TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Big_Dick_Capitalist Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by Big_Dick_Capitalist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Honestly, there's nothing broken with dating. It's rough for sure if you're not in the top 10%, but the same could be said of many arenas of life. There's nothing to be solved, we're all just going to have to keep moving.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/22 11:42 AM
1

Everytime a FDS harpie post black/white shit like this I just wonder what's the damn point. No, basing your argument on a Sandman video is not valid, it's stupid as fuck. If a relationship is strained both involved is probably causing it. Losing perspective relationsship-wise is a sure fire way to destroy the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 01:11 PM
3

Dayum, misandrists really at it this morning.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 06:25 AM
23

Debatable until you can point out specifics in regards to faulty logical reasoning and statistics. I'd also caution labelling the entire manosphere as some sort of fundamentalist right-leaning ideology supporting mass murder and terrorist attacks. That's FDS-level stupidity. By your profile, this will probably get thrown out by the feminist-echo chamber you're apparently in, trying nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 04:29 PM
53

I don't think society is necessarily against men, but what's most definitely true is that women get special treatment, often at the expense of men. Mainstream media disregards RP-theory and labels it misogyny, simply because that's easier than actually debating the proposed arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 02:07 PM
0

Bad idea not utilizing your best years to find a long term partner. Not all men sleep around.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:56 AM
3

lol, what is this. Sluts are apparently less star-fishy in bed. It's a matter of mindset and intention if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 11:13 AM
19

Same gender =/= same point of view I don't think it's misogynistic to state that males can replace females as friends. You lose some perspective though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:17 AM
7

Inherently harsh rhetoric will pop up, especially so in the manosphere. I think a lot of men are frustrated hence it shouldn't be unexpected though unwarranted, that posts containing pure bitterness and hate come along regarding dating, sex and women. Most men are average, for most women that's apparently not good enough. Fairness is a social construct that men should neither expect nor want, rather they should just internalize the reality of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:48 PM
18

Most are not. Just getting the information out there is the purpose. Men need to know the landscape, not the Disney blue-pilled misinformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:36 PM
0

Do you deny then, that the majority of men are either disregarded by women in their 20s or forced to settle? Women's standards are not comparable to men's standards. Men will need to improve in other areas if they're average in looks. It's not sabotaging at all in my view.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 07:00 AM
1

Political correctness on big subs is common. PPD is niche, the opinions here are reflective of a small minority of men and women. I tend to stay clear of subs that deem men's interest in protecting themselves, their assets or their children as toxic masculine behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:11 PM
3

It's everybody's kryptonite. The average person is unreliable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:05 PM
1

On the plus side, all of those habits, once ingrained, will serve the man for life. Once she's past the wall, there's little to do in terms of recovery. Men who have done the work can keep it up till they are 40-something. The ceiling is higher, most men are too lazy to reach it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:01 PM
1

Had sex. Based
/r/seduction15/03/22 04:17 AM
19

Nowadays, critique of women is considered as misogyny. It's a fine line, that's for sure.
/r/seduction18/01/22 08:53 PM
1

This sound like PUA-garbage intended for guys not wanting to put in the work. Gym, smell, hair, clothing, skincare, teeth etc. When you're done with those, you have probably maxed out your looks, most guys have not though.
/r/seduction07/01/22 12:22 PM
2

Becomes significantly less important when the man earns in the upper brackets, think 200-300k year. There are several negatives with high income earners, if we're both in that segment, the relationship will probably suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 04:28 PM
1

Without a doubt. Low-quality men are probably very frustrated within the current dating climate. Rather just accept the hypergamous nature of women and get grinding. Equality in all walks of life is a loser's utopia.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 06:51 PM
4

High-quality men are in demand, hence they shouldn't accept taking all kinds of tests simply to make sure that you feel safe or confident enough that he's worth your time. Instead, he should determine if you're are worth of his time, and surprisingly that's often done without playing all sorts of games. Do you see the difference? One is about leading people on, the other is about establishing boundaries and aligning expectations. You could ask why women shit test and men don't, it's a different …
/r/seduction28/10/21 04:54 PM
23

Generally, girls utilizing shit tests should be avoided altogether. No high-quality man would entertain the games they are playing. Next
/r/seduction28/10/21 09:14 AM
3

Speed dating limits the validity of the study. Much like online dating, speed dating comes down to physical traits much more than intrinsic traits. Gauging RMV for instance would prove troublesome if the methodology relies on speed dating as the primary measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 02:29 PM
1

Ugly girls can still offer heavenly sex, as they have to compensate for their ugliness. The same way ugly guys need to be rich/have enough status to attract hoes. Average shy women are in high demand for ugly-average men, maybe some attractive men, as some find it cute. I still think the general rankings are as followed: Attractive Women Attractive Men Ugly Women Ugly Men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 06:10 AM
0

That's something we disagree on. Marriage or partnership doesn't and shouldn't strip you of autonomy and having the sole right of control of one's assets and income. Your premise is based on multiple fallacies. People have different hobbies, careers, ambitions and so on in life. Naturally, spending amounts and priorities will vary. That's not to say that you shouldn't split 50/50 on collective obligations such as mortgage and kids. Men are typically the breadwinners and should always protect cur…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 07:16 PM
0

This is naive as hell, somebody is getting hurt when things don't work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 07:02 PM
1

This is the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/21 08:47 PM
1

Nobody besides women in the bbw fetish can get away with being fat. Women can get away with the right fat distribution, men cannot regardless of distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 09:25 AM
0

Most women and men are low value, that's a fair point. Proposing a false dichotomy is not. Thinking relationships like investments is a doomed outlook. At some point, most people will want to connect on an intimate level, but since most people are low value, you gotta vet properly and bite the bullet. I think it's great that women are pursuing careers, but they are not excluding pair bonding with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 06:24 AM
5

It's not some arbitrary "dynamic" out of the blue. It's a statistically well-understood social phenomenon. Women are hypergamous by nature, and will by extension seek well-established men. I'd also wager that a sizeable portion of women appreciates virtues such as social intelligence, sexual ability, maturity, stable finances and likewise, which all are developing with age. Discrepancies at larger age gaps, but older men are favoured by the majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 01:49 PM
2

So you're saying that hypergamy is a thing? Shocker
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 04:10 PM
1

Hence the "ideally", not realistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 03:43 PM
1

Male perspective (Granted, this is standards for the opposite gender but W/e) Unhealthy habits are red flags (smoking, narcotics, excessive drinking or eating unhealthy foods Body composition - Don't be fat or obese, anything curvy and under is fine. Bonus points if you're working out Intelligence and ambition - Super important, doesn't have to be work-related. Should earn around my salary bracket though. Youth, fertility and beauty. Aka doesn't have hit the wall or close to it. I think the cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 03:21 PM
3

The field in terms of rights post-pregnancy between men and women are disproportionate. Men feel robbed when they have no say regarding pregnancy, financial conditions and likewise. Further, in terms of contraceptive methods, men also receive the short end of the stick. Options are often limited to condoms or a vasectomy. Neither is practical. Even if Women fuck up, there's always the Morning-after pill. In all fairness, paper abortions should be every man's right, whether the man uses contracep…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 07:24 PM
38

Dig deeper. No doubt both genders are competitive in certain aspects of life. One could make the same case for men; Workplace ambition and the attainment of wealth and status creates a toxic environment for average men. Your view heavily relies on reduction fallacies. I'd wager other sources to play equally or moreso in the toxic beauty standards of women and men. One source could be the social conditioning of both genders in regards to beauty standards, attainable or not. In essence, the proble…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 10:52 AM
0

Generally, men shouldn't take dating advice for women at all. There's a discrepancy between women's advice and how they act. In my experience, women have a harder time being direct and explicit, hence they will turn to advice, which by the majority isn't perceived as harsh or morally shallow. Men should ideally take advice from other successful men. The hard truths will come from individuals who have experienced it, not their female counterparts, who never had to struggle in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 08:45 AM
1

One thing this sub will marginalize is the efficacy of physical features. Women will absolutely turn away shorter guys in spite of other worthwhile attributes. A study was recently featured on Alexander Grace's YT channel, in which women's preferred height range was examined. Women are much less inclined to date outside of their preferred height range. The study is linked below. https://www.gertstulp.com/pdf/Stulp%20et%20al%202013_Anim%20Behav_The%20height%20of%20choosiness.pdf The intent here i…
/r/seduction29/08/21 05:06 AM
6

Thread is presenting a false dichotomy as to whenever one would drop other hobbies and interests. I imagine men in happy relationships wouldn't substitute their situation for casual sex, which in many cases is worse sex. Single men would be ecstatic and leverage the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 02:48 PM
3

This must be satire. The dating market is skewed for a reason; the pretentious standards of women. I'd argue men are burdened with much larger expectations from potential partners than the inverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 12:03 PM
1

Intellectual capacity has little to do with being a housewife. Hobbies, interests and other life worthy pursuits simply don't vanish by someone staying home. Comparing a traditional submissive partner in modern society is also quite different from the same in an underdeveloped one. Social programming is big, and no doubt you perceived your conversations with these women to be shallow and uninteresting. Most men would ideally want their partner to stay at home if they're making good money. Few do…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 11:57 AM
8

The pills may be reductivistic, but the broad generalizations are based on observations and data. Relying on outlier fallacies does not disprove the existence hypergamy, conventional beauty standards or majority preferences of men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 06:26 PM
22

Beauty and fertility are maximized in teens and early twenties, those are the primary factors. Porn probably plays a minor role in the attraction of those qualities, but you'll likely always crave young, fertile women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 04:12 PM
1

Obviously gender specific. Male side primarily LMS (looks, money, status). Looks, fertility, sex and non-promiscuous behavior on the female side. Common ones between both genders besides looks would also include things such as health and personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 01:58 PM
15

There's a big difference between ideal and at all. Most women will probably not find a man that checks every box and most men will have to settle for low value, if they're low value themself. But sure, if someone finds themselves in the 10th percentile of value, they will likely have a hard time and maybe not match with anyone, most will though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 10:37 AM
-1

Strawman-ish. Honestly, besides incels, the majority of this sub probably agrees with your point of view. In the same way ugly women should stay in their lane and have sex with ugly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 08:34 AM
7

Probably the type that hits the wall at 22
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 03:00 PM
16

*Science exists "There is no truth" You do you buddy, happy blue-pilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 02:52 PM
2

LTR's are definitely worth it. Humans are social mammals, hence spinning plates will leave you empty at some point. The paradox is however, for men, that the demands rarely equal the benefits in the current dating climate. If you fall upon a high quality women who shows interest, by all means chase that: It's a rare occurrence for men. Stay away from low value anything, they will inevitable cause you suffering and destruction.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 05:40 AM
2

The decline of fertility rates in western society is largely due to workplace demands, housing and the move from traditional gender roles. Work, education and modern hobbies "surprisingly" takes time away from long term monogamous relationship building. The problem is not lack of energy, but society pushing everyone to improve without proper safety nets for people wanting to build a family early on. Mix in the toxicity of modern dating, and it's no wonder that fertility rates continue to decline…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 09:13 AM
2

Fundamentally, most men will have to become high value to get their foot through the door. The love stage happens later, not before. Obviously it's different for high quality women, they are born high quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 10:47 AM
1

It's a paradox. Modern women spouts notions of equality and when men demands the same, suddenly the previous idealism disappears. To answer your question: The more financially well-off a man is, the less important monetary contributions from his partner becomes. Most men are not financially well-off hence why most men expect their female partner to carry their own weight (house work isn't work).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 10:23 AM
2

In short, most of the time, no. Alexander grace published new research just today covering this topic, have a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH5kitiXLGY&t=962s
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 12:39 PM
2

She belongs to Mcd, she gone. Time to fish again.
/r/askTRP20/03/21 08:56 AM
5

Any chick over 20 has sucked lotta dick, better it be yours. That or you find them young to break them in yourself.
/r/askTRP18/03/21 09:04 PM
4

Sucks cock like a pro, that's the main one.
/r/askTRP18/03/21 06:45 PM
26

More intimacy, boundaries are known, sexual compatibility etc. Furthermore, if you're into kids, marriage and long term stability, casual sex doesn't really support that. I could very much see my current gf in that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 09:53 AM
44

Casual sex is shit compared to LTR-sex, my experience at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 09:49 AM
1

Bunch of social constructivist garbage, the more egalitarian a society is, take the Nordic countries, the more the biological differences surface. Guess what, the differences between men and women are still quite large, so that entire premise is nothing but propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 08:08 AM
0

Sure, deny hypergamy with the other delusionals. Men and women are the same, aM i RiGtH? You do you, who cares. Men with high LMS-values attract the 10's.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 07:29 AM
3

It's not really a double standard, men value things such as n-count, women is more about LMS-values.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 07:07 AM
3

Cause sluts are shamed?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 06:22 AM
1

The state shouldn't support women who cant support themself and their offspring. The problem is not men, but women with selfish monetary incentives to rob men of wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 07:02 AM
1

Paper abortion is about protection fathers from the monetary incentive women have when pregnant. Men has no protection in this regard, women have multiple protections. Forcing fathers to stay in dysfunctional relationships hardly makes it better for the children. Anyways, most divorces are filled by women anyhow, so your argument is on thin ice. Why is economical punishment the best way to keep fathers from leaving?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 04:47 AM
0

Yes, a patriarchy would be unlimited times better than a matriarchy. Women shouldn't be allowed to vote anwyays, look at the entire left, marxists, sjw's, lgbt faggots etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 05:34 PM
8

I think he's referring to the seperation of true feminists, the ones who fought for equality back in the 1950s-1990s, from radical feminists and their eternal crusade against men. Pseudo claims from feminists often include talk of the pay gab myth, patriarchy etc.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/20 09:46 PM
-1

That both SMV and LMS are relevant in dating.
/r/ExRedPill26/06/20 04:06 AM
5

This screams beta buck. Using any means necessary, whilst you simultaneously devalue the price by lowering your standards. Sure if you got no self-respect or desperately want to throw away your V-card. Want to get laid? Better yourself, experiment, but have well established boundaries.
/r/seduction03/06/20 02:05 PM
1

Boys would kill to sleep with hot teachers, whereas women would not, different dynamics, biology and discourse are likely causes of this. Minors sleeping with adults is not necessarily sexual assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 03:07 PM
-1

Real men accept cum sluts - ya simp, have standards.
/r/ExRedPill25/05/20 05:00 PM
-1

Fairly common in EU countries, either the man takes part in maternity leavy or the family loses the economic compensentation they would otherwise get. In Denmark, where I live, 2 months of the leave are earmaked towards men. Imo, the state should royally fuck off and let the families decide in autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 07:26 AM
1

Why should he be forced by the state? Some men definitely would, but let the men and women decide on their own, privately.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 04:55 AM
10

I think most men, myself included, support gender equality initiatives, as long as they don't entail discrimination of men, examples being forced maternity leave and gender quotas in corporate boards. No, not every shitty thing that happens is due to the patriarchy, mansplaining or structural sexism. Why not support it? Everybody loses when women are excluded, economically, culturally and morally.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 06:16 PM
1

Assuming he's competent enough with highschool level math, it shouldn't be a problem. RDPD isn't really a book containing a great deal of finance, but I see your point.
/r/askTRP18/05/20 05:16 PM
8

Unfortunately he has become a religious, dogmatic, red-pilled nutjob. He discusses his own frame of mind, which is fine, but then proceeds to project his views onto his viewers disguised as universal truths. His earlier works regarding fitness discussions and advice were on point though
/r/ExRedPill18/05/20 04:26 PM
5

Yeah don't look into this, if you're looking for exhaustive coverage of fundamental finance. Rich Dad Poor Dad is no more than anecdotal experience, mixed in with a vague idea of basic finance theory. The book mainly covers the terminology and usage of assets and liablities. I would look into Fundamentals of Corporate Finance by Berk, DeMarzo & Harford. One of my business professors mentioned that it is widely used across multiple countries in finance disciplines. Having read the book myself, it…
/r/askTRP18/05/20 12:17 PM
4

SMV is powerrrrr
/r/askTRP13/05/20 09:47 PM
18

chill out satan, you're probably right though.
/r/askTRP13/05/20 06:52 PM
0

Grade a bullshit, claiming height doesn't matter, get real.
/r/askTRP13/05/20 09:00 AM
3

Wrong woman my man, certainly a bitch, not all women are like that however. Keep grinding.
/r/askTRP12/05/20 05:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter