TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Axleonder Archive

View 11 posts and 832 comments by Axleonder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is why stuff like this upcoming app is important. Men need their own platforms they control, men need digital sovereignty. If we're just trying to set up shop on big tech platforms like Facebook then we are just tenants who can be booted out by the Facebook landlord.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 07:47 PM
2

I look forward to this app coming out. Men need an app like this to reduce their dependency on mainstream censored top-down controlled software.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 07:42 PM
3

I'm on their Discord! They host forward thinking discussions and engage in online activism as a group.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 04:42 PM
1

Feminists are the ones who started using payment processors against us, waging economic violence. Why are you denying we should use the same weapons against them they use against us? What sort of wimp are you?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:43 PM
3

Manhating women aren't "traumatised hoes", they're well adjusted sadists. Cope harder. They have no reason to feel revenge either, they are privileged. Yes this does radicalize people, misandry begets more misandry, no boundaries on violent manhate teaches more people that it is acceptable to engage in it. How about you go somewhere else, instead of telling men not to do something about it.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 08:11 AM
2

Nah. Censor and debank their feminist manhate.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:53 AM
2

Lame. Men need to be fighting fire with fire instead of "being the better person". Feminist women have gained so much leverage that they censor and debank men's entertainment, all because they don't have to obey principles. Men need to be fighting feminists with the tools they use in return.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:52 AM
3

Why was this post locked by a moderator? This is why men's rights are such losers. Getting a feminist manhating game removed or payment blocked is actually good. This space doesn't even allow simple goals to stop the spreading of misandry.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:48 AM
2

there are a bunch of low quality games about just killing women, have been for years. You're just lying. Showing women suffering gets national attention, so any game about just killing women does not get to stand.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:46 AM
3

Feminists have been showing how hateful they are to men for decades, nothing gets done. They actually need to be punished and censored.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:42 AM
3

Feminist manhaters aren't making mistakes, they're spreading hate and they are winning. Men are losing by being passive do-nothings about it.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 07:40 AM
6

Here's to the fastest growing MRM out there right now!
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:22 AM
7

I've joined up to them. They are one of the most active mens' rights groups running right now.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 05:30 AM
1

You know itch has a report function for malicious software. So why would this remain up if it was a virus?
/r/MensRights30/05/26 10:21 AM
11

This is politics in gaming done correctly, while also being a funny JRPG.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:35 AM
0

You are a feminist. No reason to bring up Epstein over Russell Brand, he banged legal aged women in his country the UK. Are you okay?
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:47 AM
0

Yeah, so? For you to suggest Russell Brand did wrong, that makes you a feminist who's against men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:17 AM
2

Reddit allows female dating strategy to post pro-castration images against men, advocate violence on men, but banned the MGTOW sub which said nothing anywhere as bad, so don't count Reddit as the arbiters of morality here.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 11:07 PM
5

CityCrusherYT is the place for men, men there post some serious men's rights discussions.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 01:48 AM
5

Collectivism is based. Just look at the civil rights movement, using collective action to outlaw discrimination based on race.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:57 PM
2

I'm already on their Discord!
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:53 PM
2

"We need normalization to survive, and normal conditions" — You just mean revert to the institutions of 50-60-70+ years ago. Even though they were inhumanely exploitative of men, bombing foreign lands to maintain dominance, and were themselves catalysts that gave women the power to devour everything and make things like today. No thanks. If men want a fair and just world, we need to build something new.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:32 PM
25

When you post, ask Elon Musk, why hasn't he suspended feminists who post "kill all men"? He did say he would suspend anyone who calls for the genocide of any group.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 04:25 AM
1

If you believe in your rights as a man, please join this group!
/r/MensRights20/09/25 07:09 PM
8

Circumcision needs outlawing. Female child abusers need jailing.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 02:51 AM
1

For comparison, this sub r mensrights bans people for calling marriage an anti-male institution, bans people for calling out grifters for being white nationalists, and had a weird rule where you're not allowed to cross-post and promote men's subs with less than 3000 members.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 04:19 PM
-5

Really? You're falsely accusing Islam and immigrant men of misogyny? You're throwing other men under the bus of feminism. The myth of misogyny under Islam has already been debunked.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:33 AM
1

Rather than saying you are aimless (on a Men's Rights forum no less), maybe find a Men's Rights organization to join?—and help fight to legally abolish the "child support" racket, so that other men don't have to suffer under it like you had to.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 04:09 AM
1

You just made up a cretinous lie.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 02:27 AM
0

Except that is the real rationale behind historical racist policy.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 12:11 AM
0

hey, you are proven wrong by the OP's link. It's NOT "just one carriage".
/r/MensRights16/05/23 12:10 AM
0

Whites feel in danger of black men—that's the official reasoning given to racist discrimination.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:51 PM
0

It IS a bad thing. It's about treating men like underclass vermin in a gender apartheid society.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:49 PM
0

Wow, this is a true-blue anti-male threat narrative you are spewing.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:46 PM
1

It's just a straight up lie.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:42 PM
0

And if you take in account population of the country, I would say 'few creepy man' could be in numbers higher than a general popultation of some countries in Europe. This is a disgusting piece of misandrist dogma.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:41 PM
1

As an Indian, not generalizing .. But there are a few creepy men all over the country.. And womens safety cant be guaranteed. Hence, can't really blame them for having separate compartments for women on trains. Rest of the benefits/advantages given can be questionable. Wow, you are just smearing your fellow countrymen. How disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:40 PM
0

No there isn't. You're spewing misandrist and racist dogma. Stop trusting women's barefaced claims about being harassed.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:31 PM
1

I will never forget this for sure!
/r/MensRights10/04/23 07:35 AM
1

You are mistaken. "SJWs" don't exist. You can't effectively be anti-feminist if you hold onto a dodge-label.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:40 AM
1

Great—then you know that "SJW" is a pointless label.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:29 AM
1

There are no "SJWs", there are simply feminists. "SJW" is a dodge-term used by cowards to avoid calling out the later.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 08:53 PM
1

Please stop with the label "SJW", they're feminists—feminists out to attack men.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 10:28 AM
1

Exactly, lol. The idea of men dumping women for being feminists is pure revenge fantasy.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:49 PM
1

What you've determined of me means Jack all, since all you've brought are lying statements to prop up the right and deny their attacks on men.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:18 PM
1

Nice projection you just committed—accusing me of being tyranical—it's the right that's committing a lot of tyranny against men: right-wing white-knight judges refuse to jail women for murdering men—also right-wing governments introduce staring laws to jail men for looking at women.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:10 PM
0

You do men a favor, and stop promoting the right in the MRM.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 08:02 PM
0

Hey, you're telling a boatload of lies. Now you're trying to pretend it's just the "extreme" conservatives doing harm. No, it's the mainstream republican right, the ones in power, who enforce things like compulsory registration for the draft against men, or else men be fined and go to jail, and be denied federal jobs and training. This isn't the right "lettings things be water under the bridge", is it now?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:13 PM
1

Speak for yourself being "triggered". We're telling accurate things about the right, against your lies you make to excuse them, and now you're going mental and suspecting we're communists for zero reason.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:10 PM
2

This is just a lot of nonsensical babble about "communism" you've written, it has no bearing on what we said at all. Why don't you actually listen to us you right-wing NPC? Neither of us spoke for communism, we just pointed out the right has an awful track record of brutalizing men.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:36 PM
2

STFU. You generalized conservatives as these sort of good guys. So you just whine I'm generalizing because I point out they're bad.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:19 PM
0

Exactly, conservatives loves to call other men pedophiles, and cheer for the police to raid their homes and put them in jail. Republicans are also the ones in power that ruthlessly push for more child support legislation—like the new bill to give pregnant women child support—this is to force men into ever more debt or prison.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:49 PM
1

I'm glad this headmistress received some sort of friction. She literally invited a twisted sadist, Jordan Peterson, to teach boys at a school, when he has praised circumcision as a deliberate means to torture boys, and has also praised bullying and workplace hazing.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:17 PM
6

Exactly, Peterson has nothing to do with men's rights. Also one of Peterson's feminist lies is there's "porn addiction". (And he's promoted circumcision as a means to combat "porn addiction", which is totally disgusting.)
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:14 PM
4

Damn... the article demands you subscribe to their magazine to be able to comment. I'm not giving money to them. I would love to tell them what loathesome right-wing female supremacists they are and how harmful they are to men otherwise.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:17 PM
1

You're a tradcon, so you perfectly support the sacrifice of young boys in your behavior. Don't lie to us.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:15 PM
1

If suitability for combat was the issue, why do armies then force small boys into combat carrying and handling assault rifles over physically capable adult women? Shows you know nothing of what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 08:49 AM
5

"Men cause all the wars" is one of the most disingenuous statements we're told from gaslighters.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 03:06 PM
1

You are so blatantly lying. I only had to click on your page on your boycott lists to be slapped with referral links to opposing abortion, and covid vaccines, and fears of "surplus men", all when I casually scrolled down the same window with your boycott lists. All of these referral links are right-wing obsessions being slapped onto the MRM's cause, where they don't belong. Please stop inserting right-wing obsessions over MRM matters. And don't pretend this isn't happening.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:18 PM
2

Why are you linking to a log post that shoehorns in fixation against abortion? — or covid vaccines? — or threats about "surplus men"? (which is a deeply misandrist discourse) Can you please avoid steering the focus against discrimination of men into your pet right-wing obsessions?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:05 AM
2

You've made it plain to us that you are not for men's rights and think they are an impossibility, so it's too late for you to say "I actually want men's rights", it's blatant to us that you don't.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:11 AM
2

It's against your own nature to be on a "men's rights" subreddit then. So just follow your own conclusion, and don't bother being around a place called "men's rights", since to you men will never have human rights.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:08 AM
1

If you think men are just biologically predisposed to not have human rights, perhaps you shouldn't be bothering yourself on a subreddit named "men's rights".
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:22 AM
2

Stop being a misandrist liar. Also I'm not an in**l. Learn some respect not to smear people.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:05 AM
2

Incels (the true, ideological incels) have shown that they mean to harm other men and are against men's rights. See 1, 2, 3 and 4 for examples. These are the nails that show incels cannot be allowed into men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:08 PM
3

Saying that a large percentage of the male population dying off is better for continuing the species than the opposite is bunk. Just look at Russia which lost a massive portion of it male population during WWII after which the fertility rate plummeted. This is about all that is needed to tell that you are spelling horseshit.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 05:32 AM
4

No, absolutely do not support them. Both Warren Farrell and Andrew Yang are the enemies of men. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maXaxE51Lpo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wwkXBE69qg
/r/MensRights05/04/22 01:42 PM
4

Thanks for putting this feminist in their place. I can't stand feminist liars.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 10:53 AM
28

This shows how much a true and proper men's rights organization is needed, one that can legally challenge these social workers for practicing such discrimination as this, and force them to change their ways. This is truly outrageous.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 10:32 AM
16

"Woke" needs to be erased from our vocabulary. It's just bullying of men, by women asserting their social dominance.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:04 AM
5

It's plain and obvious. You're just being a concern troll. You are hurt at being called on your hostility. (You are blocked by the way for resorting to spamming and following my account around.)
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:03 AM
3

You are wrong. It is a male-hostile concept. It is only used prescriptively. You don't advocate for the rights of men if you advocate in the term male disposability. (I blocked you by the way, for spamming me and following my account around. Ta!)
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:03 AM
1

OP talks knowingly of what is going on. You are just a concern troll. You're just hurt because you are one of these male-hostile types he calls out. (I blocked you because you were spamming at me and following around my account.)
/r/MensRights21/03/22 07:03 AM
3

I am having fun reminding you of your place. Male disposability is a male-hostile concept. You can't be for men's rights if you promote male-hostile concepts that are used to deny men rights. Definitions matter. ​ EDIT: Replying to Punder_man's reply further down: Ignore themm.. this thread has been deleted anyway.. they already proved how out of touch with reality they are anyway... I personally will not be engaging further as there is little merit or fun to be had in speaking to what essential…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:00 AM
1

Wow... you're really getting downvoted for this? ...Shows there's an abundance of anti-male "MRAs" here who can't stand their bad ideas getting deflated.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:12 AM
6

No. It's only a fact of society that there's male hostility, not "male disposability". "Male disposability" is just the excuse for male hostility. Any honest MRA would drop the "male disposability" concept. If you're holding onto it, you're not to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:10 AM
3

News flash: I don't have to be the supreme leader to tell who isn't an MRA. There's a thing called having standards to a label, people have to meet these standards or else they observably aren't part of the label, otherwise the label is meaningless. A standard to observably be an MRA is to reject male-hostile concepts like "male disposability".
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:05 PM
2

I'm totally with you on this. "Male Disposability" is a trash concept that is brought up to excuse male hostility, and it has to go.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:21 PM
4

What joking? Nothing about the OP suggests he's the supreme leader, so your joking falls flat.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:12 PM
5

If you're not happy with dropping the concept, you can leave men's rights and embrace misandry.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 03:57 PM
7

It's women who rule over men. No other scapegoat is needed.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 07:20 AM
5

Just stop with this reproductive bottleneck horseshit, NPC. It's been thoroughly debunked.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 07:23 PM
65

Children are just shields for women, so don't validate the excuse that it's for caring of children. Countries and sinking ships have been willing to save adult and elderly women's lives in the place of children's lives.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:08 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:02 PM
9

The ones triggered here are misandrists like you. You get triggered at the thought of men having equal rights.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:00 PM
9

All that matters to them is are you male or not, and if you're male, you're a meat-shield.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:57 PM
14

You're a misandrist. Go away.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:07 PM
16

That video should be made public. (By the way, such men being given flowers for leaving are human beings, they don't have to be "real men". The "real man" card is a slave card and has to be tossed in the trash.)
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:47 PM
3

Biology and muscle mass doesn't make men have to fight. This is why small boys and frail old men are made to fight before any healthy fit adult woman. Fuck off with this excuse.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 12:01 AM
3

No. You are a promoter of child abuse. You admit you would prefer to abuse your son. Doubt any of your shaming attempts on us can deflect from how you're the most abhorrent person here right now.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 11:58 AM
7

You just confirmed to him that you are every bit misandrist as feminists. You are a pro-child-abuse low-life.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 06:49 AM
3

You are a tool. The male only draft is not about military effectiveness. This is why you see countries willing to draft fragile small boys and frail old men before ever assigning healthy fit "military-aged" women to do any sort of military service. ...Oh yeah, you are also a misandrist who needs to leave men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:47 AM
12

You're linking to Josh Hawley, who knocked down giving women equal responsibility to register for selective service. Get out of here with this traditional conservative nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 06:36 AM
2

You're insufferable. Stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 01:47 AM
3

You just proved you are a feminist. You are using the term "misogyny" against me. "Misogyny" is a word only feminists use. True misogyny doesn't exist. Not going to talk to you anymore now. I don't waste my time interacting with feminists.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 01:47 AM
2

Women do not want to punish female perpetrators even when they are victims of them. No, women do not suffer from not being taken seriously. Mothers do not care about their sons, as you don't see them fighting to get schools and students punished for attacking their sons. And no, you're wrong, feminists are well-adjusted and liked in society. Stop wasting my time with your bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 01:44 AM
2

Women do not care to stop female perpetrators, even when they themselves are victims of one. Case in point: the women who were victims of Alison Mack, spoke and said that she was a victim who they forgive and just want to move on from, instead of a violent sexual perpetrator who needs harsh sentencing. Women are taken very seriously, and people everywhere value the words of women far more than the words of men. Feminists did not create a situation where people stop taking women seriously, this i…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 01:18 AM
2

There is no feminism that is harming women. Sorry to pop your fantasy.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:53 PM
3

Yes. ...And notice that conservatives are flip-flopping between cheering on men avoiding women, and also fear-mongering against men avoiding women. They refuse to keep their narrative consistent.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 08:31 PM
2

Men are not refusing to marry women (women are the ones declining men for marriage.). Men also are not avoiding women in the workplace, at any real rate (men still want to have and be around women.). Not only are you not telling any real harms against women, you are telling fabrications.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 06:17 PM
5

This is such cowardly concern-trolling from you. You want us to put women ahead of men, for imagined harm's against them. You should mod a dating subreddit or a feminist one, instead of a men's rights sub. (Feminism doesn't harm women, also. This is a lie.)
/r/MensRights18/02/22 06:10 PM
4

Nope. Feminism hasn't harmed women in any sense. Enough of this lie.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 05:57 PM
3

Feminism has not harm women in any sense. It has improved their lives in every way imaginable, at the expense of men. You and the other guy are both liars.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 05:54 PM
8

Those feminists are not out of their mind, they are willfully and consciously committing acts of fascism, in order to marginalize men and to stamp their dominance over society. They need to be taken seriously. And no, boyfriends are not ditching their feminist girlfriends for being violent at these protests. Men submissively accept these violent feminist women, as men still accept what romance they can get. This is a delusional fairytale you're espousing: that feminist women are crazy and will e…
/r/MensRights18/02/22 09:16 AM
14

This is such incredibly limp begging. You're asking us to recognize (non-existent) harm against women before real harm against men, just to beg feminist women to be nice to us. Way to throw men's rights in the dirt for this.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:52 AM
6

Feminism hasn't harmed women, it has only benefited women (at men's expense). What a delusional call from you.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:44 AM
11

This is a complete begging comment you made. Wanting to please or not upset feminists is a dead-end for men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:13 AM
18

In Israel, Women's groups cancelled a law that would have allowed for women to be charged with rape: https://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape The National Organization for Women (NOW) successfully opposed a shared parenting bill in Florida, with the aid of Rep. Gov. Rick Scott: https://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/gov-rick-scott-vetoes-controversial-alimony-bill/2273409/ (Feminists opposed this by fear-mongering about how presumptive shared pa…
/r/MensRights18/02/22 03:58 AM
-1

DISCLAIMER: THIS meme is ANTI- gender roles. It is not here to validate you traditional conservatives in your gender role obsession.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 05:06 AM
3

No. I just proved that your idea is wrong and harmful towards men.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:47 AM
3

You are just repeating a myth. If alienated single men brought about violence, how come violent crimes used to be more common in the past, when men were getting married more often? How come wars are getting less common now and we're more peaceful now than ever? Marriage was in fact the highest in the past century during WWII. There is everything misandrist about your comment. You ARE repeating the misandrist idea that single unemployed men are a threat to society.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:23 AM
6

You are repeating a misandrist myth — saying that single unemployed men are inherently violent and dangerous to society. There's no evidence for this at all (in fact there's evidence for the opposite: men that women choose tend to be more violent.).
/r/MensRights09/02/22 07:07 PM
4

Good, calling this fake "hero" out.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 06:47 PM
3

Men were witch-hunted, far more than women were, and it was women and girls who started witch-hunts. You're just a breathless liar, who has to be 100% rejected. Also you're resorting to insulting me for being loveless, to try and shame me in debate, like that has anything to do with opposing your falsehoods. You're a nasty underhanded person.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 04:29 PM
3

Wives were never owned by their husbands. You're telling more ahistorical lies. Every position women got in life was what women demanded and chose, and especially demanded over men, and men had to give to them submissively. You're telling big fat lies with your replies. Your replies are to be 100% rejected.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 04:12 PM
3

You're a big fat liar. You realize women did not ever want the responsibility of going to war, and the earliest feminists did not want to go to war, but they coerced young men into going to war. Your entire reply is just lie-after-lie, and is to be completely rejected.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 03:51 PM
1

I'm reporting you to the sub. This is intentional mischaracterization of me, done for harassment.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:16 AM
3

You're telling a complete lie. You should go be an unhinged right-winger and pathological liar somewhere else than men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:43 PM
2

You're just a barefaced liar. (The right popularised the term weasel to use on anyone who is left of them, by the way.)
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:21 PM
3

You're a false-reporter then.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:15 PM
3

Here you go, weasel: https://www.reddit.com/r/Advancing_Male_Rights/comments/rakvfe/provision_to_require_women_to_sign_up_for/ It was politicians entirely on the republican isle that vocally opposed the bill and expressed that only men should be expendable during war. You're trying to be a weasel and deny the right's crimes against men.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:43 PM
2

The Republicans were the main drivers of shutting down the equal drafting of women. Why are you lying by saying it wasn't them.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:29 PM
2

Feminism isn't about equality, it is about sexist discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 02:07 PM
4

There is no such thing as "woke culture". All of it is feminism.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 10:08 PM
3

"Men are expendable to protect others" is literally the same as saying “men are garbage and less than human”. ...So is “men are rapists” with “men are ticking time-bombs to shoot people if they're spending time on video games and porn.” Man you're a traditional conservative Muppet. You lot are right-wing feminists.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 03:37 AM
2

They ban and censor proper MRAs while they defend feminists and tradcons that spew misandry. They are male-hostile.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:36 AM
15

This is important. Anyone who can should donate to them now. The NCFM is the closest pathway men have right now to gain some justice, while society is denying men justice in so many ways to count.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 07:26 AM
2

wow... mods of mensrights. Sweeping posts under the rug without any clear reason, I see? What's with removing this perfectly legitimate post that's pertinent to men's rights?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 07:02 AM
3

Wow... There was no reason for this post to be removed. What are the mods of this subreddit even thinking??
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:17 AM
2

He is right. You are the weakling. And you are coping really bad.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:26 PM
2

I'm just tired of feminists calling men the problem for the choices women make by themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 01:34 PM
4

I'm content to just tell you to go away. Feminist liars are beyond reasoning with.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 11:44 AM
4

I spot an American. Wrong. You've got nothing but lies to blame men for women's choices, feminist—lies and also deflections for your lies.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 11:40 AM
3

There are no women who are so poor that they have to prostitute themselves. Shove your feminist lies where it doesn't shine. Prostitution exists entirely by women's choice.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/22 11:05 AM
2

"MGTOW" guys are. (I'm glad you recognise this.)
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:45 PM
4

This idea that western men are being turned into psuedo-women isn't based on any reality. Why are you even getting upvoted for this?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:10 PM
3

wow... your anti-male comment gained a lot of upvotes. This shows what a misandric pothole this "men's rights" subreddit is. Wanting to trap men in "masculine" gender roles is anti-male.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:58 PM
5

Looks like this silly "MGTOW" is spamming a lot of too long; didn't read text at me now, lol.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:53 PM
4

No, I'm just content to mock you. "MGTOWs" like you need derision from men's rights spaces. You are too deluded to realize "MGTOW" is a failure, and is only derailing and harmful to men's rights advocacy.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:10 PM
2

You are too deluded to realise this is just because most men are SENT their own way. Keep coping, "MGTOW" guy.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:00 PM
3

Men aren't walking away from anything. You "MGTOW" guys really do cope hard.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:55 PM
2

Yeah yeah... We know that as soon as women demand something off you, you give it to them. Women demand to have choices so you will not deny them from having choices. Like all tradcons, you will not take away women's choice to be in the military.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:15 AM
1

Biblical nutter confirmed.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:06 AM
4

Get on with it then as make the military restrict women. ...oh you're not going to, are you. Many of you tradcons praise women having the choice to be in the military and whatever role they want. Of course, you're not really an exception to them. You're just lying and posturing by saying you want to restrict women, but you really won't.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 02:37 PM
5

Yes you traditional conservatives are extremely mental. You'll never restrict women based on what you think makes them "different". You only want to restrict men. You lot are anti-male and are woman-worshiping.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:26 PM
2

Your wall of text looks delusional. Not going to pay attention to it. You're a deeply odd and suspect person. The fact you deny equality under the law which is a basic tenent, in favor of sacrificing men's live and risking them before giving them the same rights as women, makes you menacing as well.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:00 PM
3

Basement-dwelling-shaming... anyone who resorts to this is an inherently nasty person. Guy like you all love and tolerate women living back with their parents. It's just guys getting supported by their parents that you have a problem with. Hypocrite.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:48 AM
2

I most likely know what JP is about much more than you.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:30 AM
4

Tradcons like you have all the problems with women. You lot are always mad at women for not living by your fantasy gender roles. Way to just project your own problems with women onto me. I am a real gender equalist. You're a pro-slavery aberration.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 11:29 AM
7

Women are not even raising kids, they're doing a terrible job at it. Go away with this traditional conservative delusion. "Women work the factories for clothes, farm the land, produce the bread and milk" ...lol wot?? You're reading this out like we live in the 1900s, in a story book. Typical tradcon delusion.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 05:42 AM
5

Yes, It's equal to given women the same risks and duties as men to earn the same rights. Otherwise it's slavery. Take your peter-pan shaming elsewhere. it's "real men™" like you who act like scared children. You take what mommy/wife/the woman orders from you like children who are scared of punishment. ...Actually, even children would practice more self-respect than "real men™". "real men™" are just scared imps.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:15 AM
5

More babble about "women are important to have babies"... Women aren't even choosing to give birth at replacement rates. Yet women-worshipers like you do not even care. Child birth rates are not important to you. People like you only want male-only conscription because you want to see men abused, period.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 02:39 AM
5

wow... good going, moderators of "mensrights". You removed this perfectly honest video that is speaking for men's rights. You should have just focused on removing the troublemaker who was causing problems in this post. Way to reveal your hand against this...
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:39 AM
6

You can't focus on "being men™" and be for men's rights. "Being men™" is all about being submissive and giving up your rights to women. You can't be for Jordan Peterson and be for men's right either, lol.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:20 AM
5

Get lost you tradcon bum. You lot sold men out of their equal rights to surrender and pander to women.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 12:19 AM
9

You've shown you're bothered by this video just for being made by a transwoman. You've outed yourself now. What else you come up with is clearly bull-oney.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:22 PM
6

Men's Rights should be bothered by having you around instead. It's clear you only care about men fitting into male gender roles—you're not an MRA, you're a traditional conservative—men's gender roles are to sacrifice for women—that's all "real manhood" is. Also you make men's rights look bad with your transphobia. Also men's rights has more in common with trans rights than it does with TERFs—TERFs smear men as predators to advocate for restrictions on men, and have talked about committing violen…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:22 PM
5

You're clearly mental, to think lies against men's rights being spread by a channel with hundreds of thousands of subs and views isn't something to care about.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:46 PM
3

This is some prime gaslighting you're committing to decry this video response for being posted. You're clearly bothered by this video response for some deluded reason, lol.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:38 PM
2

No one should accept your bullshit persuasion. Guys like you sure like to fearmonger about "scary" men, or "potentially-scary" men.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:13 AM
0

wow... you're painting Chinese men as a danger—"Look at all those PRC males who want to invade us!" You should go away.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:05 AM
5

China is the way it is, by the way, because both Mothers and Fathers wanted servants to look after them and plow the fields, since China was mostly dirt poor, so they wanted boys instead of girls to toil in hardship. This is all but disappearing as China has become developed and industrialized.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:03 AM
1

Why are you bringing this concern. "Too many men" is only ever brought up anywhere to paint men as a social ill.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:52 AM
4

You're just spewing mad drivel about women choosing not to date men. Go and take this elsewhere. Men here shouldn't care about trying to get dates with women, men should care about society seeing them as human beings with dignity, instead of automatic threats for just existing.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:48 AM
3

I'm not even from America. Can you stop using your thought-terminating cliche—pretending I'm an ignorant American. The provider role is slavery, by definition, and it's enforced world-wide. In fact the slavery is even harsher outside of America. And it's a gender role, period. This is why across all cultures and time it has never been accepted to have househusbands and "breadwinner" wives. I can tell you're a tradcon telling nonsense—trying to pretend to us that men being in the provider role is…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 05:01 AM
6

What are you even on about. Men get the slavery provider role forced upon them world-wide. Also the "cultural roles" anywhere ARE because of gender, dummy.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:32 PM
15

Bullshit. Men do not enjoy working like a slave to be the "primary breadwinner", men simply have to do it to bribe a woman into their lives. They risk ostracism otherwise. And women don't care much for giving care to children, beyond shitting them out; they're pretty awful at it. Why are you lying to us with this traditionalist bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:23 AM
19

Good write-up. Dishonest actors paying lip-service to men's issues are a basic problem that we face, as they're just trying to slip through their misandry, and so they need calling out. Most of these misandrists who are acting are tradcons, who hate men for being "idle" or for surrounding themselves with hobbies.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 02:59 AM
7

Anyone attacking habits men enjoy (like pornography and video games) is anti-male. They're basically saying men cannot live life for themselves, they have to live life as a servant for some woman, i.e. a member of the gender aristocracy.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 08:40 AM
7

This. This community needs to stop sharing around conservative litter. Conservatives have shown themselves to back discriminatory laws against men, and treat men's rights activists like dirt. They are not our friends.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 08:30 AM
3

Go away. You're just a LARPing woman who wants to defend housewives and their parasitism off of men. We're not interested.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 11:45 PM
1

All "tradwives" are motivated to dig into their husbands and make them overwork, so they can live an easy pampered lifestyle for themselves. The husband is the only one submitting. Now I'm not going to validate the fantasy you are pushing onto me. Step off.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 11:40 PM
2

Nope... You mean so-called "tradwives"? ...They force their husbands to work, so they can parasite off him by staying at home and being idle, and they still openly disparage their husbands in this set-up.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 04:39 PM
4

lol — women only LARP as tradwives, and they're not servants—their husbands are the real servants.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 11:07 AM
2

lol — you mean you are hurt about me telling the obvious: tradcons are all woman-worshipers.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 01:29 AM
2

The thing is you're wrong. A good read of that pictured article that debunks it shows that it's wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 12:55 AM
1

lol; not going to waste energy to point out the obvious to you. The number of tradcons who woman-worship is all of them.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 12:53 AM
3

You haven't seen tradcons, period. ...or you're lying.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 12:43 AM
2

Nice. You're projecting about yourself. You're the triggered one. Watch the video, you dishonest person. City Crusher doesn't badmouth the househusband at all, for playing the wife's role. I can tell you just looked at the description and are nitpicking from that. You're twisting the description out of context as well. By the way: I noticed you edited your reply against mine after I left my reply, so that I wouldn't be informed about your new words you added against me—so I'm editing my reply to…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:45 PM
1

City Crusher didn't refer to house husbands as parasites at all. What are you even on about. I think you're upset at City Crusher going against the gendered hypocrisy that you're in favor of. That's why you're so flagrantly lying about his video and also his audience.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 04:57 PM
2

Damn. You're killing this guy with hard truth bombs. He's just acting insane and is rambling all over the place.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:13 PM
2

No idea what you're on about, since the original person didn't link to anything "red pill". Learn to comprehend what you're replying to.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:42 PM
2

Yes. Feminists are not afraid of getting raped. They know they're the safest group on the planet. Feminists just say they are afraid of rape to push for society to clamp down on men.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 06:41 AM
2

We've been here long enough to know how ineffective and counterproductive to men's rights you same people have been, You need to get out.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 06:28 AM
2

You losers keep getting crushed by feminists, and you pretend that you're scoring here? ...man, get lost from here.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 06:28 AM
5

Shoo, free-speech concern troll. You have nothing worthwhile to say to me.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 06:09 PM
4

The men's rights movement should have a goal of getting feminism outlawed, just like the civil rights movement got racism outlawed. Outlawing racism didn't change the minds of racists, but it marginalized them so they can't spread their harmful racism throughout society. And that is a good thing. Men's rights activists should want to live in a society where feminism is outlawed. Men are after all dealing with feminists who are advocating for infanticide of baby boys, and smearing all men as pedo…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 01:34 AM
3

We already have a subreddit that aims to do that. Join r/Pink_Pill_Watch
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:04 PM
2

You respond by pressuring Reddit to get them banned.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 04:50 AM
4

You are a frequent poster in the kotakuinaction and kotakuinaction2 subs —two far-right spaces which permit white genocide conspiracy theorists to clutter up discussion, and which also ban you if you oppose white genocide conspiracy theory. Why are you lying by accusing me of engaging in partisan politics, right-winger? You are in fact the one who is projecting, when you say that I'm projecting and am being a 'partisan hack' and playing political team sports`. You're just talking about yourself.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:42 PM
5

Well put together. The right have repeatedly hammered home that they are against equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:41 PM
5

Get out, right-winger. The right have voiced clearly and loudly that it views men as meat-shields to be put in harm's way and even die for women. Neither the left nor the right are solutions for men. You right-wingers act mental, the way you bang on about the left, when the right's misandry is called out. No one claimed to be for the left.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:29 PM
4

I see that you are engaging with a dishonest tradcon who is just dancing around and playing semantics, to waste your time and energy. Just say that men were never in control. Ruling men could get destroyed at any woman's say-so, just like we see ruling men getting destroyed by metoo false accusations now. Men in positions to rule are still lower than the average woman. And then just leave it.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:50 AM
2

Exactly, it's a men's rights forum. Tradcons like you should get lost.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 08:37 PM
2

What matters is the actions taken — that's exactly my point against you. Progressives gave themselves up to feminists, so they are feminists. Their actions aren't progressive in any sense, yet you are calling falsely their actions as such.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 07:40 PM
3

"No true Scotsman" fallacy doesn't apply here, because you are trying to tell us the actions they commit are progressive in nature, when the actions are feminist in nature. And I already said to you, these "progressive stacks" all end up placing women as the most oppressed group to give everything to, and ditching help to actual racial and sexual minority groups. So "progressive stacks" are a lie. Take away the label "progressive stack" and you see they're just feminist-style pandering to women …
/r/MensRights17/12/21 02:37 PM
2

Yes. Their behavior fundamentally isn't progressive though, their behavior is feminist. That is what I'm getting at. They are de facto feminists.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 02:15 PM
3

That just means that A) feminists are falsely identifying as progressives, or B) that self-identified progressives have surrendered to feminism. And the "progressive stack" doesn't exist. What get called "the progressive stack" just means giving everything to women.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:05 PM
4

It's not "all of a sudden". Right-wingers are only in this subreddit to draw men into their right-wing politics and ditch men's issues. They never really belonged here. Cleaning the house of right-wing hijackers does make men's rights serious. You're a troll who is concern-trolling.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:31 AM
2

Well done, pointing this out.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:27 AM
5

There's nothing progressive about this, and feminism is not progressive at all. Calling feminism and this progressive is a lie.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:24 AM
7

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rexirv/conservative_site_subjecting_women_to_selective/ You just took down a post that was days older than this. So you are lying with your statement. You're retroactively removing posts about this subject now. You mods are traditional conservatives, who don't like the contradiction between men's rights and conservatives being pointed out.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:16 AM
2

Well said. You put this position in its place.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:05 AM
4

Well said.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 04:25 AM
3

No, husbands forcing wives to have sex with them was never okay, period. You're just pushing a lie now.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/21 12:48 PM
3

Under no society was rape from husbands against wives ever legal. That is an insane misandrist lie you're telling. Your school is feminist and is teaching propaganda if it taught you that.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/21 12:37 PM
3

Liar. Under no society or context were husbands ever allowed to rape their wives. That's never been true. There's marital rape codes, which are extra-legal codes, to give extra-protection to something that's already illegal, and feminists falsely frame this to claim that marital rape was legal, which is just false. If you're repeating this, then you are a feminist, who is sharing their world view.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/21 09:32 AM
2

Yes, do not trust Repubicans. They are anti-male snakes.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:56 AM
5

Wow... One more conservative outlet showing their female-supremacism. Conservative outlets that are doing this are a dime-a-dozen. Conservatives are female-supremacists. I'm finding it hard to find any exceptions.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 11:35 PM
3

Of course... It is typical of right-wingers to cover-and-dodge. They all deny being right-wing, and then act insulted when you call them out as such.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:07 PM
3

So you are anti-men's rights. Full equality under the law and in obligations is a must-have for men's rights. Sounds like you were meant to put your comment on r/TradConservatism instead of show up to a men's rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 03:42 PM
3

Oh you and your insane right-wing mental gymnastics!
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:55 AM
4

You're playing dumb, and are just wasting my time now.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:53 AM
4

You're shilling for the right-wing political tribe. Also you're just playing dumb now.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:49 AM
3

Conservatives are feminists. They believe in feminist claims about the world, and also pass legislation that feminists demand off them.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:48 AM
4

You're a pretty typical right-wing shill to paint this post that's pointing out the right's misandry as left-wing propaganda.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:44 AM
16

These archaic types treat "daughters" as special extra-humans, and give jack shit about equality under the law — "Don't draft our daughters!", is their mantra — They never give this special consideration to sons being drafted. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 01:06 AM
2

BlueOrange wasn't crushing feminists in debates, he was begging Sam Ceder and Vaush to be nice to him and was capitulating to them, as they were smearing MRAs as misogynistic and were speaking over him. The Pro Male Collective fights feminists, and has had more success in taking them down than the MHR discord has. We saw who your mods and staff were ourselves. You have feminists on there. You are a shameless liar. People reading this should not be listening to you.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:29 PM
5

anyone who supports feminism is allowed to post, and gets trolledrelentlessly. Our members find it amusing, and it also means we have amore free server than feminist ones. They normally leave a few days orhours after. Except you have feminists as moderators on the Discord, who concern troll over male circumcision with female circumcision, spread misinformation like men can beat women for disobeying them while women can't, tell things like women need to torture men as retribution for men's past w…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 12:18 PM
7

The weak men are the tradcons who want to be treated like "real men". "Real men" are weak and submissive to women, and accept women abusing them.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 04:42 AM
17

Traditional conservatives are not against feminists, they believe in the core ideas of feminism, and also pass feminist legislation when in office. Sick of having to remind people that conservatives join the feminists, and do not oppose it.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:07 PM
10

You and your right-wing delusions about the left being everywhere! Oh hush!
/r/MensRights10/12/21 08:47 PM
8

You're just the biggest pretender here that conservatives are not only not showing unanimous vocal support for anti-male legislation, but that they didn't also work politically to enforce said legislation.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 03:41 PM
2

You don't believe in reality that's right in front of you, is what you're saying. ...so you're electing to believe in the tooth fairy.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 02:59 PM
10

No conservatives are not more sympathetic. They are just prone to giving lip-service. They give lip-service while intentionally passing and supporting legislation that harms men and discriminates against them.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 02:37 PM
6

They are allowed to serve in all combat roles now. Why are you lying to us.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:56 PM
10

Conservatives are just god-awful for men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:02 PM
8

I'm glad your reply is being downvoted. It shows there's some common sense around here.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:55 PM
3

We can see conservatives today vocally demanding for and passing anti-male legislation—like the current stripping of legislation that would have made the draft gender-equal and not male-only. You can stop using the "no true Scotsman" fallacy on us, shill.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 08:33 PM
6

Not stalking you. I didn't realize you were the same poster. Not only are conservatives the most open supporters of upholding women's privileges at the cost of equal rights that would actually benefit men, but conservatives in powers have consistently acted to pass anti-male legislation, and also block pro-male reform. Anything else from conservatives is just lip service. Also "masculinity" is and was always a shit deal for men: men being used as providers and beasts of burden for women instead …
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:57 AM
2

You're a dogmatic right-wing hijacker who is obsessed with turning everything into your left-vs.-right war. You're just showing this to us even more. You are senselessly calling me left-wing for calling the right misandrist. I never claimed to be with the left. Stop pretending you are for men and men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:57 AM
7

This is just more "men's masculinity is good" bullcrap coming from conservatives, which is just saying men are good as utilities instead of saying men are humans worthy of equal rights. Do not trust in conservatives, gentlemen. They have been and still are the most shameless and vocal pushers for anti-male laws and women's privileges like male-only draft registration, alimony and child support. Look at how Republican senators like Josh Hawley called for stripping the recent provision adding wome…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:19 PM
2

The thing about you, right-winger, is you make everything about your war on the left. You say the left censors men, as if that erases the right of its crimes against men.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:00 PM
3

Conservatives endearing themselves to men to try and exploit men is not them supporting men's rights. When it comes down to it conservatives are the most brazen and shameless passers of anti-male laws and upholders of women's privileges at the cost of men. Conservatives need to stop pretending they are for men and for men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:57 PM
1

Men's rights is not a free-speech zone. This is not a gotcha you are pulling on me. I've seen right-wingers censor men's rights activists for not sharing their obsession with marriage and forcing men to "man up". So I'm not about to trust you on your free-speech concern trolling.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 08:23 PM
1

Conservatives are awful for men's rights. They are emptily pandering to men, while they along with the Republican party are the most shamelessly vocal pushers for anti-male laws like male-only draft registration, alimony and child support. Do not listen to the OP here, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 08:25 AM
3

Republicans do not agree with MRAs everywhere else, they only pretend that they do. Stop lying to us.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 08:16 PM
12

Americans should listen to this.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:34 AM
4

wow... this is the level of toxicity that's entering our mainstream politics. This is hell.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:51 PM
6

Conservative politicians are opening up to be complete woman-worshipers over this draft reform bill. They are sounding like any alt-righter or radical feminist, when they talk about the sanctity of women needing protecting above anything else. This extreme and open admittance to unequal pandering, seeping into the mainstream American right, is a very worrying trend.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:35 PM
19

Wow... I called this post's link bullshit without even reading it. Thanks for pointing it out to us. I knew just from reading the title, "America Has A Boy Crisis", that it was going to be nothing but "masculinity" shaming and "man-up" bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:30 PM
3

But by all means, go on pretending that your impotent rage is what caused this all to happen just like the Aztecs believed that sacrificing a virgin ended eclipses. This is a non-sequitor. You seem to have reading comprehension issues. So talking to you any more is a waste of time.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 07:19 PM
4

This is very important to read, as feminists are corrupting the slavery discourse by framing slavery as a thing only men do, just to just attack men period.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 04:03 PM
3

Wow, you are completely lying. Takeshi Natsuno got his bonus cut because of people mailing their anger in in protest; not because of people doing nothing and waiting for the companies to "go broke" in their heads. I actually read what happened, unlike you. You just made up bullshit on the spot. ​ So you're just a plain liar. This meme is warning against people like you.
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 09:47 AM
4

You are passive, and trying to justify "get woke, go broke". Things are not getting better for men from "get woke, go broke", things are only getting worse. And yes, protests can force companies to step-down from anti-male attacks, when they cause enough backlash. Takeshi Natsuno, president of Kadokawa Corporation, had his bonus cut and was forced to apologize, when he gave a statement inciting manga censorship, because there was harsh enough backlash from direct protests. Men don't bother to pr…
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/21 07:45 PM
3

You are passive, and you think your passivity is changing things, and are falsely blaming others for your passivity not working. Also I don't believe you when you say you are done giving these companies money. You are the very person this meme is warning about. You are the one who is lazy. Change at these companies means men have to protest and get together in public to demand feminists be fired from companies.
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/21 07:20 PM
4

People like you preaching "don't buy their shit", while attacking others for being "fanboys" and "simps", are the first ones to buy stuff from feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/21 10:03 PM
5

You can stop lying to us. Women choosing to not work is not the same as women suffering from unemployment. Women choose the housewife role so they don't have to work, and instead force the husband to work.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 08:01 PM
5

Stop lying to us. Women fall back onto gender roles where they play housewife and make the husband work, and choose not to be employed. Men meanwhile are pushed out of employment. Also stop lying to us. Men falling out of college isn't only an American thing, it's a world wide thing. Women are the majority of college and university attendees in Saudi Arabia for example, and also in India.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 05:03 PM
1

Sexually jealous men like you are common and everywhere in society. Not going to stand you just abusing me here now. Of course, you are just projecting your own narcissism, by falsely calling me "narcissist".
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 06:00 AM
2

You just revealed yourself to be a right wing supporter of metoo. Other men get to sleep around more than me, so they must be punished. This is what you're thinking. You right wingers are always about sexual jealousy of other men and hostility towards them. Also I'm not on the left. Your attempt to trip me as a "lefty" here failed. You are a confirmed right wing misandrist.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 01:14 AM
3

You're a typical insane right winger, derailing the matter of women getting to falsely accuse men, with you yourself falsely accusing "Liberal" men with the term "sex scandal". Get lost. "Sex scandal" is code for "I'm sexually jealous of other men for getting the action that I want".
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 12:32 AM
5

You are insane. It is the right who are the primary enforcers of child support. Right-wing men love to posture and tell other men "man-up™ and pay your child support". The right are mainly at fault for this. Saying nonsense about "liberals" and "wokeness" has no bearing on reality here.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/21 06:47 AM
2

Those judges white-knighting for women are the most hardcore of tradcons, they're not liberals. People saying boys are lucky to be raped are always tradcon right-wing men as well. You have to be insane to fixate and blame this on "liberals".
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/21 06:38 AM
2

Nah, you right-wingers are immune to listening to proof.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 05:23 PM
2

Shoehorning right-wing politics into this is disinformation.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 02:30 PM
2

You are making plainly incel-arguments: dreaming men had superiority over women—which never happened. Also women used to work much harder in the past. The current pervasiveness of pampered stay-at-home wives is a recent modern perversion.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/21 01:08 PM
2

Get lost, lunatic.
/r/AntiFeminists08/11/21 12:16 PM
0

I’m not a tradcon. I’m close. Yeap, you are clearly a tradcon. Tradcons love to deny being tradcons. It’s also a way to label and attack people instead of arguments. You say this as if tradcons offer arguments instead of repeating debunked appeals to male slavery. The genders aren’t equal. You just don't want things to be equal. Gender equality means being equal under the law. Progressive values are largely mistaken. You mean, "I am personally against progressive values, I only want values that …
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 09:25 PM
5

You mean to this guy "if you spread BS that men are ruling the world"... You mistyped it as "BS that women are ruling the world".
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 08:46 PM
1

Tradcons… interesting. ...you mean, "I don't like being called out, I'm aware the tradcon term applies to me, but I have no way of contradicting what's being said against me." You know, if you refute feminism you need to replace it with something. You replace it with true gender equality and progressive values. When women had privileges and men had to earn and work for women with no privileges, but ran society as a result of that burden, that was the most fair system, which accepted gender diffe…
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 02:44 PM
18

Feminists support the bloodshed of men, pure and simple. These aspects about feminism, that feminists are open about themselves, need to be publicised as heavily as possible, to push against the false narrative that feminism is a dainty and noble movement for equality.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 07:12 PM
3

I am saving this post for reference. ​ Feminists want to restrict men from creating art they want to create (and are succeeding at this). Feminists say that male creators are promoting hate-speech and violence. It's clear that feminists are entirely projecting what they want to do themselves. They create hate-art with the explicit purpose of inciting terrorism, hatred and violence. They want to commit acts of wanton cruelty and violence themselves, against males, just for being males. Their core…
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 04:48 AM
8

I have tweeted the video now. (My twitter is small, it's just my little bit to help.)
/r/MensRights30/10/21 09:11 PM
6

Any man who wants female validation has to "simp", period. You are calling other men "simp". This mean you are just blaming other men for your fantasy not coming true—your fantasy about women willing themselves towards men, on equal-or-close-to-equal terms.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/21 07:52 PM
2

We've got a racist nutter spamming this post. The mods here need to pay attention to the reports sent. This racist is violating 2 separate rules of this subreddit.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/21 06:03 AM
3

To abide to Reddit's policy against instigating harassment by revealing someone's confidential information, that's why.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/21 03:13 AM
3

Yes. I filtered her name on the screenshot though, to abide to Reddit's policy against instigating harassment.
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/21 03:11 AM
2

Go away, racist.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 09:57 PM
3

Report this bigot and move on. She's breaking 2 separate rules of this subreddit.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 08:59 PM
-2

MGTOWs are relationship-obsessed tradcons. Anyone can see this just by spending a bit of time with or on them online. You're just giving us your stale MGTOW regurgitation without paying attention to what the post is actually saying.
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/21 01:11 AM
-8

Watch all the "MGTOW" rejects flip out in this comments section.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 06:12 PM
5

You are not calling women "simp" at all. Women do not show sympathy and attention towards men. This is just desperate posturing.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:59 PM
7

You are just calling men "simps" when a woman rejects and attacks him for his effort to pander to her. If a woman accepts him for his effort to pander to her then he is not a "simp". So you are being anti-male.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:54 PM
5

Anyone who is concerned with ending sex-selective male-only conscription should consider donating to the NCFM: https://ncfm.org/lead-with-us/why-donate/ It is only through the legal efforts of the NCFM that the issue of sex-selective conscription is being challenged again, and has this much attention now. Meanwhile it will be the weight of tradcons and feminists that will try to push for this effort to fail.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 12:16 AM
5

This is exactly the kind of horrible attitude free-speech trolls expect, except they expect men's rights activists to use valuable time debating pro-baby-dick-cutters, pro-female-on-male rape apologists, and all such monsters. ...Jesus...
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 03:15 PM
1

I've had insane people I was dealing with in this subreddit rant about "feminists" only for being sluts (i.e. women giving out to other men than themselves)—meanwhile they actually agreed with feminist misandry, like feminists pushing men into gender roles. This sub is full of trad-con misandrist men who are just fueled by sexual jealously.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/21 02:14 PM
3

Women always have their restrictions removed with the help and compliance of trad-con men who are wanting to please them, then these same trad-con men blame the situation they've helped create themselves on younger men enjoying their hobbies—this happens in every country, and in every society—it's absolutely nauseating how true and repetitive this is.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 01:35 PM
3

You trad-cons in your personal behavior always bend over to women's wants, as you want to avoid upsetting women at all costs. So you will not dare to ban women from watching porn—too many women want to watch porn—you will only try to ban men from watching porn. Trad-cons like you enter governments and use power to violate the sanctity of other men all the time, while being too scared to touch women. So we can correctly judge that you are anti-male, and your framing that you want to restrict both…
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 08:56 AM
1

You are not “against” Female Dating Strategy in any sense of the word—you are a deselected trad-con who's posturing about women being sluts who turn ugly and are whiny. This is deranged crap you are accusing Female Dating Strategy of, and it is false. You are dishonest, and are exactly like Female Dating Strategy, since you share the very same core beliefs as Female Dating Strategy—you don't just “share an opinion” with them. This is why we call you who you are. You are literally the trad-con mi…
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 08:55 AM
3

BEWARE: willisbeauts is resorting to baseless smearing in his replies to diffuse the focus from his pro-slavery position against men. He just falsely labelled colombomumbojumbo a right-winger. He also just falsely appropriated the "equality" label for himself, which he is evidently not for.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 04:52 PM
2

Well you have been a man-hating trad-con. Boys are actually precious whereas you just cause harm. A time-out needs to exist for people like you.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 03:43 PM
2

You are full of tomfoolery. This is what you're giving me now, on top of your bad behavior.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 02:40 PM
4

Married men are some of the lowest-minded lifeforms out there; they are completely driven by their surrender to some woman, to subjugate and harm other men who still retain some freedom that they've given up.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 08:18 AM
2

The sentence I gave you is clear. You are just playing dumb to your behavior being called out.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 07:21 AM
2

You're an irresponsible mate-guarder who thinks fuck the kids.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 05:58 AM
3

No, not reading through it all, since your motive is to just drain my energy dealing with your propaganda. "Teaching consent" is about teaching boys that they are evil for being born male, and needs rejecting.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 05:26 AM
3

Don't give me this sleight-of-hand term "unwanted sexual behaviour". You're basically including every man who says "hey pretty" to a woman, as being next to rape. That's how you and your linked statistic reaches the bogus "1 in 3" claim.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 11:03 PM
2

I spy with my little eye, something with two words, one beginning with "H", the other with "H".
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 10:37 PM
3

I know... Men here should learn that these women come in to placate them and convince them to conform to their subhuman treatment. ...That is of course if men here are serious about demanding their rights and fair treatment, and not just here to find a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:14 PM
5

This woman is not here to have her mind changed, she's here to obfuscate the harm that feminism causes and to confuse you. Showing tolerance to this interloper actually makes you look pathetic to the minds of others.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 12:36 PM
6

Your gaslighting... I'm not interested in your gaslighting.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:18 AM
5

Not interested.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 09:30 AM
8

No one should believe you, and you are untrustworthy. We know the real history of feminism as well as its current behaviour.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 07:37 AM
7

I do not believe you.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 07:36 AM
11

The purpose of these teachings is to teach young men they are subhumans and worthy of scorn. They not for teaching about consent, sexual violence or domestic abuse. People know these things and violating consent are wrong, including young men.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 06:03 AM
3

People have kids without the (nuclear family). It's very dishonest that you tie breeding to the nuclear family. You are certainly about securing a woman in a relationship by giving money to her, and not about kids. Men are competition to you in pandering to women, so you want other men to be punished and denied help. This about sums you up.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 05:30 AM
4

You are living in delusional la-la land, if you think that house-husbands are now commonplace. This is a very desperate rationalization you are pulling.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 05:30 AM
19

Get out of here with your feminist smearing. Most domestic violence is done mutually, while most of the no-reciprocal violence comes from women. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.588.4366&rep=rep1&type=pdf
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:47 AM
13

Everyone knows that violating a woman's consent and such is wrong. This is just "we are punishing you because you are male" tutoring.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:34 AM
3

House husbands do not exist on any societal level, as wives do not abide men they see as bums in their homes. Just take a look around you. You are just source-trolling now.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/21 03:07 AM
2

You are literally making excuses for brutalizing babies, and you want to talk about validity of others. Yikes!
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 04:46 PM
3

It's just from observing reality. House-husbands do not exist if you look around in society. And you can easily look up safe-haven law. I can tell you are source-trolling and are denying reality.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:24 AM
3

You right-wing trad-cons support tax spending for married couple subsidies (so punishment for being single), and army benefits (welfare for right-wing men). So you already lost it with "not my tax dollars!" You are just a resource hoarder who wants other men to be punished and denied help. That's all you care about.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:24 AM
3

It is a nice retort, it gets straight to the point: you are not wanted in a space against feminism and you are only telling feminist brainwashing nonsense. (Thanks for the kind remark)
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 12:48 AM
3

You are unwanted here, brainwashed male feminist. This post is directed to sane anti-feminists. Go away. You are brainwashed enough to repeat the patriarchy myth, so nothing else you are telling here can be taken sincerely.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/21 10:17 PM
3

I just reported him. Let's see if this subreddit bothers to put up boundaries and disallow feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 11:24 PM
3

1: The video provided a metric, so you asking “by what metric” is dishonest. 2: Saying “you can sue your parents when you are an adult” does not negate the power differential between a helpless newborn infant and grown adults. 3: Okay, you are a male feminist who advocates for boy dick cutting. Good to know you are not to be trusted. Misandry fuels boy cutting and you admit this, but then go on about “misogyny” and “patriarchy”. 4: Boy cutting is institutionalized while rape isn't. This means th…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 11:16 PM
3

Thanks. 👍
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 10:48 PM
2

This is a great write-up that places racism as being in the heart of feminism, where it actually belongs. Feminism enables racism in their fight against due process, and feminists have been openly racist. This write-up also has a great conclusion about why the MRM needs to dump racists and alt-righters and show zero tolerance to them. This "show tolerance to everyone" approach the MRM has been taking is a dead-end—it not only alienates black men, who should be allies, it also gets the MRM slande…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 09:02 PM
3

The article you linked to me is lying, as it presumes house-husbands are commonplace now and so are breadwinner wives—which just isn't true—women dump men who earn less than themselves and so they do not abide house-husbands—house-husbands are almost non-existent. Why are you coming at me with this disingenuous article?—Women are basically never put in the situation where they lose custody of the children to the father and are made to pay child support—you will have the extremely rare case where…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 12:07 PM
3

Fuck that I’m not paying for someone else’s mistake with my tax dollars. Oh wow, you're another antisocial trad-con going “not my taxes!”—how typical. You could have just ended your reply here, since the rest is just you posturing and being disingenuous. You guys just want to hoard resources and deny other men help. Speaking along this line: 1) You don't care about women's mistakes and choices being paid for by the state, 2) you're so into berating men who are victims of child support enslavemen…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 12:07 PM
2

He is saying, you are a trad-con who believes in restricting men in oppressive gender roles, and restricting male pleasure such as porn—and you belong with the hate-mongering women on Female Dating Strategy who believe in restricting men the same as you do.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 04:27 AM
5

I can't believe this trad-con nutcase you just disturbed. He tells you to "stop whining" and "grow up", while he's using whiny insults and retorts, like someone who doesn't grow up. The projection from him is staggering. Trad-cons like him just seem to love berating men's important issues, for their own vanity's sake.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 03:49 AM
5

The amount of low-lives inhabiting this subreddit and are down-voting this video is incredibly disgusting.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 02:12 AM
4

Saying circumcision is worse than rape is perfectly valid, and factual, you only have to listen to the video point out why. You are the insane one to want to deny this.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 02:03 AM
2

They are not fat and ugly. Go look at the women on Female Dating Strategy or TikTok spewing venom against men and they are all either average-to-good-looking. Why pollute the focus that these feminist women are hate-mongers and terrorists by then calling them "fat and ugly"?
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 01:37 AM
3

No the woman isn't made to pay for kids she abandons. Don't lie to us about this.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 11:22 PM
3

The state should pay for the kids. The state aperatus is used to separate the father from the kids, so the state should pay for them. And mothers are never made to pay for kids they don't want to look after. Also fathers are forced to pay even when the mother who has custody of the kids remarries to someone who is a higher earner. So don't being dishonest about this—your question is dishonest. "Child support" is really about punishing the man, for simply being a man.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 11:21 PM
1

What low-life gave this comment a down-vote? ...God...
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 07:51 PM
2

You're right. This back-and-forth has been run into the grave now.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 04:32 PM
2

Right.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 04:28 PM
1

Your phrasing is so bad, it's impossible for anyone to tell what question you are asking, or even what you are accusing me of. Quit foaming from your mouth!
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 08:24 AM
3

My position is not on the left. The left want to pander to women and submit to gender roles just like the right. Typical right-winger, you want to scapegoat the left for problems caused by human nature. This is why the right are a dead-end.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 06:52 AM
3

You mean like how you want to degrade yourself by performing the traditional "masculine" gender role to bribe some woman, and then shame and attack other men as "betas" and "creeps". You are clearly someone who wants to bring every man down, and should be rejected.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 03:47 AM
2

What an fallacious comparison you made. What I said isn't comparable at all to "all black people are the same", as I didn't even say "all conservatives are the same". ...There is a general pattern though of right-wingers showing hostility to men who don't conform to traditional "masculine" gender roles, which you definitely fall under.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 03:07 AM
3

Like you. You will bring men down with your overt hostility, you even just showed hostility to "lazy fat" men "stuck to a computer"—so you're basically shaming men if they have a comfortable lifestyle. People should reject you.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 02:45 AM
2

You have been displaying anti-male hostility as a conservative guy in this post. You are a clear case showing how anti-male conservatives can be. So putting "anti-male" and "conservative" together isn't an oxymoron. ...And frankly, I'm only hostile back to people who show hostility first. I play by fairness. You came into this post to be hostile from the start, by attacking men as "betas" and "creeps".
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 01:17 AM
4

The app works the same as the computer at showing updated vote counts. This is such a pathetic excuse you are making. ...I like how you moved to shaming me for being lazy and being stuck on a computer, without even knowing if I'm stuck on a computer or not. This is how defeated you are that you resort to this. Shaming language about being fat and lazy is a clear hostile anti-male trait, and you are showing everyone how hostile you are.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 10:18 PM
3

This trad-con lunatic avoids having any sense; he's just wants to stay over this video.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 03:49 PM
2

No his isn't. And no both of ours don't read the same. You are out-numbered.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 03:08 PM
3

The comments here so far prove I'm right. Also the video posted being popularly up-voted as you are against it proves I'm right. You are ignoring these on purpose. What a loser you are.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 03:03 PM
1

Nope.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 05:34 AM
1

This is another non-sequitor you are pulling. Also you misread the phrasing of my comment, so your reply here makes no sense.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 05:29 AM
1

Check again. I didn't admit to anything you said. My phrasing was, yes I am calling trad-con-feminists like you out on your nonsense. And no I don't call just anyone that label, just people who actually are trad-con-feminists, like you.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 05:17 AM
3

People over this video agree with me and disagree with you, I pointed this out, and your are deliberately acting blind. You are so far gone and wrong. By the way, you have just been copying what I've said to you to apply to me this whole exchange. Only when you do it it is without any thought. You calling me pathetic is your projection of yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 05:16 AM
1

Yes. And I only call people trad-con-feminists, who are like that, like you.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 08:27 PM
2

You are just blind. You need help.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 08:22 PM
1

I make sense. It is simply calling trad-con-feminists like you out on your nonsense.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 06:22 PM
2

People agree with me over you, this video that you are against has more approval than disapproval. People most certainly disagree with you.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 06:19 PM
1

"moving the goal post", lol, more made up nonsense from you, feminist-trad-con.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 06:03 PM
2

You are a trad-con-feminist loser who is unwanted here. You haven't been saying anything that is valid.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 05:59 PM
1

This is such a non-argument. The video is making the case that there should be stigma against calling people the I-word like there is for calling people the n-word. The stigma is so strong that even spelling out the n-word can get you in trouble. We need the same strong stigma so that "In*el" has to be spelt as the "I-word".
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 05:52 PM
0

Lol, no. I am using the term "non-sequitor" in its actual definition, to assign to what you actually just made up.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 01:37 PM
0

I'll keep telling you you are unwanted here, loser. You use "child" as an insult when children are actually superior to you.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 01:14 PM
0

My approval is better than yours, that's all I said. I know I'm being downvoted. Your hostile vomit is unwanted here.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 04:07 AM
0

This doesn't follow from my logic at all. Your claim (regardless of if it's true or not) is a non-sequitur to mine.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 04:02 AM
0

People here believe me over you—your approval has been falling beneath mine. You are just spamming more deranged waffle.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 03:53 AM
0

Being a trad-con is not tied to being religious, silly. So this makes no difference.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 03:43 AM
0

You have been spamming, unable to let go of pushing your incorrect nonsense over this vitally important video, that I'm having to provide push-back for. I'm not just making an excuse. Your position has been thoroughly destroyed at this point.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 03:39 AM
0

You are a loser, who has just been spamming at me to get the last word in. Typical hostile loser. Children are actually better than you.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 05:57 PM
0

You're incorrect. Feminism predates Marxism. You can look up the Seneca Falls Convention and see that it predates Marxism. It was also made up of Quaker Protestant Christians. So feminism actually has roots in Christianity. Also Marx himself was a trad-con obsessed with relationships with women, and blamed the bourgeoisie for "seducing" women from loving working class men in his Communist Manifesto. Marx was not a Liberal. Marxism is not liberalism. You are a trad-con-feminist-hybrid who is spou…
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 05:39 PM
0

You are sick and out of your mind. Literally everything you are accusing of me is projection of yourself.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 03:29 PM
0

Feminism doesn't involve itself with marxism. Marxists aren't liberals either. You're a nutty trad-con, scapegoating the left. Typical.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 02:32 PM
0

Nope. Feminists and trad-cons agree on the same principles together, and ally with each other a lot. Also feminists are not liberals. Feminist principles and behaviour are in fact very regressive.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 03:21 AM
0

No, I only need to look at your reply and say it again directed at you: you are literally foaming from your mouth.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 03:07 AM
0

What a lame excuse, accusing me of grammar nazism. Your writing is literally like you are foaming from the mouth.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 03:03 AM
0

You are a feminist. You believe that feminism used to be good, so you are one on principle. Feminism in fact was always hateful and bigoted towards men. You really do not belong in a space called "antifeminists". This about trumps your nonsense and crazy insults you are spewing at me.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 08:43 PM
1

Holy hell... your sentence is just incoherent to read. Looks like you are breaking down now, loser.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 08:43 PM
2

Feminists are not hating women. lol. What a crazy claim you are making. Just like the rest of your reply is crazy.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 08:05 PM
1

I don't need to assume. You are like an open book. Crazy unwell lunatics like yourself are a drain on men who are actually against feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 07:59 PM
1

You use the "either you are with us or against us" mentality yourself when it comes to dealing with men you call "betas" and "creeps", yet you claim me using this mentality is bad. Again, you are being a hypocrite here and you are lack self-awareness. And I call you a trad-con and feminists because you act like one. I go by your actions. And yes you do listen-and-believe, if you think people are trustworthy when they tell you feminism was valid in the past. By your actions you listen-and-believe…
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 06:42 PM
1

You are not a centrist, you are a trad-con and feminist. So you telling me this is irrelevant.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 06:29 PM
1

No, I live by reality and the facts, unlike you. You mean you just listen-and-believed people who are purely speaking out of their emotions. Because that's what people do in general, "real people" or online. Also "Classic Liberal" is just another label taken up by trad-cons now, like "centrist". You are showing even further that you are a trad-con and a feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 06:05 PM
0

Wow... trust feminist wikipedia to lie in support of baby torture against boys.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 05:54 PM
3

Stuff like this always brings out the fake-anti-feminists from anti-feminism. Fake-anti-feminists believe that oppression against women is real if you go to the middle east or India or such places, when in fact women are favored and more privileged than men, not only in the middle east but in all cultures world wide. Please do keep this up! Keep making the fakers mad!
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 05:51 PM
2

"Destroying the concept of womanhood" ? — you mean she isn't helping gate-keep female privilege for selfish born women against these people they consider men-in-dresses, right? — Also there is no real misogyny here. Born women want to uphold their privileges over men in society, and they do not want to be equal. These women BTW are the actual feminists. Helping privileged women uphold their exclusive privileges over men is not an anti-feminist concern. This post doesn't belong in anti-feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 03:27 PM
2

Hey, I notice this Revvy loser is following me to another post, and is trying to tell me that "alpha" and "beta" are real concepts. Man this PUA loser can't just let go.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:41 PM
2

You are the one who is unable to bring in any science, and has to make bogus claims about things being proven or "well known". It is clear that dishonestly is your strong trait.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 05:17 AM
2

Feminists are not kicking each other out at all, and older feminists were and are just as hostile and bigoted towards men as what you call "modern deranged" feminists. Man you really are a typical hopeless misandrist, validating feminism of the past, which is shitting on all the men of the past who faced discrimination from feminism. You are in fact a feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 05:11 AM
4

Nope. So-called "Radical" feminists and "normal" feminists share the same belief in metoo, VAWA, the Duluth model, 1-in-3, "sex trafficking", objectification, and just about everything that demonizes and persecutes men, and makes feminism a hate movement. "Rad" fems and "normal" fems deserve to be lumped together, and the comparison you make with MRAs being falsely lumped in with PUAs, racial and nationalist movements is unjust. "Normal" feminists show hostility towards men and tend to stalk men…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:51 AM
2

There is nothing besides the debunked wolf pack studies that you and society go off of to say "alpha" and "beta" are useful. So you mean the science you pulled from your ass, correct?
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 04:25 AM
2

These are butt-hurt-tier accusations you are throwing at me now, since your position is demonstrated to be empty and hollow. Keep crying now.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 04:25 AM
2

You should hit the road. You can easily tell from my profile that I'm not a feminist, Jackass.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:41 AM
2

There is nothing wrong with this mentality. You are either with hostility against men or you are against hostility against men. This mentality is necessary to have healthy boundaries for a movement to provide hospitality towards men. You yourself have an "either with us or against us" mentality towards men you call "betas" and "creepy", yet you are trying to call out myself for having this same mentality towards my alternative ends. Your lack of self-awareness is painful.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:38 AM
2

You are clearly wrong and dishonest. It's obvious you are about your insecurities and being hostile to other men.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:27 AM
2

I see you are resorting to bare-faced lying now. Among the scientists debunking the "alpha male" concept is in fact the one who popularized the concept in our culture to begin with; the one who you regard as an "actual scientist". You should really stop embarrassing yourself now. You are clearly making up everything you are talking about.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:27 AM
1

You should pay attention to the video—it references how the science behind "alpha males" is debunked now—instead of spouting this bullshit at me.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:19 AM
2

You aren't bothering to pay attention to the video, I can clearly tell, as the video points out how you are wrong. Shut. Up.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:19 AM
2

Yeah, I can't believe how bullshit you are being.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 12:53 AM
2

This is just dishonest from you. You should stop wasting our time.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 12:53 AM
2

How was I defending other misandrists who will backstab me? You are just imagining I did this. Take your meds.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 10:18 PM
2

You are a trad-con who is posturing with the "centrist" label. All "centrists" now are just trad-cons who have taken up the label. You are actually showing me very typical trad-con behavior. ...And sorry, feminism wasn't "hijacked by extremists", it was always a hate-movement from the beginning. You can't even say you don't follow feminism if you believe the lie that feminism was valid. You've only just shown more red flags to prove your hostility towards other men.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 09:49 PM
2

...Says you yourself, who demonizes other men as "betas" and "creeps". Your lack of self-awareness is staggering! These other men who demonize all men should be rejected, but them doing this doesn't make them "betas" or "creeps", that's just nonsense.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 09:36 PM
0

...also men who women choose to sleep around with behind other men's backs are still being disrespected and abused by these same women. This nonsense about there being "alpha males" who are successful with women has to be rejected.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:28 PM
1

Males fighting to mate do not end in killing each other—that basically never happens in nature. You are clearly making up nonsense to rationalize this debunked "beta male" term.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:20 PM
1

You are a deselected loser who is hostile towards other males. Let's cut the bullshit of what you are saying. You and anyone wearing the "mgtow" label are deselected and are coping, you shouldn't be talking about short, weak, ugly men.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:12 PM
1

You are making up nonsense and are hostile towards other males. "Creep" is a made-up feminist term. You are showing you are a feminist, trad-con.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:05 PM
1

There is nothing "beta" about being a misandrist. Men in general are misandrists. You are a misandrist for attacking other men as "betas" and "creeps".
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:04 PM
2

Nope. There is no science behind the idea of "alpha" and "beta males". You are not even paying attention to the video.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 08:00 PM
1

"Beta male" is not a scientifically valid word. You are lying. You didn't even pay attention to the video pointing out how "alpha" and "beta" are debunked.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 07:57 PM
3

Wow, this PUA loser we are dealing with has nothing to argue for himself other than to be petty.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 07:52 PM
2

Of course, lawrl! ...Using pickup on women is going to take away their power to metoo accuse you and get you into deep legal trouble. It most certainly isn't going to put you into even greater risk. ...Man, what a dangerous fool this guy is.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:20 PM
3

Quit trying to bug me. You are just being pathetic now on purpose.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:06 AM
1

Wow, you are such a petty loser.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 09:40 PM
2

I'm going to have to look through these links to re-sharpen my education on the PUAs hostility towards men's rights. Thanks for this.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 08:04 PM
2

All men are submitting in order to have sex. This is a fact. It's not "peddling the sexual shame" to state this. You are just lying and gaslighting.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 08:02 PM
2

You put this PUA's nonsense in its place better and more succinctly than I could, nicely done.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:59 PM
0

No it isn't the feminists smearing. I'm not doing their work. Feminists frame PUAs as the same as men's rights all the time. You are so blatantly lying. Get out of here, hijacker.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:57 PM
6

This is very typical; feminists and the media smearing enemies of the MRM as being part of the MRM. I suspect feminists see men's rights and PUA/relationship-obsessed types who oppose men's rights as the same, mainly for the simple reason that both will speak un-favourably about women, which is a core feminist taboo. This is literally the only commonality men's rights and PUA/relationship-obsessive types might have. However men's rights and relationship-obsessed PUAs do this for completely separ…
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:39 PM
5

I didn't even say that. Lunatics like you always perceive other men to be "feminine" in order to attack them. I'm sure you're a scrawny "unmasculine" deselected man. Men who attack "feminine men" are always like this.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 05:21 PM
4

Where did I suggest I want to become a woman?—Nowhere, nutcase.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:33 PM
3

You are just rambling delusional trad-con nonsense. Take your meds.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:55 PM
2

"Alpha" and "beta" comes from debunked wolf pack studies from the 1940s that have since been replaced by better research. "alpha" and "beta" do not exist in nature. Leave men's rights you deranged trad-con nutcase.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:45 PM
1

Nope. All men are submissive to women, through all history, and all countries. There's no so-called "non-beta/alpha" men who are not submissive to women. You're just a deranged anti-male lunatic, rambling debunked pseudo-scientific nonsense like "beta" and "alpha". You don't belong in men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:27 PM
3

How are you going to get a woman to respect you?—You can't. And the only relationship women will ever allow you to have (IF they allow you) is one that's completely on her own terms. Again, you are empty posturer—you are emptily posturing about having boundaries. I never said you are an abusive asshole (...to women at least—because you ARE an abusive asshole to other men), I'm just saying you're an empty posturer.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:21 PM
3

They are not respected because women have no reason to respect men, but can still demand and place gender roles onto men. It is as simple as that.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:08 PM
3

Lol, if you're a provider slave with a massive earning, you can bribe her to stick around you for a while. This is all you are saying. You will never get her respect though. She can still divorce you and claim alimony from you, and get her pay check that way instead of being with you.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:57 PM
1

A tradcon loser like you most likely isn't getting any dates, and you'd accept the whif of a "party girl" at the first chance you are given. Your empty posturing reeks from a mile.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:51 PM
3

You have no self-respect and you're hostile to other men, tradcon. Begone from the MRM with you. Unlikely you have a girlfriend. Also you wouldn't order her not to have male friends or go to clubs without your permission. You'd be happy just to have a woman accept you to make into her bitch, where she can order you not to have female friends or to enjoy activities without her permission. You tradcons are all like this.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:43 PM
1

Make suicide is the way it is due to rigid gender roles where men are made to overwork and receive zero support—rigid masculine gender roles which feminists demand men confirm to BTW. So you are lying again.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:30 PM
3

You are getting jumped on by tradcon fake-MRAs who have no purpose to be on this subreddit. Don't let them get you down.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:26 PM
2

Men are not brainwashed by feminists to act like women, as feminists are pushing men to be more rigidly masculine than ever. Stop lying.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:14 PM
1

Nope, the west hasn't been attacking masculinity. It's just the standard women expect of masculinity has gotten higher so most men including yourself can't reach it. You are telling another tradcon lie.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:03 PM
3

You are in the wrong subreddit, tradcon. This sub is "mensrights" not "tradconcentral". Also you tradcons don't give a shit about society, you just want a woman who will accept you as their bitch. Save your excuses.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:56 PM
5

You sound like a feminist in the wrong sub. It's feminists who want to keep men locked in rigid gender roles, as feminists only push to remove gender restrictions for women.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:48 PM
1

You're a contemptible person.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:06 PM
1

You are the one playing the fool by still going.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:40 PM
1

Yep, you are just gaslighting and dodging. Your words showing you are a tradcon is what's true.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:32 PM
1

I did no such thing. You are just murmuring to your head now.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:18 PM
3

This is just gaslighting you are pulling on us. We can tell your true position, tradcon.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:44 AM
3

You belong with racists. You are using the "i-word" as slur to devalue men like racists use the n-word to devalue black people. And you are a blatant liar.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:18 AM
3

Except you hold traditional and conservative views from your very first reply. You gave yourself away. You're not pretending to anyone you're not a tradcon.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:10 AM
3

Tradcon is a valid term that anyone can use. Trying to falsely deem it an incel term only speaks to your own hostility at being called out, tradcon woman.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 01:55 PM
1

Piss off, parasite. This is my last reply engaging with you.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:47 PM
4

Men are getting jailed far more for the same and even lesser crimes than women commit. That is the reality that explains the stat.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:00 AM
5

Yes. The moderators were will always go soft on feminism so as not to scare women off and ruin their chances of having girlfriends and female validation. In spaces I run I intend to change this.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 01:50 AM
4

You want nutjobs to derail from men's rights. You are not serious about men's rights. Now you are here from our space because you are not receiving our tolerance for your desire to burn us to the ground. Waaah waaah... Booting you from our space was the right call. It is always you free-speech concern trolls who are the least accepting of men having positions outside of your own bad faith ones and who do not want to let go, ironically.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:40 PM
3

It is only solidified as a hate movement to a handful of people. Most of the world consider it a good movement. That is the observation I was getting at.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 09:38 PM
8

This is a complete smear and fantasy from your head. MRAs wanting to discuss feminists is the norm. MRAs putting up boundaries to hateful bigots is non-existent.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:12 PM
1

Feminism isn't solidified as a hate movement. It is the most accepted movement in the eyes of the entire world. What the f are you on about?
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:06 PM
1

You don't know what the term gaslighting means then, and you are basically wrong about what feminists do.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:29 PM
2

He believes Muslims have a rape culture, and is anti-porn, and also demands gender roles (in another comment), on top of his shaming against men expressing themselves, and on top of shaming my interests, and on top of using the hate-term "degenerate". He is a true-blue right-wing nutcase. He is also the greatest gift to feminism, as feminists believe in and do the same things.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:27 PM
1

This means you are lying by saying feminists support men crying. They don't.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:56 PM
1

Funny you mention Tucker Carlson, he downplays MGM while railing against FGM, in true feminist fashion. He also states being sexually assaulted by female teachers is "the greatest thing that ever happened" to teenage boys, which is the same denial of empathy to male rape victims that feminists do by going "men cannot be raped". Face it, the right are antithetical to men's rights, through-and-through. Also I didn't say the left didn't submit to feminism. You are derailing by going on about the le…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:54 PM
1

Go to pink pill subreddits, there you'll find radical feminists telling that men expressing their emotions is annoying. Any feminist decrying "male stoicism" and "toxic masculinity" is gaslighting society.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:57 PM
2

Yes. And thanks for reminding me, we can't forget about former president Trump etiher. Trump was saying women are better than men. Trump also signed legislation for more women in STEM and entrepreneurship over men. Trump also admits paying women who work for him more than he pays men. Trump also ran ads falsely accusing the group of young black men known as the Central Park Five. These examples of right-wingers fully embracing feminism are everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:13 AM
-4

You sound like a concern troll.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:44 AM
1

Hey, loser. A friend of mine just got banned and his post removed from the childsupport4men subreddit due to the right-wing trad-con moderators there, when he pointed out that republicans have blocked shared parenting reform. So you can take your "gatekeeping" card and shove it.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:25 AM
-2

That excludes trad-cons then.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:45 AM
1

You sound like a feminist. It is feminists who are currently saying for men to stop showing emotions and that they are irritated by it. You would fit perfectly at home with the pink pill radical feminists here on Reddit.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:14 AM
5

Right-wing conservatives do not care about men's rights, they only care about bribing women into a relationship. You have Paul Elam who is a classic case of a right-winger who has verbally promoted male dominance hierarchies and men overworking and getting sick to please women compared to men having equal work hours. Right-wingers tend to all be like this. You even have right-wingers here on this subreddit who told teenage boys who worry getting falsely accused in high-school by a girl to "man-u…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:00 AM
1

You are just playing the no-true-Scotsman fallacy now. Ironic. This is what the Right accuses the Left of doing all the time. You are just making piss poor excuses now to defend the failure of the right.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 10:32 PM
3

Exactly. "Masculine" men are the ultimate submissives to female masters. We have to push aside their shaming nonsense against us. They gave up their own personality for a woman to bribe into their lives, which they deep down beg for her not to divorced or abuse them. So do not fall for their tricks.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:27 PM
-3

Hush you right-wing subversive. We all can tell you are about 'winning' vs. the left and are projecting yourself onto me. You pretend for example that I am left-wing. And the right is very much responsible for the explosion of feminism. Right-wingers signed in no-fault divorce, and also blocked alimony and shared parenting reform, to the demand of feminists.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:40 PM
6

Right-wing conservatives care zero about men's rights, just like left-wingers simply don't care. Also right-wingers tend to be feminist allies just like left-wingers. So you can cut out this nonsense. At least left-wingers aren't in the MRM to infiltrate and pretend they are men's rights advocares, unlike right-wingers are. Left-wingers tend to honestly stay away from the MRM. therefore I do not bring them up here.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:35 PM
1

Denial of being about left vs. right, this is a current tactic of right-wingers. We can tell that you are a typical right-winger.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:28 PM
54

OP, you are getting swamped by right-wing trad-cons who are pretenders of men's rights advocates here and don't really belong. Do not fall for these bastards. They are only here to lure men towards their dysfunctional behavior.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:51 PM
5

Imagine someone like you wouldn't enable any woman to express themselves in any situation no matter what.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:40 PM
6

This subreddit has got a lot of right-wing trad-cons pretending to be men's rights advocates for sure. They do not belong here.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:39 PM
-2

Because this subreddit is full of right-wing infiltrators who are pretenders of men's rights advocates and want to lure men. You have got right-wing pretenders attacking you right now.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:34 PM
1

Not an incel. You are closer to an incel. Boot-licker.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 02:28 PM
1

You're just babbling more nonsense, pro-slavery boot-licker.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:13 AM
1

Just deranged words coming from a pro-slavery boot-licker, like falsely implying I'm an incel. It is boot-lickers who want a female master so badly that they promote bill-paying-slavery from men to women, who are the most incel-like. That's you.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:13 AM
1

You clearly enjoy eating shit, just by the way you enjoy being a bill-paying slave to a female master, so it's clear for anyone to tell. You're the boot-licker pretending to be a man. Boys are actually better than you.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:00 AM
1

You are massively cheeky to say that I have wild claims that I'm responsible for proving, when you haven't proven anything from your entirely wild claims you've been spamming here. You don't know anything about responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:00 AM
1

Clearly shit.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:03 PM
2

I do, and this stuff is obvious. I'm just not your Go boy. Go fetch it yourself.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 03:27 PM
2

I'm not your Go boy. This stuff is obvious to look for in men's rights spaces.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:41 PM
1

Yep, called you out. That is why you have no actual rebuttal.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:33 PM
2

What I am telling is not an outlier, but a repeated pattern of Society handing children over to violent women including female child killers. There is no pattern where men are allowed to get away with criminal or murderous behavior. Now you just have to make up excuses.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 10:11 PM
2

You do not support kids, you support a privileged entitled woman who is free to abuse her own kids. Just correcting your bullshit with bringing up kids again. You do not care about kids. You are into shaming other men over your own insecurity about needing a female master to approve of yourself, and who you lick the boots of, and tell this makes you better than other men. This actually makes you as little of a person as there can be, and certainly not anyone in any position to imply other men ar…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:59 PM
3

Nope. I am sitting on top of sources right now where mothers have killed their own children and are still free by society to work with other children. I can trounce your call of bullshit. If I have to tell stuff again it is just to correct your repeated lies and put you in your place.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:40 PM
3

You are an imposter in men's rights and you are anti-male. You use misandric shaming language like calling other men "boys", "bitches" and"(not real) men", on top of your pro-slavery boot-licking. The only person who deserves shaming is you.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:34 PM
3

You don't know anything about responsibility. You only know about giving up your earnings and dignity to a female master you want the approval of. That is as wasteful and irresponsible as can be. So don't tell other men about responsibility. And yes, society hands children over to mothers who end up killing their own children, even when the father raises objections to this and raises the violent behavior of the mother. This is the level of abuse society allows women to give to children. I am not…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:29 PM
3

The man is not paying money to a toddler or any kid, the man is paying money to a privileged entitled woman who is not given responsibility to look after the kid, and is free to abuse the kid. Just correcting your lie again. "Child support" is really woman support.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:14 PM
4

You do not support children. You support ungrateful women who are free to abuse their kids. Just telling this again to remind everyone how low your place is, pro-slavery boot-licker.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:08 PM
3

I'm having fun = so you're not serious and are just here to bash men. This is plain to see by everyone. You are just continuing to tell nonsense.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:04 PM
5

You just explained in a long-winded way that "child support" is really woman support. I understand perfectly, boot-licker.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:09 PM
5

You are just telling lies now for your abhorrent pro-slavery position against men. Any claim from you to have the moral position and attempt to shame other men is automatically invalid. No man should trust you.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:05 PM
5

You are not supporting any child by supporting "child support" slavery, you are supporting a woman who hates you, and is free to neglect and abuse her kids. Your position looks really bad to everyone sane.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:00 PM
3

We can tell you are a barefaced liar. Get out of here.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:52 PM
3

You are not a "man", you are a willing slave paying to a woman who hates you, and also a scab demanding all men do the same. This place would be better if you yourself left actually.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:48 PM
3

He has no rights to his children, so he shouldn't have to pay. Fair is fair. Sad losers like you who believe in "real men" do not believe in men's rights. You are an imposter on this subreddit. You should go away.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:35 PM
6

So "child support" is really woman support. Thanks for confirming to us.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:28 PM
3

I'd like to see HipEvil here reply to you and agree with what you're saying about him. I'm waiting on him...
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:24 PM
7

This is straight-up wrong. "Child support" is about supporting the woman.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:22 PM
1

"Child-support" is just enslavement of men to give resources to women, and anyone claiming men have a "responsibility" to it is a low-life.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:21 PM
2

You are not a good man or good father. You are just a boot-licker for pro-child-support-enslavement against men. You are the lowest kind of person actually.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:19 PM
5

A boot-licker for child-support-enslavement like yourself has no moral authority to call anyone else names, frankly. Anyone who boot-licks for child-support-enslavement is the lowest of the low.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:13 PM
5

"Child support" is not about supporting children. It is a second alimony to the wife. Let's be real here.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:11 PM
5

I've got my facts straight. Unlike you.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:29 PM
5

I don't believe you.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:27 PM
5

"deadbeat dad" is nothing but a demonizing smear against men, and you using it means you don't belong on men's rights.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:22 PM
4

The term "deadbeat dad" is nothing but a dehumanizing slur against men. Men as a whole have raised kids better than mothers have. The term must be outright rejected.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:21 PM
5

Wrong is what you are. The mother is not made responsible to support the child at all. So the "period" is against you.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:17 PM
6

Oh look, you are wrong.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:16 PM
5

If the father has no rights in relation to his child then the state should step in and pay for the child.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:58 PM
6

"Child support" is slavery and discrimination against men, and needs to be abolished.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:57 PM
1

You have my upvotes!
/r/MensRights23/07/21 02:54 AM
1

You are just dense beyond comprehension. I'm done with you. You are a waste of time.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:37 PM
2

I am well versed in knowing what feminists are. Feminists believe in mothers having full custody of children against fathers. Feminists believe in free abortions for women but men should pay child support. Feminists believe women can't rape but men can. Feminists believe women's ability to get pregnant deserves them extra-rights and privileges over men. Feminist believe in MeToo accusations and lynch-mob justice over due-process. Feminists believe in censoring video games, anime, comics, all med…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 07:58 PM
2

Thanks for confirming to everyone what a feminist is. Feminists believe in literally every single lunatic thing you've stated here (with the exception of having fathers being important, but even they just replace this with having distant men as bill-payers to child support being important.). If you believe in all this lunacy yourself then you are a feminist. Just leave men's rights spaces and leave the rest of the male sex in peace.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:04 PM
4

You are a tradcon and are against men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 02:35 PM
2

Nope. You share the same core beliefs: traditional gender roles for men, safety for women and "children" and fear against "predatory men", porn causes harm, "patriarchy" exists/existed, mothers are sacred while fathers are trash/deadbeats, child support, etc.. You actually are the same and are against men.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 10:56 AM
2

Yes you are nothing but a blah.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 05:18 PM
3

Exactly — this feminist is just here to bring in her usual smears and falsehoods to attack men with. She is lying.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:16 PM
2

Excuse me?... Me honestly stating her position is supposed to help, it is not done for me to attack you. Why are you telling me "chill"?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:12 PM
3

This lady isn't a progressive. She is a feminist, which means she is reactionary and hostile, as that's what feminism is. Do not associate the label "progressive" with feminism.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:04 PM
4

No, women do porn because they enjoy the easy attention from it. It is women who are into the violence and degradation, while men are into fantasies of equal love and respect. I am correct and you are telling falsehoods again, bigot.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:54 PM
3

You are telling a falsehood against men and are projecting about yourselves, feminist. Men do not degrade women in porn, it is women who demand porn with degradation and enjoy it. Also you ladies degrade male porn actors and male strippers all the time. Stop projecting your own traits, bigot.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:20 PM
2

The feminist view and conservative view are one-and-the-same. I've seen enough of you conservative men validate feminist terms and call other men "misogynist" to know this to be the case. You lot are beyond the pale to be in men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 12:32 PM
1

Nope. Feminists are all about averting the "male gaze" and they hold sex work to be exploitation and trafficking of women "and children". This is actual feminism. You right-wing men project a false "progressive" image of feminism which you are against, which doesn't actually exist in the real world. In reality you believe in and promote actual feminism. Feminism in the real world fear-mongers about women's safety and "children" against "predatory men", and so do you lot. Enough of your dishonest…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:45 AM
7

It is completely a feminist view, right down to the fear-mongering you parrot about children accessing porn, which comes straight from feminists telling falsehoods. You believe in feminism and you are against men.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 11:48 PM
7

You should go tag with the feminists and leave men's rights alone. You basically are a feminist, and are parroting feminism's same false narrative. Feminists would welcome you smearing porn men enjoy, like they do.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 08:29 PM
7

There is no backstory to make it acceptable. Women are a privileged caste over men.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 10:20 AM
2

Okay.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 04:45 PM
2

How does a willing slave like you end up in "men's rights"?—You clearly don't believe in having them.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 04:13 PM
1

Okay I mistook you for the thread starter. By bad.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 04:12 PM
1

Being forced into something you have no choice over and expected to die is the definition of slavery. Also, you do not need a conscripted army to guard your rights. You are not watching the video. You should respectfully stop commenting.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 04:12 PM
2

You understand his comment perfectly, you are just dishonest.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:02 PM
1

Well, I'd kinda be interested in the video's arguments, but I'm not gonna listen to two dudes laughing at each other and talking slowly while not getting to the point even when I have it on double speed. So you are not listening. Yet you feel like dumping on this post with slabs of text to make us spend energy to read. You are very disrespectful and should leave. Not reading the rest of what you wrote.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:02 PM
1

You would happily be a state-kidnapped slave, yet you are posting on a space called "men's rights". There is something wrong with you. Perhaps you should get out. You took a wrong turn to end up here.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:58 PM
1

If you didn't pay attention and watch the video, why do you deserve the energy of being responded to? You're not actually listening.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 12:34 PM
1

There is something seriously wrong with you, dude.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:56 PM
2

No, male genital mutilation isn't banned, and is practiced routinely, but it needs to be banned. Even where it isn't practiced routinely, it still needs to be banned on principle alone.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 06:55 PM
2

I can't quite make sense of your comment.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 06:12 PM
7

There's no reason to validate and use the term "International Jewish community", simply because not all Jewish people genitally mutilate, and Jewish and religious people are inconsistent in following their religious teachings all the time. Male genital mutilation remaining legal is a matter of people's apathy.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 08:16 AM
3

Nope. Jewish and religious people break from their religious traditions all the time when it is convenient to them. This one is maintained out of pure spite and misandry against the male sex.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 12:17 AM
8

I’m all for men’s rights. I’ve been circumcised and I would do the same for my son... You are clearly against men's rights. ​ can someone explain like I’m 5, what the issue is exactly. If you need explaining why knife-raping helpless baby boys is barbaric, you are gone in the head.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 10:16 PM
5

You are just living in cloud cuckoo land to say this.—On top of being a vile justifier of child abuse. What a horrible person you are.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:58 PM
4

How has not pressuring people ever worked in politics? —That was a rhetorical. You can't answer that, because it has never actually worked.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 07:40 PM
8

No. Pressure them, and be louder than the pro-cutters. The squeakiest wheel gets the most grease. God, what a wimpy suggestion.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 06:01 PM
7

Yes.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 05:57 PM
12

The full transcript: A very important bill banning circumcision is going up for debate in Denmark. So I implore the people of Denmark to speak up, and put as much pressure on their government as possible. I would say circumcision is an outdated practice, but that would imply that it was valid in the first place. The practice took off in the west in the 19th century to stop boys masturbating. I personally believe that this has always been the motive behind male genital mutilation. Any talk of rel…
/r/MensRights13/09/20 05:54 PM
15

People of Denmark, you need to pressure your government to make this bill pass. This would make the first ban against male genital cutting anywhere in the world. Circumcision is a vile practice. It just needs to end now.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 05:53 PM
2

That little bit you quoted wasn't a definite claim. Are you blind?
/r/MensRights19/08/20 07:01 AM
-1

Men have it really bad in the middle east and India. You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 01:54 PM
3

You are peddling bullshit about Saudi Arabia. Women CAN drive now in Saudi Arabia, and are gaining as many rights and affirmative action now as in western world, while men are stuck in their backwards roles. Also, forced marriages are something men suffer equally from.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 01:52 PM
7

What an out of hand bullshit claim. Also, if killing of female babies is real, it's going to be done or ordered by the mothers.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 01:45 PM
9

I do not believe for a moment that Indian rape gangs are real like are claimed. Smells like hysterical story-driven bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 01:34 PM
2

You are raising child custody and alimony legal discrimination as just an afterthought for wanting to find the perfect girl, which is what you are all about. "Finding a woman who will be fair to you" is not how you fight legal, systemic discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 06:09 PM
2

This is not the place to find a girl. This is called "men's rights". Stop coming here if you're not an MRA.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 05:45 PM
0

Nonsense. Having a relationship is not a "right". You are saying women should be forced to want to associate with men when they do not want to. This is authoritarian and beyond ridiculous. The only control of women that should be happening is to stop them from criminalizing and committing violence against men, as well as to hold them to the same legal standards men are held to.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 01:05 PM
1

What are you doing posting in a space called "men's rights"? You are not about men's rights. You are about relationships.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 10:08 AM
6

There you go: he's not an MRA. It's clear he just doesn't like women misbehaving and leaving their gender role. He of course, being a tradcon, doesn't like men not behaving to their gender role either.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:35 AM
7

Also, tradcons will pay lip service to certain men's rights issues, while trashing MRAs at the same time. Tradcons like to contradict themselves a lot.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:13 AM
4

This subreddit is tradcon infested and impedes men's rights. So likening Hollander to this subreddit isn't saying much.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:09 AM
5

You mean, websites where he rants obsessively about his russian ex-girlfriend and plasters pictures of her all over, like a tradcon. There's no "mens rights talking points" to speak of.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 10:55 AM
6

You are pretty much bare-faced lying. "...from the bits I've seen." ...meaning you can't show it.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 06:05 AM
3

Feminism has never been valid. It has been a hate movement from its very inception—sending men off to go die in WWI. That's what the suffragettes did. And frankly you don't care about men. That's why you're smearing men as "in*els" and "sexist". "In*el" is just a replacement of the n-word. Also "Sexist" just means NON-reverence towards the opposite sex. In fact I can quite tell you view men here who are "sexless", "status-less" "losers" as ni**ers who are beneath contempt, and you like to bail o…
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/20 07:09 PM
3

Correction: Feminism is the advocacy of women's privileges.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/20 05:54 PM
3

Pink Pill and Black Pill Feminists command infinitely more respect than you "anti-feminists". You'll never see them call each other "bitches". They maintain harmony in their shitting all over men, all the while they manage to get their views put on mainstream publications and praised...unlike "anti-feminists", who can't stop getting villified, all the while thinking anti-male abuse in discussions should stay up, which teaches men only to loathe themselves. Your "anti-feminism" is a complete joke…
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 04:53 AM
6

You are a "free speech" loser who doesn't care about men. You care about having toxic growth...which won't even be growth, since men will be driven away (sane men don't want to stick around a space where they will get abuse). You just want to be toxic to other men. Let's be real here. Also this platitude to "let feminists spew hatred, they are exposing themselves and helping us!" hasn't stopped feminists at all. The anti-male hate-speech has only gotten worse. You don't belong in anti-feminism, …
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 03:08 AM
5

You are out of your mind. Allowing people who in*el smear all men is not improving this space, it is trashing it up, and it's telling them they'll receive no push back for it, so they realize it is a good thing to do, and they'll carry on doing it, and keep increasing it. Banning them is needed.
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/20 01:14 AM
2

I'm not doing your research you can't be arse-bothered to bring up, and you're likely lying or are trying to raise false statistics. Also, I'm a different person who just saw your comment. Lol, you want to make personal character assumptions about me. Showing what a hostile twerp you are who just wants to pick on other guys. Thanks for proving my point!
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 04:15 PM
6

Seconded. Ban anyone who uses the In*el smear. The In*el smear is a fixation against other men's romantic prospects, when men are trying to raise their human rights concerns. It's telling men they are worthless, and is deeply anti-male.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 03:56 PM
0

Yes! —ban the person, savetheanimals20. It does this space no good for men to be a "free speech" space. Men need to have abuse-free spaces.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 03:41 PM
1

What a hostile twerp you are, picking on and assuming other men's romantic prospects, when you can't back up your falsely smearing nonsense. You don't belong on this subreddit. Scram.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 03:39 PM
3

That said, for every man falsely accused of rape, there are far more cases of a man getting off when there was legitimate evidence. Go away, you are just smearing men with nonsense. Rape is a rare crime.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 03:35 PM
2

That is nonsense, making it sound like men's rights takes learning. It doesn't. Men's rights is obvious. It's not hidden, esoteric knowlege. It's just the obvious that society chooses to ignore. "Red pill" is nothing but a kooky term used to attract white nationalists, Donald Trump supporters, and alt-righters, who don't give a fuck about men's rights. No way in hell is "red pill" lumped with MRAs. "red pill" is an invasive hijacker of MRAs, that needs booting off. "Boo hoo!!! Why do you try to …
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 06:26 AM
3

Dear "red pill" nutcase: leave my reply thread alone. I only said MRAs, I didn't say "red pill". MRAs are not the same as you, and you're a hijacker. How defeatist you feel about promoting "red pill" is your business. Don't smear men's rights with your insertion of it here.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 04:58 AM
10

Fuck, you basically want to avoid making yourself relevant, and let feminists run uncontested. Well don't complain or pretend you are better than these platforms then, when you're clearly not.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 01:00 AM
8

You make no lick of sense.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 12:45 AM
53

"It's good", meaning it's done by an MRA. MRAs need to be putting effort into getting on social media platforms, and to boot feminists out—instead of shunning and scapegoating these platforms.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/20 06:58 PM
36

Clearly it's not posted enough.
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/20 06:30 PM
1

Only the best profile picture!
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/20 09:58 AM
3

What a coward. You have to pin this on tiktok instead of women's actions. LMAO. GTFO of anti-feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 11:56 PM
5

You are a loser who can't even say it's women's fault, not tiktok. You should just leave anti-feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 11:30 PM
2

This isn't "today's people", it's just women. Women of any era commit child abuse. Man, you are a loser looking to scapegoat something different.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 11:20 PM
4

Wow... this comments section is full of complete losers, who either scapegoat tiktok, or "today's generation", instead of focusing on women's behaviour—or who even concern themselves with dating over these momsters abusing men in front of small babies. If this is what anti-feminism has to offer, anti-feminism is doomed.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 11:01 PM
2

You are just concerned with dating, that's it. You don't care about the mental child abuse being committed by these women. That's what's wrong with you.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 10:57 PM
3

These complete momsters abuse men in front of their small babies, and you basically worry about dating... Man, you are a complete loser. Just leave anti-feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 10:42 PM
2

You make it sound like you want to help men as much as you want to punish women. You are full of nonsense. ​ What if it said "end racism toward white" with "white" dashed and someone wrote "black" over it. Guess what, thats just gonna trigger the angry white males and tease the angry black males. And its exactly what you are doing. Gender is not race, and there is no comparison. There is no tolerated discrimination against women by men, anywhere in the world. So the phrase "end abuse against wom…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:49 AM
2

Of course!...
/r/MensRights22/05/20 05:41 PM
4

Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:36 PM
8

I caught this grafitti on a busy crossroad, on my way to a hospital in London. It really caught me by surprise. Whoever spray-painted the original message is a pillock... "end abuse against women" ...as if women aren't far safer than men. So good on the person who changed this. It goes to show the level that men are aware and fed up. As feminists like to put billboards up in high and public places, calling men dangerous. https://imgur.com/a/ECDa6Pl - Here's another picture to give you an idea of…
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:34 PM
1

No. You are feeding into an anti-male platitude designed to defame men, one that implies that abuse of women is common. That is nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:01 PM
1

Saying she's not rational is just coping behavior from you. Please, stop it.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 10:46 PM
1

Clementine Ford knew what she was doing. She wanted to screw over a man she felt disgust towards, and got what she wanted. She is not "irrational", she is cunning and dangerous.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 10:30 PM
0

Indeed...
/r/MensRights12/05/20 11:50 PM
-1

Jesus... Why is your comment getting downvoted this hard? She simply wanted to spite a man out of disgust, and this truth bomb somehow turns MRAs off...
/r/MensRights12/05/20 05:41 PM
3

You are sexist.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/20 08:04 PM
11

Don't lie to us.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/20 04:42 PM
6

It's regulating men's bodies.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/20 04:38 PM
1

Hehehehe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 10:48 PM
2

Don't fall for this trap by associating all this with civilizational development. The brutal dominance hierarchy is about winning female attention, that's it. Paul Elam advocates for it because he's about winning relationships with women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 09:03 PM
2

Feminism was always sexism.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/20 02:38 AM
6

Feminism is a gender supremacy movement.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/20 08:19 AM
2

I stand corrected then. The UN is still misandric, with the WHO promoting male genital mutilation in Africa as well.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:48 AM
0

The UN is a misandric hate organization.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 11:12 PM
3

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:02 AM
6

Feminists hate true gender equality.
/r/AntiFeminists10/03/20 09:44 AM
12

PragerU masks society failing men as men failing society. Despicable.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 08:11 PM
2

Hehehe.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/03/20 07:40 AM
3

The full context is "if men drew forks like they drew women".
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/03/20 07:07 AM
2

Yes it is.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/03/20 07:04 AM
9

It's from a subreddit that bullies men for drawing women however they fantasize. It's comparing men who draw women to men who draw that mangled fork.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/03/20 04:46 AM
18

This article is harmful to my brain, while trying to make sense of it. What an absolute word jumble.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen25/02/20 11:33 AM
5

Yes. Child support is slavery.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/20 02:26 AM
2

Child support is modern day slavery.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/20 02:23 AM
8

Read the tweet in the video.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/02/20 02:22 PM
24

"Circumcision" is hatred of males and maleness, pure and simple. Full stop.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/02/20 12:59 PM
53

Feminism is a hate movement.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/02/20 12:57 PM
5

Fems want mens issues just so they can squat on them.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/20 05:21 PM
5

The patriarchy is a conspiracy theory, made up so she can dish out "justified" violence.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/20 11:39 AM
3

Yes, this is very curious...
/r/MensRights22/01/20 08:08 AM
1

Do women go to prison as part of not having the vote?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 09:30 PM
1

Do men get to opt out? No vote, no conscription.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:17 PM
4

Other men do not deserve to be jailed or conscripted so you can have better access to the ladies, incel.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 02:22 PM
17

KAPOW!!
/r/PussyPass11/01/20 01:57 PM
1

No we are not. And that's not what the WHO are doing here.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 07:47 PM
5

Men get cancers from HPV, just like women. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/statistics/race.htm
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:54 PM
2

https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l6765
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:53 PM
7

24,886, the number of female cases, is 56.5% of the total 43,999 cases. And no, you don't literally suspend vaccination of boys to "all girls" first over this.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:52 PM
10

https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/statistics/race.htm 56.5% of total HPV related cancer cases. That isn't "twice as likely". Jackass.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:13 PM
7

Men need to be treating legal discrimination against themselves as a grave matter, not something to loosen up over.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:05 PM
14

No, it's not a joke. It's a lack of empathy for the male sex and men's issues.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:01 PM
3

Do you tell this in feminist reddits about girls too?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 09:38 PM
3

Hey, go pester WHO to take away vaccines for girls, and make it a feminist problem, if you believe your own shit.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 09:37 PM
3

No, this is something borne out of contempt for the male sex. Before this, the WHO have been advocating male genital mutilation throughout the third world as a quack preventative against HIV and other diseases, including HPV. The WHO have a disregard for men's human rights.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 02:34 PM
3

This is not what's happening. This is The WHO asserting that girls are extrahuman and deserving over boys. If the World Health Organization wanted to be truly rational about this, and be mindful of statistical likelihoods, they would recommend girls get the available vaccines 56.5% of the time, not completely suspend vaccination of boys.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 12:07 PM
7

You should go pester feminists and women's organizations to demand WHO take away all vaccinations for girls then... You chicken-shit.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 06:22 AM
4

Women make up 56.5% of total HPV related cancer cases. That is not a clause to give them 100% of available vaccines. This is pure and simply a denial of the humanity of boys, and you are trying to deny this.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 06:19 AM
3

I don't know what your problem is.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/20 05:23 PM
0

We are different people, with videos of our own separate voices. Why are you ducking and dodging answering the video like a cretin?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/19 08:33 PM
0

What makes you think I want you as an "ally"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/19 08:26 PM
2

"It just means you're doing it for no sex, no kids, no clean dishes or pressed shirts or dusted windowsills, and no pot roast on the table when you get home from earning the scratch that pays for that bitch." Lawrl. A housewife doesn't even promise any of this. How dishonest can you actually be?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/19 02:06 AM
-1

Holding people to standards = "purity testing", lawrl. Every serious movement has standards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 09:22 PM
3

That they are.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/19 03:21 AM
3

Yes, let's!
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:06 PM
2

Yes, it truly is sick.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 03:32 AM
1

GAH!... I totally did not notice that this was posted in this same reddit by someone else. -.- My foul then, for calling it like this. Apologies.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 03:26 AM
1

What The Hell... This petition was forwarded to other separate community subreddits. So what? This community, like those, needs to hear this petition. Why are you trying to police material, depending on if other subreddits see it, regardless if it has a serious message? You are not serious about anything.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:44 AM
1

FOR GREAT JUSTICE!
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:56 PM
2

What the World Health organization is calling for is truly disgusting and outrageous, and not befitting of any organization that is supposedly humanitarian. We need to send them a clear message that this is not okay.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:01 PM
1

"Sexual assault" is a vague, politically correct term that confuses people. That's why cases of anything happening against women use "RAPE" as often as possible. It doesn't matter which part of the world it's in.
/r/PussyPass22/12/19 08:49 PM
4

Flip the genders and watch it become "RAPE", quicker than the Flash.
/r/PussyPass21/12/19 02:34 AM
5

She provided "alcohol and sex"... and committed "sexual encounters"... as well as "sexual conduct with a minor"... ...but she did not RAPE!
/r/PussyPass20/12/19 07:02 PM
9

He is a true preacher of the gospel of PragerU: "A Tale of Men and Masculinity"... PragerU would find him right at home with them.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen08/12/19 01:53 AM
8

PragerU must really love this guy...
/r/FeminismStopsWhen08/12/19 01:16 AM
1

Men need to stop (nervously) laughing at feminism, while they continue getting their asses taken from them. It is just sickening now.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/19 12:36 PM
2

Feminism is not stupid. It is socially dominant, vicious and calculating. And you are trying to justify your own cowardice against it.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/11/19 04:30 AM
50

This article is poo-pooing over female sex offenders not getting help to reintegrate, and facing barriers... You'll NEVER see an article spew sympathy like this for male sex offenders.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:56 PM
3

Yes you are a retard. You use the "just trolling" excuse to back down from holding a position. Wuss.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 10:02 AM
3

😹😹😹 "Sodomites" are not out giving pussy passes. But I bet you are. So what are you even doing here?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 03:44 AM
3

Wow... The guy who pins me as defending baddy rapists then goes full-blown "Hail Satan!" himself. Talk about lacking self-awareness...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 03:29 AM
3

Implying I think rapists are heroes because I oppose forced castration = you are a disgusting shit. Even parents of boys who are rape victims of female babysitters and teachers, simply want the rapists locked away for a long time. That's a pretty neutral response to rapists. What you're calling for is sadistic torture for pleasure.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 03:12 AM
3

There's no points he made, because his is just anti-male hysteria, and he ignores real examples of mutilating baby boys' penises.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 02:12 AM
2

Oh look, another military minded faggot who gets triggered at being called out.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/19 02:03 AM
2

No. It's just an insult against men equivalent to calling black men "nigger". Get fucked harder.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/19 11:26 AM
3

Oh, they would. A man no matter how "tough" he think he is, is still a beggar, not a chooser.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 11:35 PM
1

this is the third time you've used the term "incel" against me. I've never identified with "incels". Get fucked.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 11:31 PM
1

Feminists are pro-marriage. You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 11:23 PM
0

No. Marriage is a negative tradition, that men accept because that's the price they have to pay to keep having a relationship with a woman, so it's NOT equal. You're deliberately straw-manning what i said.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 11:06 PM
1

You only know to personalize, and insult anyone who disagrees with marriage as "hurt", as if we're not looking at it on a systemic level. Also, women ditched their negative traditions and gender roles as soon as it suited them.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 04:12 PM
1

As if I'm responsible for married couples not being happy. This is nonsense. Why is it important to you to receive my validation?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:50 PM
2

Married men are always trying to project their bad attitudes onto other men. It is such typical fashion with you lot.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:31 PM
1

Man, the amount of married man-haters that show up in this subreddit about denying female privilege is insane.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:23 PM
-1

The man in this story thought he and his wife had mutual respect for each other. Carry on being a sucker.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:36 PM
0

You married freaks are always trying to personalize and make an escape hatch. Marriage is about the man getting down on one knee for her, and waiting at the end of the isle for her. If it was healthy why don't they both just walk down the isle together?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:33 PM
2

We routinely cut off parts of babies penises, and protect women from jail who make kids eat literal dog shit. You're just a sucker who wants to think your sacrifice means something.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:12 PM
2

Take a hike.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 09:11 AM
1

Nothing I said was pro-rape. You married chuckleheads love to make vicious threats to attack other men.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 09:10 AM
0

If you're married (and bragging about it), that means you're giving some woman the ultimate pussy pass, and this subreddit should be posting against guys like you.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 09:02 AM
-1

Oh look, another vicious pro-torture psycho who needs to take his meds.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:49 AM
0

Too bad this sub "pussypassdenied" doesn't also mean "malehostilitydenied" against you freaks coming here.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:42 AM
-1

No, you are a misandrist sadist psycho who enjoys genital torture of men. That's why you fixate on your target rapist being an older male. Also, you make light of genital torture of baby boys. You are not about justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:38 AM
1

We mutilate the genitals of baby boys every day. Female doctors do it too. Where's your outrage there? Why fixate on "30 year old men"?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 08:31 PM
0

You are a psycho.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 06:08 PM
22

Even the most violent criminal doesn't deserve their genitals ripped off. Imagine even the most violent female offender getting her uterus ripped out. That would still be met with outrage and labeled an international crime against women.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 03:26 PM
34

"I'm not perfect, but I'm not a bad man either" So a man only has the right to not to have his penis torn off so long as he's a good™ man?...
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/19 01:01 PM
25

They also shouldn't be allowed to have custody of kids.
/r/PussyPass28/10/19 11:18 PM
14

There is no positive side effect waiting for men. There is just fields of broken destroyed men. And you are okay with this.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/10/19 07:03 PM
15

Jesus... you are the literal enemy of men.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/10/19 06:51 PM
9

“I never forgot about Jonathan. My life was ruined by it, and so was his. I decided to take serious my faith, and to give up the lie. I may go to jail, but I have to right this wrong. I selfishly tried to protect myself. The truth is Jonathan lived in a physical prison, and I lived in a prison in my mind.” Bitch, living in the comfort of your home and bed is not a prison. The literal physical cold cell and iron bars you made Jonathan rot behind is. Don't even use the term “ruined” on yourself ne…
/r/PussyPass11/10/19 04:12 AM
22

My favourite Disney stuff was Fox & The Hound, when you saw the fox and hound were just little pups, and were just revelling in their friendship together. (Of course, they have to take that away over the course of the film, and introduce the female love interest.)
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/19 08:08 PM
5

Thanks... Man, that poor kid who wants to make friends and fit in... he doesn't realize he's navigating a shark tank, and all these kids actually hate each other, and hate being there, they just prey on the weakest fish and try not to be eaten, and they break up once they are able to leave. And it's not even a school and kids thing, it's a life and people in general thing.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 04:27 AM
3

Who remembers when a Hispanic autistic guy was tazered like 5 times? Or when that autistic black guy was falsely accused of rape? Woah... This actually happened?? Are there sources? That sounds despicable.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:23 AM
8

Even her icon looks like she's eyeing for prey.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/10/19 08:52 PM
21

Plenty of traditionalist judges who love to give pussy passes out there, such as in custody battles.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen13/09/19 04:12 AM
6

"parent's choice!" is an elephant all on its own. It's how this act was enabled.
/r/PussyPass10/09/19 04:14 AM
15

No she doesn't make a point.
/r/PussyPass10/09/19 03:15 AM
-4

If it was said mothers were "altering" their daughters, it still sounds pretty horrific.
/r/PussyPass10/09/19 03:13 AM
-4

Is the fact she wasn't the parent your only concern?
/r/PussyPass10/09/19 03:11 AM
15

Hey sweetcakes, minimizing MGM compared to FGM is reciting feminist propaganda, and the definition of "pussypass". You don't belong here.
/r/PussyPass10/09/19 03:04 AM
51

This cutter pharmacist was able to damage this boy because mothers are presumed to have the right to alter their sons.
/r/PussyPass09/09/19 10:52 PM
1

No. It's the defining core principle of "incel" ideology: "I can't get a girl". They don't want help on anything other than that.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:06 PM
1

I had a socially difficult upbringing too. Chasing after a "true love" relationship with the opposite sex is not the way to go though.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 12:22 PM
2

Nice smear tactic. When feminists say things they are full of shit.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:59 PM
2

I know where you took your username from. You are an obsessive stalker. I have seen what stalkers do to male spaces countless times.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:35 PM
3

Touchy touchy...
/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:20 PM
1

You reject the "incel" label, that's why you think "inceldom" describes your general life in the same breath, and why you made a big help post for "incels"...
/r/MensRights08/08/19 11:54 AM
1

You don't even know the life cycle of salmon, and you're calling me 6. Talk about projection.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:47 AM
1

Calling you by what you call yourself is not an ad-hom attack. You are blatantly lying.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:33 AM
1

You have no realistic chance of being remembered. No one is remembering salmon for swimming upstream to die. LAWRL
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:13 AM
1

Go pretend you're a real man™ elsewhere and let MRAs fight actual men's rights violations.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:33 AM
1

Not interested thank you.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:28 AM
1

You openly stand for men's imprisonment, enslavement, impoverishment in the name of poontang. Ergo you are not a men's rights activist. You can leave now.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:21 AM
1

Nice gas-lighting and goal-post shifting you did there. You posted with clear intent to invalidate the concerns of high-schoolers for your baby-making-to-trap-women-into-relationships fantasy, and quite aggressively too. "Traditional conservative", "regressive traditionalist", "libertarian"... you guys are all the same. You're all about your mate-guarding fetish. Everything else is secondary.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:15 AM
1

Species continuation is not a men's rights issue. In fact telling men to disregard their self-preservation and do whatever it takes to breed is enslavement of men, and giving all the cards to women. You don't belong here.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:55 PM
1

This nutter is feeding you sacrificial poison. Reject it and shun him.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:33 PM
2

You are a disgusting breeder-obsessed nutter. What are you doing in a space called "men's rights"???
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:22 PM
1

Hey, "incel", you don't have your own accepted definition except the mainstream feminist definition of "misogynist crazed mass murderer of women". Do you really want to play this dictionary definition game with me?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:27 PM
1

It started with MRAs recognizing the drivers behind the "traditional conservative" movement, which are just mate-guarding drivers—which then evolved to spotting those same drivers within just about every other movement including the left, and just people in general.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:45 PM
1

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 07:58 PM
4

No, "tradcon" is just the commonly accepted term for anyone wanting to mate-guard and pander to women, belief in traditional gender roles, belief in "true love" between men and women. It's got really nothing to do with change or resisting it, or time or distance or "culture".
/r/MensRights05/08/19 08:32 AM
1

Okay. Why are you personalizing this? A massive contingent of non-married, frustrated men ranting against "degeneracy" is a reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 08:04 PM
0

The people active in gaming communities are your typical geeky guys who have trouble being recognized by girls, and (so-self-proclaimed) incels by definition are not getting relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 06:47 PM
1

You've been in a movement that consistently fails to make positive change for over 10 years?... That's not exactly high praise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 02:46 PM
-1

You don't even want to make yourselves relevant as a movement for change. You just want to brag about the sophistication of your postings and how you don't sound like the feminists within your safe corner.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 02:38 PM
-2

Yes, this guy is cancer, showing up all over where we comment to be dismissive of our ideas while acting aloof and beyond our comprehension, making personal character attacks like "sad" and "lonely", also nitpicking on formal use of reddit's quote formatting. He doesn't even want to engage in ideas. Empty obsessions with "nuance", "quality of discussion", and being polite is going to get a men's platform nowhere. If this is the level this platform wants to operate on, I'm out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 12:46 PM
1

Also, you're not getting anything done by meeting the majority in an utterly misandric frame of reference. A men's movement has to be a vanguard movement. Feminists in the '70s were a minority and got laughed at, and they ended up getting the shit they want and beating the UN.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 12:43 PM
2

Explain why there are so many young guys who waffle about "degeneracy" then. I see it happen a lot on gaming discords. I haven't even touched incel forums yet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 12:09 PM
1

No. It's a still-recently radical view (and from an utterly misandrist frame of reference to boot). You labeling MGM=FGM as "radical" is disingenuous, and even a turning of things on its head.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 11:23 AM
1

MGM=FGM is the historical worldview, from old anthropological books to modern day independent researchers from Hanny Lightfoot Klein to Sarah Johnsdotter and others. It took radical feminists from the 1970s with stuff like "Hosken Report" onward to say FGM>>>MGM, and push it onto halls of power such as UN, which they did through bullying and emotional lobbying. These same feminists are the ones who also pushed for the duluth model, rape culture, patriarchy theory. So everyone here agreeing to FG…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 10:38 AM
3

As soon as dating is brought into a men's rights platform, it trumps every other issue. This happens in every platform.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 07:08 AM
2

My original comment was about what goes on in this subreddit, not outside like female behaviour. I'm not sure why you responded with an unmarried males concern.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 07:00 AM
1

Then stop shaming men into partnering up. And no, there's no serious pressure for women to have children, women dropped their negative gender roles as soon as it became convenient for them. It also has the warmth angle and stability which a relationship in theory should be providing. Relationshits provide warmth and stability, that's why people have to be punished and shamed into them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 05:45 PM
4

Way to neglect pointing out that historical traditionalist societies treat unmarried men like shit, including Islamic societies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 10:58 AM
1

Yes, men are not concerned at all with getting their basic human rights. Yet they want the label and attention of men's rights platforms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 10:46 AM
1

Yes, unmarried men being treated like pieces of shit in historically traditionalist societies is going to lead them to lash out. Your proverb says "if the youth are not initiated into the village". Why doesn't it say "if the youth don't get a relationshit"?—And why is getting a relationshit important to "being initiated into the village"? The first step to men getting their rights as human beings met is booting relationshit obsessive nutters out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 09:50 AM
1

Sure feels like this burning desire for traditional relationships has to be dealt with for every new male that enters these spaces...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 02:21 PM
2

Yes. Young men get drafted, baby boys have part of their penises cut off, but me getting a gf/wife is the burnin' issue!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 01:57 PM
1

The fact you got upvotes shows how many guys just want to be useless.
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/19 10:38 AM
5

It just shows the presidential race is useless for getting this issue met.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/19 10:43 AM
4

Then he is useless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/19 10:41 AM
1

So you are a great fan of being ineffective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/19 05:32 AM
1

"Identity politics" is just a slur used to dismiss the concerns of others. It has no real meaning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/19 04:40 AM
1

Dude who do you want it to appeal to? Young men (or just any man who touches the internet) will get it right away.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/19 03:30 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/celhk7/comment/eu3v1yi Pretty low-brow meme. Accurate though it may be, the presentation is working against the message
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/19 05:18 AM
1

Your platform will be overrun by tradcon, conspiracy theory, relashionshit obsessed nutjobs. It's as simple as that. You are repeating the mindset every other men's platform takes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/19 05:14 AM
2

You wanted it to be polite. The MRM has tried being polite for decades and has gotten nowhere for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/19 03:27 PM
1

You were the one tone-policing a meme a few posts back, adding dead weight, so of course you won't advocate for a fix.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/19 05:51 AM
2

Yes, too many MRAs don't want a principled resistance. It is pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/19 05:24 AM
1

As evidenced by a lot of the comments here, Men don't want to put up a principled resistance to feminism. Pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/19 04:02 AM
1

Feminism is not more valid in non-western countries. Women get priority over men in the rest of the globe too. Iran has majority female university attendees. Saudi Arabia has majority of women vote no on wanting to drive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/19 03:55 AM
3

This is perhaps the most earnest one-to-one message a non-military man can given to military guys.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 12:43 PM
2

Oh yeah! B)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 11:27 AM
2

Jordan Peterson brags up workplace bullying and hazing in his telling his encounter with "lunchbucket". That is anti-male as fuck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 07:54 AM
2

Preach!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 07:13 AM
2

Your linked article personalizes his experience with women—that none of them were "feminist trolls"—while ignoring the systematic legal changes that feminists push for against men, and invading of their hobbies. Also it presumes men can just have married families and be a part of raising their own kids, like the woman isn't going to just push him away.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 07:08 AM
2

Feminism is not an issue because it is a group. Feminism is an issue because it is a female supremacist hate movement, pure and simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 06:22 AM
2

It is not something a male advocacy group should be getting behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 05:45 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=medVCq8eWPk
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 04:59 AM
2

Christina Hoff Sommers wants traditional gender roles to enslave men. This trad-fem just wants traditional men to shower her with a pampered lifestyle. Male advocates should have no regard for what trad-fems want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 04:46 AM
1

Also, thinking Christina Hoff Sommers—who complains about wanting chivalry back—is a good influence for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 04:12 AM
2

What are you doing in a left wing men's space linking to tradcon manhood-obsessed dribble?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/19 04:09 AM
1

Wait what?... I wasn't sarcastic, I was literal. This video is performing better on this subreddit than an actual gay men's one which shut it down.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 02:02 AM
6

0 comments and 15 upvotes. You guys are already better at receiving this than an actual gay men's subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:32 PM
2

Yes, the desperation to come up with ever distancing labels is toxic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/19 10:45 AM
4

This meme is abrasive and to the point, which is what men's rights memes need to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/19 01:54 AM
2

Feminists are not stupid. The aim of their movement is social dominance. Telling us the movement that gave white feathers to men for not dying in the trenches is about equality...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/19 01:49 AM
1

You lost the debate. You set up rules for the debate, and you don't follow them yourself, therefore you lose the debate. You can't even play by the rules you set up yourself. How pathetic. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:05 AM
3

I know how to debate, you do not. Asking for proof for something so obvious is a desperation tactic. Stop being a triggered trad con. If this guy's video triggers you, you are the sort of person he's talking about. You are arguing like a feminist SJW, learn to logic bro.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:30 AM
3

You explain nothing. You give the bare assertion "it's just doing what dads do", before inciting a threat narrative against the video maker. In fact you prove the point the video is making: jealous mate-guarding fathers attack other men. ​ Where's your scientific observations, proof and surveys for your position, boyo?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:02 AM
5

Ad-hom attacks from someone who is triggered is not pointing out a logical fallacy. In fact your comments prove the video maker's point. A triggered trad con who is upset at being called out for bad behavior. I don't need to have a daughter to "grow up" in order to talk to you. Only mindless slaves have kids. Disparaging me as a kid, tells me you don't like the conversation going on.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:48 AM
3

You are one triggered trad con. Fathers using their daughters as a pretext to be violent or threaten other men, is not protecting their daughters.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:59 PM
3

"dweebs"... Also you go straight for the ad-hominem. Your male-on-male hostility is showing.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:15 PM
1

Also, this post is not an attempt to trivialize the issue of girls access to education around the world, which is a very important issue; Women make up the majority of university attendees in Iran. Why do you interrupt with this concern placed front and center? It's not going to endear women or society to your plight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/19 07:24 AM
2

Yes, you need to copy what's successful. And it's not "the most petty version of feminism". It's just feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/19 09:44 PM
4

This sort of attitude is what keeps any male activism to a grinding halt. And it's over something feminists would not tolerate if it was against their gender. Feminism is the most successful movement globally, and it has no hesitation demanding all kinds of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/19 10:57 AM
3

You use avoidance as an excuse to advocate men do nothing to stop it. You are okay with boys' sense of worth getting shat on with impunity.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:41 PM
3

That is not going to stop men from wanting women badly enough to settle. What is with you guys bragging up defeat as some sort of victory?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:37 PM
3

Yes, this!
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:29 PM
3

"Failed idiots" how?... They gained loads of patreon money. Anita even got to speak at the UN. Why is successfully attacking male hobbies and fantasies funny to you?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:37 PM
1

What is it with you guys wanting to personalize on this point?—as if that represents systemic change.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 04:26 PM
1

Congratulations, you are the outliers. (Assuming of course you're not lying.) You've heard the difference between exceptions and rules, right? Good luck going around with a "throw rocks at girls" shirt without getting in trouble, expelled, or fired, in any order. (Never mind you can't even buy one.) You want to protest and criticize and hate it, but so nothing should be done about it?? Feminists and society will be happy to ignore you then. You want to invest in a losing battle where you get to …
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:36 AM
0

This is a begging the question fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:04 PM
2

I know, can you believe it? Pity the men's rights movement is so desperate for attention it has no standards who it lets in. It is one of the last places to still accept these losers.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:19 PM
1

I can do literally nothing but masturbate all day and be a better contributor than Sargon. Sargon is a net loss.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:10 PM
0

Wow it is amazing that he got banned for calling out HBR for inviting the anti male Sargon to one of their conferences, you know the Sargon who claimed 1 in 4 women in Sweden are raped due to Islam. It is okay for someone to use feminist like smears, as long as the target is Muslim men. I can point to countless other examples of toxic right wingers who are anti male who get invited as well, It seems like legitimate criticism of the right wing failures in the MRM is labelled as being divisive, th…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:39 PM
1

The feminist and men's rights positions are not even remotely comparable. You are clearly more concerned about fighting "snowflakism" than misandry. Perhaps you should look elsewhere.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:00 AM
1

No you cannot just put a "girls are weak force their face in the dirt" shirt up on Amazon.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:51 AM
1

Those are feminists hijacking issues and making them their own.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:40 AM
2

Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:36 AM
1

Women do not face punishment for terrible behaviour. This is just an excuse to do nothing.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:33 AM
1

"If it wasn't for double-standards there wouldn't be any." XD
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:27 AM
1

You men are not even getting the comedy you like made for you anymore. You are hopeless.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:25 AM
1

Tell me about it...
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:21 AM
3

Okay now I know you're just a tradcon who wants to disparage other men (I doubt you're threatening "weak" women). You can kindly fuck off now.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:18 AM
2

Good luck convincing women not to push for their own gendered protection and pampering. (I predict you'll have zero success.)
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:06 AM
1

Stop making this about "we forgot how to be adults". This is an issue of pure naked misandry.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:55 AM
1

I know...
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:10 AM
2

Men are not going to avoid women for wearing this. You DON'T have a free market to buy a "punch girls before they turn into radical feminists" shirt. Allowing hateful messages against boys to go unchallenged will only invite more abuse. Free-speech-first faggot, you don't give a fuck about boys. Also a lot of you would lose your minds over a "throw rocks at whites" shirt. You are useless. Now hit the road.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:09 AM
2

Women won't get laughed at for wearing this. They will only gain encouragement.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:27 AM
1

LAWRL, touchy touchy I see...
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:26 AM
2

Those worship women's sexuality, they are not even close to equivalent. "Kick girls they grow up to be radical feminists" would be more equivalent.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:10 PM
2

It's puke inducing, isn't it?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:47 PM
2

Exactly!
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:33 PM
2

If there was an "it's okay to punch girls" shirt option on Amazon, then we can talk about shirts just being silly.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:32 PM
3

You are useless then. You can't even convince feminist to just not vote with their coughhubby'scough wallets instead of get stuff pulled for their end.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:17 PM
1

Yes, go away.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:09 PM
2

Using facts on your side is pointless. Humanity is vastly emotionally driven—not facts driven.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:07 PM
1

There's nothing "white" involved with this shirt. It's just males.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:02 PM
3

Yes, there is no subtlety involved even in their manufacturing end.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:00 PM
6

These free speech concern trolls do nothing but infect the men's movement. They are incapable of touching the feminist movement. They are defacto feminists.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:26 AM
-4

Tradcons are massive derailers of any men's movement.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:09 AM
4

Men are not going to stop wanting to associate with women for wearing this. Also profiling is only done against men.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:06 AM
3

Why are you lying? Women were always afforded pampering and protection against demeanment. Also, you lump "women" together with "minorities". This is dishonest. Why are you derailing an issue of misandry with "everyone losing their sense of humour"?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:53 AM
2

"Every other group out there is demanding shit with impunity, so let us not demand shit, just to be contrarian." This is why the men's rights movement is such fail.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:33 AM
5

There is no abuse or mistrust waiting for women for wearing this shirt. There's just encouragement to keep it up.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:27 AM
5

Exactly.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:14 AM
-16

You do not have democracy, you have massive female pandering and that's it. Trying to bring up "democracy" is pointless.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:09 AM
15

You do not get the same right to express throwing rocks at girls and sell it on a big chain like Amazon. You take such a failed position.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:58 AM
5

Amazon would NEVER be able to sell a shirt like this demeaning the opposite sex. You are massively out of touch.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:51 AM
39

Agreed.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:38 AM
1

Crazy bitch can kidnap in broad daylight without a female master to step in. Makes me fear living in this society from a whole new perspective.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:01 AM
2

My first unironic hearing of the term degenerate, it was used by Pastor Richards, the spoof televangelist from GTA:VC. That set me up for the frame of reference "degenerate" is used in. It made me wonder about all these guys, did we all not grow up on that same game.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:47 PM
-4

What's with all you pro/neutral cutters crawling out of the woodworks in the men's rights reddit? The MRM is a joke.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:02 PM
11

WTF? "Virgin incel" Where are these types of comments coming from??
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:24 AM
1

Giving them a platform on her men's issues channel, enabling them to speak at the ICMI is not "just wanting to talk and be friends".
/r/MensRights27/06/19 12:14 PM
2

I have watched youtube vids of outing online users as pedophiles or predators. They always make it a point to show the face of an unattractive autistic looking man.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:39 PM
4

Freeze Peach! (to just smear other guys as pedos)
/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:52 PM
16

Presumption of an older guy's voice being a pedo: this is disgusting low character, and part of why you guys are in the situation you are now.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 04:25 PM
0

Anyone promoting "masculinity" doesn't give a fuck about living breathing MEN. They only care about what men DO. The cunt offers nothing to men's rights. She should not be worshiped on a men's rights platform.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:54 PM
-1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/c1p4vj/its_ok_to_be_male/ Comments are full of men wanting to repair the relations between the sexes, instead of demanding their legal rights. MRAs worship this cunt for "needing their masculinity"—so she's still excluding all men, except the "masculine" ones. The MRM is a joke. Cunt also said this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D29ZANRXQAgcwfa?format=jpg&name=small
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:59 PM
2

Exactly. She just wants men to be useful to her.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:46 PM
1

That article is behind a wall.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:11 PM
1

The argument that empathy specifically had to be taught in the '70s to stop WWIII is shit. Also the PhD invoked Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany was all about working class resource hoarding men.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:47 PM
1

Link please
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:25 PM
2

Again, those aren't "millennial" things, those are guys looking for status, which is a universal guy thing. You can stop derailing now.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:22 PM
1

Those two women are feminists. I listened to the rest of the podcast. You are dealing with feminists and female nature. Why are you pinning this on "millennials"? You are a massive derailer.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:19 PM
2

Men in other parts of the world are not mighty or brutish to women any more than men in the US. Women elsewhere are just as feminist, and wrecking the men there like men are getting wrecked here. The hard cage you imagine coming from the third world, that will trap women who don't get back in their "soft" cage does not exist.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:04 PM
0

Damn straight!
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:57 AM
0

Damn...this is some real conspiracy theory shit. I want to know what it is you are smoking.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:56 AM
1

Lazy bum, you should be doing the link for us. I'm halfway through and it's full of feminist women complaining about incels. This is your measure of reduced millennial empathy?—The fuckin' incel movement?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:53 PM
2

So, apparently, mocking these men for being thirsty is acceptable, but mocking them for being 100lbs and weak as kittens because of inactivity, or because their definition of exercise is a 10km/hr toodle down the promenade that doesn’t even break a sweat, or for being selfish and rude on the roadway ... well, THAT, that’s beyond the line. Yes. Our position is the consistently pro-male one. Yours is not. BTW, you lump being selfish on the roadway with being "weak", versus being thirsty. It's bein…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:46 PM
2

Snarky passive-aggressive shit, calling others aggressive. "Oh I'm NOT DEMANDING guys be into sports or physical labour!! I'm just going to keep bringing up my contempt for guys not into that stuff, keep waffling about guys being obese or skinny like rails, and remind everyone around me—for no bloody reason whatsoever!"
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:06 PM
1

Don't play this "we are the most fit" game with him.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:47 PM
1

https://www.npr.org/2019/04/11/712276022/the-end-of-empathy?t=1560865195330 There I did it for you.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:40 PM
2

Dude, you are a slave to your ex-wife, she has full control over your son. If it's anyone you should be bashing it's her. Let go of your misplaced aggression. Where is your physical "athleticism" to take back custody of your own kid?? Not that I really think you want to be that involved with your son. You just want to enslave him into stupid shit like sports he doesn't want to do for your own personal reason, so you can live narcissistically through him. Your son living under the thumb of your e…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:43 PM
2

What is the point of linking the mate-guardian?
/r/MensRights17/06/19 11:37 AM
2

Men are not being "systematically trained". Men naturally pander to the girls.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 10:40 AM
1

VISUALLY and SPATIALLY loud. ​ You are being pedantic.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 10:37 AM
1

They got the eccentric girls with them. That's all that matters to them.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 10:26 AM
1

Why are you playing this "we are the most fit" game with him...
/r/MensRights16/06/19 10:20 PM
2

Your concern for men to do physical work, and reach a certain muscle mass and bodyweight supersedes your concern for men getting their basic humanity and rights recognized. What a joke.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 10:16 PM
1

The sheer indifference guys typically show to other guys does not amaze you. You are lying.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:06 PM
1

Guys being loud on the road, riding the loudest bikes and pulling all the eccentric girls: that's not a millennial thing, that's a universal guy thing. Guys enjoying driving the Trans Am until they have to switch to an Audi, because the girl they hooked up with doesn't approve of them being in a babe-magnet.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 08:26 PM
7

Generation bashers are some of the biggest derailers.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 10:52 AM
10

The scene is so obviously about her deriving deep satisfaction from her unlimited power to put "creepy" men in their place. That is the appeal given, the audience innately understands. Waffle about her defending herself is pure bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 11:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter