TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BeliefEditor Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by BeliefEditor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Sorry for the delay, I hadn't logged into this account in a while. Women are human beings, and they have emotions. When you treat a vulnerable person unkindly, it is normal for them to feel emotion, whether they suppress it or fully experience it. Women are highly emotional in comparison to men, and rather than suppressing their emotions, they opt to fully experience them. When a woman gets involved in a sexual situation with a man, unlike men, she tends to feel vulnerable. (This is not to say t…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/18 03:25 AM
15

This happened for several reasons: At present, women in the west have a collective belief about men being malicious within the context of engaging in their sexuality and directing it at them. And the belief that women need to band together to stop the oppression. At present, women are enabled/empowered to destroy men via exposing sexual misconduct effectuated on them (whether imaginary or actual). To a low-quality person (big ego), the above point represents a huge juicy opportunity to aggrandiz…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 07:31 PM
8

The confusion stems from seeing this with male eyes. A male inherently feels responsible for what he does. A male processes his interactions with women as him doing something to the women. A female processes her interactions with men as the men doing something to her. Women process everything from the reality that things happen to her. When a woman cheats, she doesn't feel like she is doing something to her husband; she feels like the situation is happening to her. She knows it would make her hu…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/18 05:44 AM
19

You're trying to put a band-aid on a deeper problem. That short interaction is irrelevant in the big picture; what's significant is what you are, which was perfectly revealed to her through that test. By touching her timidly and then cowering, you've shown her that you're not comfortable with it. That's unattractive. You can pretend like you're comfortable with it but women see through it. You need to change your paradigm, which is what makes you perceive touching her sexually as something you s…
/r/askTRP28/05/17 07:37 PM
3

Exactly. In the grand scheme of things, positions are interchangeable. What really matters is the growth that comes from learning to stop the "us vs them" thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 10:58 PM
2

Let me clarify that I never offered my opinion on what OP should do, I merely pointed out why she is being that way. I don't personally think getting married is something that makes sense (although everyone is free to do what they want). However, if you do decide to get married, then she does need to feel loved in order to feel all right with such a huge life decision, since the gamble-like nature of marriage would make her need to have a sense of security and stability in the future of that dec…
/r/askTRP19/04/17 11:54 AM
0

She's insecure about marrying you because she doesn't know (really feel) that you care about her. When you try to "be redpill" without being a normal person, you're like a computer that thinks in terms of algorithms and tricks to apply to women in order to have the upper hand, not listening to her emotion and to what she needs from her partner (which is love). Because that's for betas and faggots, yo! /s. Women are not stupid, they are very emotionally intuitive, and she can tell that you're not…
/r/askTRP19/04/17 07:49 AM
2

There's two parts to our sexual programming: The part that involves semen (impregnation), and the part that involves children (their survival). Your genetic programming makes you desire two things: 1) Impregnate as many fit chicks as are available to you, and 2) Pair-bond with the ones you perceive to be of high quality, protecting them and providing for them (so that the children survive). Her genetic programming makes her desire two things: 1) Secure the highest-quality sperm, and 2) Pair-bond…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/17 05:06 AM
3

That non-egoic learning-oriented attitude will give you a high-quality big-picture perspective in time.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 11:34 AM
14

I don't think she fucks them behind the beta's back because "she doesn't care about him", but because of women's dual strategy. I think when she says she loves him and has feelings for him and is in love with him she is telling the truth, but we have to understand that women have two needs: Great dick, and a great nest. / Securing the best quality semen (genes), and the best provider (support for offspring). Women's genetic mission is to have the most survivable children, for which she needs bot…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 09:00 AM
2

It's crazy. Women have evolved to use their "female power" (i.e. being attractive) to get resources from men, and we have evolved to want to give them to them. But in today's world, when you compare yourself to a girl of your same age, education and competence—provided she's at least halfway decent looking—and you realize the sheer unfairness of her having access to all those resources freely offered by the mass of psychologically castrated men by exploiting that loophole, you can't help but wak…
/r/MGTOW04/04/17 11:01 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR2Pk2SqQzg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WhQ-AEZovE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLbk5xrjJoY
/r/askTRP28/03/17 09:08 AM
1

No one said anything about treating anyone inferior. Did you forget what the name of this thread is? ("You Pedestalize Something That is Inferior to You") I said do not respect a sex because it's a sex. You've failed to convince me otherwise. I never tried to change your mind about that, I agree with that. That's why I included this part: "(not on the grounds that they are female but because of the individual conscious being they are)." Your impression of love sounds cartoonish and single minded…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/17 02:05 AM
2

You just proved to me that you have the exact mentality I argue against. Understand that there are two different things going on in this reality: one is our biological pre-installed programs, and the other is our free will. Sexual attraction, infatuation, and hormonal drives for pair-bonding happen within the context of our hardwired impersonal genetic blueprints, so everything The Red Pill teaches is absolutely correct within that context, I am not arguing against that. What I am pointing out i…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/17 06:11 PM
2

I agree. What I don't agree with is the motivation OP endorses, which is fundamentally disrespectful to women. If you fully grasp the way our hardwired gender dynamics work -unlike many rookies here- you realize there is zero need for that misogyny shit. Respecting women is not the same thing as putting them on a pedestal. That is something that completely flies over the head of "rookies" (and quite a few "pros" while we're at it). That's why women see "terpers" as pathetic and bitter neckbeards…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 10:13 PM
2

Yeah, of course I'm not advocating that anybody depend on their girlfriend to get by, that would be stupid. But the way relationships would be ideally is that men focused on creating, building and generating great things for everyone to enjoy, while women assisted them with moral support and with their physical needs. Whether it's actually doable or not is another matter. But this is a tangent that diverted from the main point I was trying to make, which is that women not being pedestalized by u…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 08:31 PM
3

Oh, right. I see what the misinterpretation was. I should be clearer about the context in which I say things. What I meant to say is that a relationship needs both the man's strength and the woman's support. Two pieces that complete a creation. OP said not to pedestalize women cuz they ain't shit. I say: that action is wise, but the motivation is not. They are valuable in their own right.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 06:06 PM
2

We don't need her help, but we appreciate it and can benefit from it. Subtle distinction. You are 100% capable of making your own money, cleaning after yourself, feeding yourself, and satisfying yourself sexually with the Internet. You don't need a woman's help, but isn't it beneficial to have someone do the latter three for you while you focus on succeeding? It's a support. There's a difference between pedestalizing women and appreciating them. Putting them down is not constructive for anyone.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 05:23 PM
3

Yes, of course. You can't depend on her for anything, ever. That's the strength of a man. So, if we are already so strong and so independent and so ubreakable and magnificent... what's the need to put women down? They're the very thing that we love, that's why we're all here. It feels like an insecure attitude to have. That's what I wanted to point out.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 05:12 PM
2

Posts like this are the reason people think The Red Pill is about misogyny. The point of pedestalization isn't to put them down because of what they are as people (while imagining that men are magnificent in comparison); the point is to understand that their role is one of support in a way that compliments your role of leadership. You have to be strong, not in spite of her but with the help of her. Putting women down is an immature and insecure attitude to have.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 07:24 AM
2

You had me cracking up with this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/16 01:20 PM
1

Yes, yes. I know what you're saying is a good understanding of reality, but you're only analyzing one type of dynamic where a woman has sex with a man: the one where it's all a game. Of course women do all the things you say, we all know that. But that happens when they are in the mentality of "just having fun". There's another mental state which is more serious than that. When a woman is in love with a man that's a whole other story. And no, being infatuated with the dick that makes her cum buc…
/r/askTRP18/12/16 01:37 AM
1

Yes, I love women.
/r/askTRP18/12/16 01:00 AM
1

I took her comment to mean that OP is not particularly good looking (in her eyes at least). A man's attractiveness is made up of two halves: the way you look and the way you are. Fortunately the way you look is the lesser half, so women can be crazy in love for ugly guys, you see it all the time.
/r/askTRP18/12/16 12:30 AM
1

Why? Because it's incompatible with your binary paradigm of Alphas and Betas? Alpha and Beta is just a guideline, not a fundamental property of reality. If OP is a guy she's clearly feeling crazy for, why exactly is it so off-the-wall to suggest that she wants sex with him?
/r/askTRP17/12/16 06:12 PM
-1

Did you read her diary entries? This chick clearly can't stop thinking about OP. I'm saying: Maybe the reason she didn't put out is because she's so into you that she's afraid you might think of her as a slut and you won't want her anymore. Blasphemy! What a whore apologist I must be to suggest this. Clearly her real agenda is nothing but lies and manipulation, she's out to get OP. He missed the other entry in her journal in which she explains her plot to bring him to ruin through mind games and…
/r/askTRP17/12/16 05:53 PM
1

Did you read the part where she wrote I'm refraining from fucking tonight just for you I'm horny as hell I just had a quite homoerotic convo I feel sexy and horny as shit I want the D soooo bad right now I wanna see you almost everyday I'm scared you don't think about me as much as I think about you I think about having sex with you, beautiful artistic sex where we paint canvasses and explore skin... ...and bdsm, and maybe swingers and maybe anal If you turn out to be anything like the idea of y…
/r/askTRP17/12/16 05:33 PM
1

I'm not necessarily saying that it would be particularly prideful for OP to turn her into his girlfriend knowing that she cucked him, but he did ask for understanding and that's what I'm hoping I'm providing. This is how women think.
/r/askTRP17/12/16 05:27 PM
7

Women often classify men (or their relationships with them) in two categories: a) Just dick b) Dick + "love/feelings/enamourment/pair-bonding/emotional investment" (There's other categories like "pair-bonding" {i.e. Beta provider} without the sex, and maybe others, but they're irrelevant to this analysis). "Just dick" is what the name implies. Like eating a burger, you don't get to know the cook or the cashier; you're in and you're out. No significant bond with the person is created or sustained…
/r/askTRP17/12/16 05:39 AM
2

Looks are half of the equation; being a competent strong resourceful survivable man is the other half. Fortunately looks are the lesser half, which means you have considerable control over your attractiveness. Also remember that there's two kinds of "attraction": one is sexual and the other is about pair-bonding. Looks matter more for sexual attraction than for pair-bonding, but it's still just half.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 09:49 AM
1

I agree with you that it makes sense to win and not to lose. However, what is winning? I don't think sex with your girlfriend should be considered a "victory". Is she not getting something out of it? Is this not another insidious form of bluepill thinking, that somehow she's giving you sex, like it's a gift? Is being a man and respecting yourself enough to establish firm boundaries not satisfaction enough? You're advocating the avoidance of conflict. I'm not gonna be respected by asking permissi…
/r/askTRP10/11/16 10:58 PM
20

What bothers me about this is... why didn't you stand up to them right then and there? You're the one who sets boundaries as a man for how others treat you. That was completely unacceptable. It irks me that there's still so many men out there who tolerate shit like that, even the ones who have technically stopped being bluepill. I'm not saying be rude in return, but there's simple ways to demand the basic respect you should receive. Not because "Hurr durr I'm a big mean Alpha Male", but simply b…
/r/askTRP10/11/16 01:52 PM
2

Ask yourself how you would be feeling and acting if you had a queue of chicks eagerly waiting for you to have sex with them, texting you asking if it's their turn yet. Then, if you were on a date, would you be focusing on the same irrelevant non-tingle-producing stuff? Or would you exude the vibe of someone who's gonna give her some dick later? Which one do you think she would like more?
/r/askTRP08/11/16 04:23 AM
1

Haha, that's a good impression. I had a MtF person partner up with me in an online course and it took me way too long to realize it wasn't a girl girl. Sounded like that.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 02:56 AM
2

Sure, here's a clip by that voice teacher: https://youtu.be/ZWD-yD-GMko (It's actually a 5-part lesson, but they're really brief, around 8 minutes in total) And here's a person whose content I don't follow but who has a good tip about "breathing into your balls", also good: https://youtu.be/P41ER1Wmkj0 I have like 7 "major" tips but I'm too lazy to do a proper post and I don't want to spam here but I can give you more tips via PM if you want.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 10:20 PM
3

Haha, that's cool man. Keep practicing.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 08:43 PM
3

Sure man. I'm not sure which ones you are distinguishing as the three, I thought I was only doing 2: deep and shallow (unless you're counting the one where you are shallowly making a failed effort to sound deep). And I didn't even show you my girl voice lol. It's actually not jarring at all. The only reason you can hear me struggle a little bit at all is actually not physical but psychological. There's somebody napping here in another room and I don't want to wake them. And I try to avoid being …
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 06:22 PM
5

I've actually watched that DVD program and it's got some good pieces of information. The biggest one you're gonna get off of that course is to learn to speak with your "optimum pitch". I wouldn't say it's a scam, there's some legit info not just on reaching deeper notes but on proper breathing, enunciation and so on. I can actually do the same thing as that guy now, the "before and after". Check it out: http://vocaroo.com/i/s0dHfvnoterI PM if you want to have a chat on Google Hangouts, I'll teac…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 05:52 PM
12

I'll also say that her as a man looks better than I do and her voice is deeper. I could use that voice therapy she used kek. Unless your vocal folds, the muscles of your neck, and/or the other components involved in producing your voice (your "instrument") have a deformity, I seriously doubt that a woman has a deeper pitch range than you. I know from first-hand experience that you can learn to produce a deeper voice. Check out this guy's before and after: https://youtu.be/1NHxN9L23qY
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 05:03 PM
1

Exactly. That was actually incorrect, I shouldn't have said "routine". It was an anecdote he told on a videoblog, so no punchline. Just a story. But yeah, sounds like it's quite common.
/r/askTRP24/10/16 01:45 AM
3

Women are the most beautiful thing in the world, and my favorite. If they connect with that side of themselves, they have a disposition to be kind, gentle, caring, loving, giving, nurturing. Whereas men have evolved to focus their attention on the outward world (building things, hunting, and such), women have evolved to focus their attention on the inner world (relationship). Women are equally skeptical and cautious of people outside of what they consider to be their group, as they are protectiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 01:39 AM
1

A local comedian who is quite RP did a routine about a girl he went out with who gave him that line. When he undressed her, he discovered that she happened to be wearing sexy underwear and that she was perfectly waxed.
/r/askTRP23/10/16 09:08 PM
2

lel
/r/askTRP20/10/16 09:58 PM
1

Yeah, we should just make the best out of what we have, getting better every day. Keep hustlin'.
/r/askTRP20/10/16 08:55 PM
1

No kidding. And just imagine how many millions and millions of cases like these happen across all cultures all the time. Not good. And it's not good for the girlfriends either, it's a lose-lose situation for everybody. So, going back to the hypothetical question of 'what if everyone was red-pilled?', well, the guys might still be soft and have a lot of work to do, but at least they'd be conscious of it and try to get better every day, we'd all be improving ourselves little by little. That is hug…
/r/askTRP20/10/16 07:44 PM
2

...whether I should tell a very old, dear, close friend of mine about TRP. He recently got in a seemingly serious relationship with this girl who sets off my "red flag" alarm due to TRP knowledge I've gained here and experienced over the years. He's very very beta and it's the most serious relationship he's gotten himself into. I can already see how it will end... That is word for word exactly the case with one of my best friends too. I knew it would crush his spirits if I flat-out told him what…
/r/askTRP20/10/16 08:43 AM
2

What does it even even mean to "become RP"? Let's say being red-pilled means to thoroughly understand the way our biological imperatives (shaped by evolution) work, and the different ways in which they manifest in modern society. That still leaves us with a very real hierarchy of SMV. Some guys will want to start a family, some won't. Some will want to spin plates forever, some won't. Some red-pilled men would be 10's, others would be 9's, and 8's and so on all the way to 1's and 0's, the same a…
/r/askTRP20/10/16 04:59 AM
1

I'm assuming this was meant in response to my comment and you accidentally posted it as a separate comment. What I have to say to that is that these men are learning. They are going from one extreme of the ignorance/knowledge spectrum to the other, and along the way, some find it necessary to be ruthless in order to really drill the message into their brain that women don't like sissies. Unfortunately, in doing that, we also forget to be compassionate of our girls and love them for what they are…
/r/askTRP17/10/16 12:53 PM
2

I'm not a father but I have a little niece whom I love too much, and not once have I taken RP dogma into serious consideration without thinking about how it would affect her if it was applied to her. I maintain that women are not evil, they are not out to "get" men, they are not horrid creatures that are against you - they are normal sentient beings just like everybody else, who happen to come equipped with some biological programs shaped by evolution which in the context of our modern society a…
/r/askTRP17/10/16 12:39 PM
1

A picture says more than a thousand words, and a video speaks millions. It would be way easier to help you if we could actually look at you doing it. My bet is that you're not intuitive. You have to have a sense of what's going on inside of her. Maybe you need to turn off the left hemisphere of your brain and become conscious of how you're making them feel through the way you express yourself, the way you talk, the way you move, and so on.
/r/askTRP15/10/16 02:04 AM
2

It will eventually; I'm just getting started switching from it being just a project to it being what I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 02:54 AM
2

I edit beliefs for a living.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 03:42 PM
1

RemindMe! 2 days
/r/askTRP11/10/16 11:31 AM
2

I wouldn't agree with that. Women enjoy looking beautiful, and men have a counterpart to that which is enjoying being strong and tall and manly. You don't "turn it off" when you're in the presence of girls you don't like just to avoid being "manipulative" or misleading. You are that way becauase you like it. Similarly, girls enjoy themselves when they look nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/16 06:56 AM
1

I'm glad you got something useful out of my wall of text, I had thought it might've been a bit overkill. Now I want to mention why I think they exhibit that kind of group behavior, so I'll try to keep this one shorter. When you are born into the kind of society that we live in, you can't help but be confused about the dynamics of men and women. There is so much information going around of so many different kinds about so many different issues and nuances related to the subject that it's only nat…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/16 03:47 AM
1

I want to comment on why I think your comments get downvoted. I'll preface my opinion by stating the obvious but important point that any group, movement, fanbase, subreddit, religion, or anything along those lines which is at its core a gathering of people who share certain specific views or attitudes, is composed of many different individuals who -although they agree on a lot of things that binds their movement together- can have very unique and vastly different personal beliefs, morals, opini…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 06:58 AM
1

Woah, I remember reading that a long time ago, even if I only barely remembered anything other than the main point of him having the realization I just read it again and it's fascinating looking at it with a relatively newly acquired RP lens; if I wasn't too lazy to do it I'd like to do the same with all his old stories.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/16 09:54 AM
2

That's not how it works, OP. Women are aroused by being desired, and men are aroused by enjoying them. Women are the desired party, men are the desirers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 08:42 PM
1

Thanks for calling out this snark thing, I see it a lot. Edit: Added words. Edit 2: Removed words.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 01:46 PM
0

I think I'm still greener than I thought, because I'm not sure what the reason is that it's so important that he doesn't give her an explanation. If I was in his place I would break up with her but I would let her know that the reason for it was because of her cheating, and I would be wary of her hamster and her ability to twist the truth in any way that benefits her and such, and I would try to stay focused so as to not fall for her mental tricks but ultimately dump her, letting her know that I…
/r/askTRP03/09/16 08:31 AM
1

I'm not sure what message you intend to convey through this comment, but There is no book yet, only the draft. And I've read it. In case you're referring to the content of the PDF about men outgrowing their ego and treating women with love and respect, to indicate that I shouldn't talk about rape: I know rape is thoroughly reprehensible; I'm talking about fantasies. In case you're implying that I'm not informed well enough: I never presume that not to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 11:47 AM
1

Well, yes. Of course there's many other factors; I mainly wanted to point out those two to shed some light on why we have this "alien" sex drive. At least one example I can think of in which this doesn't apply is in the case of a rape fantasy (or many kinds of fantasies, for that matter). How much can she "get to know" her assailant in the few seconds it takes him to spot her in a dark alley and grab her? In that sense, I'd say it's not so much about "getting to know him" but getting a feel for …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 01:59 AM
7

I really hope that cunt's Beta-shaming doesn't get to him. Hopefully someone will help him unplug. And hopefully someone will make her realize the sheer stupidity of her actions, publicly taking a shit on a sincere man who was looking for her help. Hell, if her goal is to prevent Betas from "rebelling" and shedding light on women's conniving ways, she could've told him a few white lies to help him feel better and send him on his way back to Mrs. "Do we really have to do this?", but she had to hu…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 11:44 AM
3

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 10:27 AM
3

Part of men's evolutionary strategy is a numbers game: to have sex with as many physically attractive women as are available to him. (Define “attractive” [Lower standard] – one criteria: basically good genetic and physical health. (Apparent good physical health and body symmetry). Part of women's evolutionary strategy is to bear the most survivable children, by securing the highest quality available sperm. To be as sexually attractive as possible (to men in general) and induce the one that is mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:46 AM
4

Women like good sex as much as men (or more), but only the top Chads can give it to them. Thus the 80/20 distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:28 AM
1

I want to answer this question but when you put it that way I'm afraid I don't have a firm sense of what the difference is between empathizing and sympathizing. I know I do feel empathy for women (as well as for all people), absolutely. Although it took for people who are better than me to show me a couple lessons for me to become able to do that; namely Zan Perrion through his book The Alabaster Girl. I sure am glad I came across that book before I started exploring TRP's concepts deeply, other…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 01:37 AM
2

Oh yeah, absolutely. I read Mode One probably around 2009 and it was my first big eye-opener when it comes to truth about women and dating. I credit Mr. Currie for a huge shift in paradigm, 4 or 5 years before even finding out about TRP. He may have a wonky writing style but the man's no fool, he knows his shit. And there's been many, many times when I've seen people on this sub being lauded for coming up with observations that he has been talking about for years on his radio show and in his boo…
/r/askTRP17/08/16 11:56 PM
4

Be Relentless a.k.a. The Rules, by David X. It will blow the "Nice guy" attitude out your butt. Mode One: Let The Women Know What You're Really Thinking, by Alan Roger Currie. It will show you how to have the balls to be 100% direct with women about your intentions. The Possibility of Sex: How Naive and Lustful Men are Manipulated by Women Regularly, by Alan Roger Currie. It will teach you the different ways in which women manipulate Betas out of money, favors, emotional support, and attention. …
/r/askTRP16/08/16 11:02 PM
1

Mila Kunis was the first one who popped into my mind. Also agree with Beyonce. And I don't care for Kim Kardashian or Emma Watson.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 10:24 PM
2

If you're mentioning this info in response to my claim that the girls are not too thrilled with their partners: I didn't mean that they don't enjoy spending time together doing various activities, I meant that they're not too thrilled with their partner's level of attractiveness. Remember that, while men look for one thing in women (their attractiveness) in order to have relationships with them, women look for two things in men: attractiveness and security (and they seldom find them in the same …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 10:36 PM
1

Since I'm so out of the loop with "YouTubers", I thought I wouldn't recognize any of them, but it turns out I know, follow, and like all of them. There's no mystery to this. Betas have girlfriends too. The girls may not be thrilled with their partner but they're okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 09:01 PM
-13

I have to agree with the salty women.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/16 09:25 AM
20

Because it's hot. Women's sexuality is designed to seek out the most physically and mentally dominant man around and incite him to have sex with her. A man who is abusive often posesses the qualities that make her panties wet. The reason it baffles people is because such a relationship is obviously not loving. This confusion stems from the fact that people are making the fundamental assumption that relationships should happen between people who love each other, but in reality that's only the sec…
/r/askTRP08/08/16 09:42 PM
7

It's a strategy designed to deal with your fear by means of covering it up with an antagonistic attitude. You are solving it with ego rather than through peace and self-acceptance. You are merely putting a band-aid on the fissure rather than mending it. It's a temporary, superficial solution. It might successfully help you to achieve some tranquility of mind in the short term, but the moment your ego structure is threatened, you'll fall back into the fear of not being enough. Fear is divisive an…
/r/askTRP30/07/16 07:12 PM
5

I see. I've been using the term "hamstering" loosely, I think, because I wasn't really aware that its main purpose was to execute mental gymnastics with the goal of protecting the subject's ego. I just thought hamstering meant "thinking retardedly/non-logically". What I've seen more often than not - and I'm not sure if this counts as an example of what we're talking about here - is guys willing to defend RP 'dogma' tooth and nail without ever stopping to consider alternative interpretations or e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 01:50 AM
2

Of course women can have "just sex". Though, to conclude from posts like that that one gender hamsters more than another is a generalization; there's many differences in the way the individual members of a group think which may not always be voiced. The reason why you see lots of hamstering in RP guys, I think, is because there's too much ignorance going on in our culture about these sorts of subjects, and they often hold retarded beliefs to compensate for their lack of understanding of all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 10:25 PM
5

We both agree that the sex people have and the appreciation they have for one another are two different things. To me, love is just a more profound version of this "appreciation". I would contend that it is possible to love a person who by all accounts is terrible (e.g. a lousy wife), but people are used to loving only those who are good to them and not the ones who suck. Still, if somebody finds themselves in an unsatisfying relationship, it doesn't make sense to stay in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 07:16 PM
11

I believe in love. TRP tends to mock the idea of love between a man and a woman, but I am of the opinion that the reason this stance exists is because a lot of confusion exists about the nature of love, and people mix and confuse different concepts. One thing is our sexuality, and a different, separate thing is the love that sentient beings have for each other, regardless of their gender, age, sexuality, or even species. Love exists at the level of consciousness - of the spirit, so to speak - wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 05:31 PM
1

I help people get rid of beliefs that are counterproductive/problematic/unbeneficial/limiting, which manifest in the form of different behavioral and emotional problems. You have a simple conversation where you connect a few dots and do a bit of reasoning, which leads to the belief being deleted from your mind and by extension, to the problems disappearing.
/r/askTRP19/07/16 10:53 PM
1

By eliminating your limiting beliefs. PM me if you want a complimentary Skype session. I don't have that much authority so you'll be fine.
/r/askTRP19/07/16 06:04 AM
3

It's several things: The average misinformed male conditioned by BluePill culture believe that women are way less sexual than they really are. BP male believes that women don't enjoy being wanted for their bodies. He believes that a woman wants someone who wants her exclusively for who she is but not for her body. He believes that intimacy and familiarity will make her attracted to him. He has heard those types of phrases coming from women referring to men (in the eyes of women, the mind of a ma…
/r/askTRP10/07/16 11:48 AM
5

Dude, I had this same thought process earlier in the day. Well, not all of it exactly, but definitely the part about the term "Alpha" working fine, and the term "Beta" needing some refined understanding to include the issue of providing.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/16 04:12 AM
–

An integral part of BluePill conditioning is the notion that women are attracted to goofy, upbeat, warm and friendly guys. While it may be true that it makes you a nice person, it doesn't make you sexually attractive. And if you find a guy who is both goofy and sexually attractive, the latter will be in spite of the former and not due to it. Sexual attractiveness comes from traits that are quite the opposite. Read a romance novel like Fifty Shades of Grey. You'll notice the guy is never over-exc…
/r/askTRP03/07/16 01:57 AM
10

Holy shit, how do you do that? I need to understand the hamster algorithm so it doesn't trick me again.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 04:46 PM
2

Shit tests are a reflection of insecurity. If she's highly emotionally intelligent, genuine and sweet, she probably just doesn't feel the need to.
/r/askTRP23/06/16 05:21 AM
1

No kidding, they are huge betas. But Zan is cool.
/r/askTRP20/06/16 10:18 PM
1

Watch the way Zan Perrion tells stories. He's great.
/r/askTRP20/06/16 05:48 PM
3

It is astounding to me that you would even consider not nexting her after seeing how much she disrespects you.
/r/askTRP19/06/16 06:57 PM
12

Because it is women's genetic imperative to seek their male's commitment. When a male pair-bonds with a female, he is effectively commiting to protecting and providing for her and her children, thus fulfilling the human goal of succesful survival and replication. Women feel insecure without this reassurance from their males; the reassurance that he is commited to her, becuse instinctually, if you're not really commited to her, if she's not really that special to you, if she senses that you could…
/r/askTRP26/05/16 01:44 AM
0

I would've had the same opinion before learning about consciousness.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 11:29 PM
-4

I think that the majority of the "RP" views on love (and BP, for that matter) are fairly limited. As I understand it, the reason why everyone is confused is because love and sex are two completely different things happening on two different planes. Everything TRP talks about in terms of sexual attraction is very accurate. It properly explains what goes on in the minds and bodies of human males and females; it explains sexuality perfectly. The confusion begins when you try to understand love in a…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 09:42 PM
1

I asked my sister a similar question last year. I said, paraphrasing: "How come girls like really manly, strong, brave men, like those from actions movies, and yet, despite their dislike for effeminate weak men, they tend to go crazy for those skinny, teenage-looking, high-picth-singing fancy boys from boy-bands, K-pop idols, Justin Bieber and the like? She said, paraphrasing: "Those guys, the things they sing about, they make you feel like they would be your perfect boyfriend". Women want to be…
/r/askTRP16/05/16 12:10 PM
1

Very interesting. This is a complete change in perspective for me. This whole time I'd been feeling the same way a woman does when approaching the wall; I figured my early 20's were my best time and women wouldn't want me the same as I progressively became an old fart. But now that I think about it... when have I ever seen women lamenting the lack of early-20's guys and wishing they were dating them? Never... they're always with men somewhat older than them who have their shit together. Mid-thir…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 02:03 PM
1

Wait... it's not? I just turned 26 this week and I've been feeling like shit about having already gone over my peak, which I figured was 25. What about the Rational Male could I read to learn what you learned? *To add a reason why I have this belief: it's because one time I read a woman's comment somewhere on the Internet (probably a reddit thread, I don't remember) which was something along the lines of: "Yes, older men are attractive because [they have more status/confidence/power, things like…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 10:54 AM
2

I think what he's trying to say is that it's a preferrable plan of action to improve yourself in such a way that you genuinely become stronger, as opposed to pretending that you are when you're really not.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/16 09:52 AM
1

Maybe. But keep in mind that women love showing off their men to the public, when they're proud of him and honored to be chosen by him. If this was the case with this couple, she would've been enthusiastic about running to his arms and kissing him first and not breaking it off after a half-second peck, especially because there was a camera. She would've placed her hand on his chest and smiled by his side. On the other hand, It's too common to see women in public who are almost ashamed of being w…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 12:49 PM
2

Wow. This explains so much, holy shit. Now a lot of the pieces of the puzzle make sense: Why dread works, why women want constant attention, why women love talking so much about pointless occurrences among people, why they shape-shift/chameleon adopting your interests and mannerisms, why they want leaders, why they're so attracted to men who don't give a shit about being affirmed ('cause it's manly, in contrast to them), why they need security so much ('cause they don't have the fearless indepen…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 10:16 AM
0

Did you notice the way she dodged his kiss at the end? I'd say she's not that into him.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 07:25 AM
1

Every once in a while I stumble upon a post or a comment containing intelligent insight that expands my understanding and I appreciate. This is one of them. Interesting points.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 12:35 AM
11

I'd like to recommend a book to RP Women. It's called "The Alabaster Girl", by Zan Perrion. Specifically, the first chapter. The guys over at TRP are often too focused on what they're bitter about regarding women to really absorb this book's message, but I know women will get it immediately. It is exactly about this. What is beauty in a woman. And I swear to God, I see you all with completely different eyes since I read it. In a good way. PM me for a cough<sup>complimentary copy</sup>
/r/RedPillWomen27/12/15 09:48 PM
2

I interpreted that part as: Him being aware of all the sluts he can bang = I have zero value. Better distract him with guilt.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 11:53 AM
4

Dude, you're a smart motherfucker. Also, Women are turned on by rocks and stones, not mush and goop. I'm saving that quote.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 12:31 PM
2

Really? I'm from México and I perceive girls here to be a little bit more decent. Still AWALT, but not as shameless.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 03:29 PM
19

I remember the first time I heard David X speak (a natural Red Pill Alpha who grew up in the 70's). It was a video from a seminar of his, and one of the first lines he said in it was: "Women? Yes: Very manipulative. They only lie. And they're waiting for you to come up to them to use you, you're a target. They're not nice to you. You think they're nice 'cause they're women. They're not". And I remember the very first time I heard that, my immediate reaction was "Nah... this guy must be a misogyn…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 05:02 PM
3

Fear lies to you. Not "be afraid of lies".
/r/seduction09/12/15 05:25 AM
6

Are you serious? That's fucking cool. How did you know him?
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 07:27 PM
9

She made the videos to keep him busy while she goes off to hop on the carousel. It also gives her plausible deniability. (See? I'm with you. How could I have possibly been cheating?) If she wasn't webcamming, then her guilt comes from her intention to cheat later on. Also, look at the language she uses in her response to the top comment. An innocent person would say, "It totally looked like I could've easily been webcamming [which I wasn't], so I understand his reaction". What she said was, "He …
/r/TheRedPill10/09/15 03:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter