TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlueOrange22 Archive

View 261 posts and 1,239 comments by BlueOrange22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2620

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:13 AM
2031

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:31 PM
1843

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:58 PM
1172

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:13 PM
845

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:37 PM
773

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:32 PM
624

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/08/18 05:38 PM
549

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/07/19 02:50 PM
423

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/06/18 03:33 PM
410

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:09 PM
377

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:12 AM
352

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:27 PM
338

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:10 AM
332

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:34 PM
293

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:57 PM
254

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:05 PM
244

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/12/18 03:04 PM
243

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:49 PM
212

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:22 PM
211

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:24 PM
211

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:09 PM
208

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:11 AM
204

HealthBlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/07/19 04:09 PM
197

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:25 AM
194

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:16 PM
188

Eastern CultureBlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/10/17 09:42 PM
181

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:20 PM
178

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:03 PM
178

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:51 PM
176

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/01/19 03:43 PM
175

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:22 PM
170

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:58 PM
167

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:31 PM
167

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:32 PM
166

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:40 PM
149

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:43 AM
140

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights27/09/19 08:02 AM
139

HealthBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:35 PM
138

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:55 PM
133

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:10 PM
132

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:26 PM
131

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:08 PM
129

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:00 PM
128

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:50 PM
123

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:41 PM
121

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/10/18 10:03 PM
117

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:57 PM
116

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:19 AM
116

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:50 PM
116

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:34 AM
115

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/12/18 02:35 PM
114

HealthBlueOrange22/r/MensRights19/08/19 05:34 PM
114

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:33 PM
113

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:58 AM
110

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:15 PM
109

ProgressBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:25 AM
107

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:30 PM
107

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:47 PM
104

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:14 PM
104

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:49 AM
102

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:01 PM
101

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:41 PM
98

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/10/19 03:48 PM
95

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/12/18 03:51 PM
93

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/06/19 04:17 PM
92

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/11/19 04:18 PM
86

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:04 PM
83

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:27 PM
83

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:23 PM
82

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:08 PM
80

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:32 PM
77

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:28 PM
75

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:46 PM
74

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/09/18 08:53 PM
70

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:48 PM
69

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/03/19 03:03 PM
67

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:17 PM
66

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:17 PM
66

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:03 PM
65

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:41 PM
65

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:16 PM
64

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:43 AM
64

UnconfirmedBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/10/18 08:03 PM
63

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:04 PM
62

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:06 PM
62

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:58 PM
61

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/07/19 04:32 PM
60

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:15 PM
60

Marriage/ChildrenBlueOrange22/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:19 AM
60

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/06/18 07:40 PM
59

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/08/19 06:15 PM
59

ProgressBlueOrange22/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:04 PM
59

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:06 PM
57

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:37 PM
56

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/04/19 02:21 PM
55

NSFLBlueOrange22/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:36 PM
55

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:32 AM
54

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/19 03:04 PM
53

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/10/17 08:54 PM
52

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:28 PM
52

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:53 PM
51

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/11/17 01:08 AM
51

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:01 PM
51

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights03/08/19 03:31 PM
50

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:18 PM
49

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:53 AM
49

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:42 PM
47

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:59 PM
46

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:55 PM
44

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:35 AM
43

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:23 PM
43

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:58 AM
43

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:33 PM
43

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:44 PM
42

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:12 PM
42

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/12/17 07:20 PM
42

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/03/19 08:07 PM
41

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/19 05:10 PM
41

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:38 PM
41

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:34 PM
41

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/09/19 04:02 PM
40

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:59 PM
40

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights19/07/19 08:29 AM
39

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:49 PM
39

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:22 PM
39

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:41 PM
38

IntactivismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:51 PM
37

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:17 PM
37

HumourBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:31 PM
36

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:13 PM
36

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:50 AM
36

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/05/18 07:53 PM
35

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/02/18 12:32 AM
35

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/10/19 05:13 PM
34

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:43 AM
34

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:29 PM
34

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:16 PM
33

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:38 PM
33

Marriage/ChildrenBlueOrange22/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:58 PM
32

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/12/19 05:36 PM
32

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:44 PM
31

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/19 04:59 PM
31

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:42 PM
31

ProgressBlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:40 PM
31

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights09/11/19 04:44 PM
31

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:46 PM
31

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/07/18 09:07 PM
31

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/12/17 08:07 PM
31

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/19 07:27 PM
30

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:05 PM
30

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:06 AM
30

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:49 PM
29

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/12/18 09:20 PM
29

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:02 PM
29

HealthBlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/07/19 04:17 PM
28

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:43 PM
28

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:23 PM
27

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 05:36 PM
27

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/12/18 02:04 PM
26

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights28/07/19 06:57 AM
25

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/19 04:34 PM
25

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:15 PM
25

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:44 PM
24

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:28 PM
24

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/06/19 04:07 PM
24

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/11/19 09:10 PM
24

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:44 AM
23

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/08/18 10:48 PM
23

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:16 PM
23

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/19 11:31 PM
22

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/12/18 04:18 PM
22

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights19/10/18 08:49 AM
21

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/19 06:05 PM
20

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:56 PM
20

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:47 PM
19

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:54 PM
19

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:26 PM
19

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:23 AM
18

UnconfirmedBlueOrange22/r/MensRights19/10/17 06:08 PM
18

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/19 08:22 PM
18

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights17/06/19 09:32 PM
18

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:51 PM
18

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:44 AM
17

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:17 PM
17

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/19 04:34 PM
16

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:02 AM
16

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/12/19 05:50 PM
16

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:08 AM
16

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/19 07:37 PM
14

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:07 PM
14

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:45 PM
14

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:45 AM
14

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/02/18 06:21 PM
13

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:58 PM
13

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:39 PM
13

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:14 PM
13

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:41 AM
13

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights16/08/18 01:50 AM
13

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:43 AM
13

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:41 AM
13

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 07:15 AM
12

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:38 PM
12

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:29 PM
12

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/10/17 06:50 PM
12

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:26 PM
12

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights19/08/17 11:22 PM
11

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights03/11/17 09:04 AM
11

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:24 PM
11

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:13 AM
11

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:58 PM
11

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:55 PM
10

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:44 AM
10

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:05 PM
10

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 02:24 AM
10

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/19 09:31 PM
10

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/11/17 11:13 PM
9

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/12/18 02:40 PM
9

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:04 PM
9

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/04/19 05:23 PM
9

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:39 PM
9

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:17 PM
9

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:43 AM
8

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:57 PM
8

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:17 AM
7

False AccusationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/04/18 03:24 AM
7

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:38 PM
6

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:19 PM
6

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/19 11:34 PM
6

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:47 AM
5

Activism/SupportBlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:06 PM
5

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights26/07/19 03:50 PM
5

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights13/02/19 04:57 PM
4

Social IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:50 PM
3

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights25/04/19 02:09 PM
2

FeminismBlueOrange22/r/MensRights08/11/19 11:32 PM
2

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:02 PM
2

Edu./Occu.BlueOrange22/r/MensRights11/06/19 04:05 PM
2

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:04 AM
2

HealthBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:30 PM
2

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 04:26 AM
2

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:50 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:22 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:46 PM
1

GeneralBlueOrange22/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:57 AM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:32 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:31 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/19 04:30 PM
1

DiscriminationBlueOrange22/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:13 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:27 PM
1

Global IssuesBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:28 AM
1

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:56 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:46 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:06 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:35 PM
1

Anti-MRMBlueOrange22/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:40 AM
1

BlueOrange22/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 04:21 AM
1

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:09 PM
1

Legal RightsBlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:06 PM
1

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:05 AM
0

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:47 AM
0

BlueOrange22/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:27 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,239 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

This argument makes no sense, that 'punishing false accusations will make real victims afraid to come forward'. A consequence would only occur when an accusation is proven to be false, not just whenever an accusation goes unproven. This is very scary and dangerous considering what the consequences are for being convicted of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 09:12 PM
13

Thank you, and yes, you are welcome! Some famous MRAs are women, such as Cassie Jaye, Karen Straughan, and Elizabeth Hobson.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:25 AM
9

If one partner isn't working, regardless of gender, they shouldn't complain about 'unpaid housework'. The working partner is paying for their entire life- food, home, A/C, clothes, etc. Not to say housework isn't important, of course it is, but to act like the person not earning income is being treated unfairly is ridiculous. Childcare is one thing, that's obviously challenging and important. But simple upkeep for the house someone is paying for you to live in? No right to complain, and that goe…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 05:09 PM
27

The exact percentage is likely very hard to calculate, but it's certainly significant enough to be an issue. I recall of cases falling apart when it was revealed police withheld evidence proving innocence; Liam Allen was one such case, he spent 2 years in jail as police had evidence proving his innocence all along.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:20 PM
7

This is sort of a misunderstanding though, prostate cancer is still the cancer a non-smoking man is most likely to die from. There just happens to be many extraneous cases of slower growing cancers that 'dilute' the mortality rate.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:21 PM
67

But a campaign by so-called Waspi women - the Women Against State Pension Inequality - argues that they were not given enough time to prepare for the changes. This argument doesn't make any sense. Prepare for what? There;'s no time needed to prepare, now women just keep working like normal, just like men have to. It's not a 'historic injustice' to make something equal that was unfair to begin with. If anything, it could be argued that men should be compensated for all the years of extra work pay…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 03:50 PM
171

This has now been recognized as the official guideline in the UK, and has going on for a while. It's a two-tiered justice system where one half of the population can commit violence against the other half and receive automatic leniency.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 03:44 PM
9

The reality is, false accusations happen. Saying that isn't 'victim blaming' or trying to trivialize it, it's just the reality.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:51 PM
8

I lived in London for 2 years, and one of the comments I see matches my experience: think I heard that Nottingham City Council see homeless females as vulnerable and offer them shelter, but they don’t offer shelter to males because they’re not seen as vulnerable. Anyone know if this is true? I heard this from multiple homeless men I saw. Nearly all homeless I saw where male, and they told me the councils rejected them for that reason. It's UK wide.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:35 PM
5

I like Yang, it's a shame he's not more popular, easily one of the more intelligent politicans today. I predict men's issues will start getting more political attention in the 2020s.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 06:48 AM
1

Many people have a misconception about the MRM that we're 'connected to white supremacy'. Lots of articles publishing wrong information. Here are some examples: Link 1 Link 2
/r/MensRights19/11/19 09:56 PM
1

Read the articles, but that's not quite how math works. You're projecting the same increase of rate which isn't the right way to look at it. The better healthcare gets the more even men and women will become, so the marginal gains will look higher for men, but that's just an evening out. Men are more biologically prone to heart disease and cancer. Men’s death rates are shrinking significantly faster than women’s are, and in some cancers women’s death rates are even growing while men’s are shrink…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:20 AM
5

No, this isn't right. Men die younger due to biological reasons; men are more prone to heart disease and cancer when other factors are controlled for. The Framingham Risk Score is a strong example of this, and men are more likely to both develop and die from cancer. Male gender is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease by the American Heart Association. There are hormonal and biological differences that cause men to die younger; this is why men's life expectancy is lower in every co…
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:50 AM
10

Men do die younger due to biological reasons; men are more prone to heart disease and cancer when other factors are controlled for. The Framingham Risk Score is a strong example of this, and men are more likely to both develop and die from cancer. Dangerous workplace environments just make it even worse, it's another thing bringing male life expectancy down.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:45 AM
18

Boys are less likely to attend university, but have less scholarships available. Men are more likely to be homeless, but have less shelters and help available. Men are biologically prone to shorter life expectancies, but receive less funding for research, and less access to low income healthcare programs.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:07 PM
106

The argument that people shouldn't face consequences for making false accusations because it will 'discourage real victims from reporting' makes no sense. Someone would only face legal consequences for a false accusation if it's proven that they knowingly lied.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 09:48 PM
3

Thanks! To your issue, I don't agree...if you look up the members of the panel, you will see that they are quite prominent and active and have been for some time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/19 05:16 AM
1

I watched the segment, I think you might try actually watching the video. If you have any questions or you find anything escapes you, I welcome you to ask. I don't think you're a person of particularly acute observation or reasoning so I understand if you have any questions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/19 05:15 AM
27

Punishing children for things that happened before they were born. How is that progressive or social justice?
/r/MensRights05/11/19 06:44 PM
14

This wouldn't happen to a 'privileged' social class. If men really were the privileged class, and society really was a patriarchy, then homeless men wouldn't be left to freeze to death on the streets.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 04:16 PM
2

Lots of men know it's a male problem, they are just conditioned into thinking they aren't supposed to talk about it.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:16 PM
18

It's more likely the systemic disadvantage boys face in school. Boys earn lower grades for the same work, as multiple studies show: study 1 study 2 As a result, boys earn lower grades in every subject at every age. Additionally, there are less scholarships available for male students despite male students already being the minority.\ Articles like this completely miss the point and prove why we need the MRM.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 05:17 PM
15

Welcome! You're not alone, there are many people just like you who feel the same way. Most of the public has a completely inaccurate perception of the MRM because they don't realize what some of the stats and laws actually are. Cassie Jaye did something very important when she made The Red Pill. We should spread it as much as possible. Show it to your friends at school, but be careful, talking about men's rights will get you harshly criticized by many.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:11 AM
7

This is why feminism is not enough to address male issues, and why we need a men's movement. It's also why I don't believe SJWs when they say they oppose harmful gender stereotypes...this is perpetuating a harmful gender stereotype. This is pure victim blaming. Often, men who are genuinely victims of family violence experience the violence from a same sex partner, carer or a male relative. Only recognizing males as perpetrators. Men who are the principle users of family violence often try to pre…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:45 PM
4

This is the hostile environment that toxic SJWism is creating for men. It's pure bigotry. I look forward to the day there are proper MRA networks who can help each other, especially with things like finding employment and positive social groups.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:35 AM
13

With my project due tomorrow I'm glad to say that it is on the topic of Men's rights activists. Well done! Speaking publicly is exactly what we need, and others who feel the same way will realize they are not alone.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:49 PM
56

Men are second class citizens under law in Canada. Active and mandated discrimination in employment, stigma and discrimination against male DV victims, less social welfare resources for men's health, homeless men, boys education etc...Trudeau's 'social justice' is a system of active discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 07:23 PM
6

Good to see. There are lots of people who silently think along MRA lines but are reluctant to say it out loud. The more visible we are, the more people will start talking, and right now that’s what we need.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:53 AM
11

A good justice system is one that treats everybody equally and fairly on an individual level. It's crazy that it even needs to be debated...
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:13 PM
25

Boys are being systemically disenfranchised by the education system, which causes lifelong consequences.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:56 PM
8

Enforcing harmful gender stereotypes. If someone supports a gender neutral culture, and opposes sexist language, wouldn't they be opposed to this?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:31 PM
30

My guess is none of these people have ever actually listened to a Jordan Peterson interview. I don't agree with everything he says, but I have heard several of his interviews and he isn't fascist whatsoever. However, we cannot allow fascism to continue to rise and will not tolerate its presence in our city That's extremely ironic. They literally are being fascist...
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:52 PM
6

Men are Argentina are already disadvantaged- Argentina has one one of the most lopsided gender ratios in the world (#18), and men are significantly less likely to go to university. These kinds of things are flawed because they really don't take individual circumstance into account. Say you have an 18 year old boy and 18 year old girl. Both want to code, both come from similar socioeconomic backgrounds. The boy is automatically disadvantaged. The justification is said it be that 'historical, prog…
/r/MensRights15/10/19 03:41 PM
6

You should mention the education gap and disadvantages boys face in the education system. Studies show that boys are discriminated against in education; boys receive lower grades for the same work. This means that if a male and female student so exactly the same work, the boy gets a lower grade. This is a study from MIT from really broke down the statistics and found that without question, there is direct discrimination at play. As a result, boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages. Th…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:34 PM
14

I started reading about some of the common MR issues like higher pension ages, conscription, etc. I wanted to talk about it and the MRM was one of the few communities that actually listened. I want a movement that supports general equality and fairness for all, the MRM is that so I stayed. Was 16 when I started, am 25 now. Don’t regret it.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:15 AM
1

Maybe they should do an MRA special documentary...
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:41 PM
187

And because you say "we don't need a men's movement because feminism helps men to." I don't think feminism should be expected to address men's issues, it's women's movement and that's fine. But don't criticize the MRM for simply existing...
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:36 PM
13

The hypocrisy to me is when feminists tell men that we don't need a men's movement, because feminism addresses men's issues to (which we have many examples of that not being true.) Shouldnt the people with actual lived experiences of what their issues are and how they should be addressed? IMO it really shouldn't be up to a women's movement to define toxic masculinity- it would be unfair for me to tell women about what it's like being a woman. The same should go both ways. Obviously it's wrong fo…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 05:41 PM
18

Here's a study on the gender gap in sentencing. It shows that being male is the very worst inherent factor a defendant can have in regards to sentence length.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:03 PM
42

The reality is false accusations happen and are not all that rare.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:50 PM
1

Men are a minority in college and already face disadvantages in the education system. How can even more disadvantage be justified?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:18 AM
3

I often have conversations where I can drop in one or two points that make people think. I’ve only had one full “conversion”, someone I went to school with 4 years ago. Was a conversation over a week, I showed them lots of links and stories. A few more people that I got to at least strongly reconsider. I also don’t really like the “men have it harder than women” approach as if it’s a contest...instead I just make it about MR issues as they are. We should take care not to sound dismissive of wome…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 07:43 PM
8

“The community remained diligent, vigilant and united and has now successfully secured the conversion to a shelter for women, rather than single men," state Sen. John Liu (D-Bayside) said in a prepared statement. "Although the plan is by no means perfect, we are satisfied that a far better outcome has been achieved.” It's blatant. This is what dehumanization looks like. Men are now seen as the 'lower' class of human. This is an example of why we need a men's rights movement and why feminism is N…
/r/MensRights01/10/19 03:44 PM
9

The MRM is about looking at male issues as they exist today: today, boys are disadvantaged in the education system, which sets them behind for life today, male victims of domestic violence face bias and discrimination today, men die younger, but have less health funding or acces to low income healthcare today, boys grow up in a society hostile to them, and constantly receive negative messaging today, men face conscription and higher pension ages around the world. No one alive today was alive 200…
/r/MensRights01/10/19 03:41 PM
86

If men really were economically and socially privileged, then how could it be that: boys are disadvantaged in education, earn lower grades at all ages, and are less likely to attend college men are more likely to be homeless men are more likely to be unemployed men are treated more harshly by the justice system in many countries, men have higher pension ages before then can retire in many countries, boys are forced into conscription/national service
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:00 PM
2

If feminism really was enough to help men like they say, feminists groups would publicly disassociate from comments like that, and self-proclaimed feminist politicians wouldn't say it to begin with. And the thing is, I'm fine with feminism not helping men- it's a women's movement, so there's nothing wrong with that...just don't go and attack MRAs simply for existing then.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 02:44 PM
234

But at the same time, they get to decide that men shouldn't have their own movement to address their own issues.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:11 AM
5

I thought that, like the media portrayed, it was only a group of stupid men who wanted attention. That's just it, people have a negative image of the MRM because the media inaccurately portrays us. There are many others like yiu who come here after directing experiencing hostility/discrimination/etc themselves firsthand. You'll still see articles saying stuff like how we are the 'alt-right', or 'neo nazis', or hate women etc, but all of that is nonsense and completely untrue. Welcome!
/r/MensRights23/09/19 02:01 PM
61

This is a result of the gradual dehumanization of the male gender. In the realm of today's 'social justice' movement, maleness is equated to badness. It's as if we're developing a new 'caste system' where boys are considered the lower category of people. And this is blatantly enforcing gender roles and stereotypes, it would be very hypocritical for someone to say they are trying to 'break down gender roles', but defend something like this.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:48 PM
7

It's worth noting that the London Deputy of policing and crime, Sophie Linden, is self identified feminist who tried passing a 1000 pound fine for being homeless, in an area where the vast majority of the homeless are male (because homeless men are denied housing as they are considered 'less vulnerable). This is a blatant discrimination and indefensible inequality. It is creating a separate justice system for men and women where a man is automatically treated worse simply for being male. It is d…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:51 PM
13

The question is, if such reform is a good idea, why only for women? Why limit the benefits it would bring? Why not apply to everyone? What would be the logical reason to not also happen to include men? The UK has done this, women are now exempt from prison for most crimes. It's a blatantly two-tiered and separate justice system. Right now, if a man and woman both commit fraud, stealing life savings and ruining lives, they would be treated different solely because of gender. Men already face bias…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/19 11:45 PM
7

Doesn't really change the issue though, and some of the countries are considered examples of being particularly gender equal. Women usually arent ALLOWED to even try to be a soldier. This argument is used often but I don't think it's a very good one; far more men are forced into service they don't want than women are denied service that they do. It's not really an equal comparison. I agree that women should be allowed to join the military, but it's two separate issues.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:52 PM
16

It's the way people are conditioned to think. Higher pension ages conscription life expectancy the education gap higher homelessness higher unemployment harsher treatment by the court system less access to welfare programs etc There is indeed a need for a men's rights movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/19 04:13 PM
8

The fact that this issue is raised so seriously shows how conditioned people are to ignore double standards and unfavorable circumstances when men are the gender affected. Talking about workplace discrimination, or just situations that are unequal in general: men have stricter dress codes to begin with! Many places require men to wear a suit and tie, so men are forced to wear warmer clothes. much more seriously, in many countries men have a higher state retirement age and must work longer before…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 02:18 PM
6

If someone opposed harmful gender roles and stereotypes, shouldn't they oppose automatically denying shelter based on gender?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 07:35 PM
33

Reminder than in India, men are currently not protected from sexual assault under law. The law is specifically written to exclude men.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:37 PM
44

This is the actual legal standard now in the UK, men and women have a separate justice system and women are automatically exempt from prison for most crimes.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:05 PM
114

Made this comment before, but repeating for those who haven't seen: No jail time. Remember, this is now the standard legal practice in the UK, women are automatically exempt from jail for 'non-serious crimes.' suspended for eighteen months at Inner London Crown Court after she was convicted by a jury of causing grievous bodily harm to the boy So that is an example of what is considered a 'non-serious' crime.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:47 PM
15

You need to speak up and report this. People need to fight back against this sort of thing happening, or else it will continue.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:46 PM
6

If someone opposed harmful gender roles and stereotypes, then shouldn't they oppose parents being restricted from shelters simply for their gender? This is why we need a men's rights movement. Male discrimination is hurting children to. Feminism is not going to talk about things like this, so we are needed.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:45 PM
244

No jail time. Remember, this is now the standard legal practice in the UK, women are automatically exempt from jail for 'non-serious crimes.' suspended for eighteen months at Inner London Crown Court after she was convicted by a jury of causing grievous bodily harm to the boy So that is an example of what is considered a 'non-serious' crime.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:13 PM
1

Very cool, the more positive attention we can bring to male issues the better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/19 08:43 PM
25

SJWism is normalizing extreme behavior, especially targeted against males.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:17 PM
1

Which makes no sense given that men are the gender less likely to go to university in the first place.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:36 PM
1

Which makes no sense given that men are the gender less likely to go to university in the first place.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:34 PM
4

Which makes no sense given that men are the gender less likely to go to university in the first place.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:12 PM
18

Which makes no sense given that men are the gender less likely to go to university in the first place.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:10 PM
3

Why is this only done in the field where women are the minority? Overall, men are underrepresented in Australian universities, constituting only 42% of the student population. Why would you have a special program to help the group already more likely to attend university.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:00 PM
5

Anti-MRAs like this use trolling and lies to attack us because they know facts/logic are on our side and they wouldn't win in a fair debate.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:01 PM
9

Great post, I think it helps to have direct and clear examples of actual legal disparities/discriminations men face. Many people don't really understand what MRA issues are or even really think an MRM is necessary; lists like this will help.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:53 AM
10

The way feminists say there shouldn't be a men's rights movement because feminism helps men to is ironic, and IMO hypocritical. It's just like how they say it's not up to men men to tell women what it's like to be a woman...ok, so it's not up to a women's movement to decide what male issue are, and how we should talk about it.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:51 AM
2

Not to mention how men lose wages by being forced into conscription, and must work longer before qualifying for pension ages in many countries. So men actually pay for women's early retirement, and are rewarded with less healthcare and harsher punishments by the court systems.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:19 PM
13

Feminism just isn't a sufficient vehicle to address men's issues, or even to define what masculinity is or isn't. The same way feminists say it's not up to men to lecture women about women's issues or experiences goes the other way around for us to. Men need an independent movement. Feminist theory is just that- theory. It's not scientific fact, and it's not enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/19 10:23 PM
2

I'm going to answer this to correct the misinformation in your comment. "I'm going to accuse you of what I'm doing". The "No u" bit was old in middle school. You have not been misquoted. Pointing out that your points are wrong is not misquoting. Quotes were not edited or taken out of context. Quit your bullshit. No, this is not what happened,a "no,u" is not an actual thing. You described me as doing what you were doing. My pointing that out is not a "no,u", it's simply what happened. Yes, they a…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:34 AM
4

It is clear to me that you are not participating in good faith, and after this comment I will no longer engage in this discussion with you. You're misapplying statistics and trying to twist data to fit your narrative. If you have a point to make, great, but don't bullshit to try and do it. You're entitled to your own feelings, but not your own facts. This is what you are doing right now- you're presenting a completely illogical and disingenuous interpretation of the data to a narrative that make…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:42 AM
1

Ok, but again - the 15 year survival rate for all prostate cancer is 96%. That mortality rate is not misleading, 5, 10, 15 years after diagnosis very very few people are dying from that cancer - you're more likely to die with a prostate cancer than from one, the majority are indolent, localized neoplasms. The majority of deaths come from advanced stage cancers, which are relatively rare. Also prostate cancer, while being the 2nd most common type of cancer to die from, only represents about 10% o…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 01:29 AM
1

While prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths, the actual mortality rate of prostate cancer is pretty low. On average, 90+% of prostate cancers are local or regional disease, which has ~99% 5 year survival. Prostate cancer overall survival is 98% at 10 years, 96% at 15 years, etc. Advanced disease has much higher mortality, but these cases are overall much rarer. The mortality rate has also halved in the last 20-25 years. There are ~2.9-3.1million men living with prostate ca…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:22 AM
3

If life expectancy was reversed, the "death gap" would probably be a major social issue. But because it's men who die younger, it's mostly ignored.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 05:18 PM
2

Dishonest headline, they're not arguing against women's rights. They are simply organizing in response to something harmful that they actually experience, and in a way that doesn't affect women's rights at all. False accusations happen, and commonly, so there is a movement by those affected. That's not being against women's rights in any way, the headline is very much slanted to create a false image of the MRM.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:40 PM
1

Wow, excellent! That will really legitimize this sub and give us great publicity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/19 03:02 PM
13

Firstly, what country are you in? I can help highlight the specific MR issues in your country. It just kind of seems like it is Anti-Feminism to me just to prove a point. but why is that enough to fight for rights we already have? It just seems like a bit of a “No you!” To feminism. These things are just not true, but they are common lines repeated in an attempt to discredit us and what we say. "No you" and "whataboutism" are not actual things by the way, you might wish to avoid using them in th…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 04:22 PM
97

So, one group of the population is banned from certain subway cars, and can be attacked for trying to enter one. That is not what a socially privileged class would look like.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:50 PM
107

Anyone who says they oppose harmful gender roles/stereotypes should support sufficient resources for single fathers, otherwise they are essentially supporting the gender stereotype that only mothers can/should be single parents, a stereotype harmful to both parents.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:47 PM
8

Boys are systemically disadvantaged from an early age in the education system, which sets them behind for life. Studies have shown that boys earn lower grades for the same work. As a result, boys earn lower grades in every subject at every age. This has a ripple effect the consequences of which persist for life. Boys are less likely to attend university, more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. Today's boys grow up in receiving hostility simply for how they are born. I can o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/19 02:19 AM
3

but the difference is still there, there are still innate biological differences. the framingham score shows this for heart disease, and studies show this for cancer to We see lower male life expectancies in every single country on earth. This wouldn't be the case if biology wasn't at play.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 06:43 PM
5

I think it's certainly possible that there is some truth to that, but I also believe that it is likely that men, overall, lead significantly more stressful lives than women do, as a group, and that this contributes to men's heart issues. But the thing is, that's what the framingham score did, it controlled for all factors such as lifestyle and environment, and still showed up to a 500% higher risk for developing heart disease in men. The same difference exists for cancer to, men are not just mor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 06:42 PM
10

He's very much framing it as lying on a one-sided spectrum where it's overwhelmingly unfavorable for women, and he's repeated outright myths when it came to heart disease.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:39 PM
13

Another example of why feminism is not enough for men's issues, and why we need an independent men's movement.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:49 PM
2

But if the idea is good, why only for women? That's what's so telling about this, why make it only for one gender? If it's a good idea, then just make it your general idea, why not also just happen to include men? Why a blatantly separate system?
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:46 PM
1

I think it will change as more people becoming directly affected by MRM issues, as they inevitably will, and the reality becomes undeniable. Right now so many men are anti-MRM because they don't believe the cause is necessary, because they don't actually know what the issues are, or don't believe we are right about them. Once they start experiencing them firsthand, that will change. A note here is that almost all men are already affected by MR issues without realizing it- disadvantages and bias …
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:39 PM
25

And how many nights of sleep do men lose from having to work up earlier past 60 because their retirement age is higher, or from spending a year conscripted into national service, or sleeping in the streets because single men are denied housing, or from early death? It would be an interesting comparison.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 09:47 PM
26

We need a specific and independent men's rights movement. Feminists might say that feminism is enough to help men to, but that just ins't reflected in their real world words and actions. Issues like: the gender gap in education affecting boys the unemployment gap/hiring bias against men the homelessness gap conscription higher pension ages male victims of domestic violence higher prison terms for the same crime and harsher treatment by court systems Are not adequately address by feminist groups.…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:07 PM
8

The MRM is unfairly lumped in because they know they wouldn't win a fair and honest debate. Examples of our positions: equal treatment for all people under the criminal justice system, regardless of gender fair treatment and recognition of male victims of domestic violence addressing boys struggles in education fair access to shelter and housing for homeless men adequate research for men's health to close the life expectancy gap There is no possible way it makes sense to say these are "alt right…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:08 PM
21

Men/boys: are given lower grades for the same work. Boys are less likely to attend university and more likely to fail to complete primary and secondary education are more likely to be unemployed are more likely to be homeless die younger, but have less access to low income healthcare programs and less funding for health issues have higher pension ages in many countries are involuntarily conscripted in many countries around the world. pay higher car insurance are treated more harshly by the crimi…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:03 PM
9

When you compare the issues, it becomes rather obvious why the MRM is needed. The crash dummy 'issue' is honestly absurd...men are more likely to die because our health is underfunded, we're more likely to be homeless yet denied housing/shelter, we're more likely to die working dangerous jobs especially considering that many countries have higher pension ages for men. So if a man is working a high risk job, he has to work that extra 5 years before qualifying for a pension, which puts him at even…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:26 PM
11

This is a natural consequence of the new official government policy to exempt women from prison. If 50% of the population knows that can commit crimes and receive automatically light treatment by the court system, it make sense that crime would increase by that population. I think MRAs would agree that equality does NOT mean having two separate legal systems depending on what gender you were born.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 04:25 PM
3

There's a crazy cycle of men constantly going to jail for child support. They're in jail so they can't work and earn money, so the debt keeps piling up, so once they get out, they go right back because they haven't been able to work and earn money. It's ridiculous. I'm not against child support in some cases, but the current system is extremely flawed. It has to be done in a fair way.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:29 PM
2

The Red Pill is outstanding, but I wish it had a different name because people confuse it with the red pill sub, or think it's an conservative/political thing when it isn't. That said, the more people see it, the better.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:02 PM
827

The draft/conscription is an example of people's bodies being governed without consent. The government tells you what you can and can't do with your body.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:16 PM
43

The notion of "male privilege" is wholly in contradiction with reality: in what society is the privileged class more like to be homeless? in what society is the privileged class less successful and unfavored in the education system? in what society is the privileged class treated more harshly in the court system? in what society is the privileged class forced to work longer to earn a state pension? in what society does the privileged class receive less healthcare researching and low income healt…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 03:28 PM
3

Society is being driven to dangerous levels of depersonalization from all of the toxic SJW rhetoric. We're seeing ordinary people being conditioned into what's a concerning mindset.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:08 PM
11

The title is meant to address the myth that prostate cancer isn't particularly deadly. People have a perception that it's a "milder" cancer, which just isn't true. The saying "men don't die of prostate cancer, they die with it" is 100% wrong.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 04:18 PM
9

I think when discussing what rights and discrimination men experience, making comparisons and examples help prove the point. Showing direct disparities and differences also serve to illustrate the actual reality of male privilege (or rather, the lack thereof.)
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:57 PM
7

Remember, men are currently not protected under sexual assault laws specifically due to protest from 'gender activist' groups. I agree that the MRM is not about being anti-feminism; that said, the facts are facts on this one. It's a valid and relevant point to make because it shows why we need a specific MRM.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 06:59 AM
13

This is relevant because it dispels the myth that the primary cause of DV are "power dynamics", a completely meaningless concept invented and used in the Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 06:55 AM
4

I still post there daily and I can tell you that is not true. I wouldn't post there if it was. I've actually noticed an increase in international (meaning non-american) posts in recent months.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/19 12:11 AM
6

I think r/mensrights does a good job of staying neutral; sometimes you'll see criticisms of left wing politicians, but usually in the context of intrinsically relevant criticism. I see plenty of criticisms against the right to, and we actually have a discord with very mixed politics. The MRM should remain pure and undiluted politically, I think it goes a good job of that and is why it's a high quality community.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/19 09:22 PM
9

It really is like male and female students are two separate classes of students at universities, with male students have an inherently lower status. Rules are changed to expel male students. He is being expelled for "flirting", while you can be sure that if a female student took advantage of a male student with alcohol, there would be no consequences.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:20 PM
15

It definitely seems like the MRM and general awareness of men's issues is starting to get through to the general public. It's inevitable, it's so blatant that people can't help but be directly affected.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:15 PM
13

"Those are your issues to solve" Ok, fine...so we need a men's rights movement, right? There often seems to be a hypocrisy here; feminists will say we don't need the MRM because feminism helps men to, but then ignores or dismisses many male issues.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:43 PM
12

If men were the privileged class in society, they wouldn't be treated more harshly by the court system. It makes no sense for a socially/politically privileged class to be given unfavorable treatment in the justice system.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 06:58 PM
16

Which shows how common false accusations are to begin with if this would be a cause for the decrease. The people opposing this are essentially opposing the police from finding out the truth, and opposing a potentially innocent person from defending themselves in court.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 04:23 PM
17

The people who do things like this are ignorant, and IMO incredibly hypocritical. It's very stupid to be so certain and dismissive about something you know nothing about, and refuse to make the effort to educate yourself about.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 02:49 PM
48

Most male issues affect all men, including gay men. Legal disparities are obvious- higher pension ages, conscription, etc. Men's health as you mentioned is another (eg prostate cancer.)
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:31 PM
4

I don't see the MRM as being left or right; SJWism seems to have rooted itself in the left, which is where the perception of the MRM being "right" comes from, but the MRM is political neutral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/19 09:24 PM
10

I think the general mission statement is very good and this post sums it up well. Plus, the sub can always evolve and adapt as needed as time goes on. I think the space for people who identify as "liberal MRAs" is very big, and I myself fit into that category. We're in a very strange time now where liberal parties/politicians seem to be under heavy SJW influence, which leaves people like me sort of feeling without a political "home." I do think the SJW influence on the left needs to be addressed…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/19 05:40 PM
14

If men were economically privileged, then why are they more likely to be homeless? In what society is the privileged class more likely to be homeless? Makes no sense. Ditto for more likely to be unemployed, less likely to attend university, more likely to be in prison, etc
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:15 PM
7

I agree, it's not just the shirt, it's the double standard it represents and perpetrates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/19 02:48 PM
4

I think it's a very confusing and messy line right now...it's like left and right and everything else is being blurred so much, that I don't know where I am anymore. Growing up I used to consider myself mostly liberal, not too political, and just looking at ideas individually. Now, it seems that liberal politics are heavily influenced by toxic "SJWism" and "intersectionality" in a way that just doesn't feel right. It's very confusing. I like the mission statements of this sub, a moderate approac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/19 09:29 PM
2

When it comes to comments related to feminism, fair criticism should be valid IMO, if presented in a moderate and logical way. Things must be looked at for what they are in order to have an honest and productive conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/19 07:37 PM
9

It's literally the same as "mansplaining" in reverse; she's talking over issues and lived experiences of others.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:51 AM
15

Because looking an the average value doesn’t reflect wages for the majority of workers. A few board members and CEOs can distort the average and drive it up. Taking the mean wages of the whole company doesn’t work; the 3 or 4 billionaires at the top affect the average, but the mid level male and female employees earn the same.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 03:15 PM
125

Meanwhile, in the UK, homeless men are routinely denied housing, men have a higher pension age, boys earn lower grades for the same work, the NHS neglects the biggest cancer killer of men (prostate), men are given longer prison terms for the same crime...yet this is an issue she felt was important enough to dedicate time on. Really goes to show.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:39 PM
11

So just a few, but by no means complete list: CONSCRIPTION Many countries in the world practice conscription, or involuntary military service, and in most cases, only male citizens are conscripted. This costs 1-3 years of educational and/or employment opportunity. Some countries have an alternative 'civilian service', but this essentially amounts to working for less than minimum wage PENSION AGES In many countries, men have a higher state pension age than women. Due to shorter life expectancy, t…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:47 PM
10

This is now the actual legal standard in the UK. This is very dangerous because it sends a message to half the population that they can commit crimes that put others at risk of harm without fear of serious consequences.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:50 AM
39

That's to be expected in the UK, now that feminism is influencing the justice system.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:17 PM
24

Boys are already behind in education, which sets them up to behind for life. Boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages Boys earn lower grades for the same work As a result, later in life boys are less likely to attend university, more likely to unemployed, and more likely to be homeless.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 04:11 PM
3

Lower life expectancy Less access to low income healthcare Unfavorable treatment in education, thus lower achievements and college attendance More likely to be unemployed More likely to be homeless More likely to be the victim of violence crime Longer prison sentences for the same crime These are things men have.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 02:43 PM
14

I think lots of mens rights groups are a response to women doing better That's such a disingenuous argument; it's not about being against women, it's about the fact that men are facing gap and disparities. Wouldn't it be fair to say that the goals of feminism are to address areas where women are behind (thus men doing "better")? It's completely hypocritical. She's not directly affected by men's issues, and clearly not educated about them. It's not for her to "decide" that an MRA group is 'scary'…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 04:46 PM
13

This is an example of when you must stand your ground and resist. Do not let this get away unchallenged.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 11:17 PM
7

An example of why feminism is not enough for men's issues, and why we need a men's movement. This is something feminists never talk about wanting to address.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:22 PM
17

It's inevitable for the MRM to break into the mainstream as more and more people become directly affected by the things we talk about. Cultural misandry is real, thus will directly affect real people. It's a shame that people didn't listen to us; we've been saying this for years.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:20 PM
2

The pair were sentenced to a community order to complete 70 hours of unpaid work over the next 12 months and also partake in a ten-day rehabilitation requirement. Gender privilege. Male defendants would have been sent to prison.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:02 AM
54

It's ironic that they talk about a "lack of empathy" and "lack of understanding others perspectives" when at the same time, they are automatically anti-MRA and say a man can't even have his own opinions about his own lived experiences.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:42 PM
73

Doesn't this go against wanting to address "toxic masculinity" and "gender stereotypes"? Wouldn't refusing to recognize that men can be victims be enforcing stereotypes?
/r/MensRights28/06/19 03:51 PM
9

Permanently alimony is absolutely indefensible. Imagine two 28 year olds get married, and divorce at 38. Under permanent alimony, the man will be paying his ex for the rest of his life, even in his 80s. It's even taken from welfare and social security. I remember a story from Florida of a 72 year old with Alzheimer's being unable to get proper care due to permanent alimony.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:49 PM
4

By why should it be "different?" Why does someone have the right to just "decide" that men aren't deserving of an equal justice system? If prison is so harmful and costly for such cases, why would you want to restrict this approach to only half the population, and a minority of the prison population? Why not apply to everyone? And why generalize? Isn't it far more efficient and practical to apply these guidelines by cases circumstance rather than arbitrary categorizations?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:37 PM
2

With all due respect, did you not read my post? It's as if you didn't read it at all, or misunderstand it. Feminism as a movement has one primary goal; Create a society where women have equal opportunities and choices. But that claim doesn't match the actions and words of many prominent feminist organizations/speakers, including support for laws. It takes the norms around sex/gender we have now and examines their history and use so we can decide whether to maintain the status quo or change. But …
/r/MensRights21/06/19 09:02 PM
4

Yet another example of why feminism/menslib is not sufficient to address men's issues.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 05:51 AM
52

Men and boys are: given lower grades for the same work throughout their educational careers less likely to attend university more likely to be unemployed more likely to be homeless given less options for low income healthcare treated more harshly by the justice system forced to work longer before qualifying for state pensions in many countries given less legal protection and assistance for domestic violence These things wouldn't happened to a socially and economically 'privileged' class.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:35 PM
21

The terms and lingo are constructed as debate tactics, rather than legitimate ideas. They are designed to be flexible enough to be spun whichever way the conversation goes.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:03 PM
16

Menslib is not a sub for "mens liberation", it's a feminist sub that restricts what men are able to post, and doesn't allow any critical posting of feminism. Why? Why shouldn't men get to choose what they express on a men's lib sub? Why should a women's movement dictate the rules on a men's sub? Why is it wrong to call out feminist groups when they directly work against the interests of equality and male issues? You can't just say "that doesn't happen", because objectively it does and countless …
/r/MensRights19/06/19 06:20 AM
14

SJWs invent definitions and theory, and then present them in debates as if they are fact. They say "you need to educate yourself on intersectional theory, because clearly you don't understand what it is." No, I understand it, I just fundamentally disagree within the context of understanding. Feminist theory is not science, and not objective fact.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:40 PM
2

Indeed, feminist psychologists (e.g. Willott, Griffin, Edley, Wetherell etc.) have produced some great work on men and masculinities that shows men can be bound by expectations and practices that harm them. This is an example of how feminism does not help men, and why we need a specific men's movement for male issues. Feminists take it upon themselves to oppose any such effort to address male issues that they do not control themselves; what gives them THiS right? What gives them the presumed aut…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:27 PM
12

This shows that the public perception of men's issues and the MRM is changing,and starting to shift in our favor.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 12:33 AM
3

Many countries have higher pension ages for men, despite men having shorter life expectancies. So men work longer and die younger. Many countries practice male only conscription. If this is for school, a good issue to focus on is the education gap. Boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all levels. Research suggests that boys are discriminated against in grading, and receive lower grades for the same work. This obviously has long term consequences on college and future employment. It's great …
/r/MensRights11/06/19 04:27 PM
9

Having such a surgery at age 8 is outrageous. 8!?!?! This is an example of how toxic the SJW movement is becoming. It's so blatantly obvious, I honestly don't understand how so many people miss it.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 03:58 PM
5

One the best qualities of the MRM is it's neutrality. We are not watered down by any unrelated ideologies, which IMO maintains a certain 'purity' of principles. When movements or groups try and become overly intersectional, they can water down what they are about and lose focus/organization. The MRM is not partisan, or liberal/conservative leaning.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:34 PM
6

Great post! Posters are a great way to get people talking, there’s likely many people who are pro-MRA but reluctant to speak out because they expect negative backlash. Seeing posters encourages people that they are not alone.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 01:42 PM
83

This is why MRAs talk about false accusations- they happen, and the consequences are very serious.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 03:06 PM
2

In a 2018 report, the Anti-Defamation League divided this “manosphere” into three overlapping tribes: “men’s rights activists,” who have channeled legitimate advocacy for equal treatment in divorce and custody disputes into a toxic male rage; At least this shows that we've managed to present MR facts and issues well enough so that they can't deny the legitimacy. The only criticism they have for us is a completely false characterization, which shows that people are anti-MRM mostly because they mi…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 05:23 AM
9

Objectively, it's hard to argue against the points of the MRM, so counter arguments tend to be stupid, immature and void of intellectual quality. Just like this example.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:16 PM
2

Yes, I think it’s a good move. There are plenty of single fathers, and not even that, a married father can still be alone with his child somewhere.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:18 AM
32

The British police and justice system have made feminist theory an official part of their doctrine; it's actually the standard legal practice for women to exempt from most crimes. This was someone physically beating a disabled person in a wheelchair, but because it was a woman and the victim a man, a police force governed by feminist thinking doesn't take it seriously.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:27 PM
34

It's insane that an MRA would be targeted for violence. Why? For what? For thinking pension ages should be equal? For wanting to address the education gap? For thinking homeless men deserve shelter? For wanting adequate research for mens health to close the longevity gap? If a group is targeted for violence for simply pointing out privileges, and the legal system doesn't even care, then that group is obviously not privileged in that society.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 02:11 PM
3

It's a ridiculous idea, and is an idea that goes against what feminism claims to be about, because it would reinforce gender stereotypes of women being weak and incapable. It goes against equality in every way- it's like saying that women aren't even as mature or accountable as 13 year old boys, because even a 13 year old boy can go to juvenile prison. I disagree with that, I think men and women should be considered equal, thus treated with equal responsibility. It's extremely dangerous for half…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 01:30 PM
29

Men in India face numerous disparities in law. Men are not protected from rape under law, specifically due to protests and lobbying from feminist groups
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:15 PM
12

In all honestly, he needs to get out of the relationship for good. It will not stop, and will only get worse. He absolutely cannot get married to her or have children with her, he will then be stuck in what is already a dangerous situation. This is never going to get better. If she's already using a baseball bat so soon and so young, it may very well end in his death or serious injury one day.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:51 AM
2

This is excellent, the MRM should have more meetups like this. It's an excellent way to take activism and organization to the next level, as well as foster a stronger sense of community. It also gives up more public visibility, which is good. If people see us and know us in person, it can shatter many of the misconceptions.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:46 AM
67

The theory of patriarchy and male privilege make no sense- it what society is the privileged group treated less favorably in the court, while the disadvantaged group is treated more favorably? That makes no sense. Having preferential treatment in the legal system is literally a definition of privilege, and vice versa; being treated more harshly simply for being in a certain group is literally a definition of discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:39 AM
17

Men are always expected to put their own comfort and safety last. From the draft, to dangerous situations, higher pension ages, forced conscription, evacuating last, etc, right down to seats on public transportation. The thanks we get is to be denied homeless shelters, less scholarships, legalized discrimination in employment, less healthcare, and constant vilification.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:00 PM
2

I disagree, at least for false accusations. A false accusation can happen to anyone, for a variety of reasons. It even happens to celebrities and star athletes.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:10 AM
1

It’s inevitable for people to realize the MRM is right when they start being directly affected by the issues we talk about.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:13 PM
44

good catch, thanks!
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:40 AM
279

So 75% of the homeless are men. If men were economically privileged, how would that be possible? Why would the more privileged group of people be less likely to have a job and shelter?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:02 AM
56

It's two completely separate standards, where men are given unfavorable treatment. That's the very nature of what MRAs mean by 'societal misandry'- when a double standard or discrimination is bad for men, it's ignored like it "doesnt count."
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:18 PM
2

"populations that are historically underrepresented and underserved in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) careers" This is completely unjust and senseless because you don't somehow benefit from men being over represented in stem 25 years ago. You're in high school now, you need to get your education now. It makes no sense to restrict your opportunities because of what happened to completely unrelated people in the past. It's especially unjust considering that in the US, boys…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:16 PM
5

We're an open community, we should welcome the chance to show people who we really are and what we really believe. We cannot grow without putting ourselves out there and engaging in public discourse. Let people come here and read what we say; our words speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:51 PM
2

Great post, and thank you for coming in! The MRM is widely misunderstood. People have a totally inaccurate perception of what we are about and what we believe. If I'm honest, a lot of that is due to anti-MRAs blatantly lying and misrepresenting us. People then read that and believe it. The MRM is a very fair and moderate group overall, which is why I am here.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:06 PM
14

Agreed, MR issues aren't partisan and male discrimination can happen from either party.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:37 PM
377

This kind of rhetoric is legitimate harmful, imagine the psychological effect on children who grow up surrounded by it and seeing adults and authority figures saying it. This is a society gradually adopts biases and bigotries, and starts to develop a tendency to see a "bad" group of people as separate and inherently bad, based just on how they were born.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:38 PM
5

Which would be perfectly justified if that company was doing so unfairly, and discriminatory. However, what happens if a company has a higher average salary recorded for male workers due to nondiscriminatory factors? Example, studies show that men work for overtime. An employee that works more overtime deserves to be paid more. Would these factors be controlled for?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:04 PM
72

Men are alert to false accusations because we actually see them happen around us in the real world.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:05 PM
193

It's so hypocritical, I bet "mansplaining" is part of the course, but the entire course is feminism teaching men what it's "actually" like to be men...who are they to decide? It's so arrogant.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:00 PM
3

It's a legitimate feeling, people who try and dismiss it aren't paying attention to the regular news stories of false accusations. It happens, and it seems to be happening more than ever before.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 12:08 PM
5

Good place to connect with MRAs, and lots of good discussions.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:13 PM
2

Actual consequences would only be for false accusations that can be proven. So there should be no risk of someone going to jail for making a true accusation.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:10 PM
14

It's blatant discrimination. It's literally being treated like a lower class of student. If your paying tuition, you're paying but getting less. If it's public, then male tax payers are paying for less.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:13 PM
10

This is why it's 100% wrong when feminists say "we don't need a men's rights movement because feminism addresses male issues to." No it doesn't, it tries to ban students from speaking in class because of how they were born. It truly is like opposite world, it's blatantly bigoted and discriminated, it's treating people worse for how they were born. And why do they get to decide on my behalf that I wouldn't be allowed to speak?? What the hell gives them that right? 'This is not about stopping peop…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:51 PM
1

Oops! Wrong thread. Was meant for the thread about banning male students from speaking in class
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:50 PM
1

This is why it's 100% wrong when feminists say "we don't need a men's rights movement because feminism addresses male issues to." No it doesn't, it tries to ban students from speaking in class because of how they were born. It truly is like opposite world, it's blatantly bigoted and discriminated, it's treating people worse for how they were born. And why do they get to decide on my behalf that I wouldn't be allowed to speak?? What the hell gives them that right? 'This is not about stopping peop…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:32 PM
6

Why doesn't the author educate herself instead of spreading misinformation? The only valid arguments anti-MRAs can make are completely lies or misunderstandings. They always speak for us as if they somehow know better about something that they actually know nothing about.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 01:48 PM
7

Pure lies. You know anti-MRAs are wrong when they have to rely on intentionally disingenuous "arguments." They can never hold their own in a fair debate, because facts and reason are on our side.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 03:37 PM
5

This is why we need a men's rights movement, and why it needs to be something separate from feminism.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 03:35 PM
5

Great post, and thank you!
/r/MensRights17/04/19 03:06 PM
4

Remember, it's the actual legal standard now to automatically exempt women from prison for most crimes. There is a blatantly two-tiered justice system in the UK where men are legally disadvantaged and treated more harshly under law by virtue of gender alone. The question is, will public assault count as a "serious crime"?
/r/MensRights17/04/19 03:02 PM
11

It's so absurdly hypocritical, they'd slam the reverse as sexist and mansplaining. Feminists say "is different" because "sexism=power+prejudice" but the thing is, that definition is just made up. It's not real or scientific, yet it's presented as fact.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:37 PM
2

It's right, it's actually even more, it's 25%. World population 7.5 billion. India population 1.3 billion. 7.5/1.3= 2.5 India and China together compromise more than half of the world's population.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:43 PM
31

This is blatant sexism and discrimination. There are two distinct court systems in the UK, and men are second class citizens. Remember, this the actual policy from the UK's highest court. the 30-year-old, who already had two previous convictions for drink-driving This is her this offense. This is what happens when half of the population is immune from prison, criminals will continue to commit crimes that HURT PEOPLE because there are no consequences.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:26 PM
17

Reminder that as of today, the India constitution does not recognize male victims of rape. This is specifically due to feminist lobbying. Because of their protest, 10% of the world population lost legal recognition/protection of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:18 PM
6

It's so completely disingenuous to label criticism as "sexist", it's not that people are trying to "tear her" because she's a woman, they are just saying it's not accurate to say she did more than everyone else. It was the whole team!
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:14 PM
22

This is what happens when people are subjected to constant anti-male propaganda, along with the knowledge of no risk of prison if you happen to be a certain gender. I'm curious to follow this and see what the consequences are; reverse the genders and it would be considered sexual assault with prison time. Let's see what actually happens.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 10:04 PM
41

Good post. Contrary to any misconceptions, the MRM isn't left wing or right wing, it's just about looking at general male specific issues.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:48 PM
12

A study showed that female candidate are favored 2:1 over male candidates for tenure. Cornell University researchers found that when using identical qualifications, but changing the sex of the applicant, "women candidates are favored 2 to 1 over men for tenure-track positions in the science, technology, engineering and math fields." This follows the general trends for male statistics in the U.S. Starting from an early age, boys perform worse in school and are less likely to graduate high school,…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:11 AM
1

Each case should be decided individually; practices that automatically give the child to the mother alone takes the risk of that mother being abusive, and leaving the child in custody with an abusive parent. People say it's to protect the child, but it's completely sexist to assume the father is automatically the abusive parent. Custody should be decided based on circumstance and evidence. Sometimes this will mean the mother, sometimes this will mean the father, sometimes this will mean shared c…
/r/MensRights07/04/19 02:03 PM
3

So they found that we are a reasonable, fair minded group who supports equality...as of course we already knew. People have a negative perception if the MRM because we are misrepresented and slandered constantly. Anyone who gives an objective look at our beliefs would have to see that we are in the right, IMO. We support equality and oppose discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 05:11 PM
12

If men actually were economically advantaged in the U.S, they wouldn't be more likely to be unemployed, more likely to be homeless, less likely to attend university, etc.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:06 PM
25

In the U.S, men are economically disadvantaged in every measurable category: Less likely to attend University More likely to be homeless More likely to be unemployed. Because men are less likely to graduate high school and attend university, they now earn less when entering the workforce for the same time. It wouldn't be possible for women to outearn men when being hired if there was a systemic wage gap disfavoring women.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 04:26 PM
6

You're not alone, and that's why many of us are here. I bet lots of your classmates feel the same way but don't say anything; all that has to happen is for guys to start talking about it and organizing groups, Men's Rights clubs, etc. Anti MRAs want us to feel like we completely alone, but that's not true.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 02:21 PM
10

But the greater part of his anger is directed at the CPS, which, having assessed the evidence, decided to charge him with ‘sexual assault by penetration’. He said: ‘It is just bizarre. Why couldn’t the CPS have used common sense?’ Because the UK court system is now controlled by SJWs and men are second class citizens.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 03:05 PM
67

And people say the MRM is a hate movement...for what exactly? for caring about boys education and massive gap? for pointing out blatantly inequality like conscription and pension age differences? for thinking male DV victims deserve basic rights and protection? for thinking homeless men deserve basic shelter so they don't freeze to death? These are all things we have to fight anti-MRAs on. Who is really being hateful?
/r/MensRights30/03/19 03:00 PM
16

Ridiculous, the MRM is opposed to gender roles and stereotypes. It's those roles that lead to many male issues in the first place, like conscription, higher pension ages, etc. Gender stereotypes like 'men can't be DV victims' is a stereotype we fight against.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 02:58 PM
24

"Recalling that sexism is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between women and men, which leads to discrimination and prevents the full advancement of women in society; But it's not. This is made-up feminist theory that is presented as if it's actual fact. This is feminist debate- they assume the theories and definitions that they invented are inherently true, and any ideas out of that context are automatically wrong. "II.A.2. Undertake a systematic review of all laws, regul…
/r/MensRights30/03/19 02:50 PM
60

It's a pro-feminist sub; gender bias and double standards are to be expected.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:29 PM
5

There are inherent biological factors that cause men to die younger, and this is a fact. Rates of heart disease bu gender, from the American Heart Association Men are more likely to both develop and die from cancer Yet there is no white house commission on men's health in the US. IMO if life expectancy trends were reverse and it was women who died younger, i would be considered a major social issue and would be constantly brought up as a "male privilege" to live longer. Which, to be fair, living…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 04:36 PM
18

What's scary is how false accusations are almost considered a "progressive" thing to do in more radical SJW spheres of thought. There are organized and calculated efforts by people who either genuinely believe it's not wrong to do, or don't have the empathy to care.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 04:24 PM
3

It's an absurd hypocrisy to the degree of suspicious motives; the entire system that choose someone with such history as DV spokesperson comes into question.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 03:42 PM
5

Court records indicate Eslinger had a previous DUI conviction. And it's her second DUI. We have a two tiered justice system, men are automatically punished simply for being men. This isn't complaining for complain's sake, this is about deterrence. She did this again because there was likely no serious punish the first time. If 50% of the population knows they can commit crimes with relative impunity, then you will see a likelihood of those crimes being committed. This is in violation of Nevada l…
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:24 PM
2

But the point is if the evidence proves that an accusation is false, then the accusers aren't victims...and there's no way a police officer wouldn't understand that. The logic is completely skewed, you're preventing evidence that may prove a crime didn't happen to protect the victim of said crime. Calling that "victim blaming" makes no sense!
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:17 PM
9

It's so incredibly blatant, I can't fathom how people don't see it. Two self identifying feminists admit to committing domestic abuse against their male partners. Then, other feminists support them. Then, they advocate for gendered DV laws that would fail to recognize male victims. So they are literally guilty of doing the very thing they are trying to erase from view. These are not "fringe" people, don't let people say "oh, feminism is about equality and men to you're just looking at extreme ex…
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:14 PM
3

If feminists are right that we don’t need a men’s rights movement because “feminism helps men to”, then they should have no problem with this. Let’s see what the reaction is.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:59 PM
7

And more likely to be assaulted, and more likely to die in an accident really anywhere...society has normalized violence and death for men, it's the manifestation of male disposability.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:54 PM
11

To consider who is privileged in a society, look at what group is allowed to assault the other with less consequences. In what society is the oppressed group treated more leniently for assaulting the privileged class?
/r/MensRights17/03/19 02:08 PM
10

If it should be considered "mansplaining" for men to talk over women's lived experiences, then i should be considered womansplaining for women to talk over men's lived experiences. I can understand the logic of saying feminism should be about women and for women, and that men can't fully understand what women experience...if the same logic applies both ways, and that men's issues need a specific men's movement. It isn't up to feminists to "decide" what men's issues are, what the male lived exper…
/r/MensRights17/03/19 02:06 PM
12

Outrageous, this is how I know anti-MRAs are wrong, they have no idea who we are or what we believe. It's inexcusable to compare us to this, the MRM talks for male issues that affect men of all races an all religions around the world.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 02:05 PM
7

If it should be considered "mansplaining" for men to talk over women's lived experiences, then i should be considered womansplaining for women to talk over men's lived experiences. I can understand the logic of saying feminism should be about women and for women, and that men can't fully understand what women experience...if the same logic applies both ways, and that men's issues need a specific men's movement. It isn't up to feminists to "decide" what men's issues are, what the male lived exper…
/r/MensRights16/03/19 02:39 PM
10

It's only for one day, to promote awareness of the wage gap, it's not a permanent decision. Still, consider the "gaps" they don't pay attention to...the education gap the unemployment gap, the homelessness gap, the life expectancy gap...any gap where men are behind is totally ignored.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 02:49 PM
14

Intersectional "social justice" is a toxic and bigoted ideology hiding behind the mask of "equality". But at it's core, it is disingenuous and dangerous.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:54 PM
14

The current wave of "intersectional" feminism and the so called social justice movement is truly an extremeist fascist-minded ideology in disguise. It's a toxic and dangerous movement, it conditions people to hate and identity certain individuals as "the enemy". This is something called milieu control: milieu control Milieu control involves the control of communication within a group environment, that also may (or may not) result in a significant degree of isolation from surrounding society. Whe…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:52 PM
6

People have an inaccurate perception of what the MRM is. The negative stereotypes are widespread, and we don't (yet) have the platform or public influence to change that. I think it's coming around though; people seem more and more wary of SJWism.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:28 AM
3

A trans man will be affected by legal disparities and discrimination just like cis men. Higher retirement ages, conscription, car insurance rates, small business government loans, employment laws (Germany and Canada both have laws stating a woman should be preferred above an equaly qualified man. The male unemployment rate is higher in both countries). Yes! We welcome any and all people who support equality and the MRM. I hope you continue posting here!
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:27 AM
189

Feminism is obviously not a movement that sufficiently helps men to. The modern day "intersectional" political movement is a radical and extreme movement. This is mirroring the early stages of fascism/dystopian societies.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 12:52 PM
389

And just imagine this in a country where women have zero risk of prison for crimes like theft
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:36 PM
3

This is blatantly illegal, not to mention completely illogical and unfair.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:11 PM
18

It's very hypocritical that the same feminists who talk about "mansplaining" are the ones who say there shouldn't be a men's rights movement at all. It makes no sense when they say feminism is enough for men's issues, it's not for them to decide what male issues are and how to fix them. Just like it shouldn't be up to men to dictate how feminism should be, the same goes both ways.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:39 PM
95

A boy today is constantly told that he is bad and wrong because of his gender. He lives in an environment where the mainstream "politically correct" forces teach him and others around him that bigotry and hatred against him is ok, or even justice. He gets lower grades for the same work, which puts him behind for life. He is less likely to attend college, more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. He is more likely to develop heart disease and cancer, and more likely to die bef…
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:33 PM
1

This is an example of feminist theory that they completely invent and make up out of nothing, than present it as fact. In reality, it's nothing, and it doesn't become true just because they say that it does. It's a completely made up and nonsensical argument.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 01:03 PM
15

The Duluth Model is illogical nonsense that feminists invented out of nothing. It's disingenuous and nothing more than a convoluted way of excusing and excluding DV against men.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 01:49 PM
8

"Intersectional" feminist theory perpetrates gender stereotypes and misconceptions such as men not being real victims of domestic violence. I'm not surprised that this sort of thing is becoming more common, there is a societal conditioning towards an anti-male bias.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:09 PM
4

It's just so hypocritical, why do feminists get to just "decide" that a men's movement is wrong unless it's under their control? Why do they get to dictate what men's issues are and how to fix them?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:06 PM
2

So what do men say among themselves? Surely if it's that bad, regular people notice and talk between themselves. How does the average man and average woman feel about all this? Thanks btw
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:48 AM
6

Feminists present opinion as fact, and in this case, opinion that completely ignores reality/data. The author decides to completely ignore/talk over the grading bias against boys: link 1 link 2 These studies are actual science, rather than "theory" or opinion. Feminism is clearly not adequate to address men's issues if they not only ignore but talk over and erase men and boys lived experiences.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:51 AM
3

If it’s not sexist to talk about the value of parents who happen to be female, why is it sexist to talk about the value of parents who happen to be male?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:46 AM
3

Exactly what the MRM needs, good work!
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:38 AM
22

See, to me that sounds like a sudden MRM wave waiting to happen. Just like the 60s when counter-culture rebelled against old standards, I bet the same happens in Spain. People are just too afraid to be the first to say anything publicly, because they are afraid they will be alone. But all it takes it one figure to stand up and lead and the rest will follow. Something is love to see is a rock band, like a Guns N’ Roses style band, that’s pro-MRA. A whole counter culture like the hippies once were…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 02:07 AM
131

Hard to believe society reached this point...how is the men’s rights movement in Spain? How aware are most people? Do most men see the problem with these things? Sounds like something which can’t help but boil over eventually.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 12:57 AM
11

Many countries practices male only conscription Many countries have higher state pension ages for men boys receive lower grades for the same work Consider how homeless men are denied shelter/housing. Consider how male DV victims are treated. Consider, in the public sphere, what gender is allowed to speak about their issues without media backlash, and what gender isn't. There's no sensible debate that sexism against men isn't real. It is. Feminists have made up their own definition of sexism that…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:01 PM
4

They know they can't win a fair debate, so they use violence and fear tactics. This is very telling, it reveals how they are a controlling and fascist-minded ideology. It says a lot that MRAs would welcome debate, while antiMRAs try and shut it down with violence.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:53 PM
6

I'd be careful with the word "revolution" because it might be spun to imply an armed revolution, which obviously isn't what we want, we want a social and political movement, which is what we are. I think the early stages are already beginning, people are starting to a have a vague "awareness" that something is just 'off' with the social justice movement, intersectional feminism, etc, but they can't quite put their fingers on it. They're beginning to notice on a conscious and subconscious level t…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:51 PM
37

Remember, this is the actual legal standard in the UK. And notice how it says “for serious crimes only.” Stabbing and nearly killing a man isn’t considered a serious crime.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:01 AM
7

"Women experiencing homelessness face unique vulnerabilities and barriers." God, this is such a ridiculous arguement. It's like saying a hospital wouldn't treat someone with a broken arm, because two broken arms is worse. And I don't buy that it's that different, it's a very abstract argument to say "its much harder for homeless women." How? Homeless men face the same hunger, cold, and yes, risk of violence. Homeless men are assaulted regularly, it's not something they are "immune from." The art…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 02:45 PM
21

Blatant discrimination and disenfranchisement in the education system is a major disadvantage for males, with lifelong repercussions. Men are more likely to be homeless, unemployed, and incarcerated, and the education is one of the pieces as to why.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:43 PM
1

I see this kind of complaint a lot, but it's not really valid. There aren't enough new stories or new relevant legislation everyday to entirely fill up the front page on a day to day basis. Having real world examples of notable figures demonstrating signs of the society condition we're trying to address is perfectly fine. That said, I do think there should be more posts about specific issues; pretty much every thing has been posted before but we can recycle posts for new members. Matter of fact,…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:17 AM
9

The "intersectional" wave of feminism is a toxic and extreme ideology, and as you're obviously well aware, not about equality. This is the extreme behavior it conditions into people- actual violence against anyone who dissents. it's brainwashing. Just imagine those people becoming teachers, doctors, police officers, judges, politicians, etc.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:16 PM
6

In the US, men are: less likely to graduate high school and attend college more likely to be homeless more likely to be unemployed Saying men are “two steps forward” economically makes no sense; if anything, statistically the opposite is more true.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:24 AM
26

This is so completely backwards, it's the exact opposite of "gender neutral" in every possible way. It's creating a paradigm where "cis men" are seen as secondary people.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:05 PM
10

"“proud princess whether he likes it or not.” Doesn't that directly violate feminist principals like consent and body autonomy? Isn't she in fact forcing gender standards on him, just in reverse, by forcing him to do or avoid certain activities? This is far more restricting and oppressive then giving child free will to choose for themselves. And it's child abuse. This is just another example of how "intersectional feminism" can be distorted into a harmful and senseless ideology.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:16 PM
3

Always good to see real world action. Well done!
/r/MensRights21/02/19 02:00 AM
11

It's very telling that they feel the need to censor. If we're so obviously wrong and illogical, why not let us show it? They censor us because they know we are right.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:29 PM
12

This is why we need a men's rights movement. "Intersectional feminist theory" tries to erase the existence of male victims like him.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:56 PM
6

This is what happens when feminist influence takes root in the court system. Crimes by woman against men, even involving violence, are ignored. It's a two tiered system where one gender is systematically privileged over the other; men are second class citizens where violence against them is accepted if committed by (directly or indirectly) the privileged gender.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:55 PM
14

So 86% of the homeless are men, but they are the homeless population ignored. This is something called the "majority-minority" hypocrisy of feminism. When women are the majority of people affected by an issue, they say "the focus needs to be on women because they are the primary victims". When women are the minority of people affected by an issue, they say "women are a smaller, often overlooked group, so need special focus." What this means for homelessness in the UK is that men are routinely de…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:11 PM
22

Every year these happen, they will grow a little bit more and a few more people will come to the MRM. Well done for doing something consistently, and consistently well!
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:58 PM
13

Anti-MRAs criticize the MRM for wanting to "maintain gender roles", but the opposite is true. We want to end the gender roles that cause things like: higher pension ages conscription longer prison sentences. The MRM is general is about undoing the societal gender stereotype that a men's rights movement isn't needed in the first place. The MRM is definitely against the idea of the traditional patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 09:25 PM
1

This is how people who follow "intersectional" philosophies think; judging people by race and gender is a central element to the philosophy, so it's all they see. It's the opposite of an equal and "gender neutral" way of thinking, it's all about rigid adherence to seeing people for the way they were born, rather than individual humans.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:58 PM
7

Unfair. Number 20 especially. Men were forced to fight in battles against their will and die at a young age. Womans suffrage is 100 years old in the U.S and U.K; no one alive today was of voting age before suffrage, so one alive today in the US/UK was ever denied to vote on a basis of gender.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 04:40 PM
3

A mixture of intentional disinformation/slandering and misconceptions. Feminists lie and distort what the MRM is; we don't have the exposure of platform to correct the record, so our voice is rarely heard.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:26 PM
15

And what's very hypocritical is how feminists present themselves as ones who get to define what masculinity is. They say it's mansplaining for men to talk over feminism, or "mansplain" what feminism is, because men can't appreciate the lived experiences of women. But then they do the opposite and talk over the lived experiences of men with their own made up, unscientific and sexist definition of masculinity as it stops the conversation. Men's issues aren't about them. It's not up to feminists to…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:23 PM
114

"Intersectional" theory will cause great harm to an entire generation. Feminist theory is harmful and unscientific. It's not a someone shouldn't be able to choose to wear a dress, it's that he was forced to wear a dress. This mother put him in harm's way, he doesn't want to go to school likely because he was bullied, possible physically.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:10 PM
7

No surprise that feminists are so hostile to the idea of recognizing male victims of domestic violence. It's just so blatant, I can't believe people still debate whether or not the modern day "intersectional" movement is really about equality. It's so blatantly toxic.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:33 PM
3

The problem with feminist theory is that more often than not it's just comprised of abstract, vague ideas rather than actual scientific fact. Gender studies courses teach an interpretation of feminist literature as fact, so it's just a circular affirmation of itself. Feminist theory uses feminist theory as it's supporting evidence.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:37 PM
2

I sort of envision something that has a more recreational vibe; something that has a fun and social feel to it. It would more about creating a sense of unity and network, and improving our public image and persona. Many people have the wrong image of "incel" associated with MRAs; we need to show that that's not us. A private group may not do that, but it would at least bring MRAs closer together and feel more like a community. A facebook group wouldn't have that privacy option and I think it wou…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:24 PM
12

I can't stand the inherent self-righteousness of the "woke" and "intersectional" philosophy; the way they talk with an absolute arrogance. The tone is so condescending, "come with me on this journey", as if those who don't agree are unquestionably narrow-minded and wrong. That said, with how Hollywood is, it's very possible that this is something he's being pressured or "encouraged" to say.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:03 PM
3

Sorry but I don't agree, we need a more palatable and non-political forum to foster a sense of community. This worked very well for the social justice movement who heavily used social media to grow.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:47 PM
2

Two examples are Sarah Jeong and Bahar Mustafa. Sarah Jeong is a self described feminist who was hired last year to be an editor for the New York Times. Controversy arose when some old tweets of hers surfaced where she made blatantly bigoted remarks. These two in particularly stick out: It's a little sick how my joy I take in being Cruel to old white men "Kill all men" and "kill all bad men still means kill all men She then actually claimed that she was somehow the victim of sexism when people c…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:34 PM
5

It's only a matter of time before the MRM catches on considering that the facts and logic are overwhelming on our side.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 02:20 AM
6

If feminists actually wanted to challenge harmful gender roles and stereotypes, they would have no problem recognizing male victims of domestic violence. Surely the idea that men can't be victims if a harmful gender stereotype, right? It's the MRM that seems to support gender equality and oppose harmful gender stereotypes.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:55 PM
10

Singapore is an example of a country with a major need for MR. Singapore practices male only conscription, where all male citizens are forced into military training for two years. Singapore also practices caning on criminals, where certain criminal offenders are beaten with a wooden cane. However, caning is reserved only for men. I always wonder, how do men think and talk about these things in countries where they happen? /u/necrohexr, do men ever talk to themselves about how it's obviously disc…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:51 PM
9

and a strong preference for certain slowly dying gender roles This is particularly infuriating not just because it's wrong, but the degree of which it's wrong. It couldn't be anymore the opposite of true. Feminists defend gender roles and MRAs oppose gender roles when you look at issues like: pension ages conscription domestic violence homeless housing/shelters resource allocation. The U/N restricted men from food distribution because of the gender stereotype that men were somehow not vulnerable…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:17 AM
58

Many progressives, such as the National Organization for Women, cheered news of the Boy Scouts’ new policy. “NOW welcomes the news that the Boy Scouts of America have once again admitted to their long history of discrimination, this time against girls, and are taking steps to correct it,” the group said in a 2017 statement. Just look at the hypocrisy of that...NOW accuses the boy scouts of discrimination, despite the fact that the girl scouts also excluded children of a certain gender. Now, they…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 10:05 PM
4

I don't want to be biased, but simply put, I'm an MRA because facts and logic and overwhelmingly aligned with the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 07:25 PM
6

This would be an excellent idea, but obviously risky, so you have to be careful. You could start with anonymous fliers, just something simple like a Microsoft word document saying "Our school could use a mens rights movement. The mens rights movement is misunderstood, we support equality and simply want to address male issues", etc, or something simpler. Good facts to bring up in a high school setting is the education gap that boys face. In the U.S, boys earn lower grades for all subjects at all…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:39 PM
10

And when feminists defend gendered DV laws like this, they are enforcing gender stereotypes of women being weak and incapable. MRAs are the ones who oppose gender stereotypes because we oppose gender generalizations and defaults.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 04:41 PM
4

Selective service occurs in the US; other than that no.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 04:50 PM
6

Good list! Two to add, maybe you have them but I can't see them, are conscription and unequal pension ages Conscription: This is forced military service where citizens are forced to join the military or face a consequences, often prison. In most countries, only men are conscripted. Some countries have alternative "civil service", which is essentially doing government labor for less than minimum wage. Unequal pension ages: In some countries, the state pension age is higher for men, meaning men mo…
/r/MensRights07/02/19 04:45 PM
4

This is something that I'd guess is much more common than people realize. It's good to see something like this, it can feel like we aren't making progress but attitudes and awareness are definitely improving for the MRM.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 04:34 PM
7

This is excellent! This is the kind of little event that will bring change; getting people to talk and think about it, and getting people to see MRAs as their friends and normal people. Well done!
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:49 AM
6

What feminists say and do are not only different, but opposite. They come up with justifications for inferior treatment for men based on gender stereotypes (like for homeless, men "aren't as vulnerable." Blatant stereotype that men are inherently more capable.)
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:32 AM
9

Male issues affect men of all races. Issues like: male issues of domestic violence men’s health conscription higher pension ages the education gap the unemployment gap the homeless gap life get sentencing for the same crime Have a gendered nature that affects all men, of any race. The MRM is sometimes criticized or dismissed as being “only for white men”, but that is 100% false.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:39 AM
14

Supporting “gendered” policies and practices such as “priority need” for homeless housing (where homeless men are denied) or the Duluth model for DV (where male victims are erased) are enforcements of gender norms.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:32 AM
19

Submitted. Maybe this is a good thing, maybe not...the Guardian is more on the pro-feminist lean, so I wouldn't hold my breath. That said, you never know. This was my response in the "male issues" section: Discrimination in the university systems- boys earn lower grades than girls for the same work, and are less likely to attend university. The entire narrative of privilege is flawed, as white boys in particularly fare the WORST in the university system. Male victims of domestic violence face di…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:04 PM
2

Very well put together, well done!
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:52 AM
12

Feminists are very hypocritical when on one hand, they talk about supporting a gender neutral society and opposing gender roles, but then at the same time, supported a very one sided and gendered approach to domestic violence. They say it's misogynistic and patriarchal to automatically see women as weak an incapable, which is true- so why couldn't women commit violence? Feminists will then give some word salad about "societal power", but that's just abstract nonsense and doesn't really mean anyt…
/r/MensRights02/02/19 03:24 PM
9

It's been known for a while now that boys get lower grades than girls in all subjects at all ages. It's also been known that discrimination and bias are major factors, with boys earning lower grades for the same work. A study from MIT broke the data down in a very detailed analysis, and it really is undeniable.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:54 PM
9

Sorry, but I don't notice or agree with this at all. There are plenty of posts about specific issues on a day to day basis, and posts about double standards are a means to highlight disparities and gender discrimination. The premise of the MRM regards differences n treatment and legal rights that occur due to gender, so posts comparing said differences make sense.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:50 PM
38

Men are expected to consider the comfort of their attacker over their own safety. When 50% of the population attacks a man, he is expected to take care of the person assaulting him rather than defend himself.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:35 PM
13

A few more: Feminists protest equal pension age (UK) Feminist protest equal conscription (Norway) University welfare officer and avowed feminist tweets "kill white men (UK) Feminists protest law protecting male rape victims because of this, is not illegal to sexually assault men in India (India) Obvious there are many, many more.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:31 AM
6

It’s going to happen more and more as toxic SJWism takes a generational hold. It will change the dating and marriage landscape. It’s one of those unspoken MR issues that exists at a large scale below the surface. Never talked about, but frequently thought about.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 03:08 PM
5

Fully recommend, it’s good to connect MRAs and build a sense of community.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:21 PM
3

I don’t see any of that on the discord whatsoever.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:14 PM
9

There's a theory I think applies to the SJW movement called the theory of political ponerology. The theory holds that networks of manipulative people form cooperations to increase their political and social power. The SJW/intersectional movement isn't "just happening", it's too well coordinated and calculated. Think about how very distinct elements seem to emerge out of nowhere- the SJW "look" (glasses, dyed hair, etc), common phrases and buzzwords...it's not all just happening randomly at the s…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:58 AM
538

This is yet another example of why feminism is not enough to address male issues, and we need a men's rights movement. Especially note the link in the middle of the article page, about the mens officer being harassed. Just look at their comments: NUS officer Ilyas Nagdee accused the university of “weaponising tragic student suicides” at Bristol University “ in order to pursue this vile undemocratic shambles of a men's officer”, labelling the election: “The worst thing I've seen in student politi…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:49 AM
7

Welcome! You're not alone here, many think like you do, and this is a community that understands what you're saying.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:35 PM
22

Thanks! Yes, whole article. They prefer shorter letters if you want to get it printed. I'll keep you all updated on followups/reactions.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:01 PM
27

Which group would deny food to people based on their gender? A. The Men's Rights Movement. or B. Intersectional feminism. MRAs wouldn’t do that. This cannot be said to be a "fringe" or "conspiracy" opinion, this happened. And what happens when this starts occurring in grocery stores and hospitals and social security offices? How bad might this get?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:03 PM
202

This would be very inconvenient for society considering that men are the majority of: garbage collectors electricians plumbers laborers transport drivers factory workers Not to mention of all of the unpaid physical labor, and responsibility to be the first to respond to danger.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:06 PM
23

Thing is, it's only a facade to manipulate, feminism hurts black men just as much. Male issues like education, homelessness, longer prison sentences, conscription, etc, affect men of all races. If a law discriminates against men, black men (and men of any race) will be affected. Feminists pretend to support black men, by using race to divide men from realizing just how significant the MR cause is. But it's misleading, the things feminists actually say and support hurts black men more than helps …
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:38 PM
34

conscription. In most countries, only men are subjected to conscripted, or given the option to perform labor for less than minimum wage. pension ages/ In many countries, the state pension age is higher for men, forcing men to work to an older age, despite shorter life expectancy it's not illegal to rape men in india boys earn lower grades for the same work homeless men have less access to shelter male victims of domestic violence are often ignored, or even the ones arrested when they call. men's…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 01:32 PM
240

The couple are both in their sixties and separated about 20 years ago. That's what makes it so absurd, she has had 20 years to find work and save like any adult would. Instead, he is losing most the pension he will need to rely on when he is too old to work. This could well lead to him becoming homeless or starving. How can feminists claim to support equality if they support treating women as a dependent class? Why would an equally capable person need a ruling like this? 75% isn't justifiable in…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 01:30 PM
5

Higher pension ages to, in many countries
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:49 PM
16

They are the weak.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:02 PM
36

It's a completely two-tiered system where men are second class citizens under rule. She sexually assaulted him, but he couldn't even defend himself because he would have been the one charged. That is the nature of a feminism system; men are a lesser class by fault and are so inherently underprivileged that they cannot even defend themselves from sexual assault.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 01:37 PM
2

I don't want to say this is "good", but it's a sign of progress...the more directly this affects people's lives, and the more open and publc we are about being MRAs, the more in brings the conversation to a necessary fever pitch.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:19 PM
17

A true measure of who is oppressed/privileged in a society- who can be criticized? Who can’t be? Who is allowed to advocate for discrimination and bias in their own favor?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 04:48 PM
16

Good idea! Done: http://archive.is/COHGY
/r/MensRights18/01/19 04:32 PM
11

Toxic masculinity is a common talking point within intersectional feminism, here's an article about this very video. Feminists frequently discuss it in the context of intersectional theory, and by doing so, they are acting as the arbiters of what toxic masculinity is and what the effects are. Here are several other examples of many: geekfeminism femmagazine everydayfeminism. This one in particular has a tone of lecturing and presumptuous over-certainty. another from vox, the tone "its time to be…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 06:06 PM
31

It's that "masculinity" is being defined by feminism, which is hypocritical- feminists say it's not up to men to tell women how feminism should be, so likewise, a masculinity and male issues should be defined by the men who have the relative lived experience.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:34 PM
7

Exactly, ant-MRAs have come up with a trope to dismiss this, "women behaving badly", but that's not what it's about. Like you said, it's primarily about two things: Disparities in the criminal justice system. More lenient or harsh treatment in a criminal court system is a blatant inequality, and reflects larger societal disparities between classes. If feminists campaign for every inequality faced by women, including sexist air conditioning or manspreading, why should we address differential trea…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:42 PM
5

The negative perception people have of the men’s rights movement just isn’t true. The MRM isn’t sexist and isn’t anti-women; In an MRA because I noticed the same thing you did, that this is a very fair and rational movement.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 04:55 PM
9

Good idea, false accusations are much more common than people realize, hopefully if people speak out, the issue will get more attention.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 04:53 PM
13

A Harvard academic is “shocked” at what MRAs have known for years...
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:08 PM
6

The male issues talked about by MRAs affect all men. You’re not alone, we’re growing everyday. Welcome to the MRM!
/r/MensRights12/01/19 06:39 PM
55

Men in the UK are less likely to finish secondary school, less likely to attend university, more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. It make no sense for men to be disfavored, even indirectly, in education.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:17 PM
24

The hypocrisy/irony is that this directly enforced gender roles and stereotypes. We're told it's sexist to think in gender stereotypes, but also that's it's sexist not to support them.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 05:03 PM
28

This has been the case in the United States for a while now. It's because men face bias in education, leading to lower college attendance, thus worse employment opportunities.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 05:00 PM
28

It's sexist to automatically assume one gender is more honest than the other. It's even worse if it's enshrined into police procedure.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:39 PM
153

This, along with the new guidelines on no prison for women for most crimes, is setting up a society where men are wholly inferior citizens by social standards and crimes against men by women will not be recognized or taken seriously. It's the beginnings of a movie-like dystopia. I can't fathom not being able to see it.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:33 PM
2

This is wrong on nearly every level. Intersectional "theory" is made-up and disingenuous wordplay, it's just meaningless phrases written in a way that tries to sound sophisticated and sensible. But it's not. Womens violence doesn't have the same level of societal support ??? What??? It's women's violence against men that isn't taken seriously...this is seriously suggesting that society supports men's violence against women more?? Violence against women is definitely and overwhelmingly seen as be…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:43 PM
14

These sorts of studies will happen because of us speaking out for years. It has been and will be thankless, but we persevere.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:57 PM
6

Feel free to use it!
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:32 PM
114

The absolute irony and hypocrisy is almost impossible to fathom. For a feminist to tell men it's "mansplaining" to talk about an issue specific to men, and to completely speak over the lived experiences of those actually affected, very much proves her point. She's actually hurting people by spreading misinformation. It's not ok.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 02:06 PM
2

This is excellent!! Kudos to whoever thought this up; this is how a movement spreads.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:52 PM
11

Men experience the unpaid responsibility to risk their safety to protect women in violent and dangerous situations. This doesn't just apply to man-made situations, it applies to natural disasters to- if resources or space was limited, men are expected to volunteer themselves in harm's way. Men are expected to ignore self preservation, and do so without thanks.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 08:46 PM
23

Two blatantly different justice systems based on gender. Removing gender has a marginal impact on the accuracy of the sentence risk assessment instrument. Overall, the accuracy rate is still moderate to strong and the accuracy of low and high risk predictions remain essentially the same. However, removing gender results in fewer females classified as low risk and more females classified as high risk. This argument makes no sense. There are saying that men are more likely to be considered "high r…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:17 PM
12

It's milieu control in effect. It's a learned tactic for distraction and idea suppression, they hijack threads and derail the topic. The idea is to split men of difference races and create a situation where they see each others as "the enemy" so we don't realize that we have male specific social justice issues in common.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:54 AM
30

Today, men are: less likely to receive university education more likely to be unemployed more likely to be homeless treated more harshly by the criminal justice system In what society does this happen to the more privileged class?
/r/MensRights04/01/19 07:40 PM
9

You're absolute in the right, and absolutely not wrong for pushing someone away for it. If people are criticizing you for the push, keep asking them "oh, why did I push them away?", make them say it out loud. If they say "it doesn't matter", as them why.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 01:47 PM
12

We are growing fasting than ever. 2018 was a big step up, we went from still mostly considered a fringe internet phenomena to knocking on the door of mainstream consciousness. I think 2019 is an opportunity for a breakout year- let's go!
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:21 AM
26

Boys earn lower grades in all subjects and at all ages. Studies suggest grading bias is a major factor: https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/02/16/female-teachers-give-male_n_1281236.html https://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier-1.pdf This has lifelong consequences, with men being less likely to be college educated, more likely to be homeless, and more likely to be homeless. I can't help but think having a more equal gender ratio of teachers would at l…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:19 AM
2

Feminists talk about "unpaid emotional labor", but I think knowing that your physical safety is put into danger day is a form of unpaid emotional labor, not to mention unpaid physical labor men do everyday. When there is a dangerous situation, or break in, or fight, etc; i's automatical men who supposed to put themselves in harms way to protect women. This is very much an "unpaid labor" to.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:31 PM
7

You need to directly challenge this, what the principal is saying makes no sense and cannot be logically defended. It is likely that she is SJW and not operating in good faith, so you need to be prepared for unreasonable push back. Make it an issue, make print outs, go to the parents, challenge the principal on specifics, ask her specifically why helping the struggling gender would reinforce gender roles, and what gender roles she means, etc. Tell her that as a woman, it's not her place to defin…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 03:07 AM
16

And it's so hypocritical to, feminists specifically defend genders stereotypes such as "women are weaker" to justify things like: gendered and discriminatory domestic violence laws one sided attitudes towards consent and sexual assault higher pension ages for men male only conscription "priority need" homeless policies for women over men (women being vulnerable) Feminism is built on these principles. I can't imagine the level of doublethink necessary to not notice...
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:17 PM
3

Another example of why the MRM is for all men of all races. Intersectional “theory” conditions a creeping, toxic societal bias against men, and this applies to men of any race.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:17 PM
52

The feminist criticism of the MRM is unreasonable and hypocritical; feminists do not adequately address male issues, and male issues should not be addressed under the scope of a women's movement anyway. It shouldn't be up to feminists to decide how male issues are discussed and addressed. Let's just take a look at some examples what we criticize feminists for, blatantly sexist/discriminatory behavior: feminist protest equal pension ages. They argue that they "dont have enough time to prepare." S…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 02:08 PM
6

And men are thanked by housing policies that exclude homeless men because they aren't 'priority need'; so we just freeze to death instead.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 01:55 AM
4

Because of the growing influence of “SJW feminism” in the police force, and their attitude that men shouldn’t be taken seriously as victims.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 12:03 AM
2

This element means that the statistics can't fairly be applied to single working adults, That is literally the entire point...I don't think you're following what I'm saying, or maybe I'm not getting what your saying, but everything you just said is in line with my argument, so I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with? aka what's actually going on is that caretakers can't actually take on 48-hours due to the amount of domestic responsibilities, and this disadvantages mostly women due to them gen…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:50 PM
5

But there isn't really a logical need to NOT help homeless men to. homelessness is a very small fraction of the government budget. just because homeless men aren't As vulnerable, they still are very vulnerable and face cold, hunger and assault. Women being more vulnerable isn't an actually valid reason to NOT care about homeless men; there's no logical reason to suddenly say "ok, stop here" when you get to homeless men. Think of it this way- a hospital wouldn't not treat a broken hand foot just …
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:45 PM
2

Yes you can, and don't give me a pro-tip about study text, The sample is working Australian adults, not exclusively single working adults, so you can't make conclusions about single working people based on this study. This doesn't make sense, you haven't said anything here. It doesn't matter if the study didn't sample single working adults, my point still stands. In fact, that the study didn't focus exclusively on single adults strengthens my argument because it shows how over generalized and in…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:35 PM
2

But it’s entirely made up nonsense, it is t science women’s “unpaid labor” isn’t an actual thing. The male brain would have to be vastly superior to the female brain in order for this study to make sense when applied to single people.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:55 AM
31

And how does this apply to single people? A single man and single woman living alone are equally responsible for doing their own chores in their own home.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 03:47 PM
9

This is perfect reflection of the true state of societal privilege/oppression. The class allowed to initiate physical harm on the other is not the oppressed class.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 03:12 PM
10

This is getting ridiculous, intersectional feminism is a regressive hate ideology. Time to shut it down.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 03:05 PM
1

A man guilty of breaking into a woman's home and physically assaulted her wouldn't be home if he had prior felonies. Men get bail, but in certain cases bail isn't offered if the prisoner poses too much of a flight risk, or risk to the community at large.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 11:06 PM
19

People forget but 18 year old boys being forced into battle to die was the norm for many years in recent history. WW2 from 41-45, Korea from 50-53, Vietnam from 65-73. Many men still alive today were drafted, and all through the 70s-2000s working men were all men who experienced drafts in their lifetimes. It's something totally left out of conversations on privilege and equality (no surprise why)
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:42 PM
10

This is what creeping fascism and a society of true class separation looks like, when a class a people are dehumanized and devalued to the point of being seen as "separate" from the rest of society. The "intersectional" bigotry and hostile sentiment towards men/white men is plain bigotry, nothing else.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:39 PM
1

Which is ridiculous because it's completely the opposite of what's true; women are literally legally privileged and enjoy a separate legal standard under British law where they do not go to prison for non violent crimes. A serious crime of fraud or theft would result in prison for a man, but not a woman of equal or even greater economic status. Feminists have campaigned to close all womens prisons for a while now. A study from the University of Michigan shows that gender is the largest factor in…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:02 PM
2

This happens all the time but feminist organizations directly advocate for "gendered" policies that marginalize and discrimination against male victims. The Duluth model is a feminist inspired model for police responses to domestic violence and teaches that gender dynamics are the cause of DV, and in practice, that men are rarely victims of domestic violence. The Duluth model is the basis for many "mandatory male arrest" practices of police, where a man is automatically arrested in any DV call, …
/r/MensRights20/12/18 01:55 PM
3

And by not teaching respect for boys, the implication is that it isn't important. The intentional exclusion is a message in and of itself.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:31 PM
12

Feminism advocates for a separate legal standard for men and women, where gender is a direct factor in treatment. In a feminist society, female criminals are not to be held accountable, and half of the population can commit violent crimes with leniency.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:30 PM
5

Why does diversity mean no white males? Wouldn’t a white man just be seen as another person included in diversity? Why do they count against university as if lesser people?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:52 PM
4

This is great! I keep meaning to that follow up post to the Canadian GBA series, there's more to do. But I love the site!
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:37 PM
2

6:30 tonight!
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:45 PM
3

Thank you for sharing. Not much I can say, saying "sorry to hear that" doesn't really help; I am glad you have your children.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:59 PM
5

I thought she was trying to kill me, she kept slamming my head into the door and screaming nonsense at me. I finally pushed her off me, and at that point my neighbor got up and restrained ME. Because I had pushed her off me. He stood there watching for 3+ minutes of her wailing on me and did nothing, but the second I tried to defend myself, This is what's so enraging; this could have killed you, or caused brain damage, but you weren't even allowed to defend yourself. Men are expected to place th…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 03:05 PM
4

This is what differences in gender privilege actually looks like, blatantly different and preferable treatment in the court system. This is a blatant inequality, and in reversed, would be considered a major feminist issue.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 03:00 PM
5

Because men are discriminated against in hiring- often as function of law- and are thus less likely to be employed.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:55 PM
4

Please do!
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:09 PM
10

Ableism- how does she know one of them isn't disabled? Or recently had surgery and has a bad knee?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 01:16 PM
4

Your comment is good satire because it's actually exactly the logic feminists use to deny homeless men shelters, poor men healthcare, disadvantaged male children scholarships, etc
/r/MensRights14/12/18 01:05 PM
9

Being able to commit violence with leniency is something the privileged class in a society can do, not the oppressed class.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 08:41 PM
15

This is a legal norm now in the UK, women do not receive prison sentences for non-violent crimes. This includes, as we can see, child pornography. Half of the population of the UK can now transmit child pornography without any risk of a prison term.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 06:58 PM
11

Of course, Britain now has a separate legal system for men and women where men are second class citizens under law; women do not face serious consequences for crimes like stalking, so men stalked by women have no protection from it.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:55 PM
4

Illustrating homeless men as being "less vulnerable" and thus less in need of assistance is propagating gender roles; why are homeless men less vulnerable? Because they are stronger? Because they are supposed to be tough? Why wouldn't a homeless man need assistance? Feminist philosophies and political ideas are hypocritical and harmful.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:51 PM
4

Just a few, but by no means all examples: pension/retirement. In many countries, men have a higher state pension age than women, meaning they must work longer and to an older age before they can retire. This, coupled with men's shorter life expectancies, means men often only enjoy half the years in retirement. It's worth nothing that feminist legal scholars protest against equal ages.) Consider that in the UK, homeless men are often denied housing because they aren't ruled "priority need" and co…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:57 PM
14

In the US, women entering the workforce now earn more than their male peers. This wouldn't happened if systemic gender discrimination was dominate in the workforce; it wouldn't even be possible.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:27 PM
21

Trying to frame shorter prison sentences for men as a manifestation of male privilege is infuriating because it's so much the opposite of true. A study from the University of Michigan found that men receive longer sentences for the same crime and that gender is the single largest predictor of term length. Female privilege in the court system is actual legal standard in the UK now; women have a different justice system and do not go to prison for the same crimes.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 01:23 PM
1

I'd be willing to bet there is a strong overlap between this club and identifying with intersectional feminism and social justice. There is a strong anti-male rhetoric being conditioned into people, and this kind of thing isn't surprising.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:41 PM
6

No way, we've been dealing with this for years and we're only growing, and growing stronger. They can and will try to slow us down, but we're right and we know it, and people are beginning to realize that.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 05:31 PM
1

The next post will be Monday or Tuesday, it's about the disaster prepared and response plan of the federal government. You can guess how resource allocation is viewed through a gender lens...
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:10 AM
6

It's a myth that prostate cancer isn't deadly- prostate cancer is actually the 2nd biggest cancer killer of men overall, and the cancer a non-smoking man is most likely to get.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:47 PM
2

Use whatever you like, but credit me if you wouldn't mind!
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:26 PM
67

The logic is very sexist, feminists assume women never lie, but how does that make sense? Men lie, and women are people just like men, so why wouldn't women sometimes lie to? It's sexist to say that one gender is inherently more honest than another. People who happen to be male sometimes lie, and people who happen to be female sometimes lie.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:25 PM
2

I had literally just read about this and was going to post!! I'm doing a series on the GBA- I'd love to get a link for the secretaries, I completely believe it.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:52 PM
1

Feminist "theory" is just that- theory. And what's more, completely pseudo-science.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:55 PM
22

We're seeing the gradual progression into dystopian society in real time. Constant anti-male conditioning and brainwashing to dehumanize men so people accept discriminatory laws.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:53 PM
6

Was about to message you this, yes for my next post I'm going to get into a more detailed analysis, it'll be a series.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:28 PM
16

Maybe take a current events class and learn the actual facts and data on male issues today, and how you benefit from being immune to them!
/r/MensRights04/12/18 11:49 PM
80

This is normal, discrimination against men is viewed as if it "doesn't count"; if anyone tries pointing it out, they are attacked by feminists who say: "Stop derailing" "wut about the menz" "MRAs just want to maintain male privilege." The car insurance example is just another illustration of our point regarding societal misandry- men are the gender allowed to be discrimination against, and it wouldn't be that way if men were actually privileged.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:15 PM
10

Young women are now earning more than their male peers when entering the workforce. This wouldn't be possible if there was a systemic wage gap disfavoring women...how would it be possible for the disadvantaged class to earn more from the very beginning?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:41 PM
5

People are conditioned to have a very different reaction to when something happens to a man versus a woman. Bad things happening to a man don't "count" as much, societal bias in tilted against men....this is what we see manifest as societal misandry. SJW feminism is making this worse, the attitude of the woman posting this is an example of the increasing anti-male sentiment. Feminism is gradually conditioning people to dehumanize men. $2000 could put someone out of their rent and get them evicte…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:54 PM
35

Think about how hypocritical this is- the same feminists who talk about "mansplaining" are insisting that men are wrong about male issues, and that it should be up to feminists how male issues are addressed.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:52 PM
27

They have a website with all the info and court documents here: http://savejames.com/
/r/MensRights30/11/18 02:34 PM
6

What's ridiculous is how feminists want to close women's prisons and have no jail for adult female criminals, because women are THAT much disadvantaged as not to be held accountable, but 11-12 year old boys should go to prison for this...they are saying a 30 year old women is beneath the level of an 11 year old boy when it comes to responsibility and accountability. My local area has seen an alarming spike in teen suicide with almost 78% of the completions being teen boys. It has become an epide…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:24 PM
17

This is an actual systemic disadvantage, and sets boys behind for life. Boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages. There are multiple studies that suggest teacher bias in grading is the root cause; teachers give boys lower grades for the same work. This sets up lifelong consequences- men are less likely to attend university, more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. If feminists truly cared about equality and social justice, they should care about this, but they don'…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:14 PM
15

Men are less likely to be educated. Boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages. There is evidence to suggest grading bias is to blame. This sets boys behind for life. Men are less likely to attend and graduate from university. men are more likely to be unemployed men are more likely to be homeless men are given less access to low income healthcare, and have less government funding to research their healthcare given less access to homeless housing many countries practice male only conscri…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:02 PM
5

This is great! Seeing more of this in public will undoubtedly spark feminist backlash, which will awaken many people.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:51 PM
3

It's a hub for psychopaths, it's disingenuous and intentionally inaccurate.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:50 PM
369

Quick addition to my comment- you should spread this on social media, show your male classmates what is happening to them. This goes on allowed because people aren't aware of it. It makes no sense to disfavor men from educational and employment opportunities, boys are less likely to attend university at all levels, and men have a higher unemployment rate. Boys earn lower grades and are given lower grades for the same work. Why should a boy from a working class family be disfavored over a girl fr…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:46 PM
7

This article shows who the privileged gender really is. In no society could the oppressed class stab a member of the privileged class and ask for leniency due to do convenience.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:13 PM
90

They allegedly shot down his requests for shift changes so that he could make court custody hearings about his autistic daughter; refused to authorize his overtime and delayed his OT payments; and refused his request to transfer. This is the current state of men in society- denied access of their children, raped at work, and no social or legal recourse to fix it. This would not happen to the privileged class of a society.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:11 PM
1

That she is ignorant and incredibly hypocritical. She'd be the first to say it's "mansplaining" for a man to dismiss feminism, yet she is automatically dismissing male issues that don't affect her, and that she isn't even educated about. Who is she to make that determination? Who is she to speak over the lived experiences of people here? There's nothing misogynistic about this sub or the MR issues we discuss, she is entire ignorant and narrow-viewed.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:06 PM
10

and shall be imprisoned for a minimum of one year and a maximum of 16 years That's terrifying. You can suddenly go to prison even if you just live your life quietly and privately. Men in Iceland have a constant threat of imprisonment just for living.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 04:25 PM
27

Feminism is clearly NOT "also for men." They ignore or lie about our issues and data, we need a mens rights movement.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:11 PM
4

If feminists opposed gender roles, and opposed basing laws on said roles, shouldn't they oppose this? What's the implication of having less time for women? I don't understand how anyone could claim to support gender equality, but not oppose thi. 'This discrimination is occurring ironically at the direction of the Australian Human Rights Commission,' he said. It's not ironic, SJW organizations are anti-equality.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:14 PM
66

Boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all levels in the U.S
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:10 PM
3

Pure womansplaining. This is why we need a mens rights movement. Feminism is NOT enough to solve mens issues.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:43 PM
3

The privileged class in a society is the class treated leniently in court. It makes no sense that the oppressed class can assault the privileged class and be treated MORE leniently because of it.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:10 PM
3

And in countries with male only conscription, men pay more taxes via the cheap social labor.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 07:53 PM
2

Due to title IX, the vast majority of colleges have fewer mens teams than womens teams, yet mens teams are STILL targeted for cuts under the guise of "equality."
/r/MensRights15/11/18 06:28 PM
2

Young males pay more for car insurance, earn less entering the workforce, and discriminated against in hiring. Why should a male student from a poor background, or earning minimum wage, be forced to pay more than a female student from a rich background? Isn't that against the principle of intersectionality? It's ignoring individual differences such as class, health, employment, etc
/r/MensRights10/11/18 06:02 PM
1

Textbook manipulative language, slow creeping SJW takeover.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 05:50 PM
42

Feminist talk about “unpaid labor”, but how about men’s unpaid expectation to sacrifice themselves to save women? It’s a gender role feminists ignore, men expected to put ourselves in harms way and not care about dying.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:33 PM
8

It's not equality to automatically believe one gender over another.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 03:25 PM
90

Male in academics are at a social disadvantage. Boys get lower grades in all subjects at all levels. Evidence suggests that this because of grading bias against boys, where boys are given lower grades for the same work: link 1 link 2 As a result, men are now a minority in the university system. Think about it- favor is being given to the already advantaged class. Men are 2nd class citizens.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:22 PM
36

In a feminist society, men are punished for being victims of rape.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:11 PM
2

Sarah Jeong, editor of New York Times: It's a little sick how much joy I take in being cruel to old white men What the anti male "principle" of SJWism really is is a gradution conditioning and dehumanization to accept future discrimination, mass arrest, violence, etc...it's the early steps of fascism.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 07:13 PM
3

Well, then you really don't understand the MRM. We don't share any philosophy or beliefs...the MRM just wants to address certain issues that affect men and boys, and that's it. There's a very wide gap, we have no association whatsoever. What positions of the MRM do you disagree with, and why? In what way do you think the MRM is similar to incels? What beliefs do you think we share?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:49 PM
8

Think about a 10 month sentence, it would be crimes like assault and theft. 50% of the population will be allowed to commit most crimes without any serious consequence. Men are blatantly 2nd class citizens.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 04:07 PM
137

There’s nothing misogynistic about the MRM or any of our beliefs. I always ask these people “what specific position of the MRM do you disagree with, and why?”. I never get any sensible answers.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:33 AM
6

I actually do believe that this was an accident and that she thought it was just garbage; your mind wouldn't jump to think a person was just laying there. But I also think a man would have been sentenced to prison, and the privileged class isn't the one treated more harshly in the court system.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:07 PM
62

When feminists fight against fathers rights, they are hurting people. SJWism is a hate movement that doesn't care about right and wrong.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 04:00 PM
17

First of all, crimes like theft do hurt people- why should half the population be allowed to commit theft against the other? Secondly, women get shorter sentences for the same crime to begin with, so many of the sentences that are under a year may have been violent crimes to begin with. This is especially true of domestic violence. If this happens, 50% of the population will essentially be allowed to steal and even assault with no practical consequences.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:04 PM
9

At the advice of suffragettes, and either way, that's not a justification for what they did.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:26 PM
21

And her reasoning is because they are "white males." That is PURE hatred and bigotry, no way around it. Femini dehumanize white men like we are a different class of people. And remember, during WW1 feminists pushed for war and male conscription called the white feather campaign
/r/MensRights02/11/18 02:40 PM
1

This is what happens all the time, feminists completely control the council system and make housing impossible for men. In London, virtually every homeless person you see is white and male because they are refused housing by default. Make no mistake, this wasn't an accident.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:28 PM
2

It's like boys are "lesser" children of a different class. Just imagine the reverse.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:13 AM
6

The U.N food programs for children "focus on girls" to the point that boys are entirely left out.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 06:02 PM
8

The reality of male privilege. Male privilege is not reflected in any real world data: in what society is the privileged class less likely to graduate high school and attend university? in what society is the privileged class more likely to be homeless? in what society is the privileged class more likely to be unemployed? in what society does the privilege class receive less access and research towards healthcare? -in what society does the privileged class receiver longer sentences for the same …
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:20 AM
4

We should have an established plan for the event of the subreddit's deletion, and an established place we know to go to.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:54 AM
20

The thing is, you're not alone, the other people like you are just staying silent because they are afraid of saying the "wrong people." Lots of people agree with the MRM, even if they don't realize it- the average person only thinks the MRM is a bad thing because they don't understand what we're really about, but if you talk to them about the basic issues, you'll find that they agree. I think a good way to reach high school students is to appeal to them directly- talk about an issue that is happ…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:52 AM
1

but you take that and you apply it to...all women? No, but the judge did. That was actually the specific element of the decision, so yes, that is how I relayed it- as it happened. Wish you could stop blaming that fact on women. Nothing about this post or sub is anyway "blaming women." The two people who are directly to blame in this case are the psychologist and the judge. A broader scope might also find the more disingenuous elements of SJWism culpable as well.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:14 AM
22

Feminism does nothing to address the double standards of violence against men. They claim to help men by "addressing harmful gender roles", but in practice do either nothing or the opposite.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 08:52 PM
23

Welcome to the sub, we're growing at a faster rate than ever before, and it seems the MRM (mens rights movement) as a whole is to. As it becomes more obvious that mens rights is necessary, and as feminism because more and more extreme, it will become inevitable that people notice and start talking about it. I think we're just getting started and 2019 will be the year of breakthrough to mainstream relevance in social awareness/public opinion.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:51 AM
3

Since either gender parent can be an abusive, automatically giving children to a certain gender is bad because it doesn't give any room for discretion. Custody cases should be made on an individual basis.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:49 AM
12

This kind of thing happens all the time, men are second class citizens in the court system.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:42 AM
103

I'm shadowbanned from submitting to r/news. I can comment, but not submit new threads. It's already in Canada and got 2000 upvotes.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:09 PM
6

This will become the new reality- automatic prison for any accusation against a man, no consequences for false accusations.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:22 PM
2

So, speaking over men's lived experiences. This is exactly what mansplaining is but in reverse- she is telling men they are wrong about what happens to them, all while denying the reality of male victims of domestic violence. Feminism can NOT be "for men to" if they deny male victims of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:11 PM
1

This is being done to excuse the crime and turn the accuser into the victim. It will get to the point where there is essentially no consequence for a false accusation, which is very scary. There needs to be a deterrence from that sort of crime. Imagine if an accusation is automatic prison time, and NO penalty exists for making false accusations.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 04:57 PM
18

The irony here, feminist saying it should be up to them to define masculinity and male issues. Exactly what they say mansplaining is but in reverse, except now, it's a good thing because feminism is still in control. Purely manipulative and controlling.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:40 AM
3

That's actually what happened in India.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:22 PM
12

I think graphs that illustrate men's health issues can be effective. Here's one for prostate cancer to dispel the myth that prostate cancer isn't deadly- in fact, it is the second biggest cancer killer of men, and the cancer a nonsmoking man is most likely to die from.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:42 AM
25

Feminist ignore the gender roles that are favorable to them. When they say things like "genderless world" or "gender is a construct", they don't mean it for issue like domestic violence, pension ages, dangerous jobs, etc.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:32 AM
14

That wouldn't happened to the privileged class of a society- in what society is the privileged class treated more harshly by the court system while the oppressed class is treated more favorably? That just makes no sense.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:21 PM
7

100%, and I think it’s a driving force behind the growth of the MRM. Our subscriber count is growing faster than ever before, reactions to men’s rights on social media are much more positive, or at least tolerant, then say 3 years ago.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 05:02 PM
2

Thanks! I’m going to try and have videos daily, or at least 4-5 times a week. I’m just starting with shorter 5 minute introductory videos but will eventually start with longer videos and more in depth production.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:58 PM
9

It’s already too easy for men to cry foul every time a woman says or does anything they don’t like. Don’t enshrine that in law I just can't believe the author is missing how ironic and hypocritical this is- they are writing this article with disingenuous intentions, they aren't trying to be sensible, they are being intentionally manipulative. This is a pure double standard, how could someone write this and possible not notice?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:21 AM
54

The actual positions and principals of the men's rights movement are very moderate, and we tend to be a reasonable and fair minded group. I'm always impressed and proud at how well we stay above the political fray and nonsense going on, we stay consistent and on point. I can definitely feel the tide changing, people are beginning to accept us and realize that we are right.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:53 AM
13

It's inevitable, SJWism has been slowly creeping up the level of toxicity and extremism they openly display, like the frog in the boiling pot, but eventually, people will notice. It will be impossible to maintain the façade forever. This is why we should be open, always talking to people, you know never know who might be a silent MRA, or having similar thoughts and would be very open to us.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 06:57 PM
5

This is a good chance to talk to your classmates, I bet many of them are feeling the same way but are afraid to say anything. These are the kinds of experiences that can actually represent can opportunity to come together. I think silent MRAs are everywhere, they're just waiting for someone else to speak first.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 06:54 PM
16

They can’t allow fair and open discussion, because they know that the facts and reality are against them. They use bans/blocks to restrict available information to readers, as a means of brainwashing. It’s called milieu control
/r/MensRights16/10/18 07:14 PM
21

What will be interesting to see is how feminists react- if they truly support equality, they should have no problem with this. But I predict some response along the lines of “it’s wrong to recognize sexism against mean because it ignores the reality of power structures”, or some similarly disingenuous reasoning.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:27 AM
105

An oppressed class wouldn’t be able to get away with murder.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:24 AM
38

If men were in anyway the socially and privileged class, this wouldn’t have happened.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:18 PM
3

Feminism claims to oppose gender stereotypes, yet actively perpetuate such stereotypes regarding male victims of domestic violence. Feminists try to completely erase them and claim they don’t really exist.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:17 PM
25

This is what happens when a social movement is promoting toxicity and extremism. The SJW movement has been hijacked and is an extreme and bigoted ideology.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 09:35 PM
7

Men are: less likely to be educated more likely to be unemployed more likely to be homeless given less access to low income healthcare, and have less government funding to research their healthcare given less access to homeless housing in some countries, are conscripted against their will in some countries, have a higher state pension age treated more harshly by the criminal justice system. In what society would this happen to the privileged class? Statistically and logically, the concept of mal…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 06:16 PM
1

That’s why we have to read and post everyday, things aren’t just going to get better if we ignore them. It’s up to people like us to do something, we can’t just pretend that everything is ok- the desire to ignore social issues and “just live” is tempting, but unviable. The situation will collapse around you, even if you try to ignore it.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:54 PM
41

And what’s must unfair about this is that statistic ally, men are already worse off economically. This is justified by saying it’s to help women catch up, but it’s men who are behind. Men in Canada are less likely to be educated, more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. In Budget 2018, the Government of Canada announced a new Apprenticeship Incentive Grant for Women to further support women in entering, progressing, and completing their training in Red Seal trades where wome…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:36 PM
2

One factor you fail to consider is the gendered nature of sentencing where men receive longer sentences for the same crime. There is a gendered nature to the disparity seen in sentencing. It may not be the sole contributor, but it's relevant.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:12 AM
14

According to research carried out by the Association of Teachers and Lecturers in 2015, more than 22 per cent of school and college staff have had false allegations made against them by a pupil. 22% is a huge percentage. My guess is that covers the majority of white male teachers, and SJWs organize accusations against them. It’s a pure hate ideology.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:23 PM
10

The class treated more harshly by the court system is not the privileged class of a society.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 05:44 PM
7

People wonder why MRAs are anti-feminist, just look at him for an example. He’s a prominent and respected feminist figure and he denies that male victims of DV even exist. How can we possibly support that?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 03:46 PM
12

Exactly, just look at study where they switched feminist words with Mein Kampf and it looked believable SJW language is hateful and extreme. As you point out, consider kill all men, and how Sara Jeong was hired as an editor for the New York Times even after tweeting how she enjoys being cruel to old white men. SJW fascism is absolutely a hate movement, and genocide absolutely is a fair and reasonable association to make.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:02 PM
3

In other words, true equality is when every individual is treated equally.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 05:22 PM
20

Yet another example of how toxic and radical SJW feminism is. This is indefensible.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 05:20 PM
14

Blatant psychopaths, it’s obvious that they are not operating in good faith. They do not debate fairly or sensibly ever, it’s an actual hate sub.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 05:58 AM
8

Until the MRM is the next cool thing!
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:48 PM
14

MANY secret MRAs in Hollywood.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 10:36 PM
5

SHW feminism is a hate ideology. The creeping anti white male rhetoric follows exactly patterns of historical fascist regimes. kill white men joy from cruelty.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 08:08 PM
3

Karen Straughan is an anti-feminist MRA
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:33 PM
2

Those people have a duty to call out and condemn this behavior. I don't see any feminists standing up to the extremism within their ranks. Why did no one speak out against the women's march having Donna Hylton as a speaker, who was convicted of murder and rape?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:55 PM
5

Boys earn lower grades at all ages in all subjects. This of course leads to lower university attendance and higher unemployment rates later in life. Multiple studies suggest that boys ace bias in grading: Study 1 Study 2 Especially notice study 2, it's from the MIT school of economic and gives a very detailed and irrefutable breakdown of the plain bias and grading discrimination. Sexism sets boys behind for life.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:53 PM
2

When one class of citizen can assault another class with legal impunity, that is not an oppressed class, that is the class with privilege.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:44 PM
7

It's sexist to automatically believe one gender, so when feminists say women should always be believed, they are saying men are the less honest gender. People who happen to be male sometimes lie, and people who happen to be female sometimes lies.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 05:15 PM
3

This will keep happening as SJWism brainwashing continues to condition people to hate white males. Feminism is encouraging hatred and violence against men.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 05:12 PM
8

Plus, they say it's "mansplaining" to even talk about the MRM or any male issue in a way other than the feminist approved narrative. So...which is it? Should men be allowed to speak or not?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:20 AM
2

This will resonate well because so many people know a victim of a false rape accusation, the SJW stranglehold on the media covers it up, but it's out there everywhere.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:15 AM
2

It won't be long until they come for us. It really is starting to feel like tensions in society are coming to a head...
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:14 AM
1

It's feminists who treat masculinity as toxic with concepts such as "mansplaining" and "patriarchy." They say domestic violence is the cause of gender dynamics and the imbalance between men and women...so in other words, men can't be victims due to power structures. But then, they say that men can't speak up or express themselves due to "toxic masculinity" and the gender roles it places on men....but they are the ones defending those gender roles! The MRM is literally men expressing themselves, …
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:00 PM
8

The SJW movement is controlled by a network of psychopaths, they operate using manipulative and psychologically controlling language. There is no "enough" for them, they're not just going to stop. There will be no such thing as "just living" and staying out of the way, they will make it so you cannot live day to day life without hinderance. Applying for jobs, applying for college, medicare, social security, etc...it will be a full scale attack that never ends. We must resist.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:57 PM
3

And it makes no sense when you look at the statistics: men are less likely to be educated. men are more likely to be unemployed men are more likely to be homeless men are treated more harshly by the criminal court system men receive less government assistance and spending for things such as healthcare, small business loans, employment programs, etc. in many countries, men are conscripted into involuntary service in many countries, men have a higher pension age. In what society doo these factors …
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:54 PM
2

Menslibs is a feminist subreddit and the opposite of helping men. It's nothing more than a tool for SJW propaganda.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:09 PM
1

This is getting scary- this isn't just an economic disadvantaged or discrimination like being conscripted, this is the inability to just live without risk of being imprisoned for a crime you didn't commit. There's no such thing as just "lying low" and "just living" in an SJW world, you will be targeted and interfered with. They will go out of their way to hurt you. We are seeing a societal takeover by creeping fascism in real time. We don't have the option of doing nothing, we must resist.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:46 PM
9

Feminists talk about unpaid "emotional labor", saying women experience emotional toil by dealing with unpaid work without complaint. They say it's because society conditions women not the complain, they still silent, and it's "emotional labor." Firstly, they completely ignore the unpaid manual labor and dangerous situations society expects men to do. Men are expected to take up the less comfortable or more dangerous position in an emergency to protect women, and men's comfort is less valued. It'…
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:36 PM
8

It's also logically absurd- nobody would suggest "teach murderers not to murder" or "teach terrorists not to be terrorists" as effective solutions on their own, because it's obviously not enough. Someone people without empathy or morals don't care about right and wrong, and teaching them what the right thing is means nothing. It's a harmful and delusional approach.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:58 PM
15

It's mind-blowingly hypocritical and ironic that the same feminists who use the word "mansplaining" are the ones who instantly dismiss the very existence of the men's rights movement. They say it's not for men to define what feminism should be, so then why should it be up to them to decide what mens issues are and how they should be addressed?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:18 PM
5

The sub has consistently maintained an exception standard of quality in my time posting here, it's one of the best communities on the web. In general, the MRM is very fair and sensible. You can never control every comment on a open forum, but negative comments are usually quickly downvoted.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:11 AM
3

payment amounts must be without regard for the physical capability That's a perfect example of an MR issue any reasonable person would agree with if they only knew about it and looked at MR issues with an unbiased lens. There's absolutely no reasonable justification for it.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:53 PM
7

"For once"? "For a change?" Being drafted against our will was an example of "stepping up,." She was 20 in 1967, she was exempt from the draft and didn't have to step up. Manual labor, dangerous jobs, hauling trash, plumbing, construction, factory work, farming, etc...men step up plenty, what has she done?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:52 AM
24

Mansplaining is a manipulative and disingenuous debate tactic- they can shut down or deflect any valid criticism with "mansplaining", and of course if you point out how unreasonable that is, they say it's "mansplaining mansplaining." It can be thrown out whenever a person who happens to be a man disagrees with a person who happens to be a woman. It's very sexist to, it's suggesting that somehow being a man means your voice is less valid. Any time a
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:48 AM
22

That's extremely dangerous, and step down the road of true societal class oppression- this is saying one class of people (men) should be considered automatically guilty of a serious crime and sentenced to long prison terms even without evidence.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:52 AM
3

Spread awareness in your school about the issues. People who have a negative perception of the MRM likely just don't understand it or realize what the issues are. Education is a good place to start- did you know that boys earn lower marks at all levels in every grade? This would of course set boys behind from the very beginning, a lower high school GPA has a negative effect on college applications, and collegiate education can have a lifelong effect on employment and economic status. Unsurprisin…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:58 PM
4

Gender should not be a factor in college admissions or employment. It's obviously wrong for a course to be imbalanced due to discrimination, but if it's fair and just happens to be imbalanced because one gender happens to apply more, that's just how it is. There are fields that are female dominated, but that doesn't automatically mean men are being discriminated against in those fields, it may just be that men happen to apply less. Obviously there are social factors to consider, but girl outperf…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:40 PM
35

But it's likely that factually accurate information will be dismissed as "mansplaining", and any attempt at further discussion dismissed as "mansplaining mansplaining."
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:22 AM
4

I think we've crossed the event horizon, and can no longer expect society to just "go back to normal" without some form of civil unrest. But I actually think it might not be as bad as you might expect; I think the majority of people are ideologically aligned with the MRM even if they don't realize it- they are being manipulated by SJWs, but once they start to realize what's up, they won't support it anymore. I think the anti male and anti white male brainwashing of children in schools will backf…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:47 AM
2

It's a human rights abuse to deny father's access to their children without reasonable justification. Anti fathers rights groups- which is an actual thing- make the argument that it's to protect children from abusive parents. But that makes no sense, you wouldn't want a gendered rule for that, you'd make the ruling based on the individual circumstances. How does it make sense to award custody to the mother if it's the mother being the abusive parent? It's sexist and totally senseless to automati…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:32 PM
3

We changed the password and deleted it, after he took the bait of a troll and released our names publicly without permission. But his twitter history looked bad for the MRM.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:57 AM
6

No, it was a pattern of behavior from the beginning, it wasn't one incident, and I wasn't the only one to think so. r/menslib is a known anti-MRA sub. They are fundamentally opposed to us, they are a pro-SJW sub.You're injecting toxic elements into the MRM, which is also why you were banned.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:55 AM
17

I did read it, understood it, and fundamentally disagree within the context of comprehension. I disagree with the premise of the article. What do the stats say? Williams, a 23-time Grand Slam champion, was one of 10 women punished for code violations at this year's US Open, while 26 men were fined. Most of the fines issued were for racquet violations - 14 men and five women. Three men and three women were penalised for an audible obscenity, five men were fined for time delays, while four men and…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:34 PM
50

The narrative is the opposite of true- it would have been sexist NOT to have fined her. Men are fined for the same thing, so why should the standards be different?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:52 PM
47

"But I've seen other men call other umpires several things. I'm here fighting for women's rights and for women's equality and for all kinds of stuff. Then accept accountability, like men have to. And notice how she isn't bothered by how women play less sets, and have the heat break men don't have- those things directly imply that women are weaker, why doesn't that bother her?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:04 AM
10

So actual science being restricted because of a made-up theory. Remember this when ever debating the validity of gender studies; it's made up an anti-science.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:24 PM
1

Suppose an SJW government takes power, at a time when they also control the media and universities- what do you think they will do?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:24 AM
29

It's the way things like the draft aren't even considered or remembered that is what we mean by engrained misandry, and why we need the MRM. Without us, many male issues and inequalities would remain invisible
/r/MensRights07/09/18 02:57 AM
19

This is a very real and sizable portion of the SJW/feminism movement; pure bigotry and hatred, exactly like fascism in every way.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:11 PM
12

Feminist protest equal pension ages Feminist protest inclusion of male victims under legal recognition of rape. It's actually, on paper, not illegal to rape a man in India because of India feminists in Norway protest equal conscription NOW protested alimony reform. This was related to the case of the 72 year old man with dementia who was forced to go without adequate care feminists advise closing all womens prisons, two separate but equal justice systems that completely ignores individual circum…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:15 PM
2

Society normalizes violence against men, when it's men dying or being hurt it's just considered "normal" and not a big deal.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:21 AM
53

This is just another example of the many false accusations- it's obvious that false accusations occur, it's just dishonest to say the MRM is trying to "blame victims" by talking about it.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 01:55 PM
9

MRAs just want to address certain male specific issues and disparities- that's it. There's nothing sexist about the MRM, MRAs are not against women's rights, and there are many women in the MRM.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:58 AM
139

Anti-MRA employs classic manipulative tactics- first they say the MRM isn't necessary because feminism "helps men to." But then, when you point out the things feminists do that hurt men (gendered DV laws, etc) or the issues they ignore (conscription), they say "oh, well feminism isn't about men."
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:12 PM
1

I can't help but think how much better a society ruled by an MRA government would be. Thinks like access to healthcare would be a given.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:33 PM
3

I'm going to do a lot of writing/posting, I've been busy with work this past week but I think this is a great idea!
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:58 PM
2

I'll work on something good and post it here. Maybe I'll go to an open town hall somewhere in LA...they film them all and put them online, now that might cause a stir!
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:14 PM
3

We can't wonder who that person is going to be, we need to be those people. We're the front and only lines of male equality.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:47 PM
24

Feminists notions such as "mansplaining" are tactics of psychological manipulation, and debate tactics to derail and throw someone off. It's not a legitimate concept, and it's also completely hypocritical- they say men shouldn't speak over the lived experiences of women, or about how feminism should "actually be." Ok, fair enough...but then they do exactly that when they criticize the men's rights movement, and tell us how men's issues "actually" are and what the "right" way to address it is. Th…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:26 PM
8

It's an encouraging first step. We are slowly beginning to break through, and I think progress will accelerate exponentially.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:25 PM
23

This is why I think the MRM is going to accelerate soon- MR issues are now becoming a direct interference with peoples day to day lives. It will eventually become so undeniable to people that action will force itself upon the world.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:16 PM
10

This is female privilege, favorable treatment in the court system because of circumstances of birth (gender, in this case.)
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:10 PM
32

A blatant example of why we need a men's rights movement, and why it's not true when feminists say that feminism helps men to. No, it ignores issues like male victims of domestic violence
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:46 AM
2

Of course
/r/MensRights16/08/18 06:30 PM
14

This is what happens to a person who is in the privileged class in a society. The oppressed class cannot murder someone of the privileged class and then get some of their money instead of the family, that just doesn't make any sense. This is an example of privileged treatment.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:47 PM
9

This is great, and indeed brave. This is the kind of small step that kicks a giant step into motion. Good luck!
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:46 PM
12

Feminist conditioning is training people to see men as lesser, so sexually assaulting them is seen as something that "doesn't count." I didn't want to break down the fourth wall and so I stayed in character, until the scene was over. I probably tried to brush it off but now, a few days later, see how much I was violated. It's hard, but situations like this need to be confronted immediately, and with strength. Make a scene, make it absolutely impossible for them to continue thinking that they can…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:43 PM
6

It's so arrogant and unaware, to: Is this a joke? No? Why would it be? What part is the joke?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:40 PM
107

This is why "mens rights is not a thing" is so ignorant and narrow minded. This is why we need the MRM.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:08 PM
2

Exactly how it is- do you remember exactly where that was from? What channel or program?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:25 PM
1

I'm well aware of what the written policy is. The actual practice rarely follows the outline as is written. The fact that the homeless population is vastly disproportionately one race/gender combination suggests something else is happening.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:24 PM
12

In London, you will see that the vast majority of the homeless are white and male. Just walk around the city if you're ever there and see for yourself. I would stop and talk to them and they'd all say the same thing- the council, which assigns housing, tells them that because they are single white males, they are not considered "vulnerable" or "priority need. It's a purely disingenuous system, there's no reason not to give shelter to a homeless person who is white and male- there's no such thing…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:34 PM
13

Just look at how feminists talk about male victims of domestic violence, it's the only proof you need that "feminism helps men, to" is absolutely false. We need a men's rights movement for issues like male DV victims that no one else talks about.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:30 PM
10

Most regular people are more aligned with the MRM than with SJWism, they are just brainwashed and have misconceptions about what the MRM actually is. I think that the vast majority of people would agree with us if they saw an objective presentation of what we actually believe.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:16 PM
5

If these accusations are true, it supports the premise that feminism is toxic and manipulative, and so attracts toxic and manipulative people. Narcissistic and psychopathic men become feminists to manipulate others for personal gain. If these accusations are false, Kimmel is suddenly coming face to face with the reality of false accusations. It will be interesting to see how this reality collided with his beliefs.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:28 PM
2

Definitely!
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:43 PM
5

Thanks! And to anyone, feel free to reformat it in a more presentable way. If you think you can redo this in an easier to read way with charts or formatting, feel free!
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:38 PM
2

This is fantastic. This is what the MRM needs, a more visible public presence. Get people thinking and talking about it. Same on the protesters. Spreading lies and disinformation- what exactly are they protesting? Are they against mens health? Are they against shelters for homeless men? Do they support domestic abuse against men? It's good to see the public beginning to recognize the truth about the MRM. We just want fairness and equality.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:50 PM
8

It's so patronizing, feminism just assumes it has a monopoly on truth and what's right. There's no room for disagreement or any opinion that goes against their hivemind narrative.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:32 PM
3

Men in Poland already pay a tax in form of having a higher pension age. Male pension age is 65, women’s is 60. Men must pay more taxes and receive less state benefits.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 12:38 AM
1

He is very literally referring to previous experiences with food handouts ALL OVER THE WORLD. But if you think about it logically, it makes no sense- firstly, why not give food to everybody? Then there's no need of redistribution in the first place. A bag of rice is 55 pounds, which is heavy- if they argue that women are more vulnerable which the UN and feminists do, they can't be offended when I point out that that is heavy for a woman to carry- it's heavy for anyone. How are single men without…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:23 PM
33

I can never understand the logic that if a man and woman are equally drunk, the men is guilty of rape. Feminists use the typical "power dynamic" argument, but in a way, isn't that speaking over the experience of the man who was too drunk to consent?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 06:15 PM
5

Then when the men are forced to beg for food, they are "harrassing". When they have no other choice but to take food, that is taken as evidence that they are indeed troublemakers and riots. Which is then used as justification to withhold food from them. This is exactly what happens.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:31 PM
10

What's interesting is the reasoning literally admits that it's the same kind of hairstyle common in women's fashion today- they say it's having hair "like a girl."
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:29 PM
3

Yet actual physical violence against men isn't counted, or is even blamed on the male victim.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:27 PM
7

Exactly- how would a single man get food? And wouldn't it just make sense to give everybody food to begin with? If you have a safe camp with a military presence, you can have food distribution to everyone safely.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:56 PM
2

I wasn't just referring to this definition, I was referring to sexism as often defined by feminist academics. I'd also say that you have a deficit in awareness for what sexism and discrimination against men exists- I'd imagine it's many magnitudes more than you'd suspect. Many instances of male sexism are ignored, we are conditioned not to think about it- conscription, pension ages, life expectancy and the education gap are example of male disparities that happen around the globe.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:35 AM
1

How about MRA Central?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:07 AM
1

Wow, thanks guys!
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:05 AM
3

Hey, just saw this, I'd love to do some writing and make some submissions. I'd definitely be interested in being a moderator as well.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:05 AM
51

This is how SJW word manipulation works: They say sexism against men doesn't exist, because "sexism= power+bias." They invent a definition out of nothing, and when you try and disagree, they say that a man can't define sexism because he has "historical power structures that limit his vision of privilege." They just use fancy, convoluted language that fools the average person. It's all invented and means nothing.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:45 AM
51

This is absolutely disgusting and can only be the work of a true psychopath. This is was not done in good faith, this done to taunt. This is like an Onion article- she's given money to study homelessness, but uses it to mock and insult them, and accuse them of patriarchy. It's beyond absurd Dej claims she learned that many aspire to “hegemonic masculinity,” which she defines as the type of masculinity that serves to “fortify the dominance of men” and ultimately “subordinate women.” However, she …
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:41 AM
30

It isn’t up to feminist to invalidate the lived experience of men. They say it’s “mansplaining” if men try and talk over women’s issues- how is this any different? It’s pure womansplaining.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 06:56 PM
12

I have no respect for Uma if she takes Alimony. Weak.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 06:33 PM
7

This is why the men's rights movement needs to be a thing, and why feminism is not all we need to help men. Feminism isn't against "harmful gender roles", it reinforces these gender roles by encouraging the legal system to consider female criminals as being a "vulnerable class" and treating them with leniency. This affects men because if half of the population knows they will be treated leniently, they is less deterrence from committing violent crimes, which means more people will be victims of …
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:52 PM
23

This story was just disgusting. Feminism is harming people, including children.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:39 PM
1

I think it's fake, deleted the post.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:34 AM
1

I'm trying to track it down...I'm actually really hoping it's fake, if it would be very disturbing otherwise. That it's actually believable is disturbing enough
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:06 AM
1

Looking. I'm actually really hoping it is fake.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:56 PM
53

So this is how "mansplaining" works as a manipulative and psychologically controlling debate tactic. If you were to point this out, a feminist might say that it's "mansplaining" or a "wut about teh menz" This is meant to dismiss and discredit the speaker, it's a "zinger" type of line that other SJWs will be familiar with, it's "taught" as a "standard response" so people believe it and repeat it automatically. Of course it's nonsense, and the it's actually the opposite- dismissing the reality of …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:55 PM
35

"Of course a man would write that." This is a psychological tactic to dismiss and delegitimize the speaker- it's compounded by how a man will be dehumanized to the audience an SJW feminism would be addressing. "Laws against mansplaining." The irony of accusing a man of mansplaining just for saying male victims of domestic violence exist...I can't fathom having such little self awareness. It would be easy to think that this was just a troll if it didn't so accurate reflect that words and actions …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:52 PM
15

Meanwhile, men die 5 years younger due to innate biological causes but male health is significantly under researched. Just imagine if the life expectancies were reversed, and it was men who lived longer, and historically medical research was more focused on women. Feminists would call it a massive pressing issue and demand a huge government budget to research and fix the issue. They'd say that even if women were the historically more researched gender when it comes to health, they were still beh…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:56 PM
9

This is something that's always ignored whenever people talk about the achievement gap and incarceration gap, whenever you hear that it only means in relation to race, but gender is an even bigger gap. It's another example of how the MRM is for men of all races, and when feminists say it's only for white men, that's just not true. Look at issues affecting black American men, for example: education rates college attendance rates unemployment rate prison rates child support/alimony life expectancy…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:10 PM
9

So, one gender can commit bank robbery or murder, but then claim to be a victim of domestic violence and receive leniency, even if it isn't true? Meanwhile, a man can be a victim of abuse for years, and the one day he defends himself and pushes away someone swinging an object towards his head, he is arrested. That is feminist equality.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:02 PM
3

Sorry, but there is a 99% that Harvey is guilty of many of the charges. Even if someone people tried exploiting the situation by making their own untrue accusation, he's still almost certain guilty of many if not most of the accusations. We shouldn't be defending him.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:44 AM
12

Very much needed, men are routinely arrested for false accusations, ignored when they are victims of domestic violence, and don't forget- it's legal to rape men in India, because feminists protested equality under law.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 06:23 PM
70

I think doing that will work against them eventually, there's no way there are tens of millions of psychopaths in the US, most people who are anti-MRA and pro SJW are normal people with a distorted perception and misunderstanding of what's going on. I have to believe that some people realize the truth everytime something like this happens, or at the very least begin to sense that something isn't off.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:27 PM
5

IMO, this toxic and bigoted attitude is the norm within the SJW feminist ideology- it's a toxic and bigoted ideology by nature. This is feminism.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:50 PM
10

The way feminists strongly oppose the MRM simply for talking about our basic issues is hypocritical and sexist. We see the words and actions of feminists, and how they are the completely opposite of equality. Feminist positions on topics such as male victims of domestic violence, homeless men, pension ages, etc, demonstrate a toxic opposition of basic equality. Feminists construct elaborate and convoluted arguments to dismiss and try and refute clear cut MRA talking points in a manipulative and …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:18 AM
9

I look at it like this- men or people, and women are people. People lie. There are men who lie, and there are women who lie. Why would one gender automatically tell the truth more than another? If someone believes in gender equality, why should they judge someone's honesty on gender? The feminists attitude of automatically assuming men are lying is sexism. They try and frame it like we're "ignoring victims" but that's not it...if someone is lying, they aren't a victim, and we see stories of fals…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:25 PM
26

And feminists will say "but you can't compare it to FGM." That isn't the point. You don't have to just dismiss something by saying "something else is worse"- and if it doesn't compare, why bring it up anyway? This is serious enough of a matter not to be dismissed.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:21 PM
14

If having a gender neutral bathroom is progressive, why not do it for both bathrooms? This seems like a small thing, but that's what it is, another small step, slowly moving towards second class citizen status. It starts psychological, get children used to men having "less" so 15 years from now any restrictive law seems normal and acceptable.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:06 PM
1

It's the people who most oppose the men's rights movement that justify it the most.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:19 AM
1

The first thing you did was say you want to bring patriarchal muslim values, or for us to make you a sandwich. Am I supposed to talk that seriously, or are you just an idiot in good faith?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:15 AM
3

We need to educate people on what the MRM is actually about, and correct the misconceptions about us. The false image people have about us, like we're misogynistic or incels, etc, is something we need to fix. If you have internet access, you have everything you need to contribute- be a positive image of an MRA. Post facts and MR issues on social media. Teach people what we are about and what our issues are.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:00 PM
6

The story may be small, but it's not about the story, it's about the example, and how it can be extrapolated to bigger issues and misandry as a whole.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:54 PM
2

Doesn't this reinforce gender roles? And isn't that discriminating against a minority group? They are saying they focus less on men because they are the minority...but isn't that what that would mean?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:23 PM
94

Charing men more is purely sexist and discriminatory. The argument that it's because men are statistically more likely to have accidents is the point- that's the double standard, the reverse would never be allowed in a situation charging women more.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:52 PM
166

Does this go both ways, or is it "different" when she interjects to him?
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:50 PM
27

This sets boys behind from an early age and has life long consequences. And just think how much worse it will get when the SJW generation reaches the age where they become teachers/professors, which is probably happening already. Maybe that's even a part of the increasing rate of the gender gap.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:16 PM
8

And a major reason men under report it is because they know they might be arrested. Feminist theories like the Duluth model are employed throughout the US and lead to many men being arrested even when they are the ones who call.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:04 PM
32

Those 18 year olds drafted into battle seemed to do pretty well.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:19 PM
4

They are great, direct public activity and visibility is the only way we're going to grow. We have to be direct when discussion/confronting male issues.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:23 PM
1

The feminist attitude towards male victims of domestic violence is a good example of how they are hypocritical and don't support equality.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:22 PM
10

They know they can’t hold their own against us in a fair debate, so they resort to tactics like this. It’s one way we know we are right- they have no legitimate counter argument for what we say.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:40 AM
71

In what society is the privileged class: more likely to be homeless less likely to be employed treated more harshly by the court system receives less healthcare and health research less likely to be college education Male privilege just isn’t reality for the vast majority of the population.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 10:48 PM
169

IMO wars/conscription is one of the most overlooked male UNprivileges. It’s not just something that happened along time ago, there are men who would be alive today had they not been drafted into Vietnam/Korea/WW2.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 10:46 PM
8

It's like he wasn't listening at all. anti MRAs tend to have very narrow perspectives and biases. What can be wrong about MRA issues from an objective and ethical standpoint? homelessness unemployment education conscription pension ages male victims of domestic violence Etc...what us sexist about that? And what is wrong about those things is the facts and data are what they are?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:16 PM
24

Here's a good test for which gender is actually privileged. Flip the genders for every statistic and see what happens. Suddenly: women are more likely to be unemployed women are more likely to be homeless cases like this, male only jobs positions men live longer and get MORE healthcare/health research boys do better in school and are more likely to go to university, most teachers are male and studies say there is a bias against girls women have higher pension ages women must do national service …
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:06 PM
2

Of course...otherwise you'd have two completely different standards based on nothing but gender. People are sometimes wrong- so men are people who are sometimes wrong, and women are people who are sometimes wrong.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:02 PM
7

The date doesn't sound like an MRA at all. Anti MRAs dishonestly slander us by calling any man who acts poorly "an MRA." There is nothing MRA about the man in this story.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:40 PM
15

Incels have nothing to do with the MRM, and we have no connection to them.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:20 PM
44

I've noticed almost without fail that when I meet someone who is SJWish in anyway, they always prove to be lower quality people. Immature, petty, manipulative, dishonest, etc. It's very telling. Compare the words and actions of feminists with the words and actions of MRAs, there's just no comparison. You don't get an MRA equivalent of things like this: link link link You just don't see that kind of hatred here anywhere.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:48 PM
4

I say that if isn't up to men to decide what feminism should be and what women's issues are "actually like", then it shouldn't be up to you to tell me what's like to be a male. I have the lived experience of being male, I know it more than you. You trying to tell me what it's "actually like" is womansplaining!
/r/MensRights21/07/18 05:42 PM
2

It's a completely different standard, most of these would be normal male-to-male interactions. 'Mansplaining' is an effective conversation manipulative trick, any rational response or counter is just "mansplaining mansplaining." In reality, mansplaining is nothing.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 05:40 PM
5

Nice to see male victims getting recognition, almost a surprise considering the state of the UK political climate.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 05:38 PM
24

Thanks for your support, I feel like the MRM is almost evolving into a general ideology of fairness and rational thinking. When you look at what MRAs say and actually want, we really do just want basic equality and fairness for all.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 07:44 PM
143

Pure bigotry. That is what having a default negative perception of a person because of their race and gender is- it's just simple bigotry. This is the attitude of SJW feminism. The white male hate they foster and encourage is a way of building bigotry in people; they target young teens on tumblr and brainwash them into prejudice.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:35 PM
7

Excellent, this is the kind of the thing the MRM needs to be doing more of.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:32 PM
1

This is something we can look at and know we were a part of. IMO the MRM probably made up a large percentage of those being vocal about this.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:46 PM
1

It wasn’t of the best quality. Lots of odd posts and posts about incels.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 03:02 AM
1

I spent some time there, it seems to be infiltrated with anti-MRA trolls and people talking about incels. I don't think it was legitimate. A discord would be a good idea, I was thinking of starting one with an initial vetting process to make sure it starts off with the right tone and culture.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:32 AM
24

This is the early steps of dehumanization to justify oppression and discrimination years down the road. This is how things like fascism and genocide begin, 15 years before. Children are taught to hate anyone born white and male, there is a psychological effect to seeing literature like this, especially when the adults/parents around you agree with it. This is textbook psychopathy and milieu control. Milieu control is tactic of psychological manipulation characterized by the unification of groups…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:27 AM
2

A blatant violation of reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 12:45 AM
4

There are many people like you, the men's rights movement has a bad reputation because of misconceptions and slander. You'll all kinds of things about MRAs, that we're sexist, we are just trying to "cling on to privilege", but none of that is true. You have a feeling that you trust, and you know you're right about this stuff, and that's why your here, and you're not alone.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:00 PM
6

I think basic healthcare should be a human right for a country with the means to provide it. Just my opinion.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:49 PM
4

These accusations against us are either absolute lies, or absolute ignorance. Anyone who thinks this about the MRM either knows nothing about us, or being disingenuous because they know they have no valid argument against us. To be anti-MRM is just so ridiculous...what do we believe that is wrong? What would someone disagree with? Lists like these are usually written n bad faith by anti MRAs to smear because they have no valid argument.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:59 PM
24

This should be considered a basic human right. Funny to watch the same feminists who insist that lacking reproductive rights and healthcare is "oppression" suddenly do a reversal when it's male health in question.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:39 PM
3

Good list. In society is the privileged class less likely to be education and more likely to be unemployed, homeless, or in prison.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:14 AM
1

There is actually a very large study called the Framingham risk study which looked at all factors- smoking, weight, diet, etc. It showed that when all things are equal, men still have a very significantly higher chance of developing and dying from heart disease simply for being male. They even divide score charts by gender for that reason, the difference is so large: Try playing around with some numbers yourself. link wiki link Even when everything is controlled for- such as smoking and diet- me…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:33 AM
2

Because it’s a false and nonsensical devotion invention to manipulate the narrative.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:24 PM
3

You’d never see an MRA do this. It’s so plainly obvious that there is a radical and toxic nature behind SJW feminism. If you wonder what it looks like when SJWs become parents, or foster parents, here it is. And just imagine when they become police officers and judges and medical professionals, what they would do.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:21 PM
24

I can definitely sense a gradual shift in public perception towards the MRM, people are beginning to realize that we are right.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 10:39 PM
10

The gender gap in education is clearly pronounced. Boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages. There is evidence to suggest that bias is at play. Were the genders reversed in this scenario, it would be consider a major social issue by mainstream media and academia, instead of being ignored as it is now. And do you see any feminists talk about this? Of course not, they say feminism "helps men to" but that's nonsense. This is the kind of issue that shows why the MRM is needed, if we don't …
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:44 PM
5

Conscription in generally seems to ve greatly overlooked in the narrative of gender equality. Men were drafted to die as recently as the 70s, and there are hundreds of thousands of men living today who had to go through a draft, many of whom are still injured/disabled today. This is so hypocritical, the same people who would say not to "mansplain over women's lived experience" then womansplain over this.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:21 PM
1

Everything about false accusations like this is bad. It can ruin someones life and send an innocent person to prison. Now, these kinds of stories happen so often it seems like people are beginning to not take them seriously, and are skeptical from the very beginning. It's not a casual thing whatsoever, how society reached a place where this happens so flippantly is a mystery.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:16 PM
1

A forum would be great, yes. I'd use it.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:12 PM
1

"Mansplaining" is nothing, it's a purely manipulative and disingenuous argument designed to shut down any disagreement. It's a ridiculously hypocritical narrative, the idea that men can't disagree with anyone who happens to be a woman without being sexist. But of course men can disagree with men, women can disagree with men, women can disagree with women, etc. Mansplaining is not a thing.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:10 PM
2

I think this is a great idea! We need to spread to as many spheres of influence as possible.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 06:04 PM
8

Yes! There are many great female MRAs, like Cassie Jaye or Karen Straughn, and many women who post here. In general, the MRM is one of the most open, rational, and fair minded social groups I’ve come across.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:58 PM
8

It shouldn’t be up to feminism to decide what masculinity is, nor what is or isn’t toxic about it.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:57 PM
1

It may not seem like a huge case, but it’s more about the blatant double legal standard, and what that represents as a whole. A different legal standard for one gender, a citizen and taxpayer does not have an equal experience.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:55 PM
4

Considering that men die younger due to innate biological factors, there should be more male-specific health research to close the life expectancy gap.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 12:07 AM
5

They are deciding that the MRM, which they know nothing about, is misogynistic. It would be illegal for us to even talk about these issues.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:11 PM
3

An actual men’s strike would bring society to a standstill. The lack of garbage collection alone.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:09 PM
5

She is obviously a legitimate psychopath, and this is very scary for the child. It isn’t hard to imagine how awful it will be for him growing up. Even for her, these comments are quite shocking. And the thing is, where are the feminists denouncing this? We always hear “oh, real feminism is just about equality”...so where are those real feminists now? It seems she is only supported.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:08 PM
15

So, 50% of the population should be allowed to physically hurt the other 50%, and of course this poster decides that she is on the 50% allowed to do so. Entitlement to violence against men is part of feminist philosophy, I absolutely think SJW culture is contributing to this attitude.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 05:40 PM
21

And now, feminists are suggesting that women work less hours because they do more housework...shouldn't the solution be working the same hours and doing equal housework?
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:55 PM
5

Firstly, look at the actual study- it's so manipulative, using big words and ridiculous mathematical equations, it's so transparently disingenuous. It uses complex and convoluted language and math "look right", and defend an logically indefensible premise. These findings reflect the outside-of-work hours that women lose to traditional domestic responsibilities and care-giving duties. But how will this apply to single people who live alone? A single person doesn't do any extra domestic work becau…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 11:13 PM
7

The article is the opposite of equality and pure victim blaming, it's ridiculous...they criticize the men for defending themselves. So they are just supposed to accept long prison terms for a crime they didn't commit? It's pure sexism and bigotry.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 09:27 PM
4

It's an invented and meaningless term intended to manipulate conversations, just like "mansplaining." How about the emotional labor of being told we can't even advocate for our own issues by people who don't even face those issues? Is there any room for us to disagree using our own "lived experiences"? How about how we receive more prison terms for the same crime? How we're more likely to be homeless? How we face vitriol and accepted bigotry in the media? Can we claim our own emotional labor? Fe…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 09:25 PM
7

Feminists would defend this by point out how Osteoporosis occurs earlier and more frequently in women, but that argument in reverse is EXACTLY what they said about women and heart disease! That's harmful to men, whose bones also weaken with age, though later than for women. What's more, men are twice as likely as women to die within a year of breaking a hip, research shows. There is now great attention given to women's heart disease, because it was unfair to ignore them before. So, why would thi…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:17 PM
2

This article is manipulative, sexist, disingenuous, and textbook victim blaming. "Vulnerable" seems to be a buzzword feminists use whenever they need to justify different or hypocritical treatment of women/men. Trying to make a victim out of false accusers in indefensible.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:08 PM
18

What the MRM needs more than anything is better public visibility and image. Learn as much as you can, have well developed arguments, and talk about the MRM and MR issues. Be careful about who you tell, but present a positive example and image of the MRM. Spread information, tell people you trust about the MRM. Be active on social media, and speak up when you feel comfortable.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:21 AM
1

Or maybe not- sometimes I think it's the opposite, being the only MRA actor in Hollywood could open you to a huge number of people who would want to see that. It's all about having the right packaging and presentation. I've been saying for a while that the biggest problem the MRM has isn't our message or issues, it's our image. That's really all we need to fix, we know we're right and would win any fair and honest debate, the public just has a negative perception of us.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 11:13 PM
2

This is just me, but I think that relationships and attraction are best when happen spontaneously. Like you say, it's about chemistry and you can't force it. I think it's a mistake to "try" and "make" a relationship work, it shouldn't be like that. Obviously it's not always going to be smooth sailing, but genuine attraction and chemistry are things that happen naturally. You can't force yourself out of the friendzone, it just doesn't work. What you can do is make yourself more attractive as a pa…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 10:30 PM
1

It was pretty much a normal shoot and work environment, nothing really particular about it that would be an "MRA" related. It being female created/led didn't really have any effect on anything, and there wasn't really any 'political' vibe with anyone.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 10:22 PM
30

Conscription if the one of the most blatant male disparities worldwide, but is rarely discussed or given attention. It's a major violation of equality, it's mind boggling how "gender neutral" countries like Austria/Finland etc carry on the practice with seemingly no awareness as to the inequality it is.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 05:51 PM
15

No. We are NOT going to win by hiding. I may not live to see us finish the fight, but I'm not going to die before I see us begin. Now is the time.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:55 AM
3

This is a clear difference in treatment by the court system based on gender. Men are second class citizens in the UK. Some quotes from the article: Given the low and medium risk profile of the majority of female prisoners serving short sentences, it may be more appropriate, in many cases, to manage them in the community rather than in custody Wait...low and medium risk? What is "medium risk"? Why should a low risk male offender be sent to prison, but a "medium risk" female offender be "managed i…
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:49 AM
3

Men are second class citizens under law in the U.K. Simply being male means you have a higher pension age.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 06:05 PM
79

The argument feminists use against father's rights is so disingenuous, they say that MRAs are "fighting for the abuser", but it's the opposite- we just think gender shouldn't be a factor, and custody should be decided on a sensible and case by case basis. It's the feminist position that leads to a risk of abuse, as custody is automatically decided by gender, even if the mother happens to be the abusive parent.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 07:17 PM
277

In no society is the privileged class: more likely to be homeless more likely to be unemployed less likely to attend university given less healthcare treated more harshly in the justice system. By any sensible metric, male privilege is not a thing for the vast majority of the population.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 03:56 PM
10

There needs to be more of this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 01:50 AM
17

I don't think his reply about historical oppression of women was the best, I would have said this this: Yes, women were denied political power- although women still became Queens and leaders. But, they were also exempt from the gender roles expected of men, such as being conscripted and dying in battle in your 20s. And this is the main point- no one alive 300 years ago is alive today. Feminists use the word "we" when talking about historical oppression...but shouldn't that mean I can take credit…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:29 AM
3

Speaking up is the only way to change something. Being passive is how situations get worse, and how toxic and manipulative ideologies like SJWism gets away with what they do. You probably aren’t alone in feeling how you do, and people are just silent out of fear. Be the person who starts the change.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:19 PM
7

I was lucky, parents still married and never had any real problems growing up. It took me a while to realize that my family situation isn’t the norm for many people. Dads deserve to be recognized.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 07:24 PM
13

High correlation between SJWs=psychopaths. It’s a manipulative movement that brainwashes in a cult-like manner.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:55 AM
65

I agree with not being arrested, but the university should have the right to have security remove her from the grounds. A male professor showing up shirtless would also be unprofessional by conventional standards and should definitely be removed. It’s cambridge, even flip flops are inappropriate in that scenario.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:53 AM
5

There is so much wrong in this video, I'm not even sure where to begin. It isn't even close to being a "debunking." The conditions underwhich women enter capitalism are substantially worse. No. Boys fare worse in education at all ages in all subjects. Men are significantly less likely to attend university, and women earn more degrees at all levels. Men are more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. His criticism of quality of life makes no sense....quality of life literally is…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 07:41 PM
1

Firstly, welcome the group. Don't feel bad, the modern day SJW movement employs potent psychological manipulation tactics, it's easy to have a negative perception of the MRM when you are lied to constantly. Whether or not you want to bring this up with your friends is something only you can decide. If you make post like this on social media for your friends to see, you already know how toxic it can be, it might not matter if you're being reasonable, they may turn against you. Redpill is an excel…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 05:47 PM
60

The suffragettes in England were fierce advocates of WW1, they campaigned for total war and the draft, arguing that surrender of Germany wasn't enough, they should draft young men and send them to fight until every German man of fighting age was dead: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/151/the-white-feather-campaign-a-struggle-with-masculinity-during-world-war-i https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/nicoletta-f-gullace/white-feather-girls-womens-militarism-in-uk https://www.theguardian.com/wo…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 03:32 PM
4

There’s another: womansplaining
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:17 PM
2

If that kind of bigotry/toxicity against white men is the vibe in that bookstore, how can any reasonable person expect them to shop there?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:01 AM
16

It’s literally womansplaining. A person explaining why being bigoted against others for how they are born. It’s insane how people don’t see it. My question is, if being born makes you wrong, at what age do you become guilty? Does she think boys are born wrong, or does it happen at a certain age? When does a male become guilty?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:43 PM
12

Propaganda and social manipulation. SJWs/anti-MRAs know that they’d never hold their own in a fair debate, so they’ve created the antiMRA narrative as a smear campaign-discredit us before we even get a chance to speak to turn people away and prevent them from researching the actual issues. It’s exactly how social manipulation works, antiMRAs can’t actually counter our points so they create a negative perception about us instead.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:43 PM
13

Yes, they realize. The SJW movement is malicious and manipulative, all of their arguments are disingenuous and they never operate in good faith. Bigotry against men isn't just something they accept, it's something they propagate.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:06 PM
1

This is a straight up fascist hate group, as extremist as anything. It’s scary how they have the numbers to organize tens of thousands of protesters in the streets, just imagine if they ever come to power in government positions. I don’t see SK lasting another decade without mass civil unrest.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:50 PM
8

People are definitely waking up to the things the MRM says, even if they still believe the negative slander against the movement, the issues and double standards are hard to deny.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:54 PM
2

The whole "anti white male" trope in the social justice movement is just bigotry in disguise. It's the result of psychological manipulation, it's how many extreme and fascist ideologies take power, they create an "enemy" in the minds of people a la 1984.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:45 PM
13

The MRM needs more meetups and public events; that's the next step and the only way we're really going to grow. If we want to take the next step into political and social relevancy, we need to have public visibility.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:01 AM
25

In what society is the privileged class refused an education when even after their innocence is proven?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 11:41 PM
8

2nd comment on this but want to say, the wording from the researchers is extremely strange: suggesting that feminists might try to resist gender norms by devaluing men. This is the opposite of true. Sacrificing men seems to be going along with the gender roles that men are stronger and less vulnerable. They're saying it like they are "resisting the stereotypes to see men as higher value" in a way that almost masks the core issue of these feminists seeing men as lower value. Correcting my previou…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:31 PM
3

“We argue that both these responses reflect resistance because they do not assimilate to but instead go against subliminal stereotypes, attempting to counteract them,” they explain, adding that this may be how feminists fight the notion that men are more socially valued than women. No, it is because they are sexist and bigoted. This study shows exactly why feminism is not "also for men" and why we need the MRM.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:19 PM
3

It's social conditioning and a manipulative debate tactic. Anti-MRAs know they don't have any valid arguments, so they have to use disingenuous methods instead. They suppress the conversation out of ignorance/fear.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:22 PM
17

Completely untrue. The men's rights movement is not anti-women, criticizing specific actions from political organizations is not anti-women, nor is pointing out double standards in court, public opinion, etc. None of our positions are anti-women. It isn't us who: defends denying housing to homeless people of the opposite gender supports exclusion of recognition to victims of domestic abuse of the opposite gender specifically campaigns against equal pension ages. I could go on and on. The MRM is …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:37 PM
1

Just looked that up, and that's good. I'd like to see more treatment based research, most of it seems to be on the effects of TRT, but ok, thanks for that!
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:32 PM
1

that are classic to men; women's symptoms of a heart attack are completely different This actually isn't true. Men get all of the symptoms that are considered "womens symptoms" such as sore jaw, nausea, etc. It's actually dangerous to spread this misinformation because then men might ignore their own heart attack symptoms. Take a look at this article from the AHA. It states: But women are somewhat more likely than men to experience some of the other common symptoms, particularly shortness of bre…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:13 PM
13

women who stand to lose up to around £45,000 from the recent state pension changes But this "loss" is money that was extra, that they only had because of their gender in the first place. Men not only die younger but never had that 45 thousand to begin with. It's like how feminists say, to those with privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:28 PM
3

This is the country where it's legal to rape men. So I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:27 PM
1

This is true, but the biological factors are undeniable to. Testosterone in linked to higher rates of heart disease, and hormonal/immunity differences to higher cancer rates. One example of rates of heart disease by gender, as shown by the American Heart Association. This isn't showing men who die of heart disease that might not have had they sought treatment, but prevalence of the disease in the first place, which means if anything, if men are less likely to be screened, the disparity could be …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:24 PM
0

Even among babies and infants, males have a higher cancer incidence rate. This can only be explained by a biological factor. It's an issue because adequate research could save lives and help close the life expectancy gap.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:10 AM
0

I see the men's rights movement shift into something more, something of a general movement for fairness and rational thinking. It's still a men's movement, but I can definitely see evolution.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 01:31 AM
2

Welcome! Firstly, thanks for you support! I completely agree that it's hypocritical- feminists will say that a movement for women's issues should be about women, and organized by women. And I agree, that makes sense. So, in the same way, men should be the main organizers of a men's movement, because we have lived experience being male. What feminists call "mansplaining" is what they are doing when they dismiss the mens rights movement without even understanding it.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:34 PM
2

Ah, didn't mean to come across as standoffish if that's what you meant. We get a great deal many of disingenuous trolls so I'm always a little bit hair-trigger about it.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:30 PM
2

Oh look, you made an account yesterday to part of intentionally disingenuous attacks on MR. No, it isn't. Like heart disease, biologically factors are at play. This is evident by the fact that even among child and infants males get cancer at a higher rate- I don't male babies or smoking or drinking more, do you? From that linked article: Now, discoveries by Lane and the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT reveal that genetic differences between males and females may account for some of the imbala…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:24 PM
2

Men's rates of cancer should be improving at a higher rate than women if the two are equalizing, that's how math works. And no, men get cancer at a higher prevalence and have a higher mortality rate. There's no sensible debate on this.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:10 PM
5

But that's irrelevant next to the male death rates- men still die at a higher rate, so if anything, you could argue that it was fair to test more on men on basis of priority and proportional need, same for heart disease. What you said doesn't fact that as of today, men still die of cancer at a higher rate. And treatments have nothing to do with prevalence of cancer. You're just using long sentences and medical terms to try and sound "right", but your comment makes no sense. So I think I'll go pl…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:08 PM
2

The SJW movement is rooted in manipulation, they know they are wrong, their goal isn't equality or social justice. "Social justice" is just a facade for their bigotry
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:26 PM
21

But you cannot make a sensible and factually based argument without being disingenuously labeled a "mansplainer". It's completely hypothetical for feminists to say men can't form their own group to talk about their own male specific issues.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:23 PM
1

Even if the show does, the article has a clear tone that the majority of the MRM can be described by those qualities. A person also might say the tone of the show was disingenuous in its portrayal, because it will affirm a perception to viewers that is common believed and inaccurate
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:10 PM
5

All of it. If you really believe that Fran represents MRAs, you have a gross misconception about what the MRM is about. We support equality, would not have supported the reverand, and thibk in an equal society women should work to help pay taxes and bills. There isn't a strong stain of sexism in the MRM- which MRM view do you thibk is sexist, and why? The MRM is a very fair and sensible ideology. It isn't us who advocates for treating people differently for their gender, or discrimination agains…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:50 PM
2

It isn't just the satire, it's the way the article implies that it's true.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:46 PM
3

You're grossly oversimplifying the issue and entirely missing the point- did you not read my post? You are also apparently not very good at reading comprehension because the article clearly states that the portrayal is "not far from the truth". The article implies that the MRM is sexist and against equality, which simply isn't true. I suspect that you are not have this conversation in good faith and are here to manipulate and discredit.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:22 PM
3

The men's rights movement is nothing like they imply. And you saying it's "just satire" makes no sense, the article implies that the MRM is misogynistic and toxic in real life. They are painting a very negative and inaccurate image which fosters misconceptions about what the MRM is and believes
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:18 PM
9

Female privilege
/r/MensRights02/06/18 09:16 AM
1

It's conditioning people to accept creeping discrimination and hatred of men.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 09:15 AM
11

Absolutely. Anti-MRAs know that they have no valid arguments against us and could never win a fair debate, so dirty tactics are to be expected. As we grow, we're bound to encounter more push back. But we will win in the end.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:40 AM
14

A relief to see this being taken seriously. The argument that having consequences for false accusations somehow hurts real victims makes no sense- there's no reason for someone making a true accusation to be afraid of being charged, because there wouldn't be any proof that they are lying. Someone should only be charged with a false accusation if there is solid evidence. False accusations have to carry consequences, it's too damaging of a crime too allow to go unanswered.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:17 PM
3

Good to see this case being recognized and ruled fairly, like many saying here I suspect this kind of thing happens all the time and a lot more than we hear about. I think the influence of the MRM nagging society about issues like this definitely has an effect. For years we've been injecting awareness of this into the public sphere, and I bet we make a difference in people's minds, even if subconsciously.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:13 PM
1

Interesting post. IMO most people are MRAs without realizing it, even if they are anti-MRM, it's usually because they have misconceptions about what the MRM actually is, or simply don't really know the reality behind MRA issues. Obviously I can't pretend not to be biased, but I really do believe that the MRM is objectively one of the fairest and most rational social ideologies.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:47 AM
19

It starts from an early age, boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:39 AM
3

I suspect this sub is visited daily by bad actors and trolls with malicious intent to sow discord, make the MRM look bad, etc. I also think the MRM is experiencing a growth spurt, and this kind of thing happens when lots of young new members join a movement at once, especially one so contentious. Maybe people came here after experiencing discrimination/violence/abuse, so it makes sense that they feel frustration.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:35 PM
23

To anyone who says "she's just an extremist" or "she doesn't represent real feminism", where are the feminist groups or academics denouncing her? Why don't they criticize her? Why don't they publicly distance themselves and say straight up that she doesn't represent feminism? Why is she welcomed into feminist groups and events if she "doesn't represent true feminism?"
/r/MensRights15/05/18 06:49 PM
15

The anti-white male sentiment of the SJW movement is actually held up as if it's a real "value" or principle- it's just pure bigotry in disguise. The ouster came after the sons, Mark and David Wellstone, raised concerns about overspending in areas of the organization’s budget — and after a dispute over the direction and priorities of the group. Sounds like they were noticing that the SJW types coming in were just inflating the budget to pay themselves. They really do operate using classic manipu…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 06:47 PM
20

This is getting beyond the point of acceptability. This is one gender being allowed to assault and injure the other with relative impunity, and the feminist justice system allowing it. had faced mandatory prison time under 2014 laws that required automatic jail time for people who assaulted emergency workers on duty, but Judge Cotterell found special circumstances applied to both women. What was the special circumstances? There is nothing in this article that shows me any reason they should be e…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 06:19 PM
49

It's purely manipulative language, it isn't being written in good faith. Arguments like these are written to "sound good" by sounding formal and as if someone qualified wrote it, but it's absolute nothing.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:51 PM
176

This is ridiculous, this is one gender being able to assault the other with impunity from prison. This is second class citizenship. She didn't get prison because in the UK, it's now the legal standard for women to not be given prison. Here, the bench book given to judges suggest not giving prison sentences to women: https://www.rt.com/uk/420223-judges-court-language-equality/ This was after long campaigning by feminist groups, who argued that closing women's prisons was a move towards equality: …
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:55 PM
3

Even if they aren't taken first, surely by a year? 15 years is ridiculous, they should be to find at least a room by a bed. But that's interesting, you could make a great post with that if you do a bit of investigating!
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:47 AM
4

They have to spread these lies because they know they wouldn't have a foot to stand on in a fair debate. It's the kind of dirty tactic they have to use.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 12:53 AM
0

I keep seeing anti MRM articles trying to link incels with the MRM. We have nothing to do with incels, I don't even really know what it is, I know vaguely it's about men who feel they can't experience any romantic or sexual experiences with women- that really has nothing to do with us, the MRM is about legal and societal disparities that men and boys experience. It doesn't have anything to do with people's personal lives in that manner.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 12:52 AM
4

I've always said this. Look at /u/theothermod with MHRAconnect, here: https://www.mhraconnect.com/ What I think we need the most is meetups. Even if it's just 2 or 3 people meeting in a bar, or at someones home for a couple of hours a week, it gets the ball rolling.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 12:45 AM
13

Another female privilege is having lower state pension ages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_age Also, unemployment. Men are more likely to be unemployed: Canada: https://countryeconomy.com/unemployment/canada US: https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea10.htm UK: https://www.statista.com/statistics/280236/unemployment-rate-by-gender-in-the-united-kingdom-uk-year-on-year/ Same goes for things like low income health programs. Women can get free heart screenings under the [wisewoman](https:/…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:04 PM
14

I think a major point of gender equality forgotten about is how many men alive today were drafted against their will, and killed or permanently injured in their teens/20s.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:20 AM
54

Thanks for posting! Many are here for similar reasons- they notice something is very wrong with the current narrative of "social justice", "politically correct", "equality", etc. Exactly like you said, feminism is supposed to be about equality and fairness, and the thing is, I think most people who would call themselves "feminists" have good intentions, but are being misled by the radical propaganda of the whole "SJW" brand of feminism going around. I see that whole wave is manipulative, toxic, …
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:19 AM
6

a world where boys get everything and girls get crumbs And this is what milieu control does, gives people a strong sense of moral high ground and permission to dictate over others based on false perception. Boys are less likely to attend university, more likely to be homeless, more likely to be unemployed, yet some vague belief that "boys get everything" gives this woman the idea that she has the right to deny a child space in a playground? The anti-male sentiment fostered by the SJW movement is…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:15 PM
10

Many of them do it on purpose because they are anti-MRM. Although, I also think it's an example of misconceptions of the MRM- people believe that because it's the only perspective they are given. Obviously I don't need to tell this to anyone here, but just to be clear the MRM has nothing to do with the incel movement. There isn't even an indirect relationship, there is no connection whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:11 PM
5

The "weird energy" is a unrelenting disingenuity and manipulation of psychopaths, even when you've made a point that you know is clearly reasonable and true, they find a way to retort in a way that makes no sense, but just "sounds good" with the workds they use. It's a very telling sign of ASPD, they invent their terms like "mansplaining" or "sexism is power + bias" to defende morally and sensible indefensible positions.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:18 PM
18

Why the hell does she even have "supporters" anyway? Who would support that? She lies about him being abusive, attacked him when sleeping, performed genital mutilation...and she has supporters? I think there's a honest question to be asked- who are the supporters? Why do I get the feeling they are feminist activists?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:15 PM
4

The doublethink to is how they are fine with things being gendered even if the implication is "women are weaker"- like prioritizing housing for homeless women, more lenient prison terms for women, male victims of domestic violence, etc. It's completely hypocritical.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:10 PM
2

Sure thing, and as someone else said, there's much more to it than that. I'll gather up some links and send them via PM tomorrow.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:15 AM
3

Hey! Thanks for stopping by, I've been an MRA for about 7 years now. For your questions: A movement that supports gender equality, with a focus on the many male issues and disparities that seem to be ignored. I think it's almost evolving to be beyond simply male issues, and encompasses an ideology against radical SJWism as a whole. The MRM in it's pure state is about address male discriminations that exist around the world. In effect, this also means opposing the radical and manipulative "social…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:43 PM
5

There is clearly some kind of core to SJW feminism, a network that coordinates activity and comes up with the lingo all feminists around the world seem to start using at the same time.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:29 PM
3

I have to ddisagree overall, the quality of this subreddit is excellent. We are the moderate side, but it isn't that simple- the current global political situation is so extreme and radical, that any honest representation and review won't feel completely moderate. But there's no way to write about what's going on without using that kind of language- it's what's happening, so it's what is being said.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:25 PM
4

Police, CLSC and hospital throw you out literally telling you to grow ball. Which completely goes against the concept of "gender neutral" and "men should able to express their emotions to." No one encourages and fosters "toxic masculinity" as much as feminists do.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:39 PM
2

7 1/2 years isn't enough, a man would get life. This story completely shatters the feminist myth that women are incapable of domestic abuse. I'd also be willing to bet that she identifies as a feminist. The worst part about this story is if he had defended himself, he would have been the oen arrested and labeled an abuser. This is what toxic feminism is encouraging- the dehumanization of men, and desirability of this behavior.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:36 PM
4

It's very telling as far as supposedly oppression/privilege go. In what society is the oppressed class more able to speak freely, and even critically of the privileged class?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 04:39 PM
12

But literally saying "kill white men" or "men deserve to die" will not only be allowed, but will probably result in appointment to a government or university position.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:07 PM
4

As SJW arguments are narratives are created by psychopaths, they are very manipulative and apt at debate. Yet you so often here exactly the same metaphors, similes, and phrases, so you know it's never organic, they aren't just "coming up" with what they say, they're getting it from somewhere. You'll hear "I didn't say that." and when they know their lines aren't working on you or they are losing the debate: "You obviously aren't open to dialogue and aren't here in good faith. I no longer wish to…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:00 PM
92

So, the person who says people should be murdered for what gender they are is also the person who thinks they have the moral high ground? Or stand for "social justice?"
/r/MensRights13/04/18 09:20 PM
7

Which makes no sense when you think about it- women are the majority of undergrad and graduate students. And think of it this way- a student would be allowed to start a women's group without problem, but a men's issues group would probably be shut down right away. If only one gender is allowed freedom of assembly and speech, how is that gender the one being oppressed? There are far more groups and resources for the majority group on campus- it makes no sense to say that group is the disadvantage…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:59 PM
19

Not surprising at all, I've often thought of this before. Maybe people are anti-MRM because they have a false perception of us, and don't really get what the issues are or take them seriously. But when they see their husbands, fathers, brothers, sons, etc affected, it'll suddenly change all of that. IMO what makes us most likely to win in the end is that we're the right side and we know it- lies and manipulation can only go so far, eventually it'll become undeniable which side is telling the tru…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:44 PM
5

Men can't stop working because society has to have working plumbing, electricity, garbage disposal, food production, food delivery, etc...
/r/MensRights12/04/18 05:21 AM
4

SJW feminism operates using a technique of psychological manipulation referred to as milieu control. It describes them to a Tee, just read it and picture SJWs in the described behavior. It's why there seems to be certain fashions and "looks" with hairstyle, glasses, etc, associated with feminism. It's a way of not only publicly identifying like-minded people, but excluding people who aren't subscribed to the group think. It's why whenever you get into a debate, you hear the same phrases and argu…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 12:08 AM
1

It has been illegal to discriminate on pay for decades. Young women entering the workforce now earn more than young men. Men are also more likely to be unemployed, and less likely to attend university.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 07:46 PM
9

It seems that false allegations are becoming more and more common, I suspect because people are being radicalized by SJWism.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 07:40 PM
2

Its calculated, that's a common tactic they do. Can you send me the link?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:48 PM
22

Which makes no sense, and actually argues in favor of the bill. This bill would give both parents equal rights, but it wouldn't guarantee that both parents see their children, a judge can still prevent an abusive parent from having access. Right now, often only one parent- the mother- has access, but what if that mother is abusive? Then the abusive parent controls the child, and nothing can be done about it. This bill would give that child a chance to escape from the abuse. The feminist logic he…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:40 PM
3

There's nothing "right wing" about the MRM, the MRM is about male issues and legal/social disparities facing men and boys, regardless of partisanship.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:36 PM
21

You'll see, it won't be long until it's protested for "sexism" by the same people who use the term "mansplaining."
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:05 AM
1

Good! The belief that prostate cancer isn't very deadly is a myth- it's the second biggest cancer killer of men in the UK overall, and the cancer a non-smoking man in the UK is most likely to die from.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:59 AM
2

Young men have been earning less their their female peers, and have for years now.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:51 PM
60

Especially at a time where misandry is so readily conditioned into people, starting from an early age.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:31 PM
25

What we're seeing in things like this is social conditioning, years of programming though medians like social media and hashtags, to slowly brainwash people into accepting what would be considered clearly sexist and abusive- but not when against males.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 10:51 PM
7

Great documentary, it should be encouraged and spread as much as possible.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 10:49 PM
6

We should spread this story more, it's a good example of a male issue that people can see in a clear manner.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:49 PM
7

More milieu control, this is psychological warfare. It's subtle, creeping indoctrination of hate and feminism's monopoly on truth. It's exactly like early stage fascism- it may not feel like it, but it's how it starts.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:47 PM
6

People who would agree with not giving prison time for a false accusation don't get how deterrence works. This directly affects the victims of false accusations, and if the accusers know they won't face any consequences for it, what prevents them from doing it and hurting more people?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:44 PM
2

"Men are incarcerated because they commit more crimes. That's not a “disadvantage”. That’s a consequence of actions they CHOOSE. Have you been to prison? Why or why not? No, there is a demonstrable bias against men in the court system. Studies shows that men receive more prison time for the same crime. In the UK, the chief justice now advises against sending women to prison for anything at all Women outlive men because of genetics. It’s true across all socioeconomic classes, races and cultures. …
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:40 PM
2

Th progressive/SJW movement is a psychologically manipulative hate ideology. Look up *Milieu control, it describes it perfectly, the graduate de-humanization and ostracization of class through graduate sub-conscious condition. That's why you see all the anti-white male sentiment on tumblr, twitter, etc of feminists...the idea is over the years you brainwash an entire generation to believe it.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 03:46 PM
17

Free recruiting for the MRM. Male students will see that they are the minority on campus, feel that they are the ones not allowed to voice their opinions, see the open discrimination and hostility, and realize something is just wrong. So privileged that they aren't allowed to speak.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:50 PM
24

Boys earn lower grades at all ages and in all subjects.Studies suggest discrimination may be at play Scandinavian countries are considered the most feminist and gender neutral in world, but it's here the gender gap seems to be widest: Sweden boys behind in reading Finnish schools see large education gap, boys far behind Women earn more college degrees at all levels
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:46 PM
2

Ok. Maybe it could be weekly, something like every Sunday or Monday, etc
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:09 AM
10

It's pure ignorance, if not social propaganda. Who do we hate? Which position of ours is hateful? When I read about stories of male DV victims, and how we're the only ones trying to help them, and then read the people who push for the one-sided laws that exclude call us hateful and backwards, it's infuriating.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:59 PM
2

This is how they use social manipulation- it becomes impossible to have dialogue because they brand us and just "defending our privilege" so no matter what we say, that's people s perception. It's a psychological tactic and so obvious not true, it has to be both malicious and calculated. There's just no sensible way to say the goals of the MRM are "supremacist", it's literally for what equality is.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:56 PM
1

Thanks for stopping by, I think more direct dialogue is good. Usually trying to speak about the MRM or public, or throwing an event, will get you fiercely protested and people will try and shut you down. That's one difference between the MRM and intersectional feminism- one would want open discourse, and one wouldn't. To fully explain the MRM would take more than any one comment could explain, it took years to learn everything that there is. In a nut shell, the problem is that terms and theories…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:53 PM
2

This should be expected now that England's feminist chief justice has advised no prison for women
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:38 PM
5

This is pure propaganda and direct evidence that the SJW movement is a extremist and manipulative ideology.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:28 PM
3

This is pure propaganda.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:56 PM
11

The MRM seems to be getting more mainstream by the month.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:53 PM
5

The MRM is for equality and fairness.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:52 PM
11

"Mansplaining" is a manipulative debate technique with a built-in "impossibility factor"- it becomes impossible to answer without being further accused of mansplaining.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:42 PM
1

And In the UK, women are now exempt from prison outright
/r/MensRights07/03/18 04:35 PM
3

I see MR as independent from anything else. It's only about social and political male issues, with more focus on the political side, eg actual disparity in law like conscription or pension ages. We aren't associated with any politician or political party unless they are specifically an MR candidate, and we don't have any position on life philosophies like MGTOW.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:37 PM

These stories seem to be happening a lot in the UK right now, and remember, under the new guidelines women do not go to prison so there is now no deterrence from making a false accusation. One gender is now more or less immune from punishment for committing crimes against the other.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:07 PM
12

Anti-MRM sentiments all derive from either dishonesty, ignorance and fear. That fear is one of either 2 things- fear of having the SJW narrative taken apart, or misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:02 PM
126

The MRM still has to shake off the false perception (lie, really) of being anti-women, and that seems to be happening more and more everyday as mothers, sisters, daughters, etc see MRM issues effect men in their own family. There's no denying it when it happens, and I actually think they is a parallel correlation between the increase of rapid SJWism and interest in the MRM. People are brought here by the extremism and blatant misandry they encounter.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:00 PM
73

And the way she was attacked at that speech yesterday, protesters screaming her down and not letting her speak..it's because they're afraid of her and know she's right. Anti-MRMs know they couldn't hold their own in a fair debate, so that's what they do. If what she said was so wrong, why are they so afraid of it being heard? It would just make her look bad- why are they so desperate to stop it?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 04:58 PM
2

In other words, discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 07:09 PM
3

This feminist argument of only helping women in 3rd world countries just makes no sense- there is no village where all the men are hording food and the women are left hungry. This is just going to mean that half of the population in starving areas will be denied food. She will add: “No campaign for women’s equality can ignore the fact that globally 60 per cent of chronically hungry people are women and girls. So you're ignoring 40% of the world's hungry, and that's a good solution?????
/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:21 PM
1

"Legal doctrine that assumes women will not make false claims." What is the logical basis for believing that one gender wouldn't lie about one particular thing? If they know that people who happen to be female can lie, then why wouldn't those dishonest people lie about that or any one particular thing?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:10 PM
12

This is surreal, this a feminist chief justice essentially decriminalization any crime committed by a woman. There are now two completely separate justice systems for each gender. Being a woman means you can commit crimes without fear of consequence. There now isn't any deterrence for a woman committing fraud, or robbing a bank, or assault- whereas men will still go to prison for even minor crimes. The Bench Book adds: "Women remain disadvantaged in many public and private areas of their lives. …
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:07 PM
5

Good to see, this is the kind of thing that needs to happen over and over and over until people start to get it. No one is going to do it for us.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 09:10 PM
1

So not only do feminists lie about this, but they falsely reinforce harmful gender roles.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:38 PM
75

Just awful. So many stories lately of men falsely accused of rape, it's clearly something that happens at a relatively frequent rate.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:23 PM
32

The whole anti white male attitude of SJW feminism is just pure bigotry. It's disguised with manipulative and synthetic language like "privilege" and "systems of oppression", but it's just a radical hate group using psychological tactics. It's exactly like something called "Millieu Control", which I learned from another excellent mind in this subreddit. Read it up and it describes SJW exactly. Millieu Control 1 Millieu Control 2 Millieu Control 3
/r/MensRights03/03/18 06:56 PM
5

We always say things like "o, this should be talked about more." But we don't realize that it's us who have to make that happen. It's like we keep waiting for people to "getting it" before we come out, but that won't happen. We have to lead people to realizing the truth, and that means being uncomfortable in the beginning.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 06:45 PM
28

Look at Trudeau's latest "feminist budget", this is exactly what happens when feminists control an entire government. and it'll get worse. denied because they are male. thats canadian law now.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:12 AM
23

It's ridiculous, the logic of thinking 95% of those in famine/poverty are female. a brother and sister are born to the same parents in a village with no school- being make wont magically get him an education. there are no villages where only the men eat food, that's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:08 AM
4

MJ making a mistake-not thinking it twice was his mistake, and why he is stuck with the problem.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:12 AM
3

Fighting back is right, what's happening now is a slow creep of control. The SJW feminist movement needs to be directly confronted and defeated, it's radical, bigoted and extreme. Say that only men have a lived male experience, and use specific male issues as examples of why a male specific group is needed. I'd focus especially on education - boys have unique needs in education to be addressed. They key point is that boys earn lower grades in all subjects and all ages. Other issues: men are more…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:28 AM
2

At least awareness is at the point where such an event was scheduled, and the cancellation was covered. That said, the modern day SJW feminism movement mirrors fascism in every way.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:27 PM
4

"Mansplaining" is nothing more than a psychological conversational tactic to shut someone down when they disagree with the feminist narrative. The irony is ridiculous- they'd use this to stop a man talking about his own lived experience and how it relates to MR. It's like a built-in, step by step process to always have a means to say "you're just mansplaining." Disagree with this board? "Mansplaining."
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:26 PM
7

The college gap is going to get even worse as campuses become even more hostile to boys. I can imagine a scenario 5 years down the road where going to college as a male is essentially taking a 5% risk of being falsely accused and imprisoned. This is how they are weakening men, scaring then from going to college so they fall behind in society.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:25 AM
11

There's so much there could be addressed regarding men's equality to, such as: conscription unequal pension ages boys underachievement in education caning of men only in Singapore Etc. People ask why does the MRM have to be anti-feminist. The answer is that feminism controls the narrative and suppresses any attempt to say anything counter to that narrative. It does not allow any other perspective to be heard, no matter how valid.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:28 PM
34

Can't commend her enough for doing this, I think it's very telling that she started out the film as a feminist expecting a negative outlook on the MRM, but by the end, was pro-MRA. Any honest look at the data and ethics shows that we are the right side. Also telling to me is how anti-MRA factions have avoided this so much- why? If we're clearly wrong, then any documentary about us should show that, and you should want people to see it- what are you afraid of?
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:23 PM
8

Good. These types of things need to confronted and not just passively accepted- it's not about whether it's a "big deal" or not, it's about not allowing what is discrimination and different standards to be implied as OK. It's not ok for a university to just decide that a rule that presents a different and disfavorable standard for one gender is now what students must abide by. Radical SJW feminism has gotten as far as it has because of people's reluctance to call it out publicly and engage in co…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:36 PM
9

It makes no sense to say that the economically and socially privileged class is the class that: performs worse in school at every age is likely likely to attend university is more likely to be unemployed is more likely to be homeless is forced to join the military, or work for below minimum wage, for a period of a year or more receives more jail time for the same crime. Likewise, it makes no sense that the oppressed class can assault the privileged class with more leniency receives less healthca…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:23 PM
43

How would this not be blatant unconstitutional gender discrimination? Notice how any area where males are the minority, such as university, are ignored.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:16 PM
16

Which is just ridiculous- in what way are our goals "supremacist"? What positions of us are this way? Homelesness? The gender gap in education? Conscription? Pension ages? It really shows how just because something is considered to be a "mainstream" or "official" source/organization doesn't name it so.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 05:35 PM
38

Not bizarre to us. The MRM always seems to be years ahead when it comes to things like this, then we're forced to sit through ridicule from people who say how "mysterious" and "unexpected" it is.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 07:24 PM
6

Wow, great to see, good on her. I used to do things like this but it's hard when few listen and most that do write you off without even listening. But if we coordinate a day where *tens of thousands of people around the world did this, while making a hashtag or post going viral, and getting media coverage, it would be a major break in the dam.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:50 PM
6

In the UK, young women are now earning more than their male peers. This makes sense as now more women than men attend university. If there was large-scale discrimination in salary, it wouldn't be possible for women to be earning more than men from the very start of their careers- how would it "just happen" despite the discrimination?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 10:52 PM
12

At liberal universities, anyone who tries to talk about male issues or start an MR group is threatened and harassed. Yet she can write a piece like this attacking nonsensical ideas like "patriarchy"...so, if men are the gender not allowed to even speak for themselves, in what way is that living in a patriarchy? A male-dominated society where a male student can't even speak freely at a public university? That just makes no sense. When one class of people aren't even allowed to speak freely, I don…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:59 PM
11

Indeed, data shows that boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages It's data on female teachers giving boys lower gradesknown for a while. I can only imagine how the influx of feminist/SJT influence in society has made it worse. Lower grades could lead to life long disadvantage, and this is clearly a serious and engrained problem. Of course, try and bring this up and you'll be immediately shot down as "mansplaining" or "misogynistic". The modern day SJW feminist ideology mirrors fascism …
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:43 PM
3

Discrimination of males is the norm in education/employment.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:27 AM
3

Well, by definition, its true. Its that in practice, its the opposite. Anyone can invent a positive definition/description of themselves but it means nothing if the actions don't follow. North Korea is a democracy "by definition"- they have elections. In reality if course, the elections are a sham and the government is a dictatorship.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:37 PM
41

Things they should cover: the education gender gap, boys fall behind and underperform almost everywhere in Eurpe the homeless gap, men more likely to be homeless how conscription affects careers and health in later life how many are disadvantaged or more likely to die in poverty due to higher state pension ages, common in Europe.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:33 PM
5

The fact that Ruth Bader would say this publicly is very telling- no one could possibly accuse her of being pro-MRA or anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:58 PM
17

I think it's already starting to happen now- conversations I overhear, general comments I see on default subreddits and the internet as a whole, people generally becoming aware of that something is wrong with the SJW movement. I just think we need one spark to push us into the next level.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:57 PM
7

In the US, males are: less likely to attend university less likely to earn post grad degrees have higher unemployment across all age and ethnicity brackets young men now earn less entering the workforce. From using points as measuring sticks, men are not economically privileged in the U.S
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:55 PM
7

Classic feminist tactics, attack any valid point as"what about teh menz" or "mansplaining." Whenever you point out a disparity against men, they call it misogyny, and if you explain why that doesn't make sense, they call it mansplaining. In his widely controversial Feb. 2 op-ed in The Dartmouth titled “You’re Not Tripping,” Spector points out the female super-majority of Trip leaders, as female tour guides outnumber male ones by a nearly 5-to-1 ratio. 5-to-1 is a pretty blatant and significant d…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:22 PM
2

Penn State officials have yet to comment on the incident. “We’re trying to figure out what the next step is,” said an employee in the school’s office of communications. In other words, they are afraid of the backlash of firing a sociopathic feminist professor.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:17 PM
12

This is exactly what feminist prison reform has done in the UK, men and women are now a separate class in the legal system. I keep saying this, but seriously- if one group of people is allowed to severely assault another group of people with great leniency, then that group is not the group that is socially/legally oppressed!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:10 PM
3

Victim blaming male victims of domestic violence is a common aspect of feminist culture. I keep saying this, but seriously- if one group of people is allowed to severely assault another group of people with great leniency, then that group is not the group that is socially/legally oppressed!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:08 PM
5

Very cool idea! I've been saying that something like a logo could go a long way in our branding and visibility- something simple, colorful and eyecatching.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:03 PM
56

It's funny the gender gaps that are ignored, such as: -gender inequality in homelessness -gender inequality in high school dropouts -gender inequality in unemployment etc. I wonder why this is? O yes, because in those gaps, the gender in the unfavorable position is male, so the gap isn't deemed as actually "real" inequality.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:29 PM
6

These accusations could result in serious disruption or violence to the accused, but of course she doesn't stop because there is no consequence for the actions.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:47 PM
26

I liked Last Jedi, but this criticism makes no sense. He presents it as sexism to not like it, but the opposite is true- not being allowed to dislike it is having a different standard for men and women. You should be able to like or dislike male and/or female lead movies at your own accord, without there being a different standard.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:41 PM
36

The language and vitriol of SJW feminist types is pure bigotry. It's a hate group. What would the motivation be the have that in your bio, or to make that tweet? How can anyone who says that be respected within a political party or ideology?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:30 PM
2

Excellent! And actually, I'm not too surprised that you got a decent reaction- people are definitely waking up and perceptions of the MRM are changing. That being said, be vigilant, it's likely that some people are going to go pretending to be interested but have bad intentions- assume they're going to try and set you up or accuse you in some way. This is great, exactly the kind of thing we need to be doing. Well done!
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:48 PM
13

To know which class in truly the privileged in any society, compare the reaction to when one infringed on the other. Who faces more serious consequences? Which class of person is it considered "not as bad" to assault? Rarely is the oppressed class treated with more leniency for assaulted the privileged class...
/r/MensRights15/02/18 05:59 PM
6

Living in L.A I often overhear conversations where I just get the sense that the people would identify as progressive/anti MRA because they've been conditioned to, but there is an unspoken recognition of the male issues- the problem is they don't feel like they are allowed to say it. Sometimes I think all the MRM needs to really kick off and rapidly grow in numbers is for people to feel as if they've been given permission.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:56 PM
9

What I like about the MRM is we are objectively fair and consistant, and judge based on merit. If I was judging a comedy contest and the funniest 5 comics were all women, I'd put all 5 women in the final round. Why? Because the male comedians just weren't good enough that night. Same goes for hiring, etc.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:48 PM
56

Encouraging to see! The tide definitely seems to be turning in our favor in the sphere of public awareness and opinion.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:49 PM
80

Hi! First of all, thank you for doing all of this, and for taking action when it would be much easier not to. You have my gratitude! Really, the best thing to do is to give examples of issues and data. Examples of laws and statistics like: conscription pension ages unemployment rate homeless rate life expectancy available healthcare university attendance rate education as a whole etc It's the best way to illustrate the need/philosophy of the MRM is to directly show what the issues are and back u…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:38 PM
93

The way courts treat women who commit assault/violence against men is very telling about the true state of privilege: in what society is the legally and socially oppressed class able to commit violence against the legally and socially privileged class with leniency? You have a lower status, but you're allowed to commit violence against people with a higher status...that just makes no sense.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:31 PM
16

Once again, using the "prostate cancer isn't deadly" myth. No surprise this decision was reached in a very feminist country, yet people still can't seem to connect the dots. The current head of the Swedish national Board of Health is Olivia Wigzell who is, surprise surprise, a feminist. Sweden has one of the world's highest death rates for prostate cancer. Some quotes from that data source: Sweden was the only EU Member State where the standardised death rate for men for prostate cancer was high…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:28 PM
13

A suspended sentence is ridiculous, this was assault with a weapon that left a serious mark on the face. That the narrative is spun as male privilege being a thing....In what society is the oppressed class the one who is allowed to assault the other with more lenient judgement? It's insane. And the fact that if he didn't have the video evidence, he'd be the one in jail.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:51 PM
3

Male issues affect black men at an even higher rate, things like shorter life expectancy longer prison terms for the same crime college attendance rates unemployment rate The SJW movement co-ops movements like BLM to prevent people from realizing this, they talk about "intersectionality" but completely wash away the gendered factor of these issues. Black men have more reasons to be MRAs than anyone, the MRM does more for those issues than feminism/SJWism ever will. I'm starting to hear it more a…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:43 PM
61

I've never understood the doublethink necessary to accept something like this. The conference is literally about equality, yet literally being born a certain way disqualifies you...not your views, not your personality, not your record- just how you were born. The Anti-white male sentiment of the SJW movement is just bigotry, nothing more.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:40 PM
4

Best thing is to block them, because then they are shut out from any of your future posts. Anti-MRAs are such losers, doing things like that. That they resort to such tactics is how we know we are the right side. They're too cowardly to engage in open and honest debate because they know their logic and arguments against the MRM don't have a foot to stand on. Their methods of operation are very telling. The anti-MRA movement is a weak, petty, pathetic, and intellectually hollow movement.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:52 PM
13

Higher car insurance actually has more potential long term consequences then people think. Justin Trudeau's new homeless plan sets aside special funding for women only programs, and the entire homeless service will be gendered, despite the fact that the vast majority of the homeless are men. But if someone is living paycheck to paycheck, a few hundred dollars a month can be the difference between being able to save or not, which in a pinch can pay your rent one month if you say lose your job. Sa…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:13 PM
11

So, one class of tuition paying student gets more rights on campus than another. Clubs are places for networking and can help someone later in their career, so this is more than just loss of social activities, it's a disadvantage. The sexism here aside from the obvious double standard is the reasoning that women have decided that men can't organize and gather their own events because they are too dangerous if they do. What's next? How can a university apply an entirely separate standard of rule …
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:24 PM
20

People seem to forget there are men alive today who were drafted involuntarily to combat during WW2, Korea and Vietnam. And there are many men who would be here but aren't because they were killed at the age of 18. When people say being a woman was a disadvantage for Hillary Clinton, but no one seems to consider that had she been male, she might have been drafted and killed in the Vietnam war.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:30 PM
7

South Korea's male only conscription is longer than many other places in the world, it's blatant example of inequality and 2 years is a significant chunk of one's youth, but of course, it's ignored. I've heard about that very radical feminist group megalia, didn't they have a very controversial website taken down? I can't seem to find any links in English that I can understand. The MRM is a worldwide movement. We need more cooperation and collaboration, we're all in the same fight.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:57 PM
8

This is a good example of feminist hypocrisy. They say they are against gender norms such as women being weaker, but it comes to something like domestic violence, suddenly they say women are too weak for men to be victims, or with homeless, because men are not as "vulnerable", they don't need homeless shelters.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 07:19 PM
22

There's actually evidence that female teachers give boys lower grades for the same work.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 07:17 PM
6

You'll notice so many SJWs have very similar patterns of speech and linguistic similarities. They repeat the same phrases and metaphors, and often times you can tell they don't really understand or can't explain the words they are saying, they are just repeating them from somewhere else...it's obvious they are "getting it" from somewhere else. The arguments they construct, like mansplaining, sound like classic manipulative language anti-socials (ASPDs) use. It's intellectually a very hollow and …
/r/MensRights06/02/18 07:09 PM
12

His government has worked out exactly how you think a feminist government would- homeless men excluded from housing, money given away for women's only issues and male veterans are left without healthcare, gender gap in education unaddressed, male victims of domestic violence ignored, etc. It's no surprise and very telling to me that MRAs are able to call it months/years in advance. If we're not right, how are we able to do that?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 07:05 PM
6

People should know the truth of the "white feather" campaign of the suffragettes during world war 1. They were very pro-war, lobbying for "total war" and shaming and mocking men they saw around civilian areas. Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 This was after it was common knowledge how terrible conditions were at the front, and what a waste of life it was. Interesting that these were from feminists, and seem like they are exactly the same personality type as SJWs today.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 05:42 PM
29

Excellent! Exactly the kind of thing the MRM needs, more visibility which in turns shows encourages people to be openly MRA and speak openly about the issues. You'll likely to get serious backlash, but you'll doing the right thing- stick with it! Doing what you're doing is how we're going to win.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:56 PM
9

This would be presented as something "gender neutral", but that's very hypocritical because in other aspects, Canada is very gendered in a way that implies they believe women are weaker. Being female is considered a plus in qualifying for homelessness. Why would this be? It says that women are "more vulnerable"...so weaker, right? How else would you interrupt that? And keep in that that's not what I'm saying, that's what I'm reading here, and there really isn't any other sensible interpretation …
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:52 PM
35

The line "men don't die of prostate cancer, they die with it" is completely false. It's a myth that prostate cancer isn't deadly. Official statistics show that in the UK, prostate cancer is the second biggest cancer killer of men overall, and the cancer a non-smoking man is most likely to die from.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:53 PM
9

Men in Canada pay taxes but are refused basic services such as housing- this is what feminist policies do. The UK has the same thing, you'll see the word "vulnerable" being used a lot, that's really just a code word for "no men"- everyone homeless person is vulnerable, there's no such thing as homeless person that isn't vulnerable. A feminist system literally means inequality and less people helped by designed- the language is such that it's basically impossible for a man to quality under ordina…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:44 PM
41

It's a myth that prostate cancer isn't deadly and that "men don't die of prostate cancer, they die with prostate cancer." In the U.S, prostate cancer is the second biggest cancer killer of men overall behind only lung cancer, and the cancer non-smoking men are most likely to die from.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:38 AM
23

I think people having sons and watching what happens to them will be a big part of the MRM future success. Radical SJW rhetoric won't sound so good when people have a son. When people like this start teaching en masse in elementary schools and 10 year olds are coming home and repeating the things they hear, it'll be a very sudden wake up call.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:01 PM
44

Women entering the workforce in the UK are now outearning their male peers, as women earning degrees at a significantly higher rate, and employment laws disfavor males in the hiring process.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:42 PM
3

The MRM alone seems to speak for male DV victims. Stories like this are why we must keep persevering.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:36 PM
7

Which makes no sense- isn't one of the complaints feminist make the gender roles that put men as the sole breadwinners in the majority of families? It seems to me like men work to get things for their family, but very little for themselves. This "stat" is sexist because there's a implication of selfishness there, besides the fact that it's completely false and made up.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:55 PM
13

After the recent publicized assault cases falling apart, it seems evidence that something is going on. Remember that the deputy of policing and crime in London is Sophie Linden, a self described feminist, who was responsible for trying to push the homeless fine in hackney. It's because of us that these stories get attention in the media, and because of how we push that these things get resolved. Without an MRM these cases would be forgotten about and many more innocents would be sent to prison. …
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:28 PM
40

So, she actually says "women are weaker." This is a typical hypocrisy of feminists- they oppose gender roles, except when those gender roles benefit women. They say they oppose all the notions that women are weaker and less capable, but then, openly have a stance that women are weaker when it's convenient. Same goes for laws for recognizing male victims of domestic abuse- feminists get angry at any suggestion that women are weaker and less capable, but then oppose laws giving protection and reco…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:22 PM
3

What's especially wrong about these alimony laws is that even if the divorced man was a victim of domestic abuse, in some states he'll still owe his abuser part of his income for a while, sometimes even for life. Even if he's ex-wife remarries or starts a new career and earns more than him, he'll still have to pay the alimony even if it means he can't afford life saving healthcare. So he may literally just have to die because he's paying a portion of his income to someone he divorced 20 years ag…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:26 PM
2

Pure propaganda of a radical ideology.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 08:51 PM
72

This is no longer tolerable. This is proof of malicious organization within SJW academic circles. They expelled him for being raped. She actually raped him. She also admitted that Doe had asked her to leave multiple times during the encounter. So he said expressed "no" and his lack of consent, and she continued. That's rape. Doe was disturbed by these revelations, while Smith “indicated she wanted to have sexual intercourse” with Doe, who turned her down. Smith then made a comment about “a frien…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:56 PM
3

Nothing wrong with advocating for women's issues, it's the radical nature and blatant bigotry of the SJW feminist wave that we oppose. I think a government or society controlled by the MRM would cover everyone and be a fair and equal movement, because that's just how most MRAs are. Equality is a value and we never stand for anything but. That said, right now I think a separate WRA is a good idea, the problem is the SJW feminist movement isn't really about equality. An honest MRM and WRM should b…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:20 PM
2

As already said they aren't giving female students any extra time male students didn't get, so there's no discrimination here. However it is interesting they make an issue of the only subject where men get more degrees, and ignore that fact that women are still the majority of degree earners overall. They only change the one subject that's the subject with more male qualifiers- why not do this for literature, or a subject where men don't earn as many degrees? The lengthening of exams was welcome…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:14 PM
3

As women are more likely to earn a university degree, they are earning more than their male peers entering the workforce: Source Source The male unemployment rate is also higher across all ethnicities and age brackets.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:08 PM
3

Violence against men seems to be a fixture of the more radical SJWs. It's a very much like the white feather campaign in WW1. It's a fad, but a radical fad with a hostile "mob mentality" factor. The question is, how does it end?
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:42 PM
11

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/03/bahar-mustafa-charges-dropped-killallwhitemen-row Bahar Mustafa, ranking equality officer and a major university, "kill white men."
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:33 PM
80

Good to see the recognition, the tide is definition changing for the MRM. People are starting to realize what's going on.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:29 PM
22

Wow, I had no idea feminists want to address male only conscription, unequal pension ages, the education gap, lower male life expectancy, different treatment from the justice system, etc...
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:12 PM
41

Mansplaining is such a hypocritical term, it's ridiculous. Mansplaining is, in practice, a term feminists use to dismiss or attempt to shut down any argument made by anyone male that disagrees with them or provides a rational counterpoint to what they say. Mansplaining is nothing- it’s a completely made up term that’s nothing more that a conversational trick and debate tactic that feminists use whenever they can’t hold their own in a fair and honest debate- make a good point they can’t counter, …
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:37 PM
1

Because from experience, a woman knows that she will not face any consequences for physically harming 50% of the population. In what society is the oppressed class allowed to physically assault the privileged class with impunity? A basic question to determine who the privileged class in a society is is "who is literally allowed to physically harm the other when they want without punishment?"
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:59 PM
16

Like how other important situations such as plumbing, manual, labor, dangerous situations, defending others from harm, fighting in war, virtually all construction, garbage collection, etc, are left to men without complaint.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:53 PM
14

The patterns of the SJW movement and gender studies courses are perfect example of Milieu control. It's propaganda and psychological manipulation. I also think such courses are used to recruit and suss out individuals who are in line with the more radical and extreme core of SJW feminism.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:37 PM
19

Mark my words, 2018 is going to be the year that the MRM becomes a faction within Hollywood. There are more secret MRAs in the business than people think and so many people are ready for the end of SJWism.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:12 PM
6

This question is exactly why we need more central organization.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 10:12 PM
5

It isn't ok by my book. If someone doesn't support equality, then they do not support MRA values.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:24 PM
39

The completely lack of empathy or consideration for the men is a symptom of toxic misandry. The dehumanization of men is conditioned from early childhood, and it's getting more and more toxic.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:30 PM
32

What's scary is thinking about how many SJW police officers/judges there are, and how they'd treat male victims of crime, especially male victims of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:29 PM
2

Men pay the same tax rate an individual level, but receive less payback from tax dollars. Homeless men have less resources and shelters, less funding for men's health, less scholarships for boys (despite being behind in education), etc. And this is for the drafted/conscripted gender that is already behind in education and employment.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:26 PM
3

The white feather campaign was pure vitriol and radicalization. It was a good example of the psychology of mob mentality: Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 You'll notice it was the feminists suffragettes who were behind the movement, and who were the most eager/radical about mocking men and pushing them towards their death. They were writing in support of the war from the beginning, as if figuring out how to get men kicked was a prominent subject on her mind. The white feather campaign was a h…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:24 PM
339

It really feels like 2018 is the year the MRM steps fully into mainstream conversation and awareness, signs of it are everywhere. People are starting to realize what's what.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 06:23 PM
16

I don't think of the MRM as left or right, or connected to any party or politician. MR issues are not left or right issues, so our political philosophy should be neutral. The MRM would "endorse" a candidate if they lined up with MR views, party wouldn't matter. I think it says a lot about our credibility that we have such diversity of political opinions and backgrounds in the MRM.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:56 PM
18

I've been saying this for a while- what the MRM really needs is more centralized structure. Something that serves as a sort of "official" voice of the MRM, that would have a website with a complete databank and listing of MR issues and facts that would be the place to go if one wanted to learn about the MRM or look up an issue. Branding is important to, things like image and public presence are huge factors in success. A recognizable logo can be a good idea. Better organization makes it easier t…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:36 PM
4

I should say it wasn't with a teacher, but I was 16 and the woman was 32. It was at a summer program I did at a local college, she said she liked college age which is what she thought I was. No real thoughts, never caused a problem for anyone AFAIK so I don't think about it much.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:09 PM
29

I read the details of the lawsuit, it's crazy- the SJW movement really mirrors an extremist and fascist manner of thinking. Openly support harassing and booing people for being born a certain way- how is that considered the standard "equality movement?"
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:42 PM
35

It's interesting how hypocritical feminism will be when it comes to gender roles and whether or not women are weaker than men. This poster of course suggests that men are the one's expected to "step in to save women", but why? Because it implies women are weaker, there's no other interpretation or implication. Same thing when it comes to laws, feminists want women to have lenient and easier conditions under law, essentially implying that they are the weaker gender- otherwise, why would women nee…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:10 PM
6

Indian men are blatantly second class citizens under law. Seperate laws and seperate legal system, not to mention no legal protection for sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:04 PM
4

Cassie Jaye is amazing for doing this. I wish everyone e on the planet watched this.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:42 PM
24

Its starting to break. People are starting to realize the reality of SJW toxicity.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:40 PM
5

Despite the fact that in Italy, men are already less likely to attend university overall, and more likely to be unemployed. Italian men pay the same tax rate as women do, they should have equal access to state services. There's no law against women studying science in Italy-and why do they only do this for the one field that might still be male majority? This is giving an extra advantage in education to the gender thats already got the advantage.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:35 PM
126

Its telling that having more feminism/SJWism in a workplace significantly increases the likelihood of gender based discrimination and differing treatment and said workplace.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:30 PM
20

This type of language really shows how radical and bigoted the SJW movement is. Its a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:28 PM
35

Putting it "in order" is difficult so don't take the order I give too seriously: Conscription Men forced into the military, or forced to do "alternative service" for less pay. Become a year behind on education and work. If girls were forced to clean the park every Sunday for a year, it would be considered sexist and spark outrage. Something much worse for boys is ignored. The Education gap. Boys get lower grades in all subjects at all ages. This puts boys behind for life, and men are less likely…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:59 PM
149

The male unemployment rate is higher and has been for decades. Being male is a factor that makes being hired more difficult. US link has been updated. US UK In addition to being more likely to be unemployed, men are much more likely to be homeless. The narrative that "men are privileged" just doesn't add up- in what society odes the privileged class have more difficulty finding work and more likely to be on the streets without basic shelter?
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:36 PM
2

Actions speak louder than words. Feminist organizations repeatedly oppose efforts for equality, which don't forget includes why its current legal to sexually harass and assault men in India. Its such a hypocritical thing to say, how can an ideology address issues they either refuse to acknowledge as real, or actively work against?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:50 PM
30

Statistically it makes no sense to consider males privileged, especially in a school setting where boys earn lower grades than girls in all subjects. Even more ironic considering how most teachers are female, and studies now suggest female teachers give boys lower grades Men are statistically behind for life: less likely to attend university conscription in many countries higher pension ages in many countries higher unemployment rate more likely to be homeless shorter life expectancy yet less fu…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:46 PM
1

That subreddit is nothing more than a hate group. They do not operate in good faith and are purely disingenuous- just notice how they ignore the vast majority of posts here and focus on any comment that they can spin to make us look bad, which are often heavily downvoted here anyway.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:31 PM
4

An accomplishment we can look at and say "we did that." This is an excellent community that I take pride in participating in!
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:24 PM
14

In the UK, women are now significantly more likely to attend university, and are thus earning more on average
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:51 PM
40

Women entering the workforce now earn more than their male peers on average, which reflects the trend that women are now the majority of university degree earners. Source Source
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:49 PM
7

Media can't be trusted to be honest with stories like this, it's really a responsibility we have to take up because we are the only ones who will. This why we need organization and coordination so when we put together coordinate campaigns of social media when we want to bring an issue or person to pubic prominence.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:47 PM
53

"Elgin has lawful shelters that provide a safe space for people to go throughout the year," Center said in a statement. "In times of extreme temperature, temporary locations open within the community that all conform to regulations and codes."The city also noted there is a women's shelter and other facilities around the area where people can go. A full list can be found on the city's website. In other words, the same feminist-inspired codes that make it almost impossible for homeless men in Lond…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:13 PM
18

There's clearly bias among the offices at university responsible for these kinds of cases, as if a larger force is at hand behind the influence.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:06 PM
20

Just a small example from reddit, but I've definitely noticed a new trend where comments I make about MRM related topics get upvoted rather than immediately downvoted out, and I also see more and more top comments on any given article being in agreement with what the MRM would say, even if not specifically in support of the MRM. Lots of articles are picking up on things now, conversations I have/overhear in public, etc. The tide definitely changing.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 04:10 PM
27

Its nothing more than an indoctrination course for a radicalized ideology.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 04:06 PM
1

Yes, that would be a great way to increase visibility,but we should do it late in the year so we have time to generate enough awareness so it has a decent showing. Our first major public event can't look too lightly attended, or else it risks not being taken seriously.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 03:47 PM
6

So often when I get into dialogue with SJW feminists or anti-MRAs on twitter, reddit, w/e, they use blatant lies or wrong information, which to me is very telling. There really aren't any valid or sensible arguments against the MRM or MRM positions.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:57 PM
43

This is how socially engineering begins for a fascist society. Dehumanizing the "undesirable class" and programming children from an early age to recognize one class of people as superior/inferior to other.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:56 PM
7

Absolute not. Our issues are valid and true. #Metoo has a perfectly valid principal, and isn't mutually exclusive at all. The MRM supports basic human rights and decency for all. I see us steadily growing, and public opinion beginning to sway in our favor.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:54 PM
20

Attempts to censor and suppress the MRM should be expected; anti-MRAs know they would never win an honest debate so they fall back on other tactics.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 07:17 PM
40

So sorry to hear this. This is sadly a common occurrence. Feminists pushed for gendered laws and models for domestic violence that encourage the system to ignore male victims and assume men can only be perpetrators. This is what the feminist Duluth Model is really all about.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 03:59 PM
14

Currently the age is 67 for both, so women are having the age reduced by 7 years, and men only 2. The life expectancy is 73.6 for men, 81.3 for women. So under this rule men will have 8.6 years in retirement, while women will have 21.3, almost 3 times as long. And since conscription only ended in 2008 in Poland, many of the men being made to work longer are hit by double discrimination. This is an example of how blatant discrimination against men is accepted. This should clearly violate the EU's…
/r/MensRights01/01/18 02:28 PM
30

Female teachers give boys lower grades for the same work: source source source It's well documented that boys earn lower grades in girls in all subjects at all ages- I wonder how much of this is due to anti-male bias by the education system?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:01 PM
18

The SJW feminist movement is operating exactly like any radical fascist ideology does. It's a hate movement and their tactics are those of psychological warfare and manipulation.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:57 AM
11

Good, the argument to say false accusers shouldn't face charges because it discourages real victims from coming forward makes no sense- you'd only press charges when it's proven that the accusations are a lie. Simply not being able to prove them wouldn't be grounds for a conviction. There has to be a deterrence from doing something so destructive to another person.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:55 AM
12

Firstly, how are all these innocent people being convicted anyway just an hearsay? It's become that easy to have a man imprisoned on a lie. it would be another three years before his conviction was overturned. Why did it take 3 years after police had proof of his innocence? There is something going on there. There are clearly political motivations at play behind this trend.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:53 AM
24

What's interesting is the hypocrisy feminists have when it comes to gender roles and gender neutral. Sometimes they say gender shouldn't be a thing and society should be gender neutral, and that it's wrong to have ideas of "masculine" toys or movie roles because it paints women as weaker. But then, other times they not only insist on gendered language and laws but even oppose attempts at gender equality/neutrality, eg rape or domestic violence laws, equal pension ages, UN food distribution polic…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:26 PM
1

And the thing is, you know an MRA teacher would be completely fair and wouldn't do anything like giving men higher grades. It's just so obvious which side is more about actual equality.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 05:39 AM
16

Something I actually find somewhat encouraging is how many people dismiss MRA claims and issues because they just don't believe them, rather than not thinking it's a valid issue. It makes it easier to convince people if you just show the stats and data, so much of what we say is just objectively true and an easy fact to verify, things like pension ages conscription unemployment rate university attendance rates These are things that aren't even a matter of "convincing" people, it's just something…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:07 PM
12

Singapore practices caning as punishment for students and criminals, but only for males Singapore also has mandatory male only conscription. All male citizens must serve two years in the military.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:57 PM
3

Ignorance.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:28 PM
1029

There have actually been studies that show female teachers gives boys lower grades for the same work source source source Which is a systemic and lifelong disadvantage. Lower grades in primary school leads has an adverse affect of university attendance, which has an adverse affect on employment, which of course affects everything. Not having a job, or as good of a job, can lead to: -more likely to be homeless -more likely to be unemployed -less likely to afford quality healthcare, which can lead…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:23 PM
7

And more likely to be unemployed and more likely to be homeless. And because women are now earning more college degrees, they are starting to earn more than men . By data and measurable, there's just no reasonable way to argue that men are economically privileged in the UK today.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:49 PM
43

So this is what a feminist court system looks like. He gets a harsher sentence than the woman who severely beat her baby.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:08 PM
612

This story was just unbelievable. To me, this shows that the Australian court system has to be under influence of a very malicious and toxic force of some kind. Feminists fought to prevent women going to prison for anything and now we get this.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:06 PM
33

Men are more likely to be victims of violent crime and murder in the first place. Violence and harm to men is normalized, from school bullying to war.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 01:07 PM
9

"Sexism equals prejudice + power" is a meaningless and made up definition invented by feminists to excuse their own sexism. It isn't valid or sensible in any way- making up a definition with fancy words doesn't make it true.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:51 PM
3

Dangerous situation if one half of the population is able to commit theft, fraud, assault and murder knowing they will be relatively free of consequence. And why should reforms be gender based? Instead of saying "most women commit non violent crimes and/or are mentally ill, so therefore let's have reform for women", why not make it reform for anyone who is mentally ill or commits a non-violent crime? Why the pointless exclusion of the other half of the population?
/r/MensRights24/12/17 04:25 PM
6

Actually, now that women are more likely than men to attend college, women entering the workforce are earning more than their male counterparts: United States: http://archive.is/eSkp1 United Kingdom: http://archive.is/LB1u5 There's no company that systemically pays men higher wages for the same job, and it's illegal to do so anyway. Also not considered is how men are more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 03:32 PM
27

Agree, that's why we're the right side. We are the side that wants equality and fairness.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 08:08 PM
15

And where did that pressure come from? There's clearly some force or ideology behind that pressure, and it seems rather obvious that SJW feminism is to blame.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:33 PM
15

Which is ridiculous, MRA issues affect all men, which obviously includes black men. -Homelessness -male victims of domestic violence -higher unemployment ages -male health -education gap, lower graduation and university attendance rates -higher pension ages -conscription -I'm rather sure we're one of the only ones who try and bring attention to this etc, affect black men as well, and in fact black men are often more affected by MRA issues. It's telling that every negative review and criticism of…
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:30 PM
42

It's inevitable that the MRM grows. People may dismiss it until they become directly affected by an MRM issue, which will obviously force them to realize the truth. At the end of the day, our biggest advantage is knowing that we are the right side
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:28 PM
4

Young women are now earning more than their male peers, as the effect of high university attendance is starting to appear. http://archive.is/eSkp1 (Source for United States) http://archive.is/LB1u5 (Source for United Kingdom) It's even true at the CEO level, a longtime given example of the gender gap: https://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2017/05/31/new-report-women-ceos-make-more-than-men
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:55 PM
10

So this is showing that it's a pattern of what seems to me like intentional behavior. What social ideology might be behind this is that's the case? This is, IMO, due to growing feminist influence in the UK government. Remember that Sophie Linden is an outspoken feminist and current Deputy of policing and crime in London.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:00 PM
93

The sexist policy was also defended by arguing “women comprise the overwhelming majority of victims of domestic abuse” That logic makes no sense. I call it the "majority/minority paradox" of feminism- for whatever issue, whenever the majority of affected women, feminists say "well since women are the majority of those affected, this is a woman's issue and woman should be the focus. " but whenever men are the majority of those affected, feminist say "because women are a minority of those affected…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:29 PM
1

He's going to get in trouble for how he worded this- it's not that the inappropriate behavior and assaults are the fault of actresses who make such offers, it's about the difference in consent. If an actress makes this type of offer and is the one to initiate conversation on the topic, then it's not really misconduct or assault. If a director/producer brings it up first or without consent, then obviously it's inappropriate. Massive difference between Weinstein pressuring an actor out of the blue…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:08 PM
16

I agree, we consider ourselves to be the right side and thus should maintain a certain standard of quality. I also think we get a lot of trolling and false flag posts trying to make the MRM look bad, anti-MRAs know they can't hold their own against us in an honest debate so they have to resort to dirty tactics like making fake profiles, pretending to be mras then posting here. By and large this is by far one of the more respectful and high quality communities/subreddits I'm aware of. Some of the…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 05:27 PM
28

As I said before, I can't help but wonder how much SJW policy influence was behind this.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:02 PM
1

I've never seen a good one or anything more than "this was bad and wrong" without being able to give a reason why. It's interesting actually that in general there seem to be very few critiques of The Red Pill, likely because there really isn't any reasonable objections to be had. The facts and quotes are facts and quotes, and it's difficult to present an honest view of the MRM without making the MRM look like the better side.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:55 PM
14

The level of fervor and intensity for radical SJW feminism is starting to look like that of the white feather campaign in world war 1. You might want to google the white feather campaign, it was a group of feminist women who went around shaming men to enlist for battle. They were very pro war in 1914, writing letters pushing for the war, ad supported it throughout This was even after a couple years in where it was known how terrible the war was and many casualties had already taken place. That's…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:46 PM
12

Well firstly, because of how feminists constantly attack the MRM and MRA issues without even understanding them, or blatantly lying about that. They say the MRM shouldn't even exist and refuse to even have a square debate as to why. Feminists actively fight against MRA when we try and talk about an issue, even if it's something that has no effect on women whatsoever. Feminists attack MRAs for talking about things like men's health, male victims of domestic violence, male homelessness, statistics…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:27 PM
25

To me, this sounds like what you'd expect from a police force following feminist/SJW policies, and it's scary considering that's what they'd want to do- knowingly convict an innocent person. This is what will happen more and more as SJW influence over government, police, courts, etc grow. This is why the MRM is essentially and why we have to win. London's Deputy mayor of policing and Crime is Sophie Linden, an outspoken feminist. She was one of the those responsible for the proposed hackney home…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:14 PM
2

So they invent a definition that excuses their own bigotry, then say the MRM isn't needed because feminism-a woman's lead movement -is for equality and better understands the male issues they don't even know about or fight against, then say it's "mansplaining" to disagree. sexism equals power + prejeduice is an example of a made up definition that uses an 'academic tone' to sound like its a proper theory. But it's nothing. It's in fact a pretext for promoting actual discriminatory views and laws…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 03:29 PM
4

It's not making it more difficult for victims to come forward to simply treat a situation for what it is-the data is data. It doesn't mean someone coming forward is taken less seriously, it just means that the facts are what they are, and the existence of false accusations aren't just dismissed.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:01 PM
8

It's just crazy to me how so many consider the MRM to be a fringe hate group when we know we just know the truth and want fairness for all, although that's a common rerun in history. I've never regretted a moment of being an MRA, and I never will. Studies like these never surprise us, it's just the common knowledge we get criticized for trying to tell and accused of mansplaining for challenging the narrative we know to be wrong.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 04:53 PM
3

It's like this in society at large, both in law and social trends. Homeless men ignored, male dv victims blamed, men's health underresearched, male gap in education ignored, etc. And the people who say "a homeless woman is more vulnerable" , that just isn't a valid argument for leaving a homeless man to freeze/starve (which is exactly what happens in London with the councils). Homeless men need food and shelter like any other person.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:53 PM
1

It doesn't matter how rare a serious crime is, in an equal society everyone should be treated on an individual basis. Secondly, the 2% statistic is almost certainly false, especially now when we see proof of accusation, eggs Rodney Anderson. Whatever the percent it happens enough to warrant taking seriously.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:44 PM
2

The MRM seems to be exploding in India, it seems almost mainstream now. We get little news on India's domestic affairs in the US, anyone from India noticing it?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:36 PM
29

I can only imagine how damaged children raised by sjw types might be.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:29 PM
14

Whenever I read a story like this I can't help but wonder to what degree perpetrators were influenced by some form of radical /misandrist sjw media.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:41 PM
7

Yes. Seeing patterns of bigotry and bias normalized by society at large makes it easy to justify in people's minds.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:30 PM
3

I think many are narcissists/ASPDs who recognize each other. Anti-socials can usually identify each other almost immediately, I think SJWism and radfem is run by a network ASPDs (aka "psychopath", which is different than it is in the movies. Look up what it actually means, it describes feminists perfectly) as their form of stimulation. There's a lot of infighting because a psychopath will never really care for or like another person, they just have coordinated a movement together for their own p…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:17 PM
5

The deputy Mayor of policing and crime is Sophie Liden who is an outspoken feminist, which she identifies as on her twitter page. She was also responsible for the homeless fine in hackney, and area with a near exclusively male homeless population. The debate in policing now is moving much more to identify those issues in the same way as we would other types of incident or crime, establishing if a crime has been committed or not. But even if a crime hasn’t been committed the debate now is similar…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 04:05 PM
11

For people to take the issue as seriously as they should, they need to have an accurate view at how common the problem is. People needed to be educated that it's not false allegations are as rare as they think, and those 2-8% figures are likely far too low. Then, a fair system is set up that gives the falsely accused a fair chance to defend themselves. For the MRM to actually do that, first we need to actually be in campuses.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:53 PM
19

It's a slow grind but when it's over, you'll look back to the days of the MRM and realize how important it was.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:47 PM
15

The argument that poverty mostly effects women just makes no sense. If there is a famine, there is a food shortage for everyone. There's no village in the world where all the men live on one half of town hording all the food. The reality of millions of boys are without education and minions of men go hungry, and this sexist policy will leave them without, and cost lives. People will starve to death because of Trudeau.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:30 PM
2

No, I support ideas like universal healthcare, I mean in the sense of a communist government. I think healthcare should be free.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:16 PM
6

And not just Ireland. These aren't just social trends either, they result from actual discrimination and disparity of law- hiring policies that favor women, and education system that favors women (more scholarships), government resources, less healthcare programs and research, etc.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:36 PM
12

It's social engineering to normalize bigoted and oppressive views, to condition people to accept a future blatantly sexist government.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:34 PM
12

Things like this are opportunities to get others interested in the MRM. You could be having conversations with your classmates about this. It's ridiculous to, boys are already behind in education, they don't need even more disadvantages. And it's scary how now "one gender is better than the other" is being taught in schools, it's brainwashing bigotry into feminism. Like I said with the Canada story of accusations going to feminist groups for "investigation", all of these are little steps that bu…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:32 PM
89

To the feminist organizations with clear anti-male bias and a belief that men are always guilty. This will really allow feminists to imprison any man they want to. They control their own findings of their "investigations", and I suspect will almost always find a man guilty no matter what. This is unbelievable that this is happened. This shows worrying control a radical and bigotry ideology has over government and law enforcement. They are becoming the new government/police. This is how oppressiv…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:53 PM
8

Think about what this is- someone committed grievous bodily harm and permanently and severely disfigured someone's genitals. But, because of their gender, they will not go to prison because there are literally no prisons in the entire country for that gender This is how extreme political/social ideologies take power, it's always gradually over a period of years. We are seeing a creeping effect in real time- 7 years ago when I first became an MRA I would have thought "well, it would never get tha…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 08:55 PM
16

Needless to say, reverse the genders and they'd be in jail as we speak. People ask "what's a female privilege", one answer is the ability to literally stab your partner with a deadly weapon and not only escape significant legal consequences, but possibly escape expulsion from school to. And how articles on these studies trying to frame it as an example of class inequality, no, the difference is gender. A rich man would be a jail for doing this, as anyone should be.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:38 PM
8

They lie because they wouldn't be able to hold their own in a fair and honest debate. Their entire movement is based on dishonesty and brainwashing.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:20 PM
3

One positive takeaway is at least male victims are getting attention from the media. People will only start taking it seriously when victim's experiences are taken seriously and listened to. Some of these numbers probably aren't part of increase, they were always happening but ignored. I also wouldn't be surprised if SJWish wasn't at play in the increase to, as young people are becoming radicalized and conditioned to think violence against men is ok or even funny/empowering.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:19 PM
18

I leave it that vague because I can't think of many areas where men have an advantage in society. The only things I can think of is that women have to pay more for health insurance than men for the same reason that men have to pay more for car insurance. Actually that changed a few years ago around 2010, now women pay the same for health insurance. Men still pay more for car insurance Overall, its overwhelmingly no. And certainly not in anyway that follows the feminist theory or definition of it…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:12 PM
24

Which shows the hypocrisy. What if he's a victim of past sexual assault and this was very traumatic for him? And it's ableist to- what if he has a certain psychiatric condition where he strongly dislikes being groped by strangers? it's pure womansplaining for feminists to say why it's ok for women to grope and inappropriately touch men. The "power imbalance" is a made-up and nonsensical argument.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:15 AM
1

I've gotten to the point where I'm actually supporting people when there's proof they did it, because they still had their life ruined long before any evidence came out against them If you mean you support them even after the proof comes out, then no, I'm sorry, but that's 100% wrong and not a position compatible with the MRM. If there's proof then that means the person is guilty of sexual harassment/assault, and that is not someone who should be supported in anyway. The MRM doesn't do things li…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:08 AM
61

I really think that the majority of people who would describe themselves as anti-MRA only think that way because they don't realize the full reality of the issues and overall situation. If they learned the truth, they'd realize the truth about feminism and the MRM. Cassie Jaye is a good example, she started out anti-MRA but switched after digging into the issues and facts. We need to educate. Any opportunity, in work, in public, whenever you overhear someone say something you know is part of the…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 10:14 PM
5

Sweden is considered a flagstaff country for feminism and one of the world's most gender equal, yet has one of the largest gender gaps in higher education in the world When males are behind or disproportionately underrepresented, it's considered equality. Nice to see the fairness and recognition in the article.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:36 PM
1

Seriously, of all the things we SHOULD be concerned about in all this is how many former and current MALE CHILD ACTORS have come out to say "Yes, this shit is real, and it needs to stop." Seriously, if we aren't going to believe other men, much less young boys, who do we believe, and who the fuck are we fighting to protect? This subreddit has been filled with posts about the ongoing scandals and male victims. Do you even read this subreddit? What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:12 PM
1

But you can't just make a sweeping statement about the validity of the MRM and then limit to conversation to college grads only. That makes no sense. You can fuck right off with that attitude, it's you not making any sense whatsoever. I am successfully and effectively taking your arguments apart piece by piece, and you are failing to deliver any coherent or sensible responses.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:11 PM
1

http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/12/pf/gender-pay-gap/index.html Minimum wage is the same for either gender, so a woman working minimum wage isn't disadvantaged compared to a man working minimum wage. Even if women are single out earning men, that single living is still usually not enough to support a child. But then the same is true for men, and even more so if they are earning less on average? And yes, we still have a vast majority of men in positions of power earning higher salaried wages than wo…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:08 PM
1

What assertion? You back up your assertion, what you said is a vague claim with no support that makes no sense. It's overall easier for women to find work. You can argue that low income wages make it difficult to raise a child, but no* income makes it even more difficult. Overall, a single father would be more likely to be finaicially hindered raising a child than a single mother, so it makes no sense to say that women are disadvantaged just because they are less likely to get the jobs that allo…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:03 PM
1

I'm question if you understand what the MRM is because of your current posts. There is no logical or moral reason to stop being an active MRA because of the political landscape, or what happens to others. You're saying things that are blatantly untrue, then being dismissive and insulting, while providing incoherent arguments for your claims.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:53 PM
1

I'm understanding what you're saying and the context. It's wrong and doesn't make sense. I'm not failing to understand just because I'm not agreeing... Many parents support children working menial wage jobs. It's harder for a father to find work to support his ch but once again, jobs that can actually support another human being prefer to higher men. Citation needed. What does this mean? Young women now earn more than young men in the United States. Single mothers have far more resources than si…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:49 PM
1

No, women have an easier time finding work than men. That's why the unemployment and homeless rate is higher for men than for women. Men are specifically disadvantaged in hiring.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:41 PM
1

Women have trouble finding jobs when they're pregnant, man. Men have more trouble finding jobs in general. Men are more likely to be unemployed and more likely to be homeless. There is currently a front page thread about a job listing only open to women. we should be WRA's as well as MRA's, that's the point. You cannot ethically vouch for men's right and not vouch for women's rights. No. The MRM is specifically a movement for male issues. We still support equality and women's rights as a princip…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:22 PM
1

That said, I haven't had much desire to "counter act" misandric Feminism these days against the current political landscape, I'm sorry, but why not? What does one have to do with the other? If you're an MRA then you know those men's issues still exist and why they are important. It doesn't make any sense that you'd stop wanting to counter act sexism and bigotry just because other bad things tend to be happen. if you advocate for women's rights in the eyes of The Red Pill or anyone leaning toward…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:17 PM
9

Pure sexism/bigotry. She is angry because the director happens to be a certain gender...in what way is that not sexism?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:02 PM
22

This is because of feminist lobbying to essentially decriminalize female violence: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly This is dangerous because now one half of the population has no deterrence from committing a violent crime. A woman in the UK knows she can assault/abuse with near impunity.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:09 PM
5

In other words, they are upset at being treated equally and with the same standard.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:12 PM
4

Which should be something that goes without saying. It'll be interesting to see if anyone opposes this, and if so, who and why.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:20 AM
11

It's just unbelievable but also very telling to degree the U.N is ignoring this... Like how is this not a massive international issue?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:47 PM
2

The SJW patterns of social engineering are blatant bigotry, identical to any other hate movement.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 09:54 PM
9

This is another example of societal misandry and male disposability. This should be paid for by taxes. Men pay taxes to, so why don't they get the same social safety net like homeless shelters? The privileged gender is not the one left to die on the streets.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 09:49 PM
79

Which really can't be justified as men are less likely to attend university at any degree level. Men are already the minority of university students and disadvantaged and behind in education starting from elementary school - why should they be even more disadvantaged?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:24 AM
2

And how much time does she spend in the mrm or any mrm forum? But who do we hate, exactly? Do they say we hate women? Why does wanting to help homeless men, male dv victims, men's health, or boys education mean we hate web? People's negation view of us like your doctor is due to ignorance.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 06:26 PM
1

Another case of female privilege. Feminists fought for gendered policies to prevent women from going to prison. https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly The real purpose is the quasi legalization of women's violence and crimes against men.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 06:23 PM
4

Lack of branding and negative public perception. Both of these problems exist because we lack necessary public visibility. A lot of people don't know about the MRM and of they do, they often read anti-MRA material that gives them a false perception. This is why public image and branding is so important. SJWism exploded so quickly using memes and hashtags-aka, branding. The MRM needs more central organization, a one stop place for people to learn about issues, stats, etc. I think having a network…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 06:12 PM
14

For decades, men who lost their jobs between 60-65 due to disability or layoffs would end up broke or even homeless because they missed the pension age by a few years and ended up without any income- few people will hire someone over 60.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:08 PM
48

So she's using sexism to excuse her lack of work. And so, when she starts working, she'll be a worse employee because she didn't really study and learn in university, but when's fired/not promoted because of it, she'll use accusations of sexism again. And she knows that's not a fair excuse, she knows she didn't do the work, but that's what feminism teaches. It's not about fairness, equality or rationality.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:05 PM
73

Young women in the UK are actually earning more than their male peers now, as they are more likely to attend university: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds And men still have a higher pension age.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:48 PM
11

It says a lot about feminism that they consider someone who fought against basic rights for male domestic abuse victims an influence and icon.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:45 PM
3

I find a lot of people are anti-SJW, but still hold negative views of the MRM because of they have misconceptions and an inaccurate view of what we are. But yes, I've definitely noticed the change, people are definitely starting to get it.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:07 PM
5

It's not a "weapon", it's just an issue. And see how they try and make it a republican thing, it's not, it's just something that happens that people are noticing.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:26 PM
5

Great news!
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:24 PM
6

This is an example of why I have no doubt that the mrm is the right side, not just objectively and logically, but morally to.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:24 PM
7

I've done this test before with a throwaway- acting blatantly hateful and extreme will get you updated in feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:21 PM
7

To see this a lot in trailers, commercials, etc, situations that would definitely be considered sexist if reversed. Pay attention to how men are portrayed in commercials today, even in the last 6 months I've seen it get worse.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:19 PM
3

Why does he see them as being mutually exclusive? Talking about false accusations doesn't take away from victims of assault, it makes no sense to use one to dismiss the other.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:11 PM
71

Well firstly, that would go against feminist intersectionality by ignoring children of lower classes. More hypocrisy. Feminists say this is "progressive" because it's supposed to help girls who are underrepresented, but that makes no sense- excluding boyd does nothing to help girls, and a 7-11 year old boy doesn't somehow "inherent" knowledge in coding from previous decades of male overrepresentation. I've seen a mother try to explain to her son why "It's a good thing that they're being inclusiv…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 08:42 PM
5

That this is surprising or even "controversial" says a lot. Good to see though
/r/MensRights26/11/17 08:22 PM
6

This story needs to be bigger, this is truly insane. The radical SJW feminism is an anti social hate movement that is getting out of control. These people are actually nurses and doctors, and one day will be police officers and judged and officials... People need to know this is happening. We should spread this how we can, social media, etc.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:52 AM
6

It's so hypocritical for the same feminists who use terms like "mansplaining" to also just automatically dismiss male issues they don't even know about or experience.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:50 AM
15

Pure hate group. This whole "anti white male" sjw wave is toxic and deranged. And it IS like that, just look at the number of likes. That's not just "one extreme example ", and she's not really joking.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:23 AM
5

Why does this standard only go one way? Not only is there no reason to think women make remarks about men like that any less, but it's socially acceptable to do so in public with the genders reversed. The hypocrisy is feminists say exactly the kinds of statements about men they would consider sexist in reverse. Hostile, generalized statements and theories-delivered-as-facts about men constantly.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:18 PM
22

It's up to us to make it happen. We can't wait for "them" to do it for us, we are "them". 2017 was the year the public perception really began to shift and SJWs made their major move to take control. It's also when the MRM began to break into the mainstream. 2018 needs to be for the MRM what 2014 was for SJWs- we need a viral year to really eneter everyday public consciousness.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:12 PM
92

So based on an arbitrary, made up phenomena, she gets to decide that it's ok for innocent people to suffer? Lindin next tweeted her belief that “false allegations VERY rarely happen, so even bringing it up borders on a derailment tactic” in discussing what she sees as the “worldwide, systemic oppression of half the population.” So even if someone is innocent, it's derailment for them to tell the truth? It's not a derailment tactic to say that what's happening is what's happening. And of course, …
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:53 PM
50

This is what SJW feminism is teaching people. It's hateful and fascist ideology, strife with severe mental illness and anti-social tendencies. And of ocurse, she feels completely ok doing this because she thinks as a woman doing it to a man, nothing can happen to her and that's it "ok" for her to do. If women were really the oppressed gender who had to be afraid of men, is that what she would have done? Or are her actions those of someone who clearly knew her gender would protect her?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:52 PM
21

All of her current tweets reflect the purely insular and circular logic of SJW feminism- they believe that because of their own theory, it's impossible for them to be wrong, and anyone with a disagreement is a misogynist. Or, she's just a bigot who doesn't care about her hypocrisy. The SJW is such a bigoted and low quality ideology. Men built your world, it's us who are asked to sacrifice our lives to protect others, who are you to say one gender deserves to be murdered while at the same time sa…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:18 PM
48

The child support system on constant imprisonment is ridiculous- it creates an impossible situation, the man can't work to earn the money, and going to prison hurts chances of future employment while racking up debt and causing him to lose his home, which only continues the cycle. The amount of support owned is often ridiculous and impossible for the man to pay, to.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:38 AM
16

So, under Victoria law, there's a legal possibility that someone of a specific gender can murder a baby, and get less jail time than a robbery or drug charge? That's just insane, there's no moral way to defend that.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:34 AM
15

Feminist inspired laws and theories such as the Duluth Model cause police to ignore male victims because there is no legal recognition for male victims of domestic violence. Sometimes men who are victims even end up of the one arrested- the study below shows experiences of male DV victims seeking help, often being ignored, ridiculed, or arrested themselves: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/
/r/MensRights23/11/17 11:03 PM
78

Something to think about, when feminists use vague points like "society shames female sexuality which is why so many people dont understand female anatomy" as a sign of misogyny, how about how doctors are trained without learning about natural male anatomy like the frenulum, ridged band, etc, because American medical textbooks use circumcised penises as the norm. There is no standard medical procedure for circumcision because it is not a real procedure. Yet it's feminist women who tell men how w…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:12 PM
12

I know notice this is day to day life to. Women completely miss that they do the very things they would consider harassment in done by a man, just ingrained double standards. Unwanted comments, touching, etc. Its just how people are taught to think that it "doesnt count" if its a man.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:38 PM
13

It's outrageoously hypocritial for the same feminists who throw around terms like "mansplaining" to womansplain why they feel male circumcision isn' that bad, and how men are supposed to feel about it. The world needs to see videos like this.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:18 PM
9

Feminists protest MRAs because they know they can't win an honest debate, and that MRAs are telling to truth. They protest out of fear and bigotry.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:08 AM
2

This needs more exposure- it doesn't just affect the fathers, but the children to. They want to make it almost impossible for the father to raise his child without starving himself.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:07 AM
6

That's just unacceptable, she committed violent sexual assault with a deadly weapon. Pure female privilege at work. MRM threads seriously read like onion headlines. That's what it come to.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:05 AM
34

So, she's not concerned with an issue that doesn't affect her. Seems like a qualified opinion. This kind of thinking stems purely from the misandry infecting the current wave of SJW feminism propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:38 AM
7

Most rational and ethical people think like we do, even if they don't realize it because they have a falsely negative perception of the MRM. Women have fathers, brothers and sons, and they don't want the toxicity of SJW feminism either, which is why the MRM is growing so quickly.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:28 PM
4

They say "the concept of misandry fuels MRAs" as if it's wrong for men to resist discrimination and sexism...like they're annoyed we actually care about it and say something about it.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:43 PM
2

Currently, men make up only one in 10 patients attending commercial weight management programmes like Slimming World through referral by the NHS and Local Authorities, despite being more likely to be overweight than women and more likely to carry dangerous excess fat around the waist. Now a study of 940 patients by the University of Oxford has shown that when health professionals verbally offer referral to men and women equally, based on BMI and without the risk of gender bias, the proportion of…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:40 PM
41

There just seems to be a much higher quality of discussion in MRA communities, both intellectually and morally. I always seem to have the highest quality conversations on here, it really does seem like this is the very best community on reddit, which only makes the negative mainstream perception that much more ridiculous. Female MRAs are just good people who see through the false narrative and support the right thing, just like Cassie Jaye- she set out to portray what she expected to be a negati…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:50 AM
1

The narrative of "power dynamics" related to abuse is how feminists are about to justify laws and legal systems that ignore male victims of domestic violence, such as the duluth model. It's also how feminists in India fought to keep sexual assault of men legal: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Activists-oppose-making-rape-gender-neutral/articleshow/15049606.cms
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:19 AM
16

Wow, that's encouraging to see, good on them.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:15 AM
2

Now if they only want give adequate resources to mens health...
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:30 PM
9

The intentions behind someone who attack men's day is very telling as to their motivations and real feelings towards equality. Why would anyone be against the things we talk about here?
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:19 PM
5

It's so hypocritical for feminists to think that women and feminists are the best sources for masculinity. Bell Hooks does not know what it is like to be male. A women's movement by and for women should not be the ones to decide how mens day should or shouldnt operate. One of the comments says "isnt this made by MRAs? It's good that we can co-op this into something good." So what's not good about it now? And how would YOU change it to be good?
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:16 PM
33

And feminists are fighting against this, which just goes to show who is really for equality. Yes, it's important that one gender doesn't get automatic leniency, because otherwise they are encouraged to comment the crime. If someone knows they weren't be punished too seriously for assault or robbery, they may be more likely to do it and harm other people. It's not just about women, it's about victims of crime. So when they say "stop making this about men", it actually is about men, especially mal…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:09 PM
3

They know they're wrong and that data and logic are on our side, so they refuse to engage in fair and honest dialogue. Their narrative is built on dishonesty, it's very telling to see their reaction- rather than use debate to expose how wrong MRAs are, as they say, and support their own arguments, they run away from conversation. Why? If their narrative is true, they should have no problem debating an MRA about these things, it would be a very easy debate for them and they could make us look bad…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:53 PM
2

Excellent! Very tough fight MRAs have in India, but so important.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:49 PM
4

Everyday, men are -more likely to die younger -more likely to experience violence -are conscripted involuntarily -are more likely to be homeless -have higher pension ages
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:27 PM
26

This is what happens when an entire "social justice" movement demonizes people (men) for being born a certain way.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:24 PM
16

It's literally like this in the UK. Councils make decisions for housing and are completely run by SJWs. They invent these impossibly convoluted formulas to determine "vulnerability" and "priority need" which is really just code for denying men. I would stop and talk to homeless men in London, this is what they'd all say. Just youtube "homeless london" or "homeless U.K" and watch some homeless men being interviewed. It's exactly what happens and it's systemic. Of course, don't forget when Sophie …
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:20 PM
6

Remember that there are many women who are here, and support us. Think of Cassie Jaye and what she did. The problem is a core of psychopaths who control the feminist narrative and brainwash others. Many people who are anti-MRA are just misinformed and have a false perception and the issues and what we're about.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:49 AM
3

Very telling tactics. They know they can't win a fair debate, so they do this instead.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter