TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BothWaysItGoes Archive

View 4 posts and 719 comments by BothWaysItGoes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah, and I am saying that it is not some objective truth that is not discrimination, at least it is not self-evident that it is. It's just current modern practice to not treat it as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 05:35 PM
3

You are basically arguing that the modern dominant practice isn't bad because it is modern and dominant. Do you understand that many people disagree on what is a right, where the rights end, whether the right is even a legitimate concept, and so on? We would never get women's rights if everyone had attitude like yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:44 PM
3

In the eyes of morality and the law, no one is being discriminated through sexual/romantic rejection as no one is owed a relationship. Thus being denied one isn't a discriminatory act In the logic of the hegemonic system it is indeed not discrimination, but you cannot derive that it is objective truth based merely on the fact that it is the predominant social practice enforced by people who benefit from it. That's like arguing that kings and nobility deserve their status because that's what they…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:36 PM
3

It says that heterosexuality should be redefined from a preference to a political institution. It also says that “Heterosexuality has been both forcibly and subliminally imposed on women.” *Yawn* Because the language of the dominant system is oppressive we have to redefine words and talk nonsense, that’s called deconstruction and it’s actually *really* deep, we are fighting and exposing hidden power structures by writing trash papers and publishing them in trash journals, that’s what Lenin would…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:35 AM
2

So you may say that all women pretend to not be heterosexual only if you claim that it is the fault of patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:04 AM
0

Well, don’t write shitty theory if you don’t want it to be appropriated by shitty people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:00 AM
-2

Sophomore liberal arts pretentious drivel. Sex in humans is inherently related to internal fertilization. Why is it impossible, unimaginable, incomprehensible for you that some things are based on tame and reasonable facts of life and not on oppression that needs decentering?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 08:49 AM
14

I’ve seen “pickme” used both to denigrate women who are traditionally feminine and to denigrate non-feminine women who are “Not Like Other Girls” and enjoy male hobbies. In either case the term seems mostly overused, like incel or nazi, and being almost completely devoid of any semantic utility. In either case, trying to attract men using your personality is the opposite of using sex and money as the attraction tool.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 02:20 AM
2

Any solution to a societal ill would require public discourse, it’s not a simple task with a straightforward solution. But a society cannot exist without a certain degree of expectations placed on everyone, that’s for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:50 PM
3

The first step would be to realize that the problem exists. That’s already a hurdle as is seen in this comment section because any sober critique is treated as an attack on basic human rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 08:30 PM
2

I don’t see where I said that I’m against freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:09 PM
4

I don’t get where I suggested that we should remove choice from half the population. You are projecting your insecurities onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 01:24 PM
6

No, freedom to choose is not positive agenda. The top comment literally discusses confusion and indeterminacy of both men and women regarding each other. How is being free to choose addresses it in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:57 PM
1

I am not saying that everyone should follow an agenda, let alone an arbitrary defined one. I am saying that offering a choice doesn’t in any way solve the problem that the top comment has outlined. That’s all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:52 PM
1

Offering a choice is not a constructive advice and it lacks any positive agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:43 PM
14

Being raised “free” doesn’t solve confusion, it bears confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:21 PM
2

What exactly are those just so stories that you refer to? Please provide links to peer reviewed evo psych papers about height preference where you’ve seen them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:00 PM
1

Yeah, basically. Like I basically dislike opinions of nazis, fraudsters, liars, murderers, hypocrites. I simply disagree with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 08:36 PM
2

There is a difference between substantial critique and regurgitated nonsense. I guess no evolutionary psychologist in the world since E. O. Wilson have ever thought that culture may influence behaviour and take that into account or that scientific statements should be falsifiable. All universities that award PhDs in Psychology for studies in evo psych completely missed that notion, but OP with his cunning mind has exposed the charlatans.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:08 PM
2

It's just a field of study with its limitations. OP didn't just say it's not hard science. OP pretends it's just a bunch of blogposts with its own lore and not an academic field with journals, peer review, many various branches and interdisciplinary collaboration, continuous improvement, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:59 PM
0

It means you have a distorted outlook on what qualifies as poor quality, what qualifies as an academic field, and how academic fields fare relatively to each other. Most evo-psych explanations are mechanistically incomplete Science is incomplete in general. So what? Evo-psych is largely unfalsifiable The whole paragraph just shows poor grasp of what evo-psych arguments are, what falsifiability is, and what is the proper outlook on science may be beyond the level of 2015 /r/atheism understanding.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:45 PM
0

People will trash evo psych for not being scientific enough and then subscribe to some feel-good therapy du jour; p-hacked psychology studies designed with the only aimed to be featured as an op-ed in Guardian; and horoscopes. You talk about rigorous reasoning and Real Analysis yet you only provide baseless accusations with zero references or literature reviews. That’s quite ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:17 PM
7

The implication is that they are misogynists who are looking for traditional submissive women. Not every person in tech is a tech bro; not every person in finance is a finance bro; not every person who found a wife in a 3rd world country is a passport bro. But there’s a stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 03:00 PM
3

Do you really believe in Petersonian chaotic vagina and orderly penis?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 12:47 AM
4

What is even itishoemath? How do you know it’s a rise in western redpill spaces and not just a bunch of Indians with recent access to the internet and people like you with paranoia and weak psyche who follow ragebait content with 30 likes?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 10:20 PM
–

The man on the left works out and he is fit. The man on the right is borderline emaciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:12 AM
3

That’s a red herring. None of those things matter. The bar is not on the floor. Not caring about cleaning as much as a woman does is not a dealbreaker. Not having a good job, not being tall, not being confident - those things are often a dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 06:24 PM
10

Others? Are you fighting?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:13 PM
55

Funny how a country is your house when you are forced to die for it and it’s no one’s land when you are forced to accept immigrants. Can’t win in a game when the rules are made up on the spot to make you lose.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:11 PM
1

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter about being a good person. If you have enough fame and status, some women — not all, but more than a trivial amount — will worship you and the ground you walk on. Yeah, it doesn’t matter if you want to date young single moms from broken homes. And, well, considering that you’ve also attended the concert, maybe that’s the best you can do, but I’m sure you can at least try to aim for someone better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:45 PM
–

If you don’t overdose yourself with alcohol and junk food every week, you won’t need to go to bed at 8pm when you are 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:39 PM
–

Lmao, where are they supposed to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:27 PM
–

This is literally AFBB.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 05:00 PM
2

What’s wrong with your reading comprehension? It’s not about what a partner gives you. It’s about what caste or class you and your partner are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:25 AM
2

Here is the Oxford English Dictionary definition: A term first used by W. Coldstream, to denote the custom which forbids the marriage of a woman into a group of lower standing than her own; also transf., of any marriage with a partner of higher social standing. You are a 🤡.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:03 AM
2

That’s not the “original etymology”. That’s just someone misusing the word making it useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:56 AM
3

hypergamy noun the action of marrying or forming a sexual relationship with a person of a superior sociological or educational background.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:36 AM
1

That’s the opposite of what I’ve said.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:53 AM
3

What happened to AWALT? Are you implying that women are in fact not all “like that”? AWALT is a meme born in response to NAWALT. The whole thing is very similar to feminist #NotAllMen, which I personally find hilarious. AWALT = treat every gun you take as loaded. I personally don’t consider this a healthy attitude, but it is indeed a common approach in TRP circles. Not very Redpill of you bro Sorry for not acting like the straw man you imagined in your head?.. And it is a contradiction to sugges…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 01:07 AM
3

Complaining about women being hypergamous or picky is some incel shit, not redpill stuff. Hypergamy is just an observation. “Picky” and “hypergamous” are different things. “Hypergamous” means desiring men with higher social status than the woman herself. Being hypergamous and picky: I want a man in finance with a trust fund. Being hypergamous and not picky: I want a man who earns more than me and who is better educated than me. There is no contradiction. A woman in any big city can literally go …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:52 AM
1

Are you talking about some specific redpill “gurus” or is it just your impression of random Redditor around here? I personally didn’t have the same impression of either. But maybe you could provide some examples of this disingenuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:20 AM
8

Naturally attractive men don’t need self-help so they are less likely to get into something like TRP. Though, they are likely to exhibit TRP behaviour; after all, TRP tries to explain how to mimic being a naturally attractive man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 07:43 PM
1

How have their lineage survived before anti-depressants?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:57 PM
2

Sorry for not adding footnotes to account for an extremely minuscule amount of people. I forgot that Reddit commenters are too autistic to understand pragmatic generalisations. What’s next? If I write “dogs have four legs”, you are gonna lecture me how not all dogs have four legs? When it is blatantly obvious to anyone who has ever worked with patients that there are tons of patients who pursue therapy, exercise, live a good life and even after all that still require medication for their depress…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:53 PM
0

Yeah, of course, I am sure that ignoring your mental illness to the point of needing medication is a very heritable trait. Not sure how it contradicts what I’ve said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:42 PM
-2

It is true. Around 18% of women take anti-depressants. People with huge genetic predispositions to mental illness are a rounding error.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 09:47 PM
2

If you need anti-depressants, you were too late to pursue proper mental healthcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 09:12 PM
–

What’s next? Arguing with a flat-earther who skipped all his school classes? You can start here. Maybe then you’ll stop saying nonsense like, The problem with evolutionary psychology is that it's often a tautology. Women today are X because it is evolutionary beneficial, X must be evolutionary beneficial because women today are X.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:04 PM
–

I’m just making fun of you. Why would I want to hear your “adult” reply? You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:40 PM
–

I’ve literally said the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:19 PM
–

There are plenty of people espousing nonsense, yes. But is the RP any different from any other community in that regard? I doubt so. It’s the Sturgeons law.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:04 PM
–

So you don’t know anything about evo psych, ok, thanks for your valuable opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:00 PM
–

Wow, you must have a PhD in evo psych. Your description is totally apt and doesn’t misrepresent it in any way. Can you recommend a good evo psych textbook that you’ve read?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:23 AM
1

Stop taking everything so literally. Some guy generalised something in a blogpost therefore he and every person who took a look at his post literally think that all women become ugly when they turn 30 by magic. That’s just stupid on your part to read it that way. You are doing the reverse #NotAllMen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:10 AM
13

Can hold a normal conversation and is looking for a relationship (the bar is literally that low) I guess you mean “can lead a conversation being funny and exciting while not losing enthusiasm because of dry responses”.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 09:49 PM
1

I haven't said there are only two types of women over 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 04:45 PM
–

Women don’t need to be mature. They follow their partner. There is only a minority of women who prefer equal leadership responsibilities, let alone the leading role.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 06:46 PM
0

The value of a human being isn’t connected to their sexual attraction. If you think it is, you are wicked.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 08:48 PM
1

I don’t understand how your comment relates to mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 04:26 PM
0

I think that’s a reductive statement. Yeah, the point of a generalisation is to be reductive. It ignores more women’s experiences than the sum of these two types and it only serves to devalue single women over 30. All devaluation is in your head. Don’t be so prejudiced.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 04:25 PM
–

You can open the link I provided to you and learn it in 10 seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 04:24 PM
1

Yeah, it makes sense. Lots of stuff in the red pill makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 08:22 AM
1

That’s a very misleading factoid. MILF is a popular category because all porn by default is not-MILF.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 12:24 AM
1

I am not sure what exactly you are asking. A guy with incel-type views is a guy with incel-type views, whether he is in a relationship or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 12:15 AM
–

Define marriage. Oh, you are in a committed relationship with a partner, but it’s not a marriage because you didn’t have a giant party and didn’t file papers to the government? Well, that’s how marriage worked in many places for many years. Except the fraud part, that’s something recent, congrats for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 12:01 AM
3

Sure, why not? Lots of young women find older guys attractive. It doesn’t mean they are ready to jump in bed with any old guy. Just like finding same age guys attractive doesn’t mean they are ready to jump in bed with them. I wouldn’t even be surprised if such women are less promiscuous because older men usually look for more serious relationships (or at least those women may think so).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:44 PM
1

Attitude is exactly what differentiates an incel from a guy who just can’t get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:31 PM
–

How often do you hear people talking about a bangmaid lmao? Touch grass.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:25 PM
7

How ironic. There is one already in this very thread… Or maybe it's because our standards actually change as we get older and we're looking for a man who actually has his shit together?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:20 PM
0

There are two main types of women over 30 who date. Those who get a lot of attention, can’t properly vet men, get attracted to assholes and constantly deal with bullshit. Thus, they become suspicious and “tough”. A normal woman who gets lots of attention would already find a normal guy by 30. And those who just don’t get that much attention. They are just desperate by the time they are 30. Of course some just get unlucky, get into weird life circumstances and so on. But those are outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:15 PM
-3

25 is the prime age for women. Had time to prove to be mature enough to be an adult but still looks young. Had some life experience but not a lot of baggage. 30 is the prime age for men because it’s the time they have figured out their career and learned how to behave and lead in a relationship. Of course the best partners are usually taken by that age by someone who saw the potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:09 PM
-1

That’s a lot of time you have for your hobbies and friends. You are literally complaining about having a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 05:15 AM
-1

The ideal situation is to have a network of people you can co-parent with, ie your friends and relatives. If you don’t have any, you probably will be bored with or without a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 03:43 AM
-5

Can’t imagine willing to slave away at a job instead of spending time with your kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 12:55 AM
2

Under neoliberalism/capitalism Throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 12:53 AM
2

Yeah, feminists never talk about patriarchy or about being oppressed by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:41 AM
–

Are they married to men who earn less, have less education and have lesser social status?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:22 AM
–

If you collect all of the people who were willing to settle down with you, and average out their looks, that's your "league" for settling down. If you collect all of the people who were willing to hook up with you, and average out their looks, that's your "league" for hooking up. It’s not complicated, duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 05:50 AM
0

Then they aren’t red pill? Being whiney = losing frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 10:16 AM
1

The relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:47 PM
1

You are delusional if you think most women don’t prefer the man to lead.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:39 PM
1

They are different. Men are dominant, women are submissive. If men and women showed equal initiative, equal courtship effort, equal everything etc, then your question would make at least an ounce of sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:08 AM
3

It indicates she either doesn’t care about looks or is mental.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 02:32 AM
1

You may also not take every statement at face value and recognise obvious exaggerations without being butthurt about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 01:25 AM
1

I can feel that this post was typed by weak low T fingers. Have you checked your T levels?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 12:07 PM
4

Why then God, spouses and parents are mentioned the most in award acceptance speeches? I pity your relationships if friends provide you more emotional support than your close relatives. No friendship can make up for that unless the friendship is pathological, which is an issue in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:46 PM
7

It’s not about “coping”. It’s about going through life with people who support you. Not everyone is comfortable being a solitary psychopath. People around you can help you grow as a person. Guess what happens to people whose issues don’t affect anyone else, they keep being lonely and miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:39 PM
–

For each of those places there is probably a dozen of posts on Reddit where women complain how it’s creepy that men hit on them there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 06:26 PM
–

Like, where?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 06:56 AM
10

Yeah, she is competing for attention not with other women but with GOP and Andrew Tate, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:02 PM
7

Yeah, I would prefer that to her being “polite” and wasting my time because she is afraid to say “no”.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:09 AM
10

It makes anti-RP people feel good. A just world governed by karma, it feels so nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 12:57 PM
0

“Racism is tacky” says a guy who stereotypes the way a large varied racial demographic speaks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 11:41 PM
0

Yeah, it’s well studied that AAVE let alone it’s specific slang variations are not employed by all black Americans. I am sorry, but if you live in da hood and say aight bet when you tell others how many bitches you had, you are a douche bag, even if you don’t know that word.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:27 PM
-1

There isn’t really such thing as “black slang”. Slang is a sociocultural phenomenon. People in ghettos don’t speak like people from upper class and vice versa. Why does “black slang” always get associated with negative stereotypes? Well, why do you associate blackness with being a douchebag? Maybe it’s your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:12 PM
1

Yes She wants you to be that man. She’s secretly rooting for you. She doesn’t want to reject you. Every time a new man walks up to her, she’s secretly saying to herself, “Please, please, please be the man. Be the attractive man that I can’t say no to.” And then he nervously stutters around buying her a drink and makes uncomfortable jokes about the weather and she’s back to that horribly uncomfortable position of having to reject him again. Other times it doesn’t even get that far. It’s obvious b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 07:14 PM
–

I bet this post is written by a deluded overweight American girl who thinks that all fit girls have anorexia.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/23 01:27 PM
2

Look at all those irrelevant publications from marginal media!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 12:04 AM
3

At least it’s just DailyMail. I guess even women-oriented rags understand that the story is bad for optics.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:55 AM
5

The difference is the dynamic between men and women in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:02 AM
0

Advice: don't take advice from people on the Internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 02:54 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:23 PM
2

The meme is saying that lots of PPD women are like that, it’s in the title. It doesn’t mean that it’s the only kind of women, or even PPD women, that exists. “I have seen women who aren’t like that”, “Eh, I have seen a tiger without stripes, so?”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:29 PM
2

Where did you see that claim? What is wrong with your reading comprehension? Generics are statements such as “tigers are striped”, “a duck lays eggs”, “the dodo is extinct”, and “ticks carry Lyme disease”. Generics express generalizations, but unlike quantified statements, generics do not carry information about how many members of the kind or category have the property.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:19 PM
4

⁠Not true seen men without jobs pick up women Obama was a president therefore racism isn’t real 🤡🤡🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:58 PM
5

No, for psychologists having low self esteem means choosing “no” for questions like “I am satisfied with myself” or “I take positive attitude towards myself”. That doesn’t mean you don’t think you deserve more.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:32 PM
6

Having low self esteem doesn’t preclude you from thinking that others are worse or that you deserve more.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:22 PM
5

You could but none of them define what they mean in their abstracts, so you have to waste time trying to get access to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:21 PM
11

Nah, being chubby plummets attractiveness a lot. And you can’t even compensate it with a pretty face, because your face is one of the first things that starts looking fat when you gain weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:16 PM
9

Fetish literally just means a sexual preference with an implication that it's something weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:56 PM
3

"Why are Asian women liked more?", "Because they are liked more". Wow, what an elucidating answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:55 PM
2

Imagine being the most privileged race on Earth and still getting ignored bc of Asian and Latino. What is wrong with wh*te w*men?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:53 PM
1

There is no bare minimum. Everyone is different and everyone has different standards. One would think it should be easy for the soup letters crowd to understand, but apparently the idea of cultural differences is incomprehensible to them the moment it is not about race or gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/22 03:22 PM
1

I.e. the evidence is mixed and there is no reason to assert that there is no association.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:43 AM
1

Until we control for all variables we don't assume anything either way. Yet you keep doing it. For example, let's look at the top athletes Let's look at actual studies that find correlation between attractiveness, health and intelligence. Evolution isn't about outliers. The evidence is mixed. Whether Micheal Phelps is ugly or handsome has no bearing on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 07:49 AM
1

You just don't understand how science works. You don't assume correlation is causation. Ever. Not assuming that correlation is causation doesn't mean that you should assume the reverse. Because it is weakly correlated and could even potentially be explained by having more friends and more positive feedback in life as a result of being attractive. It could be explained by a host of just so stories. So what? Why is your story better than all the others?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 07:13 AM
1

I'm asking if that mechanism is effective in the case of two people who are not visibly unhealthy. And the evidence isn't there that it is. You've just asserted that there is a correlation. Why would it be ineffective? It is not ignorant to not assume causation where only correlation exists. It is absolutely ignorant. The correct thing to do is to learn humility and to stop assuming random stuff that suits your worldview. It exists to attract mates. Those who attracted more mates, passed on thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 06:32 AM
1

Again the question you're answering is "are visibly unhealthy people less healthy than not visibly unhealthy people" which is just silly and you should have understood that isn't the question being asked because it is a ridiculous question. No, it is not ridiculous. You don't seem to understand that attractiveness is the mechanism by which humans judge how healthy someone is. Just like people smell food and look at it to know if it is spoiled. You imply there is some specific visual measure by w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 06:11 AM
1

Is them being ugly causing them to have health issues or are health issues causing them to be ugly. The sense of aesthetics in humans has evolved to find conditions that help reproduction attractive and to find conditions that hinder reproduction unattractive. That's why people find spoiled food bad, even though it is obviously true that some taste towards food is quite "random" and doesn't help or hinder survival, especially in modern times. The question is saying if there is a healthy good loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 05:21 AM
1

Chicken or egg? What? Can you spell out those two options? I've never seen a study that suggested that any and all ugliness is the result of some health issue. Please provide the evicting even if it's mixed. Me neither. Who said that it is? I didn't suggest there was a fisherian runaway in people, I suggested that the idea that good looking being healthy is not the case in nature. What is your evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 04:32 AM
1

The question wasn't "are obviously unhealthy people less healthy than not obviously unhealthy people" that's a dishonest take. Garbage logic. That’s because your framing is completely dishonest. The statement was that people who look very ugly are very unhealthy most of the time. It is not a stretch to make an assumption that people who look somewhat ugly are somewhat unhealthy. Is it actually true? The evidence is mixed. Garbage logic is to assume that the opinion that you find more convenient …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 03:59 AM
1

The "science" is that there is a very weak correlation between good looks and health. Yeah, which means you cannot smugly assert random stuff like you do. The other bit is just evopsych which is just observing behavior and trying to figure out an explanation for it. What? Have you heard of a fisherian runaways? So what? But perfect health doesn't guarantee good looks. Of course. And people who are in perfect health and are ugly aren't less healthy than healthy people with pretty faces. Again. We…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 03:39 AM
1

The question was if you look at an ugly man vs a hot man which is healthier/has better genetics. Yeah, that question is not settled. Everybody knows people can be disfigured by birth defects and disease but those are not relevant to the point. Because they have visible health problems, not just a lack of facial symmetry or some such thing. How is that not relevant to the point? Do you think the mechanism that makes us dislike disfigured people is totally different from a mechanism that makes us …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 02:33 AM
1

No, the logic you are using is garbage. And now you arbitrary put restrictions on what to consider.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 02:03 AM
0

Many studies disagree with you. Also, there are obvious examples of many disfiguring diseases that make you look ugly and not a single one that makes you look beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:56 PM
0

Having genes for Alzheimer runs counter to the idea that bad genes get driven out by natural selection. Do you see a connection? Some things are unlikely yet they still happen, one occcurrence doesn’t really mean much.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:20 PM
0

It makes as much sense as what you've written about Hemsworth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 05:18 PM
1

You might as well say that evolution isn't real, because if it were real, clearly genes that make you predisposed to Alzheimer's would get culled.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 04:08 PM
1

Hahahaha, no. Psychology is an incredibly unreliable field with no well-agreed methodology that is deep into a replication crisis. By no means evo psych is so bad that it could snatch that title from other psychological subfields.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 04:03 PM
0

What are your favourite top 5 chemistry claims? What kind of question is that? If you want to know more about evo-psych, read something like The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. It covers both the foundations of the field (ie the philosophical and methodological background) and the modern research in humans and other animals (cognition, mating, altruism, cultural evolution, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 04:02 PM
1

Indeed, that would be incredibly surprising and would basically be an indictment on the whole field. That's actually a great way to falsify a theory: if it cannot explain existence of various possible behaviors, then it is just incomplete or even wrong. Thankfully, evo-psychologists are well aware of that and they don't believe in such stupid stuff that you insinuate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 03:28 PM
0

The problem with evo psych is that it's unfalsifiable No, it is not a problem with evo psych. Lots of stuff is "unfalsifiable" if we compare it to hard sciences. And even there, you get speculative stuff like string theory or things that are purely based on intuition (one-way speed of light). But being rooted in biology and utilizing robust methodology like game theory, evo psych is far more falsifiable that 99% of stuff that is getting parroted here let one stuff like gender studies. a tool to …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 03:25 PM
-1

“The bar is on the floor” in the sense that most of the romantic/sexual interest women receive is from perverts, creeps, weirdos or other degenerates. Yeah, in your warped worldview where every man that shows romantic/sexual interest in any place outside of bedroom is automatically designated a pervert, creep, weirdo and degenerate. On the surface this seems like basic things any well socialised adult should be capable of but that is not the case in the world we live in. No, any well socialized …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 09:22 AM
0

What is counter-intuitive about it? You have written 5 paragraphs and none of them relate to the title of your post. Can you try to frame your position in a clear way, so we don’t have to second-guess the implications buried in your text?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 12:14 AM
2

I don't care how this corrupt world works, my point still stands. Your point only stands in the world where people's noses grow when they lie. The world doesn't improve without discussions on what SHOULD be done. Yeah, and I am telling you why what you proposed shouldn't be done. so that people can stop playing dumb and pretending like it's okay to just trust each other I've just tried to explain to you why people don't just trust each other. Time to break down the illusions. I know that makes y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 09:07 AM
1

Imagine writing something like “employees should be 100% transparent at job interviews” or “politicians should be 100% transparent at elections”. That’s not how the world works. The whole complexity of social interactions is built in such way so that one simple random guy who learned to lie wouldn’t break the whole system down and dupe everyone just because everyone assumes that everyone is 100% honest. And that little fact has first-order, second-order and higher-order effects on behavior of al…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 04:05 PM
3

The problem with the internet is that people get so out of touch with reality that write inane stuff like this that they would recognize as completely autistic (in medical sense) bullshit (in usual sense) were they only to touch grass.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 03:57 PM
1

That description makes the “dominant” guy sound like an asshole. Where does it show his leadership skills, that he is able to protect people and to stand up for himself? Just one more proof that most social studies are useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 09:38 AM
0

I wouldn’t call it a lie per se, but it’s an incredibly dishonest, misleading, fallacious and deceptive framing. Most people who cite that stuff wouldn’t even be able to tell what it refers to, what the metrics are, how big is the difference, etc. It’s just pure abuse of science in the name of your preferences by “omg I love science” morons who can’t even grasp what a p-value is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:45 AM
1

Who says it’s done consciously?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:37 AM
1

Is it true most women do not want to date significantly old men? True. What do you mean by “significantly older”? Lots of people dated or even married someone 10+ older than them. That’s not some fringe behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:37 AM
6

Sorry, to be clear - you think that not being a leader or not having a great career makes you inferior as a human being?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 05:57 PM
6

You think that a person who had sex only in intimate relationships would be less likely to form a bond with the help of sex than a person who had many ONS?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 04:35 PM
4

do you go out much there are some blogs and youtubers 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 08:44 PM
2

I don’t even see that many of them in a gym let alone public places. This is a body of a typical guy who regularly goes to gym: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/close-shot-mans-upper-body-below-60901441 (and he most likely flexed his abs for the photo)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 08:20 PM
5

Lol, who thinks that bodybuilder types are attractive? Are you stuck in a time capsule in 80s with Stallone and Schwarzenegger action movies on replay?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 07:41 PM
1

That's different, because the two complement each other, and one person isn't inherently offering more value than the other. First of all, no one offers any inherent value. Second, demands aren’t unidimensional, you can offset demands in one sphere by providing more value through other means (looks, personality, money, social status, sense of humor, etc). So men who have high body counts but want low body count women are demanding a woman that objectively offers more value than they do No? Is bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:43 AM
-1

Group 3 exists, but they are a small minority, and they are hypocritical, unrealistic, entitled morons whose opinions should be completely disregarded. Lmao. All three groups are hypocritical because they refuse to date men /s. There is nothing hypocritical about having preferences. If someone wants to be a SAHP, is it hypocritical to expect their SO to have a job? No, people value different things, and there is nothing hypocritical in not wanting to date a mirror copy of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 06:16 AM
2

Reading this thread is fucking sad. Reading your comment is sad. Your inability to take responsibility is appalling. You can walk away, break up, divorce, etc. Instead of that you do nothing and complain on the Internet about it 17 years later. No wonder you get into bad relationships, you should work on yourself and your attitude.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:50 PM
1

Well I can't say I know what definition libertarians use, but everyone else defines it as when the businesses, industry, and trade in a nation are owned by private individuals to produce profit. That’s a very simplistic definition. You could argue that Ancient Rome and even feudal Europe fall under such definition, which makes it utterly useless.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:13 PM
2

Sure, if you think that bailouts, welfare, government interventions in private affairs, government spending being 30%-50% of GDP is capitalism, then 99% of all democracies are capitalist. That’s not a libertarian understanding of capitalism though, even though it probably falls under one of many definitions of capitalism.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:42 AM
2

There was a 10 year period in Sweden between the suffrage for all men who pay taxes and the suffrage for most men and women. That’s not a very long history.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:15 PM
3

A story as old as time, Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron. Peter Thiel
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:10 PM
5

I would call that toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:33 PM
1

Lmao, can’t win at those games.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 08:16 AM
3

A good place to plough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 08:24 AM
2

are you looking for a committed relationship I don’t exclude such possibility. I live in different countries for spans of months/years. And so far I didn’t find anyone whom I would like to share my lifestyle with and vice versa. It’s been mostly short-term dating. Something between hookups and relationships I guess? are you expecting women to want to hook up with you even though you've never met before?🤔 I don’t expect all women to want to hook up with me, but it happens sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 06:11 PM
3

I think most women want to not have to work very hard to just make the first date go well - if it doesn’t, you simply don’t go out again. And vice versa - communication is important but people would generally prefer the first date to be relatively effortless since the actual relationship will naturally add additional stress. A girl wants you to read her mind? No, she just wants things to feel natural and if you naturally don’t align with her, don’t expect a second date. Sure. That’s partly becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 06:01 PM
6

Yeah, TRP is very similar to feminism in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:40 AM
1

Gibme your voting rights right now and go to kitchen!!!! - trp ceo, probably
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:03 AM
1

High blood pressure?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:49 AM
1

Gibme your voting rights now!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:41 AM
1

I am sorry that I don’t live in your head and have no idea what kind of inane beliefs you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:41 AM
0

The pot calling the kettle back. It seems like existence of nuance baffles you. And you need a conspiracy theory to turn a nuanced discussion into fearmongering about enslavement of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:39 AM
0

Yeah, you have a conspiracy theory. Otherwise you would provide actual evidence instead of your paraphrases and wild assertions that redpillers want to take away women’s right to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:36 AM
1

Idk what you mean by “prominently features”.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:30 AM
0

Yeah, it’s really hard to have a discussion when your only standing ground is the idea that TRP is a massive conspiracy of thousands of men who don’t spell out their real thoughts and only speak in dog whistles.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:19 AM
1

Are you saying that bachelors that regularly have sex with no strings attached dream of 1960s when such lifestyle could only exist among superwealthy or hippies? That sounds ridiculous lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:13 AM
0

I simply don’t see the value judgments you claim there are. Let’s take your example and analyze it, “women with high n-count are more likely to be impulsive and more likely to cheat on you”. Is it a moral statement? What moral judgements does it imply? Even if we take that statement at face value, there aren’t moral judgments it necessarily entails that I can think of.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:07 AM
2

TRP says that the world has changed and it has become harder to get successful using old patterns of sexual behavior. And… that means that redpillers want to enslave women?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:57 AM
0

There are facts about the world. You may think the world should be different. You may think it shouldn’t be different. Is such state of affairs immoral? Should you use your knowledge for your hedonistic needs? It is up to you and your morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:50 AM
2

No? https://archive.is/20150610190226/www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/12v1hf/almost_a_hundred_subscribers_welcome_newcomers/ I am here to say, for better or for worse, the frame around public discourse is a feminist frame, and we've lost our identity because of it. But this isn't the end of the world. The world is changing, but men are still part of it. We just need to make sure we're changing with it. It's too easy to blame feminism for our troubles. Men, our happiness is our responsibilit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:41 AM
1

Ok. Your paraphrase of TRP sounds like it has some value judgments. So what? It reminds me of an old Russian Jewish joke: — Why is everyone talking about Caruso? He burrs and lisps, it’s awful. — Oh, you have got a Caruso recording? — No, Abram sang it to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:33 AM
3

The problem TRP deals with is something along “I want to have sex, but women don’t want to have sex with me”. The solution TRP gives is something along “lift, eat well, groom yourself, find a hobby and use some manipulative pick up techniques”. And this solution is not implied, it is spelled out. It doesn’t tell men to change the society, it doesn’t tell men to re-educate everyone, it doesn’t tell men to start a social revolution. All those implications are mostly in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:24 AM
2

Ok, I googled that quote and didn’t find anything. If you have to make up quotes to try to “win” an argument, just mayyybe you are the one who is wrong. Think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:13 AM
1

No, you are confused. If you think that the only solution to the factual reality of male-female dynamics is subjugation of women, you are simply a horrible human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:05 AM
1

Is-ought problem refers to the fact that you cannot derive value judgement from descriptive statements. It doesn’t literally mean that you can rephrase value judgements.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:04 AM
4

Yep, and TRP acknowledges that many men are like that and that they won’t succeed in the dating market. Those men aren’t praised or encouraged to behave like that by TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:59 AM
1

You can’t derive “ought” from “is”.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:56 AM
4

Thank you for this post. It really shows that many “progressive” people are just conservatives in denial who are afraid of their beliefs. If you think that a certain state of society would require total subjugation, it’s you who are the problem, it’s you who are backward. The only reason you don’t believe in reality it’s because you think that such reality could only be managed by subjugation of women, which is nuts and you are afraid of it. You are nuts and you should feel bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:54 AM
2

Why don't people talk more about the fact that a lot of average/below average women have bad personalities? Hot women get hate on all the time for their personality which is funny to me because most guys' only experience with them is either being ignored by them or rejected by them lol. Because of selection effects. People who rise to prominent positions either has to have good looks/charisma or good personality. So people with bad looks and bad personality will be underrepresented in your every…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 01:53 PM
2

I see many men (myself included) who can't afford a Ferrari with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 01:22 PM
2

Comparing a desire for intimacy with a woman to a Ferrari, what a dumb-ass post.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 01:21 PM
0

That was an objective treatment of your views.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 07:29 PM
1

You want to give American female soccer players free money they didn’t win. So that makes you a SJW-nationalist who wants to treat women in a special way.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:33 PM
1

Thinking that women need special treatment is very reactionary.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:22 PM
3

The only thing worse than SJW is SJW wedded with neonationalist nonsense. How does your brain even function…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 06:35 PM
15

What study do you refer to? You linked a dumb pop sci oped.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 12:20 PM
1

That totally depends on the nature of dates, their speed, the expectations and other context. I wouldn’t expect exclusivity after a single good Tinder date.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:06 AM
-1

He is a guy who can have sex, date or marry lots of women because he is wealthy and famous. His personality isn’t really that important for that things to happen. Arguing whether that means he is alpha or beta seems like a needless fixation on labels that exist only for generic guidance. The situation is too idiosyncratic and therefore irrelevant for 99.99% of people who are not extremely wealthy and famous cucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:01 AM
1

The fact that some men are high value and it is not really subjective. Like, yeah, sure, you personally may prefer to live in a bungalow on the outskirts of civilization rather than in a penthouse apartment in Manhattan. But that doesn't change the fact that Manhattan penthouses are really desirable and that's why they cost around $35,000,000. It's quite to stupid to deny inter-subjective patterns of behavior in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 01:57 PM
1

We have to accept that this stuff is subjective. If high value means LTR sex, no one else can say otherwise because that’s what it means to you Cope and seethe
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 01:48 PM
0

muh not all men
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 01:05 AM
1

Well, it is nice to get different perspectives on various issues. It is also fascinating to read bloopers spouting bullshit about incels and redpillers spouting bullshit about evo psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 04:34 PM
1

Yeah, surely putting gags in people’s mouthes is a very humane option.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 10:35 AM
6

Lol, I have never seen a real-life person with Disney facial expressions before.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/21 03:16 AM
7

There is a point in complaining. Make a legal complaint and earn $$$.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 10:22 AM
9

Well, patriarchy is entrenched into the society so clearly 5 year old boys also search it.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 09:38 PM
9

Men could solve this problem by dropping all the slut shaming and double standards. This is such a stupid mentality to treat all men as if it is a single homogenous group with everyday meetings where they deccide what to do and how to behave. Well, guess what, there is no Men Of the Earth NGO that every male human works at.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:05 AM
2

I find utilitarian arguments kind of stupid. Why wouldn’t I date men? Why wouldn’t I date fat women? Why wouldn’t I date overly promiscuous women? Because I don’t want to, it is my preference, I haven’t consciously chosen it, it developed as I was growing up both by biological and environmental factors, and I don’t have a wish and probably ability to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 08:00 PM
1

They are not ugly on the screen. They are ugly in the plot story.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 11:49 AM
8

Have you ever watched a romcom? It’s all about a creepy ugly dude doing overly obsessive romantic gestures and getting a girl in the end and “saving” her from a jock.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:14 PM
1

Leftists don't believe humans are the same nor that their behavior is solely down to conditioning. Do you think class is a form of psychology or emanates from it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_consciousness Arguably right wingers/liberals fundamentally believe all humans are the same; unless you're a flat fascist and believe in genetically inferior people meant for slave stock. If you talk about classical liberals, yes, for sure. John Locke derives his idea of natural rights from the tabul…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:44 PM
1

Yeah sorry mate but the phrase “country X has higher salaries if you don’t take exchange rate into account” is a hilariously stupid thing to say no matter the context.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 09:07 PM
2

Uhm, so what? That’s because Australian dollars are close to the US dollars. It seems like everything I have said went over head. Of course people in Europe don’t say they need someone over 182 cm (=6ft), they say they want someone over 180 cm, because people round things.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 02:30 PM
2

Then you would know that then numbers on your banknotes are relative. The government can just remove or add zeros and nothing will change except the exchange rate. And this exchange rate is exactly how people can compare the worth of one currency to another, just like you can calculate the worth of your salary in iPhones, bananas, bitcoin, salt, oil, Google stocks, whatever. (Well, of course the less liquid the good the less precise is the measure.) When people talk about 6 figure salary, they t…
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 01:57 PM
2

You don’t seem to understand how currencies work and why exchange rates exist.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 01:48 PM
10

But Australia has higher wages than the US if you do not take the exchange rate into account. Yeah, and Americans are three times as tall as Europeans if you don’t convert feet into meters
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 11:43 AM
7

Learn history. Every single progressive movement in the US and Europe was under major influence of the French intelectual culture in 60s and 70s. Try to find a single famous book on feminism post 70s which ideas can’t be traced back to Derrida or Foucault.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 04:08 PM
12

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 04:06 PM
46

Yep, According to ugly left wing men every human is the same, but conditioned differently by the society. And of course due to their biases they thought that it was their worldview that was the most woke one and free of any bad social influence. Hence, according to such position the only reason women don’t want to fuck them is because they are repressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 04:05 PM
2

Look at men who are able to do both and see what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 02:02 PM
16

First off, if a woman passes a police force’s physical requirements, as those women did If a woman passes a police force’s physical requirements it means she passes a police force’s physical requirements designed specifically for women. then you saying they aren’t strong enough is irrelevant because the police themselves decided they are Irrelevant to whom? Of course it may give brownie points to the police department for their diversity efforts, but will it increase my security? That's what rel…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 07:19 PM
2

I just know that women who want to discuss a sexual relationship probably have been sexually assaulted or had insecurities about sex. Or they're like me and have fucked up backs or knees or a medical condition like narcolepsy, seizures, etc. There's a billion and one reasons why people would want to discuss consent before the act. Haha, you really make it hard for men not to run away when women “want to discuss a sexual relationship”. Honestly, who wants to deal with insecurities, fucked up back…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 09:11 AM
2

How do you imagine this selection mechanism to work? A miniscule minority of women select ONS based on dick picks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 11:27 PM
1

When men hit 30s, they get a stable job and a nice place to live, so they become more attractive partners. Maybe it is not true in your particular situation (something like poor rural place where people are perpetually poor?) and other factors are in play, but it is true in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 02:21 AM
1

you still gotta put in the time to get anywhere past Well, my point is that it is not a thing in IT. At least not in a way that someone would say that his career was hindered by job hopping. You just have to show that you are good at the interviews and then you are like everyone else most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:13 AM
1

It is normal and common to change jobs every 2-3 years in IT.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 04:15 PM
4

Dude, if you are such a shallow person that 4 years of free time is enough to get bored of life to the point that the only way to find meaning is to slave away at a job (that of course may be fulfilling and useful), this is your own problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 03:30 PM
2

have you been in a position having all the free time in the world? Yeah? In university during summers? You can pay attention to all your hobbies and start new ones that you didn’t have time for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 03:07 PM
1

so every 3-4 years we'd move to another state. Obviously this meant a new job for me and having to start from scratch. I never really could progress far before I was the new guy somewhere else. This made me realize how much I hate business culture outside IT.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 03:06 PM
5

These numbers mean nothing. Effects of genes and environment are interdependent.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 08:02 PM
3

Women don’t usually measure a man’s cock I must have been hanging out with weird women because like half of them wanted to measure my dick or asked me the precise size.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 12:46 PM
2

They don't know what goes on at these universities. To study this was literally the point of their paper. How can you say they don’t know what’s going on?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/20 01:23 AM
1

I am not sure what you are trying to say. Every trait is interactive. Genes can’t exist without environment. This is biology 101. I don’t see how it contradicts TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:06 PM
2

Media isn’t glorifying anything, it’s just showing... that people have emotions? How radical. Nah, it's glorifying it. Every part of it. Both hedonistic entertainment culture and modern political rhetoric that e.g. treats feeling unsafe as important as being unsafe. And the impact of emotions is never minimised. Well, if you can't minimize impact of emotions in decision-making when it matters, it means you were not suitable for the leadership positions. Anger, rage, pride, ego, fear are quite co…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 01:42 AM
3

Existence of environmental factors doesn’t preclude existence of genetic factors. Hypergamy, this is a review of the whole field of the mate choice: http://web.simmons.edu/%7Eturnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf Prediction of sex based on brain, two different models that use different brain data: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29322586/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-21495-7
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 11:27 PM
2

Emotions aren’t respected - full stop. Positions of power aren’t given because of assumed emotions. Which means all women are looked down upon and any man that has shown emotions. Emotions are glorified in modern media. It's all about fun, hedonism, love, etc. It’s absurd though, people in positions of power act irrationally, impulsively and violently all the time. They do act out of an emotional state, they just dont show it/gaslight people to seem like they’re logical. You cannot take emotions…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 09:36 PM
-1

Emotions are not respected in positions of power. It is amazing how you managed to twist it into a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 03:24 PM
4

CNC What a stupid name for a rape fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 03:08 PM
3

biologically defined gender roles All sexually dimorphic animals exhibit different behavior based on their sex. There is no reason to assume that humans are any different. the concept of "male" brains/ "female" brains There is an overwhelming scientific evidence of the impact of testosterone on brain development. Machine learning algorithms can predict sex based on a very limited dataset with 90% accuracy. hypergamy That’s an empirical fact. female privilege This has nothing to do with TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 03:05 PM
0

Thank you for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/20 10:04 PM
0

Open a dictionary
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/20 08:26 PM
0

Personality and character are synonyms. You are doing meaningless word play.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/20 07:51 PM
2

That’s true. Lots of redpillers are morons who try to justify their hatred of women and preexisting beliefs. Nevertheless, redpill helps, just read the sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 06:21 PM
15

Being more assertive != jumping out of bushes and groping women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 04:05 AM
3

That's a pretty big leap of assumptions as to motivation. Not a lady, but I don't need to offer some broad theoretical framework to replace RP just because I think RP is shit. I agree. It is much better to not offer an alternative, because most alternatives TRP haters propose are sadly usually much more stupid and counterproductive. You go around asking atheists to explain how life started if some god didn't do it? Uhm, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 02:12 PM
3

The corrlelation is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 08:18 PM
3

You can go on dates, hold hands AND have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 02:49 PM
2

I personally feel that whoever asks someone out on a date should pay for the other person, regardless of gender. It tells the person "Thank you for taking the time out of your day to spend time with me and I appreciate your company" I get that everyone is raised differently Yeah, when I was raised it never crossed my mind to treat every woman that spends time with me as an escort that should be paid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:36 PM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 03:07 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 12:50 PM
3

Because men over thirty don’t mind dating women under thirty.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 12:37 PM
-2

In what kind of country knowledge of another language gets you respect? In Europe knowing another language (English) is almost a pre-request for any college-educated person.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 08:39 PM
3

I do think that, ironically, the world that men built may slowly be becoming intrinsically better suited for the average woman than man It is not ironic unless you believe in a primitive conflict theory that posits that people can't empathize with and don't care about people who are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 06:54 PM
10

Learn another language If that doesn't get you respect come back and I'll chop my dick off. Americans lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 06:52 PM
2

It doesn't matter. Yeah, there are probably some fringes of society that TRP doesn't apply to, but it is aimed at normal people who participate in the mainstream society and various internal and adjacent sub-societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 08:54 PM
2

You are talking about some fringe cases, not many women are excited by submissive men. In fact, it is hard for submissive men to find a woman even in the BDSM community.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 08:07 PM
2

The modern society is a complex interweb of many social hierarchies. The Red Pill Theory is concerned with getting laid, so the most pragmatically useful definition of alpha is the one who gets laid and whom women want to get laid with. It is in no way a low bar. In many relationships women have sex with their partner because they want to have sex, not because they want to have sex with their partner. It's hard to excite a sexual desire in a woman by simple presence alone; many men try to do stu…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 07:51 PM
3

That's a surprise. It shouldn’t be. Beijing, Shanghai, Kuala Lumpur are very modern Westernized city. I think I talk to normal people. I guess there are also normal people you don’t talk to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 04:33 PM
8

So my SO is an alpha bucks? Maybe. Maybe you have unconventional values. He has great genetics, he could get anyone else but he sticks with me and my radfem bullshit. Doesn’t that make him a beta though? Betas stay in relationships because they are afraid they won’t find someone else. Maybe he is just stupid or he fell in love with you or you are low maintenance. He is after all “simping” for a woman. Courting is not simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 04:18 PM
3

Lol, it depends on what kind of people you talk to. I have never lived in Germany, but Spain, Russia, the US all have big hookup cultures. The US one is the biggest, that’s true. I have also have been to China and Malaysia for a short time and there are lots of girls who are ready to hookup, but it may be because I am white and it is not normal in general idk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 04:08 PM
14

How can we make sure he is alpha bucks rather than beta bucks? You know he is alpha if you desire him sexually. Is it advisable to find an alpha bucks? If you want an LTR, of course. What are the definitions of an alpha bucks? In RP theory Alpha Bucks is an alpha (ie women want to fuck him) who pursues a traditional LTR (ie he makes more financial investments into the relationship).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 04:04 PM
1

Most of casual sex is (unfortunately for me) an extreme form of serial monogamy. I would prefer having many stable partners that you can explore things with.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:31 PM
4

Yeah, now compare how many teens go to “sex parties” and how many go to regular alcohol parties and have sex there.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:30 PM
6

Go to an African tribal village and tell me how many “low SOI neurotic nebbish dweebs” there are. Then explain to me the peculiar condition of biology that lead to such different results and how it has absolutely nothing to do with society.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:24 PM
2

There's no logical reason for a woman to reject this. Lmao, there is no logical reason for attraction. It is just a bunch of primitive animal instincts intertwined with upbringing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 07:17 AM
2

music videos or covers of women being carried by shirtless men Yeah, women want to be desired by attractive men, but they don’t want to date all of them at once. What I feel prevents women from expressing this more freely is social shame Meh, I know some women who enjoy casual sex in the country where it is shamed upon (Russia), none of them are into polyamory (they probably exist, but they are a small minority).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 07:13 AM
1

I didn’t understand why people like the way they do with regard to gender and was really confused by all the social norms around that because they go against the idea of equality, but then I hit puberty....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 01:02 PM
3

Many people are X, and many people are the opposite of X. That's the point. You find something on the Internet without bothering to understand the context and seethe with rage that people with different experience are different and have different grounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 01:14 AM
5

I love how the two most popular attacks against TRP is "it is common sense" and "it is batshit crazy nonsense".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 12:58 AM
3

If you cringe at everything, it’s probably just your insecurity spilling over.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 01:01 AM
3

One more reason for financial abortion. Men who can simply abandon a child won’t stay with a pregnant woman and abuse her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/20 04:41 PM
3

go on small excursions, stay at home watching movies or play video games, go out and photograph together, travel together, get drunk together, go go-karting, minigolfing, playing pool or shuffleboard, or just sit next to each other doing absolutely nothing because we are too tired for anything after work but we still enjoy each other's company Ok, buddy, if your bar for being fun is silently watching movies or sitting next to each other doing absolutely nothing then you indeed will have hard tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 10:24 PM
5

we’ve forgotten that ONS and hookups can be awkward AF Everything can be awkward if you are awkward. Anything can be comfortable if you feel the flow. Men who are able to get ONS in the first place usually have high social intelligence. You don’t know what they like, can’t get too kinky since you haven’t discussed kinks Uh, not every person is a sex freak with a ranked excel list of their kinks. If you are into that, maybe you should choose kinky parties and long term sex friends over ONS. and o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 05:54 PM
2

All that matters is people get to choose what they want, and then we deal with it. This. We should strive to make the choice more informed though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 01:44 PM
-2

There is no need for a solution because there is no problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/20 08:09 AM
1

A person can do something bad without lying or misleading. They don’t even have to be aware that they did something bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 02:23 PM
2

Consent doesn’t matter, it’s not business law, people aren’t robots. Some of the oldest texts are literally about battling your impulses and undesired behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 12:06 PM
0

You constantly make value judgments in your post regarding their choices. It is simply normal that, even though they are intrinsically linked sexual and “social” values, of most people are different. You conflate then and that makes your logic contrived.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/20 08:23 PM
-1

why not just put the girls who sleep with these men and as you say 'endorse' his behaviour as shitty people who you wouldn't wanna be with regardless? For what? They do what they want. You just have to stop lying to yourself (and to other people) that the world is just and there are karmic consequences. What if the girls that do end up doing this (A minority, yep, sorry inner city poor redittors, there's a whole other America out there with low crime neighborhoods where there isn't even a thug s…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/20 08:01 PM
1

Surely you can see that the implication is that most women won't agree that they want to be seen "as nothing more than cum dumpsters", and, hence, are hypocritical if we assume that OP's beliefs about desires are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:07 AM
27

No, only bluepillers and feminists think that man's worth is equal to his ability to access sex. Hence, "incel" is the biggest insult they can think of.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 05:25 PM
2

Maybe 30 years ago that could be true but not now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 06:25 PM
5

Because of the selection effect the guy "at the finish line" is more likely to cheat because the first group also includes people who are less likely to break up in the first place (which is correlated with cheating).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 06:23 PM
10

Yes this is true regardless of looks. No, it is not lmao. Why did they stop talking to you? Because they are talking to someone more attractive rn. It is that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 05:50 AM
1

Nah, that would be Catholics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 07:40 PM
2

Example: a survey of Fortune 500 CEO height revealed that they were on average 6 ft 0 in (1.83 m) tall, which is approximately 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) taller than the average American man
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 06:31 PM
1

Oh, yeah, no one has ever said anything like that. What an original profound revelation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 06:29 PM
1

Puritans were based and redpilled
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 06:19 PM
1

Generally, no. I only hold contempt against people who are very delusional about their motivation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 06:11 PM
1

"Aim high" is not hypergamy lmao, you seem to fundamentally misunderstand the issue. The top men are those with high socioeconomic status. The top women are those with hot looks. That's the difference. That's what hypergamy means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 06:03 PM
2

They pick them?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 10:21 AM
6

Noone is taking children because of responsibility lmao. If you had an ounce of responsibility you would adopt a child into a healthy family instead of selfishly indulding your reproductive instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 06:55 AM
1

Learn to read lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 06:11 PM
12

Ah, Avengers and Star Wars, the pinnacle of expression of timid human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:08 AM
6

This parapgraph literally explains why MRP exists. I don't understand how people like you can pretend they are better than TRP when you don't even have basic reading comprehension skills to engage with a text understandable by a normal 13 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 07:22 AM
12

Novels? Poetry? Men are at the top of these fields that require talking about your feelings. Literally noone cares about this stuff unless you are studying English Lit PhD or hang out with NEETs with Creative Writing degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 07:05 AM
9

From Married Red Pill FAQ Isn’t TRP against marriage? Our goal is to help newly unplugging men trapped in loveless, unhappy, low-sex marriages. By becoming stronger and more assertive men, they can bring a lot of happiness to their marriage and LTRs. We encourage men to grow in those areas before reaching the point to "next that bitch." MRP was specifically created so that married, committed men could have a place to discuss marital issues without the younger crowd immediately howling: "NEEEXXXX…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 07:00 AM
16

TRP is against marriage and says you shouldn't care what women do in their free time. Learn to cook and clean your own aparatment. You don't need a woman for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 04:21 AM
53

Her personality: "I love to travel"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 04:15 AM
2

Pua suggests you to pretend to be someone else, wich is very difficult and tiring. For many people it is less tiring than being an incel or getting yourself in order. About non-needyness, pua and redpill teach overcompensation and narcisism as far as I have seen. That's really weird, because they explain it using the most clear and unambigious words possible. Showing desire means expressing yourself without caring too much about her opinion about you. This is one way to show non needyness. You s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 02:36 AM
1

It has nothing to do with those bullshit pickup artists. Meh, it is basically the same. The relevant difference is that PUA suggests to fake it, while Models suggest to be it. And in general, Models has less misogynistic and more compassionate vibes. According to the book (I have yet to test this) women find non-neediness extremely attractive. That's what one of the main pillars of PUA and TRP, abundance mentality. When a man shows how much he desires her (think about many ways men show extreme …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 02:10 AM
17

Lots of women my age still look and act college age Geez most guys my age are still paying off THEIR OWN student loans and just settling into being full blown adults. I see myself as just an aging soyboy, so I'm not much different than college guys just lost some of my looks but similar vibe. I hope you are wrong and it is just your social bubble. I would rather live in world of Karens than a world of kids who never figured how to grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 02:02 AM
19

Men who boast about “Spinning Plates” speak as if they are Alphas running their own harem. But by definition, a harem is a system in which many women share one man but do not sleep with other men. Men boast about it because for men getting sex is hard, even getting sex with promiscuous women. To me, spinning plates is just a wanna be alpha term for...casually dating/ sleeping around? It is a PUA term that refers to exactly this. The point of a metaphor is that if you spin many plates you don't c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 01:51 AM
2

Did I get that right? No. So we have this "sexless" men problem. Yes, without scare quotes. Of course these guess talk about sex but every-time we say get a prostitute they say the problem is love and intimacy . Not every time, but yes. And I would say the underlying cause is evolutionary drive for reproduction. Something about sympathy because maslows hierarchy of needs aren't being met and a section of men are going to start offing themselves. Something about sympathy, empathy and pragmatism. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 01:26 AM
2

The dichotomy makes no sense. First, genes decide whether you turn out a human, an ant, a bee, a dolphin or something else. Second, so does everything else, a zygote has no brain, legs or nerve system, you need a whole environment that helps it grow into a human. At that point you should realize that the impact of both genes and environment is absolutely massive and it makes zero sense to talk about one without the other, and it is even more complicated because of the various gene-environment in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 01:47 PM
1

Getting your kid a debit card and transferring pocket money there is not something only rich people do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:07 PM
1

I honestly thought this post is satire because of how obviously self-contradictory it is, but I see serious replies and now I am confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:23 AM
2

without oversharing and coming off as socially retarded Because being honest and upfront about it is exactly what constitutes social retardation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 06:40 AM
1

Close to none. Even the TRP subreddit is full of tradcons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 11:44 PM
4

What a ridiculous middle-class-bubble tone-deaf idea. 16% of Americans live in poverty. Half of all Americans live within ~200% of the federal poverty line.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 12:25 AM
3

Nah, it is 68/1.05 ~= 64.76. You have calculated a decrease by 5% from 68.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 07:09 PM
1

Ok, I googled and the post is indeed a good representation of the TRP, the title and the delievery are there for the shock value that has its purpose. If you remove the flowery langauge, the post basically comes down to "incels and traditionalists are stupid, women like to have sex, stop trying to lock them down or put them on a pedestal, isn't it awesome that you can have sex with so many women without any investment"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 06:04 AM
1

Ironically, you are doing exactly what you accuse "TRP ideology" of. You are taking extremes and pretend the opposite or something inbetween never happens. Most of stuff people accuse TRP of is not there, or it is only professed by people in their anger phase or by extremely online shut-ins. For example, lots of people interpret "all women are like that" as "all women are the same" and ignore all the context, and I seriously wonder what is wrong with their reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:35 AM
2

None of these articles says that most prostitutes are victims of trafficking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 04:23 AM
2

Source? I suspect this is not true for places with legalized prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 02:49 AM
1

This is a nice write-up: https://www.cato.org/blog/libertarianism-coronavirus-pandemic
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 03:03 PM
3

Yeah, in this context it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 01:33 PM
6

Sure, but to the topic at hand, how is it relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 01:23 PM
7

I don’t see how this makes a difference crucial. Not many people have enthusiastic consent in most low paying or dangerous jobs. So what? Or even when my friend is ill and I help them with something, I don’t have any enthusiasm about it, yet I still do it because they are my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 12:41 PM
1

People should do whatever they want (as long as it doesn't hurt others) but they shouldn't expect other people to ignore it. Judge freely and accept that you too will be judged. Also, men all over the world build whole subcultures around not having sex for whole life, so it is not like it is unheard of.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 12:16 PM
7

What is this relevant "huge difference"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 12:13 PM
2

Because everyone knows it is true but it is not moving enough to get people going. Everyone knows eating well, lifting, not playing games the whole days is good for your health and social life. Not everyone can be motivated enough to actually follow through. The path to sucess is mundane and boring. The same thing with Jordan Peterson. What are the two most populat complaints about him? Paradoxically, people either complain that (1) the stuff he says is obvious and was known to everyone forever …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 11:59 AM
1

The first person you should apply it to is yourself. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elephant_in_the_Brain
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:29 PM
1

By that logic we are more similar to plants than different sharing over 50% of DNA with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 01:47 PM
1

This is one of these statements you can argue about forever because the differences are qualitative and there is no unique correct way to assign arbitrary numerical values to differences and determine whether they are more equal or more different. You can essentially agree on every difference, but keep arguing whether it counts as big or small. The whole thing is just pseudo-intellectual masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 01:43 PM
1

No, why would you think I am arguing agaisnt marraige?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 05:54 PM
1

Those people are dumb. Ok, whatever. When did pussy become imagination? I am not sure if you are trolling or autistic, I will just copypast wiki here: Physical intimacy can often convey the real meaning or intention of an interaction in a way that accompanying speech simply cannot do. Physical intimacy can be exchanged between any people but as it is often used to communicate positive and intimate feelings, it most often occurs in people who have a preexisting relationship, whether familial plat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 05:23 PM
1

Marraige laws?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 05:17 PM
2

Oh, so you're fucking your friends and building a family together? Damn dude, you are lucky as hell! People get married to get sex and reproduce, that's my point, they don't get married for personality and work ethic. She's fucking you. What more physical intimacy could there be? You're paying her to indulge in your legal fantasies. It's still a fantasy and not a real thing. That means he's ugly and need to lower his standards. And be miserable and dissatisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 03:02 PM
1

As I said men get women to have sex and to reproduce. I don't know what they should do, but usually they have sex and raise the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 03:00 PM
1

You can get access to friendship without marrying anyone. Getting a hooker won't provide you a genuine physical intimacy, a fuckbuddy can work for some people (for others it kinda ruins intimacy) but getting one is harder than marrying for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 02:22 PM
1

who told you to get married FOR SEX?! What else do you get married for realistically that friendship can't provide you? Access to genuine physical intimacy and reproduction is the number one reason for men to go out of their way and get women, everything else just isn't worth the hassle and can be accessed far easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 02:16 PM
0

that’s why you can’t get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 03:33 AM
2

Short men face unique challenges everywhere. You can notice it yourself in business envrionment. I was like the highest guy in my high school class and almost the highest one in university, but when I joined a consulting firm where I had to meet lots of top management I was average or even a bit below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 03:29 AM
3

Using virgin as an insult, passive-aggressive emojis... So many red flags in one post. It is funny how you think you have any kind of moral high ground here. Neither requiring higher height nor being more fit nor having certain hair color nor having a higher salary is hypocritical. Having higher standards for someone else is not even what hypocricy means, open a dictionary at least. How can you be so smug and ignorant at the same time? EDIT: saying that you should uphold yourself to the same dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 03:21 AM
2

It is not a matter of "high" and "low". You can't arrange everything in a neat moral hierarchy like an autistic child who arranges his toys according to their height and color. But it is actually funny because this thinking shows that with high certainty you are a woman. Because generally women care a lot about man's social status and their sexial attraction is indeed often based on implied social worth, while a man can simply find gingers more attractive without thinking that red-haired people …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 02:47 AM
3

It is a direct implication. If you think you didn't imply that, there is an obvious case of doublethink. But let's just think about it for a bit. You have said the same demands should be applied to yourself as to your partner, apparently, with an underlying assumption that it is only true unless they shouldn't (like being the same sex or the same gender). So in such case did you say, mean or imply anything at all if the only meaningful interpration of your statment is a vapid tautology?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 02:35 AM
8

TIL not being gay is hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 02:15 AM
2

Movies are made by capitalists to earn money, they aren’t made “by men for men.”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 02:40 PM
1

It is an irrational drive that makes you feel good. Like why do people eat cakes? It is just sugar that hijacks your neural paths and abuses your evolved drive for scarce energy that is out of need in 21st century. Well, yeah, so what? Eating a cake is still nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 04:41 AM
1

Most men don't have any kind of real threatening power that women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 04:39 AM
9

I wonder if this is a troll account beause of how stupid their post and their replies are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 04:12 AM
5

Yes, by teachers, mothers, relatives, romcoms, pop culture, etc. I heard “All I want is a Nice Guy” from women, not “I’ll have “I’ll fuck the first guy who showed me human decency!” Yes, so men get the idea that you have to be a nice guy to get laid, but it turns out you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 03:38 AM
3

It is as useless as any other complement or any other human ritual whatsoever. It is still nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 03:33 PM
0

No, it is not a manospherian meme. It is a blue pill meme and you got duped into it. The traditional masculine ethos and the red pill framework both suggest that you don’t deserve anything and you have to work to get what you want. The idea of entitlement to anything someone else has is either a leftist idea or something extremely fringe on the right wing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/20 02:24 PM
0

I have literally never had this problem. Either you are dating a way older dating pool that has different expectations or you need to “man up” to stop giving vibes of a creampuff (or both).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 01:28 PM
10

I don't understand why if a person wants to have sex with you it means they don't respect you, or that you shouldn't respect them. It seems you have some psychological issues like Madonna–whore complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 02:11 PM
1

Trust me, noone fucking cares whether a woman wears make up unless it's literally her job to be pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 04:59 PM
1

If you want to know what women want, think about what you want Hahaha, what an awful advice. Being unable to understand that people are differnet from you is literally autism and shows complete lack of social skills. women are all individuals with different likes and tastes Yeah, sure. I don't like footbal or sports in general, but if you ask me, do men love football? I will say, of coiurse, yes, and they also like sport cars. This is absolutely true, most men do even though all of them are uniq…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 10:38 AM
2

"No, I just stopped wearing make up". Here, problem solved, I just saved you 20 minutes of your every morning. Nobody will give a shit after you show up w/o make up after a 3rd or 4th time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 10:24 AM
2

If people would do something only for themselves, they would also do it at home alone. Not many people (I would conjecture, a minuscule minority) dress up or wear make up at home alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 07:50 PM
2

No, that’s wrong. Marriage of a woman with a man of higher social status is hypergamy from the POV of a woman, but hypogamy from the POV of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 07:39 AM
0

Hypogamy is dating down, *anti-hypogamy is dating equal or up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 06:15 PM
1

It is completely acceptable to desire whatever you want in your partner. Sexual attraction is the most irrational human desire. Also, it’s not hypergamy if they are equals. It’s only hypergamy if they are aiming higher than their social class. Yeah, ok, but anti-hypogamy sounds more weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 05:47 PM
5

She is just a woman that fully conforms to a hypergamy stereotype. It's not snobbish or elitist for women to seek out a partner with a similar or higher level of education, it's what most of them do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 04:30 PM
1

Men want feminine women. Women want masculine men. Mothers and fathers embody many principles of their respective gender traits. I see why you would confuse the two. However, wanting to have a caring empathic wife means you want a mom as much as wanting to have a strong, protective husband means you want a dad. It just seems like you want to shame men for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 10:01 AM
1

This is just a male-hating bullshit. This post doesn’t reflect Russian reality, but it shows a deranged view of a small but growing minority of Russian women who being raised in a conservative family but being exposed to liberal Western media have an out-of-proportion knee-jerk reaction towards current Russian norms. The idea that, for example, men are children because women remind them of anniversaries and stuff like this is quite stupid. It is almost a universal comedy trope among all cultures…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 09:55 AM
1

Russia doesn’t have a crazy high divorce rates, it is on par with developed countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 09:47 AM
12

How could SO many of you not have known this? Imagine being raised by a single mother, or that father is working 70hrs/wk and doesn't spend much time around kids. Imagine going to school where 95% of your teachers are women. Imagine spending your free time watching TV series written by urban liberal progressives. Of course they get the idea that women prefer handsome men over ugly men and rich men over poor men. But they get bombared with messages that good personality, being nice to women, mann…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 09:12 PM
3

The RP is the sidebar. If you obsess over online forums and feel the need to read or make field reports every time you go outside, you failed at the very beginning. Talking to other people to triangulate your mistakes and get feedback is fine, circlejerking around it in a feel-good support group is not. Naturally, people who don’t get it and stay online are overrepresented at online forums. Moderators should have been able to prevent it, but it seems like they had little power and suffered somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/20 03:37 PM
3

I’m single until married and don’t owe you anything, including my n-word pass
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 09:46 PM
1

But it can put your mind deeply in a state where it becomes hard to get a life. So, stressful?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 02:28 PM
3

That’s not a fact. That’s just your ethical view, which has nothing to do with modern science or medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 04:51 PM
2

I don’t understand what you mean by worthless. You seem to confuse biology, ethics and medical conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 04:28 PM
1

I am sure these men would also settle down in extreme circumstances, so I am not sure what is your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 04:20 PM
4

It's natural for men to kill animals, kill each other, kill babies from another man, rape women, construct strict power hierarchies and punish and torture those who divert from them. I don't think not engaging in "natural" behaviour means you have a psychic injury.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 03:53 PM
5

It makes you delusional, probably. Most women do not want random romantic attention, they call it harassment and get men in trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 03:49 PM
3

I think this reflects the cultural background of Chris Rock (~80% of African-American children are born to unmarrried mothers) rather than the general thinking of all American men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 02:13 PM
1

Lots of biological explanations are very shaky. Surely there are many biological drives, but they don't easily map onto complex cultural phenomena. But it may be true. You can say if he has to pay for it, he is unattractive. Or you may say if he can afford it, he has a high social status. In many Asian and Middle East countries men have to pay many thousands of dollars for a bride. Bible literally says that you have to pay 50 shekels to the father of the virgin you want to marry. Paying for wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 10:56 PM
3

Yeah, Good. OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 03:53 PM
5

you all think The sooner you realise women are diverse This is funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 10:28 AM
3

Not caring about anyone’s opinion is basically toxic masculinity, I don’t understand why feminists fetishize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:54 AM
2

Then why are you amused by that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:52 AM
1

Why would you not care about your own opinion? Do you hate yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 01:46 AM
1

Do you feel bad after going to a masseur?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 09:42 PM
7

As for what i think a "non-normie" is ....probably someone with aspergers/autism , social anxiety, maybe a bit asocial or just someone who's generally way too into "internet culture" (4chan/9gag/ weird parts of reddit). These are "non-normies" you notice. However, there are many "non-normies" you wouldn't be able to distinguish from "normies" because they have high cognitive empathy and they are able to fake their "normalness". For example, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, so-calle…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 09:36 PM
7

Funny that feminist theory kinda agrees with OP and says that family is a patriarchal institution women are forced into.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 08:01 PM
3

Is it not considered problematic and frowned upon? I always thought that fangirl is almost a pejorative, not to mention groupies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 11:26 AM
1

the bi/lesbian scene has a stereotype for being even more hypersexualized than what occurs in straight dating Lmao, what? Gay men surely are more sexually active than straights, but does anyone really think that lesbians are more sexually active than straight couples?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 11:18 AM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 03:13 PM
5

Woah, not every person on the Internet has cluster B personality disorder that results in low self-esteem and they are actually well-adjusted individuals. How dare they?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 02:54 PM
3

Of course you can, but it is less probable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 10:02 AM
1

These things "just happend" only from the POV of a woman. Man does the work, and he can either do it naturally or consciously. It doesn't matter if he is over-investing if the girl doesn't notice it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 09:52 AM
9

For the same reason you tell your wife that she is unique or that your parents are the best. Some things that are true are hard to swallow but the facade makes them bearable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/20 05:28 AM
4

So you want good things and you don't want bad things Uhm, yes, how is it surprising to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/20 04:43 PM
2

validation isn’t as big of a feeling Nah, it is very big of a feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 04:52 PM
1

alphas if anything are the least discriminating and tend to see women as holes Haha, this is bullshit that leads to stupid memes like "sexual objectification" being a thing. If men would only care about holes, they would only fuck fleshlights and sex dolls, it is far more convienient and easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 04:47 PM
1

Fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:43 PM
0

I don’t see any contradictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 07:25 PM
2

What’s your problem with my flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 07:12 PM
5

I hope you are doing a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:50 PM
28

Why does bluepill hamstering so often looks like conservative "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" bullshit? This is so funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:23 PM
1

Being a billionaire is also very rare, so what? It doesn't mean being a billionaire is a contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:21 PM
1

(1) having a variety of partners, and (2) locking down the partner(s)' sexuality in that they won't sleep with anyone else. Men want both of these contradictory elements They aren't contradictory, there are many examples of men having many locked down partners. In the ancient Near East it was common for royalty to have many wives/concubines who lived in seclusion guarded by eunuchs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 11:13 AM
3

No, height is normally distributed, but weight is skewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 10:44 PM
8

5'9 may be average as well as 200 pounds, but it doesn't mean that an average guy is 5'9 and 200 pounds. Just like even though Muhammed is a very common name and Wang is a very common surname, Muhhamed Wang is not so likely to even exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 08:56 PM
1

You really can't imagine an equality that doesn't involve a transaction? Not a complex one where everyone performs different duties, that's why our modern world is based on contractual relationships. Why would you want to take more from your partner than you give back? That's a pretty fucked attitude. The thing is, why would you care who takes more in your relationship? That's a pretty fucked attitude. Mother doesn't disavow her children because they aren't as useful to her as she is to them. Or…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 08:09 AM
-1

If you want to keep everything equal in aggregate, maybe you should pay for her services with $$$ and vice versa. Relationships are not about keeping things equal or caring about it unless it is a job and you are strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 07:39 AM
1

Good journalists are worthwhile to read even if they have an agenda. Clickbait nonsense? Not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 07:35 AM
1

“Preying” lmao. Are lonely people kids or disabled? Such language is a way for society to absolve itself of any responsibility in marginalization of “lonely” people. And unions prey on poor workers, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 07:07 AM
5

Don’t read shitty op-eds by 23 year old myopic morons who have neither experience nor education outside of journalism and creative writing
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 06:51 AM
1

This definition is so arbitrary it sounds like it was designed to be a slur applied to people who don't follow the party line.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:46 PM
1

a stranger with your friends Wut
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:38 PM
1

but you demand "sources" from me? lol Well, it's you who claimed it's a fact that needs no doubt. really your young male friends tell you they doint watch porn and jerk off when theyre having lots of sex? They don't report me timesheets, but people talk about their sex lifes with their friends sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:10 PM
1

The male experience of being a young man and having many close friends who happen to be young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:04 PM
4

What women consider "the average man" is actually 80th percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:02 PM
1

There are so many variables at play, experience of a single woman is barely evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 05:01 PM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:50 PM
0

[X] Doubt Unless they have the most boring sex one can imagine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:43 PM
1

Implausibility of such development should make you question this narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 11:06 AM
2

How would a man develop a porn addiction if he had enough sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/20 04:16 AM
1

There is literally no downside to having free stuff over not having free stuff. Any attempt to find positivity in not having free stuff is ridiculous hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 08:10 AM
1

He is a psychotherapist who is good at his job with ridiculous ideas outside of his field, which is a pretty common thing in academia as I have noticed. If you ignore ridiculous parts, you can learn some useful stuff. And for some reason instead of criticizing ridiculous parts of his philosophy, media keeps attacking sensible things he says.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 08:03 AM
2

A minority or a women does a bad thing: we should empathize with them, they are disenfranchized and alienated by modern society, we should give them a place to speak out and give them more power A man who can't fullfil his basic reproductive need that billions years of evolution molded him for does a bad thing: ew, an incel, we should deplatform and shame them
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 07:55 AM
0

No, not all men are naturally alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 04:30 AM
2

Being unable to have a romantic relationship is way more damaging than following basic emotional control
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 04:26 AM
14

She says ‘taking advantage’ but we don’t know if she means they had sex at least somewhat consentually or the dude legit forced himself on her. Oh, we know. If he legit forced himself on her she would say exactly that.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:50 PM
1

Yeah, equating sexual attraction to wanting a sex doll is one of the worst misandrist tropes
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 01:15 PM
3

Chill, it is ok to be autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 09:01 AM
2

Well, you seem to be completely lost and you think “just answering question” in its most nonsensical interpretation ignoring any context is how humans talk, so I assume you pretend to be autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:58 AM
3

Are you pretending to be autistic? Maybe you should improve your reading comprehension skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:50 AM
2

There are many ways to get kids
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:47 AM
2

I didn’t say they don’t exist, so you think if we compare amount of billionaire that swapped old wives for younger ones, it will be comparable to the reverse?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:46 AM
2

If you install Grindr you will find out that having sex is very easy
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:44 AM
5

Right, billionaires buy expensive young prostitutes because they are easier to manipulate and coerce. And they marry young hot women because it is so much harder to manipulate old women into a marriage with a billionaire.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:41 AM
8

Well, maybe then people here should stop arguing that women are just as desirable when they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:40 AM
-1

Sure, so?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:39 AM
6

The easiest way to have sex is to install Grindr
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:38 AM
3

Every single user on that post has this definition in mind. Haha, I wish. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/eky1a0/do_women_really_hit_the_wall_at_30/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/eci05i/30s_male_here_been_reading_trp_for_years_i/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/cgxnkt/cmv_the_entire_rpmgtow_concept_of_the_wall_is_a/?utm_source=share&ut…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:36 AM
0

Well, that’s very weird, but ok, you do you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:29 AM
1

The point of TRP is to be able to attract young beautiful women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/20 08:16 AM
5

You seem to dislike this bad thing, so you must like this ridiculous caricature of opposite behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/20 03:42 AM
0

Haha, of course I do, everyone is free to choose to date anyone provided they have appropriate mental development.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 10:22 AM
1

I think 99% of people would consider a person who is content with losing their social status as a little bitch rather than someone who fights back.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:50 PM
31

Jesus, you found a way to get offended for calling women people. This is my personal favorite. The fact that less competitive departments require more math and that they are more well funded is part of the study I have referenced. I have read it a few years ago, but I think you can easily google it. There are many reasons why less women knew math in 1970s, childhood socialization, women being generally more interested in “people” over “things”, contemporary social context, etc. It is known that …
/r/MensRights04/01/20 08:39 PM
0

right. a moral or legal entitlement to have or do something. Yeah, I am pretty fucking sure I am using it correctly. I think laws around sex should be rethought, neither lowering nor increasing age of consent would change anything significantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 07:51 PM
49

There was a study done in 1975 (!) at Berkeley. At first, it seemd like there was a bias towards men, but when they broke down data by depatments it turned out that there is a bias towards women but they are more likely to apply to more competitive departments (so low addmission rate of "top" departments drived the general admission rate of women down). The less "competetive" departments require math so people who don't know math don't even bother applying to it, and they are generally more well…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:43 PM
1

It all depends on what type of women you are with. In my personal experience, for example, most will just say something like “everything is fine”, it is even a common cultural trope portrayed in books, movies, songs, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 04:21 PM
2

People prioritize their well-being over others
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 03:21 PM
2

which is what were actually talking about, not vague thing considered "reprehensible by society" Uhm, then don't generalize your arguments to everything? If you say "shame" shouldn't matter to grown ass men... then I assume you mean exactly that. I don't assume you mean "shame" should matter to grown ass men, but in this particular case it shouldn't, but I am going to overdramatize my actual position to a ridiculous level because fuck knows why. and people are allowed to choose their friends, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 01:50 PM
2

This is a pretty fucking retarded point. People lose friends and jobs because they do something considered reprehensible by society. This is especially damning if you work in something like sales or any other business facing role. Maybe if you are a neckbeard who has no friends and manages the firm's IT in the basement it doesn't matter, but for 95% of people shame absolutely does matter and social shaming is the most basic primitive form of social organization that exists among all primates.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 12:11 PM
1

5% is already a noticable minority. 5% basically means one of the kids in your high school class is a part of this minority and everyone in the country knows at least one such person. 20-40% of population is basically part of the mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:33 AM
24

If you had sex because saying "no" felt rude, there was no coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:27 AM
2

Men are shamed for their choice, they defend this choice. There isn't much to get confused about, but you have managed to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:24 AM
1

Polygyny getting normalized, incel issues becoming mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:08 AM
0

Are you one of these people who thinks racism doesn't exist since the Fourteenth Amendment was passed? No, I don't know any such evidence and I didn't say nor imply that it exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:05 AM
0

By that logic any SAHM relationship is creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:48 AM
0

You’re not entitled to affirmation or approval. Sure, no one is. I don't see a reason to point this out? If you’re that sensitive to social disapproval, Maybe don’t do the thing that the majority of people consider distasteful? Not all people want to silently conform to ridiculous norms imposed by society, people fight for their rights, I don't see anything wrong with this. I’m not aware of any movement to illegalize sex between young adults and older adults so what is being “infringed” upon? No…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:46 AM
2

I don't understand what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 07:11 AM
3

Women aren't as horny as men and they generally prefer lack of any "emotional labour" to having "sexual satisfaction".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 07:07 AM
0

all fucking creeps and low value This is the only real problem. Stay in your lane, boys. If teens were only pursued by hot guys, it wouldn't be treated as such an important issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 07:02 AM
-1

i find it fascinating that men feel the need to constantly argue or defend their right to fuck young girls It is also fascinating how a certain subgroup of people trie to infringe on this right and make life of men difficult. like why do you need everyone to approve or accept every decision you make. Uhm, people are social creatures, and being ostracized from your social circle can ruin your life. its already settled law so no one is trying to take away your right to do it so...? Hahaha, men are…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 07:01 AM
1

most people question the motives The motive of dating is having a romantic relationship and sex. What is there to question?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 06:53 AM
8

Framing everything as a test and life as a competition is a stupid TRP's gimmick. People live the way they are comfortable with. And that's pretty much it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 06:52 AM
1

Most women don't provide direct feedback. The ability to understand what they want depends on your social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 05:39 AM
1

So what’s the problem with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 09:19 AM
3

If by mentally stable you mean someone who can fit in into society than trivially he is by definition mentally unstable. But if we can imagine a more sophisticated interpretation of mental stability, he may actually be more stable and reasonable than most people who just sit at home and do nothing to change the world around them even though they are very displeased with it. If he reasoned about his decisions and calculated his actions in a clear way. I don’t see why he should be called mentally …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 09:19 AM
1

33% of what they say is true and trivial, but framed in a controversial way 33% is false but would be earth-shattering if true 33% is somewhat interesting, but not particularly important And yes, views of intellectuals rarely do reflect mainstream opinions, even those of their followers
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:54 AM
1

No reason to fix what is not broken. Why do you want to shame a certain type of sexual attraction and fetish? Just let people do what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:48 AM
1

I actually find it funny how people in the US pretend attraction to post-puberty girls is weird and equate it to attraction to 6 year old kids, and at the same time their media sexualize young girls the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:46 AM
5

There's a difference between showing emotions and being insufferably whiny Yes, if you are a woman it is called "showing emotions", if you are a man it is called "being insufferably whiny."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:43 AM
1

If people only cared about sex as a physical process divorced from any societal implications, they would just masturbate and feel happy about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:42 AM
4

Framing every different point of view and value system, no matter how misguided and wrong it is, as mental illness sounds very Orwellian.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:40 AM
1

You are saying as if there is a fine line between thinking that nazis are bad and wanting to gas every right-winger when in fact there is a fucking gulf between these opinions, even though neither of them is particularly nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 06:10 AM
4

You're being as uncharitable So is complaining about a shitpost
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:30 AM
8

Nothing wrong with generalizing an entire group of people as something highly negative: nazis are bad. You see? Very simple and almost trivially true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:23 AM
7

Yes, what you say is very true. But saying "there are so many people from so many places, with so many different types of upbringings and life experiences" with an implication that generalizing people is wrong is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 05:03 AM
5

The problem is that you sound like you are against any kind of generalization There are so many people from so many places, with so many different types of upbringings and life experiences and yet somehow, when a person generalizes an entire group of people as stupid, vain, shortsighted, or some other trait... ...they can still be correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 03:54 AM
13

Our brains are giant pattern-matching machines and their sole job is to make sense out of our complex words to be able to navigate and live in it. If you are unable to notice patterns that correlate with class, status, upbringing, wealth, geography, sex, race, most likely you are simply retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 03:19 AM
5

Kafkatrap
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/19 10:15 PM
2

Reread your comment, please
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 10:36 AM
3

Younger women are easier to manipulate it is a status symbol to have a young trophy wife Things that are easy to have can't be status symbols.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 03:25 AM
17

If this is true, why do old men constantly try to hit on young women and why do young women complain about it so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:35 PM
1

Surely there are grades of caring between “don’t give a shit” and “the only thing to care about”?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 06:34 PM
1

Only for legal benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 04:17 PM
1

Example?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 08:46 AM
1

The framing and agenda don't make their data wrong. And it makes far more sense than your anectodata. Young girls complain about attention from older guys, young prostitutes are far more expensive, all rich guys marry young women. Just being mildly aware of what is going on in the world entirely contradicts your view. Yes, there are guys who are attracted to MILFs more than younger girls, and some guys are even attracted to very old women, but they are a minority. And yes, the life of an average…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 12:36 PM
1

Ok, so there are three points. Reference: https://theblog.okcupid.com/the-case-for-an-older-woman-99d8cabacdf5 Young women receive much more attention than older women. A woman’s desirability peaks at 21, which, ironically enough is the age that men just begin their “prime,” i.e. become more desirable than average. Following that dotted line out, you can see that a woman of 31 is already “past her prime,” while a man doesn’t become so until 36. As we mentioned above, after age 26, a man has more…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 09:05 AM
0

Just to make it clear, do you really believe for a 30+ woman it is as easy to find a date as it is for a 20 years old one?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 06:54 AM
1

Yes, there is also a non-traditional expectation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 03:02 AM
1

There is no contradiction. How do you explain you love your mother but you don't want to fuck her? Different people in your life fill different social roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/19 06:05 AM
2

I guess that makes sense. It is inevitable that extremely online people will overrun any online community. Guys who care about techniques are out there practicing these techniques and the guys who circlejerk over their faux-sociology are writing tirades about womahn. Another thing to consider is that what had to written is already written out there and there is not much to be added, so the red pill as a project with a goal died out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 09:55 AM
1

What is your idea of "the current RP Theory"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 08:48 AM
1

dating in Russia is heavily in favor / for the benefit of men LMAO, no. Another facet is homophobia is so serious that it’s considered “gay” to eat out a woman, and women’s sexual pleasure / satisfaction is not at all a priority. Yeah, but you should keep in mind that the same liberal/conservative or left/right or whatever you call it divide exists in Russia too. The proportion just skews harder to the right. But if you are a student in Moscow in a good university most likely lots of your peers …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 08:48 AM
1

I have no idea what you are talking about. The Red Pill theory applies everywhere. Of course some things may be more or less important depending on the cultural differences, but having low height or not being fit won't make you an incel in neither the US nor Russia. And having high height and being fit will increases your chances in both countries. The only difference between the red pill in and outside the West is that people outside of the West don't have to take "the pill" to understand these…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 08:19 AM
1

Yes, it does matter to the type of guys you date with. They aren’t either right or wrong type.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 11:02 PM
6

The idea that women naturally talk more (or at least want to talk more) is a red pill idea Is every gender stereotype that existed before feminism now "red pill"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/19 12:51 AM
4

It's normal, it is not super common. 1 in 5 people have sex before they are 16.
/r/seduction08/12/19 09:26 PM
1

Nah, women are hypoagentive and emotionally reactive. So sometimes if you put a bit more effort without coming off as needy or creepy you may get what you want. When someone is crazy about you, you will know. If a woman is crazy about you after 1 or 2 dates either you are very high value (which doesn't apply to 95% of guys) or she has some issues.
/r/seduction08/12/19 07:36 PM
1

Another trash self-report study with meaningless numbers. Scientists should at least try to calibrate answers asking questions like "would you go on a date with him/her?", "do you think he/she has a partner or has no problems finding it?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/19 09:19 PM
1

He would be ahead of his time if he didn't become famous until after his death. He was born right in his time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/19 09:31 PM
2

I don't care what women want, I only care what they respond to I am not an academic, I am not a theoretician I like how the PUA from the first minute disregards pseudo-scientific bullshit extremely online TRP guys are obsessed with. Unfortunately, guys like him seem to be a minority among the "redpilled". I guess Sturgeon's law also applies to online communities and people in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/19 03:02 PM
2

I am confused. Are we talking about pop culture or science? In pop culture for some people it may have these connotations. But in neither science nor TRP alpha is associated with being a bully that gives zero fucks about others.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 02:17 AM
1

No, not really, alpha is not a bully, they are a leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 02:10 AM
1

"Alpha" doesn't usually have any moral connotations, it is a descriptive term.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 02:06 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 01:48 AM
1

Attempting to dominate other men, physically or psychologically So? Dominance is an alpha trait. It also includes such things as being empathetic towards the weak, helping your friends, etc. Reckless wealth-seeking, spending money in an attempt to display wealth, rather than spending wisely. These are not alpha traits. Attempting to gain a leadership role for the purposes of elevating one's status, rather than having someone who would be a GOOD leader take the role. Yeah, that's the whole point …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 11:23 PM
1

No, I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 11:17 PM
1

Moronic behaviours like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:34 PM
1

If you think that chimpanzee alpha males bash women over the head with clubs and drag them to their cave, you don't know anything about primates.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:33 PM
1

Using everyday word in everyday setting is not anti-scientific. I don’t think anyone claims that “alpha male” is a term of art in human ethology (and there would be nothing wrong if it were, it just isn’t for some historical and cultural reasons). But drawing comparisons is normal and even people who study animal behavior draw comparisons between people and animals (going as far as a primatologist comparing Obama to an alpha-male and McCain to an inexperienced junior). And if you really studied …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 06:13 PM
1

At least I'm not clinging to primitivistic notions of what I think humans are. Notions derived from fucking apes who don't have intellect anywhere near what humans do. Denying that human brains are hardwired with primal instincts is the most anti-scientific thing you can believe in. There is no such thing as a human "alpha male" because there is no scientific basis to claim that they exist. "Alpha" is shorthand for "can fuck a lot of bitches." Does this sound scientific to you?? Yes, of course, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 04:48 PM
1

I agree. Ugly people get together and are bitter about it. So 75% (yes, I pulled this number out of my ass) of relationships are just dysfunctional families "Married... with Children" style but without any TV glamourization.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 12:00 PM
1

The same as a man minus the burden of calling the shots and deciding things in a female company plus having to care about menstruation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 11:54 AM
1

Of course, alpha males vary from species to species. Inability to comprehend a semantic widening induced by a very simple metonymy may imply that you have some problems with verbal reasoning abilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 09:24 AM
2

By your standards every political movement is a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 09:20 AM
2

XY females (not transgender) may even get pregnant if they undergo hormone replacement therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 08:46 AM
11

why in the fuck do blue pillers think that the problem incels and the like have that is stopping them form getting women is that they have a low view of women It is a very simple just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/19 08:19 AM
1

I only hear confusion about “alpha males” in just-so stories on Reddit and Twitter left-spaces. In my personal experience, which is of course limited, people don’t get confused and understand what being alpha means. It’s not even a completely new concept. People talked about machos, wanting to be one, etc 20 years ago and it was normal, and no one accused these people of being white nationalists woman haters, even though macho has much stronger physical and aggressive connotations than alpha mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 01:00 PM
1

Thank you for providing a good example. “Dominant” means different things for non-human primates and humans, yet we still use the same word and understand how the meanings are connected. The same with alpha male.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 07:10 PM
1

In the context of humans alpha male simply means a dominant man who is in charge and whom women are usually attracted to. The term applies to humans simply by the fact that this is how people use this word. Like with any other word.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 06:23 PM
1

Yeah, and TRP says that bullies aren’t alpha https://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/da2n9a/are_school_bullies_alpha_or_are_they_beta/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 06:20 PM
1

If a situation exists, it is natural, by definition of nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 09:54 AM
1

There are no references in this article, so I have no idea how to check it, but this quote: In primates, the alpha male is the one who can literally beat up every other male. So the position depends entirely on physical violence Provides zero sources in Google and it directly contradicts Frans de Waal (h-index of 108, in science h-index of 60 is considered exceptional).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 09:51 AM
1

I don't know what qualifies as "scientific meaning" for you, but the ethologist who popularized the term "alpha male" directly compares humans and primates when he discusses alpha males. https://www.tedmed.com/talks/show?id=686742
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 09:48 AM
1

You are taking it too literally. Leaders of countries are certainly alphas, but so are millions of other people. Humans are parts of many social groups. This is really not a hard concept to grasp. This just sounds like willful inability to comprehend a very simple idea on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 09:18 AM
1

Sure, but this sounds pretty much like motte-and-bailey. Of course humans are more complex. And of course humans don’t literally manfight to become the leader of their tribe or whatever. But no one implies they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 10:59 PM
1

In scientific papers it usually refers non-human primates, but in common parlance it has a more general meaning. The same thing as with almost any other word in language.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 09:32 PM
1

Uhm. This is a non sequitur. It is not a matter of arguing. There is no controversy. The term "alpha male" is used in scientific papers to refer to the dominant male who calls the shots and has the biggest reproductive success in his social group. The idea that "alpha male" is controversial is already an ideological win, a shift of Overton window. Making the case that the term applies to humans is a waste of time, imaging arguing on national TV whether rape is bad. The fact of arguing itself wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 08:37 PM
2

Mass movements matter, nobody cares what ivory tower feminism is because it has no impact on society aside from the memes it may produce that eventually are accepted by the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:37 AM
-1

People who use the term alpha male in the ordinary sense are infinitely more correct than people who try to dunk on them after watching Adam Ruins Everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 03:38 PM
0

But if you mix packs in captivity wolves will establish dominance hierarchy. The very same thing happens with humans, compare kinship-based dynamics to a mass society.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 03:21 PM
1

Exactly, so it does apply even to wolves (besides thousands of other species) as the text you copypasted confirms.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 03:15 PM
-3

This is a very stupid myth, it does apply to wolves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 11:42 AM
2

Beep-boop, I am a perfect rational agent. Let me calculate expected utility conditional on my relationship with a red pilled man. I need to maximize my Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility function.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 09:20 AM
1

Yeah, there is no reason to do it. And in fact, many people who are oppposed to prostitution are also opposed to striptease and similar stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 10:42 PM
1

I pay them so they do certain acts using their body. I don't see the line when it suddenly becomes disgusting and immoral. I understand people that may say that none of it is immoral. Or people who are generally opposed to all kinds of work and say that capitalism is immoral. But I don't understand why you draw that arbitrary line.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 10:38 PM
1

I pay for a service, just like at a restaurant, or at opera, or at a dance performance, or at a theatre, or at a massage. Lots of services require people to use their body.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 10:34 PM
1

And stimulating myself, like cooking for myself, is not something I may be interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 09:24 PM
1

You invent bullshit reasons to rationalize social norms ingrained to you by society and are literally unable to understand a very basic analogy. Sorry, but you are very dense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 09:08 PM
1

So I hire a prostitute because I don't want to masturbate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 09:04 PM
1

LMAO, Americans think fundies still exist as a political block in the first world countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 09:00 PM
1

Should I stop going to restaurants because I can cook?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 08:58 PM
1

There is no country where prostitution is normalized. Only the very new generation (under ~22, and still not the majority of them) sees it as something not shameful. Let's wait 10-20 years and see how it plays out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 08:55 PM
1

female dating strategies taking responsibility for yourself Uhm, what? Women don't need to take responsibility to be successful in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 05:30 PM
15

Any female involuntary celibate sub is a joke. One of the most upvoted posts from /r/trufemcels literally says that it is easy to get a man to fuck with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 02:57 PM
2

Most guys I know don't pretend they don't do this, and it isn't considered controversial or misandryst to point that out. It is even made fun of in pop culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 08:42 AM
2

A sexology student who can ask 600+ people about their sex life but can't provide a peer-reviewed study, sounds totally legit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 01:57 PM
2

crying whining Uh, just another post full of heteronormative gender-shaming from a woman who is afraid to lose her precious social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 03:34 PM
2

I think she was just shittesting you. Push/pull, you know, girls do this too.
/r/seduction25/09/19 01:44 PM
2

Most men don’t even get to have 5 romantic partners
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 02:34 PM
3

Yes, of course, I could spend my lifetime collecting degress and doing fun socilally unproductive research.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 08:33 PM
1

Is there even a reason to argue with a person who believes that his personal anecdotes are good evidence? If you are a person of a slightly higher empirical standards: https://m.imgur.com/Ijgzwsk
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 12:24 AM
1

It is not cheating if you both agreed to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 07:03 PM
3

Sex positivity makes social life confusing as hell especially for people with social anxiety and low EQ. Traditional rules break down but there are so many new implicit rules that are very hard to follow and it results in miscommunication and confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 09:43 PM
3

I think we should realize that sexual services are not really different from drugs or gambling in terms of how they target the disenfranchised, outcasts, undesirables and other psychologically vulnerable people. It is not something that should be banned but it is something that should be regulated in some form and we should encourage people to seek and provide help. Of course she provides a real and valuable service many men want and do pay for. The problem is that such services are in need, it …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 02:25 PM
4

Cool is always cynical detachment and not caring You are still living in 00s.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 08:46 AM
5

From the comments: The assertion that men have strength and women don't is inherently sexist
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/19 10:09 AM
2

Does he have any arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 03:11 PM
2

Why would you assume there is a purpose to nature?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 02:49 PM
0

Apparently this word has multiple meanings, I meant that: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_hatch
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 07:12 PM
0

You think men should not have to pay for their own kids? Why is this controversial, ever heard of baby boxes?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 03:17 PM
2

I am not pissed lmao, I don’t know or care who she is or what she does. She baited million thirsty kids into likes on Instagram. I don’t see why you whiteknight her so much and I find it ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/19 02:54 PM
1

It is wrong to make a promise and break it, especially intentionally misleading people. It is a really basic concept, really. Even kids understand it.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/19 02:20 PM
1

I didn’t say anything contrary to that.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/19 01:36 PM
0

So? Is porn a special type of performance that entitles you to act like a dick? Pornstars are not any different from any other type of stars and don’t warrant any special considerations. We aren’t in 19th century.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/19 11:53 AM
2

When you make a promise and break it, it is bad. What is so fucking hard to understand about it? Are you so dense you don’t understand basic societal norms?
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/19 10:46 AM
1

Apparently, gang bros, hillbillies and maga enthusiasts are the most popular audience at Megan Thee Stallion tours and their patriarchal colonizing whiteness makes it impossible for her to let them touch her. Yeah, when you write it explicitly, it sounds even dumber.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 05:36 PM
-3

Sorry, I don’t care, I don’t know why you think it is in any way relevant to the topic at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 05:27 PM
0

“I am not comfortable when black people touch me, but when white people do it I don’t feel threatened”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 04:54 PM
2

They are nerds and watch porn because they don't fuck. If there weren't porn, games and other addictive activities, there would be a rape epidemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 11:24 AM
16

You just have to explain to them that there are seventy-two virgins waiting for them after their death.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 08:33 AM
14

The destruction of traditional paths to mating, confused mixed values on what constitutes proper courtship display, the rise of proportion of the population excluded from the sexual economy; all of these breed anti-social sexual behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 08:26 AM
2

1) Libertarians aren't anarcho-capitalists who are against state and taxes 2) Most prominent libertarians (Hayek, Friedman) didn't identify as conservatives
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 08:14 AM
4

But there are two kinds of security: the certainty of a given minimum of sustenance for all and the security of a given standard of life, of the relative position which one person or group enjoys compared with others. There is no reason why, in a society which has reached the general level of wealth ours has, the first kind of security should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom; that is: some minimum of food, shelter and clothing, sufficient to preserve health. Nor is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 09:02 PM
0

Yeah, poverty is hard. I don’t see why we should privilege SAHM over other poor people and lay the burden on their ex-partners. It’s two wrongs and they don’t make right together.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 07:37 PM
4

Sure, I support unemployment benefits too. Not sure what it has to do with alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 06:16 PM
7

Welfare is not a sign of autonomy, it is exactly the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/19 06:12 PM
4

That's like saying to a black guy that he is not being discriminated because Obama or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 07:49 PM
2

It sure as hell has nothing to do with PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:50 AM
15

A knee-jerk reaction against modern progressivism that is not fundamentally connected to the basic trp ideas and in some ways even contradicts them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 07:47 PM
0

This made me want to puke and hit the gym
/r/MensRights02/01/19 03:47 PM
5

Blue pillers are securely attached and used to egalitarian secure-secure relationships. Secure-secure relationships aren't always egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 05:32 PM
5

400-lb ogres for weight loss advice Would you go for an advice on how to lose weight to a person who managed to lose weight or to a person who never had the problem in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 05:26 PM
1

What if you correct for the average age of marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 11:28 PM
2

So 56% of people living with their parents are men and this is somehow a very big gap?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 03:46 AM
1

What source did you use to prove that it is a male thing? I am sure it has stats for women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 01:59 AM
2

it's not a problem because society doesn't see anything wrong with women living at home until 30 Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 01:55 AM
4

This is the point. You have not heard of it as a big problem because it is not considered a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 01:47 AM
9

Because when young women live at home until their late 20s into their 30s it is not considered arrested development.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 01:41 AM
23

They are just punching up all these suicide victims, homeless, blue-collar workers, social outcasts and other privileged scum.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 10:38 PM
4

Lol, how many half-truths can you put in one sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 02:13 PM
2

If you call someone a Nazi, everyone viscerally understands what that means Nobody knows what that means. It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 04:49 PM
1

You have to analyze opportunity costs. She can tell him to fuck off and be miserable alone, yes, but there are reasons she doesn't do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/18 10:09 AM
2

Or would you tell her to GTFO cause shes worth more than being a "dick hot pocket" for an asshole? Let's be real, she's an obese insecure woman who cheated on her boyfriend. Do you think she will be able to find anyone better?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/18 10:42 PM
92

Muhammed is the most popular first name, Li is the most popular family name. But Muhammed Li is not the most popular name. Do you now understand your fallacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/18 03:38 PM
2

5 upvotes and it's mostly about make up...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/18 07:16 PM
5

To trick whom? For girls to trick themselves? Do they really believe they go to the guy to check his cool whatever?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/18 03:15 PM
10

If a girl is not going to have casual sex under any circumstances, she is of no interest to TRP. Of course we should keep in mind that she can be deceived into sex and dumped, which probably made her write this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 04:11 PM
43

I am a relationship minded person. To this end, Chad/Alpha is incredible unattractive. Chad is also unattractive to lesbians, straight men and even turtles. But neither he wants to be attractive to them. Chad is unattractive to you, you are unattractive to Chad. There is no conflict. I don't see a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 01:58 PM
2

How is it relevant? Are pregnant migrants separated from their unborn children?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:44 AM
0

If feminists giving their opinions about something affects you so much, you really need to re-examine your personal principles. It affects everyone and the feminist and feminism-inspired lobby is one of the biggest in the modern times. Are you always this triggered and affected by everyone’s opinion of what you should and should not do? No, I don't really see you would infer such outrageous claim. If you cannot tell the difference and the impact of someone giving an opinion (and yes, even a stro…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 01:06 AM
1

Do you know the difference between criticism and dictation? Yes I know. I don't see it how it's important in this particular context. You’re all grasping at straws It's you who is grasping at straws. Feminists don't tell you what to do, they just say that what you are doing is immoral and oppressive, that's such a big and important difference! It's a valid nitpick that has no bearing on the gist of the argument at best, and a digression at worst. the feminism boogeyman that you’ve created is rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 07:34 PM
11

> No one has tried to dictate to men to find anything attractive. >Feminists express their criticisms about what men find attractive. That’s it. Wow, a very important distinction. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:54 AM
3

Because they are unable to get ONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 09:19 PM
47

I thought it's hard for women to understand men. Now I realize they don't understand them at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 12:49 PM
1

incel I am saving sex for marriage Do you understand what "in" in "incel" stands for?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 02:28 AM
8

Right to get 4.0 GPA.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:58 PM
5

there are men out there who aren’t total pigs and who are actually interested in more than sex As if it is bad to be interested only in sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/18 06:44 PM
1

It's feminists who are outrages at that. Men are just outraged that feminists pretend it's not the normal state of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/18 12:02 AM
33

Useless and inapplicable theory that provides no real insight. Psychology is a real field, anti-intellectualism is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 06:44 AM
0

So I think it's not a big deal if it's not even illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:27 PM
0

Asking a subordinate/coworker if you can whip your dick out and masturbate is sexual harassment, but in most cases it is not technically illegal So sexual harassment is not illegal in the US?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:12 PM
0

So if you don't ask, it's ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:05 PM
1

Neither 'sex' nor 'harassment' refer to the workplace. The fact that you find this insane just shows how deep status quo ideology is ingrained in your worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 12:37 PM
1

Because the term “sexual harassment” refers to workplace incidents. This is simply not true. We’re talking about whether something would violate your HR dept’s sexual harassment guidelines. What is Louis CK's HR dept? Does he know he has one? I was looking for more of a yes or no, but I think it’s safe to assume that “so?” really means “no”. It's required for everyone in my company to complete Ethics training. If you read it, it would increase your understanding. As it appears now, you have no i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 09:48 AM
1

Correct. How is workplace different from other circumstances? I don't see any reason for such distinction. If you read it, you would understand why asking your coworker if you can take your dick out at work and beat off in front of her would be sexual harassment. If you read everything uncritically, you would believe all kinds of stupid shit. Have you ever read through the HR manual? So?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 08:35 AM
1

Unwanted sexual advances in the workplace. Read the whole sentence, not just the first few words. So unwanted sexual advances outside of the workplace aren't harassment? What country do you live in? I find it hard to believe you’ve never been advised before about what constitutes sexual harassment. Is there an employee manual or HR policy you can take a look at? Might give you a better understanding of the topic. Of course there is. So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 08:00 AM
1

This is a pretty broad definition and you’ll find it will vary slightly by the workplace. Yes, this is a very useless definition. "Unwanted sexual advances". Well, I guess Tinder's super-like is sexual harassment now. Have you ever had a job before, or are you a student? I work in IT/management consulting in a big multinational company. Have you ever had a job before? Nobody cares about this HR seminars bullshit unless you are communicating with a client.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 02:19 AM
1

Then why did you bring up flirting? What was the relevance to the specific incident we’re discussing? To explain that people engage in sexual behavior at work. Oh honey, I didn’t mean a literal textbook. If you worked in a corporate environment you would have been educated on what exactly constitutes sexual harassment. You would have either attended a seminar or been given an HR manual or something like that. ... I meant it’s a very clear and concise example of what sexual harassment looks like.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 02:06 AM
1

Asking a coworker is she’ll watch you jerk off is not flirting. Not what I said. This is like textbook sexual harassment. So what. How are textbooks related to life? They aren't. They just perpetuate status quo ideology. I assume not corporate. How is it relevant? Does Louis CK work in a corporate environment?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 12:54 AM
4

People flirt and have sex at work. Why is this so hard to grasp?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 12:29 AM
5

It's not sexual harassment. It's just inappropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/18 11:49 PM
12

His career is ruined.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/18 11:48 PM
3

If I were gay, man 3. Man 1 is probably the most attractive for women because he looks cute and caring.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 06:41 AM
1

I was in Los Angeles and Stockholm. Women dressed nice in both cities. I don't see how it varies be it NA or Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 05:59 AM
1

Rodeo Drive is what fashion industry promotes. You said there is a big gap. I don't see one. I see that people want to wear that stuff and they wear similar things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 05:29 AM
1

You are not supposed to wear runway clothing. Come to Rodeo Drive or visit farfetch.com and tell me that's not the clothing people want to wear. And no brand sells runway clothing for daily wear. No, I've never been to Walmart because there is no Walmart in my country.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 04:15 AM
1

Any reasonable person understands the general rules what to wear (e.g. you shouldn't be nude or dress as if it's a nightclub if you are at office). It is not going to be a distraction unless you are a 13 year old insecure girl. In such case though psychological help is more beneficial than pandering to needs of a small mentally unstable minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/18 01:20 AM
1

Do you believe that this is a good argument for citizen uniforms?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 11:57 PM
1

There’s a big gap between what the fashion industry promotes and what the average woman wears. I dunno. What do you mean by that? What does "the fashion industry" promote? Do you have examples? Do you mean "high fashion" like what they show on Fashion TV? Most women aren’t dressing super sexy on a day to day basis. Well, ofc, they aren't dressing super sexy. They are dressing sexy and wear trendy stylish clothes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 11:54 PM
1

Nothing about hormones/testosterone? Wtf kind of sex study is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 08:41 PM
4

If you are Zizek, you will get a supermodel wife. If you are an assistant professor who teaches Blue Pill Studies, well...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 07:58 PM
6

It costs $$$ to eat healthy. Cheap food is unbalanced, it makes you fat but it doesn't provide nutrients you need.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 01:31 AM
1

Millimeters is a misleading measure. Human brain uses proportional scales. e.g. interpupillary distance is usually between 40 and 50 mm. If your PD is 35 mm, you are 10% off normal range. Talk about "mere" mm. Compare it to height, 10% off 180cm moves you to a category of midgets dating-wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 07:18 PM
4

LTR-attraction and sexual attraction are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 08:28 PM
1

ONLY and exclusively This is simply an exaggeration.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/18 07:36 AM
1

Yeah, people want to get relevant stories. Girls watch chick flicks, boys watch buddy movies. Do you have a problem with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/18 07:34 AM
3

I’ve never met "fat guys who demand hot women like them".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 06:01 PM
3

An extremely small minority that is hated by almost everyone doesn’t mean that "the world is full" of such people
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 05:41 PM
1

When I was a teen I couldn’t understand why the fuck the Fight Club is considered cult classic. It wasn’t until I learned about 90’s emasculation when I understood what the movie is a reaction to and what is its message.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 05:06 PM
3

You are comparing celebrity endorsed movement to a banned sub...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 04:46 PM
1

Male feminists usually only attract cops.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/18 04:36 PM
12

If I had to do the typical Western mating ritual for a weekly vanilla sex, I would rather jerk off and buy a prostitute occasionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 07:36 PM
3

Almost as if different people want different things. And almost as if people want different things from short-term and long-term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/18 06:46 AM
5

It happens on every feminism-aligned sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 08:37 AM
4

If women stopped wanting marriage and kids, the human race would end, so it doesn't matter anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 08:31 AM
4

Men are just more likely to act.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 08:28 AM
0

This post reeks of the "a housewife is a CEO" meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 08:15 PM
8

Happy women are in love, disappointed settle for a partnership.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 07:41 PM
1

Q4RP: What do you think BP means by "true self" Well, they literally mean it. It is a primitive thought-terminating cliche that alludes to the idea that there is a neutral, almost agency-free, state of humans with a just-world fallacy vibe. Q4All: Define your "true self?" In the past people believed that vacuum is simply void (and this is the literal translation from latin), but nowadays we know that physics is more complicated. Now, vacuum state is defined as a state with the lowest possible en…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 06:27 PM
1

I am sex-neutral. I think people can have sex with whomever and however they want, but others can judge them however they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 05:03 PM
2

No, what a stupid article. It's easy to have sex if you are a matured successful man. And even for them it's hard to get 8+ women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 05:02 PM
1

Society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 07:44 PM
2

I was being sarcastic dumbo. You can re-read it again if you don't understand how you contradict yourself, dumbo. I’m fear mongering against the fear mongering. The only person who is fear mongering is you. Nobody is saying that having a partner you want is bad. It's you who says that not having a partner is bad. Why is it so hard to understand? the fear mongering I see in the manosphere when it comes to marriage and children Oh, sure, then go argue with "the manosphere". There were no fear mong…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:41 AM
2

Except that in the OP he’s giving men advice on how to retire early, by working your ass off to a faceless corporation until you’ve saved enough to retire at 50 or 60 then you can do all the fun stuffs” and I think that’s a retarded fucking piece of advice that won’t work for most men. Procreation is only the driving force behind evolution, no biggy. I’m sure there will be no repercussions to teaching people to only care about themselves so they can retire at 60 instead of 65 with a wife and kid…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:17 AM
2

When you cherry picked my comment to where I said it might take time away from those things, implying that just because you lost time in one thing, means that you didn’t gain it more in some other way. Maybe if you made actual effort instead of smart assing it, I’d have a better understanding of your position. The position is pretty simple. Different strokes for different folks. I don't understand why it's so hard to understand for you and what kind of explanation is needed. That was an example …
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:21 AM
1

You’re assuming that having a wife and kids is worse than being alone No. Where do I assume or claim it? I’m trying to tell you that it doesn’t have to be No, you are saying that a person who stopped playing games and focused on career and kids has improved his life and view in life. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. imagine you found a partner that shared your passions, liked your friends and helped you fulfill your life goals Imagine you found a bunch of such people and you don't w…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:00 AM
1

How is having a wife and kids stopping you from having passion, friends or other sort of fulfillment? Sure it takes time away from those things You answered your question. the assumption here is that you chose to have children so that has personal benefits in itself which oftentimes are more fulfilling than other things you found fulfilling. And some people chose to not have children because other things are more fulfilling for them. A friend of mine stopped playing video games and started focus…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:46 AM
5

They just focus on their passions, friends, and other sorts of fulfillment that often go by the way side when you have a family.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:39 AM
1

Plenty of white folks blend in with the black community all the time? I’m confused. So are they white or black?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 09:51 PM
1

Ok, do you think that a black person can immigrate to the US now and join black community while a white person living in the US can't? Isn't it kind of problematic and divisive?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 09:39 PM
1

Ok. What do you think is "black culture"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 09:23 PM
1

Because it is defined by slavery and opposition to white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 09:14 PM
3

Damn it. I have learned a lot about the US and its politics since Trump nomination, but it's still fucking weird to see discussion of white and black people as if they are different castes that don't interact. Ok, I understand there are black neighborhoods where there are lots of people with black skin. But why would they create some kind of "black community"? Damn, social situation in the US is truly fucked beyond the point of repair. Also, this is probably the saddest shit I've read on this su…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 08:27 PM
2

Well, in that sense, it is responsible. In a sense that it contributed to the result.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 06:11 PM
6

Obviously, no. Why would it not be responsible? For starters, responsibility is a moral category and applies only to moral agents, e.g. humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 05:46 PM
3

Why bother with 3D-women when you can watch hentai with your favorite waifu?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 05:39 PM
7

Sounds ridiculous. Why would it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 05:36 PM
1

These are two very different things. One involves highly complex psychology and the other is based on the idea that all women who had open marriage and didn’t find a new partner are just less likely to reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 05:26 PM
13

It is a Freudian unfalsifiable hypothesis. Do you understand that even if this behaviour is a result of evolutionsry pressure to find a better mate, it still doesn’t prove that there is a subconcious desire? It is just a useless middleman you can cut off with Occam’s razor.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 05:16 PM
6

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 05:10 PM
4

This is why I find all this pseudo-Freudian bullshit useless. You can twist it in any way and rationalize anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/18 04:59 AM
2

HODL
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 08:45 PM
1

Why would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:29 AM
1

Most people hate fascism because "muh wwii your fathers normandy", evidence: lots of people eat up fascist ideas if they are called differently. Most people in the world are homophobes, transphobes and believe in God. If your average South-East Asian farmer had a Twitter, he would be called a fascist by every leftist and ChapoLover.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 10:48 PM
3

More like a hyperbole used to signal his despair.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:45 AM
1

Can't you just put everything under "Incompatibility", lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 03:53 AM
1

The problem is the assertion that disagreeing with your husband will you make you "a terrible wife".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 11:06 PM
4

Never saying no directly is one of these things I associate with shitty US/multinational corporate culture. I can’t bear people who can’t say "no".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/18 11:31 PM
2

Plausible deniability if the flirting becomes awful Plausible deniability to not look like a slut It is natural for them They think it is how flirting should be done, being upfront just may feel wrong (this may be actually a rationalization of 1,2 and 3)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 11:33 PM
2

I didn't like the idea that men and women were very different (their values, behaviour, etc) so I was trying to rationalize that it is not true. I had an idea similar to "internalized misogyny", but I didn't know the actual word or other concepts of modern feminism because it was like 10 years ago, I was 13 and lived in Russia. I put blue pill in scare quotes because it was actually me who was a contrarian, views of redpill are simply the norm in Russia.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 11:28 PM
2

You were explained why men like casual sex. It is not because it is a good sexual strategy, it is simply a byproduct of evolution. It doesn’t mean it is bad or good, it simply is and it is a foriegn feeling to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 01:01 AM
27

What really offends bloopers is not the existence of RP, but the existence of the issues themselves. Wow, you are right. That’s probably what I felt when I was in my "blue pill" phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 12:46 AM
11

I care about the guys who are not getting enough sex from their wife I can't make myself care that some guy isn't getting as much casual sex as he wants So you can empathize with men who feel entitled to sex with their wife, but can’t empathize with men who don’t have a wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 12:43 AM
1

Naive and hearing those lines for the first time sounds like 13, not 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 10:53 PM
2

Jeez, with such shitty advice no wonder men turn to PUA and redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 10:12 PM
2

Shaming is one of the most effective ways to influence someone's behaviour, it is literally the evolutionary reason behind shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 07:55 AM
2

her cheap emotionally unavailable boyfriend Cheap?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 04:40 PM
1

Just let people register joint ownership and intimates (including best friends if they want to).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 06:40 PM
1

They spend all day in the gym to try to attract this small minority of woman who want to have casual sex that I've mentioned. And of course good looks matter, they just don't matter that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 05:15 PM
8

I feel that in Russia relationships are very practical. Not to say that they lack romantic aspect, but I feel that people are more aware of "бытовуха" (which approxiamtely means "everyday routine life", but it is much richer in connotation and I struggle to find a precise translation). On the one hand it is good that women don't decieve themselves that they want to find a true love when they are 30 and understand that they need a man with a good steady job that can support their children. On oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 02:31 PM
2

Wealth and status allow you to buy prostitutes Why do you need status to buy prostitutes, lol? Thats a much different sort of attraction than the attraction she felt for the ex-con with a six pack and a motorcycle who beat the shit out of her when she was a teenager. This is a kind of attraction only a small minority of women has. Women aren't men, they mostly don't care about your six pack.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 02:09 PM
2

Simply no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 01:58 PM
1

One of the reasons is that women and men treat children differently, so it’s natural that feminists would completely misunderstand the message.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/17 03:12 AM
1

I think your explanation of why men want to treat women as children, but women don’t want to nurture men is not fleshed out and is handwaving. But I agree with your general point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/17 03:09 AM
1

I am baffled at how many people utterly failed at understanding what OP meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/17 12:55 AM
3

Yes, this is a real problem and it’s the reason why number of Muslims has increased so rapidly in Western countries./s
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/17 12:51 AM
3

Being in an American college puts you above 90% of world population in terms of success, talk about privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/17 12:43 AM
2

/r/Polyamory /r/NonMonogamy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 11:50 AM
2

Why would it given that that was exactly what was written? Common sense. Words mean nothing, in 2017 we are communicating with thought beams and assumptions about intentions. That’s how language works, it is not algebra.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:39 PM
6

It is imprecise only if your brain is poisoned by identity politics. The idea that he blames all women didn’t even cross my mind.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:26 PM
2

What you are saying doesn't make any sense. Red Pillers have changed their views at least once, that's the whole point of the red pill analogy. Of course the blue pill view is not the default inborn view, it is simply a mainstream view in modern Western culture. The red pill view is a status quo in Eastern European, Middle Eastern and Asian countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/17 11:44 PM
1

No, it isn't obvious that freindship and romantic relationship are based on the same type of affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/17 01:49 PM
2

That what did you mean? Evo psych doesn't have a specific theoretical explanation for every behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 12:36 PM
1

It's put forth as the only reason for behavior By whom?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 08:19 AM
1

Do I believe every specific theoretical ev psych explanation put forth for every behavior? That would be impossible. Many evo psychologists disagree with each other. Like many physicists disagree with each other or mathematicians.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 08:18 AM
69

The name is wrong. It is a doodle for this holiday. It is a somewhat ambivalent holiday. On the one hand it is indeed treated as a male equivalent of Women's day by most of people, on the other hand women in the armed forces celebrate it too.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:37 PM
9

How much of such kind of debate is just linguistic confusions? I mean, what is the question even about? In sociology class, they always talk about how everything is "performed." Do people without sociology degree have sufficient understanding of what is meant by term of art "performativity"? You can’t just take a word and run astray with it based on your casual use. I mention these "old people" experiments because we think of old age as being totally biological. Nothing you’ve said implies it is…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/17 01:19 PM
1

It's a [damn] shame domestic violence is frowned upon. There is no valid arguments to justify abusing someone. Wait, it is non sequitur. There is no valid arguments to justify abusing someone violence. Now, that's something very unconvincing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 01:19 AM
1

Well, if you consider Eastern and South Europe white then most white cultures have RP gender dynamics woven into them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 10:06 PM
1

I am surprised you can say something completely off-topic and find it meaningful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/17 07:00 AM
1

Anything that could be defined as "benevolent sexism" that just makes life harder for women, is, by definition, hostile sexism. That's why it is called "hostile sexism" instead of "benevolent sexism". Anything that could be defined as "benevolent sexism" that helps women is helpful for everyone. Opening doors for people(when it's warranted), letting people make choices for themselves, etc. What does it even suppose to mean? When women are treated as men they think they are treated unfairly and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 07:24 PM
2

Obviously that just depends on what you define as "benevolent sexism." It is not controversial what to consider as "benevolent sexism", what an asinine argument. Obviously you are just spouting ad hoc rationalizations. Imagine a man saying to a feminist "obviously that just depends what you define as sexism", lol. Opening doors for people is one thing, but adamantly refusing to let women open doors for themselves(which is actually something I've experienced on more than a few dates, those guys d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 07:08 PM
2

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf?sequence=1 Two studies demonstrated that lay people misperceive the relationship between hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) in men, but not in women. While men's endorsement of BS is viewed as a sign of a univalently positive attitude towards women, their rejection of BS is perceived as a sign of univalent sexist antipathy. Low BS men were judged as more hostile towards women than high BS men, suggesting that perc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:44 PM
0

He asked them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 10:06 AM
2

Exactly. And it contradicts sex-positive feminism. That’s my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 06:25 AM
1

I’ve never said there are not different rules. Seriously, what the hell? Are you misinterpreting me on purpose? I can say to my coworker "hey do you want a burger?" or "let’s go bowling this friday" or even ask them on a date. Why can’t I ask to masturbate in front of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:57 AM
1

The rules are not arbitrary, we had them because 99% of people liked them. We all just want to stop having such weird rules. We just want equality. No sane woman wants to be treated like a man. If she wants to, she is either transgender (or at least very masculine, like Camille Paglia) or batshit crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:46 AM
1

Because most women don’t want to now have to work with someone who asked to show them his dick. And some people don’t want to work with black people or women. People should be tolerant. you actually don’t see the problem with that? That’s the point. I see the problem, but I think that blue pills who consider it a problem are hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:19 AM
0

It is a problem in a work environment. Yeah, why? How does it create a hostile work environment? Why is it a big deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:12 AM
1

Because a cornerstone of sex-positive feminism is consent. So, asking requires a consent? Do I have to ask to ask or what? Sex-positive feminism also has nothing to do with workplace sexual harassment policies, which is what this is all actually about. No need to derail. Ok, I put it in a wrong way. What I meant is that in traditional society sex is a taboo, in a modern society sex is not a big deal, sexualization is rampant and ONS is commonplace. So, what is the problem with asking to look at …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 04:59 AM
0

I, for example, understand why it is wrong from my view, I don’t understand how it is wrong from a view of sex-positive feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 04:39 AM
0

You see, this is the problem. Somehow sex is not a big deal, yet sexual harassment is the worst thing ever besides murder. Western society has to decide. Either it is okay to be casual about sex and sexualize everything or it is not to okay to casually ask people to masturbate in front of them. It can’t be both.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 04:35 AM
9

In How I Met Your Mother Ted, the main character, has 6 LTR, ~15 STR, ~20 ONS and over 40 dates. Movies and TV series are a form of escapism. Nothing surprising. I think this contributes to misogyny and the unrealistic standards that men have by making average looking men think that they are entitled to elite looking women because they see it happen in TV/movies. I don't see how it contributes to misogyny. Even if we assume that men are more entitled because of Hollywood, so what? It doesn't mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 01:56 AM
1

Some ≠ to a ludicrous degree
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:33 PM
5

Something something a friend makes a review of a game without disclosure something something rape threats something something gamers are dead. How is it relevant? 99% of people don't care about GG and have no idea what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 09:33 PM
5

Nerds gatekeep games. This is pretty much indisputable. Nerds even gatekeep games against other nerds. Only in the most broad meaningless sense. As in "casuals are making gaming worse" or something like that. Obsession can be as bad as threats. Well, you gotta pick one. Either it is gatekeeping or awkward obsession, these are contradictory. Hot take: it is neither, there is simply a higher percanatge of socially awkard men in gaming. Another hot take: men are mean to everyone. I know many women …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 09:21 PM
3

How does your theory that video games are gatekept to a ludicrous degree by men deal with the fact that evidence contradicts it? How these two stereotypes even can co-exist? 1) Nerds gatekeep games 2) Nerds wants nerds with boobs as girlfriends, they don't want romantic partnerships
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 09:07 PM
1

OP's info doesn't disprove it. Manifestations of relational aggression include: * Excluding others from social activities; * Damaging victim's reputations with others by spreading rumors and gossiping about the victim, or humiliating him/her in front of others; * Withdrawing attention and friendship. * Psychological manipulation and coercion can also be considered as a type of relational aggression. 3 out of 4 manifestations have nothing to do with feminine toxicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 12:46 AM
1

I think it is a stretch to equate manipulative behaviour and relational aggression. Talking shit behind the back and spreading lies are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 12:19 AM
1

it generally argues that the SMP is either fundamentally unjust or perhaps suffering from some kind of market failure I don't think you have to make a certain value judgement to be considered RedPill. Either you believe it is just or unjust it doesn't matter. But I may be wrong. making a woman settle for someone she doesn't find attractive violates the Pareto criterion because it makes her subjectively worse off It doesn't violate Pareto criterion, it just isn't a Pareto improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 11:51 PM
1

I don't know whether her analysis on the prevalence of described behaviour is correct (I lean towards this position), but her attitude is certainly wrong. Ok, men don't want relationships. So what? It doesn't mean they suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 11:32 PM
1

Am Russian. Can confirm. We all have learned this saying in school./s
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:21 PM
21

The argument that men cannot experience sexism, or that white's in western society cannot experience racism, is based on the narrower academic definition of these terms. The argument is based on the (concious or unconcious) desire to legitimize racism towards oppressors (aka white people). Everything else is just a pretext, any person can understand based on the context what people mean when they talk about racism. The objective of redefinition is clear and deserves no bit of legitimacy.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:08 PM
2

When I use modern apps, they always remind me of household appliances. So many absolutely incomprehensible unmotivated icons without any resemblence to anything they represent. Is that button "forward" or "reply"? Oh, what does this button do? Archive? Weird. The problem with household appliances is, you can't just hit a random button and see what happens next. My oven has different modes with cryptic icons and the only word that is spelled out is "OFF". Like, seriously? We had "I" and "O" icons…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:59 AM
41

Taking care of kids is hard, but almost everything you’ve listed is bullshit. "Inventory management", my ass, you seem like a person who would buy Amazon Dash Button. Do you think people who live alone don’t have time to cook a meal or screw in a lightbulb (unless they spend 4+ hours commuting it is hard to believe in)? These things are absolutely not hard. They don’t require neither strength nor brain.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter