TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BCeagle2008 Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by BCeagle2008 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-13

I guess I've found all the /r/incels refugees.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 03:45 PM
1

I never claimed it "never happens". I never claimed that judges don't have personal biases. I never claimed that judges don't always follow the law. What I am claiming is that downward modifications are routine. Instead of focusing on that point you go off into some mens' rights rant about custody and how it's biased in favor of mothers. Get a fucking grip. Downward modifications are routine. They are easily obtained and judges are not looking to "stick it to men" over fucking modifications to c…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:54 PM
1

We are talking about child support modifications. You people are insane.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:44 PM
1

I'm an attorney, lmao.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 04:00 PM
1

That has nothing to do with child support downard modifications.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:09 PM
1

I suppose this is the shit you believe when you spend too much time reading self-serving, one-sided, anecdotal horror stories on websites dedicated to villainizing the child support system.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:51 PM
1

You only go to prison if you have the ability to pay but refuse. If you cannot pay your child support obligation you should make an application for a downward modification. You can do this on your own without an attorney. It is routine.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:40 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:27 PM
1

You cannot have it both ways. A woman cannot have sole decision over the birth of a child whilst excluding the very possibility she might end up as the sole provider for said child. A woman does not have the "sole decision" over the birth of a child. You stick your dick in a woman and you assume the responsibility that a baby might be born and that you will have to care for it. It was your choice as well. If that's too much for you to handle, don't have sex with that woman. Simple solution.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:29 PM
1

the very simple demand of child support and its enforcement is illiberal, immoral and intolerable. One person should not be forced to do anything, positive or negative, for or to any other person. By allowing one parent to abdicate their responsibility of supporting their child financially you are forcing one parent to assume the other's obligation. I think it's funny that you believe it's more immoral to force a parent to care for their child financially than it is to allow a parent to abandon …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:05 PM
-1

Where to start.... We have a ton of laws that have vague wording in them, which allows the judge and jury to take into consideration the context of the scanario and the intent of the criminal. If the provision requires all context to be left out, it is a flawed implementation of justice, as the punishment given isn't relative to the crime commited, or the intent of the crime (again, intent is something judges and jurors must take into consideration in making a decision, manslaughter exists becau…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:24 PM
1

Can you suggest some modifications that would not undermine the entire purpose of the law?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:00 PM
1

Seems to me all you need to is establish a rule stating that documented proof is required if you were physically unable. Explicitly stating "without regards to physical ability" sound like those lazy zero tolerance rules. It's not a zero tolerance rule. I just explained to you how it's not. You say the amendment is used to protect people, but currently it is at the expense of others. That is wrong and it needs to be rectified. Your point of view is myopic. You are advocating for the elimination …
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:49 PM
-5

They don't advise you to rearrange your life on the off chance you get captured by insurgents. Appointing a power of attorney isn't "rearranging your life". By the way, the government tells you that a power of attorney is a good idea before traveling to a high risk area. It's part of state department's travel advisory. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/before-you-go/travelers-with-special-considerations/high-risk-travelers.html Draft a will and designate appropriate…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:39 PM
0

Do you not believe that the standard is too broad? No, because the amount of people escaping child support obligations before the law far outweighs the number of people unfairly being harmed by it after the law. Nobody plans for a hostage situation It's not like he went to work in France. He went to Kuwait. Maybe he never planned on being held hostage, but there are a number of predictable scenarios (like being imprisoned) where a power of attorney would be helpful advanced planning. Nobody plan…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:29 PM
-2

He wasn't innocent though? He didn't pay his child support obligation.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:13 PM
-12

I have no idea what you are trying to argue, but I'll attempt to explain why that provision exists. The purpose of the Bradley Amendment was to curtail forgiveness of accumulated child support debt, otherwise known as retroactive modifications. Before the amendment, obligees would bring the obligor to court for large sums of child support arrears. The obligee would then have to prove that the obligor violated their obligation. During the court proceeding, the obligor could argue that much of the…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:45 PM
-21

The problem here is that he was unable to make an application to reduce his obligation due to his exceptional circumstances. I would caution against making broad judgments against the efficacy and appropriateness of a law based upon extreme outliers and unique circumstances. The Bradley Amendment was introduced to fix very real and very common problems with child support enforcement. This situation is certainly one of those unintended consequences. Regardless, he could have prepared himself in a…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:26 PM
-26

You can still make an application to reduce your child support obligation due to a change in circumstance.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 03:49 PM
0

If someone said that in real life they 100% deserve to be sued. I don't think anyone would defend an example like you provided, because it's completely impermissible and there are systems in place to punish that bad behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/18 02:12 PM
1

Those are bona fide occupational qualifications, the overriding use of outright discrimination in hiring and employment policy. That's different that using gender/race/etc as one of the many factors in your hiring decision.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/18 02:10 PM
3

When is it the "only" factor that people consider? Can you provide any example of that being the case?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/18 01:12 PM
-15

If you are creating a dating app, do you think you should be forced to hire 10 male candidates and 0 female candidates just because none of the female candidates were "more qualified" for the position than the male candidates? Wouldn't having female perspective on the app have some impact on the development of your app? Flip the genders around if you want, point still stands. It's hard to create a hard and fast rule that "gender should have nothing to do with who gets hired" when sometimes it ha…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/18 11:33 AM
9

Good approach to life. Let us know how that works out for you.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:18 PM
8

If you spent less time on the internet building a victim complex and more time in reality you would know that this is already extremely common despite the fact that the concept of linking movember to cancer research is fairly new and certainly not as entrenched as something like breast cancer awareness in October. If you want to build awareness at your university feel free to get one of your student groups to send out an email like this one. But I guess it's easier to complain on the internet.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:18 PM
1

My response was because I was told that if a man didn't want a kid he should use a condom or not have sex. I'm just wondering why it is ok to tell a man that, and not a woman. You are literally the only person in this thread saying that. Congrats. If I'm going to pay for the next twenty years to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars under the threat of imprisonment if I don't. Yeah, I should have some say in the matter. Do you think men should have no reproductive rights? You're right, th…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:53 PM
0

Just out of curiosity. Do I get to tell women seeking an abortion that if they didn't want the kid they shouldn't have had sex or used a condom? Sure, why couldn't you tell them that? Doesn't mean your words will have an effect or force them to change their action. Somehow, I don't think your reasoning is going to apply to men and women. Equality though, right? Don't make me laugh. You seem to want special treatment for women, and men can just fuck right off. Why do you think you should be able …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:23 PM
-11

I wouldn't expect alimony if I divorced my higher earning wife. I wouldn't have left work because she earned more. I'm an independent person and I think if you sacrifice your own independence that's your choice. You don't get to continue benefitting from someone else when your relationship ends, that's unfair. Do you know how marriages work? When one spouse doesn't pursue a career it's presumed to be a joint decision. Everything you do as a married couple is presumed to be a joint decision. If n…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:57 PM
-15

I know that you are someone who would say something as stupid as this: Alimony and (to a lesser extent) child support payments are stupidly unfair. You shouldn't have to pay someone else because they made poor decisions with their life.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:11 PM
-13

I would probably agree that a woman who marries someone like you has made a poor decision with their life.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter