TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BatmanBrah Archive

View 6 posts and 143 comments by BatmanBrah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

One of the most 'masculine' things you can do in this world is to have a craft & go out there & do it well, so well that you become a multimillionaire & everybody knows who you are. If you think testosterone is a poison, then by all accounts give away your money & live your life in obscurity somewhere far away. Will he do this? Of course not. He just wants the brownie points.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:11 AM
5

This is absolutely a 'be the kind of change you want to see in the world' type of thing. Just don't be too loud, and also keep your hands still, when confronting a potentially abusive woman. You do not want to give any of these white knight 'heroes' an excuse to get in YOUR face if you step up & say this behaviour is not ok.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:53 AM
13

This is gonna be a fucking disaster. Very similarly qualified men & women + this = guys getting picked for the job every damn time.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:38 PM
1

It's not about proving a point, men ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NECESSARILY need a space for them to discuss mental health.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:42 AM
4

Bruh WHAT IS UP with this little dude's TEETH
/r/MensRights26/10/20 06:48 AM
1

What a moron. Joking about firing women into the sun also doesn't have any basis in reality but she'd be the first to call out that type of talk.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:36 AM
6

This is an example of punching down. The idea that a regular working guy, who doesn't screw over employees, fraud taxpayers, rip people off, hurt people, damage property, pollute lakes and rivers, pass laws aimed at enriching a few and harming the many, but looks over the internet for naked pics of a celebrity is what's wrong with society is simply bizarre. But of course the fact they do the same thing with a man's nude pics shows they don't actually care, they just want to take shots at men.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 07:26 PM
56

Posting StoneToss here is bad optics, but this particular comic is truth.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:28 AM
11

Intersectionality is a funny thing. Looking at society on a group basis of class, race, sexuality, disability, etc and making claims of the respective privilege of people based on their identity in these groups. Some of the generalizations are reasonably sound. Poor people, trans people, disabled people, sexually non-orthadox people, ethnic minorities, (this one is more nuanced obviously), on average would have a harder time in life. But the entire idea that men as a class are a privileged group…
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:38 AM
2

I don't feel there's anything to add to what you've said, but I want to bring up a side point. It's about people who orient themselves around social justice under an anti-western anti-male anti-white frame of thinking, those who are anti-men's rights. They claim to be very supportive of the type of feminism that puts forward the lie that women and men are the same, and call for 'equity' measures, but also claim to be supportive of trans people. In reality, this 'support' is either a lie, or it c…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 08:36 AM
2

The thing about left wing ideologues and the topic of intersectionality and identity politics is they integrate aspects of identity together, WHITENESS, STRAIGHTNESS, MALENESS. The fact of the matter is that you can see the dishonesty and misandry of third wave feminism for what it is, while also truly feeling for the struggle of gays, trans and blacks in America. At the very same time, you can look at legislation limiting freedom of speech for the supposed benefit of trans people, or people who…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:39 PM
99

Another funny thing about this - one of the biggest, or perhaps even the biggest reason why black Americans make up such a large representation of inmates... is because they come from single parent households, which, across the board, is a hugely disadvantageous factor that increases anybody's chances of prison. So the demonizing of men, or the propagation of the delusion that a single woman will raise a child as well as two parents would, simply fuels the fire.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:31 PM
46

Even if the company was 'female-led', that's completely irrelevant to men's rights unless the company got to the way it was through gender 'diversity' quotas and the undermining of meritocracy.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:17 AM
12

It's a tough situation. On one hand, I'm not sure I fully stand behind this. If this were an Islamic terrorist attack, (or some other religious terror attack), or if it were blatantly and obviously a terror attack from the far left or the far right, I would completely dismiss any comment that we have to start treating Muslims, regressive leftists or ethno-state supporters better, or these things happen, because I'd be disgusted at the implication that such violence is tied to not treating a cert…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:11 AM
2

It should be emphasized early on that there is, in some sense, a wage gap of about .78 to 1 for women to men in the United States. It just also needs to be acknowledged that this is a good thing, since if it were 1 to 1 tomorrow, with no actual changes in the hours worked, industries, occupations, etc of women or men, it would mean that women would be getting paid about 28% more than men for 28% less economic output. [NB: I recall seeing a link that the actual wage gap when all material factors …
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:13 AM
1

Why am I a badass? It's not like you'd lay a hand on me for blocking your way and restricting your movement.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:27 AM
2

It seems to me that you're not. Your point was that MRAs can be as susceptible to shutting things down as SJWs. But if that were true, then the post would be removed and yours would make no sense.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:41 PM
2

If I ever find out who you are IRL I'm going to stop you from going where ever you want to go by blocking the way with my arms and legs and see how you react.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:39 PM
14

Guilty until proven innocent, then.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:34 AM
4

The important thing is brushing past what is said and understanding the implications of what is said, and what the person who said the words believes in and intends to do. Sexual abuse survivors deserve to be believed? Yes they do. Very few would possibly dispute such a thing. However... On the night CNN aired a controversial and, as many legal critics call it, flawed documentary on sexual assault on college campuses, Democratic Party frontrunner Hillary Clinton tweeted solidarity with victims o…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:12 PM
13

I was banned from /r/Feminism for stating that its possible for men to experience discrimination on a video loosely titled as, 'if men could experience discrimination', and posting sources demonstrating suicide statistics, violent crime statistics, criminal sentencing, homelessness, divorce courts and more. From this, it's quite obvious that its a subreddit that deserves nothing good.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:45 AM
8

The implicit denial of the unrestricted shit talking on the internet against all demographics, through looking at internet comments focused purely on a single gender as if it is subject to some kind of targeted influential and unique movement, unseen by other demographics... never ceases to amaze me.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 11:47 AM
5

No porn isn't the problem so much as the reason why you'd do it in the first place. Generally avoiding high occurrence with the hardcore porn of today is probably a good thing with regard to benefiting your own mental and sexually health, IMO. If you're abstaining because you want to be a 'real man' or think porn is misogynistic then you're fucking up though
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:23 AM
1

Imagine the ludicrousness of if popular media actually accused women who happened to support a female candidate of being misandrist. And yet the notion that men who don't like Hilary are misogynistic is actually spoken about completely non sarcastically.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:08 AM
1

Should be interesting to see how it compares to actual substantive evidence.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:50 PM
-1

I'd say 30%. Of course that's based on absolutely nothing and only a fool would take my guess work as an accurate figure.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:41 AM
3

I'm so glad that this thread has shot up after that god awful /r/AskReddit thread about things reddit takes too seriously, and the predictable, 'men's rights' posts.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:18 AM
23

...And to see such discrimination against men in such a physically demanding occupation... What a particularly harmful form of discrimination not just against those involved but against a society with still some need of police officers with the physical strength to protect others.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 10:56 AM
13

That's it, really. It's not worth getting annoyed by a silly comic which reduces men to furniture. The annoyance comes in knowing that if the genders were flipped, people would react much more aversely to this.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:00 PM
18

Don't be. It just paints a vivid picture is all.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:51 AM
19

Jesus Christ :(
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:40 AM
1

Yes. The problem essentially exists due to a couple of factors. The first is equal outcome feminism. Equal opportunity feminism relates to granting women the same opportunities as men, which was essentially achieved in the USA from a legal setting in the 1960s. Equal outcome feminism tries to enforce a 50/50 ratio of women to men in certain fields of employment, university, boards, councils, etc. It actively harms men because it disrupts the allocating of the most suitable person to the job for …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:50 AM
3

Whether this is true or not, (though several factors strongly suggest it is overblown), the fact that conversations can be had here without insults and abuse being thrown at those who simply question the biased statistics they've been told being a primary viewpoint is truly a great thing.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:31 PM
-2

Obviously she's (probably) not being serious, but still, that sort of immaturity and emotional outburst isn't becoming of a DA, or anybody for that matter.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:24 PM
1

Signed.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 11:46 PM
11

"A better measure would be... shifting the burden of proof on the issue of consent to the defence. "This approach does not contradict the fundamental principle that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty - the basic facts of the case still have to be made out - but it does mean the prosecution doesn't need to prove a negative, namely that there was no consent. So it doesn't contradict the principal of innocence until proven guilty, but it shifts the burden of proof onto the defence. "This a…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 11:57 AM
3

Not to mention the 3 dead men in his apartment.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:47 AM
2

I think it relates to several things, but one which hasn't been touched on much is the fact that they can get away with it. Considering the level of problems faced by men in society, for a man in the western world to then identify with a group that ignores those problems and focuses on the other gender which is largely the creation of false issues, and about issues with no real solution, (excluding a 1984 type society)... It requires a degree of masochism that enjoys self hate.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:37 AM
2

Look at the very nature of feminism in 2014 in the Western World. You have a world where men's issues include significantly harsher criminal sentences for the same crimes, the vast majority of homicide, assault and suicide victims, the vast majority of homeless people, almost all workplace deaths, and with various social responsibilities and burdens unchanged from times past despite 40+ years of feminism, it's simply the reality that a huge chunk of the people that then decide to dedicate themse…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:49 AM
-1

I was actually banned from /r/feminism for criticizing a thread because it stated that men don't experience sexism, and when someone responded by saying that that men do, but that women experience it worse, I posted sources regarding men's issues and was banned. There's a difference between feminism that simply doesn't focus on men's issues, to feminism which actively tries to marginalize men's rights, and in my experience, /r/feminism definitely doesn't know the difference.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:32 AM
3

If you're going to use gender differences to argue for things that positively affect women, then it should also go in the way of men. But in this day and age, that would be completely impossible to implement in the western world, so it makes perfect sense to argue for equality even where a non equal stance may make sense, simply because if we do nothing then feminists will continue to fight for the benefits of women whilst disregarding men's issues, creating a worse and less equity based world.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:03 AM
1

I really do have to laugh at your attempt to put yourself in some superior position by not responding for a week, and then instantly doing so. It's like those people who say, 'this conversation is over' and then keep responding. It just makes you look like an ass. Ah I see what you just tried to do. No, You are troll here. it only makes you fool if you can't figure out you are being trolled. ... Stop this. If you really newer saw comment which depicted thought process (like my first comment here…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:21 AM
1

So you're the one trolling me? I wasn't really aware. I'm not upset at all, just a little bamboozled at your generally odd comments. But if responding to me once a week makes you feel superior, then I wouldn't have it any other way.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:03 AM
1

If I actually were trolling, you'd be a complete fool to have continued responding thus far.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:54 PM
0

I was never trolling. You're just attempting to substitute that false scenario for the truth. Or I guess asking what somebody means when they make a vague post is trolling... lol.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:36 PM
2

Technically I'd say so. The words typically against women just feels so forced in there by feminists. It's as if there can't be a mention of sexism without the underlying hiss that women have it worse, which is childish as well as untrue.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:51 AM
0

It's not my fault you're being overly vague. That rests on you. I feel that you expect people to bend over backwards to read your disjointed thoughts into the way you want them to be read. But that's not other's responsibilities. If you have something to say then say it. Lets not substitute half witted sarcasm for straight forwardness.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:52 AM
1

You're making a couple of mistakes here. Your previous comments were disjointed and vague, and you've made the assumption that because I don't know what you're attempting to say, that this makes it my fault.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 11:44 PM
2

Just because I don't agree with you, doesn't make me a troll. There is no chance human living on this planet doesn't understand how role models work. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:12 AM
3

Huh? I never said I was joking. If you try to act like a man who spends millions on gadgets to act as a professional vigilante, feels more himself punching criminals in the face than talking to people without his costume on, and has a strong aversion to emotion, (excluding the pain of his parent's death), you're in for a bad time.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:51 PM
3

Not sure what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:23 PM
4

Bruce Wayne is... Not a normal man. He's extremely smart, tactical and focuses on channelling his psychotic problems in certain ways. I wouldn't take his reaction over this as conditioning male children to accept rape. In the event of a female character being made pregnant, and by circumstance she goes into a coma for long enough to give birth, and finds out afterwards, then I'm pretty sure she would react very differently to Batman, (and to some extent the difference here of giving birth should…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 05:37 AM
1

Ah, you must be Quinn! Definitely better that you asked about this here rather than on the misc. The gender swap prank is a great idea if properly executed.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:47 AM
2

Men's rights is the other side of the coin. Feminism focuses on women's issues, and men's rights focuses on men's issues. There's nothing wrong with either movement from a definitional standpoint, but time and time again feminism is consistently plagued with stupidity and sexism. When men's rights seems to conflict with feminism it is more than usually due to sexism, bias and dishonesty from the feminists who insist on inflicting people with their stupidity. In a perfect world, they wouldn't con…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:44 AM
2

The ability to use the word 'pride' without being seriously questioned for being a supremacist unfortunately doesn't extend to all.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:48 AM
10

Attitudes like that are exactly why this sub reddit is important. Also, it's worth noting that when the only real major criticism of something is expressed as something such as posting it in a cringe subreddit, as oppose to critics actually logically dismantling what is actually being said, then that really says a lot more about the critics than it does the thing being criticized.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:53 AM
5

Your viewpoint is idealistic but not entirely realistic. There are serious problems in the feminist movement, and simply claiming that the people that cause the problems aren't true feminists and calling it a day aren't going to make things any better. When possibly the majority of the people who say they are X, that call themselves X, are technically not X, realistically this does have some bearing on what the actual definition is.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:47 AM
13

One of the things that's constantly complained about here is the masculine culture that forces too many young men into suicide Well firstly, male suicide rates are often mentioned, but you specified that it's caused by 'masculine culture' which is vague and an over-generalization. I wouldn't call a society that views men as less valuable than women as a masculine culture at all. then you go and call someone a wuss for calling someone else out on hateful language? Yep. And that has nothing to do …
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:55 PM
19

You've probably made the assumption that he was referring to all women, rather than just Cesar's wife. Either that or you're just being a wuss.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:20 PM
3

Eventually when this becomes more well known, feminism's definition of sexism will change. It's essentially a self serving philosophy. It's definitions of things are definitions which are convenient to the cause.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:18 AM
3

I actually saw this on facebook around... 2 months ago. I posted a serious response, (to be clear, this is the only time I've ever done something like this on FB, I don't really use FB to debate about stuff), and I posted a response criticizing it's one sidedness and ignoring that men can be sexually assaulted. AKA I acted like it wasn't satire. Many people responded negatively and I pretty much dismantled their arguments, but the thing was, of the... 8 people who commented on my post making ad …
/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:17 PM
1

I assumed that /r/Feminism was the largest, or one of the largest, feminist forums on the internet. The fact that going there and getting banned because of pointing out that sexism also happens to men after seeing it stated that it did not, and being banned for posting evidence, IS an issue which affects mens rights.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:40 PM
2

It's cool to have you in my thread. You're actually the first female MRA that I learned about on the internet. You're a very empathetic person.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:33 PM
1

Well the thing is, subs don't ban people. Mods do. You're talking about getting banned by a sub, (as oppose to from it) as if that's an actual possibility, and that because an individual mod did so, (as oppose to the entire subreddit somehow coming together and collectively banning me), that this nullifies the problems with that sub reddit, which it doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:20 PM
1

I understand that. I just tried to put into words the difference between being discriminated directly and having it happen to those around you, and how for many people there can be less incentive to take action if it affects others directly instead of yourself.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 12:00 AM
6

Basically, if you expect to be an involved male feminist then expect to be frequently treated as a second class citizen. Whenever I see a woman being supportive of mens rights issues I get this warm feeling of witnessing another human being supporting something which doesn't directly affect them, but they want to do the right thing. I can't even imagine thinking about it in any negative sort of way.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 10:05 AM
1

It's really great to see that I'm actually reading this sort of general perspective off a news site. I'm just so used to going to sites and being blasted with a perspective that seems to strongly favour feminism.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:54 AM
2

You're saying nature says we must judge women for having many sexual partners. I'm saying it's a factor. People convince themselves and others that there is nothing wrong with it, (and it would be better if people felt this way IMO), but negative instinctual feelings about the matter don't simply leave the entire human race when it's expedient for them to do so. I'm still not quite sure what you're saying. When I think of what I said in relation to overpopulation I can only think that promiscuou…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:59 AM
4

Why would it be?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:53 AM
5

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:50 AM
6

The problem is that a society where women aren't judged at all for having many sexual partners is impractical. Instinctually we've evolved as a species to have negative connotations about it due to it's correlation with a woman having a baby with no father to take care of it, (which would then either result in the death of the child, the poor upbringing of the child, eg not having enough food, becoming an unhealthy adult and having less chance of producing offspring, or draining the tribe's reso…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:45 AM
1

The sick irony of it all is that they will criticise people who say some of these things should not apply as 'abuse' as it will result in the trivialising of their suffering, when really their own overly open definitions are more trivialising than anything else could ever be.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:41 AM
1

But thats the thing for me. Most of the gripes here have to do with the "freedom" that feminism is spoke about. Seems like the same why can't white people say the N-word? crowd. No idea what you're trying to say. Anybody should be able to say the N word if they want to. Meanwhile, I visit the fem reddit and they are talking about stopping gang rapes, letting little girls go to school, teaching women to do their finances, etc. I understand we (men) don't have it perfect, but even you can accept t…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:59 PM
1

To some degree, yes. I wouldn't have used the word 'worry' if I were you though. There's a world of difference between being slightly worried about something and actually trying to do something about it. The thing is, for most people here, 'doing' is essentially trying to sway people's viewpoints to see things in a certain way, however there is little debate here that the banning on female driving and organized gang rapes in India are bad. Basically everybody who could possibly be taken seriousl…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:11 PM
4

One of the things I like about the Mens rights movement compared to feminism is that it doesn't pretend to be an 'equality' movement in the way that feminism does. What I mean is that feminism has the arrogance to focus on women's issues and do nothing about mens issues and then either not worry or think about the effects on men, idiotically assume that men's issues are getting resolved by doing nothing, or even maliciously enjoy that men's issues are not getting looked at. The mens rights movem…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:34 AM
1

One of the greatest comments I've ever read on this sub. Absolutely spot on.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:27 AM
2

Some very valid points in that article. Not a huge fan of the title though.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:39 AM
2

Great answer. Thanks for this
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:08 AM
0

I've never taken one but considering that all the times it has been brought up, it was by somebody I was arguing with condescendingly saying I should take one in the face of me pointing out valid things... I wouldn't be surprised if it were full of one sided crap. To be the devil's advocate again... How could one objectively assert that the majority of 'feminists' are like this? Here's one possible argument with some roughly estimated figures to convey my point: Say 50% of society believes in ge…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:06 PM
0

If 99% of feminists aren't "true feminists" then maybe that definition of feminism is bullshit. That's totally true. But the issue is that asserting that the majority of feminists are like this, which is a difficult assertion to prove.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:43 PM
9

They are attempting to make a satire of rape culture and the humor falls flat not only because of it's cruelty, but because it's based on false assertions. It doesn't work because rape culture doesn't actually exist as they believe it to. Only a small group of people believe that rape victims are 'responsible' or 'at fault' for their rape, (in the west), as oppose to it being a legitimate 'culture'. It also relies on the assumption that telling a woman to be careful equals blaming them if someth…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:52 PM
16

Just to be the devils advocate here... When I go to google and search 'define feminism' the definition is: 'the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes'. Do you agree or disagree with this?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:44 PM
4

If she is a member of a terrorist organisation who plans to turn her baby into a super soldier in order to kill political opponents who oppose the aims of a fascist futuristic totalitarian government, then I guess not telling her might be a better idea.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:29 AM
38

There's probably several scenarios where it may be a better idea not to tell the man that she is expecting his baby but I can't think of any right now. She should probably tell him. In an ideal world where men have reproductive rights, the women should tell the man, and he could then ask her to have an abortion if that's what he wants. Then the woman can get an abortion, or she can decide to keep it knowing that the man won't be under financial obligation to the child due to her refusing to get …
/r/MensRights26/12/13 01:47 AM
20

You're so mad right now
/r/MensRights26/12/13 01:41 AM
1

I dunno man/miss. I've got a nagging suspicion that the only thing that separates a strong aversion to something, and condemning them for it, is whether you're an inherently rude person. And there are clearly no shortages of rude people in the world. But of course some people will find a way to be pissed off about your tastes whether you're rude about it or not.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:50 AM
22

I've found that /r/askreddit is very anti Mens Rights. I've been downvoted into oblivion for pointing out the wage gap myth, and for pointing out that sexism against men as well as women is something that should be addressed by society. /r/cringepics is also a pretty bad place. Downvotes galore for stating that being a mens rights activist doesn't mean that you beat women.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:49 AM
3

The only silver lining was that they stole the male model calendars as well. They might be morally twisted psychotic thieves, but at least there's a bit of consistency to them.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:40 AM
1

you should have picked an earlier, less ambiguous, year. What year? they are based on unproven hypotheses What hypotheses?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:16 AM
1

I don't put myself above other people needlessly. I have rules. If I were in your position and were basically not justifying myself at all and telling the other person to look it up, then it would only be fair that they insist I actually provide something. This isn't about me. If I were reading this argument and it were involving random anonymous people, I would think the same thing that I'm currently thinking. This isn't about who I am or who you are, it's about the principal that you should ju…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:56 PM
1

I've read your history. That's a little creepy. And of course the prelude to empty ad-hominem attacks. I understand you think you're being hyper-rational. You're not. You're being contrary to be contrary. You know damn well where these resources are. I know this, you know this. You're wrong. I'm asking you basic questions about your viewpoint upon which you became defensive. I've been rational throughout this. The only times that I was being contrary to be contrary, was to get back at you for be…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:47 PM
0

Link me a video. I already gave you a concrete example of how feminists mine areas like Saudi Arabia to gain political power here and to shut down criticism here. If you want me to find an example, read about Elevatorgate. http://www.conservapedia.com/Elevatorgate I'm about to read this now. Women somehow managed to gain the right to vote here and express themselves under similar conditions. Perhaps they aren't as weak and objectified as you believe. Perhaps you don't know exactly how weak and o…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:37 PM
2

I am not your bud. I am not your dude. We are not friends. In response to workplace deaths: That stat is because most potentially lethal jobs (construction, mining, etc) are staffed by men. Yep. There's nothing related to sexism in that. If people bitch about women not being more CEOs, then people have just as much of a right to bitch about men being 97% of workplace deaths. Feminists don't "whine" about being oppressed, Whine is just a snarky word to describe complaining when you don't agree wi…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:30 PM
0

You have confused Feminism with Women's Rights. I'm not sure I have. Perhaps your definitions are better in some regard but in actuality the technical definition of feminism is for equality... Which from a practical standpoint can be messed up considering that a massive chunk of them are sexist. I think it would possibly be a good thing if more people acknowledged these definitions of yours but currently those aren't the widely used definitions and I think it would just confuse people.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 07:44 PM
2

I shouldn't have to bring shit to the table. You're the one making dozens of false assertions after false assertions. Back up what you say. Feminists have been doing for years, and yet you only seem to care when men point out that they can be victims too. You're a classic part of the problem. Men are 97% of workplace deaths, receive significantly higher sentences than women for the same crimes, receive unfair turnouts in divorce settlements, but I guess sexism against men is no big deal, right? …
/r/MensRights15/12/13 07:40 PM
0

I thought I spelled it out. You thought wrong. Western Feminists are interested in Saudi women only in-so-far as they can exploit them. Saudi women and Islamic women (in general) do speak for themselves and are quite articulate. I suggest you maybe hit youtube and look for their discussions on the matter. It sounds like you're just saying 'look it up' as justification for not explaining yourself. I'm sure they have some freedoms but for a country where women aren't allowed to drive, I'm sure you…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 07:32 PM
0

It just seems like everything you just said is either completely unsubstantiated, makes false assumptions or just doesn't make much sense. Your first paragraph doesn't explain how feminism is colonial at all. Regardless of whether I disagree with the content, (I don't particularly disagree), how this is colonial is beyond me at this stage. Just because the feminism movement in the 60s was primarily white women that doesn't mean that the movement is only for white women. It's intended to help wom…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 07:42 AM
1

How is western feminism racist and colonial? Also I think you're oversimplifying wanting something. It could be very possible that a bulk of women in Saudi want their equivalent to 1960s feminism, but they simply don't want it enough to rock the boat. I want a diet coke but I'm not going to go through the hassle of walking somewhere and buying it.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:48 AM
3

Trampling over the rights of men =/= women standing up for themselves. You're constantly trying to distract the argument, to make it personal, because you don't have anything of logical value. So you insist that we hate women, that we're afraid of women, that we fear equality, instead of addressing any actual points of the movement. You're trying to use the 'pink whip', to try to scare and guilt us into not talking about improving the rights of men because it is supposed to make us sexist, loser…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:24 AM
3

A 50/50 male to female CEO situation isn't 'fair', or 'equal'. The current situation exists the way it does because men tend to be more appropriate choices for CEOs. They're more likely to have the qualifications and experience because men are more likely to pursue career options involving eventually becoming a CEO, and the additional work experience from not birthing and raising a child, (which women tend to spend more time doing than men), assists them too. They're not chosen because they're m…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:18 AM
4

I agree with the general message but I'd say that if you live in somewhere like Saudi Arabia, being a feminist today would be pretty reasonable. But I suppose it depends on your definition of modern feminist.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:13 AM
58

'Daniel-san' was the one who learned karate. I wasn't referring to him. I was referring to Mr Miyagi who encouraged him to learn karate. People who believe in a rape culture in the western world often equate the suggestion that someone take precautionary measures as 'victim blaming'. 'Daniel-san, you should learn karate.' 'Oh so it's my fault I was assaulted? This is evidence of assault culture!'
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:35 PM
212

I just realized that if you apply 'rape culture' logic to Karate Kid, then Mr Miyagi is an 'assault apologist' for getting Daniel to learn Karate to defend himself from the bullies.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 11:34 AM
2

It's not a crime, it's a punch line. /s
/r/MensRights07/12/13 11:26 AM
3

I find that the anti violence movement is not only extremely focused on women and neglects men, but it actually shames men into acting as if women are the only victims of violence. In my country, there's a poster I see in bus stations, on my work billboard, 'Are you man enough to stop violence against women?' Regardless of the message, trying to manipulate somebody into following you by planting an idea of what it 'means' to be a man which fits your agenda, is manipulative and indicative of bull…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:09 PM
1

It depends on context but you're generally right. An exception might be a nightclub/party where everyone is intoxicated and a girl is taking shots from multiple girl's navals to which a young man exclaims nearby, 'Damn dis bitch is crazy!'
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:39 AM
4

If the term 'mansplaining' is ever thrown at me I'd just respond for a call for them to 'quit your femplaining'. Might give them some understanding of how these gendered terms can be annoying and unnecessary. Though more likely it would just lead to more bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:52 AM
20

His deleted comment was Really? wtf. Ever since i subscribed to this sub I just see a bunch of whiny white males complaining about how they're victimized in society even though they're not. male rape represents 0.001% of all the cases and it's only fair that it is also represented as such in media My reply - Your terrible post has already been pretty much destroyed but I'll simply point out the ridiculousness of your inclusion of 'white' when describing the mens rights movement. The majority of …
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:52 PM
3

aaaahhhh... God damn it.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:47 AM
2

Part of me suspects that many of them do, but actively choose to ignore it and hope that others don't point it out. I just hope that's a very small group.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:41 AM
2

Should be cool to watch two people talk about this in an actual professional debate setting. Too often I see things revert to, 'You're just bitter/a misogynist' instead of actually addressing points made.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:33 AM
6

As a general rule of life: Do not listen to somebody who tries to use your gender as justification for listening to them. They are trying to manipulate you.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:25 AM
0

I can't remember the last time these people have single-handedly destroyed themselves so beautifully. This is truly incredible.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 09:23 AM
4

Next thing you know they'll have a WW2 movie where they're forced to have women as half of the soldiers storming the beaches.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:41 PM
1

I don't think I am. Men paying for a large chunk of women is basically factual. The only assumption that I've made is that on average women are naturally less concerned with making money than men are. I understand that many would disagree with this.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 11:48 PM
2

I wasn't referring to critical in the academic sense. but the fact that more women than men have to support themselves on low paying jobs is actually a huge social problem. I'm not sure I agree. It seems to me that regardless of 'social constructs' women in general are less concerned about earning high income compared to men, so it's natural that men on average earn more, (not to be mistaken for earning more for the same job). Also, what we need to consider is that a huge chunk of women have the…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:02 PM
6

imo more justified than this ignorant circlejerk of a thread So blatant sexism is better than criticising it? Gotcha.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:29 AM
0

I think the hen word could actually be quite useful to be used in a court of law regarding equal sentencing for the same crimes for men and women.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:22 AM
2

I'm talking about the people that don't very strongly benefit or believe in feminist ideology. There have got to be several people, people who aren't indoctrinated with bullshit, who saw that facebook argument, saw a total inability for this person to comprehend logic, and took something out of it that might not have previously fit into their world view, or developed a small piece of a world view they didn't have previously.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 10:33 AM
2

because it benefits them to do so I don't get this. I really don't see how making a bunch of people see a person who is trying to influence others to believe in her views, respond to valid counter claims with the same rambling response that is already invalidated by the previous comment.... I don't see how that would advance her interests at all. It would only put people off from her interests.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:14 AM
74

It's as if she literally has a 10 second memory and forgot all the facts you just told her. Some people are simply indoctrinated by bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:32 PM
3

The guy you spoke to already answered with his own explanation of not identifying himself as a MRA. But my input would be this. I feel that feminism is a jumbled mess of goals for women that covers a wide scope of things, many of which are unjust towards men. In some regard, with the google definition of feminism being an equality movement you could argue that the injustice isn't actually feminism... But when what seems like the majority of people who call themselves feminists agree with such th…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:22 PM
1

Interesting post. I feel that if women ran the world, there would be more emphasis on safety and less on freedom... Which can be a good or bad thing depending on where you are. In my country it would generally be a bad thing.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:55 AM
3

I hope this ends with her wasting 5 years to get a degree when she's rightfully unable to pass the bar test.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:04 AM
20

Video games seem to attract a particularly nasty feminazi group of individuals. What I find interesting is how much they pour into women not being sexual objects in gaming, expressed through their image, and yet at the same time they say nothing about the hoards of powerful muscular men, with deep crunchy voices, forearms like legs of ham, bulging biceps and boulder shoulders. I don't have a problem with male OR female objectification in gaming, but those who do should at least be consistent abo…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:12 AM
5

She should have thought about that before she tried to destroy a man's life, shouldn't she.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:46 PM
9

Sometimes it's just about seeing something for what it is.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:37 AM
9

I strongly agree with your second paragraph, but not your first. Conclusively saying that women in general have had it worse off is a very difficult statement to make. Considering harsh working hours and conditions for men, the responsibility to provide for their families, partake in the women first mentality in emergencies, and to fight and die in battles and wars, compared to a woman having to cook, take care of children for most of the day, and several other facets I'm sure. I think many peop…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:07 PM
3

Usually when someone tells you what a real man is, listening to them is a TERRIBLE IDEA. They are probably trying to manipulate you.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 05:02 AM
6

This is basically libel.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:04 AM
2

They want the responsibility of an infant, but the rights of a citizen.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:50 AM
1

I'm wondering what makes you say men have more rights? Men have no reproductive rights and women have all of them. Is there something I'm not considering?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:09 PM
10

The idea that men have easier lives than women is actually one of the general misconceptions that I detest the most. Perhaps it's true in the Middle East, but certainly not in the west.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:53 AM
1

I don't think that your ancestors lack of involvement in the slave trade should even matter. Because it shouldn't matter at all what someone's ancestors did, nobody should ever hold a person accountable for their ancestor's actions. I don't care if you're Hitler's son, (hypothetically), if you're a cool dude then you're cool with me.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:21 AM
0

Leaving feminists to take care of men's rights issues is like leaving a pig to guard a cake.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:06 AM
2

Have you tried talking to them?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:52 AM
20

Apparently so in some cases. IMO the man should be able to make an abortion request, and if she refuses, then the man has no responsibility to the child. It's fair to both the man and the woman.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:41 AM
1

I think this whole issue can be summarized in the conclusion that it's possible to raise a well balanced, kind, promising young person from a single mother, but generally, it's better that a child have a father and a mother figure for them to become the best person they can be.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:14 AM
0

I'm cool with this so long as there were also ones which mock women tbh.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:31 AM
7

The reason why a man could fairly claim economic discrimination in the U.S is because of artificial barriers for 'equal' pay and employment. It's essentially a case where men are actually vastly better at something than women, (ie physical job), or where they flock to it in far greater numbers due to preference, and instead of acknowledging this factually, modern feminists generally take an approach of 'sexism', even though a women who does the same job as a man gets paid just as much. Also, the…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:57 AM
1

disgusting
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:55 PM
-3

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gBOoWjU3wDI/UFdS9Y-9_wI/AAAAAAAADCQ/q-psML1GNqU/s1600/slow-clap-gif.gif
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:04 AM
8

It feels a bit poorly written though there is useful stuff for sure in there. If people could contribute to cleaning it up, (ie organising it a little better, and making it a little less opinionated in some parts), then it may stay. If there's a violence against women page on Wiki, then there should be one for men too.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter