TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bitter-Section-946 Archive

View 2 posts and 90 comments by Bitter-Section-946 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Activism/SupportBitter-Section-946/r/MensRights18/10/25 12:58 PM
19

Activism/SupportBitter-Section-946/r/MensRights29/09/25 03:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Or is it better to simply counter the narrative and down vote (or whatever) posts that are there to only push double standards. No commentary necessary.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:08 PM
5

Woah....that's a bit general. Unchecked rage never leads to anything positive. The female narrative is overwhelming. The feminization of the world is creating a lopsided experience in all the ways that truly matter. That said... Not all women are bad, or bad actors. Not gonna lie - I've been through some dark times including false allegations and all the worst possible negative fall out associated with it. Some key pillers of my support network were women. If you're able to find one of the good …
/r/MensRights21/05/26 10:43 PM
1

I stand by what was said earlier
/r/MensRights20/05/26 11:49 PM
8

Spoken like someone who has never faced false allegations. OP has it right. Just steer clear.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 03:23 PM
4

This is the way. Although, expect a rough ride moving forward.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 03:16 PM
1

You need to come up with 2 more of these... This will officially enshrine the 10 Corporate Commandments in the new world.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 03:16 PM
39

I'm not sure a recording will do. Better to carry a pocket sworn affidavit and record the signing of it, after she passes a notorized sobriety test.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 11:52 AM
2

Sure as sh1t won't be on Reddit
/r/MensRights07/03/26 03:52 AM
7

Isn't this the exact inverse of dating culture in the 90's and early 2000's? Back then, men were expected to pay cover charges and ladies got in free. I don't recall articles or hysteria back then. This was simply the way it was.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:22 PM
12

It's completely accurate, if and only if you look at that statement on its own with no understanding that those numbers apply to only 10- 15% of men on the platform. It's a statement that is trying to use stats to bolster the argument but remains woefully ignorant of reality.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 02:19 PM
20

If this was a guy talking like this... Ohhhhh the humanity
/r/MensRights11/02/26 01:28 PM
9

WTF?! No guy I know makes jokes about this. Not when I was a kid, nor now. You must be a troll looking for hate down votes. Well, I'm happy to oblige.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 02:52 PM
6

Although technically it's possible to reverse a vasectomy, the doctor conducting them will stress it should be considered an irreversible procedure. Doctors will have you consider sperm freezing if having kids is a remote consideration.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 02:49 PM
0

Empathy is the ability to understand the emotional response. Naming the emotion is definitely a part of it, but it circles more around why the individual is feeling the way they do.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 02:41 PM
1

If you're just dating, then I would suggest not to worry. There's 2 ways this can go. Way 1. Once you move in together, you either find a new 2 bedroom place where you both pay equally (sign a room mate agreeement), or move into your place, but sign a landlord tenant agreement. Wear protection - even if she's on the pill and inspect the wrappers carefully before doing anything. If you're talking marriage (not sure why you would to be honest unless she signs a prenup in front of a third party obj…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 01:45 PM
6

Perhaps. This is all due to the standards women have in place - not men. Look it up - guys don't share the same image of beauty as women. You do it to yourselves.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:26 AM
19

Why not? It works for women
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:44 PM
1

Spoken like a man /s
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:18 AM
1

Since when did cancel culture care about due process?
/r/MensRights07/11/25 10:59 PM
10

Our materialistic values? If you look at who is the "gate keeper" for goods and services into the house, if you look at who consumes more as a percentage of income, if you look at industries who target specific demographics for most opportunity, the answer for all of these is women. So following your logic, the last line should be amended to "....it's a reflection and a side effect of feminist materialistic values".
/r/MensRights06/11/25 02:51 PM
3

Wow! There's actually a word for this?! The Great Feminisation is upon us.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 09:44 PM
3

If this is the case, the number holds as much credibility as a realtor who claims they sold the house above asking.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:46 PM
14

If this were the case, then I would be interested to REALLY dig I to it. Here's some challenges: An allegation costs nothing to raise, will most likely end in a conviction without legal intervention, and WITH legal intervention, plea bargains /peace bonds are used in lieu of conviction. This isn't technically a conviction, but it's still an admission of wrong doing. People take the plea bargain / peace bond because they can't afford to fight the allegations through the system, and a declaration …
/r/MensRights03/11/25 04:08 PM
29

I would be interested to know how they came across the 4% number.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 01:52 PM
4

Yeah...it's the Mother Goose defence - Women are sugar and spice..
/r/MensRights30/10/25 10:44 PM
21

That last statement of yours really clinches it. Many people in this sub have been victims of false accusations - myself included. It's not anxiety - It's: 1. approaching situations like this with a full understanding of how some people will take full advantage of the system wherever, whenever possible. 2. understanding the system intentionally doesn't take note of the damage caused at the fear of stopping allegations from coming forward (even false ones) 3. understanding there's nothing that wi…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 04:31 PM
23

Wow...your logic...it actually hurts my head. You seem to he approaching this with the idea men are predators that need to he exposed - with a corallery of women never stretch the facts to benefit themselves. Both of those statements are false! Some men are predators (as are some women) and some women stretch the truth for self benefit (as do some men). By making this a gendered issue to begin with, it's already rail roading a single party. I've already gone over the issues with the second point…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 03:54 PM
37

I think you may have missed the point here. This law is saying the opposite. "French criminal law has until now defined rape as a penetrative act or oral sex act committed on someone using "violence, coercion, threat or surprise". It did not make clear mention of the need for consent, and prosecutors had to prove the intention to rape to secure a guilty verdict." The wording of this law is concerning at best, and the anticipated "ammendments" are equally concerning. Here's why: The wording has r…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 01:46 PM
2

Agreed - men need to report it. Guys are in a tough situation. We don't think it's a problem, until things blow up. If it is an abusive situation (where she is the abuser), there's no hesitation to call the police. This heavily skews stats and paints an inaccurate picture of reality. The bigger problem is, you don't know how much of a problem this is, until they are in the middle of it. By that time, it's too late. The solution is to report it. Articles like this help raise awareness of the init…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 01:51 PM
3

I say take what we can get. Forward this - help spread awareness
/r/MensRights19/10/25 02:57 AM
23

Agree with you, however there are countless studies showing women are above human immorality. Women just don't make stuff up and falsely report it to the police - ever. /s
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:41 PM
6

I don't know if you've noticed, but you're in such a space right now. What we talk about is really up to the individual, and what they happen to be dealing with at the time. In this case, Men's Rights, or rather lack there of. In any event, the spaces are infiltrated and labeled misogynistic. What you're suggesting is akin to pushing a rope.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 08:06 PM
5

I can genuinely appreciate you are coming from a place of concern - thank you for that. The reality is, what you are suggesting is much easier said than done. There is too much anti male sentiment (legally, socially, etc). If men tried to attempt to create male spaces, they would be attacked and accused of being exclusionary. Women's groups and advocates for women's right would shut it down - hard. If you don't believe me, look at the YMCA. They had to drop the MCA to be more inclusive. We are l…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 04:37 PM
0

Depends on your coworkers and work culture. If the majority of your colleagues are women, or if your culture is heavily bought into DEI, then yes.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:56 PM
3

I'm so sorry to hear you've had to go through this once let alone twice. I also have been a victim of false allegations, losing my employment and giving her a leg up in family court. I'm looking into pursuing civil action - but this as we all know is financially punitive with no means to collect even if you win. Perhaps there is a silver lining to the Facebook shame angle in your case. This is a written record - and may count as liable. Stories like this need FAR more visibility. According to wo…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 09:28 PM
10

How could they. The thought of the legal system holding women accountable is generally unthinkable.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 03:47 AM
292

There should be the equivalent of a murder in the 3rd degree charge applied to the person who filed the false report. 2 lives were lost because she had a moment of regret. This story plays out all too often. This should include financial penalties as well as incarceration.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 10:08 PM
5

There's no consequence at all for false police reports when provided by women.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 04:35 PM
17

Two things. First, I'm Canadian. I don't agree with how POTUS goes about doing what he's doing, but I also believe the west can't continue in the direction "the left" wants to go without more checks and balances. Canada will most likely be going back to polls in the spring to eject the current government, which follows a similar path to what has happened in France and soon to be Britain. Second, body shaming shouldn't be necessary in any context. With AOC recently being called a "Porky Puerto Ri…
/r/MensRights07/10/25 04:05 PM
181

Uhhhh....hello???? Body shaming is PERFECTLY OK, if you're shaming a man
/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:42 AM
1

Agreed, but this is the one thing in our control and can action immediately.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 11:44 AM
13

When will people get it. Stop beating on each other. Period. Women beating men IS NOT a definition of a strong woman. This is the definition of a coward! Embracing a system they know won't allow any consequence to befall them, whether it be getting hit back, legal or social. Men don't live in that world.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 03:16 AM
1

I don't think this is opting out of chivalry. It's more defining chivalry as being a decent human...to all - not treating women differently when it comes to financial parity or ability to problem solve.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 04:19 PM
0

I think both are true. At one point, patriarchy was the foundation of society. There are still relics of this foundation that confound men and play into a newly renowed gynocentric model. For example, medical conditions are often described from the male perspective. In the DSM IV, i.e., it was thought that female serial killers did not exist. We now know this to be false. The laws are no different. Looking at the language used, aggressors are typically male, victims are typically female. I know …
/r/MensRights30/09/25 04:16 PM
29

Don't get angry. Use the same tactics when dating. See how quickly things change.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:06 PM
13

There's literally no such thing. Either some guy, somewhere, will find them attractive or they're not into guys. True hate towards men, means they aren't looking to attract them.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 12:12 PM
1

Fully agree with this
/r/MensRights19/09/25 12:53 PM
1

I disagree with your premise. Protecting offspring isn't a male /female dynamic - it's a parental dynamic. I will in the same breath argue men are into protecting the group (including the female) and women are focused on themselves and children, as they assume men can handle themselves. I think this is where th issue is. Women by default don't look out for men. It's not malicious, it's by design.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 12:35 PM
6

This needs broad circulation. Thanks for the resource. Hopefully there's something available on the other side of the pond.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 10:10 PM
28

This comment is riddled in expectancy bias and sheer ignorance of reality. Look at the data. In general, men fight with fists, women fight with words. Don't believe this? Check out ANY high-school in the world. Guys who fight end up with bruises, girls who fight end up with eating disorders. So yes, DV cases where women are actual victims show bruises - according to your statement, this is the only form of "hurt". Male victims of DV are falsely accused of violence, have their lives torn asunder,…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 12:54 PM
7

Not following the logic of this one. Regardless of your politics, that election was the most controversial in history having some of the most impactful ramifications to match. There were meltdowns on both sides, and depending on your allegiance, justification for both meltdowns. I kindly ask you to remove your "dead cat" from the table.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:15 PM
8

The problem is men. Maybe we should start demanding equal pay for time we work, or more likely, just work less for the same pay (to be on par with women). Nothing helps bring clarity to a corporation like declining earnings.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 12:19 PM
2

Yet, the laws don't see this as abuse.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 02:36 PM
2

What country are you in? Places like this still exist?
/r/MensRights04/09/25 02:01 PM
5

I'm in Canada. Spoken like false allegations have never been brought to you. Trust me...there's no such thing as innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 12:35 PM
48

Doesn't matter. Remember Bear vs strange man in the woods? Rational thought is a thing of the past.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 04:01 PM
29

I'm even pushing back on this one. One false allegation is enough to destroy your life. I would rather be in court trying to defend why I didn't act, as opposed to defending against false allegations.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:59 PM
14

Unfortunately, by staying in this type of environment, you are left with several options: 1. Wear a body cam at all times 2. Never do anything with just 2 people (yourself and another, especially if opposite sex) 3. Accept the potential of fall out if you don't do 1 or 2 4. Find a new place to work I sound jaded - I recognize this. Call it wisdom.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:57 PM
63

What's ridiculous is the lack of real consequences on the woman who fabricates the whole thing. It's a slap on the wrist at best. I mean, it's only pergury.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:54 PM
27

Or...if you're a guy, just don't touch anyone. Period. It's too easy to be falsely accused and there's virtually no defence unless there are witnesses who are willing to put their necks on the line.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:06 PM
150

False allegations are nearly impossible to defeat without video or audio proof. So sorry to hear this.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:04 PM
2

That's simple. Set the standard. Apply it to both genders. Understand how this standard applies to both men and women. We fool ourselves into believing men and women are equal. There are physical strengths and limitations to both, eg., men are stronger in general, women are more flexible. There is also differences in how we are socialized and interact. Go to any high-school in the world to watch true human nature. When guys fight, people end up with bruises, when girls fight, people end up with …
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:53 PM
9

Gonna be honest here. The question, although innocent enough has just enough ignorance to be infuriating. That said, it could be genuine, so I'll do my best to answer in swaths - if pressed, I can provide examples: The systems and processes in place. Although the language used may be equal in many cases, practices and execution aren't. For example, law enforcement practices an active definition of assault being (paraphrased), if you're larger, or stronger, then you can't be assaulted. This is gi…
/r/MensRights04/08/25 04:06 PM
1

And men quite literally make the bearing of those children possible (unless you believe women can self impregnate). Your "generally speaking" comments are dated. Look at any modern hetero relationship with kids. Men have upped their games significantly from the 50s. In fact, a good chunk of male divorcees complain about slaying dragons outside of the home, then coming home to do the same. The game has changed now, but the narrative favoring women hasn't. I'm not saying women don't contribute. I'…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 03:40 AM
0

I was replying to the bearer of your children line. There's only recognition of the female contribution.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 03:24 AM
0

This narrative has to stop. It takes 2 to make a baby and a village to raise it. Stop down playing the critical role fathers play in their children's development. Look at any study. Guys have much to be proud of in this area.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 03:08 AM
3

Are there services like this in Canada? It's refreshing to know this sort of thing is there. Thank you for what you do.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 03:40 PM
1

I did therapy. Find a therapist who deals with trauma. I was spinning my wheels until I did this. In this situation, pain is mandatory, suffering is optional. I understand there will likely be little to no consequences for her criminally, but there is child custody, decision making, finances, protection order, etc. I'm gearing up for a civil suit as well. If you go this route, pack a lunch. It's a long bumpy road.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 10:39 PM
0

Not following the last paragraph. Typically, Conservatives are Right of Centre....and how did you manage to turn this into a political argument?
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:39 PM
1

I agree. Asking for verifiable fact should never be looked down upon. Perhaps this is personal bias, but I don't think that's what the downvotes were for. I think people took issue with the latter part of your statement, which I believe was along the lines of "we all know that to not be true".
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:27 PM
4

Fully agree, however, I'm not just referring to predators. I think society has often viewed things from the male perspective only (yes, I'm talking about the patriarchy), however, an unfortunate side effect is, societal ailments of all kinds are defined solely as a male problem. Predators = male Abusers = male Twisted mindset = male I could go on. The challenge is that we have not evaluated how women present in the same situations. It's just assumed they don't partake. The narrative needs to cha…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:58 PM
2

What should be evident is there are more commonalities between the sexes than differences. A key difference is method of execution. The end results are similar.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:59 PM
8

Here's one back for you. I've been there too
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:51 PM
0

Makes perfect sense to me. "One of the bad men" is Latin for men who hold all (even women) accountable for actions and words.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 02:49 PM
1

I think this is the difference between function vs fashion. In general, men are geared towards functional and women the other way. So...yeah, what you said
/r/MensRights27/06/25 12:48 PM
1

Don't know about the "mostly American" thing. We've got them in Canada, and I can tell you from experience, the prosecution tries to slap them onto Not Guilty pleas the same way McDonald's slaps fries on to a burger and drink purchase. There are SERIOUS implications if you take a plea bargain (in Canada). On the lowest levels, it's an admission of guilt. If you didn't do it, you're probably better off mortgaging the house and going to court, instead of taking a plea.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 03:02 PM
1

The article is written from the position men are the abusers. Wasn't my case.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 02:15 PM
24

Courtrooms are not about justice.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 01:59 PM
1

Holding belly laughing... Fully agree with the statement, however... Any man who has ever tried to hold a woman accountable has been: * flamed on Reddit / media * divorced * arrested (falsely accused of course) * Any combo of the above Any woman who's tried to hold women accountable has: * transitioned and is subjected to the list above * hangs out on r/mensrights and has lost all credibility with women I think that's it.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 02:05 PM
18

Women cracked this code a long time ago. Talk...talk loud, support each. Rinse repeat. Don't stop the cycle until someone takes notice and does something about it. Why don't we just use the same formula?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 01:28 PM
1

Could this explain the global push to the left? More guys are staying single, making their mark while women look around and empathize with each other looking to the government to support the single mom. There are more women than men on the planet...
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:48 AM
1

I would agree with your above statement if you swap out the word "People" for "The loudest women".
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:45 AM
2

This argument can be countered by eggs were designed to accept only one sperm at a time. Occasionally two sperm penetrate at roughly the same time, resulting in an embryo with too many chromosomes, which results in miscarriage. The original argument stands. Regardless of how many potential sperm, the egg only accepts one.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:42 AM
0

Feminism isn't the issue. At its core, I don't think most people would have an issue with the idea of feminism - equality opportunities. The problem is far more insidious. Men and women aren't equal. There are some things men are generally better at and other things women are better at. Physically, men are stronger, yet women are smaller and far more flexible. One isn't better - just different. This is a simple difference, but there are more. It's the proliferation of systemic mysandry, selectiv…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:14 PM
15

Why wouldn't this behaviour be seen as toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights18/06/25 02:09 PM
1

Is "toxic feminity" a thing?
/r/MensRights17/06/25 01:52 PM
1

What you're alluding to in the 2nd last paragraph is what I came here to say. Advancement of a disenfranchised cohort, seems by nature, to paint any other cohort negatively in order seem "better". Take any movement be it feminism (which oddly enough didn't start this way), BLM, DEI, etc. and the trend shows.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 01:42 PM
1

Taking stats without a clear understanding of how they are to be used is the issue. When these were put in place , there was no concept of female abusers (women only were abused). I find it interesting society has leaned in this direction when the saying is "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" - is there a male equivalent?
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:54 PM
1

Fully agreed. Definitions seem to be written from a single gender perspective in most cases. Until recently, it was thought highly improbable to have female serial killers. The last 5 years has shown 2 (both nurses I believe) in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:50 PM
1

The term IPV has bias towards men. If you think about how the genders fight, look at any high-school in any part of the world. Guys end up with bruises, girls end up with eating disorders (or some other psychological damage). Violence implies physicality- the method guys choose to vent aggression. The term should be changed to Intimate Partner Abuse. There's already documentation defining different types of abuse and emotional /psychological are defined. Changing how we keep stats, we'll that's …
/r/MensRights17/06/25 12:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter