TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BeingDS Archive

View 8 posts and 74 comments by BeingDS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Men do not innately need violence or war to feel satisfied with life. Source required. Just because evolution required it of us in the past, doesn't mean we can't be happy without it. Source required. Feeling uncomfortable about not being "enough of a man" is a result of societal conditioning on what a man should be and not our own innate understanding of this concept. Source required. The problem goes away just as well if you understand<sup>1</sup> that the whole idea of "being a man" is meanin…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:25 AM
3

That's what happens when politicians take over science.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 02:37 AM
–

You seem to be responding negatively based only on emotion. What studies can you reference to refute Junger's philosophy?
/r/MensRights31/01/15 02:36 AM
–

I think you misread the article. He's not supporting these things; he's decrying them. He's trying to start an intelligent conversation about why our society is seeing these phenomena and what things we might need to change before we can end the pattern.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:51 AM
–

“I have friends who are anthropologists and primatologists and evolutionary psychologists … [who are under] an enormous amount of pressure to generate data that shows that all gender differences are cultural.” In other words, data about gender relations and gender roles has to be deliberately altered and suppressed to arrive at the conclusion that gender roles aren't real.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:59 AM
1

Trolling?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:15 AM
1

No. But this is a lot different than saying that a woman is unmarriageable just because she's 27.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:02 AM
1

Yeah, the original link was like that too, when I scrolled to it in the forum. What is the real link?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:51 PM
5

real news that men are not marrying women her age She's in her mid-20's...
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:03 PM
5

There are tons of historical examples of people "arguing their case" or resisting injustice when people's minds were already made up about them. If you want to change something that's wrong, you can't shy away from adversity. avoid that pain and accept another form of pain. This is a euphemism for taking the easy road out of fear that doing what's necessary to achieve justice will be "too hard". This is a shitty attitude and people who think this way will always be abused. History is also full o…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 10:07 PM
2

The whole reason he's in that shitty situation is that people like elebrin don't nut up and refuse to be pussified by their overbearing spouses. Single actions are not enough. Men as a unit need to rise up and assert ourselves, so that people like the OP can leave their bitchy domineering abusers without having to lose face doing it.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:59 PM
7

I would stay married for the kids and just stop having sex (probably have to stop wanking too or make sure you flush it every time). People like you need to nut up. You're the reason we men have to put up with this. Our united front is spoiled by cowards who'd rather flush their lives down the drain than grow a spine.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:16 PM
1

If your partner is using sex as a weapon to further a controlling and abusive agenda, then yes.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:14 PM
9

http://www.barstoolsports.com/nyc/super-page/swedish-politicians-trying-to-ban-men-from-peeing-standing-up/
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:48 PM
1

http://www.barstoolsports.com/nyc/super-page/swedish-politicians-trying-to-ban-men-from-peeing-standing-up/ Shazam!
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:47 PM
3

Not if you cite them in the bibliography and properly quote and use inline citations in the text. All scholarly papers and publications use and quote sources. Haven't you ever done a research paper?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:33 PM
0

...and based solely on this ephemeral "possibility", (YAY! You spelled a fucking word! gives cookie) you say we should treat women as a lesser species? Here's an idea. Why don't you grow a pair, figure out what the fuck you're trying to say, and then (since the burden of proof lies with you, as the proponent of female inequality of ability) why don't you go ahead and give us some facts instead of derogatory innuendo and unfounded, baseless snipes at an entire gender based solely on your hatred a…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:40 PM
1

/r/egalitarian is thattaway Fuck off. Men's rights activists need not believe in the equality farce. Fuck off. Sideways. You ignorant fucking fuck.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:34 PM
-2

Feminists are like Republicans: Scared, ignorant, dishonest, and willing to go to any ends to justify the means they use to perpetuate their ridiculous conspiracy movement.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:07 PM
2

Umm... And before you come back with some dumb shit about how grammar arguments equal conceding the point, allow me to school you a bit: 1) Women, on average, do have equal abilities to men, on average; when they are allowed the same rights. MRA is not about contesting this fact (or about repressing women for the sake of appearances). It's about forcing a formerly-good movement run amok to come back to sanity. 2) There is a reason that women have been called the weaker sex for all of history: ME…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:27 AM
2

Where the hell did you "study" where they didn't send your ass back to third grade when you handed in your first paper? You're so full of shit it's not even funny. Tell you what though. I'll take you seriously when you can type one fucking sentence in adult English. Buh bye!
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:59 PM
0

there is a reason women have been called the weaker sex for all of history Isn't it shocking that the person who comes out with crap like this is the one fucker in the room who's too dumb to spell FEMINIST (or much of anything fucking else, apparently). Seriously, what the fuck are you, 12? If so, come back when you're over the fact that Lil' Suzie Spellman didn't invite you to her Beiber Fever party. You don't know shit about feminism, or MRAs. If you're a grown-up, then I suggest GED equivalen…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:47 AM
3

Maybe I should leave. I thought that this subreddit was championing equal rights for men. If you're correct, then I must be mistaken and this must be exactly what the feminist groups claim it is: a nest of pissed-off misogynist malcontents who want to swing their dicks around and force women back into the kitchen and second-class society. That's the only kind of place where opinions like yours come from. For the record, I'm not pro-feminist. But suggesting that women should be equal to men (not …
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:10 PM
-1

Some people need to be told to fuck off. A lot of the people who grow up all fucked up and have problems turn out that way because when they misbehave and say stupid shit, nobody told them to shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:20 PM
2

I think you're the one in the wrong place. I think you must be looking for r/malesuperiority. Men's rights is about restoring balance between women and men in the areas where they've gone too far in their quest for equality. It's NOT about restoring a male-dominated society.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:19 PM
9

It took a great deal of experience with women, in the workplace as well as in dating, to make us realize that in fact, women are very different from men, and in most respects inferior. Bullshit articles like this from ignorant and backward sources like this don't do anything good for our cause. MRA ≠ Misogyny! We believe in EQUAL RIGHTS REGARDLESS OF GENDER... not in this nineteenth century discriminatory garbage you're trying to associate us with, so either educate yourself or fuck off!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:38 PM
3

Increased attention means we're going to have to be much more diligent in downvoting and banning ignorant posts and comments though. One thing taken out of context could set us back years.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:35 PM
-11

It's posts like this that get us a bad wrap. Why are you using insulting language? Referring to women as "Whorish" is counter-productive and gains us nothing but more scorn. Be the bigger person or keep it to yourself please.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:25 AM
2

He said that he has no visitation rights. So there's no court order for visitation for the ex-bitch to obey.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 08:57 AM
1

According to the survey 1 in 4 people believes that urinating while standing up should be a criminal offense. idon'twanttoliveonthisplanetanymore.jpg
/r/MensRights14/06/12 10:35 PM
–

Great thought, but the only thing that will be known is that some arrogant misogynist filed a harassing suit against four innocent girls. This will be because the media will bend over backwards for the feminist movement and the real facts of the case will not be widely reported. Woman=innocent. Man=guilty.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:04 AM
11

Not enough evidence = If I charged them, they'd never fuck me. Stupid corrupt pigs. Acting like they did the man a favor by not charging him despite the video. These fucking whores should be tossed in jail, with real rape victims for counselors. The police should be fired without benefits for favoritism and incompetence.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 02:58 AM
1

Separate issue. She wasn't assaulted in a dentist's chair. She (hopefully) didn't have to go around for months or years with no teeth at all, as this poor man may have to, if he doesn't have thousands of dollars jingling around in his pocket and has to sue the woman who did this to get his teeth replaced.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 02:34 AM
0

Well shit, why don't we just take people we don't like to Poland and kick the shit out of them? Three years might be a price worth paying for some folks...
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:43 PM
1

I see... for a second I wondered why you were getting up boats... See above.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:42 PM
4

And? She should be under investigation for aggravated assault, mutilation, torture, and sexual assault. Malpractice suits should be the absolute least of her worries. If she were a man and her victim a woman, this would almost certainly be the case. Unfortunately for anyone and everyone interested in justice she can use the "tits defense" to get off easy.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:17 PM
1

Can you think of just one (reasonably attractive, at-least-partially intelligent, non-desperate, relationship-material) woman who would go on a second date with a guy who has an entire mouth full of false teeth (assuming he can even afford all that surgery, or even bring himself to sit in a dentist's chair after what he's been through)? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:14 PM
2

EDIT: Whew... For a minute, I thought this person was serious...
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:11 PM
3

And yet it is gendered... If a man did the same to a woman, it would be front page news and he'd be facing 25 to life for aggravated assault. The only reason she's not internationally infamous and facing the ruination of her entire life is that she has a vagina and not a penis.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:33 AM
–

Man: Make an unwanted sexual advance, with or without knowing it's unwanted... life in prison. Woman: Ruin a man's sex life permanently... pay no restitution, three years in jail, max. And yet the feminazi's still think they are being discriminated against... WTF...
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:31 AM
-2

Cut out our babies tonsils and appendix, since it's likely that they'll get tonsillitis and/or appendicitis? Why not? Those procedures do have medical applications. The foreskin and the clitoris are not even in the same ballpark when it comes to this argument. The clitoris is a nerve center which greatly affects sexual satisfaction. The foreskin is a flap of skin which does nothing but hang there getting in the way.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:31 PM
3

You don't need a genetic test to determine if a woman is the mother... you just need witnesses...
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:55 PM
3

HOW DOES THIS NEED TO BE SPELLED OUT?!
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:55 PM
9

More specifically, we're taught that men used to feel superior and that that was horrible of them and if we ever feel superior or confident in our masculinity then we should be ashamed because feeling that anything a woman or girl does is wrong is sexist and ignorant. Basically in our formative days we're shamed and bullied into the belief that confident feelings are wrong unless you're a female.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:55 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/seduction10/02/12 11:49 PM
1

There's no possible way she could have proofread her rant? And think about it... why give the benefit of the doubt on something so simple getting fucked up? As George Carlin said, "Think about how fucking stupid the average person is, then realize that half of 'em are even dumber than that!"
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:39 PM
2

I don't think people who are too fucking stupid to spell the word "opinion" should be telling anyone else how to think or act. Finish fifth grade, then talk to us.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:49 AM
-4

This is so when you go to the club it won't be all dudes humping each other and bumping asses on the dance floor. Do you want a favorable female to male ratio in the club? Then shut up. EDIT: Ok, guys... listen up. They're not going to give men free drinks. And if they don't give women free drinks, women won't go to bars, unless we bring them, and pay for them. So, unless you'd like to pay for your drinks and their drinks, instead of just yours, leave this one be. It's beneficial for everyone th…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 04:19 PM
1

No. That wouldn't work... Clearly sex should be consensual, and never forced. I find myself with my foot in my mouth, because I've failed to make myself properly understood. It's obvious to me that I know rape is wrong, so I didn't think my words could be construed the way they have been. Nobody who knows me would think that I meant that. I think there's a lot society can do to normalize sexual relations, both in terms of devilifying it and demystifying it. That's all, in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 05:43 AM
0

You didn't read my edit. And you're putting words in my mouth to make me look like a creep on purpose. Stop that. As I said in my post above, which I don't think you've read very well: By "limiting rejection of sexual advances" ... I was thinking of the establishment of programs to help men whose sex lives are either stagnant or non-existent identify and rectify the issues which are holding them back, and also the elimination of the "sex is dirty" culture which makes people think that consenting…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:15 AM
1

You seem to think that I'm advocating unlimited touching rights. I'm not.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:14 AM
-1

I asked a question about sexual society. You replied with Tea Party propaganda.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:11 AM
2

Again, just devil's advocate here, but by that standard of logic, women can choose to stop leaving the house, choose to stop unlocking their doors and windows, and choose to have their vaginas sewn shut, so as to avoid putting themselves in that situation I don't feel that it's reasonable to expect that unlobotomized men should just try a few years to become sexually successful and then give up and waddle off whistling "Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Da", anymore than I feel it's reasonable for normal, socially-…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:08 AM
-1

Take this to /r/politics, please.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:10 AM
3

Wait... how can a math question be "male-leaning"? In what way can a questions solvable by an unchanging scientific process with only one correct answer be discriminatory?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:37 AM
1

Rape can be punished by life without parole. False accusation is the more serious offense, because it is the ultimate fucking over of an innocent person.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:53 PM
1

If a woman is raped, then the accusation would not be false. Also, mere acquittal of the accused would not constitute a crime on the plaintiff's part. It should require having knowingly lied.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:07 PM
0

So for the crime of sending an innocent person to prison and ruining their life and reputation permanently, you should be fined and have to go on probabtion, at the worst? Bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:03 PM
0

Perjury is a different thing entirely. When a person accuses another person of a violent crime, such as rape; knowing the accusation to be false, they are subjecting that person to 20 years to life behind bars. When you try to steal an innocent person's life from them by getting them locked up for something they didn't do, you're just as bad as any murderer. At least rape victims get a chance to rebuild their lives. Put yourself in the shoes of an innocent man who is facing life without parole b…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:01 PM
0

That doesn't make any sense to me. If the penalty is harsher, it will make more non-victims think twice before making the false accusation in the first place. Think about it like this... should we make the penalty for murder 1 week of community service so that more murderers will confess? What a false accuser is attempting to do is to steal someone's life from them, much the way a murderer does. These people need to be given punishments which fit the crime, not just slapped on the wrist and piti…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:57 PM
1

No, the lowest form of communication are your grunts of disapproval at things which make you feel insecure because they are above your ability to comprehend. Political cartoons are one of the most effective forms of real-world meme communication because they encapsulate an entire discussion in one or two images. They are incredibly important because they illustrate the good and bad of what's going on in an easy-to-understand, easy-to-digest format which is accessible to anyone who's ever read a …
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:31 PM
5

Man: "You're a good sort." Feminist: "How dare you speak to me, insect!" Fuck everything about this!
/r/MensRights01/09/11 06:31 PM
3

the difference is subtle...but its a difference. You don't understand what she's doing here. It's ok, you're no more stupid than the other 85-90% of the population who also aren't well-educated enough to pick up on stuff like this. But here's how it works. She could have easily used another word, but she didn't. She chose to describe the way she feels men treat women as "rape". "Rape" is a word with a very strong, very specific connotation to a disturbing, violent act, the thought of which is ca…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:27 PM
-1

I like how you've failed to see that I've just shown you specific proof that Wikipedia can and has been pranked, trolled, and unfactually altered, and you're too much of a sissy little childish fuckstick to admit that you've been rebutted. Go ahead and hide behind your technicalities, asshat.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:49 AM
1

Here you go, troll.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:42 AM
1

you know that wasn't what she meant Do I? She said "all men are rapists and that's all they are". Those words came out of her mouth, and I believe, as anyone trained in the English language and the art of speech might, that those words were calculated to have a very specific effect and meaning. She and her extremist movement can explain them away in any way they like, but I don't intend to let her get away with saying something like that and then sidestepping the meaning of her own words. There'…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:40 AM
6

I suspect you're right that she probably got raped at some point, because vitriol like hers doesn't just come out of nowhere, and usually has as a source some kind of severe trauma which causes the type of psychological damage which results in conditions like militant misandry. However to avoid glorifying such an event, since nobody deserves that kind of thing, no matter how much of a rotten bitch they happen to be, I prefer to rephrase your questions thus: Jeez... who shit in her unflavored org…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:34 AM
-1

You clearly have not seen the inside of an academic institution in awhile. Wikipedia is maintained by the public. Anyone can make an account and put anything they like out there. It's not reputable because it can be changed at will by any troll with 15 minutes and the desire to do so. So here's a list of sources better than Wikipedia: Any source. /list Wikipedia is great for casual reference, because in general, our anal-retentive, sexually and socially challenged friends maintain it fairly well…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:29 AM
3

Upvote. However... It's really stupid, but it isn't calling all men literal rapists. ...when taken out of context as feminists so often do...
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:26 AM
5

As feminists go, she was pretty influential. And anyone making statements like that is dangerous.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 10:32 PM
1

Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. They can say anything on there, and based on feminism's propensity to, as you say, "distort", "misinterpret", and "outright make-up" facts and statistics, why would you trust anything in there which attempts to mitigate the damaging statements of a militant misandrynist? What better way to "spread around to try to infect as many people as possible" than to make apologist statements on Wikipedia, which many people who don't know any better take for gospel? Just …
/r/MensRights31/08/11 10:30 PM
35

She was one of the original famous militant feminists. Quotes attributed to her include "All me are rapists and that is all they are." She was fond of saying that male physical emotional and sexual abuse of women was systemic and part of a "concerted campaign". As though every man on Earth was getting the "Rape Women" Newsletter and we all attended big meetings to coordinate rape and discrimination. She was a world-class bitch, and perhaps to a greater extent than any other woman, especially dur…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 08:19 PM
1

sup.
/r/seduction25/01/11 01:04 AM
1

Orlando
/r/seduction25/01/11 01:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter