TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AssAssIn46 Archive

View 22 posts and 594 comments by AssAssIn46 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
159

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:39 PM
142

AssAssIn46/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:09 PM
66

Edu./Occu.AssAssIn46/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:40 PM
48

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:46 AM
48

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights27/03/16 11:13 PM
32

Edu./Occu.AssAssIn46/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:42 PM
31

DiscriminationAssAssIn46/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:48 AM
31

Marriage/DivorceAssAssIn46/r/MensRights10/06/17 01:31 PM
29

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:47 PM
27

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:56 AM
25

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:20 PM
18

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights28/12/16 08:02 AM
17

GeneralAssAssIn46/r/MensRights12/04/17 09:28 PM
16

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:53 AM
14

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:23 PM
10

Social IssuesAssAssIn46/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:13 PM
9

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:02 PM
8

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:28 AM
7

Social IssuesAssAssIn46/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:38 AM
5

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:23 PM
2

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:03 PM
2

AssAssIn46/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I stopped coming to this sub years ago when I realised these battles are pointless. I commend those who continue to stand up to it, they're better than I am, but it's not something I am going to concern myself with at all times like I used to. It's not good for my mental health. This shit wears you down. And not just men's issues, there are many other issues which you look into and realise are woven into the fabric of society and have been for generations, a concequence of human natural itself p…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:43 AM
8

Honestly I read the title and it pissed me off at how stupid of a thing it was to do but even still reading this makes it seem even stupider. Sometimes I have to remind myself that I have biases which work against my actual beliefs.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:58 PM
2

It would but it doesn't which is part of the problem. Nevermind that the logic is flawed, it's inconsistent.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:57 AM
6

I think he's just religious and doesn't think it's appropriate. I don't like the guy, in fact I dislike him but I don't really see a problem with this particular idea of his because ultimately it doesn't harm anyone and if anything it protects everyone involved. That's the problem with modern politics though. People will see they disagree with a person on something/somethings and then completely denounce everything the person does regardless of whether what they do is a good or bad thing.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 11:10 AM
4

He has made two stupid posts with 0 any upvotes on one of them and 4 on the other. He's also getting called out for it in the comments yet this sub is somehow incels 2.0. Get some perspective.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:00 PM
0

So?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:51 PM
2

I'm a man and I'm not offended by this. Male and female sexuality are deeply different, 99% of men would enjoy being groped - even without permit - by an attractive woman. This is why rape statistics are so skewed, most men see acts of sexual assault as valid signs of interest while women dresd them. He's speaking on behalf of all men but that's obviously not going to give you an accurate sense of how men in general feel about this. However it will give you a general sense of how he feels about …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:49 PM
4

Go on ahead and instead of men and women switch it to white people and black people and maybe then you'll realise why the article is stupid. The author is writing a biased article about a non-issue which encourages people to judge others by the genetics rather than their character. Sounds like discrimination to me. The fact that this is even being treated as an "issue" is the problem, let alone the bias.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:22 PM
3

The argument is that all discrimination is wrong my guy. No one is saying they're the exact same thing but they're very similar in execution. It's discrimination by the government on the basis of sex like it used to be on the basis of skin colour. The legal or social repercussions might not me the same but the execution of it is the same. One group is given a privilege over another group. That's the problem here.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:50 PM
2

Usually I'd say this joke has gotten old and overused but the type of people to do this shit probably believe that as well. Use their own stupidity against them, their brain fucking short-circuits.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:30 PM
0

Yeah but it's passive support which does nothing. And people are too afraid to actively support the MRM because it's been ingrained that any gender equality movement which isn't feminism is inherently sexist. Feminism has a monopoly on gender equality movements. While I do appreciate the sentiment, talking to these people goes down like this: "Suicide is a major problem for men, we really need to do something." "Yeah I agree". That's basically what it boils down to. People will agree with stuff …
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:49 PM
1

This tells you all you need to know about the sub, lmao. The third post as stupid as it is, isn't even anything to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:58 PM
1

You will get the same attitude from that sub that you get from your feminist friends. You'll hear things which are more in line with the views you're starting to questions. It'll help you feel comfortable because you recognise these ideas and won't have to criticise your current world view because it's hard to except you've been wrong about a lot of things for a long time. Now I'm not one of those armchair psychologists and this isn't me making a random prediction on the way you'll act. I'm simp…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:52 PM
3

Why'd I bother, you don't seem like someone who can be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:20 PM
3

For me it's never been about have gender specific programs. It's not the lack of it for the other gender. The other gender 95% of the time being male because shit wouldn't fly the other way round.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:17 PM
5

And we should care because? This sub isn't for shit like this.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:48 PM
5

Honestly as someone who has never been a regular viewer of conventional news media, mostly because I've grown up with the internet rather than TV, I'm surprised that they get away with this shit. Just watching that interview you can tell how disgustingly she was acting towards him and how unfair their treatment was. It was clear as day that they had an agenda to paint him in a very specific way and it's infuriating that they get away with this shit. Regular viewers who're familiar with the journ…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:41 AM
4

Here's an idea. People have different views than yourself. But wait! There's more! Just because they have differing views doesn't mean you have to bombard them with hate and smear their public image. Shocking amiright? Because they have views you don't agree with doesn't mean they're monsters who want to kill all women, minorities, whatever. I'm from UK, a country where abortion is mostly a non-issue. I support a women's right to have an abortion. That doesn't change the fact that my Christian f…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:31 AM
3

I agree with you on some things you said and disagree with other things but regardless, I think people would be much more receptive of what you have to say if you didn't insult someone who's trying to have a civil discussion and isn't being rude or insulting just because you disagree with them.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:08 PM
0

Jesus you're either a troll or a retard. Also, I literally just had some crumpets how the fuck did you know?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:41 PM
3

Also this is a fucking meme. Why the fuck should we care about what's clearly a joke? If it was some organisation which fights against body shaming or something which promoted the same idea here then I'd understand but this is literally a joke.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:39 PM
-1

Hey let me explain to you why your comment was idiotic. Some guy was pointing out how Meghan isn't a princess, another guy said she was and I explained that she wasn't. Nice, civil conversation where the guy learnt something about the Britain monarchy. Now you chose to get involved into this thread and start talking about how she is a princess because... you're American and Americans think married to prince = princess? First off, no mate it's just you. The general assumption that married to prin…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:30 PM
0

This keeps getting funnier because you're all missing the point and keep acting like the stereotype I was talking about. I'll explain in a bit. Best bit is that I wasn't shitting on America or all Americans, just the retards. Every country has those but of course some people took offense because they feel personally attacked. I'm also curious about the sudden interest in my comment ever since that guy replied to me.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:07 PM
-2

Keep doubling down on it, lmao.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:36 PM
-3

People like you are the reason Americans are stereotyped as being dumb nationalists..
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:51 PM
1

Well then I guess its a good thing I haven't heard much about them in a long time.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 10:18 PM
2

You're replying to the wrong comment.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:28 PM
2

I appreciate that you took the time to come here and read the wall of text I wrote and you're right that men and women experience different challenges. I'm just pointing out that a lot of what we might see as sexism may not be due to sex after all, whether it affects men or women. Men and women face different issues but not all are due to sexism, that's my point.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:02 PM
3

I think I understand what you mean which is why I'm personally against government funded schemes which give preference to a gender or race rather than merit If person B wants to get to X but they are 5x away compared to A who is 2x away then either they can try to cover the distance in a way which would get them their quicker or change their destination. Neither should be given anything. The way I see it, men shouldn't be given planes. Instead women's cars should be taken away and men's 5x shoul…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:34 PM
19

She wasn't, she was called Princess Diana colloquially but she did not officially have the title.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:24 PM
8

At my undergrad institution and grad institution there’s a huge gender disproportion. I'd like to ask you why you think this is a bad thing if it's caused by free choice. I'm assuming you're talking about STEM as that's the field you're studying. If women are retroactively choosing to go into non-STEM careers then why is this a problem? Is free choice less important than equal representation? Should we but pressure on young women to do STEM even if they don't want to? What about careers like con…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:23 PM
12

I'm going to address this first because I think you've got the wrong idea about this. I don’t think that we should be taking other people’s privileges away. Maybe we should be distributing privileges based on the issue that a certain group faces. Any and every equality movement is based on this because privileges are advantages. There are two ways you can do this. Take the advantage away from the privileged or give them to the ones without. However, biological advantages are not privileges and t…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:54 PM
-1

When were they not in control? lmao. Been on Reddit for 2 and a half years now and that sub has always been fucked. And boo-hoo you got banned. What do you want us to do about it? Anything to actually do with men's rights? This is nothing new, we all know that sub bans people left and right. We don't need the spam because you need validation. Edit: Love the brigading by the way. Hello r/feminism, how are y'all doing today?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:37 PM
1

Like u/timedesuyyo said above a few time, have you read any of the replies you've gotten so far? Do you know what the topic of this discussion is?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:31 PM
38

You're not a prince/princess unless you're Royal blood. Colloquially they might be called a princess but they don't have that title.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:27 PM
29

No, she's the Duchess of Sussex.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:19 PM
23

Just want to make something clear. 'The Red Pill' used to refer to a fucked up sub called r/TheRedPill which was sexist, misogynist, the whole lot. r/MensRight was not affiliated with them. Admittedly we had some crossover with them but blatant sexism from them was usually downvoted. IIRC it's banned now. This is why when 'The Red Pill' documentary was released a lot of people were confused, it wasn't the best naming choice to be honest but the documentary is unrelated to it. Anyway I've got a c…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:17 PM
5

Yep that's the distinction I was making between what they should get and what they're asking for.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:11 PM
3

I mean that's called negotiation and all these actors have agents who already do it for them.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:06 PM
2

Agreed but it's definitely not deserved and a bigger non-issue would be your experienced coworker being a retard and demanding you're payed the same as him or he won't work for the company. Either he's taking a pay cut or he's out.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:05 PM
4

Oh come on man, you're acting as if it's not the same for women like 99.999% of the time. Most of the female actors who're complaining about a non-issue are only complaining after they've become famous because people will actually listen to their bullshit. You think production company executives actually give a shit about what a female actor has to say? Fuck no they don't regardless of gender. Only time they care is when it's a famous actor who can cause them diminishing profits due to criticism…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:03 PM
4

I honestly don't know what you're talking about. Actors are paid depending on how in demand they are, how much money they bring in and how much they can negotiation for. Being better at acting and better looking are both factors contribute to how famous you are which in turn increases you demand and how much money you can bring in. Its not as simple as better looking = more pay. It's multiple factors which go into paying an actor and looks is just one of the many.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:00 PM
7

I understand what you mean but I disagree with the way you've said it so don't take this as me challenging you in any way. I'll preface this by saying that when I say "they" I'm talking about modern feminists and female entertainers who complain about equal pay to their male counterparts, among certain women in other industries. They 100% deserve equal pay for the same work as a man and proportional to how much money they bring in. Of course that's not really what these female actors are asking …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:55 PM
1

10/10 Strawman mate.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:04 PM
1

Grew up in the UK mate lmao. After reading the rest of your comment about how it's the fault of women who've been forced to wear hijabs since they were kids for giving into it under the threat of being excluded from the family, emotional and physical abuse and how it's all just one big misunderstanding despite what the Quran explicitly says, I don't think this will be a productive discussion so I'm just going to agree to disagree and end it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:12 PM
1

That they're pedophile rapists, fuck them.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:12 PM
1

This is just gaslighting. She knows this will cause controversy and get her attention which is why she did it. She can also hide behind a front of trying to help women to do minimal damage to her already shit reputation. Other than that everything about this is horrible. It doesn't look or sound good and the lyrics are cringe worthy.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:06 PM
1

Damn I didn't know it was free with Prime. Definitely going to watch it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:58 PM
2

Can't really defend that to be honest. Eminem has said and done some fucked up shit but nothing like this. He doesn't deserve this. On the other hand the lead singer of RHCP is a self proclaimed child rapist.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:56 PM
5

"Nobody believes that". Ah yes I see you must have asked every women who wears a hijab then. Comparing it to some stuff that Christians don't follow is false equivalence because it's literally not the same thing. I've grown up with a massive Muslim community and I can tell you that being forced to wear the hijab is a very real thing. I've had friends complain to me about it. It's literally not a choice for a lot of women. Some choose to do so, great. But it is forced on a great number of women a…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:34 PM
3

I agree they should definitely attempt to find the real father. He has a right to see his child. Honestly if they find him and he's a decent guy I see this story ending well for the child, his legal and the biological father. His legal father seems like a good guy for fighting for the custody of the child even though he's not the biological father. Honestly just hope it works out for them. Mother should be in prison for fraud and human trafficking.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:29 PM
39

Yeah it's cringy are fuck. Only problem here is that the same treatment probably wouldn't be given to an equally offensive/funny/cringy anti-men's right group. Personally, I say let them all on the platform for the sake of free speech but they're free to do as they please. The only problem is that like Facebook, they most likely claim to be unbiased which is intellectually dishonest.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:10 PM
12

He's the president of the US. Even if they wanted to, it wouldn't be a wise business move.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:07 PM
7

It's literally legal for Twitter to do so. It doesn't matter what anyone's opinion is because law>opinion. Now if you want to change the law that's another thing but criticism for explaining why something is legal is baseless criticism.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:06 PM
1

I don't see as many feminist trolls as much as I see incels and the TRP community.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:41 PM
-1

I don't come to this sub as much as I used to and I was shocked to the amount of incel stuff that was upvoted and being spread in one of the top posts. I was genuinely shocked. When I first subbed we very openly condemned r/incels and r/TRP because they literally promote violence against women, manipulation, rape, etc. Now no one was being as extreme but the core idea of le chad fucks all the women and how all women want is chad dick were being spread in a thinly veiled comments which were less …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:39 PM
1

I'm not even replying to you, what the fuck are you talking about? Also, I'm telling him to fuck off because he's an incel spreading retarded incel shit.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 06:16 PM
7

I see where you're coming from but it's sets a precedent for expempting such barbaric religious practises from the law. The first few countries to pass anti MGM laws in western countries have to apply it to everyone equally regardless of religion.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 10:43 PM
18

Get the fuck out of here with your incel shit. This post is an interesting topic for discussion but there's a fuck ton of incels here, as there are in any thread about reproduction.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 10:26 PM
1

You're just keep repeating what I said man and not actually answering the question. My point is that parents should put pressure on the Girl Scouts to improve instead of getting the Boy Scouts to do it. Money talk, if you don't like the way it's run, don't give them money. Force them to change.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:53 PM
1

I meant if the problem is the management then why don't parents who send their children to the Girl Scouts and don't like they way they operate take it up with them. If enough members have a problem that they want the Boy Scouts to take the responsibility then why not just collectively try to make the Girl Scouts improve?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:40 PM
1

Yeah that's what I was saying.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:20 PM
2

I'm agreeing with you. Maybe I didn't word it right, I wasn't specifically talking about you when I said "if you're using the". I was talking about the UN and feminist organisations.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 11:48 AM
1

Mostly due to biology. Gotta learn to live with it.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 10:11 AM
1

But then you're expecting the men under 25 who do drive safely to make up for the cost of men under 25 who don't drive safely. If individuality is what you're going for then it's not at all being achieved here. Same type of reasoning can be used to justify racial discrimination and there are laws against that for a reason.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:42 AM
1

I've seen this on another sub and that OP posted it to many subs but not this one so I'm assuming OP saw it somewhere else and decided to crosspost it. I thought of crossposting it too but didn't, highly doubt it's a troll.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:05 AM
1

That's completely fine. I'm not on either side of the argument but the point others are trying to make is that there are two groups: Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts. Instead of making Boy Scouts unisex so girls get to have the same experience as the boys, why not improve the Girl Scots instead? In another thread I read about experiences from former Girl Scout members and their reasoning for why GS is so bad is because the organisers are unwilling to change it. If that's the problem, why not tackle th…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:01 AM
4

That should be the route to go if you're using the 50/50 equality of outcome logic. The image is trying to say we need to reduce the number of female journalists killed because 19% is too high when it should be the other way round. Reduce number of male journalists killed because 81% is too high. Even then, targeting by gender is plain wrong. Reduce journalists deaths regardless of gender, that should be the goal.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:55 AM
3

I mean yeah that could be the case. But this was specifically designed to evoke the thought that 19% of the victims being women is too high. They purposely didn't say what percentage of journalists are women because that'd negatively impact their goal.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:51 AM
18

Mens suicide is probably the men's issue that gets the most attention yet it's not even a fraction of the attention that some women's issues get. In the UK suicide in the biggest killer of men under 40 (I think, can't remember the exact age) yet there are no major campaigns for it year round like there are for many women's issues.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:50 AM
2

Going to be honest here and say that while I don't believe it was fake because that'd be fucking stupid and the logistics of it just couldn't work, it is kind of weird that the students in the media were drama students and some had been on the news before. Maybe someone can shed some light on it.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:46 PM
3

The thing is, questions like that are completely valid regardless of the genders of the victim or perpetrator but people get sour because you're not supposed to question victims when it's women. How the fuck are you supposed to get to the truth without asking the people involved in the situations questions? The one double standard that pisses me off to no end is that you're not allowed to ask questions which may be perceived to paint a woman/women in a bad light when talking about genders or in …
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:29 PM
8

This story is pretty interesting when it comes to public reactions to shootings. The main difference between this and other shootings is that while the perpetrators of both have clear mental issues, most shootings that make the news are school shootings where children are the victims. Here the victims are employees of a corporation. Rather than an attack on innocent civilians, it's seen as an attack on a corporation. For school shootings, often times the perpetrator is attacking the institution …
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:07 PM
1

Twat will probably cancel vaccinations for teenage girls too.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 12:00 AM
2

I really think you're missing his point. His point is that regardless of skill level the amount your payed depends on how popular your sport is i.e. how many people watch it. He gave the example of some people thinking women play better basketball to show that despite people thinking that women are more skilled at basketball than men within their own league, less people watch it so it doesn't matter if they play better or not, they'll be payed less.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:58 PM
2

The line about CEOs is perfect. It really makes you think, though. The reason there are more male CEOs and MPs is a reflection of the past, when, for example, we didn't have paternal leave parity. That was my first reaction as well, I never thought about it like that but it makes sense. It's hard to research so I don't know how much evidence there is to support it other than the fact that a greater percentage of new CEOs are women compared to before. While I don't think this is the main reason, …
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:53 PM
2

Could be but I know someone like this so it wouldn't surprise me if it was real.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:43 PM
5

Pushing towards an extreme on one side or the other. That's sad. Hopefully he'll be fine, that's all anyone can hope for.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:43 PM
20

Can confirm, know a person like this. "My son is only 2 years old and he goes to [some sort of pre-school] because me and my husband earn a lot of money and we can afford it. When he goes to school he'll be privileged over the young black boy in his class which isn't fair". I shit you not these people are retarded. If it isn't fair then give up your fucking money and don't send him to a pre-school. Jesus fuck, I don't understand how these people think this is logical. Also, assumes that because …
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:41 PM
2

What the absolute fuck? What country did this take place in and where was he from? I'm guessing it was the UK but of course I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:14 PM
6

more support from this sub Reddit than the feminist ones. I know this sub is pretty supportive of most victims but I'm kind of surprised the feminist ones weren't supportive. For all the crazy stuff they say about those they perceive to be against them, I always assumed that they were still supportive of victims they advocate for.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:11 PM
1

"Mixing of sexes is misogynistic" - SJWs 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/18 04:53 PM
8

So should we just give up trying to reason with people because a large number of them are going to be dishonest? Yeah, that'll change things.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:01 PM
1

Talking about the prime minister of one of the most powerful countries in the world being a bit of a dick seems fair. Not exactly advocating for rights with this particular post but there's no reason we can't do both, just make another post.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:40 AM
2

The man is a fucking treasure. He chooses his words so damn carefully. You can disagree with him on many things but you cannot deny his incredible ability to think about every single word he speaks before he says it. It doesn't mean he always gets it right, it means he puts thought into it to make sure people being dishonest do not succeed in using fallacies to get to him.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:28 AM
3

Every time I hear of a situation like this I remember this glorious video.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:10 AM
1

Are you aware of how business works? Supply-Demand basic principles. Higher demand for a product = higher profit as supply is limited to an extent. Why would a network offer a show that brings in 1million viewers for their weekly shows the same as a show that brings in 4 million? Do you expect them to divide their profits equally among all tv shows? Dividing money equally between employees is also idiotic. The CEOs of businesses are payed more than the IT Technicians because they have more worth…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:55 AM
2

This is best analogy I could think of to get the main point across but it isn't prefect. It'd be the same as lowering qualifications for a job because a lower number of applicants who're adequately qualified are women. The qualifications would be lower for all but are made for the sole purpose of helping women. This analogy isn't truely accurate either, it's actually worse in this case. In the analogy better qualified applicants will still have a better chance. Here, male students are able to pa…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:41 AM
1

Agreed but I don't know how most businesses differentiate between competent employees who're fairly productive for the most part. The one working over time will surely get attention though.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:17 AM
2

I think that was the joke.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:11 AM
5

Same with my philosophy teacher. I think its disgusting that they would teach the shitty stuff about other religions but not their own. The weird thing is that she was genuinely really knowledgeable about philosophy and ethics. Some of the "less shitty" stuff she'd consider when just talking to people privately but there's always the "x interpretation" bullshit response. What I find interesting is that through out my school life most P&E teachers have been atheist/agnostic or fairly religious if…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:09 AM
13

The alt-right Nazi commanding an army of 50,000 internet trolls? Of course you'd do that /s
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:00 AM
16

Or an employee at a company, even if they provided evidence smh.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 01:59 AM
1

No it's not a citizen's duty. For most people self preservation is the most important and there's nothing wrong with that. Millions of years of evolution has programmed us to look out for ourselves first. However, helping someone in danger is a commendable thing to do but it shouldn't be expected of a person to help someone while putting their own safety at risk.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:55 PM
0

Really liked his comedy but he sold the fuck out to be just another late night show host. I'm not one to usually accuses people of stuff like this but man his new show and his old comedy are complete opposites when it comes to certain things. Can't blame him really, most people would do it for the money. He makes a fair point here and of course there's more to it but this is obviously just a joke.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:22 PM
1

I mean if this works then she's run a successful scam business for herself and the people who fall for it were never going to be successful in business anyway. Not much harm done. Even if you want a feminist business school, you have to be completely fucking dense to fall for this shit. Natural selection, the stupid will lose, let it happen.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:46 PM
1

“If capitalism is an economy that values masculine traits, what could another economy look like?” asks Armbrust, arguing that the traditional economy is based on masculine traits such as “individualism” and “speed and efficiency.” These traits, Armbrust claims, should be shunned in favor of more feminine ones, such as “mindfulness,” “gratitude,” and “generosity” — all traits that can help promote the “redistribution of money and power.” In all fairness to her, the only people who'll fall for thi…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:44 PM
1

What's fucked up is that this whole Weinstein bullshit got CK Louis caught in the middle where it was clear he was a creep but not someone who abused their power like Weinstein. The mob mentality after Weinstein got exposed spread like fucking wildfire, CK Louis, from what I've read simply asked to do creepy shit to happen. Mostly after shows and shit where it's fucking obvious what he'd want. Simply, decline. He never threatened to harm careers or try to force someone. He apologised for his act…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:39 PM
2

The point wasn't well made. If you're trying to discuss something and find mutual ground, being a dick is the exact opposite of what you should do because otherwise you're letting people know that you have no interest in listening to conflicting opinions.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:29 AM
2

It wasn't even that we're trying to have a better image due to all the lies spread about us that he got shat on. It's because he was being a dick about it. If you have a point to make then go ahead, this sub rarely ever censors but do it in a civil manner otherwise it's obvious you're not looking to discuss issues, you want to project and complain.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:21 AM
3

Honestly I don't know but I'd say find a particular cause you want to support and find a good charity for it. There are some charities listed in the sidebar so look there.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:16 AM
2

At the time everyone's witty and funny reference to something "funny" in the post got a shitload of upvotes. Though there were a couple of people pointing out the shitty jokes and references being upvoted.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:09 AM
4

On a show on a channel owned by Vice so it really makes me curious as well.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:04 AM
0

I believe that your heart is in the right place but you're fail to understand how this works.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 11:56 PM
2

you had to go and call liberal arts worthless I'm sorry but would you mind telling me where I did this or am I missing something? (maybe your username?)
/r/MensRights03/12/17 11:54 PM
5

I asked for examples and you gave a whopping zero. Examples of people who're generally believed to have sexually assaulted someone is not what I asked for. My personal beliefs about those two aside, one hasn't been taken to trial and the other walked free not because of a lack of evidence or inability to prove guilt, but because of his case being supposedly mishandled which common logic dictates that for a powerful person is more than likely just a way to get them off the hook. Needless to say, …
/r/MensRights03/12/17 11:51 PM
4

What exactly is your point and how is it relevant to what I said above?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 11:35 PM
68

People in this sub have varying opinions. I'm speaking for myself and what the artist is trying to depict. This in the sub which likes to act like false accusations make up 90% of all rape claims This really isn't the case though is it? Find me one example of someone claiming that 90% or even the vast majority of rape claims are false accusations and being upvoted or praised on the plethora of threads about false rape accusations on the front page or the sub as a whole.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:29 PM
26

Like half of the stories in that thread end with "she threatened to tell them I raped her" or "she told them I raped her". It's fucked up.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:20 PM
228

I think that it's trying to say that they create a victim complex causing women to underestimate themselves and painting a bleak picture of the world. Women are heavily encouraged to go into STEM, given scholarships and preferential treatment in those fields yet feminist keep complaining about it like there's a huge wall of sexism stopping them from going into STEM. This could potentially put women off by painting a negative view of STEM subjects. Also, a lot of these feminists are taking women'…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:17 PM
3

I'm not saying there aren't MRAs who think that, I'm just talking about the general opinion on this sub. Of course there are people who think otherwise but either you talk directly to them about their reasons for it or comment on a thread/comment relevant to that subject so that at least you're replying to something where someone has given their reasoning otherwise who are you really talking to? There are a number of arguments someone might make for not having women's hour e.g. it's discriminati…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:12 PM
1

HAH you're so fucking easy to manipulate. Without a doubt the worst bot on Reddit.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:25 PM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:18 PM
1

I don't have Facebook you stupid bot. I'm not going to fall for your tricks, I know you're evil.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:08 PM
1

Bad bot. Watch out for ninja edits.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:15 PM
1

r/iamverybadass
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:09 PM
4

No problem with women's hour. I think it's a good thing infact. However, afford men the same services. That's the general argument that people here make.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:07 PM
11

This is just retarded. I don't see this directly as a civil rights issue but this is just stupid. Taking away a goddamn computer lab for a social justice centre. Hmm I can just imagine how the future would be like with these geniuses running the world. The economy and society are sure to thrive under their leadership.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:04 PM
6

Which is a consequence of no one taking it seriously socially either.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 01:18 PM
9

I disagree. Women are way less likely to be convicted for the same crime as men or get a sentence just as long. But when you compare white women to black women, the same is true. Black women have it better than men but worse than white women. The disparity in conviction rates and length of sentences between black and white women is similar to the the disparity between black and white men. Taking gender out the equation. The only major difference is race. So it is indeed a different world for bla…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:19 PM
1

I understand that you're just speculating but I can't say I agree without sufficient data to back up this claim.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:11 PM
9

She wrote: “In my opinion, people with extreme mental health issues should be forcibly injected with the medication which helps them – screw human rights. How grotesque that the state incessantly nannies and lectures and taxes the non-mad over what they ingest, and lets the insane do as they please!” Feminist - advocating for the rights... "screw human rights" She's batshit crazy. That article is fucking disgusting. I clicked that link expecting that she'd be looking for sympathy but nope. It's …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:09 PM
7

I'm making assumptions here so I could be completely wrong. However, I'd say it's because since 1920 the life expectancy of the entire population has increased quite a bit and people are dying due to different causes. Mostly diseases that come with old age I'm guessing. The difference more than likely comes from the lack of spending on men's health care compared to women's. This means less treatment, resources or less effective treatment for men with men's specific diseases and such. Men are als…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:30 AM
1

You've been resorting to insults too, just because you didn't explicitly swear doesn't mean it was an insult. You were being condescending instead of actually replying to the argument so I felt it was fair. Should I have been the bigger man and not use insults? Yeah probably, but at worst I did the equivalent to what you did. Also, my mistake, you said taxed but the point still stands. Bringing up toilet paper has a lot to do with the issue because it's arguably just as essential of a hygiene pr…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:23 AM
1

Hygiene products don't exactly need to be split into gender specific products. You can't argue that because white men are more likely to be convicted for the same crime as white women, their gender should remain anonymous during trials but leave out the same issue affecting black men; even if you're not against the same thing happening for cases where the accused is black. Similarly, you can't argue that one particular hygiene product not be taxed while leaving out other essential hygiene produc…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:19 AM
1

and the reason I felt free to generalize is his opinion seems to be by far the prevailing view there, not just a few bad apples. a person from men's rights reflecting the majority view of the subreddit Most of the top comments are pointing out the irony in the title so I can't exactly agree with this.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:13 AM
0

A large number of women (and a fair amount of men) independently identify as feminists. It skews the number of lowers the percentage of crazy feminists within the movement because most of these people don't do anything other than say "yes" when someone asks "are you a feminist?". They don't have any power within the movement but as long as they themselves claim to be feminists, we can't do much. The vocal minority has the power and are the majority of activists which is why I personally don't li…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:10 AM
0

NOW is the largest feminist organization in the world, and fathers wanting equal custody is a form of abusive control, according to them. What I said in my comment above: However the reason I don't personally like feminism is that most of the feminist actually causing change (i.e. in positions of power) are part of that vocal minority and feminism as a movement has negatively impacted men's lives. A large number of women (and a fair amount of men) independently identify as feminists. It skews th…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:22 PM
1

Yes and you're making that judgement based on the fact that he's a person from mensrights. Saying "a person from mensrights" implies any person from mensrights. Then you say "accusing others of judging a group by it's worst element. That's rich," which implies that it's solely ironic because the person is from mensrights because that the only reason you give as to why it's "rich".
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:18 PM
1

Great, we're arguing that if this does get tax deduction then so should other hygiene products because they're just as and in some cases more needed e.g. toilet paper or diapers.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:15 PM
1

It's not a debating lesson again as you put it trying to be the condescending prick that you are. We're just asking you to be consistent with your logic. If you think tampons should be free because women bleed every 4 weeks, then toiler paper should be free because people shit every day. That's why he bought up toilet paper. But you chose to ignore him and just repeat the "we shouldn't be twats about women's issues" without explaining how we're acting like twats just because we disagree on one p…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:13 PM
1

Yes and that's the reason you gave as to why it isn't the same. You don't give any reason as to why you disagree with it being the same. All you say is that one is a gender role and the other is universal. From this all I get is that the reason they're not the same is that one is a gender role and the other in universal. Well, I wasn't trying to dispute this point, I was just pointing out that telling a man to man up being universal doesn't make it okay. But anyway, telling a women to go to the …
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:08 PM
7

Telling someone to man the fuck up and stop being weak is universal. Doesn't make it okay.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:22 AM
4

Be aware not scared. You're way too deep into the hype. Remember that for the most part, like most people, your life will be fairly comfortable.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:21 AM
1

I mean you could always just make it up and not actually have your girlfriend go on dates with your friends unless her parents want proof and shit. In that case just take a few pictures and you're done.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:14 AM
1

He's being cautious and trying to do the right thing give the man a fucking break.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:12 AM
1

I was with you until this. You did the exactly thing Bush was talking about and the exact thing you were point out when you said "a person from mensrights". This might be the most ironic thread I've ever seen on Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:04 AM
0

His point is that like it or not, MRAs and many anti-SJWs form their opinions on the vocal minority on feminists. I believe this is true. However the reason I don't personally like feminism is that most of the feminist actually causing change (i.e. in positions of power) are part of that vocal minority and feminism as a movement has negatively impacted men's lives.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:02 AM
1

All of which are fair and make sense.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:59 PM
1

Banished? I guess it depends on the country you're in because I've never heard of it happening over here in the UK but I do know it does happen in more "traditional" countries.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:57 PM
1

E.g. food despite it being the most basic need.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:55 PM
2

Read what you're saying. You start of with a fallacy again, lmao. No reply to his actual argument rather the fact that he called out you using a fallacy so he's unworthy of your time. Again, I get the idea of "let them have this or show we're not against women's issues" however they're a massive level of dishonestly there. If we don't agree that they are a right, we're letting them have it just to appease them which can be considered morally wrong (also don't want to comprise our beliefs) and it…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:54 PM
2

I completely agree with what you're saying here but that doesn't mean I or anyone else has to agree with this particular issue. Hygiene products are a privilege, not a right. No tax on hygiene products as a whole is a good idea so those less fortunate can at least have some comfort but they're definitely not a "right".
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:47 PM
23

Difference is that unlike Trump, Obama wasn't called out for his bullshit by the MSM. For years I went on believing he was a great president who did nothing wrong until I grew older and did some research. He was better than some definitely but by no means was a a great president.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 08:14 PM
2

Both sound like insufferable pricks to me if I'm honest. This shit is just straight up cringe.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:51 PM
1

I agree with your point about the example because it isn't related to male on female assault. But that's not what I was attempting to highlight. I was talking about how people reacted when the topic male on female assault was brought up.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:42 PM
11

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:56 PM
9

I commented in that thread because I was horrified that it happened first of all. Then you have people saying it's not as bad if it's a male student. I took issue with this and promptly got downvoted. I know people will say that I'm just running back to my echo-chamber and in some ways that's true. But more importantly, I'm posting this to highlight that on a supposed "liberal" website where people aren't SJWs shit like this still happens. SJWs aren't the reason liberals are despised by many peo…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:53 PM
7

Thanks, I'm so fucking excited for my new amazing life!
/r/MensRights14/09/17 08:04 PM
3

That's great, I'm getting contacts soon anyway so everything works out perfectly. Oh by the way, what level of tan can I maintain without it affecting my privilege points and monthly privilege income?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 08:02 PM
33

Are you white? What type of bleach would you recommend? Or will you racists not accept be because I wasn't born white?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:31 PM
14

Every time a see a story like this I'm genuinely flabbergasted. Stuff like this shouldn't even be an issue let alone a men's or women's issue. Someone beat a fucking baby for fucks sake. Lock the motherfucker up, there's no justification for child abuse in any case.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:48 PM
95

Two reasons. You don't talk about men's issues because it's not socially acceptable and many people will automatically view you as a misogynist, racist monster. When it comes to men's issues, many people who do agree just nod their heads and move on.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:44 PM
193

White supremacists? Fuck me I need to get my goddamn skin bleached.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:41 PM
5

I am legitimately shocked.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 07:01 PM
1

Well fuck me. Will need a source on that before I let you do anything to me though. Also, was a similar study done on how men view women?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:09 PM
3

Jews are only white when it fits their agenda. Edit: by "their" I do not mean Jews.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:42 AM
3

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:41 AM
2

Not really healthy if either view it as "marring down".
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:04 AM
22

They'll tie it to toxic masculinity way before that.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:01 AM
2

🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:27 AM
2

I thought this was a joke. Then I read the article.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:42 AM
5

I'd like sources because I have a hunch that at the very least these statistics are being misrepresented.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:26 AM
17

Historically (and to this day) more men have died in battle. You want to call for affirmative action on that? How about construction work or mining? People seem to be under the notion that for some reason it's okay to discriminate against future generations because their predecessors had advantages. But only for men when it comes to gender issues and only for white people when it comes to race issues. If you're going to use flawed ass logic, at least be consistent with it.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:13 AM
2

but heaven forbid someone in this sub not subscribe to every single alt-right policy. The smell of bullshit is so strong. This sub has Trump supporters, yes. But it also has a lot of people who're anti-Trump or don't give a shit and a lot of liberals, libertarians, whatever. Trump supporters are in no way even close to a majority of people here yet you go claiming that people are scrutinized for, not even being anti-trump, no but for being anti alt-right. That's some next level bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:00 AM
17

You see somehow I don't think they oppose feminist for the same reasons as us and their treatment of them is fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:47 PM
3

I've jerked it to a lot of fucked up porn that I'm not even into e.g. incest. Mostly when that's on the homepage and I can't be asked to search for shit. Does this mean I want to fuck my nonexistent sister? No, no it doesn't.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:32 PM
2

You listen here. Us poor minorities are marginalized and oppressed people and we need freedom from their oppression. Only our ultra liberal left wing overlords allies can liberate us.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 11:11 PM
4

Although I don't agree with the whole "the left" thing I think I have a good understanding of it. There are two main reasons for it. The first is that this sub is largely uncensored. This means people on the left (like me) and people on the right (like people from T_D) can both comment. This of course leads to a lot of shit being thrown on both sides. The other reason is that no matter how you look at it, the left has never been in support of the MRM. The loudest on their side label us as alt-ri…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 10:35 PM
1

Seriously I rarely ever see race discussed in this sub unless it's relevant to the topic. It's surprising to hear this shit but at the same time I completely understand why it's done by the people who do it. It's done to undermine us because it's easier to label, scrutinize and dismiss through misinformation rather than offer actual criticism.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 10:27 PM
2

I'm from the UK so we didn't really learn much about American history lol. However some of those things still hold true for the UK like women who owned property being allowed to vote.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 11:08 AM
2

Even though a few years ago I realised that feminist propaganda was false and damaging to the rights of men and women and what feminism as a movement had become, I still held first wave and second wave feminism in high regard. I mean, that's what they taught us in school and they wouldn't teach us a biased version of events would they? Especially not in history class lmao. I realised this while situation when I watched a TL;DR video explaining the history of feminism. It was much more violent an…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:57 AM
3

Not that I agree or disagree with OP's point (due to lack of knowledge on the subject), but he didn't say anything about the people you mentioned. If anything his point was that if the USA were to have a female president she needs to be a president rather than a "female" president. Her being a woman shouldn't play any part in her presidency.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 01:52 PM
2

Hell I don't like May but we don't get called sexist for criticising her although I wonder if that'd be the case if we had a female prime minister under a Labour government. In all honestly, I don't think it'd be too different but I guess that also depends on the policies put forward. Americans need to get past identity politics and over here in Britain we need to stop trying to fucking emulate them.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 01:49 PM
1

I sort of feel bad for MtF as it is. Those who transition have a hard time as it is because of biology not being too kind. Then they gotta deal with increased discrimination. FtM can quite successfully transition and appear like average men, lucky for them I guess.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:19 AM
11

What I've come to realise over time when it comes to things like objectification, stereotypical portray or men and attitude towards men in the workplace is that men don't give a shit about the former and suck it up when it comes to the latter. I'm not saying all women just complain about it or they're inherently inclined to complain about it. I am saying that feminism's narrative of women are victim and how even the small of things which are in no way related to gender are somehow sexist towards…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:13 AM
3

It's a facebook comment from some random person, this doesn't belong here. I've already seen it on other subs where it does belong, let's keep it that way.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:00 AM
7

She didn't threaten him, read the article.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 12:55 AM
26

This is fucked up, this isn't r/violenceagainstwomen and I don't want it to turn into this. Hopefully the cop looses the fucking lawsuit and should receive a prison sentence. Drunk driving is irresponsible but the cop had no right to abuse his power like that an assault a non-violent citizen.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 12:52 AM
1

That's not my point. My point was that you highlighting "usually", to show that you accounted for the reply that someone made, is not adequate. It does not adequately refute his point.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 11:19 PM
1

I know it's a social trait. I don't know why you felt the need to explain it when I didn't dispute that. My point is that regardless of other things, long hair is a choice.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 03:10 PM
1

Being 50% of the population doesnt mean much when it comes to target demographics and marketing e.g. beauty products.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 10:03 AM
1

"Beating women to prove you're not a sexist. An inspirational figure."
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 10:01 AM
1

Also, I doubt many women playing these games have problems playing as half naked ripped men. Jin is one sexy motherfucker.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 09:59 AM
1

These people would probably be furious about that too because they can't seem to grasp the concept of entertainment. People play games, watch TV shows and movies with sexualised characters because people like sex and like seeing hot people naked. There's nothing wrong with that, the whole point of the activity is entertainment.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 09:58 AM
1

I don't understand how that's a proper counter. It's still a choice.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/17 09:43 AM
12

Yep, but it does make a powerful point to those who're open minded.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 02:11 PM
1

So you want us to act like complete dickheads as well?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:31 PM
2

I find jokes about violence against women funny as well if they're funny. Jokes are jokes, you can choose to be offended over them like many of feminists we criticise or you can be mature, laugh at it or ignore it and move on.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:30 PM
-11

It's a joke, try not to act like the ones we tend to criticise for being easily offended.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:56 PM
5

This. Is. Fucking. Hilarious. My only problem is that if something similar with reversed genders was posted on another sub like r/CringeAnarchy or r/dankmemes a lot of the people who upvoted his will call the misogyny and normalizing violence against women.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:54 PM
5

If someone is dangerous to a population and possibly society do you agree measures should be taken to stop them from being dangerous? If yes then I see no reason as to why you'd say that compulsory vaccines are wrong or immoral.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:48 PM
1

Fucking hate the idea of diversity for the sake of diversity to the point where you actively discriminate against the majority. The majority isn't inherently bad and the minority/minorities isn't inherently good. Same can be said for men/women and ethnic groups in this context. I say this as a man from an ethnic minority, I'm not a fucking victim. Let my qualifications speak for themselves. I also think blind recruitment should actually be common method of recruitment when the goal is to reduce …
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:33 PM
1

AFAIK in third world countries a greater percentage of the homeless are women compared to other countries.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:24 AM
3

Man I like Ben so much but at the same time I can't help but think he's slightly hypocritical about certain things when he defends religion so strongly. I agree with people's rights to practice whatever religion they please as long as they don't infringe on other people's rights. However, Ben displays such a high level of awareness and offers strong criticism to political and social issues, some of which I disagree with yet they're still consistent with his other views and have the same logic be…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:11 PM
1

Yes but I think it's fair to say that child molesters aren't exactly suitable to be parents. The risk towards the child is too big to take even if it's unlikely a child molester will do anything to their own children (which I doubt it is). Also, I think it's fair to assume that adopted children are much more likely to get abused.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:04 PM
2

Yep. However, I think OP is talking about people who genuinely believe they're advocating for equality yet they're doing this type of shit. Many of these people do not realise what they're actually doing and their inability to notice their own hypocrisy is mind boggling.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:59 PM
1

I wouldn't randomly take money from someone I knew either. Seems really fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:56 PM
2

Agreed. Especially for luxury goods. Even vitamins are not necessary unless your doctor prescribes them or tells you to take them.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:08 PM
1

Oh that makes sense. Funny you mentioned UA because I was just reading a post mentioning it before I saw your reply.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:17 PM
10

If fatherhood is determined by society then couldn't theoretically any random bloke walking down the street be "made" the father of any child? That's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:58 PM
1

That would makes sense to be honest as long putting your name their was a choice.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:56 PM
0

consent compulsory
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:51 PM
2

It's isn't and it shouldn't be either way. The vitamins a man needs versus vitamins a women needs are probably different and in different quantities so it makes sense then men's one costs more. As long as the ingredient list is different it's justified. Now if it's the exact same then it's wrong but I'd just buy the cheaper one.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:49 PM
5

Lol, going my their own terminology I guess not but they still face many of the same issues. The MRM is for anyone who faces same issues as most men do at large.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:42 PM
5

Also, it's the internet so people like being dicks because of anonymity.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:41 PM
1

It was good, she deserves good pay which she'll most likely get with bonuses like most other actors.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:02 PM
1

From a business POV it's a good opportunity. As long as she stays low and lets other do the talking it'll work out fine. If she goes full blown complaining about a non-issue then she's only going to get herself more haters and would just be flat out lying which reflects badly on her.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:44 PM
-5

So when a chick comes along spouting all that, "I need a real man bullshit, little does she know I've already showed a dozen women like her the door. I was with you until this r/iamverybadass line.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:36 AM
9

He took a pay cut to get the role and or help with the budget tho I'd guess the former. Which is often what actors do yet people are complaining about this. Jonah Hill was much more known than Gadot was before this movie as well. Although he had a smaller role and arguably the movie wasn't as anticipated or big but the relative cost is still fucking low.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:33 AM
2

Honestly, I hated MoS when I watched it when it came out but those criticisms just don't stand up. Memory is a funny thing and now that I think of it, I actually seem to like it. Maybe because at that time I barely knew anything about DC and now I know much, much more than before. Regardless, you criticism don't stand up. If anything, the story was the problem not character development which there was a ton of.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:30 AM
1

Because people's views on several subjects go hand in hand. Are you an MRA? Well then you're most likely also anti-feminist. This doesn't mean all MRAs and anti-feminist or that you have to me anti-feminist to be an MRA. The two things often go in hand due to obvious reasons. It's the same thing with the regressive left. The regressive left is more than likely to be feminist and even everyone on the left is more than likely to be feminist (as in moderates who fail to see feminism's damage). This…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:21 PM
1

I meant fucking with cops not literally doing the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 04:23 PM
1

Recycling for sustainable development. I like the way you think.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 01:05 PM
1

I was with you until that last line, well and the second part of the first one. Now that I think about it, I only agreed with the second sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 11:54 AM
1

I'd say it was fair for what it was. Reverse the scenarios though and you know the man would've gone to prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 11:53 AM
3

I don't think I've ever laughed this hard from watching a serious, real interaction between anyone. The comment section is pretty hilarious too.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 11:48 AM
1

This shit made me laugh so hard. How some people are like this is beyond me.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 11:43 AM
4

Exactly the same scenario won't happen obviously. What a shitty attempt at negating my point.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 11:42 AM
1

And the one where like a white girl were show and being violent, then claiming to be victims and the officers then pinned her down to arrest her. This description isn't even specific enough because I don't know how to describe it further and people will probably think of different ones but that itself says something.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 10:24 AM
1

Yes and that comes back to what the parent comment said which is that men who're only interested in sex go to prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 09:01 AM
61

Oh come on man, there are videos of trashy white girls doing this shit as well. People are just shitty in general.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 08:33 AM
1

scares me to think of millions of men from less civilized countries pouring into the West. It scares me too but at the same time if we don't do anything millions of people will die. It's a moral dilemma which I have no solution to. Just a shitty and unfortunate situation all round.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:14 AM
1

I don't know, I'll probably need statistics on that. Based on general information though I'd say yes.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:05 AM
2

I don't know to be honest. I'd say maybe, within set quotas, allow whoever comes first. The point a lot of us make here, at least I do, is that things like affirmative action and gender quotas for jobs and degrees are sexist because jobs/placements are given to candidates at the expense of candidates just as qualified or more qualified because the candidate picked has a vagina. Equality doesn't mean 50/50 in everything, it means lack of discrimination. Affirmative action and diversity quotas are…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:51 AM
4

Sadistic sure, but not a paedophile unless they're sexually attracted to children. You're misusing the word paedophile, I understand what you mean, but that's just not what paedophillia is.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:17 AM
5

I agree, it was. But you know why they're talking about men fighting for their rights? Because men too had to fight for their goddamn rights. We're told that women were oppressed by the evil patriarchy of men but that's completely false if you look at history. Yes, social norms were different for men and women and men had more rights. However, men fought for those rights too. The only people who did have basic human rights throughout history has been the upper class. Working class men had to ear…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:45 PM
15

In theory, why wouldn't you be a feminist? It's about the oppressed trying to get rights that have forever been denied to them. And that's exactly why people act like you're some woman-hating misogynist if you say you aren't a feminist. I agree with the idea of women and men have equal rights. What I don't agree with is the ideology of feminism. A lot of ideologies are based on noble causes, like feminism is, but they themselves can be very despicable. I criticize feminism, not women having equa…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:40 PM
7

I agree man which is why I said: And they say FGM is done to the child for a man's pleasure but MGM isn't done for a woman's. People can uses excuses like hygiene or STI prevention but we all know that's bullshit. and being that it's become the norm so most women prefer mutilated dick. What I mean is, parents mutilate their newborn boy because women prefer it and think if they aren't circumcised they'll get turned down. I don't think it's paedophillia though.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:32 PM
2

As a student this make my fucking blood boil.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 04:25 PM
4

I sort of lumped that in with religion but I don't think much of it is done because of masturbation anymore, even if it started out like that. I could be completely wrong though.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 04:02 PM
6

It wasn't the best analogy but it wasn't the worst either. People sympathise with animals and the guy tried using that to make a point.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:15 PM
12

Analogies are good for making people see a point with something more familiar with. The point is that if it's not okay to do it do an animal, what the fucking hell makes you think it's okay to do it to a newborn child? People sadly care more about animal rights than the right of a newborn male baby to not be mutilated so to express from that point of view might make them consider the issue differently.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:00 AM
51

"So it gets sucked" "No one wants an uncircumcised pp" "His wife will thank me" And they say FGM is done to the child for a man's pleasure but MGM isn't done for a woman's. People can uses excuses like hygiene or STI prevention but we all know that's bullshit. Theres two main reasons MGM is done, one being religion and the other (prominent in the US) being that it's become the norm so most women prefer mutilated dick.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:56 AM
2

Yeah but I mean it still isn't logical.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:51 AM
2

Most Jews aren't even practicing. I wonder what they think of Orthodox Jews. I feel sorry for them because shit like this makes them seem bad.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:16 PM
12

And leave your doggos to me.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:13 PM
3

Name: Minister-For-Men Age: 1 day Occupation: Bad Troll
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:10 PM
1

I haven't seen people simply questioning climate change being called deniers and I'd like to think that accepting climate change isn't a "liberal" thing because science does not have a political bias.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:08 PM
14

Lmao. If they're using this bullshit then the same logic could be applied to them. "Your ancestors were involved in the slave trade so it's okay to force you to be a slave" or "X person in your family was criminal so you deserve to go to prison". Void of any logic it really is.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:32 PM
7

He's a bit over the top but it's important to remember he's a comic trying to be funny. The points he makes are still very valid.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 01:32 PM
4

We need affarmative action for more women terrorists!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:23 PM
21

She won't say Islam specifically​ because she knows more people will be offended. Better keep it to just religion.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:22 PM
10

That's not the point. This isn't specifically about engineering, engineering is just being used as an example. The point being made is that first off, approximately 60% people going to university are women so of course there's around 2/3 women (+6% from percentage of women going 5o university) holding student loan debt. The next point is that men on average choose degrees which get them higher paying jobs on average so they're able to completely pay off their loans faster whereas women choose a …
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:59 PM
26

Did you even read his comment? He simply said that someone with an Engineering degree can pay off their student loans much faster than someone with a liberal arts degree. Are you trying to dispute this?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:22 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:15 PM
-2

You dropped the /s
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:14 PM
2

But that's just like... your opinion man. /s
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:13 PM
6

The comment section gives me hope. Nice to see that for a change.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:03 AM
2

Agreed. That's exactly my point. At the end of the day it's a child being forcibly mutilated. People say that MGM isn't as severe as FGM and even though it's more complicated than that, let's just let them have it for the sake of argument. But how does this justify MGM? People say MGM isn't the same thing as FGM as a backhanded justification for it and my point was severity shouldn't even be an issue which is why I made the murder/abuse comparison. I should have made myself clearer because I did…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:56 PM
2

not any definition to be honest. I was comparing American "liberals" who're liberals in America, call themselves liberals and are treated as liberal politically but in my opinion aren't very liberal. My point was that in the UK people are starting to act in a similar way to American liberals due to the use of the internet and most big websites on the internet showing an American POV of the world.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:54 PM
1

That's not how it works. We can't advocate that men be treated as innocent until proven guilty then advocate women are treated the way men are treated now. Be consisted with your beliefs. I included a TL;DR because I realised it was a bit long. What exactly is convoluted about my comment?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:52 PM
2

I agree with you. I was adding on.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:50 PM
2

That people said, I'm seeing a lot of "Liberals" here in the UK fully accepting the US Regressive usurpation of the term Agreed. Which is why I don't exactly agree with u/52576078's comment. Ask any liberal if they're feminists in the UK and most will say yes. Now within liberal circles if you said you weren't a feminist you would get a reaction and maybe even the whole "not feminist= misogynist" labelling thing to dismiss argument within the younger generation. An increasing number of people ar…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:03 PM
2

It's like, killing 100 people is worse than killing 1 person so killing one person should be okay. Or a more applicable example: abusing 3 people is worse so abusing one person shouldn't have any legal consequence. Either way you look at it MGM, more or less severe than FGM, you cannot argue that it isn't mutilating without choice in most cases, performed on underage children and a painful/traumatic experience. If these things do not count as abuse to you then frankly open discussion with people…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:49 PM
1

I agree with the premise that the victim, regardless of gender should be treated the same. I know that the intentions of the guy who said it were good but I'd like to point something out. My position on any crime including abuse, violence and such is innocent until proven guilty. A lot of the time in courts this isn't held true when it comes to how the accused is treated and socially it rarely is held true when it's something like abuse, rape, violence against a woman. When it's men who're the a…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:44 PM
1

you guys I didn't say anything until you said "bored at work, I'm not trolling, just trying to get negative karma" then tried trolling so I have no idea what you're talking about. Pulling out buzz words like echo chamber doesn't mean you've got a leg up on me by trying to dismiss what I say. This sub is made up of individuals who although may agree of many things, still have their own opinions. To say "you guys" and make yourself look like some victim who's being treated unfairly by everyone in …
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:38 AM
1

"Hurr durr, I'm so cool, you're just a play thing to me." It's sad really, lol.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:23 PM
1

Or pretty much any default. I always thought Reddit was pretty liberal in terms of politics and could get carried away with that but I also thought that it was critical of SJWs and the likes too. Maybe it's only recently or just that I've started using defaults more these days but it seems like it's filled with SJW type stuff. Of coruse there'll be people calling it out but unless interputed, there'll just be threads with this type of bullshit. What I love is that I recently saw a question in r/…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:32 PM
1

There are quite a few, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. For example, YouTube in case you were serious.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:19 PM
215

She also sends a good message about how court cases should be dealt with which does get a fair amount of attention if it's something major. For that reason alone I'm fine with it even if it's just a daytime reality TV show. It does a lot of good even if it's just to seem good.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:24 PM
2

Context matters. In this context its a single person trying to learn about us, attacking them won't do shit. The movement as a whole probably won't accomplish much when it comes to social and political changes acting that way but if an individual is trying to hear us out attacking them will do us no good.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 07:45 PM
3

I understand why you're saying that but it's just not how it works. No one will suddenly change their views if you slap them across the face with something opposing. I can't remember where but I read an article linked to a study that when you aggressive push your point it makes people less likely to consider it whereas acknowledging their opinion and then questioning it makes them evaluate their own opinion which has a much bigger impact. Hostility will only make people turn away.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 04:55 PM
2

I know I wasn't arguing against you.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 04:49 PM
14

I don't dislike her anymore, I'm just indifferent to her. I understand why she's being praised and why this is good thing (encourages other, spread the message to militant feminists, etc) but I don't outright respect her for doing something I expect a decent person to do by default. It took her a long time to realise that and for that reason I cannot say I respect her. However like I said I am indifferent to her so that's something I guess. If she takes this opportunity to use her platform to un…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:42 PM
5

Having preferences are okay, but saying shit like this isn't for a lot of people. I actually wouldn't mind it if the joke was funny. The joke is unfunny and in bad taste which is why many people take offence to this type of stuff. Also the fact that this is sort of true which is fine but there's no need to make people feel shitty. The double standard of saying the same thing about fat women and getting hate also worsens it. If this is okay then that should be okay too. Shit comedy is still comed…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:37 PM
4

I'm not fond of most feminists but this type of stuff really isn't helpful to our cause.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:28 PM
1

Respect.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:22 PM
1

OIC, thanks.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:19 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights13/05/17 11:36 PM
2

I think he was joking.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:41 PM
5

If they do ever meet someone like that they'll most likely walk away annoyed and angry, maybe moan about it to their echo chamber then forget about it and continue living the way they do.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:35 PM
2

The sexual assault excuse is bullshit. That's the exact argument people use in order to avoid allowing trans people use the toilet of their choice. You're more likely to get sexually assaulted by a priest than in a toilet. Statistically the excuse it bullshit. Why should we cater to people's feelings? If that's how society worked it would be utter shit right now. Also, why do some people's feelings matter more than other's? Why should we disregard statistical data in order to cater to people's f…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:51 PM
9

Disposability. That's what it comes down to.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:43 AM
2

I wouldn't necessarily generalize all feminists to think that men wouldn't be affected by having their restrooms changed like that. You know that's clearly not what he meant. Of course he didn't mean every single feminist that exists. He was talking about the feminists you hear about on the internet and the news who do this type of stuff and those who run feminist organisations and have the political power to affect it like they have as you can see. this isolated case in UCSB seems pretty unfair…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:37 AM
3

Why does everyone need a "safe space bathroom" though? "Hur dur I'm a victim cater to my needs" hysteria. That's why. I agree with everything you said. I don't care who I have to take a shit next to but if I'm restricted to one toilet while others can go to any that's literally discrimination. Be consistent with your beliefs for fuck sake but then again, SJWs aren't exactly known for that.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:30 AM
2

MFW I realise I was an idiot for believing they were heroes like school taught me.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:21 AM
1

I live in London, I think it's about as "feminist" as it gets. I don't live in central London or areas too close to it where I assume it's even worse. It's just that most men I know don't care about it or make fun of it because they see how ridiculous it is. Most women are indifferent to it but of course there are some militant feminists.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:37 AM
1

Agreed. I've seen it gets progressive worse. At least most people I know don't care but that doesn't change the fact that in institutions like school and workplaces this shit is being pushed.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:15 AM
7

They were around 14, they sure as shit deserve it. At that age most people know that it's wrong to sexually assault someone and spread child pornography which I'm willing to bet these girls knew but they didn't think that their actions would have consequences but that doesn't mean they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:12 AM
3

"Well young boys that age fantasise about being sexually assaulted, stripped, filmed and humiliated. It's just how boys are." - sexist, dismissive assholes probably.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:09 AM
8

That's what I thought until just a few days ago when someone posted statistics saying otherwise. Men and women are both lenient on women and IIRC female judges are just as or more lenient on women than male judges.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:05 AM
2

Also check out the sidebar. It has tons of important info about issues and how you can help.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:47 PM
1

Well how do I reply to that? Just read my comment above again I guess.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:44 PM
2

Seriously you don't have to apologise. If you didn't do anything wrong you don't have to take responsibility for anyone else. Also, women as a whole don't have to apologise for anything either. Men and women both have issues and can have a lack of understanding for the other's at times. The only people who do need to apologise would be rad-fem groups and their leaders who over the years have painted a shitty picture of men, the MRM and have hindered progress.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:42 PM
1

Summoning u/SkywardStrike63 who'll be happy to learn this.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:33 PM
1

Which hospital is this from? Just curious because I think I might have seen that before although the boards look pretty much the same at all hospitals. Usually I'd make a joke about going in saying you identify as a women but that'd be useless because of biological differences and waste the doctors' time.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:31 PM
4

How much karma do you want man? I've upvoted you like 19 times (using RES to see it) and only started noticing around 16 upvotes. In all seriousness, I appreciate your contributions.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:29 PM
2

Word for word what I said out loud.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:55 PM
13

I don't mind the joke but a lot of people are agreeing unironically which is what gets me.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:49 PM
4

and chose the only obvious, rational, non-abusive path. If only more people would do that.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:00 PM
3

I won the "circumcise or not" discussion and my kids are both intact Fuck yeah. Good dad.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 10:57 PM
2

That's awesome, it's nice to have learnt that. Thanks. Also, do you know if the impacts on the father have anything to do with hormonal changes? I've read that parents go through several hormonal changes when they become parents and it's obviously more severe for mothers due to pregnancies but could SSC have an impact on hormonal changes in fathers and could a lack of SSC explain why some fathers don't feel as much of a connection to their children?
/r/MensRights01/05/17 10:55 PM
3

5%ers Hey guys, Rich Piana here.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:21 PM
4

i.e. victim blaming.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:00 PM
2

Is the Independent any good? I've read some articles from it and they seem alright.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:59 PM
4

Everything Salon does makes me cringe. This is from last December. How can they be so ignorant or shamelessly promote lies.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:56 PM
3

I'm not a feminist but not all feminists are rad feminists or feminists who're passive to men's issues. She may well care about men and women having equal rights, you don't have enough information about her to label her a hatemongers. The MRM is the victim of this all the time by many feminists so I'd like to think that we can behave better than them and don't do this type of shit. Modern feminism as a movement is something I don't like but individual feminists I won't judge without knowing thei…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 12:27 AM
1

I can read fine. I have to disagree. You clearly missed the "Edit" there or maybe you can't fully understand what you read. You can't write. Simply not true, this comment and the post itself show I can write.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 03:57 PM
1

So it's my fault you can't read?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 03:54 PM
1

TL;DR: Remove low effort karma farming posts and memes because they make us look like a joke meme sub because that gets highly upvoted often. Looks like a sentence to me but you're entitled to your opinion.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 03:52 PM
2

Lol calm down man. People may not think a guy grabbing a girl is wrong whereas they might laugh this off which is sexist but no one is calling him a raping misogynist. Maybe SJWs but they make up a small part of the population. Sexism exists but you're this particular thing way out of proportion. Don't create your own misery. It's not going to be good for anyone, especially you.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:22 PM
1

Do you even know what troll means? Troll =/= someone who disagrees with me.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:34 AM
1

Tl;DR added.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:32 AM
2

Yes I agree, but sort by top for the past month and you'll see how many are memes and how many are hard hitting news stories.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:29 AM
2

And it's tax-exempt status. Size means fuck all when you have tax-exempt status.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 09:13 PM
1

Another one bites the fucking dust. This is my first time posting here, I've maybe lurked here twice before out of interest. I don't have a solid opinion on MGTOW but I can say I sure as shit understand why it exists and it sucks the life out of me.
/r/MGTOW12/04/17 03:00 AM
1

He fucked her as well and clearly he isn't going around shoving his dick in women either so he had no reason to assume she was a whore. Too bad for him.
/r/MGTOW12/04/17 02:57 AM
1

I'm banned like most people here. Are you subscribed to this sub by the way?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:08 PM
7

It's not these statements that are hypocritical. It's that these statements show that rape culture is bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:07 AM
15

women judges That's why a like a lot of women judges, no whiteknighting bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:04 AM
4

I saw this too, the guy has been covering a lot of stories of teachers sleeping with students and bringing light to the reality that boys get sexually abused too.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:03 AM
1

I think what he meant was that he doesn't want to pay taxes for children with parents who can't pay money for their kids but he willing to pay a little amount, just enough, to stop kids from starving.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:23 PM
1

Simply identifying them doesn't accomplish anything because most people who would debate with a feminist more than likely have come across these before. In the title you stated that you made it in response to their mansplaining bingo cards and this is what makes us look petty. Arguing against these things is useless, provide an argument based on facts and data and using persuasive methods to get your point across. If they reject it and turn to these arguments then there more than likely is no po…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:14 PM
1

This doesn't accomplish much other than making us look petty.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:09 PM
1

I'll be honest and say that I'm confused as fuck. They're kids who did not intend for him to kill himself but their stupidity has lead to this. It's a complicated situation and I don't know what can be done to make it better. All I can do is hope that the parents come out of this okay though I doubt they'll be the same. This is so goddamn sad.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:06 PM
1

I understand that you have good intentions and this is pretty tame but we really shouldn't things like that, it makes us look petty. Be better than them.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:59 PM
1

Also the fact that they hold the moral high ground yet say and do some ridiculous things. As a liberal myself, I am disappointed. However I am happy that people are starting to see the ridiculousness.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:55 PM
2

The fucked up thing is that I thought the article was real and not satire because of how some feminist say this for real. Also, it showed up due to Google's search algorithm so you can't really blame them.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:54 PM
1

I'd like to point out to everyone who isn't British that most of us think the monarchy is a fucking joke as well. Good for tourism though so there's that but fuck wasting tax payers' money on them.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:41 PM
1

This is cringe. I really hope you're a troll for your own sake.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:39 PM

I have a feminist teacher and fuck me is it awful for the whole class. I remember one time she explained less women are in STEM because society is sexist and tells them not to be. People pointed out how our school promotes women only programs and days where we discuss women's right (none for men btw, don't expect it though) yet women still end up choosing women only subjects and men end up choosing stereotypical male subjects. Her response "Well I don't know, they're being told what they can and…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:36 PM
9

Because men can't have things men like.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:47 PM
2

Then anime club!
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:44 PM
5

No! We must force women to do this in order for them to be more equal to men. Young women need to know they can do what they want to do regardless of what society thinks and we need to show them this by forcing women to do things society wants them to do. /s
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:42 PM
6

It's only a handful of Tumblr feminists. /s
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:04 PM
2

Fair enough, you got me.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 04:41 PM
32

Context: the shit he was doing with his hands like waving them about is part of his character so he kind of just incorporated pushing them out of his way as part of the act.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:11 PM
2

That's some funny ass shit with the gifs and all. This if definitely the best reply.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:07 PM
1

Better her than the poor sod getting falsely accused by her.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 01:45 PM
1

Those extremists are not their responsibility. And even if they were, what do you want them to do? March in unison towards terrorists with bombs and guns and beat them up?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 01:40 PM
3

Because that's not diversity. She's a woman who is also a super hero. Diversity in this case pretty much means forced diversity which is the problem. Making adaptations of old characters another race or gender pisses fans off. When people want to see their favourite superheros in live action it means they want to see their favourite superheros in live action, not someone who doesn't look anything like them. Imagine if superman was a scrawny 5"6' kid rather than what he actually looks like, it'd …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 01:30 PM
7

DAE WE SHOULD TURN WHITE CHARACTER INTO AN ASIAN BECAUSE HE DOES KUNG FU? KUNG FU = ASIAN, RIGHT? YOU'RE SO RACIST AND I'M NOT, I'M A GOOD PERSON. If anyone is confused, this is about the whole Iron Fist shitfest.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 01:18 PM
2

Turns out I've already seen that. This one and the one with Wrecking Ball playing are my favourite.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 01:15 PM
4

I'm well aware of the DNC's corruption. Needless to say, I have no respect for them. About those wire tapping claims however, I'm not too sure that they're true.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 10:20 PM
10

Got Trump instead so it's not any better though is it? It's like choosing between a giant douche and a turd sandwich.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 09:49 PM
2

He gave a straight response and then asked a similar question seeing as how she started the topic of preferences. He wasn't malicious or anything, I don't see anything wrong with that. She also responded honestly so good on her as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 09:47 PM
3

AFAIK, gender dysphoria is what transgender people suffer from.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 07:42 PM
5

I think he means that society needs to acknowledge that gender dysphoria is a disorder rather than treating it like it's normal. Of course doctors and medical professionals need to be treating actual patients suffering from gender dysphoria but I don't think that's what he meant.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/17 02:39 AM
2

Seems me that black guys get the worst of false accusations, this shit is so wrong. Why anyone would ever falsely report rape is beyond me. I guess its because a lot of the time they know they'll get away with it or if they do get caught, nothing will happen because how society has given alleged rape victims so much power that they're treated as actual victims and the accused is treated as the perpetrator. Don't get me wrong, I fully support rape victims and find raped to be a disgusting crime, …
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:06 AM
2

This is not true. Proof.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:34 AM
2

Why didn't you head to the nearest government building and show them you privilege card? Would have saved you from all that trouble. All jokes aside, that's one hell of a story. Hope you're doing well.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:49 AM
3

Regardless of what your view if on the BLM Movement, this isn't relevant in this sub nor do we need it.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:06 AM
1

I don't think that contributes to it much if at all. Most likely diet and exercise and one that I've heard mentioned numerous times is increased oestrogen in the water supply.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:04 AM
1

White knight are just as bad as or in some cases worse than radical feminists. They're worse in some cases because most positions of powers are held by men. As evident by convictions and sentencing of men vs women for the same crime, it's obvious that a shit load of judges are white knights. Therefore, I'd argue affirmative action should be allowed in this case for sex and race. I'm not a fan of affirmative action but in cases where sex/race/gender could be required for a job, I think it should …
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:58 AM
3

Great now can we also get a very biased and exaggerated book about working class men? How about one that's not even exaggerated, we'll do fine with facts rather than opinion? No? I thought so.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:52 AM
2

Alright, lets start with you or your mother or your father or your sibling or your kid as that "1 innocent person". At the end of the day, if you kill that innocent person, you're not any better, plus the real person who committed the crime got away.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:49 AM
1

In very few cases yes I would support the death penalty., raping kids in one of them. The only reason I am against it is that mistakes can be made and the wrong person being convicted and killed is not worth it.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:46 AM
2

and that's totally accepted by the female society. If I'm being fair, it isn't. Most women who do this are called all sorts of shit.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:13 PM
2

Regarding rape some nations have laws that require you to attempt what is within your means to leave the situation (I do think this are reasonable) unless you are under duress. His friend was drunk, this doesn't usually apply when the victim is female (rightfully so) so theoretically it shouldn't apply when the victim is a man.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:34 PM
2

Feminism isn't as "in your face" in the UK but feminist ideals are much more ingrained in British society so even if you find people opposing feminists, it'll be hard to find those who're open about being MRAs because of backlash. I'm from the UK and a student and I'm quite happy that a lot of my male friends think feminism is bullshit, yet none of them are MRAs. In school we regularly have teachers and people promoting feminist propaganda and most people laugh that off no matter how hard our sc…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:30 PM
0

christians Anything but. In the UK religion is much more personal. I don't why Christians seem to think there is some war on Christianity. It's mostly Christians from the USA who think this way which is even more mind boggling because the American government caters so much to Christians.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:55 AM
1

Now do one for most deaths at work sorted by the jobs and gender if possible.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 06:09 PM
1

Perhaps it would be helpful if posters could indicate which part of feminist doctrine the posts challenge when posting, to avoid confusing people? I agree with you. I was talking about that particular post. Context matters. I posted that in a comment which doesn't mention anything other than a woman committing a crime, not sentencing or anything about men. I also stated that such posts would be fine if provided with an explanation.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:53 PM
1

Context matters. I posted that in a comment which doesn't mention anything other than a woman committing a crime, not sentencing or anything about men. I also stated that such posts would be fine if provided with an explanation.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:52 PM
2

Agreed. My main point was that the article doesn't talk about sentencing and that everyone in the sub already knows that women can be violent. I also stated that such posts would be okay if OP provided an explanation to relate it to our cause because otherwise it just looks like women bashing (which it may have been) which turns people away.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:50 PM
1

I'm well aware of it. I was specifically talking about the article which just describes a woman committing a crime. It does not talk about sentencing at all. I suggest you have a look at the comment chain for a better explanation.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:47 PM
2

That was me, thanks. I clicked on this post wondering what it'd be about and this was a pleasant surprise. I know a lot of people think I don't understand the sentencing gap but I'm fully aware of that. The whole point of the comment was that the article does not talk about sentencing therefore it's irrelevant to our cause. The article literally just describes a woman commuting a crime. That's literally it. Here's the rest of the comment chain for a better explanation.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:46 PM
5

Same thing with the BBC news app but at this point I don't really care because I'd rather get Men's Rights news from this sub anyway.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:29 AM
1

Yet at the same time, the news media, especially the tabloids, absolutely lap up any stories involving female violence such as this. It's like they are unable to join the dots and consider that, maybe, just maybe, the guy in that example isn't lying. I see, if OP had provided an explanation such as this then I'd be completely fine with this article. I hadn't though about it before but I agree that the media don't join up the dots between women being violent in non DV cases with women also being …
/r/MensRights18/02/17 02:54 PM
8

The stats seem pretty accurate as well. From what I've read on other sources, men make up 33% of victims of DV and 651,000/1,851,000 comes down to about 35%. This article does give me a little hope, especially with the mentioning of ManKind as you stated.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:45 PM
6

I understand what you're trying to say but I'd be okay with posts such as these if OP bothered to do what I said. If you're going to make a post that's very vaguely related to men's right then you should at least make an effort to show people how it's relevant to this sub. If you're going to post an article with a weak connection to men's rights then you better post an explanation and make the connection or it's nothing but a shitpost for karma or whatever your agenda is. DV articles are obvious…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:36 PM
2

I said no one here is denying it. All the article posted by OP tells us is that this woman committed a crime. You're using a completely unrelated article to argue that this post is relevant. And even your explanation is entirely based on the article you provided not the one posted by OP. If you want to talk about the article you referenced then post that article because that article is relevant and this one is not. If it's already been posted and it's been long enough a repost will be fine if no…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:29 PM
47

This does not talk about sentencing at all. It's irrelevant. We all know women can be criminals and be violent just like men, no one here is denying it. Posting a story about how a woman attacked a teenager isn't relevant to men's rights at all. OP doesn't even relate it to men's rights. If you're going to make a post that's very vaguely related to men's right then you should at least make an effort to show people how it's relevant to this sub. I'm tired of people just posting stories about wome…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:22 AM
3

I could be wrong but I don't think that always works.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:03 AM
3

Hell I don't even understand the idea of a legal marriage. Like what's the point of it? Marriage is most significantly a religious/traditional thing that people do. People can still have traditional and religious marriages without having to sign a piece of paper to be officially married. Legal marriage has always seemed pointless to me.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:01 AM
0

The thing is they're still choosing to have kids and be the one who doesn't work. People manage to take care of children while working. Those who are poor usually have to have both parents working and those who have more money don't need to have both parents working but seeing as those less fortunate can make it work, they can too. Unless in the marriage agreement it specifically says that the partner earning money will give alimony, there is no reason to force it on married couples. The reason …
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:20 PM
2

Support doesn't mean it's inherently right. It has 24 upvotes so hardly much support anyway, it also has other people calling it out in the comments and many people here complain about posts like this here because they're shitposts and nothing more. If you want to make fun of feminist go to r/TIA or r/CringeAnarachy, this sub isn't for bitching about things.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:28 AM
2

The UK's feminism is very different from the US'. It's much less explicit but much more ingrained in society.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:24 AM

FOR FUCKS SAKE, that's the job I want to do in a few years. It's good to know that I'll be discriminated against because of my gender, maybe the ethnicity thing will even it would for me but I'll feel dirty as fuck for using that. Then again, I'm pretty sure people from my ethnicity are pretty common in the industry.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:19 AM
4

If it's mutual agreement than it's the fault of the one stay home for being an idiot and relying on their partner for survival. If you go into such an agreement you need to realise that there might come a time when your partner leaves you and you have no source of income. Don't want that to happen to you? Simple, keep working while you're married and don't marry someone who wants you to stop working.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:12 AM
2

Except when people get married they choose to marry a person who doesn't want to work or they choose to stay at home because it's convenient for them. If you're going to be an idiot and rely solely on your partner for survival because you're either too lazy to work or your partner doesn't want you working then you're an idiot. It isn't your partner's fault either, you knew going into the marriage what was going on and you chose to stay with someone who didn't want you to work. If they leave you,…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:09 AM
2

Well if you did that a) you'd be a twat b) she'd be a bad judge of character. The woman is a grown ass adult, if you rely 100% on the guy you marry for survival then you're stupid, same goes the other way round. If your partner doesn't want you to work when you get married, it's your choice to stay with them. A rational person wouldn't be an idiot and rely solely on their partner for survival, leave your partner and if you don't want to then you're responsible if the person just ups and leaves b…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:04 AM
9

Please stop shitposting, it makes r/MensRights seem like a bunch of whiners. Most people don't like crazy Tumblr feminists either, it's not something exclusive to the MRM. This makes us seem like a joke.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:57 AM
2

I would like the thank the BBC for a much less biased article, including relevant quotes and not just the ones which go with the mainstream narrative. BBC news has recently been losing some credibility in my eyes but this makes me want to keep reading them, they're still biased in their articles but seeing that the other side of the argument is also reported makes it worth checking out.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:55 AM
1

What a bullshit article, they handpicked the responses from those opposing the advert and conveniently left out the ones which claim the gender pay gap is a myth. They also then present false statistics about the gender pay gap to reinforce the idea that those opposing are dumb misogynists because "look we have $100% true statistics and these people are speaking out their arse please don't actually look up the real statistics or what most people are comparing about because they have the real dat…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:37 PM
1

It started off with one man, now it's two men. Progress is slow but inevitable. Support from more people will only speed up the rate. I'm pretty sure that a lot of people don't need to be informed about sexism against men. They already know it. They just need to know that if they speak out against it, they will be supported by others with similar views even if they are ostracised by the majority.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:27 PM
1

I agree with the idea of male disposability but I don't think it's fully applicable here. I think the fat acceptance thing is due to women biologically being more emotional and self-conscious so they give more of a crap whereas fat guys are like "I'm fat :'( whatever". Also, this is where society not giving a crap comes into play, making fun of fat guys is much more socially accepted than making fun of fat women. This is due to same reasons as "Male protagonist is dumb idiot" that we see a lot i…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:18 PM
2

Lol, I couldn't tell if you supported DJT or not until I read the end bit. Anyway, a lot of people here repeatedly stated that Donald Trump is not someone who will be helpful to the MRM. Clinton and Trump both would have been hindrances in different ways so it doesn't really make a difference who wins when it comes to the MRM in my opinion. However, I do find it funny that some people thought Trump would be a good thing for us.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:12 AM
2

I didn't think the Chairman vs Chairwomen thing was weird until you pointed it out, mostly because I started reading it with gender already in mind considering the title of this post but something else also gave away that this has an underlying agenda. It's this sentence right at the top Most librarians are Democrats. Most farmers are Republicans. Comparing librarians to farmers, I find that quite funny. Being a librarian is considered more of an intellectual job whereas people think of farmers …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:54 AM
1

Whoever made this must not have know that Corbyn would never even acknowledge this otherwise they wouldn't have made such a stupid mistake. On another note, I agree with the quote of course.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:43 AM
3

They might as well have scrapped that comparison and in it's place put bright red text in bold saying "This data has an underlying agenda".
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:39 AM
3

Fuck, not 18 yet, that must be the reason why I'm not in on it... yet.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:13 PM
8

Private female only and male only spaces should be allowed because they're free to do as they please. Public, government funded gender exclusive places shouldn't be without an equivalent for the opposite gender. Also, private gyms which have an extra women only area shouldn't be allowed if men and women pay the same amount for memberships, same goes for men only areas in gym but I don't think I've ever seen any of those. My current gym has a women only area and to be honest it's piss taking that…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:46 PM
5

As a man, I'd like to be let in on the secrets. Where do I acquire this sacred information.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:35 PM
12

(d) we support feminism unlike those other brands
/r/MensRights02/02/17 07:27 PM
7

Does snowflake need a special gym Clearly they do which is why they shame people for lifting heavy.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:45 PM
6

The female presenter at the end just spouted something incredibly stupid. Yes, there is a focus on clothes and appearance of women in positions of power and your point is? There shouldn't be? Well ideally not but that's not how society works. The same thing happens to men, Cameron was called all sorts of things during his time, politicians are always ridiculed about their appearance (Nigel I'm looking at you mate). You think if Cameron turned up in some denim people wouldn't judge him? All those…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:44 AM
1

The website seems dodgey but as someone else in the thread confirmed, the story is old but real. However, I don't see this as being a men's rights or even women's rights issue. It's simply a shitty mother being a shitty mother, gender doesn't seem like a factor here. If I'm missing something, feel free to go ahead and point it out.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 03:55 AM
6

My point was that sadly that is not how reality works. Kids can't slap the shit out of their abusive mommies and daddies.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:46 PM
8

Sadly, that's not how reality works.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:24 PM
2

I'm female, nineteen, and I go to a liberal arts college. I've been sexually assaulted (by a male), abused emotionally and mentally (by a male), and generally been screwed over a lot. Hope you're doing well, you have my sympathy. We women won. We win in family court. In rape cases. We utterly ruin lives by accusing perfectly innocent men of rape. We molest and rape children, and not only do we get away with it, but it is assumed the victim wanted it (puberty hit me with the libido of a slut when…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:17 PM
1

This reached /r/all so a lot of people from r/T_D and Reddit's majority left members, some of which are SJWs, are here.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 02:56 PM
2

No, menrights supports abortion at large but it also want's financial "abortion" for men. It's not, "both or nothing" it's "we have abortion, now can men dissolve financial responsibilities if they choose to".
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:27 AM
6

I understand where you're coming from and I think he was being a creep but that doesn't seem related to rape or any form of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:21 AM
1

I agree with you but I really don't get the point of calling it a Women's March. A men's march isn't need so I'm trying to say we should call it that. I'd much more be in favour of it (I still support it, just a few things which bug me) if it was more to do with LGBT rights because LGBT rights are much more threatened by Trump and more so his VP than women's rights. It's only a technical term though so it's not a big deal.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:17 AM
5

So your opinion is "My opinion is right"? Why should be respect old traditions and not carrying on with them doesn't mean we're not respecting them.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:41 PM
2

You say that as if it hasn't been done before. News outlets and SJWs will do whatever it takes to push their agenda.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:17 PM
6

It goes back to ancient Rome So does slavery, so what's your point? Are you some sort of history denier? I don't even understand in the slightest how you got to that conclusion from what /u/TechnoSam_Belpois said.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:15 PM
4

Fucking hell, I don't want to support him but the idea is something I can't not support. Then again, he's only doing this to benefit himself and I doubt he gives a shit about men. Edit: Actually, a Men's March would just be antagonising and achieve nothing, the Women's March did good, lets leave it at that.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:12 PM
3

But this doesn't really do anything to help men's rights. Most people here know stuff like this happens and is a double standard and those who just come to visit also know that this woman is just being stupid. If some people here do think this is okay, you posting a picture of it happening isn't going to change that.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:10 PM
3

I get why you think it should be illegal but it's a very complex matter. If you're actually a trans child, it's best to start before puberty so you can actually look and feel much more like the gender you want to be, after puberty it really doesn't work as well. However, this does mean that some shitty parents may brainwash their kids into doing it or force them to do it which is sick. The best solution would be to find a way to detect gender dysphoria and not just psychologically. I don't know …
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:08 PM
2

I'm 100% pro choice man but this is dumb. She's just ending a life she would have wanted if it was yesterday or tomorrow but just because she doesn't want to associate it with a particular day she's going to end it. That's inconceivably dumb and just makes me angry but hopefully she goes through with it so that child doesn't have to be raised by someone like her.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:00 PM
4

Jessica: "My husband and I made the decision when our son was born that I should work full time and he would work part time and be the stay-at-home parent. This is because, as a woman, I get far more rights as a working mother than he would as a working father. "I am entitled to flexible working and have more legal rights. I work 36 hours a week and he works between 16 and 18, split over a Friday afternoon and Sunday afternoon which means we are at home together on a Saturday and our son only ha…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:22 PM
2

I really think we should have a vote to decide whether to keep these shitty facebook/social media posts or not. Some may be relevant (these can be left up of course) but almost all are not. I also think that the mods should remove them because I think that we're being brigaded in some way because those posts just have way too many upvotes for this sub. Removing these posts imo will be helpful for everyone in this sub.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:09 PM
1

It's poorly worded but I think it's supposed to mean thinking she wants it due to certain actions or things said which aren't explicit consent. A better way of saying it would be "I thought she was asking for it." Would be better if it was he/she instead of just she of course.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:48 PM
3

This is not what /r/MensRights is for.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 10:43 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:40 PM
1

They're not generalisations though, they're facts. Those things I mentioned are literally in the Queen and the Haidths, read up.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:40 PM
1

proselytize Funny that, I stated facts, I didn't try to preach or make an alternative seem better than Islam, I made them seem comparable. OP asked a question and I replied, it was as simple as that. If you think that all discussion unrelated to the subreddit should be banned regardless of the fact that it stems from discussion related to the subreddit then take it up with the mods, if we're discussing something, it's dumb to just shut it down because it's unrelated to the subreddit, it's not so…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:33 PM
1

As far as I know, yes.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:23 PM
2

No but everybody who is racist to white people and cannot stand criticism of non-whites surely belongs there. Also, fun fact, your comment was racist, nothing OP said implied he was white but you assumed he was white because in your view, only white people are racist bigots and view other races as inferior. Well done, you're a bigot. Also, before you assume I'm white as well, I'm brown.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:24 AM
2

Because that implies that men are doing it just because they're men which is not the real reason. There is a clear distinction here, only Muslim men are doing this, no other men and this is because Islam promotes the segregation of genders which is a fact, look it up before calling me a racist or an Islamophobe.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:19 AM
4

It's the alt left being the alt left. The alt left dominates the media, just like they go around silencing and labelling people as sexists, misogynists and racists for saying anything remotely critical of anyone who isn't a white man. That's just how it is. Reddit has always been much for left but recently, due to the presence of subs like /r/T_D and other far right subs, a lot of left leaning subs have become far left subs. Since the majority of Reddit is left, even those who're aren't far left…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:07 AM
4

Hate the ideology which is the problem, hate the radical leaders who preach it, hate the men and women who support it and treat Muslims who don't support it just like everyone else.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:42 AM

Is it just me or is this a troll thread, sure seems like one because a lot of fucked up things are being mentioned here.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 03:58 AM
1

Is this really a problem though? You can find cheap and good razors if it's really that big of a deal, it just depends on the brand. There are expensive men's razors and there there are cheap women's razors. At this point you're just bullying the seller to get what you want, you could easily go with an alternative but no, you choose to go with that certain razor and then bully and shame the seller to get it for a price you want.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 03:54 AM
1

I don't know what you mean by that video but man you had to ruin that. Unless it's some sort of reference I'm not getting.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 03:48 AM
7

Petition More info The petition is closed. Funny that, petition supporting men's rights generally don't seem to get much support anyway. Make me lose faith in humanity, I don't know why this would be anything but good, trying to make this seem bad or not needed is just doing mental gymnastics to justify your beliefs but for the sake of discussion, if anyone has any objections to it please do go ahead, though obviously I doubt it because it's the Men's Rights subbreddit
/r/MensRights02/01/17 03:41 AM
1

Record it, try to place cameras in your house so that you don't have to rely on filming on your phone or something. If you don't want to go to the police straight away, make copies of the tape and show them to her, talk to her and it might help, if it doesn't then go to the police. I know you love her but you can't let her treat you like shit. Do you see yourself with her in the future? Do you want to raise a family with her? These are the questions you need to ask yourself. My advice would be t…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 12:40 AM
2

This would be okay if men only gyms are allowed. I don't know if they're allowed or not but even if they are, I doubt many of them exist.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 02:02 PM
1

I'm asking for an answer to my question, it's fine though keep dodging it.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 09:56 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 09:10 PM
1

But how important is it really for men to do that? It's more of a choice than a need whereas tracking periods is much more of a need for women and that is what Apple is catering to.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 09:02 PM
1

Yes but the app in question only tracks periods and not other thing sexual health issues for women, if it did, there'd be a case for them not making the app for men too but that isn't the case. Periods are easy to track and it's very useful for women to track them. Not once did I claim that you can't track men's sexual health issues, I said there aren't any men's sexual health issues remotely similar to periods. But well done, again, your lack of response shows that your inability to answer the …
/r/MensRights30/12/16 09:00 PM
1

Do men have periods? No? Do you have no idea and are but are unable to admit you're wrong? Hmm, maybe?
/r/MensRights30/12/16 08:34 PM
2

Comment I left above: Well then both are wrong. People best qualified for the job/internship should get the job/internship unless a particular gender is needed (not wanted) for the job. In your case, it's justified because gender is important when dealing with clients. Another example of this is acting/theatre or hiring a female/male doctor for specifically female/male patients because they feel more comfortable.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:33 PM
1

Well if I start a business and hire 1000 women but 500 men, that wouldn't make a dent in the statistics but it doesn't mean it's not discrimination based on gender meaning it is in fact a rights issue. Edit: Especially because less women choose to study subjects which would qualify them for jobs in the tech industry.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:30 PM
1

Well then both are wrong. People best qualified for the job/internship should get the job/internship unless a particular gender is needed (not wanted) for the job.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:28 PM
1

How exactly do you track men's sexual health and what for?
/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:17 PM
1

That is true from what I've heard. However, also remember that trans-women are much more recognisable than trans-men because that just how biology works.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:51 AM
2

Pretty much, sometimes it feels like people here are just trying to find reasons to be triggered over little things.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:49 AM
1

I'm saying it's hard to make apps which track men's sexual health and there isn't much of a market for it so not many app developers will focus of making it.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:48 AM
1

They have issues no doubt but they're not anything like periods like I said. For that they'll need specialised apps to help then with their problems and I doubt many apps could help with such problems.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 08:01 PM
8

I honestly understand what you mean, when you pay for a product, you expect it to cater to you and not just particular part of the population but to be fair, it's mostly just tracking periods and stuff and men don't have anything remotely close to that happening to them. I might be wrong though so if someone would like to explain why then please, go ahead.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:06 PM
-6

I find it a bit fucked up but come on, is this really a problem?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 08:09 AM
3

For anyone who doesn't want to go to the website, here are the statistics related to gender and sexual orientation: Sexual Orientation bias: In 2015, law enforcement agencies reported 1,219 hate crime offenses based on sexual-orientation bias. Of these offenses: 62.2 percent were classified as anti-gay (male) bias. 19.3 percent were prompted by an anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (mixed group) bias. 13.8 percent were classified as anti-lesbian bias. 2.9 percent were classified as anti…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 08:06 AM
18

That's not her.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/16 05:25 AM
10

~Papa bless \//\
/r/MensRights25/12/16 05:23 AM
2

I agree you can be both. I'm talking about the feminists and even some MRAs who create this "us vs them" situation where they claim you can't be both. You're talking about MRAs exclusively in this sub but there are other places on the internet where there are MRAs with the "fuck all women" philosophy. be at risk to become what you claim? I'm not saying MRAs who're already MRAs will become crazy, I said it'll attract more As because once it's a socially neutral position, As won't have to fear bac…
/r/MensRights25/12/16 12:37 AM
1

Still, they're from opposing parties so it makes much more sense and Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee before the 27th of June which is when the article was written. Add the that the fact that Trump had been heavily featured in the media for negative things so it'd be incredibly stupid to assume he doesn't get enough hate on social media for him to be mentioned in the article. No matter which way you look at it, to leave Trump out of this is clear bias or sheer stupidity and it's q…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:14 PM
11

A lot of this is true but a lot of this is subjective as well. I agree with most of it though but since it doesn't provide much data people won't really believe it.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:19 AM
2

What???? Where do you live? I thought it was men can't be raped by women because that's classed with sexual assault which, like the article states, is included in the same category as being flashed.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:11 AM
2

I will give the Guardian some credit though, I only found this article because I found an article where they were talking about sexism against men, they didn't exactly call it sexism but said areas where "men lose out" and they also had some feminist bullshit but it's still very good because their target audience is mainly young people and feminists so it gets the message across to them.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:10 AM
10

The graphs and tables show that male and female politicians are just as likely to face abuse online. They also highlight Hillary Clinton but compare her to Bernie Sanders instead of Trump. That's clearly bias because we all know Trump got much more abuse than Hillary yet they use Bernie who wasn't the nominee. They conveniently leave out the god-damn president-elect and even Obama. It's that's not bias then I don't know what is. Also, the more a politicians leans towards the left or the right (o…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:52 AM
3

Every time Amy Schumer talks about her vagina I loose my shit.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:47 PM
18

According to dominant stereotypes, men can't be sexually assaulted by women. But according to a new, wide-ranging study, around two-thirds of men who report sexual victimization say their assailant was female. It's hard to tell how many of the sexual assaults were rape but that's hard to determine that when men being raped by women is classed with sexual assault. The first few paragraphs for the article explain this very well: There are many great things about the Centers for Disease Control and…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:39 PM
24

Those with privilege are oblivious to it. /s
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:48 PM
7

This make me so happy to see that most people in the video support this. The interviewer on the other hand seems to be trying to get the two speakers to disagree for some good TV. She and Nargund also seem to be blaming men for the lack of the contraceptive pill for men because "it's time for men to take responsibility", "will women trust men" or "will men be ready to take the responsibility". The first one is plain stupid, men couldn't take responsibility so far because it wasn't possible becau…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:39 PM
3

If this really did happen then you have my condolences. They tried to bully a 15 year old kid over some dumb bullshit and white knights flooded in after that. But I fucking hate women. this isn't okay. It was a couple of assholes and their mindless followers who did this, not all women. There is no reason to take it out on all women. With a mentality like that, you'll only have bad experiences with other people, particularly women.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 04:21 PM
5

Read my comment again. You're using a bloody strawman. I didn't talk about men's right and TRP not being related. I said the documentary called The Red Pill and the subreddit called The Red Pill are unrelated. Also, TRP is small community on the sites like reddit and 4chan and not much to worry about despite what it may promote. Also, again, if you clicked on the link or researched it you'd know they're different. The TRP you're talking about is a subreddit whereas this is obviously a form on me…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 01:36 AM
12

That doesn't stop you from going to Google and typing "The Red Pill documentary" and researching about what it actually is instead of making baseless claims about something you have no idea of. You're confusing it with the subbreddit /r/theredpill which is completely unrelated. If you choose to associate them to then it's you being ignorant and condemning the documentary for non-existent issues instead of bothering to research about what the documentary is. Hell, it's even on YouTube.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:10 PM
8

My grandma's days' idea of strong women: when life gets really hard, complaining doesn't make it better, take it one day at a time, and remind yourself of all the good in life that hadn't been taken away. This is very important. Older women generally do not support today's feminism (third wave) because it's not what it was once about, what they actually experienced. Yet you'll see 20 year old women telling them they don't know better because they're from a time when women were oppressed and are …
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:25 PM
1

I agree but, they're a loud minority but still a large group which is why they have so much influence in the media and entertainment industry. They also do things which are straight up immoral like this show. Imagine a show where guys went around stabbing women in the vagina, probably a horror show if it even becomes a show. This on the other hand is comedy. This show not only highlights the influence of feminism, their distorted world view and hypocritical ideology but also male disposability, …
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:21 PM
2

Gay couple are the least likely to be violent. Straight are in between, 50/50 for men and women but women are perpetrators 70% of the time in non-reciprocal violence. Lesbian couples are the most violent.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:01 PM
2

To be fair, I'm guessing it worked out well for you. Otherwise this would have been in the news or something and your name would have been out there with alleged rapist to it. It's fucked up that you have to let people like this go free in order to protect yourself but it's what you have to do sometimes. But I'm by no means advocating not putting criminals like these behind bars. If you want to file charges against anyone who's falsely accused you then by all means do so.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:01 PM
1

It would represent a certain conservative mindset at a time when the workforce was mostly made up of men. This is not the case today. If you want to raise a child than you should get a job to have money to raise it. If you're unable to do so then give it to the other parent who can. If it's not safe for the child to be around the other parent then the government can support the parent or the parent should give up their legal rights as the child's guardian. Of course if the divorce is on good ter…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:47 PM
29

Still, if he was under 16, this could have easily been titled: "Paedophile goes to prison for sexually abusing underage schoolboy" And look at this gem which is suggest right next to the first paragraph with the photo of a man. That title seems fair to me because it's honest and that man is a disgusting piece of shit. But the fact that the title of this article describes them as having sex instead of any other word which tells people the act is illegal or despicable is also disgusting. If you we…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:26 PM
1

OP isn't saying that there shouldn't be women's classes for self defence because he doesn't care about their well being or something. He's saying that it's discriminatory for them to only be for women. Women are weaker than men so self defence classes are useful when 50% of the population is stronger than you. But, the point we make about things like muggings, women being weaker and in relation to that, self-defence classes is that you need to look at people as individuals rather than women/men.…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 10:17 AM
1

It's a matter of perspective, sure the man didn't deny her pass by not tolerating his disgusting behaviour however in the end, when all was said and done, he came out of it looking like the bad guy because of how it was reported. The man may have denied her pass but the news channel didn't. The news channel has more power than him which is why in the end, no pass was denied and the end result saw the situation get worse for the man.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:25 AM
8

The man got harshly demonised. No pass denied here.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 07:40 PM
2

same age boy young girl Something, is not right about this article.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 05:08 PM
2

Don't know who that is I'm afraid but thanks for introducing me to someone new.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 05:53 PM
3

A lot of people also dislike her but that's not because of her genitals. And in my opinion she is by no means great. Although as someone who wanted to remain in the EU, I appreciate that she's strongly going ahead with leaving the EU and respecting democracy despite voting to remain herself. She's also been very vocal about leaving the EU and hasn't shown any signs of regret which is what we need from strong leader at a time like this because we don't want to be fucked over. Also, it did kind of…
/r/MensRights13/11/16 05:32 PM
2

I don't know much about Comedy Central but I do know a little about stand up comedy. The paedophile jokes are very common among certain comics who have a more offensive style of comedy like CK Louis, Jimmy Carr and Frankie Boyle. These type of comics also happen to be some of the most popular ones so in all honesty, I don't think there is much of a problem with offence when it comes to comedy. It's also one the main reasons I like it so much, it's a complete showcase of freedom on expression. Co…
/r/MensRights13/11/16 10:58 AM
3

Exactly so it's not that the democrats didn't vote, they just didn't care about her or like her enough to vote for her like they did with Obama.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:21 PM
3

I don't think you understand what people are trying to say here which is fair enough so let me try explaining. Hillary Clinton = presidential candidate for entire country including women, men, girl and boys. Hillary didn't talk much about boys during her campaign but used the fact that she was a women to get votes. She also seems to be a strong feminist and says things which unfairly favour women (reduced prison sentences, primary victims of war). In this tweet, she again only encourages girls t…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:17 PM
1

Apart from feminists who want special treatment, most people don't like being treated like the victim, an example of this is kids denying they're being bullied because they think it's embarrassing. That sort of feeling doesn't ever go away and to make matters worse, when you're treated like a victim when in reality you aren't really as vulnerable as people make you seem, you start to dislike those who make you appear as such even if they say they want to help you because it seems condescending a…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:03 PM
3

That dataisbeautiful post is very misleading. Apart from Obama, previous candidates got the same votes as Clinton. It seems like Obama made more people vote rather then Hillary putting democrats off voting altogether.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:51 PM
6

From my experience, boys and men pick STEM subjects because they're better paid. Women pick subjects, any subjects because they like them. That's the response I always get when asking people "Why do you want to be ___?". There are exceptions on both sides of course. And I have to say that I've done the same thing. I've changed what I want to study in order to get more opportunities at highly paid jobs but at the same time it doesn't mean I'm studying something I hate.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:30 AM
2

Is she advertising prostitution or is there something deeper?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:01 PM
6

They're fucking kids. Tell them what they want to hear. They know what they want won't happen and the kid that got elected knows that no one believed him but it sounds nice and it's a stupid class president so kids don't care enough to think about it.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:58 PM
3

It shows how marriage can be a shitty deal for men in financial terms.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 12:25 AM
3

In terms of a nuclear family, it'd still be a nuclear family with or without marriage. Same with any other type of family.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 12:18 AM
1

Bubble wrap it, soft and warm.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 12:16 AM
8

It's the same with men as well to be fair. I'm sure every straight guy has been asked the question "Would you suck a dick for a £1,000,000?" and 90% of the time people say no. I always said no as well but the other day someone asked me that and I really thought about it. Usually people don't think about it and just say no because they don't want people to think they're gay or whatever but when you really think about it it's so fuckin' worth it. Its 1mil for fuck's sake. You'll be set for life an…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 12:15 AM
2

But if men don't exist then everyone will have equal rights!
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:35 PM
3

The irony of this is laughable.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:30 PM
4

Hodge twins approved.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/16 01:38 PM
1

Women have had to bear the responsibility of contraception Yes because getting pregnant to get child support is so uncommon and if the woman does accidentally get pregnant, it's blamed on the woman and the man doesn't have the pay shit. /s
/r/MensRights30/10/16 11:34 PM
4

Amber Hilberling, Convicted of Pushing Husband Out High Rise Window, Found Dead in Prison What bullshit. She wasn't "convicted of pushing husband out of high rise window", she was convicted of a form of murder (manslaughter, culpable homicide...)
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/16 11:11 PM
2

This is pure fucking evil but it begs the question. On a scale of 1-10, how evil does an act have to be for the perpetrator to be trialled without their gender making a difference? Before you accuse me of being dramatic and the MRA version of SJWs, I'm only saying this because statistically women get less time for the same crime and are more likely to not get convicted whereas men are more likely to get convicted for the crimes they didn't commit. However, there seen to be instances when gender …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/16 11:02 PM
1

Pretty much but the same can be said for Hillary who's a scummy liar and will say whatever to get more votes. If people bothered doing their research on her they'd find out that she's just as bad, if not worse, than Trump.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 07:58 AM
10

Good thing she wasn't talking to a black man, but then again she is a feminist so never mind I guess.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/16 04:49 PM
13

but I would vote for this man if at all possible and donate to his campaign. That's why a lot of voters are fucking dumb. "Oh the candidate said something I like, I'll just not bother researching the rest of his policies and just vote for him, hehehe".
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/16 04:47 PM
36

Real "__" can be about anything. Just because a group says they stand for something doesn't actually mean they stand for that particular thing, it's how they act as part of that group which shows what they stand for. ISIS believe they're good people or say they're good people but arguably most people would disagree. It's the same as the woman saying "It's a word that's used". Jimmy Savile's dick was also used but we all know what for.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/16 04:45 PM
10

He was trying to make himself look like a big shot Guys do that all the time... as a joke. He and the guy he was talking to both knew what he said wasn't true and Trump, as crazy as he is, also knew that the guy didn't believe him but said it anyway as a joke.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 11:37 AM
6

He'd get condemned by his party members and get rape accusations. Oh wait...
/r/MensRights22/10/16 11:34 AM
1

Care to explain?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:02 PM
6

I just don't seem to understand why feminists and SJWs argue that there is no difference between male and female behaviour because of our brains and that our brains are the same. At the same time they promote the bullshit idea of "toxic masculinity" but fair enough, they can just blame that on society and not genetics. However, they still talk about the "gender is a social construct" bullshit which make sense if "toxic masculinity" exists. BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE! If male and female brain are exa…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:54 PM
1

Pretty sure most people don't care about which gender has more emojis. Mostly women and teenagers use them anyway so who cares? Being underrepresented in a selection of emojis will literally affect no one.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:37 PM
6

Not the first time I've seen a post about r/rape mods banning and ignoring male victims and sadly, it wont be the last.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:38 PM
-11

Mods really should remove this post. It gets posted like once a day and does nothing for anyone. Most people have seen it and keeping it up for however many people join each day doesn't make a huge difference. Reposting this like 6 months since the last one if fine but this fucking often is stupid. Time of the downvotes.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:29 PM
12

If you want men to be "gentlemen" then you better fucking be a "lady" or else shut the fuck up and stop trying to impose traditional gender roles on men with a new, spicy, juicy twist (guilt responsibility) while at the same time wanting women to be liberated from traditional gender roles which for the most of the western world they have been free from for the past few decades.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:27 PM
0

Elgintensity reference
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 05:37 PM
28

"Inn-er Cit-y, here is something you can't understand, I can legally kill a manfor slapping my titties at the gym.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 04:36 AM
2

Domestic violence is most comment in lesbian couples, then straight couples (70% non-reciprocal perpetrated by women) and least (also very low) in gay couples.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/16 09:27 PM
0

Alright, I'll admit that wasn't the best choice of words but the small amount of tax paid for it save a huge amount of money and provides healthcare in emergencies without having to worry about how you'll pay the goddamn bills.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/16 08:28 PM
1

Feel free to move to another country without free healthcare.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/16 08:23 PM
1

Use the Invaders technique!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/16 08:12 PM
2

Two areas: Everyone - can get very busy, up to 200+ people in a fairly small area with easily 80% men Women - haven't been inside so I can't say what it's like there or what equipment they have, etc. Even if a lot of women use the women only gym which they don't because most come with a male so they stay in the gym which everyone can use. When the majority of your customers are men, I get that you want to make the gym appealing to women who're a big market but much less likely to join but making…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 07:33 PM
1

From what I know, the majority of rapes do no get reported in India. Women are very ashamed and do no show their face in public if these rapes happen in rural areas. Their families also try to hide it because it brings shame. I know this sounds very much like a stereotype but I'm pretty sure it's somewhat true. However, I doubt India has that many false rape accusations (I could be wrong though) because women don't want people to think they've been raped. Also, India has a culture very protectiv…
/r/MensRights03/09/16 09:47 PM
1

TL:DR "They're sexist because the female guards demanded I have a membership to enter the clubs. Also, gay men are sexist for giving me weird looks in the men's toilet." She got laughed in the face about the membership dilemma by the police officers as you'd expect but that seconds thing she complained about sounds more interesting. Pretty sure a man would get destroyed by the news and social media if he said he wanted to go in the women's toilet without getting weird looks let alone admitting h…
/r/MensRights03/09/16 09:35 PM
7

I've seen a lot of posts and read a lot of article about this story and I'm sure others have too so taking those into consideration this seems pretty accurate. If you've been following the story then it's pretty clear he was innocent (like he was found by the university/court) and this article seems to just be a follow up.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 09:18 PM
2

I'm a teenager (16) so maybe I can offer a perspective much closer to the age group polled. With all the male friends I have, I'm pretty sure that I've talked about height and/or body weight to almost all of them, that's including the people I don't talk much to who're school friends however it wasn't casual, serious talk. It was a much more "joking" type of thing. What I've found is that every single one of the wants to be taller. the 5'8" guys like myself want to be 6' but also, 6'1" guys want…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 08:21 PM
2

This is in the comments from a student at MSU: I'm currently a senior at Michigan State University. The women's-only study lounge has been a source of contention for years, albeit one which hasn't ever been paid much attention. I never minded that it was there, but I also think the school has an obligation to play its part in obeying the law and ensuring that male students are not discriminated against. Feminism is great, but women have to accept that equality will entail losing a handful of the…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 12:54 PM
3

They're good by the standards of Islam. They're extremists by the standards of the rest of us.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 06:44 PM
5

they force the corrupted view that they have on their religion Just dropped by to say that ISIS are GOOD Muslims but bad people. They literally do shit that their religion teaches them to do. Which is also similar to feminism because feminazis are the extremists of the group and the "moderate feminists" either defend/support feminazis but don't do the shit that feminazis do or they claim that the feminazis "have got it all wrong" and it's not "real feminism" just like what moderate Muslims do/sa…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 05:43 PM
10

Just a friendly reminder that women are the perpetrators of 70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence and 50% of reciprocal. Source: http://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf Here's a summary of the study from the pdf and a table with the statistics: http://imgur.com/wD2IZ8p http://imgur.com/WyEkXl6 Feel free to dispute it if you think the finding are misleading.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:42 PM
2

Screw you my precious feelings matter. /s
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:19 AM
-4

If I did have penis envy going on, I doubt I'd be envious of the penis that was molested by a fat babysitter I agree the other guy is wrong and being a dick but WTF man, that was just uncalled for.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:55 PM
9

Dude are you crazy? No one is saying that you should sulk in misery and we're glad you got past it. We're saying that these rapists need to be fuckin' convicted and sent to prison for an adequate amount of time be it a man or a woman, the latter of which rarely even gets convicted due to the fact that either people don't take it seriously or because in some places, rape according to the law cannot be carried out by females. Edit: Also, most rape victims do not want money, they want justice. They…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:51 PM
3

MAGGLE MAGGLE MAGGLE FTFY
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:53 AM
2

This is such bs, some of the things were shit that everyone does regardless of gender but each question was only about one gender which is pretty dumb, things like "women tend to exaggerate problems at work" is something a lot of people do so I want say I agree that women do it but since there isn't the same question about men (which I'd also agree to) it seems like a sexist pig. Also, to be 0% sexist you need to disagree strongly with each question which makes the quiz even dumber than I though…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 05:38 PM
2

Just to clear things up for anyone who doesn't know, OP was making fun of people who previously said that about Father's Day.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:01 PM
1

Screw the sexism, that shit is straight up cringey.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:02 AM
2

All the upvotes?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:45 PM
2

Yeah, that's why I'm not making any conclusion but I thought it'd be interesting to compare it to Pistorius's case since they seem to have one big similarity.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:36 PM
2

A certain man named Oscar Pistorius comes to mind.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:58 PM
12

Nothing. But it's hypocritical as shit when they blame men for liking women with big busts and curvy (not their standards which are actually bumpy) bodies and then say their type "tall, dark, handsome" as if they're unique and don't judge.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:34 PM
2

No, those are only compromises.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:32 PM
1

Oh I see, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:25 PM
2

A practical guide for parents who don't want their children to suffer and how both parents can maintain a loving relationship with them It's great but it really depends on both parents being co-operative which if they are, they'll already spend the time fairly but this guide could be immensely helpful.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:23 PM
2

So you're telling me everyone should be selfless 24/7 and not do anything for their own pleasure? What is so wrong about looking at pictures of yourself being beautiful as long as you aren't harming anyone. Sure it may be a bit vain but that doesn't make it wrong and it's none of your business as long as it's not affecting you.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:21 PM
3

Women view a man getting raped as hilarious but claim a woman getting raped is horrific. Lets be honest here. This is not only a women's issue. Men also find it funny because society as a whole finds it funny. That is also why prison rape is still such a big problem. However I must admit that in person [so take it with a grain of salt] I've never experienced men or women finding a real case of it funny, usually it's just the concept which they find funny which is still pretty stupid.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:15 PM
46

https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Success-Kid.jpg Man I'm so happy to see this, it's small but significant. Reading all the depressing articles of child abuse, DV, rape and custodial issues on this sub and another had been fucking with me for the past few days. This makes me so happy to see. Thank you for sharing it.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:26 PM
1

with the fellow lads of Reddit Bruh, you gotta stop with them vibes.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:29 PM
1

Not much, I doubt he'd have mated.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:23 PM
1

All the actors are jacked as shit except for the Flash (who's from a TV show) compared to their past versions. It shows exactly how men are sexualised in Hollywood and society in general. All that jacking up isn't healthy for the actors either, who do it for the role in a very short time and then loose it afterwards but then gain it again for the sequel. The only woman shown looked pretty much the same but was covered up a bit more in fact but that isn't to say that sexualistion doesn't happen t…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 06:07 PM
-1

Well that's fucking horrific. So when will she be prosecuted and also her alleged rapist.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:57 PM
2

Best reply : "That's it's whiter than a polar bear eating vanilla ice cream in a blizzard?" To be fair, the ice-cream is vanilla and banana flavoured. Worst/dumbest Reply : "and the hindus? and the transgenders??" How can you tell none of them are transgender? Assuming based on looks is fucking disgusting you scum, check your privilege shitlord. And the most accurate reply: "I have a feeling she's not getting the responses she hoped she would get."
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:47 PM
1

I can't help but think that if the father was a clean shaven, ripped man with bulging muscles then there would be less of an outrage. To be honest, I don't think either a picture of a man or a women naked with their child in the shower is beautiful (just an opinion) but it's not anything bad either, if the parents want to take a certain photo then so be it as long as they aren't harming the child. And people may not agree with this but I don't think that parents should post naked pictures of the…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:23 PM
1

Pretty sure he's trolling.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:17 AM
0

Man, from the information you've given I don't know if it's a men's right issue but holy fuck. This has to be one of the most awful things I've read in a while and don't forget this is the fuckin' internet. I do understand if your point is that if the genders were reversed people would have felt much, much worse but I don't see the point in getting caught up in all of that. I'll try not to judge the woman either since I don't know why she did it but I will say this, it was disgusting of her to k…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:02 PM
2

Fuck, just realised you're right. The account was created 1 day ago and this is the only post, probably a troll. Edit: Also just realised that a troll was leaving hateful comment, probably the same person. We've been had.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:06 PM
9

Wow, the feminist brain is more intriguing than anything. "How can I make this day about "Fathers" which people care much less about than the day of "Mothers" about women, and present it in a way to make women seem twice as good as men? Hmmmm."
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:30 PM
1

You're the kind of person who gives MRAs a bad name, OP didn't say anything offensive, no need to be a dick. She isn't accusing anyone of raping her right now, she's saying she was raped. There may be reason to doubt her but there's no need to interrogate her if she isn't making any accusations.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:17 PM
-1

I understand that men are more likely to be categorised as terrorists We do not have nearly enough information to assume that what the woman done was because she was sexist or just plain ignorant. No point in making assumptions and bashing the woman for being sexist.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:50 PM
1

Hey man, I think you should at least try to rephrase your question or not ask it, rape is a sensitive topic for the victim so such straight forward and detailed questions are not appreciated by most even if some might be open to talk about it.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:48 PM
1

Would you mind sharing the name of the book, please?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:44 PM
-1

I don't understand how this is related to Men's right and the need to express that it's the woman being sexist to men. I understand that men are more likely to be categorised as terrorists but this had more to do with the woman's ignorance than her being sexist. If I'm missing something please explain it to me.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:34 PM
1

Like different categories bro, those are the 2 types they watch.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 03:29 PM
1

I don't know if you understood me or not but I was agreeing with you. My point was that MRAs don't waste time trying to bring social justice to stupid issues at college campuses like SJWs and feminists.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:50 PM
1

I don't see any neckbeard MRAs campaigning on college campuses either, neckbeard feminists on the other hand...
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:15 PM
0

They only watch gay porn with ripped oiled up men and BBW.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:14 PM
5

IMO both are fine, they're supposed to look appealing and attractive. Objectification isn't always a bad thing, in cases like this it's completely fine. It's not as if their sex appeal is the only thing about these characters, it's barely a part of it. It just supposed to make the characters look cool when wearing the suit. Honestly, I can't even see the heels in the pictures, I don't know how other people are seeing them, if any of you can then please tell me. Also, do you expect the actors to …
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:34 AM
1

I do agree that anecdotal evidence holds no merit but what I meant was that when they look at a news report or an article about a woman attacking a man or anything else that goes against what they agree with, they disregard it as just one instance. I know that just one instance of something also doesn't mean that it's common however the problem is that they disregard at as just one instance instead of responding to it properly. Also, like you started, it's very hypocritical considering they use …
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:16 PM
5

I don't know how to react to that. Anger? Sadness? Disdain? It's all too confusing.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:12 AM
17

This is more true than it seems, I've seen them say this so many times that I've lost count.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:08 AM
4

I do agree with her point that women need to negotiate their salaries more. Statistics show that women have a tendency to not do so whereas men do, this account for a part the small pay gap that actually does exist.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:04 PM
1

Huffington Post, my old friend.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:03 PM
1

That actually makes a lot more sense. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:54 AM
1

It's the same worker, if you look closely, you can see him climbing on top of the rubble.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:47 AM
2

I find this greatly amusing. The hypocrisy is unreal. Thank you for sharing, I had a good laugh. My favourite part: What if every builder has gone out, bought the Guardian, read her article, and taken it completely to heart? I can see it now. Breakfast with the wife before setting off to work: “Bacon, dear?” asks Elizabeth. “No, just a soy, chai, quinoa, Gazan latte for me”, retorts Dave, the builder. “Listen love… I mean, sorry, Elizabeth… I’ve been having a think. I’ve been a total, card-carry…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:38 AM
1

My question was directed more towards her policies but I do agree with what you said. The Lib Dems are almost dead at this point and the Labour vote has been completely split although I don't think she'll get that many votes compared to the other parties so she isn't exactly "handing" Zac Goldsmith the win.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:27 AM
1

What are your thoughts on this?
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:57 AM
0

Makes a lot of repeated and also many subjective points that depend on the person. Some of the things are not even issues. All in all a shit "article".
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:45 PM
5

Basically, an awful lot of men are--and always have been--volatile and unreliable. They drink, they get abusive, and they do stupid stuff. They're bad with money, they don't help with the kids, and they don't help around the house. They demand subservience. They demand sex. 1) Okay, on average more men probably drink more than women on a regular basis but men also have a higher tolerance. Also, as long as it's not excessive I don't see how it's a problem. 2) Check domestic abuse statistics. 3) T…
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:13 AM
2

traitor to his gender We're not picking sides mate. It's not men vs women. It's men's issues and women's issues. MRAs with the mindset of men vs women are what make people think that all MRAs are the male version of feminists and make others agree with feminists who accuse us of being misogynistic.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:54 AM
5

Most men have a preference but doesn't think it matters That's just not true when it comes to being attracted to something. People are attracted to things and they can't control that, and for many is not both from any gender think their preferences matter and may discriminate (not bad in this case) based on them. while also think we're less of a person for not fulfilling those preferences. While I don't know about the general consensus of what all women think of penis size, a large portion of wo…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:05 PM
3

Okay, that was my fault. I apologise.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:24 PM
2

Some were even terrorists. Lets try that too, amirite?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:23 PM
3

Yeah you're right I worded it wrong. What I meant was jobs which can be dangerous or as you said physically demanding and some even in unsafe, dirty environments. Construction and farming can be rewarding but farming is sort of a risk for many farmers and construction causes a lot of injuries (doesn't include fatal injuries) and around 40 deaths a year as well. And mining as you probably know is very unsafe.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:09 AM
3

I read somewhere that in Britain, before the working class got the vote, only people who owned some land were allowed to vote and a few of them were women.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:55 AM
3

In a simplistic way, both are valued for what they can offer however men are valued more on what they offer (work) than women. This is mainly because men do most of the shitty jobs that keeps our day-to-day lives the way they are such as farming, mining, construction, plumbing - all important in most modern societies and some even more important in developing countries. Another thing is that in most developing countries, men make up the majority of the work force and are ones doing the shitty jo…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:49 AM
11

become romantically involved with the man after he told them he was a wealthy business owner. Shocking! one of the women had allegedly tried to leave following a rape but was stopped when the man got into her car. The man, who is on a disability pension and cannot drive Damn this must be true. not have been able to rape the women who were “of a larger stature” because he had muscular dystrophy and could use only one arm. Well that explains it. According to this article, he may have conned them a…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:30 PM
2

I feel like if a famous person said this it would be on a black background with a black and white picture of the person surrounded by a translucent white glow.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:18 PM
1

Please refer to /u/G-O's comment.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:58 AM
1

They want to keep it that way. Women can't be paedophiles so children are not at risk sitting next to them. /s
/r/MensRights10/04/16 10:45 AM
3

It's been removed, can someone post a mirror link?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 10:06 PM
8

40% of the victims are men and 60% are women, even taking into account gay relationships on both sides, it's pretty close to 50/50 but no, they have to make it sound like men are more abusing because more women are abused and women are the primary aggressor in 70% of domestic violence cases. Keep in mind that more men are told not to defend themselves against a women whereas women are taught to do this and praised for it and being of the stigma of attacking a woman even in self defence, men just…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 09:31 AM
4

Even the comments there with personal stories are just sad. Too bad men only have 0.8% of the number of shelters women have in England and Wales.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 09:19 AM
3

But men are bigger and stronger and can defend themselves better, right?That's how I have always understood it. You see this is one of the reasons why nobody takes domestic violence against males seriously. In Britain, 40% of the victims of domestic violence are men (Home Office statistical bulletins and the British Crime Survey) but you also have to take into account that men are generally laughed at when they tell someone they've been abused by a spouse, there are huge number of men who don't …
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:40 AM
2

Straw man
/r/PussyPass08/04/16 12:45 AM
1

I don't get the deal with this test, if the point is that females are biologically weaker than men therefore to balance it out, their grades should be easier to attain than men's then I understand it. But, when you take into account that this is for the army and the army needs soldiers to perform at a standard level, shouldn't it be the same for men and women? And in that case, mostly men would be a part of the army, but then the feminists will cry about inequality in the army, even though it's …
/r/PussyPass08/04/16 12:39 AM
3

Would you say that to a man or even a woman who rapes your kids? Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:08 AM
0

Or a normal Sunday at the Church.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:07 AM
6

This is so fucking stupid, it doesn't matter how much at what level of risk the daughters are at if they live with the sex offender. If you want to determine the safest environment for the kids, this is how it works: Chances of being abused when living with biological father = n% Chances of being abused when living with mother and step father = n+x% Clearly the chances of being abused are greater when living with the convicted sexual offender. It doesn't matter what the difference between "n" an…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:21 AM
1

Another thing that pisses me off is that she says the reaction to her tweets about women's rights is violent and then compares it to her tweets about gun control. This is a clear attempt to make the criticism of her opinions on women's rights seem irrelevant and a way to ridicule them.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:37 PM
1

Don't worry, the G in LGBT is soon to be kicked out. Maybe then you can fully share the pain of straight men because you know, gay people totally aren't oppressed and like half the world's population totally doesn't hate them. /s
/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:43 PM
1

That is shocking. For so many countries, the rate of male suicide was over 2 times the rate of female suicide. Thanks for sharing that. I agree that there are many factors to it but it also means that some of those factors are influenced by society and we need to find a way to control them but it'll be a long time before enough people actually care about this enough to do something.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:06 AM
7

Family pressure in India is an amazing thing. Married men are expected to do this regardless of wealth and social status and more: Take care of wife - provide essentials Take care of kids - provide education which is very expensive, public schools are looked down upon so people prefer not to send them there. Take care of parents at an old age. Live with parents/wife/kids (even in a small house and sometimes even extended family). Work to provide for everyone - a lot of the time it's like 1 man p…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:02 AM
2

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090536X13000245 Edit: Korea - http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/repkor.pdf
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:32 AM
2

Makes sense from an evolutionary point of view.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:13 AM
17

People don't see violence as violence any more when it's among adults (and kids sometimes). This is how it works: Man on woman = Fucking piece of trash attacking a defenceless woman. Man on man = Lol come on guys stop this (this is fun to watch) or look at these savages, fucking disgusting human beings. Woman on man = OMG what a brave young lady to stand up the abusive male, even if the male did not provoke her in any shape or form, what a brave woman she truly is. Btw, lol man's a pussy bitch a…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:12 AM
1

In India men walk hand in hand as friends, I would never do that because it feels weird to me but that's how I've been bought up in society. But the fact of the matter is these things aren't the biggest issues. We need to tackle bigger issues then move on the smaller ones.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:01 AM
1

I mean... men commit suicide because they get tough to beat up women and thus we need to teach them not to be violent? That's not even remotely logically coherent. This. This pissed me off so much. They completely deflected the issue of men committing suicide and turned it into something against men which is fucking disgusting. I was hoping that someone at this point would bring up the point that men's lives are not seen as important due to war, media, high level of male homicide and suicide but…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:00 AM
1

I only wanted the discount card, I didn't ask to be a part of this community. Life is hard.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:32 AM
8

Fuck it, it's a gentlemen's club.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:25 AM
11

Something I dislike about feminist influence in the media is reboots or (exact) stories where women play parts that were once played by men and of course this isn't true in all cases. You can't keep a character the same by changing its gender or sex or whatever you want to call it. Genders/sexes have differences and that has an impact on the character but feminists will try to deny this saying that women can act just as good as men which may be true but acting isn't all there is to it. The lines…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 11:53 AM
1

RemindMe! 3 years
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:21 PM
3

This is fucking outrageous. The campaign is called "Disrespect Nobody" and it claims that it's for equality for everyone. But for fuck sake, it presents so many scenarios and in every single one of them, it's a man who is shown to be the one who's violent or perverted. 40% of domestic abuse victims are men. It's also pretty fucking obvious that men do not report domestic abuse as much because people a) ignore them b) laugh at them c) don't believe them d) don't care because men can't be abused. …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 12:16 AM
7

I'd like to point out that he's being charged with rape (rightfully so). But you're telling me that men can rape other men with sticks but women cannot rape men in anyway whatsoever? Look at you there with all your equality and not man hate.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:26 PM
2

No fuck you it must have been your fault!
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter