TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BaadKitteh Archive

View 1 posts and 1,177 comments by BaadKitteh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,177 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

... you do get that the first few dates are for figuring things out, right? Are you expecting some kind of love at first sight situation? That a nice conversation over coffee is going to light a fire in her loins? The situations you're talking about are totally normal, including the ghosting which is slightly shitty in that context. Would be a lot worse if you had actually been seeing her for awhile. Basically you just need to stop assuming that a woman agreeing to a second date means you are ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 11:10 PM
–

You can't speak logic to these men, their backed up semen seems to interfere.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:42 PM
0

Yes, we're all aware men are often disgusting and would date underage teenagers if (and sadly when) they can get away with it. That doesn't mean there's any actual wall, and definitely not one in the 30s. It has more to do with male insecurity than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:40 PM
-1

You just keep telling yourselves that; it might have been true when only low paying, dead end domestic jobs were available to women, but the less true that becomes, the less women are even willing to buy the pig to get a little sausage, let alone yearning for it. Even at this point, many women are perfectly happy getting laid whenever they want and not having to deal with some manchild peeing on her bathroom rugs the rest of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:37 PM
34

You're never going to get an honest answer to that question, but it's certainly the crux of nearly every post here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:31 PM
0

What would you prefer instead? The old "hit her over the head with your club and drag her to your cave" method of wife choosing? It's seriously disturbing how many rp men seem to have an issue with the idea of women having free choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:30 PM
–

They can't do that though, that would mean admitting they are wrong in blaming women for all their problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:26 PM
-3

For herself? For her health? Lol that's wild, that you think the only reason to lose weight is to attract men 🤡🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:21 PM
4

It's endlessly entertaining to me how much this upsets your types while you are also unwilling to do anything to change it- because what you really want to change is how badly women want a man, any man. You want to wake up some day in a fantasy world where women desperately chase men, even if you have nothing in particular to offer but a dick. That won't happen, and you can't make it happen. All you men can do is change YOURSELVES, stop being so desperately thirsty, stop chasing women who have n…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 07:18 PM
–

Saying "no" outright can get a woman hurt or killed, and not even that rarely. There's a reason giving men fake phone numbers became a trope- it satisfied them for long enough to get away safely. Talk to your bros about how gross and dangerous they are in response to being rejected if you want that to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 10:57 PM
1

I don't know what your point was except that you were just dying to talk shit about women who don't put their faces in their lewds/nudes- for which there are MANY, MANY reasons, the least of them being lack of attractiveness. That's something you've invented for whatever yikes-inducing reasons. But yes of course women who are looking for relationships want to be approached in a RESPECTFUL way, like duh, did you really think that was news? The primary issue is that many approaches are anything bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/23 10:53 PM
3

Sounds like exactly what your type expects, if her salary happens to be less than yours, regardless of hours or actual work involved. In fact, some of you have said exactly that on this very post. You guys might want to retreat back to trp and get your stories straight. I love how all your anecdotes are indicators of facts and women's are all delusional clichés 💀💀 that must really be convenient for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:54 AM
2

I would love you to prove that second asinine attempt at a point- that becoming a considerate partner causes a loss of respect. That's actually an insane thing to say, but I get how it's a convenient way to think for a man who doesn't want to put in any effort and also wants to blame women for all his problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:51 AM
2

IT'S HIS FUCKING HOME TOO. THEY ARE HIS FUCKING KIDS TOO. Helping to take care of those things are automatically part of having a family and being an adult, not chores you need to be assigned or expect REWARD for doing. THAT'S HOW WE GET CHILDREN TO DO CHORES. So thanks for actually proving the point by trying to argue against it. Just the entire idea that you first went to "do shit in order... to get intimacy" is a big fucking yikes. Do shit because you're a fucking grown up and it's your home …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:48 AM
6

Why bother to ask questions when you just dismiss the answers you don't like? If you wanted an echo chamber, you should have stayed safe and sound at trp where they will agree with you when you say "woman bad right guys" no matter how thin and incredibly weak the basis. This is the consensus answer among actual women responding to you- we don't want to fuck men that make us treat them like children in order to get anything done around the house- that's literally the most accurate information you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:38 AM
1

Alimony almost never happens anymore; the chances that you will ever be wealthy enough to end up in that situation is nil. CHILD SUPPORT IS NOT ALIMONY. This is some tired boomer shit to even mention at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:32 AM
2

You're connecting dots that are as far apart as the stars with millions of miles of context between them that you don't and won't ever know. You're never going to be able to reduce relationships to formulas, no matter how hard you try
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:29 AM
2

I love how you guys let your insecurities slip out- you really prefer women with less experience because you don't want the competition 🤣🤣 god forbid she have SEXUAL PREFERENCES, must be a SLUT 🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:26 AM
2

Your username is so apt for this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:17 AM
2

Ok, make sure you add how much a housekeeper and childcare would cost to any wage she makes, if she's completely responsible for the things 👍 I mean of course you're one of those disgusting people who dismisses the value of housework and childcare, the way it offers zero time off and is largely thankless- no, paying the bills is not thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:17 AM
2

Blah blah blah self serving male "logic"; see how well you can logic a woman's sex drive because you won't pick up after yourself like any decent human being lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:13 AM
4

Ah yes, the old "wife fat, might as well live in filth" trope. 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:10 AM
1

Guys willing to give her sex =/= guys she wants to move in or even date.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:08 AM
7

💯💯💯 I remember mine used to tell me to "just tell him" what I wanted him to do to help- as if he were blind and couldn't see what needed to be done. Trash is about to spill into the floor and I have to TELL YOU to take it out?! Having to tell a grown ass man to clean up after himself over. And over. And over. Is a fucking libido killer. This literally is how you have to treat children. Not only does it suck, but it makes you feel bad like you are a nag, but you literally have no other choice if …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:05 AM
4

This is so naïve it's almost cute. Even you can't explain loss of love without using the word feelings, and being as how love is a feeling, "you don't FALL OUT OF LOVE. Your feelings... may change" is you immediately contradicting yourself. I know you can fall out of love because I've experienced it, and I'm sure your answer to that is a boring No True Scotsman- according to you I'm sure it wasn't "real love ". Well, find a way to empirically determine love and prove it. Otherwise, you're just b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 07:01 AM
8

You're stuck in short term thinking and this is a long term thread. Attraction can die even without a person physically letting themselves go. Hell, mine can get snuffed like a match the moment I see someone display blatant willful ignorance, usually because their bias is threatened. There is no pretty face or body that can come back from that and other people have their own triggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 06:53 AM
–

This is such a sad, pathetic thing to wish. You rp guys are a constant source of cautionary tales.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 02:14 AM
2

Poor pitiful you- that you don't appreciate the value of friendship, not that some women were kind enough to offer it to you when you clearly do not deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 02:08 AM
4

I think it would be very entertaining for you to explain what exactly it is that you "give and give" in a friendship, and how that is reciprocated by your male friends automatically but the women must be reminded or something somehow. You guys are always great for comedy 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:59 AM
4

I'm surprised you have any friends at all- assuming you do- if you boil everything down to a "return on investment" type of thing. Yikes indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:56 AM
3

No, actually they don't. They may offer the OPTION to remain friends after a rejection, especially if there appeared to be a friendship before he took his shot , but that doesn't force anyone to say yes. Men who accept that hoping they can change her mind are at fault if that's their ulterior motive. Every woman I've ever known would much rather someone not be a fake friend, and that's what a beta orbiter is. While it might be sad to lose someone you thought was a friend because they want more, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:49 AM
1

Beta orbiters do THINK they like the women they orbit, they may even believe that they love them, but what they really want is sex and the way they respond when they don't get it gets uglier and more bitter over time, proving that they didn't ever actually like her as a person to begin with, because if they did they would be satisfied with the friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:36 AM
4

It really should be a ridiculous question, one that never occurs to anyone, but over at trp they will INSIST that's not possible. That any man pretending to be a woman's friend is a beta orbiter looking to escape the friend zone, and any woman only keeps male friends to use them, whether it's to move their furniture or as an "emotional tampon" when the men they are fucking upset them. That kinda disgusting sexist nonsense is kinda the whole reason why this sub exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 01:32 AM
0

💀💀🤣🤣 I love how you guys don't see your own dumbfuck, self-defeating hypocrisy. On your one hand women are TOTALLY INDISCRIMINATE about who they let knock them up, and that's why single mothers are trash; they should be more careful about who they let cum inside them and it's their own stupid fault when the baby daddy is a deadbeat because they should have seen it coming. We should leave her and her children to starve because she made bad choices and the deadbeat father should get off scot-free …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 08:58 PM
1

Nah women are terrible at taking rejection plenty of the time, they just usually aren't DANGEROUS. They might go off in text, they might cry, but they rarely lash out in physical violence against the person who rejected them, and unfortunately this is something every woman has to fear when she rejects a man. Why do you think giving men fake phone numbers became a trope? Because simply refusing is taking our lives into our hands. This is why men have the worse reputation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:39 PM
13

Your username is hilariously ironic 💀💀
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:05 PM
30

"encourage behavior" by being young and stupid themselves 😂🤣 but of course teenage girls are supposed to protect teenage boys from themselves while they themselves are also growing up, fantastic manly logic you have there
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:04 PM
11

Nothing, they're just obsessed and they have a script to follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:02 PM
10

yawn more blaming women for men's actions? Boring. No one makes teenage boys obsessively chase sex to the point they endanger their own futures, they choose to do it with just as much agency as the teenage girls you're trying to blame merely because they exist. Grow up and take responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:00 PM
1

LOL Men put up with the most vapid, spoiled, completely insufferably cunty women if she looks good enough to make their friends jealous. A woman will defend a guy her friends don't think is hot if she's really into him; men lie and pretend like they don't know a girl even if they fucked or dated her if they're afraid their friends will think she's ugly. I can't believe you typed a whole ass novel about this shit when men are a thousand times more shallow than women in general 💀💀
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 10:04 PM
1

Oh sure, women can pursue any career path now 🙄 it doesn't make any difference that a 10-20 year gap in employment will show on their resumes and that they'll have to start at the bottom in their middle age when they likely have kids to support.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 08:41 PM
2

Child support is NOT alimony- it's the level 1 most basic thing you can do to care for your children. If you're required to pay a mortgage for your divorced partner, guaranteed your kids live there too. If you can't say anything that isn't blatantly stupid, you should say nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 04:30 PM
3

If someone permanently and irrevocably cripples their earning potential in order to care for a shared home and children, both partners agree to this situation and want it that way, and the marriage then ends by no fault of the stay at home partner, then yes that partner is entitled to spousal support for as long as they need it. This is not an issue of gender. The fact that historically it has mostly been women is due to patriarchal constructs- women were expected to give up working or only work…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 04:26 PM
-1

Ah, I missed the nuanced point of view of pure red pill, too many of you here try to pretend like you're more reasonable than this when black and white thinking is truly all you're capable of
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 03:52 AM
1

💯💯💯 They hate themselves, and hating women is just a distraction/straight up copium. It does still exist though, that hate, and it's dangerous
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 03:50 AM
2

It's really all up to you whether you identify as toxic, no one made you do it. If you don't identify as toxic, there's no reason to get so triggered by the mention of toxic masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 03:48 AM
1

Lol no, no one that identifies as red pill likes women, regardless of their gender. Their reasons are different, but it's still hate or at the very best, disdain.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 03:43 AM
1

Neither, everyone wants different things
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:35 PM
-1

I'm sure you thought this was clever, but it really just makes you look too stupid to understand context; what part of "so exhausted eating gets confusing" suggests a person would have the time or energy for cooking?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 10:24 PM
1

Because the red pill attempts to teach struggling men that their disgusting sexist nonsense is what women want when it very much is not the vast majority of the time- red pill women are a tiny minority, a self-and-other-women hating minority that they will probably never even cross paths with in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 06:54 PM
-1

Men are definitely desired in that way, we just focus on it more when we actually connect with a man- we don't see men as just a collection of hot (or not) body parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 06:48 PM
1

I honestly wish all men could understand that dismantling all these patriarchal ideals is as much a benefit for them as us- the freedom to be what they want regardless of whatever outdated expectations, whether that is something traditional or not- it does literally nothing but empower them as much as us.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 06:44 PM
1

Believe it or not, I love lots of things about men (just not red pill men). One of my favorite things is listening to men banter with each other- I watch gaming streams where I'm barely interested in the game if the men playing have quick wits. Women generally can't do that- just rip into each other in insulting (but good natured) ways- often someone will get upset. I'm not saying this is true of ALL women, I'm speaking in majorities. I love the way men think, like their natural instinct to prob…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 04:39 PM
2

Yeah, duh, obviously; single fathers practically get hero worshipped, while all you have to do is read any post on this sub to see how (at least the worst type of) men feel about single mothers. This isn't even a question. Men always get pats on the back for just doing the base minimum expectations to take care of their kids, while women just get more expectations the better they handle them. It's grossly off balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 07:04 PM
-1

Yes, men are shitty to each other and not supportive. This is not a problem women can solve.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:22 PM
1

How much more break could we possibly give them? Here's yet another problem men need to work out among themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:21 PM
14

Yes, starve the children because their mothers either got abandoned by a deadbeat or stood up for themselves and left a shitty relationship 🙄 you people are sick
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:12 PM
11

NOT GETTING LAID IS NOT A "MALE ISSUE" Lmao I swear, you people are absolutely wild Please, do explain how men being desperate, thirsty, and having low standards is "female privilege" and how you think it should be "compensated for". Seriously, do you have the balls to admit what you really think? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:11 PM
16

I love this, because rp men will INSIST there's an objective standard for feminine attractiveness and anyone claiming to be attracted to anything else is just coping because they can't get the "real thing", for instance men who genuinely prefer bigger women don't exist according to them. But when women categorically consider something unattractive, we are wrong lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:08 PM
0

I have a feeling that a lot of those men who consider themselves "average or above average" are 1) overestimating their own appeal and 2) shooting out of their league because of it. The day men start caring more about whether their partner is a good person with compatible interests and values than whether they are "hot" enough to make their bros impressed/jealous, they will have much better luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:04 PM
2

Of course, they want a woman that contributes money but is also incredibly humble and self-sacrificing 🤣 can't have a confident, assertive woman who takes no shit, doesn't do what they're told, like we didn't need to be told this lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:26 AM
–

Some women "don't need a man" to have a family. The ones that thought they were going to have a father of some kind for their kids are an entirely other type.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:55 PM
–

Men who don't care about their children absolutely deserve to be shamed, that's insane, that's like top 10 worst shameful behaviors shit. No matter how bad your role models are, at some point adults are responsible for their own choices and "I didn't know better" is an unacceptable excuse. The ones who try and just need help are a totally different story, and in any case you're right about the US and its disgusting lack of regard for mental health and education in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:54 PM
–

Lol that dipshit obviously hasn't read the christian bible
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:49 PM
–

Bad research is literally red pill bread and butter
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:24 PM
–

If they didn't have extreme examples they'd have none at all
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:23 PM
–

Ah yes, because women wander around wearing signs with pictures of all the men they've fucked on it, so you can easily tell these things 🤣🤣 The delusion is endless. Anything it takes to put the blame for your failure on anyone but yourself Oh yeah, and as a woman who's been living on the Internet since its inception I've literally never, ever seen a woman say that bullshit. Then again you've never actually spoken to a real live woman outside of a cam site so how would you know how they talk, rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:20 PM
–

LMAO You really got me this time, I fucking snorted out loud at how stupid this is. Women "gatekeeping" pregnancy when their bodies are the only ones capable of it 💀💀 that is deadass hilarious. To be clear, it's also hilarious that you think women are the only ones who decide when sex happens- because men would obviously never ever say no, right, it's just a given that he would always want to and all men are just waiting for a yes from literally any woman like starving puppies. This is what you …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:17 PM
–

Men have the choice where they put their cum about 99.99% of the time. I'm sure once a decade some guy gets sperm jacked, but that guy is rich and famous and no one on this sub has to worry about being that guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:13 PM
–

Cries the Nice Guy™️
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:11 PM
–

Because they can't help it! They are just slaves to their desires and we're supposed to be both mommy and waifu, didn't you hear? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:11 PM
–

LITERALLY
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:09 PM
–

No he wouldn't, she is responsible for using the money for the child, his responsibility ends with making sure she receives the money. You're just making shit up because you're bitter. "We" don't "all know" shit about the stereotypes thrown around by cheap, shitty, selfish men looking for excuses not to take care of their children. Btw, paying rent/mortgage or utilities with child support money is 100% taking care of the child on the mother's part.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:09 PM
–

No one mentioned extra money, only child support. If you can't respond without a straw man you have nothing to say and should say nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:05 PM
–

They have 100% control over where they put their cum. They should take that very seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:04 PM
–

Only women are responsible for this vetting? Men can indiscriminately spray semen in every direction but women are supposed to run background checks? Lol ok
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 11:00 PM
–

Men do literally exactly the same thing about their "crazy bitch" girlfriends. That's what you get for caring more about making your friends jealous than you do about the content of a girls character.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:58 PM
–

Men who pretend to be pro-choice because they think it will help them meet sluts Men who pretend to be anti-choice because they think it will help them meet virgins Men who feign concern over any cause to create a sense of false camaraderie with women, in general. It's a pretty common trope.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:56 PM
–

Yes, because people are completely transparent about everything from day 1... oh wait, aren't you the same ones who claim women hide their "crazy" at the beginning of relationships? And it's somehow beyond your comprehension that men can and do very often do the same? Lol you fucking guys never cease to amaze
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:51 PM
–

Ah yes, because only men can determine other men's hidden motives; women are all oblivious and naï bf e. Also a father would never ever shit talk a potential partner for his daughter out of some creepy obsession with her sexual purity. That never happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:48 PM
–

Oh, you mean he should initiate that conversation before he cums in her, if he doesn't want a child with her ? You seem to have this confusion that women can decide to get pregnant without that, might just be poor wording.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:46 PM
–

Preach it. Men constantly whine about "having to make the first move"; ask for dates and initiate relationships, but when you point out that women then do the lion's share of the work to maintain the relationship, potentially for the rest of their lives, suddenly that complaint seems petty and stupid. There's a reason why women's twitters and tumblrs are full of clichés about maintaining the same energy you start with- because men absolutely do not do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:42 PM
–

💯💯💯 It's hilarious and infuriating by turns that we act like telling men they should be careful who they nut in is way too much to ask when that is the entire cause of 100% of unwanted pregnancies. Of course men can't be asked to police their own behavior! They're hardwired to spray that shit anywhere they can and are completely incapable of rising above their base level animal instincts. At least, that's what they're saying when they blame women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 10:37 PM
1

Ah yes, because people who don't pay court-imposed child support definitely follow court orders to pay fines 🙄 then they end up in prison from ignoring and evading the court, and pretend they are some kind of victim of the system instead of deadbeat garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 08:52 PM
3

Ahh, the way you move the goalposts is exactly as clumsy as your ignorant opinions suggested it would be. 👏 👏 Also, your last paragraph is blatant bullshit, to a comical degree. There are certainly more adoptive parents out there than there are perfectly healthy infants available to adopt, but when you say "orphans" that extends all the way up to teens in the system and that's where you become laughably wrong. People look in other countries because they want perfectly healthy infants or because …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 08:48 PM
3

How do you even survive, being this dense? Your blood must flow like molasses on a cold winter morning. There are no predetermined levels of support, physical or fiscal, that are LEGALLY associated with fathering a child. Therefore, literally no crime has been committed until those required levels of support are determined in a court of law and said father fails to abide by the court's decision. He might still MORALLY be very wrong to never take responsibility, but you are being very specific ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 08:35 PM
2

It's not like they stole the guy's semen? He willingly sold it of his own free will knowing exactly what it would be used for, so you have no problem with that, only with the women using it. The idea that the woman might be gay, might be well more than able to provide for a child on her own without working herself to death, and the idea that a woman might not tell the father because he's an abusive psycho don't even factor into your nonsense because they don't fit your narrative. To you, every "…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 08:15 PM
–

RP men literally can't fathom the idea of finding someone attractive but also too young to get involved with- the best you can possibly hope for is them respecting age of consent- so I guess they believe women are the same way. Of course, they're not looking for shared interests, good conversations, and equality- they're looking for a fucking PA with benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 11:47 PM
–

I see, you lack an understanding of any nuance and are meaning easy in the simplest sense. In this context, "easy" means "naïve, hasn't heard all the typical lies and bullshit already, doesn't have the experience to understand what adult relationships should be like". That makes them easy to manipulate and control, once you get "in", and since rp guys just love setting their predatory sights on women with "Daddy issues"- it's not actually as hard as you're trying to make out, when you're taking …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 11:30 PM
–

This didn't happen so hard it unhappened things that did 🤣 you literally invented this whole conversation because you really want to believe that's true. Even if the conversation did happen- and it certainly did not- 4 people talking in public about how easy or difficult it is for them to cum would have zero statistical significance regarding the "point" of your post. So much for the analytical, rational man of science 🤣 Oh, and if this is "your experience" re: women having difficulty orgasming …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 04:03 PM
5

Trp men will assume I hate men based on the comments I make, but in truth I love men, have more in common with them than most women, most of my good friends are male and though I am attracted to both, I lean towards being slightly more male-attracted than female most of the time. It's actually because I love men that I despise red pill bullshit and the toxic effects it has both on men and their relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 02:47 AM
1

None of the questions you asked would help your Joe Average. Men are never going to do better until they accept women are all different people just like they are, who want, like, and dislike different things, and there's never ever going to be a magic formula that "solves" for what women want and how to date them. "Bare minimum" mentality is pathetic and it doesn't work for good reason. The answer is to do the best he can for himself in all areas- whenever what means, because that's all anyone c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 02:18 AM
3

Who cares, let the ones who want to be traditional and the ones who don't be whatever they want. Feminism is about free choice, not about discouraging free choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:47 AM
7

Lots of women write and draw erotic things, and women don't have to pay for sex or go without it at all, if they don't want to- those situations are so rare where women are concerned they're not statistically relevant. Women are capable of being just as sexually motivated as men, it just happens differently. For most, the more good sex they're having, the more they want. Basically what you're telling everyone is you've never pleased a woman enough to make her hot for you, and that's no shocker w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:40 AM
0

Red pill type men don't feel repulsed by women with many sex partners- they feel envious and insecure, so they call it disgust because that sounds more manly. It enrages men who can't get any sex at all, how much easier it is for any woman to get laid, but refuse to accept it's entirely their fault that imbalance exists. If men had higher standards and wanted more, women would have to work harder for sex. For some reason we're just supposed to take it for granted that this is an impossible thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 01:25 AM
3

All you guys' posts read like you live in some ignorant bubble. I love how men dismiss the idea of "putting on a dress and makeup" as easy when they truly require levels of effort and expertise they can't even imagine. All you guys have to do is shower and smell good. Can you imagine one of these red pill geeks shaving every hair below their eyebrows as they expect women to do, let alone putting on makeup? Seriously, picture liquid eyeliner... I could die laughing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/23 10:49 PM
2

All the things you just named are really shallow/short lived and don't have anything to do with real love. The truth is that people change a LOT between 20 and 30, and the person you think you have "true love" with at 22 might be a total stranger at 32.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 05:21 AM
8

Suuuuure, Jan. Let me let you in on a little secret- the way women are often polite about how an encounter went, more flattering than you deserve, because she has zero intention of seeing you again and doesn't want to hurt your feelings. You may think you're pumping and dumping, but when a woman doesn't come back for more- you're just bad at it, and if she said otherwise to your face she was just being nice.
/r/ExRedPill28/10/22 04:29 AM
4

There is nothing inherently good or bad about promiscuity itself. The details are what matters; both the physical safety details and how you treat your partners. If you take precautions to prevent spread of disease and unwanted pregnancy while also behaving in an ethical way in regards to the sex you're having, by all means- fuck around all you want. It won't affect whether you are "good". If you treat your partners badly as well as putting their and your health in danger, you're a shitty person…
/r/ExRedPill28/10/22 04:23 AM
2

If a woman reacts badly to you actually seeking consent, that woman is absolutely toxic. I'm sure that wouldn't stop you from fucking her, men being how you are, but you'll see signs of it manifest in other areas if you date her.
/r/ExRedPill23/10/22 02:47 PM
2

As a man and therefore a person who doesn't live in more or less constant defense of their body against people who want to violate it- you have no idea what you're talking about. Now, continuing to ask for a kiss every single time as a relationship progresses may lose its appeal, because you should be learning your partner's signals, but for that first kiss and while you're still getting to know each other? Asking instead of just going for it is 100% sexy to most women. A toxic few that might ma…
/r/ExRedPill23/10/22 02:44 PM
4

I'll add "be less of a defensive, reactionary drama queen" to the advice; really, you just jump right to rapist when advised to examine your behavior? You come off like an extremely unpleasant person and even if you fake being otherwise a lot of people will see through that. Yes, even women; our bullshit detectors get honed at an early age because of the total lack of scruples many young men have when it comes to getting laid.
/r/ExRedPill23/10/22 02:36 PM
2

Owning your sexuality in any way you choose doesn't make you a "ho" regardless of gender, and frankly there's nothing wrong with adults who freely choose consensual sex work with other adults either (since ho is just "whore" in AAVE). I worded it that way very specifically to circumvent all the "but underage/exploitation" arguments people try to use to shame or prosecute adults who choose to sell sexual services to other adults, which is something that should never have been illegal to begin wit…
/r/ExRedPill19/10/22 10:31 PM
3

You are comparing your real life behind the scenes to this dbag's highlight reel. Why would he show you anything else in his videos? What makes you think that's any more real than anything anyone else records? There are only 2 types of women who pay attention to men like that- those looking for a payday, either directly or by association- or those who are too dim or naïve to understand they can't possibly help or change him into a worthwhile man. Why would you want either of those type of women,…
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 09:24 PM
14

RP men will dismiss their own disloyalties and betrayals as things they were entitled to as "Captain" and caregiver, since they can't get pregnant they figure they're not doing anything really wrong. They will regurgitate the gross lock and key analogy, insisting their indiscretions are really accomplishments and how men are supposed to behave if they can. It's funny how they have this deep seated paranoia about having to pay to raise someone else's kid, honestly. As if the source of DNA determi…
/r/ExRedPill14/10/22 05:33 AM
7

💯💯💯 We're not mad, we just want them to shut up and go already, wherever their own way is, faaaaar from us. Guaranteed any man self-identifying as MGTOW has absolutely nothing to offer a woman seeking a healthy, fulfilling relationship.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/22 08:28 PM
11

Obviously they exist in real life as much as they do on the Internet, but they are much less likely to admit it without the cover of anonymity because they're aware most people would be disgusted if they found out what that really means.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/22 05:32 PM
3

I will not discount those stories, but what you don't seem to realize is that the perception of women as better parents, "natural caregivers", is a direct result of patriarchal structures that red pillers seek to uphold and the rest of us want to tear down. That would result in more equitable treatment in family courts if we let the perception that women are better for kids die. Be prepared to take on a lot more than just bill paying as a father though, if you want that perception to persist.
/r/ExRedPill11/10/22 07:35 AM
2

There are plenty of self-loathing women in the world- even ones who wish women's liberation had never happened, because they honestly believe being chained to a stove barefoot and pregnant would be a preferable life to getting a job and taking care of themselves. There are even more who try to convince themselves they can "fix" a fucked up man who has some qualities they like and others that are abhorrent. The thing is those women usually get over it and move on, leaving guys like your friend fo…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 12:37 PM
3

Because you've never been in requited love- or even any serious relationship, I'd bet- you don't understand the energy or the bubble that exists when they're first established. Good friends can give each other some space for that time and not make themselves the center of the universe in every situation. A friend who "disappears" for awhile when they fall in love is completely normal, and not even a shitty person as long as the new relationship bubble doesn't last too long. If you actually value…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 12:14 PM
1

💯💯💯
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 11:57 AM
7

Because your idea of "truth" is insanely misogynistic (and misandrist; you really think men never value friendships with women? So sad that you consider yourself so mentally and emotionally limited) nonsense; that's the main reason why most people who know you exist consider red pillers a joke. That's the unsettling, life-changing truth you all don't want to accept- the world is full of people living happily outside your ridiculous world view, and we all view you with varying levels of disgust a…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 11:50 AM
2

That's also what I'm seeing
/r/ExRedPill09/10/22 12:10 PM
2

Has it not occurred to you that your confidence in how you look now makes a difference? You felt ugly before and that affected your interactions with women. Now you don't feel ugly, and that comes across too. It's not just the way you look, it's about how you feel about how you look; it changes your whole vibe. However with childish shit like that misuse of gaslighting and "reported and downvoted" it's honestly seeming like you're not here asking this in good faith but more trolling than anythin…
/r/ExRedPill09/10/22 12:08 PM
1

The red pill revels in the hypothetical harm it claims to do to the women its followers claim to use. That's why it's shameful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 05:40 AM
2

comes to a debate sub gets mad that there is disagreement LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 05:35 AM
2

It absolutely is creepy the way our military preys on disadvantaged teenagers. It's borderline evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 05:34 AM
2

If you're willing to admit you are equally shallow, the real issue here is you thinking other people should live by different standards than you and you should deal with that narcissism before it gets any more out of control.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/18 12:14 PM
13

Right here on this subreddit, in fact, as well as where roughly half of its participants come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/18 04:41 PM
6

2008 was 10 years ago, and things are changing fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/18 04:40 PM
2

Modern, sexually liberated women are much less likely to feel this way- as long as the sex was good. If the sex was bad, then I mean... duh. They really were kind of used, their needs not noticed or respected, and if there's no emotional connection either, it was a total waste of time and risk. Men are much less likely to find sex "bad" enough not to cum, so pretty much any fuck is a win for them. I don't know why this is even that confusing for anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/18 04:40 PM
2

Lol no. The "misunderstanding" comes from red piller's idea that it's OK to treat women like disposable sex toys with the minds of children based on anecdotal bullshit- really though, there's no possible justification for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 10:45 PM
1

The numbers are more or less impossible, because who really makes an account with their real information on a porn site? I have a few I use quite regularly and I've never bothered to make accounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 09:19 PM
4

This woman "watches porn", and has her own list of favorite search terms, a few times a week. Many other women I know are similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 09:15 PM
1

Sadly, you're never going to have that pleasure until you understand what constitutes proof of anything- and you demonstrably do not get that yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:59 PM
2

The real question here is- why do you expect these things to be fair? Is anything about life fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:57 PM
3

Fairly typical; not a single twerp to this day has ever posted relevant, empirical evidence for a claim they make.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:55 PM
3

"Most women", except you can't cite a single example of a woman saying that not being able to get a good boyfriend or husband is "oppression".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:53 PM
3

I dig the backpeddle! Good job admitting this entire comment thread from you is a straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:52 PM
7

I'm just tickled as hell that anyone expects "fairness" from life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:30 PM
3

Only if men choose to let them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:28 PM
2

Not particularly in my case; the only thing that makes you apt to get away with saying "outlandish" things is for us to know one another well enough to be able to banter like that. However, you're asking a personal question is if it can be answered as a group, and it can't. Also, this is a bad faith post altogether, with vague complaints of "unfairness" against men and a predetermined choice of truth; life isn't fair for anyone. No one owes anyone their time, male or female, romantic or platonic…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:27 PM
0

Considering the goals of the two subs are literally opposites, don't you find that unusual?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 12:28 AM
1

Stop making that one fact the central focus of their lives. No one will actually know that about you if you don't tell them, so how can you be stigmatized without asking for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 12:26 AM
10

I sincerely hope she finds this comment some day (sooner rather than later) and realizes that she could do better, with someone who would respect her instead of talking shit about her behind her back.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 09:29 PM
9

The people you elevate to "endorsed contributor" and "vanguard" status are; you choose your representative leaders.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 09:32 PM
1

Any option that doesn't involve dishonesty, manipulation, and emotional abuse is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 09:30 PM
6

I don't know; I don't look to strangers to solve my personal problems. You guys are the ones desperately looking for a leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 09:29 PM
-3

Yeah, me neither before he was mentioned on a post here; I've never looked online or in a book for dating advice, though. It has always seemed silly to me to think there's any advice that would be useful to everyone in every situation. Paying attention to the person you're interested in and treating them as an individual has always been the best bet as far as I'm concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 07:44 PM
4

Someone who can provide quantifiable, empirical, reproducible evidence of their claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 07:42 PM
3

It's not impossible to get a man who can do both, and I don't even agree with that platitude, or whatever you would call it; it takes both to have a good long term relationship, but the overwhelming butterflies will fade over time on matter what- as they should. That uncertainty and nervousness should be replaced by a sense of security and comfort, and if that seems "boring" then the person who feels that way most likely has a lot of emotional maturing to do. We don't stay teenagers forever, so …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 05:30 PM
7

You do realize that fascism and individualism are fundamentally opposite concepts, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 03:31 PM
8

Please cite for me a single instance of any post on The Blue Pill that states men should not desire women for sex nor seek competition with one another. If you can do that, I'll address your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 03:30 PM
1

Sure there is, and if I want to talk about it I will go to /r/BDSM or somewhere similar, where they understand that the sub's needs are just as important as the Dom's and that mutual respect is what makes those relationships work- not a sub where squashing your feelings to avoid bothering "the captain" with him is suggested instead of open, honest communication. No one is trying to say you guys can't work toward whatever relationship dynamics you want or think you want, even if you're allowing y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 05:40 PM
2

I swear, anything even approaching a "beta orbiter" is the most annoying shit I've ever dealt with. I cannot wait to get away from cloying, clingy, worshipful dudes that can't take a hint to chill out. I don't move furniture often enough to find them useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 05:37 PM
3

For the umpteenth time, "IT" for women is not casual sex most of the time... because we can get that with no problem, and it has little value. To make a fair comparison with TRP goals, "IT" would be a stable and happy relationship under whatever terms that particular person prefers- and that is not easy to get for anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 05:34 PM
2

How are social constructs not real?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 05:28 PM
3

You ever bother to weight that "statistic" by domestic violence and adultery involvement in the proceedings? I think it's pretty fucking disloyal to cheat and/or beat the shit out of your spouse, and of course you're not going to leave someone who lets you abuse them. Sticking around doesn't necessarily make you a good guy- a lot of times, it's just opportunistic. Ah, of course a down vote with no rebuttal; typical twerp ♥
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 05:24 PM
1

Nah, sweeping generalizations are more or less useless no matter who they're made about, and generalizing everyone certainly isn't going to up the accuracy of the assumptions. People are still going to need to be taken as individuals no matter what. A lot of BP rebuttal has always been that men are just as guilty of literally everything twerps complain that women do, and if we get any response other than a down vote it's a dismissal along the lines of how that doesn't matter, because TRP isn't t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 05:21 PM
1

I'm responding taking into consideration the actual TRP view of LMR, not just what you said or the rather unique view in the OP. Most TRP posts about LMR do not say that you should never push through it, otherwise this post would never have been made because TBP would have no problem with that. Oh, and telling you not to leave is not consent for sex, by the way, and if the consent comes after that you should realize that she likely only gave it because she was afraid you wouldn't see her anymore…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:42 PM
2

And in at least some of those situations the woman was raped, because she said no and it wasn't respected, and she was too afraid of what might happen to keep saying no.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:39 PM
3

That's not true, though. Some women are afraid to put up a hard no, because they don't want to risk a man becoming enraged and beating the shit out of her before he rapes her. Everyone should treat anything except enthusiastic consent as a "hard no". Only twerps would downvote the idea of making sure you have enthusiastic consent xD you guys just never stop proving me right
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:36 PM
-1

Consenting to make out is not consenting to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:35 PM
0

What you don't understand is that if a man keeps pushing after she says she isn't ready or doesn't want to, she may cease resistance out of fear of being beaten up for rejecting him. This is an extremely common worry, because it happens a lot. I have had it happen to me, and yes it was rape when it happened. I just chose to not fight in hopes that he wouldn't hurt me for resisting more forcefully. That's why enthusiastic consent is the bar you need to set for your sexual interactions, not merely…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:32 PM
1

I've read it. I'm aware of how you guys hamster away the implications of "pushing past LMR". What you're missing is the fact that anything except enthusiastic consent means NO. LMR means there is not enthusiastic consent. Period. By all means, be the next Brock Turner, though; you probably won't be so lucky with your sentencing. Those quotes you pulled, by the way, in no way whatsoever constitute the usual content of a post about LMR on the TRP sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:25 PM
-2

Most people of either gender are not going to be interested in teaching men how to take advantage of women or manipulate them into doing things. That's what it sounds like you want when you say "help men get laid" instead of "help men get dates" or "help men have successful relationships". These things do not appear to interest you from your obvious interest in keeping your options open; that is not how someone invested in a relationship thinks. So for someone who thinks along the lines of your …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 05:42 PM
0

Please post for me an example of any of your "bad ideas" in the real world. When you cannot, you'll realize that you typed an awful lot of words for an empty straw man argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:13 PM
1

AA and NA are not only not government funded, they can't be because they push religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:09 PM
2

You do realize almost every church- some nondenominational ones not included- falls under that second definition, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:08 PM
0

Who are you to determine whose needs are legitimate?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:07 PM
0

You're acting like these "safe spaces" are places that people are obligated to go and not allowed to leave- or that people of differing opinions are not allowed to create their own spaces with their own rules. This is absurd. Can you perhaps provide an example of "mind control" by a "safe space" that is not 100% optional to enter?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:04 PM
1

I think if people don't want to hear what you have to say, that is as much their freedom to tell you to fuck off and leave as it is for you to say what you like. Unless you're on your own property, you're not entitled to be there, meaning wherever people don't want to hear your shit. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences; even legally, not all speech is protected, and people banning you from their subreddits/other sites or not letting you play their reindeer games is, again, their f…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:00 PM
7

There is zero evidence that she gave any consent, and she was completely unconscious and unresponsive when found. She did not regain consciousness for several hours. By contrast, he was sober enough to get up and try to run away when he got caught on top of her. Lets don't pretend there is any kind of confusion about who is at fault here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 08:10 PM
1

Adding extra words doesn't change the fact that they are making generalizations of an entire gender, which is an accident of birth, rather than a label someone takes on by choice like "red pill".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 09:13 PM
0

LOL no- I never reddit when I'm not at work. I have a busy life, and a job with lots of free time. Feel free to analyze my account if you don't believe me. Here ya go: http://snoopsnoo.com/
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 09:10 PM
2

But it's OK for men to "spin" multiple "plates" and refuse to be honest about it? I've specifically seen twerps suggest and reinforce the idea that it's OK to laugh and ignore it if a woman asks you if you're fucking other people. The blatant, unending hypocrisy never ceases to amaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 09:08 PM
0

That's called a strawman, unless you can post something where someone from the blue pill actually said it- only you can't because it's fucking ridiculous. No one from TBP ever said you can't use someone's history to determine whether or not they are trustworthy- and twerps just get around that by refusing to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 09:03 PM
3

Them trying to say "I'm not a creep! It doesn't matter if that person felt creeped on!" is like someone saying "It's not cold in here! I'm not cold, so that person couldn't possibly be cold!" or "What do you mean you're hungry? I'm not hungry!"- you don't get to decide what constitutes someone else's feelings or perception of a situation. You just leave them the fuck alone when they indicate they want you to- it doesn't fucking matter if you think you're not creepy. That's why the perception of …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 09:01 PM
2

The difference is that TRP actively permits and encourages manipulation of others for personal gain, and that is doing harm. Telling someone you're looking for a relationship, so they'll trust you and fuck you, and then "nexting" them once you've fucked them is harmful. Demanding that your romantic partner not bother you with their problems and feelings ("shit tests" and "comfort tests") or you'll leave them is harmful. "Negging" a person's appearance so they stay insecure and work extra hard on…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 08:59 PM
3

People who rarely read tend to have a low opinion of written word, and that one obviously does not read based on how he communicates.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 12:10 AM
11

That's a no true Scotsman fallacy; surely you can do better than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 12:06 AM
1

It doesn't "lead you" to anything. You decide your reactions. Have some personal responsibility. Even if someone hurts your feelings, you don't need to tell them to "go get raped you fat pig" or some shit like they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:57 AM
3

and what about "No Ma'am", Al Bundy's group to rebel against their bossy wives? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:55 AM
2

OK, so you guys can claim society "promotes open cuckoldry" when obviously, infidelity is frowned upon by all but the poly, and "AFBB" when single women who have active sex lives are called sluts and whores, but you object to the phrase "rape culture" even though rape victims are given less quarter and belief than victims of any other crime? K then; hamster away.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:52 AM
5

Oh I get it; you're a troll. That's the only way anyone could say something so patently absurd with no irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:47 AM
2

How is it that you don't understand that the plural of anecdote is not evidence? Social media posts are not proof of anything except what someone posted on social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:45 AM
1

Those men aren't "betas", they are "omegas" by your terminology, so this entire post is based on a false premise. Good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:44 AM
0

Those are obviously loaded questions, and the answer to all of them is that a good parent will instill all of those things in their proper proportions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:38 AM
24

Humanism and feminism aren't mutually exclusive, and humanism does not deal in gender equality.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 06:36 PM
15

Everyone who believes in equality is a feminist, whether they like the "label" or not. Word definitions don't accommodate opinions.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 06:34 PM
5

Literally all of it is anecdotal. I would love to see some verifiable, peer-reviewed evidence for even one claim TRP has ever made- and no, exerpts from books that sort of insinuate things are not "proof" of a claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 10:00 PM
1

She didn't make a sweeping generalization about an entire gender in her "exaggeration".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 09:57 PM
1

Literally no world. These people have never spoken to anyone who behaves that way; they just assume the tumblrinas they like to pretend are feminists would react that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 09:56 PM
0

Anything is possible. It's possible to swim in sewage without getting a heinous infection, but I'm probably not going to do it anyway, because there's nothing in a pool of sewage that is worth the risk. Likewise I don't think TRP has anything unique to offer that offsets the risk of becoming a misogynistic piece of shit by associating with that echo chamber. You can get self-improvement advice lots of places that don't put you at risk of becoming a woman-hating asshole who thinks he knows everyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 09:48 PM
-1

To question that would be to cruelly demand you provide proof of a story you're telling of a painful moment in your life- you probably would not provide the proof, even if you had it to give, and it would be a dick move in general. Why would anyone bother? It is not a reflection of how PBI deals with anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 07:09 PM
1

Yeah, it's cute how most terps don't even understand that in a D/s dynamic the sub actually holds the power, and their submission is just as easily rescinded as it is given.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 07:01 PM
0

No, yours is- because that woman could jump on any dick she wants, and she will if yours gets boring. Meanwhile, you guys have to plan, scheme, and be constantly on guard just for a shot at her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 06:58 PM
-2

We don't underestimate your struggles- far from it, in fact, as we find many "field reports" and "success stories" posted in TRP laughably fake- we just disagree that becoming a misogynist who treats women like children or lesser beings is the way to solve your problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 06:56 PM
-3

It really is bizarre how people who fancy themselves intelligent refuse to accept the fact that being dependent on something you can literally only get from someone else for your happiness is a recipe for a frustrated, angry life, even though the majority of their posters constantly demonstrate how frustrated and angry they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 06:48 PM
3

Well yeah- I mean, a very large part of why men are so shallow is because they want to impress other men with the women they're fucking; they're fine having sex with "unattractive" women as long as their friends don't find out and tease them, so it's really not a matter of not being able to desire or enjoy sex unless the woman is HB7+. It's almost entirely about their status among other men; having your friends be jealous of who you're fucking is the ultimate goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/16 06:37 PM
-2

Adopting the terminology of you enemy is a pretty lame form of self expression. *your Do you not understand satire? You're literally describing it as if you don't understand what it means. Of course we use your own language against you. We're making fun of you. We find you laughable and ignorant- basically ridiculous. We don't hate you- we just have no respect for you or anything you have to say. You are jokes to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:25 PM
1

Literally none of your fake quotes say anything hateful. You want to know what hateful looks like? Go read what TRP has to say about single mothers, about women who enjoy sex and eschew commitment, about their own exes. That's hate. TBP is mockery, and yes probably some shaming- but that is literally the stated purpose of the sub. We're there to pick apart your nonsense and laugh at you for it, while you claim a higher ground and fall very far short. I missed that warm, fuzzy feeling when I see …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:22 PM
0

If I ever opened my reddit inbox- and I never will, sorry boys (current count 5784)- I guarantee I would find the most vile, disgusting messages possible from terpers- because I have seen them sent to people who don't rustle nearly as many jimmies as I do. I myself on the other hand have literally never sent a PM to a terp (or anyone for that matter), nor do I care to. I say what I have to say where everyone can see, and that's why I don't check my inbox- because if you're too much of a coward t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:17 PM
5

Yup, they're either looking for a free ride, or that love that Daddy never showed. I mean, I guess if a guy is OK with being a wallet or a father surrogate, k then!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:06 PM
5

Yes, people should do what makes them happy as long as they aren't taking advantage of another person to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:00 PM
8

You must be very confused if you think men slut shaming women is rare in any way. As a matter of fact, you must have never even seen the red pill sub if you think that, so what are you doing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 06:57 PM
1

How is "threatening to leave" a good way to get free stuff? If you leave, that person no longer has to spend money on you. If they are spending money on you to keep you there, you're a prostitute and they are choosing to pay you to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 06:55 PM
6

For the same reason it sees fit to shame women in relationships with younger men the same way (and often, even worse)- it's obvious the relationship is not on equal footing. It's obvious that dating someone that much younger than you puts you in a position of power over them, even if for no other reason than much more life experience. It can make a person- male or female- appear immature, as if they can't handle a real relationship with someone on their level. And of course, the older person in …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 06:51 PM
7

Actually no. States that receive the most federal aid money for impoverished citizens are overwhelmingly red, with the notable exception of Texas.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 06:28 PM
8

We may enjoy it more when it is good, but we are much less likely to get enjoyment out of it, and that probability shoots through the roof when you're talking about a new partner or ONS. I mean, duh. You guys know this. Women want good sex as much as men want sex in general, because men almost always get off regardless of what the woman does and women very often don't. It's really that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 06:25 PM
5

Your face and body are accidents of genetics. Your parents are the ones who get credit for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:04 PM
2

LOL of course terps don't love unconditionally- or in any significant way at all! If an extra 5lbs can change how you feel about someone, you don't love them. You want to possess a showpiece to make others jealous, and that 5lbs is like a scratch in the paint on your overpriced sports car. All that matters is what your bros think of your partner; that's not love. That's something childish and pathetic that mirrors those schoolyard days of showing off what your parents got you for Xmas and mockin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:03 PM
4

No one should be working 80 hours a week. I don't think you'll find many people, regardless of gender or marital status, who would want that for themselves or their partners/potential partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 08:00 PM
8

No. Being "really good looking" is an accident of genetics and has nothing to do with who you are as a person. That's why "love" based primarily on looks doesn't mean much; it's shallow, and if the person gets in an accident or something that changes their appearance you have nothing left. The only kind of love that isn't shallow is the kind based on what a person thinks and chooses to do with their life, and frankly (while I personally don't care about wealth beyond the basic point of being adu…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 07:55 PM
5

You shouldn't consider yourself "deeply committed" to someone when you find out they are not who you thought they were. In that situation, you were "deeply committed" to an imaginary person, a character that they made up to hook you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 08:20 PM
4

It's their fault they don't end it immediately based on someone's entitled douchebag behavior, regardless of gender, when it manifests itself. Life is full of "picking the wrong person" and it only becomes a problem when you don't accept the fact that you've made a mistake and end it. Anyone can fool someone in the short term. That's kind of what red pillers are counting on, anyway- that they can fool a woman into thinking they're worthwhile long enough to get their dicks wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 08:16 PM
4

Of course it is. Men are just as likely, if not more so, to take bullshit from a partner just because she's hot enough to impress their friends. It's stupid on the part of anyone who does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 08:14 PM
1

Lol; he meant Voltaire's "BrainyQuotes" page
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 07:22 PM
3

And yet, when called to be responsible for the most reprehensible ideas that get widespread support on TRP, you guys whine that blues are too focused on the extremes and can't understand nuance because you use sweeping generalizations instead of accurate comparisons because it's simpler (and more polarizing of course, which is essential to selling a cultish mentality).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 06:47 PM
-3

insensitivising lol; that's not a word so no, it did not come from autocorrect. Did you mean "incentivizing" or did you actually mean something to do with sensitivity? Might be better to stick to words you actually know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 06:44 PM
2

"Getting information" and "following unsubstantiated claims as gospel" are not the same thing. And yes, the claims are unsubstantiated if you haven't literally seen empirical, verifiable proof of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/16 12:26 AM
2

So suddenly his opinion is more valid because he has a cock?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 12:11 AM
3

It's really funny to me that terps constantly rail on this (inaccurate) idea that women only want to bang the "top 20% of men" when they themselves only want to bang "the top 20% of women", if even that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 12:10 AM
1

Standards set by media and advertising are intentionally too high, created with photoshop, unrealistic to the point of impossibility because that's how many companies make money. Personal standards are never "too high", technically, because they're a personal choice. If you personally are having trouble finding people who meet your standards, you might want to rethink them, but that doesn't mean they are "too high" or that anyone really has any place judging them. That doesn't mean it's OK to tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 12:05 AM
6

Surely you are joking about the "non adult" part. I get that you guys like to try to shock people, but that's more pathetic than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:34 PM
1

You can't call it a no true Scotsman fallacy when there are clearly defined parameters for belonging to a certain group that are not being met. Some people actually aren't part of a group, and pointing that out is not always a fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:29 PM
1

It's not wrong because it does not victimize any other person or infringe on anyone else's rights. "Sluts" are having consensual sex. That's it. If you find it "wrong", it is based on personal morality. It's not objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:25 PM
2

So, let me get this straight- men doing primary parenting duties = sacless cuck, but courts assuming women make better parents is also wrong? I wonder how often you guys even notice your blatant contradictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:21 PM
0

It's how you meet women you have things in common with, dingus- it's not a direct path to pussy. Are you really that dim? Is that why TRP stuff has to be written in such simple and inaccurate terms, because to make it any more complex would alienate the demographic?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:18 PM
1

I'd love to see proof of even one TRP success. You're making the claims. TBP is response to TRP. The burden of proof is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:17 PM
3

Seriously? No one in your life ever told you that being in good shape is good for you? No one ever told you obsessing over one person who doesn't want you is a bad idea? No one ever told you that focusing on making your own life better would make you more happy than trying to get someone else to fix it? Because these are the basic instructions anyone would get with a single Google search for any of those problems, in any context, and were common knowledge previously. Also, OP is apparently plann…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:13 PM
3

You guys can't prove anything you claim, so the moment when you come through with your own, we'll be on the hook for evidence for a counter-claim. You're the initiator. Blue Pill is response to Red Pill. Trying to pass the burden of proof off will not work.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:01 PM
3

That's funny, because the New Testament clearly states that Jesus did not come to change the law, but to fulfill it. It's a common misconception that Christians don't have to pay attention to the Old Testament. Convenient too, since literally every verse they try to use against civil rights activists comes from the OT.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 10:57 PM
5

The parts that are actually self-improvement as opposed to the parts that are about using and hurting others for your own benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 10:49 PM
3

"Women are no longer my goal" "I'm not at plating level (I'm trying to get my fitness into check first" Yeah, your goal is still women. Also, only one thing you're doing is something you wouldn't have been instructed to do by literally anyone offering life improvement advice, and that is the "agree and amplify" bit. There may be some situations where that is useful- but if you use it in a debate setting, it's called reductio ad absurdum, and just like it appears it is a useless, throwaway argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 10:46 PM
4

Women didn't actually get to choose one; they were forbidden from joining the military. Since that restriction has been lifted, many women do join the military despite the fact that sexual harassment and assault is a constant problem that is rarely dealt with in the manner it should be. Did you have any other worthless attempts at a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 11:21 PM
3

We know how good you guys are at imagining things, but I'm continually amazed at how good you are at missing the point when it suits you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 11:20 PM
1

It's more or less useless either way. The people that benefit from it are people who barely had problems to begin with and just needed a nudge in the right direction for taking care of themselves and being assertive; those who are the worst off are only going to get more bitter and jaded by believing that women are somehow to blame for his loneliness. Then there are the people who take it way too far and form abusive relationships with equally mentally damaged women and call it "successful" beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 11:16 PM
0

So you're for parents being forced to pay for a test even if they don't want it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 11:08 PM
1

People should not lie to their partners about anything, especially things like their children, and it's a ridiculous straw man to act as if most people would actually be OK with that. I'm a woman and I think TRP is almost as disgusting as it is funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 11:07 PM
2

You aren't teaching "losers" to make friends and meet women. You're teaching "losers" maybe make friends and use women. You teach "losers" to disrespect women and see them all as inferior beings. You can make all the euphemisms you want, but we have read what you say on your sub. The watered-down version you try to push on PPD as if it weren't that bad fools only those who haven't been directly to your sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 10:59 PM
2

Yeah, I was kind of hoping that was a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 10:56 PM
1

Do you really think the only dynamics that exist are "woman submissive" and "weak, passive, ineffectual man"? Do you really think someone has to be the subjugated partner? Someone taking charge in a crisis doesn't mean they are dominant over the other partner under normal conditions- it just means in that situation, they took charge. The next crisis, it might be the other partner. That is egalitarian. It's rather sad that you see anyone who has different standards of attractiveness than you as h…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 10:55 PM
1

Yeah, and we've all said that infinite times. Pretending like they just can't understand what the problem is with treating an adult woman like a child whose wants and needs are silly and unimportant is SOP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 10:24 PM
0

I don't even see how you've really made a "view" to change; no one from TBP has said that nothing from TRP is useful and no one who follows any of it can be successful, at least. The problem is twerps presenting their ideals as blanket truth for everyone (AWALT), claiming they have scientific backing for it (BIOTRUFS), and de facto saying everyone else who does not accept their claims lives in a made up world by saying we chose the "blue pill" as a Matrix reference. I've said it many times- most…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 10:01 PM
-2

Yup, it's an endless, droning circlejerk of self-fulfilling prophecy wearing different disguises depending on the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 11:39 PM
3

So why are so many men obese if they're so good at making the "right decisions"? I don't buy your "logic", to be clear- I'm just curious how you explain that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 11:35 PM
4

It's funny that you refer to people who support Bernie Sanders as some sort of extremist group.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 11:34 PM
1

The point is that it doesn't infringe on anyone's rights for a private enterprise to do so on and with their own property, so as long as you get that we're good.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 07:14 PM
1

That's a fair enough point, but trauma victims stumbling across things like that is just horrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 07:12 PM
1

Lol, I bet all those "you're"s where it was supposed to be "your" were "accidents" too, huh? :P You need to calm down. You asked why people wanted red pill removed; this post isn't about you as in individual, it's about people who espouse red pill ideals. I don't know how any woman can simply accept being considered inferior, a complementary being only good for supporting a man and making babies, but that's your issue and frankly I couldn't even begin to care about it. You've made your informed …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 07:10 PM
1

"Censorship" with a capital C in the middle of a sentence the way you're using it can only be practiced by a governing entity; you started with an ignorant premise. A private enterprise deciding how its assets are to be used is not employing censorship, and that's what reddit is, as well as what they are doing. You cannot expect to be able to say whatever you want on someone else's property, virtual or brick and mortar. Try walking into a store and harassing customers or staff- or even yelling t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 12:59 AM
1

No. HB stands for "hard body", not "hot babe".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:48 PM
1

He was raunchy and absolutely respectful. He loved women and their sexuality. He never slut shamed. Leave it to a twerp to not even be able to recognize sex-positive music when it's right in their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:46 PM
1

You're absolutely delusional if you think Prince was gay. Tell yourself whatever you need to sweetie; I know that cognitive dissonance is rough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:44 PM
1

He looks better lately with that bald head, but yeah that woman is almost certainly gold digging.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:39 PM
1

He was fucking beautiful. You're drunk on haterade, bro; maybe your sober eyes see better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:33 PM
1

Prince was what most people would call "alpha", absolutely, but he is nothing like what twerps call alpha. He was small (more like a yoga body than body builder), very respectful of women as equals, and incredibly accepting and into women's sexuality and sexual freedom. As he says in "Gett Off"- he'll only call you later if you say he can. He never slut shamed. He never fat shamed ("I like 'em fat; I like 'em proud. So bring your big ass round here so I can work on that zipper baby"). He liked m…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:32 PM
1

If you're looking for twerps to admit their hypocrisy, don't hold your breath. They either aren't bright enough to understand that they are hypocrites, or they deny it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:24 PM
1

I'm aware; you did it again in your next comment, and with "flap's" too. Try reading more so you'll know what English actually looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:23 PM
0

No, it's about how terps act as if women have an advantage in that most of us can get laid by a fairly wide range of men any time we want, and the counter to that is- so fucking what? "Dick" is not a be-all, end-all goal for most women, no matter how horny we may be. We care more about who the dick is attached to than men care about their carrier of vag. It's not an advantage to be swimming in a sea of random but accessible dick. That doesn't mean at all that we don't like or care about sex. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:17 PM
0

No, we don't say sex doesn't matter as much to women. We say meaningless, random sex doesn't matter as much to women. Nice try, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:13 PM
-1

blowjob's whats? There are no apostrophes in plurals. Aww, illiterate twerp is mad! Turn off sub style to down vote; so kyoot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:11 PM
0

It doesn't, in the mind of any rational, decent human being. Sex is a mutual act unless you are obsessed with power dynamics like the average twerp. If you're looking for logic or anything that seems even vaguely rational, asking twerps is always going to disappoint you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:08 PM
4

Ah, again you (meaning terps) vastly overestimate the value of being used for meaningless sex to most women. When will you guys understand it means basically nothing to us that a guy is willing to fuck us? We don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 10:55 PM
-1

You didn't even read what Blue said. Men are not told their only value is in their physical attractiveness and if they are fat or "ugly", they are worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 10:53 PM
0

It's applicable to anyone who feels like they aren't getting enough dating action and wants more. You see what you want to see based on your preconceived opinions and the places you go to read things. It's very, very far from "always" telling men those things and "never" telling women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 10:51 PM
1

Are you really saying that no one but a fetishist or a desperate incel could possibly be attracted to a woman who is 100 pounds overweight? I mean, you chose to add in the asterisks for emphasis for a reason, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:55 PM
3

OK, now you're just making ignorant statements. Women absolutely do have fetishes. I promise. Now, foot fetishes- maybe not? But the wild world of fetish is broad and deep, and encompasses many, many things. Such proclamations are nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:53 PM
2

Aaand added to my search terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:50 PM
9

People are attracted to what they're attracted to. BBM porn doesn't really exist because men in porn are rarely attractive in any way regardless of weight, and those of us vag owners who watch porn are more likely to be looking for specific situations than caring about the appearance of those involved. I can only think of one male porn star I find attractive and he is older, a bit round in the middle, and mostly bald. I find chubby guys attractive in real life frequently. I've almost never seen …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:48 PM
3

Nope. TRP doesn't treat women equally to men. In fact, they constantly make a point of saying that women do not deserve to be treated as well as your bros, that they deserve to be treated with disrespect and lied to, used, and thrown away. All this is being said about women while terps pat each other on the back about how honorable they are, how loyal, how much better than women they are due to those things. So nope. This is not just wrong, it is laughably so- and just like literally every terp …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 09:40 PM
2

Absolutely, if the customer walks away feeling like they got hosed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 06:11 PM
1

Most people take consent pretty seriously. There's nothing light or jokey about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 08:05 PM
4

LOL; do you really think it reflects well on men that they might be less likely to discriminate based on learning disability? Most people would just see that as another example of men being willing to fuck anything that sits still long enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 07:02 PM
8

First off, "TBP" is not laughing at your problems. We laugh at terps when they post their silly, obviously fake "field reports". We laugh at terps pretending to be uber successful and masculine while spending hours out of every day on reddit. We do not laugh at people with learning disabilities because they have learning disabilities. Talk to your edgelord terp buddies about mocking people as autists and retards before you start trying to fling shit over the fence. Not being attracted to you is …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 06:49 PM
2

Just so you're clear, the reason why men end up in jail for it more often is because women are more seriously hurt in domestic violence situations, and by far the most often killed. Yes, no one should hit anyone, ever, and it's not funny. However, a guy who gets punched by a woman and isn't injured in any way, the most common outcome, is probably not going to call the police about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 11:38 PM
2

Let me ask you this- would you pay a woman to tell you how to get laid? Do you know any men that would? Why would you believe what she says, with your red pill view of how women think (meaning you believe they don't know what they want, so how could a woman tell you)? And most importantly- if the information came from a woman and didn't work immediately, can you accept that most men would immediately ditch their female hookup coach and deny anything she tried to teach had merit?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:54 PM
4

So 100% spot on
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:32 PM
1

Are you really trying to say that this hypothetical woman couldn't possibly sense horny desperation in a guy who is talking to her for the sole purpose of getting his dick wet? Because that is obviously what Rosie is talking about, and desperation is referred to as the stinkiest cologne for a reason. It does come across, and it is totally off-putting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:29 PM
5

Again I'll lead with the fact that your view is irrelevant to me (and I realize you are not here to have it changed), but allow me to rephrase what you just said so you can fully appreciate its silliness: "Women don't tell men how to use other women for sex, so they must not know what they want! Obviously if they knew what would get us into panties quickly and easily, they would tell us!" LOL! No. No, we mostly wouldn't. Some women do, actually, help men in exactly that way- but the majority of …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 10:22 PM
2

You have a fundamental lack of understanding about what "sexist" and "sexism" mean, therefore this post is a worthless bunch of hot air. Calling someone who happens to be a man an asshole is not saying "all men are assholes by nature of having been born male." You know, like AWALT? That's sexist. Do more reading and less typing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 11:16 PM
0

You should really spend some time actually studying psychology before you present people in abusive relationships (of any gender and with any kind of abuse) as being only a choice away from freedom. It's not that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 11:12 PM
1

Well yes, helping women avoid men who subscribe to red pill ideas is my secondary goal here, after laughing at terps. I take their lingo, their suggestions to each other, and their examples, and I share them with women in other places to help them notice the red flags and get out before they get hurt. Oh, and there's nothing subjective about the fact that using another person for your own personal gain to their detriment is wrong. Not unless you're a sociopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 11:09 PM
0

No, we have not acknowledged that "it works". Nothing categorically "works" in reference to interpersonal relations, because people are too dissimilar for simple formulas. It can work, for certain types of men with certain types of women, and when it does it creates abusive relationships. Most decent people object to abuse. Mental and emotional neglect and abuse is not any better than physical abuse, and some terps openly support rape. The real question is, why would any thinking person think tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 11:07 PM
3

You will not find that anywhere on the blue pill sub, in any form, or even close. I would love you to post even one example that says anything close to that- I know you won't. You'll just downvote me and not respond, or respond with something useless. That is your most pathetic straw man yet, Pem, and that's really saying something considering how many you have collected here. There actually is nothing called "blue pill theory", so wherever you think you saw it is nonsense. Literally all we say …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 11:00 PM
6

Yes Bastard, you love rape. We know. It's boring at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 10:57 PM
3

They actually believe women are so irrational and incapable of thought that we don't know what we want, so we basically live in some constant state of unhappiness with what we have and want something else, something "better" (hypergamy)- but all because we "lie" about what makes us happy. Yeah. It's as stupid as it sounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 10:55 PM
2

LOL! If there is any "pleasing women" going on in a terp's life, it is entirely incidental. If it infringed upon his own pleasure- or even his convenience- it would not happen. Terps constantly post that women are responsible for their own pleasure and men shouldn't go out of their way to be good in bed (or to cater to her feelings/needs, as this post is not as much about sex as I initially thought). Being good in bed and a caring, empathetic husband/boyfriend would keep a woman without having t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 10:47 PM
5

Seriously; if you are more carefully coiffed than I am, we're not going to get along.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 09:24 PM
4

I couldn't care less about your view, but I personally cannot tell the difference between expensive men's clothes and off the rack discount stuff. When I say style, I mean a man who knows how his clothes should fit and looks like he gives a shit about his appearance. It doesn't cost a lot to have a decent haircut or to manscape a little so it looks like you tried. There's a line though, where you can look like you care too much, and that's as unattractive as not caring at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 09:19 PM
1

Prove it isn't; we can wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 11:01 PM
6

They don't know any other way to view things after awhile, which is really the saddest part. To really accept red pill dogma, you have to completely lose all belief in what makes love worthwhile and turn your relationships into a constant power struggle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 11:00 PM
1

I was about to say, people with healthy Dom/sub dynamics understand that only submission offered freely and with enthusiastic consent means anything. I'm glad you threw in the sarcasm disclaimer, because usually your comments are agreeable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 10:57 PM
3

Uh oh... terps aren't gonna like this. They really don't want to have to admit why they enjoy sex with people who aren't that into it, at least, not the ones who post here. I'm getting some popcorn ready to read these comments for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 10:47 PM
2

So that's a no, along with your subreddit-blocked downvote; gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 08:12 PM
3

Seems like maybe you slept through middle school science class; do yourself a favor and Google "burden of proof in scientific method" before you respond any more. Oh, and downvoting is against subreddit rules there, "alpha" ;) P.S. What you are doing is called "Shifting the burden", defined as "Fallacious shifting of the burden of proof occurs if someone makes a claim that needs justification, then demands that the opponent justify the opposite of the claim. The opponent has no such burden until…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 08:05 PM
1

The person making the claim is on the hook for the evidence to back it up, not the person refuting the claim. This is basic stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:50 PM
1

They can be discussed abstractly, but they cannot be debated, which is what OP is addressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:47 PM
2

So many "jokes"; so few citations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:44 PM
0

Gosh, could you post even one of those surveys? That would be super.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:43 PM
1

The problem is, you have never had a sample of 150k men saying one thing. I doubt you could even find an example of 10,000 people from your sub actually saying the same thing at the same time, which changes the veracity of your arguments significantly. Your subscriber list does not equal advocacy for whatever anyone from TRP chooses to say- especially considering a lot of those are just there for the lulz. Aww, big bad terp mod downvotes without responding when shown to be wrong; how adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:42 PM
4

I disagree. There is no way to word a lot of things red pill says about women in a way that is actually "nice".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:39 PM
4

Zero, if you were pushing the same ideas under "nicer" wording. There's no way to justify treating adult women like children, or manipulating them for your own ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:38 PM
11

LOL! That is the essence of debate. If you don't have any citation for your claims, they are nothing but anecdote and opinion, which is basically worthless from a debate standpoint. There is no "debate" of opinions. That's called arguing, not debating. I just noticed your last line- as people who identify as "blue pill" generally have no ideology to defend beyond "everyone deserves to be treated with basic respect as a person" and "equality is preferable to inequality", obviously the people with…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 07:37 PM
1

I figured there was a reason I liked your comments. I have no problem with the self-improvement part of TRP. Anyone can benefit from taking care of themselves, broadening their horizons, and naturally those things can boost confidence and improve the way people perceive you. I don't even disagree that people can be happy in more "traditional" type relationships; hell, I'm more "traditional" than most of my women friends personally. I'm not against that type of dynamic by any means- I just think …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 07:02 PM
2

I have to ask; how do you identify?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:43 PM
2

Of course; that's one of the many reasons it's absurd to assume you can categorize an entire gender. What is OK in a relationship is what has been agreed upon between those involved in the relationship, nothing more or less than that. To speak to your example, it's perfectly OK for a married person to go to a club of any kind that they have told their spouse they're going to and their spouse is OK with, end of, regardless of how other people might handle their own spouse. It is not OK to lie to …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:36 PM
1

Exactly; it's not really a gendered term. "Adult child" just calls up images of creepy diaper fetishes and whatnot, so we end up using man/woman instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 05:16 PM
5

Uh, it's exactly the same behaviors, exhibited by a woman. A person that expects someone else to handle all the adult responsibility. A person who doesn't consider others when they do things. A person who pouts and whines when they don't get what they want. "Man/womanchild" is precisely the same thing, no matter who's doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 05:14 PM
2

The vast majority of women do not use abortion as a standard birth control method, and the very idea that they do is anti-choice propaganda of the worst kind. There is zero data to support it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:41 PM
4

I've actually said as much as OP states in many of my own comments, but of course the idea of refusing easy sex for logical reasons gets down voted every time. Any opinion that involves a man getting less sex for any reason goes over like a lead balloon anywhere terps hang out. Not very rational, but of course we can't expect rationality from people who have vilified half the world's population.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:38 PM
2

Making abortion illegal doesn't stop it or even slow it down. It just causes more people to die. This is fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:35 PM
3

It's cute how people try to pretend they're not saying they'd rather let children, completely innocent children, and even children who share their DNA starve than help their mothers. The mothers they liked enough to fuck, at least once. Children totally deserve to go without and suffer rather than inconvenience a man, according to terps.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:34 PM
7

So, the pregnant woman is categorically a slut, but we should stop shaming men? You're some piece of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:25 PM
3

Oh, haven't you heard? Single mothers are literally the scum of the earth, because they all chose to become single mothers to take advantage of men, either directly through child support or indirectly from their hard-earned taxes (obviously only men pay those). They're never abandoned; the fathers can't be deadbeats.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:17 PM
4

Oh sure, because guys never, ever stick their dick in crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:15 PM
3

No, they don't. Feminism is about freedom of choice. You can choose "female imperative" however you see it because you have the freedom to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 10:13 PM
1

1) Because it's a natural human reaction, regardless of whether it is rational. 2) Because often that person was well aware they were cheating with someone, may have even been an acquaintance of the spouse, and that means they were being directly disrespectful in the worst way possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:24 PM
7

Ah yes, because one post by someone most of us have never heard of, that got minimal attention and was subsequently removed, is so comparable to hundreds or thousands of misogynistic posts, some of which blatantly endorse abuse and rape, that are not removed. Oh, you guys just tried too hard with this one. It only makes you look even more ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:00 PM
13

Would you stop being so ridiculously obtuse? Literally everyone who doesn't identify as red pill is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:57 PM
8

Because "we" don't give a fuck about what that person has to say, as "we" are not a group with shared ideology beyond contempt for people like you. "We" aren't "we". "We" are everyone except you. It's blatantly asinine to pretend otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:54 PM
17

Oh, so it's just TBP who uses "more severe and emotive language than is appropriate"? You might want to talk to your terp bros about the absolutely drama-laden language they're using to describe the post in question here, lest ye seem even more silly and hypocritical than usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:51 PM
5

Sure, tell yourself whatever you want; I'll never suggest anyone manipulate their partner for their own benefit, and I'll never say it's OK to get someone drunk to have sex with them, so this blue will always be better than any red.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:44 PM
4

I promise it's not nearly as fun as all the melodramatic hand-wringing and whining from the red side; seriously. You guys let people post literally endorsing rape, and then you try to act like this one person's opinion that barely anyone else on the sub cares about is some kind of moral victory for you. It could not be more pathetic or funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:40 PM
5

Yes, because one post that is barely upvoted is so valid. The way you guys are drooling over this is awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:35 PM
10

Yeah, and this one post with barely any upvotes is totally "lots of posts" too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:32 PM
8

It has all of 29 upvotes. It's an extremely unusual post for the sub. I don't see how it even matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:32 PM
5

Oh I'm not worried, per se. I'm more or less spying. I just take what I see there and repackage it for women to read in other places, complete with quotes, screenshots, and the whole shebang. I talk one on one with women who are worried men they're seeing might be trying to game them in some way, help them recognize the signs, and get away. And I love nothing about reddit more than the fact that you guys are bothered by that ♥
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:19 PM
0

Good job on you throwing in that "violently and forcefully" so you can slip by all the suggestions for getting women too drunk to think straight in order to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:12 PM
-3

And yet here you are, defending yourself- if you actually didn't care, you wouldn't post on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:10 PM
0

The difference being of course that the main, central points of red pill ideology are toxic and hateful, and the people who embody those traits in most other groups are the fringe instead of the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:09 PM
2

So the tens of thousands of untested rape kits sitting in police stations across the US hasn't led you to the conclusion that being "proactive" and seeking "actual, legal justice" sometimes- often even- doesn't do a damned thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:15 PM
1

So you would tell your daughter that, then? That men shouting lewd remarks at her in the street is something she should just ignore, because nothing can be done?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:11 PM
3

You do realize that fire alarm thing happened one time, right? Just so you're clear. Once.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:09 PM
1

I think if the only thing you care about is the path of least resistance, you're probably correct. However, I would personally not be happy in a relationship where I always had to make assumptions- especially that my partner was more or less simpleminded- and no communication over things like sharing chores or desire for sex took place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:01 PM
3

You can't expect anything better, really; you have to take everything in this sub with a big dose of humor. The most important thing is to pick out specific behaviors that are mentioned here and on trp so you can call them out when you see them elsewhere and help others avoid people like them. I know you guys don't like that I do that, but I love when you remind me how much you don't like it; downvote me harder, you wusses.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:05 PM
7

You... you do realize that's not an actual fact, right? It's not backed up by any type of scientific consensus or even citable evidence. It's just some shit people made up. It's a "rule" the way that bad things always happen in threes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:52 PM
1

But you're here backing up a person who is making the argument that women literally can't be FA. So which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:48 PM
1

If you actually have no standards, you wouldn't call any woman "disgusting".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:41 PM
7

You do realize that shallow interactions with no feelings involved do not alleviate loneliness, right? Being used for sex doesn't make women feel any better than paying for sex or buying a bride would for a man. It's not like you don't know, no matter how much denial you try to have, that you were nothing but a hole to that guy who never calls.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:39 PM
1

The red pill is not going to do anything good for you. I suggest you disconnect from their toxic bullshit while you still can, if it's not too late. Oh, we're actually on PPD, not FA. Well, in that case, I rebut that you are not here to have your view changed because you are refusing to accept what anyone else has to say. You don't care that the women you're talking about don't necessarily want casual sex with "chad" or whomever, meaning that is not a benefit and does not make them any less alon…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:20 PM
1

That shit honestly bothers me. I always wonder how those same people would feel if people took gay characters and made fan fiction about them being straight. I think the gay incest fanfic of Supernatural is probably the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:07 PM
2

Tumblr can be super dumb, because Jessica obviously loves the D.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:06 PM
3

I'd love to see your info on them having the least sex, because I can counter it with info that states they have the most orgasms during sex. "How dare you ask me to provide citation for my claims! I am red pill man and above such trivialities! I'm going to downvote you against sub rules!" ~alreadyredschool
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:01 PM
3

How often do you really think a woman is actually abusive with an initial rejection? Now, if you're talking about some drunk chick at a college party as OP seems to be, they might laugh in your face and be rude- but they're drunk. If you're expecting polite behavior from drunk people, you're going to find a lot more disappointments. Sober people will most often try to be nice at first. They will say they don't feel chemistry, that they're liking someone else, any number of excuses- and often, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:02 PM
6

The "harm" is subjective, and you can't ask women (or anyone, really) in general to not live their lives the way they want to because it makes some men who can't get laid sad when they're not doing anything ethically wrong- honest promiscuity is perfectly ethical. Only lying to be promiscuous is wrong. Lots of things can "hurt" people. Driving flashy, expensive cars could "hurt" people who are super into cars but can't afford one. Being in a relationship with someone could "hurt" everyone else w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 10:50 PM
1

I don't think I have ever missed anyone flirting with me, or anyone flirting with anyone else in my general vicinity for that matter; I can smell horny intentions like a fart in a car. I think maybe I've had someone being oblivious to my flirting before, but back when it would have mattered I would have just been more obvious because I had no shame. I have definitely been accused of flirting when I was just being nice/helpful, more so when I was younger than recently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 06:10 PM
1

She has complete 100% physical burden, risk, and responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 05:08 PM
3

Yeah, because fucking random women you can't even trust to tell you if they get pregnant is such civilized behavior. Take some responsibility!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 05:01 PM
1

The novelty is long gone, but the responsibility to young women coming up now never will be; every one I save is a victory.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 11:03 PM
2

Downvotes from terps are my absolute favorite. Literally nothing is more pathetic, beta behavior on reddit than turning off subreddit style to downvote someone because your jimmies got rustled. Makes me giggle every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 11:01 PM
1

Honestly, if I ever saw a valid argument from a terp- meaning, one not based on a personal story we have no way of knowing is true, something with unbiased citation- I would be too shocked to be insulting. Fortunately, that day has yet to come, and I mostly post here for fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:58 PM
2

I'm so very shocked that zero terps had the cajones to reply to this. Seriously. My face may get stuck in ubershocked mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:50 PM
1

Yes, the way people treat you is totally in a sealed bubble and is never, ever affected by the way you treat them. Keep telling yourself that until your lonely, bitter death.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:49 PM
-1

If you have an actual, signed contract stating a person will consent to sex however often, you'd have legal ground (possibly, there is precedent for throwing out contracts on the basis of being unreasonable and infringing on their actual rights, meaning making someone agree to something illegal will not stand in court). Promising not to cheat- "forsaking all others" is the standard verbiage- is actually part of most marriage contracts. Frequency of sex is not, therefore lacking that aforemention…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:42 PM
1

Do you feel the same way about people who smoke, people who drink to excess, and people who don't eat healthily while still being thin due to high metabolism? Those people are just as unhealthy as someone with a high BMI, they just don't physically appear so. That is the difference between caring about health and just being superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:31 PM
1

Ultimately, it really doesn't fucking matter. Someone's worth is not affected by their weight. What you do with your life is all that matters, and someone who helps others and is a good person while weighing 400 pounds is far more valuable than an asshole who treats others like shit based on their appearance, no matter their BMI. The only people who think otherwise are uselessly shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:21 PM
1

Right, because they know others would find them disgusting for saying so, or at least very stupid. This is why I focus on the specific behaviors to help women identify and distance themselves from red pillers. The bright side of that is, even if the guy never heard of red pill, the behaviors are shitty enough that they deserve it either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:10 PM
-2

That would be a very, very poor idea. Penalizing someone for not giving consent to sex would absolutely never stand in a court. There is no consequence for exercising bodily autonomy, as it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:08 PM
0

Some states have no option for a "faulted" divorce, regardless of abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:06 PM
1

I think what the disagreeing people meant is that universities should take action to remove rapists from campus as well as police handling the investigation, but that might just be my hopefulness speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:04 PM
1

I disagree- I think most of us understand you just fine. Where we differ is in reaction- you seem to think "all's fair" when it comes to getting your dicks wet, and we don't think it's OK to use people or to manipulate and dispose of people regardless of who does it or what their justification for being that kind of terrible person might be. You think that not having a simple answer to your "problem" is the same as not understanding it, when that's simply not the case. Looking for simple answers…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:58 PM
2

Some people can be "held down and kicked" and not hold all of humanity responsible, thereby becoming a bitter, cynical person who cares only for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:52 PM
7

Well, "respect" isn't just one thing to everyone, but I think most rational people understand that there are levels of respect. The idea of being considerate and treating others as you would be treated is the base level of respect, the kind of treatment every decent person offers everyone else on the basis of them being a human being. There are deeper/higher levels of respect, such as one might have for someone very accomplished in their field, an authority figure, or someone they love in some w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:44 PM
1

I find pretty much none of this surprising- especially how those who identify as red did not have consensus in many areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:31 PM
3

Likewise; I find it very sexy. The security to admit another man is sexually attractive or openly discuss homosexual thoughts or fantasies is relatively rare and extremely refreshing. I'm not even one of these young things either; creeping up on 40 more quickly than I like to think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 01:05 AM
2

To you. Not to me. Not to anyone I know personally, and only in older books or books that refer to a more sexually repressed time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 12:25 AM
6

Maybe those men should discourage other men from being pieces of shit, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 12:03 AM
2

And yet, you think that is all the fault of the mothers doing what they can on their own instead of the fathers who more often than not choose to be deadbeats with no contact to avoid providing any financial support.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:34 PM
2

You think a woman having any priority other than you makes them a horrible partner, apparently. Not everyone shares your massive ego, desperate need for attention, or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:32 PM
2

Bullshit. Plenty of people who pay taxes vote to have those tax dollars used to benefit the people instead of themselves only.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:29 PM
1

No, they just don't have anywhere to go where people will agree with all their ridiculous, one-sided stories and confirm that their problems are the fault of some system, some other person, anyone but themselves. People seeking an echo chamber aren't really looking to solve problems, but to make themselves feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:23 PM
-5

This is a lovely strawman full of bullshit. Fake quotes are less than worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 12:37 AM
-2

Prove it. Sounds like total bullshit. No one would ever tell you that getting in better shape or broadening your horizons to take on new interests is "fake". That, or you talk to incredibly stupid people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 12:36 AM
-5

Just be yourself works for anyone who isn't a self-absorbed jackass, basically. By "works" I don't mean "gets them whatever they want"- because no one gets whatever they want, not Chad Thundercock and not the most smokin HB10 lady on the planet. People who imagine this is the case are the reason why the cliche about not comparing your behind the scenes action to everyone else's highlight reel exists. What I mean by "works" is "most likely to attract someone who is actually compatible to themselv…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 12:34 AM
1

If you full on lie to someone about how strongly you feel about them and the type of relationship you're seeking in order to get laid, you tricked them into having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 09:46 PM
2

Mostly because you guys are the ones saying that if a woman makes you wait for sex, you should next her because she thinks you're beta. You're the ones that believe you should be able to get any woman on the first night if she's really attracted to you. How can you not see this post is supposed to illustrate the lack of logic in what you advocate?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 10:17 PM
3

Where is your polling data? You made the original claim, and I bet you don't have any either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 10:15 PM
6

It's definitely a myth; I fooled around with my husband pretty much from Day 1 and here we are, 17 years later.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 10:04 PM
2

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 09:57 PM
2

If someone I was dating got nosy with my friends about me in that way- not in the "what does she like because I want to know what to get her for her birthday" way, obviously- when I wasn't there or something like that, they would laugh at him and tell him to talk to me; I wouldn't have friends that would react any other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 09:57 PM
2

The answer is "do whatever the fuck you want, because you don't want to LTR a man like that anyway".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 09:52 PM
1

So being an asshole is a weapon to you? That's pretty revealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 08:42 PM
5

No, it isn't. There is a lot of difference between "not being a doormat" and "wishing rape and death on someone who rejects you", or even "insulting and attempting to belittle someone who rejects you". Being a doormat or not has literally nothing to do with the Nice GuyTM label.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 08:35 PM
2

Some women are repulsed by "submissive" men, and for some women they are ideal. Any time you base a premise on such a sweeping generality, you're going to be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 08:32 PM
1

The delusions you guys have are almost as cute as a basket of puppies... being drowned in a river.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:49 PM
1

We definitely understand the point of analogies, and that's why ones that liken women to objects are considered disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:45 PM
1

Legality doesn't make you any less gross and predatory, but justify yourself however you choose! That hamster needs exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:43 PM
1

Aww, you think Leo DiCaprio is skinny; that's so adorable. Where did this double chin come from then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:36 PM
3

One of my guy friends posted a dumbass meme like that just a couple of days ago! It had a picture of one of the rapist teachers and a caption along the lines of "why couldn't I get this lucky?" I've never seen a woman say anything remotely like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:15 PM
3

Aww, the guy with the separate account for terp crap is worried about his internet points!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:12 PM
4

Maybe you'll be the genius who can finally tell me what rights that men don't have, so there's a need for "men's rights activists". If you're going to bother to respond, please make sure you are familiar with what rights are so that we don't have to go through the whole "family court/'divorce rape'/homelessness" and whatever else nonsense; it's very old by this point and I'm not interested in explaining to another willfully ignorant person the difference between personal biases and documented, l…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:59 AM
2

You should perhaps read the comment that a response is responding to; you just agreed that TRP is a cult as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:47 AM
2

I'm glad to see that you agree TRP promotes cultish behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:46 AM
4

This is a stupid place to post this question. I'm not one of those mods and I refuse to speculate about their motivations. I'm not even subbed anywhere with "feminism" in the name, actually. I see that you wanted to have a little hissy fit and I guess you're entitled to it because this post isn't being removed, but as the current top comment points out, TRP also bans dissenters very quickly. That's how subreddits (and Facebook groups*) work. Whining about it is childish and pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:42 AM
1

Way too few details to make any kind of judgement. On the few details you've assigned and without any other context, it doesn't seem like a believable story. However, it's also a rather ridiculous story and I don't see how it's relevant to anything. Oh, I'm a woman who is more or less heteroromantic so I would be talking about a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 07:58 PM
24

It's more similar to the way women used to stay in miserable marriages (well, used to more often; we still do it) where they were being abused and neglected to make sure their kids would be financially OK than it is any indication of what a woman truly wants with freedom to choose- and of course, that's why terpers hate the fact that women do, in fact, have that freedom now and wish they could take it away. Women don't want that role of the "war bride"; they just made the best of it that they co…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 07:51 PM
2

They're really that upset about having proof that they are wrong put directly in their faces where they can't avoid it. Me, I never open my reddit inbox. I used to middle-click it into the next tab and then close the tab without looking when it maxed out at 25, just to make the notification go away. Since they started keeping actual count of your inbox though, I've decided it's way more entertaining to see the numbers add up. I check context on the comments that I think may have interesting resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 01:32 AM
3

The slogan for Barbie last I noticed (meaning when I was the age to have them) was "We girls can do anything; right Barbie?" which means they were presenting those dolls as symbols of actual goals little girls could attain. I don't remember my Masters of the Universe collection having that sort of advertising, and I had the He-man and She-Ra collections both.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 09:31 PM
2

And in your bizarro universe, there are only "skinny" and "fat". We can totally tell you get out a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 09:29 PM
5

Yup; I even posted some handy-dandy infographics in my top level comment for anyone wondering if we're right or how exactly she is impossible. A Barbie to scale would be stuck on all fours, unable to hold up her head, missing half her liver and most of her intestines, and have wrists too delicate to carry any weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 09:28 PM
4

You're "ridiculous" if you think having a preference for anything but skinny is a "fetish". Don't think you're being clever in your wording; you're about as subtle as a jackhammer. Edited to use a less insulting word, lest anyone get butthurt
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:43 PM
3

Have superhero toys ever been marketed with the slogan "We Can Do Anything!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:42 PM
2

YES! To scale, her head would be 22" and her waist would be 16" LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:41 PM
6

Especially Bratz, and I kinda agree on those.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:38 PM
6

You've never met anyone with a real "Barbie build", because her measurements to scale are impossible. Yay! More butthurt terp downvotes to facts they don't want to hear; my absolute favorite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:37 PM
9

She's not anything even approaching "fat"; she's just moderately more realistic than traditional Barbie. Traditional Barbie is built to literally impossible measurements. Anyone who thinks a normal body is "encouraging obesity" is flat out retarded. This Barbie won't encourage obesity because it doesn't show obesity. The old Barbie could, and did, present an unachievable standard of "beauty" to little girls, but I think most little girls figured that out pretty quickly and I don't think they hur…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:28 PM
18

Why didn't you care when Kanye was calling her a whore first? Is that not also revenge gossip and badmouthing your ex on social media? Do you have a delusion that she posted that out of nowhere, in response to nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 06:37 PM
9

Because they may claim that outside their little hugbox, but I've read too many posts on TRP directly that refer to plates not knowing they are plates- which means they haven't been informed he is dating/fucking other people, and how it's OK for men to cheat if they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 01:27 AM
4

Another woman who is attracted to genuinely nerdy, awkward men here; I don't even mind taking a back seat to his obsessions sometimes, because a man who is passionate about something intellectual turns me on something fierce. Terps don't see this as real because their self-perceived "intelligence" is mostly a combination of confirmation bias and Dunning-Kruger effect, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 07:24 PM
11

I can't answer on behalf of a whole gender, unlike people who imagine they can, but I personally do not do that. My only issue is people who do those things dishonestly, and I have that problem with men, women, and any other gender identity imaginable. I think people are free to pursue any relationship dynamics they choose with fully informed, consenting partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 07:07 PM
3

From a digital marketplace. Amazon is not the only one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 07:17 PM
11

There's literally no context in which "While walking to my place, I realized how drunk she was. In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she legally couldn’t give her consent. It didn’t help matters that I was sober, but I can’t say I cared or even hesitated. I won’t rationalize my actions, but having sex is what I do." could look any better. It's also not the only time he advocates rape quite clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 07:15 PM
6

They're not trying to make anything illegal; they just want Amazon to remove the books. It's a perfectly valid thing to petition, and it won't stop any other platform that sells them from doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 07:14 PM
4

Yeah, you're sneaking that "lying about it" bit in yourself, though, and that's the only part that could be considered wrong. Oh, and a quote from one person doesn't prove anything by any standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:32 PM
1

I'm sure that's exactly how you'd feel after spending some time in prison, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:57 PM
3

Then he needs to find someone who is as into anal as he is, not coerce reluctant partners with threats of being dumped.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:56 PM
5

As she said repeatedly, only if they are pressuring partners who don't want to do it into it because of the obsession. You guys really seem to take issue with "enthusiastic consent"- meaning both partners are really into what is happening, not one partner getting their kinks satisfied while the other suffers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:52 PM
2

Some people genuinely don't like it though, and some people would rather not receive it, and that's totally fine as long as that's the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:51 PM
4

It doesn't have to be if both partners are OK with it not being reciprocal. Obviously. It's when the person who isn't receiving isn't happy about it that it becomes a problem. Also obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:49 PM
8

They have this absolutely absurd impression that a woman would never do anything they didn't actually enjoy when they are young/immature and 1) trying to pretend they are more experienced than they are or 2) trying desperately to keep a guy who is bad for her because she doesn't know better yet or 3) are actually experimenting and decide later that particular experiment, lets say anal for the sake of argument, was not pleasurable and don't want to do it anymore. Red pill guys apparently want wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:47 PM
3

Nope. False, assumptive generalization. I don't think anyone should do anything sexually that they don't want to do, regardless of gender. However, men who expect oral sex and don't want to give it make me laugh, because they're ridiculous- and so are women who feel the same way. Expecting something you're unwilling to give is always amusing. You typed an awful lot over something you're completely wrong about, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:34 PM
1

Yeah, but how much right to protest does that first mate have before it's called a "shit test"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 10:58 PM
6

Yeah, that's a really bad analogy. Bill Gates isn't in love with those African kids and they don't live together in a home they share.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 10:54 PM
2

No, you shouldn't do things for people expecting them to do things back, and that is not nice. However, in a romantic relationship if one person is doing all the giving, it's a bad relationship whether the giver gets upset about it or not. You don't actually have to be aware of it to be taken advantage of, and if your relationships really went the way you claimed, you were completely justified in feeling like there was no mutual concern going on. It was right that it bothered you, because it ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 10:34 PM
1

Your comment reads like your entire relationship experience has come from TV and movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:03 PM
1

And you want to be that guy for whom a woman might do something that makes her uncomfortable; what does that say about you that your primary sexual motivation has nothing to do with your partner's pleasure? You seem to have some seriously egocentric issues that need working out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:00 PM
4

If you think anyone should perform a sex act for you for any reason except enthusiastic interest, there is something deeply wrong with you and I hope you have a therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:58 PM
11

Because wanting super hot, super young virgins is men's prerogative, but a woman having standards of attractiveness is hypergamy!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:56 PM
4

Literally everyone's relationship woes are their own faults. If terps could accept this, none of these subs would exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:55 PM
1

Yup, 100% agreed. No one owes anyone anything, outside of parents and children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:53 PM
2

So quit making the effort; no one will miss you, and that's why you're really salty. You know that no one really cares if you make an effort. You know that any woman you want has other options, and it makes you mad. Poor, pitiful you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:52 PM
1

So, women are "dumb as shit" for fucking really hot men because they can't date them, but men would feel lucky to get just a fuck out of a really hot woman far out of their league? You're that sure that no women just wanna have sex with hot people and it's always about trying to lock him down? Because I've had sex with people whose last names I never bothered to learn- because they were hot, because I was horny. I had no regret. All of this is just sour grapes doused in salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:49 PM
2

It's adorable how you can't make a comment without a baseless strawman or anecdote that you seem to think proves something. You might just be my favorite.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:47 PM
2

So get on your bros about being more picky; that's the only thing that could possibly change here. It has fuckall to do with women that many men have no standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:45 PM
6

It's totally impossible that someone might try something and then decide they don't want to do it anymore, right? It's also totally impossible that when someone is younger and more naive, they might be coerced into doing things they'd rather not, because they don't want to be "childish" or they want to seem wild and sexy. Obviously no one's sexual desires change as they age and discover what actually works for them in bed, so they change what they are willing to do. It must all be about the alph…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:43 PM
4

I'm not at all surprised to find no rebuttal to this- good job!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:32 PM
6

It never did. Society that kept women from earning their own way inspired literally nothing but dependence. Dependence due to lack of choices- not love, respect, or loyalty. I suppose to some, it's more or less the same. I personally would rather have someone want to be with me than need to be with me, but I'm an emotionally mature adult who respects the feelings of others and doesn't expect anyone to give me anything, regardless of what I offer them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:28 PM
7

The entire idea of Christian Grey makes me want to vomit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:21 PM
2

The entire premise here is just gross. Don't do anything you don't want to for anyone, no matter what gender you/they are, and don't blame others if you choose to do things you don't really want to do expecting certain outcomes that were never implied or promised. Stop pretending anyone owes you anything just because you want something. No matter what you do, no one has to give you sex or love or anything in response. TRP doesn't destroy anything except the basic human decency and relationships …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:18 PM
1

Yes. Blue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:55 PM
8

Yes, and in greater proportions at literally every age level.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:15 PM
5

I had a 23 year old man literally throwing himself at me when I was 34 and temporarily separated; like, to the point where I had to cut off even friendly contact because he was showing up at my apartment, standing in my driveway calling me over and over trying to get me to let him in. This is after telling him very clearly from the day I met him that I wasn't looking to get involved with anyone, and I just wanted friends to hang out, smoke weed, and play video games with. I have no idea what att…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:09 PM
5

You mean, women who use OKCupid prefer dominant men? Women who are looking for submissive men do so on Fetlife or other sites.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 08:58 PM
2

You most likely don't view every conversation you have as a power struggle for who is most alpha in every exchange, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 08:10 PM
1

Tell me; how do you feel about vaccines? I'm genuinely fascinated by this line of reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 08:04 PM
4

They are very careful to word their claims in such a way as to be able to move the goalposts easily when faced with refuting evidence, and when called out for their deliberate vagueness and failure to argue from an honest claim, they insist we don't "understand comparisons" or that they're "talking the way men talk, and we can't understand". Attempting to debate with a terp is like "debating" with a confirmed theist; they've made up their minds, nothing will sway them, and their lack of proof do…
/r/ExRedPill07/01/16 11:27 PM
2

There are single women who use dating apps who get it practically every day. Either it's more than 5%, or that 5% is really, really busy on those apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:43 PM
2

I think it's a roaring good time; I love seeing how fast my comments go to zero after I post them. It's completely adorable. I can't think of anything less an example of detached, amused mastery than going to the effort of downvoting someone in a sub that has it disabled by default just because they pointed out the holes in your argument or called you on your bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:39 PM
2

No one responds to "I feel down about this" with "you're not owed anything", and your utterly dishonest euphemisms fool no one. People respond with "you're not owed anything" to comments like "all girls are stupid sluts who only like assholes and not nice guys like me" and things of that nature- and that is a very mild example of the vitriol women see even when they very politely reject a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:33 PM
-1

So, the only way to "say anything" is to throw a temper tantrum and call the woman who rejected him a stupid, fat slut? Please. Fucking ridiculous. And being told he's being a childish moron for saying those things is the same being "not allowed" to say the childish, moronic things? Also ridiculous. You're allowed to say what you want. People are allowed to respond to what you say how they want. Your freedom of speech doesn't come with a qualifier of receptive audience. People who think that way…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:25 PM
1

The line she was responding to was precisely the same kind of comment! Are you butthurt because she used fewer words to express her conflicting personal experience? The original comment was a sweeping generalization and she responded in kind. You're ridiculous with these walls of text.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:08 PM
7

Who is stopping "lonely nice guys" from publicly complaining about anything? It's just so much melodrama when you act like receiving negative response is being prohibited from doing something. "Lol no, you're single because you're a creep/because you cling/because you're ugly/whatever mean thing someone might say" is not the same as being forcibly silenced; it's just childish to equate the two. "Post-wall career women" are just as liable to receive negative responses when they bitch about being …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:54 PM
4

All you need is a small loan of a million dollars and you too can be a success!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:44 PM
5

I think it's ridiculous that prostitution is illegal, as that only makes it more dangerous for everyone involved, and I think it should be legalized and regulated for safety just like every other industry. The shame comes from that feeling that you have to pay for it because you can't get a woman who likes you without paying for it and plenty of other men can, which I understand. I think it was a lesser concern back when women by and large did not fuck outside of marriage unless they were prosti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:35 PM
5

How is it, exactly? Did she commit a crime she's being forgiven for because she's female? Do you think a woman celebrity who did the same with a 14 year old boy would not receive the same ridicule?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:06 AM
8

Either weak trolling or sincere insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:02 AM
1

Even if she were 17 and not 14, that dude is fucking gross for trying to hit on her. I don't know if she has grounds for a lawsuit, but that's her prerogative if she wants, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:01 AM
11

Ah, so what we should shoot for is "better than the worst case scenario" instead of "pursuit of happiness". Makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:58 PM
2

Mine doesn't; you jealous?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:56 PM
8

right, because a gilded cage isn't a cage after all
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:54 PM
-1

At least half of which are laughing at you and crossposting what you say other places for other people's amusement and fair warning- just so you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:38 PM
2

Reductio ad absurdum is their bread and butter; no matter how many times it gets pointed out, they never stop. It's funny and ironic, because they generally try to claim they're playing the most likely odds ("of course not AWALT but most WALT and all women can be LT" lol) while constantly using these highly uncommon examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:28 PM
1

Sometimes I wonder why they don't see how immature and irrational it is to think they can engineer a relationship in a way that guarantees it won't turn into a disaster, let alone be successful*. I a letter before the terps got butthurt and started downvoting against the rules xD I can always come here for that boost, thanks "alphas" LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:20 PM
0

Yes, because the mental stability of drug addicts is so indicative of the majority of the population. I need to just make a reductio ad absurdum bot to respond to the asinine examples for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:18 PM
6

In a perfect world, no one would. But most often those families with kids are started in a relationship full of "happy feelz" with the full commitment of everyone involved, and then things change for whatever reason; there are no guarantees in life. There aren't even any near-guarantees. That's one of the funniest things about TRP in my opinion; this illusion that they can somehow mitigate the risk of getting into a relationship when there's simply no way to predict the future. It's actually ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:29 PM
2

He's into you, but only for what sex he can get with as little effort on his part as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:17 PM
6

There's always the option of putting time, effort, and care into your marriage so it doesn't fall apart in 10 years, but I guess that's too much to ask, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:14 PM
6

It's absolutely asinine to point to divorce rates as indicative of anything except increased options; do you think all the marriages that used to stay together did so because they were good, happy ones? Oh, hell no. They stayed together because women were treated like failures if they got divorced, and they had very few options financially without a man in the house to be the breadwinner. They stayed together because a woman who had been divorced was considered tarnished and would have difficult…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:06 PM
5

If a relationship is working on one partner's terms more than the other, it isn't working at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:01 PM
8

I like people who communicate like adults and treat me with respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:58 PM
4

If he never gives any indication of rp bullshit, he's not rp enough to matter. By spreading their lingo and their suggested behaviors- for instance, if your man gets up and leaves while you are trying to discuss something with him he doesn't want to talk about, and then refuses to tell you where he went or what he was doing, things like that- we help women to identify and purge the influence from their lives. It's never "too late". Each mistake is a learning experience. Oh, and it's really, real…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:51 PM
5

Disinterest is not being despised; the rejected person invents that in their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:32 PM
3

Yes, what's really important is your delusions of grandeur; thanks for the laughs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:31 PM
6

Agreed; I'd say about 2/3rds of the people I call friends are men I don't find sexually attractive, and at least half of those are men I never found sexually attractive. I'm quite sure I'm not that special and unique in this regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:29 PM
5

Bullshit. I have, and have always had, plenty of male friends I was not attracted to sexually, and I am only kind to people when I don't want to be as employment- monetary compensation is required. The rest of the time, if I don't want to pay attention to you, I'll ignore you. If you make an ass out of yourself because of it, I'll be mean to you until you leave me alone. I don't care who knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:25 PM
13

I don't despise "beta" or "incel" men, but just because I am a woman my general indifference to them is seen as such, because if I don't give a man sex that must mean I hate and disrespect him. Even if I were to speak of a friend who I know is sad due to being incel and acknowledge that I do have sympathy for him, it would be discounted by terp standards unless I give him sex, or help him get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:20 PM
2

To be fair, it sort of is if you're talking about the perspective of someone under 25; 35-45 seems quite "old" to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:16 AM
0

So... you're saying that not dating or having sex with a man for whatever reason is "punishing" and "banishing" them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:14 AM
1

Yes, because when it comes to learning, the only thing to take into consideration is the monetary prospects of the associated industry; people who study subjects that truly interest them and they have a passion for are fools! Ugh. That's why I support B.I.; a person's worth isn't measured in how much money they can earn and we weren't meant to little more than cogs in the machine of capitalism. Wrong sub for quasi-socialist rants, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:11 AM
4

I think the entire idea of "masculinity" or "femininity" crises is rooted in outdated gender roles. For some reason, some people cling to them (in my opinion because it is easier to follow a beaten path or have a template for life in a sense, rather than truly making your own choices), and some people want to abolish- namely those who stand up in the name of gender equality. I think everyone should just be what they want to be, and fuck what is considered "masculine" or "feminine" by anyone else…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:06 AM
3

If you're looking for guarantees in life, good luck with that; what a very immature, unrealistic way of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 09:45 PM
1

It doesn't seem very alpha to be concerned about "shaming", and no one is forcing any men in the Western world to get married. Isn't that a womanly kind of problem, such worry about the opinions of people who ultimately don't matter? Tsk tsk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 09:42 PM
8

I find your interpretation of her words, which included nothing you said, absolutely telling and fascinating. I'm sorry about your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:18 PM
6

How do you propose to "debate in good faith" without any quantifiable evidence to back up your claims? I'm not sure you know what a debate actually is, and that's the problem. It seems what you mean by "debate in good faith" is "accept what we say as true so we can convince you we are right, despite your own experience which we will dismiss as lies or delusions".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:14 PM
6

The melodrama in this comment has truly made my afternoon; thank you. I so missed the whiny, "turn off subreddit style" downvotes from you guys over the holidays. ♥ Nice to know you're still as easily triggered as ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:12 PM
10

TRP is very into making sure their wording is vague enough to move the goalposts any time they're faced with having to actually back up a claim. That's yet another thing they have in common with religion, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:10 PM
6

That's really all anyone is asking; I've said it a dozen times if I've said it once. If they hadn't presented their narrow little set of ideals as universal truth and labeled anyone who doesn't accept that as delusional, probably no one would have cared what they did in their sad little sub. They chose to pick a fight with the rest of the world. Their butthurt over having the gauntlet picked up is so very entertaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:09 PM
7

I think saying "Oh, well this is a sub for men! If other people read it, that's their problem!" is just a really weak cop-out. Take some responsibility for what you do and say in public, please, if you guys can manage that. When the men on the sub are saying "this is what I want" and "this is what I don't want", it logically follows that those statements be interpreted by a woman seeking a man as instructions for how to behave and how not to behave. You don't have to face a woman and say "You mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:04 PM
8

The comments of BGS usually read like that; seem too oblivious to be trolling, yet too frankly dumb to be taken seriously. It's easy to tell that he is very young and parroting things, rather than speaking from real life experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 06:58 PM
2

Oh, but there's no dogma! LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 06:53 PM
8

That's how cognitive dissonance works, and TRP is buried in it to the eyebrows.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 06:52 PM
3

You have internalized the Madonna/whore complex so deeply that you've broken your ability to understand that women can be sexual beings and still good people. I feel sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 06:49 PM
3

OK... so you're saying that you want due process from a system with no courts(which insinuates you don't actually know what due process is, that's funny), something that already happens if a DV case does go to court, and the right to something that literally every man already has the right to- unless you can prove there is anywhere a man by law cannot get a paternity test. Or are you trying to say that a man should have them paid for by someone else? Man, you guys are really bad at this. *Edit T…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:59 PM
4

How is that a right? Is there a law that says women must get shorter sentences, or that is that due to the bias of judges? Tsk tsk, I expected a better attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:55 PM
3

LOL actually, no, just saying "well we say this thing all the time but we don't actually mean it" does not, in fact, nullify or discredit any arguments against it. That's just one of my favorite terper goalpost moves, actually, among many, many other fallacies terps constantly perpetuate. It is fucking hilarious that you would even try that. I'm starting to think you're actually trolling now, because that would fit in so well on /r/iamverysmart or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:49 PM
-1

Right, if you pull up almost any MRA page on the most used sites like Facebook, they will be full of ugly, hateful posts about feminists and have literally nothing that actually helps men. There's only one MRA page on Fb that has anything actually useful on it, and it gets almost no activity. Meanwhile, the ones full of "hurr hurr feminists are fat and ugly, look at the hypocrisy because this one thing happened" bullshit and dank maymays are buzzing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:42 PM
0

People keep asking him for those, and he's not providing them because that actually didn't happen; there was no attack at all. A fire alarm was pulled. Here's confirmation from one of their own sites to head off any accusations of sources biased against MRAs. What a drama queen, right? I was particularly amused by the extremely emotional, melodramatic wording, such as addressing the people pulling the fire alarms like this "I want to speak specifically to the gamblers of other people’s lives. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:40 PM
2

Oh yes, and the fact that terpers constantly say women are useful for nothing but sex and childrearing, that they don't think women are ever particularly intelligent, funny, or interesting outside of their sexual appeal, that they wouldn't be friends with a woman because there'd be no point totally doesn't lend itself to the idea that men objectify women sexually. Nah, not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:30 PM
0

Maybe you'll be the magical MRA who can finally tell me what rights men don't have here in the western world, or US specifically if that's your location. I've still never had one be able to name a single actual right they're fighting for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:28 PM
2

yawn Except misogyny is the reason behind pretty much every piece of advice involving interactions with women on channel terp, so it directly influences the advice they're giving other men and the actions they claim to take in their lives. They "want and desire" women who give them exactly what they want, without expecting much of anything in return from them. That's not flattering or positive; it's selfish and egomaniacal. Way to type a lot and say nothing useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 07:21 PM
5

I've read the entire post including your OP from an archive, thanks, and all of your comments are the same. The only emotion I'm feeling here is disgust for you. You're less than every empathetic human on the planet if you see no reason to report an admitted rapist. You don't even deserve pity. Oh, and work on your literacy- I said he "fucks a good number of chicks" only because they don't know he is a rapist. It has fuckall to do with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 08:38 PM
6

Yeah, I'm sure the victim wouldn't call for any accountability on his part.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:51 PM
8

I mean I guess, if the emotional response he was looking for was derision and complete lack of respect for him. I'm not outraged; he didn't surprise me at all. I'm having about the same reaction to this as I would stepping in dog shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:50 PM
18

The rapist described it as a punch, and you're inventing your own euphemisms to soften it in your own mind? You people are delusional beyond anything rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:49 PM
13

Mostly because he wants to be one so badly that he pretends he already is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:47 PM
15

That's well within the statute of limitations, ignoramus.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:46 PM
17

No, I think my tag of "Alfalfa Cry Baby" is much more common.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:45 PM
9

You didn't answer the question- or are you saying you don't care if your mother gets raped because you don't like her? You really try so hard to be edgy. I'm starting to realize there's no way you're a grown adult with normal brain function.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:43 PM
12

That is only because they don't know he's a rapist. He hides that to get laid, and you're fine with that, but when women hide details about their pasts to seem more high value that's a terrible lie, yes? You're a hypocrite and you read like you wish you were a sociopath. You're not, because an actual sociopath wouldn't bother to argue in internet comments like this, but it's obvious you desperately want to sound like one. "Oh, my buddy violently raped someone in the middle of a steroid-induced r…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:40 PM
8

Aww, PissWhiteFailstorm couldn't handle the heat on his post, huh? So sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:30 PM
0

Gosh, I'd love you to point out where anyone from TBP ever said these damaged types are only 1% of women! Can you maybe link that? Yeah, I didn't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 01:11 AM
4

Right, because models and actresses are never emotionally damaged LOL Oh man, that's really a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 01:08 AM
3

Bahaha, that's how I often explain it actually- a bunch of men who wish they could have either the 50s Beaver Cleaver or even biblical times type life, because women were more or less stuck doing whatever a man wanted to avoid destitution. I wish I could feel bad that men can no longer leverage a mediocre salary into a lifelong maid and sex slave, but... haha who am I kidding. No I don't. I think the anger over having to actually be an attractive person to attract a mate on equal ground is fucki…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 01:05 AM
6

I would say it entirely depends on the woman and the dude. I've had sex with guys I didn't even want to spend the night after, and I've had sex with guys that I've wanted to spend my life being their human footstool after. Very few of the latter would meet the criteria for a "Chad" either, but TRP wouldn't believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 01:02 AM
2

I've seen no one claim those things "shouldn't be distracting". I've seen many people claim that men (and boys, if we're going to loop school dress codes in) should learn to control themselves anyway, regardless of "distraction", and that's perfectly valid. Being distracted by something is not the same as abandoning what you're doing to stare or grabbing the thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:59 AM
4

There isn't a debate if there isn't any evidence; that's the whole point. Terps make these grand claims about universal truths based on pretty much nothing quantifiable. Lacking evidence, it's just an argument- which is why this sub houses very few debates and many entertaining slapfights instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:56 AM
4

They have no standard of evidence. If someone they consider to "get it" says something, they believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:54 AM
6

I know right; sometimes they buy their own hype a little much and forget that we are not, after all, oblivious or ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:51 AM
5

I have never seen anyone claim men's "SMV" peaks in their early 20s- that's sexual peak. Like women's sexual peaks are in their early 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 06:11 PM
1

Well, it's a good thing that your opinion of what is beautiful and what isn't is only relevant to you, now isn't it? I can't imagine having so little going on that what other people are attracted to would bother me. Perhaps you need more hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:40 AM
4

Continuing to be someone's friend after telling them all you want is to be friends is not leading them on in any way, and that's all I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:37 AM
1

You are entitled to commitment if someone tells you they're going to commit to you. Otherwise, I totally agree with you, but it has nothing to do with my comment. You're really all about those straw men, aren't you? Can't actually refute my statements, it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:36 AM
5

Did I say anything about magic? I only even set an age because you asked for one so nicely. The very first criteria I mentioned was for that impressionable person who was told very little or mostly bad information by their parents, and I put a little + after the 25 just for them. I would need far more information about this person to even begin to guess, starting with whether or not they still live at home, whether they work steadily/how long they have held a job (because holding a job long term…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:43 PM
7

Eh, early 20s? It really depends on the upbringing and how far from that they have moved as adults. A person who was brought up in a strict religious home might be overly naive until they're 25+, especially if they still live at home with their parents. People who got out on their own right away at 18 or even before and start having to handle adult business right away mature faster and might have their heads on straight younger than 25. If you need a cutoff, I'd say that you should expect most p…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:06 PM
7

I really don't believe that, past a certain age. I buy it about very young men maybe, and men that have been overly sheltered- but I feel like those things are equally true about women with their equivalent life experience. I don't think men who have been kindly but firmly told by a woman friend that they don't think of them that way don't "get it"; I think they are hoping for one of those "emotional, vulnerable moments" where she might feel down enough to lean on them for comfort and try to seg…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:36 PM
1

So your hypothetical situations are valid, and mine are "funny"; gotcha. I said "if", and merely continued your own line of reasoning. I know just as much about this imaginary "short, ugly guy" as you do, and yet you're acting as if I'm assuming something more than you are by presenting another point of view. You led off with the flaws of this hypothetical man, and yet when I work off that same basis, I'm somehow doing something different, right? If this hypothetical person were a terper, he wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:27 PM
13

Even if it does "create an unequal relationship", that relationship continuing on those terms is entirely the choice of the person who isn't getting what they expected. If a person can't deal with being friends with someone they're attracted to knowing that person doesn't want them, they should move on instead of hanging around hoping the object of their nonplatonic affection will change their mind. I'm deliberately using nongendered pronouns because this is equally true in any dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:06 PM
2

When he meets someone who makes him want to settle down, and that person agrees is the only criteria I really have there. I could say, for instance, "don't get married before (whatever) age!" or similar, but there are always outliers, and why live your life by some arbitrary set of rules created by someone who doesn't know you or your prospective partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 09:51 PM
-1

I don't know how that was hard to follow, but I'll expand. Your hypothetical "short, ugly" guy complains that he is lonely, and your comment insinuates that his looks are to blame for this loneliness and frustration, because you make no mention of anything else about this person. What I said is his attitude about his appearance, previous rejections, and the way he approaches women is much more likely to be the problem than his appearance alone- all of course hypothetically, lest I lose you again…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:18 PM
4

I've lived inside a female brain for over 30 years, and you're wrong. You don't care that you're wrong, because your ideology gives you a way to blame others for your shortcomings, whether real or just imagined. You blame your mother and "society" for "teaching you wrong", you blame women for lying about what they want, but in the end it just comes down to "It's not my fault!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:09 PM
2

That was a lot of words you just used to say nothing. I'm not making an assumption when I'm directly responding to something, or observing a behavior. Oh, and I'm not very nice. It's totally irrelevant to this discussion, but I thought you might wanna know you did manage to get one thing right.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:07 PM
2

So you're the lone exception to the rule of this thing that you say all other men do. What a very special snowflake you are! Here's that internet pat on the back you were looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:04 PM
1

Because you're demonstrating how your label was based on your behavior and not your appearance, and that's the truth they're trying to dodge.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:02 PM
1

So, what you're saying is the way "Nice GuysTM " choose to behave is really the fault of the women that reject them, so it's not their fault and they shouldn't be mocked for it? My my, despite your desperate attempts to condescend, you just keep digging yourself deeper into "passing the buck". What a pity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:00 PM
1

No, they're perfectly normal words used to describe the type of attractiveness promoted by media, while acknowledging that not all attractiveness is that particular type. Reading more will help with that weak vocabulary.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:58 PM
0

Not getting fucked is not the same thing as being mocked for being a "nice guy". Your goalposts are being moved back and forth so quickly, it's amazing you can keep track.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:33 PM
1

They act like we couldn't literally bury them in posts demonstrating the behaviors we're talking about from /r/niceguys, /r/justneckbeardthings, and /r/creepypms in particular
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:29 PM
0

Really? You're trying to compare generalizing an entire gender with zero qualifications with "generalizing" a group of people who choose to engage in very specific behaviors? You guys don't have hamsters; they can't spin a wheel fast enough for you. It might take an engine. it's all because he believes that being nice to a woman and being her friend could form the basis for a stronger and more lasting relationship No. No no no. It's because he thinks that's ALL that is required, and any women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:24 PM
-1

Ben downvotes everyone who disagrees with him; I don't think he's even an adult, so you'll have to take his childishness with a grain of salt or 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:14 PM
1

You're just provably wrong. Go read the posts on /r/niceguys. They often do not contain images of the person in question at all- oh, and there are "Nice GirlsTM " represented as well. They are all examples of behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:13 PM
1

No one can take advantage of your "niceness" without your active and continuous consent. I thought TRP was all about owning your shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:11 PM
2

That is so unbelievably pathetic, it really doesn't deserve a response. Don't pretend to be someone's friend if all you want is sex. They're not taking advantage of you if you choose to dishonestly do this. You are 100% responsible for your own behavior. No one can take advantage of your "niceness" without your active consent. Fucking own your shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:08 PM
5

No, we mock claiming to be nice while demonstrating that they are not, in fact, "nice" at all. You can pretend that's not true all you want, but you're just fooling yourself. LOL I just saw where you called refusing sex ("sexual dismissal") as an example of "effectively mocking"... sorry dude. You don't get to make up meanings for words to dishonestly support your arguments. Fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:04 PM
3

Ah, so "decent" is the only criteria a woman is allowed to have when choosing a sexual partner, is that what you're saying? Any "decent" man "deserves" sex, in your estimation?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:02 PM
0

Oh, and when that "short ugly guy" is presented with concrete examples of the behavior that he is being mocked for, does he still get to pretend it's just about his looks?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:01 PM
-1

Why do you think women in general have to give a shit about whether or not a man she isn't attracted to is "in his sexual prime"? It's completely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:58 PM
3

Yeah, that's why beards are pretty much the hottest male fashion trend right now. Kid, you're completely lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:57 PM
7

Right, because "No Fat Guys" tshirts are a thing, and "No Fat Chicks" ones aren't. Puhlease. Lets play a game; Google "fat men" and then Google "fat women", and compare the mockery. I know you won't, or won't report your results honestly, because you're utterly full of shit. I'm just making sure you understand I'm fully aware that you're full of shit. When you guys override subreddit style to downvote me is my very favorite thing ♥ the rustling of jimmies could be heard throughout the interwebs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:55 PM
1

Maybe if guys would stop talking about how fucked up it is that they were "nice" to someone for however long, or "was always there for her", or "did everything for her", and they still won't "give them a chance", that analogy would go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:52 PM
1

LOL no. We aren't mocking nice guys precisely, anyway, but the behaviors. For instance, if you hit on a woman via dating app and she rejects you, so you decide to tell her how fat and ugly she is and you didn't want it anyway- it kinda overshadows the "Nice, easygoing guy" bullshit you wrote in your profile. If you expect women to look past your appearance because you are "nice", while acting like only conventionally beautiful women are good enough for you, you're delusional. If you think all gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:44 PM
1

Hey, I've seen MicroSlut; the midget goes around this office building with a keyboard apparently "forcing" people to have sex with each other by typing on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:24 PM
1

1) 34-45 2) none, I've been nowhere but work and home 3) none, only work, home, and grocery shopping 4) I'm just gonna say none, because if they did, it was short, awkward, and I don't remember it. I don't go out to socialize really anymore. 5) married 6) I'm perfectly happy not being approached while I work and shop. 7) The answer would not change if I were single. 8) Probably dozens of times, but they're mostly quite a ways in the past. 9) Not for a significant period of time, but to be fair I…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:14 PM
1

Right, because it's too much to expect a man who is super concerned about such things to ask; after all, once he admits he would insist on an abortion or refuse any responsibility, he might not get his dick wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:11 PM
1

Does a man take 50% of the risk of carrying a pregnancy to term? Is he equally likely to get stuck with a child and zero support from the other parent? No? Well, duh. Don't stick your dick in someone if you're not sure you agree on what to do in the event of an accidental pregnancy. Have some responsibility for your actions, for fuck's sake; you should be embarrassed to whine in public like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:08 PM
1

Because men can't get pregnant, and women can. That risk of sex is solely a danger to women, it's only their bodies that are affected, and all of this makes perfect sense in a purely logical way. It's rather ironic that so many rp men would eagerly support legislation that would allow all men to deny responsibility for a child, considering that would almost certainly make women categorically more cautious about sex and make it much harder to run their game, which is weak enough already.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:05 PM
0

It's avoidable by not fucking someone until you know them well enough to have had the discussion about how to handle a pregnancy- and then not fucking her at all if you don't agree. Of course, that doesn't even occur to most terps as an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:00 PM
1

Indeed, what about toilet paper, feminine hygiene products, toothpaste, soap and shampoo...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:55 PM
0

Your flair is adorable; what an attitude to bring to a debate sub, and the fact that you think anything you have to say would be analogous to a beating is just precious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:53 PM
5

And yet, to suggest a man not fuck someone until they know them well enough to be reasonably sure they won't do something like that is seen as ridiculous and unrealistic. Turn down easy sex in favor of prudent life choices? No way!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:49 PM
1

Ho's whats ain't loyal? Or did you mean hoes? Because you know, plurals don't need apostrophes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 10:16 PM
1

Are you fucking kidding me? Are you really trying to say one example is better than dozens, even hundreds? Or is it just that you don't want to look at that post yet again to be reminded of all the disgusting shit being said in TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 10:14 PM
2

Need we remind you that hasn't been proven to any reasonable standard? I'm not sure why you guys can't seem to grasp the fact that merely saying something over and over doesn't make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 10:13 PM
5

You might as well be talking to a wall; terpers will never believe their POV is the exclusive territory of emotionally damaged, bitter men any more than they will admit that their tactics only work on their female counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 09:50 PM
-3

concealed ovulation LOL! Your level of paranoia is pitiful, really. WOMEN WERE BIOLOGICALLY DESIGNED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF MEN, GUYS! YOU HEARD IT HERE!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 09:01 PM
2

Why do your ECs regularly make misogynistic posts if that's only "anger phase"? Any post that refers to women as children or worthless sluts is misogynistic, among other things. Shouldn't they be showing what happens after that, if the goal is to get past it, instead of feeding the flames?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 07:05 PM
2

I'm not sure if you realize this, but you actually don't have to offer an alternative answer to dismiss one you are offered. I'm not sure where you got that impression.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 07:04 PM
2

We always tell you that relationships based on compromise and mutual respect (that means "Your feelings and needs are just as important to me as my own", in case you weren't sure), with honest communication are the best ones- not the ones where one partner manipulates the other for their own contentment, with a "My way or the highway, leave if you don't like it; I'll just go find someone else." attitude toward their partner's needs and feelings. The fact that you choose to ignore that one consis…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:58 PM
1

No, that's not "all" it's about. If it were, there would never have been a blue pill or this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:50 PM
2

No one objects to men getting more from their lives until they're "getting more" at the expense of someone else's happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:49 PM
2

I think being articulate and precise in your meaning is important, and constantly claiming that you don't mean to be taken literally is a very easy way to move the goalposts or put yourself in a position of never really having to defend your positions, because they are semantically vague enough to slip around anyone's objections. It's weak at best, and dishonest at worst as a debating tactic. If you say "always", you are rebutted on that basis, and you respond "well, of course not always", what …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:45 PM
1

So the fact that people feel differently about those they have casual sex with vs. people they date seriously carries no weight with you? That's pretty self-defeating, but I guess you're welcome to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:39 PM
2

LOL; he reposted it in MGTOW
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:34 PM
3

What about men who leave their wives of 20+ years to get with someone their children's age because they have money? I understand you're not really here for a debate- just to shoot down anyone who disagrees with you despite your complete and total lack of valid arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 09:25 PM
8

Yuuuup. I think Jason Mamoa is the most beautiful thing I've seen in years, but it doesn't stop me from being attracted to my husband or any number of other men less conventionally attractive than him (the celebrity).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 09:24 PM
3

When you use terms like "always" and "never", you're pretty much going to be wrong from the start. I did not forget how much terps love sweeping generalizations. Also, simply stating it does not make it true. You must offer actual proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 09:22 PM
12

yawn Prove all women are only attracted to men "above them". In order to do this, you must first define what that means in quantifiable terms, and then provide proof your assertion is correct, however that's possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 09:20 PM
1

I don't know why the stereotype that women never, or almost never, ask anyone out still exists; I don't know any women who haven't asked someone out at some point or another. I certainly have. Not as often as I've been asked out, of course, but I don't see how that's some kind of problem that needs fixing. If I wanted it badly enough, I asked. I'd imagine that's how most people feel, regardless of gender- if you want it, ask. If you don't particularly, maybe don't ask? Playing the numbers game h…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 07:23 PM
3

Lol every one of your sources is a .com; do you even research, bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:41 PM
3

You cited the daily mail, moron; I can't figure out if you're trolling with these posts, or whether you're really this stupid. By the way, I'm a woman who can do "tech", including coding; I've written my own testing suites in Selenium for the web development team I used to be a part of- I was the head of testing, over 2 men, and I was an independent contractor so there was zero government involvement in my hiring. The majority of my employment history has been tech related. I've been a quality i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:36 PM
4

OP seems to have difficulty understanding that; hell, I know a couple that has been together for over 20 years and has 4 kids. Never married.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:28 PM
4

You do realize women don't get pregnant in a vacuum, right? Why do you think it's OK to absolve men of any responsibility while advocating penalizing women? I mean, I know why- I really just want to see what kind of cute euphemisms you come up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:27 PM
6

The word is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:19 PM
2

How about, if you don't want to be a father, keep your dick in your pants? Yeah, I'm aware that's too much to ask. Men apparently are not capable of handling that responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:19 PM
4

Oh, OK; I suppose next time I get a support request, I should pass that off to a male co-worker. After all, I don't really do anything, right? Who cares if it's your problem that needs fixing? You can just wait. Also, being as how in the US, productivity is the highest it's ever been, I would love to see your source for proving women haven't contributed to that. I'm sure it's very amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 08:10 PM
1

"Fat People Hate"; it's been banned, but the attitudes have not all gone to Voat like they promised. That's the only bad part.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 12:53 AM
1

Woman here; never been offered a discount on a rental, either before or after becoming a mother. Could have maybe qualified for Section 8 many years ago, but only because I was a mother, and they told me the waiting list for housing was literally years long. You're going to have to come with more details than that to be believable. Now if what you're talking about is male real estate agents making shady deals to exchange sex for rent or some other porno type arrangement, that has nothing whatsoe…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:12 PM
5

Terps love reductio ad absurdum. It might just be their favorite logical fallacy, because it's less well-known than things like ad hominem. It's like they never found out that extrapolating someone's point to a ridiculous degree is not just a weak debating tactic, but makes them look asinine as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:10 PM
1

So, there's one thing that any woman who has the ability to start a business can get. One thing. Wow, it's so damned easy to be a woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:08 PM
5

You guys should really be looking to each other to fix the majority of your issues instead of whining that feminists don't do it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:05 PM
4

I'm not sure how they haven't noticed that men who actually seek custody and do not have a history of being a threat are rarely denied at least joint custody now; family court business has change tremendously over the last several decades. Is it even? No, but there's been a lot of progress. They just look up the statistics for who gets the kids and wave those numbers around like they are meaningful without those 2 very important variables I listed at the top- the most important of which is the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:04 PM
1

You have offered zero data, only your own anecdotes- and vague ones at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:01 PM
4

Men are entirely responsible for instituting Selective Services signup, many women are against it and any kind of draft, ever (including myself). What federal aide without any obligation can only women get? Your number 3 is so vague, there's not even any way to prove or disprove it. Also, colleges tend to value spelling- the word is higher. Number four has literally nothing to do with the post, and that bias has been found with mostly male judges- once again, guys really need to do some shit for…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:00 PM
3

Right, every volunteer just does it so they can yell loudly about it in front of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:52 PM
3

No, you're not saying where because people could easily prove you wrong, even with just a state.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:50 PM
4

Ahh, I see, you need people to look poor to deserve your help. I suppose if they hobbled up in old, dirty clothes you would have been OK with that. Those people are poor enough to deserve to eat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:48 PM
1

You do realize that a lot of elderly, disabled people can't run their own errands, and have either family or a home help nurse to do so? Your assumptions are literally nothing but that, and your ugly, hateful outlook is entirely of your own making. I wonder which charities you're speaking of? You should really specify.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:47 PM
5

Not just that, but men can get literally every single one of those benefits in the same situations with the same criteria. Maybe if men didn't abandon their children so often, more men could be the lucky recipients of these bountiful freebies that help single mothers live so well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:43 PM
0

So, what you're saying is any woman can get help, but only if she starts a business- which is a tiny portion of women. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:42 PM
3

Appeal to nature is a logical fallacy- "natural" is not automatically better than "unnatural"- and this post is obviously pointed at people who want a monogamous relationship, which is more than possible with commitment from both partners. I'm totally OK with people who are openly, honestly poly, but I'm not OK with telling people who prefer monogamy that they're wrong, especially on such specious grounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:35 PM
3

Sadly, a lot of people think that's OK, and used that excuse to defend disgusting hate subs like fph- even though they swear they care about facts and psychologists overwhelmingly agree that shaming is almost never a motivator for positive change. To the contrary, shaming most often results in deepening depression and more difficulty in finding the motivation to make positive changes. The best way to convince someone to do something better for themselves is to be supportive, but that's not as mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:29 PM
1

I would say that it's less about blaming your partner for your unhappiness in other areas as it is taking out your unhappiness in other areas on your partner simply because they are there the most, and they love you, so they take more shit from you than most people would- but they shouldn't have to, and after a while no one wants to do it anymore, regardless of love. People shouldn't bring their shit home to their partners and smear it everywhere. Leave it at work/school/wherever its source may …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:24 PM
2

Equality is not sameness, and most people are intelligent enough to understand that. Equality is in opportunity and treatment, not personality. It's utterly ridiculous how terps seem unable to grasp this simple concept. Literally no one is saying men and women are the same, and the fact that that straw man is such a go-to for you guys is actually pretty funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 10:22 PM
3

Most red pill men would say they had zero reason to be friends with any woman with no sex on the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 08:48 PM
11

A "hit piece" made up of direct quotes- m'kay. If your own words make you look bad, that's because you're bad.
/r/ExRedPill19/11/15 07:48 PM
10

The post is nothing but images of posts and comments taken directly from TRP. It is perfectly valid.
/r/ExRedPill19/11/15 07:46 PM
4

By you, and people like you- your opinions have no more value than anyone else's.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:55 PM
7

... you quoted your own straw man as an example of hypocrisy in your opponent? LOL you're amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:54 PM
10

You wouldn't be on PPD if you didn't have a problem with the blue pill sub. Why even come here and defend yourself if what TBP is saying doesn't matter to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:49 PM
4

So... you think 20+ partners in someone's whole life is indicative of "hypersexuality" in a mental illness context? Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:47 PM
13

Just the fact that you think "sluttery" should have "adverse effects" for women only illustrates far more plainly what you really think than all this pseudologic and euphemism for hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 06:45 PM
3

As long as all you care about is getting what you want above all else, you're doomed to failure eventually. Enjoy the temporary feeling of having it all, though; perhaps the memory will comfort you in darker times.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:57 PM
6

It's almost like you find what you're looking for; who'd have thunk it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:56 PM
6

Their reluctance is not the woman's problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:38 PM
8

Because when a woman has sex, it's always a transaction- ONS got it "for free" while people she dates are "paying" for it... LOL. You guys are so cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:31 PM
2

And your hoops are a game of "identify-the-slut"! Why is your bullshit OK? You've created this dynamic where women are held to different standards than men for the exact same behavior, and whining that women may find ways around that dynamic (because it's obviously ridiculous). If men weren't out there having casual sex, women would have no one to be "sluts" with. The majority of your own little cult is desperately looking for a woman who fucks on the first date on one hand, while dismissing tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:24 PM
2

It's cute that you would be so offended at the idea of a woman using "deceit and manipulation" when that's the basis of all terper strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:17 PM
0

And there's nothing worse than a woman who enjoys her life and wants to have sex, is there? I'm so glad people like you are dying out. You won't be missed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:13 PM
3

Why do you never suggest to a man that he not be a "slut"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:10 PM
7

I've been with my husband for 17 years, and he has never asked for my "N count", while I have been perfectly honest that I have no idea what mine is because I had a crazy couple of years out of high school and didn't keep score. He also whored around at about the same age. It's utterly irrelevant to secure people. Oh, and there you go comparing women to objects again; you guys really can't fathom the fact that women are people, can you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 10:07 PM
1

You don't have to read The Blue Pill or PPD either; it works both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 09:07 PM
1

No retard, it was a very direct attack on the terper assertion that women are children. Try to keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 09:03 PM
6

Yeah, because that's what men who have lives full of eager, horny women and fulfilling hobbies/careers do with their time; thanks for confirming what losers you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 09:02 PM
2

I have rarely seen such a melodramatic statement from anyone but a teenage girl. Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 11:16 PM
7

The real question is, why are you such a loser that you can't get with a woman who has real life experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:40 PM
1

Only with a partner under 21.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:38 PM
4

It might help you figure out what a hypocrite actually is if you look it up so you may also spell it correctly. Also, apparently you're not intelligent enough to understand that "power imbalance" is not a blanket statement meaning the exact same thing in every situation; what a shocker that someone who identifies as terp would have a problem figuring that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 09:00 PM
3

That makes no sense if you take a girl's virginity and then lose interest while still in the relationship; she'd have to be fucking someone else to give you an STI. I don't think you read the OP thoroughly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:34 PM
0

It's quite deliberate- make sure you're never saying exactly what you mean, and you can always move the goalposts when you get called out on your shit by pretending you meant something else- bonus points for calling people "tone police", pedants, or saying they can't "understand nuance/metaphors" for interpreting your words by their literal definitions. It's typical of people who think gaslighting is acceptable behavior in a relationship. Sadly, TRP posts aren't the only place in my life where I…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:18 PM
1

I think the fact that you say "TBP/Feminism" as if they were the same thing is ridiculous; you seem to have no idea what's going on, but I hope the post made you feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:08 PM
2

Shhh, you can't point out how irrational they are, or they might have a temper tantrum!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:09 AM
2

It's frustrating to have your whole gender stereotyped by the actions of a few, and from the narrow perception of few people, isn't it? Doesn't it make you question their motives? What could possibly be the point of making ridiculous blanket statements about a whole gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:07 AM
6

So you're stating that the person who files for divorce is the 100% reason for the divorce? You're gonna need some citation for that too. You're ignoring the fact that wealthy men who marry women young enough to be their daughters often continue to fuck around and the most obvious problem of all- what the fuck do people 20+ years apart have in common? No matter how hot the person is, if you only like them when they're naked things are going to fall apart. Mental connection matters, as much as te…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:03 AM
5

They're thinking "Man this is hot and I wanna see her naked" and "Man my friends will be so jealous that I banged this chick". Terpers like to pretend all their feelings for women are so honorable and deeply rooted, but honestly all they really want is props from their friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:00 AM
3

a man who is a millionaire & has everything going for him would marry a waitress working for the minimum wage if he found her to be passably attractive extremely attractive & they got along. Citation needed, otherwise we're going to have to make my update. Men of the only type terpers acknowledge existing really don't care about much of anything but looks, so status/ambition and intelligence don't figure as much into their partner choices. The truth is that extremely successful people most often…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:56 PM
13

Considering terpers would consider leaving over a 20 pound weight gain justified, they should have zero moral issues with this. Me personally, I also have no problem with it, and I think she did more than anyone could possibly be expected to before it went that far. He probably wanted to die for a long time and was just waiting for an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:49 PM
1

Poor white knights, they have zero agency to decide who they do and don't help. They have to protected from their own decisions because they're simply not smart or strong enough to run their own lives. Thank goodness there's you!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:05 PM
2

Thanks for admitting it, but we knew that already. That's why decent people who have respect for others disdain you. That's why you have to keep your methods under wraps, because outside your little echo chamber they would be disgusted by you. Nice to see a little self-awareness; too bad you're not using it to be a better person instead of a sack of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:03 PM
7

So is this a novelty account where you argue with yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 08:00 PM
1

I can see what people find attractive about him, but it's not my kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 08:27 PM
3

Absolutely, and looking for a short cut to what they think they deserve. It amuses me to know how few of them actually get anything they want in real life out of their little cesspool of hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:35 PM
5

Oh great; another person who doesn't understand the first amendment rights they claim to hold dear. If you're not being arrested for what you say, your first amendment rights are intact, period. That is literally all you are guaranteed. Please, try being less ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:29 PM
0

Now apply that to TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:28 PM
1

Name calling women and using shaming language against women is practically TRP bread and butter. Oh, and when you allow posts about how rape should be legal to keep women in line, you don't get to say accusations of inciting violence against women are "baseless". What you're really saying is that you can dish it out, but you can't take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:27 PM
6

If he wrote in your margins "STUPID!" and "CHILDISH!" and similar, that would not be useful criticism- it would be hateful and intended to hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:16 PM
8

Discuss whatever you want. When you use hate speech and are blatantly misogynistic while doing it, you're going to be called out for it. If you want a place where women can't "poke their heads in", make your sub private. Otherwise, deal with the fallout of your own behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:10 PM
6

Are you actually trying to say that the only possible opposing position to rp bullshit is claiming women are saints who can do no wrong? Are you actually retarded? It's so much fun when butt*hurt terpers override the sub rules to down vote everything I say. +1
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:09 PM
1

That's because you put on glasses with red lenses by choice. You see what you want to see. Just like xtians see angels in clouds, you see confirmation of your dogmatic beliefs. They're basically the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 05:03 PM
2

So you think people should "tolerate" anything less than equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:54 PM
3

I've never upvoted someone with red pill flair before. There truly is a first time for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 04:38 PM
3

I would say I have definitely had sex with men I wouldn't date because I was horny, but I didn't find them ugly at the time I fucked them; there are lots of reasons not to date someone, and top of my list is being rather dim. A guy doesn't have to be smart to scratch the itch though, especially if you can get him to go home after so you don't have to talk to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 06:39 PM
7

No, a better topic would not be "BP does not believe women are sexual gatekeepers". A better topic would be "BP does not believe that having sex devalues a woman in any way, nor does it increase the value of a man in anything but his own mind. Therefore implying that a woman who has a lot of sex is a poor "gatekeeper" and worth less than a woman who has fewer partners and is, by that definition a better "gatekeeper" is incorrect and misogynistic."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:45 PM
2

There is no difference in the inherent value of a woman based on how much sex she has, no. If you think there is, you're a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:39 PM
9

Mostly because it implies that a woman who chooses to have a lot of sex for whatever reason is worth less than a woman who doesn't, because the "chaste" woman is a good "guardian" and the "promiscuous" woman is a shitty "guardian". It implies that having sex is a failure on the part of the woman and a victory on the part of the man. I'm not sure why you would find it difficult to get that. When you guys turn off sub style to downvote me without having the balls to attempt a rebuttal, it makes me…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:37 PM
7

Reductio ad absurdum is completely lost on terpers, despite their fondness for using it as a fallacy when it suits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:35 PM
4

Oh no, because women are so fundamentally incapable of telling the truth that they don't even know what they want, to hear terpers tell the tale. They say when women claim they want something, it's all lies. That's why they think its OK to disrespect her boundaries with things like "pushing through LMR".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:09 PM
-1

I'm sure it's not interesting to a person who fancies themselves intelligent, but can't manage to figure out which version of "to" he needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:09 PM
5

That's very easy to claim with zero proof, so here's the pat on the back you were looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:06 PM
-2

How do you not see the blatant hypocrisy he is showing you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:05 PM
1

If you're doing something your employer doesn't want associated with their business, they are right to fire you. It's sad that you people don't consider why a company would want to distance themselves from your hate speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:04 PM
5

Oh no, they make a very concerted effort to not use their lingo out in the real world, because they know damned well that anyone with decency and common sense is appalled at the things associated with the red pill and they're afraid if people know, their manipulations won't work. That's why I take everything they talk about and spread it around as much as I can so that it doesn't take a slip of the tongue on lingo to identify them. They depend on women being ignorant of their "Game", so lets mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:03 PM
2

My mom did most of the cooking and my stepdad worked more, so I guess we were semi-traditional in some ways. However, my mom worked through most of my childhood and neither of them was the unquestionable "captain" or anything like that. My mom is also a severe narcissist, so I don't know if any of my personal childhood experience would be valid here- having a narcissistic mother and an enabling father figure is only going to be relatable to other children of narcissists. My view of gender roles …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 09:53 PM
1

I think the only honest answer to this is some women would be, and some wouldn't. There are other factors at play, and there's no telling what that type of effect that "sexual utopia" would have on the way sexual interaction is regarded in society. In a place so free, maybe actually learning how to make sex good for each other instead of merely as "safe" as possible would result in a smaller gap between women's expected enjoyment and men's- seems like that would result in more promiscuity, just …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 06:23 PM
4

The eeeevil feeeeemales made me dooo it! LOL terpers, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 05:25 PM
3

Bullshit. In general, women desire good sex as much as men desire sex in general- it's just that we understand we have less likelihood of getting a truly satisfying experience from a random encounter than a man does. Disappointing sex can make us feel worse than no sex, plus we are more likely to get diseases from men than they are from us, and most of us have pregnancy to worry about no matter how careful we are. It's not about "libido" necessarily- it's about risk vs. reward scenario. Women ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 05:21 PM
3

I don't think there's anything misogynist at all about relationship dynamics that both people are comfortable and happy with; hell, were it economically possible, I would still be a SAHM and wife who does all the cooking and cleaning. I was happy in that role- it wasn't perfect, but I felt like I was doing the best I could for my husband and son, and I support other women who feel that way. I also support women who would rather work than stay at home, women who never want to have children, and w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 11:28 PM
5

Literally no one on those subs ever responds to a perfectly respectful request like that. I read them daily (well, except weekends, and I catch up on creepypms every Monday). There's miles of difference between leading off with a disgusting dick pic or "Damn girl you fine, why don't you show me those titties" and the other desperate, disrespectful messages that get posted there and "Hi, I see we have this thing in common, would you like to get to know one another better?" or your example. Go the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:40 PM
1

Oh right! I forgot YouTube was now a great source for legitimate scientific studies. People would never post misleadingly edited videos to pander to certain audiences, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:37 PM
3

That's exactly it, and I've said it many times myself- TRP would not likely have encountered much resistance if they presented themselves honestly- one way to get into certain types of relationships being that certain things are true. Instead, they decided to paint themselves as the only people who accept reality, disrespect literally everyone else as being delusional, and make sweeping generalizations as if they are ever useful in the context of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:35 PM
5

My my, you're bitter. You may not be ready for PPD yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:33 PM
1

As soon as you move from focusing on making yourself more attractive to others- perfectly OK and common sense to do, we all agree there- to how to manipulate potential partners, dismiss their needs and feelings, and treat your partner like a subordinate regardless of their actual wishes on the subject, that's where you lose everyone who believes that relationships between adults should be based on mutual respect and honesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:32 PM
4

TBP is a subreddit of satire and mockery of TRP - that's all people who post there have in common, disdain for most things red pill. Terpers decided we were their archrivals because dogmatic belief systems attract more loyal and fervent followers when there is an opponent to feel persecuted by. "Us against the world" is a very potent rallying cry, and terpers basically live by it. They really should thank us; they'd likely have a fraction of the attention they have gained without our mockery.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:24 PM
3

You do realize that no matter how much you accumulate, you're going to die, right? You could die any time, today even, and none of that shit is going with you. Is there any real reason to be so rich you could wipe your ass with $100 bills, or is that ridiculous extreme just some kind of fantasy of yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 11:35 PM
8

So in your language, "lol" means "I have no way to refute this, so I'm going to pretend I find it funny instead of vexing", right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 11:27 PM
5

Far more information would be needed to make any kind of valid judgement on the situation. We have no idea how he went about asking people out, who he asked, or a multitude of other details that are essential. On the surface, 1000 rejections sounds like the guy is doing something very off-putting, because statistically speaking that's not a likely result. On top of all that, who even knows if this ever really happened?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:34 PM
0

Stop buying shit for women if you don't want to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:36 PM
2

Yes, only you define weakness as showing any kind of respect or consideration for women or their needs; nice try, but we know better.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:34 PM
2

Ding ding ding! That's one of the things I find most hilarious about RP crap; the "pussy pass" and its counterparts are entirely created and maintained by men, and literally all they have to do to stop it is stop treating women who are conventionally attractive as if they were special- treat "hot" women just like you treat anyone else and all that stuff just disappears. But they won't do it; they'd rather continue to worship accidents of genetics as if they were indicative of a person's worth an…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:32 PM
2

Yes, because not wanting a cock in her ass means she does nothing but lie there. Are you really that stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:26 PM
1

Pretty sure they got it, since they referred to your question as loaded. Not that quick, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:24 PM
2

Ahh, but it's all our faults as feeeeeemales don't you see, because we "let" men get that way and still gave them sex, so they didn't bother to try any harder. No matter what, wimminz are to blame! Lol, that was fun to type.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:13 PM
-1

They simply can't fathom the fact that we are a group of people with little in common other than contempt for them; beyond that, we may have zero common interests/goals or even ways of handling relationships. Comments you make don't represent me, or any other poster to TBP. Comments I make are only representative of my opinions, and I never attribute them to a greater "blue pill" whole. It's fairly common of those who follow dogmatic principles to assume everyone else does as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:57 PM
0

It's cute that you think we care whether you "take us seriously"; you should, we're out there exposing your game as fast as you can make it up, but I couldn't even begin to care how you feel about it really.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:52 PM
0

What other people say has nothing to do with what I say. Until you can quote me saying any of that silly shit, it has nothing to do with me. This post is just another example of how indoctrinated people have issues understanding that those who oppose them don't necessarily have their own group ideology to push. You could replace all the gendered terms here with people of any religion vs. atheists where the religious people are taking something one atheist says and trying to hold us all to task o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:49 PM
2

I don't own any dogs, but if I ever do it will be a corgi. LOL at butthurt terps downvoting everything with my name on it xD you guys are just so cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:39 PM
0

I feel like mine is self-explanatory- I don't just disagree with RP ideals, I actively oppose them and the damage they will inevitably cause anyone unfortunate enough to fall for them, both men and women. However, since the men are making the choice to get involved in the toxicity, I see that as their prerogative and seek to educate women against being drawn into it unwittingly, since the inherent dishonesty in how rp men handle women doesn't allow them the option to choose freely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:37 PM
0

That's why the most important thing we can do is spread the jargon and the associated behaviors :3 good luck keeping them under wraps.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:53 PM
0

It's important to blatantly call out this behavior when we see it and reject the guys using it by naming the behavior, to their faces. I understand that's not necessarily something you can do with your boss, but if it comes up in dating situations women have got to stop trying to be nice and start being blunt. This shit is not going to fly, not with women who have any self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:48 PM
8

That's exactly it- being falsely accused of a crime is not a gendered issue. Literally anyone can be accused of anything at any time. The best defense is to never even present the appearance of possibly having committed the crime you're so worried about, but every time I suggest that perhaps having sex with drunk women isn't the best idea the terper downvotes fall like rain.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 09:49 PM
2

They exist, but they are far more rare than RP likes to present, along with every other "women are out to get you!" behavior you guys like to hype up as being common ("spermjacking", "divorce rape").
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 09:47 PM
2

Oh I don't know, I guess not having sex with someone unless you're 100% sure you have enthusiastic, sober consent is just too outlandish to consider, huh? That's obviously the best way to minimize the chances, but turning down pussy, even when she can't stand up on her own, is just too much to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 09:40 PM
2

You really shouldn't presume to state your opponents' arguments when you understand them so badly. The issue with terper advice is that it frequently encourages dishonesty, disrespect, and manipulation to get what you want from a woman regardless of her needs or feelings. The issue with terper view of women is that it is misogynistic and infantilizing. The majority of RP "endorsed contributors" talk about women as little more than cumdumpsters; their wants, needs, and ambitions are derided or co…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 09:37 PM
7

I would have told the whiners that person's terms of employment were none of their fucking business and to present an argument for why they thought they should be able to work from home for consideration. Everyone should get an opportunity to ask for something- it doesn't mean everyone has to be approved. Bowing to that kind of pressure creates a precedent that I wouldn't want in place anywhere I would work.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 09:51 PM
0

LOL you said "chalk full" twice! Ohh thank you for the giggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 08:57 PM
0

How dare we expect them to say what they mean and use words by their definitions! They can't doublespeak themselves loopholes if they are articulate and grammatically correct!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 08:56 PM
-1

The world "all" has a meaning. You choosing to assign some other meaning to it than the real one doesn't make you correct. It makes you ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 08:52 PM
0

The phrase is "chock full", genius; what do you think "chalk full" means, exactly? The irony of following that with "we are better writers" is probably the funniest thing you've ever typed, by the way; congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 08:48 PM
4

Yeah, that was an obvious and very poorly executed attempt at a deflection for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 08:46 PM
2

I'd leave him for being a tactless fuckwit who says utterly unnecessary and hurtful things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 06:25 PM
2

If he said that to me, that I was "OK" and he would like sex more with someone better looking, he can fuck right off and see if he can find her. There's a difference between what we think sometimes and what we say out loud, out of decency, respect, and caring for someone's feelings. You don't have to lie to not say incredibly hurtful things. Most people have a fairly firm grasp of tact, whether they choose to exercise it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 06:23 PM
2

"Blue Pill" as it is relevant here, and I am 100% in favor of adults who freely choose to do sex work- I think their professions should be safe, regulated, and fully legal. I am equally opposed to any kind of exploitation of anyone, certainly minors under any circumstances but also coercion of disadvantaged adults, and think that anyone using someone else for sex work without due compensation or against their freely given consent deserves harsh criminal penalties. No one should profit from someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 05:51 PM
2

Are you seriously saying that frustration is any kind of justification for assaulting someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:19 PM
6

To be fair, smoking inside the house is gross on multiple levels. It stains the walls, it sticks to the upholstery, and it's dangerous to everyone's health. The smell of some cigars outright turns my stomach. Frankly I don't think anyone should be doing it, and it doesn't seem at all over the top. He could just not smoke cigars when it's freezing; you don't need them to live. You're kind of saying that in general, men are slobs unless a woman makes them not be gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 12:59 AM
4

The username really should have clued you in.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 12:56 AM
17

It would 100% depend on why he didn't want me to have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 11:37 PM
13

Marriage existed long before christianity. You are objectively wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 11:30 PM
13

TRP is obsessed with what they feel is their "due respect" and therefore they are hyper paranoid about any slights, imagined or real. It's not a big deal. At all. On any level, especially if you're getting married. It doesn't change the terms of marriage at all. I took my husband's last name because I wanted to, and he would not have cared in the slightest if I hadn't. Then again, he doesn't spend all his time looking for outside confirmation of his manliness, so he doesn't need to beat his ches…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 11:27 PM
1

People who pretend things that would hurt them aren't happening to avoid the pain are still being hurt. The only way having sex with others is OK is when it is openly agreed upon between partners, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 09:30 PM
1

You never explained any kind of point. You just keep saying "it's worse when women cheat because it is" over and over. You haven't presented one concrete example of how that could be so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 09:29 PM
0

Yeah, the circumstances are more or less irrelevant. The betrayal is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 09:25 PM
1

Please, please stop spelling "programs" with an apostrophe. Plurals do not require apostrophes under any circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 09:20 PM
6

OK, so that sheds a bit more light on your meaning, but the excerpt you originally used doesn't come off like that at all. From that perspective, I find it hard to generalize about any group of people since that feeling comes from individual actions, not group mentality. I think anyone would be about equally subject to this mistaken feeling of righteousness. If I had to pin it down, I would still say that RP would be slightly more prone, because the majority of people who actually identify as BP…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 09:10 PM
5

Oh, but he's a 7! He said so! LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 08:44 PM
2

LOL and you think women are vapid? I cannot stop laughing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 08:43 PM
3

The point is if it is true, it is understood without being said. It would only need to be said if it were not proven nonverbally. Not being proven nonverbally definitely implies lack of "kingly" status.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 08:27 PM
2

LOL Neither of those are in the slightest bit obscure- you can buy Death Note stuff at Hot Topic for fuck's sake- and if "preppy white girls" are the only ones you like, that's your own fault for being so superficially biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 08:24 PM
15

And really, that's all BP is about (besides mocking RP) if anything- the indisputable fact that there is no immutable "truth" of relationships and that every couple is different, so no- couples who don't conform to terper ideals aren't faking it or living outside reality. If they hadn't decided that their ideal was the only "real truth" and presented it that way, there probably would have never been any backlash.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 08:12 PM
12

You don't understand that definition at all if you think you see more examples of it in BP. Read this again, slowly and carefully: phenomenon whereby increased confidence and security in one’s self-image or self-concept tends to make that individual worry less about the consequences of subsequent immoral behavior and, therefore, more likely to make immoral choices and act immorally. Bold obviously mine, in hopes that you will understand where I'm going with this this. That snippet practically ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 08:04 PM
2

My human sexuality book was also university level, and it was specifically about humans and their sex organs. However, if you need additional proof since you obviously aren't going to verify it yourself: Pregnancy may cause the labia minora to darken in color. I may have been a bit off in thinking that actually giving birth was the reason, but it is definitely pregnancy and not sex that causes that change. As you will see if you continue reading, labia color changes during sex are temporary and …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 10:31 PM
6

I think because we are taught all of our lives that our appearance is the most important thing about us; it's slowly changing, but harping on how pretty a little girl is, while it seems complimentary, really creates a connection between praise and appearance in your mind at an early age, and those things stick with us. Even on this post you can see how this issue has affected people; I saw a woman refer to her own vulva is "roast beef"-like, and at least one man insisting that shorter labia are …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 10:23 PM
3

That may be the most honest and true thing a terper has ever said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 09:27 PM
1

No, that is not what causes the darkening; it has little to do with when they have sex, and literally everything to do with giving birth. That can sort of be related since you have to have sex to get pregnant, but your friend needs to study harder- even then you don't actually change unless you give birth vaginally.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 09:25 PM
6

Ignoramuses who don't see much pussy outside of porno get some very weird ideas about vulva and vaginas- that having more sex makes a vagina "loose" or "worn out", that long labia are a sign of use; it's kind of comical and sad, really. /r/badwomensanatomy is a great place to see this kind of idiocy. I don't know where the "fashion" of having short labia minora that can be hidden inside the labia majora came from, but it's as meaningless as most fashion. It's associated with being young and virg…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 09:21 PM
2

Lesbian's what? You do know plurals don't require apostrophes, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:16 PM
2

I suppose we'll care about your opinion when you have an institute.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:12 PM
2

I will firmly stick by my explanation of "for the lulz". Though there is a certain amount of value to keeping an eye on people you feel are dangerous (in whatever way) so you can inform others of the danger and what to look for to avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:11 PM
1

Saying "many bp people" is just like saying "many people"; bp has no bearing on any subject except opinion of the red pill and its followers. Many people are ignorant about BDSM and think that "submissive" is related to being subjugated or lesser when the truth of BDSM relationships is anything but that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 07:11 PM
2

They always give up when you point out that honesty and informed consent are the most important parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 07:08 PM
2

Is reductio ad absurdum just your favorite fallacy, or are you hoping that we won't have heard of it? Too bad for you, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 07:06 PM
0

I don't either, but it's more about the smells. Unpleasant odors really kill a mood for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 07:04 PM
3

I also watch rape porn frequently; it's rather cute, the assumptions they make about people who disagree with them, isn't it? Two women who enjoy force fantasy but still don't think that men should treat their partners with disrespect; who'd have thunk it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:58 PM
3

That's literally all they do, so you're correct. They think they know the answers, and anything that doesn't fit is dismissed as an anomaly or even outright lie, regardless of how many people who don't identify as terpers support it. It's called confirmation bias, and trp is steeped in it. "I believe what I want to believe because it allows me to blame others- I only blame myself in the sense that I'm not attractive/interesting/rich enough for these shallow hypergamous feeeeemales". They preach …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:52 PM
3

There I can probably surmise that men in gay porn tend to be better looking than men in straight porn. I have been known to enjoy gay porn myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 11:08 PM
2

Men fuck wealthy and unattractive women for precisely the same reason. Funny how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:44 PM
2

Yeah, we're doing the same thing with you guys- spreading the word about who is a misogynist fuckwad who believes women are big children who have to be managed and treated like less than them. Nice how that works out, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:43 PM
1

I love men. I appreciate the directness of their communication and their gross, immature humor. I love their ability to play, really play, at any age. I prefer hanging out with men in general because I've never been into traditionally feminine activities like group shopping/salon trips and gossip is really boring to me. I seriously don't care about it- I have no interest at all. I don't watch soaps or evening dramas for the same reason. I don't keep many women friends because I like having secre…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:37 PM
2

The only things I can think of that even qualify for such a title are using negative stereotypes about women like being overly weak or emotional to manipulate an unfavorable situation or avoid work, and I think those silly bitches should be called out/fired if the situation warrants. Bursting into tears when caught fucking up shouldn't get you out of trouble. However, women who are so inclined are going to keep doing shit like that as long as men keep falling for it; it would be useless otherwis…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:19 PM
3

If you're not doing it on purpose, it's not dread game. Are you being obtuse for a reason or just to be annoying?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:16 PM
5

It's pretty fair to say that flirting with other people in front of your spouse is deliberately hurtful and disrespectful unless it has been discussed and established as OK, period. If you care about someone, you shouldn't want to be disrespectful and hurtful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:12 PM
2

It certainly is! I'm as against terper BS as anyone could possibly be, and I totally believe that ending a relationship due to sexual compatibility is both fair and a good idea. The problem is terpers are irrationally terrified of "divorce rape", even though the vast majority of US marriages end in equitable distribution of property and zero alimony, and joint custody for fathers who actually seek it is the most common it has ever been. They seem to have some kind of objection to paying child su…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 10:10 PM
1

You completely missed the part where no one is forced to marry. Asking "why should a man marry" is useless, because a man who wants to marry, will, and a man who doesn't want to marry, won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:59 PM
1

I would love for you to point out where, in any dictionary standard or legal, that monogamy "implies" sexual needs will be met. Your entire premise rests on that assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:55 PM
3

If your wife is aware that you are getting sex from other women and approves, it's not cheating. Otherwise, it is. No amount of word salad will change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:43 PM
5

Your obligation not to cheat is not a "sexual obligation". It is a trust based obligation from a promise that you, yourself, gave in a marriage ceremony of your own free will. The wording is generally something like "forsaking all others", and that leaves zero loopholes. Sleeping with someone else after promising not to without the express consent of the person to whom you made the promise is cheating, no matter how you try to use semantic subterfuge. There will never be a way you can twist lack…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:40 PM
16

Well, all of us women who actually know how our sex drives work will certainly take your utterly ignorant assumption under advisement LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:29 PM
1

Your entire premise hinges on the assumption that withholding sex is a manipulative move with zero context or proof that is the case, and it very often is not. I'm the HL in my relationship, so I deeply and personally understand what it's like to feel like you're not getting enough sex, but I feel like it's not just fallacious but counterproductive to assume malice with no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:27 PM
8

The idea that anyone is obligated to offer use of their body to anyone else for any reason under any circumstances is utterly repugnant to any thinking person, so to equate exercising one's bodily autonomy with open and blatant disrespect of someone you claim to love and hold above all others makes zero sense, except to those who feel they are entitled to sex. Oh, and your assertion that going without sex is like being tortured holds no water, otherwise prisons would all be required to have conj…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:23 PM
-1

How very convenient that you can guarantee his experience fits with your rhetoric. What a useful skill, this ability to determine such things!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:16 PM
1

If your wife had an accident tomorrow that rendered her incapable of ever fucking you again, would you still feel what you call affection? If not, you do not love her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:15 PM
0

What a lovely straw man, so wrapped up in ribbons and tied with pretty bows- too bad the blue pill has no interest in infringing on anyone's freedom of speech. Offering rebuttal and even mockery doesn't stop you from saying what you wish. When it makes you happy to have power over someone you're in a relationship with, you have completely lost sight of the point of being in a relationship and it's not unlikely that your partner is being abused, no matter how strongly their Stockholm Syndrome may…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:09 PM
2

Bullshit. Until the misogynistic and downright hateful talk about women in trp stops, you will never be able to make a believable argument that you think men are "no better or worse" than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:02 PM
1

Only if you can prove those personal anecdotes have anything to do with feminism as a movement. It might be amusing to watch you try.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:00 PM
1

LOL; nearly your whole point is that historically things have "worked better" a certain way, and you claim to be "more developed"? There is seriously very little funnier than watching you guys delude yourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:59 PM
1

You should let those "friends" know that shaming is proven to exacerbate the emotional/mental problems that contribute to problem eating and obesity, and they are quite literally helping to kill the person they're mocking early. This is not tumblr science. This is psychologist expert consensus. Shaming motivates almost no one to positive life changes. Support does. Showing someone why they care about them being around is far more likely to help them decide to lose weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:55 PM
0

No one shames for those physical things only except in reference to a certain pattern of behavior that includes constantly blaming others for your problems and feeling entitled. It is the behavior being mocked. I haven't decided if you know that and you're being facetious, or if you're really that ignorant of this point you're arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:52 PM
0

It's never your place to comment on someone's appearance unless they ask for your input. Period. End of.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:48 PM
0

Citation needed. And you'd better have it with a statement like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:28 PM
-1

Yes. From other men. You guys should probably work on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:27 PM
0

LOL! So... you're jealous because women are more superficially supportive of each other? And you're blaming the fact that men don't support each other emotionally on women, somehow? Sorry, this type of illogical progression will have to be explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:25 PM
0

I'm sure you can prove all that is really true and not just what you tell yourself to justify being a hateful fucktard, can't you? Also, I'm sure you treat people who smoke and drink excessively with equal derision, right? Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite now would we? Workaholics/the highly stressed are also at a high risk for heart attack, so we probably need to start treating those people like shit too. After all, they're all making unhealthy choices. Or is it really all about you being a supe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:23 PM
2

People who argue that "fat acceptance" is about forcing fat on people are the same ignorant assholes who claim that the "health at any size" movement is for lying about the effects weight has on your health- they don't read anything about it besides TumblrInAction or other places that make fun of it, so they wouldn't have any idea that it's not uncommon for overweight people to go untreated for serious health problems because doctors assume their weight is the problem and insist on weight loss b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:20 PM
0

So I guess your word when you married her is worthless? Aren't men supposed to be super honorable and stuff? How do you reconcile that particular bit of hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:13 PM
1

I know right; well, at least they have dating sites for people with herpes now. He'll probably be able to get something even if he does admit his STIs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:12 PM
1

Yes, because literally every time a woman has a problem or has a bad day, that's a shit test!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:11 PM
1

Ooh, the old "I know you are, but what am I?" comeback! Paul Ruebens would be so flattered that you're still kicking his jams.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:10 PM
-2

Anyone who wants to be a decent human being and deal with relationships on respectful, equal footing would reject ideas that suggested otherwise. Oh, and it's hilarious that you would say any man could say something works on "the vast majority of women" LOL; how many women do you think the average terp meets, exactly? By the way, "sees" is plural and does not require an apostrophe. What did you think you were saying there exactly? See is? Does something belong to see? Also, "losses" is what you …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:02 PM
0

It's cute how you just undermined your own point; marriage counselors would never give advice without meeting with each couple in order to find out about them, because everyone is different. The fact that there are healthy relationship behaviors (honesty, open communication) and unhealthy ones (manipulation, dishonesty) doesn't change the fact that each couple is unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 10:01 PM
1

You really shouldn't have bothered here; the only time they are strictly scientific is when they're demanding evidence from other people. The fact that they have none whatsoever for their own assertions never fazes them. "I say this works so it does" is the literally the only thing any of them have.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 09:58 PM
0

The Blue Pill isn't "losing" anything. You assume there's some kind of battle going on? Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 09:51 PM
1

More of a one-liner in the episode where Elliot was trying to figure out how old he really was for his birthday. Remember how that backfired with the whole forced retirement thing?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:57 PM
5

I'm over 30 and I have almost been refused alcohol purchase because I changed my haircut and the clerk didn't believe I was as old as my ID says.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:55 PM
3

Probably because the thought of you counseling anyone with your toxic views of women is terrifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 04:39 PM
3

No it doesn't, you idiot. False accusations have the same burden of proof as any crime, meaning failure to convict is not proof of false allegations. They have to prove the person was actually lying, not just show that they can't prove they did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 04:37 PM
4

Entitlement in that context refers to any kind of structured payment, and I recall that promoting the general welfare has been one of the primary goals of this country since the Declaration of Independence, so why don't you try your bullshit where people don't know better?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 04:33 PM
4

Do you guys fuck your straw men? Is that why you love them so much, seriously? Because literally every single time those words are used, they're in reference to sex and romantic reciprocation. Every fucking time. Not basic human respect; literally no one has ever said that you don't deserve to be treated with human decency. You need to take your bitter bullshit to therapy. *Edit I see you talking about having anxiety. Well, guess what cupcake- lots of people have anxiety. I have it pretty badly …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 04:23 PM
5

I can't imagine feeling like a sex doll is anything but another sex toy- perhaps fun, but peripheral to the experience and not primary. It wouldn't matter how advanced it was. Having sex with an artificial life form would always be masturbation, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 08:58 PM
13

Tell him flat out that you know what he's doing and you won't put up with it. Then stick with that. Those guys are so delusional that nothing less will help. If he's already "doubled down" then he's committed to this more than he is to you, and unless you want to end up in a flat-out abusive relationship or getting cheated on, you have to stop it now. You also need to be ready to leave.
/r/ExRedPill14/09/15 11:14 PM
0

You mean higher, genius?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 11:08 PM
0

So what you're saying is no.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 11:08 PM
1

Your lack of comprehension of what "institutional" means is baffling. Systematic racism is the issue here, not individual anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 11:03 PM
-2

Oh look, yet another person who hasn't bothered to inform themselves about what privilege really is whining that their personal circumstances disprove it. yawn
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 10:54 PM
-2

This post is literally nothing but straw men; you do know that, right? There are some crazies who say all of those types of things, but they are hardly organized or numerous enough to be considered any kind of "movement".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 10:52 PM
1

I love men. I enjoy the company of men more, and more often, than I do most women. I absolutely love fucking men. Although I'm bisexual, I'm entirely heteroromantic and have not ever had a serious dating relationship with a woman. I don't have those warm, fuzzy love feelings for women; only men. I dislike terpers. They are not men, in my book; they are overcompensating, nasty-minded, immature wannabes looking for tricks and manipulation to get what they want instead of being up front, honest, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 11:37 PM
1

If you think that isn't the prevailing sentiment of TRP, you haven't spent enough time there. *edit Your flair is confusing :P
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 11:30 PM
6

Truth; give me a bespectacled IT guy who knows more about my computer than I do (and I can take it apart & put it back together successfully) over a meathead braggart literally any day, for anything, including meaningless casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 09:25 PM
-1

You guys literally cannot ever deal with the fact that you do everything you whine about other people doing; all you ever say is "This isn't about us!". It's so transparent and pitiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 08:35 PM
4

That might matter if we had a "side", or if we were trying to win people over; we're not. We're just pointing and laughing. Sometimes we come here to do it directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 08:10 PM
-1

You don't seem to understand the difference between "hate" and "mockery". We don't think terpers have no right to exist. We wouldn't murder them, given the opportunity. We just think they're a huge joke. Only someone extremely oversensitive would call mockery and satire "hate".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 08:09 PM
2

If that is the case, we're sorely behind; we've done literally nothing whatsoever to push any kind of agenda. We just make fun of you. I suppose sharing your disgusting methods with other women would seem like a "radical feminist agenda" to someone who is depending on ignorance to get laid, but that's really just too bad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 09:29 PM
5

What they really mean is that women who are thoroughly beaten down rarely leave relationships, no matter how bad they are; if the goal is just to stay married, this is a logical- abusive, but logical- way to achieve that. Take a woman with no other options and destroy her self-esteem until she has no faith in herself and she will stay with you until she dies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 09:27 PM
-1

You do realize what you're doing right now is building a straw man, right? I see how hard you're working, but you need to realize that we all see it and it isn't going anywhere. The Blue Pill only exists to oppose the terpers. There is not ideology, no common theme except mockery and satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 09:24 PM
6

Of course not. We believe that the success rate is roughly equivalent to anyone else using any other method, meaning that what they're doing doesn't "work" and confirmation bias is heavily at play. We don't believe, because we have zero reason to believe, that red pill method works better than anything else. Most women are disgusted by your ideals, and we are spreading your bullshit as quickly as we can, I assure you. Some day, every woman will laugh at attempts to "neg" and run game in your sty…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 09:16 PM
8

Wow, a country where women are barely more than property reports most rape accusations are "false"? What a shocker.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 09:12 PM
15

Dare we say... hamstering? Heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 04:36 PM
1

It's funny how you would blow a gasket if one of us said that about a man. You guys are so adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 04:34 PM
1

It's income-based, so her phat Food Network money is what's causing that. I figure if mom is loaded, the kid deserves some luxury; fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 04:34 PM
8

They're just trying as hard as they can to obfuscate the fact that this ruling is something they deny ever happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 04:33 PM
8

So... a woman is paying massive child support to a man who has primary custody, and you guys choose to whine about the fact that it's being reported? Could that possibly be because your cognitive dissonance can't directly face this blatant evidence that maybe all your bullshit about those laws being sexist isn't right, and it really was about income all along just like the law and everyone with common sense says?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 04:30 PM
3

No. She's one woman making one woman's choices. No single person could ever be proof of any terper claims. It's cute when you guys turn off subreddit style to downvote when you disagree, but don't have the balls to respond. How very alfalfa! Maintain that frame LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 05:34 PM
9

I know; it's almost like if you go after women for casual sex, you end up with women who are into casual sex! It's a truly baffling phenomenon. Where they utterly fail is equating their "sluts" of preference to women who won't give them the time of day.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 05:30 PM
2

I have a high "N-count"; I don't know what it is but 50 would be a generous lowball, I'm thinking. I stopped keeping score just out of high school at 9, and I'm in my 30s now. They weren't all men and they weren't all single encounters; by that I don't mean ONS, I mean group sex. I had a capricious youth; nearly all of my count happened between the ages of 18 and 21. I had lots of fun, I didn't lie to or manipulate anyone, and I used mountains of condoms. I do not (and have never had) have any k…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 05:20 PM
6

Begging the question does not become you. People obfuscate when they are worried about being judged for their answers, and I'm sure you're aware of that. What was your goal in wanting someone else to say it? So you can "prove" women lie, and the dismiss the fact that men lie just as frequently as not important?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 05:16 PM
2

why the number of subscribers climbs so quickly? Because it's a hilarious shit show and upon reading gives a similar level of amusement to watching the worst kind of reality TV, mostly; you're delusional if you think all your subscribers "took the pill" or have any interest in taking it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:39 PM
2

No, it's sexist because when we point out that "all men are like that" in the exact same way "all women are like that", you guys say it doesn't matter. When we point out that men are at least equally guilty of every single poor behavior that you constantly bash women for, you say it doesn't matter. You are sexist down so deep that it is part of you and you can't see it, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:36 PM
4

That's OK :) we're busy teaching young women to recognize the signs of your manipulation, so you're all going to be just as mad 10, 20, 50 years from now as you are at this moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:33 PM
5

Yeah, and there's a reason why circumstantial evidence is almost never sufficient to convict anyone, as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:30 PM
3

How pitiful is it that you have to post the whole album every time? I'm sure it's too difficult to actually be accurate, as usual; all fallacies are like that!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:23 PM
3

Yes, if someone chose who they wanted to associate with based on personality tests they would be equally illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:22 PM
4

It's cute that you think hypotheses with zero substantiation require refutation. You guys can't even grasp burden of proof, let alone what constitutes evidence or a valid theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:20 PM
12

That's too difficult though. It's much easier to follow a formula and blame the woman when it fails. After all, self-fulfilling prophecy is exactly what people who think in generalizations really want- confirmation of what they have already decided it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:19 PM
1

You go ahead and tell yourself whatever you want; that's all you guys do anyway. You're wrong and you have zero proof otherwise, but you're not concerned with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 04:29 PM
3

You're dealing with a deeply ingrained case of confirmation bias, and it's only going to frustrate you to "debate" with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 04:26 PM
0

Well, at least someone finally gets that people who are anti-red pill categorically have no ideology of their own to push, and no agenda for rejecting and disdaining to advice given other than finding it personally repugnant. We're not trying to support any status quo or keep men from getting laid- we just know bullshit when we see it, and won't simply be quiet about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 04:24 PM
0

It's funny how you keep avoiding actually addressing those posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:17 AM
-3

Yeah, it's so hard to understand why someone might be too upset to continue after reading a post about how it should be OK to rape your wife, or how getting a girl drunk to fuck her is OK. People are just so emotional!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:16 AM
4

On this very post, a terper denies that blue pill people have happy relationships and says they are lying because they don't want others to know they aren't happy. Anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:14 AM
3

The burden of proof is on the one making the claim; if we were even interested in "refuting" red pill bullshit, you would have to prove there were anything to refute first.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:12 AM
3

Anecdotes are not "data" in the sense of being quantifiable evidence whose "analysis" would yield any useful results. You're talking about people telling stories on the internet, and trying to say that "analyzing" those stories constitutes some kind of research. Any actual scientist would set you straight really quickly if you were to refer to field reports, that have zero proof of authenticity, as "data". Saying TRP is "more well read" is the least logical and most ridiculous assertion, even af…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:09 AM
4

You'll have to forgive us for not taking the time to "consider" whether emotional abuse, blatant manipulation, and overt sexism might be valid. I know; how closed minded of us!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:06 AM
7

That's exactly right; it doesn't come up often in my daily life, but I have had occasion to mention red pill dogma and it is invariably met with disbelief that it is even real or serious, and then disgust when they realize I'm not kidding (My husband was one of those people; disgusted amusement was his response). Personally I'm beginning to think I should talk about it more often, cross post their bullshit to as many places as I can so that women can be armed against their manipulation and emoti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:04 AM
6

Oh right, because your terper anecdotes are $100% truthful, but any that are contrary must be lies. How can you possibly assume what kind of relationship anyone on AM had? That's a huge fucking assumption to make no point at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 11:59 PM
0

Yeah, only not. War has a shitton of rules, and decent people have plenty about love too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 11:52 PM
6

Robbing banks or theft in general works for making money. It's still unethical and something most people would not consider, because it victimizes others. Terpers don't seem to be concerned with anyone else's well-being but their own. You're never going to convince decent people this is OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 11:48 PM
2

Well, it's a good thing the majority of us aren't interested in logically refuting red pill bullshit; the blue pill is mostly about satire and mockery. We don't have any agenda of our own to push, being very different people with a myriad of lifestyles and points of view. The only thing we agree upon categorically is that the vast majority of red pill claims, beyond the obvious and common sense part that improving yourself will obviously make you more attractive and successful romantically, are …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 11:47 PM
3

I might want an STI test before we have sex (I've made it this far without catching anything and I intend to keep it that way), but it's not a deal breaker for me. I don't have anything against sex workers, only people who exploit them or mistreat them and make money off their labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 04:21 PM
5

Are you denying there's a lot of poverty in Russia? From the amount of extremely disturbing porn I see cute Russian women participating in, it seems to me that attractive women of certain income levels are pretty open to options that women in some places wouldn't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 04:19 PM
0

Child support is not a substitute for alimony, it is supporting your children. You could at least try not to let your overwhelming bias leak through.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 04:10 PM
1

Custody is awarded by a court in cases of divorce even if there is no dispute, just to be clear. It's part of the divorce proceedings.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 04:00 PM
1

To be super clear on top of any other silly posts about US divorce law, alimony very rarely happens anymore in this country, and is not even possible in some states. Alimony was a concept that was much more common when many middle and upper class women did not work at all for their adult lives, so being left by their husbands would have left them destitute. It was rarely an exorbitant amount of money unless you're talking about millionaire divorces, which was super rich back then. It was intende…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 03:57 PM
2

The things they get right are common sense. I'm part of your majority; I've said many times that *not being obsessed with getting laid (the "pussy pedestal") and being a person people want to be around are obviously good ideas. It's the disrespectful, demeaning, damn-near dehumanizing way terpers talk about women that makes them batshit crazy misogynists. It's their willingness to follow people like Roosh who openly and proudly admit to and advocate rape that make people look upon them with disg…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 11:20 PM
2

If you handle your business in an honest and respectful manner, it is fair. Otherwise, nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 11:12 PM
1

LOL! You think people were happier when there was less divorce? Maybe men were; they had the little woman trapped at home with no options, cooking and cleaning and hoping against hope that their husband came home too tired to give her 2 minutes of humping with no foreplay. (It's not even that long ago that women's orgasms were commonly thought to be a myth.) Meanwhile, hubby could run around cheating and get away with it, because what is wifey gonna do once you knock her up a couple of times? Sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:54 PM
1

Having an expectation of getting sex without a clear agreement for such is idiotic. It's no wonder your sub is so full of bitter, angry men; hinging your entire life's happiness on how often you can manipulate someone into giving you what you want is a recipe for frustration.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:46 PM
12

That's absolutely asinine. Men have absolute control over their sex lives; they just don't get to force others to be involved in their sex lives. Men are free to say yes or no, to seek or not seek sex, same as women. It's so incredibly pathetic that anyone actually believes that women choosing to not have sex with men under whatever circumstances is some kind of infringement on the men's rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:43 PM
2

Tell yourself whatever you need to, dude. The world is full of people who have never even heard of your bullshit leading happy lives and having healthy relationships. Your ugly, bitter little corner of the world isn't even significant on a global scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:25 PM
1

It's cute how you don't see you fulfill your own prophecies with your "slut tests"; you push someone to do what you want to see in order to dismiss them, and then if you see any sign of what you're pushing for, you treat it like evidence when you tainted the whole experiment with your bias to begin with. You guys can't even begin to fathom scientific method.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:36 PM
3

They would ignore the results of such a survey or study if it did not mesh with their expected results by saying that women commonly lie about what they want, so it would be a couple thousand crowdfunded dollars down the drain.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:31 PM
1

Well the reality of AWALT is that we'd say only, say 30% of women would marry a man who makes less than them, imo I bet for even that one statistical claim, you cannot provide any valid citation. Even the way you phrase it is ignorant- "the reality... is" and then at the end "imo". Terpers need to realize that literally all they have is "IMO". That's it. No factual basis, no reliable evidence, no expert consensus. Just opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:29 PM
1

Saying "nu uh because you can't disprove it" is the exact same argument theists make for their fairy tales, so congrats on managing to sink to that level. A hypothesis does not have to be "done away with" without expert consensus, but it does need to be treated like a hypothesis, which is nothing but a fancy sounding word for guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:26 PM
0

Exactly- as opposed to "biotrufs!" and the whole point of being known as "red pill" indicates that they are the only ones who know how things "really are". It's cute how much backpedaling and "of course not all or always" we're seeing on this post, isn't it? Because under logical scrutiny, literally every "biotruf" falls apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:24 PM
6

Why bother? All they will do is dismiss the facts, say they won't police their tone or attempt to be accurate because generalizations are easier, and go on about their ignorant way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:18 PM
5

Aww, him so butthurt! How adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 09:59 PM
1

decrease are population LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 09:53 PM
1

All people are potential rapists. This is an asinine question. Also, all of your "shouldn't they" bullshit is victim blaming. If you are passed out naked and spread-eagled on a park bench, it's still 100% the fault of the person who commits the assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 10:36 PM
-1

Whoooa now, hold on there- are you seriously saying that anyone who does anything to improve themselves in hopes it will help them be more successful in relationships is red pill? Because no. No no no. If your ideology began and ended with self-improvement, no one would have any problem with it. It's when you get into emotional manipulation, sexual coercion (yes, that is what pushing through "LMR" is, no matter how you try to spin it) and blatant dishonesty in relationships that people are disgu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:27 PM
0

Isn't this semantic juggling adorable? This is my favorite part. "We call it by different words when men do it, so it's not the same thing!" LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:16 PM
0

You expect a terper to provide a direct and honest answer to a simple question? You'll get over that today!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:09 PM
0

ITT: idiotic terpers who believe people make zero movement while sleeping. I would be too embarrassed to ever speak in public, were I that ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 09:08 PM
-1

It doesn't, but limited minds prefer to work in generalizations. It's easier to deal in stereotypes, regardless of validity or accuracy, than to handle each unique situation for what it actually is. That way when things fail, it can be attributed to preconceived notions and blame can be explained away with "AWALT" - basically what a terper would call "hamstering" to the most extreme degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 08:55 PM
2

10 women is a negligible portion of the population, so yeah, it wouldn't prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:36 PM
2

You have no idea if she's ever done such a thing, but I hope you find your straw man cuddly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:35 PM
3

Why do terpers resort to reductio ad absurdum so quickly? Do you actually realize, deep down, that outlandish examples are the only kind that make your points look feasible? Or do you simply not understand what a useless debating tactic that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:34 PM
2

I would love to see your evidence for the assertion that it isn't possible to love more than one person equally- and if all you have is the fact that amount of love can't be measured, well then you kind of blew your own point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:24 PM
1

Narcissistic and delusional are the cornerstones of TRP- you're not wrong. Anyone else find it adorably ironic that they spend so much time whining about women who hurt them and trying to make sure it doesn't happen again, but when women do similar things they're "alpha widows"?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 10:13 PM
-1

We understand that terpers don't have the capacity for sapiosexuality. You don't have to remind us.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 06:48 PM
-1

Yes, because she is all women. Seriously, have you guys ever even peeked at the definition of evidence or proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 06:28 PM
4

1) I don't think we can "get men to open up emotionally" if they don't want to; trying to force that kind of thing is useless. It will end in a fight or dishonesty as the guy tries to get you to leave him alone. If you need a man who is more emotionally available, go find one. They don't all act like they are made of stone. 2) No, I'm happy to hear and empathize with anything he might want to tell me. I would not pry for things he doesn't. I do not feel put off or disgusted by men who admit to h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 12:43 AM
4

I think if it makes a guy happy to behave in a gentlemanly way, more power to him. It is sexist, by definition, and it is outdated as we strive toward equality as a society, but it's not something that is damaging to anyone if they choose it freely; obligation is the bad part. I feel the same way about women who feel the need to conform to the sexist, outdated ideal of ladylike behavior. You do you- just don't expect me to. As a woman who does not fit the generally-accepted definition of "Lady",…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 12:26 AM
2

His entire argument is based on the idea that his assumed "motivations" behind bad behavior might be different depending on gender, and that that somehow makes a difference, when it demonstrably does not. There is no "motivation" that could ever excuse dishonesty and betrayal. It doesn't matter if you're tucked or dangly in your pants. People who do those things are shitty people, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 12:17 AM
2

Look at that hamster go; "men are special and don't have to be held to the same standard as we expect from women!" Nope. Bullshit is exactly the same no matter what genitals the perpetrator sports. Dishonesty and betrayal are not gendered topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 12:15 AM
0

Nice ad hominem. What a logical, rational rebuttal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 11:58 PM
5

Right, "recent"; previously instead of giving them anti-depressant pills, they sent them to the doctor for "hysteria" when they were "stressed out" where they were "massaged" to a "paroxysm" so they could calm down... meaning a doctor masturbated them to orgasm with a vibrator, because their ignorant husbands thought 2 minutes of humping with zero foreplay was how sex works, they were shamed into thinking masturbating themselves was gross and wrong, and they had literally no outlets for their mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 11:54 PM
5

So? Is there a point? How do you even quantify "more emotional"? Never mind; you were never trying to make a valid observation, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 11:41 PM
4

That's sadly more likely the more self-obsessed the guy is, as well- like "What, you're not almost there just because you're with me? Isn't my mere presence and penetration just that hot? Must be something wrong with you then."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 11:36 PM
1

Yeah it was not good.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 12:13 AM
1

There's no need for an apostrophe in the word "wants". It's not autocorrect either, because that's not a word at all. I hope you're making literacy part of your self-improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 12:11 AM
1

I can't help but pity people who don't understand the appeal of anticipation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 09:08 PM
4

It's really sad that you think your personal experience is an absolute and all-encompassing truth. I have male friends. I have male friends I've had over a decade, even, with zero sexual tension.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 09:06 PM
2

Crude is right, and "case study" is really pushing the limits of that idea. Maybe you have busy, shallow, or otherwise uncaring friends- there's zero scientific basis for extrapolating that to the entire population.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:50 PM
2

Nothing, as long as the women they have casual sex with are also interested in that kind of relationship and are aware that's all is going on. I'm sure I don't really need to go pull* terp posts on "plates" who don't know they're "plates" to prove that isn't the case, unless you want to be blatantly obtuse. Nothing is wrong with anything in a relationship as long as it is honest and respectful. The problem is that rp "strategy" is often dishonest, indirect, and designed to keep any prospective p…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:45 PM
2

Regardless of gender: People who are not honest and up front about their intentions are manipulative, fake, and all those other redundant and unnecessary adjectives you used. Other generalizations about "unattractive men" on reddit are generally based on examples of their behavior that come directly from that person, not someone else's opinion based on nothing but "this man is unattractive". When someone pulls a social media post or shares a PM conversation that says anything along the lines of …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:36 PM
1

But I doubt you want to say that That's where you're wrong- most women are completely up front about it, and it makes absolutely zero difference when someone has set their expectations for something else. How do you think the "friend zone" myth came to be? Most guys are not complaining that women don't tell them they only want to be friends- they're complaining that they do tell them that. As if they would rather be left hanging in hopes than know for certain it isn't happening. It is 100% the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:20 PM
0

That is literally insane. "Don't be friends with a man, because he may have completely baseless expectations of you that will make him feel used if you don't follow through eventually". Are you fucking serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:18 PM
2

There's no reason for that. Those things either progress normally in the course of getting to know someone or they don't. The real problem is people making assumptions based on what they think are clues but could be nothing. Actually, the real problem with most things are assumptions. What really needs to happen is no one expecting anything they haven't been expressly promised. That would solve pretty much any related problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:16 PM
9

Asking and discussing preferences is not coercion, so maybe you should familiarize yourself with the definition before you make such ignorant comments. That was the worst part of your overall silly and baseless, anecdotal rant. Coercion involves threat of violence or other harm to get someone to do what you want. Even threatening to break up with someone if they don't want to blow you more often would not meet that criteria. Basically if the way you state your preferences makes you feel like you…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 06:55 PM
1

Right, because anyone who disagrees with you is the equivalent of a 5 year old. Way to keep that ego on the forefront, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:45 PM
1

No doesn't always mean no Yes, yes it does. No absolutely always means no unless it is changed to a yes by the person who said no originally without being coerced in any way. You never even addressed the idea that you can't rape your spouse- you just tried to deflect by assuming every spousal rape case is from an extended length dead bedroom and a man pushed to his wit's end (and no, even that wouldn't be an excuse). Yes, it is wrong to cheat, but it's still less morally objectionable than rape …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:42 PM
1

A set of strategies that depends on certain things you believe being true to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:34 PM
1

For fuck's sake, please, plurals do not require apostrophes even when they end in vowels.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:27 PM
0

So... the takeaway from this is "Of course not all women are like that, but it's easier to be pithy than accurate". It definitely did not take a wall of text to say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 08:34 PM
3

"Hardcore" terpers object to leftist political policies because they have a large focus on social safety nets, and when women don't necessarily have to depend on their children's fathers and therefore stick around no matter how miserable or abused they are, the option of getting help allows them a way out of bad relationships. Terpers liked it better when women were forced to spend their lives at best, unfulfilled and at worst being constantly mistreated, because men had a built in maid and sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 08:29 PM
3

You're just talking straight out of your ass. I personally know literally zero married women who got a thousand dollar diamond- or any diamond, for most of them- and barely any who do not work full time along with their husbands. You're as mired in the past as any terper. The women you're talking about are a dying breed in this economy. Your second point is so biased and baseless it doesn't deserve rebuttal. Number 3 makes a circular argument regarding terms that were made up by "the manosphere"…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 06:17 PM
3

"DAE women can only achieve things through being slutty?!?" Yeah. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 10:37 PM
1

Obvious clues: offering to do things for me, asking if I'm single, asking what I do for fun, complimenting specific details about my appearance (as opposed to "Hey, you look nice today!" or something) Less obvious clues: hovering in my vicinity, looking for excuses to talk about inane things/random texts, liking my social media posts that are inside jokes with other people he can't possibly get, suggestive jokes- especially the "I'm only kidding, flirting with you just now... unless you like it!…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 05:33 PM
1

Hookups are casual sex, generally at least oral, whether ONS or fuck buddy/booty call arrangements. I think anything that stops short of oral/genital contact or penetrative sex would be more likely to be called making out than hooking up, even if hands on genitals are involved (unless you're in junior high. That could be considered hooking up at that age). I've had lots of them, way more than I can remember. By "outside of a monogamous relationship" do you mean while in one, with someone else? B…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 12:58 AM
6

The main problem is that they can't seem to grasp the fact that the plural of anecdote is not evidence. It doesn't matter how many field reports get posted. They're still not facts; they don't prove anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 12:52 AM
5

Higher reasoning skills make us fundamentally more complicated than most animals, and that complication renders generalizations less accurate and useful. Those "bio truth theories" don't have much to say about say, dolphins, because they are more complicated than wolves or deer due to their intelligence. Some other animals choose a single mate for life, and while we may know about penguin gifts, do we know the same for beavers, or any of the other species that practice monogamy? However, I'm sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 12:49 AM
0

Apparently it is; equality must mean precise 50% split on literally everything. It can't possibly mean 2 people both doing the best they can to support each other and accepting each other's efforts in the good faith they are usually offered. It can't possibly be about not keeping score at all and being happy we can do things to help each other. That makes too much sense for terper brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:06 PM
2

Absolutely he can. Red pill bs might work through a haze of alcohol and lust, but in the cold light of day it's just a guy being a selfish asshole. But hey, since meaningless sex is all most of them want, they're cool with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:03 PM
1

Haha, I love that no one has responded to this because they know that almost no one, even feeeeemales, gets alimony anymore. At least, not in the US. I know you're not there from your previous posts, but most terpers are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 10:59 PM
1

Uh, you have to prove something before you can disprove it. The people making the claims bear the sole burden of proof. Since they have provided no proof that a woman will leave you based on your failure to make them happy with any more frequency than men will do the same thing, this question is utterly useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 10:55 PM
1

Women absolutely do not have more legal rights than men. Please stop saying such asinine things. Unless you're talking about their choice on abortions, which men do not have because, get this, they can't be pregnant! That is literally the only actual "right" that women have and men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 10:52 PM
2

All decent people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 10:38 PM
3

You are very fucktarded if you think emotional trauma is a "controlling behavior".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 10:07 PM
3

That kid is ridiculous. The woman was also unkind, but seriously, wtf is that guy on about. He sounds like he's about 15 and a totally douche. As far as how that extrapolates to all those groups? Yes, quite often it is backlash and lacking in logical basis. A lot of it is self-fulfilling prophecy too, along with a healthy dash of confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 10:02 PM
4

You get what you expect to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 09:45 PM
6

I think the idea of keeping score so that things can be "100% equal" is something that would actually cause problems in a relationship. What I consider equal is that we both do what needs to be done. We both make concessions for the comfort and happiness of the other. Of course major decisions are shared, and personal decisions may or may not be depending. Neither of us expects to be catered to. Neither one of us considers any type of chore or activity gendered; we both just do what needs to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 09:43 PM
1

Settling is what pretty much everyone feels like they do, unless they perceive their partner as significantly more desirable than they are. I don't think it really exists in any quantifiable sense; a person can think they're in a great relationship and decide they "settled" later, based on their own satisfaction with the relationship. Being in a relationship that feels wanting in one or more ways is what I would suppose the actual definition would be, or close enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 06:56 PM
2

This is a lovely example of semantic sophistry. Thanks for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 06:53 PM
1

Because obviously you are a unicorn. That's a pretty hefty ego you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 06:29 PM
4

You deliberately took that in the most obtuse way possible because you know damn well it's only logical. That's a fallacious debating tactic known as reductio ad absurdum, which I guess I can add to straw man as a favorite of your type.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 06:16 PM
2

There isn't one. The Blue Pill has no ideology or advice to offer. It merely points out and mocks the things we find most worthy from The Red Pill. Individual members that identify as such may offer their own opinions, but they do not speak for all "blue pillers", since literally everything that is not red pill is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 06:13 PM
4

Thanks for throwing in a little generalization about men that you don't have respect for to show OP what hypocrisy really looks like. Of course, if you have any objection to slut-shaming, you must be a white knighting "mangina".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 11:09 PM
1

Why do you people always assume people keep score on how many people they sleep with? (Oh right, because it is the center of your universe.) What is a person with no notch count, because they didn't bother to keep one?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:56 PM
0

Only to terpers; The Blue Pill is literally nothing except opposition to The Red Pill. Terpers have created an ideology for The Blue Pill so that they can imagine they are attacking them on equal ground. The truth is, we share no ideals or beliefs except that The Red Pill is toxic and full of whiny manchildren who amuse and disgust us by turns. Our own relationships and ideals are rarely ever discussed. You should check it out sometime if you need a laugh. That's all it is to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:45 PM
1

Straw man seems to be one of this one's favorites.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:36 PM
0

"She" is also 100% lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 08:55 PM
-3

Of course that's it! It couldn't possibly be that medical diagnoses have improved and continue to improve constantly. Do you think vaccinations cause autism too? After all, they're diagnosing it so much more now!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 08:53 PM
0

Me neither, not even when I was separated- I still got more offers than I had any interest in pursuing, and I was just over 30 at the time. Mostly from really young men too; if I ever do end up single again, I'm definitely never having sex with guys 10+ years younger than me. What a clingy, annoying disaster that was. You'd think a 22 year old guy would be stoked to find a horny woman who just wanted to play video games, smoke weed, and fuck, but oh no- he got super butthurt and even a bit stalk…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 08:50 PM
-3

She really doesn't, and recognizes those momentary pangs are the last remaining vestiges of the way she was raised. Typical terper only saw what he wanted to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 08:46 PM
2

Well sure, there are masochists and people who aren't too bright in every group, but men and women both more or less equally likely to overlook extremely bad character traits, at least temporarily, for someone very good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 11:48 PM
1

I call it "Special Snowflake Syndrome".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:54 PM
3

Are you serious, or providing a Nice GirlTM example?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:53 PM
5

They're the same thing as Nice GuysTM; women who become irrationally hateful and abusive when rejected, who post rants about how men only like "bitches" (when what she means is "women who have something to offer"). It's 2 sides of the exact same coin. The posts from them are rarer, I believe because of a combination of guys not finding their bullshit as disturbing as women do and not caring to share it (to be fair though, men less often have reason to feel genuinely threatened by such things), a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:50 PM
1

So you think all the posts in /r/creepyPMs and /r/niceguys are made up? Completely fabricated as some kind of feminist plot? Please say yes. It would totally make my Friday afternoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:42 PM
3

Nice people do not tell others they should go get raped and die for refusing to send them pictures of their tits. Sorry. There's only so far "frustration" goes as an excuse for asshole behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:41 PM
0

If you are being nice expecting a reward, you are not nice. YOU ARE NOT NICE. YOU ARE FAKE. Do you seriously think women can't tell fake nice from real nice? I mean we obviously can, due to the large number of Nice Guys<sup>TM</sup> out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:38 PM
0

Of course they don't use those exact words, and you're being extremely disingenuous to pretend that's the only way this interpretation is correct. They don't say "YOU OWE ME SEX!" they say "FUCK YOU THEN WHORE" or "FINE YOU'RE A FAT SLUT ANYWAY" or something else hateful and insulting, and then they go to their favorite subreddit or Fb page and post long rants about how women only want assholes and how they'll never get a girl even though they're "so nice". Now you can pretend this shit doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:35 PM
1

That person is saying that your behavior determines what you are, not what you claim to be. When a person claims to be "nice", but behaves in a manner directly contradictory to every definition of nice, they are not nice. They are liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:32 PM
1

Why is it that you people can't understand that being nice as a means to an end is not nice? It's like pretending to like something to get a relationship- say, a woman who swears she thinks basketball is amazing because she thinks it will get her a basketball player boyfriend. When he finds out she actually doesn't know anything about it, should he just be like "aw, OK, well she was just trying to get a relationship, it doesn't matter that she pretended to be something she wasn't"? Would she be …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:30 PM
0

And they are not attractive because we can totally tell that they're faking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:26 PM
2

He doesn't understand that you're telling him it doesn't matter that they're "frustrated" when they treat women who reject them badly- the way they react proves they simply are not nice. Genuinely nice people do not insult others for rejecting them. Genuinely nice people know how to handle their frustration without lashing out against others. That is fundamentally "not nice". thedoti is working under the mistaken assumption that Nice GuysTM actually are nice, and it's society lying to them that …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:24 PM
1

If you immediately tell a woman she's a fat ugly skank when she says she's not interested in you, you are not a nice person. Period. Genuinely nice people do not react to simple rejection like petulant children who dropped their ice cream and can't have more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:17 PM
1

That's absolutely ridiculous. All of my female friends are atheists and they have zero "spiritual" feelings about their sexuality or anyone else's. What decade are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:15 PM
0

If you have to compare yourself to a domestic abuser to seem attractive, you're starting from the wrong waterline. That has nothing to do with "bare minimum"; those people are so far below the bar that it's a long way above them to even reach bare minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:11 PM
-1

Dear sweet baby jeebus, you cited memes LOL All you're proving here is that the Nice GuyTM attitude has been around for a long time. Take a look at /r/creepyPMs some time if you need proof that guys often take an immediate turn for the cruel and insulting when rejected, after previously claiming to be "nice". Claiming you are a nice person doesn't make it true, and people who spend the most time complaining about how "nice" they are are the least likely to be genuine. Oh, and daughters have to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:08 PM
1

As if you guys don't spend literally all your time on trp or ppd dictating what is and is not real- your name even signifies you think you're the only ones living in reality. The rest of us are just telling you what's true for us, and you deny every point of view that doesn't fit your narrative. Truly a less self-aware group of people I have never seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 09:04 PM
3

No matter how many women tell you flat out that you are wrong about what we find attractive, you just keep hamstering it away and substituting your dogma. It's funny to watch, but also makes me feel sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 08:54 PM
2

I think if you're trying to read great societal truths into pop culture cinema, you're trying too hard to convince yourself of something. I could make the opposite of a terper argument using Titanic, and that was at least based on a true story. Girl has perfect alfalfa male- rich, tall, sexy, treats her like a dog to keep her in her place. Girl meets very poor, shorter, still cute because movie, but basically the opposite of her fiance and is enamored, somehow still creates dem tingles even thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 06:14 PM
2

Yeah, things were much better when people had to stay married no matter how miserable they were, because there were no other reasonable choices!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 06:01 PM
3

The irony of you wishing someone had posted a dissenting opinion in your precious sub so they'd be banned is utterly delicious even before we take into consideration you misunderstood it. I believe I'll keep this one for posterity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:32 PM
-1

/r/menkampf/ Many people would probably be surprised that I'm amused by mockery of over-the-top SJWs, because they see my advocacy of basic human decency, emotional maturity, and respect in relationships as putting me in that category. Nope. I disdain extremists of all types.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:30 PM
1

Language evolves, no matter how much progress scares terpers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:26 PM
2

"Becoming"? The base premise is misogynistic. Shrouding your misogyny in pseudoscience only fools yourselves. "Women's true nature" is a ridiculous idea, as if women- or men, for that matter- were a homogeneous group with no individual differentiation. You disdain women and you seek to learn to use them for your own purposes without having to make any compromises toward their happiness. Your purpose is repugnant to any decent person.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 04:56 PM
0

Well, that's the truest thing any of you guys have said in this thread, or maybe ever that I've seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:08 AM
0

He did the opposite of play hard to get- he was there like all the time. I read the books on loan from a friend, and they just get worse as they progress. But never ever for a moment is Edward a red pill man in any sense. He puts her first in absolutely everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:04 AM
0

aka Nice GuysTM
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:03 AM
3

50 Shades is not BDSM, not by a long shot. It makes me cringe to even see the comparisons, frankly. People in the BDSM community overwhelmingly despise how that book makes them look. How exactly does it work that in one comment it's the best seller ever therefore it's what women want, and in the next "mainstream society" is squeamish about it? You say unpilled, but all of your comments on this post have been decidedly reddish, and that particular contradiction does not compute.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:59 PM
1

"Proportionately more" is a long way from "AWALT", better hold frame now! You're starting to concede that blanket stereotyping might not be entirely valid and they'll pull your terper privileges!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:47 PM
1

Ah, good ol' terper misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:45 PM
1

Women who don't want to be used, mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:45 PM
0

No, but no sweeping generalizations can be accurately made from it. *edit Threw an extra "no" in there; sorry, it must be sort of an automatic defensive maneuver when dealing with people who don't acknowledge that no means no, like your average red piller
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:44 PM
1

Please cite for me any instance where consensual, healthy BDSM play has been decried by TBP. Take as long as you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:43 PM
-1

Don't you realize that by that statistic, you're mostly talking about older women making the purchases since they're going print media instead of electronic? Ya'll terpers really trying to get into aging soccer mom undies?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:40 PM
1

I read better erotica than Twilight fan fiction and bodice-rippers, and sometimes I watch porn. Most women below middle age watch porn fairly regularly. What I like to read are usually short stories self-published online. Literally none of them have anything to do with the Fabio set.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:38 PM
1

You may think that's funny, but it's the absolute truth. A paperback doesn't cost much, and after hearing how utterly crap the book was from people informed about that kind of lifestyle plenty of people checked it out to confirm. The women who enjoyed that shit are generally not very smart and know nothing or next to nothing about kink/BDSM. They're sheltered soccer moms and young women who never read anything really dirty before. If other popular stories had their fan fiction get published, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:35 PM
-1

Rape is not an acceptable form of sex play anywhere. If you mean force fantasy, that's not the same thing, because there is consent and the "force" is pretend.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:32 PM
1

Truth! I haven't opened a bodice-ripper since I was a teenager and that was all I could scrounge for naughty reading. They're the wheelhouse of middle-aged women and grandmas for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:29 PM
1

the guy is awesome as fuck, yet he decides to go for a bland unremarkable woman. It's amazing that you didn't notice how incredibly telling just that one little part of your comment really is. You're saying that the woman this man loves to the point he'd die for her is nothing, and you're saying this in a broadly generalized way since no specific characters are mentioned- meaning you believe that no woman is truly good enough for your hero Chad Thundercock. That a man who can be slaying poon lef…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:24 PM
-1

You like your "truth" because it seems simple, but that's why it is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:21 PM
1

The problem is, you people think making any compromise, allowing for anyone else's needs and feelings except your own, is "being a doormat". Actually, those are what emotionally mature people in relationships do every day; demanding that all your needs be met and assuming that the other person is fulfilled by doing so- which is such a laughable concept, it doesn't even deserve rebuttal- is how children interact with parents, not adults in mutual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:20 PM
-1

Yes, because reductio ad absurdum is such a valid debating tactic. Do you find it possible to deal in reality, or is using extreme and therefore unrealistic examples the best you can do?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:17 PM
0

It's because they live in a slightly alternate reality where everything is still just like the 1950s, only not. They just want to put the things that are "not" back into that frame of reference. When women desperately needed a husband to get out of her parents' house and get on with her life, it was very easy for a man to leverage a meager to modest salary into a lifelong maid and sex slave, as they had very few other options. I wonder if they've ever read the Nancy Friday books written about an…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:15 PM
1

Because fantasy and reality aren't the same thing. When you figure that out, you'll see no more use for terper bullshit. Honestly, what an absolutely idiotic idea to even consider- we like to read murder mysteries too. We don't want to be murdered. *edit got that Shatner comma
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:11 PM
1

Absolutely, as long as everyone is in the loop, get married in as big a group as you like. Tax code would need to be overhauled to prevent dependent fraud, but I'm all for that happening so that polyamorous people can make it legal if they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 10:59 PM
1

Yeah, recognizing that everyone is different and supporting what makes anyone happy- as long as it is honest- is a radical concept, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 10:58 PM
1

It was for a date, not a fuck. I don't think you understand the nature of evidence or proof whatsoever. That's not even close to how that kind of study would be conducted. Where is the control group?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 10:57 PM
3

Lots of women are attracted to non-dominant men. Regardless of base instincts, we can aspire to behavior that better supports functioning societies. I have no problem with people who aren't into monogamy, as long as they don't lie to their partners. If you're living your life in the open, you're alright, but you don't get to be a liar or a cheat and just blame base instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 10:56 PM
0

I'm not saying that the person you were arguing with said it perfectly- they didn't. The first thing you said is that it wasn't even necessary to read the previous conversation, so spare me the straw men. He's still being a bit immature and disrespectful, but as many comments in this thread indicate he may not be interested in very long term relationships or isn't into marriage, that's not all that surprising. He's also never been in a situation where 2 people are working full time, raising kids…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 07:09 PM
3

Laying there spread-eagled without responding to anything; comes off like "duty sex" usually
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 07:01 PM
3

Because no one ever goes on the internet and tells convenient lies! The convenient ones are the very most $100% true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 07:00 PM
0

Because talking about their feeeeeelings is so beeeeeta.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:57 PM
4

Yeah, all those direct quotes are such straw men!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:57 PM
1

You haven't been paying attention if you think anyone gets alimony for life; barely anyone in the US gets alimony at all anymore. I know you really wish it were the 1950s, but you can't pull your statistics from 60-70 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:52 PM
4

It's facetious to the point of blatant dishonesty to act as if being in a romantic relationship doesn't involve feelings being affected by your partner. They obviously wouldn't exist, otherwise. Isn't it your feelings, like your sexual desire- a feeling- that is inspiring you to "dread game"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:50 PM
-1

You don't know what Occam's Razor is, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:48 PM
0

You're trying to act like the wording and the way you act doesn't count as long as you have the same goal - in this case, for your partner to take better care of themselves and show more enthusiasm for sex. You are completely wrong. Couples who respect each other do not flirt with other people in front of their SO, a common component of "dread game", nor do they simply disappear for hours with no explanation, they are not rude and dismissive, nor mocking and cold. The idea behind the way a matur…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:45 PM
1

All other factors being equal, no. It's actually illogical to assume that, because people who've been around and then decide to get married know what's out there- they had it. They chose to give it up for a long term relationship. It's the people who decide to marry the first person they sleep with that get those midlife "what did I miss out on" regrets.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:58 AM
4

Yeah, now. Women had to fight to get jobs that didn't involve typing, cleaning, or childcare, and to join the military. It wasn't women who made those rules, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:34 AM
1

Because there's no such thing as cheating by accident. Period. It's a betrayal of trust if you have agreed to be monogamous, which must be the case since we're talking specifically about cheating, not just having sex with other people. People who prefer monogamous relationships don't want to have a partner that fucks around. To those people, you might as well be saying "why is it a big deal when your partner steals your stuff and pawns it for drug money? Lets disregard diseases and assume people…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 11:41 PM
1

The blind, belligerent certainty of dogmatic belief; basically the same thing that makes religious people think they can tell who is going to hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 06:13 PM
2

By cheating, if he has the money or influence, if he's got any terper ideas. Never mind that he's also aging and would only get any if he were paying on some level; older men delude themselves about their appearance on the positive side constantly, while women start freaking out as soon as the first wrinkle appears.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 06:08 PM
2

Because obviously every woman is just supposed to know that every man wants a porn star begging for anal in the bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 06:06 PM
6

It doesn't matter how correct you are; your story doesn't fit the narrative, therefore you will be dismissed as a delusional, hamstering feeeeemale. That's why this sub is such a silly idea. Really funny material sometimes, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 06:05 PM
4

Yes, all the terper men are scrambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 06:03 PM
3

Isn't it adorable how hard they're trying? You'd think they'd be too busy slaying poon to argue with you about your own reality, but here they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 06:01 PM
9

Bullet dodged, for anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:58 PM
1

I feel sorry for your lack of depth. Most men do no suffer from your problems, but I understand you cannot fathom that. Good for you that you have found a woman capable of tolerating your superficiality. You made zero mention of any of the feelings that really make a marriage. That means yours is a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:55 PM
1

Gosh, I bet those surveys are really valid and conducted in ways that make their findings super unbiased. Care to link any?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 06:44 PM
1

Since "Blue Pill" is literally nothing except opposition to and mockery of terper ideals, by saying you were already "red pill" you made it obvious that you would think everyone else was wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 06:41 PM
0

As if there could be any cognitive dissonance from random shit typed up by internet strangers with zero proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 10:50 PM
2

Meh, the best lies are the ones that don't seem ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 10:49 PM
3

Oh good fuckin lawds, that is hard to read. I had to side-eye it while constantly cringing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 10:45 PM
6

99.99% bullshit; they generally read like a fantasy made up by someone who has barely any idea how social interactions really go down and are entirely too skewed in favor of the poster. The stilted dialog, the convenience of nearly every detail- I'd x-post to /r/thathappened more often, but it honestly feels like cheating. *skipped a letter
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 10:44 PM
3

I would probably check my phone notifications if my dinner date was in the bathroom, if for no other reason than to have something to do with my hands and not look awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 07:33 PM
4

Not from sex, if you're really that dense- from emotional manipulation *by people who have lived twice their lifetime and had life experience they can't fathom.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 11:34 PM
6

No, they are also creepy as fuck, particularly if they manipulate and lie to bang them. Nice attempt at a straw man, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 11:33 PM
4

This is reddit. The chances of actually observing one another in rl are slim. We do laugh at what we see in the real world, but as far as reddit goes, it's perfectly valid to hold people to what they say. It's not like people generally dig for off-the-wall statements when we call terpers out, anyway- most criticism is for highly upvoted posts and comments, and/or those from endorsed contributors. Oh, and as far as resolution goes- who's talking resolution (besides you of course)? There can't be …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 10:12 PM
4

Wow, that is so well said. I completely agree with you, and add to that my own mention of self-fulfilling prophecy- they go after a certain type of woman, ignore all other options because they aren't "hot" enough, and then tell themselves that all women are the same as the ones they chase because they refuse to acknowledge anything else as a valid option. I could have utterly ignored them if they weren't so deeply hateful about nearly all women, and so creepy about women that they should leave t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 10:06 PM
8

I can't even with the idea of trying to extrapolate hormonal teenage bandwagoning with actual adult relationship dynamics :D I snorted out loud
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 09:55 PM
5

It's part delusion and part self-fulfilling prophecy- and all toxic. Yes, anyone would be better served taking care of themselves, finding fulfilling activities and occupations, and feeling confident- these are not red pill concepts. They are common sense. The rest is pure bullshit, some of it hateful and some of it just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 09:52 PM
0

The analogy is pretty much spot-on actually. We don't really rally behind any beliefs except that terpers are misogynistic, self-deluded dorks ripe for mocking. I've never gotten advice on anything at TBP, just lots of laughs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 05:45 PM
1

Too bad there's nothing to "agree with" or not about "Blue Pill"; blue pill is simply everything else that isn't red pill. The really important thing here is that you've found a way to feel superior to everyone, so you have that going for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 05:38 PM
1

My son seems to be doing fine so far; 13 and had the same girlfriend for about a year, talks to her often and stuff, which is about as far as it should go at his age. I give him advice on how to take care of himself (as far as getting exercise, eating well, and keeping clean), to not be too bossy and lord over conversations or activities (as an only child, he took a bit longer learning to let other people make decisions when playing or hanging out), but I think the only piece of advice I've give…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:26 AM
2

do we put too much stock on appearance 100% yes. People who stress the physical over the mental are constantly miserable in their relationships because it doesn't matter how good someone looks- after the sex is over, if you can't stand to listen to them talk, it's not going to work out. Compatibility is far more important than how socially acceptable someone's appearance is. As far as my personal opinion goes- I'm not really attracted to men who are overly muscley, and especially the veiny types…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 08:13 PM
-3

Blah blah blah, these people don't like us = conspiracy! LOL I can't remember ever even looking at SRS. I've certainly never been subbed. OMG, tbp discourages ableist slurs! ONOES MUH FREEEDUMZ (that don't exist on reddit and never have, but I'm going to keep pretending this is all new).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 04:44 PM
-1

Oh look, a bunch of fake quotes! Is that like a whole field of straw men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:52 PM
-2

You don't seem to understand irony. People are born women, therefore it is utterly asinine to assume everyone born a woman is the same. People choose to accept terper principles. There is no comparison whatsoever between making sweeping generalizations about a whole gender with zero other criteria and associating a self-identified group of people who share a dogmatic belief system by what they most often say, and by what their ostensible "leaders" say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:50 PM
1

TRP's "success with women" is highly debatable. There's very little proof that most people who post on that sub have any success with women at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:44 PM
5

Equality is not damaging for anyone except those who seek superiority over others or who fear their inadequacies. You came here looking for confirmation of something you already decided, and your bias colors the responses to give you what you want. Standard terper stuff. I hope it gave you that self-righteous rush you were looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:39 PM
4

Aww, found the Nice GuyTM
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:53 PM
5

Yeah, because people never do self-destructive things due to emotional trauma or other mental issues. Everyone is totally in their right mind, always.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:51 PM
1

A lot of people are satisfied with their telephone psychics, too. That doesn't mean they've actually helped them in any way. Is it fun to be a binky for whiny manchildren to suck when they're butthurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:49 PM
6

These comments came from endorsed contributors, not new members. Nice try, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:45 PM
7

So what you're saying is that TRP endorsed contributors have the mindset of adolescent boys? It's always nice when a terper admits it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:43 PM
-5

If it saves one confused guy from taking your bullshit as gospel, it was more than worth the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:37 PM
-1

That's absolutely idiotic. Your sub is open. Therefore, your sub is responsible for the content it makes available to literally everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:35 PM
14

"Why should I shame guys who are trying to get laid by emotionally manipulating women, being fundamentally dishonest, along with a little physical intimidation if she has last minute resistance" Yeah, I can't imagine how anyone would have a problem with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:32 PM
6

Bullshit. That assumes the victim is capable of fighting back without getting seriously hurt, and also ignores the consequences suffered by victims when they fight back. Schools often treat kids who fight back against being bullied just as badly as bullies, if not worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter