AM
0

Does she huff gasoline in her spare time or something? Does she have some kind of alien brain parasite that consumes all logical thought processes as they are formed? There has to be some kind of explanation for this. There is, she's a feminist. This is what many years of feminism turns you into. A hateful, idiotic shrewd who thinks "gender equality" is achieved by focusing entirely on one gender (tip: it ain't men!).
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:37 AM
32

I think it's hard to hide the fact that feminists are just looking for excuses to be "victims".
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:21 AM
3

It's really refreshing seeing something good come out of these daytime women's shows. I must admit. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:17 AM
1

Thanks for the insight to women's heart disease/health. Definitely some interesting stuff.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:49 AM
1

My apologies, I seem to have misinterpreted some of the things you stated. No. I don't see that. Also, that'd be fine if there were also federally-funded "safe spaces" for men. This program is not federally funded. The federally-funded example was that of what feminists asks for, not this organization. I was trying to make an analogy to the style of thinking, not the exact entity. If you want an all male, "no women included" version, why not create one? No one is stopping you. I'll even spread a…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:40 AM
1

I'm not in total disagreement with you. I acknowledge that men and women have certain differences in the way they are diagnosed and which medicines/treatments they need. You brought up excellent points and I'm not trying to dismiss them. What I'm saying is that we don't need entire organizations like this to address the issues of ONE gender. The American Heart Association discusses women's heart health/disease and lists many pages designed to advocate for women's heart health. Hell, if it even s…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:32 AM
1

Great. Show me a "Men's Heart Disease" organization doing the funding and wearing some other color. I'd love to hear about it. Oh, what is that? Everything that isn't "women only" is "male only"? Well shit... this whole time I thought the American Heart Association was also for women? Seems like my aunt shouldn't be eating that oatmeal now since the American Heart Association only recommends its good for me to eat :)
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:30 AM
1

I'm not sure if you're aware, but like most "scientific findings", there is quite a bit of disparity. Even doing a simple google search about men AND women's heart disease leads you to pages which only address WOMEN'S issues with 'heart disease', such as this one. Here, by the way, is what the American Heart Association says about your first link: Men have a greater risk of heart attack than women do, and they have attacks earlier in life. Even after menopause, when women’s death rate from heart…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:26 AM
0

Oh, give me a break. If heart attacks were seen as an "old man's disease", then where is the "Men's Heart Disease" flag? It seems that anything that is in ANY way 'unique' to women has to have some special subsidiary funded exclusively for it. Both men and women suffer from heart attacks (men probably moreso, not to mention men live shorter lives on average), they BOTH deserve to be funded. Not to have exclusive "no men allowed" foundations like this.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:20 AM
20

First sentence of response back to this abuser: It speaks highly of your maturity and moral growth that you can look back on what you did with insight and disgust. Oh really, Prudie? I wonder how "highly" you'd speak of a male babysitter's "maturity and moral growth" after he repeatedly spanked and made a 3-4 year old girl sit in the corner naked. Christ.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:35 PM
7

When your argument is generally limited to sociological theories like "patriarchy" and emotion, it's sort of hard to have a "rational discussion". I don't really understand what NAFALT-ers think they'll accomplish by welcoming those who oppose virtually everything about our ideology with open arms and upvotes.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:28 PM
3

You honestly don't see the comedy in it? For one, I doubt a serious feminist would call him/herself a "straw_feminist". Two, even amongst feminists many of these are a bit "extreme". Don't take the internet so seriously.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:00 PM
3

It's a joke account...
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:57 PM
20

Does this utterly piss anybody else off? Can somebody explain to me why we need a day to raise awareness to WOMEN's heart disease? Anybody, please? What is so wrong with raising awareness to HEART DISEASE as a whole? Why is there priority given to WOMEN? It's as silly as having a Asian-American heart disease day or a Jewish heart disease day. It's almost as if they will prioritize ANYTHING that women face just because.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:37 PM
5

But straw feminists do exist! See here's one on reddit :)
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:18 PM
3

I understand where you're coming from and it's awesome that you're against this barbaric practice, but the thing is that when people come in here and say "I like my circumcision", it validates the pro-circumcision advocates and only adds to their cause. If you're fine with it, then great. However, you (and others) having to reiterate how happy you are with having your foreskin forcibly removed is 1) grossly irrelevant to the cause and 2) only suits the agenda of those who promote this practice.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:59 PM
15

I don't really understand what causes people to come in here and talk about how much they "like their circumcision". It doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is that it should not be FORCED on children, ever. It's no different than this kid growing up and saying "I like my tattoo", then people using this as a reason to tattoo their infants.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:46 AM
8

I think it's pretty obvious the only reason this is being brought up is to debunk the nonsensical feminist fallacy of "women being objectified" and that "women are more concerned with personality while men are more concerned with looks" implication.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:24 AM
12

I couldn't agree more. Here is my severely ANGRY DUDEBRO response to her blatantly hateful comment. Unsurprisingly enough, I received no answer. Doesn't seem they have very high standards over at "the slate", now do they Hanna?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:04 AM
1

You typing as if you are winning. Look as long as a President can campaign on a slogan in the USA with, "War against Women" you guys are not even close to 'winning' -- feminism has the upper hand -- obviously. It's ironic how you claim to be so "knowledgable" about feminism, yet you forget to recall how long it took before feminism "won". Regardless of whether or not you think we're "winning", is irrelevant. Less and less feminists exist every year while more and more MRA's are born every year. …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:28 PM
0

What's he difference between endorsing Mensrights and feminism? Primarily, MRA's and the MRM focuses on facts and logic in order to present its issues. Feminism utilizes falsified statistics and bogus sociological conspiracy theories in order to fear-monger their way to the common woman (and man). See that's the difference you are not recognizing that outside observers see your stance as hypocritical. You cannot be on a group call Mensrights and say feminism is wrong. Yes, I can and I will. Femi…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:37 PM
1

I can't help but smile during all of this :)
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:03 AM
2

Here's why. Most people who self-identify as "feminist" here on Reddit I don't believe have grasp of what patriarchy theory is or what it entails. They actually believe they are feminists because feminsim = gender equality. I disagree. Most definitely believe that the "patriarchy" is a bad thing and that it "hurts women", at least. They may not understand every single intricate detail about it (or how utterly bogus the theory is), but I do believe most understand the basis of it. There are two t…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:03 AM
1

Let's all wait for all of those great feminists who created/supported/endorsed Title IX to fight against this obvious sexism. You know, all of those feminists that believe in "gender equality" and care so much about "boys". Let's see how many of them get behind this :)
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:33 AM
6

You're either a good satirist or an idiot. Patriarchy Theory is what most branches of feminism assumes is true (vs. Panarchy/Polyarchy or Matriarchy). All branches believe in "patriarchy theory". Feminism ideology falls apart without believing all of women's problems (and men) are the fault of a male-made system designed to oppress women. Feminism NEEDS "patriarchy theory" so every single self-proclaimed "feminist" believes in it.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:30 AM
3

I know, amazing how this only has 14 upvotes. Chris Thompson, wherever you are, you are the MAN! I dream of a day when feminist bigotry is hindered on every single university campus :)
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:21 AM
1

K
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:45 AM
1

What a fine rebuttal.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:43 AM
4

I'm not sure if you know, but when people hear "circumcision" in the US, they think male circumcision. When people hear "genital mutilation", they think female circumcision. Which is why when you look either of them up, one is just called "circumcision" while the other is "female genital mutilation/cutting". I think there's about a 0% chance that anybody honestly thought this discussion was about female circumcision.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:25 AM
1

Here's a great article.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:18 AM
1

No, it seems everyone is done with YOUR crap actually. You're lack of argument and red herrings about being "profiled" are not helping your "reason" for NAFALTing. I know you're 17, but please do more reading on feminist theory before you regurgitate another NAFALT argument again. Feminists and feminism is NOT helping men, quite the contrary. Yes, that includes the people you consider to be "good feminists".
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:17 AM
9

I came to post this. I think this is the beginning of something GREAT guys. I'm going to get my dancing shoes ready :)
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:57 AM
0

It certainly is a curious thing that male circumcision has persisted in american society and female circumcision has not. Perhaps due to Jewish Mohel practice focusing solely on male foreskin. Or feminism only addressing the issues of women while ignoring those of men. Gynocentricity at its finest! It's upsetting to note that not all of the western world is completely open to abortion. I find it much more upsetting that male circumcision takes a pass everywhere, while people have to talk about "…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:55 AM
4

Not all women are feminists. I never said they were. Not all feminists are feminazis. I never said they were. But you refuse to believe that this making you the male equivalent of a feminazi. You can't even make an argument correctly without restating what somebody else said. Funny, I never believed any of that. Also, I dont know what I'm "restating" that somebody else already said. I'm sure nobody has ever made a NAFALT argument like yours before... You're so original! :) Here you are on a Mond…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:46 AM
3

That is your definition. No, it's not. Saying feminists support patriarchy theory is like saying Neo-Nazi's support racial inequality. If you're so right about this, I am still waiting for your list of feminists who disagree with patriarchy theory. Go on, disprove me. I double doggy dare you :) And it's a 'no true Scotsman' definition. It is not a global one. We're just going in circles here. No, it's not. Feminist theory is black and white. Maybe if you actually read some, you'd be agreeing wit…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:16 AM
4

Oh, whats the matter? Too hard to debate with logic when your NAFALT argument get's debunked? Read some feminist theory sometime and get back to me.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:15 AM
0

It's just that I have read articles that were both against and for a hood on a hygienic level so I tend to favor my personal experience on the subject (In that my partners with passing health issues such as dryness seemed to effect those with/without hoods equally, also that sexual gratification seemed to be unaffected.) I tend to be more interested in protecting children's rights regardless of what "health professionals" who are profiting largely over it have to say. I don't really care what re…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:06 AM
2

There are a great many people who would fall under the dictionary definition of feminists, which means simply having an interest in rights and equality for women, who wouldn't fall into your narrow stereotypical 'Feminazi' mold. Reading comprehension, do you have it? I asked specifically WHICH feminists DO NOT believe in the "patriarchy". I don't care what you consider to be a "good feminist" since what we consider "good" or "bad" is subjective. A feminist does not have to be a "feminazi" in ord…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:59 AM
7

Great, so where is my list? I want to see all of these feminists that don't believe in the very staple of feminist theory which is the "patriarchy". Please show me them :)
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:41 AM
0

You are acting like the male equivalent of your idea of feminists. Being a judgmental jerk doesn't help anybody, feminist or MRA. You're right. We should just give a free pass to "feminists" because "not all of them are like that". Those feminists that are "not like that" will of course, not fight against the hateful rhetoric that is overwhelmingly filled in their movement. Let's see you go tell your little feminists friends over at r/feminism or r/SRS that MRA's shouldn't be judged and let's he…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:40 AM
5

Thanks! I'll go read now. Good, please start with this. Seriously, if you're going to read anything rather than regurgitate some sarcastic drivel, read THIS. It'll debunk all of your arguments in a total of 2-3 minutes. Not only do you have clairvoyant insight into my reading habits, but your super brain can also determine what every SINGLE feminist thinks. Okay. Explain to me which feminists do not believe in "patriarchy" theory. Please, go on. I'm waiting for your "long" list of feminists that…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:17 AM
4

People like this need more praise.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:06 AM
1

My fear is that "foreskin restoration" will become yet another excuse from the feminists/circumcision advocates to ignore the issue of cutting up boys at young ages because they can just get "fixed" later if they don't like it. The core issue is that baby boys are getting cut up in a country which thinks giving girls a symbolic prick to the clitoris to draw blood is "mutilation" and I think it should stick to that.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:59 AM
8

Your narrow, self-serving definitions and pigeonholing of things are very tidy and convenient, I'll grant you that. As is your constant NAFALTing and feminist-apologism. You probably have no idea that what you're doing is essentially enabling feminist bigotry, do you? The world is sure easy to figure out when with a broad sweep of your hand you can proclaim ALL of a group to believe xyz. Are you honestly suggesting that not all feminists believe in the "patriarchy"? How many "feminists" have you…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:55 AM
3

To be fair, not many things change when "clitoral hood removal" (a form of female circumcision) is performed yet you'll be deafened by feminist meanderings if you were to suggest performing it on women (let alone infants). Male circumcision also does certainly change some things that are important to the function of male genitalia. The real reason men (and women) don't care is because we live in a very gynocentric feminist culture that pits women as the "oppressed victims" and men as the "oppres…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:45 AM
1

I really don't think foreskin restoration is the answer. The problem is that in the Western world, boys (unlike girls) are not given a right to their bodies. EVERY human being has a right to their body and shouldn't be forced into having parts of them cut off because mommy thinks it looks better or because some imaginary man in the sky told them to do it. This is a human rights issue, not a "cosmetic fix up" that needs to be done later in life. If a man (or woman) wants to be circumcised for wha…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:29 AM
12

Besides the obvious NAFALT here, anybody that claims we live in a "patriarchy" is supporting bigoted social-science theory. You do realize that the "patriarchy" is what feminists use as a scapegoat to blame ALL of women's (and men's) problems on, right? Let's not pretend that feminists (all of which believe in this "patriarchy", mind you) are "good". The "better" ones are generally ignorant to what their movement is doing, not "good".
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:19 AM
6

Bio: Gina Barreca is an English professor at the University of Connecticut and a feminist scholar who has written eight books. She can be reached through her website at http://www.ginabarreca.com. Feminists don't hate men. No, never. They just want equality. Great people, those feminists.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:24 AM
11

LOL. Yes Kate, feminism is certainly "more rational now" and doesn't try to slander/censor people who disagree with them. No, never.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:59 PM
1

You're victim-blaming and promoting bear-attack culture! Isn't it funny that all you need to do is apply "rape culture" theory to virtually ANY other entity to see how incredibly bogus it is?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:39 AM
1

I cannot be the only one who finds it INCREDIBLY ironic that these feminists will make posters like this about how giving preventative measures to women is "sexist to men", yet gladly say we need to "teach men" not to commit rape. Let's see how well these feminists take MRA's claiming we need to teach women not to be "gold-digging whores" or "poison their husbands". It's utterly disgusting how low these people think of men as a gender if they truly believe we need to be taught "not to rape". Ple…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:15 AM
20

Oh, those shallow men who want women to be healthy and attractive! All they want is sex! It's all a tool of the patriarchy to control women's bodies!!!111 Ew, your penis is natural? CUT IT RIGHT NOW!
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:07 AM
1

Well feminists would probably give a number that is hugely inflated Like all men. Regardless of what exact "percentage of men commit rape", it's a VERY tiny and miniscule amount.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:59 AM
3

Listening to her interview made me reaffirm my beliefs in how feminism is riddled with idiots. "I saw these Men's Rights posters all over campus and they made me uncomfortable" So, we should only allow what makes you "feel" comfortable to be spoken? Christ, and THESE people are entering the workforce...
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:38 AM
27

Callender says it’s hypocritical of Winfrey to speak out against female genital mutilation, while saying it’s all right to use a face cream made from foreskins from circumcised infant males. Well, feminists haven't exactly been one for consistency. Especially in regards to treating men with the "equality" they treat women.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:14 AM
2

Without being rude (and I apologize if I come off as such), but 35 is what I considered to be "later in life". Many other women are not as intelligent as you and have ended up miserable thanks to this toxic ideology.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:01 AM
7

They dont know about it. A lot of people say theyre a "feminist" because they dont follow these issues closely and just think it's a generic term for "person who thinks women are equal and wants to make it so bad things happen to women less." Well, there are two types of feminists (as there are with every hate movement/group). There are the ignorant and the evil. The ignorant help the evil by being ignorant. Claiming you are something you know nothing about is not something we should support or …
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:57 AM
29

Ah, yes... good ol' "egalitarian" Danielle Sandhu is trying to shut down a website which showcases and fights for men's issues. What a surprise! Those feminists have such interesting ways of showcasing their love for "equality" and "freedom of speech", don't they! :)
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:42 AM
1

I'm not a dude. I'm an older woman and a former feminist. Sorry to distract from the argument going on, but serious kudos for seeing the light later in life :)
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:23 AM
11

Looks like you finally took the red pill... something more men and women are doing every year I'm happy to admit :) Welcome Jovial_Gorilla!
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:02 AM
74

You know, for all feminists chastize men for supposedly "silencing" the voices of women and fully endorse "free speech", you'd think they wouldn't trying to constantly be silencing those whom disagree with them. Any NAFALT-ers want to explain to me why all of the "good feminists" aren't complaining about the U of T's radical feminist student union members trying to force their hateful ideology by silencing those who disagree with them?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:53 AM
1

Only feminists, misandrists and fear mongers. Both of the latter usually come with the latter.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:59 AM
9

But rape culture!!!!11 Oh yeah, feminist theology isn't anti-male. /s
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:26 AM
20

Just uh.. curious... where are the "men's safe spaces" being funded by universities?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:39 PM
7

Great stuff :) As time goes on (and the MRM, inevitably, gains more and more momentum), we're going to see more and more politicians supporting our cause.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:15 PM
6

And you're just scratching the surface of feminist bigotry... Welcome Aridane! :)
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:55 AM
4

When I go out I don't leave my drink unattended, wander off alone or get too drunk for fear I might get assaulted. One of the most insulting things is when feminists pretend ONLY women are "worried about their safety". They pretend like ONLY women get attacked (even though men are 3-4 times more likely to be victims of violent attacks) and that men have a "privilege" because they don't have to worry about it. It's truly unbelievable and really shows you how idiotic feminist rhetoric is.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:22 AM
3

I had no idea calling out feminists for their bigotry was akin to hating women. You learn something new everyday!
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:27 AM
1

This is one of the biggest reasons why I don't believe in "more education" is really "higher learning", particularly in the "Liberal Arts". It's disgusting how utter morons come out of educational institutions majoring in things like "women's studies".
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:59 AM
4

Lots of posts in that sub of "feminism helping men" :) So many examples!
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:52 AM
3

It's disgusting that this video is getting downvoted. EVERY MRA needs to watch this video to see the sheer hatred of these animals and how little the "good feminists" did to combat them.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:14 AM
3

C'mon guise, feminists care about men! Let us just wait for all of the "good feminists" to correct this "bad feminist" on her blatantly sexist victim-blaming. /s
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:51 AM
8

Oh man, this must be one of those 'male privileges' these feminists keep talking about. All those poor, innocent women having to lie on their backs for a few minutes in order to get access to high-level education and, inevitably, a high-paying job. All while those men have to work their asses off in order to pay off their student loans. This certainly won't change how many of each gender decides to go to college or not...
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:07 AM
2

It's satire from our very own typhonblue :)
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:00 AM
6

Male advocates and feminists should be working together toward gender equality, but were not going to get there by demonizing feminist groups.... it just turns this community in the extremist opposite of SRS. Oh Christ, another NAFALT-er. Take a nice read and stop pretending that feminists AREN'T the ones who put these problems here in the first place. Remember it is FEMINISTS that are protesting speeches addressing MEN'S concerns. The only rhetoric that has to stop is YOURS. Stop being an enabl…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:44 PM
3

I'm not sure if you've realized, Flarehl, but GirlWritesWhat is virtually the face of this movement at the moment. Let's also not forget TyphonBlue, Christina Hoff Sommers, Erin Pizzey and the many women here like yourself supporting us. Also, continue being awesome. That is all :)
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:12 AM
5

Oh, definitely. That intensely difficult 6 years they spent working "hard" for that mindless "women's studies" degree which mommy and daddy funded. Now, these poor souls are having such stressed lives working at the local Starbucks. Such is life as a SRSer!
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:55 AM
1

Things like these really make me worry about feminists. If you look at what feminists have been doing for the last couple decades and are STILL doing, you'll be FAR more worried. This sub will teach you that more than anything. Believe me.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:49 AM
1

Because it's tons of fun to laugh at idiots and educational to understand what idiocy looks like first hand?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:19 AM
9

I think the hags on "The Talk" have had that award for awhile...
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:15 AM
6

Pretty much anything related to SRS is going to be filled with the garbage you just described. Especially the group of people they consider the "least privileged". Oh, and: r/SRSWimmin r/antiSRS r/SRSsucks You're welcome :)
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:09 AM
5

But we should focus on the already banned virtually everywhere female circumcision instead because patriarchy and its worst. Sorta. -Your Average Feminist In all seriousness, its awesome seeing intactivists and MRA's working hand-in-hand.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:03 AM
1

Yup, my dad even has an account in one. They're taking over!
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:59 AM
4

Example #13355 of why feminists don't care about gender equality and only think women can be victims of "sexism". And, example #891389393 of why feminists are complete idiots who try to label virtually anything as 'sexism' and 'objectification'.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:04 AM
1

Probably not. But then again, there are a few chinese banks in my town...
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:49 PM
9

Last I checked, Paul Ryan wasn't an MRA. He's a Republican whose anti-abortion, as far as I know. Abortion is a complicated topic covering lots of moral grounds with people. Even though I am pro-abortion, being anti-abortion does not make you a bad person. Also, try not to take little jpg's like this too seriously before looking into it first. They're usually riddled with propagandist material.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:27 AM
3

And people say Bank of America is bad... I will be sure to never bank at "China Merchants Bank".
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:19 AM
2

"Feminists do more than any other group to advocate for male rights." Oh, okay. Give me one example without using a sociological theory to explain it. Just ONE :)
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:50 AM
0

Exactly my point. Paul Elam jokes about being a misogynist and you think that's perfectly fine, but as soon as a feminist jokes about being a misandrist, you get upset. It depends on the context. The word "misogyny" is grossly over-used in contemporary society and pretty much means anything feminists dislike. The word "misandry" (which autocorrect is even attempting to correct me on right now) is unknown to most people. The feminists I'm talking about literally believe that "misandry" doesn't ex…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:29 AM
1

I agree. One thing I will add is that these women think this way because they will automatically assume the man "deserved it" because he must've done something to deserve it. I've spoken with women who supported this sick animal and they justified it with this very reasoning since they know what somebody must've done to them in order for them to cut off somebody's penis. Yes, seriously.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:41 AM
1

I didn't know you needed a degree or to earn a certain amount in order to consider yourself and endorse "feminism". "Feminists" aren't limited to the SlutWalk protesters or the bra-burners. Anybody who chooses to support or endorse feminism is a feminist. All I'm saying is that pretending these women aren't feminists is no different that pretending they ARE feminists. I would personally assume, since these are Western women, that they hold much more favorable views of feminism than negative ones…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:28 AM
2

I agree, but you cannot assume that many of these "normal everyday women" weren't hardline feminist activists as well. The seed ofmisandry that is planted inside the modern Western woman's heads was done so by feminists.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:48 AM
6

Actually, it is. Slicing off a breast does not hinder sexual ability, nor does it stop you from urinating properly. It's actually pretty ridiculous that people think they're comparable in any way. Also, fun fact. Sharon Osbourne recently had a double mastectomy due to breast cancer. Even the universe wanted to pay this bitch back! :)
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:27 AM
5

Let me tell you something. Sure this wasn't a "feminist convention" since feminists (even for how stupid many of them are) generally will not put something like this on display since they know they are on watch for misandry. However, I can assure you that if you went up to each of these cunts and ask their opinion of feminism, you'll get FAR more high opinions of feminism than any low opinion. These same women will talk about how "shocking" some woman having a finger put on her by a man is, but …
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:24 AM
3

Well, let's go back a couple months to see Jill Fillipovic promoting male circumcision. Jill and Feministe are a cancer.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:06 AM
38

This is one repost I never mind seeing. The greatest thing about this incident is that it literally PROVED that feminists don't give two shit's about men or gender equality. Notice that when this occurred (I was one of many who helped spread this around to every male outlet), not a SINGLE feminist did ANYTHING about this incident. No articles on Jezebel, Feministe or any other supposed "equality-loving" website. Feminists completely ignored this (as MRA's have been proclaiming for years) but at …
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:02 AM
5

Hey guise! I'm a feminist and we're not all like that. Feminism is a great thing and doesn't work towards censoring others or hurting men. Those are only feminazi's. Now, I'm going to go back to endorsing these feminazi's while telling the MRA's how to run their movement. -Your Average "Not Like That" Feminist
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:54 PM
2

I'll let the AmazingAtheist respond to this one.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:16 PM
7

Check your privilege before you do it!
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:57 AM
14

Hey young men! Planning to go to college? Gotta register to stay eligible for federal loans! It disgusts me that feminists yap all day about how supposedly "oppressed" women are, but completely ignore this fact. Feminists for "equality" alright!
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:19 AM
2

Or maybe men not having to use their "male privilege" of being drafted overseas to die so that women can be "oppressed" back home.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:37 AM
2

Leave it up to feminists to turn a noun into an adjective. And somehow these people are given positions at universities...
/r/MensRights12/01/13 12:12 AM
1

If you honestly think "feminism" isn't an institution than you clearly know nothing of the feminist institutions which have been forcing anti-male legislature for the last few decades. Stop attempting to apologize for feminists and those who choose to align themselves with its hateful institutions.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 12:05 AM
5

Second sentence. Read it.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:51 AM
6

Feminism is not another word for "women's rights". If you care at all about the rights of men, the last thing you should support is an institution which time and time again fights against men's rights. However, chances are you probably do not follow your own movement very well if you think the MRM and feminism are in any way compatible. Drop the bigoted 'feminist' label and call yourself an 'egalitarian' if anything.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:42 AM
47

I've noticed it's more of a shame tactic than anything. Feminists talk about how "strong", "powerful" and "independent" they are, but will be the very first to cower and call anybody that says or does anything to them that they dislike "creepy". Most of this "creep-shaming" is propagated by feminists and their fear-mongering "all men are potential rapists" fallacies.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:51 AM
4

Because they like to blame all of their problems on other's rather than themselves. See here for evidence. This is the kind of livelihood these people have, they blame and slander an entire gender/race but will go apeshit at the smallest smidgeon of supposed "sexism" or "racism" directed at one of those people. Their world is black and white, where all women and minorities are constant oppressed victims and all white males are puppeteering this victimhood. This is the sort of reality feminists a…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:19 AM
-2

Oh, the irony :)
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:10 AM
0

Interesting how if someone like Anita Sarkeesiam or Jessica Valenti referred to themselves as "misandrists," there would be a huge uproar in the MRA community. No, it would just solidify what we already know. There are already NUMEROUS feminists who joke around with the word "misandry". Not much of a surprise, Ms. LadyLuq. As for your Paul Elam quotes, I don't feel like copy pasting them and just cluttering up this convo further so I'll just address them individually. I agree that Paul Elam may …
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:03 AM
1

If you consider circumcision to be a health procedure with health benefits, No, it does not matter. If cutting off a clitoris is considered to be a procedure with some "health benefits", it does not give the parents the right to do it. If, under some impossible circumstances, a male circumcision was REQUIRED in order to save an infant's life then you'd have a point. Having supposed "health benefits" doesn't suddenly give free reign for parents to apply a procedure whenever they feel like it.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:23 AM
5

The debate is whether or not circumcision actually has any real health benefits. Or whether or not cutting off part of your child's genital's at birth is acceptable.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:11 PM
-1

I know, right? Nevermind what your CHILD thinks of the procedure, we should address how the PARENTS feel. Amazing that people this daft are members of the "American Association of Pediatrics". Great standards for medicine we got over here in America.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 08:13 PM
0

Paul Elam is a misogynist. Source: Paul Elam's YouTube username is TheHappyMisogynist. Wow, you cannot be this stupid. You obviously have never looked up the word "irony" or "satire" in your life. I guess if I wrote "asshole" in my username, it would totally make an asshole! YouTube username's are serious business! You are truly an idiot if you claim to be an MRA and not even know that one of the most prominent MRA figureheads openly labels himself as a misogynist. Well, Ms. LadyLuq... if you're…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:16 PM
6

For females only because circumcision for women usually includes literally cutting the clitoris off and circumcision of females is rarely ever practiced in the USA. So? Removal of the clitoral hood is also a form of female circumcision (which is identical to its male variant) or, as the feminist West likes to call it, "female genital mutilation". Yet, for some STRANGE reason, that's illegal. Also, I don't see how something being rarely practiced in the USA justifies legality or illegality of any…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:35 AM
2

Man, wouldn't it be great to see one of these idiotic Tumblr social-justice crusaders get sued? I can't wait :)
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:13 AM
-1

Just because certain feminists use patriarchy as a conspiracy theory doesn't mean that a form of it doesn't exist. Biological patriarchy exists. That is the straight definition of "patriarchy" taken out of a biology textbook (not some garbage social-science literature) which literally means "male-run" or "men at the head of the household". If anything, "patriarchy" has protected women. Patriarchy is real and the effects of it are real on society. It when you start blaming "the patriarchy" vs a p…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:02 AM
0

Do "Paul Elam" and "Warren Farrell" ring a bell? Wow, you are truly an idiot. Go ahead and please show me these "misogynistic" comments from these apparent "misogynists".
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:59 AM
2

You deserve the downvotes. There is a difference between "biological patriarchy" and "feminist partiarchy". Biological patriarchy is simply "men are head of household". Feminist patriarchy states that BECAUSE this form of "patriarchy" exists, men are constantly oppressing/subjugating women and all men are privileged little goons whose problems (which conveniently arose from feminist legislature) are actually because of this "patriarchy". The "patriarchy" is a feminist scapegoat to blame ALL of m…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:34 AM
1

It's starting to occur to me that my perception of feminism might be starkly different from a lot of people on here because of where I'm from. I upvoted you solely because of this. However, it has little to do with "where you're from" and much more to do with your lack of research on feminism and being force-fed pro-feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:26 AM
2

My hope in doing so would be that perhaps, he could recognize that he was mad at particular people or sets of circumstances and not at ME. What you don't understand is that its not YOU directly we're upset at, it's the movement you choose to align yourself with. If you care at all about "where his anger is coming from", please read this. I was hoping that perhaps, he would be open to discussing his viewpoints with me in a way that wasn't so hateful. That's how we make progress, isn't it? Movemen…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:19 AM
1

I agree, it's utterly disgusting it's happening on OUR subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:54 AM
5

Secondly, rapists often purposely get their victims drunk so that it's easier to rape them, which means that if narratives that "it's the victims fault for getting drunk" become prelavent it's really fucking hard to deal with those rapists. It's funny how feminists throw around the phrase "get their victims drunk" as if the "victim" didn't consent to getting drunk. Offering somebody drinks is not "getting somebody drunk". If you offered and they willingly obliged, then THEY HAVE CONSENTED to get…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:30 AM
9

The problem is that we've heard this same regurgitated garbage rinsed and repeated since the beginning of this subreddit. You seem very angry about this issue. Maybe it's just me, but I figure that people who're ACTUALLY oppressed are generally pretty upset. It's also funny how you feminists love to insult MRA's with this rather than even attempting to understand where this anger comes from. I, however, never hear feminists slander the more "vocal" angry feminists for their anger. I wonder why t…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:56 AM
3

Please read.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:45 AM
6

Finally a GOOD post in this thread. Disgusting to see the ignorant feminists getting upvoted and the MRA's downvoted here. There are literally daily instances of feminist bigotry posted on this subreddit alone and yet these ignoramuses want to talk about the "good" of feminism. I'm sure there are some great White Nationalists out there, but that doesn't change the fact that the movement is bigoted and shouldn't be openly criticized/demonized. These feminist-apologists don't understand that label…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:40 AM
2

You don't deserve these downvotes. Especially disgusting that you're getting downvoted for this on this subreddit while people who're openly supporting feminist bigotry are getting upvoted. Absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:30 AM
13

Feminists are not the enemy. Feminazis are. No.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:24 AM
1

Oh okay then. Why don't you show me some "misogynistic" comments from any well-known MRA's? Ironic since there's literally dozens from well-known feminists (if not hundreds). Comments on reddit (which are very 'tame' to begin with) are not proof of MRA bigotry.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:15 AM
1

I'v rarely heard a girl virgin shame another girl and never heard a girl "virgin shame" a guy. Disagree with a few feminists (and many women) on reddit and you'll get all of the "you just hate women because you can't get laid" comments. It's actually hard to imagine how you haven't heard "virgin-shaming" to be honest. Most women are also turned off when they hear a man has not had many sexual partners (or any at all), the same way many men are turned off when they hear a woman has had a lot of s…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:12 AM
1

Right, that's why I'm not a feminist. Then maybe it's time you went over and showcased their bigotry for a bit? They've certainly got FAR more than we do and they (for some straaange reason) aren't put on the SPLC's all-mighty "hate" list. Seems like THEY are the ones need exposing more than we do. So is "Men Can Stop Rape." But that phrase is treated as serious misandry, while "women are evil liars" is apparently not misogynistic to you. For one, "Men Can Stop Rape" is not really 'tame'. Somebo…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:57 AM
1

Over-exaggerating? You saw the quotes. They were hateful, bigoted, and misogynistic, and somehow they got many many upvotes. I saw the quotes and didn't see anything half as hateful as the garbage spewed by feminist groups. The quotes were VERY tame in terms of 'sexism'. When shit like this is posted on daytime television, you look like a real moron pretending any of the bullshit you posted is "sexism". Also, even these tame comments are VERY rare in /r/MensRights. Why don't you go visit the nic…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:09 PM
5

AWESOME STUFF!! It's great to see people fighting feminist bigotry, especially like this. We need to support these people as much as we can :)
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:27 AM
3

This is an awesome video and explains EXACTLY how I've felt about the modern "Atheist" movement for some time. However, it seems great that these morons have denigrated to another cesspool called "Atheism+". They'll probably end up migrating there anyways, because their parasitic rhetoric cannot stand very well in a truly open forum.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:04 AM
1

I literally JUST replied to a comment from a self-proclaimed feminist blaming all sexism against men to be a result of "misogyny". No, seriously. TIL all of men's problems are because of "misogyny"...
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:56 AM
1

Really? I'm not a feminist, I identify as an egalitarian. Which is why you're wasting your time over-exaggerating these posts to literally mean "misogyny"? Why don't you go over to SRS and see how well they treat your arguments towards their ACTUAL bigotry? Maybe then you'll realize how pointless it is sitting here and pretending we're the ones spewing bigotry. Yeah, because calling women evil is not real misogyny. I didn't see any posts literally saying all women are evil. This is just an examp…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:41 AM
-2

This is a ridiculous comparison, and not just because I'm pro-LGBT and anti-MRA Funny how you can be pro the rights of lesbians/gays/bisexuals/transsexuals and against those of men. It's funny how people like you are literally hindering the LGBT movement by stating garbage like this.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:57 AM
-1

It's amazing how you feminists go around posting any little smidgeon of supposed "misogyny" as some serious edition of "woman-hating". Why don't you go to your little feminist blogs and see the kind of hateful shit about MALES being upvoted on a routine basis? You think these bogus slight exaggerations here are evidence of "misogyny"? Maybe you should look up the word "misogyny" sometime rather than going on nit-picking witch hunts. Oh and while you're at it, why don't you take a nice gander at …
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:43 AM
0

So basically, anytime anyone disagrees with you on a gender issue, they're a feminist. Lol. That's not how it works. Are you honestly blind enough to not see the gross CATERING TO FEMINISM that Jezebel posts? Nearly all of the "feminists" I know on facebook directly link to Jezebel more than any other website. Ironically enough, EVERY SINGLE JEZEBEL ARTICLE these feminists post is DIRECTLY catering to feminists interests! I guess it must be some incredible coincidence then! I could post a millio…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:35 AM
-2

Any time you see a feminist who claims to "get it" about men but is still a feminist -- they don't get it. Exactly. I've gotten into quite a few quarrels with some of these "I'm a feminist and an MRA" types that come in here and think the two are synonymous with each gender's rights. These idiots simply have NOT seen what their movement is up to and how much it is damaging the rights of men. You can't be a Klansman and a Civil Rights Activist.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 11:15 PM
0

They claim they are not a feminist site as the reason why they post “controversial” stuff, Okay, and where is the proof for this? Some person on Tumblr saying it doesn't make it true. Jezebel is VERY feminist and certainly advocates feminist bigotry out in the open. Even if they actually DO claim to be non-feminist, they are certainly not open about it nor would they be doing it for anything other than PR purposes. Not to mention the fact that they post articles (mainly from the same woman) mock…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 10:39 PM
3

Don't forget the man-loving, Western-culture-encompassing ideology these lovely women are filled with. I'm sure those "feminist psychology courses" would cure those young men's suicidal thoughts up in a jiffy!
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:25 AM
5

I couldn't agree with you more but one thing I HAVE noticed in more recent years is how negatively people interpret the word "feminist". It certainly seems to be leading to a brighter future :)
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:22 AM
-1

What exactly is "sexist" about it. I've looked at it numerous times...
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:54 AM
-5

Sorry, I just posted them in this thread since it seems like people can't read them. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15db9e/got_banned_from_raskwomen/c7lg2hn
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:41 AM
3

Great stuff. I guess "German Greer" is part of that supposed "few angry vocal" that isn't a "true feminist" that feminists are always telling us about.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:16 AM
4

She is 100% correct. I love it when feminists tell me they're soo "against circumcision" and I ask them to show me a SINGLE instance of feminists fighting against male circumcision. Guess what? They somehow can't find one. Doesn't seem feminists give a shit after all.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:14 AM
-10

Post 1: Funny, I've been been reading /mr for a little over a year now and I have never come across such bigotry being upvoted. Is it possible you, purposefully, mistook the entire thread because you're so used to hearing pandering to women and their issues in modern society? Post 2: Being "smart" generally doesn't mean posting fallacies and ignoring the double standards prevalent on the other side of the argument. However, I feel this comment of yours was probably more emotional-based than logi…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:55 AM
-3

Weird, when I click the links it sends me to my posts... I guess I'll just copy paste them real quick into a post.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:51 AM
-5

Uh... the three posts right up there^ That's it.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:47 AM
10

Unbelievable seeing those two "parents" smiling so gleefully during all of this. Truly shows how "sheepish" the average human really is.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:46 AM
-9

It does because there are oftentimes speculators and people on the fence about issues that haven't heard enough to choose a side yet. When they see people discussing and bringing up our points, it helps them understand our message better.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:20 AM
0

Rofl, okay. Source please. I'd love to see this.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 10:18 AM
-10

To be fair, we need to get our message out in some form. Discussing and counter-arguing radical feminists like the ones responding to the OP is not the same posting pictures of dildos and trolling subreddits.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:52 PM
4

And also pro-male-genital mutilation. Please point this out when you're told that feminists care about male circumcision. Jill Filipovic is your average feminist scum.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:14 PM
5

(I think one could even argue it was caused by the feminist movement) It would be hard to argue against it. Look at the shows previous to the feminist movement (I Love Lucy, for example) and look at the emasculated imps on television now. Feminism has definitely created a toxic image of men in the media.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:32 AM
3

Stupidity should be a crime. You are now evading all of the fallacies you've presented regarding male genital mutilation and trying to utilize the fact that the feminized "feminism" definition is evidence of anything. In case you haven't noticed, there is an agenda behind "feminism" which is why they vehemently fight to be associated with "equal rights". However, there is no "agenda" behind the word "mutilation", you nitwit. Also, according to your definition of "circumcision" with the VERY LINK…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:25 AM
5

I'm talking about the "70 percent of Germans opposing" the law. It's great to see this much disapproval over male genital mutilation and it's getting people from all over to discuss the actual morality behind this barbaric procedure.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:38 AM
3

Cutting off a girls breasts is actual mutilation. Circumcision is only mutilation by the standards of the moral crusaders in this subreddit. It is not a valid analogy and furthermore you invented a far more extreme position than I hold and then proceed to call it ridiculous, i.e a straw man attack. sigh Mutilation: 1: to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting. 2: to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential p…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:43 AM
2

Nobody accuses them of being "pedophiles". You're too stupid to realize that there are ALSO scientific papers AGAINST circumcision but you completely ignore them. In reality, studies are only as good as the variables and setting utilized to create them. You don't hear about studies EVER being conducted about female circumcision. Why is that? It is, in reality, YOU that is the skeptic, because no matter what evidence presents itself you will NOT understand that it is NOT your decision to cut up a…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:22 AM
4

Today I learned a direct analogy is a strawman. Your "surgical vaccine" argument for male genital mutilation is JUST as logical as my "surgical vaccine" argument for performing forced mastectomies on girls. It's stupid and has no place on anybody's moral compass. By the way, I too come from a religion where circumcision is also mandatory for infant boys and I can see the barbarity and stupidity in this redundant practice. You should be ashamed of yourself for holding onto this garbage and not pr…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:16 AM
5

Oh and hey, by the way. Would you be in favor of cutting off your daughter's breasts too since it prevents breast cancer? Somebody call the World Health Organization, I have another "surgical vaccine" for them to make billions off of!!
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:05 AM
3

I gotta love your idiotic 2 sentence remarks to our entire paragraphs debunking your nonsense. I see your bogus pamphlet explaining some possible "benefits" of cutting up your child's genitals and I raise you an entire scholarly list of studies showcasing the gross negative effects of male genital mutilation. I'm sure the people making billions to cut up your child's genitals are real happy you think their rhetoric is "scientific", even though science seems to also disagree with you and them. Ca…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:03 AM
4

It's basically just a bullying forum, doesn't tumblr have some policy against that? If it did, then Tumblr would not be chalk full of feminists. Particularly Tumblr feminists.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:31 AM
5

You're an idiot who clearly doesn't understand how lobbyists work. You just mindlessly support any group of people who claims that something is "beneficial" which you support. Ironically enough, you're great little WHO here also doesn't conduct studies on female circumcision to determine if THAT will prevent AIDS transmission, even if there is certainly a chance it does. I cannot believe that you can be stupid enough to consider a circumcision to be "akin to vaccination in terms of medical benef…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:26 AM
9

Anytime, it's definitely great to hear from people who're intelligent enough to see the kind of hatred prevalent in feminism before they turn into the inevitable "radfem". The problem as far as labels go is that the MRM needs to exist in order to counter the hatred and harm in feminism. If you cannot tell from the responses you've had here, you're more than welcome in our movement. In fact, much of the MRM consists of ex-feminists. If I may make another recommendation, you should also check out …
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:12 AM
11

You can do what you want, the Jewish community only wants to circumcise our own, You mean force circumcision on YOUR infants. Nobody here is against people choosing to get themselves circumcised on their OWN terms later in life, but let's not pretend that you're not forcing a procedure onto others without their consent. This garbage argument could be said for Sudanese men saying they only wish to circumcise their "own daughters" and nobody else. Human rights are human rights. You don't get to di…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:27 AM
10

WOW... I am shocked to hear your response. You sound like a VERY intelligent young girl. You're right that the majority of men don't call because they don't think they'll be taken seriously, I was just alluding to another possible reason since these great "egalitarian" feminist organizations seem to be so against putting males anywhere near these "rape crisis" institutions. You're very welcome. I must admit I'm very happy to see that you've witnessed the gross harm in feminism and how toxic it c…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:13 AM
14

Just a few things I'd like to bring up. You say: rapes against women do happen, and whether or not they happen to women more often than to men is outside of my understanding because I have only ever even heard of a handful of calls from men (in our local center). and then say For the call center (read: rape crisis center) at which I volunteer, up until very recently (due to a change in leadership), men were not allowed to be advocates (I don't want to be too wordy and explain what an advocate is…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:31 AM
17

Christina Hoff Sommer's really deserves more respect than she gets.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:33 PM
1

I guess the way we raise our "girls" has nothing to do with violence contribution. You know. Because girls never commit violence or anything.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:47 PM
4

Is there anyway us foreigners can support the German's endeavors? I couldn't be more proud of our European cousins... Let's hope this catches on.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:56 PM
1

I actually haven't noticed that, but I certainly believe you. It's great to see the MRM voice get louder and louder (as it inevitably will).
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:48 PM
-1

Same here. It's the best and clearest article I've read so far concerning the NAFALT argument. JohntheOther is the man!
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:47 PM
4

Yes. Let's stop judging an entire movement which is promoting anti-male policies and hateful rhetoric and instead blame the problems on particular members of the group (whom all of the other "good" members seem to support/endorse). That will definitely help the cause! :)
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:01 PM
6

Well when you consider the fact the Warren Farrel is a rape apologist Rofl, looks like another SRS slandering buffoon on /mr. Please give me ANY evidence that Warren Farrell is a "rape apologist". Or are you just calling him one because he is focusing on the issues concerning MEN and BOYS for a change? Funny, I don't remember any of you femitards calling him a "rape apologist" when he was a chairman at the National Organization of Women in the 70's. You people are filthy, slandering scum. also y…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:56 AM
-1

I wasn't saying MRM is harming society, because it isn't at all. But feminists are and have been for quite some time. You cannot blame us for hating a movement for forcing us to create a movement to protect ourselves from bigotry. I was just saying not all feminists are like that, just like not all MRA are misogynists. I've been in the MRM for roughly 3 years. Still haven't seen one of these mystical "misogynists". If there are any "misogynists" within the manosphere, it's generally MGTOW guys w…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:28 AM
2

Anytime. Always glad to help :)
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:21 AM
16

It just ticks me off when a lot of guys (and girls) here get angry at feminists that blame the men (Or MRA), when you guys (some of you) are blaming feminism. MRA's aren't creating anti-female policies and violently protesting feminist rallies. Feminists are creating anti-male policies and violently protesting speeches about issues relating to men/boys. Please show me the gross harm the MRM is doing to society.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:13 AM
2

NAFALT. Look it up.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:06 AM
17

Jezebel is probably the biggest feminist outlet around. Reading the garbage on Jezebel is a great introspect into what modern feminism is. Jezebel would not be the biggest feminist outlet if it the average feminist didn't agree with the garbage written on it.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 05:51 AM
10

Ironic since they claim to be so "gender-neutral", yet all they want to do is distinguish genitalia.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:29 AM
18

Right? One of the most irritating things regarding feminists are their constant "you just want to talk about your penis" mentality. In a recent thread regarding the UN condemning female circumcision (but not male circumcision), feminists in that thread were saying that the men commenting about how male circumcision should be included and its similarities to its female variant just wanted to "talk about their penises". Utterly disgusting. Could you imagine if when feminists brought up female circ…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:05 AM
19

It means penises don't rape people. Men do. Fixed that for ya.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:01 AM
18

VERY good point. Up until recently these bigots have been allowed to speak their hateful rhetoric and get away with it. Now that they are getting exposed and called out for their bigotry, they're closing/making their accounts private. The more we call them out for their bigotry, the less of a voice they'll have to spread their hate-speech. This also greatly explains why the Jezebelians are so up in arms over MRA's as of late. I'm very happy to know these hate-mongers are frustrated :)
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:59 AM
13

One look at the SRS posters in the female circumcision thread certainly proves this. Disgusting how they claim to be "pro-gender-equality", yet are more than willing to call a procedure which happens to women "genital mutilation" but refer to its male variant as "circumcision". Feminists are truly a cancer.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:48 AM
1

"Some feminists"?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:11 AM
21

So... let's see what all of the feminist apologists have to say about this one? It seems that they keep telling me that feminism is so against "male circumcision", yet I don't hear any feminists hounding Sister Schwarzer here. No. Clearly, JohntheOther and Paul Elam are bigger bigots and are more worthy of hatred pitted against them than a feminist promoting male genital mutilation. Feminists are against male genital mutilation, my ass.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:23 AM
1

I, as a young feminist, don't understand why ALL of feminism is being discredited. I think this article will help you understand why. There are "good" skinheads and White Nationalists in the world too. That doesn't mean that we cannot call out their movements for their bigotry...
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:20 AM
3

Awesome stuff from Barbarossaaaa as usual.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:19 AM
3

Oh yeah, feminists certainly care so very much about men's problems. These are ESTABLISHED feminist groups saying these things, not the "radfem's" we keep hearing are the "real" problem with feminism. This is feminism being spoken to you. Please do not support these hate-mongers.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:10 AM
1

You're probably thinking of Lorena Bobbitt, whom millions of feminists endorsed, supported and helped get out of jail time for committing a VERY similar atrocity upon her husband. Feminists don't support violence, my ass.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:01 AM
5

A crime drama at that.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:35 PM
3

The German-born male feminist tried to kill a woman with oven gas. Irony.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:23 PM
0

I agree :)
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:57 PM
4

that my gender comes with the implication that it will intimidate, control, threaten and overpower simply by being present Sometimes I think being a male feminist is a mental disorder.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:34 AM
1

I couldn't believe the association of "you're a man, so we have to sit you down and tell you over and over again that sexual assault is bad - that will solve it". You know what's even worst? The fact that feminists are the ones who call for these actions then later on say they "fight for men's rights too!!111". Remember this the next time you're told feminism is for "equality".
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:57 AM
1

Where women have been time and time again through countless societies have been sidelined and forced to domesticity It's funny how "oppressive" people think being a homemaker is when the males in the family were working 15 hours in back-breaking labor and dying on battlefields throughout most of history. If you ask me, women had it pretty good in regards to the "gender paradigm". what's wrong with encouraging books that show girls examples of females doing something beyond raising children? Beca…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:17 AM
4

Please don't insult Christianity that way.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:09 AM
-4

Funny. When Jezebel has articles titled "Uncircumcised penises may be costing us billions" with an "egalitarian" feminist author stating that she will probably "circumcise her son if she had one", I can certainly see these morons "flicking away" the rights of male babies.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:07 AM
0

I'd be a lot more inclined to follow this movement if it was more inclusive of the issues of other men, such as those of colour, homosexuality and those who identify as males. How does it not? Men's rights are men's rights. Your gender's rights don't suddenly change with your skin tone and/or sexual preference. I can't actually remember, it's been even longer since something along those lines came on the front page. Why exactly do we have to directly fight for "queer rights"? We are clearly figh…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:03 AM
2

Awesome stuff! The MRM is growing exponentially every year which is why feminists have only recently started chastizing us on their front pages. The more they try to push us back, the more scared they are of our numbers. Kudos to Denmark! :)
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:54 AM
67

Men are expected to do the heavier lifting, harder work, and combined we make less tips. I have a feeling you've come to understand why the imaginary "wage gap" is utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:51 AM
5

Let's not forget how most male circumcision articles love to post comedic images of a male baby with a "shocked" look on its face and pictures of phallic objects being cut up, but only show crying faces and serious pictures when articles of female circumcision arise. I honestly think this constant "humor" in male circumcision is a large reason for what is keeping this barbaric practice alive. Ironically enough, I don't see any feminists nit-picking THOSE articles.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:49 AM
4

Please explain what apparent "bigotry" is involved in appropriately labeling these morons as "screeching feminists"?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:44 AM
6

Funny, I don't recall hearing anybody complaining about "backstreet practices" of female circumcision when it was getting banned. Nor anybody justifying keeping it legal as a result. I wonder why that is...
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:43 AM
3

The European Parliament's Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality prepared a report that calls for a ban of all books that show the traditional family where the father is the breadwinner and the mother takes care of the children in schools and day care centers of Europe. According to the authors, these books are bad for the future life of children, especially girls, and promote wrong behavioral patterns. In the future, it may prevent them from building a career. Oh yeah, feminists have n…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:29 AM
1

It appears that your problem is with the word feminism, if we titled it woman's rights or maybes woman's organisation, would these evoke less angst on your part? More shame tactics about the "angst" now, I see... really adds to your supposed "arguments" :) I have a problem with the FEMINIST movement, which you seem to ignore. Instead of intellectually examining an organization for what it is, you choose to play semantics and use "shame tactics" to force your "win" in an argument. I don't give a …
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:09 AM
2

You think that's bad? Oh man, you have got quite a bit to understand about how women (and society) view domestic abuse against men.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:46 AM
19

Fuck the culture we've created where we can't have any humor, any fun, any jokes, or any mildly offensive content anywhere in plain sight. This is what happens when you create majors and mandatory courses in hateful rhetoric. You allow a group of people complete control over the words of others. If you do not "fit in", you are not allowed to "speak". Unfortunately, this is what educational institutions have become in the Western world. Full of pseudo-intellectuals and insufferable crybabies like…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 12:53 AM
11

However. dailymail.co.uk is a tabloid, with sensationalist writing targeting to the same women who would, in America, pick up People and Ok! magazine and follow the latest scandal obsessively. And... this is very close to the 'modern Western woman'. We're not only anti-feminist, but more than anything, anti-misandry. You don't have to be a feminist in order to spout hateful misandrous garbage like this. I'll laugh with you on these, but don't confuse it with feminism. Nobody is calling her a fem…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:05 AM
5

Notice how that she say's "good, I hope we're getting there" to Shriver's comment on how it's a "woman's nation". Feminists definitely want equality!
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:39 AM
13

Bernard's video response Also, looks like Peter Lloyd wrote an article referencing this bigot: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2246471/A-bigot-bra--Male-writer-responds-Esther-Walkers-admission-doesnt-want-baby-boy.html#addComment
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:11 AM
3

One of the best videos on youtube, in my honest opinion.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:53 AM
0

So... which one of you cowards still thinks "feminists" should "work" with us?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:47 AM
5

It frequently takes these sorts of libertarian idealist stances in a way that does seem to indicate a pervasive desire to simply oppose feminism, rather than looking at issues from an egalitarian perspective. I disagree. There is no reason to call ourselves "MRA's" if we're only going to appeal to the "egalitarians". There is a good reason why we are MRA's in the first place. By your standards, we should stop calling it "A Voice for Men" and call it "A Voice for People". Men are disadvantaged to…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:46 AM
10

Even though I did not listen to the podcast, I'll try my best to answer your questions. Basically the gist of it is that women need to accept any abuse they receive in video games and any involvement in changing video game culture by women is attention seeking. It depends on what you consider "abuse". Frankly, I consider some idiot saying stupid shit over the internet to be very low on the "abuse" scale. I used to play games competitively during my high school years (back when video games were s…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:21 AM
1

I would like to bring up something with the "genocide on women" nonsense. I have a friend on facebook (whose a long-term girlfriend of a high school friend of mine) who is, ironically, an elementary school teacher herself. She is very pro-feminist and posts feminist drivel from time to time. She posted up some article about a women killed in Juarez, Mexico with the quote "the femicide in mexico is so sad". Now, there are COUNTLESS men dying in Mexico as we speak (far more than women), but she cl…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:39 AM
6

Ah, the ol' "patriarchy hurts men too" even though men designed the "patriarchy" to specifically denigrate and oppress women scapegoat. Good turn-around there feminist, you keep blaming the world's problems on an imaginary feminist scapegoat theory and we'll keep focusing on reality.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:35 PM
5

"Hey Blacks... uh, we'd like you to leave in order to help this White festival and stuff..." What I'm not a racist, I cordially asked the Blacks to leave. They didn't have to or anything... This small incident, and the responses to it, teaches us some important lessons about levels of misogyny in our society. It is clear that those making trouble and "sabotaging" the festival are those who complained and demanded refunds, even though they had decided to leave entirely of their own volition. I'm …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:29 PM
1

Sorry, I didn't mean to "saddle the entirely of these problems" onto you. I know you're not the one (directly) spreading hate and bigotry in your movement. However, when your movement is directly responsible for shit like this, and the supposed "real" members in your movement do nothing about it... It's impossible to not question the legitimacy of your movement.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:08 PM
1

Sorry, I'll delete it right now.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:57 PM
2

Why do moderate practitioners of Islam still call themselves "Muslim" when there is a radical vocal minority that want to cause terror in the name of Islam? There are ALOT of parts to this question. Islam and feminism are two completely different entities (namely because of the differences between the countries these two ideologies tend to inhabit). Why do moderate Christians still call themselves "Christian" when there is a radical minority that clearly and directly want to set back every singl…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:44 PM
3

If you dislike (and so many other so-called "feminists") hate them so much, then why isn't there a push to police your movement? Why do you insist on calling yourself a "feminist" (and therefore associating yourself with these hate-mongers) if you disagree with them so vehemently? Also, you can't be an MRA and feminist because our theologies differ drastically. Every single feminist "sub-sect" (no matter how supposedly "moderate") believes in the bigoted "patriarchy" theory which blames all of t…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:50 PM
7

Funny, your post history clearly suggests you're gay, yet you're calling us "a bunch of fucking closet marys"?. Oh well, looks like I'm just going to have to "ignore this idiot" :)
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:09 PM
2

I already answered this, but I meant "conduct discourse". I think Rogan will agree 100% with girlwriteswhat. By the way, I had absolutely no idea Rogan was on the Tom Leykis show.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:06 PM
10

Yes, clearly. We should be stating that "whistling" is equivalent to "sexual assault". That wont undermine sexual assault victims or anything...
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:57 PM
3

Well, I guess what I meant was "conduct discourse". I definitely don't think Rogan will be against her (or our) views. And yes, it'll definitely be great to deprogram thousands of white knights.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:45 PM
-26

The complaining and whining in this post is something from a feminist youtube channel. Yeah, strip clubs are pretty shitty places and strippers hustle. Not a "gender" issue.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:51 AM
60

The only reason why assault is assault is because it makes you feel unsafe. No. Pick up a dictionary sometime, please. If I pulled a knife on you, for example, but didn't actually stab you, wouldn't you feel unsafe? It's the same situation. Depends entirely on the scenario. If you brandished a knife and told me (or alluded to) that you were going to hurt me, I would. However, if you simply brandished a knife to cut something, I would not. Also, you are trying to claim that brandishing a weapon i…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:35 AM
73

Okay. You feeling "uninvited" and feeling "unsafe" is not the same as "sexual assault". Your "feelings" don't dictate serious terms like "assault" and "rape". I've witnessed millions of cat-calls in my life and guess what? They ended the same way: The woman ignores the calls and the man (or men) go on their merry way. Problem is the feminist society we live in has convinced you (and women, in general) that men need to cater "to your feelings". If "cat-calls" make you feel unsafe, then you've pro…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:02 AM
51

I'm going to guess "cat-calling". I've noticed that the recent feminist pet is to call "cat-calling" sexual assault. Yes, you heard that right. Whistling at a woman is now "sexual assault". In other news, flipping somebody off is now "murder".
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:42 AM
1

Funny, you're the second person to claim you know her. She must be real popular. Either way, she sounds like quite an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:18 AM
2

I haven't heard one of his podcasts in a while as well, but I will also MAKE SURE to listen to this one and encourage others to do so as well. They're usually posted on youtube.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:59 AM
2

I don't think you're understanding. I'm not saying that you are intentionally supporting feminists. I'm saying that making "sandwich" and "kitchen" jokes only harms the MRM since it caters to the feminist viewpoint of "constant misogyny". There are much better ways to protest feminists than making childish, "sexist" jokes.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:57 AM
22

Oh man, how Joe destroyed that emasculated twerp Kilstein had me rolling on the floor. I can't even imagine what girlwriteswhat would do to him. Either way, this would give girlwriteswhat (and the entire MRM by default) some serious exposure since Rogan's podcast is VERY popular.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:26 AM
61

Fuck yeah! As a huge Rogan fan, it would be AWESOME to have Rogan and Girlwriteswhat debate.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:06 AM
6

Sure, that sounds like a wonderful idea! But hey, while we're ahead, why stop at chivalry? Let's also bring back the death penalty for women convicted of committing adultery and revoke women's right to vote! You know, all of those great things that were also around during the times of "chivalry".
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:15 AM
6

You are awesome. That is all.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:10 AM
29

Great stuff! We are certainly making strides, especially with this "Warren Farrell protest". You should seriously consider thanking your professor personally if you haven't already. It certainly helps reinforce their decision in fighting misandry.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:09 AM
7

The problem is that these "humor" incidents only lead to us being further judged and solidifying the case made for feminism. Making kitchen/sandwich jokes is only going to hurt the MRM. Making rational and logical arguments for men's rights while showcasing the bigotry within feminism is the only way the MRM is going to grow.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:46 PM
3

I remember this being posted all over during the "Rayon McIntosh" McDonald's incident.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:26 PM
11

"I need feminism because people have told me to my face that my hijab oppress me" Holy moly. This has got to be at least ONE of the worst ones I've ever heard. Last I checked, FEMINISTS were the ones telling you that religion (particularly Islam) "oppresses" women. I can't even believe somebody can be stupid enough to put something like this down. She could have replaced "feminism" with "Nazism" and the argument would've held the same weight. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:55 PM
0

Oh, believe me, I know. I just didn't want you thinking that the subreddit was against you. We all appreciate everything you've done and will continue to fight the good fight along your side.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:37 PM
3

Come on guys! Feminists totally care about men! These are not REAL feminists, like me and my friends over at the local anti-patriarchy fight league. We totally care about men. We care so much about them, that we're going to ignore all of the overwhelming negative shit feminists do to men but still call ourselves "feminists" and just tell others that we're "not like them". What an excellent day to be a feminist! :D /s
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:19 AM
1

Ah, I see. My apologies for the misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:05 AM
2

Aren't we all, aren't we all. It's really through the MRM that I have really realized just how "sheepish" human beings really are. People will literally just believe something just because they are told to believe it. However, the MRM is growing bigger and bigger every year :)
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:04 AM
0

It's upsetting seeing you downvoted here. You are a true MRA and we are all by your side. The whole poster campaign in Canada alone has contributed to so many new MRA's.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:01 AM
1

oh you replied again, how beautiful! Glad you did too, sweetie :) spelling and grammar checking? really? okay ... how about theory and concepts checking Mine are more than checked and I stand by them contentedly. I totally adore how you reduced my writing to its tiny irrelevants yet fail to check your own work for its theory content You mean your repetitive shame tactics were "tiny irrelevants". I think they make up most of your "argument" here, ma'am. you seem attached to your patriarchy number…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:58 AM
1

And please explain to me how this is considered "hate speech" or how it deserves 'banned' as a commercial on any pretenses?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:27 AM
1

Im replying to only this as it is totally obvious that you chosen to ignore what I have said and then (stupidly) reiterated to me what I have stated clearly and concisely to you I literally quoted virtually every single thing you said and responded appropiately to it. Please let me know what I "chose to ignore". you have no understanding of the movement, its history or its philosophy I think my understanding is far more sufficient than yours. I couldn't also give two shits about the "philosophy"…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:55 PM
0

okay chickadee, I do read it,vast amounts of it, and I also read around it and see what other theories feed in to it Oh, yes. "Patriarchy" to blame men for all of women's and men's problems is certainly not hateful. Neither is "rape culture", which feminists only apply to women being raped. Also, claiming that women cannot be sexist towards men because men are the "oppressors". Great non-hateful stuff, right there! and lets be honest here, we both know you ve only read that brand of feminism bec…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:42 PM
1

Im a feminist, Im well read and Im not the little victim number that you seem to think. So, let me ask you something. If I called myself a "Nazi" and said that I am supportive of "racial-equality", does that suddenly nullify all of the other Nazi's bigotry? Does that suddenly change the movement? Please read this sometime to understand how it doesn't matter just "what you believe" or claim to believe. I dont think you are qualified to tell me what feminist are, I dont consider you to be educated…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:28 PM
1

equality means equality not equality on particular terms Then why does your movement continuously push for "equality" when it benefits women, but not when it benefits men? but here is the nitty gritty, equality cant exist per say as biology gets in the way Which is why the idea of "equality" in many ways is a farce. Feminism is against "biology" which is what turns your movement into a social-science farce in the first place. Do we live in one? really, infantile question ... our society is many …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:21 PM
1

I am very much aware of what feminism has achieved and not achieved, and Im a feminist, I can see clearly (NOT BLINKERED) what feminism has done, who 'we' (both males and females) have benefited and have suffered, trust me on this, Im a mother of a son and am concerned about both genders. Then why do you support a movement that goes against everything that could be beneficial to your son? Why are you so willing to ignore the countless incidents of feminist suppression of men's rights and downrig…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:16 PM
12

I don't think 54,000 people are MRA's, but I do think the vast majority of them are sympathetic to MRA causes or those interested in issues relating to men. I actually think this sub creates the most MRA's, not to mention that the MRM is growing every year. Also, VERY well said John. Well said.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:03 AM
1

They are fairly recent in the scheme of things, 70s for Solanas wasn't it? and what was she anyway? Well, the 70's isn't "recent" in feminist history. and what was she anyway? Just a crazy woman shooting men because she couldn't be famous, and she topped herself anyway, sadly the scum manifesto is still around. She is a "respected" feminist in the community whose hateful rhetoric is still mandatory reading in feminist courses. Funny how you downplay that its just "still around". Then we have Dwa…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:17 AM
1

My SO believes in both matriarchal and patriarchal aspects of society, she also believes in both male and female privilege, by the tome of your reply it sounds like you are trying to tell her what she is rather than letting her define that, much in the same way feminism is trying to tell MRAs that they are a hate group. No. I'm not "telling her who she is", I'm telling her who "feminists" are. She can be whoever she is and call herself a "feminist", but that doesn't mean that is what feminism is…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:10 AM
10

I mean, I know there's a local gay (male) club down in Florida I think it was that allegedly does and believes similar things, so it's not a brand of crazy unique to women, but sometimes the sheer absurdity makes me think for a moment. You're telling me you heard of a gay club in Florida which advocates gendercide and believes in gay (male) only societies?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:51 PM
20

believing things like heterosexual relationships are ways of suppressing women and that men should have no place in their communities. Sounds a whole lot like radical feminism to me... In reality, Lesbian Separatists or "Separatist Feminists" are a subsect of Radical Feminists. They're usually even crazier than Radical Feminists. Yes, you heard that right. Even crazier than radical feminists.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:35 PM
1

I think it's only really in recent decades that the man hating has really been so common or apparent with feminism. Then how do you explain Valerie Solanas and Andrea Dworkin? These people's hateful rhetoric, by the way, is still mandatory reading in feminist courses to this day. "Man-hating" has only become "more apparant" in recent years/decades of feminist history.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:58 PM
1

If you are so against the concept of "patriarchy", then what would make you date someone who believes so strongly in it? Maybe your girlfriend is extremely far off from a "feminist", but believes she is one because she is believes in "equality"; but every single feminist group/organization believes in the mythical "patriarchy" and utilizes it as a scapegoat for all of women's and men's problems, regardless of how "moderate" the group is perceived. To this day, I haven't met a single feminist tha…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:55 PM
2

They make pdf's that big? Man, technology is really getting huge... :)
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:13 AM
4

I don't deny things like male privilege exist and I also strongly believe female privilege exists although in different areas naturally. What "male privilege" do you believe exists? Also, if you willing to believe in "male privilege", what are your opinions of sexist feminist theories like "patriarchy"? Most importantly though, most people who call themselves "feminists" are very ignorant of what feminism is or what it is doing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:09 AM
3

That is AWESOME. Seems like Christmas came early this year :) Also, note that around this time last year, the infamous agent orange files were posted :)
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:06 AM
1

It's been posted here before. It's part of some "domestic violence"/"sexual violence" advertisement that showcased that women can also be the aggressors. It's staged.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:04 AM
7

You mean what a rape and incest apologist! /s
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:13 AM
5

Holy shit, did I just a watch a news video which finally called feminists out for their violence and showcased men's rights for what it was? This is HUGE. This news anchor and Warren Farrell deserve an award. Also, I would like to extend a personal "thank you" to everybody and ANYBODY involved in spreading this video. Those violent savages protesting Mr. Farrell also deserve a "thank you" for showcasing their own hatred and violent intent on video for everybody to witness :) Good job, MensRights…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:06 AM
11

Are you kidding? This is EXACTLY what University feminism looks like. Go to your local women's studies department and bring up "men's rights issues" and you'll see exactly how "democratic" University campuses are. The one thing I learned about universities from my experience was that universities are only interested in what you have to say if it "fits" their specific classifications of what's "okay" or not "okay".
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:55 AM
2

There are quite a few more of them than you think. Oh and NAFALT.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:37 AM
18

No, Amanda. All men are rapists and all rapists are men. Thank you for showing us all what feminism is teaching young, impressionable women.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:34 AM
1

We don't like to think about it, and we don't like to talk about it, but the fact is that men are also sexually assaulted. Hmm... That's strange. Feminists don't seem to like to talk about "male rape", but for some odd reason, they can't seem to get enough of talking about "female rape".
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:31 AM
0

This is awesome stuff :)
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:16 AM
1

Oh and speaking of these imaginary "oppressive institutions" feminists are against, do you think most feminists consider this to be an oppressive institution? Oh no, we finally address men's issues and now feminists are lining up (as directed to from their WOMEN'S STUDIES COURSES) to take down this "oppressive institution". Sounds like quite a few feminists are against him if he's being preached as "hateful" by entire WOMEN'S STUDIES DEPARTMENTS. Funny, because they weren't so against him when h…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:56 AM
1

To move from "some" to "all" is fallacious reasoning. I don't doubt that there have been some feminists who have pushed for things that do limit the rights of men, but I do doubt that all feminists push for things that limit the rights of men. It doesn't matter what "some" feminists do. Just because there are "some" feminists that care to some degree about men's issues doesn't change the fact that the MOVEMENT is hateful. Even if a movement is hateful, it doesn't necessarily mean that everybody …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:53 AM
2

Isn't the point of equality that we all be seen, treated, and respected as individuals? Your generalizations come across as ironic to me. What "generalizations" are you talking about here? Of course, that is the point of equality... I don't see how that contradicts with what I'm saying. Feminism is to gender "equality", what the KKK is to civil liberties. And in any case, the essentialist rhetoric employed by some MRA's (cough cough) is just as denigrating, harmful, and counter-productive as the…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:37 AM
7

Let's not forget it'd be all over every single remotely popular feminist outlet.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:37 AM
17

Why should feminism support a movement that's trying to deconstruct and destroy it? Feminism claims it's goals are to attain "gender equality". MRA's showcase instances where feminists not only neglect, but actively push towards suppressing the rights of men. Feminists, in turn, slander us as "rape apologists", "misogynists", etc. If feminism actually supported "gender equality", there would be no MRM. However, feminism is after gender-supremacy, not equality. So, why should feminism support us?…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:35 AM
51

And these are the people who we keep hearing are "for equality"? Where are all of the NAFALT feminist apologists now?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:38 AM
1

The city that impacted me the most was Ciudad Juarez due to the high level of feminicides. I'm sorry but it's hard to take somebody seriously who uses the word "femicide" in a serious context. Are you implying that MEN aren't killed more often in Ciudad Juarez than women? Why is that when women are killed, you call it a "femicide", even when men are killed far more routinely? It is also important to state that machismo is alive and well in some parts (not all, but some parts, mostly rural) of Me…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:00 AM
1

Your statement clearly implied that the "extreme" branches weren't common nor that they were the "majority".
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:53 AM
5

Why does some extreme branches of Feminism see the Men's Rights movement as an enemy? You mean all branches with a couple exceptions?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:17 PM
2

It was growing up in a matriarchy, growing up in a city where crimes against women was rampant Hmm... What city was this? Most cities I've heard of are mostly full of crimes against men. and because I had the naive notion that the most brilliant minds would inhabit that department and deal with rational thought. Oh man, were you ever wrong... but most of the freshmen and sophomores either had too much enthusiasm to channel it healthily in our programs (like social events such as Take Back the Ni…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:00 AM
13

For many, the perception of a feminist is of a crazy person, sadly, just because some are too radical in their approach and just come off as men -haters, like you stated. Since you've only recently discovered this subreddit, I think I'll be the first to break it to you. There are FARR more than just "some" crazy feminists. You can literally see daily instances of feminist insanity on this subreddit alone. There is a very good reason why feminists are seen as "man-haters".
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:38 AM
22

Throughout history women have been subject to many horrors, but I feel that now when they try standing up for themselves as Feminists, most of them forget the reason for even trying. The problem with statements like this is that it negates the "horrors" (which were mostly worst than their female counterparts) of men. Sure, women faced "horrors", but men often faced worst horrors. However, when men were faced with them you rarely hear about them. Feminists just pretend like only women faced "horr…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:33 AM
1

I am happy to hear that. However, I must admit I'm completely curious, what made you volunteer at the "women's studies" at your university?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:29 AM
15

I think pretty much everything I hated about college can be summed up in this video... And people ask us why we feel "threatened" with feminists? These people are worst than the "oppressors" they fought against in the past.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:26 AM
6

I literally have no idea why you're downvoted...
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:19 AM
29

Pretty funny how saying that "men cannot be left to run things on their own" isn't sexist, but stating that the "most qualified and most politically experienced" individual should be would label you as a "misogynist". Reason #13535 of why I joined the MRM...
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:17 AM
1

Yeah, because it's not like feminism creates "severe insecurity and anxiety" in men, or anything. I'm sure if I'm told that my gender is responsible for all of the wrongs and that I need to be "taught" not to rape, I'd be such a happy, non-insecure individual.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:14 AM
1

How old are you that you go to Jezebel or Feministing for your feminist news? Perhaps we have some generational gap going on. I am in my 30s and would not cite either of those sites as mouthpieces of feminism. Old enough to understand where the largest numbers of FEMINISTS go to. Maybe the current 'feminists' in their 30's you hang out with wouldn't cite "Jezebel" and "feministing" as their primary feminist website, but you have to be so out of touch with reality if you think these literally ARE…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:46 AM
0

Pretty disgusting you think that way, I must admit. You're so certain feminists are sooo supportive of men (despite me providing you PLENTY of examples showcasing otherwise) in your previous posts, but somehow MRA's are against women? Go ahead and show me any evidence of MRA's being "against women".
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:17 AM
2

She didn't say "all immigrants", those were your words. Oh yeah.. you're right. She just said let's "open the borders". Because... last I checked... borders keep immigrants out. I absolutely guarantee that I know more about feminism that most people here, probably yourself included. It's funny, you know. I haven't heard of any "radical feminists" not being marxists/communists/socialists/anarchists. Not to mention how much the general political left seems to pander to feminists. Not to mention fe…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:00 AM
2

I wonder if you realize how insane you sound right now. That woman is not radical. Again, she says "men are not the problem". Does that sound radical to you? It depends, once again, on your definition of "radical". Sure, she is by no means an Andrea Dworkin or Valerie Solanas. But the nonsense she's spewing is pretty common in extreme feminist circles. Responding right away with a "YES" to men being sent to prison for assault, but then conveniently "changing the topic" when she is asked the same…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:44 AM
1

Reading that statement makes me sick. "Direct our programming at men". It's like something out of a Mussolini's handbook. Why don't you take your "programming" and shove it up your asses?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:38 AM
2

No, I think guiding someone who's on the right track is going to benefit men's rights. What difference does it make at which point you saw a need for a MRM? Because it's far easier and more efficient to "convert" people who at least respect some of our views, rather than moron's who've been brainwashed into feminist hell. Also, THAT particular woman is not doing the most damage. She sounds completely reasonable and moderate (if confused) compared to a lot of feminists. Really, "reasonable" and "…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:35 AM
2

I disagree. Although there are many who where, there are also many of us who saw the light from the beginning (like myself). I don't see how I'm "hurting MR and ultimately myself" by not supporting the people who are doing the most damage to men's rights. I'm sure you think apologizing for feminist behavior is going to somehow benefit men's rights though, right?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:23 AM
2

When it is a woman, while yes it is, there is a hesitation. This is her brain trying to rationalize it. I can just imagine her thinking pattern... Man... Crime..... Against Women...... ABSOLUTELY JAIL TIME Woman....Crime.... Against Man......... Well.. uh... what did he do to her? Did he hit her? Did he pressure her into sex? Did he rape her? Oh fuck it, that's not the "point".
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:19 AM
2

That depends entirely on what you consider a "potential ally". I don't see feminists as "potential allies" or those who prioritize violence between the genders. I think calling out feminists for the idiots they are gives us better "allies" than "victimizing" morons like this.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:17 AM
3

Great to see there are already people responding to this. I'd love to see these "misleading stats" that MRA's are pushing. Are they anything like the "1 in 4 women are raped" stat?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:47 AM
2

Maybe I should rephrase and say, I've never met a feminist who wasn't also an intactivist? Now that's quite a statement... If so many feminists are so opposed to male genital mutilation, then why do they allow articles promoting male circumcision to be published on the largest feminist outlets (Jezebel, feministing, etc)? If this was such a "universal" issue amongst feminists, then why don't feminists fight to get these ridiculous articles taken down rather than supporting them? What are feminis…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:32 AM
2

I don't know. I've never met an intactivist who wasn't also a hardcore feminist, so I might disagree with your assessment that feminists care little about male circumcision. This entire community is full of intactivists that aren't feminists. If feminists care so much about male circumcision, then can you please show me some instances of feminists doing literally anything about it? Feminists seem to have no problem organizing "Slut-Walks" and rallying protests over minor issues, but I have yet t…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:26 AM
2

After a VERY hesitated "umm... welll... um..." and then she quickly said "yeah, but that's not the point....". Ironically enough, she said "yes" pretty quickly when asked the reverse.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:41 PM
2

There are women skeeved by foreskin, probably because they've never seen an uncircumcised penis before. It's funny. Feminists are constantly complaining that men everywhere are putting "unfair" expectations on them by stating such "ridiculous" things like "don't be fat". Yet, women tell men that they need to literally have a piece of their genital integrity removed in order to have sex with them and feminists don't say anything about it? Do you see how hard it is to feel for feminist whims?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:39 PM
1

Guy lost me at "However, there are some great feminist youtube channel's out there, like feministfrequency". How anybody can call a channel which literally sit around and "picks out" anything with a smidgeon of "patriarchy" in it a "good channel" is beyond me.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:44 AM
0

Ah, yes... the good mangina project strikes again with another fabulous article.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:31 AM
2

Really? That's one of the worst ones I have. But then again, there are a plethora to choose from. I think we agreed on male genital mutilation earlier.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 04:35 AM
2

Usually, yes. However, movements like yours apparently need "sex-positive" variations to conteract the average "sex-negative" form of yourselves. Makes you wonder how valid an ideology must be if it needs a "sex-positive" variation, eh? :)
/r/MensRights30/11/12 04:11 AM
2

I already told you you were a genius. Feminists everywhere are rejoicing at your sarcasm.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:56 AM
2

Funny, most I've met have been pretty flat-chested. Or maybe it's because you've burned your bra's so it sticks out more?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:47 AM
2

Us big bad MRA's do. Probably explains why most feminists wind up man-hating, lesbians though...
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:32 AM
2

Oh and illogical fallacies! Sorry, forgot to mention that one. I prefer a bad lay to illogical fallacies.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:26 AM
10

Sure is. It's a mockery.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:21 AM
2

I'd rather take a bad lay, than a man-hater, sweetie :)
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:20 AM
1

Oh. Em. Gee. You women's studies major's are brilliant! It's no wonder so many of you are hired straight out of college to work for Fortune 500 companies! Not only did you manage to debunk me entirely, but you ALSO managed to showcase how intellectually stimulating a fine debate with a feminist can be! I cannot believe that we have been wasting our time relying on MRA's to discuss logical rhetoric when we could've just worked with you brilliant feminists! :D
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:10 AM
1

What fine rebuttal from an equally cunning linguist. Amazing how you managed to debunk all of my points so eloquently! Boy, they sure do teach you women's studies major's to be real critical thinkers! :)
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:58 AM
1

You are entitled to your opinion, obviously. People who incite violence upon others are not deserving of my respect of their livelihood. Maybe you're far too soft?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:37 AM
1

I just re-read my post and haven't found anything "surreal" about it. Seems very "real" to me. It seems like you aren't interested in debate, either, just mudslinging. It's funny how you feminists opt out of debating as soon as you are called out for your bigotry. Suddenly the argument is now "mudslinging" because I am asking you to answer for the movement you choose to align yourself with. And as expected, you decide to change the argument and slander me instead. Then again, I guess I can't rea…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:32 AM
1

So what made it so hard for you "reply" to? Was it too long or too logical? Or are you just utilizing this as a feminist shame tactic because you literally have no rebuttal to any of my points?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:13 AM
2

It seems like many people are content to use feminism as a scapegoat for the world's ills. No, but they are responsible for a PLETHORA of problems, particularly those of men's. You want to know what a real "scapegoat" is? Why don't you go talk about the imaginary "Patriarchy" theory to your feminist friends? Let's see how fast they start blaming all of women's (and men's) issues on this "Patriarchy!!11". What are the negative affects of the direct actions of feminists? Gee, I don't know girl_gia…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:08 AM
3

This is an AWESOME video. Great video to give out to the 'casuals'. Love it.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:19 AM
5

Because I am a feminist. Ah, I see, so you still believe in the feminist indoctrination definition of "feminism". I guess you're willing to ignore what feminism actually is or the direct actions of feminism because somebody told you the "definition" was "gender equality". Perhaps the history of feminism is more important to me than its current incarnation? Even the earliest groups of feminists (ie. the suffragettes) didn't fight for "gender equality". They fought for the right for women to vote …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:49 AM
0

I think it's "quite fabulous" myself. Ridiculous that people are crying about this after this animal literally incited violence. I hope she gets brain cancer next.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:42 PM
0

I have VERY little respect for people who incite violence. The only people I do not give "freedom of speech" rights to are those who incite violence (ie. radfemhub, The Talk hosts, etc). People who incite violence are generally MORE responsible for violence than those who actually commit the violence in the first place. She blatantly incited violence more than once and I am very happy to hear she is suffering. I hope for the very worst life has to offer this animal and the other hosts on the sho…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:39 PM
4

May all be forewarned of the cancerous rhetoric of feminism. THIS right here is a pure example of what feminist indoctrination does to males and the sheer hatred of males evident in feminism.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:28 PM
-1

If by "stupid remarks", you mean laugh at another human being's suffering (for doing no apparent harm) and literally PRAISE it. Not only did this animal make those comments on the Talk, but she even a month prior during the Schwarzenegger Love Child scandal stated that she would "cut off [Schwarzenegger's] dick" if she was Maria Shriver. It's very possible that the very reason Becker decided to mutilate her husband was due to literally hearing this less than a month previously. This animal DOES …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:16 PM
1

To all of those confused, watch this. I personally don't feel an ounce of pity for ANYBODY who not only laughs at another beings incredible suffering for doing no harm, but literally praises it.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:10 PM
4

Well, I would as soon cite Jezebel as a credible feminist news source as I would cite Fox News as a credible news source. Regardless of your feelings on "Jezebel", it is one of the largest (if not the largest) feminist website around. It is as "credible" to the average feminists feelings as you can get. Anyway, THIS feminist would have had her son circumsized over her dead body. And whoever is the cause of circumcision, considering the rates have declined from 80% to 50% in the past thirty years…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:19 PM
-2

That's absurd. Atheism is the ABSENCE of a belief, not a belief. That's like saying feminism is the ABSENCE of the belief of traditional gender roles. Atheists believe in modern science as opposed to religious rhetoric. Again, look at the definition on any dictionary. Then compare that to the definition of a (political) movement. And you'll see that they are quite different. I literally just copy-pasted both definitions from a dictionary. I'm not going to argue semantics with you. There are more…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:52 PM
1

Oh okay then. I think I'm going to go make a "rape joke" at an atheism conference. Don't worry, it's okay. I'll just tell them that 999,999 out of 1,000,000 MRA's have no interest in raping anybody. I'm sure Rebecca Watson will give out a nice hearty laugh.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:49 PM
7

Circumcision is something that is largely determined and perpetuated by men, and not like some feminist conspiracy. O rly? If feminists are so anti-male-genital-mutilation, then why are articles like this published on the most mainstream of feminist websites? Oh, and since Gawker links aren't allowed, why don't you type in "Uncircumcised penises are costing us billions Jezebel" into google sometime. Feminists are more than willing to downplay circumcision in order to exaggerate how bad it's fema…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:45 PM
-1

One more time: Atheism is not a movement. Atheism: the doctrine or belief that there is no God. Feminism: the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. If atheism isn't a movement, then neither is feminism. Just because one is talked about more as a 'movement' doesn't mean that there is a stronger and stronger push for atheism (which is, essentially, a movement).
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:37 PM
-2

I disagree. A movement is judged by the movement's actions. We, MRA's, routinely call out feminists for not policing their own movement and aligning/associating themselves with man-haters. Your statement is the equivalent of saying "You're a feminist if you believe in equal rights for men and women!", which is obviously untrue. I'm not going to call out feminists for it and then turn around and align myself with people who think 'Rebecca Watson' deserves a position of power. Also, atheism (like …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:15 PM
-1

People like her are why I refuse to call myself an atheist. I cannot believe something this disgusting and idiotic honestly has POWER in the atheist community. Atheists, it's time you started policing your movement...
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:48 PM
11

That is only after this was posted here... Previous to this the comments looked like a far tamer version of these. Also note that this actual issue occurred last year.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:29 PM
0

Biden is a king amongst mangina's.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:05 AM
1

Mostly feminists and feminist-lobbyists. Obama's entire campaign was about the imaginary "war on women" and he did a whole lot more just bring it up in his campaign.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:49 AM
2

I can't speak for /r/onexchromosome, but I will say that /r/OneY is a feminist-induced shithole for the most part. It's really sad that a male-space is dominated with feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:22 AM
1

NOOO!! They're clearly discriminated and discredited against!1111 It's all a result of the patriarchy! /s
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:07 AM
0

Holy mangina hell. I can only imagine many years of indoctrinated emasculation this "David Rayfield" has received...
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:05 AM
5

Wow, what a load of sexist horseshit. It's amazing how truly toxic feminist rhetoric is. The pay gap has been LONG debunked and we still have people like this going around literally discriminating because of it. What next, do we charge more for female coffins to "raise awareness" to the 94% workplace death rate of men? I hope this sexist garbage gets boycotted to bankrupcy.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:01 AM
0

Hmm... Sounds like that "victim-blaming" that supposed female rape victims go through we keep hearing about from feminists, eh?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:23 AM
7

Truly disgusting. Let us all wait for our great "equality-loving" feminists to fight this misandry in order to promote "gender-equality".
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:51 AM
1

It surprises me how someone can perform such intricate logical gymnastics to arrive at conclusions like this. This statement deserves to be QFT. It's important we showcase how grossly idiotic these people really are.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:52 AM
11

http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/13vttu/this_is_hanging_in_my_schools_library_i_guess_i/
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:42 AM
8

But hey, he won't remember it so it's okay! /s
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:44 AM
35

Most circumcisions are done without anesthetic. Even in hospitals.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:37 PM
3

Great stuff man! :)
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:44 AM
8

Feminists, making sure anything and everything is worst when it occurs to women. Even when men are the ones suffering.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:13 AM
10

It's shameful that you get 100% upvotes for a veiled-racist rant that shows no understanding of the issues involved No. He's getting 100% of the upvotes for showcasing the idiocy in utilizing propagandized studies in order to defend mutilating baby boys. You are getting 100% of the downvotes for posting a serious of propagandized studies in order to defend the mutilation of baby boys. It's unbelievable that people like you are so adament about removing the rights of males to their own bodies. If…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:00 AM
4

Good stuff! :)
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:56 AM
6

Please don't start thinking that you did anything "wrong" here. You need your career and you did more than 95% of men would do. Great job!
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:23 AM
3

Besides the obvious fact that engineers, computer programmers, labor-intensive work and pretty much all 'male-dominated' work is far more useful than any of these positions, statements like this: They go with the claim that its because the patriarchy... are pretty much a template for feminists to blame any and all problems on the imaginary "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:33 PM
11

I recently had an argument with a feminist about this EXACT topic. She stated that it is because of "lifestyle choices". Yes, men are choosing deadly jobs over those cushy Secretary and Receptionist positions because of 'lifestyle choices'. Ironically enough, she didn't think the same way for the wage gap or why there were more men in STEM fields over women. Nah, those were clearly because of "oppression".
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:22 AM
1

This right here is why the MRM needs to exist...
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:35 AM
4

People can take anything the wrong way. The idea of a "financial abortion" is not very far from the idea of allowing a woman to have an "abortion". One is just more accepted, while one is not. Doesn't really make it any more "whacky" or "out of context".
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:33 AM
12

The only people who deserve scorn here are the people who wanted to prevent the exchange of ideas. Ah, like the feminists clearly shaming Farrell and the entire MRM in the video?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:22 AM
16

Male Privilege. Oh, and Patriarchy. That too.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:06 AM
6

I think I got lucky though because my professor was the only male teaching a women studies class at my university and he did not consider himself a feminist. Wow... You certainly got lucky. I wonder what could've driven him to teach a "women's studies course" under those conditions.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:05 AM
7

Don't worry, sweetheart. The year after I graduated from my college, they started forcing everyone to take one course in "gender" studies (I barely escaped). That's horrible, nobody should be required to take that garbage. I had to take a sociology course and that was horrendous enough. Never again.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:04 AM
2

Lowest paid degree's are almost exclusively female-dominated.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:00 AM
12

Best thing I've heard come out of a "gender class", that's for certain.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:17 AM
27

That's illogical, alienating, and fucking stupid. You just defined feminism and 70% of Tumblr.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:15 AM
5

Alternatively it affects women more because... vagina. What an incredibly sexist thing for you to say. Everybody knows the real answer is because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:12 AM
7

Some of his ideas might sound a bit whacky out of context but he is a gentle moderate voice for the most part. I don't think I've heard a single "a bit whacky out of context" thing he's ever said. I'm certain the only people who think this are the same animals protesting outside.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:27 AM
2

Uh... yes... And how well would society take such a comment? The comment OBVIOUSLY implies that men only 'stood upright' to masturbate... It's obviously not a discussion on the morality of masturbation, I think it's very against men. Especially since they decided to post it up on "International Men's Day".
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:17 AM
19

Awesome stuff! Much respect to the Indians and a Happy International Men's day to them!
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:08 AM
5

"We have reason to believe that man first walked upright to free his hands for masturbation." – Lily Tomlin Wow... Imagine the sheer hell that would rise if a quote like this was put up for "international women's day"? It's unbelievable that kind of stupid shit that is considered "misogynistic", yet shit like flies on the ONE time of the year we can celebrate the good things men have done. I wonder where all of the feminism outrage is over this?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:58 AM
9

Last I checked, PLENTY of people are still chastising Chris Brown. Hell, whenever he's invited onto a popular award show, people are constantly howling about why he shouldn't be allowed.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:19 AM
0

Like every other "joke". It's a JOKE! I'm VERY against censorship and I find it appalling that "rape jokes" against men (even by comedians) are considered "unfunny" while it's completely acceptable to laugh about men being genitally mutilated by their wives. Rape committed against men is considered hilarious as well and they are made FAR more often than against women. Ironically enough, nobody (feminists particularly) seem to not care very much for any violent "jokes" against men.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:14 AM
11

Oh, you're far from being the "only one". We like to call it taking the red pill..
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:01 AM
16

Hey, thank you for supporting us. Believe it or not, pretty much everybody here started out like you.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:48 AM
-1

Absolutely agreed. I would personally purchase a gun as well, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:40 PM
26

This is a direct threat of violence. It's not okay by any stretch of imagination.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:20 PM
2

Sure do. Oh, and what color "ribbon" is the discussion regarding gender-violence being preached to girls and women. Anybody know?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:40 PM
0

Oh boy, here we go again with another NAFALT-er... Because many of the non-manhater feminists are actually out having successful careers and living their lives, and are thus too busy to keep up with the actions of bitter Womens' Studies majors circlejerking on Tumblr (disclaimer - there is actually at least one sane feminist on Tumblr, she also supports MRA and posted favorably on this subreddit at one point). Alright, let's not pretend that this is the ONLY time feminists and feminism as a whol…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:10 PM
14

Well, let's hear what the feminst apologists have NAFALT-ers have to say about this one. Time and time again, feminists show their true colors and yet people still try to apologize for their bigotry. Un-fucking-believable.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:33 AM
2

Last I checked, Bill Clinton not only supported feminists but even married one.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:28 AM
2

As did you to me :)
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:02 PM
4

Great, loving people those feminists.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:44 PM
12

Uh... how many not "feminist-friendly" presidents have we had in recent history?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:42 PM
6

Neither is "men's rights", obviously. Or anybody's rights/interests other than women's.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:41 PM
3

By personal autonomy I mean the right to say no to sex. To choose who they marry. To be able to see a doctor. Make friends. Wear clothing they enjoy. Eat the food they want. Bear children because they want to not because they have to. Be able to have an education, mobility, make choices for themselves without the threat of violence or punishment. And men deserve that right as well, because oftentimes they are harmed by the same male dominated society. To be fair, very little of this (aside from …
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:35 PM
3

What I mean is that there are cultures in which only men can own property, own a business, get an education. Yes, because these are the ways of the old days. Times were not always the same as they are now. Men and women needed to showcase their greatest assets in order to create the best efficiencies to survive. Women could not do the same work men used to do in those days (and even many occupations nowadays) at the same efficiencies as men which is why their "job" was to take care of children, …
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:09 PM
4

I agree with you that feminism has failed miserably, and is based on things that really have no foundation in out society. Couldn't be more right about that, good sir/madam. However I will say that there is patriarchal structure in much of the world. And oftentimes it harms men's freedom as well as women's rights. I disagree entirely. You see, there is a BIG difference between biological "patriarchy" and feminist "Patriarchy". Legitimate biological "patriarchy" is just men being the head of the …
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:37 PM
5

I don't think the extremist means of feminism is helpful Last I checked, "patriarchy" and "rape culture" were standard components of feminism. Find me a feminist who doesn't believe in these two tenets. It is not 'extreme feminism', this is extreme feminism. in fact, I often wonder if the association with feminism is hurting their cause more than helping. Well, when you work towards oppressing and shaming an entire group of people you're going to receive backlash. Hence why the MRM exists. I'm n…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:25 PM
6

The problem with feminism is the hateful rhetoric and principals which guide it. Utilizing fear-mongering tactics like implementing social-science theories such as "Patriarchy" and "rape culture" put women in a constant state of fear towards men. This state of fear leads women to (inevitably) have strong contempt for men. Which causes the modern-day misandry you see. This is not the same as addressing/promoting women's issues. Just because feminism does do this as well, does not mean that it ONL…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:13 PM
9

Ah, the ol' "Patriarchy is the problem" scapegoat. Funny, I'd imagine if we lived in the supposed "patriarchy", we wouldn't have to worry about men being 'oppressed'.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:06 PM
11

Good job on the postering! Men are truly starting to stand up to feminist bigotry. I agree with you that this is what we need to do.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:30 AM
2

Anytime! People like you need serious props for your effort on ending male mutilation. Either way, you can always talk with the father. Personally, I find it sickening that anybody thinks they have the right to do something like this to their baby boy (let alone a woman). If it was a baby girl, you'd be lynched for even mentioning genital altering.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:17 AM
3

Just wanted to say thank you for your good deeds here. It's utterly disgusting how 'normal' American's think mutilating a baby boy is. Here's to hoping your sister is convinced. What does the father think of the decision?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:27 AM
1

Done, very easy survey :)
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:01 PM
-5

Sorry, should've pointed out.. she starts talking around 3:30. Please leave a comment in order to showcase her idiocy to those who are less familiar about the MRM/feminism.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:42 PM
1

Well, I extend the same outlook on atheism as I do to other movements (like feminism). I judge them as a whole and this is what I have experienced from the movement. If you disagree, that's fine.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:25 PM
1

Suicide. Oh, and being murdered. Especially for ones country. Or family. Or other women in general.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:41 AM
1

Well, you have to fail pretty horribly if a mouth-breather like Rebecca Watson not only becomes a 'prominent member' but a 'leader' in your movement. I'm not trying to shit on Dawkins and other legit atheist philosophers, but what their movement has become.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:17 AM
2

I don't understand.... I don't take anybody would willingly take these pictures and let somebody else post them up... I don't think there's really anyway that this blog is truthful...
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:00 PM
11

Hahaha, this is brilliant! I'm having a ball reading these. What makes it the funniest is that feminists will actually agree with about 80% of this persons posts.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:43 PM
1

Oh, I agree. However, the fact that people like her are taken seriously in any circle of people makes me severely question the intelligence of those circle of people. Just like we chastise feminists for 'not policing their movement', it's time the atheists started doing the same in my opinion. I am not implying however, that doing this suddenly makes the claims of Dawkins any less justified.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:00 PM
1

Hardly. I just don't like to support a movement I don't believe in. Unlike the feminists we call out here for supporting feminism whilst ignoring the hateful filth present in their movement, I actually follow the movements I support closely (like the MRM) and analyze it for what it is rather than what people "say it is". Unfortunately, much of the 'atheist' movement has turned into a circlejerk of pseudo-intellectuals which fight over frivolous arguments and utilize feminist debate tactics of co…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:58 PM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqU9JFbtucU
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:51 AM
4

Ironically enough, Rebecca Watson is the reason why I no longer call myself an 'atheist' or associate with the 'atheist movement'. Any group of people that puts an idiot like Watson in charge of anything is not a "progressive group" in my eyes.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:48 AM
0

Oh, I don't know guys... I mean... I don't trust myself to take it. You know, because us guys don't care about having to pay child support for the next 18 years of our lives... And stuff... /s
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:15 AM
-6

Ah, yes, leave it to feminists to attempt to make another bullshit, nowhere near the same law in order to try to 'analogize' a law they dislike. It's just like the stupid law they tried to make by 'banning vasectomies' because of the abortion laws. Vasectomies and abortions are about as similar as Viagra and condoms are.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:23 AM
1

I can't be the only one that thought of this
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:14 AM
2

It's amazing. Let's put aside the obvious "it doesn't fucking matter, because women can always take their own birth control" argument for now. Can you imagine how grossly sexist an article would be if it was (in ANY way, shape or form) implying that women couldn't be trusted with ANYTHING over men? Could you see it in some sort of "Scientific journal" like this?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:11 AM
1

We need more people like you in this world. That was brilliant.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:59 AM
3

Uh, okay. First off, no true scotsman. Secondly, the "history" feminists teach is VERY contorted. They literally analyze anything a woman had to go through as 'oppression' but completely disregard the vast oppressions of men throughout history (i.e. OMG WIMMINZ IN THE 1800's WERE SO OPPRESSED ALL THEY DID WAS COOK AND CLEAN... when their husbands were out slaving away in coal mines and risking their lives daily in order to provide for their families). The supposed 'oppression' of women does not …
/r/MensRights10/11/12 01:53 AM
1

Okay, hold on. You're in a "Gender Studies" course, yet you claim to have "lots of issues with the Feminism movement". I don't know who you are, but I think it's wise to say you chose the wrong major...
/r/MensRights10/11/12 01:44 AM
4

To be honest, I don't think either is really a serious "problem". People are going to insult people, period. Whether it's on the clothes you wear, the food you eat or the people you associate with, people are going to make specific insults towards you. People will make gendered insults, just like people will make classist insults. It's really the way the world is and it's not going to stop. I think the biggest problem is that the world has gotten very 'soft' and everybody thinks any little insul…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:16 PM
1

Hell yes to Bill Burr's Monday Morning Podcast! Bill Burr is actually far more aware of MRA issues than most people. He has done podcasts addressing MANY men's issues. You can find them all over youtube.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:27 PM
1

I have a policy not to engage in terribly drawn-out arguments with people who have not done sufficient in-depth research, let anger seep into their argument, and use swear words in their writing. That's a convenient way to stating that you won't debate with somebody who will continue to debate with you, who has different views than you (I guarantee my "in-depth research" into feminism and the MRM far outweighs yours) and that you have such thin skin you cannot handle 'curse words'. Maybe you hav…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:23 PM
60

Ah, yes "creep-shaming" at its finest. And ironically enough, it seems to be condoned by those lovely feminist friends of ours at "WomensRightsNews". Considering how much these morons yap about "slut-shaming", you'd think they wouldn't endorse "creep-shaming" and committing acts of crime against them. Great people those feminists, we should really be working together with these people to create true "gender equality".
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:06 AM
2

Welcome to feminism.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:52 AM
1

I think training people to push back the way you did is one of the most important roles r/MR plays. This is what a real civil rights movement looks like on the ground. This is such a truthful and awesome comment.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:49 AM
2

So if a communist walks into one of my conversations to talk to me about communism, they are "poisoning me with their nonsense," and thus they are "bullying" me? If they try to shovel it in your face like this person did, then yes, I would consider it bullying. He wasn't even reacting to her comment about how he depicts women as being brainless or stupid. He was reacting to her insistence that he make eye contact with her, and his reaction was embarrassing. He was reacting to a lot of things. He…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 06:04 AM
1

She wasn't bullying anyone. She rudely demanded eye contact. Rudeness and bullying aren't comparable in any way. I don't really believe she barged into this conversation to 'rudely demand eye contact'; she came in to poison him with her nonsense and he reacted accordingly. That constitutes as 'bullying' in my eyes. If you don't believe so, that's fine and your prerogative. I'd much prefer more men to stand up in the manner Joe did rather than quietly sit around like some lapdog or SRSMen poster.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:07 AM
1

Could he have reacted a bit better? Yes. Did he react 'inappropriately'? No. People like this idiot (or whatever you want to think of her as) think they can waltz in and bully anybody into their bigoted rhetoric. It's actually quite relieving seeing somebody react to a bully this way, seeing how most men wouldn't have the courage to stand up to a bullying woman. Overall great job for Rogan and for anybody who fights this sort of nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:12 AM
1

1: Abortion is a multi-faceted issue that cannot be completely separated from the right of a woman to prevent certain changes from happening to her body. You're right that it is a "multi-faceted issue". However, it's primarily an issue of morality and ethics, not one of a "woman's body". Your right ends as soon as another's start. You cannot trump 'over the rights of others' and justify it because you think it violates your 'rights'. If you consider a fetus a "human being", than that "human bein…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:55 AM
2

I remember seeing this video a couple years ago. Always puts a smile on my face to see Rogan put a verbal beatdown on this moron.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:06 AM
20

AWESOME news! For those who don't remember, this is what the feminists over at SFU were saying about the men's center. Looks like their hate campaign not only was unsuccessful, but showcased how toxic feminism and these "women's centers" can really be.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:32 AM
0

It is definitely up to the person who has been assaulted/thinks they will be to respond in a manner which they think is reasonable. Agreed. Finally, I would appreciate if you don't make assumptions about the violence that individuals have experienced. My apologies. I was just trying to illustrate that when people are attacked, they react accordingly and they shouldn't be chastized for protecting themselves against a violent attacker. If this situation were reversed or it was two men/women involv…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:26 AM
5

A low-level physical assault is not justification for a person at their job or any other place in society to lose their calm in the manner in which the bus driver did. What you don't seem to understand that it is not up to the VICTIM to sit around and decipher what a "low-level physical assault" is. Assault is assault, period. If you don't want to get into a physical altercation, don't assault another person no matter how much you believe it is "low-level". Yes, self-defence is important. Howeve…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:31 AM
2

I cannot tell you how much it bothers me that feminists get all up in arms over anything remotely related to rape, but ignore EVERYTHING else. Maybe it's just me, but bands have been posting ads of men tortured/beaten/killed all over the place and I've NEVER heard a feminist or some "women's shelter" give a shit. Hard rock bands, in general, are known for having 'shocking' material on their album covers/ads/etc but these people only give a shit when 'rape' or any 'violence against women' is pres…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:41 AM
9

AWESOME. Congratulations and thank you for your huge contribution :)
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:32 AM
2

Why? He was unprofessional and violated the codes of conduct he agreed to in his employment. Did you actually watch the entire video? The girl ASSAULTED HIM. Yes, as in PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED him and he appropriately defended himself. Once you put your hands on someone, don't expect them to react 'professionally' towards you. This is not a by-product of a feminist society. I do not in any way support the woman's actions, but neither can the bus driver's actions be defended. It is absolutely a by-p…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:30 AM
4

The Ugly Truth
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:31 PM
2

Anytime! :)
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:09 PM
2

Mainly I was trying to get across why women feel uncomfortable with the idea of a bunch of men at strip clubs, and trying to show an example of a woman's behaviour you would also not want to see. No, you're giving an example that is nowhere the same nor applies as an analogy. There's a BIG difference between going to a strip club and being a stripper. I refuse to be told where I can or can't go, but I would also do the same for my girlfriend. If she wants to go to a male strip club, she can go. …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 10:04 PM
6

what do you think would have happened if it was a man harassing the bus driver and he got uppercutted? I'm pretty sure the bus driver would have also been fired in this situation, while i do not agree with the assault charges that's for the court system to figure out ( however corrupt people might find it) No, I think she'd actually be praised and paraded around by feminists and shown why you don't "lay your hands on a girl, brah". I don't know what parallel universe you live in where a WOMAN wo…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:53 PM
14

Ridiculous, but expected when living in a feminist society. This man deserved to be employee of the year after this incident.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:52 PM
2

I don't know why anybody other than SRS scum would be downvoting this. This was an EXCELLENT video showcasing feminist hate-speech indoctrination at a young age.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:19 AM
2

Let's correct this feminists drivel: Actually, feminists are usually preoccupied with reproductive rights Or pretending that abortion is a 'right of a woman' solely based on the fact that it's "her body". In reality, abortion is a question of morality of at which point a 'fetus' becomes a living human being (if ever) with the same rights to livelihood granted by the constitution. Instead, feminists will pretend that it is their 'right' solely because it's 'their body'. Oh, and shaming men that i…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:53 AM
14

Yeah, only boys 'want' to have sex with older women. They clearly 'want' it, whereas girls don't. Girls NEVER want to have sex with older men. Never. Never.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:26 AM
1

You ever hear that feminist "there are more women in poverty than men" (even though 80% of the homeless are men and, generally, veterans) claim? Yeah, that's what happens.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:22 AM
2

Ms. Ledbetter worked the exact same job and made much less than even the lowest paid male peer. That's arguable discrimination and shouldn't be shoved aside simply because she's some lady. To be fair, they are also not looking into other MANY other factors. If I work the same job as someone else, but am far less efficient/work less hours/call in sick more often/am less likely to relocate/etc than I will probably be paid less than others who hold the same job position as me. I cannot go up and bl…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:13 AM
12

The funniest things about this is that, statistically, women call out over twice as often to work than men and have lower pain tolerances on average.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:11 AM
1

It's things like this that make me actually want to support places. Way to go PJ's!!
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:07 AM
16

AWESOME stuff! I would've loved almost nothing more than to have seen some of these around my college rather than the constant feminist 'rape statistic' meanderings. I will now put UofT above other institutions.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 03:47 AM
2

Oh, believe me, I'm certainly not slandering anybody for flagging this hate-monger. I'm also for the equality of all, but I just believe that it might be better (for the better of the genders) for those to witness the sheer horrors of the modern feminist movement in order to help create gender equality. Unlike the KKK, most of society see's feminists as people for the 'greater good', not for the hate-mongers that they are. This is slowly changing, but I believe that this will help expose others …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:52 PM
0

I was about to report this but realized it's much better for people to see the true goals of modern feminism for what it is. You see, feminists try to shut off our voices because they know that we utilize logic and reason to make our arguments so our arguments could easily sway an individual away from feminism. Maybe it's better to allow this idiot and her cronies to put up their hateful videos in order to help people see that feminism is a hate-movement first and foremost. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:21 PM
1

Sounds like you ran into a SRSter and later, their headquarters. Although I'm sorry this happened to you, now you'll know better before attempting to make close friends with feminists and their ilk.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:51 PM
1

Oh, I understand the sexism very well and I recall that 'sperm' is a 'gift'. I just don't see the 'justification' for it in anyway. Usually there is at least SOME attempt at justifying this sort of B.S. to begin with. What about in regards to tubal litigations? Are husbands notified as such?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:39 PM
8

I literally came here to post this, but realized somebody beat me to it. Unbelievable how a group posts this kind of garbage (even regardless of it being complete bullshit) and it's not classified as 'hate'. Just goes to show you how anything a woman goes through is somehow 'tougher' in the feminists eye than when a man goes through it.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:37 PM
0

The point she is making is that reproductive rights, THE WHOLE SPECTRUM OF THEM, should be at the discretion of each individual in question. And she is right. Abortion is a question of morality and at what point a fetus (if ever) is considered a child. The "its a woman's body!!!11" statement is a strawman designed by pro-abortionists/feminists to avoid the actual moral questions behind abortion and pretend women are 'victimized' because "men are trying to take away their reproductive rights". Sh…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:16 AM
0

Can someone explain this rule to me? Please? What business of the wife is it? Do wives have to get signed consents from their husbands in order to receive tubal litigations? What possible reasoning is there for this?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:07 AM
1

Funny, last I checked, you've been the one avoiding debate with me and ALL other posters this entire time.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:03 AM
1

I hear that's not very far.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:42 PM
19

Even though, you're a feminist hate-monger (as provided from not only this post, but nearly all of your others), I think I'd be nice to have a nice breakdown of your nonsensical feminist drivel: You're acting like a gigantic asshole, and you tell women that it is their duty to help men? He stated early on that he was 'venting', if you were too stupid to tell yourself. He is obviously going through a rough patch right now since his close friend died. Ironically if you were such an 'oppressed West…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:10 PM
2

Ask yourself how sexual stereotypes affect your attitudes and actions toward women or other men. How exactly does this help 'avoid sexual assault'? Accept a person's decision when they say "no." Don't see it as a challenge. When a woman says no, that doesn't mean wait a few minutes and then try again. This sounds like common sense... Avoid clouding your judgment and understanding of what another person wants by using alcohol and other drugs. I had no idea this was exclusive to men... Realize tha…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:26 PM
5

Yes because infant male mutilation is such a 'necessary' procedure. Look at all of those civilized Europeans and Asians! Die in a fire.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:03 PM
1

Good analogy!
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:45 PM
3

So have I. And they come from the same place :)
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:45 PM
11

I couldn't agree any more with you. It's just a bullshit political scheme conducted by Democrats just like Republicans "war on religion". In reality, it's just a way of getting voters by pandering to specific groups of people all while ignoring the REAL problem: the economy. Also, yes, abortion is not about the 'rights of women to their bodies'. Your 'rights' end right as someone else's start. Abortion is a question of morality and at what point a fetus is considered a living being (if at all). …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:30 PM
28

Probably the same place the 'wage gap myth', 1 in 4 women are raped and the 'super bowl' day has the highest incidence of DV fallacies come from: Up some feminists ass.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:29 AM
13

I don't think any 'skilled surgeon' can repair that damage, unfortunately. If something like this was to happen to a girl, EVERYBODY would be questioning the procedure. Truly disgusting.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:25 AM
4

No. Feminist theory is VERY hateful and VERY misandric. Not to mention any institution that works towards benefitting ONE gender is not a movement promoting gender 'equality'.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:12 AM
3

The classic scenario is where she simply gets to stop cleaning, cooking and doing the house duties she did in the past, whereas he is still obligated to provide a roof and food for her. Cleaning, cooking and doing house duties "I'm a woman and I have rights! This isn't the 1800's and I'm not a slave to you!" Man obligated to provide shelter/food/monetary support for children "It's tradition! Only a deadbeat wouldn't do this for his wife!"
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:03 AM
5

Anything with Warren Farrell's name on it should be legit to anybody interested in gender relations.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:22 AM
5

Exactly.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:18 AM
2

AWESOME STUFF! THIS right here is what we need more of (and are inevitably going to get more of as the years and readership progresses).
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:10 AM
1

Isn't it ironic that the people most complaining about 'inequality' are the ones fully endorsing it?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:39 AM
1

"Men age like fine wine, women age like milk" doesn't promote violence against a gender. This one definitely does.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:18 PM
4

I understand what you're saying but please do not equate chimpanzee's with radfem's. Chimpanzee's have it hard as it is.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:47 PM
26

That is an AWESOME analogy. But please wait for us. No. Why in hell should anybody WAIT for YOU or ANYBODY ELSE who didn't give two shits about them back when their own personal financial liability wasn't of concern?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:20 PM
5

Remember this the next time you hear feminists bitch about 'dat dere patriarchy!!11'.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:08 PM
-2

Obviously, I'm not LITERALLY saying that female politicians are LITERALLY saying "we should prioritize women's health over men's health", but it's pretty much impossible to NOT realize how much more EMPHASIS is put on women's health (and cancers) over men's cancer. The fact that so many female politicians are backing the overly sexist "Obamacare" shows exactly this.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:04 PM
8

Everybody who has contributed here really deserves a pat on the back for this! Good job, we literally couldn't have done it without you :)
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:54 PM
1

I find it incredible ironic that somebody who says hateful, bigoted social-science nonsense like this is running as a "Peace and Freedom Party Candidate". Peace and freedom alright...
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:51 PM
0

Oh believe me I know. I was in Spain 2 years ago (along with most of Southern Europe) and saw how bad the recession was. Then again, trying to find work in the U.S. is very difficult as well :(
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:48 PM
0

Whoa whoa whoa wait a minute! You live in Portugal and you've never met a feminist?? How much are flights from the U.S. to Portugal and how easy is it to get a green card? :)
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:27 PM
13

I was literally going to write exactly this. When I stop hearing female politicians/newswriters/etc tell men that male circumcision is not 'mutilation' or that we should prioritize women's health over men's health (even though women live 5-6 years longer than men on average), then I'll start giving a shit about these 'evil' male politicians giving their opinions on women's health care.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:21 PM
4

Great job! We need to see more of what you're doing, which seems to be the case as the MRM keeps growing :)
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:18 PM
9

There were a bunch of female Vietnam War Vets who got battle fatigue from their service there, for example. I have NEVER heard of female Vietnam vets (especially any that 'died' or got 'fatigue' from anything more than making bullets for men to die with).
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:16 PM
1

He responded to mine. Said that if he received bad news from the doctor that he was going to file a suit.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:35 PM
3

Are they seriously comparing masturbation (which BOTH women and men can do without the consequence of impregnation/abortion) to abortion? Jesus Christ, feminists will literally shame men of ANYTHING to try and justify their position.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:29 PM
1

Oh hey, it's long-time feminist and male-genital-mutilation-supporter Jill Filipovic with ANOTHER feminist hypocrisy!
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:14 PM
1

I agree to a degree. You are correct about the 'curious' part, but you know damn well if this was done to a woman there'd be a whole lot less 'curiosity' and a whole lot more 'filing for a lawsuit/notifying the authorities'.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:47 PM
2

But you yourself just said women tend to use more health care services than men. And this isn't just for childbirth and things of that nature, it also applies to general health-related visits. Yes, exactly. They spend more on health services which is why their health costs are higher. It's not the fault of men that women utilize more health services. The "car insurance figure" is based on men driving more. Ironically enough, politicians only seem to be interested in talking about health insuranc…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:36 PM
0

Looks like an overreaction as with anything a feminist cries about. It looks like a stupid flyer done for shock-funny purposes. Especially in contrast to the even stupider "man can stop rape" posters at every university. The very reason this poster was probably done is because of how ridiculously 'shocking' even mentioning the word 'rape' has become in Western society. Unfortunately, these students will probably be punished far more severely than they should be.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:17 PM
2

Wow, this is so spot on and about as brilliant as you can get! I wish I could upvote you more than once for this.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:57 PM
5

Family Guy (like all other 'shock-funny' comedy shows) pokes fun of a plethora of 'taboo' issues. They may make jokes about murder, theft, genocide, rape (particularly male rape) but for some straaaaange reason, feminists only care when they make 'rape jokes' about women.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:51 PM
7

You have every right to be angry. Let me tell you that you are certainly not alone and the MRM is getting larger everyday because of feminists twits like your sociology professor.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:47 PM
-3

"Cringe-worthy experience" and feminist are about as close as Nazism and Hitler.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:43 PM
1

The link is still up... but if you mean my comment, here it is.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:33 PM
3

Look at it now :) And to make matters even better, the OP told me that he is visiting his doctor today and is filing a suit if he gets bad news. Helping men and raising awareness to violence against men all in one :)
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:32 PM
10

You have great parents!
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:11 AM
2

Women utilize more health care services than men which is why their insurance is higher (to cover the costs of the services they utilize, obviously). Considering the fact that women live an average of 5 years or so longer than men, I think that men's health needs a bit more talk than the constant pandering to women's health (particularly in the political left in the U.S. and most Western nations). Men pay more than women in car insurance because they tend to drive more (which leads to more accid…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 10:32 AM
1

It may've changed since I was the first one to write 'file an assault charge', but there are still plenty of comments inquiring more into why he did to 'deserve it' than giving him advice.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 10:17 AM
5

Agreed, let's help this poor man attain justice. r/MR should be about helping men.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:35 AM
4

What a bunch of freaks...
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:01 AM
2

Funny, I'd love to hear the shitstorm in r/feminisms or any of the shithole SRS subreddits had this been a male magazine stating how lowly women's brains operated during sex.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:52 AM
1

Oh, I know it's ridiculous, but at least they TRIED to get rid of this barbaric act. The temporary ban definitely provoked a lot of thoughts into people's heads around the world about MGM.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:46 AM
1

First a circumcision ban and now this. I now know why I keep getting told that Germany is the best country in all of Europe...
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:25 PM
2

There's a great number of countries where women do actually have less rights then men do, and I don't think it's unfortunate that we try to equalize things in areas which need equalizing. We don't need 'feminism' to 'equalize' things. The problem with feminism is that it doesn't just 'promote womens rights', but is completely chock full of hateful rhetoric and social science theories that are cancerous to society. When feminism catches on, it turns into what you see today. It is possible to prom…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:41 PM
1

Holy fuck, that's an amazing analogy! Good work!
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:00 AM
1

There are Canadian provinces where the rate of infant circumcision is in the single numbers. If this is true, this makes me VERY happy.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:49 PM
2

I'm not religious, but GOD BLESS these people.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:48 PM
1

Get lost, troll.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:49 PM
1

Here have some more negative karma for defending feminist scum promoting male genital mutilation, dipshit :)
/r/MensRights05/10/12 09:10 AM
1

SRS TROLL: PLEASE DOWNVOTE AND IGNORE
/r/MensRights05/10/12 09:08 AM
15

You know... maybe it's just me... but when I hear an organization claims its 'gender equality', it's sort of uh... EXPECTED of them to defend 'gender equality'. The fact that only 'some feminists' protest in favor of forbidding male genital mutilation (while ALL are in favor of forbidding female genital mutilation) shows exactly how full of shit their movement is.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:04 AM
2

Just watched the whole thing... Awesome and hilarious documentary. Penn and Teller is great, especially their bit on circumcision.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:06 AM
13

Disgusting. Definitely saddening news. I'm listening for the feminist outcry but all I can hear are crickets...
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:54 AM
4

Yeah, I was thinking that on second glance.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:06 AM
2

https://www.facebook.com/groups/354056021282233/?ref=ts&fref=ts We've been trying for some time now...
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:34 PM
14

EXACTLY. What kind of 'legitimate' institution writes something like "you should be aware that to date, PotentialPredators.com has never lost a case". I guarantee this is run by a bunch of bullying, fear-mongering feminist scum. This should really be at the top, I have a feeling LOTS of awareness can get this horrible website taken down.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:28 PM
2

Answer: Never
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:23 PM
3

It's funny you mention this, because I recently got banned from r/feminism. I will admit that the mod, demmian, is significantly better than the SRS and feminisms scum but it's amazing how simply offering a different opinion and asking for answers for feminism's actions will get you banned. This is the BIGGEST problem with feminists, they don't want to answer for their wrongdoings. They just ignore them and only focus on womens 'issues' (no matter how minuscule) and pretend that they're the only…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:13 PM
1

Congrats on winning the primary! I'll certainly try to alert those in NH :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:01 PM
1

Oh, and just from the frontpage today: http://i.imgur.com/9wFvN.jpg This is clearly not offensive in the least. Only rapists should be offended by this!
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:30 PM
4

It is about time that we got some real political allies! The larger our movement gets, the more inevitable it becomes that we are to become political. Please let us know how we can help vote you in :)
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:28 PM
1

Another point I forgot to mention. Aside from the points I gave about why lying to the public about rape statistics is VERY harmful, remember that MEN are more often the victims of violence than women are by both men AND women. Issues like these get ignored and trampled on when you pretend that violence against women is some sort of epidemic. When we try to present our issues, feminists respond with why we need to focus our attention to the newly founded 'rape' epidemic in the Western world rath…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:20 PM
1

You were saying that 1 in 4 women had been raped according to the stats, then said that 1 in 4 women in their lifetime had been raped, been an "attempted rape", been sexually assaulted or an attempted sexual assault. I certainly said no such thing. I just don't understand what these 'radical hateful feminist organizations' have to gain from falsely inflating rape statistics. I don't understand why you can't 'understand' what they have to gain. Do you think people are going to give an organizatio…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:59 PM
1

Another reminder, please direct all SRS-idiocy to r/antiSRS.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:02 AM
1

You are rude and use too many inflated buzz-words for me to take you really seriously. fear-mongering? 'hateful feminist department'? I'm just trying to talk about college surveys, you don't have to respond like I'm threatening you and your firstborn with some crazed feminist army behind me. Well, I apologize if you consider 'fear-mongering' and 'hateful feminist department' to be 'rude words'. I do tend to get quite argumentative, but I didn't (and still don't) really consider those terms to be…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:50 AM
1

whoa, you would have witnessed it? are you inside of bathrooms at parties, just waiting? Lol, how did I know already that that statement would set you off? do you have cameras in bedrooms or on couches late at night when someone is passed out? do you have a personal surveillance team? No, but I have been partying for a significant portion of my life and have slept over NUMEROUS times at house parties of all sorts and known a significant amount of women who've done the same. Of course, I don't ha…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:34 AM
1

they do anonymous surveys, apparently people are more likely to tell you their secrets if they cannot be linked back to them. There are ALOT of factors at play here. Surveys can be especially flawed since many feminist surveys consider 'rape' to be pretty much anything involving sex and disdain from a woman. Christina Hoff Sommer's mentioned awhile ago one of the 'anonymous survey' questions which literally worded rape as having sex while under the influence of drugs/alcohol. If a woman answered…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:40 AM
0

Rofl, lookie here... more idiotic feminist scum. Since we are so 'intentionally blind and intellectually dishonest', why don't you tell me how this bullshit '90% of rapes are unreported' estimation is derived? Do you not understand how anybody can make up some nonsense about how x % of rapes are unreported? How the hell is anybody going to record/estimate how many rapes are 'unreported' if they are NEVER REPORTED??
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:05 AM
5

TIL what Patriarchy is - a one-way valve for blame. When women are oppressed, that's Patriarchy, in which all men are complicit and share the burden of shame. When men are oppressed, that's Patriarchy, in which all men are complicit and share the burden of shame. We call that a 'scapegoat' :)
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:15 PM
1

"When men feel that they discriminated against due to a hateful gender-supremacist movement, it's actually because they haven't been indoctrinated enough by a social-science theory that was made up by the same hateful gender-supremacist movement." Allen G Johnson, Mangina-Extroadinaire
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:14 PM
1

Absolutely. I refuse to align myself with the atheist community if that hateful morons like Skepchick's rhetoric is considered even somewhat legitimate.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:59 PM
2

It's completely amazing and disgusting at the same time. I have yet to read any textbook that has claimed that men were better than women at ANYTHING positive. This is why the MRM needs to exist.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:56 PM
1

I couldn't care less what the 'definition' of feminism is. The 'definition' was created by feminists who (like any other political group) are going to make their goals/inhibitions appear to be far BETTER than they actually are. To understand a movement, you DO NOT utilize the movements OWN definition. You analyze/assess the actions of the movement. I just had a conversation with a feminist who (when I brought up the 'definition' of feminism of proof that feminists must also address issues of men…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:50 PM
2

It depends. If the people at the TOP of the food chain in the MRA world started saying it and its followers (us) ignored it / didn't call them out (like the feminists do in their movement), then yes. If this happened, I would remove myself and all connection from the MRA community. However, as you can see, there is VERY FEW of us that act this way. MRA's also actually police their movement and are very quick to call each other out unlike feminists.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:45 PM
1

I support the general THEORY of atheism since I am non-religious, but I don't call myself an atheist because I refuse to support the overtly feminist and 'pretentious, pseudointellectual douchebags'. If I see a movement going that a way I dislike than I, as anybody should, remove myself from that movement. Sort of like supporting women's rights, without supporting feminism.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:41 PM
19

Since we're all getting VERY tired of saying it... No True Scotsman
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:44 AM
0

I don't see the purpose of supporting feminism if you're not going to support what it does to people in actuality. It's like supporting a theory because you think it will work out great, then when it's implemented and doesn't work out great, still support the 'theory'. Feminists ARE what feminism creates. If you think that hate-mongering feminists are some strange anomaly, then you know VERY little about feminist 'logic' and the hateful social-science theory which revolves around it.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:40 AM
4

I'm going to assume that you're new here. "/s" means 'sarcasm'. It's a joke and I'm mocking the typical feminist nonsense. I'm obviously 100% in agreement with your statement.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:36 AM
6

Because they're for 'gender-equality'! Duh! /s Feminists are scum.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:19 AM
2

Do you honestly think that splitting up OUR MOVEMENT is doing any good to our MOVEMENT? If you honestly think that the comments here are 'misogynistic, transphobic, homophobic, boorish" or "rude", then you are either VERY stupid or VERY emasculated. I've been on this subreddit for over a year now and I can count on one hand the comments I've read that matched your description. People need to vent sometimes. That's what oppressed people generally do.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:18 AM
3

Please don't suggest that feminst-sympathizing shit-hole of a subreddit r/OneY. That place was practically a 'SRS-lite' when I was subscribed there.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:29 AM
5

Absolutely disgusting and appalling. Feminists are truly a cancerous lot.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:14 AM
8

Hey guys, I just got an epiphany. Murder is far worst than rape. That means that rape should be legalized and not looked upon anywhere near as bad as murder! Boy, what a smartie I am! :)
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:08 AM
6

Hey, where are all of you feminist-apologists now? It's so funny how we have tons of these idiots roaming this subreddit talking up how feminism is about 'equality' and 'genital integrity'. Where the hell are you cowards now? First that Jezebel article was published promoting this and now you have the OTHER biggest feminist website posting it? Seriously, I'm starting to believe that the feminist-apologists on this subreddit are even WORST than the feminists themselves.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:06 AM
-1

The men in my life and the men's rights web sites I read have never been short of brutally honest about the reality of how my life, work and especially my relationship with my wife would be. They don't lie to me and so I don't lie to myself. This is, essentially, amongst the BEST things about the men's rights movement. MRA's don't bullshit and sugar-coat like feminists do. We tell things the WAY they are regardless of if they 'hurt peoples feelings' or not. If the world ran this way and without …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:58 AM
1

Dude, that shit was from last year... you probably have a better chance of finding it over me. Our responses got posted on Manboobz website as 'hate' since we were instigating a web response to this and 'promoting' 4chan's behavior.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:49 AM
43

This was from last year. 4chan raided her facebook along with other 'justiceporn-like' shenanigans.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:10 PM
1

I'd MUCH rather just get rid of hateful feminist organizations like "Take Back the Night" rather than point out a couple random stats about violence against men.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:13 PM
3

Well, what is considered to be a 'non-issue' is in the eye of the beholder. I consider almost all of feminist 'issues' to be non-issues or fallacies. I don't think halloween costumes are huge men's issues (especially considering the HUGE issues we already have to address), but I do also believe that a lot of male sexuality and body image is pushed upon boys at a young age and nobody protects them. However, the minute a 'body image issue' comes up for a female then it's all over the news. This is…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:29 AM
3

Well, that goes hand-in-hand with my point. If dressing up children as 'body-builders' with large 'muscles', then why is it wrong for a little girl to dress up as 'model' with large 'breasts'? These two examples go hand-in-hand, but one is considered to be VERY immoral even though they push the same 'body-image' issues.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:52 PM
2

It shouldn't surprise you when you realize you live in a culture which is constantly pandering to violence against women (like the above nonsensical 'statistics'), showcasing violence against men to be 'funny' (no matter how harmful/debilitation/humiliating it can be to a man) and have entire television channels like 'Lifetime' which rely ENTIRELY on re-runs of shows depicting men as aggressors and women as victims.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:45 PM
6

The one time I was actually impressed with the feminized-psychology course I took in high school was when the teacher asked which gender had the most incidents of violence committed against and EVERYBODY said 'women'. When he revealed it was really 'men', everybody had a shocked/confused look on their face. Definitely the best day I ever had in that class.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:28 AM
3

Even though I agree with what you're saying there's two points I'd like to bring up. 1) If I recall correctly from my childhood, I don't remember YOUNG girls (around the boys age in that costume) wearing 'skimpy' clothing nor dressing up as 'models'. 2) Even though certain female characters have bigger breasts, I don't remember any little girls wearing 'fake boobs'. I could not even imagine the outcry if a 7 year old girl received a costume with fake tits.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:12 AM
9

AWESOME news. This 'gender quota' is so unbelievably sexist and disgusting. Yet, I can assure you that 10/10 of those 'gender-egalitarian' feminists will think this is a completely just law.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:52 AM
1

It's about goddamn time that the cancer that kills more people every year and goes after the EXACT people not only playing the sport but ALSO primarily watching the sport is finally addressed.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:30 PM
1

You're very welcome. It's certainly nice to see a woman who had the misfortune of having abusive men in her life not become (or remain) a man-hating feminist.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:22 PM
1

I apologize for you feeling that way and what happened to the female figure(s) in your life. There are also many men who feel the same powerlessness from women in Western society. I just think that much of what feminism actually creates more 'negative energy' by dwelling on biological differences like this rather than realizing that men and women are different. As for women being called 'stupid sluts', men are also shamed as 'horny assholes who only think with their little head'. Also (going int…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:05 PM
2

I spent many years struggling with the fact that as a woman I'm weaker. That's why I said I once hated and envied men. Well, one thing I've never understood is why it's so hard for many women to grasp that men are BETTER at things than them. I can't even turn on the television without hearing about how 'good' women are at something else over women. This is one of the biggest harms of feminism, in my honest opinion, since instead of reasoning with biology they just make up theories about why sexu…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:38 PM
2

Speaking for the USA, we don't require anyone to go to war. Is that why I, as a male, had to sign up for a mandatory draft at 18 or I would get 5 years in prison + $250,000 fine when you don't? Sounds like it's quite the requirement to me... Many other countries around the world are the same. Let's see what happens when a country actually attacks them. It's easy to point this out in a modern Western nation which is not being seriously attacked, but history shows EXACTLY what happens to men when …
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:12 PM
2

Men and women now serve in the military in many countries without being forced to as I understand it. WITHOUT 'being forced to', is correct. Their male counterparts aren't so lucky. I believe women in the military is due to being socialized differently now. Women are not as physically efficient as males in any regard. No amount of 'socialization' or feminist hate speech will change this. I believe women are less likely to vote for wars in the first place. That's just a belief. Queen Elizabeth wa…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:44 PM
2

Most of what I've thought about as being sad parts of the past and present, I haven't put a gender to if it was mostly men who struggled with it. I'm trying. I see that and applaud you for seeking views different than yours. Anyway, I will continue to think its sad that women were not allowed to vote. And of course women had responsibility, to their families and children at least if not their paid jobs. I don't think you understand what I mean by 'responsibility'. Women DID NOT have the RESPONSI…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:51 PM
3

Because it's not particularly 'sad' that women couldn't vote given the circumstances. Men could not vote throughout almost all of history as well and got the universal right to vote around the same time women did. Also, women had no RESPONSIBILITY which is why they didn't have the RIGHT to vote. Yet, you never hear anybody complain about how 'sad' it is that men couldn't vote and were forced to die in wars since the beginning of time. If you looked at a (relatively) unbiased view of history rath…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:27 PM
1

It's quite disgusting to see people write such nasty things about somebody who has done SO MUCH for our movement on here. Paul Elam and GWW make the EXACT same claims, but I never hear anybody trash GWW (as they shouldn't, of course). There needs to be more people with a backbone to fight the people who ACTUALLY say incendiary things like Elam/GWW/Jto/etc and less of the feminist apologists who overlook the sheer harm that feminism is doing and constantly criticize every word of the MRM.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:13 AM
3

Later in the class she said that women should stay home and take care of children while the husband has a job. Because "women just aren't as good at math and business as men are, and guys can't take care of kids". Out of curiosity, how well did the class respond to this statement compared to the last?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:30 AM
1

Maybe, but as much as feminists tend to despise MRAs they don't needlessly focus on them and make every other topic about them for good reason. Maybe it's because feminism has done SIGNIFICANTLY more harm to men's issues/rights than the MRM has EVER done to feminism. Here is a video of feminists literally slashing down posters that simply state that "men should also have rights" then running away when the cops show up. Still convinced that we shouldn't focus on 'exposing' feminists?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:24 AM
5

I agree with you to a degree, but I believe that these idiotic articles do us a lot of good by showcasing how completely irrational and hateful modern feminism is. When people keep seeing the driveling patterns of the feminist, then they begin to notice how credible our movement really is.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:09 AM
2

Though it's sad that it took so long for women's suffrage. Funny thing though... only MEN still have to sign up for the draft. It's hard to feel 'so sad' for the oppressed women of the past when their husbands/fathers/sons were the ones actually being FORCED to die in war. I don't mean to sound mean here, but I honestly cannot fathom how feminists sit around here crying about not 'being able to vote' (even though most men couldn't vote either, anyways) when MEN were the ones actually shoveled to…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:57 AM
3

Don't forget "misogyny in video games"!
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:56 AM
8

Feminist hate-mongering as usual. The men's rights group in Vancouver simply PUT UP POSTERS and the feminist bigots were seen tearing DOWN these posters. Yet, of course the delusional feminists over at Jezebel are going to 'justify' it by plastering about how "MISOGYNISTIC!!!!111" it is to put up posters explaining the plight of men. Feminists will literally justify anything. They are a very depraved and sick group indeed.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:53 AM
2

Male Circumcision - "Just a piece of skin you don't need, unlike that evil, vile, oppressive FGM!!11" Female Circumcision - "Horribly oppressive and cruel. Ban on ALL POSSIBLE FORMS of it!" Abortion - "It's a woman's body, it's her choiiiice!" Prostitution - "Oppresses and controls women's bodies for male sexual satisfaction! Completely evil, BAN ON ALL POSSIBLE FORMS OF IT!" Good on the Danes for not supporting this complete inconsistency that is feminist 'ideology'. Hope to hear more news abou…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:43 AM
3

I'm sure you know this already, but almost all of the "strong independent women" I've witnessed do anything BUT "own up to their behavior and take responsibility for their lives".
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:31 AM
1

Thank you! Feels like I'm talking to a wall sometimes...
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:12 AM
9

Yay for harmless feminism guise! Let's all support these hate-mongers since it's sooo obvious they care about gender equality :)
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:10 AM
1

So, what? They obviously aren't gender identicals since you can have SEX without a clitoris. Explain to me how a man is going to have penetrative sex with a woman if he doesn't have a penis?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:08 AM
4

I agree 100%. It's disgusting hearing the feminist apologists on this subreddit downplaying the numerous horrors and hate-mongering of feminism. What do you cowards have to say about this? Oh, let me guess? Not all feminists are like that?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:30 AM
18

I wonder how many of the so-called "not like that" feminists out there are fighting these idiots rather than aligning themselves to the same movement. Maybe it's just me, but it just seeeeems to me that these so called "gender-egalitarian" feminists don't give two shits about "gender-equality".
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:18 AM
1

This is definitely a step in the right direction!
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:14 AM
2

As bad as this behavior is, it's worse that it doesn't happen to women as often as to men I don't think I've heard of a single instance of this happening to a woman. Ever.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:46 AM
26

The fact that ANYBODY can actually be SO offended by that poster shows EXACTLY why feminism is a hate movement. It disgusts me that we have people on this VERY subreddit defending feminism when THIS is how they view men's rights. Cowards at best.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:05 AM
4

Go away SRS-troll.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:03 AM
1

Well to be more accurate removal of the penis is akin to removal of the clitoris No. The clitoris is the equivalent of the glans penis or penis head. Cutting off a penis disallows a man to have sex. Cutting off a clitoris does NOT disallow a woman to have sex, it just significantly desensitizes the pleasure.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:01 AM
1

Someone send this to Hugo Schwyzer and David Futrelle! I'd love to hear those moron's responses to this :)
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:58 AM
0

What my "little friends" and I are trying to get across is that we are not all like that. Once again, NAFALT/ No True Scotsman fallacy. For the millionth time, it does NOT matter that you and your small circle of feminist pals aren't 'like that', since the very MOVEMENT you align yourself with is 'like that'. It's literally akin to me saying that me and my group of pro-Nazism friends aren't "like that" since not all Nazi's think alike. The fact that I align myself with a hateful ideology does no…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:50 AM
1

Well, people aren't going to 'ditch Feminism' unless they're actually EDUCATED about it. If there isn't a force FIGHTING feminism, then where is anybody going to actually LEARN about the overwhelmingly negative effects of feminism?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:38 AM
0

Simple as that. I agree that this world will try to force ideas of what is means to be a man (that are often conflicting and confusing) and if he doesn't fit these goal perfectly, they will tear him down. Feminism will do SIGNIFICANTLY MORE to 'tear him down' than any gender roles will.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:40 AM
1

"Guys, we have a problem" Funny... You'd figure that if he wanted to address 'guys', this emasculated shrivel wouldn't post it on one of the most man-hating websites. Then again, you can't expect much reasoning skills from a male feminist.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:33 AM
1

Wow, that subreddit is disgusting. The reason is dis-align myself from the atheist movement is because it is riddled with feminism which is, essentially, another religion. Reading the 'posts' on that filthy subreddit prove this exactly.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:29 AM
3

Out of complete curiosity, how much of an asshole do you think you'd be if you lost roughly $400 million simply because of a divorce?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:15 AM
6

More people need to know about this man.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:05 AM
3

It may be very well be, but it wouldn't be the first time feminist's have discussed practicing gender eugenics.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:01 AM
14

OMG YOU RAPE APOLOGIST! How can you defend a rapist like that? DON'T YOU KNOW WE LIVE IN A RAPE CULTURE? It's so obvious that she was being raped because you know... there is no other reason why a woman would hurt another human being. HE TOTALLY DESERVED IT and you're a misogynist for suggesting otherwise! /s
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:58 AM
3

Excellent letter, Percy. More people need to fight against hateful feminist-disguised organizations such as this. These people should not be at the forefront of ANY organization, let alone ones that are designated to help humanity.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:56 AM
0

To me, a feminist is someone who believes in equal rights and opportunities for women and men. This is the dictionary definition of feminism. Then why do feminist's overtly focus on privileging women over men? Why don't feminists EVER protest or do virtually ANYTHING for men's issues, especially in correlation to how grossly they inflate women's issues? The women you are describing are not feminists, they are misandrists.. or femi-nazis if you prefer. NAFALT. If these aren't 'feminists', then wh…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:03 AM
25

Feminist white-knight scum. There is literally ZERO truth in this entire article. If anybody thinks the feminism is not harmful, take one look at what it has turned this 'man' into.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:44 PM
2

Thank you! Honestly, the fact that you support us and understand what feminism has done/ is doing is more than we can ask for :)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:40 PM
-1

Everybody here already posted the direct hypocrisy in your statement, so I don't see why I need to reiterate what's already been repeated to you. The purpose of the 'game' was to show you that there are VERY FEW (if any) of these supposed 'vile misogynists' in our movement, whereas there are TONS of 'vile misandrists' within your movement. Here is one that was found dead about a week ago. Sitting around and trying to pretend that feminism and the MRM have anywhere NEAR the same level of hate-mon…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:38 PM
8

This is exactly why the MRM is so important and crucial in the Western world. Many people think that solution to gender equality is MORE feminism, but in reality, feminism will only make ALL of these issues far WORSE. I really wish there were more people like you around.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:25 PM
-1

I was raised by feminists and honestly I find the "man hating feminist" to exist only in the fringe, much like how in the men's rights movement there are vile misogynists but I wouldn't paint the whole movement as misogynist. Alright, buddy. Let's play a game. You show me some of these supposed outspoken 'vile misogynists' within our group and we'll post double the outspoken feminist hate-mongerers. I apologize that you were raised by hateful people, but let's not pretend that aligning yourself …
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:12 PM
9

I no longer call myself a Feminist, I'd rather not be associated with those crazies. You know, it's so funny when I read all of these feminist posts giving the same NAFALT arguments time and time again when their movement steps out of line. There is no amount of bad behavior that'll teach these nimrod's how horribly hateful their movement truly is. They are in a constant state of belief in which feminism is the 'harmless' support system they had at their university. Here's a personal 'thank you'…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:08 PM
1

I don't think you understood the above claim. When I gave the two scenarios; these are the two scenarios of Obama. You said that you liked to think that he was just an ignoramus and is only catering to women for votes. I gave the scenario in which he WAS and in which he ISN'T. Neither of them are ones I'd like to have in office.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:40 PM
0

Well, I was talking about the Romney vs Obama debate. I'm not a fan of Romney, but I certainly prefer him over the white-knighting and radical-feminist hate machine Gynobama.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:55 PM
1

You're correct, but you DO vote for the lesser evil.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:49 PM
15

This is what I literally read in my head when I see one of these nonsense ad's.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:44 PM
-1

Remember how his wife scolded him for calling Father's Day a "Forgotten Holiday"? Nope, I do not actually. I have a strong feeling that he didn't do a whole lot more than say "Sorry dear", and go on to chastize 'deadbeat' fathers on fathers day like he did in previous years. This sort of attitude is NOT symbolic of a strong leader and is NOT the kind of person I want running a country. Especially as a MAN. I'd like to think that he knows what he is saying is misandric and is only really saying i…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:24 PM
0

I tend to respect those who support MY RIGHTS, rather than a feminist cesspool. So yes, it is a BIG reason, as it should be for any man.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:12 PM
2

You have to be fairly naive to think that the Republicans are ANYWHERE near the same playing field in terms of feminist hate speech as the Democrats.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:10 PM
1

Because it ISN'T a discussion, especially if you are studying a major which mainly (supposedly) consists of issues surrounding GENDER EQUALITY. How you can possibly claim to be for 'gender equality' and then turn around and say that it's COMPLETELY OKAY for a baby boy to have the tip of his penis cut off, but of course, any remotely similar procedure conducted on a woman (even if she consents) is "cruel", "oppressive" and "barbaric. Here is how a discussion on male circumcision should look like?…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:08 PM
3

I have a feeling this nitwit doesn't care much about the ETHICS behind circumcision either. Another gynocrat for America!
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:15 AM
0

More white-knightery and feminist hate speech from the political left. Precisely why I'll be voting Republican.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:37 AM
0

I've noticed this for years. VERY happy somebody brought this up.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:22 AM
1

Goddamn male privilege! Goddamn Patriarchy! Why won't you let women be forced to sign up to die in war like the rest of us??!!
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:15 AM
1

Or just less "women's and gender studies" professors to begin with. If you claim to be a professor of "gender studies", yet still think that male genital mutilation is a 'discussion' to be had then you know NOTHING about 'gender equality'. The hypocrisy of feminism makes me sick.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:12 AM
1

This is utterly fucking disgusting. Where are all of those worthless feminists now? Suddenly, they don't seem to care so much about gender equality or genital integrity.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:59 AM
2

I remember seeing this show about 5-6 years ago and just thinking to myself and realized from his show to always be aware of those who think they're the most 'morally-conscious'. This show certainly cements my concerns.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:23 PM
5

Excellent! I must say it's always great seeing gay's come over and join the ideology that works on equalizing their own gender rather than the hate-fueled one which most of them end up joining.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:21 PM
5

A man finds a woman's body attractive - OBJECTICATION!!111 A woman finds a man's body attractive - Simple female fun! A woman finds a man's bank account attractive - Simply female fun!
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:47 PM
8

Typical scumbaggery from journalists. I'd love to see what brilliant examples they claim for AVfM supporting 'rapists'.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:45 PM
1

"If you got pregnant, it's your own damn fault" = Oppression "If he got her pregnant, it's his own damn fault" = Justice
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:37 PM
0

She's protesting the fact that if she were male, she'd have no problems were she to get pregnant but not want to have the baby. Which, to be fair, is probably true. Hmm.. You mean besides the fact that men have NO CHOICE whatsoever? No reproductive rights whatsoever? No matter which of these legislatures passes, men will still NOT have reproductive rights. Let's not pretend this idiot is right about anything and is anything but a delusional feminist.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:35 PM
1

The best is when they try to shame us with that "wow, you're angry" speech. Yes, moron, people who're actually oppressed and don't have massive organizations to protect them are generally uh... angry.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:30 PM
1

It's quite interesting how feminists lose their shit over supposed 'objectification', yet they have absolutely no problem making fun of male genitals. Take a look at the shriveling emasculating losers over at r/SRS, they complain non-stop about non-issues like 'objectification', yet have no problem posting pictures of dildos all over the place on their shit-subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:21 PM
1

Funny how you morons have the same "OH NOEZ CONGRESS IS MOSTLY MALE = OPPRESSION!!!111" argument. Yes, so what that it's only male? Why don't you give me the names of politicians that are actually PROMOTING MEN'S RIGHTS rather than WOMEN'S RIGHTS? All these 'evil, male' politicians seem to be more focused on giving free hand-outs to women than they are towards promoting the rights of men. Puts a bit of a damper on your little 'argument' here, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:11 PM
1

LOL, I love how you always end your comments with "I hope you are (insert insult here) the rest of your life, you coward." Classy. Glad, you like it. If I had to guess why you hate women, I'd say either a) no woman worth a damn has ever given you the time of day because she realised that you're worthless piece of mysogynistic shit. or b) your wife left you for being a mysogynistic piece of shit and she's sucking you dry financially while not allowing you to see your kids. I like how you call me …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 10:06 PM
0

You're right, I couldn't give a shit about a group that states that male circumcision is 'advised' and 'harmless'. Are you actually suggesting that the study you 'found' here is anywhere NEAR the level of the studies conducted on MALE CIRCUMCISION? Do you not understand how politics and lobbyists effect these studies? Maybe you don't hear about new studies because FGM has already been condemned by the UN and most research these days is on the phenomenon itself and what progress is being made in …
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:16 AM
5

Wow. You really hate women, don't you? Or do you just hate women who happen to have an opinion that differs from your own?? Hahaha! Hey dipshit, how about you EXPLAIN to me why I 'hate women'? Oh, let me guess? Because I disagree with your bullshit arguments? Is that why YOU'RE the one getting downvoted here? If anybody here is sexist, its YOU. YOU are the one undermining our genital mutilation, you tard. Now get bent. I love how you brought rape up into this conversation, is that your mysogynis…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:06 AM
2

For one, I refuse to use political terms like "pro-choice" or "pro-life". I'm mostly pro-abortion, but I fully understand where anti-abortionists are coming from. The political left makes up the "War on Women" and calls any moral decisions on abortion that are against their views "controlling womens bodies". This is, of course, just feminist nonsense designed to get women to vote for their party (and damn, if this last election has ever proven the effectiveness of playing on feminists stupidity)…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:47 AM
1

Please address the rest of my questions. This is extremely vague.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:38 AM
6

How exactly am I a coward? Because everybody would know your reaction if this was performed on a girl, you coward. I've actually watched that as well. And it wasn't being performed on a baby, she was probably 10 or so, and since it's illegal it wasn't done by a doctor, no anelgesics were administered, and the instruments weren't sterilized, which is much more horrifying in my opinion. At least the baby boy had pain killers, a skilled doctor, and won't remember - he'll also still be able to have …
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:36 AM
1

Uh no. WHO has NEVER done ANY STUDIES on female circumcision. Just because they write "has no health benefits" doesn't mean that there was actual STUDIES done it. They just haven't FOUND HEALTH BENEFITS because there has NEVER BEEN ANY CONCLUSIVE STUDIES CONDUCTED. Why are there constantly studies coming out about the effects of male circumcision on males but NEVER ANY on females? What's wrong with studying the actual victims of the practice? You don't think women talking about their complete la…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:32 AM
3

I'd love to see one on male genital mutilation sometime. I bet this mangina never thought of that. Also, abortion is a MORAL issue, not necessarily a 'sole womans issue' which feminists and gynocrats like to pretend.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:03 AM
3

I'd love to see how 'not exactly horrifying' you'd find a video of a girl being circumcised. Even if the baby 'barely made a peep', I'd bet you'd call for the death of the circumciser, you coward.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:01 AM
12

You can't be this illiterate. I did say "as long as it's legal". So, if female circumcision was legal, then it's all fine and dandy? Laws change all the time, you nitwit, you can't judge the MORALITY of EVERYTHING by the current "laws" in place. Laws are constantly under scrutiny, such as the one on male circumcision. Take a glance into what Germany is doing about it (but that might involve you actually reading something). Plus female circumcision isn't in the same ballpark as circumcision. Remo…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:57 AM
0

I think what they mean aren't "women's studies grade" papers on female circumcision, but actual LEGITIMATE scientific studies on the positive/negative effects of female circumcision. Anybody can write some abstract by observing some women in some culture, but every time there has been some scientific research done on female circumcision feminists vehemently opposed it and got it cancelled. There has been thousands done on male circumcision, but as far as I know, none on female circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:48 AM
3

To be fair, if you look up the arguments for female circumcision, you'll find out that they literally have the IDENTICAL arguments that proponents of male circumcision do: "God wants us to do it", it's cleaner, it can prevent diseases, it helps with hygiene, it looks better, it's tradition/culture/etc.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:45 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_soldier#Africa
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:43 AM
5

In short, no. What separates feminism and the MRM are the THEORIES which each entity holds. Feminism is chalk full of social-science theory like "patriarchy" and "male privilege" which is VERY detrimental to men and men's rights. Very few MRA's (as you'll find here) are against "a womans right to choose" or, non-politcally, abortion. However, abortion is actually more of a issue of morality rather than just a straight 'womans issue'.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:37 AM
3

Out of curiosity. Can you please explain to me and the others on this board why exactly you consider yourself a 'feminism'? Since you've been a lurker, I figure you've realized the sheer harm that feminism has caused to men (even if you've only scratched the surface thus far)? If you are so in support of men's rights and our issues, what makes you want to support a movement and group of organizations that literally wish nothing more than to see us and "mens rights" crumble to the ground? Also, d…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:33 AM
10

Well if that's the case, then religious female circumcision should be legalized according to you now shouldn't it? How about some nice preteen boob jobs too? You know, since parents control absolutely everything about their childrens' lives? You can't be this stupid.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:19 AM
1

If I recall correctly, she said "Answer him", which made absolutely no sense in the context of the question he was asking. It's strongly possible he misheard her (since he said that she said "answer him") or that she didn't understand the context she meant it in. EDIT: Also, I don't know if it was a 'heckler', since he asked the crowd a question and she responded.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:14 AM
1

Being able to control and limit men's sexuality is a very large part of feminism. Making prostitution illegal is a HUGE way that this is done.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:09 PM
1

Does Christopher Titus bring up men's issues at all? It's been a long time since I've seen any of his material.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:08 PM
1

That certainly disappointed me too, but in the stand up he mentions that there are certainly 'reasons' that woman can be hit. He also discusses this paradox along with questioning why women are the only ones who people 'question' when they do bad shit. He was just trying to appeal to the audience since he didn't want to be written off as a 'woman-hater'. However, he has more courage than ANYBODY I've ever seen whose brought up MRM-related issues. Him and Mark Rudov are both up there.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:38 PM
3

I 100% agree. His last stand-up was a bit funnier, but this one was a bit more 'political'. He literally goes on about almost all of the issues we discuss here. The MRM is only going to spread if more people know about our issues, rather than hear Obama yap on all day about how 'under-privileged' Western women are.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:35 PM
1

It doesn't really matter what you want, quite frankly. Feminism is what it is and the name FEMINISM in of itself is not synonymous with 'equality', so I don't know why you want it to be. "Egalitarian" is a FAR better term and much more adequately describes what we should be aiming at.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:31 PM
-2

My bad, fixed.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:29 PM
11

"Oh, just man up you bunch of whiners! Everybody knows that its only 'mutilation' when it happens to women! When it happens to men, its just a useless flap of skin. There are much more important issues in the world we should be addressing like misogyny in video games and comedians making rape jokes against hecklers." -Your average feminist
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:33 AM
2

Always happy to see the morons over at /r/SRS help bring more MRA's in :)
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:30 AM
1

Jezebel has sparked much controversy among both feminists and MRAs for many things, most notably the promoting of negative attitude towards men and writing purposely controversial articles to achieve page views. Um... Considering Jezebel is considered to be one of the biggest internet outlets for feminism, I have a STRONG feeling that most feminists don't think it's very 'controversial'. I have also never heard/seen/read of a feminist writing ANYTHING negative about Jezebel. Not saying it's neve…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:25 AM
2

That sounds like feminist justice to me!
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:19 AM
1

Absolutely appalling. More of the world needs to see this shit and see for themselves how absolutely cancerous and dangerous feminism is.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:10 AM
3

Awesome article. It has certainly cemented my respect for Mr. Galloway.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:02 AM
0

Are you mentally retarded or something? Jezebel is a 'controversial blog'? Feministing and Jezebel are the fucking BIGGEST feminist WEBSITES (not BLOGS) on the internet, you nitwit. And if you READ THE COMMENTS, you'll see that there are ALOT who could give two shits about male genital mutilation. But oh hey, looks like you just posted up this question on r/feminism and are going to pretend like a few positive responses completely validates one of the BIGGEST FEMINIST WEBSITES around posting thi…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 03:52 AM
17

I had a feminist moron try to tell me that "Akin" is an MRA today. Yes, really.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:33 PM
5

For some straaange reason, I have a feeling that feminists had absolutely NOTHING to do with this.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:32 PM
11

For any of those still believing that feminism is all about 'sweet gender equality', take a CLOSE look at what happens to males (and females) who dwelve into its rhetoric. THIS RIGHT HERE folks is the RESULT of a man whose swallowed ALL of feminism's rhetoric. If you think feminism is not 'harmful', then you are only kidding yourself.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:27 PM
2

I live in the same state as John Hopkins, so there goes your little 'down under' argument. Just because its a great medical school DOES NOT mean that there aren't lobbyists and political influences which help 'create' views. Circumcision has a huge lobby (its a billion dollar industry) and it is particularly strong in the United States. I couldn't give a rats ass how well a school is ranked. EVERY OTHER MEDICAL ASSOCIATION aside from the U.S. and Israel is AGAINST circumcision and I'll take thei…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:32 PM
5

Also, most feminists I've met don't give two shits about male circumcision, or are against it but simply reject the grouping if it with female genital mutilation, because they are two different practices. Let's forget the article already posted twice already showing feminist's unsympathetic nature towards male genital mutilation. Don't you think the people that are funded by the GOVERNMENT who claim to promote "GENDER EQUALITY" (note: NOT FEMALE SUPREMACY) should do a whole lot more than 'not ca…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:13 AM
7

You should read more before posting. Also, why don't we stop pretending that promoting men's rights and calling out feminism are mutually exclusive, shall we? Feminism has done A LOT of harm to men and is much of the reason we are fighting for our rights to begin with. They even CONTINUE to fight AGAINST us, as you can see from the article on male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:10 AM
-1

Just go on to compare their clitoral hood (which is removed during Type 1A of female circumcision) as a "useless flap of skin". Then again, almost every part of a feminist is a "useless flap of skin". This is honestly why I (even though I'm pro-abortion) can't agree on feminists on this topic either. How in the living fuck can you make arguments like "our body, our choice" but then turn around and say male genital mutilation on an infant is okay? Feminism should be a crime.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:04 AM
11

This has been some of the greatest stuff the MRM has achieved as of late. I'm so happy to see this barbaric act being banned all over the place. I can only hope for a day when ignorant America does the same.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:58 AM
1

I must say that I am embarrassed of my gender because of mangina's like Jaime Kilstein. This 'man' is the most emasculated shriveled douche nozzle I've witnessed since Manboobz. I am grateful that I'm nowhere near associated with this Kilstein idiot and I hope the worst life has to offer him for turning his back on his gender. Edit: Oh, and Joe not only wins, but obliterates. +1 to Joe
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:28 AM
7

What he said ^ Men's rights and feminism (particularly modern feminism) have an inverse relationship. Feminism seeks to push the rights of men down in order to privilege women. Legislature like VAWA, ObamaCare and Title IX are just a few examples of feminist legislature which harms men significantly. Instead of being a blind feminist sympathist, I highly recommend you read some of the articles (particularly the one posted by 'Eryemil') and witness for yourself the horror that feminism causes for…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:06 AM
4

The longer I observe feminism, the longer I realize that there is never a 'low' feminists won't denigrate to. But then again, it's articles like these that shut feminists up in debates and wake more people up, so that's always a plus. Btw, it's an honor to have you post in my thread :)
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:01 AM
7

Preach on, brother. If more people thought the way you did and less like the ignorant, cowardly feminist sympathizers we often get in this subreddit we'd live in a FAR better world. Remember to quote this EXACT source the next time a feminist tries to tell you about how 'gender-equal' feminism is and how much they want to control 'their own bodies'. Feminists are absolute scum.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:55 AM
6

Only a REAL egalitarian would quote that, not some gynocrat like Obama. And yes, I understand it's play on his words.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:52 AM
5

I was thinking this myself. I was even considering posting it on r/MRref, but realized it's only for studies. Either way, I can't count the amount of feminists who've told me that feminists are against circumcision in particular. However, I have found that feminists COMPLETELY ignore arguments when they're found out red-handed. Look how few feminists posted at my posted article on their subreddit. Feminists are the biggest cowards on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:49 AM
2

You honestly didn't have a feminist bias when discussing gender issues in ANY OF YOUR CLASSES? You never heard your teachers utilize preferential treatment of girls over boys? You were never taught that male circumcision is just a healthy cut of 'useless skin' while female circumcision is a vile act equivalent to female castration? You weren't told about how unbelievably 'oppressed' women have been throughout history while completely ignoring male oppressions? You weren't told about all of the p…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:25 AM
2

Well, there are ALOT of facets in which feminism has reared its ugly head over the years and the media is CERTAINLY another huge one. The reason school is to blame is because of a variety of reasons. There is VERY strong gynocentricity in the Western school system. This leads to lots of feminist discussion and a feminist education. I actually have a hard time imagining that you 'swallowed the red pill' and haven't yet heard any anti-male bias in your classrooms. From discussions on male genital …
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:08 AM
4

Considering I've seen about three posts on this board in the last few days about how upset men are that they're assumed rapists, I just can't take you seriously, dude. That's an easy way of saying, "I know you have a point but I'm just not going to believe you anyways". Women are told to look out for themselves, to just use common sense, and common sense would dictate that hey, you should be on guard. So let me ask you a similar situation. If you are walking through a crime-ridden African-Americ…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:02 AM
6

Well, SaltandSulfur, women (just like men) should take the necessary precautions and responsibilities needed to avoid putting themselves in such situations to begin with. When I go out (and I'm a male), I'm not necessarily 'perpetually on guard' but I understand that I am 3 times MORE likely to have a violent crime committed against me than a member of the opposite sex. I understand that it is my RESPONSIBILITY to protect MYSELF and I try my utmost BEST to not put myself into a situation which c…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:34 AM
4

Hey, look its a SRS-er! Christ, that was pathetic.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:23 AM
31

Oh hey, look guys! It's our ever-loving feminist friends that are sooo against male genital mutilation!!! Where are you feminist sympathizers now? Let's hear it from all of you "feminism isn't that bad guise its just for equal rights" types now! Christ, I barely skinned this article and the sheer hatred for male genital autonomy from feminists is enough to kill a man.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:22 AM
7

I agree with the statement, however, this is mostly because of a feminist school-system that has pushed males into this direction. The fact that we exist shows that men are starting to 'wake up' from this attitude.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:17 AM
64

What a bunch of ignorant MRA's as usual. Don't you guys understand feminism theory at all? Patriarchy theory clearly explains that women are constantly being oppressed so they NEED their own clubhouse(s) because they are just SAFE SPACES for women to be free from the shackles of masculine domination. However, these 'male-only' organizations are not 'safe spaces', they are domineering and masculine organizations designed to oppress women. You MRA's just don't get it, do you? Just take an indoctri…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:14 AM
2

Would you also advise young teens and working adults not to walk around at 10-6am in their own neighborhood if it were in a crime-ridden area? What would you advise them to do? To take precautions, like all other things. Don't walk down dimly lit regions and try to avoid dangerous regions. Things like that. The reason why your counter-analogy is perceived as ignorant and misleading is because it draws equivalence between a woman living day-to-day in a social world to a man walking around with sp…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:31 PM
1

As if we needed another reason to hate Hillary Clinton. This idiot honestly thinks that 'women' are the real 'victims' in war and that male genital mutilation is the way to solve HIV. Between this and Obama's misandric white-knight campaign, I have no intentions of ever voting Democratic.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:42 PM
7

Giving advice on how to avoid being in a vulnerable situation is not blaming the victim for being raped. Say you're mugged, the problem is still that you were mugged not that you were walking alone with your phone out. The same applies to rape, it's genuinely just sound advice not to leave your drink unwatched near strangers just as its smart not to loudly use your phone by yourself at night in an unfamiliar place. THIS! A strong reason why feminism is so toxic is because they take any advice on…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:30 PM
7

Not necessarily. You're correct in that "a rape joke is not a rape" and "a crappy tv show is not real life", but that does not mean that it doesn't influence the way people think. The reason why many women believe men are automatically guilty is because of the perception of males in the media. Turn on Lifetime any time and you'll see the same 'evil oppressive male' hurting an innocent women. Many young women and girls growing up watching these shows and literally believe that this is how domesti…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:57 AM
8

Yes. Reason being that allowing ONE GROUP (whether it be race/gender/etc) allowed to be performed violent acts against for 'disobeying' another group only proves to legitimize doing so in real life.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:27 AM
10

It seems pretty basic to me, but I guess I'll try. My point is that this shows a societal ISSUE when something like this is considered to be 'acceptable' when doing the same exact thing with the genders reversed would lead to talks about 'subjugating/subordinating women' and an immediate ban/slandering of the show and its producers. You will not see a show in which women are being 'shocked' by not complying with their boyfriends because entire communities will consider it inappropriate and 'oppr…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:18 AM
9

Our favorite lovable gynocrat Obama doing what he does best. What the feminists tell him to do. This shows exactly which gender is having a 'war' conducted upon them.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:15 AM
5

Don't forget our offer for a clitoral hood as well! Only $60 shipping and handling from various central autonomous regions in Africa! Oh wait...
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:10 AM
3

Generally speaking, the farther left you go on the political sphere, the more feminist you get. Even if they act more like fascists.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:06 AM
1

Awesome stuff. If anybody is forcing the MRM forward right now its AVfM. Nothing but respect for the good people at AVfM!
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:00 AM
4

Thank you for protecting your son(s). It's absolutely disgusting to see males promote their OWN genital mutilation, but that's what happens when you're raised in a feminist society which pushes the ideology of 'only women are oppressed' and 'its only genital mutilation when it happens to women'. One large argument I've seen that's persuaded ignorant husbands/wives is that he will now have a choice and be able to get it done later in life on his OWN accord if he likes.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:55 AM
18

Please let me know of a show where women are being 'shocked' when they misbehave to their boyfriends and I'll show you a third world country ran by religious zealous. Or a heavy feminist lawsuit.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:49 AM
3

I couldn't agree more. With all of the circumcision bans and near-bans as of late, I believe it is the latter :)
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:43 AM
1

This is why I will NEVER support these supposed 'civil liberties' groups like the ACLU and the morons over at the SPLC. They seem to be little pet organizations that leftists like Hillary run to whenever an issue makes them uncomfortable, but when MEN are the ones being harmed there's suddenly NO talk or protests from them. The ACLU has actually fought in FAVOR of male genital mutilation. So much for 'civil liberties', eh?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:16 PM
0

Oh, and speaking about male genital mutilation (or known to feminists as just 'circumcision' when it happens to men), what are your little feminist friends doing about this? It seems that when a VERY POPULAR FEMALE FEMINIST is pushing to genitally mutilate baby boys in third world countries, there isn't an outcry from any of you? No protests, no articles, NOTHING. Instead, you're going to waste your time manipulating the definition of rape so that you can somehow 'rape' somebody 'non-violently'.…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:57 PM
1

Wow, good job rebuttal-ing all of my points! And by rebuttal-ing, I mean using a collaboration of strawman's and shame tactics! Good God, you feminists are soo intelligent! Right so we're back to "circumcision is worse than rape" and "if it's not violent rape then it's not even rape" and I'm supposed to think your opinions are legit? Funny how good you feminists are at putting words into each other's mouths. Is it no wonder that your movement is getting smaller every year when you resort to such…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:52 PM
1

Rofl, nice reversal and typical feminist shame meanderings! Yea so you pick the extreme shit and post is as unreasonable You consider the Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) to be 'extreme shit' then? Well, at least we can agree on ONE thing :) trying to manipulate legislature into a "only-the-mans-word-counts" on female rape allegations. And how exactly have ANY of us done this? Because we are trying to allow men to have a WORD on the female rape allegation? Because we are trying to have those …
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:57 PM
1

I'm asking his, because I have seen multiple instances of comments in this sub where the commenter is making negative generalizations about women. If you do see any 'woman bashing', it's because they're SRS/feminist trolls 99% of the time. Like all other trolls, you downvote them and ignore them. I can guarantee you that the 'negative generalizations' you witnessed were also completely downvoted into reddit hell, so I don't know why you think anybody aside from radical feminists think that this …
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:33 PM
1

Let's see... When their bullshit "fighting against women being raped" campaign consists of: Creating laws which push against SOLELY WOMEN being raped while COMPLETELY ignoring the other gender. Falsifying statistics like "1 in 4 women are raped" and over-inflating yearly rape statistics to 'scare' women into supporting their movement Creating laws which HELP create false rape allegations Creating additional laws (and lobbying) to disallow those who commit false rape allegations to be appropriate…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:13 PM
1

Don't give me that grossly over-done comparison of the WBC and radical feminism. The WBC holds NO POWER within the Christian community and are exiled from EVERY single facet of the Christian community. Radical feminism is accepted in nearly every single feminist community and almost all of the feminist political leaders consider themselves to be 'radical feminists'. Maybe instead of sitting here trying to justify why feminists are ignorant, you should be calling them out for supporting an ideolo…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:57 PM
1

Oh indeed, yes. Feminists certainly fight JUST AS HARD to end rape against men as they do against women.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:52 PM
-2

Say what you want about the GOP, but at least it's not a feminist cesspool like the dem's.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:32 AM
0

OMG WHAT ANIMALS! How can they just stare at a woman in a slightly revealing dress like that? What a bunch of sexual-harassers and rape-supporters! That poor woman, how did she handle all those evil men looking at her as she walked by? /s TIL Looking at a woman is 'sexual harassment'. Is there an end to feminist redundancy and downright idiocy?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:25 AM
11

Let's not forget that she is looked upon as some 'victim' because she 'hates men'. However, if someone claimed to hate women (i.e. George Sodini) because they were victimized and went on a shooting rampage they are looked upon as dangerous and evil animals. Yet another double standard feminist's are going to keep perpetuating. A sexist female criminal - A 'victim' so therefore excused A male criminal - A dangerous, hate-monger
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:20 AM
4

Interesting... I noticed that there is a slight left-leaning favoritism in this sub-reddit regardless of the horrors the left is doing to men and the sheer level of feminists who currently occupy it. Either way, the last thing I want is splitting up of MRA's. We have enough enemies at the moment.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:10 AM
6

I've learned that its mostly this subreddit too (albeit this subreddit is probably the best meeting ground for spreading and discussing men's issues at the moment). Most other online MRA's venues I've seen were much less worried about offending at every post.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:04 AM
44

Feminist: "Definitely men. A woman can't rape because patriarchy. Men need to learn to keep it in their pants and avoid ALL drunk women" MRA: "Entirely depends on the situation and how the events occurred. Being under the influence of alcohol doesn't instantly mean 'rape'. One gender is NOT responsible for EVERY rape." There are your answers. Now who sounds more reasonable?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:02 AM
6

I couldn't agree more. I understand the reasoning behind it, but people here don't seem to understand that worrying constantly about ending up on that redundant imbecile "Manboobz" is exactly what they want us to do. It doesn't matter how polite, coherent and civilized we act; idiots like these will stop at NOTHING to shame us in every way imaginable. I've been saying this since I first came here. Fortunately, you can only silence and put people in fear for so long until they begin to rebel and …
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:53 AM
6

Girl "geeks" (now that it's trendy. No girl would identify as such when it was a label that conferred social leprosy) There is no way you deserve these downvotes after an incredibly truthful statement like this. When I was playing video in my high school days, we almost NEVER saw/heard of girl gamers. But now that it's 'mainstream' and 'cool' to be a nerd, these feminists are coming in and DEMANDING that we change our (virtually ONLY) male-only space to cater to them entirely.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:45 AM
0

I was going to respond to this mangina's indoctrinated drivel, but then I scrolled down and realized that you had already provided an excellent rebuttal. Excellent job and awesome article! :)
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:41 AM
7

It is always great to see the MRM spreading and branching out to more regions. Feminists are finding it harder and harder to 'ignore' us now :)
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:00 PM
1

Not all of them, of course. Feminist are scum, for the most part. However, what I meant was that if there is ANY MRA-issue these imbecile's will ever support, it's that of MGM since it doesn't take away their little legislative privileges.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:49 PM
1

I couldn't care less about little subcategories about feminism. Feminism has done A LOT of harm and very few people besides Christina Hoff Sommer's believe in 'gender/equity feminists'. Feminism is feminism and we have better things to do than try to separate feminists into categories they themselves don't even really believe in.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:45 PM
6

Congratulations. You're the inevitable angry guy that makes these conversations not worth having. It's just so very high school to quote the other person and respond to each point with angry, caps-lock ridden attacks. Wow, great rebuttal's to all of my arguments! You have certainly proven how wrong I am in my thinking. I'm so sorry if utilizing a caps-lock to showcase emphasis is too much for your 'thick' feminist skin to handle! You, personally, are responsible for the loss of an ally and the i…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:41 PM
4

No guys, you don't understand! This poor woman was under such heavy stress from her wedding that she ended up just 'snapping' and consequently, 'stabbing' her groom. She needs need care and not punishment! /s
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:22 PM
5

Go away troll.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:20 PM
4

Personally, I believe that feminism can work for equality for everybody. It may be an unconsciously biased opinion, but I think it's also understandable that feminism focuses mostly on women's issues, and the main request of male participants is that they listen to and try to understand women's stories of how they feel and what they've been through. Mostly women's issue? How about EXCLUSIVELY women's issues? When was the last time feminists fought for a MALE ISSUE? And don't feed me more of this…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:11 PM
7

The patriarchy is a paradox which pretty much translates to: "whatever feminists don't like is part of it". I think the only kinda decent argument I've heard from them is the idea that women take the man's surname in marriage, which is pretty weak since it's entirely optional. Oh yeah? Ask the next feminist you meet with this view about what she thinks about a MAN having to buy her a RING for the EXACT SAME REASONS? The ring and the surname were both indicative of a man 'owning' a woman. Yet... …
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:42 PM
0

The case of David Reimer showcased that pretty much everything feminism claimed was fact with its social-science reasoning, was in fact bullshit. Gender / gender roles are NOT a social construct and circumcision is NOT just a 'harmless procedure' when compared to its female variant. The next time you go on one of your feminist rants, remember that this is the kind of heinous garbage you are supporting.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:37 PM
1

I disagree entirely. Feminists have accomplished almost everything they have through 'nagging' about it and doing ALOT of it. I also think that using a real VOICE to complain about something hits people harder than just an e-mail. At the very least, a combination of the two will DEFINITELY help more than just one or the other.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:10 PM
2

Don't worry, I've 'considered' it far more than you have. Actually, it is more because of 'cultural' reasons than anything. The reason why circumcision is a 'go-to' medical procedure for something as small as 'phimosis' in North America is because of 'culture'. Most other countries aren't going to hack off part of your penis because of something that can be cured with creams and exercise. But because this culture fully endorses male genital mutilation on infant baby boys because of "cultural or …
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:07 PM
1

Please don't listen to the negative nancies in this thread. The only way things are ever going to change is if people start making a stand like you did. Good job, seriously, the MRM needs more people like you.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:01 PM
0

I think this attitude affects the MRM worst than feminism does. This exact case actually occurred on another airline previously and it was overturned due to people complaining. Proactive people like the "DaNiceguy" is what we need more of. This is why feminists get their bigotry accomplished, because they spend more time encouraging each other for their activism rather than pretending rather than insulting each others activism.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:59 PM
5

Yes because the ONLY POSSIBLE CURE for phimosis is circumcision. Yup, definitely. Creams and exercises don't everrrr cure that, now do they? Everybody medical association certainly agrees that circumcision is the only cure for phimosis! In other news, the best cure to a broken hand is direct arm amputation.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:41 PM
1

The one thing feminists and MRA's can agree on is that circumcision is a barbaric ritual. Why? Because it doesn't affect women whatsoever. Making infant circumcision illegal does not alter any of the privileges given to women by feminist bigoted legislature. However, it doesn't really matter that they 'care' because, like every other issue they claim to 'care' about, they will waste more of their time fighting non-issues than fighting to cure ANY male problem.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:38 PM
5

This is why I cannot ever support circumcision advocates like this scumbag nor any feminist rhetoric about 'gender roles'. This incident alone proves ALL of it to be complete bullshit and anybody with half a brain can concur.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 10:00 AM
3

Can you just imagine the dribble you could write up with that logic? I wonder how well the L.A. Times would take "Well, the woman staying at home all day was good enough with Jesus! Man up ladies!". The fact that women of this caliber of intelligence are hired to be writers for the 'L.A. Times' shows just how non-'oppressed' women are in this country.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:44 AM
8

Don't worry fellow MRA's, I'm sure our all of our gender-equity supporting feminists will fight this hard because they understand that this woman is endorsing genital mutilation and lack of consent. Feminists always stress these two points and stress that they are about 'gender equality' and not 'female supremacy', so this is completely up their alley. Let us just wait.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:24 AM
10

AWESOME points! I am starting to see more and more people showcasing feminist hate-mongering the same way this guy is.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:49 AM
2

Rofl what a bunch of lunatics. Those people are the most sheltered and censoring-loving bunch of dipshits on the internet.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:48 AM
2

Out of complete curiosity, what could have honestly driven you to subscribe to that shit-fest in the first place? I honestly haven't found a SINGLE positive thing from them...
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:09 AM
9

Jesus, I can smell the stench of overfat Andrea Dworkin's corpse in that subreddit. How any male can actually be emasculated enough to join that shit-hole sub is beyond me.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:04 AM
5

I was only able to stomach about 30 seconds of that victimizing garbage. All I heard was the local feminist-fatboy gurgling about all of the 'XTREME MISOGYNY!!11' that exists somewhere on the internet and pretending that non-issues are issues. All we need is that other feminist idiot who thought that a man asking a woman out to coffee in an elevator is unacceptable... Oh wait.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 08:06 PM
0

More people should do what you're doing. The SPLC is a feminist cancer.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 07:49 PM
13

It is so amazing how feminist hypocrisy seems to have no limit. Every time I see a feminist article, I think that there's no way the level of hypocrisy can be any higher. Then another article pops up and completely shatter's the previous record. These people are so unbelievably delusional, I honestly cannot believe some of the people on this board try to tell me that feminism isn't "all that bad".
/r/MensRights11/08/12 07:47 PM
2

This sounds like a small win for the MRA's. Soon feminist filth like this will realize that they can't act like little children to get EVERYTHING. I honestly cannot applaud John the Other more for this, I wish I could help.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:10 PM
1

*have defected over to SRS
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:07 PM
13

Even though it probably doesn't mean much, here's a personal thank you for doing what is best when everyone else was against you. I never noticed how strong 'herd-mentality' really is until I became an intactivist.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:04 PM
10

Send her southernguy22's post. Let's see what her 'rebuttals' are.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:38 PM
1

I think the issue has much more to do with women being accustomed to being coddled in real life and being shocked when that female privilege suddenly doesn't apply. I couldn't agree with you more. That being so, why is it so unreasonable that some people want to create places that offer a respite from it? I think you misread or didn't read much of what I wrote. Clans already exist and I don't have a problem with them whatsoever. Hell, I was in multiple gaming clans back in the day. I was just po…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:52 PM
0

What exactly was he charged with in the first place? You aren't allowed to have a goddamn Men's Rights blog in Norway?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:16 PM
1

Not necessarily. 1) We are a WESTERN GENDER-RELATIONS MOVEMENT. This means that we discuss GENDER-RELATIONS ISSUES within the WESTERN WORLD. We are NOT RESPONSIBLE for EVERY ISSUE on the planet. Genital mutilation/domestic violence FITS THIS CATEGORY and they are serious issues, unlike being too much of a coward to take insults from random people on the internet. 2) Genital mutilation and domestic violence are forced PHYSICAL issues. Being called names on the internet isn't. 3) Even with things …
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:09 PM
16

Lol, looks like some feminists are realizing they aren't going to beat us with the typical 'women empowered' dribble so now they're taking a more 'well, we empower men too' angle in order to help their own movement. Yeah, I'm sure the free-loving eugenics supporting lunatics at radfemhub sure aim to empower us! Reminds me an awful lot of the 'No, seriously, what about the menz?' shit-blog.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:50 PM
0

Uh... what? How is that even relevant? Last I heard this was a GENDER-RELATIONS subreddit/group/movement and that's what we were discussing here. All of the issues you've asserted are international/foreign issues which aren't even gender-related.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:43 PM
-1

"I don't care about it so no one else should" is not a defensible position. Oh yes, genital mutilation/biased divorce court proceedings/biased domestic abuse legislature/cancerous hate-mongering feminist rhetoric in society MOVE ASIDE because people are insulted in online video games! Oh noez! Uh huh. No, sweetheart, the world doesn't work that way. Treating people abusively doesn't "help" them in any sense. It's just abuse. Actually, yes it does. It develops tougher skin and it develops charact…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:37 PM
0

No problem with that, there are clans already out for that (as stated already). They have the choice to not even play the game to begin with if they are thin-skinned enough to think anonymous peoples insults over the internet are offensive enough to not enjoy the game.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:27 PM
-2

Oh, give me a break. I don't just mean the 'workplace', I mean LIFE. People are going to insult you, hurt your feelings and denigrate you your ENTIRE LIFE. Maybe you haven't experienced it much yet, but it happens to EVERYONE. Teaching people to be little butthurt cowards because some idiot over the internet called them a bitch/whore/cunt is NOT doing them any favors. Teaching people mental toughness is the way to develop and progress an individual. There are REAL issues to discuss and people ca…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:18 PM
3

I concur. I actually think people SHOULD be insulted over the internet. How will you ever grow up to be able to take the daily grind if this is the sort of shit you get offended over?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 09:58 PM
2

Have a highly moderated casual gaming circle for people who are new to gaming and don't want to put up with the crap that they would get from hardcore gamers. And have a gaming circle for hardcore gamers. Or you can teach people to grow some skin so that they don't turn into limp-wristed, pathetic SRS crybabies over what some person over the internet said to them.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 09:51 PM
2

It's amazing the levels of non-issues feminists complain about. You know your gender isn't very discriminated against when you have time to complain about what people say in voluntary online video games. FWIW, in my online gaming days, I heard 'faggot' and 'nigger' about a billion more times than I heard any insults towards women. Ironically enough, I don't hear gays or blacks complaining a whole lot about it...
/r/MensRights02/08/12 09:50 PM
1

He asked a simple question which was "which large feminist organizations work towards helping men?", and you gave a long-winded red herring instead about 'lobbies'. What you don't understand is that nobody cares about some microscopic organizations in Canada who call themselves 'feminists', we care about the ACTUAL FEMINIST GROUPS who actually have POWER. None of these feminists are doing men any good and are spending their efforts on spewing their hateful, social-science theory as fact. If you …
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:00 PM
1

Hmm... Let's see... getting killed or getting raped? Gee... I wonder which is worst...
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:49 PM
4

Ozy is a feminist dipshit that pretends to be some protector of men's rights, yet spends most of her time insulting and demonizing the MRM. Just a few weeks ago, she was defending male circumcision and speaking about how negatively she viewed Germany's court ruling. And you want to say that she 'tries' and that she's a 'good person'. Stop apologizing for these idiots, please.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:04 AM
-2

No. As unfortunate as it is, the left hates men as much as the right hates abortion. Maybe even more.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:57 AM
5

Good stuff as usual by the great people at AVfM.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:54 AM
2

And still no answer... Definitely confirms our belief about feminism and how little they care about men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:19 AM
2

Well , as a Jew , had I been living in Nazi Germany , how much do you think I would care about how not all Nazis were the same . Sure , many people didn't sympathize with the movement or even want to call themselves Nazis but that wouldn't have made much difference to me when I was lining up for my shower in Auschwitz . Awesome comparison. The NAFALT argument has been done to death and these feminists coming in pretending to be the mouthpiece for '<insert bullshit label> feminism' are becoming s…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:17 AM
1

What do you expect from a group of people who try to create issues out of non-issues on a daily basis? When there are no legitimate issues to 'fight for', they find the closest thing that makes them uncomfortable or hurts their feelings and lobby for it to be banned.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:26 AM
1

Edit your post.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:10 AM
1

Right, and how many male soldiers are killed?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 12:48 AM
-1

Okay, let's not forget that you get to choose who you have sex with. So do women. If you get "no choice" in the birth control matter then you shouldn't be sleeping with that woman because she doesn't respect you. Or just not make false comparisons about how birth control also gives men a choice, which it doesn't. If you don't trust your girlfriend to take her pill, then she shouldn't be your girlfriend. Once again, this was about comparisons, not what somebody SHOULD do. Your comparison is inval…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:26 PM
5

Good point, even though I couldn't be any more in advocation for anti-infant-circumcision legislature.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:03 PM
-1

but both women and men benefit from the effects of them. Only if the woman WANTS it to 'benefit' him. He gets no choice as to the matter nor is there any way for him to be sure she actually took the birth control pill. A woman can physically see a condom on a man. There is plenty demand for male birth control, but feminists believe we should be focusing on pushing free birth control for women rather than pushing for the male birth control pill to come out. Here is a Brazilian endocrinologist exp…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:26 PM
2

Less and less women's studies courses/majors offered every year! :)
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:46 PM
1

Well some did. And then they became MRA's.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:02 AM
1

It doesn't matter if it is painful. It doesn't matter if it doesn't impede sexual performance(I'm not complaining), it doesn't matter if it is 'safe'. It isn't needful. It shouldn't be done with out the consent of the patient. Thank you.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:43 AM
1

It's livelihood. Although, that is diminishing every year.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:34 AM
9

You know what is so funny? When I keep hearing people talk (not only feminists, mind you) about how many 'radicals' we have in the MRM when there are AT LEAST DOZENS of blogs such as this one on the internet which feminists NEVER address. Disgusting violent filth like this doesn't seem to bother feminists, but suddenly Paul Elam is some horrible person. Seriously, I get sick to death of the feminist-sympathizers writing off shit like this off but nit-picking every word from the MRM. Feminism is …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:16 AM
1

more women have died for men throughout history. C'mon guys, ol' mangina Schwyzer is totally right on this. I mean, having children is ONLY for men. Only men want children. Children are only bred because a MAN wants them. Our super-equal-reproductive-rights legislature completely resembles this. Haven't you guys heard of all these cases of women wanting abortions but not being able to get them because their male counterparts won't let them? Only a man can make a woman have an abortion. /s You ha…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:05 AM
8

Go away troll.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:58 AM
1

Awesome stuff as always by AVfM!
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:40 AM
1

I don't blame feminism, but rather the belief our society holds that men are macho and can always overpower women, or that they don't need help when dealing with abusive men. It's crazy. You should blame feminism because feminism claims to 'promote gender equality', yet wastes its time only privileging women (by attempting to justify fallacies such as 'male privilege' and 'patriarchy') all while completely IGNORING men's problems.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:34 AM
1

Too bad Change.org is riddled with bigoted feminists and their overly-liberal following. There has been numerous attempts in the past to have a 'mens rights' section along with their 'womens rights' section, but they have promptly refused to implement it.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:25 PM
2

Jezebel is full of feminist idiots - Reddit
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:04 PM
1

I'm not sure to which privileges you're referring, but if it's healthcare I would hope there is equality as well. You haven't been here long if you can't guess how many privileges women have over men in Western society. A lot of the things that are being debated with health care are female specific. Almost everything is geared to make WOMEN'S HEALTH better and CHEAPER because "it costs more". Yes, it costs more because women need certain specific costly gyno-related exams/treatments yearly. Wome…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:02 PM
5

Oh man, more emotional dribblings from you? This is my last post on this. I find it very amusing that you're claiming to be this great MRA and yet falling into the trap of hegemonic masculinity by telling me to "[g]row some skin" in response to taking offense at something. Yes. Grow some skin. Taking offense at TRUTHFUL depictions of what CIRCUMCISION DOES TO THE BODY is not HELPING anybody. Actually, trying to FIGHT truthful depictions of the harm of circumcision HINDERS our movement more than …
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:45 AM
6

It's not about taking anything the wrong way, it's like exposing a rape victim to a barrage of explicit information about rape and not expecting them to feel offended et cetera. Making a website outlining the PROBLEMS a rape victim is NOT wrong, no matter how hard you try to twist it. "[...] intact men [...] enjoy sex as nature intended [circumcised men do not]" Emasculating and invalidating. No. It's COMPLETELY truthful. Nature INTENDED for men to have foreskins. How little skin do you have to …
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:23 AM
2

Why do groups of people believe that women need to be protected more than men? Why don't you go ask the feminist groups, whose rhetoric you're supporting, the same question? After all, they're the ones promoting legislative privileges to women around the clock. Kinda knocks their own little bullshit 'patriarchy' theory, now doesn't it?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:14 AM
5

Not only was I not talking about myself, but: Okay buddy, I meant 'grow some skin' as in attain THICKER SKIN, not literally 'grow some foreskin'. I honestly can't believe you managed to take this the wrong way. So you're saying that men who -- by no choice of their own -- are circumcise should be told that they're less-than-men, and that they should just "man up" and deal with it. The article said NOTHING AT ALL about being 'less-than-men', just simply what CIRCUMCISION DOES (as concluded by stu…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:09 AM
5

Grow some skin. If somebody was to type in the effects of female circumcision, would it suddenly become invalid because it could offend a female circumcision victim? Supporting the TRUTH rather than the "its-not-so-bad" garbage fed to us in the American education system about circumcision supports the cause of men far more than vice versa. Nobody stated that the truth doesn't hurt.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:56 AM
20

"The Council of Ethics and the Children's Council has recommended a ban." Now THAT sounds like a true "Council of Ethics" and "Childrens Council" that's for the interests of the CHILD, not of an interest groups PROFITS. The American systems should try to adopt this sometime.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:51 AM
9

I'm circumcised and I fully agree with the comments you quoted. The comments made were from multiple studies which have been conducted. Writing the effects of male circumcision does not create a 'burning' and 'insensitive indictment of the manliness and potency of men who happen to be genital mutilation victims'. If they write the effects of female circumcision, does that do the same to female victims?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter