TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlackPills4Breakfast Archive

View 9 posts and 355 comments by BlackPills4Breakfast on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I did and the statistics from my country at least show that binge drinking is rapidly increasing and way beyond 90's levels. I understand why you don't want to reveal your country (because of privacy concerns), but I highly doubt that you have any meaningful statistics to back your claim up. Yes, I'm calling you a liar. Which is why I mentioned life style as well. Excessive alcohol misuse will generally make a 30-year-old look like they are 32. Other poor lifestyle choices may produce similar re…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 12:10 AM
1

20 years ago girls werent drinking in their twenties like they do now./ Spoken like someone who never experienced the 1990's. The affect of excessive alcohol consumption on physical looks is very much overplayed. The truth of the matter is that a lot of people just have good skin and hair genetics, so ageing will have a lesser impact on them, regardless of alcohol/drug consumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 11:24 PM
1

LOL. You can tel that that chart was composed by a 40-year-old guy suffering from a crippling midlife crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 07:43 PM
1

''The wall'' has always been around the time of menopause. It's only an incel revenge fantasy that women lose their attractiveness by the time they hit 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 07:04 PM
1

You shouldn't really believe or disbelieve anyone if there's no independent evidence for their claim, unless they are personally close to you and trustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 06:00 PM
1

How retarded do you have to be to believe that there's absolutely no way that there's a creator of this universe? A deist ''God'' could exist, but a personal ''God'' demonstrably doesn't. If a deistic ''God'' cannot or will not intervene, then what would make it different to observable nature?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 02:02 AM
1

Then again, your personal thoughts on this issue are almost certainly incorrect, statistically. So why would you even believe in that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:58 AM
1

That paranoid victim mentality is sooooooooooo sexy to the pretty m'ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:57 AM
1

Feelz before reelz.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:54 AM
2

Whatever makes you sleep at night, you weirdo. I think I may have sinned by my comment, so can you please pray to the natural elements and the scary hebejeebees for my entails to be saved tonight?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:54 AM
2

I understand why people are spiritual and/or believe in a God as a coping mechanism, but it's fucking stupid to put your head above the parapet and talk about real-life with that deluded mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:49 AM
2

Or what if you are full of shit and latch on to the antiquated notion of ''God'' because you can't face reality, and the alternative? I don't understand how you can rationalise the fact that when people lack knowledge, and have little or no education, they generally believe in God and the supernatural. Yet, when knowledge and education is abundant in society, God and religion dies. How would you explain that observable phenomenon?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:46 AM
1

Would it be too hard to cast your mind back to when you lived in Dansk? You must understand the context of my reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:40 AM
2

He showed things saying atheism is the fastest dying group around the world No. Wishful thinking, I imagine. Atheism is just the absence of belief in God or gods. This absence of belief is growing daily, as more and more countries modernise and have citizens who gain access to the internet. The hub of modern civilisation is Western Europe, and we have not only had atheism as a plurality for decades, but religious adherence is dropping exponentially, year by year.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:34 AM
2

I think it's important to note that when the original people invented the concept of "God," they were referring to something specifically, which is totally different from the "God" t [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:29 AM
1

Of course, it won't ''hurt'' you to be raised in that way. It may even be helpful for many people. The point is that it's completely and utterly retarded to believe in this fantasy if you have any kind of grounding in logic and reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:29 AM
1

Go on...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:27 AM
2

Aren't you from Denmark? Good luck finding a ''religious'' person in your country from a non-immigrant background. God and religion are dead in the information age. Accept it and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:26 AM
4

When people proselytize for atheism, I genuinely believe they just want to prove they're smarter than other people Or maybe it's just that ''God'' is a figment of the imagination of primitive humans without scientific resources? Hmmm?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:24 AM
3

ITT: No-one actually offering counter-evidence to the premise. But, ''muh beliefs'', ''muh beliefs!'' Sorry, cuntbadgers, that just doesn't work in the internet age of 2017. Most Western/Northern European countries are already atheistic, and these countries are the hub of world progress. The UK, France, Germany, etc. As other, less advanced countries modernise, their levels of atheism increase proportionately, and they get some education, which makes them eschew this superstitious nonsense. By 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 01:21 AM
1

You're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 12:18 AM
10

This kind of autism is probably the major reason why the pretty m'ladies reject you. That, and your ugly features and demeanour. Just admit yourself to a psychiatric facility, you fucking creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 12:03 AM
1

Let me show you this video of a Jamaican cricketer smashing it out of the park. Oh no!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:46 PM
1

The ''endgame'' is always the procrastinating weirdos palming themselves off about actually doing ''it''.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:08 PM
1

if you work hard, you will at least won't end up somewhere you wouldn't want to be.Cope, cope, cope. Cope, cope, cope. I'm not a millionaire. Oh, no problem, I'll just work hard and become one. It's as easy as ABC.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:01 PM
1

Got any evidence that they didn't view them as inferiors cross culturally? Are you seriously asking someone to prove a negative? Please delete your account. The standing notion is that the evil patriarchy has been a cross cultural phenomenon fuqboi There's no ''standing notion'', you fucking baby. Have a word with yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 10:40 PM
1

Your entire post is a shit test. You're expecting a load of betas to validate your post with attention. That's just not going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 10:34 PM
1

I answered the question. Recorded history spans a few thousand years. When I get some scientific evidence to support the ''hypothesis'' that males cross-culturally view females as ''inferior'', then I'll think about changing my opinion on the matter. Until then, fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 10:21 PM
1

"sit in your ass" (just be yourself) That's not the implied meaning of that phrase at all. "actually do something"(go for it) Yeah, there's a real difference in these feel-good platitudes! Go for it! Totally!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 10:12 PM
1

Fathers who want to be in their children's lives, but women who know their support payments would suffer in the process, so they make both the man and the child(ren) suffer her greed. In other words, men who irresponsibly fathered children with women. You're saying that socioeconomic status is the only indicator of whether women will attempt to take advantage of men? I'm talking about social (as in social nous and acuity) and sexual ''have nots'' - nothing to do with class or socioeconomic statu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 09:32 PM
4

The worst maternal mortality rate in the world is in South Sudan, where 1 in every 50 women die through childbirth or complications from it. Even allowing for the fact that it's the most impoverished country in the world, there is still limited access to modern medicine for a lot of people there. It just goes to show how pregnancy and childbirth was a slightly better odds version of Russian roulette for women throughout human history. I think that this risk is always underplayed in assessments o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 09:17 PM
2

Not a white man, think the amount of racism directed at them right now that everyone shrugs off is disgusting. It's shrugged off because it's easy to shrug it off. ''White privilege'' is an inarguable concept, but it's got more to do with simple mathematics and human nature, rather than anything more sinister. The use of the word ''privilege'' is intentionally divisive and shit-stirring, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:58 PM
3

Genuine asexuality would have to rely on some extremely rare undiagnosed/unobserved condition of the endocrine system, so it's pretty much non-existent. It's more of a mental/social condition, and it's really weird when someone displays it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:48 PM
3

It's the kind of language and concept which gets uncritically regurgitated by the manosphere/altright types, yes. Seriously, if you used the phrase ''absolving women of their agency'' in a crowd of people who didn't care what that phrase meant, they'd still rightfully assume that you were some weird, sex-starved nerd who lives on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:45 PM
1

Men who want to do what women want them to do. I just don't see the argument, yet. Taking responsibility for - what would be a good example of a man taking responsibility for his actions that a woman could not take advantage? There are an infinite amount of possibilities. I believe the RP would somewhat accurately relate it to the concept of ''frame''. I'm not being lazy here, but I'll just reverse the question to illustrate my argument: ''What would be a good example of a woman taking advantage…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:41 PM
4

That's what leads to the added creepiness which so many of them display. A slightly robotic, asexual vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:13 PM
1

Fortunately they are the trash who take themselves out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:11 PM
2

TRP/manosphere/MGTOW/altright/gamers, etc. They are all symptoms of the same cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:08 PM
7

I think that these kind of questions can easily be answered by ex post facto pseudoscientific evolutionary psychology. Just observe how people behave in the present day, and make up some unrepeatable, unobservable and unfalsifiable ''theory'' which promotes your personal prejudices.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:06 PM
2

Peg the old butt-pirate with his pegged-leg. That'll make the ol' captain ''ooh arrr'' a bit. He won't even need an eye-patch, as the massaging of the prostrate will make him ''go Japanese''. He may not be ale to ''keep a look out'' from the ''crow's nest'' for a while, if you know what I'm saying. But following the above advice regularly should prevent him from ''walking the plank'' for at least the foreseeable future.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 08:02 PM
2

Socially and sexually inept white men are lashing out as the world carries on as it has done in all of recorded human history FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:54 PM
2

Can you elaborate, here? If a man takes responsibility for his actions, then he can't be taken advantage of. Women possess no physical power over men, so there's no primal fear of violence, nor coercion taking place, which forces him to do anything which he doesn't. Ergo, it's the man's responsibility not to be taken advantage of. Not that all women- or even most - would necessarily take advantage, but the old adage, ''you give an inch, they take a mile'', applies to a sizeable amount of men and…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:52 PM
0

Firstly, Men wouldn't be able to be taken advantage of if they took responsibility for their actions. Secondly, any civil threat which women hold over men is only enabled and enforced by other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:33 PM
11

redpillers rely on "hard work" to get there. The irony is that they mock the ''just be yourself'' platitude, yet totally buy into the feel-good ''just go for it!'' and ''you can do anything of you put your mind to it!'' feel-good, motivational drivel. The RP and BP are equally deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:18 PM
1

Discussing opinions and beliefs shouldn't rely on anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:16 PM
1

More like ''random anonymous internet poster makes random anecdotal claim which cannot be verified, but conveniently ''backs up'' point which they were originally shit-posting about''.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:14 PM
2

There are lots of extroverted incels. While it's obviously a comedy, Jay from the Inbetweeners is a send-up of exactly that type. There's a world of difference between normal, functioning people who have no success with women, and those who wallow in these kind of corners of the internet. The former are normal, and are generally sexually inhibited, shy and self-conscious. The latter are invariably mentally ill narcissists with an unhealthy fixation on being validated and adored by their peers. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:11 PM
0

Of course you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:02 PM
1

It's not ''just world'' at all. It's cause and effect. It's largely not the fault of the bottom 5-10% that they are social and sexual failures. But because that is the reality, they become embittered and hateful towards those who reject them (young, attractive women and ''normies''), and try to elevate themselves above others in the social hierarchy (hence their fondness for alt-right ideology).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:02 PM
1

I mean that even so the threat of a man physically harming a woman is a rare occurrence - certainly compared to the same threat posed to a man - there's still a primal fear of conflict when a woman faces 95% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:58 PM
2

Where is RP deluded? AWALT, the wall, hypergamy, lifting being the answer to the world's ills, women are like children, alt-right politics, evolutionary psychology, confirmation bias on the aforementioned concepts, etc. The list goes on. They create a highly ordered and structured ''reality'' to combat their feelings of no control,fear and helplessness, rather than face the actual realities of the world. This is classic coping behaviour. If one is truly nihilist, what stops them from becoming da…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:54 PM
2

Not top 20%. More like this bottom 5% are pre-existing failures who squander any chance of meaningful improvement by wallowing in self-imposed victimhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:23 PM
7

The unfortunate truth is that men get turned on by expressing their own sexuality and presenting themselves as a sexual being. This is why catcalling is a thing, and is also why a lot of men will creepily make comments about their sexual activity or ''what they'd do'' to a woman. They want all the attractive women - and bros who they are trying to impress - in earshot to imagine them having sex when they do this. The good thing is that like most other anti-social urges, most grown adults who are…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:20 PM
2

I think that both men and women feel this on a primal level. However, men will experience this from a varying percentage others, depending on how threatening they are, themselves. Whereas women will experience it from just about 95 of men. I think that most men will develop a more severe fear of conflict because men are exposed to the real or implied threat of physical violence on a far, far more regular basis than women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:14 PM
2

Most black pill ''incel'' types use it negatively until in warps into their fantastical worldview, with nonsense such as ''looks are everything''. The problem with BP and RP is they are both filled with delusion,wishful thinking and just world thinking. I think that positive black pill is about accepting and internalising nihilistic reality and accepting your limitations.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:43 PM
0

Because they lack physical power. If a woman has a grievance she can hardly take it up with a man with anything other than words. This the trait which low betas and omagas also have. This is why you'll notice that almost all so-called ''AWALT'' traits are also observable in low-beta and omega men. Women, low-betas and omegas are petrified of conflict because they know they will get physically rekt.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:37 PM
1

I identify as black pill because I've always assumed it to be synonymous with genuine nihilism. Just like nihilism, you can mope about it and be in a near-incessant state of existential angst, or you accept it and use it positively.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:08 PM
5

The truth of the matter is that the manosphere/altright are social and sexual failures. It is clear in the vitriol in their writing, and also by how much they oppose feminism and SJW concepts. In reality, modern day society benefits white men even more (at least those who aren't social and sexual failures).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:04 PM
1

Strong username to post content ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:18 AM
1

There are some serious ugly fuckers in the criminal underworld.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:04 AM
5

Women over 28 are worthless 28? Granny fucker. Girls generally hit the wall when they are about 14 or 15 (no paedo). I remember this HBBBBBB9 19-year-old post-wall slut eye-fucking me and rubbing her exposed clit against my crotch. And I was like ''nooooooo thank you, I'm just going to wait here for these prime, fresh and moist peak 13-year-olds to finish their class at school''. Post-wall slags are so deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:53 AM
2

and end the genetic lineage of my kind. If you have siblings, uncles/aunts, or first cousins, then you not procreating will have no bearing on your ''genetic lineage''.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:43 AM
1

Nah, that's for beta chodes. You have to have a menacing, criminal, and violent vibe. Then the women will have knickers like the Niagara Falls.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:39 AM
2

A great tactic I've found is to creep up behind a pretty m'lady and breathe heavily on her ear/neck area. She will turn around, which is a shit test. Do not hesitate to take the next step and drool and dribble on her neck - like a komodo dragon - as this will make her tense and nervous (another shit test), but as long as you maintain frame and growl like a wild animal whilst continually breathing and salivating on her, then she won't be perturbed at all. Females love this animalistic sexuality, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:36 AM
2

Run bad boy/local drug lord game.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:30 AM
1

because what’s inside matters The wheels on the hamster wheel go round and round, round and round...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:29 AM
1

Are we just wasting time until we die? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:27 AM
2

I don't have any personal vendettas, but I dislike the gays, communists and Buddhists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:26 AM
1

Some Melanesians are even blacker than Africans.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:19 AM
1

Just maintaining frame, my brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:08 AM
2

Oh, I forgot about the Slavs. Your observation is not unfounded, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:07 AM
1

Northern European (British, Scandinavian, German, Dutch, Belgian, northern French, etc.) Southern European (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Greek, southern French, etc.) Eastern Europeans (Polish, Russian, Bulgarian, Serbian, Ukrainian, etc.) North African (Moroccan, Tunisian, Libyan, Egyptian) Middle Eastern (Iraqi, Lebanese, Saudi, Kuwaiti, Emirati, etc.) Sub-Saharan African (black) South Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi) South-East Asian (Thai, Vietnamese, Laotian, Burmese, etc.) East Asia…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:05 AM
1

Edited to include sub-Saharan African.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:54 AM
1

Both.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:52 AM
1

anime Nerd alert.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:51 AM
1

You sound defensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:51 AM
1

I can't tolerate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:40 AM
1

People own pets to satisfy their paternal/maternal instincts. It's really creepy shit, and I don't know anyone with an above-average IQ who owns a pet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:39 AM
1

So if I can shoot rabbits, then I can shoot fascists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:37 AM
1

People who own pets are pathetic. They are not children, you fucking creepy weirdos.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:18 AM
1

Apparently they don't do ''it'' too much down in Puerrrrrrrrrrrrrto Rrrrrrrrrrrico.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:13 AM
1

Just make sure your hen night ''antics'' are kept on the down low. Go to Amsterdam or Bratislava or somewhere, so as you have plausible deniability when your omega cuckold future ''husband'' questions why you couldn't walk straight for two solid weeks after your ''holiday''. Also, don't forget to sperm-jack one of the many, many Chads who you will fuck, and pass the future baby off as your husband's. It's your civilised duty to ensure that you get filled with alpha spunk, rather than some worthl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:11 AM
1

This is how we do it down in Puerrrrrrrto Rrrrrrrrrico.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:59 AM
1

Your wording is a clusterfuck of confusement. There's a reason why the yankee players were kneeling at Wembley yesterday, when they were playing a poor man's version of rugby.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:49 AM
2

I genuinely believe in equality, just so long as those pretty, yet enragingly unavailable feeeeemales learn to know their place in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:47 AM
1

Black people in US commit almost all the violent crime per capita That comment makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:42 AM
1

The judge even complimented him before sentencing his ass. High SMV male.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:41 AM
1

I'd bang her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:40 AM
1

Mongolians had a bit of a horse culture. I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Genghis was a prototype ''Mr. Hands''. I'm guessing that ''mummy'' wasn't in the picture, ergo the aggression and butthurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:39 AM
1

Thankfully, I'm not from the land of government police murdering black people indiscriminately. AKA the USA. I can only comment on the court proceedings in my city in the civilised world. 0.0x% of people will ever commit a serious crime, and an even smaller number will actually appear in court..
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:32 AM
1

Although, Katarina Witt was also one of my first crushes. She was so beautiful! The Olympics were certainly a stage where my nascent sexuality came to the fore!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:19 AM
1

Me. /Nuff said.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:12 AM
1

LOL no. You appear to have a disconnect from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:08 AM
1

How about SEAL team 6 I'm glad those cunts died in that crash in Afghanistan.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:04 AM
1

Most men don't go to court.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:02 AM
2

I don't know. I used to like Steffi Graf when I was younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 11:06 PM
2

German men are generally the antithesis of manliness in the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:52 PM
2

I saw Tintin trek through the Himalayas to save his nigga Chang in Tibet. I also saw Tintin defending the Roma people before it was fashionable. However, they were just comic books which I read when I was a child. They are not important in the real world and my day-to-day life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:38 PM
2

'''Nuff said'' is just a colloquial way of saying ''enough said'' in English.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:31 PM
1

That looks pretty childish to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:29 PM
2

Germany 'Nuff said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:26 PM
1

No, TRP is good, if you wade through the bullshit. The problem is that the kind of awkward, nerdy, spectrum-dwelling boys who inhabit it will not understand congruency. In real life, they'll come across as that creepy, possibly deformed ''baddie'', which is a staple in horror films.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 10:24 PM
2

I don't know where you live, but girls who enjoy this kind of immature ''art'' are invariably in the ''can't skate through life with my looks'' category.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:52 PM
1

Well that rules out 99.9% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:49 PM
1

We need to stop this immature reddit (wo)man-child glorification of childish things. Anime = cartoons for children. Comic books = comic books for children. Video games = video games for children. Cartoons = cartoons for children. Superhero/Fantasy = superhero/fantasy for children. We've got to stop grown adults normalising these childish pursuits in modern-day society. I enjoyed watching Tom & Jerry, Roadrunner, Danger Mouse, etc. on the TV when I was a young child. I also enjoyed reading Tintin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:45 PM
1

Are you sexually attracted to Donald Trump?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:32 PM
2

These are guys who literally need a online cult to tell them how to act and behave in normal social situations. Imagine these 3/10, socially awkward dweebs attempting to apply this ''I'm the prize'' and ''dominant'' persona? Cringe Actually, that doesn't even explain the thought. Cringe x 10 Nope, that still doesn't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:30 PM
6

No-one cares about your gay nerdery. Fat neckbeards and legbeards need to leave the anime, comic book and videogame worship behind. It's pathetic. Geeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:19 PM
1

Male Purple/black Hypothetically yes Yes Yes N/A
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:12 PM
4

The answer to your question OP, is as soon as he stops providing the beta bucks, and the ''duty sex'' becomes so much of a chore that you go down to your local police station and fabricate a rape claim. That should get him out of your hair for the time being (and, hopefully get him in prison for the next 20 years), which will leave you with all the time in the world to shag Chad, Brad and Thad, which your primitive childlike hindbrain is craving for. Then, your next step should be to hook in ano…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:10 PM
9

Are you hitting on me again? Here, take this smirk, followed by a shit-eating grin, but not an upvote - because I'm an edgy badboy who is acting aloof.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:00 PM
0

Ah, that's going to be a bit of a problem, because I love those nails digging in on a handy or blowy. You need to grow those nails longer to please your new master, twink.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:50 PM
1

Only if they are going for dat dere tommee-tippee look.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:48 PM
6

Bite me, twink.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:44 PM
3

I see we watch the same kind of real life FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:42 PM
5

The hottest kinds of crime are when a hot man dominates, humiliates or degrades another man, regardless of the circumstances. This is a certain way of creating those tingly twinges, and I'm not even joking here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:25 PM
14

It should also be acknowledged that I know several people of <insert relevant demographic>, and they always say and do things which support my opinions and beliefs. For example, if I believe that women all settle with beta bucks after they hit their early-30's, I will always ''know several'' women in this demographic who very conveniently have openly and candidly stated that they have ''settled'' for stable, non-tingly betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:10 PM
2

Although, to be fair, God did pass Lot's wife's shit test quite well. She was really salty after that, though. However, I think that scripture would have been a lot better if God used more amused mastery, smirks and shit-eating grins.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:04 PM
10

Another example of the Penis Pass is God/Allah/Jehovah/whatever. He behaves like a complete and utter bell-end throughout most of scripture, and completely loses his frame many times in the Old Testament. Yet people worship him like he's some kind of divine being.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:47 PM
4

Penis Pass = Donald Trump elected US president. Imagine a woman living his lifestyle, and doing or saying the things which he has, and getting anything more than 2,000 votes. The Penis Pass is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:44 PM
3

Nice guys are just the result of social ineptness meeting male solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 06:52 PM
1

Yeah, and in day-to-day life?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 10:49 PM
0

Pink isn't a girl colour. Yet we have trans activists, teachers etc pulling psychologists and the authorities into cases where a boy likes pink, thinking that somehow means he's transgender. You're all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 10:46 PM
1

Well in Canada there's the whole law thing. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 10:43 PM
0

The point is that arbitrary gender binaries in interests are things feminists have seemed to do away with, along with the shaming of boys and girls who don't conform to those binaries. The idea that a boy liking pink or playing with dolls doesn't make him a "sissy" or "fag" or "wimp" or a "girl", for example. He can still be a man, no matter his interests, as the interests and their implications are purely social ideas and mean nothing on a biological level. Feminism - and every other ideologica…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 10:19 PM
6

Transitioning before puberty would certainly be beneficial for children who eventually become transgender as adults, but in the absence of any kind of individual neuroscientific evidence, then it's just not practical or ethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 09:58 PM
6

Pointing out your ignorance on the subject isn't demonstrating anything But an emotionally charged reply to an innocuous comment probably is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 09:54 PM
4

An increase in testosterone generally makes men more emotional. ''Roid rage'' isn't just an urban myth. Sitting at 3361ng/dl and run other steroids besides testerone. If you've never done roids or had high t keep the 140lb science nerd shit to yourself. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 09:14 PM
1

I don't see the contradiction here. It's an indisputable fact that society is stratified along male/female gender lines, which are generally - but not entirely - analogous with biological sex. It's also an indisputable fact that some people who are born into their biological sex are unhappy with it and are much more comfortable to identify as the other gender. There's no contradiction there, at all, unless you think that people who ideologically want to break down rigid gender roles in society s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 09:08 PM
4

Trans people should work on educating the population on how gender works instead of getting into arguments over pronouns imo. Where are there serious arguments about pronouns? If a man presents himself as a woman, then it's only polite to refer to him as ''her'', and vice versa. The xe, xer BS is just tumblrina teenage angst which does the rounds on right-wing internet communities. In reality, any grown adult who requests unique pronouns is obnoxiously anti-social and/or mentally unstable to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 08:58 PM
2

Scientific studies would beg to differ In what way? I'm pretty sure that the effects of varying levels of testosterone on a person's mental state and behaviours have been scientifically studied and acknowledged. There is definitely a point of diminishing returns when it come to testosterone levels. Yeah, there's a cap on how much of anything the body can actually utilise, and the amount is often quite low. The upper limit for testosterone must be reasonably higher than natural production, becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 08:50 PM
3

No, I've witnessed it in more than one person. Normal and low levels of testosterone influence your mental state and behaviours. You'd be hard-pressed to argue that the effect stops at the high and extreme end of the scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:58 PM
5

I don't think that there's a problem with children exploring other genders. It goes without saying that it's abusive for a parent or any other adult to push a child towards a non-binary gender. Obviously, absolutely no hormones should be administrated before adulthood. It's interesting, though, because as transgenderism is (rightfully) increasingly normalised in society, it's going to be more accessible to children for experimentation. So it's going to be a challenge to discern between those who…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:54 PM
7

It's the estrogen fluctuations that do most of that. I'm not sure about that, People with natural high T levels tend to be more emotional. It doesn't exist the way most people think about it I've witnessed it first hand, and it does work in a similar way to how most people think of it. Eg. Heightened emotions, lack of self-control, paranoia, misplaced feelings of invulnerability, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:41 PM
13

An increase in testosterone generally makes men more emotional. ''Roid rage'' isn't just an urban myth. People with high testosterone levels (natural or artificial) are generally quite neurotic, so the higher the T, the more similar they are to women, in that respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:10 PM
1

Like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 01:28 AM
1

There's no difference. The difference is in your perception, which falls under the confines of strong hamsterisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 01:13 AM
0

Yanks gonna yank.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 11:02 PM
1

Dominance and domineering are the same side of the same coin, so this just seems like mental hamsteration.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 10:57 PM
2

The point is that women can be victims, or on the receiving end in particular circumstances, in society, but that neither proves nor disproves feminism or anti-feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 10:53 PM
1

A large amount of feminism is probably felt by ''the grass is greener'' mentality. However, there are some societal mainstays which they have every right and justification to change and alter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 10:49 PM
2

Because the idea that any kind of mainstream feminism includes the concept of ''women are capable of anything'' is an intellectually dishonest strawman. People on both sides don't give enough respect to the differences in the male and female endocrine systems. A lot of RP men just come out with simplistic and uneducated ''hurr, durr, I have 10-20 times the amount of testosterone as you'', and think that that can explain the differences. A lot of BP/feminist men and women like to completely ignor…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 10:04 PM
1

So, I am more right than I realize. I think that your beliefs ares somewhat misplaced if you think that there is any kind of ''wisdom of the crowds'' concept on the internet. Sadly, an internet community is just as likely to be that creepy weirdo leading and orchestrating a cult, rather than an someone preaching logic, reason and tested knowledge. Freedom implies equality, but equality does not necessarily imply freedom. Establishment and stewardship of an equal society necessitates an intrusive…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 09:51 PM
6

Feminism is paradoxical in that its ideology says women are capable of anything while at the same time women are victims. That's a somewhat simplistic and un-nuanced view, which I'm sure that you picked up from internet communities, rather than the real world. That's a bad thing because equality does not necessarily imply freedom. I think that personal freedom to make your own life choices would constitute the very definition of freedom. Same can be said for a manned mission to Mars. Yes. And a …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 09:18 PM
9

My personal problem with most TRP topics (other than the over-excited, sometimes delusional content) is that really awkward, almost pompous way that they type. I know they have rules on how to structure an OP, but even within those broad rules, contributors still invariably manage to come-off as really socially and verbally awkward, trying hard to gain attention, and basically writing like an illy-formed human robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 09:12 PM
2

Many aspects of feminism, yes. Feminism mainly wants equality, and that concept isn't without potential, considering that global empathy and good behaviour go hand-in-hand with large portions of affluent and civilised socities in the West. Many of their beliefs, however, are based upon unprovable concepts, pseudoscience and ridiculous emotional biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 09:05 PM
3

To each his own.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 09:01 PM
1

''Morality'' is just a concept to prevent negative feelings and assuage our consciences. If someone is comfortable about their beliefs and actions, then no non-existent and nebulous external concepts are relevant. Fortunately, most people have a normal degree of empathy and a nagging ''righteous'' conscience, which enables the majority of us to live in a peaceful and civilised society.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 09:00 PM
3

So why do you come on a subreddit like this if you aren't entertained by the content?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:53 PM
2

We can still gain entertainment value, and find out about others' personal experiences to give us something to think about. Subjects like these, though, are just pure mental masturbation, because long after the time which we have been unknowingly inculcated by environment in our formative years, can we even offer some level of introspection about it, by which time it's too late to offer any knowledgeable or informed perspective on the development.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:51 PM
1

Because anything else is agenda-driven mental masturbation. We all know that people suffer from all sorts of internal biases, so any opinion formed is going to be heavily slanted by what you want to believe, your emotions and your conscience. You can try and be as objective as you like, but this doesn't always work. In a matter like this, where we have no fucking way of knowing how a boy or a girl would be influenced in a non-gender-stratified society, then any such discussion or observation abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:42 PM
12

This is more of that unprovable mental masturbation. We can't accurately ascertain how much influence is nature and how much is nurture in the formative years of a child's upbringing in a gender-stratified society. The only way we could find this out to any degree of accuracy would be to conduct unethical and illegal experimentation. And even then, the results would probably have too many accounted for variables to serve any valid purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 07:17 PM
2

I mean more specific non-male behaviours, like passive aggressiveness, negative gossiping and talking shit behind someone's back, etc. Those kind of behaviours are frowned upon by many men, as they seem snide, cowardly and disloyal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 07:11 PM
1

If they use attraction to their partner, and/or get bored with the relationship, then there's a possibility of that, in the same way that men do. A big difference is that the average woman is more likely to have viable cheating alternatives with relatively attractive men, wehreas the average man is likely to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 07:07 PM
2

Hypergamy is RP hamstering about the fact that women are attracted to attractive men. No need for pseudoscientific bunk to explain this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 06:14 PM
5

The problem with AWALT is that almost all of the behaviours attributed to it are easily found in low-tier betas and omegas. People don't want to acknowledge that the big difference between women and alpha/high-beta men is power - and by ''power'', I'm talking about raw physical power and a propensity for violence. This is why women and low-beta/omega men avoid confrontation and exhibit these behaviours. You can't exactly expect a woman to express herself in the same way as a confident man, becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 06:12 PM
2

What is honestly and logically bad about cuckoldry? Because it's the sexual expression of a major character flaw. It's a grown man indulging himself in his depravity, rather than fighting against it, which again shows a weakness and contemptible level of character. As long as it doesn't result in any children that have to deal with the complicated nature of the conception, I don't really care. Smug ''moral'' virtue signalling will get you nowhere, and it certainly won't earn you any brownie poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 11:26 PM
3

How does consensual sex between people bother you so much? Does gay sex bother you too? For fuck's sake, can't anyone on this sub argue honestly and logically?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 11:12 PM
2

I refer you to my above comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 11:10 PM
2

''Kink shaming'' is good. Kinks don't occur in a vacuum. They are the sexual expression of a person's psyche. Voluntary cuckolds are the most contemptibly vile creatures, and BDSM fetishists should be acquainted with a little bit of Zyklon B. We need to stop with this ''judge not, lest ye be judged'' bullshit, and also stop with this idea that pervy kinks are miraculously separated from the person's mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 11:08 PM
3

that we need to enslave them? Jesu Christo. Can't anyone on Purple Pill Debate actually participate in a discussion which doesn't involve logical fallacies which would make even a 10-year-old child blush with embarrassment?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 11:01 PM
1

I see what you're saying, that it WILL exist as a term used. However,, when I mean "doesnt exist" I mean it not existing after being put under a logical lens. There is no illogicality about potentially accepting another gender, as gender is socially defined. As previously mentioned, some cultures have already accepted and acknowledged third genders. I am referring to the people who demand pronouns OUTSIDE of the male\female\neutral, like xe, xi, xer, bun, bunn, bunself, etc. How many people in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 10:57 PM
1

I don't really know or care about US politics, so I can't really comment on the election of their political leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 10:50 PM
1

Here's my main gripe with the whole "more than two genders" thing. Just now you described these people WITHOUT the need of a third gender. You just used adjectives. There's no need to make each individual "adjective" a new "gender". I largely agree wuth you about this. As things stand, there are two defined genders, and most transgender people will fall within one or the other. However, if a third gender becomes so prevalent that society officially accepts and adopts is, then there will become a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 10:18 PM
1

I don't believe I should listen to a biologist about biology because they are a biologist, other wise I would have to also believe any other biologist even if their views perfectly contradict Dawkins This is where scientific literacy comes into play. People like Dawkins aren't just plucking their scientific knowledge out of their arse. All hard sciences are easily falsifiable, and there are millions upon millions of professional and amateur scientists around the world who could falsify scientifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 10:04 PM
1

No. For socially inadequate sexual failures, the internet leads to personal and social ''devolution''. The only good thing is that these people won't breed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:58 PM
2

but sexualizing themselves isn't innately creepy Speak for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:56 PM
2

That's always a safe, unfalsifiable platitude to hide behind. Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:55 PM
1

So, transgender men. Men who are transgender. There's no logic to consier that a third gender. As far as I'm aware, these cultures acknowledge them as a different gender. They mainly comprise men who are more comfortable adopting a female persona and identity, and effeminate gay men. No, there MUST be some logic behind it. Just because a bunch of idiots say things, doesnt make them factually true. The logic is that if there's a sizeable enough minority of a non-binary gender, then society will a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:53 PM
2

Ah his "authority" isn't valid. That's exactly the same as saying that a phd makes you valid and correctness does not. OK, this should be perfectly simple: an eminent biologist discussing biology is someone who you should listen to about the subject of biology. An eminent biologist pontificating about philosophy and religion means jack shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:44 PM
1

I dont assume. If they try to associate things like "right wingers" to "racist", then that's a problem. You did assume in your initial reply. Accusations of ''racism'' are often used to silence others through shame, so I understand your trepidation about that. Except that it's not really a strawman, since many leftists do that all the time See https://i.imgur.com/6qTczcZ.png How could some random link possibly invalidate my comment? That's not how it works. It still needs to have a logical expla…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:37 PM
3

You are surprised that women are people just like men and so being people they have sexual fantasies as well? How did you come to that ridiculous ''conclusion'' from my comment? We are discussing a particular sexual fantasy which is highly popular amongst women. A fantasy which involves the woman being degraded and ''owned'' by a sexy and dominant man. How many men have sexual fantasies which involve their own degradation and submission, other than BDSM sub weirdos and cuckold freaks?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:27 PM
4

How could he be correct on the matter but invalid? His authority on the subject is invalid. Philosophising and mental masturbation are not something which is relevant to biology. His opinion about God and religion are as valid as yours or mine. It's just that he's another example of someone dishonestly hiding behind his reputation to propagate his personal feels. I say this as someone who fucking stumped Dawkins in an AMA r/thathappened I take you believe that a phd is what makes a view valid no…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:23 PM
1

you say creepy, the rest of us say sexy. No, the rest of us don't. Female creepiness is usually unacknowledged because they don't pose any kind of physical threat, but the creepiness is there, nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:15 PM
1

Does your average anti-fem have like any idea about Feminism outside of a surface level? The problem is that so many socially inadequate and sexual failures live on the internet, so things which are big on the internet, but which are small in real life, take on an incommensurate levelof importance to those on the spectrum and the other assorted riff-raff who populate communities such as Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:03 PM
1

No, but it's a slippery slop. I've seen that type of """argument""" THOUSANDS of times already. A lot of left-wingers do engage in virtue-signalling, immature ''gotcha'' name-calling, and canned hivemind comments, but you shouldn't assume that everyone expressing left-leaning views falls into this category. In addition, strawmanning any left-leaning beliefs into an idiotic caricature of the worst of left-wing expression is intellectually dishonest and an insular way of thinking. HAHAHAHA. You do…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 08:11 PM
1

I'm obviously using ''say'' in the context of internet comments. Commenting anonymously on the internet is more of a ''doing'' rather than a ''saying''.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:58 PM
4

So when they say things like ''I'm normally quite left-wing, but...<insert ridiculously right-wing comment>''. It's easy to observe that their self-declared purported political views are not real, and they are actually of a different political persuasion than the one which they claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:08 PM
3

No, I meant the bit about Nazis, homophobia, etc. which I never mentioned. You've just got to accept that the right-wing is the losing side as education and science catches up with people. Right-wing ideology is based on fear, ignorance and scientific illiteracy. Left-wing ideology is hardly without its flaws, but when you improve education and scientific knowledge, then most people will adopt a slightly left-leaning world-view on the majority of issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:06 PM
2

Stop strawmanning.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:00 PM
7

Yes, when these pop scientists and professors get their 15 minutes of fame, it all seems to go to their heads, and the hero-worship which is bestowed upon them by various betas and omegas just fuels this. What this guy says outside of his field of expertise is completely irrelevant, yet he, and others of his ilk, appear to be hiding behind the appeal to authority fallacy. Richard Dawkins is another prime example. He is an eminent biologist, but his views on God and religion - even so he's largel…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 06:59 PM
3

The sexualization of self is literally how human beings find mates. you have to signal availability to be considered. Not at all. A woman's sexualisation of her self is very creepy. Men do this to a lesser extent, and consequently only mildly creepy. I also don't think dominance puts you at the bottom of society. it could, but it could also out you at the top. you think wealthy and successful guys got there by being pushovers? Most people live in their own little bubble. For example, there's a h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 06:51 PM
3

Writing comments on internet discussion boards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 06:40 PM
0

Except it is exactly a liberal perspective because it's a human perspective. Liberals dislike masculinity and the alt-right because they can't control them. It's exactly the same thing. It's how they deal with it, though. Acknowledging and accepting unpleasant truths about reality and society shouldn't automatically lead to fear, anger, hate, and passive self-indulgence, which is what RP and alt-right ideology appears to be based on. The link between these thought processes can't be denied. You …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 01:05 PM
1

Do women look for that? I don't know, but I'd guess that they wouldn't be too numerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 12:40 PM
1

Because pressure is relative to the individual who experiences it, so someone may be able to easily brush off something which externally looks very difficult, while others may get in a tizz about something which appears to be not a big issue. Then there's also those who suffer in silence, with each pressurised situation gradually gnawing away at their mental equilibrium.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 12:39 PM
5

The sexualisation of the self is very creepy, and women are generally more prone to this than men. It's fucked-up because they are turned-on by displays of dominance and humiliation by high-value men. The very traits which put someone at the bottom of a civilised society are at the top of behaviours which women sexually select for. It's obviously not something to get too bothered about, as people can't help their DNA, and it's not exactly like male sexuality is without valid criticism. When I sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 12:34 PM
1

I think that's marketed towards the aforementioned men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 12:24 PM
1

The entire formula of their thought process is conservative and reactionary. They generally dislike women and femininity because they can't control it, which doesn't sound like a very socially liberal perspective. It's like a subreddit lamenting the behaviours and traits of a particular race, and claiming that they have left-wing members. There's even a ''redpillright'' spin-off sub which is full of fearful alt-right bollocks. MGTOW is much the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 12:23 PM
2

This is exactly why it's pedantic to dispute that women are turned on by the idea of being raped. It doesn't mean that they are turned on by some creepy random person violently raping her, but it means that they are turned on by a strong, dominant and attractive man having consensual sex with her in a manner which would be correctly classified as rape by independent and objective judgements.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 10:03 AM
6

It is a matter of perception, but I'm using civilised society as the standard. And by civilised standards, much of female sexuality is creepy and fucked up. Even more so than male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:45 AM
2

But it's not to the actual woman, and usually if a woman is raped and claims to be raped, it's based on their experience. Subjective experiences and introspection are invariably clouded by biases, rationalisation and a huge vested interest in the outcome. A person's beliefs and behaviours can only be judged to any degree of accuracy by others. Your example of rape is very pertinent. Rape is defined by the laws of your country. A woman may feel that she was raped, and the man may feel that the se…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:38 AM
1

Watch what they do, not what they say. Humans generally aren't logical, and put feels before reals. Self-declared beliefs are irrelevant, as everyone forms their thoughts and beliefs through biases which assuage their conscience. The fact of the matter is that RP ideology is based on fearful, reactionary, conservative, black-and-white thinking. The same traits are used to form right-wing political beliefs. It's impossible for someone to be genuinely politically left and have RP beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:29 AM
3

That's irrelevant, because a person's behaviour is judged objectively and independently, and not on an individual's subjective experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 09:02 AM
7

I don't understand how people are like, women are into rape. Rape is literally sex one doesn't want, so while people could be into extreme stuff, bdsm, etc, it all seems to be in the context of something they want. That's a little bit pedantic. When people say that women are into rape, they don't mean that she would be turned on by some creepy, balding 50-year-old in a dirty anorak dragging her down an alleyway. What they mean is that they are receptive to an attractive and dominant male having …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 08:45 AM
8

A lot of light is correctly shone on the more negative aspects of male sexuality, but it's very much a taboo to acknowledge that a lot of female sexuality is really creepy and fucked up. The fact that most women want to submit to a dominant man, and suffer sexual degradation from him, is something that is swept under the rug, even so most people know that this is true. I'm convinced that religions didn't highly regulate female sexuality for the sake of it. It was more a response to unchecked fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 08:32 AM
5

Everyone - men and women alike - are fighting their personal battles. It's absurd to suggest that there's some kind of external scale of ''pressure'', when pressure situations are developed internally.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:25 AM
11

Women are looking for the male unicorn - a guy who is a twat towards others, but nice to her. A passably attractive man who displays dominance, throws his weight around and dominates an humiliates others gives women the tingles. It has to be accepted that women sexually select for many obnoxious traits in a man. This is why it's really difficult to muster any kind of sympathy for a woman in an abusive relationship. It seems that the concept of ''you made your bed, now lie in it'' is miraculously…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:20 AM
3

Watch what they do, not what they say. Self-declared political beliefs are worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:09 AM
3

I highly doubt it. Manosphere communities are populated by reactionary alt-right types, which is why they largely can't be taken seriously. If they had a large and diverse cross-section of men, then maybe they would be taken more seriously, but, in the end, they are just yet another offshoot of alt-right sexual failures.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:07 AM
3

I would definitely not put out early, as 99.9% of heterosexual men would be receptive to a non-fat young woman offering sex. To men, sex is isolated and detached from any emotional or romantic feelings, so having sex with a man in an attempt to make him like her is a futile endeavour.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 07:01 AM
2

The link between RP, MGTOW, MRA, etc. and alt-right, reactionary,''religious'' style beliefs, can't be denied. I highly doubt that the average man from these communities was anything other than traditionally sexist and/or misogynistic in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 06:49 AM
-1

Strawman. Are you denying the point/argument? And plenty of successful men are incredibly misogynistic too. Yes and no. Hell the most misogynistic man I've ever met had a triple digit N. You seriously need to step away from the internet and experience the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 07:36 PM
1

What do you mean? Misogyny is practically synonymous with being a sexual failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 06:23 PM
11

Your argument is strawman ''feminism''. You're attempting to create a bogeyman with a supposed ''gotcha'' involving concepts which are not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 06:21 PM
3

Misogyny is an overused and often misused term. It's almost become synonymous with the term ''sexism'', even so sexism and misogyny are two different concepts (even so there's a lot of overlap amongst men who hold the ''sexist'' position). Misogyny - as in an actual hatred for women - is a mindset which is only held by sexual failures. Just look at areas where misogyny is a prerequisite, TRP, MRA, MGTOW, etc. The one common denominator amongst these ''men'' is that they are all sexual failures. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 06:09 PM
0

Did you reply to the wrong comment? It's just that it seems completely unrelated to my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 02:12 PM
0

I don't think there is anything more contemptible than a voluntary cuckold. These people are pure human trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 11:01 AM
1

It's obviously appearance. Youth is factored into the rating of her looks. eg. 35-year-old who is a 7/10 is probably facially an 8 or a 9, and a 19-year-old who is a 6/10, is probably only facially a 4 or 5. It's just that women's faces and hair quality generally finish developing and ''feminising'' as early as their mid-teens (no paedo) and maybe as late as their very early twenties. There's no physical improvement they can make (other than weight loss for those on the chubbier side of things) …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:45 PM
1

It really will.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 10:42 PM
1

People are more on their best behaviour when they first meet each other. And any deviation from this will be found out from knowing each other for a short amount of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 10:25 PM
1

Don't get defensiveness over shallow. You understood what I meant. I know exactly what you mean about it. But why should I bother debating with someone who can't understand a bigger picture?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 10:10 PM
1

Most people meet their partners through organic means. It's highly unlikely that a man who dates a woman he knows will be deceived by her personality or behaviours.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 10:07 PM
3

I'm sorry to hear about that. From what you've described, I can't imagine picking off skin. It was largely tied to anxiety, and getting treated for anxiety helped my dermotillomania too. I still have episodes, especially when I'm stressed (and it doesn't help that stress causes me skin to break out, which makes it so tempting to pick.) Yes, it's very difficult when the plucking or picking is related to some kind of mental state, even though it's not a conscious action.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 10:02 PM
2

Not sure If true but it freaked me out enough to stop doing it. It's sort of true. If you pluck the same hair over and over again, then you could damage the follicle permanently, so the hair stops sprouting. This won't be noticeable unless you pluck the same hairs in the same patch for a number of years. Hairs also grow in cycles, so if you pluck a particular hair, it may not grow again for months and years, but, once again, hair coverage is dense on most parts of the body where it grows, so it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 08:31 PM
3

The very fact that you're asking this question shows that you know full well what the ''point'' is. This is more of a rant/vent than an honest topic for debate. I don't mean to sound patronising, but you really need to steer away from the manosphere, as it sounds like that their pseudoscientific and ''headless chicken'' nonsense is seriously and negatively affecting your mental state. All five of your bullet points are just slavishly repeating RP rubbish. Out in the real world, dating isn't real…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 08:23 PM
3

Does anyone else here have personal experience with trichotillomania (compulsive hair plucking)? About three years ago I developed it in my nose, as it was so satisfying to pluck those nasal hairs out. After a while, the urge spread to my eyebrows, sideboards and above my ears. Just recently, I've also started to pluck out the hairs on the cheek portion of my stubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 08:13 PM
2

I believe this is false, there can be a multitude of non shallow reasons attraction is lost. Well, firstly, losing attraction for someone because they become fat is no more or less ''shallow'' than any other reason. ''Shallow'' is just shaming language used by people who don't possess a particular trait which many other people sexually and/or romantically desire. Secondly, what other reasons do a man lose attraction for a woman who they have known for some time? People change. Become bitchy, ann…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 07:52 PM
6

Yes I agree with this. If hypergamy literally means women will typically branch swing or cheat, the possibilities are endless because so many men have something subjectively "better", and yet not all women will branch swing or cheat. Looks, height, charisma, dominance, status, money, other personality traits, etc. The list of factors which can and do contribute to a woman's attraction towards a man are quite extensive. So extensive, in fact, that a man who was smack bang average in all of these …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 06:33 PM
3

Friendships - like sexual relationships - are formed organically through propinquity and chance. Most people don't generally go out and search for friends in some kind of systemic process.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 06:23 PM
8

The major problem with RP's intellectually dishonest definition of ''hypergamy'' is that it's impossible to separate the idea from confirmation bias. If a woman cheats - sexually or emotionally - then, by definition, she found the man attractive. So RPers just hamster away the fact that she was attracted to him because he was attractive, by clinging on one of their unfalsifiable pet theories. Considering the fact that a woman's attraction to a man is generally multi-faceted, it's not hard to fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 06:18 PM
3

Nice try. Abortion or adoption is is a personal choice flor a pregnat woman. A man, however, has 100% control over whether he impregnates a sexual partner, or not. We should be looking at why so many ''men'' are shirking their responsibilities of providing for their flesh and blood.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 12:34 AM
1

You know that I'm correct, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 12:13 AM
2

Heterosexual men and women are notoriously bad at assessing the attractiveness of their own gender. It's more than likely that these ''chiselled featured'' heroes of yours are just 4-6 in the male looks range.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 11:15 PM
6

A man makes his reproductive decision when he decides to ejaculate in a woman. Shirking responsibility for this conscious action is pure cowardice. If the ''father'' isn't paying towards his responsibility, then obviously the state will assume his financial obligations. It's hardly surprising that the state will chase up all deadbeat parents who fail to care for their progeny.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 11:11 PM
5

AWALT is demonstrably false in the literal sense, as anyone with only a passing knowledge of genetics and epigenetics would know, An AWALT mindset would generally work in a casual dating environment, but it's going to bite you in the bum if you operate under that mindset in any semblance of a serious relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 10:32 PM
2

You even acknowledged that it may be down to experience, but you're still using it as an argument that 30-somethings aren't physically over-the-hill?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:50 PM
2

I think clean shaven actually least preferred, but I hear you. I think that clean shaven or slight stubble has the most broad appeal to women of all cultures. Almost all indigenous peoples shave their facial hair, despite a well-trimmed beard being potentially more practical. My main claim is that men and women don't value neoteny the same. Our SMVs have different starting points and different trajectories. The problem, which I'm outlining, is that for men to go some way to compensate for their …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:45 PM
1

The Manager is his 30s has more status than the Data Entry Clerk in his 20s. No, it's about expectations. The manager in his 30's didn't achieve that position overnight. He would have been geared towards that trajectory in his younger days. Similarly, if a 20-something Data Entry Officer is doing that with an obvious career path in place, then no-one will care.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:36 PM
2

it's not just an anecdote, guys in their 30s are generally more useful on job sites [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:32 PM
2

If you are considering growing out your beard to attract women, don't ask what a majority of women like; ask what a majority of hot, young and stupid women like. The majority of ''hot, young and stupid women'' also prefer clean-shaven guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:30 PM
2

women often prefer a rugged older dude to a college numale. By ''college'' I'm guessing that you're referring to university. Of course 18-19 year-old university students will look weak/unattractive in comparison, because their face/body generally hasn't masculinised fully at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:28 PM
2

I don't understand why actual data on men and women setting their age range for an allowable match on a large dating side would be any less admissible than that. My comment is clearly personal opinion. Citing some dating site ''research'' as if it bears any weight in the discussion, is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:23 PM
2

I know a lot of guys who work physical jobs and guys in their mid 30s are generally much more capable than guys in their early 20s That's just a personal anecdote. It's demonstrable that - across all physically demanding sports - participants start to lose their reflexes and recovery abilities in their late twenties.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:20 PM
2

All of that doesn't really matter because most women prefer clean-shaven or stubble. If beards were sexually attractive, then they wouldn't be a trend or fad which comes and goes every couple of decades. They are fare more easier to maintain, yet most men don't grow them because they know that they don't generally do anything for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:15 PM
3

But the expected trajectory caters for that. Take being a doctor, for example. The expectations are in place as soon as the person goes to university and studies medicine. There is just no possibility that a random 30-something could decide to become a doctor. And this is similar with most professions. People just don't become successful in their 30's out of the blue. There's a career trajectory which they started in their twenties, or even late teens. Someone may become a Managing Director of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:11 PM
6

Completely uncontrolled data from an online dating site should be completely inadmissible on this forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 11:04 PM
5

How does social status depreciate? If you're a 20-year-old cashier at Tesco, then no-one gives a damn. If you're a 30-year-old cashier at Tesco, then you've got some problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:59 PM
5

What's important about OkCupid data?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:53 PM
8

You cannot wish your warped beliefs into reality. Sorry to tell you that, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:51 PM
3

In almost all sports, late 20's and especially early 30's are when players and teams start changing their schedules because they just can't hack it anymore. That should be a monumental wake-up call for everyone. Just think about it: a 29-year-old guy now needs an extra day's rest because he's not as physically capable as he was when was 22.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:49 PM
8

A woman's physical peak is a few years younger than a man's. A woman doesn't really lose her physical attractiveness in the same way that a man does, though. Most men will still get rock hard for a 40+ woman, just so long as she's not fat, and has a reasonable face. A woman's ageing is generally more stable and gradual, whereas men can suffer from aggressive balding, premature greying, double chins without being fat, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:44 PM
9

You say it's just a "coping mechanism". Does that mean you don't think there's any truth to it at all? There is no way that 30+ men are more physically attractive than they were in their twenties, unless they make a lifestyle change like losing weight. The only way that a man can increase his attractiveness as he gets older is through personality/life experience and increasing social status. The big problem is that most men have already made their mark in social status whilst they are in their t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:36 PM
6

But facial hair isn't really that important. Women who prefer beards are a minority, as most prefer men to be clean-shaven or have some stubble. And unless a man has some bum-fluff facial hair like a 14-year-old boy, then stubble will look fine on non-blond men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:25 PM
13

Imo your mental state gets better as you're a little older, you have more life experience, and that's something that makes pretty much all aspects of your life easier, including dating. This is absolutely true. But you can't defeat Father Time, looks-wise. Men tend to physically peak in their early to mid twenties, stay steady through their mid to late twenties, and even their early thirties if they age well, but it's all downhill from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:19 PM
5

Men do wrinkle more slowly, due to more collagen, kind of like black vs white people. The difference between skin decay in men and and women is marginal, though. Any slight advantage in skin degradation which men have is more than offset by balding and going grey, on average, 5 years earlier than women. In addition, women can improve their skin via make-up and can die their hair with social impunity. My beard is thicker, my bones are denser (true for most men). I'm starting to grey on the sides …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:13 PM
20

but my late 20s and early 30s were way easier than my early 20s Well that doesn't really tell us anything. You could have had a major lifestyle change and/or improved your physical appearance. To put it bluntly, a fat person who decided to hit the gym in their 30's is going to more sexual success than they did in their teens or twenties. That doesn't mean that they are more successful because they are 30+.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 10:02 PM
58

Men don't age like wine. That concept is just a coping mechanism for 30-something guys who can't face the reality that their balding, greying and wrinkling appearance signals the fact that their attractiveness is clattering downhill with the speed of a runaway train.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 09:38 PM
1

I thought you were the person who cited the wikipedia entry? Perhaps not, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 08:29 PM
1

That's actual hypergamy, though. Not the twisted, intellectually dishonest RP definition of it. Hypergamy just means dating up in social class, which is an observable phenomenon amongst poor and uneducated women - mail order brides being the most obvious example of this. When women have free choice in their dating partners - like in the West - then they generally date within their social class.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 08:15 PM
1

You're the one who cited a wikipedia entry which quoted pseudoscience, so....
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 08:11 PM
2

Odell Beckham Jr. is regularly called out as one of the most emotional athletes for his on camera anger. I have no idea who that guy is, but I'm assuming that he displays somewhat childlike emotions. I accept that ''emotional'' can also be used for people with a rather childlike lack of control in emotional fortitude, but those people are - thankfully - few and far between.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 08:04 PM
1

I refer you to my previous comment. Pseudoscience is not science!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:59 PM
4

I mean, your narrow rationale is correct if you only argue that men (defined as creatures of emotional outbursts in your OP) equate crying as the only emotion. ''Emotional'' is often used as a euphemism for crying. For example, when sports reports state that a sportsman is ''emotional'', they always mean that they were in tears or fighting them back. A sportsman who displays anger is never called ''emotional'', even so they are as emotional as if they had been crying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:47 PM
2

You need to work on holding that frame, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:42 PM
2

Citing pseudoscientific and highly inconclusive/uninstructive studies in an attempt to dispel the pseudoscientific nature of the claim? Whatever tickles your pickle, matey.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 06:36 PM
1

How on Earth are you taking 27-30 minutes to run/jog 5 kilometres? Are you crawling along the ground for some of the way? I walk 5km in 44 minutes, and, although I'm a brisk walker, it's not uncommon for me to be outpaced on the pavements. I don't see why so many people appear to be flabbergasted at the idea of turning a 44-minute walk into a 15-16-minute run with a couple of weeks of endurance training.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 06:13 PM
7

It's just astrology for pseudo-intellectuals. Anyone who takes MBTI seriously just shows that they have a very primitive, uneducated and superstitious understanding of the world and reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:50 PM
5

Did this comment sound good when you imagined it in your head? Unfortunately, in reality, it just comes across as some mumbo-jumbo, platitudinous drivel.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:24 PM
3

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:21 PM
4

I don't think that it's a question of ''being good at it''. I don't care one way or another which pseudonym is posting a comment. The understatement of user identity is one of the best features of Reddit, as far as I'm concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:21 PM
3

I don't understand. I just read your comment, and had to consciously make an effort to see that someone with the moniker of ''DarkLord0chinChin'' made it. Which has no relevance to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:09 PM
3

Ignore - like downvoting - = butthurt option. I don't care one way or another about any poster on Reddit. This site isn't like a traditional internet forum, with easy to identify avatars and signatures. I read every comment just as a generic one, because there's no obvious individuality associated with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:04 PM
2

It was just a rough estimate, considering my walking speed coupled with hypothetical endurance training.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:51 PM
5

Rather difficult, due to the fact that usernames are somewhat unobtrusive on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:50 PM
2

And...?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:43 PM
2

I walk briskly. I could walk 5km in 45 minutes. I hardly think that it's too far-fetched that I could run/jog 3 times faster with a couple of weeks of endurance training.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:42 PM
11

Yes, it really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:39 PM
9

Enough with that MBTI BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:39 PM
9

women REASON via emotion Exactly the same as men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:05 PM
3

As stated, if I had the inclination to take part in two weeks of endurance training, then I would.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 04:03 PM
3

Just read that comment as ''if I had the inclination''.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 03:36 PM
1

I'm more of a walker than a runner. I walk at roughly 4.2mph (6.8kph), so I'd walk a 5k in about 44 minutes. If I had a couple of weeks of endurance training, I reckon that I'd run a 5k in about 15-16 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 03:23 PM
4

What? Both that idea and hypergamy stem from female nature. [citation needed] Right, all of RP are idiots. Coming from a black pill, lol. I never said that they were idiots. Acting illogically, and adopting an illogical worldview to stop negative feelings does not make them idiots. In fact, striving to gain some sort of emotional equilibrium is entirely logical, even if that emotional state is achieved through illogical beliefs and practises.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 03:02 PM
1

The idea arises from RP's emotionally-based, pseudoscientific rubbish about ''hypergamy''. It basically stems from a warped worldview; a worldview which was created entirely to assuage their emotional disharmony.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 02:03 PM
1

Men are ''supposed'' to be attracted to long, flowing hair on women, and whilst I find that attractive, I think that most women look better with their hair scraped back in a pony-tail.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 01:56 PM
1

Rape is whatever your country's laws define it as. Mentally masturbating about the subject on an internet message board serves no purpose whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 09:57 AM
4

There's no such thing as ''involuntary celibacy''. It's just a self-indulgent term used by picky people and people who don't have the bollocks to proactively try and have sexual relationships and intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 09:54 AM
4

Ched Evans wouldn't have been convicted if it were just a simple case of ''he said, she said''. All of these mental masturbatory arguments are just the luxury of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 09:01 PM
6

They won't be able to, because it's one of those intellectually dishonest RP/MGTOW/MRA claims which doesn't actually stand up to scrutiny. Any criminal case with that as the prosecution's trump card would be laughed out of court. I think that a lot of people who live on the internet just don't understand how the real world works. For a criminal case to even come to court, there has to be some strong quality control for a prosecution to be made. Private businesses and organisations will not put a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 08:01 PM
1

What is he renowned for outside of his political and military history? His sexual exploits are quite renowned. It only seems ''idiotic'' to you, because I presume that you are a woman (judging by your OP).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 02:33 AM
1

They're not so different, it's just that the hormonal cocktail produced by the male endocrine system creates a much stronger urge for aggressive dominance, both socially and sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 02:25 AM
1

It looks like one of those penis gourds which you see remote tribesmen in the hills of PNG wearing. This item of clothing is obviously intended as a joke, though. So I wouldn't read too much in to it, if I were you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 02:09 AM
11

Your personal childhood experiences don't equate to ''most women''. In addition, I think that it's fair to say that the kind of man who sexually propositions a 10-year-old girl is somewhat an exception to the norm. Having a bad experience with a male paedophile isn't really instructive of normal male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:58 AM
1

I think that it's a reasonably well-known story about him, if you look beyond the more SFW facts about him. It's hardly ''idiotic'' to have sex with that many women - although the numbers are likely an exaggeration, as even dictators will lie about their n counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:36 AM
1

Because power and sex are inexorably linked. You can achieve something without power (such as Newton and Tesla), without sex being a by-product of it. Whereas if you achieve something with power and dominance, then sex will ultimately follow (eg. Genghis Khan, Castro, and every single other sexually-functioning powerful man in history).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:20 AM
1

That's reasonable, but for a man, casual sex and ONSs are about power and dominance. By having sex with her he ''possesses'' and ''owns'' her, and gains validation and social bragging rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:16 AM
1

But their achievements weren't power-related. Nobody thinks that Newton was a virile dick-swinger because he came up with the Laws of Motion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:08 AM
1

I'm going to speculate that both were on the autism spectrum. Although he was one of the greatest scientists in history, Newton spent an inordinate amount of time trying to scientifically prove the Bible - in other words, barking up the wrong tree. It seems that science was almost a side issue to him, as he persevered with trying to find a non-existent biblical ''code''. Even if Tesla had had a missus, you just know that she would have hopped on the dick of ol' Tommy Edison, with alacrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:55 AM
0

Why get legally married, though, if divorce is a potential option somewhere down the line? The pros of legal marriage don't appear to outweigh the potential cons of divorce, for either party.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:49 AM
1

So? It's claimed that he slept with over 30,000 women - something which is more renowned than any other non-power related accomplishment which he achieved. And power = sex, so one would assume he had the pick of the Cuban lasses, even without hearing about his notoriety for this behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:43 AM
4

Nicolas Sarkozy's wife stated that basically she got the tingles for him when she thought about his ability to devastate other countries with France's nuclear arsenal. A woman's sexuality is a really, really dark place when you do some digging.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:30 AM
3

Yes, but surely even a small journey into the real world would dismantle the ''80/20'' nonsense, and the cuckold fantasy that women are getting pounded left, right and centre by muscular, throbbing-dicked Chads. This is why it almost seems like an exposition by aliens - aliens who can't fathom how the real world and socio-sexual human dynamics actually work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:02 AM
2

If he had been a virgin eunuch, he'd have been derided for his impotence. Dan Bilzerian is semi-famous. Other men are renowned for huge n counts, such as Fidel Castro. Compare that to whoever won the 10 metre prone air rifle Gold Medal in Rio, who probably doesn't even have a recognisable face or name in their home country.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:56 PM
2

People who interact with each other regularly, unwittingly ''get their foot in the door'' as a relationship partner (so long as they are not weirdos) and put themselves in pole position for a potential relationship with someone close-ish to them. It's amazing how so many think that a woman, for example, is going to ignore a 5/10 in favour of a 8/10, even so she's never met that hypothetical 8/10, yet the 5/10 is in her immediate vicinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:42 PM
1

If Genghis Khan had been a limp-dicked virgin, would he have been viewed the same? Of course not. He would have been a laughing stock, despite being one of the most successful warlords in history. With power and dominance, comes an assumption of sexual success. You mention Olympic athletes, but a Gold Medallist in an unglamorous sport or discipline is virtually unheard of, as opposed to someone who hasn't achieved much but is well-known for fucking attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:28 PM
1

You really don't understand men...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:18 PM
3

I met this really nice guy at the bar. The chemistry was instant. He was funny, charming, and had a killer smile. We talked about our lives for a bit, joking around. We then went back to his place to watch a movie and have a few drinks. One thing led to another, and we ended up having really wild sex. It was a lot of fun and I hope we see each other again. While you're not wrong with your paraphrasing, this really isn't what men are looking for in casual sex. The enthusiasm level of the whole qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:16 PM
2

Every man wants to have sex (eg. power and dominance) over attractive women. Stating the purported sexual exploits to other men is an attempt to exert power and dominance over them, by showcasing your achievements and prowess in the highest competitive field (shagging women).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:08 PM
3

It means something along the lines of being actually close to another person on a physical and social level. As in, you're in or around their social circle and within their immediate proximity. For example, a 5/10 or 6/10 male workmate is more likely to form a sexual relationship with an attractive female colleague, than a potential 8/10 whom she has never met. It's basically being in the right place at the right time, and ''striking while the iron is hot''.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:02 PM
1

Well, the study was from the USA, and they have way more religious fundamentalists than any other developed country.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 10:35 PM
3

15% of women age 20-24 haven't had sex since coming of age, but how many are doing it due to increased selectiveness? I think that traditional cultures and religions must come into play here. Despite what RP claims, many women (and sometimes men) from these cultures are still virgins into adulthood, due to family pressure and fear of social ostracisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 10:30 PM
3

People on this sub always underestimate the importance of propinquity in sexual and romantic relationships. Out in the real world, relationships of all kinds are formed generally formed organically, and purported ''requirements'' for men and women are actually very loosely applied. I sometimes feel like that half the contributors here are aliens, who are wracking their brains to understand how human sex and relationships formulate from scratch, even so these relationships don't form that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 09:37 PM
2

I think that it goes without saying that it's easier for men to get laid nowadays. The advent of Tinder, and social media in general opens up a huge number of potential sexual partners in your locality, whom you wouldn't have had a chance of interacting with in the past. In addition to the more modern methods, people still have the traditional methods available of meeting people through social circles, in the workplace, nightclubbing, etc. Also, there's less and less stigma surrounding people (e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 05:37 PM
2

This is just self-indulgent twaddle. A lot of men want to be sexualised in the way they sexualise women, and a lot of women want to be sexualised in the way which they sexualise men. What's the point in complaining about something which isn't going to change?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 04:01 PM
8

It depends on your age and exposure to it. I'm in my 30's, so I discovered sex and my sexuality in the pre-internet days. When I started viewing porn in my late teens and early twenties, I was able to easily discern between what was real/normal, and what was not. I think younger people are going to struggle with it, because I know that I wouldn't have had an idea of what was normal in the depictions, if I'd had access to hardcore pornography when I was in the 10-12 age range (a common age for ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 03:57 PM
2

You're ignoring the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 10:45 PM
2

If the RP didn't propagate these beliefs, then maybe they'd be a helpless victim. However, RP ''beliefs'' are inexorably tied to Alt-right philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 10:08 PM
1

Well, he's fat and ugly, so consequently failed to get laid. It's a wonder why more of these fat, ugly losers don't ''go postal''.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 09:59 PM
1

It takes all day if you have no running water or electricity No, it doesn't. It takes maybe 1-2 hours to do, without modern appliances. Sitting around waiting for clothing to air and dry is not ''work''.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 09:50 PM
1

If chores are fun or not I think is highly mbti dependent. Please stop talking to me. I can actually feel my IQ dropping from this ''discussion''.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 09:45 PM
2

Whatever helps you sleep at night, matey.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 09:41 PM
1

Mate, you've never been in a household where the washing machine went kaput. Yes, the process may take several hours, but 95%+ of those hours aren't exerting any kind of labour/effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 06:01 PM
1

Paul Eddington ftw! Great actor.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:54 PM
-1

Okay, now add another adult and several children to that. Maybe 8 hours per week. Nothing serious. So? So all the activities are fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:52 PM
0

Exactly. There's no way that process would take more than an hour or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:42 PM
1

Wut? In English, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:40 PM
1

WTF?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:35 PM
1

Ask your grandparents how they did it. You're erroneously conflating the washing and drying process of pre-machine days. With modern cleaning agents. Nope. I use traditional and biological cleaning solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:31 PM
2

You're being intellectually dishonest here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:29 PM
3

Go to a poor village in a third world country and see for yourself. They cook over rudimentary fires, How does this remotely relate to people in Western society?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:23 PM
2

In what era did washing clothes ''take all day''? I can - and have - handwash my dirty laundry within an hour, with no machines present.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:19 PM
1

Homie I hand-wash my bras and it takes about 30-45 minutes. And that's one article of clothing for one person. Washing all the clothes for a family of 4-5 by hand is going to take longer than an hour. Have you ever considered that you're slow in the process? The cumulative ''work'' of washing, airing and drying my personal laundry, would take me maybe 2 hours a week, without any machines. Let's not sugar coat this into something which it's not. in the past people did things like grow their own v…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:12 PM
3

In the past, "home management" was a much bigger job than it is today. Washing, airing and drying laundry would take 1 cumulative hour per day, maximum. Even before the advent of technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:55 PM
3

That's a matter of opinion...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:44 PM
5

I'm not sure why cooking is generally considered gendered. I love cooking, and creating new ''trial and error'' recipes! I agree that ''home management'' is not difficult or complex. I often wonder what these wives did in the past, when their husbands were working.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:41 PM
3

I'm a man, and I love cleaning. When you fill a bucket with hot water and add a bit of detergent, the frothing up is pure Nirvana! I actually enjoy most ''housewife'' duties.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:14 PM
1

She's sexually attracted to him, and she's cheating with him because he is better. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 03:35 PM
1

Back in the day, almost all married for money and better status. Beta Bucks. There's no need to get nostalgic for a past that never was. Many a housewife in a boring, frustrating relationship would have been pounded by the plumber or plasterer, whilst hubby was working his 9-5.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 03:33 PM
2

Ronaldo is better. Therefore she's cheating with him. If he weren't better, she wouldn't cheat. I don't see how this is so hard to comprehend. It's difficult to comprehend because you've accepted that he's 10/10, yet you're blundering around like a bull in a china shop, trying to dismiss the obvious. Ronaldo is a 10/10. Women are attracted to attractive men. Why introduce the unnecessary and unfalsifiable variable of ''better'' in to the self-evident concept of women being sexually attracted to …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 03:30 PM
2

How can you possibly say he's a 10/10, and yet somehow he isn't "better" than the man she's with? OF COURSE he's "better". The ''better'' is a self-evident factor of being a 10/10. No evidence to support a claim that Ronaldo is "better" than the man she's cheating on? Really? REALLY? it's self-evident. You said it yourself: Ronaldo is a 10/10, she's cheating with him, ergo, he's "Better". More and more circular reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 03:12 PM
2

It isn't. The man they're cheating with is more attractive. Again, circular reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 03:09 PM
1

Women who cheat are having sex with a man who's more attractive to them than the man they're with. This is just circular reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:49 PM
1

Of course she's going to cheat with Ronaldo. He's "Better" than the man she's with. This is a perfect example of confirmation bias. You claim that she cheats with Cristiano because he's ''better'' than partner, but ignore the fact that he's a 10/10 in a woman's eyes. Why introduce this variable of ''better'', when there's no need, or evidence to back this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:46 PM
5

Please state and set forth ALL the alleged coping mechanisms You are requesting an exhaustive list, even so I made no indication that I would provide one. The wall is a pretty well described phenomenon. The fact that you don't like it doesn't negate it. Every woman hits the wall. You're talking about aging, which affects everyone. Do men hit the wall when they bald, grey, wrinkle and sag? If by "yin and yang" you're talking about women getting their comeuppance in some sort of cosmic "fairness" …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:43 PM
3

My comment wasn't intended to name anything, so I suggest you that look into the mechanics of discussion and debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:26 PM
2

Trp simply looked at what women are marrying for. What are they marrying for?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:25 PM
1

The RP concept of ''hypergamy'' is circular reasoning. If Cristiano Ronaldo starts chatting up an average guy's missus, then she probably will cheat - logistics permitting. RP will claim ''hypergamy'', but more logical people would conclude that a handsome global icon with stratospheric status showing sexual interest in her is what made her cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:22 PM
3

OK. Glad to know you can accept the term's usage. It would be somewhat childish and obstructive to pretend that I didn't understand and accept the RP usage of the term. Yes, women are attracted to attractive men. So, what makes you think that women who cheat are ''trading up'', rather than just being sexually attracted to a sexually attractive man? The RP concept of ''hypergamy'' appears to be just confirmation bias of a flawed hypothesis. If a woman cheats, or is sexually attracted to someone o…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:12 PM
4

Coping mechanisms, wish fulfilment, perfect world fallacies = ''the wall'', for starters. Nebulous fairness, logic and purpose in life = their evo psych BS, and a general air of some kind of ''yin and yang'' in our existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:00 PM
3

--No one at TRP cares that you don't like the term of art use of "hypergamy". We're not changing for snowflakes. Get over it, and get over yourself. Why would they change? I've already outlined the sneaky (and logical) reasoning for its usage. If they manage to hook in more gullible and socially awkward losers by using a fancy Latin, ''sciency'' term to lend credence to their house of cards, then they'd be foolish to change it. If it ain't broke, don't fix it... -The term describes a set of repe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 01:55 PM
5

All TRP is doing is observing female behaviors and choices, describing and systematizing them, and setting them out for people to read. That's it. It's pure observation and reporting. The problem with RP is that it's very hit and miss. Their 'hits'' are often very insightful and instructive, but their ''misses'' are usually fanciful and deluded. There is just too much coping mechanisms, wish fulfilment, perfect world fallacies, and appeals to some nebulous fairness, logic and purpose in life, fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 01:48 PM
6

The use of the term ''hypergamy'' is a problem, because it's intellectually dishonest to misuse and abuse the term, in a haphazard attempt to gain some kind of legitimacy for a concept which is the figment of a sexually frustrated neckbeard's imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 01:42 PM
4

OK then, a ''social observer'' named F. Roger Devlin intellectually dishonestly appropriated the term. And now RP carries on the dishonesty by perpetuating it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 01:32 PM
2

Also, I would have liked an "other" option for the MBTI question so I could say it's stupid and refuse to answer. Whenever someone asks me my MBTI type, I always answer with my star sign. We should have moved on from this primitive and superstitious nonsense. Anyone who takes MBTI seriously just shows that they haven't got too much going on in between their ears. It's just astrology for low-IQ pseudo-intellectuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 12:08 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 11:39 AM
2

None of my three comments were ever intended to address this, so I think that you need to understand context in discussion and debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 11:18 AM
5

No, they use the term - along with pseudoscientific concepts derived from off-the-top-of-the-head evo psych BS - to hook gullible people into their ''product'', and for self-affirmation of their doubts. The idea of women ''trading up'' is illogical, and the conclusion is drawn from confirmation bias. Seeing as there are so many components which could potentially make a man attractive to a woman, then you would struggle not to find something ''better'' about Man B, as opposed to Man A. The RP con…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 11:00 AM
4

That demographic is tiny. Transgender people have no impact on the everyday life of cisgendered people. They are a very obscure side issue. If, hypothetically, transgenderism ceased to exist overnight, then no-one would even notice or care. It's only sad-acts who live on the internet who make transgender people a big issue. eg. Alt-right, radical feminists, TRP, and MGTOW types.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 10:43 AM
4

It's intellectually dishonest dishonest because they've picked up a fancy sociological term and twisted it to mean something which bears only a tangential similarity to its actual meaning. The only reason they use the term is to give the RP concept a semblance of respectability. I didn't say that the use of the term was illogical, as I've outlined the very logical and sneaky reasoning for the usage. It's the RP concept of ''hypergamy'' which is illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 10:33 AM
2

''Hypergamy'' means marrying up in social class. It's a sociological term with a specific meaning. RP has hijacked this term to lend an air of legitimacy to one of their illogical concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 09:46 AM
2

But please lord why can't men love to iron? Because there's generally no major difference between an ironed and unironed item of clothing. Once you finish ironing, you get a slightly better version of the original item. There's no achievement or ''orgasm moment'' at the end of the process, unlike DIY, cooking, or major cleaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 08:51 AM
2

No-one outside the internet really cares about transgender people or issues, one way or another. They aren't on most people's radars, as they make up such a tiny fraction of the population. I have sympathy with transgender people, and I support the ''normalisation'' of them in society, but I've only met 2-3 in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 08:40 AM
0

This study is completely flawed and worthless. The ''sexualised'' woman looks exactly the same as the ''non-sexualised'' one. The only difference being that her upper arms and shoulders are uncovered. It also claims something about ''Western cultural sexualisation'', yet they didn't carry out the experiment amongst non-Western men to draw any conclusions about environmental impacts. This ''research'' is pseudoscientific rubbish.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 08:30 AM
5

The intellectually dishonest RP definition of''hypergamy'' is definitely one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 08:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter