TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BinaryShadow Archive

View 26 posts and 4,317 comments by BinaryShadow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
105

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights30/01/12 05:42 AM
76

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights18/08/09 10:57 AM
63

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights28/08/08 05:28 PM
62

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights21/04/09 10:56 AM
51

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights18/06/08 12:10 PM
32

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:58 PM
25

BinaryShadow/r/seduction29/06/12 08:32 PM
22

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights27/06/08 11:01 PM
21

BinaryShadow/r/seduction21/05/12 06:19 AM
19

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights24/06/08 04:58 PM
16

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights09/12/08 12:45 PM
14

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights16/07/09 11:47 AM
11

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights18/06/08 12:21 PM
11

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights17/06/08 08:21 PM
11

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights21/01/09 02:12 PM
9

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights15/08/09 06:09 AM
7

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:43 AM
7

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights05/08/08 05:50 PM
7

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:44 AM
6

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights27/06/08 10:57 PM
6

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights01/11/10 04:31 AM
5

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights18/06/08 12:05 PM
5

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights10/02/11 08:27 AM
5

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights04/07/11 07:18 PM
4

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights19/08/08 03:41 AM
3

BinaryShadow/r/MensRights11/03/09 01:58 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,317 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Anything that involves a woman not being 100% in charge will be seen as "degrading to women" by some nut. The same nut that probably gets off on the same stuff with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:22 AM
3

If only they did the same to the anti-abortion posters all over the fucking place (I'm pro-choice).
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:20 AM
2

I can only assume that this image stems from pure ignorance and that those who enforce it are unwilling to educate themselves further. Ignorance (the biggest one) Hatred of anything that's not feminist-approved Deliberate mudslinging to scare people away from our growing movement that's almost hit 40k members on reddit alone. Fear of losing the government-sanctioned monopoly on gender debates. "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:18 AM
3

A hell of a lot better than it was before.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:17 AM
4

If I ever saw one, I'd find a way to hygienically throw it in the fucking trash.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:15 AM
13

You need a wingman to deflect her and keep her distracted. She's just jealous of the attention she's not getting.
/r/seduction03/07/12 07:08 AM
2

The first lesson everyone needs to learn is that no issue is black/white. If someone frames it that way, they are trying to sell something.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 07:00 AM
3

lol, perfect. I've seen that movie way too many times.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:37 AM
3

Hostage taking is fun. YOLO!
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:26 AM
4

Can't watch the video at work, but please tell me it's the "never key a man's car" scene. "I wish I had caught him doing it. It would have been worth him doing it if I could have caught him."
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:26 AM
3

It's just that simple :)
/r/seduction03/07/12 02:52 AM
7

Sometimes. In this case, he really is a runaway slave. He played by the rules, he gave up most of his assets for her. Then she wanted more and got the system to overrule her own fucking signature on a deal that they both agreed to. At that point, I would have left as well.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:24 PM
3

It's most likely seen as a government-imposed expense.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:18 AM
1

Yep. It seems that the more society demonizes porn geared towards men, the more society is encouraging porn for women. Mainstream movies and "50 Shades of Grey" being sold at Walmart seem to provide some evidence.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:14 AM
5

Damn, now that's an SRSer that has never left the parents' basement. Or even googled anything related to those subjects. Men don't commit suicide more? Wow.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:46 AM
1

Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving [gold-digging ex] without [even more over-the-top] support FIFY
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:34 AM
1

lol at your hyperness. You're 18. "Young, dumb, and full of cum" as a wise man once said in a movie called Point Break. So you apparently have opened sets with girls on Facebook, or at least charmed them enough in real life to set up some kind of communications medium. Well done. If they are just a window on your computer screen, ask for a phone number. The point is to move it closer to real life interaction. If you're not good with online-game, then move it away from that.
/r/seduction02/07/12 07:37 AM
19

The privilege of all the potential joys of having his genitals mutilated as an infant, and then growing up to hear women freely opine on their preference for mutilated men. Don't forget the ongoing battle to end all forms of FGM (some are less intrusive than accepted MGM practices) while simultaneously justifying MGM. The ACLU really revealed itself in this regard.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:31 AM
1

lol, unless she was bullshitting, that's what it said. I'll try to find it somewhere and provide a link.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:21 AM
6

Which, ironically, is the opposite of true anarchy.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:58 AM
2

The Chippendales was a limited event at a (most likely) high class venue. Very unfair comparison.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:43 AM
3

Or a single male stripper, for that matter.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:43 AM
2

Also: when she says it's about power for men ... does anyone else think that the men in that situation were almost 100% powerless, they seemed more like the rabbit than the fox. I wouldn't say they are 100% powerless, but it's definitely not black/white. Some of them are addicted and have willingly given into the fantasy that these girls provide for good money, but they can walk away anytime (easier said than done). Some see it as just a night out with the guys with some tits in your face. On th…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:41 AM
4

The Spearmint Rhino Club in London, by contrast, is subterranean and windowless A. Not all strip clubs are like this. B. It couldnt possinly be because its cheaper and is less likely to attract "decency" protesters. What I found funny about that comparison is that the male strippers were on some kind of limited tour. Of course the venue will be higher class. The other place is there all the time.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:37 AM
6

There is not a single woman here who actually wants to have sex with a Chippendale. We are all mouth, and no panties. Sex has left the building. We want cuddles, not tongues. I highly, highly doubt that. I love how she can speak for all internal feelings of all women in the room, screaming like school children at male flesh. Outside I meet a woman who jumped for a T-shirt, fighting off other women to get it. "I'm not that bothered about it now," she tells me, "Do you want it?" That's because she…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:34 AM
1

Slutwalks are for college-aged upper-middle-class females who don't want to spend their "activism" and "victimization" doing real work like going to the Middle East. Plus, it's a giant stand against having any responsibility whatsoever for avoiding situations involving rape. You can argue which tactics are valid or not all you want, but a lot of these twits want all responsibility on someone else.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:51 AM
5

Just because there is no hierarchic government doesn't mean that there is no sense of rule and no enforced laws. How can you enforce laws without a proper government? Who made the laws? Who's enforcing them? Who's watching the watchmen? A government is needed, even if it consists of one charismatic person and his/her followers.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:49 AM
10

The lord our father, Donkey Kong.
/r/seduction02/07/12 05:46 AM
4

The bigger the government, the more feminist it is. Look at Sweden as a good example. Every day, mroe pro-female/anti-male laws get passed. That shit wouldn't fly without proper government restraints keeping everyone at bay. To lump anarchy with "anti-racism" and "anti-sexism" is noble. But how can you really enforce such things without a government in place? But feminists have veered far far away from egalatarianism.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:44 AM
4

Someone that doesn't know how to control their emotions (or was never taught otherwise).
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:32 AM
8

Feminism wouldn't survive without a big government pointing guns at everyone they tell them to.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:31 AM
11

“rushed and pressured and did not read” More like she saw fucking dollar signs and let her greed consume her limited logic circuits. Now she's regretting that she didn't squeeze even more blood from that stone.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:19 AM
11

No shit. If she's so lost without four grand in support (more than a lot of dual income families pull in), sell the playboy mansion, sign up for some classes, and get a fucking job.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:17 AM
2

Which always makes me laugh that they've infested r/anarchism.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:15 AM
3

Couldn't get over the racist comments I imagine two years in prison where hearing racist shit every day might change a man.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:15 AM
2

Most likely he meant that his parents never visited him again on the inside.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:14 AM
3

It's the "what's mine is mine and what's yours is ours" mentality.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:03 AM
2

Seddit isn't about helping individuals find the cheat codes to getting girls, it's an undertaking where you want to improve yourself and put in the hard work to start enjoying your life. So that means he's in the right place, genius.
/r/seduction02/07/12 04:50 AM
1

My friend, what I am saying is that you cannot look for validation from other people, it all comes from within yourself. I am very aware of this problem and am working on it. This is a lot harder to overcome than I thought since it's basically pushing against 29 year old programming at this point. Any advice?
/r/seduction02/07/12 04:49 AM
1

I'm fairly unattractive r/malefashionadvice about 30lbs overweight r/fitness, r/bodybuilding with a penis that's just about six inches That's average, bro. Every time I've started to date a girl casually I usually lose it due to my ridiculous inferiority complex. Read the sidebar on Inner Game.
/r/seduction02/07/12 04:45 AM
2

When she gives her hand, twirl her. You'll get a smile out of it at the very least.
/r/seduction02/07/12 04:41 AM
2

Good to see you're not actually reading my comment It was a bit vague, so I must have misunderstood. If you bring 2 girls with you to the bar, your social proof is ten times greater than if you bring 5 dudes. During the day, if you're hanging out with friends, listening to music or what not, it's generally more socially acceptable than being alone. That makes sense. I don't disagree with that. Is that what you meant in your first comment? There are so many different variations, and seeing as you…
/r/seduction01/07/12 11:20 AM
2

It depends on the people you go out with. If they drag you down (sit at the table/bar and do nothing) or passively/intentionally cockblock you then you're better off alone. If you're with people that make the night more fun then of course it's better to have a "home base" so to speak.
/r/seduction01/07/12 09:51 AM
6

Have you considered going out solo?
/r/seduction01/07/12 08:26 AM
4

But they say that calling a woman a "girl" or a "lady" is also offensive. I had a teacher that, before playing a video from the 50's, made sure that we knew she was offended by the guy's use of the word "girl" when referring to the female employees he manages. So the video starts. Sure enough, he refers to the female employees as girls (not to their face, but when discussing something they were doing at work). What this teacher failed to see was that he was calling the male employees under him "…
/r/MensRights01/07/12 08:08 AM
1

I usually start with coffee or drinks.
/r/seduction01/07/12 06:58 AM
3

Good response. I recommend you reformat to use the numbering convention in reddit. Here: Type the number followed by period and a space. Then type your statement. On a new line, type the second number, etc.
/r/seduction01/07/12 05:52 AM
2

Exactly. Eventually, you'll be asked why you picked up guitar. If you have this awesome passionate response about music being the universal language, or something like that (and really mean it), she'll vibe off those feelings. She'll connect with you by telling you her passion, etc. If you have some answer like "I do it to pick up chicks." or "it makes me look cool" then she'll be quickly let down. Like a magician revealing how the trick works by using some stupid-looking device in their sleeve.
/r/seduction01/07/12 05:39 AM
1

Target practice.
/r/seduction01/07/12 05:07 AM
3

•seduce them until they would go to bed with me Why the fuck are you doing this if you don't want to sleep with them? Pretend she's a guy. Would you seduce a guy if you just want a buddy to watch the game with?
/r/seduction01/07/12 04:51 AM
1

Option 3: You didn't escalate when first meeting. I'm not saying grab her ass after the handshake, but have a conversation. Make her talk about herself. Assume attraction.
/r/seduction01/07/12 04:49 AM
1

It's obvious that a good looking body trumps a sloppy one any day. You still need to do the heavy lifting of the first approach and whatnot. But I feel that it's more than that once you have her at a table and want to talk about yourself. Shows that you have determination and drive Shows that you take care of yourself If you're going to be the leader of a relationship (be it one night or ten years), you need to learn how to manage yourself. To set goals that that involve delayed gratification. A…
/r/seduction01/07/12 04:46 AM
3

Trust your instincts!
/r/seduction01/07/12 04:39 AM
1

lol. The coffee date is tomorrow evening. Let's see if she is as pretty without the dim lights.
/r/seduction01/07/12 04:15 AM
2

Hell, I'm 5'8 and I never let that bother me. It seems like every guy around me is taller. But, one of my buddies has absolutely NO problem with women and he's an inch shorter than me.
/r/seduction30/06/12 05:49 PM
10

Depends on the skill, really. Cooking isn't just for impressing girls. It's for feeding yourself instead of ordering McDonalds every night. Yeah, if you go out and spend big money on guitar lessons with the sole purpose of entertaining a woman like a monkey, that's kinda sad though. If you spend big money on guitar lessons for YOURSELF, that's cool.
/r/seduction30/06/12 05:36 PM
9

The old "snake in the open field" maneuver.
/r/seduction30/06/12 05:34 PM
1

Scarcity principle in action
/r/seduction30/06/12 02:12 PM
2

Or, in some cases, chess to checkers :)
/r/seduction30/06/12 10:59 AM
35

If you guys are tight, you should set up a code. The code is to fuck off when one of you brings a girl over.
/r/seduction30/06/12 10:57 AM
1

Tonight will be worth more for your experience than the two years of reading you've done so far. As someone who just finished his first solo sarge last night (#close), I can vouch for that personally. Best of luck, friend.
/r/seduction30/06/12 10:56 AM
1

Yeah. Everyone knows that you need to say "brotip." It's a total panty-dropper.
/r/seduction30/06/12 06:59 AM
2

I did the night before. I was more depressed than I have been in a long time. I had thoughts like "I wish I never met them. At least I wouldn't feel like shit playing Diablo 3." Nothing like checking facebook out of boredom to see pictures of the group hanging out in a bar and looking like they are having the time of their lives. That's when I realized that something just isn't right. I was clinging to these two things (oneitis-girl and social group) and letting them dictate my reality. If they …
/r/seduction30/06/12 06:13 AM
3

Outcome independence, brother. Go out with the intention of getting shot down. I'm in the same situation with my friends (or lack of) and have been forced down the solo-path out of necessity. Go out there, don't drink too much, and you'll live to tell the tale. Put up a FR and we'll chisel your game like the armchair pimps we all are :)
/r/seduction30/06/12 04:12 AM
1

I know! I'm glad the first time is done with. You have no idea how afraid I was of doing this (the day before I chickened right the fuck out). This time, I just got in the car and told my anxiety to fuck off.
/r/seduction30/06/12 04:10 AM
2

Thanks! I'm just happy the first time is over. Now I can just fine-tune the strategies. One night out really is worth a month of reading up on it.
/r/seduction30/06/12 04:09 AM
1

Yeah well my options were: Sit in apartment and stew about how this group that was inviting me to shit three times a week a few weeks ago have completely forgotten my existence. Man up and go make a night of it anyway.
/r/seduction30/06/12 04:07 AM
2

I most likely did hold back, actually. I twirled her on the dance floor and she held my grip while we danced some more. I could have taken it further, I suppose. I was a bit worried about her coworkers seeing her. Bullshit excuse, most likely, but hey I'm new at this stuff. Baby steps!
/r/seduction30/06/12 04:05 AM
0

The point is that there's nothing wrong with being single or only casually dating rather than settling. Unlike most MRA's who bitch about women who have tastes like "need money and six pound cock" I don't mind women having their own personal standards as long as I can have mine.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:34 PM
1

Yep. As someone who lives overseas and is away from all his friends, I would much rather be friend-zoned by a chick with a cool social group that I can mingle with than have a relationship with her and fuck it all up.
/r/seduction29/06/12 08:26 PM
1

Yeah, here in my city the nightlife doesn't pick up until at least 10 PM or so, and I need to be up at 5 AM.
/r/seduction29/06/12 04:22 PM
1

Told her to just say no if she didn't want to. That. Don't act like a bitch if she says no and gives you a most likely legit reason.
/r/seduction28/06/12 01:07 PM
15

Your second response was the right one. Venting women most likely don't want to hear solutions. They want to hear stuff like "I know! I hate that! One time the same thing happened to me and it pissed me off!" I think if you had started with that one, then it would have been fine.
/r/seduction28/06/12 01:05 PM
2

In the middle of that now. I usually alternate. If she initiates one time, I'll wait a day or two and initiate. Then I expect her to do so for the next time. If she doesn't after a three or four days (especially with no date set), hail mary. Then give up.
/r/seduction28/06/12 10:38 AM
9

God forbid somebody have different tastes in women than you.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:55 AM
2

One would hope it wasn't bad. She initiates facebook/whatsapp chats every other day or so. I guess that means she isn't completely scared away.
/r/seduction28/06/12 03:25 AM
2

So I had this girl on a date, and her eye contact was hit and miss. I kept my eye contact pretty firm (obviously not trying to look into her skull or anything, but confident). She was doing the majority of the talking, but was having difficulty holding eye contact for longer than a few seconds (she wasn't looking at anything in particular). Bad sign?
/r/seduction27/06/12 02:22 PM
3

"Now now, a pillow fight can solve all our problems." nowkiss.jpg
/r/seduction27/06/12 01:51 PM
6

True.
/r/seduction27/06/12 11:15 AM
5

Nervous could be a good thing, though. Especially if it's a date.
/r/seduction27/06/12 11:12 AM
4

I tried to diffuse the situation without loosing Girl B (my obvious choice) and without wrecking their friendship. You might want to expand on this one. How did you attempt?
/r/seduction27/06/12 11:09 AM
2

Similiarly, when they adjust their outfits, etc.
/r/seduction27/06/12 10:56 AM
1

We say it to each other in jest.
/r/seduction27/06/12 08:37 AM
2

You have no idea but you most likely made her day.
/r/seduction27/06/12 08:35 AM
2

Yep. The BS medical reasons.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 04:51 AM
1

I would say I'm between beginner and intermediate. I don't have a problem handling myself in social groups at clubs (introducing myself to people that come late to group, talking to any and all females AND MALES involved, dancing, twirling the girls for fun, etc). I am still struggling to get myself out to solo, though. As for dating, I'm still learning the basics about how to handle myself. How to read body language (but not obsess over it), how to thread conversations, etc. A work in progress.
/r/seduction26/06/12 07:46 AM
1

Well put, but I would add that while the guy was in the LTR, the pressure was off. He wasn't there to get laid or anything, he was there to wing for his friend. Now that he is out there with the intention of more than good conversation and winging, it's a bit tougher.
/r/seduction26/06/12 07:18 AM
7

It depends, I suppose. It wouldn't be wise to date the girls you live with (shitting where you eat), but if the house is known to have kick ass parties it would be kinda cool.
/r/seduction26/06/12 06:52 AM
1

Thanks for doing this! Chinos. What's the best shoes to wear with khaki/black pairs? Shirts? Context would be clubs, dates, and even just going to the mall (obviously different outfits). Thanks!
/r/seduction26/06/12 04:52 AM
3

This past weekend I was invited out to a club with a few friends (just started getting into this social circle which is the victory for the month). I was dancing with this one girl just for fun. This random douche slipped in between us and tried to AMOG me. Before I could gather my thoughts, the girl grabbed my hand and pushed the guy away saying "I don't know him!" and we kept dancing.
/r/seduction25/06/12 11:55 AM
2

I love how it is never looked at in reverse. When women make less than men (77 cents myth), it's always glossed over WHY (and it's not even the same jobs being compared).
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:38 AM
17

but I guess men kind of go with the flow." Men really don't have an option, do they. An entire generation of men have been brought up with the belief that they are either oppressing women (when they do something better than women on average) or they are inferior (when women do something better than men).
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:48 PM
42

Nowadays, the situation is blatantly reversed. How often do you hear, publicly, that men are inferior to women? Whenever women outdo men, it's because they are innately gifted. Whenever men outdo women, it's because of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:28 PM
19

And let the hamster wheel turn. Why does this happen? "A woman has more motivation to study, to get a degree, to be somebody," Hernandez said. "For me it's really important to get a degree." Helps when all of society is bending over backwards to ensure women get even more degrees over men (scholarships, leadership training only for women, etc). "I do believe that," 28-year-old Jorge Oquendo said. "I have two sisters. Both of them are going to college. A lot of girls actually go to college and st…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:25 PM
1

I have eaten while taking a dump but that was because of time constraints Causing an infinite loop
/r/seduction24/06/12 11:06 AM
1

I always loved flirting via text, but I'm telling you, it's a black hole. Got a question for you. I'm casually dating this one girl who is a big texter/whatsapp/facebook person. I don't have too many problems getting her on a date, but she does initiate texts every now and then throughout the week and some of it is a bit flirty. Keep it short? Sweet?
/r/seduction24/06/12 10:39 AM
4

And what's the #1 retort to your answer? "IT'S NOT THE SAME THING AS RAPE WHICH IS FAR WORSE!"
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:58 AM
2

The only way to make that a reality involves cures far worse than the disease. We're talking massive budgets for the police, big-brother style surveillence, and a lot of false-positives (walking down the street and looking at the idiot man wearing jewelry and offensive signs adn getting annoyed COULD BE A CRIME SO ARREST-MODE!). It's far easier to tell people to not do stupid shit.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:56 AM
14

100% of women born today will die someday. What can we do to fix that?
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:50 AM
8

holy shit dude, not a single thing you said was relevant to my points. And your main point isn't relevant to the discussion anyway. it's not a fair analogy NOT BECAUSE OF HOW MUCH WORSE ONE IS THAN THE OTHER but because a rapist is a human being who acts on a desire that harms the victim while a car accident is a fucking ACCIDENT - two cars collide when neither was intending on it happening. honestly, if you were any smarter you would just come up with an analogy that involves giving both partie…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:32 AM
8

a rapist does not equal a car that accidentally crashes into you. This is always the position the opposition takes. It's NOT A FAIR ANALOGY! Rape is soooo much worse than anything! Rape is a crime. A crime with a bad guy and a victim. However, the victim could take precautions that would mitigate the risks. Similar to driving safely helps avoid car accidents. Or how not walking around at 4 AM in a shady neighborhood might help prevent mugging. this woman's desire to not worry about being sexuall…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:03 AM
8

I would do some scouting. Ask your friends and whatnot if they would be interested in the idea. Build some support because, like a previous story involving a college that did a similar thing, you'll create a lot of enemies from the feminist side who like having the monopoly on gender discussions. When you're ready to make your move, be sure everything's ready to go. You'll be questioned (a lot more than a feminist-slanted group would be) about your motives, ideas, goals, etc. Contact some people…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:22 AM
8

And all these "I should be able to walk at 4 AM" messages translates to "I shouldn't have to have agency."
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:16 AM
26

The only men's group in my college was "Men against Rape." In other words, a feminist group. Anything else was either women-only or co-ed. The "what's mine is mine and what's yours is ours" mentality we've all grown used to.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:05 AM
7

Why not? It seemed reasonable to me. Rape is a horrible thing, but so is getting in a car accident. You can debate on which is actually worse, but it's irrevelent. I always see this retort as a way of downplaying a perfectly logical analogy to make a point.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:01 AM
8

If you refer to the census, you're just "babysitting."
/r/MensRights24/06/12 06:54 AM
2

She seemed to be doing the same thing, texting three times before he could answer. I think that was okay.
/r/seduction24/06/12 05:37 AM
3

Four, when ordering food, you find out what she wants, then order for the both of you. Hint. Don't do this: "Oh! I want the bbq ribs!" "...she'll have the salad."
/r/seduction24/06/12 05:31 AM
0

Wouldn't surprise me
/r/seduction23/06/12 10:21 PM
17

Outcome independence :p
/r/seduction23/06/12 10:20 PM
2

That's how I felt before I dumped my ex. Like she's the only thing that matters to me and I have nothing without her. So I put up with her shit and let her control me. One day, I snapped during a fight and dumped her right there. Adrenaline was pumping and afterwards I was in some state of shock. Never knew I had it in me. So what now? I picked up some hobbies with my new free time. Fire staffing, if you must know (random as hell but I love fire and martial arts so there you go). I started worki…
/r/seduction23/06/12 10:52 AM
2

What do you mean "she?" Is this your friend, girlfriend, random girl you're stalking? What? If it's someone you just met and she wants to leave you say "Hey, nice talking with you. Let me get your number and we'll go out sometime." Then you let her go and enjoy the rest of the night.
/r/seduction23/06/12 09:16 AM
1

Yeah but then you won't have anyone to talk to with or go to the strip club during your lunch break and...patriarchy...or something.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 05:41 AM
1

You live a life of abundance. You have two or three girls you date a week. You don't have to put up with shit from someone because you have options. You choose who you want to be with. This is the mentality you have to have.
/r/seduction21/06/12 03:35 PM
1

That picture is the scariest thing I've seen all day.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:31 AM
4

Nah. It means more wingmen that know what the fuck they're doing :)
/r/seduction21/06/12 09:56 AM
3

hey you are too cute for me to not say anything I've honestly never opened with something like this. I have a lot better time just opening with "hey, how you doing tonight?" and just go from there. It's just a matter of how you say it really. If I force myself to use the "cute" line, I know I'll mess it up or get worried or some shit. But what's the harm in asking someone how they are doing?
/r/seduction21/06/12 09:53 AM
3

Or keep the egos of some women high so they keep buying shit they don't need.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:36 AM
1

How's your social life otherwise? Do you have interesting hobbies? How do you validate yourself?
/r/seduction21/06/12 07:17 AM
1

no...why do you ask. I was taking a shot in the dark that you had gotten out of a really serious relationship and are hesitant to start another one up. I'm in this situation but I don't mind dating casually. So if you've never had a serious relationship, then are you afraid of one? i don't see women as targets, i'm very empathetic about everything..i don't keep scores or numbers or anything like that....but sure..everyone feels better when they're successful. I never said that you keep scores or…
/r/seduction21/06/12 07:14 AM
3

What's stopping you? Determination comes from within. As Bruce Lee once said to someone who didn't want to run extra miles with him, "then die."
/r/seduction21/06/12 07:08 AM
13

More to the point: be outcome-independent. If you get rejected, who cares. If you f-close behind the bar in 10 minutes, who cares. Neither affect your mindset and view on life.
/r/seduction21/06/12 07:07 AM
1

Possibly you see the women you're targeting as just that: targets. You like the challenge and the ego-boost when it all works out (#-close, etc), but you're not interested in the dating process. Have you been in a serious relationship before?
/r/seduction21/06/12 05:49 AM
6

Abudance mentality. Don't focus on just one girl. I'm struggling with this one, myself. Meet more people, especially of the female persuasion. You should have the mentality of you choosing her, not her choosing you. If that makes any sense.
/r/seduction21/06/12 05:17 AM
1

You crave the chase.
/r/seduction21/06/12 04:40 AM
7

Saudi Arabia of feminism...
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:19 AM
1

You shouldn't feel any less comfortable approaching an HB10 than some old man asking for the time near the bus stop. In an ideal world, that is.
/r/seduction20/06/12 06:53 AM
3

Yeah, sometimes I even surprise myself with how I've changed. The old me would have sat there and stewed at how I "lost her attention" and even started having negative feelings towards the "asshole" talking with her. The two girls next to me would have continued with their internal conversation, unbothered. The HB8 probably would have thought "what happened to that fun guy I invited out? Why is he just sitting there all boring?" and lost attraction and value. The trick is to always ensure you're…
/r/seduction20/06/12 06:29 AM
1

The same way you get to Carnegie Hall: practice. And not just on HB's. Talk to everyone!
/r/seduction20/06/12 05:14 AM
6

This happened to me at a gathering a few weeks ago. I was invited by this HB8 I've been interested in so I made the time to go. She sits next to me and we start talking. This guy she knows who is sitting across from us randomly interrupts and starts blabbing on about whatever. Not sure if he interrupted or jumped in right whent eh conversation had a pause, but it still happened. Well she started talking with him (nothing serious or flirty or anything). What did I do? I opened a (harmless) set wi…
/r/seduction20/06/12 05:03 AM
1

look back on your approaches Look back on your approaches. Reflect on them. But don't overthink while you're DOING your approaches or on your dates. The best nights I ever had, I didn't think about anything until after it was over. Everything just naturally flowed, and flowed well.
/r/seduction20/06/12 04:57 AM
2

If you're getting a bj, it sounds like you're going to be fine as long as you don't fuck it up. If you need to dress it up, put some movies out and pour some wine.
/r/seduction19/06/12 12:46 PM
2

Ended up with her number, so not all was lost in the disaster. Sounds like a success to me, brother!
/r/seduction19/06/12 12:37 PM
1

But every other scholarship is for white males!....wait...
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:31 PM
4

This is what feminism looks like when they have no more real battles to fight in their own privileged societies.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:25 PM
1

Were the questions asked simply ones that require a short answer (yes/no/[location]/etc)?
/r/seduction19/06/12 11:23 AM
1

Yeah, even if they don't like you that much they'll talk to you for hours about themselves. Afterwards, they'll feel like you're a great person to talk with and (if you plant the seeds right) someone pretty damn attractive as well.
/r/seduction19/06/12 10:48 AM
3

She liked listening to my friend and I tell stories but didn't really talk too much. Stupid question, but did you give her a chance to talk? I always make it a point to keep everyone interacting. Asking questions, teasing, etc. She's looking to you to lead the conversation. So lead.
/r/seduction19/06/12 10:47 AM
3

She's playing hard to get. Up the game, brotha. You almost have her.
/r/seduction19/06/12 09:50 AM
1

Yes. Ideally you want to get HER to qualify herself to YOU.
/r/seduction19/06/12 08:36 AM
2

"How about we meet up at [bar] on [day] and talk it over? What do you say?"
/r/seduction19/06/12 08:32 AM
1

Exactly. Even if it's not detrimental to your coolness or attractiveness, you are burning up things to talk about even before the date.
/r/seduction19/06/12 08:24 AM
1

You're most likely right. Watching those videos right now. Pretty good stuff.
/r/seduction19/06/12 06:40 AM
3

I do love that picture, even if I'm the target.
/r/seduction18/06/12 05:13 PM
3

Don't remember which PUA said it but it stuck in my memory: "An object in motion tends to stay in motion." I suggest frequenting a coffee shop.
/r/seduction18/06/12 12:32 PM
3

Hit the gym. It'll build your confidence up as well.
/r/seduction18/06/12 12:31 PM
2

Some crazy people honestly do believe that all heterosexual sex is rape.
/r/seduction18/06/12 02:06 AM
3

She was cock blocking her hot friend.
/r/seduction18/06/12 02:03 AM
7

She inflates when the sun goes down
/r/seduction18/06/12 01:56 AM
1

Green shot's a helluva drug
/r/seduction18/06/12 01:50 AM
1

If you feel like texting one more time to her, you could say "A simple no would have sufficed. I don't appreciate your angry friends harassing me. I won't talk to you again. Good day." Something along those lines that makes her feel like an ultra-paranoid twit to your friendly bantor. Even if she replies, just ignore it.
/r/seduction17/06/12 11:21 AM
1

Yep. Walk away. Delete the number. Last thing you need is some tool white knight knocking on your door.
/r/seduction17/06/12 11:17 AM
1

Damn. Don't know, man. She may need mroe data on you before she feels comfortable. Perhaps retreat into facebook for a bit? Tell her you'll add her on facebook and then she can stalk your profile. This girl I'm casually dating didn't answer my first date proposal (via facebook chat) until she stalked my facebook profile for 15 minutes or so.
/r/seduction17/06/12 10:59 AM
8

Hmm, will have to try this next time I take this one girl out. I've been hit with the "sweet" thing twice already. One time I ignored it, the other time I said "Don't get used to it" in a joking way.
/r/seduction17/06/12 10:52 AM
3

To a feminist, gender equality always means "what's mine is mine and what's yours is ours."
/r/MensRights17/06/12 09:40 AM
1

Good luck.
/r/seduction17/06/12 09:18 AM
1

You know in the states we have these things called "urinals" for the specific purpose of standing up while urinating. Saves water, saves space, and less mess. It's like...magic. But that would mean making men and women's bathrooms different! Men might gain an biological advantage in a world where only women's biological advantages are allowed! The horror!
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:59 AM
1

Okay. Heed my advice from above. Wait for a bit (however long she waited to text back plus a few minuets). Push for a date. Low pressure. Open area. Bar that's decent and near the both of you. Throw in the bar and date and time. "Ah, well how come you don't know your own town? lol. We should meet up for a few drinks at [bar] on [date]."
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:52 AM
18

I love how after the green shot kicked in, she went from HB7 to HB8.
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:46 AM
2

So [her loc.] is nearby? Same town? State? Country? Edit: DO NOT REPLY YET
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:45 AM
2

You shouldn't apologize. Own your actions. Yeah yeah hindsight, 20/20, etc. I say wait for some kind of reply, any kind. If she doesn't reply, then forget it. Definitely don't add her via FB or anything. Just move on. If she does reply, then push for a date like I said. Don't text back immediately. Wait maybe half an hour or something.
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:35 AM
2

Ignore them. They know they feel threatened by us and can't stand the fact that we're nearing 40k members (despite their biggest slandering efforts). Any bad press we get only swells our numbers as the propaganda is dispelled almost immediately by any curious redditor peeping their head in.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:30 AM
2

Tell her the general part of town you live in. Find a decent bar between the two of you (neutral zone) and push for a date (provide bar name and time in the text). Maybe "How about we catch up at [bar] on [date/time]." Like I said, keep it friendly. If she says no way then you back off and move on.
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:24 AM
2

Wait. Pedo? When you started messaging? She gave you her full name so she has some kind of inherit trust in you. I don't think she'd give it out otherwise. Just put that crap out of your mind and move forward. No coffee? Maybe drinks at a quiet bar somewhere? Oh, and don't add by facebook. Just push for a date. Skip the online BS.
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:18 AM
2

Well it wouldn't hurt to try. I say text with a date request. Something casual (coffee, perhaps).
/r/seduction17/06/12 08:10 AM
2

Is she still away?
/r/seduction17/06/12 07:59 AM
1

I prefer just having one or two beers to loosen myself up a bit. Anything more than that, I start fucking up.
/r/seduction17/06/12 06:06 AM
9

Barack, pull your head out of feminism's asshole for one fucking day and appreciate Fathers. For fuck's sake. Even if you're anti-father-fuck-all-men, a little positive reinforcement might make some dads a little more willing to be there for their families? Maybe? If Romney was smart, he'd give a BIG speech appreciationg Fathers. No jokes and no sarcastic winks/nudges to jealous-for-attention-feminists. Just one long speech about how his Father was always there for him, how he is there for his c…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:03 AM
2

One drink? You poor fool! Wait till you see those goddamn Snookis.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:02 AM
26

It's a joke. Yes. But it's Father's Day. For one fucking day a year, society is supposed to appreciate MEN for being Fathers. One fucking day. Mother's Day is nothing but complete and total appreciation for women (as with the rest of the women days/months we celebrate). Political correctness has gone to the point where you can't even celebrate Fatherhood one day a year without some sarcastic joke.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:52 AM
1

Similar to the Drug War zealots. Their messed up sense of morality and controlling other peoples' behaviors far outweigh anything else.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:42 AM
1

You're fine. If she returns the message, then continue to probe until your memory comes around. If she doesn't, then wait a few days and then unfriend.
/r/seduction17/06/12 05:41 AM
1

I thought I woudl be intimidated by this, but now I like being in a group where I'm not the most attractive or social. Why? These guys are ALWAYS getting party invites and whatnot. So as long as I keep adding value, I keep getting invited. Then I can turn myself loose (once I build some inner confidence) and meet new people and build up my own social circle. Surround yourself with powerful allies.
/r/seduction17/06/12 05:36 AM
2

Hey as long as you get a date, just focus your energies on the date. Once it's set, then keep the texts to a minimum. I wouldn't really initiate the texts until close to the date just as a reminder: "See you tonight!" Save all your conversation topics for the date. But for next time, just come right out with the date request within a few texts. Be definite. Have the date set up already so all she has to do is say yes. "We should get some coffee tomorrow at 6. What do you say?"
/r/seduction17/06/12 05:32 AM
3

Agreed. If she wants OP, she should turn her b/f loose and let him find a woman that respects him more. Honestly, I never enter a relationship out of infidelity. If she did it to him, she'll do it to me when the next guy comes around.
/r/seduction17/06/12 05:08 AM
1

I'm having a similar problem. This girl is far more comfortable talking by Whatsapp/Facebook than phone. I've called her a few times (to set up a date) and she rarely answers (but texts back later on). I always push for a date in the real world as I have been taught and usually get it, so there is still hope. But if she's frisky via chat, I'll return the energy and try to keep her smiling, but then will exit pretty quickly. I don't want to be associated with chat. I want to be associated with fu…
/r/seduction17/06/12 05:07 AM
1

I suppose you could make up answers in an obvious jokingly way. And then try to redirect the conversation towards her. She should be qualifying herself to you. Yeah yeah, hindsight, 20/20, etc.
/r/seduction17/06/12 04:42 AM
10

Legalized and regulated prostitution would be a legitimate, non abusive, business. Everyone involved has rights and protections. Keeping it illegal harms women more than legalizing it.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 01:13 PM
1

When dancing or talking with a girl, I like the loud music. Gives me a chance to get REAL close to hear what she's saying (cheek-to-cheek in an "accidental" bump), even holding her waist and pulling her closer. Subtle, but effective.
/r/seduction16/06/12 12:09 PM
1

or that a product can "help you build inner game" is stupid. I agree. You don't need a product or some kind of wonder-kit to build your inner game. Anyone that's selling something like that is bullshit. All I needed was some fucking time on the sidebar to start getting my shit together. It's not like I read the material and then magically leveled up. I read the material and gained the confidence to say "fuck it, I'll give it a try." Success, failure, it doesn't matter. You always move forward. W…
/r/seduction16/06/12 12:02 PM
1

Here she asks me all sorts of questions like my ex-girlfriends full name, what I thought of her when we first met, how long i would wait until marrying a girl after engagement (lol right?), how many kids i wanted to have, whatever. I don't know if I would have answered these questions. That's just me, though.
/r/seduction16/06/12 11:59 AM
4

Probably until the first dwarf-with-hookers scene and then turned it off in fear of patriarchal oppression.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 10:37 AM
2

As long as it's ended, I don't care. If you have to get the bigots on board with just dollars and cents, so be it.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 10:31 AM
7

Translation of all this hype: "During football season, everyone forgets about MEEEEE!"
/r/MensRights16/06/12 10:30 AM
1

Right. I consider myself an introvert (tested INTJ as well). I go out a lot more often than I used to, but I still need alone time to recharge. There's introverted and then there's being a hermit.
/r/seduction16/06/12 10:20 AM
6

I'm honestly not a fan of shitting where I eat. Being a new job for you, I'd tread carefully. It'll be fun until the breakup and then you're stuck working with someone you hate. Also, you might want to look into the rules about dating coworkers. Some places look down upon it. But, that being said, it's not impossible to do this and have a good time. Assume attraction. So she approached you first. You already had someone build your awesomeness up for you. It sounds like you're in. I suggest getti…
/r/seduction16/06/12 06:59 AM
2

Two years. A man would get two years for tickling someone else's kid in the park.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:09 AM
1

Maybe you would need to have the procedure before a birth certificate is issued.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:09 AM
2

Here's an idea to help prevent HIV. Stop with the damn "abstinence-only" education and teach young adults how to practice safe sex! WOW! Amazing! And there's no butchery involved!
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:07 AM
1

Or have your male child overseas where his human rights are protected and then bring him back. But that kills his chances of running for president (should you be the ambitious father/mother type).
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:06 AM
3

Feminists don't give a shit about the attempted rape scene. They have always hated Lara Croft (and those like her in the video game culture). Lara represents everything they hate about video games. Sexy woman, massive fanservice everywhere, accepted by society (ie not pornography), and the fact that guys are playing this game instead of pursuing "real" women (and buying them stuff). So any and all evidence to back up their rage against the Lara Crofts out there will be pursued.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:01 AM
4

Move the fuck out? Hell, just fucking LEAVE. Go to one of the many women's shelters (that turn away men in the same situations), tell them your story (true or not), and the guy is in cuffs within an hour.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:56 AM
2

And the marriage rate just keeps on dropping. Keep it up, boys and girls, keep it up.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:55 AM
3

But how will we continue to increase our regulation over men's thoughts if we allow them to get away with this atrocity?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:54 AM
43

Just now? Wikipedia allowed the total defamation of the mens right's page by radical feminists from within a while back.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:53 AM
6

Feminists leeched onto the Civil Rights movement 50-60 years ago and have never let go of that cash cow.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:50 AM
2

Also, why on earth would a MAN say "men are fucking stupid"? Feminist white-knight lapdog. No one worth their salt should have to insult themselves to please others.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:48 AM
1

Just read the sidebar on inner game. It's not pickup lines, it's how to build confidence in yourself. Great articles.
/r/seduction16/06/12 05:41 AM
1

I would wager a bro-guess that Tyler means you thread the conversation, but thread it productively. When giving a few options to thread (things she mentioned: her car or her home town) you pick something that can lead you to what you want to talk about eventually. Think a few moves ahead.
/r/seduction16/06/12 05:37 AM
1

the importance of confidence, security, emotional stability, etc..that exists, but the concept of inner game is a way to make more money. Those concepts ARE inner game. The words "inner game" just summarize the ideas up.
/r/seduction15/06/12 04:00 AM
9

The pattern on my floor blows my mind if I'm high.
/r/seduction15/06/12 03:02 AM
1

/r/amiugly Shit, I'm not even that brave.
/r/seduction15/06/12 02:59 AM
1

I think I was guilty of this one for the last ten years.
/r/seduction15/06/12 02:57 AM
2

Overseas, it's not much better. Just add used diapers to the mix and you get the idea.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:52 AM
3

I love how just two days ago, we were being called out for being sexist for saying "a gaggle of women!" Meanwhile, CNN has no issue with publishing an article talking about a "gaggle of men."
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:48 AM
4

Fair enough. My point is that the status quo is very heavily pro-feminist, which means supremacy-type behavior is just down the street.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 04:17 PM
4

True. But feminism is one of the few areas where actively pushing against it is deemed "politically incorrect" and, in some cases, a hate movement.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:53 PM
3

how bad is it for you if a woman has a baby when you don't want her to have it? It's her choice. I just don't want to have to subsidize it with forced child support. If she wants to play single mom (AKA married to the government teat), then so be it. How do you think it compares to a woman having an abortion she doesn't want? No woman should ever be forced into an abortion. If her life choices are protected, so should mine.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:32 PM
1

I'm an American (circumcised) and am casually dating a woman from the UK. I'm actually dreading that "conversation" should things escalate.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:25 PM
1

[can't come up with intellectual retort so will correct your grammar]
/r/seduction14/06/12 01:23 PM
53

A fine start. You feel that surge in confidence? It will go down again, but will never go back to the point you started. You talked to an HB8 and she didn't bite your head off. An important lesson.
/r/seduction14/06/12 12:43 PM
1

Casual means she is eyeing another guy for some action and wants to keep you around in case it fucks up. I say if you're uncomfortable with that setup, you discuss it with her. If she doesn't want to go your way, you break up. However, if you're okay with it, simply treat it like a casual relationship. Stop calling as much. Schedule a lot less dates. Most importantly, get some other dates. Build a little abundance mentality and competition. When she gets her head out of her ass and realizes that…
/r/seduction14/06/12 12:40 PM
37

True. But it really goes to show that unchecked feminism is nothing but female supremacy. You can't give one side of a debate guns and expect everyone to "play nice."
/r/MensRights14/06/12 12:35 PM
1

women game you. they wanna make you chase. I didn't set up enough confidence when talking with her the first few times. She obviously thinks I'm disposable enough to fuck around with my mind like a cat playing with its prey. I consider this a failure on my part and not bite. when women just don't seem to want to give you the time of day. I move on. Abundance mentality and outcome independence. If she truly likes me, she'll stop fucking around. If she doesn't, then meh. when women don't respond t…
/r/seduction14/06/12 12:20 PM
43

Jesus, what a scary thought. Men taught at a very early age that they can't even take a piss without a woman's permission and approval. Sweden really is on the way to becoming "the Saudi Arabia of Feminism."
/r/MensRights14/06/12 12:14 PM
5

It makes the grammar nazis out there feel good about themselves since they can't contribute anything else to the conversation.
/r/seduction14/06/12 11:47 AM
2

And be completely off the PC-radars.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:23 AM
111

Swedish feminists getting more and more desperate to justify their bloated and redundant existence.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:22 AM
1

To me, if you're learning lines, routines, etc then you're not attacking the source of your problems. You're just masking your own insecurities and lack of confidence with pre-programmed formulas. If you're learning about inner game, taking care of yourself, and building confidence, that can be classified as "self-help" but essentially solves your lady problems as well.
/r/seduction14/06/12 10:45 AM
1

Samir, you're missing the point. The point of the exercise is that you're supposed to figure out what you would want to do if...PC LOAD LETTER?
/r/seduction14/06/12 10:25 AM
1

Cyber-hipsters.
/r/seduction14/06/12 10:24 AM
3

Sadly, the ACLU will stop complaining about FGM long enough to agree with you (yes I know you were being sarcastic).
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:28 AM
4

"Ithoughtthiswas'merica! I can't start a fight at my son's baseball game?"
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:44 AM
1

A good compromise.
/r/seduction12/06/12 01:54 PM
4

It could never work, and there's no reason why it should work. For god's sake, let men piss in peace!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 11:00 AM
1

Build attraction the whole night. Then you say "let's go to my tent."
/r/seduction12/06/12 10:03 AM
6

You should propose a day and if she's busy, she'll let you know. Hopefully, she'll counter-propose a new date. Then you're set.
/r/seduction12/06/12 10:02 AM
14

Consider yourself bugged.
/r/seduction12/06/12 09:01 AM
2

Like the World Cup last year. The US actually gave a shit until we lost and then viewership dropped like a rock.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:11 AM
3

It's....QUOTA TIME! Go after the politically incorrect. And go after them HARD! First one to jail someone for daring to not have a job wins!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:10 AM
6

It's called "fishing." They are fishing for compliments. "No I don't put up with you, dear! You're so kind, and sweet, and..." I usually jokingly call out the bullshit. My humor isn't returned, usually. When you learn to not depend on others for validation, this shit ends very quickly.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:08 AM
3

Nobody ever says, "Gee dad, it's so easy to read with all this light!" Chris Rock
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:05 AM
1

Exactly. I'm overseas so can't do much else than a phone call on Fathers'/Mothers' Day and a nice email. But it's the thought that counts.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:04 AM
7

Pretty insane. If you think about it, a man's public bathroom is the last bastion of public male spaces. Everythign else has been "cleansed" and become co-ed (while female-only spaces are sprouting up everwhere). Controlling men's behavior in their own bathroom is simply the next step in completely conquering all that is male.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:59 AM
1

Also one time a girl I liked "playfully" kicked me in the butt so I "playfully" shoved her back. She responded by screaming and running away, which left me shocked. Don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/seduction12/06/12 04:49 AM
1

Then you warn her of the consequences, first.
/r/seduction12/06/12 03:58 AM
1

In your culture, was it acceptable to touch a lot? Italians are like that.
/r/seduction12/06/12 03:19 AM
2

Gracias.
/r/seduction11/06/12 01:05 PM
3

Exactly. It's something I'm working on, myself. A good thing to do is speak slowly, and even pause in the middle of a sentence as you gather your words. You're holding her attention (possibly even more if her mind was wandering) and you will say the right thing.
/r/seduction11/06/12 12:17 PM
2

What's your culture background? Born and raised in the states? Born and raised elsewhere and came to the states?
/r/seduction11/06/12 11:47 AM
2

I am.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:53 AM
5

Speak slower.
/r/seduction11/06/12 10:38 AM
1

Outcome independent means you go out to have a good time. You won't let people take that feeling away. You won't let some HB9 that rejects you and makes you feel like a creep ruin your night. You laugh it off, and move on. You stop thinking "what if" and you just fucking do it.
/r/seduction11/06/12 09:36 AM
4

Not even with my cake?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 09:09 AM
9

You could argue your first post has fuck-all to do with the topic as well, other than distracting away from a blatant double-standard that happens to benefit women.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:58 AM
11

Women are as guilty of domestic violence as men are. And that's the big feminist victory known as VAWA for you.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:47 AM
1

All this will do is allow companies to pay workers even less.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:45 AM
14

And MEN are the victims of a vast majority of violent crimes.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:43 AM
2

Just someone that probably got downvoted in SRS and is making amends by trolling r/mr with their sockpuppet.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:41 AM
4

All I see is that these PC scum have found their "nigger" or "jew" to attack and see absolutely no hypocrisy in their actions. The SRSisters are no different, except they hate "cis" white males.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:39 AM
7

So all male Kennedys from now on have to be abused as punishment? What kind of shit is that?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:31 AM
2

Divorce potential.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:30 AM
13

Scumbag husband pays the bills and is beta enough to put up with this kind of villification.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:27 AM
2

Happy cake day!
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:26 AM
1

This is why I don't date feminists. I wouldn't last a fucking month with that shit. Support equality? Great! Men-bad-women-good? No.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:26 AM
2

I don't think I'm a bad looking guy. Good. Don't think that. I don't have that confidence or boost that some guys do.. Start small. Ask them for the time. Read more about inner game on the sidebar. Am I stuck in this phase forever? Only if you choose to be. I am not a virgin but I only had sex with one girl... Stop being outcome dependent. Women aren't trophies. Focus on building your own awesome-sauce before anything else and women will come to you.
/r/seduction11/06/12 05:39 AM
25

Just pretend they are all fat.
/r/seduction11/06/12 04:58 AM
2

The inner game stuff is not out dated. Read it and understand it. Basically you need to validate yourself and not rely on others to get you in state.
/r/seduction11/06/12 04:51 AM
4

ew
/r/seduction11/06/12 04:47 AM
1

Not when you finish your essay I'd finish that first. When you're on a roll, best to let it play out first.
/r/seduction11/06/12 04:47 AM
8

Came in expecting this one. Well done.
/r/seduction11/06/12 04:46 AM
7

Either way, it's worth noting that she does have leverage against me because she's paying for my part of the rent since I don't have a job. You have no leverage. Fix this part first.
/r/seduction10/06/12 10:05 AM
4

As a social-introvert, I find that I can do it only in small doses. Like a few nights a week MAX (most likely just the two weekend nights). Otherwise, I need to recharge alone or with close friends only. It is getting easier. I find the hardest part is stepping outside the house or driving up to the club/bar. Once I'm there and have a beer in me, I'm good. Not the life of the party or anything just yet, but am comfortable.
/r/seduction10/06/12 04:33 AM
7

If you're a little teapot, you OWN that little teapot.
/r/seduction09/06/12 08:01 AM
5

Tell that to the pervs in r/ladyboners. Oh wait, they aren't perverted, they are sexually empowered!
/r/MensRights09/06/12 07:05 AM
7

It's called "Oppression Olympics." Nobody wins.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 07:03 AM
9

Bro tip: Don't wear a watch when doing this.
/r/seduction09/06/12 05:50 AM
42

I don't REALLY want to be a PUA, but I need to learn your ways until I can find someone I really want to be with and can be with. Don't be a "PUA." Be yourself. This is how I study seduction: It's not about picking up women. It's about building attractiveness. I want to be proud of MYSELF. To find MYSELF attractive and awesome and kickass. It's about building a great life for yourself. And it's all about your inner game, your confidence. Once you build that, you'll have no problem talking to wom…
/r/seduction09/06/12 05:39 AM
1

Spoken like webmd.
/r/seduction07/06/12 10:53 AM
1

Yep. The most important accessory to any proper baby boy torture chamber.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:33 AM
2

And as these males enter female-dominated occupations, sexism and gender privilege follow: men even earn more than women in these once-taboo fields for males. So, just because men are entering these arenas does not mean gender equality is being achieved. Men entering female turf and succeeding = sexism and gender privilege. Women entering male turf and succeeding = obvious evidence that women > men.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:08 AM
6

I wish I were a woman so I could assault anyone without repercussions. FTFY
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:04 AM
5

The only reason is because of all the bad press.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:03 AM
2

Most of SRS are men.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:31 AM
1

Not a problem. This is the first link on inner game.
/r/seduction06/06/12 07:02 AM
3

Sidebar --->
/r/seduction06/06/12 06:36 AM
1

Nah. Moved on.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:23 AM
1

Okay. Never paid too much attention to Dr. Weir's "guest appearences" in one of the last seasons and was glad to see her go off to another show. I was just sitting there annoyed at the new president "clean house" and replace all the best characters with idiots. I knew it was due to writing and contracts and whatnot, but what a shit excuse. Yes, Vala Mal Doran is probably the point where the show jumped the shark. There's no replacing Richard Dean Anderson's general badassery mixed in with snarky…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:01 AM
3

Never saw it. Quit after about season 9 or 10 of the original show. When Richard Dean Anderson left, it kinda turned me off to the whole series.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:49 AM
9

Meh, Sam Carter never rubbed me the wrong way. It's that stupid bitch from another show that came on in one of the last seasons that turned me off to the whole show. She contributed NOTHING but stupid humor. Sure she was hot and all, but she was fucking annoying. One time she propped her feet up on teh general's desk and said "When will a woman get to sit here?" or some shit. Um, fuck off you guys already have a woman running Stargate Atlantis (apparently the new president thinks some reporter w…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:41 AM
14

It's an interesting "circle jerk." I call it the Jon Stewart defense (and I love Jon Stewart). Jon Stewart attacks politicians and mainstream news channels. He cites sources, video clips, etc in a humorous way to get his point across. He's invited to the "enemy's" show where he gets called out on his statements. His defense? "I'm not a news show. It's comedy central. The show after mine is puppets making prank calls!" While true, it's reframing the debate. Like an ad-hominem onto himself. He doe…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:58 AM
2

It would be nice to filter ACLU donations to go to certain causes instead of one big warchest. I love the ACLU and what it stands for, but will refuse to give a cent until this barbarism is condemned.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:53 AM
6

Not if some mainstream religion feels oppressed. A male child has less rights than animals in this department.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:52 AM
4

This sexist crap is why I'm glad I went to school overseas. It was an American school with FAR more male teachers than the equivalent in the states. Almost 50/50. If you're an American and have kids, I highly recommend getting a job overseas where they have an American school. The best jobs pay for your kids' education as part of the package. Better education, less feminist influence, and more male representation.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:50 AM
12

Petty pandering to the feminist base due to the "War on Womenz" crap. It's nice being a guy right now. Either you're stereotyped as a male sexist prick that wants all womenz in the kitchenz (GOP) or you're a feminist lapdog (DEM). Never mind the real issues like deficit, wars, etc going on right in front of our faces.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:46 AM
2

As someone who is not big and gets shit for it, thank you for taking the time to write this up.
/r/seduction05/06/12 06:42 AM
5

I'm sure this will be included in the "War on Women" hype going on right now.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:50 AM
6

At least he didn't get the double chin :)))
/r/seduction02/06/12 06:47 AM
1

Depends on her character. Is she the fun and crazy and random type? Putt-putt is fun and lets you get in close to "help with her form" if you know what I mean.
/r/seduction02/06/12 05:33 AM
7

The pity-fuck at the end is totally worth it! Just wait a few more weeks!
/r/seduction02/06/12 04:48 AM
2

The majority of homeless are men, and there are countless services dedicated to helping homeless women. I agree that the title is misleading as this ban applies to both genders of homeless, however.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 04:43 AM
2

My guess is that the feminists are keeping the pressure on. It takes power away from the family court schemes as men no longer need to commit to a woman to get a child (other than the agreed-upon payment for services rendered). Also, there's some white knight problems due to the surrogate changing her mind and wanting to keep the child and the money and everyone says "well you should've known better, hyuk hyuk."
/r/MensRights02/06/12 04:40 AM
0

They get to chuckle to themselves and spew cheeto dust all over their keyboard. I honestly could give two shits about these group of losers.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 04:37 AM
2

Obama is convinced women are tougher in a rough economy, when 80% of jobs lost during the recession were held by men. Those 80% would have recovered faster if the feminist groups didn't push Obama to essentially pay a tax to feminists from the bailout. This "tax" went to female-dominated sectors that gained jobs during the same timeframe. Essentially, it was a feminist bribe to shut them up while Obama tried to fix the economy.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 04:34 AM
3

Good. Keep your cool, keep your facts straight. Let him/her explode and act like a spoiled brat with a tantrum. You won't win this person over, but those fence-sitters watching will see you in a much more favorable light.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 04:31 AM
1

But the servers keep crapping out and then I'm alone in the dark with the "Error 34" bullshit on my screen.
/r/seduction01/06/12 03:21 PM
2

I always liked Vincent's response in Pulp Fiction: "I have my moments." But it depends on the context, obviously. Don't dwell on it though.
/r/seduction01/06/12 03:01 PM
1

Yeah, we're going out of my league now. I suggest going over to /r/malefashionadvice and see what those pros have to say.
/r/seduction01/06/12 10:00 AM
1

It went well. We talked, laughed, joked. Might even score a second date, but not sure yet. That's the beauty of single life that I missed: the mystery of it all. Good luck with yours!
/r/seduction01/06/12 05:30 AM
2

Mom said he was no good anyway.
/r/seduction01/06/12 03:45 AM
2

Masters in 69ology
/r/seduction31/05/12 10:35 PM
2

It's how I got my degree, bro.
/r/seduction31/05/12 04:54 PM
14

Today? Drove to work. I'm in the MIddle East. Driving is scary every day! Seriously? The scariest thing for me today is to come: got my first date since breaking off my three year relationship this evening. Not sure how it will go, what's going to happen, etc.
/r/seduction31/05/12 12:08 PM
11

As someone who spies on you in the bushes outside your window, thanks.
/r/seduction31/05/12 12:07 PM
1

What's your build? Are you skinny (Hunter Thompson)? Tall and buff (Van Diesel)?
/r/seduction31/05/12 11:54 AM
2

Sarcasm? I didn't mean anything bad. If anything, get some proper advice on products you can use. I hope you didn't interpret that as me telling you to fuck off. I meant to consult a dermatologist about expert advice.
/r/seduction31/05/12 10:19 AM
1

I'm telling you. The men's public bathroom is the LAST public place that belongs to men and only men. The last place. Everything else is "shared." If there's a gym, there's a shared space and a women's place. If there's a student club, it's co-ed or women-only. There are no mens spaces anymore. Dont' give me the shit about private golf clubs or tournaments either. Those are private areas with a thinning wall of defense from the PC crowds (who, across the street, have unbothered female-only equiv…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:12 AM
1

To summarize: "BUT WHAT ABOUT MEEEE?"
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:04 AM
0

Should bus drivers do that? No. Should the courts get involved because someone was offended? No. The women should have raised a complaint witht he bus company, who would in turn reprimand the bus drivers accordingly. If that doesn't addres the situation, go to the press. The bad publicity will make it happen. Playing the lawsuit lottery over "babe" just reinforces the stereotype of the weak woman unable to cope with the big bad outside-the-house world.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:00 AM
1

Some people simply don't know empathy.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:55 AM
2

To be fair, it's the businesses talking about this. They don't give two shits about men's mental health issues until it hurts the bottom line. Sadly, this is one of the few ways a society will ever specifically go out to help men. This is also one of the reasons why the MGTOW message is so strong.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:49 AM
5

Click the link. Her story is there in full.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:48 AM
15

What else would you expect from the so-called misogyny of reddit? A woman that's not a feminist? SHAME HER!
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:40 AM
-1

Agreed. This is an area where feminists and radically-social conservatives see eye-to-eye. Both want to put men in their "place." The disagreement is where a woman's "place" is.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:38 AM
1

Sunscreen? Don't know about the zits, though. If it's a big problem, I suggest booking an appointment with a dermatologist and see what your options are. If anything, get some proper advice on products you can use.
/r/seduction31/05/12 09:30 AM
10

No he's not. And stop calling me Shirley.
/r/seduction31/05/12 07:39 AM
2

Own it. Like Picard. Or Walter White.
/r/seduction31/05/12 07:38 AM
2

But fishsticks are delicious!
/r/seduction31/05/12 07:34 AM
82

Yep. Only a real man signs up to die for his country. There's no other suitable role for a male otherwise. Nice. /s One could easily create the same thing insulting women. How women back in the day all took care of themselves, their house, their husbands and now they are just a bunch of screaminig selfish idiots in the Marriage 2.0 world. I don't actually believe that, but that's how it would feel if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:15 AM
6

The same passion was said when men and women were first fighting for abortion rights for women. A man knocks up a woman and she's forever set down a path, whether or not she wants to? How unfair! Now that the shoe is on the other foot, those same people pushing so hard for women's choices scoff at the idea of a man getting the same priviliges. In fact, a lot of them use the SAME arguments their ENEMIES used decades ago (and even today)! "He should have kept it in his pants if he didn't want to b…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:10 AM
6

I would laugh too if the system was so geared in my favor that I could do all those horrible things and walk away free.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:52 AM
3

SRS-speak.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:17 AM
2

My god...it's all coming together. I hate it when I crap myself when talking to ladies!
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:36 AM
3

NCSMC doesn't want couples to work it out. They want more single mothers so they can keep organization justified.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:41 AM
2

Elsbeth McInnes, from the National Council of Single Mothers and their Children Lol, no self-preservation agenda there.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:40 AM
1

You don't argue with a feminist in a public forum to change their mind. You argue with a feminist in a public forum to make the other observers think about it for a minute. Also, by staying calm and focused, it makes them look like a lunatic. Like Yellow's first ad hominem (plus the sexist card to boot) and then raving like an idiot the rest of the time.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:39 AM
1

TIL Myspace is still around and is dominated by women.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:30 AM
1

We could not participate in the government’s Women-Owned Small Business program unless there was another female competitor,” We couldn't get our vagina-handout because there weren't enough vaginas around. We had to compete like men and it was not fair.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:17 AM
2

I have a lot of family in teaching and teaching administration and from what I have heard administrations jump at the chance to have men teach, especially in elementary school, but almost none apply. The way I've always seen it was a matter of pay. It's no secret that most teachers (especially younger education) get paid very little compared to other jobs. It's something that needs to change, yes, but it's still a problem. Men are still seen as the "provider" so must generate as much $$$/hour as…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 06:12 AM
4

Yeah. I'm 29 and just got out of a relationship of 3 years. It hurt, and I'm still recovering. I couldn't even imagine going through a divorce and losing my children to an ex (especially if I did nothing to deserve it), then going bankrupt (retirement? What's that) trying to get custody or even keep up with the child support while living in some shithole apartment. Yeah, I can see the gears in my mind start to spin the wrong way in such a situation.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:44 AM
6

The government just wants to offload the "burden" onto someone else (ie the guy). Otherwise, she gets to suck off the government teat and the budget takes a hit. It's a matter of "either you pay or I pay, and I have the guns so..." Why it's not some set minimum standard (like $$$ per child) annoys the shit out of me though. "The life she became accustomed to" is over when they signed the divorce papers and took the house, children and possessions. What about the life he became accustomed to? Fuc…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:38 AM
10

TIL: When I take a shit in the morning, I'm doing it to get laid.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:34 AM
1

upon further reflection this really reminds of a very juvenile mentality It's Psychology Today. I haven't even read it yet and I know it will be full of pseudo-factual PC bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:33 AM
3

BEEP BOOP! I HAVE NOTHING INTELLIGENT TO ADD SO HERE'S SOME MEMES IN ALL CAPS!
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:30 AM
4

MMORPG's are really bad for this. Using a male avatar, I got no offers for help (and only comments calling me "newb"). Using a female avatar? Help up the ass. "Here let me fight that monster for you" or "Follow me, I'll give you free armor to get you started" or "Yeah I beat that quest, let me walk you through it." White knighting at its best. The minute I said I was actually a guy was hilarious. You can almost see the "Oh shit" face from their avatar as they type out curses and simply walk off.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:25 AM
6

Yep. I think we netted about 2k new subscribers because of all the publicity due to the "hate group" mislabel.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:16 AM
14

The government funds a lot more for women's benefit than men's benefit, yet men pay the majority of taxes. Shouldn't, by that logic, women be taxed more for all the stuff they get out of it? Nah...that's sexist.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 08:51 AM
1

and both parties are arrested Feminists are fine with this but won't support arresting the "victim" (ie the woman).
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:20 AM
1

Turkey has something similar. Three weeks army training for every male citizen above a certain age. I have a buddy of mine who is dicking with that right now (he works overseas and can't afford to lose his job over some BS "duty" like that).
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:20 AM
1

All the feminist chickenhawks wanting more spots for women (just not for themselves) in the military like to forget about the draft as well as this story.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:18 AM
1

God damn this needs an update after the fact.
/r/seduction27/05/12 05:50 AM
12

Came in to say this. OP, start learning about inner game and confidence. This information is not about memorizing lines and routines. It's about building YOURSELF up from the inside out. Start here
/r/seduction27/05/12 05:39 AM
15

It is as long as the victim is male. Then he wanted it, obviously.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 04:50 AM
2

Don't be an idiot. Don't be nervous. Just relax, have fun, make jokes. There's two girls for every guy. It's all a matter of which one (or two) gets to be the lucky one.
/r/seduction26/05/12 03:55 PM
17

"Edit: I'm not sure what to do. I know you guys think you're not SAP's but..." "Edit2: It's 6 AM and she left. Damn"
/r/seduction26/05/12 03:54 PM
1

"Excuse me, Flo?" Laugh. "What's the soup du jour?" "It's the soup of the day." "Mmm, that sounds good. I think I'll have that."
/r/seduction26/05/12 03:50 PM
25

Why is she rewarded with money? If my family is brutally murdered tomorrow I wouldn't get a dime. All I'd get (and want) is justice. Civil lawsuit, my ass. Rape is horrible, but it didn't cost her $1.5 million in damages.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:00 AM
136

Start off with something you two have in common...like a lack of balls Nice.
/r/seduction26/05/12 05:30 AM
1

All this talk of "risk-adverse" simply means there aren't as many guys taking the risks as there used to be. When there's risks, there's guys who are rewarded and guys who failed. The more risk takers, the more rewards, and the more "eligible bachelors" there are for the REAL risk-adverse gender.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:59 PM
5

Malkor is an SRS poster. Just sayin'
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:56 PM
3

Well that was a useless comment. What do you expect. This person was tagged as SRS.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:55 PM
2

I highly doubt you'll be saddled with half that debt. More like all of it.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:53 PM
3

Better call Saul!
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:42 PM
2

Yeah no shit. Sometimes a breakup sucks, is painful, and is dragged out. Do you really want to go through all that shit again? It's like quitting cigarettes.
/r/seduction25/05/12 05:01 AM
1

"It could be the lighting"
/r/seduction25/05/12 05:00 AM
4

Using your club voice I see
/r/seduction25/05/12 02:58 AM
1

This has to be a troll: I fully respect what you did because it's your body and your life and if you want a man to get you pregnant it's your right to "encourage" that. Plenty of girls trick guys into getting them pregnant and guys should just accept it once it happens and give the woman whatever she asks for.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:18 AM
1

Wow. What's an HB1?
/r/seduction24/05/12 02:09 AM
1

if the situation arised I see what you did there
/r/seduction23/05/12 05:01 PM
1

Read life hacks off the sidebar in regards to your bedroom/bathroom/etc. And follow it.
/r/seduction23/05/12 12:41 PM
1

Pickup artists cannot help but check out their playing field. They'll focus on you when you're looking, but the minute they think you're distracted, they're eyeing someone else. So watch out for men making eye contact with other women over your shoulder, it's a sure sign of a pickup artist. Lol, I can picture a guy reading this and deciding to constantly stare at the woman like a freak the rest of the night. Eyeing her as soon as he spots her when he comes out of the bathroom. Keeping eye contac…
/r/seduction23/05/12 12:38 PM
7

I am. SRS! OVER HERE! WE'RE BEING OPPRESSIVE AGAIN!
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:30 PM
2

I love the inspiration but I honestly chuckled at the idea of this happening right on the street: What if she lets you play with her tits?
/r/seduction23/05/12 12:20 PM
1

1 year ago I managed to ask an old lady what time it is, this is my biggest achievement. Well there's a start! How about you make yourself a goal of asking five strangers the time every day for a week? Obviously, don't do it all in the same place, etc. When you're in line for coffee When you see someone at work sitting on a bench/chair alone When you're getting your mail at your apartment (if you live in an apartment) I was never THAT shy around people, but I didn't just magically start talking …
/r/seduction23/05/12 12:19 PM
1

First date for me is coffee. So even if I do have to pay, it's a few bucks anyway. Although I consider it a plus if she offers to pay her own.
/r/seduction23/05/12 11:30 AM
6

"Baby, that was so good for you that you should cut me a discount."
/r/seduction23/05/12 11:29 AM
3

Where are the Feminists advocating for more male influences in the teaching and nursing professions? They are whining about it as we speak. More men are getting into those female-dominated positions and feminists are bitching about some kind of "glass escalator." (Projection based on the REAL glass escalator, affiramative action policies, that they've used).
/r/MensRights23/05/12 10:37 AM
2

As for the appendix, I can't believe people just blindly had those removed (not when they needed to, mind you). Hopefully, in a generation, people will say the same thing about male foreskin.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 10:30 AM
6

They just need cleaner butcheries, of course. /s
/r/MensRights23/05/12 10:29 AM
2

"I can see the party is right here, what makes you guys so much damn fun?" I love this one.
/r/seduction23/05/12 06:23 AM
2

To add to this, thread questions into the conversation about whatever they are talking about. Soon they are talking to you and not each other. They are now entertaining you with their stories. Thread further and subtly guide it to wherever you want.
/r/seduction23/05/12 06:22 AM
6

She had a boyfriend already. Fuck that drama.
/r/seduction23/05/12 06:20 AM
4

Apex Fallacy.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:44 AM
3

The Navy won't hurt one of their poster-girls.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:42 AM
12

Hey. White people can be African-American (South African), just don't tell the PC crowd.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:30 AM
3

Feminists care about making things better for themselves; women in the middle east are being burned and raped and treated sub-human, yet I rarely hear any NA femmes harping on that. Oh you'll hear that from them when it benefits the argument. Like if a man dares mention how he has it worse in [situation], they'll deflect by bringing up middle eastern women being stoned for adultery or something. IN other words, they have the right to bitch about men sitting in an "oppressing" manner on a bus, bu…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:25 AM
104

Men can't win, can they. THey really can't. On one side, women have overtaken men in just about every school field imaginable (and the ones we haven't, it's our fault we love it more than they do). They are increasingly AA'ing their way into jobs and lawsuiting their way into a boring working and hostile work enviornment. On the other side, you have men entering predominantly female areas (and due to their reactions, doing well). I would think feminists would be screaming in joy. But no. They wa…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:06 AM
1

Judging how they acted in San Francisco, it's more like AMerican Circumfetishist Lover's Union
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:03 AM
2

Yeah I was a bit paranoid asking for numbers because I didn't know who and who wasn't single (a lot of girls walked on the boat with guys attached to them and I couldn't remember who didn't). I have asked for phone numbers in the past, but not so quickly. Haha, just practice. I did manage to get a few adds on Facebook since someone caught me on camera once or twice and commented on it. Found out one of the girls is single so there's that. Good texting tip. Will have to remember that one. Yes. Al…
/r/seduction23/05/12 01:56 AM
7

ACLU = if it benefits boys, we hate it because it hurts boys and girls.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:40 PM
10

It's unfair to both male and female students = unfair to female students. Boys tend to do well in single-sex classrooms. So do girls. What is unfair is that girls won't be able to curbstomb boys in the classroom directly anymore and boys have a fighting chance in a non-male-hostile environment.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:14 PM
1

And there is. You just have to know the right people. Like anything else in this world.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:04 PM
2

Teaching English is a good start for China/Korea I hear.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:35 PM
2

Both. It's a human thing, not a gender thing. The example it used was Democrat/Republican. I'll come back in a few hours and post the link up. Edit: It's buried in here
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:08 PM
1

I saw a study done on a college campus where an attractive member of the opposite sex propositioned average university students for sex. The man had a very low success ratio and the woman had a very high one. The problem is, for the life of me I can't find it. Can anyone with better google-fu than mine locate it for me? Thanks a lot r/mensrights. Keep fighting the good fight. The OP was talking about a study and I was commenting on it because I knew of it. Maybe you should read past the headline…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:57 AM
3

So you are basically admitting that men have to work a lot harder for sex than women do. I never denied that. Way to counter your own argument? What do you think my argument was? I sense some miscommunication here.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:07 AM
1

It's true that there is a group bias, but there's many reasons for that. The media is very hostile to men. The school system is very hostile to boys/men. Some genders are currently more equal than others in terms of government benefits, attention, research. Such policies and issues already in place make it the situation you are explaining. It is possible to have a "big government" solution without it being corrupted back into feminist-land. The MRA movement with the internet is just taking off a…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:49 AM
1

Interesting concept. Honest question here: How would such a thing be enforced? I can't think of much other than forcing at least one gender to have a procedure of some sort before fertile age.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:47 AM
1

The headline is pretty much the only way a white male is allowed to publicly express his race/gender these days. The article, thankfully, wasn't full of that shit but talking about others doing it.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:27 AM
2

She told me that a guy friend of hers asked her if she had a boyfriend, cause he had a friend that was really into her. She said she does, but her friend said he still wants them to meet up and intro them to one another after work on Friday, and she agreed. She also said she saw the guy's pretty cute, is taller than her (she's into tall guys), etc. I'd quietly listen to this, down the rest of the drink, put the drink down, look at her in the eye, and tell her that it's over. Right there. If it's…
/r/seduction22/05/12 08:15 AM
2

lol that's what I thought. Maybe the conversation was so obvious that he got caught anyway.
/r/seduction22/05/12 08:12 AM
2

Yep. Should a divorce happens, she'll want half. And she'll get it too.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:45 AM
1

If he asked, she’d probably kick his butt, erase his hard drive, and take custody of their dog. And even if he insisted, there’s no way that it holds up court. And the bitch wouldn't have gotten a wedding ring. Problem solved since she revealed her cards way too early. It never hurts the person with more money to ask.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:43 AM
0

It's a bullshit study because men and women are wired differently when it comes to the mating ritual. Men LIKE it when attractive women approach them so openly. Women HATE it because it happens ALL the time and it's not how they like being courted (on average anyway). Oprah-fans hear this study and wildly cheer at their own perceived superiority over their feelings and hormones. I bet you anything if that experiement involved someone that knew how to actually get a woman into bed (and had more t…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:36 AM
2

Right from Sun Tzu's Art of War: Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Feminism has allowed itself to become like a "cloud" as you put it for the obvious benefits you showed. Feminists are free to attack men in horrible ways under the flag of feminism and then individual feminists can protect themselves and their flag by saying "not all of us are like that" when called on it. You cannot "attack" feminism as a group be…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:30 AM
1

You're never too old to have an overseas assignment. I'm in the Middle East working alongside 50-60 year old guys beefing up their nesteggs.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:11 AM
6

Must be nice having a taxpayer funded organization work to siphon away badly needed stimulus money from (male-dominated) sectors that needed it the most to (female-dominated) sectors that gained jobs during the same timeframe. That's right. Men pay the majority of taxes in this country. Men paid to help fund an organization that directly fucked them. Unemployed men have to read shit like this now.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:05 AM
1

You fire him and take one of the 20 guys off the street begging for the job in.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:00 AM
2

I just finished an article that discusses how the brain functions when you feed it information that contradicts a worldview it has (like telling a feminist MRA stuff). The areas that process logic start shutting down until you feed it stuff that reinforces that worldview. In other words, you put your g/f's brain into hibernation mode.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 06:56 AM
1

If you want a really good example for leading, look at Captain Picard in Enterprise:TNG. When you are doing it right, in a well established group, you sometimes can lead by just saying 'yes' or 'no' to the proposals of the members of your group. I'd like to stress these two points with some more trekkie nerdage. There was an episode of TNG where a situation forced Counselor Troi to be the ranking officer. She is a smart woman but obviously knew fuck-all about the technical issues they were in. I…
/r/seduction22/05/12 05:50 AM
2

First rule of martial arts: If you can avoid the fight, do so. The asshole could have a knife. He could have a gun. He could have six of his pussy friends hiding behind the corner waiting for the signal to come in for backup. So if even if you are winning, you could still lose. Big time. Like Chakosa said, talking your way out of a fight if pretty damn alpha in my opinion. It makes you look civilized. You are in control. You handle his irrational barbaric anger and easily-detected manipulation t…
/r/seduction22/05/12 05:33 AM
2

Plus you come off like the 40 year old virgin.
/r/seduction22/05/12 05:31 AM
4

2.Mentioning human centipede at all during a conversation does not work either. Using it as an opener is probably one of the worst you can do. Baby, I'd like to surgicially splice you and two other people together, mouth to anus, and have you be my pet. You know what you and your two friends have in common? Similar body types that go well in a HC combination. You ever see that movie Human Centipede? The hot chick that swallows the asian guys shit reminds me of you. Yeah, those go well.
/r/seduction22/05/12 05:27 AM
1

Gracias
/r/seduction22/05/12 03:18 AM
2

Good advice. I got another run at it this weekend with the same crowd (but hopefully some single ladies this time). Gotta keep the pressure on.
/r/seduction21/05/12 06:16 PM
1

Hey thanks for the advice. That makes a lot of sense because "interview mode" is pretty lame filler anyway.
/r/seduction21/05/12 05:58 PM
1

Thanks! I'm guessing this sudden burst of social energy was some kind of defense mechanism now that it's been a few days. Let's hope I learn how to summon it on command.
/r/seduction21/05/12 01:17 PM
4

It was her idea to go to my place first, then she'd walk home. As soon as we get to my apartment, immediately the mood changes. Her body language got really tense and she gave me pretty much a "Well, here you are, I'll get going." It sounds like she was serious about going to your place first then going home. She may be holding back for a reason that you can't control.
/r/seduction21/05/12 12:23 PM
3

We will discuss my insurance information...over drinks. Tonight.
/r/seduction21/05/12 11:42 AM
9

Bump the back of her car. "Baby, you going my way?"
/r/seduction21/05/12 11:34 AM
1

True. You lose your girlfriend's respect, it's only a matter of time before they dump your ass or cheat on you out of frustration.
/r/seduction21/05/12 11:06 AM
3

Or an angry territorial husband with an attitude (rightfully so).
/r/seduction21/05/12 10:35 AM
3

To add to your #1: "I want you to get into a fight with a stranger. And I want you to lose."
/r/seduction21/05/12 08:50 AM
2

You don't "lift women" by giving them gender-based boosts and hiding the fact boys are suffering. You target inequalities from a gender-neutral perspective and attack it that way. These feminist-based boosts will help women but will not disappear when women start outpacing men. Then you have an entitlement-complex similar to how the women are acting about a men's club in a college campus (even though women dominate college at 60%+ enrollment).
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:44 AM
6

Honestly? I read it for the inner game stuff. I had fuck-all confidence unless I was really drunk (which is not really confidence when you find out what you actually were like the next day). I never stood up for myself. I was always being pushed around by the people in my life. The confidence I built up over the last few months was what partially got me the courage to break it off when the shit hit the fan and I couldnt' take it anymore. I never had cheated or had any intentions of cheating whil…
/r/seduction21/05/12 08:36 AM
11

It's like Data became a PUA.
/r/seduction21/05/12 07:21 AM
8

Cardio Double-tap
/r/seduction21/05/12 07:10 AM
2

I learned this when taking martial arts. You can practice all you want, but it's nothing compared to being thrown in the ring and forced to use what you learned in a real fight. It's the same with this stuff. Read about inner game. Don't take notes or anything, but process it. Get the general idea of it all. Then go out there and be confident. Come back and reflect on what you did vs not do. Post a [FR] and get some feedback. Rinse and repeat. A healthy mix of theory and field-work is what you n…
/r/seduction21/05/12 06:34 AM
9

I think that would have been really creepy, but that's just my gut reaction of the idea. If I wave at someone and they pull a U-ey and start following me around that would scare the shit out of me.
/r/seduction21/05/12 06:09 AM
8

They have no escape!
/r/seduction21/05/12 06:08 AM
2

Light your cigar with one.
/r/seduction21/05/12 06:07 AM
4

Honestly? I wouldn't care about SRS if they kept their shit to themselves. It's when they pollute other subs and threads like some kind of Big Brother government PC agency that pisses me off.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 05:11 AM
10

She deserves every penny. After all, they dated for almost 8 years. That's EIGHT years of hard work and Mark totally couldn't have coded the brilliant facebook that brought a good chunk of the world together without her! So she deserves half! /s
/r/MensRights21/05/12 05:01 AM
8

I support equality, either way. If you want the death penalty gone, you want it gone for both genders. Saying "well it's progress if they protect women from it" means the feminist groups call it a victory and move on to the next "injustice."
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:58 AM
8

"Help generate revenue for our sports budget, but try not to rape anyone. Teehee!"
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:54 AM
2

It gives the target of all their hatred the chance to collaborate and share ideas. All it takes is one educated MRA with some speaking time to get the ball moving. This cannot happen. The feminist propaganda campaign in colleges all over america have worked too hard for something like this to come along and undermine their "training."
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:22 AM
3

Denying equal services smells like privilege to me.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:21 AM
1

Funny how the askfeminist post wasn't swapped originally for an accurate experiment.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:19 AM
0

Radfemhub advocates aborting any baby that's male. Your point?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:15 AM
7

Exactly. There's a difference between being drunk and flirting with a guy you thought was hotter and someone having sex with you while you're unconscious. This whole debate is just feminists trying to not only get out of false rape discussions, but to excuse women's bad sexual choices when drinking.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:51 PM
6

It's a bad time to be a young man in India.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:45 PM
2

Edit: Everything that happened was true, but now for the twist. It was a guy who this happend to.he and she should be reversed. still feel the same way? Cute SRS-style experiment. The genders weren't even swapped (making the male the victim) for the ask feminists post. So of course feminists will say it was rape. They see your edit and can say "well yeah it's still rape" to keep the moral high ground. No chance of catching them with their pants down. Unlike here where it was an obvious attempt t…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:40 PM
1

Depending on what time you go to places you may have to line up for ages only to get knocked backed. No offense, but if that ever happened to me I'd refuse to ever go there again. No club is worth spending some of my friday evening for a chance at getting in.
/r/seduction20/05/12 12:31 PM
5

Married guys not looking to cheat can still participate by: Giving advice (duh) Winging So I imagine there's a few of them out there.
/r/seduction20/05/12 12:28 PM
2

lol, good point. The best case is they harp elsewhere.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 09:53 AM
1

Such mating rituals are not just human based. I remember a documentory showing lizards (or at least reptiles and this shot was of a lizard). The male lizard keeps a tidy space. He removes fallen leaves from his space and keeps it clean. He collects things like bones and puts them in a big pile. Then he waits. A female appears. He starts to "show off" his prizes. He picks up each item and shows it to her, dropping it and repeating with each item. She carefully analyzes the entire package. If she …
/r/MensRights20/05/12 09:51 AM
1

Actually, what I see is a skinny guy with a lot of confidence, and this picture is telling us that it's bad when a "non-attractive" guy dares think he's above his "place." Also, yes, it's blatantly ignoring the fact that men have body issues as well (and even promoting the idea that an "ugly" guy should be more self-conscious)
/r/MensRights20/05/12 09:19 AM
1

That kind of marketing isn't just at women. That's a basic marketing strategy. Show the problem (even ones you didn't know existed or considered bad). This can be subtle or skipped sometimes. Show the solution (my product). Show happy people using product from every camera angle possible.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:54 AM
1

You have to think. What if the man gets asked questions like "Do you want time to yourself away from your wife? Do you enjoy time with the 'guys'? Do you respect every one of her friends?" If the guy doesn't jump the hoops just right, he may be deemed as psychologically unfit (AKA still too much his own person) for marriage. Unless he's rich then we'll just skip those questions.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:34 AM
29

Touche
/r/seduction20/05/12 06:59 AM
1

Guy must have a good smile? How the fuck is that possible?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 06:40 AM
1

Plus they always have cool stories to tell you while you drink your fine ale.
/r/seduction20/05/12 05:19 AM
16

Or: "I really regret asking her to dance."
/r/seduction20/05/12 05:15 AM
3

Ask more questions. Learn about conversation threading.
/r/seduction20/05/12 05:14 AM
2

CP was just the beginning. It gives the government the tools they crave (more control). Once it's set up, then obviously "hate sites" should be banned. What's a hate site? Whatever we disagree with, of course! Next step it's pro-terrorist sites because we don't want another 9/11. But what's a terrorist? Whatever we say is one.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:55 PM
13

A large guy can get a woman. He just has to be rich.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:59 AM
2

The Swedish Affirmative Action plan. Keep it to benefit women. Drop it when men need it.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:05 AM
0

Probably pissed off the wrong rich person.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:02 AM
2

Record the next encounter as evidence.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:02 AM
18

Because everywhere else on a college campus is a men's space! A space where you need permission from feminsts to have your own club. A space where women outnumber men across the board in college (except for a dwindling few degrees) yet women are considered "minorities." A space where you can't walk to a class without some poster telling you to stop raping and beating women.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:58 AM
13

Hey, that remark is offensive to all eunuchs out there.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:58 AM
4

Man writes obvious satire on female sexuality/agency-- MISOGYNY!! Even better. Man writes satire based on a misandric joke to put the shoe on the other foot. MISOGYNY! IT'S NOT FUNNY! WAHHH!
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:16 AM
1

Exactly. Any man that doesn't 100% trust his wife should have his head examined. How misogynistic of him! /s
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:09 AM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:47 PM
34

Can men get a mandatory paternity test before signing a birth certificates?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:18 PM
6

Lol, what a bet. Heads you keep your stuff (which has become "our" stuff), tails you lose half.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:13 PM
12

Yep. The white knight judge will say something like "hell hath no fury..." and let her walk away with nothing. Might even make a cute story in the local news with the newscasters giggling like idiots at the guy.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:34 AM
9

Only spoiled children throw tantrums to that degree. And yes, there are 25-30 year old children out there.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:19 AM
-1

I'll concede that white women have it far better than black women. I'll even say that white women have it better than white men at this point.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:18 AM
4

There's nothing wrong with marriage (other than the bridezilla demands). It's the divorce industry and family court schemes that need improvements.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:40 AM
8

How the hell is some online pledge "binding?"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:39 AM
21

I'm glad she took the time to lay evidence against her should he press charges (and he's a complete loser if he doesn't).
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:36 AM
21

Or "acting like a spoiled bitch child?"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:36 AM
5

PATRIARCHY!!!!
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:35 AM
5

Or Larry Summers shocking poor feminist women by saying that the gender gap in sciences could perhaps be explained by biological reasons (as in the genders are proficient at different things on average, not that one is better than the other)? That cost him his job, and some radical feminist took his place.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:34 AM
2

Live by the sword, die by the sword. The question is should we be swinging the sword in the first place.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:30 AM
1

Those situations concern young men a lot more than young women, who receive far more scholarship opportunities than men.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:29 AM
6

Bad or not, it seems one gender is allowed to legally be the vindictive bitch and steal property and the other isn't.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:38 PM
8

Nice to know my childhood crush wasn't wasted on a bad person. We knew [people were skittish] when they made us cut out a bunch about circumcision. To get a PG-13 rating we had to cut out the actual description of circumcision. So apparently it is very uncomfortable for people to hear how it works -- when you have to clamp on the foreskin, pull it over [the glans], and then slice it off. That is apparently really uncomfortable for people to hear. But I think it is important to know. America is t…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:32 PM
4

The double-think is strong with this group.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:18 PM
2

Nah, she believes that. Why? It gives her free reign to be as sexist as she wants without all the SRS-type flack politically incorrect groups get for doing the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:17 PM
1

but would likely be distressed smell Man Town. Go to my old gym sometime :)
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:49 PM
2

I think we're in agreement about the role of insurance companies. I'm for single payer. This system would benefit both genders.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:20 AM
6

Also, the vast majority of scholarships in this country are not race-specific and gender-specific Ah, but there ARE gender/race-specific scholarships adn they are perfectly fine...if they are politically correct. Remember the story about the $500 white-scholarship throwing everyone into a shitfit? I had to read essays about it in my fucking english lit book as an example of a persuasive essay (no political agenda there...). Every argument against it could have easily applied to a women's only sc…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:19 AM
4

Are they winning those scholarships because of their race? No. They are winning because they earned them. Don't get me wrong, I'm for helping people in lower socioeconomic settings. Not just because someone is a special color or gender, though. So if these groups happen to be african american, then more african americans will benefit. But it won't be because of their race.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:52 AM
0

Are there studies to show this? It's common sense. You have a business. You charge women more than men for this service because they consume more. Mr. Government says you must charge equal rates now. There's a few options: Increase men's premiums to that of women. Decrease women's slightly and increase men's slightly to equalize Decrease women's use of services. 1 means women pay the same, but men are being royally fucked. Women still consume more services. No wealth transfer from men to women, …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:48 AM
1

Women currently pay more health premiums because they are more expensive to insure. Just like men pay more car insurance. By forcing equal premiums in one area but ignoring another, you benefit women only. Men will have to pay higher premiums, on average, to pay for women's more expensive care. Throw in more freebies like birth control and you're essentially making men pay more for women's wellbeing. Hence the term wealth transfer. The "War on Women" in this context is the gall of religious busi…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:48 AM
0

I know how that might sounds You sound racist to me. Telling me to shut up based on the color of my skin. There are more subtle ways to hide your politically correct "I hate white menz" agenda.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:35 AM
1

In other words, broke-ass states increase efforts to rob the working class' politically correct targets.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:43 AM
1

That's just a mandatory circlejerk handout to keep the feminists happy. It's similar to how people on r/politics always say "I don't agree with Ron Paul but..." and then go on to say how they agree with some of his things.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:41 AM
1

How else do you get to that position He obviously didn't forget his white cisgendered male funpass that day they were handing out the new positions. /s
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:40 AM
2

In this economy, businesses can't afford to kick away good talent in the name of political correctness.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:38 AM
1

Yeah that smelled like pure projection to me.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:35 AM
5

You apply for college. Scholarship opportunities? Hmm...only the gender and race neutral ones. My white friend who was an eighth Hispanic qualified for more scholarships than me. And I got better grades than he did. Difficulty setting my ass.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:29 AM
1

This is what happens when the government rewards infantile behavior.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:26 AM
1

They should call them Mandles.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:13 AM
2

It's still private-insurance. Just that the government is forcing them to provide the services AND charge men and women equal premiums. IN other words, just another wealth transfer from men to women.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:13 AM
1

I don't fear committment. I fear the extreme lifestyle change (on my part only) when she stops committing.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:10 AM
1

Or maybe quick to marry? Most of the ex's in my life started pressuring me for a ring before we had everything sorted out. Let's just get married and figure it all out later(which translates to we're going to live where she wants to, and then we'll finally discuss kids)!
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:10 AM
3

"Don't kill people, citizen! That's my job!"
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:04 AM
1

Nah, I'm not a coal miner. I program computers for a living. But I studied my ass off in college so that I wouldn't end up in a job like that. It was just an example of a job that is completely male dominated and is not on the radar for the feminist "equality" brigade (except maybe getting their paychecks).
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:01 AM
1

Dude, you met the feminist that represents ALL women! You should have felt honored! /s
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:59 AM
3

I don't kwno where I stand on this one. Does MGTOW mean no sex at all? What about flings and friends with benefits (safe sex only, of course) and one night stands? If those are okay, then perhaps the 14 point checklist means a woman can only break the MGTOW spell if they pass all these qualifications. Since most women fall short of this (obviously), he's saying he is happy being single until Miss Perfect comes along. I can respect that and have no issues with women holding such standards either.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:57 AM
6

Yeah, but she COULD have children. So that makes her automatically stronger than any male. Ever. /s
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:52 AM
1

It's not just religion. US culture is pretty sickminded when it comes to MGM. Almost to the point where being uncut is "weird" and "gross." It's probably why the practice has more allies than just religious folk.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:06 AM
2

Agreed. Spend the year on yourself. Travel alone or with a few friends. Take weekend vacation adventures. Develop a hobby. Hit the gym and build self-esteem. Focus on your career. Enjoy the fact that every hour of your life is yours to command.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:24 AM
2

I respect people's decisions to live their lives the way they want, unless I disagree with it.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:18 AM
2

I don't think it's a problem as long as it's legal and you don't end up in jail right next to the "deadbead" dads (while she walks free, nonetheless).
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:17 AM
3

A few (male) players didn't like it and cited why. Selena caleld them "weenies" and played the "girls are better because pregnancy" card, despite acting like a child when a line judge makes a call she disagrees with as well as being beaten by a #203 ranked guy.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:26 AM
3

She can't handle a bad call, resorting to threatening line judges and throwing a shitfit when she gets in trouble about it.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:24 AM
7

Childbirth: An agonizing process that can be helped with massive amounts of drugs that lasts from 2 hours to multiple days. Or avoided altogether with c-sections. Coal mining: A dangerous job that affects your lungs, your back, your muscles that pays decently in a town with few other options and after decades of it, you're told to piss off.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:22 AM
5

I agree with that. But it should come with responsibilities on her side: It should be considered child abuse if the woman smokes, drinks, does drugs while pregnant. She shouldn't be entitled to his support if he doesn't want the child and she does and he lets her know within a reasonable time of her informing him of the pregnancy. And even then, there should be a paternity test required by law to prevent cuckolding. Edit: The guy/girl seems reasonable when I mentioned parental surrender with a r…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:17 AM
2

Nothing. The government profits multiple times by this system. It saves the government money as they offload the burden onto the nearest male. The local governments get more federal money the more child support cases they have Family courts profit from the lawyer battles. Private prisons are enjoying a new group of "customers" as men are being locked up when they can't pay the huge amounts of child support (job or not). In all honesty, all that you would have to do is force transparancy with the…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:14 AM
2

My ex (while we were dating) stalking my facebook account was pretty creepy. She spent more time on my profile than I did. God forbid a girl that's semi-attractive post something on my wall.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:11 AM
1

It's what happens when only one gender is allowed at the table for gender discussions.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:08 AM
2

The surfer dudes in Point Break maybe?
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:31 AM
3

They were charged more because they cost more. Just like auto insurance is set up right now. Our problem with this is the same with most other feminist issues: they only want to fix inequalities for women while ignoring men's inequalities...then keep trying to hijack the discussion by saying "feminists are for equality for both genders!"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:30 AM
5

More benefits paid for by men. The feminist way.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:29 AM
2

I'm late 20's and I already got the fuck out. Overseas right now, earning taxfree income and pocketing every cent of it. And insurance is provided for me as part of my contract.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:26 AM
4

•Men will be charged more for health insurance so that women can be charged less. And that's not even counting all the freebie goodies they are fighting to force insurance carriers to provide.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:25 AM
8

That's different. Men need auto insurance more so they should pay more...wait.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:24 AM
4

And even then, childbirth pain can be handled by doing C-sections.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:37 AM
16

No, that's the day where leaders gather around and bash deadbeat dads and tell the rest of dads to man up. /s
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:18 AM
2

Nightclubs are fun. It's an easy way to break the ice with women, plsu dancing kicks ass (even if you suck at it). Don't be chump, don't buy women drinks, don't put up with anyone's shit, show a little backbone, and you're in.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 08:56 AM
8

Hell, I always noticed that if Ebert hated the movie it usually turned out to be pretty good.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 05:24 AM
6

ACLU hid behind the religious excuse in San Francisco when a bill was coming around to ban it.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:01 AM
7

MUTILATING MY SONS GENITALS IS MY RIGHT AS A PARENT. In all seriousness, the ACLU chose this position over protecting children. Funny how they react in horror at the suggestion of doing the same for females. Note: I disagree with any non-medical reason (as in urgent, not some imaginary risk later on) to circumcise boys or girls.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:00 AM
1

When old white women go to Jamacia and talk to John St. Cock for some fucky-fucky.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:57 AM
8

"My dad worked his ass off in a dangerous job so I could go to college and hate men professionally. Because he coped with alchohol and 'dominated' at home means the patriarchy needs to be destroyed." I'm assuming when she says "dominate but not physically" she means he comes home after being bitched at all day by his boss and refused to take shit from his spoiled wife and daughter. In other words, he refused to be dominated at home as well.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:49 AM
13

Same with "reverse racism."
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:45 AM
13

Keep in mind that Ed lost all his muscle mass he gained for American History X for Fight Club. He is supposed to be the "normal" early 30's male. Also, Brad Pitt isn't real. It's who Ed wishes he looked like. "All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I fuck like you wanna fuck, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not." You could argue that Ed was lashing out at that sign because he still has that mentality himself. E…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:42 AM
1

First date should always be something light and friendly, like coffee. I refuse to "wine and dine" some random chick just because she has blessed me with her company. For the record, all my g/f's have refused to take my money on the first (light) date. Afterwards, we took turns just to avoid the hassle of dividing out the bill (which in busy restaurants adds yet another lenghtly return trip from the staff to get you out of there).
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:03 PM
3

Must be nice to have your genitalia protected from barbaric rituals, religious or not.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 05:23 AM
1

He won because he never invaded Russia in the summer.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 04:43 AM
2

Find those articles talking about that doctor who supports female circumscision for the same reasons we're hearing about male circumscision. Compare and contrast. Let the audience figure out their biases all on their own.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 04:26 AM
2

Feminist advocacy groups and hardline feminists like Gloria Allred not so much. big feminism Those groups are the ones with the power to enact change. The rest of the "little feminists" simply go along with it, even if they disagree with some of it in principle.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 04:24 AM
3

Divorce courts mirror society: More women are paying alimony now [than before].
/r/MensRights12/05/12 04:23 AM
5

What I really find annoying is that men pay more service charge for buying an online ticket. Really?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:37 PM
1

Jack and Broke.
/r/seduction10/05/12 02:16 PM
1

Peanut Butter Brottle
/r/seduction10/05/12 01:16 PM
2

Brosel Sprouts?
/r/seduction10/05/12 09:16 AM
2

No, but you are taught every way that men judge women. Looks, thinness, etc.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:04 AM
1

Urinals help, as well.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:03 AM
1

I believe r/equality is on your side. The radical political correct feminist implying that only white people can be racist and men can be sexist is downvoted to shit.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:16 AM
1

29, IT; Applications Development. Just want to say it's nice having an MRA in the law enforcement department.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:10 AM
1

I went to an all-boys high school as well. The only gripe I had was that it was a Catholic one (which actually made me less religious the more I was exposed). Otherwise, it was far easier to express yourself in an all-male classroom. The courses were tailored to how boys learned, was more tolerable of boys being boys (within reason), and it was just an overall more friendly atmosphere. College is one thing, but I'd much rather put my (hypothetical) son in an all-boys learning environment at an e…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:04 AM
1

That's not a symptom of "equality." Equality is equality. However, mainstream feminists (and even the feminists back in teh 1900's) only focus on half the problem (where women fall short compared to men). Early feminists fought for real inequalities like the right to vote (but forgot about the draft). Today's feminists fight for equal representation in STEM fields even though they outnumber men in colleges as a whole (more opportunities) and have no problem getting into STEM fields (in fact it's…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:58 AM
8

Typical feminist propaganda to lump r/mensrights with r/jailbait. Welcome to the machine.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:54 AM
4

There's that male privilege showing up again, especially on college campuses where everywhere but a few threatened areas are male-only spaces, men are outnumbed by women 3 to 2, and the smallest whisper from a woman gets a man thrown in jail. Not only that, but the idea of punishing innocent men is not horrifying but debatable.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:39 AM
4

"I'm fine with white supremacy. White supremacy 4ever!"
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:36 AM
1

she would have gone back to find Gaston At the bottom of the cliff, no less.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:30 AM
1

Agreed. For a beast, he actually was pretty graceful (with some dancing lessons and whatnot) and had decent charisma.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:28 AM
3

Nor would you. Gender (aka Women) Studies is a whitewashed version of gender theory that completely favors women.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:28 AM
1

Really handsome, good natured dude is captured by an ugly hag woman-beast. Lol, that sounds like the Stephen King book "Misery" except he doesn't fall for her.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:27 AM
0

Surrounded by trinkets that she deems worthy (in this case, books).
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:25 AM
1

How did I have so many typos in one post? Thank you, good sir/madam.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:20 PM
1

I've heard the same, which I find hilarious. We're both dirty on average, but let's (as always) focus on men!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:55 AM
1

Though it does seem wholly ineffective. Agreed. No one is going to tell me how to urinate. I am perfectly capable of not making a mess and will not be treated like a child because some others can't handle it.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:38 AM
5

Shit, with white knight bouncers right there? You'd be carted off to prison for at least 5 years.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:28 AM
1

After a long trawl I found this Guess you didn't search as long as you thought: Aussieland Canada Restaurant There's mention of Swedish feminists in a university pushing for it but I can't find any news articles on it at the moment, but I'll keep looking. Next time, I suggest you keep your insults to yourself and act like an adult.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:27 AM
3

I'm guessing it counters the upvote bots (digg had a huge problem with this one).
/r/MensRights09/05/12 09:39 AM
7

But he punched her window! He made her "uncomfortable!" What kind of animal makes a woman uncomfortable and a little scared after she decks him in the face? /s
/r/MensRights09/05/12 09:38 AM
3

"Everywhere outside our women's only club is a male safe space!" Inside this "male safe space" are nothing but harrassing signs like this.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 09:29 AM
3

It's the feminist's desperate and ongoing attempt to latch onto the Civil Rights movement and be lumped in with actual minorities.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:40 AM
1

No need to downvote. What I'm saying is that she's saying to the wives: "Think about yourself!" and to the husbands: "Think about your wife!"
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:27 AM
1

That decade includes down time for the training + actually working with the six figures carrying you until you are back where you should be. However, a lot of ex's like to use that money to do even less than they were doing before and completely suck off their ex's tit.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:13 AM
1

To be fair, at least they are still trying to persuade instead of "forgetting" their BC pills.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:48 AM
4

That only applies to men.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:48 AM
1

I hope the GOP is happy with their "War on Women." They'll most likely lose the election and the pendulum will swing even further in favor to women. Prepare for 70/30 gender split in schools, man-taxes, forced-equal premiums if women had to pay more, and more to come!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:48 AM
3

The white knight role was part of a social contract between teh genders. Men protected women and brought home the bacon, women took care of men (in the home, etc). Women weren't expected to be tough, that was a man's job. Of course, feminism tore apart theri side of the contract while "forgetting" about men. They like having their cake and the taste of it as well. Tear up both sides of the contract (and stop bitching about where the "good men" have gone)! MGTOW is about tearing up the other side…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:44 AM
1

I smell projection. Jesus, if a woman ever said I was in a "cult" I'd ask her to define that term.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:32 AM
1

She should be payed somewhat like the unemployment system would pay her, for a certain period of time, until at which point you could cut ties because she didn't get a job. Agreed. She shouldn't be getting millions of dollars of mommy-support. One check of 6 figures is PLENTY to get her going. Think about it. That's enough to enroll in school, pay all the bills, and completely focus on her own career for at least a decade of absolutely comfortable living.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:32 AM
1

There are many women that choose this route. The problem is that it's completely up to them. The gun is pointed at the man, and it's up to her to fire or not. This is not fair. If she wants more than 50/50 custody, she should have to prove why (and not the "i felt threatened" bullshit either). Otherwise, default 50/50.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:29 AM
3

Just don't crunch the red and blue up and snort it. You're gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:27 AM
11

No job and no car? The boyfriend is supporting everyone, I take it? If she snatches the kid (not just joint custody but near-full custody), prepare for the child support.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:24 AM
11

I believe it's the fact that the SRS anti-mensrights propaganda machine is backfiring. People are hearing how horrifying we are, come in out of curiosity, see how it's not horrifying but reasonable, then some sign up.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:21 AM
5

Which is why some radical bored feminists in Europe are trying to get the act of pissing standing up banned. Because it's not fair that men can do it faster.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:19 AM
2

The end-all-be-all of excuses to keep men out. It makes them feel "uncomfortable." Amazing how much legislation is based on the comfort-levels of women, isn't it?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:04 PM
1

Husbands: ME ME ME ME ME! Wives: ME ME ME ME ME ! FTFY
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:58 PM
11

Only to brats that love being offended.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:53 PM
1

I think if you get banned from SRS you should get a badge.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:58 AM
11

Fuck, that person deleted the post. What was it?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:57 AM
2

I agree with everything you said. What I said is my guess is to why they are so hostile to men racing.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:47 AM
1

Even Lisa has some pretty big flaws in her personality. Yeah, a 40 year old feminist stuck in a 9 year old body. To be fair, she probably would be that old if she was allowed to age from the beginning of the show.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:27 AM
2

Because they are afraid a woman will never win the race.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:23 AM
3

Tell 'em, Steve-Dave!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:07 AM
4

But this way you reduce HIV as well as give beauty cream companies more supply for Oprah!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:04 AM
1

Children is a deal-breaker. I wanted kids, and she didn't. She wanted me to provide, pay all the bills, pay off her debt. She didn't want to do shit but sit around the house and write (and do whatever little chores is necessary since I'm not a sloppy person). And on top of all that, we didn't agree with kids. When she found out it was a deal breaker, she started letting things slip out like "I wish I was barren" and "I'd abort any baby we had." That's her choice and I respect it, but that doesn'…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:31 AM
4

I would never expose myself to all the risks of marriage just to pay off someone's debt for a degree they aren't even using. She has to work at least long enough to pay off all her debts herself as well as cover a good portion of the bills. If kids enter the picture, that's a different discussion. That being siad, I still would prefer someone that pulled their own weight around. My ex not only didn't want to work, she didn't want kids either. Over many nights, I asked myself "what's the fucking …
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:39 AM
1

As long as it doesn't work too well while your target politely excuses herself so that you and cockblocker can get to know each other better.
/r/seduction08/05/12 07:01 AM
1

Any movement for "equality" was never about helping men. Sweden is a prime example as they dropped the gender-neutral affirmative action policies the minute men needed them (women were and still are an overwhelming majority of college students). The reason? No man should get in college over a qualified woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:16 AM
2

They need a men's center becasue that will be the one place on campus where men aren't shamed for being male by sexists like this.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:47 AM
6

The only people freaking out about this are those that falsly associate equality with women's perks. They've never seen anything to tell them otherwise. Girls-only scholarship to a college 60% female already? Ah that's equality. Girls-only gym class and a co-ed for the guys? Equality! Girls-only college clubs and women's centers? Equality! Men's Center? SEXIST!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:46 AM
1

Lol, "Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" right at the top of the article. THAT'S probably a clue as to why men run away from you screaming. The first part of the article (other than the misandry snuck in towards the beginning) isn't that bad. Both genders are more selfish these days. Of course, midway through it, the author dismisses female selfishness outright and focuses on men. There's another clue as to why she's alone.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:36 AM
2

Don't forget 5: Get bored and divorce the man, taking half of everything he's worked for, and most of everything the both of you worked for, keep the kids, and get child support, THEN continue doing whatever you want.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:33 AM
2

Yeah, one of the shows even focuses on women killing men. The commericals are hyper-sexualized and basically shows the female murderer in a good light. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:51 AM
3

It's a test to see how she reacts. An ex wanted to stay home, write, and do basically fuck-all while I worked my 40-50 hour/week job and paid all the bills. I told her absolutely not. Should we get married, she works as well. She had school loans. There's no way in fuck I'd work harder to pay off HER debt for a degree that she didn't even use.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:50 AM
1

Political correctness was never about ending bigotry and racism. It was about ending bigotry and racism among the groups not in the politically-correct circle. If you're inside the circle, it's fair game to both: Be publicly and openly proud of your group. Hate on the politically-incorrect groups.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:37 PM
1

Most likely this: She wanted to play "Let's you and him fight." She was "afraid" of the violence that ensued, knowing it was partly her fault (instead of grabbing you and demanding you both just leave). She projected this fear onto you.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:48 PM
3

Same here! I demand the mods give us badges!
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:45 PM
2

I'm #69 baby. You know what that means? Fuck-all.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:45 PM
5

Sounds like western feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:29 PM
11

That's right, kids. A baby boy gets butchered and bleeds to death? We're not focusing enough on women's genitalia. *headdesk
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:26 PM
1

Someone feels threatened by our existence. The real push for equality can do that to someone in the privileged world of political correctness.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:12 AM
2

Profit. Family courts and child support agency gets to justify itself by destroying another family. Kids more likely to go to jail = profit for private prisons Father more likely to go broke and be thrown in debt jail = profit for private prisons. Mother is "independent" = profit for Lifetime writing a documentory on her "struggles."
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:06 AM
2

What a waste of fine rage comic characters.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:05 AM
5

At least The Stand was fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:04 AM
1

If that happens then he MUST be guilty of something. /s
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:03 AM
2

By reading that comment, I didn't give Jezebel any more ad revenue.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:35 AM
2

Yeah, the writer let her humanity slip out for a second and quickly politically-corrected it.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:33 AM
0

I don't want to generalize, but I've been with a few girls who hated just about every one of my friends and bitched everytime I chose to go out with them for a guy's night out rather than sit in the house trapped with her on the couch watching TV. They always had friends coming into the relationship but started to neglect them more and more until I was the only one keeping their social meter high. And how dare I not do the same thing with my friends, right?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:31 AM
3

Or maybe, just maybe, Oliver is a dumbass kid who hates reading. Or maybe, just maybe, Oliver has always been force-fed girl-friendly books that schools love to use these days. Gone are Huckleberry Finn or Tom Sawyer. To be replaced with female-centric topics and characters that bore most young boys to death.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:18 AM
2

Projection. Mensrights groups contain some angry males, sure. But radfemhub blows anything I've seen over here right out of the water.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:21 AM
7

When they manipulate their friends to getting us semi-labeled a hate group by their other feminist-buddies, it's gone past trolling.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:58 PM
2

Fair enough. I know the idea and have practiced a few times, but I drive an automatic at the moment.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:31 PM
3

If I move to Europe, I'll learn.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:21 PM
7

I saw that one as well. So the fuck what? Unless you live in the mountains, that's not a fucking lifeskill requirement anymore. Yeah it's a nice to have just in case you need to drive one in a bind, but a fucking man-requirement?
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:47 PM
6

The wiggle room is that when there's a difference that makes women superior to men, it's applicable. If the difference makes men look better, it's pseudo-science bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:58 AM
3

If I sit a woman in a room and tell her "My partner has your husband, three kids, and your goldfish tied up and gagged in your house. If you do not have sex with me right now, I will call my partner and tell him to execute them one by one." If she willingly concedes to sex and doesn't scream or fight back, that's still rape. Even if it was all a bluff. At least I think that's non-forcible rape. Rape by duress, if that's a different category.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:08 AM
23

I'm assuming stemgang's post above is sarcasm.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:02 AM
3

Agreed. The internet is helping the MRA idea get around much quicker than anything. But it won't be long before some feminist government in Australia decides that MRA is a hate group and all websites associated with it should be censored (China-style).
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:00 AM
9

1 If you want to see real oppression, go to the Middle East. The strawman implies that we should forget ALL issues with women here because of the Middle East having it worse. Isn't that the same shit feminists throw at MRA's because we apparently have it better than them anyway so we should ignore all our own problems? 2 How can women expect us to respect them when they won’t respect themselves? Asking women to respect themselves in order to ‘earn’ the right to be treated like a human being is t…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:56 AM
3

Not if the religion involved is popular. ACLU threw baby boys under the bus to protect the Jewish tradition.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:47 AM
3

Apparently, the response was laughter. The problem is bigger than just one misandrist.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:44 AM
13

Throw a punch? Seriously? Nothing turns a woman like this on more than playing "Let's you and him fight."
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:41 AM
14

They want a dominant man in the bedroom, submissive everywhere else.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:40 AM
58

God damn, if I ever have a child I will have to learn some martial arts. Not to defend against criminals, but white knight abductions.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:35 AM
16

"We got arrested for being black on a Friday night. It was a misdemeanor, so I thought we'd be out right away."
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:32 AM
39

Even if you're driving a shitty car and white in a white upper-class neighborhood, you're also "suspcisious." My college roommate drove an 80's malibu and his parents were decently well off. He always had cops conveniently going his way (even through a drive-thru as a test).
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:31 AM
29

Sorry, but if I risk going to jail because a mother screams that I molested her child publicly while I walked him twenty feet to the nearest security booth, it's not worth it. Is it fair? No. Would I rather help the kid? Yep. Am I going to risk my career, and (if I were to marry) my family over it? No. Let a woman help the kid and not suffer the same risks.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:26 AM
1

This is where everyone else comes to our anti-MGM posts, flips the genders, and spouts the points out in opposition to this.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:23 AM
3

Be that as it may, it just makes it that more obvious that the justice system was perverted for political reasons. I may not agree with his political views but no man should be jailed in a maximum security prison for this.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:20 AM
3

I refuse to believe a "routine criminal check" was the reason for this. 45 years and a successful career and this never came up? No, this was political to get him out of the way.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:17 AM
58

I have left scared children alone to fend for themselves because of this attitude. Hope those careless moms are happy.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:14 AM
1

Unless your spelling and grammar are atrocious, 20% of a complicated lab shouldn't involve that in a high level technical course. We are forced to take English Comp and Technical Writing for that flavor of nitpicking. That requirement is there to give the non technical bullshitters a boost.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:06 AM
6

Or competition.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:28 PM
8

it is men who should pay the price for that privilege by getting circumcised. Men should be cut near birth so they don't have the means to bitch about it. Men should not have a birth control pill, only women can have that freedom. Should she get pregnant (deliberately or not), men will not have a say in any part of the decision. Should she carry the baby to term, men will pay for that choice. Either directly (child support) or indirectly (taxpayers that are 70% men). Should men marry and she get…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:21 PM
9

Being that she's in college...she has more privileges than men have rights.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:01 PM
8

They have answers. Apex fallacy answers, but they are there. Then I hear about not enough women in the military while "forgetting" the draft policy.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:00 PM
4

Yep. That man earned at least two headache-excuses for the evening.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:58 AM
0

It came back in college where, even in the stemmist of STEM-fields, they started demanding essays. Any excuse to make you write a paper. And a big chunk of the grade was spelling/grammar (like 20%). Guess which gender benefited from that random-ass requirement? Nothing like writing about analyzing one sorting algorithm vs another and seeing red ink on your paper marking grammar mistakes. What the fuck. Um, this is a computer science course. Why not put another lab in and let us apply something w…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:54 AM
1

Funny how in France, a man can be fined for not putting out for his wife on demand.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:25 AM
1

In 2009 MADD took in $41,006,038 and paid salaries of $20,537,936, over half of their income. source Of course they'll expand their justification for existence. There's money to be made!
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:24 AM
7

No, I've heard this one: The rights of the child are violated when you get their DNA without consent. Never mind MGM which is far worse than a pin-prick for a blood sample.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:22 AM
2

Yeah, I mean if a teacher is worried that a six year old boy can overpower them and make them feel threatened, then they need a different job.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:37 AM
3

Don't take this the wrong way, I don't see the fact that it's specifically females being shown as abusers as progress - I see the fact that both genders are now being shown as abusers as progress. It's not only that. It's the fact that women are shown as abusers at all. Usually, it's the same formula of man--bad-woman-good. If the story goes to show her as the villain and he did nothing to "justify" her "reaction," than that is progress as it educates people that it's not only possible but wrong…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:34 AM
7

It's just an example of feminism hijacking a greater movement for their own benefit. Why do people say we should restrict condom sales so men can experience what it's like for women? News flash, we don't have birth control Even better, men already have to buy the condoms. Women will be handed BC to them for free (well, with forced-equal premiums, men will indirectly have to buy THAT part of birth control on top of their condom purchases).
/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:24 AM
3

At least Spencer's is known as a joke and gag gift store.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:24 AM
1

Apparently he or she did do shit about it since you ran and deleted your troll comment.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:21 AM
4

Funny. If Salma Hayek wasn't considered physically attractive by "weak" and "strong" men alike, she wouldn't have a fucking job in that industry. Anybody see her on Saturday Night Live? Most of her skits involved pimping her own movie over another competing one. Way to be entertaining...
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:17 AM
3

I highly doubt this is real if the name of the livejournal is "miss andrist." Most feminists deny misandry altogether.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:22 AM
3

Such anti-male culture will, I think, eventually bring back the technical school business. I know it's still around now, but the diploma-dependent job market may turn into a skills-dependent job market where if you are certified (college degree or not), then you have a shot at the job. College is great, but this kind of cancer on it is only hurting the idea. With student loans, scholarships helping uppder middle class women over poor men, and fluff degree requirements, it may not even be worth i…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:18 AM
1

"does not take into account marginalized or subordinate men" Funny, most of these white girl upper-middle-class princesses never give two shits about marginalized women unless it will benefit them directly (more blindly-female-based perks, for example).
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:15 AM
1

How dare you give the second class citizens a spot at the front of the bus? Are you fucking insane?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:10 AM
11

Men should be allowed to discriminate against males just as much as women! Where are the MRA's for this poor man? /s
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:09 AM
3

Makes you wonder if they would freak out if they discovered one of the yoga students was a lesbian.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:14 AM
2

Apex Fallacy is the short answer to your question. That's what kills me about the feminists in OWS. They don't mind the 1% running everything, they just want more women with the whips.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:00 AM
1

Feminists are just taking advantage of this perceived "war on women" to get as much taxpayer-subsidized goodies as possible. They already got equal premiums in health insurance (even though they use more than men). Yet another wealth transfer from men to women in the bank. The whining won't stop after the election, but will become much less effective.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:59 AM
1

who actually thinks that women's business ideas are more worthy of funding? If a woman's business has a good idea worthy of funding, she'll get it. The problem is that women's businesses aren't pulling their creative weight but want "equal funding" anyway.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:55 AM
1

Even the actual rapists seem to get away with it a lot more than the male equivalent.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:53 AM
1

It's not just business. Think of the OWS protests. Men and women built it up, organized it, did all teh groundwork, and were the first out there. Feminists came rushing in after it was established and attempted to hijack it, carve out "safe spaces" (besides their own basements where they have been dwelling with Lfietime on for decades now, or the curves gym, or their hotel floors, or their old girls' clubs in work, etc). Or the German Pirate Party. Men and women (mostly men) laid the ground work…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:51 AM
3

ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO! /s
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:48 AM
1

Never. If the whining stops, then the government (with the big hardon for deficit reducing) will start noticing all this feminist bloat in the budget. Same with schools. It's like building a sandcastle with the tide rising. You have to keep adding more sand to it or nature will run its course.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:47 AM
6

"He's violating our girls' only club safe space! I wanna wear tight pants that show my ass without a guy potentially staring at it!"
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:45 AM
30

Feminists were smart to conquer education (especially YOUNG education). That's where the reprogramming is most effective. If you teach boys they are worthless as young as possible, it's more likely to stick and let the girls succeed over them. It also is more likely to produce male lapdogs like this piece of work.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:40 AM
21

Never went through that abuse, but I am very familier with teachers always telling us how girls did something better than boys (but NEVER vice versa). "We all know girls are better than boys at handwriting" was one that I remember hearing. Nothing like all the girls looking at the boys with smirks of superiority. But don't you DARE tell the girls that boys are better than them at something. That's just sexist and hurts their development!
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:39 AM
18

*pat pat Who's a good male feminist? WHO'S A GOOD BOY?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:36 AM
1

Men can't do anything! Right, grrls? /s
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:23 AM
2

Exactly. This entire shitstorm is just to distract us from the real issues that neither party want to discuss. The debt, the economy, the endless wars, etc. Political feminists are loving it because while the country is in desperate need of solutions to federal issues, both parties are wasting a shitload of time and money on them instead.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:52 AM
4

But it's okay because it's MALE circumcision. HIV rates or something...
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:49 AM
1

Well done! Keep up the good fight!
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:30 AM
2

If you click on "related" for this story, you'll see comments from redditors reacting in horror about the idea of a female baby being cut. Amazing mental gymnastics when you substitue male for female, though.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:04 AM
6

Breastfeeding. Always an interesting debate. On one hand, you have men and women who prefer not to see that sort of thing in public. What's the response? IT'S A NATURAL ACT AND I'LL DO IT WHEREVER THE FUCK I WANT, ASSHOLE! Usually is followed by some kind of homosexual slant because I may not want to see a tit in public. On the other hand, you have women "uncomfortable" doing it around men. Instead of, I don't know, doing it at home or using a bottle, they demand men go away. Heaven forbid their…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:06 AM
1

Breaking Bad. Walter, a few slipups aside, acts like a very mature and caring parent to his children. There are scenes where he's holding his newborn baby girl with such a blissful look on his face. He changes diapers and all that fun stuff as well (and does it with skill). Surprisingly rare in today's media.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:36 AM
1

Empowering women by still fixating on men (even if just the act of beating them up for petty reasons). Sounds mature to me. Reminds me of a child that's mad at one of his parents, but still follows them around the mall.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:34 AM
2

Exactly. Is that so hard to understand? However, in this case, a card for herself still means he's footing the bill.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:16 AM
10

If women are uncomfortable about breastfeeding around me, they should do it at home or get a fucking bottle.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:05 AM
2

She has no right to tell you what to do. Especially treating you like her spoiled brat child.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:03 AM
3

This attitude in society is the #1 cause for all family court biases. It's why mommy gets the child in the divorce unless she was caught doing meth.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:56 AM
1

I don't have any beef with the leave time. I am more concerned about the educational opportunities of men in Sweden. However, it is more "equal" in Sweden than it is anywhere else, where guys are lucky to have the fucking weekend when their child is born.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:44 AM
4

Headline smells like Apex Fallacy.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:29 PM
4

Wikipedia has been compromised as a tool since feminists trashed the MRA articles.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:25 PM
1

The trouble is that egalitarian feminists are often filled with subconscious anti-male bias and beliefs that they slip into partisan feminism: Hence the term "egalitarian feminist." Egalitarian when it serves to benefit women, feminist when it serves to benefit men.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:03 PM
1

However teaching people, esepcially kids that gender doesn't exist through the use of language will eventually lead them in a position where they are unable to disciminate based upon gender. True, but established teaching practices currently favor girls. I'm talking about ending recess, Title IX'ing away boy's sports, less competition and more cooperation (girls thrive in all these cases). By removing gender, there's no way to fix these issues or even address them logically (probably the point o…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:41 PM
1

Double-edged sword. My guess is that there will be no gender where men could benefit, but leave gender in place (AA quotas in hiring, etc) where women will gain.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:23 AM
2

Strange enough that this idea came from the education community. An area women virtually conquered decades ago and reconstructed to suit their needs.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:24 AM
1

Yet he would most likely be alive if it wasn't for the stab wound. But that clearly doesn't matter if it was a woman doing the stabbing. He probably deserved it, right?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:21 AM
2

An architect and the construction worker need each other to make a building, but one architect is worth more than a construction worker because which one is easier to replace and train up?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:12 AM
7

Two years ago the World Economic Forum designated Sweden as the most gender-equal country in the world. It boasts the highest proportion of working women in the world and allow for 480-day parental leaves — of which 60 days are reserved for dads. That doesn't sound very gender-equal to me. That sounds like "girls have it better here in more ways than normal." Affirmative action policies in colleges were gender-neutral, but were abolished the minute men needed them (since women are 60% of college…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:06 AM
2

And his current wife got her money the same way.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:01 AM
1

I can see assets acquired during the marriage being split. But whatever he came in with, he should leave with and vice versa.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:58 AM
1

is marriage even necessary in todays environment? Not really. These days, all a woman has to do is rape a man (or lie about BC), get pregnant and sick the family court goons on him for huge child support payments.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:56 AM
2

A male child doesn't even have the right to bodily integrity. Do you think that getting paternity information is really that big of a deal?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:53 AM
5

I wouldn't marry a woman that refused to sign an ironclad pre-nup.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:51 AM
1

When it benefits women, it will happen.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:47 AM
1

www.regender.com Been around for a long time, blatantly copied by the SRSisters (forgot their copycat addon or site).
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:44 AM
1

And he'd get it, too. One way or the other.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:43 AM
2

Someone that condons barbarism when it suits them (ie against a man because of what he did to a woman).
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:42 AM
81

Ms. Lane is a bit of a cunt. I'm sure she's upset by being called that, but if she was secure that she wasn't a cunt, she wouldn't be threatened by it.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:39 AM
15

Don't forget scapegoats (patriarchy, the menz, women who disagree are just brainwashed, etc).
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:31 AM
2

No, we were talking about 1920 Quick, point to a time where women were blatantly oppressed and use it against the other side discussing the present. Tried and true method of distraction. Yes you didn't have the right to vote. That doesn't mean you didn't have privileges. Like not being dragged into a war. In fact, you made fun of men who didn't want to go. That is something I call privilege. They're. Both. Wrong. Agreed. Feminism fought for the rights that benefitted women, but left the one that…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:27 AM
4

But to mention any of them is sexist and causes more slut walks. What a world we live in where a protest occurs when someone tries to assign responsibility to a woman.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:15 AM
2

My point is that men still ruled over women. The rights for citizens were incomplete, and forced enlistment is wrong, but women were denied most fundamental human rights (most of all, personal agency). Feminism got fundamental rights for women. Men are still forced into a draft or lose benefits that women get for free. To say "forced enlistment is wrong" and dismiss it after that means you don't care (screw you, I've got mine). This isn't a pissing contest, but for the OP to make a statement abo…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:12 AM
1

Yes it's fair. I would ask for one. In fact, I would demand one. If she gets insulted, boo-fucking-hoo. If it comes up as actually my child, I won't apologize for asking (no matter what glare I get from her). I'd rather do all this than raise someone else's child with me knowing. Anyone that argues against this is essentially arguing for cuckolding.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:40 AM
14

IT'S NOT THE SAME AS RAPE! *closes ears and starts singing
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:39 AM
39

TIL Feminists need to manufacture fear to justify itself and took the strategy right from the neocon playbook.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:37 AM
2

A year later and she still can't woman up and move on with her life. What a loser.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:14 AM
0

While I agree with this, if one gender is restrained so should the other. Perhaps when both genders are treated equally will we allow restrictions to loosen up again.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:12 AM
3

Good lord. This person sounds like they have an opinion and refuse to hear any different. You were polite, you cited many sources, and all she had to say was "MUST BE NICE BEING A MAN!" and then later on admitting she works 40 hour weeks with three day weekends! No wonder she got paid less.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:54 AM
3

You're still in high school. These girls know nothing of the real world and are only parroting what they heard. They will grow old alone if they keep it up, but there's nothing wrong with that (until they get pissy that there's no good men left).
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:51 AM
3

I'm usually Democrat/left, but I really wish the established party would back away from feminism. It's getting pretty damn annoying.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:48 AM
2

It's not just the child support system. It's the fact that she's rewarded with free money, one way or the other. The government is just defending it's budget by pointing guns at the nearest male and offloading the burden onto him. Now what's wrong with this? These single moms that get on Oprah and talk about how strong and independent they are and how they have the hardest job in the world.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:21 AM
2

No, it's privileged for her to act "offended" or "insulted" that you dare question her beliefs and not have her laughed out of the room.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:19 AM
1

And before 1920, you were handing men white feathers if they didn't want to go to war. Your point?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:46 AM
4

Thankfully, this particular bit of propaganda didn't go unchallenged.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:45 AM
3

A bunch of grown women acting like high school brats in their Old Girls' Club, going back on what they agreed to, catfighting over it, then quickly blaming men and "male-dominated" political culture to excuse their behaviors.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:26 AM
4

SRS is a ban-happy circlejerk that hides their bigotry in a thinly-veiled claim of it being satire. The only way to survive in that sub is to completely toe the line and study up on the memes. That's it. Since there's no room for discussion, there's no way it will ever change.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:15 AM
5

Stop ripping open old wounds just for victim-points, okay? Focus in the present.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:09 AM
4

All hetero-sex is rape. No woman would want one of those disgusting symbols of oppression inside her, anyway. /s
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:07 AM
1

Ha! Nice one!
/r/seduction29/04/12 02:53 PM
8

It is, but it looks like it worked for him by caving. He DID give a beer to another friend so it would have come off as a total douche move to not give one to her.
/r/seduction29/04/12 12:57 PM
3

Let's then watch these people try to defend all male spaces when there exists the equivalent for women. Let's watch these people try to defend all female spaces when there doesn't exist the equivalent for men. My friend, thanks for the popcorn. But I must say the rationalization-hamster has already spun us a lovely tale explaining this one. Allow me: You see, everywhere that's not a female space is a male space. We run 99% of the college campus (at 45% of the representation and dropping fast). W…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:56 AM
1

While I agree with this rally, the article predictably hides the fact that the majority of workplace deaths are men and played the creative pronoun game to avoid mentioning that fact.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:08 AM
5

Title IX for the men, handicaps for the women. Got it.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:54 AM
1

This entire scheme cannot be for the welfare of the children. How can a man in jail pay child support? The only ones to gain from this are the private prisons.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:51 AM
7

Lots of victim blaming in the comments.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:48 AM
3

Feminists enjoy an unchecked privilege on college campuses. This is what is being threatened. Nothing more, nothing less. The men's center will only serve to educate men and tell them they aren't all sexual beasts desperatly trying to concel their rape lusts. It will serve as an outlet for frustration, a place for men to bond and cope, to help each other out, and a source for many future lifelong friendships among men. This won't happen because feminists only want that for women.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:45 AM
2

Having men know the truth threatens the feminist stranglehold on university campuses all over. It won't END feminism, but will add a much-needed counterbalance to the discussion of gender rights. In other words, allowing this men's center threatens feminist privilege on the young minds of the college. They will play every card they have to ensure this doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:42 AM
2

The only thing this "threatens" women with is their privilege as a woman on a college campus. They are the only ones at the table for gender discussion. They have affirmative actioned their way into a majority on the campus as a whole. Despite all this, they still have a women's center and freak out at the idea of a men's center.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:32 AM
1

Yeah this is my feelings as well. His existence counters everything they try so hard to keep in their heads. He will not be taken seriously and will be treated very disrespectfully.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:29 AM
1

"You're not allowed to be offended. It takes the fun away from my bigotry." If my g/f used that and disregarded my feelings so blatantly, I'd tell her to leave. Honestly.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:13 AM
0

Yep. Attack. If that fails, hijack.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:07 AM
3

Male studies is not necessary, as everything else is a study of men. Or you mean, study of men's achievements and knowledge? These harpies need to watch their anti-female sexism.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:59 AM
5

Unchecked feminism tends to spew out stupid when its privilege is threatened FTFY
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:57 AM
1

To sum it up: Don't do things that I don't want you to do. Don't stop me from doing what I want to do.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:36 AM
3

To reveal someone's hypocracy and bias, just mention BOTH forms of mutliation and keep them linked. "I believe mutilation of boys and girls is barbaric. No child should have this done to them for non-medical reasons when they cannot consent" Watch everyone's double-thinking kick in as they justify one and get horrified at the other (mostly for the same reasons).
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:34 AM
2

"My ex stuck his dick in crazy. Free TV!"
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:30 AM
5

Thats how they like it
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:46 AM
3

"Women's rights fought for opportunities without responsibilities." Translated for ya.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:37 AM
3

House parties (other people's houses).
/r/seduction28/04/12 01:09 PM
1

Good puppet.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 05:05 AM
2

Girls, if you think they do this because women are superior to men, think again. They are doing it because YOU are the advertising. YOU are the product on display to lure the real customers in. Enjoy your drink!
/r/MensRights28/04/12 05:01 AM
1

While this is true, there's no reason to make the law gender-specific. Even if it really is targeted to protect females, having such a law on the books shows they aren't ready for gender-equality.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:59 AM
6

The opposite of love is apathy.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:27 AM
4

I can get drunk, piss on the sidewalk, and get more time than that.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:26 AM
1

It's the MRA's! They did it! closes ears and starts singing
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:24 AM
2

I don't think many people are condemning this woman. It's the feminists' reaction (don't blame women, blame society. But blame the men, too!)
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:24 AM
1

Ah, gotcha.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 12:35 PM
1

Which is horribly racist if white people want the same thing. I remember the Civil Rights movement in the '60's fought against it. Now? It's perfectly fine as long as it's women demanding men go away.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 12:21 PM
3

I had no bluff. I was willing to walk away. She wasn't (at least yet). We'll revisit in a month and there will be no bluffs.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 09:00 AM
1

Except to those that use their karma count as some kind of dick measuring. I love it when people whine about being downvoted. It's a fucking website with a hivemind, people.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:48 AM
1

Help me out here with the SO BRAVE. Does that mean you're ridiculing what I said? Memes these days are getting harder and harder to follow. I don't care if you are, I just want to know.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:45 AM
1

Title IX is applied only at the cost of males. It does not apply when males want their equality enforced.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:42 AM
1

I benefit from all of that, I'm not going to lie. Its awesome for me. Today's generation of women (especially white women) and minorities benefit from the very same things. Who discriminates against us? Legally? Everyone else has the power to discriminate against white and/or males if they want to. Women? How much power do they hold? As much power as you plus more. What can they LEGALLY not do? Front-lines combat? I'll give them that if they want to be put in the draft to get the same benefits t…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:36 AM
1

All the gyms I have ever attended with a women-only section never charged women a premium for this. It was subsidized by men via equal monthly/yearly fees. If women pay more for the privilege then I'm okay with it as long as it doesn't take up 75% of the gym.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:26 AM
1

Remember, kids. It's "creepy" if a man enters into a traditionally female role. If a woman enters into a traditionally male role, you better not give even a second take unless you want to be labeled a sexist.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:24 AM
5

Fair enough. That's why I worded my response the way I did. I didn't say cis = n**ger, I said it is a tool used by SRS the way white racists use words like that.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:10 AM
3

Well, to be fair, it was a black guy who tapped her. /s
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:40 AM
5

The same reason black people can freely discriminate against white people and call them "cracka-ass crackas." Political correctness doesn't end sexism and racism. It merely shields those in the protected group from those not in the protected group.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:29 AM
7

What do you mean the new "cis" trend? The actual word is just a label attached to non-transexuals. It's also quickly becoming the equivalent of n**ger for SRS trolls (eg cis-straight white guys are disgusting! LOL).
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:27 AM
0

No apology necessary. In fact, I have tremendous respect for you since you came in and allowed us to state our case (that this viperz person is an SRS troll with absolutely no life).
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:24 AM
3

Yeah a few drinks won't hurt anyone. It's the people that are completely shitfaced that shouldn't be driving.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:22 AM
3

Focus on yourself. Find good hobbies that involve social interaction. Go to the gym. Get a good social circle and enjoy life. The ladies will follow the minute you stop pressuring yourself.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:19 AM
4

Super moms with the super courts forcing a man (or all men via taxpayer funds) to subsidize her independent lifestyle.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:15 AM
8

Going through this very thing. My g/f laid the ultimatum on me. I told her I wasn't ready for marriage and if that's a deal-breaker then I'll understand. She decided to wait a while. Apparently, me calling the bluff wasn't part of the calculations (her confidence shrunk as I calmly responded). But if a month passes, I may break it off out of respect just because I don't want to prevent her from getting what she wants.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:11 AM
3

I don't know if she genuinely meant it. Welcome to first world feminism.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:00 AM
4

You lucky basterd
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:25 PM
1

Separate room with workout equipment. Nothing special, but only women can use it. They, of course, can use the coed facilities. Women do not pay extra fees for this privilege.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:24 PM
7

Don't forget our Friday-night rapefest! The bars close around 3 AM so that's when we strike
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:57 PM
26

Shit, she'll probably get an oppression-promotion for taking on all those misogynists.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:56 PM
3

What about minorities who "feel" intimidated by white people? We need an hour for each minority as well. There's 24 hour slots per day to work with, people!
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:54 PM
10

Welcome to reddit.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:31 PM
2

Here's another solution. If women want extra privileges, then do the math where men are only paying for what they can use. In other words, you want it, you pay for it. Of course, that wouldn't fly at all in this world. Private gym memberships don't discriminate by gender and women still get women-only rooms that men don't have access to (with no equivalent for men). Edit: Exception is the gym at my girlfriend's apartment. Free for those in the apartment. It welcomes non-apartment dwellers if you…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:13 PM
1

I like the X-Men as well, but it seems like some of the mutants really get the shaft in terms of powers.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:41 PM
1

It's what that death-trap known as TVTropes calls "fanservice." Black Widow needs to be thin, hot, flexible, and (apparently) let her hair down. Not to mention a few nice ass shots as she walks away from the camera (at least twice in the movie). It would have been less offensive to keep her out and leave the guys, honestly. But sex sells, so there you go. Edit: To add to this, it's more of why I don't like IM2. The first one had a decent story with good characters. Pepper was hot, sure, but she …
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:29 PM
1

Cherry-picked. SRS style.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:20 AM
3

Lol, you should have seen my college's weightlifting electives. Co-ed version, women's only version. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:19 AM
2

Men get harsher sentences than women: Nothing to see here... More like, "Why don't they close the women's prisons! That's horrible that they'd lock a woman up!"
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:53 AM
2

To be fair, Iron Man 2 wasn't that good. I LOVED the first one, however. Iron Man 2 was basically "Let's show Tony drunk/sick while we groom the Avengers story."
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:48 AM
1

If you recall the random hot chick doing impossible kicks and flips and seemingly out of place in an Iron Man movie, then yeah that was Black Widow.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:39 AM
3

Iron Man 2 had to have Black Widow in it. Why? Fuck if I know other than to groom her for the Avengers. And she'll most likely steal some spotlight in Iron Man 3 as well. Avengers has a shitload of awesome superheroes to work with. Heroes with supernatural abilities like Hulk and Thor, heroes with supernatural intelligence like Iron Man...and Black Widow. A woman with martial arts training and a skintight outfit. And she'll most likely get unproportional camera time to do her CGI-flips and kicks…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:27 AM
0

and all whites must apologize. And whites are the ones to suffer from "hate-crime retaliation" for it.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:02 AM
4

Being that the majority of money spent in this country is from women, they probably don't care about you. That's the problem. Everyone bitched about women not earning as much as men (true or not), but nobody seems to mind that women get to swipe the debit/credit cards the most in a market completely catered to their needs and egos.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:00 AM
1

Liberal doesn't necessarily mean feminist (despite what feminists try to hijack). Try to remember that. I consider myself a liberal, but not an ally with feminists in most issues.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:53 AM
1

It's counter-productive. I'd rather the mods continue to work in meta on the future of r/mensrights as well as banning blatant trolls than participating in censor-wars with feminism.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:50 AM
2

"invading their space". It's hard to walk to the store without invading a "woman's space." How many spaces are there for men? You know what's left? The men's public bathroom. That's just about it. And, even now, some feminists are scheming about controlling men even in the bathroom (no urinals, can't stand while peeing, and even a perverted fantasy of having girls watch boys pee to make sure they behave). Such a fantasy would be horrifying if you reversed the genders. Imagine issuing boys to wat…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:44 AM
2

That's because feminists see themselves as "neutral" when they are far from it. They aren't for equality, they are for themselves. There's nothing wrong with that except for the blatant dishonesty about preserving their "image" as the monopoly-holder on what determines equality.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:20 AM
25

I have no problem with this if they dedicated a (reasonable) hour for only men. Why that's so complicated for most people in power to understand just baffles me.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:16 AM
2

That's what they call mansplaining when the genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:13 AM
1

I never understood the locked-in monthly payments to the ex. Why not a percentage of his income based on her contributions to the business? Shit, it may be 50/50 since she was implied to be a business partner. If the business starts collapsing, so does her income. But you know, she has entitlements to be supported.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:35 AM
1

Possibly. The "hotness discount" in female hiring goes both ways. There may be very qualified female sports-nuts who would excel greatly in the job but aren't attractive enough to make the cut.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:31 AM
2

It's satire. I don't have a link, but the same author made fun of feminists as well.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:30 AM
1

Agreed. The "post-fight discussion" in boxing happens right after the boxer leaves the ring (before the locker room). Why not hassle them right there in other sports and let the players go to the locker room in peace?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:22 AM
1

I agree with the gender segregation in terms of locker rooms, but there's nothing wrong with women covering men's sports otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:21 AM
19

International CNN, perhaps. But they have to compete against real news media.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:17 AM
24

Only the barbaric religions! /s
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:33 PM
2

Well, there goes the whole surrogate mother idea. It was nice while it lasted and gave couples who were unable to conceive a shot at raising a family. Thanks to selfish bitches like this, it will be a thing of the past. Glad to see society is stepping up and assisting in putting such a good thing into the ground by rewarding idiots.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:41 AM
2

Jezebel is the Fox News for gender discussions.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:39 AM
22

The government wants to save money from mandatory woman/child support by kicking it over to the nearest male. There is no other reason for this to make sense to me.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:36 PM
1

Then come along and delete the post (unless the mods did it).
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:15 PM
105

Oh silly! I know it can be confusing for your male brain, but let me help you. It's only sexist if it's a slant against women. Make sense? /s
/r/MensRights22/04/12 12:15 PM
4

In this case, these particular feminists are just trying to justify their existence without leaving the parent-funded dorm rooms and going overseas to help real women in trouble.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:50 AM
1

Weed does not impair your judgement. If anything, I'm more paranoid about sex and whatnot while high. I don't smoke that much, but when I do, the idea of someone "taking advantage of me" is bullshit. I'm fully aware of my surroundings and you could even say I'm hyper-aware. I overthink things way too much. There's no way I'd "be tricked" into giving consent while high. If I did go with the moment and regret it later, I was certainly not raped. Booze messes with your judgement. You tend to do thi…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:46 AM
1

I highly doubt this is just a "male" thought process.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:21 AM
2

Why would the government hate this deception? They get more child support federal funding to pay for the kid. They get more money in the court system (divorce lawyers, family courts, etc). Feminist lobby is off their ass in this case. The more stable a family is, the less money the system makes off of them. Therefore, like Zorg said in 5th Element: "Life, which you so nobly serve, comes from destruction, disorder, and chaos." Destroying families is what keeps millions of people employed and the …
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:15 AM
1

If child support payments had to be justified (debit card, no cash withdrawals from ATM, reports sent to payer each month who can use it as evidence to get it reduced), the problem would solve itself. She would have to justify why she needs 240k/child each month or they would starve and die in rags. When she can't prove it, it gets reduced to something more reasonable (maybe 1k/month per child at the MOST). Should she still be able to live like a queen? No. She should be given money to get her l…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:11 AM
3

She has the baby, so she gets the choice. That being said, she shouldn't have the right to force you to 18 years of child support if you don't want to be a father yet (and alert her with enough time for her to still make her choice legally).
/r/MensRights21/04/12 05:51 AM
1

If you think about it, the men's public bathroom is just about the only spot left for men in a literal sense. Any "male" spaces have already been invaded by women while "female" spaces are still sacred and needed. Even the damn boy scouts are being hit. The men's bathroom is the only place a man can truly go to get away from women without social penalty. It would make sense for feminists to flex their government-paid muscles in that area sooner or later.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 05:48 AM
1

Implied gender-based weakness. "We can't help it" means that men make a huge mess in the bathroom and it's all genetic due to our Y chromosone. It's just another man willing to beat himself up just for feminist approval.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 05:44 AM
2

Really? Why not "older woman" too? Because cougars are sexy! /s
/r/MensRights21/04/12 05:33 AM
8

The consensus among the Democrats is that those who want the bill changed are simply wanting to get out of child support payments. Or see their kids more often. The bill had plenty of exceptions for abusive parents and whatnot. One could argue that women will be granted less child support. We can't have that because that may hurt a woman's independence!
/r/MensRights21/04/12 05:22 AM
17

It is a bot created to counter a previous troll strategy of posting a self post, gathering support from the comments, then changing the text to something completly horrible and then posting to SRS how sexist we all are. Rightsbot simply copies the self post text and submits it to a seperate sub for documentation purposes.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 05:16 AM
6

To use a framework set up by aeth: How it works: Woman gets depressed enough to kill all her children? Not guilty because she was depressed. Man gets common depression after birth? Man up, you pussy.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 04:28 AM
2

She doesn't appreciate rival dogs not encroaching on your property?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:50 PM
1

Don't forget that this mainly benefits stay-at-home housewives (if no children, that makes it more obvious). Shouldn't she be forced to come over and tidy up for him a few times a week as well? Not to mention homecooked meals at least a few times a week (with enough food frozen for him to reheat on the off days).
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:05 PM
1

There are cheap "travel" shoes a woman can buy that easily fit in her purse (they fold up nicely) for this very purpose.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:40 AM
5

Exactly. Forget emotions. Forget logic. Just cut the funding and everyone will suddenly stop caring so much about MGM when they actually have to pay for it.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:25 AM
2

One sista looking out for another.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:10 AM
1

Me: Fuck. Check. Well I'll tell you what. I'm gonna give you the neutral side, when you behave well enough I'll give you the good one. All downhill after this.
/r/seduction18/04/12 01:47 PM
6

Someone might have tripped over his burning corpse and caught on fire!
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:38 PM
2

Especially when it comes at the expense of his lifestyle that HE became accustomed to (or was already living before they married and combined assets). Doesn't matter if he's broke and one step away from jail due to child support payments based on a job he doesn't have anymore, as long as she has the same lifestyle!
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:30 PM
10

More simply, they want another reason to play victim and justify their existence.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:29 AM
2

I love how it's essential some rich divorcee "afford the lifestyle she enjoyed" while married. I can understand reasonable child support and even reasonable alimony (temporary, but enough to get her off her ass and invest in herself). But 54k/month? Really?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:14 AM
79

"but I can only fit three letters on that"
/r/seduction18/04/12 08:29 AM
1

Possibly. Not sure, but honestly it wouldn't surprise me if the feminist lobby would push for even MORE gender-based discounts. Might as well, since there's a WAR ON WOMEN going on.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 08:13 AM
1

You have the followers of feminism and the leaders of feminism. The leaders of feminism lie and distort the truth to suit their gains. For example, the wage gap myth ignores choices and experience and lumps everything up into a nice neat number of oppression (70-80% of what men earn). This gives the appearence of "inequality" and lack of women's rights in the workplace. So to fix this, give women free money for nothing other than their gender, no matter what their experience or choices are in li…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:01 AM
1

I...think you got that reversed (unless I missed out on something). Women pay more in health care insurance because they consume more health care. Feminists rallied to make it "equal" (ie subsidize their more expensive health care with men's premiums). On top of that, they pushed to get more and more goodies covered in insurance (now that they aren't paying for them). Since men drive more, they get in more accidents. I don't know if they are more likely to get in more accidents, mile per mile, b…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:54 AM
1

Feminists have already locked in the term "privilege" as a defense mechanism against blowback for their more radical ideas. If you object to their thoughts, you haven't checked your "privilege" or your "privilege" has blinded you to the absolute horrors a woman goes through. To have feminists acknowledge that women have privilege goes against their entire framework of the patriarchy. With this unravelled, you start to analyze the "rights" they have pushed for themselves that hurt men and it just…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:45 AM
3

That's why I put safe space in quotations (as with the qualifier "so-called").
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:42 AM
10

With the marriage rate dropping, the alimony scam needs to be propped up somehow.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:39 AM
1

And how would the state justify increased federal funding to combat the deadbeat problem?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:35 AM
9

Or the lesbian-flavored feminists' utter distaste for any heterosexual activity.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:32 AM
21

Mensrights is deemed a hate group by the radicals because this is a spot where men may gather in a so-called "safe space" and discuss their own issues/experiences and how it may impact their lives. Such activities are only reserved for the politically correct.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:30 AM
1

Sweden is a good example of what a completely conquered feminist territory would look like. They have great health care, but it's not like that was a feminist cause (they just hijacked the government and the schools after the groundwork was done).
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:43 AM
4

Good luck with that one.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:42 AM
4

The best way to control your enemy is to keep them from gathering in exclusive groups. They tend to get too comfortable and start developing unapproved opinions.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:41 AM
7

Would would have thought that if the fathers weren't in jail, they were more likely to work and get the money (or at least put a dent in it). Amazing!
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:50 PM
4

And she totally likes it. In all seriousness, she has advertised beauty cream that is made from chemicals utilized from infant foreskins.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:27 PM
1

Yes. Maybe it doesn't tell us if it's a troll or not, but outputs the data in a nice report. Age of account, Frequency of SRS posts in last 50-100 posts, frequency of MRA posts (>= 1 comment karma) in last 50-100 posts, etc.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:39 AM
2

Just taking in advice from multiple sources at the moment. Thanks for taking the time to give yours.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:32 AM
1

Good advice. It won't take a year for me to figure this one out. Maybe a month at most.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:46 AM
2

Jesus, if my hypothetical wife went to attend one of these things, I'd lawyer up pretty damn quickly as a precaution.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:38 AM
2

A valid question. We both work overseas and make damn good money. Currently, I outearn her but not by a huge amount. I can see her career overseas lasting much longer than mine, depending on the situation at my work. Which was factored into my hesitations as it may come to a point where one of us may have to end our lucrative career to be with the other later on.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:15 AM
3

Oprah's beauty cream supply is running low.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:44 AM
4

Bite me. You sounded so civil earlier, if not a bit frank. I never downvoted your responses to me, but this one earned it.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:56 AM
4

What you get are guys like me. Not afraid of having children and settling down with one woman for life. Just afraid of the risks of watching it all disappear with a very expensive divorce.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:54 AM
3

Definitely. Women have a LOT more leeway in this area than men do (who could be charged with rape or being labeled a creep, etc).
/r/seduction17/04/12 06:31 AM
3

Believe me, she knows the risk. I told her at least three times that choosing to stay with me means we'll have this conversation again. I can't tell her that I'd feel the same way because I honestly don't know. But yes, if I didn't want marriage ever I would have taken the hint and let myself out. I care about her too much to string her along with false hope. So yes, I'm torn. I'm 100% against it right now, but who knows what will happen a year from now (or sooner if her itch outgrows her patien…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:27 AM
3

And she knows that because I told her it's a risk if she stays with me. I swear, if this ends I won't date a girl seriously for longer than six months again until I'm ready.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:22 AM
2

It's all about what you want in the end. If what you want matches up with what she wants, then great. If it doesn't, someone has to lose. Yeah you can compromise on most things, but you can't get a little bit pregnant. You can't get a little bit married (cohab I guess could qualify, but no legal benefits come with it). I understood that and was willing to accept the consequences. She's not getting any younger, and for a woman that's a big thing if you want kids with smaller risks of impairments.…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:18 AM
2

Agreed. And I have some time to think about it. TIme I didn't assume I had when the conversation started, and I wasn't going to make the decision right then and there (if pushed in a corner, it would have become real easy).
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:14 AM
2

Children don't scare me. It's losing them that scares me. She agreed we would go DINK for a while to save up money first. So we're okay on that. I want kids someday, so does she.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:51 AM
3

As a political slacktivist, I would much rather this issue not come about at all. I'd rather us have a real debate at the federal level about federal issues. Issues like the economy. THe war on terror. The war on drugs. The deficit. Our competitive value as a nation compared to the world. The job situation. Corruption in the government due to lobbyists and Super PACs. Global warming. Anything. But what do we get? A manufactured crisis to distract us and divide us. This election could have really…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:43 AM
4

Female-only healthcare expenses covered by the state Not to mention covered by men's premiums now. Obama's helath care plan forces equal premiums by gender. This was because women use more expenses and racked up higher premiums on average. It was painted as horrible discrimination. Dead silence on car insurance rates, however.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:24 AM
9

It wasn't shitty for her. It's understandable after three years of serious dating to ask where it's all going. She's not getting any younger, she says. She may not be able to have children if she waits around forever, she says. I respect that. So I told her the truth and put my cards on the table. It bought me some time to figure it out. But if she was going to go full on ultimatum I would have packed up my shit and left that night. And it would have been out of respect for her.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:21 AM
25

I got the "ultimatum" last night from the g/f. She wanted the next step, I didn't. I told her why. It's not marriage that I fear, it's divorce. It's not committment I fear, it's that when one of us chooses to break it, I would be the one to lose. She understood and was quiet. Inadvertantly, I flipped the ultimatum on her. I said that if you really want that and you know I don't, then I'll understand if you want to break up. It will suck, it will be depressing, but you'll find another guy that wa…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:08 AM
1

Not foolproof, but if you're going to do it, do it right. Lawyer up, hammer out the agreements, and make sure you're not making her sign it under "duress" (with her lawyer present). If she balks about how unromantic this is, then call her bluff.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:02 AM
1

Not seeing a feminist issue here....a woman took drinks and food from a man and promised sex in return, then bailed. She should have to give to him what she said she would. Sounds awful, doesn't it.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:59 AM
2

These girls got left by the same game they were most likely playing and are mad they got played. Except the most likely turned on the waterworks and the white knights in blue showed up to make it all better. Unbelievable the police are involved in this. God forbid a woman (or women) have to foot the bill for food they mostly ate. These days, chivalry is not only one-way, it's apparently legal to force it.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:56 AM
1

He then stepped out for a phone call and never returned, leaving his date with the bill and “no means to pay,” Three fucking people couldn't come up with $95? For fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:49 AM
9

"Feminists" are really, really happy about women being denied access to legal and constitutional healthcare choices. While you may lose some battles at the state level (at the worst), you definitely won't lose anything at the federal level. The feminist-voting bloc is way too strong for that. The entire media is working on your side. GOP have lost support from women in record numbers due to this shit. It will most likely cost them the election, no matter what Obama does in the next six months. W…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:58 PM
1

Well, that could be the point of all this political noise.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:21 PM
1

If she mentions that she might have an STD, that could be a total turn off.
/r/seduction16/04/12 01:38 PM
2

She took the other half.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:36 PM
2

Exactly. Attractive guys with personalities matching those of a block of wood get girls GIGGLING over their lame jokes and stupid anecdotes. An unattractive guy has to be REALLY damn witty to overcome that hurdle.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:34 PM
1

with ugly chicks guys don't want them near them. Well, only an asshole would never befriend an unattractive woman just because of her looks. Everyone is allowed to have their own standards about who they bed, though. I'm not complaining about women shooing away ugly guys because they are too ugly for them. I'm complaining about women screaming "CREEP!" which implies the guy was trying to molest her or something when he was most likely doing the EXACT SAME THING an attractive guy would do. You wo…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:30 PM
36

With this supposed "War on Women" going on, get used to Obama kissing some massive feminist ass. Feminists are fucking ECSTATIC about this genius GOP strategy lately. Now they can get their Dem lapdogs to pass all kinds of shit. This election will not be about MRA's or even real equality, that's for damn sure.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:27 PM
2

proof? Any "unwanted attention" is deemed harassment if the woman so chooses to feel that way. It's 100% subjective. She's free to pluck out two or three white knights (or bouncers or cops) to pull this unwanted thing away from her so the wanted things can continue their "chase." ugly women are just shamed for the fact that they are unattractive and existing. In other words, they receive no "benefits" in the job world for their physical looks. They have to work harder to find a mate than their p…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:23 PM
3

Ugly chicks aren't creep-shamed to the point where they could get arrested.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:12 PM
3

Prince Charming is a player with a good lawyer.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:09 PM
3

Porn and video games. Things that the other side tries to demonize (it's competition, after all).
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:06 PM
5

An unattractive and an attractive guy can do the EXACT same thing under the EXACT same context and the ugly guy will be the "creep" while the other guy will be the "confident" one.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:03 PM
6

The trick is to show too much interest and be attractive. Otherwise, you're a creeper.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:02 PM
5

My favorite: Call me up in the evening. If I don't answer, she gets annoyed. If I do answer, she basically expects me to steer the entire conversation (passively responding to my questions, etc). Not so bad, except she demands a phone call every damn night (even days where we saw each other for hours). Five minutes is all I can handle, but I get the passive-agressive action when she says goodbye unless we've talked for at least 15 minutes. Anybody else HATE using the phone when a chat window cle…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:00 PM
1

I disagree that feminism is benefiting directly from southern male conservatives. They don't benefit in all cases, but some cases they do. Any time a judge passes on a lighter sentence to a woman just because she's a woman benefits women unequally. That's "benevolent sexism" and most feminists (if they acknowledge it at all) pays lip service about how it should end or allows the "weaker sex" stereotype to persist in beneficial contexts. Would you say that men's rights is in support of a welfare …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:46 PM
6

Yeah well, my first post was a little vague anyway. Heh. Apologies all around!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:03 PM
3

A very important word. Were they grabbing his dick and twisting it left and right, only to have the target to turn it straight? What a group!
/r/seduction16/04/12 11:23 AM
5

There isn't enough details in the article (plus you're only hearing her side of the story), but it sounds like she pressured him to marry her. The way she said she was constantly "auditioning" herself translates, to me, as "See how awesome I am? Where's my ring?"
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:21 AM
1

I bet she slapes like a pro.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:35 AM
1

The comments are supportive. The situation is upsetting, but at least reddit isn't on the wrong side.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:33 AM
2

"Back in their place working tirelessly to provide for me until I get bored enough to divorce him and take everything else."
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:24 AM
1

Logic is a construct of the patriarchy and has no meaning in the Fempire.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:24 AM
2

meta-trolling?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:23 AM
1

I think we all missed some good sarcasm. The idea that /mr is a hate group is about as dumb as the idea that SRS shares child porn.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:22 AM
1

Not toeing the feminist line perfectly means you hate women.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:21 AM
1

True, but a real fair way to go about this shouldn't be that she does ALL the chores. If, in this case, she does make less and work less than him, she should do more than half the chores. However, that doesn't mean he shouldn't do any of the chores. You basically work it so that you're both done with your work and chores at the same time each night (within reason). If she has absolutely no job and no income of her own, I don't see why the man should do any chores, honestly. He's doing his part a…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:18 AM
1

And it's a shame that men are so often willing to marry down. Very true.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:08 AM
1

The point of alimony is to give the person the same lifestyle they had while married. Which shouldn't be the case. This person doesn't have the same lifestyle they had while married; the other person is gone. What this does is give them all the perks of that lifestyle (money, house, kids) without the spouse. What about the spouse? This person is kicked out of their house, has to pay horrible amounts of money, and gets nothing in return but debts. What about their lifestyle they got used to? Ah..…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:58 AM
1

Or maybe he didn't want to get married?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:54 AM
1

Good advice that I follow already.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 07:00 AM
1

I grow tired of explaining this, but it never hurts to educate. Look at the title of the post. Process the words carefully (grammatical errors and all). He's ALREADY divorced. He's paid the exwife off for his freedom. He's reacting to a DIFFERENT woman who is "flirting" with him. In other words, stay away from my money, I learned my lesson eight years ago. As for the money "they" produced, there isn't enough information to work with. You're speculating that they married out of high school and bu…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:55 AM
2

Copies of everything as well. Keep the original in a safe place, give the copies to the dad for his files. Don't even tell the dad where the originals are, so he won't be manipulated into giving them up.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:53 AM
1

SRS, the bottom dwellers of every sub.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:48 AM
4

It wouldn't ruin anyone's life if the media kept their mouths shut until after the verdict. No public smearing. Also, the man's employer shouldn't be able to discriminate against him until he's proven guilty so maybe a mandatory sabatical to deal with this is in order. They don't have to pay him for this time because if he's innocent then the government should pay him the pay he's due (then turn around and demand it from her).
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:42 AM
2

I've got a better one: Prosecute every false claim. If she not only picked out the wrong guy but wasn't raped at all, here's the punishment. She serves the jail time he had served during the process (but no more), she pays him any losses and is exposed to lawsuits afterwards, if any news outlet reported his name they are forced to print an article explaining the truth and if they mentioned his name they HAVE to mention hers now. This has to come out that she wasn't raped at all but abused the ju…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:39 AM
5

What other crime can cause an automatic arrest based on a simple allegation? Serious question. Any other crimes covered in VAWA. Domestic abuse, feeling "threatened", "suspicious he's doing something illegal", being a guy that called the cops on his wife for the same accusations, to name a few.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:36 AM
1

Conservative white knights are an ally with feminism when it comes to this particular issue. These guys love keeping the woman at home with the kids while the man provides (like the "good old days"). The man should provide, one way or the other. That explains legitimate child support (the actual father). Then the state budget comes into play to explain the illegitimate child support (the targeted "father"). The less women/children supported on the state dime, the less budget has to be allocated …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:31 AM
1

Abortion, adoption are always options. There won't be jail involved, but no man she identified will have to pay if they prove they aren't the father. If she wants to play independent single mom after that, then she's more than welcome to see how hard being independent really is.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:27 AM
1

Besides, white families make a hell of a lot more money than black on average so it seems pretty fair to me. It's not government money, is it? Then why not base scholarships on socio-economic status instead of race/gender?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:16 AM
1

This helps if they aren't using a throwaway account. Given that some of the help asked contains sensitive information, it's reasonable that people might use a throwaway when asking for help.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:14 AM
1

they believe that the ideas eschewed here are bad/evil/wrong, and so they don't want them spreading. They believe that so much that they are willing to distort the truth to spread the propaganda, cherry-picking posts (legit MRA posts but contain bitterness or SRS trolls) to further their cause.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:12 AM
1

Which is the point. The point of this method of SRS/SA trolling is to discourage people from helping each other out in this sub, which in turn would increase the positive exposure and actually do some good to one of our own. By introducting Koch Brothers Super PAC-style noise to the discussion, they are trying to derail our efforts all for their circlejerk. The best way to proceed is to read what they have to say and treat it as legit, but remain civil and avoid any bitterness that they can harv…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:10 AM
1

SRS Troll sockpuppet.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:07 AM
2

SRS Troll.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:07 AM
2

Good point. It's wise to study up on these laws (they vary by country and even state for the US) and bail before the time limit is up.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:04 AM
5

Tape recorder, document everything on paper with a timestamp. Ex) "4/15/2012 6:35 PM, [dad's wife's name] arrived home clearly intoxicated. Yelled at [brother1's name] for not cleaning up the house even though she never told him to in the first place. See tape recording #134"
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:03 AM
5

"I'm a racist and a sexist and YOU need to stop what you're pursuing in your own life and help ME out"
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:02 AM
1

(Hint: this doesn't exist.) Good save, brother. Don't blow it for us! ...wait...damn it!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:01 AM
3

Interestingly enough, if she has some moderate skills in IT or some other STEM field, she is much more likely to succeed by "cleaning up and putting on a suit" when applying for a job.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:58 AM
3

Stop abusing that poor woman with logic!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:56 AM
1

But that's the only good thing about Germany. What about the beer? And barmaids?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:54 AM
1

That sounds like rape culture. Oh, silly. Guys can't get raped! /s
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:32 AM
11

Cohabitation. All the perks of a DINK relationship with significantly lower exit costs.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:30 AM
3

You can still do that with cohab. It's trickier, but at least there's no mommy-support involved and she can't take half your assets.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:28 AM
5

It is a bitch move, but a real one I am glad that is being exposed.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:14 AM
3

If you're excited, your 22nd finger may confuse your audience.
/r/seduction15/04/12 10:58 AM
1

Hillary Clinton was probably one of the more qualified women to be president. I didn't agree with her politics (way too feminist-minded to be reasonable), but she had the qualifications and the experience. When she started crying on stage and bitching about sexism is when she lost my respect (again, when you take the politics out). Politics is tough. It's not a "man's game." It's a "tough game." If you can't stand the constant barrage of attacks, you can't play the game. The other two loonies yo…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:32 AM
3

They have had a taste of privilige and they like it. Now it's all about projection to defend it.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:31 AM
0

If anything, why not open your own amazing country club and golf course, and just admit women. That's not the point. There are many of those already. THe point is to ensure that no man has a safe space left in America other than the damn bathroom.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:30 AM
2

The only difference is that men (as a gender) aren't part of the politically-correct club. Only PC groups can have their own spaces.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:28 AM
1

Because the last thing you want to allow from a group you're attacking and taking advantage of is to have their own "safe" spaces.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:26 AM
2

Just politically-correct bigotry. Move along.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 09:46 AM
1

Fine, they didn't say the word "whore." The point is still there.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 07:57 AM
1

Looks like someone has bills to pay and wants to play the lawsuit lottery. What a country.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:25 AM
2

"Your honor, the child really did need those gold-plated roller blades!"
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:19 AM
1

To them, gender is only a social construct when it is beneficial in particular contexts. To sum it up, if responsibility was to fall on a woman, then gender is a social construct. If responsibility was to fall on a man, then gender is not a social construct. Examples: The draft: Only men should be drafted. Women can receive the same benefits for free. Gender is not a social construct. Women in combat roles: Men and women are equal so women should be allowed in (if they freely choose). Gender is …
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:14 AM
2

My first reaction would be to sit up, throw her on her back, and tell her to get the fuck out. There's no need to punch her and hand your freedom to the cops on a silver platter.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:10 AM
2

As someone that wants to be married with kids someday, I am willing to hold off until such laws change (if ever). Until then, I'm working overseas, saving a shitload of money each month with no debts, and am enjoying my life.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:03 AM
7

The "keep it in your pants" argument was used against women during the abortion legalization debates a long time ago. What? If you didn't want a child, why did you have sex before marriage, you whore? Now that the shoe is on the other foot, it seems these oppressed feminists don't mind the role reversal. It was never about equality, but power.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:01 AM
6

Because of the internet, and placed like /r/MensRights, the facts about marriage/divorce are available and shared more. Today's 20- and 30-somethings, people about to be married, learn more about how life works from other people's stories on the internet, not mainstream media news pieces. This is why r/mensrights was sorta-kinda-but-not-really labeled a hate group. Those that hate our very existence pick up on this rumor and refuse to hear anything else, often parroting the propaganda to scare a…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:00 AM
8

Gotta love white knights.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:25 PM
5

Logically, a draft means you are going against your will. If you wanted to go, you'd sign up.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:45 AM
3

Those that want the same benefits women get for simply turning 18.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:45 AM
4

Let's try this. The debit card is refilled on time every month. Even if the supporter hasn't paid yet. If he or she hasn't, then the government foots the bill. They are already charging massive amounts of interest on missing child support payments. When the person pays up, it doesn't go anywhere but to pay off the debt he or she owes the government. That way the one with the child gets the money and this won't happen.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:27 PM
3

Let me rephrase that: Child support money should only be spent on the child, in an accountable way. Think of a debit card that the child support money is directly deposited to and can only be used for things going directly to the child. Food, school supplies, etc. The child support payer should be given a receipt at the end of the month. No more "momma needs a new pair of shoes lololol"
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:07 PM
3

No, but it should be accountable (think debit card here).
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:57 PM
2

Bars aren't nearly as good for this as parties and small gatherings. At such events, the sole purpose is to talk and socialize and meet new people. Bars are sometimes composed of tightly-knit groups of people who are there just to enjoy their own company. Exceptions can be made, of course, but that's at least my experience.
/r/seduction10/04/12 11:06 AM
1

They didn't just magically meet everyone at once. It occured by being friendly, social, initating conversations, and bringing value to the group. When you're at a party, try to talk to everyone at least once. Introduce yourself and have a small conversation. Try to remember their names. If you hit it off, get a phone number (guy or girl) and meet up in the future. THe more social gatherings you go to, the more people you'll meet. Try not to stick to just one circle of friends. Expand your horizo…
/r/seduction10/04/12 11:04 AM
2

and how the guys would have responded. /okayface
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:35 AM
4

That's what gets to me. Everyone wants racism and sexism to end, but the politically correct do nothing but "take pride" in their labels, while asking the politically incorrect to disregard their pride in their own.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:34 AM
6

The government hates having to support women and children. They will attempt to pass the buck to just about anyone to write that expense off.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 10:29 AM
1

That's when feminists attempted to occupy (ie hijack) the Occupy movement.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:37 AM
2

There's plenty of male feminist white knights willing to do the violence for them, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:36 AM
2

Not it!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:36 AM
7

And I'm jealous when it shifts to men in their 30's who stayed fit and kept their career in line. Most articles usually have this theme after that sentence.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:32 AM
1

Your son's g/f craves the attention (and possibly the victimhood of being "leered" at to offset the attention craving).
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:29 AM
12

It's called projection, and this is definitely not the first time someone like that has acted in such a way.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:25 AM
3

"He will be willing to marry you and you are free to divorce him, take the kids and the house, and make him pay to support you for at least the next two decades. Yes, it's also good to keep cats inside when they are young so they don't bitch about going outside as much when they're older."
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:24 AM
12

Child support should only go to the child. It shouldn't just be taxfree cash in hand that's basically unaccountable.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:20 AM
1

If looking at this government's track record for gender "rights," it will serve to benefit women and women only. They had affirmative action policies in colleges to get more women in. Now that women outnumber men in college by a wide margin, men started using these AA policies. The government quickly removed the AA policies because it disadvantaged women.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:24 AM
43

"He owes you." Not owed to your children. Not to your family. You. It's all about you, girl!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:57 AM
2

The more you know ===★
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:30 PM
1

The_Patriarchy made an excellent slide show detailing the events in question. Reddit link
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:25 AM
5

The_Patriarchy made an excellent slide show detailing the events in question. Reddit link
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:24 AM
2

lol!
/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:09 AM
1

I will create a sockpuppet account that is an SRS member pretending to be an MRA member pretending to be an SRS member pretending to be an MRA member. We have to go deeper to keep up in the troll wars!
/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:18 AM
12

their browser's cache But what if they are an MRA that saw the image from here?
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:56 AM
3

They are men. Just because you don't agree with their thoughts and views doesn't make them any less so. The same goes for feminists bitching about pro-life "sellout" women.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:43 AM
3

good ideal of equality for women Equality is for everyone, not just women. If you want to push for a reform that benefits women, make it gender neutral. That way, you're helping women but should men start losing out over women, they will be helped just as much. No more VAWA. We need VAPA.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:39 AM
9

The recent Oklahoma state law recognizing personhood from conception, roundly denounced as anti-woman, was sponsored by a female legislator, Lisa Billy. The biggest champion of state bills mandating medically unnecessary ultrasound procedures for women seeking abortions is right-to-life activist Charmaine Yoest. This is something always "forgotten" when someone goes on an anti-male crusade regarding these issues. As for the comment about Democrats insulting pro-life women, that's not just a Demo…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:31 AM
9

I know right! After all, when you butcher a male child for bullshit and debunked reasons (or religious ones), it's just a male. But female butchering? That's barbaric! /s Both should be banned
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:21 AM
1

Agreed. I'm not a fan of the GOP anyway, but their strategy is pretty sickening. However, it also gives the Democrats free reign to implement as many pro-woman policies as they want with little blowback. It's not a good election for an MRA this time around. I don't think it will be for the highest elections anytime soon. That's why we have to work at the city and state level some more.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:15 AM
1

Lol. Textbook definition of projection right there.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:24 AM
4

Gender injustice is generally equated with injustice against women While the article is good, you can shorten this statement to: Gender is generally equated with women
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:17 AM
2

And such a move will most likely destroy them in the elections. If any group can band together for their own interests, it's women. They have the full support of the media, they have entire channels to rally support, and that's not even mentioning schools.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 03:10 AM
4

forcing them into giving up their child in return for money. However, it's fine for men to be forced to give up their child and pay for the privilege via mommy/child support.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:20 AM
4

but in a lot of ways, it's also a really awesome place Which is why feminists are flocking to hijack it.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:18 AM
3

Goes to show that we're getting to these inequality trolls. Their sick game of equality = feminism is almost up.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:01 AM
1

That's because only men can rape only women! /s
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:00 AM
1

Viagra isn't just for erecticle dysfunction, so in some cases it could qualify.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:52 AM
1

The media is loving this "war on women." It has sex, it has "oppression," it's easy to write about, and it distracts the people from complicated issues like the economy and the wars.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:50 AM
6

There's that abusive and patriarchical construct called "logic" again.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:41 AM
1

They claim that child caring at home is a job You know, I just thought of something. Let's make child caring a job. A job that you have to apply for and qualify for. Preferably training in nursing, child care, housekeeping, and nutrition, for example. Once you qualify, sure you're the single mom with daddy government providing. But at least the government is only providing for those that can handle the job. Don't get me wrong, there should be some support (for the children's sake, not hers) but …
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:29 AM
2

"physical violence is NEVER an acceptable response to just words, she just said something, you PUNCHED HER!" The last troll trap laid out to mensrights had a situation so horrifying to a guy (a woman stealing a condom and trying to run out the door talking about how she's going to get the baby she deserves) that he coudln't think of any way of stopping her other than punching her in the gut. Could he have acted better? Sure. Did he make a mistake? Yep. Was it so horrifying that she got hit in th…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:24 AM
2

Fear of consequences is only reserved for males.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:20 AM
2

The Democrats and GOP are not identical, but they agree on many issues that need to be debated. War on Drugs, War on Terror (and all the gate-raping, assassinations, etc), military-industrial complex, etc. Keeping BS issues like the "war on women" in the spotlight serves to distract us from thinking too hard. It's probably better to let the Democrats win this election than have the people think about the man behind the curtain too much and ruin it for all the boys and girls currently greased in.…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:13 AM
3

Translation: The election was supposed to be about the wars, the economy, and our relationship with the world. Instead, the politicians successfully distracted the people with more emotional issues.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:11 AM
5

This is somewhat surprising, and in some ways it goes along with what you hear colloquially, but on the other hand people are saying, 'shouldn't women be supporting each other? What's going on here? Those people are observing reality after being exposed to feminist brainwashing for at least a decade of school. Raver says that while the study did not delve into the reasons why women tend to single out other women for harassment, part of the reason may relate to their perception of men as being tr…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:02 AM
1

Framing it that way maximizes the power given to women while putting all the responsibility on men.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:54 AM
5

Sadly, we almost got Hillary who would have been worse.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:09 AM
22

If this feminist understood the context: "Ohhh rape directed at the guy. That's okay! Never mind! Teehee."
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:08 AM
1

"gender-aware" is a meaningless term. I don't think it's meaningless. Feminists want women to be "gender-aware" and push for women-only benefits as well as admire all the female-only traits they possess, but they want men to not be gender-aware and be told that whatever they are good at, women are as well.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:11 AM
2

Abstract "male" and "woman" out to "politically incorrect" and "politically correct" and it all makes sense. I saw a news report on some kind of racist test they put people through. Like they'll flash a word and you have to select white or black (it was more complicated than that, but bear with me). They interviewed a white person who tested as more "racist." Well this person was tripping over themselves in denying it and saying that they really weren't racist! They also interviewed a black woma…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:01 AM
3

Good for them.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 09:47 AM
1

You get nothing but laughs when you bring up the blatant discrimination of ladies' nights at bars, charging me $20 to allow me and my penis into a bar while three drunk annoying ladies behind me are allowed in for free (and sometimes with drink coupons). You are told that the bar is a private establishment and they have the right to do what they want. So now here's a golf club, paid with zero tax dollars, allowing only men to enter. Such an injustice! We need the white knight goons to come in wi…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 09:39 AM
9

Can't explain that.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 09:22 AM
1

Have you seen how complicated that wedding dress is? What about those high heels they wear down the aisle? The horrifying I-am-property display of her father "giving her away" to the husband-to-be? And that horrible rape-inducing event we call "honeymoon?" /s
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:50 AM
2

This fear of divorce cost me my last relationship as she threw the ultimatum at me. I walked. My current relationship has that elephant in the room that we're avoiding for now. The minute the ultimatum gets dropped...
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:46 AM
1

It's the smart move, since the GOP has been painted as anti-woman. I guess that removes any hope of having a voice in this election as an MRA. It also helps both sides from talking about real issues like the economy, the wars, etc.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:35 AM
1

What an idiot. Projecting women's actual desires onto men to avoid the hypocracy of feminist thought.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:34 AM
3

The response that I got, in response to my points, was variations on a theme of "Yes, that's a problem for men, but for every problem men face women face two." Or three. Or a thousand. Translation: "Not now, women are talking."
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:25 AM
13

When you were young, did you ever get in a position where you're being bitched at by someone's dad (without telling your side of the story) while the kid is behind him smiling at you? That's how I see feminism.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:02 AM
4

It's not that the ultra-conservatives are misogynists. That's half the picture. They want both genders in their place. They want women at home, but they want men providing. Women are weak, but men are always the evil ones. That's why they love child support, they love VAWA, and they love hurting women's choices. The War on Drugs was a business move to protect the paper industry at the time as well as keep the holy-rollers happy. The prison-industrial complex that has sprung up as a result lobbie…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:59 AM
9

Because it's perfectly fine to be racist and sexist if you focus your bigotry on the non-politically correct.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:41 AM
14

Punch a woman who's threatening to make herself pregnant with a discarded condom and fuck up your life: Not okay. More like punch a woman who has the condom in hand and almost out the door as a desperate attempt to stop her is WRONG WRONG WRONG! Punch a man for...anything? No problem!
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:40 AM
20

Her feminism would end by the time she got to the phone to call 911 and ask for the white knight patrol.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:39 AM
3

My favorite part was where she said that she's not being picky (even though she is, but there's nothing wrong with that IMO) then acts all pissy about a guy who asked if "she was clean."
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:47 AM
3

Yeah I don't see any MRA activism in this one. Tucker Max tried to troll Planned Parenthood and it didn't work.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:05 PM
2

I refuse to have sex without a condom, BC or not.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:05 PM
6

You will be told that there nothing stopping us from fighting both sets of crime at the same time. However, this goes out the window the minute you tell a feminist that some of these "women" problems are also men problems. Edit: Fixed phone typos
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:02 PM
1

I'm mentioning a specific form of "rape" that men have gone to jail over. Your original comment mentioned rapists and rape, so I showed you an example of such a "rapist." I didn't limit the subset, I acted within the subset given (all current examples of "rape"). This confusion would have not happened if you limited the initial scope to date rape.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:58 PM
1

women invest vastly more in biologically producing a child, in the form of extreme pain, bodily disfigurement, frequent sickness and profound hormonal and fat distribution changes, not to mention loss of work and an altered social identity since women go through pregnancy visibly whereas men can father a child without visible changes. All this ends in 9 months if she chooses not to abort. Child support lasts 18-21 years.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:26 AM
3

Plus there's many men and women who make money off of misandry.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:22 AM
2

Not to mention any possible medical risks you'd expose your children to all for the sole purpose of them "fitting in."
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:34 AM
5

I'm actually quite curious to know if there are other men like me who are circumcised and don't have any immediate drawbacks besides missing out on the choice of having a foreskin and the sensation that we may be missing out on... I'm among this group. I don't have any drawbacks because I don't know any better (I was cut as a baby). I am disgusted with the idea of circumscising any future male children I ever have.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:33 AM
1

Can't watch the video, but is this in the context of a relationship or marriage? If it's relationship, then both genders do this. If it's marriage, then the costs of exit are far higher for a man than a woman, so that wouldn't surprise me in the least.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:34 AM
4

Social proof. They stringed you along, but once you got a girl (that was most likely attractive), your value to them increased tenfold.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:33 AM
-1

symbolic logic Why do you like to abuse women?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:25 AM
1

...at the pump...or for the pump?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:09 AM
3

It's easy. First you label all men as privileged oppressors. With that lodged firmly in your skull, then any blatantly sexist (but pro-woman) policy is just evening the score.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter